UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
| þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
OR
| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-25135
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
| California (State or jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
94-2823865 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
| 1901 Churn Creek Road Redding, California (Address of principal executive offices) |
96002 (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (530) 722-3955
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
| Common Stock, No Par Value per share | NASDAQ National Market |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No þ
Note — Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those
Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the
Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference to Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act) Yes o No þ
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold,
or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of
the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
As of the last day of the second fiscal quarter of 2008, the aggregate market value of the
registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was ($41,847,856) based
on the closing sale price of $6.96 as reported on the NASDAQ National Market (National
Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System National Market System) as of
June 30, 2008.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock,
as of the last practicable date.
| Class | Outstanding at February 28, 2009 | |||
Preferred Stock, $1,000 par value |
17,000 | |||
Common Stock, No par value per share |
8,711,495 | |||
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
| Document | Parts Into Which Incorporated | |
Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders
|
Part III | |
To be held May 12, 2009 (Proxy Statement) |
Bank of Commerce Holdings Form 10-K
Table of Contents
2
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Items numbered 10 (as to directors), 11 and 12 of Part III incorporate by reference
information from the Registrant’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Registrant’s
2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held
on Tuesday, May 12, 2009.
3
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS
Bank of Commerce Holdings (the “Holding Company”) is a corporation organized under the laws of
California and a financial holding company (“FHC”) registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of
1956, as amended (“BHC Act”). The Holding Company’s principal business is to serve as a holding
company for Redding Bank of Commerce™, Roseville Bank of Commerce™, and Bank of Commerce
Mortgage™, and for other banking or banking-related subsidiaries which the Holding Company may
establish or acquire (collectively the “Company”). The Holding Company also has two unconsolidated
subsidiaries, Bank of Commerce Holdings Trust and Bank of Commerce Holdings Trust II. The Company
is listed on the NASDAQ National Market under the trading symbol BOCH (Bank of Commerce Holdings).
The Bank was incorporated as a California banking corporation on November 25, 1981, and received
its certificate of authority to begin banking operations on October 22, 1982. The Bank operates
five full service facilities in two diverse markets in Northern California. Bank of Commerce is
proud of its reputation as Northern California’s premier bank for business. During 2007, the
Company re-branded “Bank of Commerce| Bank of Choice™” reflecting a renewed commitment to making
Bank of Commerce the bank of choice™ for local businesses with a fresh focus on family and
personal finances.
The Mortgage subsidiary, Bank of Commerce Mortgage™, an affiliate of Bank of Commerce, principal
business is mortgage brokerage services. The subsidiary has an affiliated business agreement with
BWC Mortgage Services. Under the terms of the agreement, BWC Mortgage Services underwrites or
brokers mortgage products, manages the independent contractors, supporting staff, and broker
relationships with secondary market lenders. Bank of Commerce Mortgage, through this agreement,
provides office space, equipment, and marketing support for the mortgage brokerage business. All
loans are sold in the secondary market. Bank of Commerce Mortgage™ pays ten percent of gross
premiums earned to BWC Mortgage Services.
The Company continuously searches for expansion possibilities, through internal growth, strategic
alliances, acquisitions or new office and product opportunities. Systematically, the company will
reevaluate the short and long-term profitability of all lines of business, and will not hesitate to
reduce or eliminate unprofitable locations or lines of business. The Company remains a viable,
independent bank by enhancing shareholder value. This has been realized by proactive management and
commitment to staff, customers, and the markets served.
At December 31, 2008, the Company had assets of $774 million, loans of $519 million, deposits and
borrowings of $689 million and stockholder’s equity of $63 million.
The Company will provide free of charge upon request, or through links to publicly available
filings accessed through its Internet website, the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, if any, as soon
as reasonably practical after such reports have been filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The Internet address of the Company is www.bankofcommerceholdings.com.
Additionally, reports may be obtained through the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at
www.sec.gov.
General
Parent Bank Holding Company. As a financial holding company, the Parent is subject to regulation
under the BHC act and to inspection, examination and supervision by its primary regulator, the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve Board or FRB”). The Parent is
also subject to the disclosure and regulatory requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1933, as amended, and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, both as administered by
the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). As a listed Company on the NASDAQ National Market,
the Parent is subject to the rules of the NASDAQ for listed companies.
Subsidiary Bank. The Company’s subsidiary bank is subject to regulation and examination primarily
by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and secondarily by the California Department
of Financial Institutions (“CDFI”).
Nonbank Subsidiary. The Company’s nonbank subsidiary may be subject to the laws and regulations of
the federal government and/or the State of California.
4
Parent Bank Holding Company Activities
“Financial in Nature” Requirement. As a bank holding company that has elected to become a
financial holding company pursuant to the BHC Act, we may affiliate with securities firms and
insurance companies and engage in other activities that are financial in nature or incidental or
complementary to activities that are financial in nature. “Financial in Nature” activities include
securities underwriting, dealing and market making, sponsoring mutual funds and investment
companies, insurance underwriting and agency, merchant banking, and activities that the FRB, in
consultation with the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, determines from time to time to be financial
in nature or incidental to such financial activity or is complementary to a financial activity and
does not pose a safety and soundness risk.
FRB approval is not required for the Company to acquire a company (other than a bank holding
company, bank or savings association) engaged in activities that are financial in nature or
incidental to activities that are financial in nature, as determined by the FRB. Prior FRB approval
is required before the Company may acquire the beneficial ownership or control of more than 5% of
the voting shares or substantially all of the assets of a bank holding company, bank or savings
association.
Because the Company is a financial holding company, if the subsidiary bank receives a rating under
the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, as amended (“CRA”), of less than satisfactory, the Company
will be prohibited, until the rating is raised to satisfactory or better, from engaging in new
activities or acquiring companies other than bank holding companies, banks or savings associations.
The Company could engage in new activities, or acquire companies engaged in activities that are
closely related to banking under the FHC Act. In addition, if the FRB finds that the subsidiary
bank is not well capitalized or well managed, the Company would be required to enter into an
agreement with the FRB to comply with all applicable capital and management requirements and which
may contain additional limitations or conditions. Until corrected, the Company would not be able to
engage in any new activity or acquire companies engaged in activities that are not closely related
to banking under the FHC Act without prior FRB approval. If the Company failed to correct any such
condition within a prescribed period, the FRB could order the Company to divest our banking
subsidiaries or, in the alternative, to cease engaging in activities other than those closely
related to banking under the FHC Act.
Regulatory Approval. In determining whether to approve a proposed bank acquisition, federal bank
regulators will consider, among other factors, the effect of the acquisition on competition,
financial condition, and future prospects including current and projected capital ratios and
levels, the competence, experience, and integrity of management and record of compliance with laws
and regulations, the convenience and needs of the communities to be served, including the acquiring
institution’s record of compliance under the CRA, and the effectiveness of the acquiring
institution in combating money laundering activities.
Preferred Stock
Pursuant to a Letter Agreement dated November 14, 2008, and the Securities Purchase Agreement —
Standard Terms the Company issued to the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury
Department”) 17,000 shares of Bank of Commerce Holdings Series A Fixed Rate Perpetual Preferred
Stock, without par value (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), having a liquidation amount per share
equal to $1,000 for a total price of $17 million. The Series A Preferred Stock pays cumulative
dividends at a rate of 5% per year for the first five years and thereafter at a rate of 9% per
year. The Company may not redeem the Series A Preferred Stock during the first three years except
with the proceeds from a “qualified equity offering” (as defined in the Certificate of
Determination described in Item 5.03). After three years, the Company may, at our option, redeem
the Series A Preferred Stock at par value plus accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series A Preferred
Stock is generally non-voting. Prior to November 14, 2011, unless the Company has redeemed the
Series A Preferred Stock or the Treasury Department has transferred the Series A Preferred Stock to
a third party, the consent of the Treasury Department will be required for the Company to increase
our common stock dividend or repurchase our common stock or other equity or capital securities,
other than in connection with benefit plans consistent with past practice and certain other
circumstances specified in the Securities Purchase Agreement. A consequence of the Series A
Preferred Stock purchase includes certain restrictions on executive compensation that could limit
the tax deductibility of compensation we pay to executive management.
5
As part of its purchase of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Treasury Department received a warrant
(the “Warrant”) to purchase 405,405 shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial per share
exercise price of $6.29. The Warrant provides for the adjustment of the exercise price and the
number of shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise pursuant to customary anti-dilution
provisions, such as upon stock splits or distributions of securities or other assets to holders of
our common stock, and upon certain issuances of our common stock at or below a specified price
relative to the initial exercise price. The Warrant expires ten years from the issuance date. If,
on or prior to December 31, 2009, the Company receives aggregate gross cash proceeds of not less
than $17 million from “qualified equity offerings” announced after November 14, 2008, the number of
shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the Treasury Department’s exercise of the Warrant will
be reduced by one-half of the original number of shares, taking into account all adjustments,
underlying the Warrant. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Treasury Department has
agreed not to exercise voting power with respect to any shares of common stock issued upon exercise
of the Warrant.
Both the Series A Preferred Stock and Warrant will be accounted for as components of Tier 1
capital.
The Series A Preferred Stock and the Warrant were issued in a private placement exempt from
registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Upon the request
of the Treasury Department at any time, we have agreed to promptly enter into a deposit arrangement
pursuant to which the Series A Preferred Stock may be deposited and depositary shares (“Depositary
Shares”) may be issued. Neither the Series A Preferred Stock nor the Warrant will be subject to any
contractual restrictions on transfer, except that the Treasury Department may only transfer or
exercise an aggregate of one-half of the Warrant Shares prior to the earlier of the redemption of
100% of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock and December 31, 2009.
In the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed that, until such time as the Treasury
Department ceases to own any securities acquired from us pursuant to the Securities Purchase
Agreement, the Company will take all necessary action to ensure that our benefit plans with respect
to our senior executive officers comply with Section 111(b) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization
Act of 2008 (“EESA”) as implemented by any guidance or regulation under Section 111(b) of EESA that
has been issued and is in effect as of the date of issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock and the
Warrant and not adopt any benefit plans with respect to, or which cover, our senior executive
officers that do not comply with EESA. The applicable executives have consented to the foregoing.
Prior to November 14, 2011, unless the Company has redeemed the Series A Preferred Stock or the
Treasury Department has transferred the Series A Preferred Stock to a third party, the consent of
the Treasury Department will be required for us to (1) declare or pay any dividend or make any
distribution on our common stock (other than regular quarterly cash dividends of not more than
$0.08 per share of common stock) or (2) redeem, purchase or acquire any shares of the Company’s
common stock or other equity or capital securities, other than in connection with benefit plans
consistent with past practice and certain other circumstances specified in the Securities Purchase
Agreement.
Capital Purchase Plan participants may “opt out” by repaying the capital without raising additional
capital subject to consultation with the appropriate Federal regulator.
Junior Subordinated Debentures
During the first quarter 2003, Bank of Commerce Holdings formed a wholly-owned Delaware statutory
business trust, Bank of Commerce Holdings Trust (the “grantor trust”), which issued $5.2 million of
guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in Bank of Commerce Holdings’ junior subordinated
debentures (the “Trust Notes”). These debentures qualify as Tier 1 capital under Federal Reserve
Board guidelines. The proceeds from the issuance of the Trust Notes were transferred from the
grantor trust to the Holding Company and from the Holding Company to the Bank as surplus capital.
The Trust Notes accrue and pay distributions on a quarterly basis at 3 month London Interbank
Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 3.30%. The rate at December 31, 2008 was 8.12%. The rate increases are
capped at 2.75% annually and the lifetime cap is 12.5%. The final maturity on the Trust Notes is
March 18, 2033, and the debt allows for prepayment after five years on the quarterly payment date.
During the third quarter 2005, Bank of Commerce Holdings formed a wholly-owned Delaware statutory
business trust, Bank of Commerce Holdings Trust II (the “grantor trust”), which issued $10.3
million of guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in Bank of Commerce Holdings’ junior
subordinated debentures (the “Trust Notes”).
All of the issuance will qualify as Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital under Federal Reserve Board
guidelines. The issuance is priced at a fixed rate for the first five years at 6.12%.
6
Primary Market Areas
The Company operates in two distinct markets. Bank of Commerce | Redding has historically been the
leading independent commercial bank in Redding, California, and Shasta County, California. This
market has been expanding, but is still relatively small when compared to the greater Sacramento
market, the location of Roseville Bank of Commerce™. Management believes that the two markets
complement each other, with the Redding market providing the stability and the greater Sacramento
market providing growth opportunities.
Products and Services
Through the Bank and mortgage subsidiaries, the Company provides a wide range of financial services
and products for business and consumer banking. The services offered by the Bank include those
traditionally offered by banks of similar size and character in California. Products such as free
checking, interest-bearing checking (“NOW”) and savings accounts, money market deposit accounts,
sweep arrangements, commercial, construction, term loans, travelers checks, safe deposit boxes,
collection services and electronic banking activities. The Bank currently does not offer trust
services or international banking services.
The services offered by the Mortgage Company include single and multi-family residential new
financing, refinancing and equity lines of credit. All mortgage products originated through the
Mortgage Company are brokered and are not maintained on the bank’s books.
Most of the Bank’s customers are small to medium sized businesses, professionals and other
individuals with medium to high net worth, and most of the Bank’s deposits are obtained from such
customers. The primary business strategy of the Bank is to focus on its lending activities. The
Bank’s principal lines of lending are (i) commercial, (ii) real estate construction and (iii)
commercial real estate.
