FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period
ended October 31, 2008
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-4372
FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
34-0863886 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal Tower
|
|
50 Public Square |
|
|
Suite 1100
|
|
Cleveland, Ohio
|
|
44113 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code |
|
216-621-6060 |
|
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding, including unvested restricted stock, of each of the
issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at December 4, 2008 |
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock, $.33 1/3 par value
|
|
80,657,248 shares |
|
|
|
Class B Common Stock, $.33 1/3 par value
|
|
22,798,375 shares |
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
|
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed rental properties |
|
$ |
8,006,522 |
|
|
$ |
7,561,685 |
|
Projects under development |
|
|
1,925,644 |
|
|
|
1,499,495 |
|
Land held for development or sale |
|
|
194,873 |
|
|
|
155,524 |
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate |
|
|
10,127,039 |
|
|
|
9,216,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,382,020 |
) |
|
|
(1,244,391 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate, net |
|
|
8,745,019 |
|
|
|
7,972,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
|
164,677 |
|
|
|
254,434 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
332,683 |
|
|
|
248,262 |
|
Notes and accounts receivable, net |
|
|
417,357 |
|
|
|
419,090 |
|
Investments in and advances to affiliates |
|
|
419,925 |
|
|
|
495,828 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
869,160 |
|
|
|
829,998 |
|
Operating property assets held for sale |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
31,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
10,948,821 |
|
|
$ |
10,251,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage debt, nonrecourse |
|
$ |
6,827,774 |
|
|
$ |
6,338,610 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
169,936 |
|
|
|
143,874 |
|
Bank revolving credit facility |
|
|
213,500 |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
Senior and subordinated debt |
|
|
871,900 |
|
|
|
886,900 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
1,116,920 |
|
|
|
1,015,844 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
473,920 |
|
|
|
477,238 |
|
Liabilities of operating property held for sale |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
28,498 |
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
9,673,950 |
|
|
|
8,929,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interest |
|
|
372,804 |
|
|
|
349,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-Obligated Trust Preferred Securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock - without par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common stock
- $.33 1/3 par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A, 271,000,000 shares authorized, 80,076,130 and 78,237,993 shares
issued and 80,075,668 and 78,201,673 shares outstanding, respectively |
|
|
26,692 |
|
|
|
26,079 |
|
Class B, convertible, 56,000,000 shares authorized, 22,798,375 and 24,387,607 shares
issued and outstanding, respectively; 26,257,961 issuable |
|
|
7,599 |
|
|
|
8,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,291 |
|
|
|
34,208 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
241,725 |
|
|
|
229,358 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
690,942 |
|
|
|
782,871 |
|
Less treasury stock, at cost; 462 and 36,320 Class A shares, respectively |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(1,665 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
966,949 |
|
|
|
1,044,772 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(64,882 |
) |
|
|
(72,656 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
902,067 |
|
|
|
972,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
10,948,821 |
|
|
$ |
10,251,597 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from real estate operations |
|
$ |
334,530 |
|
|
$ |
333,626 |
|
|
$ |
972,415 |
|
|
$ |
889,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
200,857 |
|
|
|
201,274 |
|
|
|
594,623 |
|
|
|
547,052 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
65,443 |
|
|
|
54,414 |
|
|
|
202,290 |
|
|
|
169,942 |
|
Provision for decline in real estate |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,300 |
|
|
|
255,688 |
|
|
|
797,278 |
|
|
|
716,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(98,544 |
) |
|
|
(88,241 |
) |
|
|
(264,265 |
) |
|
|
(237,748 |
) |
Amortization of mortgage procurement costs |
|
|
(2,944 |
) |
|
|
(3,568 |
) |
|
|
(9,051 |
) |
|
|
(8,971 |
) |
Gain (Loss) early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
4,181 |
|
|
|
(4,719 |
) |
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
|
(8,903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
6,789 |
|
|
|
17,544 |
|
|
|
28,077 |
|
|
|
52,366 |
|
Gain on disposition of other investments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(22,288 |
) |
|
|
(874 |
) |
|
|
(71,002 |
) |
|
|
(30,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
(4,389 |
) |
|
|
(16,353 |
) |
|
|
(14,561 |
) |
|
|
(16,274 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
(7,025 |
) |
|
|
18,059 |
|
|
|
(12,709 |
) |
|
|
3,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,414 |
) |
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
(27,270 |
) |
|
|
(12,943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(4,462 |
) |
|
|
(2,308 |
) |
|
|
(10,324 |
) |
|
|
(10,375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(3,198 |
) |
|
|
(6,526 |
) |
|
|
(18,422 |
) |
|
|
2,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(18,534 |
) |
|
|
(11,414 |
) |
|
|
(72,478 |
) |
|
|
(24,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings from rental properties |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
Gain (loss) on disposition of rental properties |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
5,294 |
|
|
|
64,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
5,363 |
|
|
|
64,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
(18,534 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,774 |
) |
|
$ |
(67,115 |
) |
|
$ |
39,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.70 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.65 |
) |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(18,534 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,774 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax and minority interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized net gains (losses) on investment securities |
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
Change in unrealized net losses on interest rate derivative contracts |
|
|
(6,704 |
) |
|
|
(18,963 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(960 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax and minority interest |
|
$ |
(7,937 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(26,471 |
) |
|
$ |
(29,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
(67,115 |
) |
|
$ |
39,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax and minority interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized net losses on investment securities |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(135 |
) |
Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on interest rate derivative contracts |
|
|
8,845 |
|
|
|
(17,842 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(960 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax and minority interest |
|
$ |
7,774 |
|
|
$ |
(17,977 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(59,341 |
) |
|
$ |
21,843 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(Loss) Income |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at January 31, 2008 |
|
|
78,238 |
|
|
$ |
26,079 |
|
|
|
24,388 |
|
|
$ |
8,129 |
|
|
$ |
229,358 |
|
|
$ |
782,871 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
$ |
(1,665 |
) |
|
$ |
(72,656 |
) |
|
$ |
972,116 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,115 |
) |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax and minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,774 |
|
|
|
7,774 |
|
Dividends $.24 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,814 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,814 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(651 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(651 |
) |
Conversion of Class B to Class A shares |
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
(1,590 |
) |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,189 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
2,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,133 |
|
Restricted stock vested |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,556 |
|
Conversion of Class A Common Units |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,778 |
|
Distribution of accumulated equity to minority partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,710 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,710 |
) |
|
|
|
Balances at October 31, 2008 |
|
|
80,076 |
|
|
$ |
26,692 |
|
|
|
22,798 |
|
|
$ |
7,599 |
|
|
$ |
241,725 |
|
|
$ |
690,942 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(64,882 |
) |
|
$ |
902,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at January 31, 2007 |
|
|
76,693 |
|
|
$ |
25,564 |
|
|
|
25,254 |
|
|
$ |
8,418 |
|
|
$ |
247,884 |
|
|
$ |
762,062 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
$ |
(3,449 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,668 |
) |
|
$ |
1,025,811 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for uncertainty in income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,820 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax and minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,977 |
) |
|
|
(17,977 |
) |
Dividends $.23 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,621 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
(3,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,138 |
) |
Conversion of Class B to Class A shares |
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,062 |
|
Restricted stock granted out of treasury |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
6,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Restricted stock vested |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,571 |
|
Distribution of accumulated equity to minority partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,202 |
) |
|
|
|
Balances at October 31, 2007 |
|
|
77,812 |
|
|
$ |
25,937 |
|
|
|
24,618 |
|
|
$ |
8,206 |
|
|
$ |
221,098 |
|
|
$ |
778,506 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
(531 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,645 |
) |
|
$ |
1,000,571 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net Earnings (Loss) |
|
$ |
(67,115 |
) |
|
$ |
39,820 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
202,290 |
|
|
|
169,942 |
|
Provision for decline in real estate |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Amortization of mortgage procurement costs |
|
|
9,051 |
|
|
|
8,971 |
|
(Gain) loss on early extinguishment of debt, net of cash prepayment penalties |
|
|
(4,434 |
) |
|
|
8,903 |
|
Gain on disposition of other investments |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(603 |
) |
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(12,709 |
) |
|
|
3,331 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
10,324 |
|
|
|
10,375 |
|
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities |
|
|
18,422 |
|
|
|
(2,608 |
) |
Cash distributions from operations of unconsolidated entities |
|
|
40,317 |
|
|
|
23,163 |
|
Other income
- net gain on sale of an ownership interest in parking management company (2008)
and net gain on sale of development project (2007) |
|
|
(3,350 |
) |
|
|
(17,830 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
7,016 |
|
|
|
7,924 |
|
Amortization and mark-to-market adjustments of derivative instruments |
|
|
17,268 |
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
Write-off of abandoned development projects |
|
|
41,452 |
|
|
|
9,419 |
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
Amortization of mortgage procurement costs |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
363 |
|
Gain on disposition of operating properties |
|
|
(8,627 |
) |
|
|
(105,287 |
) |
Deferred income tax expense |
|
|
4,496 |
|
|
|
15,485 |
|
Cost of sales of land included in projects under development or completed rental properties |
|
|
13,076 |
|
|
|
21,397 |
|
Increase in land held for development or sale |
|
|
(17,164 |
) |
|
|
(27,473 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in notes and accounts receivable |
|
|
20,567 |
|
|
|
(12,916 |
) |
Decrease in other assets |
|
|
4,468 |
|
|
|
11,248 |
|
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash used for operating purposes |
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
(13,089 |
) |
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(45,763 |
) |
|
|
(37,316 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
230,444 |
|
|
|
116,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures, including real estate acquisitions |
|
|
(822,844 |
) |
|
|
(992,538 |
) |
Payment of lease procurement costs and other assets, net |
|
|
(60,261 |
) |
|
|
(72,675 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in restricted
cash used for investing purposes |
|
|
(123,872 |
) |
|
|
89,927 |
|
Proceeds from disposition of rental properties and other investments |
|
|
15,309 |
|
|
|
290,692 |
|
Increase in investments in and advances to affiliates |
|
|
(41,936 |
) |
|
|
(68,461 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,033,604 |
) |
|
|
(753,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from nonrecourse mortgage debt |
|
|
1,052,737 |
|
|
|
1,643,003 |
|
Principal payments on nonrecourse mortgage debt |
|
|
(533,383 |
) |
|
|
(784,271 |
) |
Proceeds from notes payable |
|
|
55,098 |
|
|
|
57,876 |
|
Payments on notes payable |
|
|
(30,924 |
) |
|
|
(65,913 |
) |
Borrowings on bank revolving credit facility |
|
|
462,500 |
|
|
|
465,000 |
|
Payments on bank revolving credit facility |
|
|
(288,000 |
) |
|
|
(465,000 |
) |
Purchase of Puttable Equity-Linked Senior Notes |
|
|
(10,571 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Change in restricted cash and book overdrafts |
|
|
43,993 |
|
|
|
(5,937 |
) |
Payment of deferred financing costs |
|
|
(31,859 |
) |
|
|
(32,033 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(651 |
) |
|
|
(3,138 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
7,062 |
|
Distributions of accumulated equity to minority partners |
|
|
(3,710 |
) |
|
|
(41,202 |
) |
Dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
(24,742 |
) |
|
|
(22,558 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in minority interest |
|
|
21,782 |
|
|
|
(33,263 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
713,403 |
|
|
|
719,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and equivalents |
|
|
(89,757 |
) |
|
|
83,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
254,434 |
|
|
|
254,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
164,677 |
|
|
$ |
337,435 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Supplemental Non-Cash Disclosures Table
The table below represents the effect of the following non-cash transactions for the nine months
ended October 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in land held for development or sale (1)(7)(8)(11) |
|
$ |
(31,058 |
) |
|
$ |
9,297 |
|
Increase in notes and accounts receivable (1)(2)(3)(6) |
|
|
(693 |
) |
|
|
(39,118 |
) |
Increase in other assets (1)(2)(3)(6) |
|
|
(47,012 |
) |
|
|
(66,777 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash (1)(2)(6) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(2,486 |
) |
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses (1)(2)(3)(6)(8)(11) |
|
|
115,873 |
|
|
|
118,073 |
|
|
|
|
Total effect on operating activities |
|
$ |
37,036 |
|
|
$ |
18,989 |
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in projects under development (1)(7)(8)(9) |
|
$ |
(108,543 |
) |
|
$ |
(29,687 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in completed rental properties (1)(2)(3)(5)(6)(7)10) |
|
|
29,783 |
|
|
|
(56,662 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash (1)(2) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Non-cash proceeds from disposition of properties (4) |
|
|
26,119 |
|
|
|
77,960 |
|
Decrease (increase) in investments in and advances to affiliates (1)(2) |
|
|
31,836 |
|
|
|
(3,915 |
) |
|
|
|
Total effect on investing activities |
|
$ |
(21,049 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,320 |
) |
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in nonrecourse mortgage debt (1)(2)(3)(4)(6)(10) |
|
$ |
(15,360 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,841 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash (2) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,412 |
) |
Increase in Class A common stock (5) |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Increase in additional paid-in capital (5)(9) |
|
|
10,276 |
|
|
|
5,647 |
|
Decrease in minority interest (1)(5)(6) |
|
|
(10,873 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Dividends declared but not yet paid |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(1,063 |
) |
|
|
|
Total effect on financing activities |
|
$ |
(15,987 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Change to full consolidation method of accounting from equity method due to the
occurrence of a triggering event as described in FIN No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities (FIN No. 46(R)), for Gladden Forest in the Land Development Group and
Shops at Wiregrass, a retail development project in the Commercial Group, during the nine
months ended October 31, 2008, and Oceanpointe Towers apartments in the Residential Group
during the nine months ended October 31, 2007. |
|
|
(2) |
|
Change to full consolidation method of accounting from equity method due to the
acquisition of partners interest in Village Center apartment community during the nine
months ended October 31, 2008 and in Midtown Towers, Sterling Glen of Glen Cove and
Sterling Glen of Great Neck apartments during the nine months ended October 31, 2007 in the
Residential Group. |
|
|
(3) |
|
Amounts related to purchase price allocations in the Commercial Group during the nine
months ended October 31, 2008 for the following office buildings: New York Times, Twelve
MetroTech Center, Commerce Court, Colorado Studios and Richmond Office Park, and during the
nine months ended October 31, 2007 for the New York portfolio transaction that closed in
November 2006 and Galleria at Sunset Mall. |
|
|
(4) |
|
Assumption of nonrecourse mortgage debt by the buyer upon sale of Sterling Glen of
Lynbrook during the nine months ended October 31, 2008 and Sterling Glen of Bayshore and
Sterling Glen of Roslyn, a development project, during the nine months ended
October 31, 2007 in the Residential Group. |
|
|
(5) |
|
Exchange of the Class A Common Units during the nine months ended October 31, 2008 (see
Note M). |
|
|
(6) |
|
Acquisition of minority ownership interests in two entities in exchange for the
Companys majority ownership interests in seventeen single-tenant pharmacy properties during the
nine months ended October 31, 2008 (see Note M). |
|
|
(7) |
|
Commercial Group and Residential Group outlots reclassified prior to sale from projects
under development or completed rental properties to land held for sale. |
|
|
(8) |
|
Increase or decrease in construction payables included in accounts payable and accrued
expenses. |
|
|
(9) |
|
Capitalization of stock-based compensation granted to employees directly involved with
the acquisition, development and construction of real estate. |
|
|
(10) |
|
Assumption of nonrecourse mortgage debt due to acquisition of properties in the
Commercial Group during the nine months ended October 31, 2007. |
|
|
(11) |
|
Exercise of the option to purchase a piece of land in Prosper, Texas that was
deconsolidated during the nine months ended October 31, 2007 due to a triggering event as
described in FIN No. 46(R). |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
A. Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and related notes included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended January 31, 2008, including the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The
results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year or any
subsequent period. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair
statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows at the dates and for the
periods presented have been included.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires the Company to make estimates and
assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements and related notes. Some of the critical estimates made by the Company include,
but are not limited to, estimates of useful lives for long-lived assets, reserves for collection on
accounts and notes receivable and other investments, provisions for decline in real estate and the
computation of expected losses on Variable Interest Entities (VIEs). As a result of the nature of
estimates made by the Company, actual results could differ.
In March 2007, management approved a plan to demolish two buildings owned by the Company adjacent
to Ten MetroTech Center, an office building located in Brooklyn, New York, to clear the land for a
residential project named 80 DeKalb Avenue. Due to the new development plan, the estimated useful
lives of the two adjacent buildings were adjusted to expire at the scheduled demolition date in
April 2007, which resulted in approximately $7,837,000 of accelerated depreciation expense
reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the nine months ended
October 31, 2007.
Reclassification
Certain prior year amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the current years presentation.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash represents legally restricted deposits with financial institutions for taxes and
insurance, security deposits, capital replacement, improvement and operating reserves, bond funds,
development escrows, construction escrows and collateral on total rate of return swaps, as well as
certain restricted deposits with qualified intermediaries related to like-kind exchanges.
Capitalized Software Costs
Costs related to software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized pursuant to
Statement of Position No. 98-1 Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained
for Internal Use, and amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful life,
which is primarily three years. The Company capitalizes significant costs incurred in the
acquisition or development of software for internal use, including the costs of the software,
materials, consultants, interest and payroll and payroll-related costs for employees directly
involved in developing internal-use computer software once final selection of the software is made.
Costs incurred prior to the final selection of software, costs not qualifying for capitalization
and routine maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred.
At October 31 and January 31, 2008, the Company has capitalized $20,015,000 and $26,840,000,
respectively, of software costs net of accumulated amortization of $20,296,000 and $11,393,000,
respectively. Total amortization of capitalized software costs amounted to $3,000,000 and
$9,053,000 for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008, respectively, and $3,251,000 and
$6,599,000 for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2007, respectively.
8
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
A. Accounting Policies (continued)
Military Housing Fee Revenues
Revenues
for development fees related to the Companys military housing
projects are earned based on a
contractual percentage of the actual development costs incurred by the military housing projects
and are recognized on a monthly basis as the costs are incurred. The Company also recognizes
additional development incentive fees based upon successful completion of certain criteria, such as
incentives to realize development cost savings, encourage small and local business participation,
comply with specified safety standards and other project management incentives as specified in the
development agreements. Revenues of $16,792,000 and $55,500,000 were recognized during the three
and nine months ended October 31, 2008, respectively, and $25,826,000 and $34,003,000 during the
three and nine months ended October 31, 2007, respectively, related to base development and
development incentive fees, which were recorded in revenues from real estate operations in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Revenues related to construction management fees are earned based on the cost of each construction
contract. The Company also recognized certain construction incentive fees based upon successful
completion of certain criteria as set forth in the construction contract. Revenues of $3,172,000
and $11,022,000 were recognized during the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008,
respectively, and $3,037,000 and $7,062,000 during the three and nine months ended October 31,
2007, respectively, related to the base construction and incentive fees, which were recorded in
revenues from real estate operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Property management and asset management fee revenues are earned based on a contractual percentage
of the annual net rental income and annual operating income, respectively, that is generated by the
military housing privatization projects as defined in the agreements. The Company also recognizes
certain property management incentive fees based upon successful completion of certain criteria as
set forth in the property management agreement. Property management and asset management fees of
$3,741,000 and $10,683,000 were recognized during the three and nine months ended October
31, 2008, respectively, and $5,287,000 and $6,206,000 during the three and nine months ended
October 31, 2007, respectively, which were recorded in revenues from real estate operations in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Historic and New Market Tax Credit Entities
The Company has certain investments in properties that have received, or the Company believes are
entitled to receive, historic rehabilitation tax credits on qualifying expenditures under Internal
Revenue Code (IRC) section 47 and new market tax credits on qualifying investments in designated
community development entities (CDEs) under IRC section 45D, as well as various state credit
programs. The Company typically enters into these investments with sophisticated financial
investors. In exchange for the financial investors initial contribution into these investments,
they are entitled to substantially all of the benefits derived from the tax credit, but generally
have no material interest in the underlying economics of the properties. Typically, these
arrangements have put/call provisions (which range up to 7 years) whereby the Company may be
obligated (or entitled) to repurchase the financial investors interest. The Company has
consolidated each of these properties in its consolidated financial statements, and has reflected
the investors contribution as a liability in its Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company guarantees the financial investor that in the event of a subsequent recapture by a
taxing authority due to the Companys noncompliance with applicable tax credit guidelines that it
will indemnify the financial investor for any recaptured tax credits. The Company initially
records a liability for the cash received from the financial investor. The Company generally
records income upon completion and certification of the qualifying development expenditures for
historic tax credits and upon certification of the qualifying investments in designated CDEs for
new market tax credits resulting in an adjustment of the liability at each balance sheet date to
the amount that would be paid to the financial investor based upon the tax credit compliance
regulations, which range from 0 to 7 years. During the three and nine months ended
October 31, 2008, the Company recognized income related to tax credits of $1,562,000 and
$4,544,000, respectively, which were recorded in interest and other income in its Consolidated
Statements of Operations. During the three and nine months ended October 31, 2007, the Company
recognized income related to tax credits of $888,000 and $2,664,000, respectively, which were
recorded in interest and other income in its Consolidated Statements of Operations.
9
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
A. Accounting Policies (continued)
Distribution of Accumulated Equity to Minority Partners
Distributions to minority partners in excess of their recorded minority interest balance related to
refinancing proceeds from nonrecourse debt, which generally arise from appreciation of the
underlying real estate assets, are reported as a reduction of additional paid-in capital in the
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity. During the nine months ended October 31, 2008,
the Company refinanced Nine MetroTech Center North, an office building located in Brooklyn, New
York. Of the total nonrecourse refinancing proceeds distributed to its minority partner in this
property during the nine months ended October 31, 2008, $3,710,000 was in excess of its minority
partners book capital account. During the nine months ended October 31, 2007, the Company
refinanced New York Times, an office building located in Manhattan, New York, Eleven MetroTech
Center and Fifteen MetroTech Center, office buildings located in Brooklyn, New York, Promenade in
Temecula, a regional mall located in Temecula, California and Columbia Park Center, a specialty
retail center located in North Bergen, New Jersey. Of the total nonrecourse refinancing proceeds
distributed to the Companys minority partners in these five properties during the nine months
ended October 31, 2007, $41,202,000 was in excess of the minority partners book capital accounts.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Net unrealized gains or losses on securities are included in accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) (OCI) and represent the difference between the market value of investments in unaffiliated
companies that are available-for-sale at the balance sheet date and the Companys cost. Another
component of accumulated OCI is foreign currency translation adjustments related to the Companys
London, England operations whose functional currency is the British pound. The assets and
liabilities related to these operations are translated into U.S. dollars at current exchange rates;
revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates. Also included in accumulated OCI is
the Companys portion of the unrealized gains and losses on the effective portions of derivative
instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges. The following table summarizes the
components of accumulated OCI included within the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
|
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities |
|
$ |
(119 |
) |
|
$ |
91 |
|
Unrealized loss on foreign currency translation |
|
|
(1,564 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Unrealized losses on interest rate contracts |
|
|
(104,522 |
) |
|
|
(119,953 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106,205 |
) |
|
|
(119,862 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest and income tax benefit |
|
|
(41,323 |
) |
|
|
(47,206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
$ |
(64,882 |
) |
|
$ |
(72,656 |
) |
|
|
|
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
During the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008, the Company recorded interest expense of
$457,000 and $482,000, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, representing the
total ineffectiveness of all cash flow hedges. During the three and nine months ended
October 31, 2007, the Company recorded interest expense of $188,000 and $136,000, respectively, in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations, representing the total ineffectiveness of all cash flow
hedges. For the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007, the amount of hedge
ineffectiveness relating to hedges designated and qualifying as fair value hedges under Statement
of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 133), was not material. The amount of derivative gains (losses)
reclassified into earnings from accumulated OCI as a result of forecasted transactions that did not
occur by the end of the originally specified time period or within an additional two-month period
of time thereafter was ($131,000) for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008, and $-0-
and $50,000 for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2007, respectively. As of
October 31, 2008, the Company expects that within the next twelve months it will reclassify amounts
recorded in accumulated OCI into earnings as an increase in interest expense of approximately
$18,677,000, net of tax.
10
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
A. Accounting Policies (continued)
The Company entered into various forward swaps to protect itself against fluctuations in the swap
rate at terms ranging between five to ten years associated with forecasted fixed rate borrowings.
At the time the Company secures and locks an interest rate on an anticipated financing, it intends
to simultaneously terminate the forward hedge associated with that financing. The table below
lists the forward swaps outstanding as of October 31, 2008 (in thousands):
Forward Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Accounted for |
|
|
|
Fully Consolidated |
|
|
under the Equity Method |
|
|
|
Properties (1) |
|
|
of Accounting
(2) |
|
Expirations for Years Ending |
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
91,625 |
|
|
|
5.72% |
|
|
$ |
120,000 |
|
|
|
5.93% |
|
Thereafter |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
(1) |
|
As these forward swaps have been designated and qualify as cash flow hedges under
SFAS No. 133, the Companys portion of unrealized gains and losses on the effective portion
of the hedges has been recorded in accumulated OCI. To the extent effective, the receipt
or payment of cash at termination on these forward swaps will be recorded in accumulated
OCI and will be amortized as either an increase or decrease to interest expense in the same
periods as the interest payments on the financing. |
|
|
(2) |
|
This forward swap does not qualify as a cash flow hedge under the provisions of SFAS
No. 133 because it relates to an unconsolidated property. Therefore, the change in the
fair value of this swap is marked to market through earnings on a quarterly basis. The
Company recorded $2,058 and $(75) as an increase in (reduction of) interest expense related
to this forward swap in its Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine
months ended October 31, 2008, respectively, and $3,134 and $1,684 for the three and nine
months ended October 31, 2007, respectively. |
From time to time, the Company and/or certain of its joint ventures (the Joint Ventures) enter
into total rate of return swaps (TRS) on various tax-exempt fixed-rate borrowings generally held
by the Company and/or within the Joint Ventures. The TRS convert these borrowings from a fixed rate
to a variable rate and provide an efficient financing product to lower the cost of capital. In
exchange for a fixed rate, the TRS require that the Company and/or the Joint Ventures pay a
variable rate, generally based on the Security Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA)
rate. At October 31, 2008, the SIFMA rate is 1.82%. Additionally, the Company and/or the Joint
Ventures have guaranteed the fair value of the underlying borrowing. Any fluctuation in the value
of the guarantee would be offset by the fluctuation in the value of the underlying borrowing,
resulting in no financial impact to the Company and/or the Joint Ventures. At October 31, 2008,
the aggregate notional amount of TRS in which the Company and/or the Joint Ventures have an
interest is approximately $476,195,000 (which includes the TRS on the $20,400,000 redevelopment
bonds (refer to Note D Senior and Subordinated Debt)). The Company believes the economic return
and related risk associated with a TRS is generally comparable to that of nonrecourse variable-rate
mortgage debt. In addition, at October 31, 2008, the Company held an interest in a TRS on a taxable
variable rate borrowing with a notional amount of $25,000,000. The underlying TRS borrowings are
subject to a fair value adjustment (refer to Note F Fair Value Measurements).
In addition, in May 2004 Stapleton Land, LLC, a consolidated subsidiary, entered into an agreement
to purchase $200,000,000 of tax increment revenue bonds issued by the Denver Urban Renewal
Authority (DURA) from a trust if they are not repurchased or remarketed between June 1, 2007 and
June 1, 2009 (see the Other Structured Financing Arrangements section of Note E). Stapleton Land,
LLC is entitled to receive a fee upon removal of the DURA bonds from the trust. The purchase
obligation and fee have been accounted for as a derivative with changes in fair value recorded
through earnings. During the nine months ended October 31, 2008, $100,000,000 of the DURA bonds
were remarketed and Stapleton Land, LLC received $13,838,000 in cash, which represented the portion
of the fee related to the remarketed bonds and was recorded as a reduction of the assets carrying
value. During the three months ended October 31, 2008, Lehman Brothers, Inc. (Lehman), the third
party obligated to pay the purchase obligation and fee to the Company, filed for bankruptcy. As a
result, the Company has reassessed the collectibility of the purchase obligation and fee and has
decreased the fair value to $-0-, resulting in an increase to operating expenses in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations of $13,816,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2008.
The fair value at January 31, 2008 of $23,108,000 is recorded in other assets in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
11
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
A. Accounting Policies (continued)
The Company estimates the fair value of its hedging instruments based on interest rate market and
bond pricing models. At October 31 and January 31, 2008, interest rate caps and swaptions were
reported at fair value of approximately $4,496,000 and $209,000, respectively, in other assets in
the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At October 31 and January 31, 2008, interest rate swap agreements
and TRS, which had a positive fair value of approximately $2,581,000 and $3,019,000, respectively,
were included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At October 31 and
January 31, 2008, interest rate swap agreements and TRS, which had a negative fair value of
approximately $126,935,000 and $109,232,000, respectively, (which includes the forward swaps) were
included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Variable Interest Entities
As of October 31, 2008, the Company determined that it is the primary beneficiary under Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003), Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities (FIN No. 46(R)) of 33 VIEs representing 22 properties (20 VIEs
representing 10 properties in Residential Group, 11 VIEs representing 10 properties in Commercial
Group and 2 VIEs/properties in Land Development Group). As of October 31, 2008, the Company held
variable interests in 42 VIEs for which it is not the primary beneficiary. As of October 31, 2008,
the maximum exposure to loss as a result of the Companys involvement with these unconsolidated
VIEs is limited to its recorded investments in those VIEs totaling approximately $101,000,000. The
Companys VIEs consist of joint ventures that are engaged, directly or indirectly, in the
ownership, development and management of office buildings, regional malls, specialty retail
centers, apartment communities, military housing, supported-living communities, land development
and the Nets.
In addition to the VIEs described above, the Company has also determined that it is the primary
beneficiary of a VIE that holds collateralized borrowings of $29,000,000 (see Note D Senior and
Subordinated Debt) as of October 31, 2008.
New Accounting Standards
In November 2008, the FASB voted on the effective date and other amendments of Proposed FASB Staff
Position (FSP) No. FAS 140-e and FIN 46(R)-e, Disclosures about Transfers of Financial Assets
and Interests in Variable Interest Entities. This FSP will require additional disclosures about
transfers of financial assets and involvement with variable interest entities. This statement is
expected to be issued in December 2008 and will be effective for all reporting periods ending after
December 15, 2008 and will require additional disclosures in the Companys Form 10-K for the year
ending January 31, 2009.