The majority of the loans of the Bank are direct loans made to individuals and small businesses in
the major market area of the Bank. See “Risk Factors That May Affect Results-Dependence on Real
Estate.” A relatively small portion of the loan portfolio of the Bank consists of loans to
individuals for personal, family or household purposes. The Bank accepts the following as
collateral for loans: real estate, listed and unlisted securities, savings and time deposits,
automobiles, machinery and equipment and other general business assets such as accounts receivable
and inventory.
The commercial loan portfolio of the Bank consists of a mix of revolving credit facilities and
intermediate term loans. The loans are generally made for working capital, asset acquisition,
business-expansion purposes, and are generally secured by a lien on the borrowers’ assets. The
Bank also makes unsecured loans to borrowers who meet the Bank’s underwriting criteria for such
loans. The Bank manages its commercial loan portfolio by monitoring its borrowers’ payment
performance and their respective financial condition, and makes periodic and appropriate
adjustments, if necessary, to the risk grade assigned to each loan in the portfolio. The primary
sources of repayment of the commercial loans of the Bank are the borrower’s conversion of
short-term assets to cash and operating cash flow. The net assets of the borrower or guarantor
and/or the liquidation of collateral are usually identified as a secondary source of repayment.
The principal factors affecting the Bank’s risk of loss from commercial lending include each
borrower’s ability to manage its business affairs and cash flows, local and general economic
conditions and real estate values in the Bank’s service area. The Bank manages risk through its
underwriting criteria, which includes strategies to match the borrower’s cash flow to loan
repayment terms, and periodic evaluations of the borrower’s operations. The Bank’s evaluations of
its borrowers are facilitated by management’s knowledge of local market conditions and periodic
reviews by a consultant of the credit administration policies of the Bank.
The real estate construction loan portfolio of the Bank consists of a mix of commercial and
residential construction loans, which are principally secured by the underlying projects. The real
estate construction loans of the Bank are predominately made for projects, which are intended to be
owner occupied. The Bank also makes real estate construction loans for speculative projects. The
principal sources of repayment of the Bank’s construction loans are sale of the underlying
collateral or permanent financing provided by the Bank or another lending source.
7
The principal risks associated with real estate construction lending include project cost overruns
that absorb the borrower’s equity in the project and deterioration of real estate values as a
result of various factors, including competitive pressures and economic downturns.
See “Risk Factors That May Affect Results-Lending Risks Associated with Commercial Banking and
Construction Activities.” The Bank manages its credit risk associated with real estate construction
lending by establishing maximum loan-to-value ratios on projects on an as-completed basis,
inspecting project status in advance of controlled disbursements and matching maturities with
expected completion dates. Generally, the Bank requires a loan-to-value ratio of no more than 80%
on single-family residential construction loans.
The commercial and construction loan portfolio of the Bank consists of loans secured by a variety
of commercial and residential real property. The specific underwriting standards of the Bank and
methods for each of its principal lines of lending include industry-accepted analysis and modeling,
and certain proprietary techniques. The Bank’s underwriting criteria is designed to comply with
applicable regulatory guidelines, including required loan-to-value ratios. The credit
administration policies of the Bank contain mandatory lien position and debt service coverage
requirements, and the Bank generally requires a guarantee from the owners of its private corporate
borrowers.
Government Supervision and Regulation
The following discussion describes the elements of an extensive regulatory framework applicable to
financial holding companies and banks and specific information about the Holding Company and its
subsidiaries. Federal regulation of banks, bank holding companies and financial holding companies
is intended primarily for the protection of depositors and the Bank Insurance Fund rather than for
the protection of stockholders and creditors.
Dividend Restrictions
The FRB generally prohibits a financial holding company from declaring or paying a cash dividend
which would impose undue pressure on the capital of subsidiary banks or would be funded only
through borrowing or other arrangements that might adversely affect a bank holding company’s
financial position. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”)
prohibits insured depository institutions from paying management fees to any controlling persons
or, with certain limited exceptions, making capital distributions, including dividends, if, after
such transaction, the institution would be undercapitalized.
In addition to the restrictions imposed under federal law, banks chartered under California law
generally may only pay cash dividends to the extent such payments do not exceed the lesser of
retained earnings of the bank or the bank’s net income for its last three fiscal years (less any
distributions to stockholders during such period). In the event a bank desires to pay cash
dividends in excess of such amount, the bank may pay a cash dividend with the prior approval of the
Commissioner in an amount not exceeding the greatest of the bank’s retained earnings, the bank’s
net income for its last fiscal year, or the bank’s net income for its current fiscal year.
Regulators also have authority to prohibit a depository institution from engaging in business
practices which are considered to be unsafe or unsound, possibly including payment of dividends or
other payments under certain circumstances even if such payments are not expressly prohibited by
statute. The FRB’s policy is that a bank holding company should not continue its existing rate of
cash dividends on its common stock unless its net income is sufficient to fully fund each dividend
and its prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with its capital needs, asset
quality and overall financial condition.
Prior to November 14, 2011, unless the Company has redeemed the Series A Preferred Stock or the
Treasury Department has transferred the Series A Preferred Stock to a third party, the consent of
the Treasury Department will be required for the Company to (1) declare or pay any dividend or make
any distribution on our common stock (other than regular quarterly cash dividends of not more than
$0.08 per share of common stock) or (2) redeem, purchase or acquire any shares of the Company’s
common stock or other equity or capital securities, other than in connection with benefit plans
consistent with past practice and certain other circumstances specified in the Securities Purchase
Agreement.
8
Interstate Banking
A financial holding company may acquire banks in states other than its home state without regard to
the permissibility of such acquisitions under state law, but subject to any state requirement that
the bank has been organized and operating for a minimum period of time, not to exceed five years,
and the requirement that the bank holding company, prior to or following the proposed acquisition,
controls no more than 10% of the total amount of deposits of insured depository institutions in the
United States and no more than 30% of such deposits in that state (or such lesser or greater amount
set by state law). Banks may also merge across state lines, therefore creating interstate
branches. Furthermore, a bank is now able to open new branches in a state in which it does not
already have banking operations if the laws of such state permit such de novo branching.
Capital Standards
In the United States of America, banks, thrifts and bank holding companies are subject to minimum
regulatory capital requirements. Specifically, U.S. banking organizations must maintain a minimum
leverage ratio and two minimum risk-based ratios. The leverage ratio measures regulatory capital as
a percentage of average on-balance-sheet assets as reported in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The risk-based ratios measure
regulatory capital as a percentage of both on- and off-balance-sheet credit exposures with some
gross differentiation based on perceived credit risk. Under these guidelines, nominal dollar
amounts of assets and credit equivalent amounts of off-balance-sheet items are multiplied by one of
several risk adjustment percentages, which range from 0% for assets with low credit risk, such as
certain U.S. government securities, to 100% for assets with relatively higher credit risk, such as
certain loans.
The current U.S. risk-based capital requirements are based on an internationally agreed framework
for capital measurement that was developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (“BSC”) in
1988. The international framework (the “1988 Accord”) accomplished several important objectives. It
strengthened capital levels at large, internationally active banks and fostered international
consistency and coordination. The 1988 Accord also reduced disincentives for banks to hold liquid,
low risk assets. By requiring banks to hold capital against off-balance-sheet exposures, the 1988
Accord represented a significant step forward for regulatory capital measurement. The federal
banking agencies require a minimum ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-adjusted assets and
off-balance-sheet items of 8%, and a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted assets and
off-balance-sheet items of 4%. The Company exceeds the minimum requirements. As of December 31,
2008, the most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the
Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
Over the past 15 years the world’s financial system has become increasingly more complex and the
BSC has been working for several years to develop a new regulatory capital framework that
recognizes new developments in financial products, incorporates advances in risk measurement and
management practices, and more precisely assesses capital charges in relation to risk (the “New
Accord”).
Overview of the New Accord
The New Accord encompasses three elements: minimum regulatory capital requirements, supervisory
review, and market discipline. Under the first element, a banking organization must calculate
capital requirements to credit risk, operational risk and market risk. The New Accord does not
change the definition of what qualifies as regulatory capital, the minimum risk-based capital
ratio, or the methodology for determining capital charges for market risk. The New Accord does
provide several methodologies for determining capital requirements for both credit and operational
risk. For credit risk there are two general approaches; the standardized approach (based on the
1988 Accord) and the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach, which uses the institution’s internal
estimates of key risk drivers to derive capital requirements.
The New Accord provides three methodologies for determining capital requirements for operational
risk: the basic indicator approach, the standardized approach, and the advanced measurement
approaches (AMA). Under the first two methodologies, capital requirements for operational risk are
fixed percentages of specified, objective risk measures (for example, gross income.) The AMA
provides the flexibility for an institution to develop its own individualized approach for
measuring operational risk, subject to supervisory oversight.
9
The second pillar of the New Accord, supervisory review, highlights the need for banking
organizations to assess their capital adequacy positions relative to overall risk (rather than to
the minimum capital requirement), and the need for supervisors to review and take appropriate
actions in response to those assessments. The third pillar of the New Accord imposes public
disclosure requirements on institutions that are intended to allow market participants to assess
key information about an institutions risk profile and its associated level of capital.
In order for a financial holding company to qualify as “well-run,” both it and the insured
depository institutions that it controls must meet the “well-capitalized” and “well-managed”
criteria set forth in Regulation Y. To qualify as “well-capitalized,” the bank must, on a
consolidated basis: (i) maintain a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater, (ii) maintain
a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6% or greater and (iii) not be subject to any order by the FRB
to meet a specified capital level. Its lead insured depository institution must be
well-capitalized (as that term is defined in the capital adequacy regulations of the applicable
bank regulator), 80% of the total risk-weighted assets held by its insured depository institutions
must be held by institutions that are well-capitalized, and none of its insured depository
institutions may be undercapitalized.
To qualify as “well-managed”: (i) each of its lead depository institutions and its depository
institutions holding 80% of the total risk-weighted assets of all its depository institutions at
their most recent examination or review must have received a composite rating, rating for
management and rating for compliance which were at least satisfactory, (ii) none of the bank
holding company’s depository institutions may have received one of the two lowest composite ratings
and (iii) neither the bank holding company nor any of its depository institutions during the
previous 12 months may have been subject to a formal enforcement order or action.
Fiscal and Monetary Policies
The Company’s business and earnings are affected significantly by the fiscal and monetary policies
of the federal government and its agencies. The Company is particularly affected by the policies of
the FRB, which regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. Among the instruments
of monetary policy available to the FRB are (a) conducting open market operations in United States
government securities, (b) changing the discount rates of borrowings of depository institutions,
(c) imposing or changing reserve requirements against depository institutions’ deposits, and (d)
imposing or changing reserve requirements against certain borrowings by banks and their affiliates.
These methods are used in varying degrees and combinations to directly affect the availability of
bank loans and deposits, as well as the interest rates charged on loans and paid on deposits. The
policies of the FRB may have a material effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and
financial condition.
Privacy Provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
Federal banking regulators, as required under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the GLB Act), have
adopted rules limiting the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose nonpublic
information about consumers to nonaffiliated third parties. The rules require disclosure of privacy
policies to consumers and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain
personal information to nonaffiliated third parties. The privacy provisions of the GLB Act affect
how consumer information is transmitted through diversified financial services companies and
conveyed to outside vendors.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley) implemented a broad range of corporate governance
and accounting measures to increase corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties for
accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies, and to protect investors by
improving the accuracy and reliability of disclosures under federal securities laws. The Company is
subject to Sarbanes-Oxley because it is required to file periodic reports with the SEC under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Among other things, Sarbanes-Oxley and/or its implementing
regulations have established new membership requirements and additional responsibilities for our
audit committee, imposed restrictions on the relationship between the Company and its outside
auditors (including restrictions on the types of non-audit services our auditors may provide to
us), imposed additional responsibilities for our external financial statements on our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, expanded the disclosure requirements for our
corporate insiders, required our management to evaluate the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures and its internal control over financial reporting, and will require our auditors to
issue a report on our internal control over financial reporting.
10
Patriot Act
The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and
Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (Patriot Act) is intended to strengthen the ability of U.S. law
enforcement agencies and intelligence communities to work together to combat terrorism on a variety
of fronts. The Patriot Act has significant implications for depository institutions, brokers,
dealers and other businesses involved in the transfer of money. The Patriot Act requires the
Company to implement new or revised policies and procedures relating to anti-money laundering,
compliance, suspicious activities, and currency transaction reporting and due diligence on
customers. The Patriot Act also requires federal bank regulators to evaluate the effectiveness of
an applicant in combating money laundering in determining whether to approve a proposed bank
acquisition.
Future Legislation
Various legislation, including proposals to change substantially the financial institution
regulatory system, is from time to time introduced in Congress. This legislation may change banking
statutes and the operating environment of the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways. If
enacted, this legislation could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand
permissible activities or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit
unions, and other financial institutions. The Company cannot predict whether any of this potential
legislation will be enacted and, if enacted, the effect that it, or any implementing regulations,
would have on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition.
State Regulation and Supervision
The Bank is a California chartered bank insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the
“FDIC”), and as such is subject to regulation, supervision and regular examination by the
California Department of Financial Institutions (“CDFI”) and the FDIC. As a non-member of the
Federal Reserve System, the primary federal regulator of the Holding Company is the Federal Reserve
Board. The regulations of these agencies affect most aspects of the Bank’s business and prescribe
permissible types of loans and investments, the amount of required reserves, requirements for
branch offices, the permissible scope of the Bank’s activities and various other requirements. The
Bank is also subject to applicable provisions of California law, insofar as such provisions are not
in conflict with or preempted by federal banking law. In addition, the Bank is subject to certain
regulations of the FRB dealing primarily with check-clearing activities, establishment of banking
reserves, Truth-in-Lending (Regulation Z), Truth-in-Savings (Regulation DD), and Equal Credit
Opportunity (Regulation B).
Under
California law, a state chartered bank is subject to various restrictions on, and requirements regarding, its operations and administration including the maintenance of branch
offices and automated teller machines, capital and reserve requirements, deposits and borrowings,
shareholder rights and duties, and investment and lending activities. Whenever it appears that the
contributed capital of a California bank is impaired, the Commissioner is required to order the
bank to correct such impairment. If a bank is unable to correct the impairment, the bank is
required to levy and collect an assessment upon its common shares. If such assessment becomes
delinquent, the common shares are to be sold by the bank.
Prompt Corrective Action and Other Enforcement Mechanisms
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”) requires each federal
banking agency to take prompt corrective action to resolve the problems of insured depository
institutions, including but not limited to those that fall below one or more prescribed minimum
capital ratios. The law required each federal banking agency to promulgate regulations defining
the following five categories in which an insured depository institution will be placed, based on
the level of its capital ratios: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized,
significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized.
11
As of December 31, 2008, the most recent notification from the FDIC categorized the Bank as “well
capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. Under the prompt
corrective action provisions of FDICIA, an insured depository institution generally will be
classified in the following categories based on the capital measures indicated below:
| Actual | Well Capitalized | Minimum Capital | ||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2008 | Capital | Ratio | Requirement | Requirement | ||||||||||||
The Company
Leverage |
$ | 73,983,019 | 10.66 | % | n/a | 4.0 | % | |||||||||
Tier 1 Risk-Based |
73,983,019 | 11.87 | % | n/a | 4.0 | % | ||||||||||
Total Risk-Based |
81,787,582 | 13.12 | % | n/a | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||
Redding Bank of
Commerce
Leverage |
$ | 72,204,835 | 10.45 | % | 5.0 | % | 4.0 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 Risk-Based |
72,204,835 | 11.58 | % | 6.0 | % | 4.0 | % | |||||||||
Total Risk-Based |
80,009,398 | 12.84 | % | 10.00 | % | 8.0 | % | |||||||||
An institution that, based upon its capital levels, is classified as “well capitalized,”
“adequately capitalized” or “undercapitalized” may be treated as though it were in the next lower
capital category if the appropriate federal banking agency, after notice and opportunity for
hearing, determines that an unsafe or unsound condition or an unsafe or unsound practice warrants
such treatment. At each successive lower capital category, an insured depository institution is
subject to more restrictions.
The federal banking agencies, however, may not treat an institution as “critically
undercapitalized” unless its capital ratio actually warrants such treatment. If an insured
depository institution is undercapitalized, it will be closely monitored by the appropriate federal
banking agency. Undercapitalized institutions must submit an acceptable capital restoration plan
with a guarantee of performance issued by the holding company. Further restrictions and sanctions
are required to be imposed on insured depository institutions that are critically undercapitalized.
The most important additional measure is that the appropriate federal banking agency is required
to either appoint a receiver for the institution within 90 days, or obtain the concurrence of the
FDIC in another form of action.
Safety and Soundness Standards
FDICIA also implemented certain specific restrictions on transactions and required federal banking
regulators to adopt overall safety and soundness standards for depository institutions related to
internal control, loan underwriting, documentation, and asset growth. Among other things, FDICIA
limits the interest rates paid on deposits by undercapitalized institutions, restricts the use of
brokered deposits, limits the aggregate extensions of credit by a depository institution to an
executive officer, director, principal shareholder or related interest, and reduces deposit
insurance coverage for deposits offered by undercapitalized institutions for deposits by certain
employee benefits accounts.
The federal banking agencies may require an institution to submit to an acceptable compliance plan
as well as have the flexibility to pursue other more appropriate or effective courses of action
given the specific circumstances and severity of an institution’s noncompliance with one or more
standards.
Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending Developments
The Bank is subject to certain fair lending requirements and reporting obligations involving home
mortgage lending operations and Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) activities. The CRA generally
requires the federal banking agencies to evaluate the record of a financial institution in meeting
the credit needs of their local communities, including low and moderate-income neighborhoods. In
addition to substantive penalties and corrective measures that may be required for a violation of
certain fair lending laws, the federal banking agencies may take compliance with such laws and CRA
into account when regulating and supervising other activities.
12
Recently Enacted Accounting Rules
On October 14, 2008, the SEC’s Office of the Chief Accountant (OCA), clarified its views on the
application of other-than-temporary impairment guidance in FAS 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, to certain perpetual preferred securities. The OCA
concluded that it would not object to a registrant applying an ‘other-than-temporary’ impairment
model to investments in perpetual preferred securities that possess significant debt-like
characteristics that is similar to the impairment model applied to debt securities, provided there
has been no evidence of deterioration in credit of the issuer. At present, the Company does not
hold any perpetual preferred securities.
On October 10, 2008, the FASB issued FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset
When the Market for That Asset is Not Active.” FAS 157-3 is a FASB Staff Position that clarifies
the application of FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” for a non-active market and
provides an illustrative example of key considerations in determining the fair value of financial
assets under such conditions. FAS 157-3 is currently under management review with the impact on the
Company yet to be determined.
On September 12, 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 133-1 and FIN 45-4, Disclosures about
Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB
Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161. This FSP
is intended to improve disclosures about credit derivatives by requiring more information about the
potential adverse effects of changes in credit risk on the financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows of the sellers of credit derivatives. It amends FAS 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, to require disclosures by sellers of credit
derivatives, including credit derivatives embedded in hybrid instruments. The FSP also amends FASB
Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others (FIN 45), to require an additional disclosure about
the current status of the payment/performance risk of a guarantee. The provisions of the FSP that
amend FAS 133 and FIN 45 are effective for reporting periods (annual or interim) ending after
November 15, 2008. Because the FSP amends only the disclosure requirements for credit derivatives
and certain guarantees, the adoption of the FSP will not affect the Company’s consolidated
financial results.
The FASB has decided to amend SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125” (SFAS 140),
impacting the accounting for qualifying special-purpose entities (“QSPS”), and make certain changes
to FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 46 (revised December 2003) “Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities — an interpretation of ARB No. 51” (FIN 46R). Exposure drafts of the proposed
requirements are expected in the third quarter of 2008. The impact on the Company and the timing
of adoption cannot be determined until the FASB issues the final amendments to SFAS 140 and FIN
46R.
On March 19, 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB No. 133” (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires expanded
qualitative, quantitative and credit-risk disclosures about derivatives and hedging activities and
their effects on the Companies financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161
also clarifies that derivatives are subject to credit risk disclosures as required by SFAS No. 107,
“Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” SFAS 161 is effective for the Companies
financial statements for the year beginning on January 1, 2009.
On December 4, 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (SFAS
141R). SFAS 141R modifies the accounting for business combinations and requires, with limited
exceptions, the acquirer in a business combination to recognize 100 percent of the assets acquired,
liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition-date fair
value. In addition, SFAS 141R requires the expensing of acquisition-related transaction and
restructuring costs, and certain contingent assets and liabilities acquired, as well as contingent
consideration, to be recognized at fair value. SFAS 141R also modifies the accounting for certain
acquired income tax assets and liabilities. SFAS 141R is effective for new acquisitions consummated
on or after January 1, 2009 and earlier adoption is not permitted.
13
Competition
The financial services industry in which the Company engages in is highly competitive. Generally,
the lines of activity and markets served involve competition with other banks, thrifts, credit
unions and other non-bank financial institutions, such as investment banking firms, investment
advisory firms, brokerage firms, investment companies and insurance entities which offer financial
services, located both domestically and through alternative deliver channels such as the Internet.
Many of these competitors enjoy fewer regulatory constraints and some may have lower cost
structures. The methods of competition center around various factors, such as customer services,
interest rates on loans and deposits, lending limits, customer convenience and technological
advances.
Securities firms, insurance companies and brokerage houses that elect to become financial holding
companies may acquire banks and other financial institutions. Combinations of this type will
significantly change the competitive environment in which we conduct business.
In order to compete with major banks and other competitors in its primary service areas, the
Company relies upon the experience of its executive and senior officers in serving business
clients, and upon its specialized services, local promotional activities and the personal contacts
made by its officers, directors and employees. For customers whose loan demand exceeds the
Company’s legal lending limit, the Company may arrange for such loans on a participation basis with
correspondent banks. Competitive pressures in the banking industry significantly increase changes
in the interest rate environment, reducing net interest margins. Less than favorable economic
conditions can also result in a deterioration of credit quality and an increase in the provisions
for loan losses.
Employees
As of February 1, 2009, the Company employed 120 full-time equivalent employees. Of these
employees, 29 were employed in the Roseville market and 91 were in the Redding market. None of the
employees within the Company are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. Management considers
its employee relations to be excellent.
14
ITEM 1A.
Forward Looking Statements and Risk Factors That May Affect Results
This report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions, and on information available to
management as of the date of this document. Forward-looking statements include the information
concerning possible or assumed future results of operations of the Company set forth under the
heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Forward-looking statements also include statements in which words such as “expects,” “anticipates,”
“intend,” “plan,” “believes,” “estimate,” “consider” or similar expressions or conditional verbs
such as “will”, “should”, “would” and “could” are intended to identify such forward looking
statements.. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including the risks discussed under the heading “Risk Factors
That May Affect Results” and elsewhere in this report. The Company’s actual future results and
shareholder values may differ materially from those anticipated and expressed in these
forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results and values,
including those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors That May Affect Results,” are beyond the
Company’s ability to control or predict. Investors are cautioned not to put undue reliance on any
forward-looking statements. In addition, the Company does not have any intention or and assumes no
obligation to update forward-looking statements after the date of the filing of this report, even
if new information, future events or other circumstances have made such statements incorrect or
misleading. Except as specifically noted herein all references to the “Company” refer to Bank of
Commerce Holdings, a California corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Overview
As a financial holding company, our earnings are significantly affected by general business and
economic conditions. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation,
monetary supply, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets, and the strength of the
United States economy and local economies in which we operate. For example, an economic downturn,
increase in unemployment, or other events that negatively impact household and/or corporate incomes
could decrease the demand for the Company’s loan and non-loan products and services and increase
the number of customers who fail to pay interest or principal on their loans. Geopolitical
conditions can also affect our earnings. Acts or threats of terrorism, actions taken by the United
States or other governments in response to acts or threats of terrorism and our military conflicts
including the aftermath of the war with Iraq could impact business conditions in the United States.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System regulates the supply of money and credit in
the United States. Its policies determine in large part our cost of funds for lending and investing
and the return we earn on those loans and investments, both of which impact our net interest
margin, and can materially affect the value of financial instruments we hold. Its policies can also
affect our borrowers, potentially increasing the risk of failure to repay their loans. Changes in
Federal Reserve Board policies are beyond our control and hard to predict or anticipate.
We operate in a highly competitive industry that could become even more competitive because of
legislative, regulatory and technological changes and continued consolidation. Banks, securities
firms and insurance companies can now merge creating a financial holding company that can offer
virtually any type of financial service, including banking, securities underwriting, insurance
(agency and underwriting) and merchant banking. Technology has lowered barriers to entry and made
it possible for non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks, such as
automatic transfer and automatic payment systems. Many of our competitors have fewer regulatory
constraints and some have lower cost structures.
The holding company, subsidiary bank and non-bank subsidiary are heavily regulated at the federal
and state levels. This regulation is intended to protect depositors, federal deposit insurance
funds and the banking system as a whole, not investors. Congress and state legislatures and federal
and state regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for
possible changes. Changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory policies including changes in
interpretation and implementation could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways including
limiting the types of financial services and products we may offer.
15
Our
failure to comply with the laws, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies and damage our reputation.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to adapt our products and services to evolving
industry standards. There is increasing pressure on financial services companies to provide
products and services at lower prices. This can reduce our net interest margin and revenues from
fee-based products and services. In addition, the widespread adoption of new technologies,
including internet-based services, could require us to make substantial expenditures to modify or
adapt our existing products and services. Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to
attract and retain key people. Competition for the best people can be intense.
Lending Risks Associated with Commercial Banking and Construction Activities
The business strategy of the Company is to focus on commercial, single family and multi-family real
estate loans, construction loans and commercial business loans. Loans secured by commercial real
estate are generally larger and involve a greater degree of credit and transaction risk than
residential mortgage (one-to-four family) loans. Because payments on loans secured by commercial
and multi-family real estate properties are often dependent on successful operation or management
of the underlying properties, repayment of such loans may be subject to a greater extent to the
then prevailing conditions in the real estate market or the economy. Moreover, real estate
construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of credit risk than
long-term financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan
is dependent largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value at
completion of construction or development compared to the estimated cost (including interest) of
construction. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, the Company may be confronted with
a project which, when completed, has a value which is insufficient to assure full repayment of the
construction loan. Although the Company manages lending risks through its underwriting and credit
administration policies, no assurance can be given that such risks would not materialize, in which
event the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and business prospects
could be materially adversely affected.
Dependence on Real Estate
At December 31, 2008, approximately 70% of the loans of the Company were secured by real estate.
The value of the Company’s real estate collateral has been, and could in the future be adversely
affected by any economic recession and any resulting adverse impact on the real estate market in
California. See “Economic Conditions and Geographic Concentration.”