Previously, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about the use of fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 does not require new fair value measurements, but applies to accounting pronouncements
that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued two Staff Positions on SFAS
No. 157: (1) FSP No. FAS 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and
Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease
Classification or Measurement under Statement 13 (FSP FAS 157-1) and (2) FSP No. FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP FAS 157-2). FSP FAS 157-1 excludes SFAS No. 13,
Accounting for Leases (SFAS No. 13) and other accounting pronouncements that address fair value
measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement under SFAS No. 13 from SFAS No.
157s scope. FSP FAS 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), to fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted this
statement for its financial assets and liabilities on February 1, 2008 (see Note F Fair Value
Measurements).
In October 2008, FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset
When the Market for That Asset is Not Active (FSP FAS No. 157-3), which clarifies the
application of SFAS No. 157. FSP FAS No. 157-3 provides guidance in determining the fair value of a
financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. The adoption of this
standard as of October 31, 2008 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
12
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
A. Accounting Policies (continued)
In September 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 133-1 and FIN 45-4, Disclosures about Credit
Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: an Amendment of SFAS No. 133 and FIN No. 45; and Clarification
of the Effective Date of SFAS No. 161 (FSP SFAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4). FSP SFAS 133-1 and FIN
45-4 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133 with the intent to provide
users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of how credit derivatives and any
hybrid instruments affect an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. FSP
SFAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 also expands the disclosure requirements of FIN No. 45, Guarantors
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness to Others by requiring the seller of a credit derivative to disclose the current
status of the payment/performance risk of the guarantee. This statement is effective for fiscal
years, and interim reporting periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after
November 15, 2008. The Company is currently assessing the impact FSP No. 133-1 and FIN 45-4 will
have on its consolidated financial statement disclosures.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 03-6-1, Determining
Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (FSP
EITF 03-6-1). This new standard requires that nonvested share-based payment awards that contain
non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents be treated as participating securities
in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 will be
applied retrospectively to all periods presented for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. The Company is currently assessing the impact that FSP EITF 03-6-1 will have on its
consolidated financial statements and results of operations for the share-based payment programs
currently in place.
In June 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue 07-5, Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded
Feature) Is Indexed to an Entitys Own Stock (EITF 07-5). Paragraph 11(a) of SFAS No. 133
specifies that a contract that would otherwise meet the definition of a derivative but is both
(a) indexed to the Companys own stock and (b) classified in stockholders equity in the statement
of financial position would not be considered a derivative financial instrument. EITF 07-5 provides
a new two-step model to be applied in determining whether a financial instrument or an embedded
feature is indexed to an issuers own stock and thus able to qualify for the SFAS No. 133 paragraph
11(a) scope exception. EITF 07-5 will be effective for the first annual reporting period beginning
after December 15, 2008, and early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently assessing the
impact EITF 07-5 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That
May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) (FSP APB 14-1), which
requires the liability and equity components of convertible debt instruments that may be settled in
cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) to be separately accounted for in a manner
that reflects the issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. This statement will change the
accounting treatment for the Companys 3.625% Puttable Equity-Linked Senior Notes due October 2011,
which were issued in October 2006. FSP APB 14-1 requires the initial debt proceeds from the sale of
a companys convertible debt instrument to be allocated between a liability component and an equity
component. The resulting debt discount will be amortized over the debt instruments expected life
as additional non-cash interest expense. Due to the increase in interest expense, the Company
expects to record additional capitalized interest based on its qualifying expenditures on its
development projects. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008,
and for interim periods within those fiscal years, with retrospective application required. The
impact of the retrospective application of FSP APB 14-1 is expected to result in additional
non-cash interest expense of approximately $1,500,000 (net of capitalized interest on the Companys
qualifying expenditures) for the year ended January 31, 2009.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (SFAS No. 162), which is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a
consistent framework or hierarchy for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing
financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP for nongovernmental entities. SFAS
No. 162 is effective 60 days following the Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) approval of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendment to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present
Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company does not expect
adoption of SFAS No. 162 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets. This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension
assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This FSP allows the Company to use its historical
experience in renewing or extending the useful life of intangible assets. This FSP is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years
and shall be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The
Company does not expect the application of this FSP to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
13
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
A. Accounting Policies (continued)
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS
No. 133 with the intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of
how derivative instruments and hedging activities affect an entitys financial position, financial
performance and cash flows. These disclosure requirements include a tabular summary of the fair
values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses, disclosure of derivative features that
are credit risk related to provide more information regarding an entitys liquidity and
cross-referencing within footnotes to make it easier for financial statement users to locate
important information about derivative instruments. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 with early
application encouraged. The Company is currently assessing the impact SFAS No. 161 will have on its
consolidated financial statement disclosures.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS No.
141(R)). SFAS No. 141(R) provides greater consistency in the accounting and financial reporting
of business combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) requires the acquiring entity in a business combination
to recognize all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction, establishes the
acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities
assumed and requires the acquirer to disclose the nature and financial effect of the business
combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). A
non-controlling interest, sometimes called minority interest, is the portion of equity in a
subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. The objective of this statement
is to improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a
reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and
reporting standards that require: (i) the ownership interest in subsidiaries held by parties other
than the parent be clearly identified, labeled, and presented in the consolidated statement of
financial position within equity, but separate from the parents equity; (ii) the amount of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest be clearly
identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of operations; (iii) changes in
a parents ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its
subsidiary be accounted for consistently and requires that they be accounted for similarly, as
equity transactions; (iv) when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained non-controlling equity
investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair value, the gain or loss on the
deconsolidation of the subsidiary is measured using fair value of any non-controlling equity
investments rather than the carrying amount of that retained investment; and (v) entities provide
sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interest of the parent and
the interest of the non-controlling owners. This statement is effective for fiscal years, and
interim reporting periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
Earlier adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently assessing the impact SFAS No. 160 will
have on its consolidated financial statements.
14
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
B. Investments in and Advances to Affiliates
Included in investments in and advances to affiliates are unconsolidated investments in entities
that the Company does not control and/or is not deemed to be the primary beneficiary, and which are
accounted for under the equity method of accounting, as well as advances to partners and other
affiliates.
Following is a reconciliation of members and partners equity to the Companys carrying value in
the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Members and partners equity, as below |
|
$ |
669,911 |
|
|
$ |
741,871 |
|
Equity of other members and partners |
|
|
524,689 |
|
|
|
553,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys investment in partnerships |
|
|
145,222 |
|
|
|
188,029 |
|
Advances to and on behalf of other affiliates |
|
|
274,703 |
|
|
|
307,799 |
|
|
|
|
Total Investments in and Advances
to Affiliates |
|
$ |
419,925 |
|
|
$ |
495,828 |
|
|
|
|
Summarized financial information (at 100%) for the equity method investments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Combined 100%) |
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed rental properties |
|
$ |
3,587,094 |
|
|
$ |
2,989,525 |
|
Projects under development |
|
|
1,364,408 |
|
|
|
1,271,998 |
|
Land held for development or sale |
|
|
266,575 |
|
|
|
265,943 |
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate |
|
|
5,218,077 |
|
|
|
4,527,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(657,601 |
) |
|
|
(606,961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate, net |
|
|
4,560,476 |
|
|
|
3,920,505 |
|
|
Restricted cash - military housing bond funds |
|
|
928,422 |
|
|
|
1,264,941 |
|
Other restricted cash |
|
|
261,294 |
|
|
|
339,200 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
502,947 |
|
|
|
409,973 |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
6,253,139 |
|
|
$ |
5,934,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage debt, nonrecourse |
|
$ |
4,664,014 |
|
|
$ |
4,486,786 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
919,214 |
|
|
|
705,962 |
|
Members and partners equity |
|
|
669,911 |
|
|
|
741,871 |
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Members/Partners Equity |
|
$ |
6,253,139 |
|
|
$ |
5,934,619 |
|
|
|
|
15
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
B. Investments in and Advances to Affiliates (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Combined 100%) |
|
|
(Combined 100%) |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
223,276 |
|
|
$ |
191,637 |
|
|
$ |
717,424 |
|
|
$ |
642,774 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
(157,859 |
) |
|
|
(135,392 |
) |
|
|
(527,215 |
) |
|
|
(446,394 |
) |
Interest expense including early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(57,104 |
) |
|
|
(57,610 |
) |
|
|
(172,266 |
) |
|
|
(159,955 |
) |
Provision for decline in real estate (1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(45,348 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(27,893 |
) |
|
|
(28,002 |
) |
|
|
(106,253 |
) |
|
|
(103,001 |
) |
Interest and other income including preferred return on disposition |
|
|
13,646 |
|
|
|
16,938 |
|
|
|
45,456 |
|
|
|
45,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(5,934 |
) |
|
|
(12,429 |
) |
|
|
(88,202 |
) |
|
|
(21,097 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of rental properties (2) |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,470 |
|
|
|
4,212 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations subtotal |
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
3,449 |
|
|
|
5,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) (pre-tax) |
|
$ |
(5,456 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,281 |
) |
|
$ |
(84,753 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,917 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Companys portion of net earnings (loss) (pre-tax) |
|
$ |
(3,198 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,526 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,422 |
) |
|
$ |
2,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The following table shows the detail of the provision for decline in real estate for
equity method investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navy Midwest (Military Housing Project) (a) |
|
(Chicago, Illinois) |
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Mercury (Condominium) |
|
(Los Angeles, California) |
|
|
12,006 |
|
|
|
- |
|
El Centro Mall (Specialty Retail Center) |
|
(El Centro, California) |
|
|
3,342 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for decline for equity method properties |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,348 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys portion of provision for decline in real estate
for equity method properties |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,661 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Amount relates to impairment of land located in
Puerto Rico held by Navy Midwest. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The following table shows the detail of gain on disposition of rental properties that
were held by equity method investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
One International Place
(Office Building) |
|
(Cleveland, Ohio) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
$ |
3,070 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Emery-Richmond (Office Building) |
|
(Warrensville Heights, Ohio) |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
- |
|
White Acres (Apartments) |
|
(Richmond Heights, Ohio) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gain on disposition for
equity method rental properties |
|
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
$ |
3,470 |
|
|
$ |
4,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys portion of gain on
disposition of equity
method rental properties |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
$ |
1,081 |
|
|
$ |
2,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
B. Investments in and Advances to Affiliates (continued)
Included in the amounts above are the following amounts for the three and nine months ended
October 31, 2008 and 2007 related to the Companys investment in an entity that is reported in the
Nets segment. This entity primarily reports on the operations of the New Jersey Nets basketball
team, a franchise of the National Basketball Association, in which the Company has been an equity
method investor since August 16, 2004. Summarized financial information for this equity method
investment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues and interest income |
|
$ |
2,050 |
|
|
$ |
2,683 |
|
|
|
$ |
59,567 |
|
|
$ |
60,289 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
(13,279 |
) |
|
|
(12,729 |
) |
|
|
|
(80,427 |
) |
|
|
(79,826 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,373 |
) |
|
|
(2,830 |
) |
|
|
|
(4,913 |
) |
|
|
(7,294 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
|
(24,230 |
) |
|
|
(24,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (pre-tax) |
|
$ |
(12,762 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,253 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(50,003 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,577 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys portion of net loss (pre-tax) |
|
$ |
(9,681 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,277 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(30,817 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Bank Revolving Credit Facility
At October 31 and January 31, 2008, the Companys bank revolving credit facility, as most recently
amended on September 10, 2008 for technical clarifications, provides for maximum borrowings of
$750,000,000 and matures in March 2010. The facility bears interest at the Companys option at
either (1) a LIBOR-based rate plus 1.45% (5.11% and 4.89% at October 31 and January 31, 2008,
respectively), or (2) a Prime-based rate plus .50%. The Company has historically elected the
LIBOR-based rate option. Of the available borrowings, up to $100,000,000 may be used for letters
of credit or surety bonds. The credit facility also contains certain financial covenants,
including maintenance of certain debt service and cash flow coverage ratios, specified levels of
net worth (as defined in the credit facility) and a dividend and stock repurchase limitation of
$40,000,000 per annual period. At October 31, 2008, the Company was in compliance with all of these
financial covenants.
Available credit on the bank revolving credit facility at October 31 and January 31, 2008 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
|
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Maximum borrowings |
|
$ |
750,000 |
|
|
$ |
750,000 |
|
Less outstanding balances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
213,500 |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
93,855 |
|
|
|
71,802 |
|
Surety bonds |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
Available credit |
|
$ |
442,645 |
|
|
$ |
639,198 |
|
|
|
|
17
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
D. Senior and Subordinated Debt
The Companys Senior and Subordinated Debt is comprised of the following at October 31 and
January 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
|
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Senior Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.625% Puttable Equity-Linked Senior Notes due 2011 |
|
$ |
272,500 |
|
|
$ |
287,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Senior Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.625% Senior Notes due 2015 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
6.500% Senior Notes due 2017 |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
7.375% Senior Notes due 2034 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
Total Senior Notes |
|
|
822,500 |
|
|
|
837,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redevelopment Bonds due 2010 |
|
|
20,400 |
|
|
|
20,400 |
|
Subordinate Tax Revenue Bonds due 2013 |
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
|
Total Subordinated Debt |
|
|
49,400 |
|
|
|
49,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Senior and Subordinated Debt |
|
$ |
871,900 |
|
|
$ |
886,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puttable Equity-Linked Senior Notes
On October 10, 2006, the Company issued $287,500,000 of 3.625% puttable equity-linked senior notes
due October 15, 2011 in a private placement. The proceeds from this offering (net of $25,000,000 of
offering costs, underwriting fees and the cost of the puttable note hedge and warrant transactions
described below) were used to repurchase $24,962,000 of the Companys Class A common stock, to
repay the outstanding balance of $190,000,000 under the bank revolving credit facility (see Note C
Bank Revolving Credit Facility) and for general working capital purposes. The notes were issued
at par and accrued interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each
year, which began on April 15, 2007. The Company may not redeem these notes prior to maturity. The
notes are unsecured unsubordinated obligations and rank equally with all other unsecured and
unsubordinated indebtedness.
During the three months ended October 31, 2008, the Company purchased, on the open market,
$15,000,000, in principal, of its puttable equity-linked senior notes for $10,571,000 in cash,
resulting in a gain, net of associated deferred financing costs, of $4,181,000, which is recorded
as early extinguishment of debt in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Holders may put their notes to the Company at their option on any day prior to the close of
business on the scheduled trading day immediately preceding July 15, 2011 only under the following
circumstances: (1) during the five business-day period after any five consecutive trading-day
period (the measurement period) in which the trading price per note for each day of that
measurement period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of the
Companys Class A common stock and the put value rate (as defined) on each such day; (2) during any
fiscal quarter after the fiscal quarter ending January 31, 2007, if the last reported sale price of
the Companys Class A common stock for 20 or more trading days in a period of 30 consecutive
trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter exceeds
130% of the applicable put value price in effect on the last trading day of the immediately
preceding fiscal quarter; or (3) upon the occurrence of specified corporate events as set forth in
the applicable indenture. On and after July 15, 2011 until the close of business on the scheduled
trading day immediately preceding the maturity date, holders may put their notes to the Company at
any time, regardless of the foregoing circumstances. In addition, upon a designated event, as
defined, the holders may require the Company to purchase for cash all or a portion of their notes
for 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, as set
forth in the applicable indenture.
If a note is put to the Company, a holder would receive (i) cash equal to the lesser of the
principal amount of the note or the put value and (ii) to the extent the put value exceeds the
principal amount of the note, shares of the Companys Class A common stock, cash, or a combination
of Class A common stock and cash, at the Companys option. The initial put value rate was 15.0631
shares of Class A common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to a put value
price of $66.39 per share of Class A common stock). The put value rate will be subject to
adjustment in some events but will not be adjusted for accrued interest. In addition, if a
fundamental change, as defined, occurs prior to the maturity date, the Company will in some cases
increase the put value rate for a holder that elects to put its notes.
18
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
D. Senior and Subordinated Debt (continued)
The Company entered into a registration rights agreement that required a shelf registration
statement to be filed within 90 days and declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (Securities Act) within 180 days after October 10, 2006. The Company filed an
immediately effective shelf registration statement under the Securities Act for the resale of the
notes and the Class A common stock issuable upon the Companys exercise of the net share settlement
option on January 4, 2007. The Company was required to use its best efforts to keep the shelf
registration statement effective until the earliest of: (1) the date all of the registrable
securities have been sold pursuant to the shelf registration statement; (2) the expiration of the
holding period under Rule 144(k) under the Securities Act, or any successor provision; or (3) two
years from the date the shelf registration statement is declared effective. As the Rule 144 holding
period has been satisfied, the Company is no longer required to keep the shelf registration
statement effective.
Concurrent with the issuance of the notes, the Company purchased a call option on its Class A
common stock in a private transaction. The purchased call option allows the Company to receive
shares of its Class A common stock and/or cash from counterparties equal to the amounts of Class A
common stock and/or cash related to the excess put value that it would pay to the holders of the
notes if put to the Company. These purchased call options will terminate upon the earlier of the
maturity date of the notes or the first day all of the notes are no longer outstanding due to a put
or otherwise. The purchased call options, which cost an aggregate $45,885,000 ($28,155,000 net of
the related tax benefit), were recorded net of tax as a reduction of shareholders equity through
additional paid-in capital during the year ended January 31, 2007. In a separate transaction, the
Company sold warrants to issue shares of the Companys Class A common stock at an exercise price of
$74.35 per share in a private transaction. If the average price of the Companys Class A common
stock during a defined period ending on or about the respective settlement dates exceeds the
exercise price of the warrants, the warrants will be settled in shares of the Companys Class A
common stock. Proceeds received from the issuance of the warrants totaled approximately $28,923,000
and were recorded as an addition to shareholders equity through additional paid-in capital during
the year ended January 31, 2007.
Other Senior Notes
On May 19, 2003, the Company issued $300,000,000 of 7.625% senior notes due June 1, 2015 in a
public offering under a shelf registration statement. Accrued interest is payable semi-annually on
December 1 and June 1. These senior notes may be redeemed by the Company at any time on or after
June 1, 2008 at a redemption price of 103.813% beginning June 1, 2008 and systematically reduced to
100% in years thereafter.
On January 25, 2005, the Company issued $150,000,000 of 6.500% senior notes due February 1, 2017 in
a public offering under a shelf registration statement. Accrued interest is payable semi-annually
on February 1 and August 1. These senior notes may be redeemed by the Company at any time on or
after February 1, 2010 at a redemption price of 103.250% beginning February 1, 2010 and
systematically reduced to 100% in the years thereafter.
On February 10, 2004, the Company issued $100,000,000 of 7.375% senior notes due February 1, 2034
in a public offering under a shelf registration statement. Accrued interest is payable quarterly on
February 1, May 1, August 1, and November 1. These senior notes may be redeemed by the Company, in
whole or in part, at any time on or after February 10, 2009 at a redemption price equal to 100% of
their principal amount plus accrued interest.
The Companys senior notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally with all existing and
future unsecured indebtedness; however, they are effectively
subordinated to the bank revolving credit facility and all existing and
future secured indebtedness and other liabilities of the Companys subsidiaries to the extent of
the value of the collateral securing such other debt.
The indentures governing the senior notes contain covenants providing, among other things,
limitations on incurring additional debt and payment of dividends.
19
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
D. Senior and Subordinated Debt (continued)
Subordinated Debt
In November 2000, the Company issued $20,400,000 of redevelopment bonds in a private placement. The
bonds bear a fixed interest rate of 8.25% and are due September 15, 2010. The Company has entered
into a TRS for the benefit of these bonds that expires on September 15, 2009. Under this TRS, the
Company receives a rate of 8.25% and pays the SIFMA rate plus a spread (0.90% through the
expiration date). Interest on the bonds is payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15.
This debt is unsecured and subordinated to the senior notes and the bank revolving credit facility.
In May 2003, the Company purchased $29,000,000 of subordinate tax revenue bonds that were
contemporaneously transferred to a custodian, which in turn issued custodial receipts that
represent ownership in the bonds to unrelated third parties. The bonds bear a fixed interest rate
of 7.875%. The Company evaluated the transfer pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities
(SFAS No. 140), and determined that the transfer did not qualify for sale accounting treatment
principally because the Company guaranteed the payment of principal and interest in the unlikely
event that there is insufficient tax revenue to support the bonds when the custodial receipts are
subject to mandatory tender on December 1, 2013. As such, the Company is the primary beneficiary
of this VIE and the book value of the bonds was recorded as a collateralized borrowing reported as
senior and subordinated debt and as held-to-maturity securities reported as other assets in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
E. Financing Arrangements
Collateralized Borrowings
On July 13, 2005, the Park Creek Metropolitan District (the District) issued $65,000,000 Senior
Subordinate Limited Property Tax Supported Revenue Refunding and Improvement Bonds, Series 2005
(the Senior Subordinate Bonds) and Stapleton Land II, LLC, a consolidated subsidiary, entered
into an agreement whereby it will receive a 1% fee on the Senior Subordinate Bonds in exchange for
providing certain credit enhancement. The Company recorded $164,000 and $488,000 of interest income related to this
arrangement in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended
October 31, 2008, respectively, and $164,000 and $558,000 for the three and nine months ended
October 31, 2007, respectively. The counterparty to the credit enhancement arrangement also owns
the underlying Senior Subordinate Bonds and can exercise its rights requiring payment from
Stapleton Land II, LLC upon an event of default of the Senior Subordinate Bonds, a refunding of the
Senior Subordinate Bonds, or failure of Stapleton Land II, LLC to post required collateral. The
agreement is scheduled to expire on July 1, 2009. The maximum potential amount of payments
Stapleton Land II, LLC could be required to make under the agreement is the par value of the Senior
Subordinate Bonds. The Company does not have any rights or obligations to acquire the Senior
Subordinate Bonds under this agreement. At October 31, 2008, the fair value of this agreement,
which is deemed to be a derivative financial instrument, was immaterial. Subsequent changes in
fair value, if any, will be marked to market through earnings.
On August 16, 2005, the District issued $58,000,000 Junior Subordinated Limited Property Tax
Supported Revenue Bonds, Series 2005 (the Junior Subordinated Bonds). The Junior Subordinated
Bonds initially were to pay a variable rate of interest. Upon issuance, the Junior Subordinated
Bonds were purchased by a third party and the sales proceeds were deposited with a trustee pursuant
to the terms of the Series 2005 Investment Agreement. Under the terms of the Series 2005
Investment Agreement, after March 1, 2006, the District may elect to withdraw funds from the
trustee for reimbursement for certain qualified infrastructure and interest expenditures
(Qualifying Expenditures). In the event that funds from the trustee are used for Qualifying
Expenditures, a corresponding amount of the Junior Subordinated Bonds converts to an 8.5% fixed
rate and matures in December 2037 (Converted Bonds). On August 16, 2005, Stapleton Land, LLC, a
consolidated subsidiary, entered into a Forward Delivery Placement Agreement (FDA) whereby
Stapleton Land, LLC was entitled and obligated to purchase the converted fixed rate Junior
Subordinated Bonds through June 2, 2008. The District withdrew $58,000,000 ($44,000,000 at January
31, 2008) of funds from the trustee for reimbursement of certain Qualifying Expenditures by June 2,
2008. Therefore, a corresponding amount of the Junior Subordinated Bonds became Converted Bonds
and were acquired by Stapleton Land, LLC under the terms of the FDA. Stapleton Land, LLC
immediately transferred the Converted Bonds to investment banks and the Company simultaneously
entered into a TRS with a notional amount of $58,000,000. The Company receives a fixed rate of
8.5% and pays SIFMA plus a spread on the TRS related to the Converted Bonds. The Company
determined that the sale of the Converted Bonds to the investment banks and simultaneous execution
of the TRS did not surrender control; therefore, the Converted Bonds have been recorded as a
secured borrowing in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the three months ended October 31,
2008, a consolidated subsidiary of the Company purchased $10,000,000 of the Converted Bonds
from one of the investment banks. As a result, on September 12, 2008, a
20
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
E. Financing Arrangements (continued)
$10,000,000 TRS contract was terminated and the corresponding amount of the secured borrowing was
removed from the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Converted Bonds are available for sale. The fair
value of the Converted Bonds was $58,000,000 and $44,000,000, respectively, at October 31, 2008 and
January 31, 2008. In connection with the Senior
Subordinate Bonds agreement described above and the TRS contracts
related to $44,000,000 of the converted bonds, Stapleton Land II, LLC
has provided certain notes receivable owned by the Company as collateral aggregating $18,000,000 as
of October 31, 2008. The Company recorded net interest income of $640,000 and $2,376,000, related to
the TRS in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended
October 31, 2008, respectively, and $386,000 and $946,000 for the three and nine months ended
October 31, 2007, respectively.
Other Structured Financing Arrangements
In
May 2004, Lehman purchased $200,000,000 in tax increment revenue bonds issued by the
DURA, with a fixed-rate coupon of 8.0% and maturity date of October 1, 2024, which were used to
fund the infrastructure costs associated with phase II of the Stapleton development project. The
DURA bonds were transferred to a trust that issued floating rate trust certificates. Stapleton
Land, LLC entered into an agreement with Lehman to purchase the DURA bonds from the trust
if they are not repurchased or remarketed between June 1, 2007 and June 1, 2009. Stapleton
Land, LLC is entitled to receive a fee upon removal of the DURA bonds from the trust equal to the
8.0% coupon rate, less the SIFMA index, less all fees and expenses due to Lehman
(collectively, the Fee). On July 1, 2008, $100,000,000 of the DURA bonds were remarketed. On
July 15, 2008, Stapleton Land, LLC was paid $13,838,000 of the fee, which represented the fee
earned on the remarketed DURA bonds. As of October 31, 2008, $100,000,000 of the DURA bonds have
not been repurchased or remarketed.
The Company has concluded that the trust described above is considered a qualified special purpose
entity pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 140 and thus is excluded from the scope of FIN No.
46(R). As a result, the DURA bonds and the activity of the trust have not been recorded in the
consolidated financial statements. The Fee has been accounted for as a derivative with changes in
fair value recorded through earnings (see Note F Fair Value Measurements). During the three
months ended October 31, 2008, Lehman, the third party obligated to pay the Fee to the Company,
filed for bankruptcy. As a result, the Company has reassessed the collectibility of the Fee and has
decreased the fair value of the Fee to $-0-, resulting in an increase to operating expenses in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations of $13,816,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2008.
The fair value of the Fee of $23,108,000 at January 31, 2008 is recorded in other assets in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company recorded interest income of $-0- and $4,546,000 related
to the change in fair value of the Fee in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three
and nine months ended October 31, 2008, respectively, and $1,204,000 and $5,463,000 for the three
and nine months ended October 31, 2007, respectively.
Stapleton Land, LLC has committed to fund $24,500,000 to the District to be used for certain
infrastructure projects and has funded $15,285,000 of this commitment as of October 31, 2008.
F. Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 on February 1, 2008 for its financial assets and liabilities. The
Company determined the financial assets and liabilities subject to SFAS No. 157 were interest rate
caps and swaptions, interest rate swap agreements (including forward swaps), TRS, borrowings
subject to TRS and the DURA Fee (refer to the Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities section of Note A).
Fair Value Hierarchy
SFAS No. 157 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based upon whether the inputs to those
valuation techniques reflect assumptions other market participants would use based upon market data
obtained from independent sources (also referred to as observable inputs). In accordance with SFAS
No. 157, the following summarizes the fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets that are unadjusted and accessible at the
measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities; |
|
|
|
Level 2 Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not
active, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial
instruments for which significant observable inputs are available, either directly or
indirectly such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted
intervals; and |
|
|
|
Level 3 Prices or valuations that require inputs that are unobservable. |
21
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
F. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair
value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value
measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Companys assessment of the
significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment
and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
Measurement of Fair Value
The Company estimates the fair value of its hedging instruments, which includes the interest rate
caps and swaptions and interest rate swap agreements (including forward swaps), based on interest
rate market pricing models. Although the Company has determined that the significant inputs used
to value its hedging instruments fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit
valuation adjustments associated with the Companys counterparties and its own credit risk utilize
Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default
by itself and its counterparties. However, as of October 31, 2008, the Company has assessed the
significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its
hedging instruments positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not
significant to the overall valuation of its hedging instruments. As a result, the Company has
determined that its hedging instruments valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of
the fair value hierarchy.
The Companys TRS have termination values equal to the difference between the fair value of the
underlying bonds and the bonds base (acquired) price times the stated par amount of the bonds.
Upon termination of the contract with the counterparty, the Company is entitled to receive the
termination value if the underlying fair value of the bonds is greater than the base price and is
obligated to pay the termination value if the underlying fair value of the bonds is less than the
base price. The underlying borrowings generally have call features at par and without prepayment
penalties. The call features of the underlying borrowings would result in a significant discount
factor to any value attributed to the exchange of cash flows in these contracts by another market
participant willing to purchase the Companys positions. Therefore, the Company believes the
termination value of the TRS approximates the fair value another market participant would assign to
these contracts. The Company compares estimates of fair value to those provided by the respective
counterparties on a quarterly basis. The Company has determined its fair value estimate of TRS is
classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
To determine the fair value of the underlying borrowings subject to TRS, the base price is
initially used as the estimate of fair value. The Company adjusts the fair value based upon
observable and unobservable measures, such as the financial performance of the underlying
collateral, interest rate risk spreads for similar transactions and loan to value ratios. In the
absence of such evidence, managements best estimate is used. At October 31, 2008, TRS borrowings
subject to fair value adjustments are approximately $501,195,000. The Company compares estimates
of fair value to those provided by the respective counterparties on a quarterly basis. The Company
has determined its fair value estimate of borrowings subject to TRS is classified in Level 3 of the
fair value hierarchy. To determine the fair value of the DURA Fee, the Company uses observable and
unobservable measures such as the underlying tax revenue to support future bonding capacity of the
DURA, credit spreads, movements in variable interest rates, the period remaining before the
remarketing date and managements estimates of the likelihood of remarketing the underlying bonds.
Additionally, the Company compares its estimate of fair value to an independent calculation by the
counterparty. The Company has determined its fair value estimate of the DURA Fee is classified in
Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. During the three months ended October 31, 2008, Lehman, the
third party obligated to pay the Fee to the Company, filed for bankruptcy. As a result, the Company
has reassessed the collectibility of the Fee and has decreased the fair value of the Fee to $-0- at
October 31, 2008.
22
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
F. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The Companys financial assets consist of interest rate caps, interest rate swap agreements with a
positive fair value, TRS with a positive fair value and the DURA Fee and are included in other
assets. The Companys financial liabilities consist of interest rate swap agreements with a
negative fair value (which includes the forward swaps) and TRS with a negative fair value included
in accounts payable and accrued expenses and borrowings subject to TRS included in mortgage debt,
nonrecourse. The following table presents information about the Companys financial assets and
liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of October 31, 2008 and
indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine
such fair value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
at October 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
4,496 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
4,496 |
|
Interest rate swap agreements (positive fair value) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,543 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,543 |
|
TRS (positive fair value) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Interest rate swap agreements (negative fair value) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(91,969 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(91,969 |
) |
TRS (negative fair value) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(34,966 |
) |
|
|
(34,966 |
) |
Fair value adjustment to the borrowings subject to TRS |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
28,151 |
|
|
|
28,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(84,930 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,777 |
) |
|
$ |
(91,707 |
) |
|
|
|
The table below presents a reconciliation of all financial assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the nine months
ended October 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
to the borrowings |
|
|
Total TRS |
|
|
DURA |
|
|
|
TRS |
|
|
subject to TRS |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, February 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
(2,866 |
) |
|
$ |
(934 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,800 |
) |
|
$ |
23,108 |
|
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(32,062 |
) |
|
|
29,085 |
|
|
|
(2,977 |
) |
|
|
(9,270 |
) (1) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(13,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
(34,928 |
) |
|
$ |
28,151 |
|
|
$ |
(6,777 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $4,546 of income earned during the nine months ended October 31, 2008, net of
$13,816 reduction in fair value of the Fee recorded during the nine months ended October 31,
2008 as an increase in operating expenses. |
23
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
G. Stock-Based Compensation
In June 2008, the shareholders approved amendments to the Companys 1994 Stock Plan to allow the
granting of performance shares, increase the aggregate maximum number of shares that may be issued
by 1,000,000 to 12,750,000 and increase the maximum number of restricted stock and performance
shares that may be issued by 2,000,000 to 2,500,000.
Performance shares may be granted to selected executives and the vesting of the shares is
contingent upon meeting management objectives established by the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors. The management objectives may be company-wide or business unit performance
goals that must be met within a performance period of at least one year. Performance shares will
generally be granted at target levels and the ultimate number of shares earned will depend upon the
degree that performance goals are met at the end of the performance period. The fair value of
performance shares is based on the closing price of the underlying stock on the date of grant and
recorded as stock-based compensation cost over the performance period. If the performance goals
are not met or are below target, then any related recognized compensation costs will be reversed.
If the performance goals are exceeded, additional compensation costs will be recorded, as
applicable, up to the maximum specified in the grant.
There were no grants of stock-based compensation during the three months ended October 31, 2008.
During the nine months ended October 31, 2008, the Company granted 430,874 stock options, 320,777
shares of restricted stock and 172,609 performance shares under the Companys 1994 Stock Plan. The
stock options had a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $10.11 per option, which was computed
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
expected term of 5.5 years, expected volatility of 22.97%, risk-free interest rate of 3.73% and
expected dividend yield of .54%. The weighted-average exercise price of the options is $36.46,
which represents the closing price of the underlying stock on the respective dates of grant. The
restricted stock had a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $36.51 per share, which represents
the closing price of the stock on the respective dates of grant. The performance shares had a
grant-date fair value of $36.38 which was the closing price of the underlying stock on the date of
grant.
At October 31, 2008, there was $16,454,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock
options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.33 years, $16,714,000
of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock that is expected to be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 2.90 years and $5,566,000 of unrecognized compensation cost
related to performance shares that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
3.25 years.
The amount of stock-based compensation costs and related deferred income tax benefit recognized in
the financial statements are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option costs |
|
$ |
2,318 |
|
|
$ |
2,308 |
|
|
|
$ |
7,456 |
|
|
$ |
8,837 |
|
Restricted stock costs |
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
|
5,386 |
|
|
|
4,734 |
|
Performance share costs |
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation costs |
|
|
4,489 |
|
|
|
3,857 |
|
|
|
|
13,556 |
|
|
|
13,571 |
|
Less amount capitalized into
qualifying real estate projects |
|
|
(2,421 |
) |
|
|
(2,010 |
) |
|
|
|
(6,540 |
) |
|
|
(5,647 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount charged to operating expenses |
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
1,847 |
|
|
|
|
7,016 |
|
|
|
7,924 |
|
Depreciation expense on capitalized
stock-based compensation |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
2,129 |
|
|
$ |
1,866 |
|
|
|
$ |
7,200 |
|
|
$ |
7,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,350 |
|
|
$ |
2,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 123(R) Share-Based Payment requires the immediate recognition of stock-based
compensation costs for awards granted to retirement-eligible grantees. The amount of grant-date
fair value expensed immediately for awards granted to retirement-eligible grantees during the nine
months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007 was $1,298,000 and $2,152,000, respectively.
In connection with the vesting of restricted stock during the nine months ended October 31, 2008
and 2007, the Company repurchased into treasury 17,355 shares and 50,186 shares, respectively, of
Class A common stock to satisfy the employees related minimum
statutory tax withholding requirements. These shares were placed in treasury with an aggregate
cost basis of $651,000 and $3,138,000, respectively.
24
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
H. Income Taxes
Income tax expense (benefit) for the three months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007 was $(11,414,000)
and $1,706,000, respectively. Income tax benefit for the nine months ended October 31, 2008 and
2007 was $(27,270,000) and $(12,943,000), respectively. The difference in the income tax expense
or benefit reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations versus the income tax expense or
benefit computed at the statutory federal income tax rate is primarily attributable to state income
taxes, additional general business credits, changes to the Companys charitable contribution and
state NOL valuation allowances based upon managements assessment of the Companys ability to
utilize such deferred tax assets, and various permanent differences between pre-tax GAAP income and
taxable income.
At January 31, 2008, the Company had a net operating loss carryforward for tax purposes of
$64,589,000 (generated primarily from the impact on the Companys net earnings of tax depreciation
expense from real estate properties and excess deductions from stock-based compensation) that will
expire in the years ending January 31, 2024 through January 31, 2028, a charitable contribution
deduction carryforward of $40,676,000 that will expire in the years ending January 31, 2009 through
January 31, 2013 ($7,111,000 expiring in the year ended January 31, 2009), general business credit
carryovers of $13,866,000 that will expire in the years ending January 31, 2009 through
January 31, 2028 ($39,000 expiring in the year ended January 31, 2009) and an alternative minimum
tax (AMT) credit carryforward of $34,894,000 that is available until used to reduce Federal tax
to the AMT amount. The Company has a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset
associated with its charitable contributions because management believes at this time that it is
more likely than not that the Company will not realize these benefits. The Companys policy is to
consider a variety of tax-deferral strategies, including tax deferred exchanges, when evaluating
its future tax position.
The Company applies the with-and-without methodology for recognizing excess tax benefits from the
deduction of stock-based compensation. The net operating loss available for the tax return, as is
noted in the paragraph above, is significantly greater than the net operating loss available for
the tax provision due to excess deductions from stock-based compensation reported on the return, as
well as the impact of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN No. 48) adjustments to the net operating loss.
The Company has not recorded a net deferred tax asset of approximately $13,355,000, as of
January 31, 2008, from excess stock-based compensation deductions for which a benefit has not yet
been recognized.
FIN No. 48
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN No. 48 effective February 1, 2007. Unrecognized tax
benefits represent those tax benefits related to tax positions that have been taken or are expected
to be taken in tax returns that are not recognized in the financial statements because management
has either concluded that it is not more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained if
audited by the appropriate taxing authority or the amount of the benefit will be less than the
amount taken or expected to be taken in its income tax returns.
As of October 31 and January 31, 2008, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits of $1,818,000 and
$2,556,000, respectively. The Company recognizes estimated interest payable on underpayments of
income taxes and estimated penalties that may result from the settlement of some uncertain tax
positions as components of income tax expense. As of October 31 and January 31, 2008, the Company
had approximately $543,000 and $840,000, respectively, of accrued interest and penalties related to
uncertain income tax positions. During the three months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007, $35,000
and $68,000, respectively, of tax expense was recorded relating to interest. Income tax expense
(benefit) relating to interest and penalties of $(297,000) and $379,000 was recorded for the nine
months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. During the nine months ended
October 31, 2008, the Company settled an Internal Revenue Service audit of one of its partnership
investments, which resulted in a decrease in the Companys unrecognized tax benefits and associated
accrued interest and penalties.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would affect the Companys effective tax rate,
if recognized as of October 31, 2008 and 2007, is $325,000 and $576,000, respectively. Based upon
the Companys assessment of the outcome of examinations that are in progress, the settlement of
liabilities, or as a result of the expiration of the statutes of limitation for certain
jurisdictions, it is reasonably possible that the related unrecognized tax benefits for tax
positions taken regarding previously filed tax returns will materially change from those recorded
at October 31, 2008. Included in the $1,818,000 of unrecognized benefits noted above, is
$1,728,000 which, due to the reasons above, could significantly decrease during the next twelve
months.
25
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
I. Discontinued Operations, Gain
on Disposition of Rental Properties, Provision for Decline in Real
Estate and Write-Off of Abandoned Development Projects
Discontinued Operations
Pursuant to the definition of a component of an entity in SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144), all earnings of discontinued
operations sold or held for sale, assuming no significant continuing involvement, have been
reclassified in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended
October 31, 2008 and 2007. The Company considers assets held for sale when the transaction has been
approved and there are no significant contingencies related to the sale that may prevent the
transaction from closing.
During the year ended January 31, 2008, the Company consummated an agreement to sell eight (seven
operating properties and one property that was under construction at the time of the agreement) and
lease four supported-living apartment properties to a third party. Pursuant to the agreement,
during the second quarter of 2007, six operating properties listed in the table below and the
property under construction, Sterling Glen of Roslyn located in Roslyn, New York, were sold. The
seventh operating property, Sterling Glen of Lynbrook, was operated by the purchaser under a
short-term lease through the date of sale, which occurred on May 20, 2008 and generated a gain on
disposition of rental property of $8,627,000 ($5,294,000, net of tax). The gain along with the
operating results of the property through the date of sale is classified as discontinued operations
for the nine months ended October 31, 2008.
Pursuant to the agreement, the four remaining properties entered into long-term operating leases
with the purchaser. The operating leases have stated terms of five or ten years with various put
and call provisions at a pre-determined purchase price that can be exercised beginning in the
second year of each lease at an amount that is in excess of the current carrying amount of the
properties. The Company is generally entitled to a fixed lease payment from the lessee over the
term of the lease in exchange for the operations of the properties, which will be retained by the
lessee. The Company has continued to consolidate the leased properties in its Consolidated Balance
Sheets as the criteria for sales accounting pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 66, Accounting
for Sales of Real Estate (SFAS No. 66), have not been achieved. Further, the Company has
concluded that the leased properties have met the criteria as VIEs pursuant to FIN No. 46(R), and
due to the Companys obligation to absorb a majority of expected losses, the leased properties are
consolidated by the Company at October 31, 2008. Additionally, these properties do not meet the
qualifications of assets held for sale under SFAS No. 144 as of October 31, 2008; therefore, these
properties have not been included in discontinued operations.
Sterling Glen of Lynbrook was classified as held for sale at January 31, 2008 through the date of
disposition. Sterling Glen of Lynbrooks assets and liabilities as of January 31, 2008 are
presented in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
29,858 |
|
Notes and accounts receivable, net |
|
|
179 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
31,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage debt, nonrecourse |
|
$ |
27,700 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
28,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
26
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
I. Discontinued Operations, Gain
on Disposition of Rental Properties, Provision for Decline in Real Estate
and Write-Off of Abandoned Development Projects (continued)
The following table lists the consolidated rental properties included in discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
Nine |
|
Three |
|
Nine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
Months |
|
Months |
|
Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Period |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
Property |
|
Location |
|
of Units |
|
Disposed |
|
10/31/2008 |
|
10/31/2008 |
|
10/31/2007 |
|
10/31/2007 |
Residential Group: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling Glen of Lynbrook |
|
Lynbrook, New York |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
Q2-2008 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Yes |
|
Yes |
|
Yes |
Sterling Glen of Bayshore |
|
Bayshore, New York |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
Q2-2007 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Yes |
Sterling
Glen of Center City |
|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
Q2-2007 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Yes |
Sterling Glen of Darien |
|
Darien, Connecticut |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
Q2-2007 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Yes |
Sterling
Glen of Forest Hills |
|
Forest Hills, New York |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
Q2-2007 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Yes |
Sterling Glen of Plainview |
|
Plainview, New York |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
Q2-2007 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Yes |
Sterling Glen of Stamford |
|
Stamford, Connecticut |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
Q2-2007 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Yes |
Landings of Brentwood |
|
Nashville, Tennessee |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
Q2-2007 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Yes |
The operating results related to discontinued operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,002 |
|
|
|
$ |
706 |
|
|
$ |
25,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(845 |
) |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
19,885 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(838 |
) |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
21,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
(3,904 |
) |
Amortization of mortgage procurement costs |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
Gain (loss) on disposition of rental properties (1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,031 |
) |
|
|
|
8,627 |
|
|
|
105,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
|
8,740 |
|
|
|
105,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19,527 |
|
|
|
|
(1,119 |
) |
|
|
25,267 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(19,123 |
) |
|
|
|
4,496 |
|
|
|
15,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
|
3,377 |
|
|
|
40,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
640 |
|
|
|
$ |
5,363 |
|
|
$ |
64,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the three months ended October 31, 2007, the above loss on disposition of rental
properties represents an adjustment of the previously reported gain on disposition of the
six Sterling Glen properties due to a change in estimate of the cost of this transaction
upon settlement of final transaction costs. |
27
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
I. |
|
Discontinued Operations, Gain on Disposition of Rental
Properties, Provision for
Decline in Real Estate and Write-Off of Abandoned Development Projects (continued) |
Gain on Disposition of Rental Properties
The following table summarizes the pre-tax gain (loss) on disposition of rental properties for the
three and nine months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seven Sterling Glen Properties (Supported-Living Apartments) (1) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(1,031 |
) |
|
|
$ |
8,627 |
|
|
$ |
80,208 |
|
Landings of Brentwood (Apartments) (2) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
25,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(1,031 |
) |
|
|
$ |
8,627 |
|
|
$ |
105,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The seven properties included in the gain on disposition are Sterling Glen of Lynbrook
for the nine months ended October 31, 2008 and Sterling Glen of Bayshore, Sterling Glen of
Center City, Sterling Glen of Darien, Sterling Glen of Forest Hills, Sterling Glen of
Plainview and Sterling Glen of Stamford for the nine months ended October 31, 2007. For the
three months ended October 31, 2007, the above loss on disposition of the six Sterling Glen
properties represents an adjustment of the previously reported gain due to a change in
estimate of the cost of this transaction upon settlement of final transaction costs. The
Company elected to deposit the sales proceeds with a qualified intermediary for the
purposes of identifying replacement assets under Section 1031 of the IRC for Sterling Glen
of Plainview and Sterling Glen of Stamford. |
|
|
(2) |
|
The Company elected to deposit the sales proceeds with a qualified intermediary for
purposes of acquiring replacement assets under Section 1031 of the IRC. |
Upon disposal, investments accounted for on the equity method are not classified as discontinued
operations under the provisions of SFAS No. 144; therefore, the gains or losses on the sales of
equity method properties are reported in continuing operations when sold. The following table
summarizes the Companys proportionate share of the gains on disposition of equity method
investments during the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007, which are included in
equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities in the Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Emery-Richmond
(Office Building) |
|
(Warrensville Heights, Ohio) |
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
One International
Place (Office
Building) |
|
(Cleveland, Ohio) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
- |
|
White Acres
(Apartments) |
|
(Richmond Heights, Ohio) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
$ |
1,081 |
|
|
$ |
2,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Decline in Real Estate
The Company reviews its real estate portfolio, including land held for development or sale, to
determine if its carrying costs will be recovered from future undiscounted cash flows whenever
events or changes indicate that recoverability of long-lived assets may not be supported by current
assumptions. In cases where the Company does not expect to recover its carrying costs, an
impairment loss is recorded as a provision for decline in real estate pursuant to the guidance
established in SFAS No. 144. For the Companys equity method real estate investments, a loss in
value of an investment which is other than a temporary decline is recognized as a provision for
decline in real estate based upon the length of time elapsed, severity of decline and all other
relevant facts and circumstances.
The Company did not record a provision for decline in real estate for the three months ended
October 31, 2008. During the nine months ended October 31, 2008, the Company recorded a provision
for decline in real estate of $365,000 for the other than temporary decline in its equity method
investment in its Land Development Group related to Old Stone Crossing at Caldwell Creek, located
in Charlotte, North Carolina. There was no provision for decline in real estate recorded for the
three and nine months ended October 31, 2007.
28
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
I. Discontinued Operations, Gain on Disposition of Rental Properties and Provision for Decline in Real Estate (continued)
There was no provision for decline in real estate for equity method investments during the three
months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007. The following table summarizes the Companys proportionate
share of the provision for decline in real estate for equity method investments during the nine
months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007, which are included in equity in earnings of unconsolidated
entities in the Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Mercury (Condominium) |
|
(Los Angeles, California) |
|
$ |
4,098 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
El Centro Mall (Specialty Retail Center) |
|
(El Centro, California) |
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,661 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-Off of Abandoned Development Projects
The
Company reviews, on a quarterly basis, each project under development
to determine whether it is probable the project will be developed. If
it is determined by management that the project will not be
developed, project costs are written off to operating expenses as an
abandoned development project cost. The Company may abandon certain
projects under development for a number of reasons, including, but
not limited to, changes in local market conditions, increases in
construction or financing costs or due to third party challenges
related to entitlements or public financing. As a result, the Company
may fail to recover expenses already incurred in exploring
development opportunities. The Company recorded write-offs of
abandoned development projects of $12,501,000 and $41,452,000 for the
three and nine months ended October 31, 2008, respectively, and
$3,765,000 and $9,419,000 for the three and nine months ended October
31, 2007, respectively.
J. Dividends
The Company, at the sole discretion of its Board of Directors, pays cash dividends on shares of
Class A and Class B common stock. On March 26, 2008, a cash dividend of $.08 per share on both
Class A and Class B common stock was declared and was paid on June 17, 2008 to shareholders of
record at the close of business on June 2, 2008. On June 19, 2008, a cash dividend of $.08 per
share on both Class A and Class B common stock was declared and was paid on September 15, 2008 to
shareholders of record at the close of business on August 29, 2008, the last business day prior to
the Board of Directors resolution date of September 1, 2008, which was a legal holiday. On
September 24, 2008, a cash dividend of $.08 per share on both Class A and Class B common stock was
declared and will be paid on December 15, 2008 to shareholders of record at the close of business
on December 1, 2008. On December 5, 2008, the Board of Directors suspended the cash dividends on
shares of Class A and Class B common stock following the
payment of dividends scheduled for December 15, 2008, until such dividends are reinstated.
K. Earnings per Share
Earnings per share (EPS) has been computed under the provisions of SFAS No. 128 Earnings Per
Share. Pursuant to EITF No. 03-6 Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under
FASB 128 (EITF 03-6), the Class A Common Units issued in exchange for Bruce C. Ratners minority
interests in the Forest City Ratner Company portfolio in November 2006, which are reflected as
minority interest in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets, are considered participating
securities as they are entitled to participate in any dividends paid to the Companys common stock
holders. Therefore, the Class A units are included in the computation of basic and diluted earnings
per share if the effect of applying the if-converted method is dilutive.
The computation of EPS for continuing operations and net earnings for the three and nine months
ended October 31, 2008 did not allocate any amounts to the holders of the Class A Common Units,
which are considered participating securities in accordance with EITF 03-6. For the three and nine
months ended October 31, 2008, the loss from continuing operations of $18,534,000 and $72,478,000
respectively, and net loss of $18,534,000 and $67,115,000 , respectively, were allocated solely to
the holders of common stock as the participating security holders do not share in the losses in
accordance with EITF 03-6.
29
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
K. Earnings per Share
The reconciliation of the amounts used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computations is
shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerators (in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations - Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
(18,534 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,414 |
) |
|
$ |
(72,478 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
(18,534 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,774 |
) |
|
$ |
(67,115 |
) |
|
$ |
39,820 |
|
Undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) - Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
(18,534 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,774 |
) |
|
$ |
(67,115 |
) |
|
$ |
39,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominators |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding - Basic |
|
|
102,845,434 |
|
|
|
102,330,172 |
|
|
|
102,714,757 |
|
|
|
102,189,119 |
|
Effect of stock options and restricted stock (1)(2) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Effect of convertible Class A Common Units (1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding - Diluted (3)(4) |
|
|
102,845,434 |
|
|
|
102,330,172 |
|
|
|
102,714,757 |
|
|
|
102,189,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations - Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.70 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
Net earnings (loss) - Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.65 |
) |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
(1) |
|
Incremental shares from dilutive securities of 4,068,885 and 4,399,126 for the three
and nine months ended October 31, 2008, respectively, and 5,257,146 and 5,490,925 for the
three and nine months ended October 31, 2007, respectively, were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect is anti-dilutive due to the
loss from continuing operations. |
|
|
(2) |
|
Weighted-average options and restricted stock of 3,506,478 and 2,678,153 for the three
and nine months ended October 31, 2008, respectively, and 1,065,215 and 842,889 for the
three and nine months ended October 31, 2007, respectively, were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive. |
|
|
(3) |
|
For the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008, weighted-average contingently
issuable securities (performance shares) of 172,609 and 85,054, respectively, were not
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the performance criteria
was not satisfied at the end of the respective periods. |
|
|
(4) |
|
The Puttable Equity-Linked Senior Notes issued in October 2006 can be put to the
Company by the holders under certain circumstances (see Note D Senior and Subordinated
Debt). If the Company exercises its net share settlement option upon a put of the notes by
the holders, it will then issue shares of its Class A common stock. The effect of these
shares was not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three and
nine months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007 because the Companys average stock price did
not exceed the put value price of the Puttable Equity-Linked Senior Notes. These notes
will be dilutive when the average stock price for the period exceeds $66.39. Additionally,
the Company sold a warrant with an exercise price of $74.35, which has also been excluded
from diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008 and
2007 because the Companys stock price did not exceed the exercise price. |
30
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
L. Segment Information
The Company operates through three strategic business units and five reportable segments,
determined in accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and
Related Information (SFAS No. 131). The three strategic units/reportable segments are the
Commercial Group, Residential Group and Land Development Group (Real Estate Groups). The
Commercial Group, the Companys largest business unit, owns, develops, acquires and operates
regional malls, specialty/urban retail centers, office and life science buildings, hotels and
mixed-use projects. The Residential Group owns, develops, acquires and operates residential rental
properties, including upscale and middle-market apartments and adaptive re-use developments.
Additionally, the Residential Group develops for-sale condominium projects and also owns interests
in entities that develop and manage military family housing. The Land Development Group acquires
and sells both land and developed lots to residential, commercial and industrial customers. It
also owns and develops land into master-planned communities and mixed-use projects. The remaining
two reportable segments are the Nets, a franchise of the National Basketball Association in which
the Company accounts for its investment on the equity method of accounting, and Corporate
Activities. The following tables summarize financial data for the Companys five reportable
segments. All amounts are presented in thousands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Identifiable Assets |
|
|
|
Expenditures for Additions to Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Group |
|
$ |
7,752,689 |
|
|
$ |
7,345,283 |
|
|
|
$ |
175,287 |
|
|
$ |
183,707 |
|
|
|
$ |
578,610 |
|
|
$ |
676,700 |
|
Residential Group |
|
|
2,676,878 |
|
|
|
2,322,971 |
|
|
|
|
98,941 |
|
|
|
68,468 |
|
|
|
|
244,041 |
|
|
|
289,325 |
|
Land Development Group |
|
|
419,578 |
|
|
|
402,452 |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10,550 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
25,305 |
|
The Nets |
|
|
5,152 |
|
|
|
14,454 |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Corporate Activities |
|
|
94,524 |
|
|
|
166,437 |
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,948,821 |
|
|
$ |
10,251,597 |
|
|
|
$ |
274,334 |
|
|
$ |
262,895 |
|
|
|
$ |
822,844 |
|
|
$ |
992,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Revenues from Real Estate Operations |
|
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Group |
|
$ |
241,895 |
|
|
$ |
216,760 |
|
|
|
$ |
697,952 |
|
|
$ |
623,356 |
|
|
|
$ |
119,659 |
|
|
$ |
105,365 |
|
|
|
$ |
364,280 |
|
|
$ |
315,089 |
|
Commercial Group Land Sales |
|
|
6,747 |
|
|
|
22,279 |
|
|
|
|
20,997 |
|
|
|
29,436 |
|
|
|
|
4,224 |
|
|
|
16,226 |
|
|
|
|
12,596 |
|
|
|
21,397 |
|
Residential Group |
|
|
75,625 |
|
|
|
81,170 |
|
|
|
|
229,622 |
|
|
|
198,029 |
|
|
|
|
44,575 |
|
|
|
55,120 |
|
|
|
|
143,028 |
|
|
|
136,824 |
|
Land Development Group |
|
|
10,263 |
|
|
|
13,417 |
|
|
|
|
23,844 |
|
|
|
38,756 |
|
|
|
|
25,323 |
|
|
|
12,964 |
|
|
|
|
44,847 |
|
|
|
39,042 |
|
The Nets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Corporate Activities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
7,076 |
|
|
|
11,599 |
|
|
|
|
29,872 |
|
|
|
34,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
334,530 |
|
|
$ |
333,626 |
|
|
|
$ |
972,415 |
|
|
$ |
889,577 |
|
|
|
$ |
200,857 |
|
|
$ |
201,274 |
|
|
|
$ |
594,623 |
|
|
$ |
547,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization Expense |
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Group |
|
$ |
48,281 |
|
|
$ |
42,793 |
|
|
|
$ |
152,118 |
|
|
$ |
128,399 |
|
|
|
$ |
66,540 |
|
|
$ |
59,352 |
|
|
|
$ |
182,982 |
|
|
$ |
150,454 |
|
Residential Group |
|
|
16,164 |
|
|
|
10,819 |
|
|
|
|
47,233 |
|
|
|
39,197 |
|
|
|
|
14,196 |
|
|
|
10,886 |
|
|
|
|
33,578 |
|
|
|
36,117 |
|
Land Development Group |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
2,745 |
|
The Nets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Corporate Activities |
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
|
|
|
17,842 |
|
|
|
17,632 |
|
|
|
|
47,733 |
|
|
|
48,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,443 |
|
|
$ |
54,414 |
|
|
|
$ |
202,290 |
|
|
$ |
169,942 |
|
|
|
$ |
98,544 |
|
|
$ |
88,241 |
|
|
|
$ |
264,265 |
|
|
$ |
237,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and Other Income |
|
|
|
Net Earnings (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Group |
|
$ |
1,256 |
|
|
$ |
4,888 |
|
|
|
$ |
7,605 |
|
|
$ |
15,121 |
|
|
|
$ |
5,535 |
|
|
$ |
5,775 |
|
|
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
20,328 |
|
Residential Group |
|
|
3,779 |
|
|
|
9,941 |
|
|
|
|
9,956 |
|
|
|
25,570 |
|
|
|
|
1,574 |
|
|
|
9,503 |
|
|
|
|
11,372 |
|
|
|
74,901 |
|
Land Development Group |
|
|
1,676 |
|
|
|
2,109 |
|
|
|
|
9,714 |
|
|
|
10,087 |
|
|
|
|
(5,769 |
) |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
|
(2,858 |
) |
|
|
4,910 |
|
The Nets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
(6,482 |
) |
|
|
(5,904 |
) |
|
|
|
(20,914 |
) |
|
|
(9,373 |
) |
Corporate Activities |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
|
(13,392 |
) |
|
|
(21,198 |
) |
|
|
|
(55,081 |
) |
|
|
(50,946 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,789 |
|
|
$ |
17,544 |
|
|
|
$ |
28,077 |
|
|
$ |
52,366 |
|
|
|
$ |
(18,534 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,774 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(67,115 |
) |
|
$ |
39,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
L. Segment Information (continued)
The Company uses a measure defined as Earnings Before Depreciation, Amortization and Deferred Taxes
(EBDT) to report its operating results. EBDT is a non-GAAP measure and is defined as net earnings
excluding the following items: i) gain (loss) on disposition of rental properties, divisions and
other investments (net of tax); ii) the adjustment to recognize rental revenues and rental expense
using the straight-line method; iii) non-cash charges for real estate depreciation, amortization,
amortization of mortgage procurement costs and deferred income taxes; iv) preferred payment which
is classified as minority interest expense in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations;
v) provision for decline in real estate (net of tax); vi) extraordinary items (net of tax); and
vii) cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (net of tax).
The Company believes that, although its business has many facets such as development, acquisitions,
disposals and property management, the core of its business is the recurring operations of its
portfolio of real estate assets. The Companys Chief Executive Officer, the chief operating
decision maker, uses EBDT, as presented, to assess performance of its portfolio of real estate
assets by operating segment because it provides information on the financial performance of the
core real estate portfolio operations. EBDT measures the profitability of a real estate segments
operations of collecting rent, paying operating expenses and servicing its debt. The Companys
segments adhere to the accounting policies described in Note A. Unlike the real estate segments,
EBDT for the Nets segment equals net earnings (loss). All amounts in the following tables are
presented in thousands.