The Company’s primary lending focus has historically been commercial real estate, commercial
lending and, to a lesser extent, construction lending. At December 31, 2008, commercial real
estate and construction loans comprised approximately 42% and 16%, respectively, of the total loans
in the portfolio of the Company. At December 31, 2008, all of the Company’s real estate mortgage,
real estate construction loans, and commercial real estate loans, were secured fully or in part by
deeds of trust on underlying real estate. The Company’s dependence on real estate increases the
risk of loss in the loan portfolio of the Company and its holdings of other real estate owned if
economic conditions in California deteriorate in the future. Deterioration of the real estate
market in California could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial
condition and results of operations. See “Economic Conditions and Geographic Concentration.”
Risks Specific to Operations in California
Our operations are located entirely in the State of California, which in recent years has
experienced economic disruptions that are unique to the state. Any fiscal and political
uncertainty surrounding the state government’s financial condition, for example may have a
material adverse effect on our customer’s businesses or on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Interest Rate Risk
The income of the Company is highly dependent on “interest rate differentials” and the resulting
net interest margins (i.e., the difference between the interest rates earned on the Bank’s
interest-earning assets such as loans and securities, and the interest rates paid on the Bank’s
interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowings). These rates are highly sensitive to
many factors, which are beyond the Company’s control, including general economic conditions,
inflation, recession and the policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies, in
particular, the FRB. Because of the Company’s preference of using variable rate pricing on the
majority of its loan portfolio and noninterest bearing demand deposit accounts the Company is asset
sensitive. As a result, the Company is generally adversely affected by declining interest rates.
In addition, changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, influence the
origination of loans, the purchase of investments and the generation of deposits.
16
These changes also affect the rates received on loans and securities and paid on deposits, which
could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of
operations. See “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk.”
Potential Volatility of Deposits
At December 31, 2008, time certificates of deposit in excess of $100,000 represented approximately
30.0% of the dollar value of the total deposits of the Company. As such, these deposits are
considered volatile and could be subject to withdrawal. Withdrawal of a material amount of such
deposits could adversely affect the liquidity of the Company, profitability, business prospects,
results of operations and cash flows. The Company monitors activity of volatile liability deposits
on a quarterly basis. Approximately $64.0 million of the $168.8 million in time certificates of
deposit over $100,000 act as core deposits with over five years history of rollover with the
Company.
Dividends
Because the Company conducts no other significant activity than the management of its investment in
the Bank and Mortgage Company, the Company is dependent on these subsidiaries for income. The
ability of the Bank and Mortgage Company to pay cash dividends in the future depends on the
profitability, growth and capital needs of the Bank and Mortgage Company. In addition, the
California Financial Code restricts the ability of the Bank to pay dividends. No assurance can be
given that the Company or the Bank will pay any dividends in the future or, if paid, such dividends
will not be discontinued.
Government Regulation and Legislation
The Company and the Bank are subject to extensive state and federal regulation, supervision and
legislation, which govern almost all aspects of the operations of the Company and the Bank. The
business of the Company is particularly susceptible to being affected by the enactment of federal
and state legislation which may have the effect of increasing or decreasing the cost of doing
business, modifying permissible activities or enhancing the competitive position of other financial
institutions. Such laws are subject to change from time to time and are primarily intended for the
protection of consumers, depositors and the deposit insurance funds, and not for the protection of
shareholders of the Company. The Company cannot predict what effect any presently contemplated or
future changes in the laws or regulations or their interpretations would have on the business and
prospects of the Company, but it could be material and adverse. See “Supervision and Regulation.”
Economic Conditions and Geographic Concentration
The Company’s operations are located and concentrated in California, particularly the counties of
El Dorado, Placer, Shasta and Sacramento, and are likely to remain so for the foreseeable future.
At December 31, 2008, approximately 70% of the Bank’s loan portfolio consisted of real estate
related loans, most of which were related to collateral located in California. Some purchased 1-4
family and home equity loans are outside of the State. A change in California economic and
business conditions will adversely affect the performance of these loans. Deterioration in
economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on the quality of the loan portfolio of
the Bank and the demand for its products and services. In addition, during periods of economic
slowdown or recession, the Bank may experience a decline in collateral values and an increase in
delinquencies and defaults. A decline in collateral values and an increase in delinquencies and
defaults increase the possibility and severity of losses. California real estate is also subject
to certain natural disasters, such as earthquakes, floods and mudslides, which are typically not
covered by the standard hazard insurance policies maintained by borrowers. Uninsured disasters may
make it difficult or impossible for borrowers to repay loans made by the Company.
Reliance on Key Employees and Others
As of February 1, 2009, the Company employed 120 employees. The Company considers employee
relations to be excellent. A collective bargaining group represents none of the employees of the
Company or its subsidiaries. Failure of the Company to attract and retain qualified personnel could
have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company does maintain life insurance with respect to eight of its officers with regard to a
salary continuation plan.
17
Adequacy of Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL)
The Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses was $8.4 million, or 1.60% of total loans at
December 31, 2008. Material future additions to the allowance for loan losses might be necessary
if material adverse changes in economic conditions occur and the performance of the loan portfolio
of the Company deteriorates. In addition, future additions to the Company’s allowance for loan and
lease losses on other real estate owned may also be required in order to reflect changes in the
markets for real estate in which the Company’s other real estate owned is located and other factors
which may result in adjustments which are necessary to ensure that the Company’s foreclosed assets
are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated costs to dispose of the properties.
Moreover, the FDIC and the DFI, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically
review the Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses and the carrying value of its assets. The
Bank was most recently examined by the FDIC in this regard during the second quarter of 2008.
Increases in the provisions for loan losses and foreclosed assets could adversely affect the Bank’s
financial condition and results of operations. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Asset Quality” and “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
(ALLL).”
Certain Ownership Restrictions under California and Federal Law
Federal law prohibits a person or group of persons “acting in concert” from acquiring “control” of
a bank holding company unless the FRB has been given 60 days prior written notice of such proposed
acquisition and within that time period the FRB has not issued a notice disapproving the proposed
acquisition or extending for up to another 30 days, the period during which such a disapproval may
be issued. An acquisition may be made before the expiration of the disapproval period if the FRB
issues written notice of its intent not to disapprove the action. Under a rebuttal presumption
established by the FRB, the acquisition of more than 10% of a class of voting stock of a bank with
a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act (such as the common stock),
would, under the circumstances set forth in the presumption, constitute the acquisition of control.
In addition, any “company” would be required to obtain the approval of the FRB under the BHCA,
before acquiring 25% (5% in the case of an acquirer that is, or is deemed to be, a bank holding
company) or more of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, or such lesser number of
shares as constitute control. See “Supervision and Regulation-Regulation and Supervision of Bank
Holding Companies.”
Under the California Financial Code, no person shall, directly or indirectly, acquire control of a
California licensed bank or a bank holding company unless the Commissioner has approved such
acquisition of control. A person would be deemed to have acquired control of the Company and the
Bank under this state law if such person, directly or indirectly, has the power (i) to vote 25% or
more of the voting power of the Company or (ii) to direct or cause the direction of the management
and policies of the Company. For purposes of this law, a person who directly or indirectly owns or
controls 10% or more of the common stock would be presumed to direct or cause the direction of the
management and policies of the Company and thereby control the Company.
Shares Eligible for Future Sale
As of February 28, 2009, the Company had 8,711,495 shares of Common Stock outstanding, of which
6,409,494 shares are eligible for sale in the public market without restriction and 2,302,001
shares are eligible for sale in the public market pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Future sales of substantial amounts of the Company’s
common stock, or the perception that such sales could occur, could have a material adverse effect
on the market price of the common stock. In addition, options to acquire 310,930 shares of the
issued and outstanding shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $5.42 to $11.59 have
been issued to directors and certain employees of the Company under the Company’s 1998 and 2008
Stock Option Plans. No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future sales of
shares, or the availability of shares for future sale, will have on the market price of the
Company’s common stock.
Technology and Computer Systems
Advances and changes in technology can significantly affect the business and operations of the
Company. The Company faces many challenges including the increased demand for providing computer
access to bank accounts and the systems to perform banking transactions electronically. The
Company’s ability to compete depends on its ability to continue to adapt its technology on a timely
and cost-effective basis to meet these requirements. In addition, the Company’s business and
operations are susceptible to negative impacts from computer system failures, communication and
energy disruption and unethical individuals with the technological ability to cause disruptions or
failures of the Company’s data processing systems.
18
Environmental Risks
The Company, in its ordinary course of business, acquires real property securing loans that are in
default, and there is a risk that hazardous substance or waste, contaminants or pollutants could
exist on such properties. The Company may be required to remove or remediate such substances from
the affected properties at its expense, and the cost of such removal or remediation may
substantially exceed the value of the affected properties or the loans secured by such properties.
Furthermore, the Company may not have adequate remedies against the prior owners or other
responsible parties to recover its costs. Finally, the Company may find it difficult or impossible
to sell the affected properties either before or following any such removal. In addition, the
Company may be considered liable for environmental liabilities concerning its borrowers’
properties, if, among other things, it participates in the management of its borrowers’ operations.
The occurrence of such an event could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
ITEM 1(b). UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None to report.
19
Item 2. PROPERTIES
The Company’s principal administrative offices and technology center consists of approximately
12,000 square feet of space on property adjacent to the branch office at 1901 Churn Creek Road,
Redding, California 96002. The Bank’s main office is housed in a two-story building with
approximately 21,000 square feet of space located at 1951 Churn Creek Road, Redding, California,
96002. The Bank owns the buildings and the 1.25 acres of land on which the buildings are situated.
The Bank also owns the land and building located at 1177 Placer Street, Redding, California,
96001, in which the Bank uses approximately 11,650 square feet of space for its banking operations.
The Company’s Roseville Bank of Commerce is located on the first floor of a three-story building
with approximately 8,550 square feet of space located at 1504 Eureka Road, Roseville, California.
The Company leases the space pursuant to a triple net lease expiring on May 31, 2012.
During the first quarter 2008, the Company has opened a new contemporary, consumer friendly express
office with extended hours located at 3455 Placer Street, Redding, California 96001. The Company
leases space consisting of approximately 3,787 square feet expiring on August 21, 2017.
During the first quarter 2009, the Company has filed regulatory applications to close the Sutter
Bank of Commerce™ division. Approval has been granted and the Company will close this division on
April 17, 2009.
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is subject to various pending and threatened legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. The Company maintains reserves for losses from legal actions that are both
probable and estimable. In the opinion of management the disposition of claims currently pending
will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted during the quarter ended December 31, 2008 to a vote of the Company’s
security holders.
20
PART II
| Item 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
The principal market on which the Common Stock is traded is the NASDAQ National Market. The Common
stock is listed under the trading symbol “BOCH”. The following table sets forth the high and low
closing sales prices of the Common Stock on the NASDAQ National Market for the periods indicated:
| Sales Price Per Share | ||||||||||||
| Quarter Ended: | High | Low | Volume | |||||||||
March 31, 2008 |
$ | 8.59 | $ | 6.00 | 211,299 | |||||||
June 30, 2008 |
$ | 8.34 | $ | 6.10 | 71,390 | |||||||
September 30, 2008 |
$ | 6.95 | $ | 5.50 | 89,184 | |||||||
December 31, 2008 |
$ | 6.60 | $ | 3.92 | 135,589 | |||||||
March 31, 2007 |
$ | 12.29 | $ | 10.98 | 112,197 | |||||||
June 30, 2007 |
$ | 12.50 | $ | 10.82 | 55,221 | |||||||
September 30, 2007 |
$ | 11.54 | $ | 9.45 | 447,215 | |||||||
December 31, 2007 |
$ | 11.64 | $ | 8.45 | 381,865 | |||||||
We believe there were approximately 676 stockholders of the Company’s common stock as of December
31, 2008, including those held in street name, and the market price on that date was $4.23 per
share. Cash dividends of $0.08, $0.08, $0.08 and $0.08 were paid on January 11, 2008, April 11,
2008, July 11, 2008 and October 10, 2008, respectively, to stockholders of record as of December
31, 2007, March 31, 2008, June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2008.Cash dividends of $0.09, $0.08,
$0.08 and $0.08 per share was paid on January 12, 2007, April 13, 2007, July 13, 2007 and October
12, 2007, respectively, to stockholders of record as of December 31, 2006, March 31, 2007, June 30,
2007 and September 30, 2007.
The Company currently expects to pay cash dividends at this rate in the future, but the Company’s
ability to pay dividends is subject to certain regulatory requirements. The Federal Reserve Board
(“FRB”) generally prohibits a financial holding company from declaring or paying a cash dividend
which would impose undue pressure on the capital of subsidiary banks or would be funded only
through borrowing or other arrangements that might adversely affect a financial services holding
company’s financial position. The FRB’s policy is that a financial holding company should not
continue its existing rate of cash dividends on its common stock unless its net income is
sufficient to fully fund each dividend and its prospective rate of earnings retention appears
consistent with its capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The power of the
board of directors of an insured depository institution to declare a cash dividend or other
distribution with respect to capital is subject to statutory and regulatory restrictions which
limit the amount available for such distribution depending upon the earnings, financial condition
and cash needs of the institution, as well as general business conditions.
In addition to the restrictions imposed under federal law, banks chartered under California law
generally may only pay cash dividends to the extent such payments do not exceed the lesser of
retained earnings of the bank or the bank’s net income for its last three fiscal years (less any
distributions to stockholders during such period). In the event a bank desires to pay cash
dividends in excess of such amount, the bank may pay a cash dividend with the prior approval of the
Commissioner of the Department of Financial Institutions in an amount not exceeding the greatest of
the bank’s retained earnings, the bank’s net income for its last fiscal year, or the bank’s net
income for its current fiscal year.
One of the provisions of the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 signed by
President George W. Bush, included changes in how dividends are taxed. Investors will now pay lower
tax rates on dividends received from domestic corporations and qualified foreign corporations. In
the past, dividend income was another source of ordinary income, taxed at the investors’ normal tax
rate. Beginning in 2003, the maximum tax rate on qualifying dividends has dropped to 5%, 10% or 15%
depending on the investors’ tax bracket. The lower tax rate is scheduled to expire in 2008.
21
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following chart sets forth information for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, regarding
equity based compensation plans of the Company.
| Number of | ||||||||||||
| securities | ||||||||||||
| remaining available | ||||||||||||
| Number of | for future issuance | |||||||||||
| securities to be | under equity | |||||||||||
| issued upon | Weighted average | compensation plans | ||||||||||
| exercise of | exercise price of | (excluding | ||||||||||
| outstanding | outstanding | securities | ||||||||||
| options, warrants | options, warrants | reflected in | ||||||||||
| and rights | and rights | column (a)). | ||||||||||
| Plan category | (a) | (b) | (c) | |||||||||
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders |
298,080 | $ | 6.35 | 588,500 | ||||||||
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by security holders |
None | None | None | |||||||||
Total |
298,080 | $ | 6.35 | 588,500 | ||||||||
During 2008, the Company issued to the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury
Department”) 17,000 shares of Bank of Commerce Holdings Series A Fixed Rate Perpetual Preferred
Stock, without par value (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), having a liquidation amount per share
equal to $1,000 for a total price of $17 million.
Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
| (c) | (d) | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of | Maximum number of | |||||||||||||||
| shares purchased as | shares that may yet | |||||||||||||||
| (a) | (b) | part of publicly | be purchased under | |||||||||||||
| Total number of | Average price paid | announced plans or | the plans or | |||||||||||||
| Period | shares purchased | per share | programs | programs | ||||||||||||
01/01/08 - 01/31/08 |
34,452 | $ | 8.50 | 34,452 | 24,348 | |||||||||||
02/01/08 - 02/29/08 |
24,348 | $ | 8.92 | 24,348 | 0 | |||||||||||
Total 2008 |
58,800 | $ | 8.57 | 58,800 | 0 | |||||||||||
22
Stock Price Performance Graph
The following graph compares the Company’s cumulative total return to shareholders during the past
five years with that of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Index (the “S&P”) and the SNL
Securities $500-$1 billion Bank Asset-Size Index (the “SNL Securities Index”). The stock price
performance shown on the following graph is not necessarily indicative of future performance of the
Company’s Common Stock.
Bank of Commerce Holdings
Five — Year Performance Graph
Five — Year Performance Graph
Stock Performance Graph (1)
| SNL Securities LC (C)2008 | (804) 977-1600 |
| (1) | Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 2003, in the Company’s Common Stock, the NASDAQ, the S&P 500 and the SNL Securities Index. The model assumes reinvestment of dividends. Source: SNL Securities (share prices for the Company’s Common Stock was furnished to SNL Securities through the NASDAQ). |
23
Item 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected consolidated financial data set forth below for the five years ended December 31,
2008, have been derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and should be
read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations” and the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto,
included elsewhere in this report.
| In Thousands (Except Ratios and Per Share Data) | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||
Statements of Income |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Interest Income |
$ | 37,690 | $ | 41,128 | $ | 37,610 | $ | 27,864 | $ | 20,996 | ||||||||||
Net Interest Income |
$ | 21,348 | $ | 22,012 | $ | 22,035 | $ | 20,238 | $ | 16,887 | ||||||||||
Provision for Loan Losses |
$ | 6,520 | $ | 3,291 | $ | 226 | $ | 448 | $ | 554 | ||||||||||
Total Noninterest Income |
$ | 2,623 | $ | 4,535 | $ | 1,928 | $ | 2,124 | $ | 2,196 | ||||||||||
Total Noninterest Expense |
$ | 15,296 | $ | 15,744 | $ | 13,333 | $ | 11,749 | $ | 10,620 | ||||||||||
Total Revenues |
$ | 40,313 | $ | 45,753 | $ | 39,539 | $ | 29,988 | $ | 23,192 | ||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 2,194 | $ | 6,107 | $ | 6,568 | $ | 6,278 | $ | 4,978 | ||||||||||
Balance Sheets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 774,214 | $ | 618,327 | $ | 583,442 | $ | 511,644 | $ | 438,545 | ||||||||||
Total Net Loans |
$ | 518,947 | $ | 486,283 | $ | 408,989 | $ | 363,305 | $ | 318,801 | ||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses |
$ | 8,429 | $ | 8,233 | $ | 4,904 | $ | 4,316 | $ | 3,866 | ||||||||||
Total Deposits |
$ | 555,282 | $ | 473,631 | $ | 439,407 | $ | 372,116 | $ | 352,878 | ||||||||||
Stockholders’ Equity |
$ | 62,578 | $ | 46,164 | $ | 43,916 | $ | 39,138 | $ | 35,283 | ||||||||||
Performance Ratios 1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Return on Average Assets 2 |
0.33 | % | 1.04 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.34 | % | 1.22 | % | ||||||||||
Return on Average Stockholders’ Equity 3 |
4.99 | % | 13.39 | % | 15.59 | % | 18.35 | % | 18.18 | % | ||||||||||
Dividend Payout |
127.04 | % | 46.47 | % | 40.36 | % | 35.74 | % | 39.29 | % | ||||||||||
Average Equity to Average Assets |
8.91 | % | 9.43 | % | 9.49 | % | 9.43 | % | 7.91 | % | ||||||||||
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital-Bank 4 |
11.58 | % | 9.97 | % | 11.42 | % | 12.08 | % | 10.80 | % | ||||||||||
Total Risk-Based Capital-Bank |
12.84 | % | 11.22 | % | 12.54 | % | 13.11 | % | 11.88 | % | ||||||||||
Net Interest Margin 5 |
3.47 | % | 3.98 | % | 4.26 | % | 4.59 | % | 4.45 | % | ||||||||||
Average Earning Assets to Total Average Assets |
92.86 | % | 93.74 | % | 94.20 | % | 94.04 | % | 92.62 | % | ||||||||||
Nonperforming Assets to Total Assets 6 |
2.98 | % | 2.01 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.08 | % | 0.54 | % | ||||||||||
Net Charge-offs to Average Loans |
1.22 | % | .00 | % | -.09 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses to Total Loans |
1.60 | % | 1.66 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.20 | % | ||||||||||
Nonperforming Loans to Allowance for Loan Losses |
239.10 | % | 150.72 | % | 0.00 | % | 9.15 | % | 61.64 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency Ratio 7 |
63.81 | % | 59.31 | % | 55.64 | % | 52.54 | % | 55.65 | % | ||||||||||
Share Data |
||||||||||||||||||||
Average Common Shares Outstanding — basic |
8,713 | 8,858 | 8,760 | 8,600 | 8,283 | |||||||||||||||
Average Common Shares Outstanding — diluted |
8,724 | 8,938 | 8,932 | 8,845 | 8,703 | |||||||||||||||
Book Value Per Common Share |
$ | 5.23 | $ | 5.27 | $ | 4.96 | $ | 4.52 | $ | 4.27 | ||||||||||
Basic Earnings Per Common Share |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.60 | ||||||||||
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 0.74 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.57 | ||||||||||
Cash Dividends Per Common Share 8 |
$ | 0.32 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.23 | ||||||||||
| 1 | Regulatory Capital Ratios and Asset Quality Ratios are end of period ratios. With the exception of end of period ratios, all ratios are based on average daily balances during the indicated period. | |
| 2 | Return on average assets is net income divided by average total assets. | |
| 3 | Return on average equity is net income divided by average stockholders’ equity. | |
| 4 | Regulatory capital ratios are defined in detail in the table on pages 42-43.. | |
| 5 | Net interest margin equals net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets. | |
| 6 | Non-performing assets includes all nonperforming loans (nonaccrual loans, loans 90 days past due and still accruing interest and restructured loans) and real estate acquired by foreclosure. | |
| 7 | The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing non-interest expense by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income. The efficiency ratio measures how the Company spends in order to generate each dollar of net revenue. | |
| 8 | Cash dividends declared during the current fiscal year |
24
Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements
of the Company and related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. This report includes
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange
Act”) and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are not
guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks. These statements are based on
management’s beliefs and assumptions, and on information available to management as of the date of
this document. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning possible or assumed
future results of operations of the Company set forth under the heading “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Forward-looking statements also
include statements in which words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intend,” “plan,” “believes,”
“estimate,” “consider” or similar expressions or conditional verbs such as “will” “should” “would”
and “could” are intended to identify such forward looking statements. The Company’s actual future
results and stockholder values may differ materially from those anticipated and expressed in these
forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results and values,
including those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors That May Affect Results,” are beyond the
Company’s ability to control or predict. Investors are cautioned not to put undue reliance on any
forward-looking statements. In addition, the Company does not have any intention to and assumes no
obligation to update forward-looking statements after the date of the filing of this report, even
if new information, future events or other circumstances have made such statements incorrect or
misleading. Except as specifically noted herein all referenced to the “Company” refer to Bank of
Commerce Holdings, a California corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Executive Overview
Our Company was established to make a profitable return while serving the financial needs of the
business and professional communities of our markets. We are in the financial services business,
and no line of financial services is beyond our charter as long as it serves the needs of
businesses and professionals in our communities. The mission of our Company is to provide its
stockholders with a safe and profitable return on their investment over the long term. Management
will attempt to minimize risk to our stockholders by making prudent business decisions, maintaining
adequate levels of capital and reserves, and maintaining effective communications with
stockholders.
Our vision is to embrace changes in the industry and develop profitable business strategies that
allow us to maintain our customer relationships and build new ones. Our competitors are no longer
just banks. We must compete with financial powerhouses that want our core business. The flexibility
provided by the Financial Holding Company Act will become increasingly important. We have
developed strategic plans that evaluate additional financial services and products that can be
delivered to our customers efficiently and profitably. Producing quality returns is, as always, a
top priority.
It is the vision of the Company to remain independent, expanding its presence through internal
growth and the addition of strategically important full service and focused service locations. The
Company will pursue attractive opportunities to enter related lines of business as well as the
possibility of acquiring financial institutions with complementary lines of business. The Company
will continue its expansion into the profitable markets, building franchise value. The Company will
distinguish itself from the competition by a commitment to efficient delivery of products and
services in its target markets — businesses and professionals, while maintaining personal
relationships with mutual loyalty.
The Company’s long term success rests on the shoulders of the leadership team to effectively
enhance the performance of the Company. As a financial services company, we are in the business of
taking risk. Whether we are successful depends largely upon whether we take the right risks and get
paid appropriately for the risks we take. Our governance structure enables us to manage all major
aspects of the Company’s business effectively through an integrated process that includes
financial, strategic, risk and leadership planning.
We define risks to include not only credit, market and liquidity risk, the traditional concerns for
financial institutions, but also operational risks, including risks related to systems, processes
or external events, as well as legal, regulatory and reputation risks. Our management processes,
structures, and policies help to ensure compliance with laws and regulations and provide clear
lines for decision-making and accountability. Results are important, but equally important is how
we achieve those results. Our core values and commitment to high ethical standards is material to
sustaining public trust and confidence in our Company.
25
Risk Management
Overview
Through our corporate governance structure, risk and return is evaluated to produce sustainable
revenues, reduce risks of earning volatility and increase stockholder value. The financial services
industry is exposed to four major risks; liquidity, credit, market and operational. Liquidity risk
is the inability to meet liability maturities and withdrawals, fund asset growth and otherwise meet
contractual obligations at reasonable market rates. Credit risk is the inability of a customer to
meet its repayment obligations. Market risk is the fluctuation in asset and liability values caused
by changes in market prices and yields and Operational risk is the potential for losses resulting
from events involving people, processes, technology, legal issues, external events, regulatory or
reputation.
Board Committees
Our corporate governance structure begins with our Board of Directors. The Board of Directors
evaluates risk through the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and four Board Committees:
| • | Loan Committee reviews credit risks and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. | |
| • | Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) reviews liquidity and market risks. | |
| • | Audit Committee reviews the scope and coverage of internal and external audit activities. | |
| • | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates corporate governance structure, charters, committee performance and acts in best interests of the corporation and its stockholders with regard to the appointment of director nominees. |
These committees review reports from management, the Company’s auditors, and other outside sources.
On the basis of materials that are available to them and on which they rely, they review the
performance of the Company’s management and personnel, and establish policies, but neither the
committees nor their individual members (in their capacities as members of the Board of Directors)
are responsible for daily operations of the Company. In particular, risk management activities
relating to individual loans are undertaken by Company personnel in accordance with the policies
established by the Board committees.