(continued on next page)
32
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
L. Segment Information (continued)
Reconciliation of EBDT to Net Earnings (Loss) by Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, 2008 |
|
Group |
|
|
Group |
|
|
Group |
|
|
The Nets |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
EBDT |
|
$ |
55,892 |
|
|
$ |
26,172 |
|
|
$ |
(13,222 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,482 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,222 |
) |
|
$ |
44,138 |
|
Depreciation and amortization Real Estate Groups |
|
|
(49,844 |
) |
|
|
(19,668 |
) |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(69,679 |
) |
Amortization
of mortgage procurement costs Real Estate Groups |
|
|
(2,257 |
) |
|
|
(880 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3,218 |
) |
Deferred
taxes Real Estate Groups |
|
|
(2,023 |
) |
|
|
(4,052 |
) |
|
|
7,702 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,830 |
|
|
|
6,457 |
|
Straight-line rent adjustment |
|
|
4,522 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,523 |
|
Preference payment (1) |
|
|
(877 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(877 |
) |
Gain on disposition of equity method rental properties, net of tax |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
5,535 |
|
|
$ |
1,574 |
|
|
$ |
(5,769 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,482 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,392 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBDT |
|
$ |
50,107 |
|
|
$ |
36,094 |
|
|
$ |
6,254 |
|
|
$ |
(5,904 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,756 |
) |
|
$ |
68,795 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization Real Estate Groups |
|
|
(43,465 |
) |
|
|
(15,197 |
) |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(58,552 |
) |
Amortization of mortgage procurement costs Real Estate Groups |
|
|
(2,934 |
) |
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3,515 |
) |
Deferred taxes Real Estate Groups |
|
|
(3,670 |
) |
|
|
(5,301 |
) |
|
|
(5,148 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3,548 |
) |
|
|
(17,667 |
) |
Straight-line rent adjustment |
|
|
6,674 |
|
|
|
(5,005 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,668 |
|
Preference payment (1) |
|
|
(937 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(937 |
) |
Gain on disposition of other investments, net of tax |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax: (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization Real Estate
Groups |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Amortization
of mortgage procurement costs
Real Estate Groups |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Deferred taxes Real Estate Groups
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
Loss on disposition of rental properties
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
5,775 |
|
|
$ |
9,503 |
|
|
$ |
1,050 |
|
|
$ |
(5,904 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,198 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,774 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBDT |
|
$ |
163,018 |
|
|
$ |
73,743 |
|
|
$ |
(11,524 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,914 |
) |
|
$ |
(55,888 |
) |
|
$ |
148,435 |
|
Depreciation and amortization Real Estate Groups |
|
|
(155,859 |
) |
|
|
(57,767 |
) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(213,942 |
) |
Amortization of mortgage procurement costs Real Estate Groups |
|
|
(7,303 |
) |
|
|
(2,360 |
) |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(9,998 |
) |
Deferred taxes Real Estate Groups |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(3,463 |
) |
|
|
9,543 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
6,758 |
|
Straight-line rent adjustment |
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,422 |
|
Preference payment (1) |
|
|
(2,744 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2,744 |
) |
Preferred return on disposition, net of tax |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
Gain on disposition of other investments, net of tax |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Provision for decline in real estate, net of tax |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
Gain on disposition of equity method rental properties, net of tax |
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
663 |
|
Provision for decline in real estate of equity method rental properties, net of tax |
|
|
(775 |
) |
|
|
(2,699 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3,474 |
) |
Discontinued operations, net of tax: (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization Real Estate
Groups |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
Amortization
of mortgage procurement costs
Real Estate Groups |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Deferred taxes Real Estate Groups
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,163 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,163 |
) |
Gain on disposition of rental properties |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,294 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,294 |
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
11,372 |
|
|
$ |
(2,858 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,914 |
) |
|
$ |
(55,081 |
) |
|
$ |
(67,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBDT |
|
$ |
154,970 |
|
|
$ |
74,661 |
|
|
$ |
7,035 |
|
|
$ |
(9,373 |
) |
|
$ |
(52,763 |
) |
|
$ |
174,530 |
|
Depreciation and amortization Real Estate Groups |
|
|
(131,811 |
) |
|
|
(51,622 |
) |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(183,617 |
) |
Amortization of mortgage procurement costs Real Estate Groups |
|
|
(7,049 |
) |
|
|
(2,402 |
) |
|
|
(452 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(9,903 |
) |
Deferred taxes Real Estate Groups |
|
|
(7,284 |
) |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(1,487 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
(7,227 |
) |
Straight-line rent adjustment |
|
|
14,273 |
|
|
|
(4,983 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9,288 |
|
Preference payment (1) |
|
|
(2,771 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2,771 |
) |
Preferred return on disposition, net of tax |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3,089 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3,089 |
) |
Gain on disposition of other investments, net of tax |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
Gain on disposition of equity method rental properties, net of tax |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax: (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization Real Estate
Groups |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,941 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,941 |
) |
Amortization of mortgage procurement costs
Real Estate Groups |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
Deferred taxes Real Estate Groups |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,636 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,636 |
) |
Gain on disposition of rental properties |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
64,604 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
64,604 |
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
20,328 |
|
|
$ |
74,901 |
|
|
$ |
4,910 |
|
|
$ |
(9,373 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,946 |
) |
|
$ |
39,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The preference payment represents the respective periods share of the annual preferred
payment in connection with the issuance of Class A Common Units in exchange for
Bruce C. Ratners minority interests in the Forest City Ratner Company portfolio. |
|
|
(2) |
|
See Note I Discontinued Operations for more information. |
33
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
M. Class A Common Units
Master Contribution Agreement
The Company and certain of its affiliates (the FCE Entities) entered into a Master Contribution
and Sale Agreement (the Master Contribution Agreement) with Bruce C. Ratner (Mr. Ratner), an
Executive Vice President and Director of the Company, and certain entities and individuals
affiliated with Mr. Ratner (the BCR Entities) on August 14, 2006. Pursuant to the Master
Contribution Agreement, on November 8, 2006, the Company issued Class A Common Units (Units) in a
newly-formed jointly-owned limited liability company to the BCR Entities in exchange for their
interests in a total of 30 retail, office and residential operating properties, and certain service
companies, all in the greater New York City metropolitan area. The Company accounted for the
issuance of the Units in exchange for the minority interests under the purchase method of
accounting. After a one-year lock-up period, which expired on November 7, 2007, the Units may be
exchanged for one of the following forms of consideration at the Companys sole discretion: (i) an
equal number of shares of the Companys Class A common stock or, (ii) cash based on a formula using
the average closing price of the Class A common stock at the time of conversion or, (iii) a
combination of cash and shares of the Companys Class A common stock. The Company has no rights to
redeem or repurchase the Units. Also pursuant to the Master Contribution Agreement, the Company
and Mr. Ratner agreed that certain projects under development would remain owned jointly until such
time as each individual project was completed and achieved stabilization. As each of the
development projects achieves stabilization, it is valued and the Company, in its discretion,
chooses among various options for the ownership of the project following stabilization consistent
with the Master Contribution Agreement. The development projects were not covered by the Tax
Protection Agreement that the parties entered into in connection with the Master Contribution
Agreement. The Tax Protection Agreement indemnified the BCR Entities included in the initial
closing against taxes payable by reason of any subsequent sale of certain operating properties.
New York Times and Twelve MetroTech Center
Two of the development projects, New York Times, an office building located in Manhattan, New York
and Twelve MetroTech Center, an office building located in Brooklyn, New York, recently achieved
stabilization. During the nine months ended October 31, 2008, the Company elected to cause certain
of its affiliates to acquire for cash the BCR Entities interests in the two projects pursuant to
agreements dated May 6, 2008 and May 12, 2008, respectively. In accordance with the agreements,
the applicable BCR Entities assigned and transferred their interests in the two projects to
affiliates of the Company and will receive approximately $121,000,000 over a 15 year period. An
affiliate of the Company has also agreed to indemnify the applicable BCR Entity against taxes
payable by it by reason of a subsequent sale or other disposition of one of the projects. The tax
indemnity provided by the affiliate of the Company expires on December 31, 2014 and is similar to
the indemnities provided for the operating properties under the Tax Protection Agreement. As was
provided in the Master Contribution Agreement, the agreement also includes customary
representations and warranties from the applicable BCR Entities regarding the operation of the
projects. The applicable BCR Entities will indemnify the applicable FCE Entities for breaches of
the representations and warranties subject to certain time limits and limitations on liability.
Consistent with the Master Contribution Agreement, the applicable FCE Entities agreed to indemnify
the applicable BCR Entities for losses resulting from claims made after the transfer of
Mr. Ratners interests.
The consideration exchanged by the Company for the BCR Entities interest in the two development
projects has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Pursuant to the
agreements, the BCR Entities received an initial cash amount of $49,249,000. The Company
calculated the net present value of the remaining payments over the 15 year period using a
discounted interest rate. This discounted amount of $56,495,000 was recorded in accounts payable
and accrued expenses on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets and will be accreted up to the
total liability through interest expense over the next 15 years using the effective interest
method.
34
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
M. Class A Common Units (continued)
The following table summarizes the allocation of the consideration exchanged for the BCR Entities
interests in the two projects. The amounts reported below are based on the Companys preliminary
allocation and certain estimates. As a result, the allocation is preliminary and subject to
change. The Company anticipates finalizing the allocation during fiscal year 2008. Amounts
presented are in thousands.
|
|
|
|
|
Completed rental properties (1) |
|
$ |
102,378 |
|
Notes and accounts receivable, net (2) |
|
|
132 |
|
Other assets (3) |
|
|
12,513 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (4) |
|
|
(9,279 |
) |
|
|
|
Total purchase price allocated |
|
$ |
105,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Represents allocation for: |
|
(1) |
|
Land, building and tenant improvements associated with the underlying real
estate |
|
|
(2) |
|
Above market leases |
|
|
(3) |
|
In-place leases, tenant relationships and leasing commissions |
|
|
(4) |
|
Below market leases |
Exchange of Units
In July 2008, the BCR Entities exchanged 247,477 of the Units. The Company issued 128,477 shares
of its Class A common stock for 128,477 of the Units and paid cash of $3,501,000 for 119,000 Units.
The Company accounted for the exchange as a purchase of minority interest, resulting in a reduction
of minority interest of $12,624,000. The following table summarizes the components of the exchange
transaction (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of completed rental properties |
|
$ |
5,345 |
|
Reduction of cash and equivalents |
|
|
3,501 |
|
Increase in Class A common stock - par value |
|
|
42 |
|
Increase in additional paid-in capital |
|
|
3,736 |
|
|
|
|
Total reduction of minority interest |
|
$ |
12,624 |
|
|
|
|
Other Related Party Transactions
During the three months ended October 31, 2008, in accordance with the parties prior understanding,
the Company redeemed Mr. Ratners minority ownership interests in two entities in exchange for the
Companys majority ownership interests in 17 single-tenant pharmacy properties and $9,043,000 in
cash. This transaction was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations
as acquisitions of the minority interests in the subsidiaries. The fair value of the consideration
paid was allocated to the acquired ownership interests, which approximated the fair value of the 17
single-tenant pharmacy properties. This transaction resulted in a reduction of minority interest of
$14,503,000 and did not result in a gain or loss. The earnings of these properties have not been
reclassified to discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008 and
2007 as the results do not have a material impact on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
N. Subsequent Event
In November 2008, a plan approved by management to initiate involuntary employee separations in
various areas of the Companys workforce to reduce costs was communicated to all employees. The
Company provided outplacement services to all employees terminated under this plan and severance
payments based on years of service and certain other defined criteria. In accordance with SFAS No.
146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, the Company recorded a
charge of approximately
$5,300,000, for estimated termination costs (outplacement and severance) in connection with the
one-time benefit arrangement during November 2008.
35
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(MD&A) of Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and the footnotes thereto contained in the annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended January 31, 2008.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We report our results of operations by each of our three strategic business units as we believe
this provides the most meaningful understanding of our financial performance. In addition to our
three strategic business units, we have two additional segments: the Nets and Corporate Activities.
Corporate Description
We principally engage in the ownership, development, management and acquisition of commercial and
residential real estate and land throughout the United States. We operate through three strategic
business units and five reportable segments. The Commercial Group, our largest business unit, owns,
develops, acquires and operates regional malls, specialty/urban retail centers, office and life
science buildings, hotels and mixed-use projects. The Residential Group owns, develops, acquires
and operates residential rental properties, including upscale and middle-market apartments and
adaptive re-use developments. Additionally, the Residential Group develops for-sale condominium
projects and also owns interests in entities that develop and manage military family housing. New
York City operations are part of the Commercial Group or Residential Group depending on the nature
of the operations. The Land Development Group acquires and sells both land and developed lots to
residential, commercial and industrial customers. It also owns and develops land into
master-planned communities and mixed-use projects.
Corporate Activities and The Nets, a franchise of the National Basketball Association (NBA) in
which we account for our investment on the equity method of accounting, are reportable segments of
the Company.
We have approximately $10.9 billion of assets in 27 states and the District of Columbia at
October 31, 2008. Our core markets include the New York City/Philadelphia metropolitan area,
Denver, Boston, Greater Washington D.C./Baltimore metropolitan area, Chicago and the state of
California. We have offices in Albuquerque, Boston, Chicago, Denver, London (England), Los Angeles,
New York City, San Francisco, Washington, D.C., and our corporate headquarters in Cleveland, Ohio.
Overview
Significant milestones occurring during the third quarter of 2008 included:
|
|
|
The openings of two retail centers including the 800,000 square foot White
Oak Village power center, located in Richmond, Virginia, and the Shops at Wiregrass,
a 642,000 square foot open-air lifestyle center,
located in Wesley Chapel, Florida, near Tampa; |
|
|
|
|
Closing on a $250,000,000 financing for the first two buildings of the Waterfront
Station mixed-use redevelopment project in Washington, D.C. The two buildings total 628,000
square feet of office and retail space. The project is being developed by a joint venture
and accounted for under the equity method of accounting; and |
|
|
|
|
Closing $141,514,000 in other nonrecourse mortgage financing transactions. |
36
Net Earnings (Loss) Net loss for the three months ended October 31, 2008 was $18,534,000 versus
$10,774,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2007. Although we have substantial recurring
revenue sources from our properties, we also enter into significant one-time transactions, which
could create substantial variances in net earnings (loss) between periods. This variance to the
prior year is primarily attributable to the following decreases, which are net of tax and minority
interest:
|
|
|
$7,630,000 ($12,434,000, pre-tax) related to the reduction in fair value of the Denver
Urban Renewal Authority (DURA) purchase obligation and fee (see the Other Structured
Financing Arrangements section of the MD&A); |
|
|
|
|
$5,360,000 ($8,735,000, pre-tax) related to increased write-offs of abandoned
development projects in 2008; |
|
|
|
|
$4,749,000 ($7,740,000, pre-tax) related to the 2007 net gain recognized in other income
on the sale of Sterling Glen of Roslyn, a consolidated supported-living apartment community
under construction in Roslyn, New York; and |
|
|
|
|
$2,261,000 ($3,684,000, pre-tax) related to decreases in Commercial Group outlot land
sales in 2008 primarily at Northfield at Stapleton, a regional mall located in Denver,
Colorado and the 2007 land sale and related site work construction at Ridge Hill, in
Yonkers, New York which is accounted for under the percentage of completion method. |
These decreases were partially offset by the following increases, net of tax and minority interest:
|
|
|
$5,183,000 ($8,447,000, pre-tax) primarily related to the gain on early extinguishment
of a portion of our puttable equity-linked senior notes due October 15, 2011 (see the
Puttable Equity-Linked Senior Notes section of the MD&A) in 2008 and the early
extinguishment of nonrecourse mortgage debt primarily at Eleven MetroTech Center, an office
building located in Brooklyn, New York, in order to secure more favorable financing terms
and at New York Times, an office building located in Manhattan, New York, in order to
obtain permanent financing, both in 2007; |
|
|
|
|
$2,441,000 ($3,978,000, pre-tax) related to lease termination fee income in 2008 at an
office building in Cleveland, Ohio; |
|
|
|
|
$917,000 ($1,335,000, pre-tax) primarily related to military housing fee income from the
management and development of units in Hawaii, Illinois, Washington and Colorado; |
|
|
|
|
$660,000 ($1,076,000, pre-tax) in 2008 related to the change in fair market value
between the comparable periods of one of our 10-year forward swaps which was marked to
market through interest expense as a result of the derivative not qualifying for hedge
accounting (see the Interest Rate Exposure section); and |
|
|
|
|
$414,000 ($674,000, pre-tax) related to income recognition on state and federal historic
rehabilitation and new market tax credits. |
Net loss for the nine months ended October 31, 2008 was ($67,115,000) versus net earnings of
$39,820,000 for the nine months ended October 31, 2007. This variance to the prior year is
primarily attributable to the following decreases, which are net of tax and minority interest:
|
|
|
$64,605,000 ($105,287,000, pre-tax) related to the 2007 gains on disposition of Landings
of Brentwood, a consolidated apartment community in Nashville, Tennessee and the following
six consolidated supported-living apartment communities: Sterling Glen of Bayshore in
Bayshore, New York, Sterling Glen of Center City in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Sterling
Glen of Darien in Darien, Connecticut, Sterling Glen of Forest Hills in Forest Hills, New
York, Sterling Glen of Plainview in Plainview, New York and Sterling Glen of Stamford in
Stamford, Connecticut; |
|
|
|
|
$18,277,000 ($29,787,000, pre-tax) related to increased write-offs of abandoned
development projects in 2008 compared to 2007. The increase primarily relates to the
write-off at Summit at Lehigh Valley, a Commercial development project with a housing
component located in Allentown, Pennsylvania, of $13,200,000 ($21,513,000 pre-tax) in 2008; |
|
|
|
|
$11,541,000 ($16,827,000, pre-tax) related to the increased share of losses from our
equity investment in the New Jersey Nets basketball team (see The Nets section); |
|
|
|
|
$10,940,000 ($17,830,000, pre-tax) related to the 2007 net gain recognized in other
income on the sale of Sterling Glen of Roslyn; |
|
|
|
|
$7,630,000 ($12,434,000 pre-tax) related to the reduction in fair value of the DURA
purchase obligation and fee (see the Other Structured Financing Arrangements section of
the MD&A); |
37
|
|
|
$3,698,000 ($6,026,000, pre-tax) primarily related to impairment charges recorded in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144), primarily at
Mercury, a condominium project in Los Angeles, California, and El Centro Mall, a specialty
retail center in El Centro, California; |
|
|
|
|
$2,173,000 ($3,404,000, pre-tax) related to decreases in condominium sales in 2008
primarily at 1100 Wilshire, an unconsolidated condominium project in Los Angeles,
California; |
|
|
|
|
$1,860,000 ($3,031,000, pre-tax) related to participation payments in 2008 on the
refinancing of 350 Massachusetts Avenue, an unconsolidated office building and Jackson
Building, a consolidated office building, both located in Cambridge, Massachusetts; and |
|
|
|
|
$1,029,000 ($1,677,000, pre-tax) related to decreases in Commercial Group outlot land
sales in 2008 primarily at Northfield at Stapleton and Ridge Hill. |
These decreases were partially offset by the following increases, net of tax and minority interest:
|
|
|
$11,561,000 ($18,754,000, pre-tax) primarily related to military housing fee income from
the management and development of units in Hawaii, Illinois, Washington and Colorado; |
|
|
|
|
$5,294,000 ($8,627,000, pre-tax) related to the 2008 gain on disposition of Sterling
Glen of Lynbrook, a supported-living apartment community in Lynbrook, New York; |
|
|
|
|
$4,809,000 ($7,837,000, pre-tax) of expense in 2007 that did not recur in 2008 related
to managements approved plan to demolish two buildings owned by us adjacent to Ten
MetroTech Center, an office building located in Brooklyn, New York, to clear the land for a
residential project named 80 DeKalb Avenue. Due to this new development plan, the
estimated useful lives of the two adjacent buildings were adjusted to expire at the
scheduled demolition date in April 2007 resulting in accelerated depreciation expense; |
|
|
|
|
$4,601,000 ($7,498,000, pre-tax) primarily related to the gain on early extinguishment
of a portion of our puttable equity-linked senior notes due October 15, 2011 (see the
Puttable Equity-Linked Senior Notes section of the MD&A) in 2008 and the early
extinguishment of nonrecourse mortgage debt primarily at Columbia Park Center, a specialty
retail center located in North Bergen, New Jersey and Eleven MetroTech Center in order to
secure more favorable financing terms, both in 2007; |
|
|
|
|
$2,441,000 ($3,978,000, pre-tax) related to lease termination fee income in 2008 at an
office building in Cleveland, Ohio; and |
|
|
|
|
$2,056,000 ($3,350,000, pre-tax) related to the 2008 gain on the sale of an ownership
interest in a parking management company. |
38
Summary of Segment Operating Results - The following tables present a summary of revenues from real
estate operations, operating expenses, interest expense and equity in earnings (loss) of
unconsolidated entities by segment for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. See discussion of these amounts by segment in the narratives following the tables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues from Real Estate Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Group |
|
$ |
241,895 |
|
|
$ |
216,760 |
|
|
$ |
25,135 |
|
|
|
$ |
697,952 |
|
|
$ |
623,356 |
|
|
$ |
74,596 |
|
Commercial Group Land Sales |
|
|
6,747 |
|
|
|
22,279 |
|
|
|
(15,532 |
) |
|
|
|
20,997 |
|
|
|
29,436 |
|
|
|
(8,439 |
) |
Residential Group |
|
|
75,625 |
|
|
|
81,170 |
|
|
|
(5,545 |
) |
|
|
|
229,622 |
|
|
|
198,029 |
|
|
|
31,593 |
|
Land Development Group |
|
|
10,263 |
|
|
|
13,417 |
|
|
|
(3,154 |
) |
|
|
|
23,844 |
|
|
|
38,756 |
|
|
|
(14,912 |
) |
The Nets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Corporate Activities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues from Real Estate Operations |
|
$ |
334,530 |
|
|
$ |
333,626 |
|
|
$ |
904 |
|
|
|
$ |
972,415 |
|
|
$ |
889,577 |
|
|
$ |
82,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Group |
|
$ |
119,659 |
|
|
$ |
105,365 |
|
|
$ |
14,294 |
|
|
|
$ |
364,280 |
|
|
$ |
315,089 |
|
|
$ |
49,191 |
|
Cost of Commercial Group Land Sales |
|
|
4,224 |
|
|
|
16,226 |
|
|
|
(12,002 |
) |
|
|
|
12,596 |
|
|
|
21,397 |
|
|
|
(8,801 |
) |
Residential Group |
|
|
44,575 |
|
|
|
55,120 |
|
|
|
(10,545 |
) |
|
|
|
143,028 |
|
|
|
136,824 |
|
|
|
6,204 |
|
Land Development Group |
|
|
25,323 |
|
|
|
12,964 |
|
|
|
12,359 |
|
|
|
|
44,847 |
|
|
|
39,042 |
|
|
|
5,805 |
|
The Nets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Corporate Activities |
|
|
7,076 |
|
|
|
11,599 |
|
|
|
(4,523 |
) |
|
|
|
29,872 |
|
|
|
34,700 |
|
|
|
(4,828 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses |
|
$ |
200,857 |
|
|
$ |
201,274 |
|
|
$ |
(417 |
) |
|
|
$ |
594,623 |
|
|
$ |
547,052 |
|
|
$ |
47,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Group |
|
$ |
66,540 |
|
|
$ |
59,352 |
|
|
$ |
7,188 |
|
|
|
$ |
182,982 |
|
|
$ |
150,454 |
|
|
$ |
32,528 |
|
Residential Group |
|
|
14,196 |
|
|
|
10,886 |
|
|
|
3,310 |
|
|
|
|
33,578 |
|
|
|
36,117 |
|
|
|
(2,539 |
) |
Land Development Group |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
2,745 |
|
|
|
(2,773 |
) |
The Nets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Corporate Activities |
|
|
17,842 |
|
|
|
17,632 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
47,733 |
|
|
|
48,432 |
|
|
|
(699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Expense |
|
$ |
98,544 |
|
|
$ |
88,241 |
|
|
$ |
10,303 |
|
|
|
$ |
264,265 |
|
|
$ |
237,748 |
|
|
$ |
26,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Group |
|
$ |
2,027 |
|
|
$ |
1,487 |
|
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,011 |
|
|
$ |
6,700 |
|
|
$ |
(3,689 |
) |
Gain on sale of Emery-Richmond |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Gain on sale of One International Place |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
881 |
|
Residential Group |
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
|
2,937 |
|
|
|
6,164 |
|
|
|
(3,227 |
) |
Gain on sale of White Acres |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,106 |
|
|
|
(2,106 |
) |
Land Development Group |
|
|
2,209 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
2,289 |
|
|
|
|
6,429 |
|
|
|
2,691 |
|
|
|
3,738 |
|
The Nets |
|
|
(9,859 |
) |
|
|
(9,576 |
) |
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
|
(31,880 |
) |
|
|
(15,053 |
) |
|
|
(16,827 |
) |
Corporate Activities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Entities |
|
$ |
(3,198 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,526 |
) |
|
$ |
3,328 |
|
|
|
$ |
(18,422 |
) |
|
$ |
2,608 |
|
|
$ |
(21,030 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
\
Commercial Group
Revenues from real estate operations Revenues from real estate operations for the Commercial
Group, including the segments land sales, increased by $9,603,000, or 4.02%, for the three months
ended October 31, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily
the result of:
|
|
|
Increase of $13,063,000 related to new property openings, as noted in the table below; |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $3,978,000 related to lease termination fee income in 2008 at an office
building in Cleveland, Ohio; and |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $2,053,000 related to revenues earned on a construction contract with the
New York City School Construction Authority for the construction of a school at Beekman, a
development project in Manhattan, New York City. |
These increases were partially offset by the following decrease:
|
|
|
Decrease of $15,532,000 related to a decrease in commercial outlot land sales primarily
related to the 2007 land sale and related site work construction at Ridge Hill in Yonkers,
New York which is accounted for under the percentage of completion method, White Oak
Village in Richmond, Virginia and Northfield at Stapleton in Denver, Colorado. |
The balance of the remaining increase in revenues from real estate operations of approximately
$6,041,000 was generally due to fluctuations in mature properties.
Revenues from real estate operations for the Commercial Group, including the segments land sales,
increased by $66,157,000, or 10.13%, for the nine months ended October 31, 2008 compared to the
same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
Increase of $55,270,000 related to new property openings, as noted in the table below; |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $3,978,000 related to lease termination fee income in 2008 at an office
building in Cleveland, Ohio; and |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $1,718,000 related to revenues earned on a construction contract with the
New York City School Construction Authority for the construction of a school at Beekman. |
These increases were partially offset by the following decrease:
|
|
|
Decrease of $8,439,000 related to a decrease in commercial outlot land sales primarily
related to the 2007 land sale and related site work construction at Ridge Hill which is
accounted for under the percentage of completion method, Victoria Gardens, in Rancho
Cucamonga, California, and Northfield at Stapleton, which was partially offset by an
increase at Short Pump Town Center in Richmond, Virginia. |
The balance of the remaining increase in revenues from real estate operations of approximately
$13,630,000 was generally due to fluctuations in mature properties.
Operating and Interest Expenses Operating expenses increased $2,292,000, or 1.89%, for the three
months ended October 31, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was
primarily the result of:
|
|
|
Increase of $2,851,000 related to write-offs of abandoned development projects; |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $2,568,000 related to new property openings, as noted in the table below;
and |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $2,053,000 related to construction of a school at Beekman. These costs are
reimbursed by the New York City School Construction Authority, which is included in
revenues from real estate operations as discussed above. |
These increases were partially offset by the following decrease:
|
|
|
Decrease of $12,002,000 related to a decrease in costs associated with commercial outlot
land sales primarily related to the 2007 land sale and related site work construction at
Ridge Hill which is accounted for under the percentage of completion method, White Oak
Village and Northfield at Stapleton. |
The balance of the remaining increase in operating expenses of approximately $6,822,000 was
generally due to fluctuations in mature properties and general operating activities.
40
Operating expenses increased $40,390,000, or 12.00%, for the nine months ended October 31, 2008
compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
Increase of $25,911,000 related to write-offs of abandoned development projects,
primarily at Summit at Lehigh Valley; |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $13,434,000 related to new property openings, as noted in the below; |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $1,759,000 related to a participation payment on the refinancing
at Jackson Building, an office building in Cambridge
Massachusetts; and |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $1,718,000 related to construction of a school at Beekman. These costs are
reimbursed by the New York City School Construction Authority, which is included in
revenues from real estate operations as discussed above. |
These increases were partially offset by the following decrease:
|
|
|
Decrease of $8,801,000 related to a decrease in costs associated with commercial outlot
sales primarily related to the 2007 land sale and related site work construction at Ridge
Hill which is accounted for under the percentage of completion method and Victoria Gardens
which was partially offset by an increase at Short Pump Town Center; |
The
balance of the remaining increase in operating expenses of
approximately $6,369,000 was
generally due to fluctuations in mature properties and general operating activities.
Interest expense for the Commercial Group increased by $7,188,000, or 12.11%, for the three months
ended October 31, 2008 and by $32,528,000, or 21.62%, for the nine months ended October 31, 2008
compared to the same periods in the prior year. These increases are primarily attributable to the
openings of the properties listed in the table below.
The following table presents the increases in revenue and operating expenses incurred by the
Commercial Group for newly-opened/acquired properties for the three and nine months ended
October 31, 2008 compared to the same periods in the prior year (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter/Year |
|
|
|
from Real |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from Real |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opened or |
|
Square |
|
Estate |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Estate |
|
|
Operating |
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
|
Acquired |
|
Feet |
|
Operations |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Centers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
White Oak Village |
|
Richmond, Virginia |
|
Q3-2008 |
|
800,000 |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
Shops at Wiregrass(2) |
|
Tampa, Florida |
|
Q3-2008 |
|
642,000 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Orchard Town Center |
|
Westminster, Colorado |
|
Q1-2008 |
|
980,000 |
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
|
4,030 |
|
|
|
2,927 |
|
Victoria Gardens-Bass Pro |
|
Rancho Cucamonga, California |
|
Q2-2007 |
|
180,000 |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
Promenade Bolingbrook |
|
Bolingbrook, Illinois |
|
Q1-2007 |
|
750,000 |
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
|
4,771 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office Buildings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Johns Hopkins - 855 North Wolfe Street |
|
East Baltimore, Maryland |
|
Q1-2008 |
|
278,000 |
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
|
3,578 |
|
|
|
1,625 |
|
New York Times |
|
Manhattan, New York |
|
Q3-2007 |
|
737,000 |
|
|
8,649 |
|
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
|
35,221 |
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
Richmond Office Park |
|
Richmond, Virginia |
|
Q2-2007 (1) |
|
570,000 |
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
|
5,631 |
|
|
|
1,494 |
|
Illinois Science and Technology Park-Building Q |
Skokie, Illinois |
|
Q1-2007 (1) |
|
158,000 |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,063 |
|
|
$ |
2,568 |
|
|
|
$ |
55,270 |
|
|
$ |
13,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Acquired property. |
|
|
(2) |
|
This property opened on October 30, 2008. |
Total occupancy for the Commercial Group is 89.9% and 89.7% for retail and office, respectively, as
of October 31, 2008 compared to 92.4% and 89.3%, respectively, as of October 31, 2007. Retail and
office occupancy as of October 31, 2008 and 2007 is based on square feet leased at the end of the
fiscal quarter. Average occupancy for hotels for the nine months ended October 31, 2008 is 70.7%
compared to 71.2% for the nine months ended October 31, 2007. Total hotel average occupancy
year-to-date for October 31, 2007 has been restated to exclude University Park at MIT Hotel, which
was sold during the year ended January 31, 2008.
As of October 31, 2008, the average base rent per square foot expiring for retail and office leases
is $26.49 and $30.77, respectively, compared to $26.16 and $28.16, respectively, as of October
31, 2007. Square feet of expiring leases and average base rent per square foot are operating
statistics that represent 100% of the square footage and base rental income per square foot from
expiring leases. The average daily rate (ADR) for our hotel portfolio is $146.07 and $140.48 for
the nine months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. ADR is an operating statistic and is
calculated by dividing revenue by the number of rooms sold for all hotels that were open and
operating for both the nine months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007.
41
Residential Group
Revenues from Real Estate Operations Revenues from real estate operations for the Residential
Group decreased by $5,545,000, or 6.8%, during the three months ended October 31, 2008 compared to
the same period in the prior year. Included in these revenues is fee income related to the
development and construction management related to our military housing projects. Military housing
fee income and related operating expenses may vary significantly from period to period based on the
timing of development and construction activity at each applicable project. This decrease was
primarily the result of:
|
|
|
Decrease of $10,445,000 related to military housing fee income from the management and
development of units located primarily in Chicago, Illinois, see related decrease in
operating expenses; and |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $968,000 due to net lease arrangements whereby we receive fixed rental
income in exchange for the operations of certain supported-living apartment properties
which were retained by the lessee (see the Discontinued Operations section of the MD&A). |
These decreases were partially offset by the following increase:
|
|
|
Increase of $1,040,000 related to new property openings and acquired properties as noted
in the table below. |
The balance of the remaining increase of approximately $4,828,000 was generally due to fluctuations
in other mature properties.
Revenues from real estate operations for the Residential Group increased by $31,593,000, or 16.0%,
during the nine months ended October 31, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year. This
increase was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
Increase of $29,934,000 related to military housing fee income from the management and
development of units located primarily on the Hawaiian islands of Oahu and Kauai; Chicago,
Illinois; Seattle, Washington and Colorado Springs, Colorado; and |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $3,735,000 related to new property openings and acquired properties as noted
in the table below. |
These increases were partially offset by the following decrease:
|
|
|
Decrease of $11,826,000 due to net lease arrangements whereby we receive fixed rental
income in exchange for the operations of certain supported-living apartment properties
which were retained by the lessee (see the Discontinued Operations section of the MD&A). |
The balance of the remaining increase of approximately $9,750,000 was generally due to fluctuations
in other mature properties.
Operating and Interest Expenses Operating expenses for the Residential Group decreased by
$10,545,000, or 19.1%, during the three months ended October 31, 2008 compared to the same period
in the prior year. This decrease was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
Decrease of $17,391,000 related to operating expenses associated with military housing
fee income. |
This decrease was partially offset by the following increases:
|
|
|
Increase of $5,884,000 in write-offs of abandoned development projects; and |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $1,453,000 related to new property openings and acquired properties as noted
in the table below. |
The balance of the remaining decrease of approximately $491,000 was generally due to fluctuations
in mature properties and general operating activities.
Operating expenses for the Residential Group increased by $6,204,000, or 4.5%, during the nine
months ended October 31, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was
primarily the result of:
|
|
|
Increase of $7,925,000 related to operating expenses associated with military housing
fee income; |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $6,122,000 in write-offs of abandoned development projects; and |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $4,553,000 related to new property openings and acquired properties as noted
in the table below. |
42
These increases were partially offset by the following decrease:
|
|
|
Decrease of $9,930,000 due to net lease arrangements whereby we receive fixed rental
income in exchange for the operations of certain supported-living apartment properties
which were retained by the lessee (see the Discontinued Operations section of the MD&A). |
The balance of the remaining decrease of approximately $2,466,000 was generally due to fluctuations
in mature properties and general operating activities.
Interest expense for the Residential Group increased by $3,310,000, or 30.4%, during the three
months ended October 31, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year and decreased by
$2,539,000, or 7.0%, during the nine months ended October 31, 2008 compared to the same period in
the prior year.
The following table presents the increases (decreases) in revenues and operating expenses incurred
by the Residential Group for newly-opened properties which have not yet reached stabilization for
the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
Revenue from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opened/ |
|
Number |
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Operating |
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
|
Acquired |
|
of Units |
|
Operations |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
Lucky Strike |
|
Richmond,Virginia |
|
Q1-2008 |
|
131 |
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
|
$ |
338 |
|
|
$ |
331 |
|
Mercantile Place on Main |
|
Dallas, Texas |
|
Q1-2008 |
|
366 |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
2,209 |
|
Wilson Building |
|
Dallas, Texas |
|
Q4-2007 (1) |
|
143 |
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
1,147 |
|
Tobacco Row - Cameron Kinney |
|
Richmond, Virginia |
|
Q2-2007 (1) |
|
259 |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
Stapleton Town Center - Botanica Phase II |
Denver, Colorado |
|
Q2-2007 |
|
154 |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,040 |
|
|
$ |
1,453 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,735 |
|
|
$ |
4,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average occupancy for the Residential Group is 89.4% and 91.8% for the nine months ended
October 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Average residential occupancy for the nine months ended
October 31, 2008 and 2007 is calculated by dividing gross potential rent less vacancy by gross
potential rent.
Total net rental income (NRI) for our Residential Group was 84.4% and 82.2% for the three months
ended October 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and 86.1% and 87.3% for the nine months ended
October 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. NRI is an operating statistic that represents the
percentage of potential rent received after deducting vacancy and rent concessions from gross
potential rent.
Military Housing Fee Revenue Revenues for development fees related to our military housing
projects are earned based on a contractual percentage of the actual development costs incurred by the
military housing projects and are recognized on a monthly basis as the costs are incurred. We also
recognize additional development incentive fees upon successful completion of certain criteria,
such as incentives to realize development cost savings, encourage small and local business
participation, comply with specified safety standards and other project management incentives as
specified in the development agreements. Revenues of $16,792,000 and $55,500,000 were recognized
during the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008, respectively, and $25,826,000 and
$34,003,000 during the three and nine months ended October 31, 2007, respectively, related to base
development and development incentive fees, which were recorded in revenues from real estate
operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Revenues related to construction management fees are earned based on the cost of each construction
contract. We also recognized certain construction incentive fees based upon successful completion
of certain criteria as set forth in the construction contract. Revenues of $3,172,000 and
$11,022,000 were recognized during the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008, respectively,
and $3,037,000 and $7,062,000 during the three and nine months ended October 31, 2007,
respectively, related to the base construction and incentive fees, which were recorded in revenues
from real estate operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Property management and asset management fee revenues are earned based on a contractual percentage
of the annual net rental income and annual operating income, respectively, that is generated by the
military housing privatization projects as defined in the agreements. We also recognize certain
property management incentive fees based upon successful completion of certain criteria as set
forth in the property management agreement. Property management and asset management fees of
$3,741,000 and $10,683,000 were recognized during the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008,
respectively, and $5,287,000 and $6,206,000 during the three and nine months ended October 31,
2007, respectively, which were recorded in revenues from real estate operations in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
43
Land Development Group
Revenues from Real Estate Operations Land sales and the related gross margins vary from period to
period depending on the timing of sales and general market conditions relating to the disposition
of significant land holdings. We have an inventory of land that we believe is in good markets
throughout the country. Our land sales have been impacted by slowing demand from home buyers in
certain core markets for the land business, reflecting conditions throughout the housing industry.
Revenues from real estate operations for the Land Development Group decreased by $3,154,000 for the
three months ended October 31, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year. This decrease is
primarily the result of:
|
|
|
Decrease of $2,943,000 in land sales at Stapleton in Denver, Colorado; |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $2,048,000 in land sales at Tangerine Crossing in Tucson, Arizona; |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $1,172,000 in land sales at Sunrise Development in Cleveland, Ohio; and |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $1,420,000 in unit/land sales primarily at three land development projects:
Wheatfield Lake in Wheatfield, New York, Mill Creek in York County, South Carolina and
Rockport Square in Lakewood, Ohio, combined with several smaller sales decreases at other
land development projects. |
These decreases were partially offset by the following increases:
|
|
|
Increase of $3,642,000 in land sales at Summers Walk in Davidson, North Carolina; and |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $787,000 in land sales primarily at two land development projects: Legacy
Lakes in Aberdeen, North Carolina and Waterbury in North Ridgeville, Ohio, combined with
several smaller sales increases at other land development projects. |
Revenues from real estate operations for the Land Development Group decreased by $14,912,000 for
the nine months ended October 31, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year. This decrease
is primarily the result of:
|
|
|
Decrease of $7,624,000 in land sales at Stapleton; |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $3,785,000 in land sales at Tangerine Crossing; |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $2,217,000 in land sales at Mill Creek; |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $1,651,000 in land sales at Sunrise Development; |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $897,000 in unit sales at Rockport Square; |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $659,000 in land sales at Wheatfield Lake; and |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $1,812,000 in land sales primarily at two land development projects:
Suncoast Lakes in Tampa, Florida and Creekstone in Copley, Ohio, combined with several
smaller sales decreases at other land development projects. |
These decreases were partially offset by the following increases:
|
|
|
Increase of $3,068,000 in land sales at Summers Walk; and |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $665,000 in land sales primarily at Legacy Lakes, combined with several
smaller sales increases at other land development projects. |
44
Operating and Interest Expenses Operating expenses increased by $12,359,000 for the three months
ended October 31, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase is primarily
the result of:
|
|
|
Increase of $13,816,000 ($12,635,000, net of minority interest) at Stapleton related to
the reduction in fair value of the DURA purchase obligation and fee (see the Other
Structured Financing Arrangements section of the MD&A); |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $2,378,000 at Summers Walk primarily related to increased land sales; and |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $1,526,000 primarily related to increased land sales at Legacy Lakes and
Waterbury, combined with several other expense increases at various land development
projects. |
These increases were partially offset by the following decreases:
|
|
|
Decrease of $2,251,000 at Stapleton primarily related to decreased land sales; |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $1,305,000 at Tangerine Crossings primarily related to decreased land sales;
and |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $1,805,000 primarily related to decreased unit/land sales at Rockport Square
and Sunrise Development, combined with several smaller expense decreases at other land
development projects. |
Operating expenses increased by $5,805,000 for the nine months ended October 31, 2008 compared to
the same period in the prior year. This increase is primarily the result of:
|
|
|
Increase of $13,816,000 ($12,635,000, net of minority interest) at Stapleton related to
the reduction in fair value of the DURA purchase obligation and fee (see the Other
Structured Financing Arrangements section of the MD&A); |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $1,784,000 at Summers Walk primarily related to increased land sales; and |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $1,397,000 primarily related to increased land sales at Legacy Lakes
combined with several smaller expense increases at other land development projects. |
These increases were partially offset by the following decreases:
|
|
|
Decrease of $4,510,000 at Stapleton primarily related to decreased land sales; |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $2,117,000 at Tangerine Crossing primarily related to decreased land sales; |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $1,275,000 at Mill Creek primarily related to decreased land sales; |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $1,099,000 at Rockport Square primarily related to decreased unit sales; |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $762,000 at Sunrise Development primarily related to decreased land sales; |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $613,000 at Wheatfield Lake primarily related to decreased land sales; and |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $816,000 primarily related to decreased land sales at Creekstone, combined
with several smaller expense decreases at other land development projects. |
Interest expense decreased by $405,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2008 and decreased by
$2,773,000 for the nine months ended October 31, 2008 compared to the same periods in the prior
year. Interest expense varies from year to year depending on the level of interest-bearing debt
within the Land Development Group.
The Nets
Our equity investment in The Nets incurred a pre-tax loss of $9,859,000 and $31,880,000 for the
three and nine months ended October 31, 2008, respectively, representing an increase in allocated
losses of $283,000 and $16,827,000 compared to the same periods in the prior year. For the nine
months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007, we recognized approximately 62% and 26% of the net loss,
respectively, because profits and losses are allocated to each member based on an analysis of the
respective members claim on the net book equity assuming a liquidation at book value at the end of
the accounting period without regard to unrealized appreciation (if any) in the fair value of The
Nets. For the nine months ended October 31, 2008, we recognized a higher share of the loss than in
the prior year because of the distribution priorities among members and because we advanced capital
to fund anticipated future operating losses on behalf of both us and certain non-funding partners.
While these capital advances receive certain preferential capital treatment, generally accepted
accounting principles require us to report losses, including significant non-cash losses resulting
from amortization, in excess of our legal ownership of approximately 23%.
45
Included in the losses for the nine months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007 are approximately
$14,934,000 and $6,376,000, respectively, of amortization, at our share, of certain assets related
to the purchase of the team. The remainder of the loss substantially relates to the operations of
the team.
Corporate Activities
Operating and Interest Expenses - Operating expenses for Corporate Activities decreased $4,523,000
for the three months ended October 31, 2008 and $4,828,000 for the nine months ended October 31,
2008, compared to the same periods in the prior year. The decrease of $4,523,000 for the three
months ended October 31, 2008 was primarily attributed to decreases of $1,896,000 in payroll and
related benefits and $1,757,000 in charitable contributions, with the remaining decrease
attributable to general corporate expenses. The decrease of $4,828,000 for the nine months ended
October 31, 2008 was primarily attributed to decreases of $2,798,000 in payroll and related
benefits, $868,000 in charitable contributions, $809,000 in stock-based compensation, with the
remaining decrease attributable to general corporate expenses.
Interest expense for Corporate Activities consists primarily of interest expense on the senior
notes and the bank revolving credit facility, excluding the portion allocated to the Land
Development Group (see Financial Condition and Liquidity section). Interest expense increased by
$210,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year
primarily related to unfavorable mark to market adjustments on Corporate derivative instruments
offset by a decrease in bank revolving credit interest expense due to decreased borrowings and a
reduction in the variable interest rate. Interest expense decreased by $699,000 for the nine months
ended October 31, 2008 compared to the same period in prior year primarily associated with
decreased borrowings on the bank revolving credit facility.
Other Activity
The following items are discussed on a consolidated basis.
Depreciation and Amortization
We recorded depreciation and amortization of $65,443,000 for the three months ended
October 31, 2008, which is an increase of $11,029,000 compared to the same period in the prior
year. Included in this increase is $11,280,000 of depreciation and amortization primarily related
to new property openings and acquisitions. This increase was partially offset by a decrease of
$251,000 in amortization related to capitalized software costs.
We recorded depreciation and amortization of $202,290,000 for the nine months ended October 31,
2008, which is an increase of $32,348,000 compared to the same period in the prior year. Included
in this increase is $37,731,000 of depreciation and amortization primarily related to new property
openings and acquisitions and $2,454,000 of amortization related to capitalized software costs.
These increases were partially offset by accelerated depreciation of $7,837,000 recorded during the
nine months ended October 31, 2007 due to managements approval to demolish two buildings adjacent
to Ten MetroTech Center, an office building located in Brooklyn, New York, to clear the land for a
residential project named 80 DeKalb Avenue. Due to the new development plan, the estimated useful
lives of the two adjacent buildings were adjusted to expire at the scheduled demolition date in
April 2007.
Provision for Decline in Real Estate
We review our real estate portfolio, including land held for development or sale, to determine if
our carrying costs will be recovered from future undiscounted cash flows whenever events or changes
indicate that recoverability of long-lived assets may not be supported by current assumptions. In
cases where we do not expect to recover our carrying costs, an impairment loss is recorded as a
provision for decline in real estate pursuant to the guidance established in SFAS No. 144. For our
equity method real estate investments, a loss in value of an investment which is other than a
temporary decline is recognized as a provision for decline in real estate based upon the length of
time elapsed, severity of decline and all other relevant facts and circumstances.
During the nine months ended October 31, 2008, we recorded a provision for decline in real estate
of $365,000 for the other than temporary decline in our equity method investment in our Land
Development Group related to Old Stone Crossing at Caldwell Creek, located in Charlotte, North
Carolina. There was no provision for decline in real estate recorded for the three and nine months
ended October 31, 2007.
46
There was no provision for decline in real estate for equity method investments during the three
months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007. The following table summarizes our proportionate share of
the provision for decline in real estate for equity method investments during the nine months ended
October 31, 2008 and 2007, which are included in equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Mercury (Condominium) |
|
(Los Angeles, California) |
|
$ |
4,098 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
El Centro Mall (Specialty Retail Center) |
|
(El Centro, California) |
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,661 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-Off
a Abandoned Development Projects
We review,
on a quarterly basis, each project under development to determine
whether it is probable the project will be developed. If it is
determined by management that the project will not be developed,
project costs are written off to operating expenses as an abandoned
development project cost. We may abandon certain projects under
development for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to,
changes in local market conditions, increases in construction or
financing costs or due to third party challenges related to
entitlements or public financing. As a result, we may fail to recover
expenses already incurred in exploring development opportunities. We
recorded write-offs of abandoned development projects of $12,501,000
and $41,452,000 for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008,
respectively, and $3,765,000 and $9,419,000 for the three and nine
months ended October 31, 2007, respectively.
Amortization of Mortgage Procurement Costs
Mortgage procurement costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related
nonrecourse mortgage debt, which approximates the effective interest method. For the three and nine
months ended October 31, 2008, we recorded amortization of mortgage procurement costs of $2,944,000
and $9,051,000, respectively. Amortization of mortgage procurement costs decreased $624,000 for the
three months ended October 31, 2008 and increased $80,000 for the nine months ended October 31,
2008 compared to the same periods in the prior year.
Gain (Loss) on Early Extinguishment of Debt
For the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008, we recorded $4,181,000 and $(1,050,000),
respectively, as gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt. The amounts for 2008 include gains on
the early extinguishment of a portion of our puttable equity-linked senior notes due October 15,
2011 (see the Puttable Equity-Linked Senior Notes section of the MD&A) and on the early
extinguishment of the Urban Development Action Grant loan at M.K. Ferguson Plaza, an office
building located in Cleveland, Ohio. These gains were offset, in part, by the impact of early
extinguishment of nonrecourse mortgage debt at Galleria at Sunset, a regional mall located in
Henderson, Nevada, and 1251 S. Michigan and Sky 55, apartment communities located in Chicago,
Illinois, in order to secure more favorable financing terms. For the three and nine months ended
October 31, 2007, we recorded $4,719,000 and $8,903,000, respectively, as loss on early
extinguishment of debt. The amounts for 2007 represent the impact of early extinguishment of
nonrecourse mortgage debt at Sterling Glen of Great Neck, a 142-unit supported living residential
community located in Great Neck, New York, Northern Boulevard and Columbia Park Center, specialty
retail centers located in Queens, New York and North Bergen, New Jersey, respectively, and Eleven
MetroTech Center, an office building located in Brooklyn, New York, in order to secure more
favorable financing terms. The amounts for 2007 also include the impact of early extinguishment of
the construction loan at New York Times, an office building located in Manhattan, New York, in
order to obtain permanent financing, as well as the costs associated with the disposition of
Landings of Brentwood, a consolidated apartment community in Nashville, Tennessee, which was sold
during the nine months ended October 31, 2007 (see the Discontinued Operations section of the
MD&A).
Interest and Other Income
We recorded $6,789,000 and $17,544,000 of interest and other income for the three months ended
October 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $28,077,000 and $52,366,000 for the nine months ended
October 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Interest and other income decreased $10,755,000 for the
three months ended October 31, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to
the 2007 additional net gain of $7,740,000 on the disposition of Sterling Glen of Roslyn, a
supported-living apartment community located in Roslyn, New York, partially offset by an increase
of $674,000 related to the income recognition on the sale of Historic Preservation and New Market
Tax Credits. For the nine months ended October 31, 2008, interest and other income decreased
$24,289,000 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to the 2007 gain of
$17,830,000 on the disposition of Sterling Glen of Roslyn and $1,846,000 related to interest income
earned by Stapleton Land, LLC on an interest rate swap related to the $75,000,000 Tax Increment
Financing (TIF) bonds which matured in 2007, partially offset by an increase of $3,350,000
related
47
to the 2008 gain on the sale of an ownership interest in a parking management company and
an increase of $1,880,000 related to the income recognition on the sale of Historic Preservation
and New Market Tax Credits.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense (benefit) for the three months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007 was $(11,414,000)
and $1,706,000, respectively. Income tax benefit for the nine months ended October 31, 2008 and
2007 was $(27,270,000) and $(12,943,000), respectively. The difference in the income tax expense or
benefit reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations versus the income tax expense or
benefit computed at the statutory federal income tax rate is primarily attributable to state income
taxes, additional general business credits, changes to our charitable contribution and state NOL
valuation allowances based upon managements assessment of our ability to utilize such deferred tax
assets and various permanent differences between pre-tax GAAP income and taxable income.
At January 31, 2008, we had a net operating loss carryforward for tax purposes of $64,589,000
(generated primarily from the impact on our net earnings of tax depreciation expense from real
estate properties and excess deductions from stock-based compensation) that will expire in the
years ending January 31, 2024 through January 31, 2028, a charitable contribution deduction
carryforward of $40,676,000 that will expire in the years ending January 31, 2009 through
January 31, 2013 ($7,111,000 expiring in the year ended January 31, 2009), general business credit
carryovers of $13,866,000 that will expire in the years ending January 31, 2009 through January 31,
2028 ($39,000 expiring in the year ended January 31, 2009) and an alternative minimum tax (AMT)
credit carryforward of $34,894,000 that is available until used to reduce Federal tax to the AMT
amount. We have a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset associated with our
charitable contributions because management believes at this time that it is more likely than not
that we will not realize these benefits. Our policy is to consider a variety of tax-deferral
strategies, including tax deferred exchanges, when evaluating our future tax position.
We apply the with-and-without methodology for recognizing excess tax benefits from the deduction
of stock-based compensation. The net operating loss available for the tax return, as is noted in
the paragraph above, is significantly greater than the net operating loss available for the tax
provision due to excess deductions from stock-based compensation reported on the return, as well as
the impact of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN No. 48) adjustments to the net operating loss. We
have not recorded a net deferred tax asset of approximately $13,355,000, as of January 31, 2008,
from excess stock-based compensation deductions for which a benefit has not yet been recognized.
FIN No. 48
We adopted the provisions of FIN No. 48 effective February 1, 2007. Unrecognized tax benefits
represent those tax benefits related to tax positions that have been taken or are expected to be
taken in tax returns that are not recognized in the financial statements because management has
either concluded that it is not more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained if
audited by the appropriate taxing authority or the amount of the benefit will be less than the
amount taken or expected to be taken in our income tax returns.
As of October 31 and January 31, 2008, we had unrecognized tax benefits of $1,818,000 and
$2,556,000, respectively. We recognize estimated interest payable on underpayments of income taxes
and estimated penalties that may result from the settlement of some uncertain tax positions as
components of income tax expense. As of October 31 and January 31, 2008, we had approximately
$543,000 and $840,000, respectively, of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain income
tax positions. During the three months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007, $35,000 and $68,000,
respectively, of tax expense was recorded relating to interest. Income tax expense (benefit)
relating to interest and penalties of $(297,000) and $379,000 was recorded for the nine months
ended October 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. During the nine months ended October 31, 2008, we
settled an Internal Revenue Service audit of one of our partnership investments, which resulted in
a decrease in our unrecognized tax benefits and associated accrued interest and penalties.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would affect our effective tax rate, if
recognized as of October 31, 2008 and 2007, is $325,000 and $576,000, respectively. Based upon our
assessment of the outcome of examinations that are in progress, the settlement of liabilities, or
as a result of the expiration of the statutes of limitation for certain jurisdictions, it is
reasonably possible that the related unrecognized tax benefits for tax positions taken regarding
previously filed tax returns will materially change from those recorded at October 31, 2008.
Included in the $1,818,000 of unrecognized benefits noted above, is $1,728,000 which, due to the
reasons above, could significantly decrease during the next twelve months.
Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Entities
Equity in loss of unconsolidated entities was $(3,198,000) for the three months ended
October 31, 2008 and $(6,526,000) for the three months ended October 31, 2007, representing an
increase of $3,328,000. This increase was primarily the result of the following activities that
occurred within our equity method investments:
48
|
|
|
Increase of $1,867,000 related to increased sales at Central Station, located in Chicago, Illinois; and |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $447,000 related to increased land sales at various development projects in San Antonio, Texas. |
|
|
|
Increase of $200,000 related to the 2008 gain on disposition of our partnership interest
in Emery-Richmond, an office building located in Warrensville Heights, Ohio. |
These increases were partially offset by the following decrease:
|
|
|
Decrease of $283,000 related to an increase in our share of the loss in The Nets (see The Nets section). |
The balance of the remaining increase of approximately $1,097,000 was due to fluctuations in the
operations of our equity method investments.
Equity in loss of unconsolidated entities was $(18,422,000) for the nine months ended
October 31, 2008 and equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities was $2,608,000 for the nine
months ended October 31, 2007, representing a decrease of $21,030,000. This decrease was primarily
the result of the following activities that occurred within our equity method investments:
|
|
|
Decrease of $16,827,000 related to an increase in our share of the loss in The Nets.
(see The Nets section of the MD&A) |
|
|
|
Decrease of $4,098,000 related to an impairment charge recorded in accordance with SFAS
No. 144 during the second quarter of 2008 for Mercury. Certain estimates of future
undiscounted cash flows on unit sales were lowered due to the continued deterioration of
the condominium market in Los Angeles; and |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $2,106,000 related to the 2007 gain on disposition of our partnership
interest in White Acres, an apartment community located in Richmond Heights, Ohio. |
|
|
|
Decrease of $2,933,000 related to decreased land sales at Gladden Farms II, located in Marana, Arizona. |
|
|
|
Decrease of $1,272,000 related to a participation payment on the refinancing
during 2008 at 350 Massachusetts Avenue, an office building located in Cambridge,
Massachusetts; and |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $1,263,000 related to an impairment charge recorded in accordance with SFAS
No. 144 during the second quarter of 2008 due to a write-down of costs to fair value less
estimated selling costs for El Centro Mall. |
These decreases were partially offset by the following increases:
|
|
|
Increase of $6,571,000 related to increased sales at Central Station; and |
|
|
|
|
Increase of $411,000 related to increased land sales at various land development projects in San Antonio, Texas. |
|
|
|
Increase of $1,081,000 related to the 2008 gains on disposition of our partnership
interests in One International Place and Emery-Richmond, office buildings located in
Cleveland, Ohio and Warrensville Heights, Ohio, respectively. |
The
balance of the remaining decrease of approximately $594,000 was due to fluctuations in the
operations of our equity method investments.
49
Discontinued Operations
Pursuant to the definition of a component of an entity in SFAS No. 144, all earnings of
discontinued operations sold or held for sale, assuming no significant continuing involvement, have
been reclassified in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended
October 31, 2008 and 2007. We consider assets held for sale when the transaction has been approved
and there are no significant contingencies related to the sale that may prevent the transaction
from closing.
During the year ended January 31, 2008, we consummated an agreement to sell eight (seven operating
properties and one property that was under construction at the time of the agreement) and lease
four supported-living apartment properties to a third party. Pursuant to the agreement, during the
second quarter of 2007, six operating properties listed in the table below and the property under
construction, Sterling Glen of Roslyn located in Roslyn, New York, were sold. The seventh operating
property, Sterling Glen of Lynbrook, was operated by the purchaser under a short-term lease through
the date of sale, which occurred on May 20, 2008 and generated a gain on disposition of rental
property of $8,627,000 ($5,294,000, net of tax). The gain along with the operating results of the
property through the date of sale is classified as discontinued operations for the nine months
ended October 31, 2008.
Pursuant to the agreement, the four remaining properties entered into long-term operating leases
with the purchaser. The operating leases have stated terms of five or ten years with various put
and call provisions at a pre-determined purchase price that can be exercised beginning in the
second year of each lease at an amount that is in excess of the current carrying amount of the
properties. We are generally entitled to a fixed lease payment from the lessee over the term of the
lease in exchange for the operations of the properties, which will be retained by the lessee. We
have continued to consolidate the leased properties in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as the
criteria for sales accounting pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 66, Accounting for Sales of
Real Estate (SFAS No. 66), have not been achieved. Further, we have concluded that the leased
properties have met the criteria as Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) pursuant to FASB
Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN No. 46(R)), and due to our obligation to absorb a majority of expected losses, the leased
properties are consolidated by us at October 31, 2008. Additionally, these properties do not meet
the qualifications of assets held for sale under SFAS No. 144 as of October 31, 2008; therefore,
these properties have not been included in discontinued operations.
Sterling Glen of Lynbrook was classified as held for sale at January 31, 2008 through the date of
disposition. Sterling Glen of Lynbrooks assets and liabilities as of January 31, 2008 are
presented in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
29,858 |
|
Notes and accounts receivable, net |
|
|
179 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
31,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage debt, nonrecourse |
|
$ |
27,700 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
28,498 |
|
|
|
|
The following table lists the consolidated rental properties included in discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
Nine |
|
Three |
|
Nine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
Months |
|
Months |
|
Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Period |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
Property |
|
Location |
|
of Units |
|
Disposed |
|
10/31/2008 |
|
10/31/2008 |
|
10/31/2007 |
|
10/31/2007 |
|
Residential Group: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling Glen of Lynbrook |
|
Lynbrook, New York |
|
|
130 |
|
|
Q2-2008 |
|
- |
|
Yes |
|
Yes |
|
Yes |
Sterling Glen of Bayshore |
|
Bayshore, New York |
|
|
85 |
|
|
Q2-2007 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Yes |
Sterling Glen of Center City |
|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
|
|
135 |
|
|
Q2-2007 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Yes |
Sterling Glen of Darien |
|
Darien, Connecticut |
|
|
80 |
|
|
Q2-2007 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Yes |
Sterling Glen of Forest Hills |
|
Forest Hills, New York |
|
|
83 |
|
|
Q2-2007 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Yes |
Sterling Glen of Plainview |
|
Plainview, New York |
|
|
79 |
|
|
Q2-2007 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Yes |
Sterling Glen of Stamford |
|
Stamford, Connecticut |
|
|
166 |
|
|
Q2-2007 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Yes |
Landings of Brentwood |
|
Nashville, Tennessee |
|
|
724 |
|
|
Q2-2007 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Yes |
50
The operating results related to discontinued operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,002 |
|
|
|
$ |
706 |
|
|
$ |
25,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(845 |
) |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
19,885 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(838 |
) |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
21,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
(3,904 |
) |
Amortization of mortgage procurement costs |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
Gain (loss) on disposition of rental properties (1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,031 |
) |
|
|
|
8,627 |
|
|
|
105,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
|
8,740 |
|
|
|
105,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19,527 |
|
|
|
|
(1,119 |
) |
|
|
25,267 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(19,123 |
) |
|
|
|
4,496 |
|
|
|
15,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
|
3,377 |
|
|
|
40,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
640 |
|
|
|
$ |
5,363 |
|
|
$ |
64,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the three months ended October 31, 2007, the above loss on disposition of rental
properties represents an adjustment of the previously reported gain on disposition of the
six Sterling Glen properties due to a change in estimate of the cost of this transaction
upon settlement of final transaction costs. |
Gain on Disposition of Rental Properties
The following table summarizes the pre-tax gain (loss) on disposition of rental properties for the
three and nine months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seven Sterling Glen Properties (Supported-Living Apartments) (1) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(1,031 |
) |
|
|
$ |
8,627 |
|
|
$ |
80,208 |
|
Landings of Brentwood (Apartments) (2) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
25,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(1,031 |
) |
|
|
$ |
8,627 |
|
|
$ |
105,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The seven properties included in the gain on disposition are Sterling Glen of Lynbrook
for the nine months ended October 31, 2008 and Sterling Glen of Bayshore, Sterling Glen of
Center City, Sterling Glen of Darien, Sterling Glen of Forest Hills, Sterling Glen of
Plainview and Sterling Glen of Stamford for the nine months ended October 31, 2007. For the
three months ended October 31, 2007, the above loss on disposition of the six Sterling Glen
properties represents an adjustment of the previously reported gain due to a change in
estimate of the cost of this transaction upon settlement of final transaction costs. We
elected to deposit the sales proceeds with a qualified intermediary for the purposes of
identifying replacement assets under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code for Sterling
Glen of Plainview and Sterling Glen of Stamford. |
|
|
(2) |
|
We elected to deposit the sales proceeds with a qualified intermediary for purposes of
acquiring replacement assets under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. |
51
Upon disposal, investments accounted for on the equity method are not classified as discontinued
operations under the provisions of SFAS No. 144; therefore, the gains or losses on the sales of
equity method properties are reported in continuing operations when sold. The following table
summarizes our proportionate share of the gains on disposition of equity method investments during
the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007, which are included in equity in earnings
of unconsolidated entities in the Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Emery-Richmond (Office Building) |
|
(Warrensville Heights, Ohio) |
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
One International Place (Office Building) |
|
(Cleveland, Ohio) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
- |
|
White Acres (Apartments) |
|
(Richmond Heights, Ohio) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
$ |
1,081 |
|
|
$ |
2,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
We believe that our sources of liquidity and capital are adequate to meet our obligations. Recent
difficulties in the real estate and mortgage markets have negatively impacted the lending and
capital markets, particularly for real estate. The risk premium demanded by capital suppliers has
increased significantly. Lending spreads have widened from recent levels and originations of new
loans for the Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities market have virtually ceased. Underwriting
standards are being tightened with lenders requiring lower loan-to values and increased debt
service coverage levels. While the long-term impact cannot be known, borrowing costs for us will
likely rise and financing levels will be lower.