Senior Leadership Committees
To ensure that our risk management goals and objectives are accomplished, oversight of our risk
taking and risk management activities are conducted through five Senior Leadership committees
comprised of management.
| • | The Senior Leadership Committee establishes short and long-term strategies and operating plans. The committee establishes performance measures and reviews performance to plan on a monthly basis. | |
| • | The Credit Round Table Committee recommends corporate credit practices and limits, including industry concentration limits and approval requirements and exceptions. | |
| • | The Technology Steering Committee establishes technological strategies, makes technology investment decisions, and manages the implementation process. | |
| • | The ALCO Round Table Committee establishes and monitors liquidity ranges, pricing, maturities, investment goals, and interest spread on balance sheet accounts. | |
| • | The SOX 404 Compliance Team has established the master plan for full documentation of the Companies internal controls and compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Section 404. |
Risk Management Controls
We use various controls to manage risk exposure within the Company. Budgeting and planning
processes provide for early indication of unplanned results or risk levels. Models are used to
estimate market risk and net interest income sensitivity. Segmentation analysis is used to estimate
expected and unexpected credit losses. Compliance to regulatory guidelines plays a significant role
in risk management as well as corporate culture and the actions of management. Our code of ethics
provides the guidelines for all employees to conduct themselves with the highest integrity in the
delivery of service to our clients.
26
Liquidity Risk Management
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the inability to meet liability maturities and withdrawals, fund asset growth and
otherwise meet contractual obligations at reasonable market rates. Liquidity management involves
maintaining ample and diverse funding capacity, liquid assets and other sources of cash to
accommodate fluctuations in asset and liability levels due to business shocks or unanticipated
events. ALCO is responsible for establishing our liquidity policy and the accounting department is
responsible for planning and executing the funding activities and strategies.
Asset liquidity sources consist of the repayments and maturities of loans, selling of loans,
short-term money market investments, maturities and sales of securities from the available-for-sale
security portfolio. Increased available-for-sale security balances were responsible for the major
use of liquidity, followed by growth in the loan portfolio. The weighted-average life of the
available-for-sale security portfolio is 10.5 years.
Liquidity is generated from liabilities through deposit growth and federal home loan bank
borrowings. We emphasize preserving and maximizing customer deposits and other customer-based
funding sources. Deposit marketing strategies are reviewed for consistency with liquidity policy
objectives.
The Company also had available correspondent banking lines of credit through correspondent
relationships totaling approximately $20.0 million and available secured borrowing lines of
approximately $58.0 million with the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. While these sources
are expected to continue to provide significant amounts of liquidity in the future, their mix, as
well as the possible use of other sources, will depend on future economic and market conditions.
Liquidity is also provided or used through the results of the Company’s operations.
The Company’s liquid assets (cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and available-for-sale
securities) totaled $216.9 million or 28.0% of total assets at December 31, 2008, $90.1 million or
14.5% of total assets at December 31, 2007 and $134.9 million or 23.1% of total assets at December
31, 2006. In 2008, the Holding Company’s primary source of funding was exercises of stock options
and dividends. The Holding Company expects to receive dividends from the Bank in 2009. (See note 18
to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the restrictions on the Bank’s ability
to pay dividends.)
To accommodate future growth and business needs, the Company develops an annual capital expenditure
budget during strategic planning sessions. The Company expects that the earnings of the Company,
acquisition of core deposits and wholesale borrowing arrangements are sufficient to support
liquidity needs in 2009.
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
The Company actively uses Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances as a source of wholesale funding
to provide liquidity and to implement leverage strategies. At December 31, 2008, the Company’s FHLB
long-term advance was fixed rate. At December 31, 2008 the Company’s FHLB short-term advances were
a fixed term borrowing without call or put features, fixed rates. At December 2008, the Company had
$120 million in FHLB advances outstanding compared to $60 million at December 31, 2007.
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Securities sold under
agreements to repurchase
with weighted average
interest rates of 0.62%,
2.84% and 4.00% at December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively |
13,853,255 | $ | 15,513,211 | $ | 37,116,610 | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank
borrowings with weighted
average interest rates of
2.41%, 4.30% and 5.64% at
December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively |
120,000,000 | 60,000,000 | 40,000,000 | |||||||||
Total FHLB borrowings |
$ | 133,853,255 | $ | 75,513,211 | $ | 77,116,610 | ||||||
27
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Securities sold under
agreements to repurchase: |
||||||||||||
Maximum outstanding at any month end |
$ | 14,581,881 | $ | 46,417,358 | $ | 37,116,610 | ||||||
Average balance during the year |
13,038,870 | 32,237,000 | 29,708,000 | |||||||||
Weighted average interest rate during year |
1.32 | % | 3.65 | % | 3.84 | % | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings: |
||||||||||||
Maximum outstanding at any month end |
$ | 120,000,000 | $ | 60,000,000 | $ | 80,000,000 | ||||||
Average Balance during the year |
83,048,645 | 46,630,462 | 59,059,300 | |||||||||
Weighted average interest rate during year |
3.40 | % | 5.20 | % | 5.21 | % | ||||||
Credit Risk Management
Credit risk arises from the inability of a customer to meet its repayment obligations. Credit risk
exists in our outstanding loans, letters of credit and unfunded loan commitments. We manage credit
risk based on the risk profile of the borrower, repayment sources and the nature of underlying
collateral given current events and conditions.
Commercial portfolio credit risk management
Commercial credit risk management begins with an assessment of the credit risk profile of the
individual borrower based on an analysis of the borrower’s financial position in light of current
industry, economic or geopolitical trends. As part of the overall credit risk assessment of a
borrower, each commercial credit is assigned a risk grade and is subject to approval based on
existing credit approval standards. Risk grading is a factor in determining the adequacy of the
allowance for loan and lease losses. Credit decisions are determined by Credit Administration to
certain limitations and approvals from the Loan Committee above certain limitations. Credit risk
is continuously monitored by Credit Administration for possible adjustment if there has been a
change in the borrower’s ability to perform under its obligations. Additionally, we manage the size
of our credit exposure through loan sales and loan participation agreements.
The primary sources of repayment of the commercial loans of the Company are from the borrower’s
operating cash flows and the borrowers’ conversion of short-term assets to cash. The net assets of
the borrower or guarantor are usually identified as a secondary source of repayment. The principal
factors affecting the Bank’s risk of loss from commercial lending include each borrower’s ability
to manage its business affairs and cash flows, local and general economic conditions and real
estate values in the Company’s service area. The Company manages its commercial loan portfolio by
monitoring its borrowers’ payment performance and their respective financial condition and makes
periodic adjustments, if necessary, to the risk grade assigned to each loan in the portfolio. The
Company’s evaluations of its borrowers’ are facilitated by management’s knowledge of local market
conditions and periodic reviews by a consultant of the credit administration policies of the
Company.
Real estate portfolio credit risk management
The principal source of repayment of the real estate construction loans of the Company is the sale
of the underlying collateral or the availability of permanent financing from the Company or other
lending source. The principal risks associated with real estate construction lending include
project cost overruns that absorb the borrower’s equity in the project and deterioration of real
estate values as a result of various factors, including competitive pressures and economic
downturns.
The Company manages its credit risk associated with real estate construction lending by
establishing a loan-to-value ratio on projects on an as-completed basis, inspecting project status
in advance of disbursements, and matching maturities with expected completion dates. Generally, the
Company requires a loan-to-value ratio of not more than 80% on single family residential
construction loans. The specific underwriting standards of the Company and methods for each of its
principal lines of lending include industry-accepted analysis and modeling and certain proprietary
techniques. The underwriting criteria of the Bank are designed to comply with applicable regulatory
guidelines, including required loan-to-value ratios. The credit administration policies of the
Company contain mandatory lien position and debt service coverage requirements, and the Bank
generally requires a guarantee from individuals owning 20% or more of the borrowing entity.
28
Concentrations of credit risk
Portfolio credit risk is evaluated with the goal that concentrations of credit exposure do not
result in unacceptable levels of risk. Concentrations of credit exposure can be measured in various
ways including industry, product, geography, and customer relationship. We review non-real estate
commercial loans by industry and real estate loans by geographic location and property type.
Nonperforming assets
The Company’s practice is to place an asset on nonaccrual status when one of the following events
occurs:(i) Any installment of principal or interest is 90 days or more past due (unless in
management’s opinion the loan is well-secured and in the process of collection), (ii) management
determines the ultimate collection of principal or interest to be unlikely or (iii) the terms of
the loan have been renegotiated due to a serious weakening of the borrower’s financial condition.
Nonperforming loans may be on nonaccrual, are 90 days past due and still accruing, or have been
restructured.
Allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL)
The allowance for loan and lease losses represents management’s best estimate of probable losses in
the loans and leases portfolio. Within the allowance, reserves are allocated to segments of the
portfolio based on specific formula components. Changes to the allowance for credit losses are
reported in the Consolidated Statement of Income in the provision for loan losses.
We perform periodic and systematic detailed evaluations of our lending portfolio to identify and
estimate the inherent risks and assess the overall collectibility. These evaluations include
general conditions such as the portfolio composition, size and maturities of various segmented
portions of the portfolio such as secured, unsecured, construction, and Small Business
Administration (“SBA”). Additional factors include concentrations of borrowers, industries,
geographical sectors, loan product, loan classes and collateral types, volume and trends of loan
delinquencies and non-accrual; criticized and classified assets and trends in the aggregate in
significant credits identified as watch list items.
The Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses is the accumulation of various components that
are calculated based upon independent methodologies. All components of the allowance for loan
losses represent an estimation performed pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies or SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan. Management’s estimate of each SFAS No. 5 component is based on certain
observable data that management believes is the most reflective of the underlying credit losses
being estimated. Changes in the amount of each component of the allowance for loan losses are
directionally consistent with changes in the observable data, taking into account the interaction
of the SFAS No. 5 components over time.
An essential element of the methodology for determining the allowance for loan and lease losses is
the Company’s credit risk evaluation process, which includes credit risk grading individual,
commercial, construction, commercial real estate, and consumer loans. Loans are assigned credit
risk grades based on the Company’s assessment of conditions that affect the borrower’s ability to
meet its contractual obligations under the loan agreement. That process includes reviewing
borrower’s current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation,
public information, and other information specific to each individual borrower. Loans are reviewed
on an annual or rotational basis or as management become aware of information affecting the
borrower’s ability to fulfill its obligations. Credit risk grades carry a dollar weighted risk
percentage.
For individually impaired loans, SFAS No. 114 provides guidance on the acceptable methods to
measure impairment. Specifically, SFAS No. 114 states that when a loan is impaired, we measure
impairment based on the present value of expected future principal and interest cash flows
discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, except that as a practical expedient, a creditor
may measure impairment based on a loan’s observable market price or the fair value of collateral,
if the loan is collateral dependent. When developing the estimate of future cash flows for a loan,
we consider all available information reflecting past events and current conditions, including the
effect of existing environmental factors. In addition to the ALLL, an allowance for unfunded loan
commitments and letters of credit is determined using estimates of the probability of funding. This
reserve is carried as a liability on the consolidated balance sheet.
29
We make provisions to the ALLL on a regular basis through charges to operations that are reflected
in our consolidated statements of income as provision expense for loan losses. When a loan is
deemed uncollectible, it is charged against the allowance. Any recoveries of previously charged-off
loans are credited back to the allowance. There is no precise method of predicting specific losses
or amounts that ultimately may be charged-off on particular categories of the loan portfolio.
Various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review
the Company’s ALLL. Such agencies may require the Company to provide additions to the allowance
based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination. There is
uncertainty concerning future economic trends. Accordingly, it is not possible to predict the
effect future economic trends may have on the level of the provisions for possible loan losses in
future periods. The ALLL should not be interpreted as an indication that charge-offs in future
periods will occur in the stated amounts or proportions.
The following table summarizes the activity in the ALLL reserves for the periods indicated.
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance: |
$ | 8,233 | $ | 4,904 | $ | 4,316 | $ | 3,866 | $ | 3,675 | $ | 3,529 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
6,520 | 3,291 | 226 | 448 | 554 | 515 | ||||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial & Financial |
(1,007 | ) | (0 | ) | (274 | ) | (83 | ) | (367 | ) | (379 | ) | ||||||||||||
Real Estate |
(5,322 | ) | (0 | ) | (0 | ) | (0 | ) | (0 | ) | (0 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other |
(0 | ) | (0 | ) | (25 | ) | (10 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total Charge-offs |
(6,329 | ) | (0 | ) | ( 299 | ) | (93 | ) | (368 | ) | (380 | ) | ||||||||||||
Recoveries: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial & Financial |
0 | 26 | 655 | 93 | 2 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate |
5 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Recoveries |
5 | 38 | 661 | 95 | 5 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net Charge-offs |
(6,324 | ) | 38 | 362 | 2 | (363 | ) | (369 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Ending Balance |
$ | 8,429 | $ | 8,233 | $ | 4,904 | $ | 4,316 | $ | 3,866 | $ | 3,675 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to
total loans |
1.60 | % | 1.66 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.30 | % | ||||||||||||
Net Charge-offs to average loans |
1.22 | % | .00 | % | -.09 | % | .00 | % | .12 | % | .13 | % | ||||||||||||
Provisions for loan and lease losses increased significantly during the fourth quarter 2008 related
to real estate development loans that were placed into non-accrual status. Elevated provisions are
associated with an aggressive reclassification of loans, following completion of a total portfolio
review, and management’s aggressive stance in recognizing impaired loans. The provisions for loan
and lease losses increased to $6,520,000 for 2008 versus $3,291,000 in 2007. Net losses were
approximately $6,324,000 compared to recoveries of approximately $38,000 in 2007. The Company’s
allowance for loan losses was 1.60% of total loans at December 31, 2008 compared to 1.66% of total
loans a year ago. The drop in ratio of allowance to total loans is directly related to the increase
in outstanding loans at December 31, 2008.
Actual and future results of the allowance provisions and charge-offs may differ materially from
trends expressed in the table and are beyond the Company’s ability to predict.
30
Allocation of Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses by product type:
| Dec. 31, 2008 | Dec. 31, 2007 | Dec. 31, 2006 | Dec. 31, 2005 | Dec. 31, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent | Percent | Percent | Percent | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| of | of | of | of | of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| category | category | category | category | category | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| to total | to total | to total | to total | to total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | Amount | loans | Amount | loans | Amount | loans | Amount | loans | Amount | loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at end of
period applicable to: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and Financial |
$ | 3,415 | 31.11 | % | $ | 1,722 | 35.11 | % | $ | 2,033 | 30.36 | % | $ | 1,900 | 30.76 | % | $ | 2,087 | 32.64 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate |
$ | 2,900 | 41.31 | % | $ | 1,512 | 35.37 | % | $ | 1,364 | 41.62 | % | $ | 1,375 | 41.11 | % | $ | 1,149 | 41.83 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Construction and Development |
$ | 1,913 | 15.97 | % | $ | 4,594 | 21.62 | % | $ | 1,244 | 26.73 | % | $ | 936 | 27.57 | % | $ | 588 | 23.95 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Installment Loans |
$ | 60 | 0.03 | % | $ | 44 | 0.05 | % | $ | 28 | 0.23 | % | $ | 28 | 0.53 | % | $ | 23 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other Loans |
$ | 116 | 0.17 | % | $ | 56 | 0.25 | % | $ | 41 | 0.05 | % | $ | 0 | 0.00 | % | $ | 0 | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unallocated |
$ | 25 | 11.41 | % | $ | 305 | 7.60 | % | $ | 194 | 1.01 | % | $ | 77 | 0.03 | % | $ | 19 | 1.37 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Allowance for loan and lease losses |
$ | 8,429 | 100.00 | % | $ | 8,233 | 100.00 | % | $ | 4,904 | 100.00 | % | $ | 4,316 | 100.00 | % | $ | 3,866 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Market Risk Management
Market risk is the potential loss due to adverse changes in market prices and yields. Market risk
is inherent in the Company’s operating positions and activities including customers’ loans, deposit
accounts, securities and long-term debt. Loans and deposits generate income and expense,
respectively, and the value of cash flows change based on general economic levels, most
importantly, the level of interest rates.
The goal for managing the assets and liabilities of the Company is to maximize stockholder value
and earnings while maintaining a high quality balance sheet without exposing the Company to undue
interest rate risk. The absolute level and volatility of interest rates can have a significant
impact on the Company’s profitability. Market risk arises from exposure to changes in interest
rates, exchange rates, commodity prices, and other relevant market rate or price risk. The Company
does not operate a trading account, and does not hold a position with exposure to foreign currency
exchange. The Company faces market risk through interest rate volatility. Net interest income risk
is measured based on rate shocks over different time horizons versus a current stable interest rate
environment. Assumptions used in these calculations are similar to those used in the planning and
budgeting model. The overall interest rate risk position and strategies are reviewed on an ongoing
basis with ALCO.
Securities Portfolio
The securities portfolio is central to our asset liability management strategies. The decision to
purchase or sell securities is based upon the current assessment of economic and financial
conditions, including the interest rate environment, liquidity and regulatory requirements. The
Company classifies its securities as “available-for-sale” or “held-to-maturity” at the time of
purchase. Generally, all securities are purchased with the intent and ability to hold the security
for long-term investment, and the Company has both the ability and intent to hold
“held-to-maturity” investments to maturity. The Company does not engage in trading activities.
Securities held-to-maturity is carried at cost adjusted for the accretion of discounts and
amortization of premiums. Securities available-for-sale may be sold to implement the Company’s
asset liability management strategies and in response to changes in interest rates, prepayment
rates and similar factors. Securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value and unrealized
gains or losses, net of income taxes, are reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income(loss), in a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Gain or loss on sale
of securities is based on the specific identification method. During the third quarter 2008, all
held-to-maturity securities were transferred to available-for-sale to provide the Company with
greater liquidity resources.
31
Operational Risk Management
Operational risk is the potential for loss resulting from events involving people, processes,
technology, legal or regulatory issues, external events, and reputation. In keeping with the
corporate governance structure, the Senior Leadership committee is responsible for operational risk
controls. Operational risks are managed through specific policies and procedures, controls and
monitoring tools. Examples of these include reconciliation processes, transaction monitoring and
analysis and system audits. Operational risks fall into two major categories, business specific and
company wide. The Senior Leadership committee works to ensure consistency in policies, processes
and assessments. With respect to company wide risks, the Senior Leadership committee works directly
with Directors to develop policies and procedures for information security, business resumption
plans, compliance and legal issues.
Critical Accounting Policies
General
The Company’s significant accounting principles are described in Note 2 of the consolidated
financial statements and are essential to understanding Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. Bank of Commerce Holdings’ consolidated financial
statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (GAAP). The financial information contained within our statements is, to a
significant extent, financial information that is based on measures of the financial effects of
transactions and events that have already occurred. Some of the Company’s accounting principles
require significant judgment to estimate values of assets or liabilities. In addition, certain
accounting principles require significant judgment in applying the complex accounting principles to
transactions to determine the most appropriate treatment.
Valuation of Investments and Impairment of Securities
Invested assets are exposed to various risks, such as interest rate, market and credit risks. Due
to the level of risk associated with certain invested assets and the level of uncertainty related
to changes in the fair value of these assets, it is possible that changes in risks in the near term
could have an adverse material impact on our results of operations or equity.
Our investment portfolio is subject to market declines below amortized cost that may be
other-than-temporary. A significant judgment in the valuation of investments is the determination
of when an ‘other-than-temporary’ impairment has occurred. The ALCO Committee reviews the
investment portfolio on at least a quarterly basis, with ongoing analysis as new information
becomes available. Any decline that is determined to be other-than-temporary is recorded as an
‘other-than-temporary’ impairment (“OTTI”) loss in the results of operations in the period in which the
determination occurred.
An investment is impaired if the fair value of the investment is less than its cost adjusted
for accretion, amortization and OTTI, otherwise defined as an unrealized loss. When an investment
is impaired, the impairment is evaluated to determine whether it is temporary or
other-than-temporary.
Significant judgment is required in the determination of whether an OTTI has occurred for an
investment. The Company follows a consistent and systematic process for determining and recording
an OTTI loss. The Company has designated the ALCO Committee responsible for the OTTI process.
The ALCO Committee’s assessment of whether an OTTI loss should be recognized incorporates both
quantitative and qualitative information. The ALCO Committee considers a number of factors
including, but not limited to: (a) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has
been less than amortized cost, (b) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer,
(c) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment for a period of time sufficient
to allow for an anticipated recovery in value, (d) whether the debtor is current on interest and
principal payments and (e) general market conditions and industry or sector specific outlook.
For securities considered to be OTTI, the security is adjusted to fair value and the resulting
losses are recognized in Realized investment gains (losses) on the Consolidated Statement of
Income.
32
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL)
The allowance for loan and lease losses is management’s best estimate of the probable losses that
may be sustained in our loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two basic principles of
accounting. (1) SFAS No.5 which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring
and estimable and (2) SFAS No. 114, which requires that losses be accrued based on the differences
between that value of collateral, present value of future cash flows or values that are observable
in the secondary market and the loan balance. The Company performs periodic and systematic detailed
evaluations of its lending portfolio to identify and estimate the inherent risks and assess the
overall collectibility. These evaluations include general conditions such as the portfolio
composition, size and maturities of various segmented portions of the portfolio such as secured,
unsecured, construction, and Small Business Administration (“SBA”).
Additional factors include concentrations of borrowers, industries, geographical sectors, loan
product, loan classes and collateral types; volume and trends of loan delinquencies and
non-accrual; criticized and classified assets and trends in the aggregate in significant credits
identified as watch list items. There are several components to the determination of the adequacy
of the ALLL. Each of these components is determined based upon estimates that can and do change
when the actual events occur. The Company estimates the SFAS No. 5 portion of the ALLL based on the
segmentation of its portfolio. For those segments that require an ALLL, the Company estimates loan
losses on a monthly basis based upon its ongoing loan review process and analysis of loan
performance. The Company follows a systematic and consistently applied approach to select the most
appropriate loss measurement methods and support its conclusions and rationale with written
documentation. One method of estimating loan losses for groups of loans is through the application
of loss rates to the groups’ aggregate loan balances. Such rates typically reflect historical loss
experience for each group of loans, adjusted for relevant economic factors over a defined period of
time. The Company evaluates and modifies its loss estimation model as needed to ensure that the
resulting loss estimate is consistent with GAAP. For individually impaired loans, SFAS No. 114
provides guidance on the acceptable methods to measure impairment.
Specifically, SFAS No. 114 states that when a loan is impaired, the Company should measure
impairment based on the present value of expected future principal and interest cash flows
discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, except that as a practical expedient, a creditor
may measure impairment based on a loan’s observable market price or the fair value of collateral,
if the loan is collateral dependent. When developing the estimate of future cash flows for a loan,
the Company considers all available information reflecting past events and current conditions,
including the effect of existing environmental factors.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R (FAS 123R), “Share-Based
Payment,” on January 1, 2006. The scope of FAS 123R includes a wide range of stock-based
compensation arrangements including stock options, restricted stock plans, performance-based
awards, stock appreciation rights, and employee stock purchase plans. FAS 123R requires the Company
to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments.
The cost is determined based on the fair value of the award on the grant date. That cost must be
recognized in the income statement over the service period of the award. Under the ‘modified
prospective’ transition method, awards that are granted, modified or settled beginning at the date
of adoption will be measured and accounted for in accordance with FAS 123R. In addition, expense
must be recognized in the income statement for unvested awards that were granted prior to the date
of adoption.
During 2008, the fair value of options granted was determined on the date of the grant using a
binomial option-pricing model with the following assumptions: a current volatility rate of 32.10%,
a risk-fee interest rate of 2.97% (based upon the five year treasury coupon rate at the time the
options were issued), expected dividends of $0.32 per share per year (current dividend payout), an
annual dividend rate of 4.56%, an assumed forfeiture rate of zero and an expected life of seven
years.
33
Revenue recognition
The Company’s primary source of revenue is net interest income, which is the difference between the
interest income it receives on interest-earning assets and the interest expense it pays on
interest-bearing liabilities, and (ii) fee income, which includes fees earned on deposit services,
income from SBA lending, electronic-based cash management services, mortgage brokerage fee income
and merchant credit card processing services. Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis. Note
2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements offers an explanation of the process for determining
when the accrual of interest income is discontinued on an impaired loan.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under the asset and
liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using currently enacted tax rates applied to such taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on
deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period
that includes the enactment date. If future income should prove non-existent or less than the
amount of deferred tax assets within the tax years to which they may be applied, the asset may not
be realized and our net income will be reduced.
34
Financial Highlights — Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis provides a comparison of the results of operations for 2008
and 2007. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
and related notes.
| Key Financial Ratios | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||
Profitability |
||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average assets |
0.33 | % | 1.04 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.34 | % | 1.22 | % | ||||||||||
Return on average equity |
4.99 | % | 13.39 | % | 15.59 | % | 18.35 | % | 18.18 | % | ||||||||||
Average earning assets to total average assets |
92.86 | % | 93.74 | % | 94.20 | % | 94.04 | % | 92.62 | % | ||||||||||
Interest Margin |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin |
3.47 | % | 3.98 | % | 4.26 | % | 4.59 | % | 4.45 | % | ||||||||||
Asset Quality |
||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to total loans |
1.60 | % | 1.66 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.20 | % | ||||||||||
Nonperforming assets to total assets |
2.98 | % | 2.01 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.08 | % | 0.54 | % | ||||||||||
Net charge-offs to average loans |
1.22 | % | 0.00 | % | -0.09 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
Liquidity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Loans to deposits |
93.28 | % | 102.67 | % | 93.08 | % | 97.63 | % | 90.34 | % | ||||||||||
Liquidity ratio |
22.56 | % | 18.49 | % | 27.96 | % | 23.57 | % | 23.23 | % | ||||||||||
Capital |
||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital — Bank |
11.58 | % | 9.97 | % | 11.42 | % | 12.08 | % | 10.80 | % | ||||||||||
Total risk-based capital — Bank |
12.84 | % | 11.22 | % | 12.54 | % | 13.11 | % | 11.88 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency |
||||||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio |
63.81 | % | 59.31 | % | 55.64 | % | 52.54 | % | 55.65 | % | ||||||||||
The above table represents key financial performance ratios that the Senior Leadership Team of the
Company monitor on a monthly basis in comparison with Uniform Bank Performance Report peer data.
Uniform Bank Performance Reports are available on all Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured
financial institutions and are used to measure quality performance to peer groupings and may be
obtained online at www.fdic.gov. Executive Management monitors the high-performing sector
of the peer group and uses this data to examine strategies of other high-performing financial
institutions and to establish the financial performance goals of the Company on an annual basis.
These goals are then communicated through budgets, strategies, planning and projections to the
Senior Leadership Team for implementation. Results are monitored both to plan and to peer at the
Board of Directors level on a monthly basis.
Balance Sheet
Our Company believes that 2008 and beyond may be redefining the financial services industry.
Despite the dramatic changes in our industry and the economic environment, Bank of Commerce
Holdings achieved solid growth in loans and deposits, and our strength and security continue to
compare favorably with our industry peers. During 2008, the focus of the Company has been on
strengthening the balance sheet, by providing appropriate reserves, strong capital, and significant
liquidity.