Our principal sources of funds are cash provided by operations, the bank revolving credit facility,
nonrecourse mortgage debt, dispositions of land held for sale as well as operating properties,
proceeds from the issuance of senior notes and from equity joint ventures and other financing
arrangements. Our principal use of funds are the financing of development and acquisitions of real
estate projects, capital expenditures for our existing portfolio, principal and interest payments
on nonrecourse mortgage debt, bank revolving credit facility and senior notes previously issued
(see Market Conditions May Negatively Impact Our Liquidity and Our Ability to Finance or Refinance
Projects in Item 1A. Risk Factors).
Our primary capital strategy seeks to isolate the operating and financial risk at the property
level to maximize returns and reduce risk on and of our equity capital. Our mortgage debt is
nonrecourse, including our construction loans, with each property separately financed. We do not
cross-collateralize our mortgage debt outside of a single identifiable project. We operate as a
C-corporation and retain substantially all of our internally generated cash flows. This cash flow,
together with refinancing and property sale proceeds has historically provided us with the
necessary liquidity to take advantage of investment opportunities. Recent changes in the lending
and capital markets have impaired the ability to sell property and to increase the rates of return to
make new investment opportunities appealing. As a result of these market changes, we have
dramatically cut back on new development and acquisition activities. We are taking the necessary
steps required to preserve liquidity by properly aligning our overhead costs with the reduced level
of development and acquisition activities and suspending cash dividends on Class A and Class B
common stock.
Effective December 1, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted new rules that
substantially modified the registration, communications and offering procedures under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act). These rules streamlined the shelf
registration process for well-known seasoned issuers (WKSI) by allowing them to file shelf
registration statements that automatically become effective. Based upon the criteria set forth in
these rules, we have determined that we were still a WKSI as of October 31, 2008; however, there is no
guarantee that we will maintain this status.
52
Bank Revolving Credit Facility
At October 31 and January 31, 2008, our bank revolving credit facility, as most recently amended on
September 10, 2008 for technical clarifications, provides for maximum borrowings of $750,000,000
and matures in March 2010. The facility bears interest at our option at either (1) a LIBOR-based
rate plus 1.45% (5.11% and 4.89% at October 31 and January 31, 2008, respectively), or (2) a
Prime-based rate plus .50%. We have historically elected the LIBOR-based rate option. Of the
available borrowings, up to $100,000,000 may be used for letters of credit or surety bonds. The
credit facility also contains certain financial covenants, including maintenance of certain debt
service and cash flow coverage ratios, specified levels of net worth (as defined in the credit
facility) and a dividend and stock repurchase limitation of $40,000,000 per annual period. At
October 31, 2008, we were in compliance with all of these financial covenants.
Available credit on the bank revolving credit facility at October 31 and January 31, 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
|
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum borrowings |
|
$ |
750,000 |
|
|
$ |
750,000 |
|
Less outstanding balances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
213,500 |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
93,855 |
|
|
|
71,802 |
|
Surety bonds |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
Available credit |
|
$ |
442,645 |
|
|
$ |
639,198 |
|
|
|
Senior and Subordinated Debt
Our Senior and Subordinated Debt is comprised of the following at October 31 and January 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
|
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.625% Puttable Equity-Linked Senior Notes due 2011 |
|
$ |
272,500 |
|
|
$ |
287,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Senior Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.625% Senior Notes due 2015 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
6.500% Senior Notes due 2017 |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
7.375% Senior Notes due 2034 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
Total Senior Notes |
|
|
822,500 |
|
|
|
837,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redevelopment Bonds due 2010 |
|
|
20,400 |
|
|
|
20,400 |
|
Subordinate Tax Revenue Bonds due 2013 |
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
Total Subordinated Debt |
|
|
49,400 |
|
|
|
49,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Senior and Subordinated Debt |
|
$ |
871,900 |
|
|
$ |
886,900 |
|
|
|
Puttable Equity-Linked Senior Notes
On October 10, 2006, we issued $287,500,000 of 3.625% puttable equity-linked senior notes due
October 15, 2011 in a private placement. The proceeds from this offering (net of $25,000,000 of
offering costs, underwriting fees and the cost of the puttable note hedge and warrant transactions
described below) were used to repurchase $24,962,000 of our Class A common stock, to repay the
outstanding balance of $190,000,000 under the bank revolving credit facility (see the Bank
Revolving Credit Facility section of the MD&A) and for general working capital purposes. The notes
were issued at par and accrued interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and
October 15 of each year, which began on April 15, 2007. We may not redeem these notes prior to
maturity. The notes are unsecured unsubordinated obligations and rank equally with all other
unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness.
During the three months ended October 31, 2008, we purchased, on the open market, $15,000,000, in
principal, of our puttable equity-linked senior notes for $10,571,000 in cash, resulting in a gain,
net of associated deferred financing costs, of $4,181,000, which is recorded as early
extinguishment of debt in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Holders may put their notes to us at their option on any day prior to the close of business on the
scheduled trading day immediately preceding July 15, 2011 only under the following circumstances:
(1) during the five business-day period after any five consecutive trading-day period (the
measurement period) in which the trading price per note for each day of that measurement period
was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of our Class A common stock and
the put value rate (as defined) on each such
53
day; (2) during any fiscal quarter after the fiscal quarter ending January 31, 2007, if the last
reported sale price of our Class A common stock for 20 or more trading days in a period of 30
consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter
exceeds 130% of the applicable put value price in effect on the last trading day of the immediately
preceding fiscal quarter; or (3) upon the occurrence of specified corporate events as set forth in
the applicable indenture. On and after July 15, 2011 until the close of business on the scheduled
trading day immediately preceding the maturity date, holders may put their notes to us at any time,
regardless of the foregoing circumstances. In addition, upon a designated event, as defined, the
holders may require us to purchase for cash all or a portion of their notes for 100% of the
principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, as set forth in the
applicable indenture.
If a note is put to us, a holder would receive (i) cash equal to the lesser of the principal amount
of the note or the put value and (ii) to the extent the put value exceeds the principal amount of
the note, shares of our Class A common stock, cash, or a combination of Class A common stock and
cash, at our option. The initial put value rate was 15.0631 shares of Class A common stock per
$1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to a put value price of $66.39 per share of Class A
common stock). The put value rate will be subject to adjustment in some events but will not be
adjusted for accrued interest. In addition, if a fundamental change, as defined, occurs prior to
the maturity date, we will in some cases increase the put value rate for a holder that elects to
put its notes.
We entered into a registration rights agreement that required a shelf registration statement to be
filed within 90 days and declared effective under the Securities Act within 180 days after
October 10, 2006. We filed an immediately effective shelf registration statement under the
Securities Act for the resale of the notes and the Class A common stock issuable upon our exercise
of the net share settlement option on January 4, 2007. We were required to use our best efforts to
keep the shelf registration statement effective until the earliest of: (1) the date all of the
registrable securities have been sold pursuant to the shelf registration statement; (2) the
expiration of the holding period under Rule 144(k) under the Securities Act, or any successor
provision; or (3) two years from the date the shelf registration statement is declared effective.
As the Rule 144 holding period has been satisfied, we are no longer required to keep the shelf
registration statement effective.
Concurrent with the issuance of the notes, we purchased a call option on our Class A common stock
in a private transaction. The purchased call option allows us to receive shares of our Class A
common stock and/or cash from counterparties equal to the amounts of Class A common stock and/or
cash related to the excess put value that we would pay to the holders of the notes if put to us.
These purchased call options will terminate upon the earlier of the maturity date of the notes or
the first day all of the notes are no longer outstanding due to a put or otherwise. The purchased
call options, which cost an aggregate $45,885,000 ($28,155,000 net of the related tax benefit),
were recorded net of tax as a reduction of shareholders equity through additional paid-in capital
during the year ended January 31, 2007. In a separate transaction, we sold warrants to issue shares
of our Class A common stock at an exercise price of $74.35 per share in a private transaction. If
the average price of our Class A common stock during a defined period ending on or about the
respective settlement dates exceeds the exercise price of the warrants, the warrants will be
settled in shares of our Class A common stock. Proceeds received from the issuance of the warrants
totaled approximately $28,923,000 and were recorded as an addition to shareholders equity through
additional paid-in capital during the year ended January 31, 2007.
Other Senior Notes
On May 19, 2003, we issued $300,000,000 of 7.625% senior notes due June 1, 2015 in a public
offering under a shelf registration statement. Accrued interest is payable semi-annually on
December 1 and June 1. These senior notes may be redeemed by us at any time on or after
June 1, 2008 at a redemption price of 103.813% beginning June 1, 2008 and systematically reduced to
100% in years thereafter.
On January 25, 2005, we issued $150,000,000 of 6.500% senior notes due February 1, 2017 in a public
offering under a shelf registration statement. Accrued interest is payable semi-annually on
February 1 and August 1. These senior notes may be redeemed by us at any time on or after
February 1, 2010 at a redemption price of 103.250% beginning February 1, 2010 and systematically
reduced to 100% in the years thereafter.
On February 10, 2004, we issued $100,000,000 of 7.375% senior notes due February 1, 2034 in a
public offering under a shelf registration statement. Accrued interest is payable quarterly on
February 1, May 1, August 1, and November 1. These senior notes may be redeemed by us, in whole or
in part, at any time on or after February 10, 2009 at a redemption price equal to 100% of their
principal amount plus accrued interest.
Our senior notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally with all existing and future
unsecured indebtedness; however, they are effectively subordinated to
the bank revolving credit facility and all existing and future
secured indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries to the extent of the value of the
collateral securing such other debt. The indentures
governing the senior notes contain covenants providing, among other things, limitations on
incurring additional debt and payment of dividends.
Subordinated Debt
In November 2000, we issued $20,400,000 of redevelopment bonds in a private placement. The bonds
bear a fixed interest rate of 8.25% and are due September 15, 2010. We entered into a total rate of
return swap (TRS) for the benefit of these bonds that expires on September 15, 2009. Under this
TRS, we receive a rate of 8.25% and pay the Security Industry and Financial Markets Association
54
(SIFMA) rate plus a spread (0.90% through the expiration date). Interest on the bonds is payable
semi-annually on March 15 and September 15. This debt is unsecured and subordinated to the senior
notes and the bank revolving credit facility.
In May 2003, we purchased $29,000,000 of subordinate tax revenue bonds that were contemporaneously
transferred to a custodian, which in turn issued custodial receipts that represent ownership in the
bonds to unrelated third parties. The bonds bear a fixed interest rate of 7.875%. We evaluated the
transfer pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities (SFAS No. 140), and determined that the
transfer did not qualify for sale accounting treatment principally because we guaranteed the
payment of principal and interest in the unlikely event that there is insufficient tax revenue to
support the bonds when the custodial receipts are subject to mandatory tender on December 1, 2013.
As such, we are the primary beneficiary of this VIE and the book value of the bonds was recorded as
a collateralized borrowing reported as senior and subordinated debt and as held-to-maturity
securities reported as other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Financing Arrangements
Collateralized Borrowings
On July 13, 2005, the Park Creek Metropolitan District (the District) issued $65,000,000 Senior
Subordinate Limited Property Tax Supported Revenue Refunding and Improvement Bonds, Series 2005
(the Senior Subordinate Bonds) and Stapleton Land II, LLC, a consolidated subsidiary, entered
into an agreement whereby it will receive a 1% fee on the Senior Subordinate Bonds in exchange for
providing certain credit enhancement. We recorded $164,000 and $488,000 of interest income related to this arrangement
in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008,
respectively, and $164,000 and $558,000 for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2007,
respectively. The counterparty to the credit enhancement arrangement also owns the underlying
Senior Subordinate Bonds and can exercise its rights requiring payment from Stapleton Land II, LLC
upon an event of default of the Senior Subordinate Bonds, a refunding of the Senior Subordinate
Bonds, or failure of Stapleton Land II, LLC to post required collateral. The agreement is scheduled
to expire on July 1, 2009. The maximum potential amount of payments Stapleton Land II, LLC could be
required to make under the agreement is the par value of the Senior Subordinate Bonds. We do not
have any rights or obligations to acquire the Senior Subordinate Bonds under this agreement. At
October 31, 2008, the fair value of this agreement, which is deemed to be a derivative financial
instrument, was immaterial. Subsequent changes in fair value, if any, will be marked to market
through earnings.
On August 16, 2005, the District issued $58,000,000 Junior Subordinated Limited Property Tax
Supported Revenue Bonds, Series 2005 (the Junior Subordinated Bonds). The Junior Subordinated
Bonds initially were to pay a variable rate of interest. Upon issuance, the Junior Subordinated
Bonds were purchased by a third party and the sales proceeds were deposited with a trustee pursuant
to the terms of the Series 2005 Investment Agreement. Under the terms of the Series 2005 Investment
Agreement, after March 1, 2006, the District may elect to withdraw funds from the trustee for
reimbursement for certain qualified infrastructure and interest expenditures (Qualifying
Expenditures). In the event that funds from the trustee are used for Qualifying Expenditures, a
corresponding amount of the Junior Subordinated Bonds converts to an 8.5% fixed rate and matures in
December 2037 (Converted Bonds). On August 16, 2005, Stapleton Land, LLC, a consolidated
subsidiary, entered into a Forward Delivery Placement Agreement (FDA) whereby Stapleton Land, LLC
was entitled and obligated to purchase the converted fixed rate Junior Subordinated Bonds through
June 2, 2008. The District withdrew $58,000,000 ($44,000,000 at January 31, 2008) of funds from the
trustee for reimbursement of certain Qualifying Expenditures by June 2, 2008. Therefore, a
corresponding amount of the Junior Subordinated Bonds became Converted Bonds and were acquired by
Stapleton Land, LLC under the terms of the FDA. Stapleton Land, LLC immediately transferred the
Converted Bonds to investment banks and we simultaneously entered into a TRS with a notional amount
of $58,000,000. We receive a fixed rate of 8.5% and pay SIFMA plus a spread on the TRS related to
the Converted Bonds. We determined that the sale of the Converted Bonds to the investment banks and
simultaneous execution of the TRS did not surrender control; therefore, the Converted Bonds have
been recorded as a secured borrowing in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the three months
ended October 31, 2008, one of our consolidated subsidiaries purchased $10,000,000 of the Converted
Bonds from one of the investment banks. As a result, on September 12, 2008, a $10,000,000 TRS
contract was terminated and the corresponding amount of the secured borrowing was removed from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. The remaining Converted Bonds are available for sale, with unrealized
holding gains and losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI). The
fair value of the Converted Bonds was $58,000,000 and $44,000,000, respectively, at
October 31, 2008 and January 31, 2008. In connection with the Senior
Subordinate Bonds agreement described above and the TRS contracts
related to $44,000,000 of the Converted Bonds, Stapleton Land II, LLC
has provided certain notes receivable owned by us as collateral aggregating $18,000,000 as of
October 31, 2008. We recorded net interest income of $640,000 and $2,376,000,
related to the TRS in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended
October 31, 2008, respectively, and $386,000 and $946,000 for the three and nine months ended
October 31, 2007, respectively.
Other Structured Financing Arrangements
In
May 2004, Lehman Brothers, Inc. (Lehman) purchased $200,000,000 in tax increment revenue bonds issued by the
DURA, with a fixed-rate coupon of 8.0% and maturity date of October 1, 2024, which were used to
fund the infrastructure costs associated with phase II of the Stapleton development project. The
DURA bonds were transferred to a trust that issued floating rate trust certificates. Stapleton
Land, LLC entered into an agreement with Lehman to purchase the DURA bonds from the trust
if they are not repurchased or remarketed between June 1, 2007 and June 1, 2009. Stapleton
Land, LLC is entitled to receive a fee upon removal of the DURA
55
bonds from the trust equal to the
8.0% coupon rate, less the SIFMA index, less all fees and expenses due to Lehman
(collectively, the Fee). On July 1, 2008, $100,000,000 of the DURA bonds were remarketed. On July 15, 2008, Stapleton Land,
LLC was paid $13,838,000 of the fee, which represented the fee earned on the remarketed DURA bonds.
As of October 31, 2008, $100,000,000 of the DURA bonds have not been repurchased or remarketed.
We have concluded that the trust described above is considered a qualified special purpose entity
pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 140 and thus is excluded from the scope of FIN No. 46(R). As
a result, the DURA bonds and the activity of the trust have not been recorded in the consolidated
financial statements. The Fee has been accounted for as a derivative with changes in fair value
recorded through earnings. During the three months ended
October 31, 2008, Lehman, the third party obligated to pay the Fee to us, filed for bankruptcy. As a result, we
have reassessed the collectibility of the Fee and have decreased the fair value of the Fee to $-0-,
resulting in an increase to operating expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations of
$13,816,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2008. The fair value of the Fee of $23,108,000
at January 31, 2008 is recorded in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recorded
interest income of $-0-and $4,546,000 related to the change in fair value of the Fee in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008,
respectively, and $1,204,000 and $5,463,000 for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2007,
respectively.
Stapleton Land, LLC has committed to fund $24,500,000 to the District to be used for certain
infrastructure projects and has funded $15,285,000 of this commitment as of October 31, 2008. Of
the $9,215,000 remaining commitment to fund, we expect $1,200,000 to be spent over the next 12 months with the
remainder expected to be spent in 2011 or thereafter.
Mortgage Financings
We use taxable and tax-exempt nonrecourse debt for our real estate projects. For those operating
projects financed with taxable debt, we generally seek long-term, fixed-rate financing for those
real estate project loans which mature within the next 12 months, as well as those real estate
projects which are projected to open and achieve stabilized operations during that same time frame.
For real estate projects financed with tax-exempt debt, we generally utilize variable-rate debt.
For construction loans, we generally pursue variable-rate financings with maturities ranging from
two to five years.
We are actively working to refinance and/or extend the maturities of the nonrecourse debt that is
coming due in due in the next 24 months. During the nine months ended October 31, 2008, we
completed the following financings:
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose of Financing |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Refinancings |
|
$ |
561,960 |
|
Development projects and acquisitions (1) |
|
|
1,008,625 |
|
Loan extensions/additional fundings |
|
|
336,582 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,907,167 |
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the full amount available to be drawn on the loans. |
The table listed above is the result of our success in not only refinancing scheduled maturities,
but also includes early financings of future loan maturities on existing properties and additional
proceeds related to our development and acquisition pipeline. Of the total 2008, 2009 and 2010
maturities reported as of October 31, 2008, over 70% of the $92,187,000 of loans that mature in
2008, over 55% of the $838,169,000 of loans that mature in 2009 and over 65% of the $509,775,000 of
loans that mature in 2010 have been addressed to date through closed loans, committed refinancings
and available extensions (some of which are based upon project specific performance and have been
extended beyond the current fiscal year).
56
Interest Rate Exposure
At October 31, 2008, the composition of nonrecourse mortgage debt was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Development |
|
|
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Properties |
|
|
Projects |
|
|
Projects |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
$ |
4,095,416 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,431 |
|
|
$ |
4,097,847 |
|
|
|
6.05 |
% |
Variable (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
1,315,604 |
|
|
|
511,984 |
|
|
|
38,775 |
|
|
|
1,866,363 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
% |
Tax-Exempt |
|
|
568,216 |
|
|
|
247,348 |
|
|
|
48,000 |
|
|
|
863,564 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,979,236 |
|
|
$ |
759,332 |
(2) |
|
$ |
89,206 |
|
|
$ |
6,827,774 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commitment from lenders |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,822,216 |
|
|
$ |
98,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Taxable variable-rate debt of $1,866,363 and tax-exempt variable-rate debt of $863,564
as of October 31, 2008 is protected with swaps and caps described in the tables below. |
|
(2) |
|
$135,356 of proceeds from outstanding debt described above is recorded as restricted
cash in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For bonds issued in conjunction with development,
the local housing authority issued the full amount of the bonds at the beginning of
construction and, until costs are incurred, bond funds must remain in escrow held by a
financial institution affiliated with the bond issuance. |
To mitigate short-term variable interest rate risk, we have purchased interest rate hedges for our
mortgage debt portfolio as follows:
Taxable (Priced off of LIBOR Index)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caps |
|
|
Swaps(1)(3) |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average Base |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average Base |
|
Period Covered |
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
11/01/08-02/01/09
(2) |
|
$ |
1,359,303 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
% |
|
$ |
973,750 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
% |
02/01/09-02/01/10 |
|
|
1,358,672 |
|
|
|
5.03 |
|
|
|
1,073,432 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
02/01/10-02/01/11 |
|
|
426,116 |
|
|
|
5.74 |
|
|
|
732,081 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
|
02/01/11-02/01/12 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
730,656 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
|
02/01/12-02/01/13 |
|
|
476,100 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
729,110 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
|
02/01/13-09/01/14 |
|
|
476,100 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
685,000 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
02/01/14-09/01/17 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
640,000 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes the forward swaps discussed below. |
|
(2) |
|
These LIBOR-based hedges as of November 1, 2008 protect the debt currently outstanding
as well as the anticipated increase in debt outstanding for projects under development or
anticipated to be under development during the year ending January 31, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes $640,000 for New York Times at 5.50% which expires in September 2017. |
Tax-Exempt (Priced off of SIFMA Index)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caps |
|
|
Swaps |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average Base |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average Base |
|
Period Covered |
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
11/01/08-02/01/09 |
|
$ |
232,025 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
% |
|
$ |
57,000 |
|
|
|
3.21 |
% |
02/01/09-02/01/10 |
|
|
232,025 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
|
|
|
57,000 |
|
|
|
3.21 |
|
02/01/10-02/01/11 |
|
|
142,715 |
|
|
|
5.91 |
|
|
|
57,000 |
|
|
|
3.21 |
|
02/01/11-02/01/12 |
|
|
41,115 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
57,000 |
|
|
|
3.21 |
|
02/01/12-02/01/13 |
|
|
12,715 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
57,000 |
|
|
|
3.21 |
|
The tax-exempt caps expressed above mainly represent protection that was purchased in conjunction
with lender hedging requirements that require the borrower to protect against significant
fluctuations in interest rates. Outside of such requirements, we generally do not hedge tax-exempt
debt because, since 1990, the base rate of this type of financing has averaged 3.06% and has never
exceeded 8.00%.
57
The interest rate hedges summarized in the previous tables were purchased to mitigate variable
interest rate risk. We entered into various forward swaps to protect ourselves against
fluctuations in the swap rate at terms ranging between five to ten years associated with forecasted
fixed rate borrowings. At the time we secure and lock an interest rate on an anticipated
financing, it is our intention to simultaneously terminate the forward swap associated with that
financing. The table below lists the forward swaps outstanding as of October 31, 2008 (dollars in
thousands):
Forward Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Accounted for |
|
|
|
Fully Consolidated |
|
|
under the Equity Method |
|
|
|
Properties (1) |
|
|
of Accounting (2) |
|
Expirations for Years Ending |
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
91,625 |
|
|
|
5.72 |
% |
|
$ |
120,000 |
|
|
|
5.93 |
% |
Thereafter |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As these forward swaps have been designated and qualify as cash flow hedges under
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS No. 133), our portion of unrealized gains and losses on the effective portion of
the hedges has been recorded in accumulated OCI. To the extent effective, the receipt or
payment of cash at termination on these forward swaps will be recorded in accumulated OCI
and will be amortized as either an increase or decrease to interest expense in the same
periods as the interest payments on the financing. |
|
(2) |
|
This forward swap does not qualify as a cash flow hedge under the provisions of SFAS
No. 133 because it relates to an unconsolidated property. Therefore, the change in the
fair value of this swap is marked to market through earnings on a quarterly basis. We
recorded $2,058 and $(75) as an increase (reduction) of interest expense related to this
forward swap in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months
ended October 31, 2008, respectively, and $3,134 and $1,684 for the three and nine months
ended October 31, 2007, respectively. |
Including the effect of the protection provided by the interest rate swaps, caps and long-term
contracts in place as of October 31, 2008, a 100 basis point increase in taxable interest rates
(including properties accounted for under the equity method and corporate debt and the effect of
interest rate floors) would increase the annual pre-tax interest cost for the next 12 months of our
variable-rate debt by approximately $10,676,000 at October 31, 2008. Although tax-exempt rates
generally move in an amount that is smaller than corresponding changes in taxable interest rates, a
100 basis point increase in tax-exempt rates (including properties accounted for under the equity
method and subordinated debt) would increase the annual pre-tax interest cost for the next
12 months of our tax-exempt variable-rate debt by approximately $9,578,000 at October 31, 2008.
The analysis above includes a portion of our taxable and tax-exempt variable-rate debt related to
construction loans for which the interest expense is capitalized.
From time to time, we and/or certain of our joint ventures (the Joint Ventures) enter into TRS on
various tax-exempt fixed-rate borrowings generally held by us and/or within the Joint Ventures. The
TRS convert these borrowings from a fixed rate to a variable rate and provide an efficient
financing product to lower the cost of capital. In exchange for a fixed rate, the TRS require that
we and/or the Joint Ventures pay a variable rate, generally based on the SIFMA rate. Additionally,
we and/or the Joint Ventures have guaranteed the fair value of the underlying borrowing that will
be payable at the expiration of the TRS. Any fluctuation in the value of the guarantee would be
offset by the fluctuation in the value of the underlying borrowing, resulting in no financial
impact to us or the Joint Ventures. At October 31, 2008, the aggregate notional amount of TRS in
which we and the Joint Ventures have an interest is approximately $476,195,000 (which includes the
TRS on the $20,400,000 redevelopment bonds (refer to the Senior and Subordinated Debt section of
the MD&A)). We believe the economic return and related risk associated with a TRS is generally
comparable to that of nonrecourse variable-rate mortgage debt. While the bonds that have TRS have
bond maturities that are generally greater than 20 years in duration, our TRS structures are
generally no more than five years in duration.