Our balance sheet grew by $156.0 million or 25.2% over the prior year end. Loans, the single
largest asset of the Company grew by $32.7 million or 6.7%, an all time high for the Company.
Deposit growth was up $81.7 million or 17.2% of which $31.1 million was centered in core checking
and savings accounts. Our new Buenaventura office in Redding, California surpassed their deposit
goals in only eight months after opening its doors.
Management has taken aggressive actions through the year in provisioning for loan losses, charging
down impairments and keeping an attentive eye on expenses. 2008 was an extremely challenging year
for credit, and management took an aggressive stance in recognizing impaired loans.
35
The Commercial and Industrial portfolio is performing well given the current market conditions
while real estate development properties and construction related lending remains under stress. Our
loan portfolio will likely continue to be influenced by weakness in real estate values, the effects
of higher energy prices and higher unemployment levels. Net charge offs were $6.3 million at
December 31, 2008 compared to net recoveries of approximately $38,000 in 2007. The charge-offs were
centered in real estate development loans. One development property was taken into other real
estate owned (OREO). OREO was $2.9 million at December 31, 2008 and zero at December 31, 2007. We
are committed to working with our customers to find potential solutions when our customers
experience financial difficulties.
Elevated provisions are associated with an aggressive reclassification of loans, following
completion of a total portfolio review, and management’s aggressive stance in recognizing impaired
loans. Our Company has provided $6.5 million in provisions for loan and lease losses compared to
$3.3 million a year ago. The Company’s allowance for loan losses was 1.60% of total loans at
December 31, 2008 compared to 1.66% of total loans a year ago.
Our Company continues to maintain a relatively low-risk, liquid and valuable available-for-sale
investment portfolio. We were fortunate in not holding any equity investments in Freddie Mac,
Fannie Mae, Lehman Brothers or other corporate investments that would have resulted in an
“other-than-temporary impairment” write down. During the fourth quarter 2008, the Company
leveraged an investment transaction by borrowing an additional $50.0 million from the FHLB and
investing in high quality government mortgage backed securities.
The capital ratios of Bank of Commerce continue to be above well-capitalized guidelines established
by regulatory agencies. With our strong capital position, we find significantly more opportunities
now for acquisitions, portfolio purchases and attractive loan and asset purchases. The Company
announced approval of its application for the United States Treasury to invest $17.0 million in the
Company’s preferred stock and common stock warrants. The U.S. Treasury introduced the Capital
Purchase Program on October 14, 2008, under which the Treasury will make up to $250 billion in
equity capital available to qualifying healthy financial institutions. Bank of Commerce Holdings
has qualified for this highly selective program and received the capital investment in November of
this year.
On October 14, 2008, the FDIC expanded deposit insurance coverage with the new Transaction Account
Guarantee Program under its Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. The new program provides
customers of financial institutions that choose to participate in it full FDIC insurance for all
deposit balances in noninterest-bearing transaction deposit accounts through December 31, 2009.
Bank of Commerce has opted to participate in this program to provide an additional level of
security to our customers.
Sources of Income
The Company derives its income from two principal sources: (i) net interest income, which is the
difference between the interest income it receives on interest-earning assets and the interest
expense it pays on interest-bearing liabilities, and (ii) fee income, which includes fees earned on
deposit services, income from payroll processing, electronic-based cash management services,
mortgage brokerage fee income and merchant credit card processing services. The income of the
Company depends to a great extent on net interest income. These interest rate factors are highly
sensitive to many factors, which are beyond the Company’s control, including general economic
conditions, inflation, recession, and the policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies,
in particular, the Federal Reserve Board. Because of the Company’s predisposition to variable rate
pricing and non-interest bearing demand deposit accounts, the Company is considered asset
sensitive. Consequently, the Company is adversely affected by declining interest rates.
Net interest income reflects both our net interest margin — the difference between the yield we
earn on our assets and the interest rate we pay for deposits and our other sources of funding —
and the amount of earning assets we hold. As a result, changes in either our net interest margin or
the amount of earning assets we hold could affect the Company’s net interest income and the
Company’s earnings.
36
Changes in interest rates — up or down — could adversely affect the Company’s net interest
margin. Although the yield we earn on our assets and our funding costs tend to move in the same
direction in response to changes in interest rates, one can rise or fall faster than the other,
causing our net interest margin to expand or contract. Many of our assets are tied to prime rate,
so they may adjust faster in response to changes in interest rates. As a result, when interest
rates fall, our yield we earn on our assets may fall faster than the repricing opportunities of our
liabilities, causing our net interest margin to contract until the repricing of liabilities catches
up.
Changes in the slope of the “yield curve” — or the spread between short-term and long-term
interest rates — could also reduce our net interest margin. Normally, the yield curve is upward
sloping, meaning short-term rates are lower than long-term rates. Because our liabilities tend to
be shorter in duration than our assets, when the yield curve flattens or even inverts, we could
experience pressure on our net interest margin as our cost of funds increases relative to the yield
we can earn on our assets.
We assess our interest rate risk by estimating the effect on our earnings under various scenarios
that differ based on assumptions about the direction, magnitude and speed of interest rate changes
and the slope of the yield curve. We currently hedge some of that interest rate risk with interest
rate derivatives.
We do not hedge all of our interest rate risk. There is always the risk that changes in interest
rates could reduce our net interest income and our earnings in material amounts, especially if
actual conditions turn out to be materially different than what we assumed. For example, if
interest rates rise or fall faster than we assumed or the slope of the yield curve changes, we may
incur significant losses on debt securities we hold as investments. To reduce our interest rate
risk, we may rebalance our investment and loan portfolios, refinance our debt and take other
strategic actions. We may incur losses or expenses when we take such actions.
Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2007
The Company reported net income of $2.19 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing
a decrease of approximately $3.91 million or 64.1%, over net income of $6.10 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007.
The decrease can be primarily attributed to the build up of provisions for loan losses of $6.52 million and a reduction of $2.4 million in revenues attributed to key life proceeds received in the prior year.
The decrease can be primarily attributed to the build up of provisions for loan losses of $6.52 million and a reduction of $2.4 million in revenues attributed to key life proceeds received in the prior year.
During the fourth quarter 2008, the Company increased provisions for loan and lease losses
significantly in relation to two real estate development loans. The Company’s provision for loan
and lease losses increased to $6,520,000 in 2008 from $3,291,000 in 2007. Credit quality
deterioration through impairment reviews on two credits within the portfolio was the principal
factor for current period provisions. Non performing assets as a percentage of total assets
increased to 2.98% compared with 2.01% in 2007.
Return on average assets (ROA) was 0.33% and return on average common equity (ROE) was 4.99% in
2008 compared with 1.04% and 13.39% respectively in 2007. Diluted earnings per share for 2008 and
2007 were $0.25 and $0.68, respectively, a decrease of 63.0% in 2008 over 2007. The Company’s
average total assets increased to $662.3 million in 2008 or 11.2% from $595.3 million in 2007.
Total deposits grew by $81.6 million or 17.2% primarily in core savings accounts followed by
certificates of deposit. Total net loans grew by $32.6 million or 6.7%.
Yields on portfolio loans decreased 179 basis points to 6.47% compared to 8.26% in 2007. Yields on
all earning assets decreased 132 basis points to 6.13% compared to 7.45% in 2007. The income of the
Company is highly dependent on “interest rate differentials” and the resulting net interest margins
(i.e., the difference between the interest rates earned on the Bank’s interest-earning assets such
as loans and securities, and the interest rates paid on the Bank’s interest-bearing liabilities
such as deposits and borrowings). These rates are highly sensitive to many factors, which are
beyond the Company’s control, including general economic conditions, inflation, recession and the
policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies, in particular, the FRB. Because of the
Company’s practice of using variable rate pricing on the majority of its loan portfolio and
noninterest bearing demand deposit accounts the Company is asset sensitive. As a result, the
Company is generally adversely affected by declining interest rates.
Funding costs decreased 106 basis points to 3.02% compared with 4.08% in 2007, reflective of the
current lower cost rate environment.
37
Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2006
The Company reported net income of $6.10 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, representing
a decrease of approximately $461,000 or 7.0%, over net income of $6.57 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006. Top line revenues are up $6.2 million over the prior year. $2.4 million of the
increase is attributed to key life proceeds received during the fourth quarter. Net interest income
dropped by $23,000 or -0.10% over the prior year and is attributed to the higher cost of funding.
During the fourth quarter 2007, the Company increased provisions for loan and lease losses
substantially in relation to two real estate development credits that were placed into non-accrual
status during the period. The Company’s provision for loan and lease losses increased to $3,291,000
in 2007 from $226,000 in 2006. Credit quality deterioration on two credits within the portfolio was
the principal factor for current period provisions. Non performing assets as a percentage of total
assets increased to 2.01% compared with 0.00% in 2006.
Return on average assets (ROA) was 1.04% and return on average common equity (ROE) was 13.39% in
2007 compared with 1.20% and 15.59% respectively in 2006. Diluted earnings per share for 2007 and
2006 were $0.68 and $0.74, respectively, a decrease of 8.1% in 2007 over 2006. The Company’s
average total assets increased to $595.3 million in 2007 or 8.3% from $549.5 million in 2006. Total
deposits grew by $34.2 million or 7.8% primarily in core checking and savings accounts. Total net
loans grew by $77.3 million or 18.9%.
Yields on portfolio loans increased 04 basis points to 8.26% compared to 8.22% in 2006. Yields on
all earning assets increased 18 basis points to 7.45% compared to 7.27% in 2006. Likewise, funding
costs increased 39 basis points to 4.08% compared with 3.69% in 2006, reflective of the competition
for deposits.
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
The primary source of income for the Company is derived from net interest income. Net interest
income represents the excess of interest and fees earned on assets (loans, securities and federal
funds sold) over the interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds. Net interest margin is net
interest income expressed as a percentage of average earning assets.
Net interest income decreased $665,000 to $21.34 million in 2008 compared to $22.01 million in 2007
and $22.03 million in 2006, representing a 3.02% decrease in 2008 over 2007, and a 0.10% decrease
in 2007 over 2006. The average balance of total earning assets increased to $615.0 million in 2008
compared to $552.9 million in 2007, an 11.4% increase.
38
The following table sets forth the Company’s daily average balance sheet, related interest income
or expense and yield or rate paid for the periods indicated. The yield on tax-exempt securities has
not been adjusted to a tax-equivalent yield basis.
Average Balances, Interest Income/Expense and Yields/Rates Paid
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average Balance | Interest | Yield/Rate | Average Balance | Interest | Yield/Rate | Average Balance | Interest | Yield/Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Earning Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio loans |
$ | 518,759 | $ | 33,582 | 6.47 | % | $ | 437,217 | $ | 36,134 | 8.26 | % | $ | 394,152 | $ | 32,394 | 8.22 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt securities |
24,399 | 1,197 | 4.91 | % | 30,727 | 1,229 | 4.00 | % | 21,112 | 787 | 3.73 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
US government
securities |
13,637 | 553 | 4.06 | % | 26,782 | 1,112 | 4.15 | % | 39,576 | 1,593 | 4.03 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage backed
securities |
37,328 | 1,916 | 5.13 | % | 43,122 | 1,973 | 4.58 | % | 42,476 | 1,828 | 4.30 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
17,987 | 303 | 1.68 | % | 13,099 | 681 | 5.20 | % | 17,124 | 872 | 5.09 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other securities |
2,918 | 139 | 4.76 | % | 2,000 | 90 | 4.50 | % | 3,075 | 136 | 4.42 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Earning Assets |
$ | 615,028 | $ | 37,690 | 6.13 | % | $ | 552,947 | $ | 41,219 | 7.45 | % | $ | 517,515 | $ | 37,610 | 7.27 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash & due from banks |
16,298 | 14,273 | 14,113 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank premises and
fixed assets |
11,097 | 10,155 | 6,878 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
19,866 | 17,986 | 11,022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Total Assets |
$ | 662,289 | $ | 595,361 | $ | 549,528 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Bearing
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing demand |
$ | 138,743 | $ | 2,173 | 1.57 | % | $ | 121,281 | $ | 2,735 | 2.26 | % | $ | 108,066 | $ | 1,504 | 1.39 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
56,914 | 1,576 | 2.77 | % | 39,565 | 1,216 | 3.07 | % | 24,633 | 289 | 1.17 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
234,493 | 8,552 | 3.65 | % | 215,511 | 10,571 | 4.91 | % | 190,568 | 8,486 | 4.45 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements |
13,043 | 173 | 1.33 | % | 32,237 | 1,177 | 3.65 | % | 29,708 | 1,138 | 3.83 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
98,518 | 3,868 | 3.93 | % | 62,095 | 3,507 | 5.65 | % | 69,014 | 4,158 | 6.02 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Interest
Liabilities |
$ | 541,711 | $ | 16,342 | 3.02 | % | $ | 470,689 | $ | 19,206 | 4.08 | % | $ | 421,989 | 15,575 | 3.69 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing
Demand |
70,933 | 72,545 | 79,245 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
5,660 | 6,502 | 6,154 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders’ equity |
43,985 | 45,625 | 42,140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Liabilities
and Stockholders’
equity |
$ | 662,289 | $ | 595,361 | $ | 549,528 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income
and Net Interest
Margin |
$ | 21,348 | 3.47 | % | $ | 22,013 | 3.98 | % | $ | 22,035 | 4.26 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income on loans includes fee income of approximately $77,000, $241,000 and $429,000 for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 respectively.
39
The following tables set forth changes in interest income and expense for each major category of
interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the amount of change attributable to
volume and