58
Cash Flows
Operating Activities
Net cash
provided by operating activities was $230,444,000 and $116,651,000 for the nine months
ended October 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The net increase in cash provided by operating
activities in the nine months ended October 31, 2008 compared to the nine months ended
October 31, 2007 of $113,793,000 is the result of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in rents and other revenues received |
|
$ |
120,773 |
|
Decrease in interest and other income received |
|
|
(8,271 |
) |
Increase in cash distributions from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
17,154 |
|
Decrease in proceeds from land sales -
Land Development Group |
|
|
(19,319 |
) |
Decrease in proceeds from land sales -
Commercial Group |
|
|
(14,476 |
) |
Decrease in land development expenditures |
|
|
9,277 |
|
Decrease in operating expenditures |
|
|
38,969 |
|
Increase in interest paid |
|
|
(30,314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
113,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
(continued on next page)
59
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $1,033,604,000 and $753,055,000 for the nine months ended
October 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The net cash used in investing activities consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
October 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Capital expenditures, including real estate acquisitions* |
|
$ |
(822,844 |
) |
|
$ |
(992,538 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of lease procurement costs and other assets, net |
|
|
(60,261 |
) |
|
|
(72,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash used for investing purposes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beekman, a mixed-use residential project under construction in Manhattan, New York |
|
|
(71,605 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
80 DeKalb Avenue, a residential project under construction in Brooklyn, New York |
|
|
(35,048 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Sterling Glen of Rye Brook, a supported-living community in Rye Brook, New York |
|
|
(12,500 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
One MetroTech Center, an office building in Brooklyn, New York |
|
|
(8,791 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Promenade Bolingbrook, a regional mall in Bolingbrook, Illinois |
|
|
(5,040 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Chase Financial Tower, an office building in Cleveland, Ohio |
|
|
(3,929 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
New York Times, an office building in Manhattan, New York |
|
|
11,705 |
|
|
|
(15,033 |
) |
Sky55, an apartment complex in Chicago, Illinois |
|
|
4,692 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Victoria Gardens, a retail center in Rancho Cucamonga, California |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19,509 |
|
Investment in a development opportunity in Ardsley, New York |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
Ridge Hill, a retail center under construction in Yonkers, New York |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,331 |
|
Higbee Building, an office building in Cleveland, Ohio |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,492 |
|
Tangerine Crossing, a land development project in Tuscon, Arizona |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,269 |
|
Sale proceeds released from (placed in) escrow for acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling Glen of Lynbrook, a supported-living community in Lynbrook, New York |
|
|
(6,349 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Mount Vernon Square, an apartment complex in Alexandria, Virginia |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
51,943 |
|
Battery Park City, a specialty retail center in Manhattan, New York |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
25,125 |
|
Sterling Glen of Stamford, a supported-living community in Stamford, Connecticut |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(8,460 |
) |
Other |
|
|
2,993 |
|
|
|
(9,249 |
) |
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
(123,872 |
) |
|
$ |
89,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposition of rental properties and other investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seven Sterling Glen supported-living communities |
|
$ |
11,159 |
|
|
$ |
187,468 |
|
Landings of Brentwood, an apartment complex in Nashville, Tennessee |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
67,756 |
|
Sterling Glen of Roslyn, a development project in Roslyn, New York |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
34,717 |
|
Ownership interest in a parking management company and other |
|
|
4,150 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
15,309 |
|
|
$ |
290,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Capital expenditures were financed as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New nonrecourse mortgage indebtedness |
|
$ |
519,354 |
|
|
$ |
858,732 |
|
Proceeeds
from disposition of rental properties and other investments including
release of investing escrows |
|
|
8,960 |
|
|
|
133,806 |
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
236,437 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Portion of cash on hand at the beginning of the year |
|
|
58,093 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital Expenditures |
|
$ |
822,844 |
|
|
$ |
992,538 |
|
|
|
|
60
Investing Activities (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Change in investments in and advances to affiliates -
(investment in) or return of investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legacy Arboretum and Barrington Place, unconsolidated apartment complexes in Charlotte
and Raleigh, North Carolina |
|
$ |
(7,448 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
Legacy Crossroads, an unconsolidated apartment complex under
development in Cary, North Carolina |
|
|
(4,531 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
818 Mission Street, an unconsolidated office building in San Francisco, California |
|
|
(7,782 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Dispositions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One International Place, an unconsolidated office building in Cleveland, Ohio |
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Emery Richmond, an unconsolidated office building in Warrensville Heights, Ohio |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Land Development: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mesa del Sol, an unconsolidated project in Albuquerque, New Mexico |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(8,810 |
) |
Unconsolidated project in San Antonio, Texas |
|
|
3,810 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Residential Projects: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1100 Wilshire, an unconsolidated condominium development project in Los Angeles, California |
|
|
2,395 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Ohana Military Communities, an unconsolidated military housing complex in Honolulu, Hawaii |
|
|
(2,212 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Uptown Apartments, an unconsolidated development project in Oakland, California |
|
|
(4,100 |
) |
|
|
2,249 |
|
Air Force Academy, an unconsolidated military housing complex in Colorado Springs, Colorado |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,817 |
) |
Fort Lincoln III & IV, primarily refinancing proceeds from an unconsolidated apartment complex in
Washington, D.C. |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,284 |
|
Hamptons, primarily refinancing proceeds from an unconsolidated apartment complex in
Beachwood, Ohio |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7,899 |
|
Mercury, an unconsolidated condominium development project in Los Angeles, California |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5,166 |
) |
Met Lofts, an unconsolidated apartment complex in Los Angeles, California |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,337 |
) |
New York City Projects: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East River Plaza, an unconsolidated retail development project in Manhattan, New York |
|
|
(25,786 |
) |
|
|
(6,495 |
) |
Sports arena complex and related development projects in Brooklyn, New York currently in
pre-development |
|
|
(1,073 |
) |
|
|
(21,363 |
) |
The Nets, a National Basketball Association franchise |
|
|
(21,678 |
) |
|
|
(25,083 |
) |
Commercial Projects: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 Massachusetts Avenue, primarily refinancing proceeds from an unconsolidated office building in
Cambridge, Massachusetts |
|
|
24,417 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Liberty Center, primarily refinancing proceeds from an unconsolidated office building in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania |
|
|
9,961 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Marketplace at River Park, primarily refinancing proceeds from an unconsolidated regional mall
in Fresno, California |
|
|
1,920 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Mesa del Sol Town Center, an unconsolidated development project in Albuquerque, New Mexico |
|
|
(1,840 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Unconsolidated development activity in Las Vegas, Nevada |
|
|
(6,221 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Waterfront Station, an unconsolidated development project in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
(9,226 |
) |
|
|
(27,420 |
) |
Village at Gulfstream, an unconsolidated development project in Hallendale, Florida |
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
|
(9,841 |
) |
Bulletin Building, primarily refinancing proceeds from an unconsolidated office building in
San Francisco, California |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8,648 |
|
Charlestown Town Center, primarily refinancing proceeds from an unconsolidated regional mall in
Charleston, West Virginia |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
21,676 |
|
San Francisco Centre-Emporium, primarily refinancing proceeds from an unconsolidated regional mall
in San Francisco, California |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15,804 |
|
Wiregrass Ranch, an unconsolidated retail development project in Tampa, Florida |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(11,761 |
) |
Other net (advances) returns of investment of equity method investments and other advances to affiliates |
|
|
3,204 |
|
|
|
(10,928 |
) |
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
(41,936 |
) |
|
$ |
(68,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
$ |
(1,033,604 |
) |
|
$ |
(753,055 |
) |
|
|
|
61
Financing Activities
Net cash
provided by financing activities was $713,403,000 and $719,626,000 for the nine months
ended October 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Net cash provided by financing activities consisted
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Proceeds from nonrecourse mortgage debt |
|
$ |
1,052,737 |
|
|
$ |
1,643,003 |
|
Principal payments on nonrecourse mortgage debt |
|
|
(533,383 |
) |
|
|
(784,271 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in notes payable |
|
|
24,174 |
|
|
|
(8,037 |
) |
Borrowings on bank revolving credit facility |
|
|
462,500 |
|
|
|
465,000 |
|
Payments on bank revolving credit facility |
|
|
(288,000 |
) |
|
|
(465,000 |
) |
Purchase of Puttable Equity-Linked Senior Notes |
|
|
(10,571 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash to be used for financing purposes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hamel Mill Lofts, a residential project under construction in Haverhill, Massachusetts |
|
|
20,723 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Lucky Strike, an apartment complex in Richmond, Virginia |
|
|
7,665 |
|
|
|
(5,295 |
) |
Edgeworth Building, an office building in Richmond Virginia |
|
|
2,981 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
Prosper, a land development project in Prosper, Texas |
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Metro 417, an apartment community in Los Angeles, California |
|
|
2,558 |
|
|
|
(5,030 |
) |
101 San Fernando, an apartment community in San Jose, California |
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Promenade Bolingbrook, a regional mall in Bolingbrook, Illinois |
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
- |
|
100 Landsdowne, an apartment complex in Cambridge, Massachusetts |
|
|
1,751 |
|
|
|
(1,151 |
) |
Sterling Glen of Great Neck, a supported-living community in Great Neck, New York |
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Easthaven at the Village, an apartment community in Beachwood, Ohio |
|
|
(3,731 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Sky55, an apartment complex in Chicago, Illinois |
|
|
(1,662 |
) |
|
|
4,280 |
|
Promenade in Temecula, a regional mall in Temecula, California |
|
|
(1,525 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Legacy Lakes, a land development project in Aberdeen, North Carolina |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
1251 S. Michigan, an apartment complex in Chicago, Illinois |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
1,642 |
|
Stapleton, a mixed-use development project in Denver, Colorado |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
Sterling Glen of Roslyn, a supported-living development project in Roslyn, New York, sold in July 2007 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,781 |
|
New York Times, an office building in Manhattan, New York |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(4,559 |
) |
Other |
|
|
2,677 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
39,391 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in book overdrafts, representing checks issued but not yet paid |
|
|
4,602 |
|
|
|
(5,883 |
) |
Payment of deferred financing costs |
|
|
(31,859 |
) |
|
|
(32,033 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(651 |
) |
|
|
(3,138 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
7,062 |
|
Distribution of accumulated equity to minority partners |
|
|
(3,710 |
) |
|
|
(41,202 |
) |
Dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
(24,742 |
) |
|
|
(22,558 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in minority interest |
|
|
21,782 |
|
|
|
(33,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
$ |
713,403 |
|
|
$ |
719,626 |
|
|
|
|
62
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to our business, and management and legal
counsel believe that these claims and lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
DIVIDENDS
At the discretion of our Board of Directors, we pay cash dividends on shares of Class A and Class B
common stock. On March 26, 2008, a cash dividend of $.08 per share on both Class A and Class B
common stock was declared and was paid on June 17, 2008 to shareholders of record at the close of
business on June 2, 2008. On June 19, 2008, a cash dividend of $.08 per share on both Class A and
Class B common stock was declared and was paid on September 15, 2008 to shareholders of record at
the close of business on August 29, 2008, the last business day prior to the Board of Directors
resolution date of September 1, 2008, which was a legal holiday. On September 24, 2008, a cash
dividend of $.08 per share on both Class A and Class B common stock was declared and will be paid
on December 15, 2008 to shareholders of record at the close of business on December 1, 2008. On
December 5, 2008, our Board of Directors suspended the cash dividends on shares of Class A and
Class B common stock following the payment of dividends
scheduled for December 15, 2008, until such dividends are reinstated.
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
As of October 31, 2008, we determined that we are the primary beneficiary under FIN No. 46(R) of
33 VIEs representing 22 properties (20 VIEs representing 10 properties in Residential Group,
11 VIEs representing 10 properties in Commercial Group and 2 VIEs/properties in Land Development
Group). As of October 31, 2008, we held variable interests in 42 VIEs for which we are not the
primary beneficiary. As of October 31, 2008, the maximum exposure to loss as a result of our
involvement with these unconsolidated VIEs is limited to our recorded investments in those VIEs
totaling approximately $101,000,000. Our VIEs consist of joint ventures that are engaged, directly
or indirectly, in the ownership, development and management of office buildings, regional malls,
specialty retail centers, apartment communities, military housing, supported-living communities,
land development and the Nets.
In addition to the VIEs described above, we have also determined that we are the primary
beneficiary of a VIE that holds collateralized borrowings of $29,000,000 (See Senior and
Subordinated Debt section of MD&A) as of October 31, 2008.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In November 2008, the FASB voted on the effective date and other amendments of Proposed FASB Staff
Position (FSP) No. FAS 140-e and FIN 46(R)-e, Disclosures about Transfers of Financial Assets
and Interests in Variable Interest Entities. This FSP will require additional disclosures about
transfers of financial assets and involvement with variable interest entities. This statement is
expected to be issued in December 2008 and will be effective for all reporting periods ending after
December 15, 2008 and will require additional disclosures in our Form 10-K for the year ending
January 31, 2009.
Previously, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about the use of fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 does not require new fair value measurements, but applies to accounting pronouncements
that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued two Staff Positions on SFAS
No. 157: (1) FSP No. FAS 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and
Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease
Classification or Measurement under Statement 13 (FSP FAS 157-1) and (2) FSP No. FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP 157-2). FSP FAS 157-1 excludes SFAS No. 13,
Accounting for Leases (SFAS No. 13) and other accounting pronouncements that address fair value
measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement under SFAS No. 13 from SFAS No.
157s scope. FSP FAS 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), to fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted this statement for our
financial assets and liabilities on February 1, 2008.
In October 2008, FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset
When the Market for That Asset is Not Active (FSP FAS No. 157-3), which clarifies the
application of SFAS No. 157. FSP FAS No. 157-3 provides guidance in determining the fair value of
a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. The adoption of this
standard as of October 31, 2008 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
63
In September 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 133-1 and FIN 45-4, Disclosures about Credit
Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: an Amendment of SFAS No. 133 and FIN No. 45; and Clarification
of the Effective Date of SFAS No. 161 (FSP SFAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4). FSP SFAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4
amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133 with the intent to provide users of
financial statements with an enhanced understanding of how credit derivatives and any hybrid
instruments affect an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. FSP SFAS
133-1 and FIN 45-4 also expands the disclosure requirements of FIN No. 45, Guarantors Accounting
and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to
Others by requiring the seller of a credit derivative to disclose the current status of the
payment/performance risk of the guarantee. This statement is effective for fiscal years, and
interim reporting periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after November 15, 2008. We
are currently assessing the impact FSP No. 133-1 and FIN 45-4 will have on our consolidated
financial statement disclosures.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 03-6-1, Determining
Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (FSP
EITF 03-6-1). This new standard requires that nonvested share-based payment awards that contain
non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents be treated as participating securities
in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 will be
applied retrospectively to all periods presented for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. We are currently assessing the impact that FSP EITF 03-6-1 will have on our consolidated
financial statements and results of operations for the share-based payment programs currently in
place.
In June 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue 07-5, Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded
Feature) Is Indexed to an Entitys Own Stock (EITF 07-5). Paragraph 11(a) of SFAS No. 133
specifies that a contract that would otherwise meet the definition of a derivative but is both
(a) indexed to our own stock and (b) classified in stockholders equity in the statement of
financial position would not be considered a derivative financial instrument. EITF 07-5 provides a
new two-step model to be applied in determining whether a financial instrument or an embedded
feature is indexed to an issuers own stock and thus able to qualify for the SFAS No. 133 paragraph
11(a) scope exception. EITF 07-5 will be effective for the first annual reporting period beginning
after December 15, 2008, and early adoption is prohibited. We are currently assessing the impact
EITF 07-5 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That
May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) (FSP APB 14-1), which
requires the liability and equity components of convertible debt instruments that may be settled in
cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) to be separately accounted for in a manner
that reflects the issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. This statement will change the
accounting treatment for our 3.625% Puttable Equity-Linked Senior Notes due October 2011, which
were issued in October 2006. FSP APB 14-1 requires the initial debt proceeds from the sale of a
companys convertible debt instrument to be allocated between a liability component and an equity
component. The resulting debt discount will be amortized over the debt instruments expected life
as additional non-cash interest expense. Due to the increase in interest expense, we expect to
record additional capitalized interest based on the qualifying expenditures on our development
projects. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and for
interim periods within those fiscal years, with retrospective application required. The impact of
the retrospective application of FSP APB 14-1 is expected to result in additional non-cash interest
expense of approximately $1,500,000 (net of capitalized interest on our qualifying expenditures)
for the year ended January 31, 2009.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (SFAS No. 162), which is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a
consistent framework or hierarchy for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing
financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP for nongovernmental entities. SFAS
No. 162 is effective 60 days following the SECs approval of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board amendment to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We do not expect adoption of SFAS No. 162 to have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
64
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets. This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension
assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This FSP allows us to use our historical experience in
renewing or extending the useful life of intangible assets. This FSP is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years and shall be
applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. We do not expect the
application of this FSP to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS
No. 133 with the intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of
how derivative instruments and hedging activities affect an entitys financial position, financial
performance and cash flows. These disclosure requirements include a tabular summary of the fair
values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses, disclosure of derivative features that
are credit risk related to provide more information regarding an entitys liquidity and
cross-referencing within footnotes to make it easier for financial statement users to locate
important information about derivative instruments. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 with early
application encouraged. We are currently assessing the impact SFAS No. 161 will have on our
consolidated financial statement disclosures.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS No.
141(R)). SFAS No. 141(R) provides greater consistency in the accounting and financial reporting
of business combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) requires the acquiring entity in a business combination
to recognize all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction, establishes the
acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities
assumed and requires the acquirer to disclose the nature and financial effect of the business
combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). A
non-controlling interest, sometimes called minority interest, is the portion of equity in a
subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. The objective of this statement
is to improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a
reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and
reporting standards that require: (i) the ownership interest in subsidiaries held by parties other
than the parent be clearly identified, labeled, and presented in the consolidated statement of
financial position within equity, but separate from the parents equity; (ii) the amount of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest be clearly
identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of operations; (iii) changes in
a parents ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its
subsidiary be accounted for consistently and requires that they be accounted for similarly, as
equity transactions; (iv) when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained non-controlling equity
investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair value, the gain or loss on the
deconsolidation of the subsidiary is measured using fair value of any non-controlling equity
investments rather than the carrying amount of that retained investment; and (v) entities provide
sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interest of the parent and
the interest of the non-controlling owners. This statement is effective for fiscal years, and
interim reporting periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
Earlier adoption is prohibited. We are currently assessing the impact SFAS No. 160 will have on
our consolidated financial statements.
65
CLASS A COMMON UNITS
Master Contribution Agreement
We and certain of our affiliates (the FCE Entities) entered into a Master Contribution and Sale
Agreement (the Master Contribution Agreement) with Bruce C. Ratner (Mr. Ratner), an Executive
Vice President and Director of ours, and certain entities and individuals affiliated with Mr.
Ratner (the BCR Entities) on August 14, 2006. Pursuant to the Master Contribution Agreement, on
November 8, 2006, we issued Class A Common Units (Units) in a newly-formed jointly-owned limited
liability company to the BCR Entities in exchange for their interests in a total of 30 retail,
office and residential operating properties, and certain service companies, all in the greater New
York City metropolitan area. We accounted for the issuance of the Units in exchange for the
minority interests under the purchase method of accounting. After a one-year lock-up period, which
expired on November 7, 2007, the Units may be exchanged for one of the following forms of
consideration at our sole discretion: (i) an equal number of shares of our Class A common stock or,
(ii) cash based on a formula using the average closing price of the Class A common stock at the
time of conversion or, (iii) a combination of cash and shares of our Class A common stock. We have
no rights to redeem or repurchase the Units. Also pursuant to the Master Contribution Agreement,
we and Mr. Ratner agreed that certain projects under development would remain owned jointly until
such time as each individual project was completed and achieved stabilization. As each of the
development projects achieves stabilization, it is valued and we, in our discretion, choose among
various options for the ownership of the project following stabilization consistent with the Master
Contribution Agreement. The development projects were not covered by the Tax Protection Agreement
that the parties entered into in connection with the Master Contribution Agreement. The Tax
Protection Agreement indemnified the BCR Entities included in the initial closing against taxes
payable by reason of any subsequent sale of certain operating properties.
New York Times and Twelve MetroTech Center
Two of the development projects, New York Times, an office building located in Manhattan, New York
and Twelve MetroTech Center, an office building located in Brooklyn, New York, recently achieved
stabilization. During the nine months ended October 31, 2008, we elected to cause certain of our
affiliates to acquire for cash the BCR Entities interests in the two projects pursuant to
agreements dated May 6, 2008 and May 12, 2008, respectively. In accordance with the agreements,
the applicable BCR Entities assigned and transferred their interests in the two projects to
affiliates of ours and will receive approximately $121,000,000 over a 15 year period. An affiliate
of ours has also agreed to indemnify the applicable BCR Entity against taxes payable by it by
reason of a subsequent sale or other disposition of one of the projects. The tax indemnity
provided by the affiliate of ours expires on December 31, 2014 and is similar to the indemnities
provided for the operating properties under the Tax Protection Agreement. As was provided in the
Master Contribution Agreement, the agreement also includes customary representations and warranties
from the applicable BCR Entities regarding the operation of the projects. The applicable BCR
Entities will indemnify the applicable FCE Entities for breaches of the representations and
warranties subject to certain time limits and limitations on liability. Consistent with the Master
Contribution Agreement, the applicable FCE Entities agreed to indemnify the applicable BCR Entities
for losses resulting from claims made after the transfer of Mr. Ratners interests.
The consideration exchanged by us for the BCR Entities interest in the two development projects
has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Pursuant to the agreements, the
BCR Entities received an initial cash amount of $49,249,000. We calculated the net present value
of the remaining payments over the 15 year period using a discounted interest rate. This
discounted amount of $56,495,000 was recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets and will be accreted up to the total liability through interest expense
over the next 15 years using the effective interest method.
The following table summarizes the allocation of the consideration exchanged for the BCR Entities
interests in the two projects. The amounts reported below are based on our preliminary allocation
and certain estimates. As a result, the allocation is preliminary and subject to change. We
anticipate finalizing the allocation during fiscal year 2008. Amounts presented are in thousands.
|
|
|
|
|
Completed rental properties (1) |
|
$ |
102,378 |
|
Notes and accounts receivable, net (2) |
|
|
132 |
|
Other assets (3) |
|
|
12,513 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (4) |
|
|
(9,279 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price allocated |
|
$ |
105,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Represents allocation for: |
|
|
(1) |
|
Land, building and tenant improvements associated with the underlying real estate |
|
(2) |
|
Above market leases |
|
(3) |
|
In-place leases, tenant relationships and leasing commissions |
|
(4) |
|
Below market leases |
66
Exchange of Units
In July 2008, the BCR Entities exchanged 247,477 of the Units. We issued 128,477 shares of our
Class A common stock for 128,477 of the Units and paid cash of $3,501,000 for 119,000 Units. We
accounted for the exchange as a purchase of minority interest, resulting in a reduction of minority
interest of $12,624,000. The following table summarizes the components of the exchange transaction
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of completed rental properties |
|
$ |
5,345 |
|
Reduction of cash and equivalents |
|
|
3,501 |
|
Increase in Class A common stock -
par value |
|
|
42 |
|
Increase in additional paid-in capital |
|
|
3,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reduction of minority interest |
|
$ |
12,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Related Party Transactions
During the three months ended October 31, 2008, in accordance with the parties prior understanding,
we redeemed Mr. Ratners minority ownership interests in two entities in exchange for our majority
ownership interests in 17 single-tenant pharmacy properties and $9,043,000 in cash. This
transaction was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations as
acquisitions of the minority interests in the subsidiaries. The fair value of the consideration
paid was allocated to the acquired ownership interests, which approximated the fair value of the 17
single-tenant pharmacy properties. This transaction resulted in a reduction of minority interest of
$14,503,000 and did not result in a gain or loss. The earnings of these properties have not been
reclassified to discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2008 and
2007 as the results do not have a material impact on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
In November 2008, we approved and communicated to all employees, a plan to initiate involuntary
employee separations in various areas of our workforce to reduce costs. We provided outplacement
services to all employees terminated under this plan and severance payments based on years of
service and certain other defined criteria. In accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, we recorded a charge of approximately $5,300,000, for
estimated termination costs (outplacement and severance) in connection with the one-time benefit
arrangement during November 2008.
INFORMATION RELATED TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by us,
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such
statements reflect managements current views with respect to financial results related to future
events and are based on assumptions and expectations that may not be realized and are inherently
subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which cannot be predicted with accuracy and some of
which might not even be anticipated. Future events and actual results, financial or otherwise, may
differ from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Risk factors discussed in Item
1A of our Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2008, as updated in Part II, Item 1A of this
Form 10-Q, and other factors that might cause differences, some of which could be material,
include, but are not limited to, general real estate development and investment risks including
lack of satisfactory financing, construction and lease-up delays and cost overruns, the impact of
current market volatility on our development pipeline, liquidity and ability to finance projects,
dependence on rental income from real property, reliance on major tenants, the effect of economic
and market conditions on a nationwide basis as well as in our primary markets, vacancies in our
properties, downturns in the housing market, competition, illiquidity of real estate investments,
bankruptcy or defaults of tenants, department store consolidations, international activities, the
impact of terrorist acts, risks associated with an investment in and operation of a professional
sports team, conflicts of interests, our substantial debt leverage and the ability to obtain and
service debt, the impact of restrictions imposed by our credit facility, the level and volatility
of interest rates, the continued availability of tax-exempt government financing, effects of
uninsured or underinsured losses, environmental liabilities, risks associated with developing and
managing properties in partnership with others, the ability to maintain effective internal
controls, compliance with governmental regulations, changes in market conditions, litigation risks,
as well as other risks listed from time to time in our reports filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. We have no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking
statements, other than imposed by law, as a result of future events or new information. Readers are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.
67
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Recent difficulties in the real estate and mortgage markets have negatively impacted the lending
and capital markets. Our market risk includes the inability to obtain construction loans,
refinance existing construction loans into long-term fixed-rate nonrecourse financing, refinance
existing nonrecourse financing at maturity, obtain renewals or replacement of credit enhancement
devices, such as letters of credit, or otherwise obtain funds by selling real estate assets or by
raising equity (see Market Conditions May Negatively Impact Our Liquidity and Our Ability to
Finance or Refinance Projects section of Item 1A. Risk Factors). We also have interest-rate
exposure on our current variable-rate debt portfolio. During the construction period, we have
historically used variable-rate debt to finance developmental projects. At October 31, 2008, our
outstanding variable-rate debt portfolio consisted of $2,079,862,000 of taxable debt (which
includes $213,500,000 related to the bank revolving facility) and $883,964,000 of tax-exempt
variable-rate debt (which includes $20,400,000 of subordinated debt). Upon opening and achieving
stabilized operations, we have historically procured long-term fixed-rate financing for our rental
properties. Additionally, we are exposed to interest rate risk upon maturity of our long-term
fixed-rate financings.
To mitigate short-term variable interest rate risk, we have purchased interest rate hedges for our
variable-rate debt as follows:
Taxable (Priced off of LIBOR Index)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caps |
|
|
Swaps(1)(3) |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average Base |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average Base |
|
Period Covered |
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
11/01/08-02/01/09 (2) |
|
$ |
1,359,303 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
% |
|
$ |
973,750 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
% |
02/01/09-02/01/10 |
|
|
1,358,672 |
|
|
|
5.03 |
|
|
|
1,073,432 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
02/01/10-02/01/11 |
|
|
426,116 |
|
|
|
5.74 |
|
|
|
732,081 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
|
02/01/11-02/01/12 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
730,656 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
|
02/01/12-02/01/13 |
|
|
476,100 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
729,110 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
|
02/01/13-09/01/14 |
|
|
476,100 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
685,000 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
02/01/14-09/01/17 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
640,000 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes the forward swaps discussed below. |
|
(2) |
|
These LIBOR-based hedges as of November 1, 2008 protect the debt currently outstanding
as well as the anticipated increase in debt outstanding for projects under development or
anticipated to be under development during the year ending January 31, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes $640,000 for New York Times at 5.50%, which expires in September 2017. |
Tax-Exempt (Priced off of SIFMA Index)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caps |
|
|
Swaps |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average Base |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average Base |
|
Period Covered |
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
11/01/08-02/01/09 |
|
$ |
232,025 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
% |
|
$ |
57,000 |
|
|
|
3.21 |
% |
02/01/09-02/01/10 |
|
|
232,025 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
|
|
|
57,000 |
|
|
|
3.21 |
|
02/01/10-02/01/11 |
|
|
142,715 |
|
|
|
5.91 |
|
|
|
57,000 |
|
|
|
3.21 |
|
02/01/11-02/01/12 |
|
|
41,115 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
57,000 |
|
|
|
3.21 |
|
02/01/12-02/01/13 |
|
|
12,715 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
57,000 |
|
|
|
3.21 |
|
The tax-exempt caps expressed above mainly represent protection that was purchased in conjunction
with lender hedging requirements that require the borrower to protect against significant
fluctuations in interest rates. Outside of such requirements, we generally do not hedge tax-exempt
debt because, since 1990, the base rate of this type of financing has averaged 3.06% and has never
exceeded 8.00%.
68
The interest rate hedges summarized in the previous tables were purchased to mitigate variable
interest rate risk. We entered into various forward swaps to protect ourselves against
fluctuations in the swap rate at terms ranging between five and ten years associated with
forecasted fixed rate borrowings. At the time we secure and lock an interest rate on an
anticipated financing, it is our intention to simultaneously terminate the forward swap associated
with that financing. The table below lists the forward swaps outstanding as of October 31, 2008
(dollars in thousands):
Forward Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Accounted for |
|
|
|
Fully Consolidated |
|
|
under the Equity Method |
|
|
|
Properties (1) |
|
|
of Accounting (2) |
|
Expirations for Years Ending |
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
91,625 |
|
|
|
5.72 |
% |
|
$ |
120,000 |
|
|
|
5.93 |
% |
Thereafter |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As these forward swaps have been designated and qualify as cash flow hedges under
SFAS No. 133, our portion of unrealized gains and losses on the effective portion of the
hedges has been recorded in accumulated OCI. To the extent effective, the receipt or
payment of cash at termination on these forward swaps will be recorded in accumulated OCI
and will be amortized as either an increase or decrease to interest expense in the same
periods as the interest payments on the financing. |
|
|
(2) |
|
This forward swap does not qualify as a cash flow hedge under the provisions of SFAS
No. 133 because it relates to an unconsolidated property. Therefore, the change in the
fair value of this swap is marked to market through earnings on a quarterly basis. We
recorded $2,058 and $(75) as an increase (reduction) of interest expense related to this
forward swap in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months
ended October 31, 2008, respectively, and $3,134 and $1,684 for the three and nine months
ended October 31, 2007, respectively. |
Including the effect of the protection provided by the interest rate swaps, caps and long-term
contracts in place as of October 31, 2008, a 100 basis point increase in taxable interest rates
(including properties accounted for under the equity method and corporate debt and the effect of
interest rate floors) would increase the annual pre-tax interest cost for the next 12 months of our
variable-rate debt by approximately $10,676,000 at October 31, 2008. Although tax-exempt rates
generally move in an amount that is smaller than corresponding changes in taxable interest rates, a
100 basis point increase in tax-exempt rates (including properties accounted for under the equity
method and subordinated debt) would increase the annual pre-tax interest cost for the next 12
months of our tax-exempt variable-rate debt by approximately $9,578,000 at October 31, 2008. The
analysis above includes a portion of our taxable and tax-exempt variable-rate debt related to
construction loans for which the interest expense is capitalized.
We estimate the fair value of our hedging instruments based on interest rate market and bond
pricing models. At October 31 and January 31, 2008, interest rate caps and swaptions were reported
at fair value of approximately $4,496,000 and $209,000, respectively, in other assets in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. At October 31 and January 31, 2008, interest rate swap agreements and
TRS, which had a positive fair value of approximately $2,581,000 and $3,019,000, respectively, were
included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At October 31 and January 31, 2008,
interest rate swap agreements and TRS, which had a negative fair value of approximately
$126,935,000 and $109,232,000, respectively (which includes the forward swaps), were included in
accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We estimate the fair value of our long-term debt by market rates, if available, or by discounting
future cash payments at interest rates that approximate the current market. Based on these
parameters, the table listed below contains our assessment of the fair value of our long-term debt
at October 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with 100 bp Decrease |
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
in Market Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
$ |
4,949,348 |
|
|
$ |
4,386,807 |
|
|
$ |
4,605,025 |
|
Variable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
2,079,862 |
|
|
|
1,926,075 |
|
|
|
1,990,761 |
|
Tax-Exempt |
|
|
883,964 |
|
|
|
837,944 |
|
|
|
956,297 |
|
The following tables provide information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to
changes in interest rates.
69
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk (continued)
October 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending January 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
10/31/08 |
|
|
Value 10/31/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate debt |
|
$ |
16,305 |
|
|
$ |
239,195 |
|
|
$ |
161,275 |
|
|
$ |
370,983 |
|
|
$ |
330,098 |
|
|
$ |
2,979,992 |
|
|
$ |
4,097,848 |
|
|
$ |
3,885,182 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
|
6.46 |
% |
|
|
6.83 |
% |
|
|
7.18 |
% |
|
|
7.04 |
% |
|
|
5.98 |
% |
|
|
5.80 |
% |
|
|
6.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior & subordinated debt (1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
272,500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
579,000 |
|
|
|
851,500 |
|
|
|
501,625 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
7.30 |
% |
|
|
6.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fixed-Rate Debt |
|
|
16,305 |
|
|
|
239,195 |
|
|
|
161,275 |
|
|
|
643,483 |
|
|
|
330,098 |
|
|
|
3,558,992 |
|
|
|
4,949,348 |
|
|
|
4,386,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-rate debt |
|
|
75,882 |
|
|
|
598,974 |
|
|
|
348,500 |
|
|
|
98,815 |
|
|
|
45,366 |
|
|
|
698,825 |
|
|
|
1,866,362 |
|
|
|
1,716,686 |
|
Weighted average interest rate (2) |
|
|
5.24 |
% |
|
|
5.76 |
% |
|
|
4.51 |
% |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
|
|
6.48 |
% |
|
|
6.34 |
% |
|
|
5.68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
204,760 |
|
|
|
658,134 |
|
|
|
863,564 |
|
|
|
817,544 |
|
Weighted average interest rate (2) |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
2.32 |
% |
|
|
3.46 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank revolving credit facility (1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
213,500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
213,500 |
|
|
|
209,389 |
|
Weighted average interest rate (2) |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
5.11 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
5.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt (1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
20,400 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
20,400 |
|
|
|
20,400 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
2.72 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
2.72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Variable-Rate Debt |
|
|
75,882 |
|
|
|
598,974 |
|
|
|
582,400 |
|
|
|
99,485 |
|
|
|
250,126 |
|
|
|
1,356,959 |
|
|
|
2,963,826 |
|
|
|
2,764,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Term Debt |
|
$ |
92,187 |
|
|
$ |
838,169 |
|
|
$ |
743,675 |
|
|
$ |
742,968 |
|
|
$ |
580,224 |
|
|
$ |
4,915,951 |
|
|
$ |
7,913,174 |
|
|
$ |
7,150,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
|
5.45 |
% |
|
|
6.07 |
% |
|
|
5.21 |
% |
|
|
5.46 |
% |
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
5.68 |
% |
|
|
5.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents recourse debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Weighted average interest rate is based on current market rates as of October 31, 2008. |
70
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk (continued)
January 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending January 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1/31/08 |
|
|
Value 1/31/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate debt |
|
$ |
84,220 |
|
|
$ |
327,885 |
|
|
$ |
174,421 |
|
|
$ |
375,489 |
|
|
$ |
319,644 |
|
|
$ |
2,650,047 |
|
|
$ |
3,931,706 |
|
|
$ |
4,062,237 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
|
6.53 |
% |
|
|
6.92 |
% |
|
|
6.78 |
% |
|
|
7.03 |
% |
|
|
5.98 |
% |
|
|
5.79 |
% |
|
|
6.08 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior & subordinated debt (1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
20,400 |
|
|
|
287,500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
579,000 |
|
|
|
886,900 |
|
|
|
812,040 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
|
- |
% |
|
|
- |
% |
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
- |
% |
|
|
7.30 |
% |
|
|
6.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fixed-Rate Debt |
|
|
84,220 |
|
|
|
327,885 |
|
|
|
194,821 |
|
|
|
662,989 |
|
|
|
319,644 |
|
|
|
3,229,047 |
|
|
|
4,818,606 |
|
|
|
4,874,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-rate debt |
|
|
672,218 |
|
|
|
152,872 |
|
|
|
170,753 |
|
|
|
10,056 |
|
|
|
45,366 |
|
|
|
653,826 |
|
|
|
1,705,091 |
|
|
|
1,705,091 |
|
Weighted average interest rate (2) |
|
|
6.68 |
% |
|
|
6.78 |
% |
|
|
6.28 |
% |
|
|
5.61 |
% |
|
|
6.37 |
% |
|
|
6.39 |
% |
|
|
6.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
85,413 |
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
613,055 |
|
|
|
701,813 |
|
|
|
701,813 |
|
Weighted average interest rate (2) |
|
|
3.12 |
% |
|
|
2.81 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
3.36 |
% |
|
|
3.36 |
% |
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank revolving credit facility (1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
Weighted average interest rate (2) |
|
|
- |
% |
|
|
- |
% |
|
|
4.89 |
% |
|
|
- |
% |
|
|
- |
% |
|
|
- |
% |
|
|
4.89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Variable-Rate Debt |
|
|
757,631 |
|
|
|
154,032 |
|
|
|
210,893 |
|
|
|
10,561 |
|
|
|
45,906 |
|
|
|
1,266,881 |
|
|
|
2,445,904 |
|
|
|
2,445,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Term Debt |
|
$ |
841,851 |
|
|
$ |
481,917 |
|
|
$ |
405,714 |
|
|
$ |
673,550 |
|
|
$ |
365,550 |
|
|
$ |
4,495,928 |
|
|
$ |
7,264,510 |
|
|
$ |
7,320,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
6.86 |
% |
|
|
6.45 |
% |
|
|
5.55 |
% |
|
|
6.02 |
% |
|
|
5.71 |
% |
|
|
5.89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents recourse debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Weighted average interest rate is based on current market rates as of January 31, 2008. |
71
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or furnishes under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Securities Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms
and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including
the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of the end of the period covered by this
quarterly report, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act, was
carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, which
includes the CEO and CFO. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of October 31, 2008.
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
In connection with the rules, the Company continues to review and document its disclosure controls
and procedures, including the Companys internal control over financial reporting, and may from
time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and ensuring that the Companys
systems evolve with the business.
72
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to its business, and management
and legal counsel believe that these claims and lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on
the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In light of unprecedented events during the past few months, such as the Federal Reserves actions
to restore short-term liquidity in the market, the collapse of major financial institutions and the
bailout of other institutions by the federal government, we are updating the risk factors We Are
Subject to Risks Associated with Investments in Real Estate and We Are Subject to Real Estate
Development Risks disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended January 31, 2008 and adding Market Conditions May Negatively Impact Our Liquidity
and Our Ability to Finance or Refinance Projects to provide additional information. Except to the
extent updated below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors that we disclosed in
our Annual Report.
We Are Subject to Risks Associated with Investments in Real Estate
The value of, and our income from, our properties may decline due to developments that adversely
affect real estate generally and those developments that are specific to our properties. General
factors that may adversely affect our real estate portfolios include:
|
|
|
Increases in interest rates; |
|
|
|
|
The availability of financing on acceptable terms, or at all, particularly given the
recent and significant market deterioration, which has resulted in the tightening of
lending standards and reduced access to capital; |
|
|
|
|
A decline in the economic conditions at the national, regional or local levels,
particularly a decline in one or more of our primary markets; |
|
|
|
|
Decreases in rental rates; |
|
|
|
|
An increase in competition for tenants and customers or a decrease in demand by tenants
and customers; |
|
|
|
|
The financial condition of tenants, including the extent of bankruptcies and defaults; |
|
|
|
|
An increase in supply or decrease in demand of our property types in our primary
markets; |
|
|
|
|
A continuation of terrorist activities or other acts of violence or war in the United
States of America or abroad or the occurrence of such activities or acts that impact
properties in our real estate portfolios or that may impact the general economy; |
|
|
|
|
Continuation or escalation of tensions in the Middle East; |
|
|
|
|
Declines in consumer spending during an economic recession that adversely affect our
revenue from our retail centers; |
|
|
|
|
Further declines in housing markets that adversely affect our revenue from our land
segment; and |
|
|
|
|
The adoption on the national, state or local level of more restrictive laws and
governmental regulations, including more restrictive zoning, land use or environmental
regulations and increased real estate taxes. |
If any of the foregoing risks were to occur or continue, our business could be adversely impacted.
There is a particular concern for the real estate industry with a continued deterioration of the
economic conditions that the nation has recently experienced. There have been significant declines
in housing markets across the United States, which originated in the sub-prime residential mortgage
market and later extended to the broader real estate markets. During 2008 and particularly during
the last few months, there has been a significant tightening of the credit markets and reduced
access to liquidity, all of which have had a negative impact on the national economy, affecting
consumer confidence and spending and negatively impacting the volume of real estate transactions.
If this downturn in the national economy were to continue, or worsen, the value of our properties,
as well as the income we receive from our properties could be adversely affected.
73
In addition, there are factors that may adversely affect the value of, and our income from,
specific properties, including:
|
|
|
Adverse changes in the perceptions of prospective tenants or purchasers of the
attractiveness of the property; |
|
|
|
|
Opposition from local community or political groups with respect to development,
construction or operations at a particular site; |
|
|
|
|
Our inability to provide adequate management and maintenance; |
|
|
|
|
The investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous materials or toxic substances at
a site; |
|
|
|
|
Our inability to collect rent or other receivables; |
|
|
|
|
An increase in operating costs; |
|
|
|
|
Introduction of a competitors property in or in close proximity to one of our current
markets; |
|
|
|
|
Underinsured or uninsured natural disasters, such as earthquakes, floods or hurricanes;
and |
|
|
|
|
Our inability to obtain adequate insurance. |
The occurrence of one or more of the above risks could result in significant delays or unexpected
expenses. If any of these occur, we may not achieve our projected returns on our properties and we
could lose some or all of our investments in those properties.
We Are Subject to Real Estate Development Risks
In addition to the risks described above, which could also adversely impact our development
projects, our development projects are subject to significant risks relating to our ability to
complete our projects on time and on budget. Factors that may result in a development project
exceeding budget, being delayed or being prevented from completion include:
|
|
|
An inability to secure sufficient financing on favorable terms, or at all, including an
inability to refinance construction loans; |
|
|
|
|
Construction delays or cost overruns, either of which may increase project development
costs; |
|
|
|
|
An increase in commodity costs; |
|
|
|
|
An inability to obtain zoning, occupancy and other required governmental permits and
authorizations; |
|
|
|
|
An inability to secure tenants or anchors necessary to support the project; |
|
|
|
|
Failure to achieve or sustain anticipated occupancy or sales levels; and |
|
|
|
|
Threatened or pending litigation. |
Some of these development risks have been magnified given current adverse industry and market
conditions. See also Market Conditions May Negatively Impact Our Liquidity and Our Ability to
Finance or Refinance Projects below. If any of these events occur, we may not achieve our
projected returns on properties under development and we could lose some or all of our investments
in those properties. In addition, the lead time required to develop, construct and lease-up a
development property has substantially increased, which could adversely impact our projected
returns or result in a termination of the development project.
In the past, we have elected not to proceed, or have been prevented from proceeding, with certain
development projects, and we anticipate that this may occur again from time to time in the future.
In addition, development projects may be delayed or terminated because a project partner or
prospective anchor withdraws or a third party challenges our entitlements or public financing.
The overall economic climate remains challenging, as a result of the ongoing stress on the capital
markets, including continued variable interest rate volatility. We are party to financial
arrangements and tenant leases with some of the companies most impacted by these events. Our
projects under construction are proceeding on schedule and our operating portfolio continues to
meet our expectations, but we have slowed the pace of our development and are taking prudent steps
to mitigate risk to our portfolio and maintain optimum levels of liquidity and profitability. If we
are unable to or decide not to proceed with certain projects, we could incur write-offs, some of
which could be substantial, which would have an adverse affect on our results of operations. If
circumstances require us or we elect to delay projects, we would incur additional carrying costs,
which could negatively impact our liquidity.
74
We periodically serve as either the construction manager or the general contractor for our
development projects. The construction of real estate projects entails unique risks, including
risks that the project will fail to conform to building plans, specifications and timetables. These
failures could be caused by labor strikes, weather, government regulations and other conditions
beyond our control. In addition, we may become liable for injuries and accidents occurring during
the construction process that are underinsured or not insured.
In the construction of new projects, we generally guarantee the lender of the construction loan the
lien-free completion of the project. This guaranty is recourse to us and places the risk of
construction delays and cost overruns on us. In addition, from time to time, we guarantee our
construction obligations to major tenants and public agencies. These types of guarantees are
released upon completion of the project, as defined. We may have significant expenditures in the
future in order to comply with our lien-free completion obligations.
Examples of projects that face these and other development risks include the following:
|
|
|
Brooklyn Atlantic Yards. We are in the process of developing Brooklyn Atlantic Yards, a
long-term $4.0 billion mixed-use project in downtown Brooklyn expected to feature an
850,000 square foot sports and entertainment arena for the Nets basketball team, a
franchise of the NBA. The acquisition and development of Brooklyn Atlantic Yards has been
formally approved by the required state governmental authorities but final documentation of
the transactions are subject to the completion of negotiations with local and state
governmental authorities, including negotiation of the applicable development documentation
and public subsidies. Pre-construction activities have commenced for the potential
removal, remediation or other activities to address environmental contamination at, on,
under or emanating to or from the land. There are also two lawsuits filed challenging the
approval process and use of eminent domain which may not be resolved in our favor resulting
in Brooklyn Atlantic Yards not being developed at all or not being developed with the
features we anticipate. As a result of the foregoing, this project has experienced delays
and may continue to experience further delays. There is also the potential for increased
costs and delays to the project as a result of (i) increasing construction costs, (ii)
scarcity of labor and supplies, (iii) our inability to obtain tax-exempt financing or the
availability of financing or public subsidies, (iv) our inability to meet required equity
contributions, (v) increasing rates for financings, (vi) loss of arena sponsorships and
related revenues and (vii) other potential litigation seeking to enjoin or prevent the
project for which there may not be insurance coverage. The development of Brooklyn Atlantic
Yards is being done in connection with the proposed move of the Nets to the planned arena.
The arena itself (and its plans) along with any movement of the team is subject to approval
by the NBA, which we may not receive. If any of the foregoing risks were to occur, we may
not be able to develop Brooklyn Atlantic Yards to the extent intended or at all. Even if we
are able to continue with the development, we would likely not be able to do so as quickly
as originally planned. |
|
|
|
|
Military Family Housing. We have formed various partnerships, primarily with the United
States Department of the Navy, to engage in the ownership, redevelopment and operation of
United States Navy and United States Marine Corps military family housing communities. We
have also formed a joint venture partnership to redevelop and operate, under a ground
lease, United States Air Force military family communities. These military family
communities, comprising approximately 12,000 housing units, are located primarily on the
islands of Oahu and Kauai, Hawaii; Chicago, Illinois; Seattle, Washington; and Colorado
Springs, Colorado. The number of military personnel stationed in these areas could be
affected by future Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission decisions. In addition,
our partnerships are at risk that future federal appropriations for Basic Allowance for
Housing (BAH) and local market adjustments to BAH do not keep pace with increases in
property taxes, utilities and other operating expenses for the partnerships. We are also
subject to the risk of competition from other local housing options available to the
military personnel. We have limited experience in projects of this type, and we cannot
assure you we will be able to complete them successfully. |
|
|
|
|
For-Sale Condominiums. We are engaged in the development of condominiums in selected
markets. Current condominium projects include Mercury, a previously unfinished office
building in Los Angeles, California, and Central Station in Chicago, Illinois. While we
have previously developed for-sale condominium projects with partners, we are developing
some of these projects during a housing downturn without the development assistance of one
or more partners. We may not be able to sell the units at the projected sales prices for a
number of reasons, including, without limitation, a rise in interest rates, continued
softening of the housing market and the inability of prospective buyers to secure
financing, which risk has been heightened due to the current financial crisis affecting the
U.S. economy. |
75
Market Conditions May Negatively Impact Our Liquidity and Our Ability to Finance or Refinance
Projects
Recent difficulties in the real estate and sub-prime mortgage markets have negatively impacted the
lending and capital markets, particularly for real estate. During 2008 and particularly during the
last few months, the capital markets have witnessed significantly adverse conditions, including a
substantial reduction in the availability of and access to capital. The risk premium demanded by
capital suppliers has increased markedly, as they are demanding greater compensation for credit
risk. Lending spreads have widened from recent levels and originations of new loans for the
commercial mortgage backed securities have decreased dramatically, if not ceased entirely.
Underwriting standards are being tightened. In addition, recent failures and consolidations of
certain financial institutions have decreased the number of potential lenders, resulting in reduced
lending levels available to the market. The continuation of these market conditions, combined with
the volatility in the financial markets, has made our ability to access capital increasingly
challenging. We are unlikely to be able to obtain financings today on terms comparable to those we
have secured in the past, and our financing costs may be significantly higher. These conditions
have required us to curtail our investment in new development projects, which will negatively
impact the future growth of our business. A continuation of these conditions may require us to
further curtail our development projects and potentially write down our investments in these
projects.
The adverse market conditions
also impact our ability to, and the cost at which we, refinance our
debt and obtain renewals or replacement of credit enhancement devices, such as letters of credit.
While some of our current financings have extension options, some of those are contingent upon
pre-determined underwriting qualifications. We cannot assure you that
a given project will meet the
required conditions to qualify for such extensions. Our inability to extend, repay or refinance our debt when
it becomes due could result in foreclosure on the properties pledged as collateral thereof, which
could result in a loss of our full investment in such properties. While we are actively working to
refinance or extend our maturing debt obligations, we cannot assure you that we will be able to do
so on a timely basis. Moreover, we expect refinancing to occur on less favorable terms. Lenders in
these market conditions will typically require a higher rate of interest, repayment of a portion of
the outstanding principal or additional equity infusions to the project.
Of our total outstanding debt of approximately $7.9 billion at October 31, 2008, approximately
$92.2 million becomes due in fiscal 2008, approximately $838.2 million becomes due in fiscal 2009
and approximately $743.7 million becomes due in fiscal 2010. This is inclusive of credit enhanced
mortgage debt we have obtained for a number of our properties to back the bonds that are issued by
a government authority and then remarketed to the public. Generally, the credit enhancement, such
as a letter of credit, expires prior to the terms of the underlying mortgage debt and must be
renewed or replaced to prevent acceleration of the underlying mortgage debt. We treat credit
enhanced debt as maturing in the year the credit enhancement expires. However, if the credit
enhancement is called upon due to the inability to remarket the bonds, the bonds would not only
incur additional interest expense, but it could accelerate the debt maturity to as early as 90 days
after the advancement occurs. As of October 31, 2008, one bond was held with the credit enhancer
and is included in our current maturities listed above.
Our bonds that are structured in a total rate of return swap arrangement (TRS) have maturities
reflected in the year the bond matures as opposed to the TRS maturity date, which is likely to be
earlier. Throughout the life of the TRS, if the property is not performing at designated levels or
due to changes in market conditions, the property may be obligated to make collateral deposits with
the counterparty. At expiration of the TRS arrangement, the property must pay or is entitled to
the difference, if any, between the fair market value of the bond and par. If the property does not
post collateral or make the counterparty whole at expiration, the counterparty could foreclose on
the property.
With the turmoil in the capital markets, an increasing number of financial institutions have sought
federal assistance or failed. In the event of a failure of a lender or counterparty to a financial
contract, many forms of assets may be at risk and may not be fully returned to us, as was the case
with amounts due to us from Lehman Brothers, Inc. of $13.8 million related to a bond remarketing
performance fee at our Stapleton project in Denver, Colorado.
Finally, while we currently have access to liquidity through our $750 million revolving credit
facility, the facility matures in March 2010. In light of challenging market conditions, lenders
under our facility may not agree to renew or extend the agreement at current commitment levels, on
similar terms or at all. As a result, our financing costs could increase and our access to
liquidity could decrease, which would adversely affect our ability to continue our development
activities.
76
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) and (b) Not applicable.
(c) Repurchase of equity securities during the quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
of Shares that May |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
Announced Plans |
|
Under the Plans |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Per Share |
|
or Programs |
|
or Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1 through August 31, 2008 |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
September 1 through September 30, 2008 |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
October 1 through October 31, 2008 (1) |
|
|
462 |
|
|
$ |
19.79 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
462 |
|
|
$ |
19.79 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During October 2008, the Company repurchased into treasury 462 shares of Class A common
stock to satisfy the minimum tax withholding requirements relating to restricted stock
vesting. These shares were not reacquired as part of a publicly announced repurchase plan
or program. |
77
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
Description of Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*3.1 |
|
|
- |
|
Amended Articles of Incorporation of Forest City Enterprises, Inc., restated effective October 1, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
- |
|
Code of Regulations as amended June 15, 2006, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the
Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2006 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
- |
|
Senior Note Indenture, dated as of May 19, 2003, between Forest City Enterprises, Inc., as issuer, and
The Bank of New York, as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Form 8-K
filed on May 20, 2003 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
- |
|
Form of 7.625% Senior Note due 2015, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Form
8-K filed on May 20, 2003 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
- |
|
Form of 7.375% Senior Note due 2034, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on February 10, 2004 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
- |
|
Form of 6.5% Senior Note due 2017, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Form 8-K
filed on January 26, 2005 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
- |
|
Indenture, dated as of October 10, 2006, between Forest City Enterprises, Inc., as issuer, and The
Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, including, as Exhibit A thereto, the Form of 3.625%
Puttable Equity-Linked Senior Note due 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys
Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2006 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
- |
|
Voting Agreement, dated November 8, 2006, by and among Forest City Enterprises, Inc., RMS Limited
Partnership, Powell Partners, Limited, Joseph M. Shafran and Bruce C. Ratner, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 9.1 to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2007 (File No.
1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.1 |
|
|
- |
|
Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the
Companys Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1999 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.2 |
|
|
- |
|
Supplemental Unfunded Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.9 to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1997 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.3 |
|
|
- |
|
Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives, effective as of January 1, 1999, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.43 to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1999 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.4 |
|
|
- |
|
First Amendment to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives, effective as of October 1, 1999,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30,
2005 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.5 |
|
|
- |
|
Second Amendment to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives, effective as of December 31, 2004,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46 to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30,
2005 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.6 |
|
|
- |
|
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives (As Amended and Restated
Effective January 1, 2008), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Companys Form 10-K for
the year ended January 31, 2008 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.7 |
|
|
- |
|
Deferred Compensation Plan for Nonemployee Directors, effective as of January 1, 1999, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.44 to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1999 (File No.
1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.8 |
|
|
- |
|
First Amendment to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Nonemployee Directors, effective October 1,
1999, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-38912). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.9 |
|
|
- |
|
Second Amendment to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Nonemployee Directors, effective March 10,
2000, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-38912). |
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
Description of Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.10 |
|
|
- |
|
Third Amendment to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Nonemployee Directors, effective March 12, 2004,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31,
2004 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.11 |
|
|
- |
|
Fourth Amendment to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Nonemployee Directors, effective as of December
31, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
April 30, 2005 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.12 |
|
|
- |
|
Fifth Amendment to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Nonemployee Directors, effective as of March 26,
2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.60 to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended January
31, 2008 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.13 |
|
|
- |
|
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Nonemployee Directors (As Amended
and Restated effective January 1, 2008), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.60 to the Companys
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2008 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.14 |
|
|
- |
|
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated as of June
19, 2008), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2008
(File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.15 |
|
|
- |
|
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. Executive Long-Term Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated as of June
19, 2008), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2008
(File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.16 |
|
|
- |
|
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. Senior Management Short-Term Incentive Plan (Effective February 1,
2008), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2008
(File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.17 |
|
|
- |
|
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. Senior Management Long-Term Incentive Plan (Effective February 1, 2008),
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2008 (File No.
1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.18 |
|
|
- |
|
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. Amended Board of Directors Compensation Policy, effective February 1,
2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended January
31, 2008 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.19 |
|
|
- |
|
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. Unfunded Nonqualified Supplemental Retirement Plan for Executives (As
Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2008), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.59 to the
Companys Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2008 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.20 |
|
|
- |
|
Amended and Restated Form of Stock Option Agreement, effective as of June 8, 2004, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2005 (File No.
1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.21 |
|
|
- |
|
Amended and Restated Form of Restricted Stock Agreement, effective as of June 8, 2004, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2005 (File No.
1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.22 |
|
|
- |
|
Form of Forest City Enterprises, Inc. Performance Shares Agreement, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to the Companys Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2008 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.23 |
|
|
- |
|
Form of Forest City Enterprises, Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Nonemployee Directors,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.66 to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31,
2008. (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.24 |
|
|
- |
|
Form of Forest City Enterprises, Inc. Restricted Shares Agreement for Nonemployee Directors,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.67 to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31,
2008 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.25 |
|
|
- |
|
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. 1994 Stock Plan (As Amended and Restated as of June 19, 2008),
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2008 (File No.
1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.26 |
|
|
- |
|
Employment Agreement entered into on May 31, 1999, effective January 1, 1999, between Forest City
Enterprises, Inc. and Albert B. Ratner, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to the Companys
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 1999 (File No. 1-4372). |
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
Description of Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.27 |
|
|
- |
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement effective as of February 28, 2000 between Forest City
Enterprises, Inc. and Albert B. Ratner, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to the Companys
Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2000 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.28 |
|
|
- |
|
Employment Agreement entered into on May 31, 1999, effective January 1, 1999, between Forest City
Enterprises, Inc. and Samuel H. Miller, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to the Companys
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 1999 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.29 |
|
|
- |
|
Deferred Compensation Agreement between Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Thomas G. Smith dated
December 27, 1995, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Companys Form 10-K for the year
ended January 31, 1997 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.30 |
|
|
- |
|
Employment Agreement (re: death benefits) entered into on May 31, 1999, between Forest City
Enterprises, Inc. and Thomas G. Smith dated December 27, 1995, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.49 to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 1999 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.31 |
|
|
- |
|
Employment Agreement entered into on July 20, 2005, effective February 1, 2005, between Forest City
Enterprises, Inc. and Charles A. Ratner, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Form 8-K filed on July 26, 2005 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.32 |
|
|
- |
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2006, by and among Charles A. Ratner
and Forest City Enterprises, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Form 8-K
filed on November 13, 2006 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.33 |
|
|
- |
|
Employment Agreement entered into on July 20, 2005, effective February 1, 2005, between Forest City
Enterprises, Inc. and James A. Ratner, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Form
8-K filed on July 26, 2005 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.34 |
|
|
- |
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2006, by and among James A. Ratner
and Forest City Enterprises, Inc, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Form 8-K
filed on November 13, 2006 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.35 |
|
|
- |
|
Employment Agreement entered into on July 20, 2005, effective February 1, 2005, between Forest City
Enterprises, Inc. and Ronald A. Ratner, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys
Form 8-K filed on July 26, 2005 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.36 |
|
|
- |
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2006, by and among Ronald A. Ratner
and Forest City Enterprises, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Form 8-K
filed on November 13, 2006 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.37 |
|
|
- |
|
Employment Agreement, effective November 9, 2006, by and among Bruce C. Ratner and Forest City
Enterprises, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K filed on
November 13, 2006 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.38 |
|
|
- |
|
Master Contribution and Sale Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2006, by and among Forest City
Enterprises, Inc., certain entities affiliated with Forest City Enterprises, Inc., Forest City Master
Associates III, LLC, certain entities affiliated with Forest City Master Associates III, LLC, certain
entities affiliated with Bruce C. Ratner and certain individuals affiliated with Bruce C. Ratner,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.54 to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31,
2006 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.39 |
|
|
- |
|
Registration Rights Agreement by and among Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and the holders of BCR Units
listed on Schedule A thereto dated November 8, 2006, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on November 7, 2007 (Registration No. 333-147201). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.40 |
|
|
- |
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2007, by and among Forest City Rental
Properties Corporation, KeyBank National Association, as Administrative Agent, National City Bank, as
Syndication Agent, Bank of America, N.A. and LaSalle Bank National Association, as Co-Documentation
Agents, and the banks named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form
8-K filed on June 12, 2007 (File No. 1-4372). |
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
Description of Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.41 |
|
|
- |
|
Additional Bank Assumption Agreement by and among The Bank of New York,
Forest City Rental Properties Corporation, and KeyBank in its capacity as administrative agent under
the Credit Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Form 8-K filed on
December 20, 2007 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.42 |
|
|
- |
|
Additional Bank Assumption Agreement by and among Wachovia Bank, N.A., Forest City Rental Properties
Corporation, and KeyBank in its capacity as administrative agent under the Credit Agreement,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2007 (File
No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.43 |
|
|
- |
|
Exhibit A to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Forest City Rental Properties
Corporation, KeyBank National Association, as Administrative Agent, National City Bank, as Syndication
Agent, Bank of America, N.A. and LaSalle Bank National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents, and
the banks named therein, revised as of December 20, 2007, further revised as of February 4, 2008 and
further revised as of February 19, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.56 to the Companys
Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2008 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10.44 |
|
|
- |
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 10, 2008, by and among
Forest City Rental Properties Corporation, Key Bank National Association, as Administrative Agent,
National City Bank, as Syndication Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Documentation Agent, and the banks
named therein. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.45 |
|
|
- |
|
Amended and Restated Guaranty of Payment of Debt, dated as of June 6, 2007, by Forest City
Enterprises, Inc. for the benefit of KeyBank National Association, as Administrative Agent, National
City Bank, as Syndication Agent, Bank of America, N.A. and LaSalle Bank National Association, as
Co-Documentation Agents, and the banks named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Companys Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2007 (File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10.46 |
|
|
- |
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Guaranty of Payment of Debt, dated as of September 10, 2008,
by Forest City Enterprises, Inc. for the benefit of KeyBank National Association, as Administrative
Agent, National City Bank, as Syndication Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Documentation Agent, and
the banks named therein. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.47 |
|
|
- |
|
Separation Agreement, dated April 1, 2008, by and between Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Thomas G.
Smith, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K filed on April 7, 2008
(File No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10.48 |
|
|
- |
|
Consultant Agreement, dated May 12, 2008, by and between Forest City Enterprises, Inc. and Thomas G.
Smith, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K filed on May 19, 2008 (File
No. 1-4372). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*31.1 |
|
|
- |
|
Principal Executive Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*31.2 |
|
|
- |
|
Principal Financial Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*32.1 |
|
|
- |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
+ |
|
Management contract or compensatory arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Form
10-Q pursuant to Item 6. |
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
81
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 8, 2008 |
|
/S/ ROBERT G. OBRIEN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Robert G. OBrien |
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 8, 2008 |
|
/S/ LINDA M. KANE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Linda M. Kane |
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting
and Administrative Officer |
|
|
82
Exhibits Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
Description of Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
- |
|
Amended Articles of Incorporation of Forest City Enterprises, Inc., restated effective October 1, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.44 |
|
|
- |
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 10, 2008, by and among
Forest City Rental Properties Corporation, Key Bank National Association, as Administrative Agent,
National City Bank, as Syndication Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Documentation Agent, and the banks
named therein. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.46 |
|
|
- |
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Guaranty of Payment of Debt, dated as of September 10, 2008,
by Forest City Enterprises, Inc. for the benefit of KeyBank National Association, as Administrative
Agent, National City Bank, as Syndication Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Documentation Agent, and
the banks named therein. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
- |
|
Principal Executive Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
- |
|
Principal Financial Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
- |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |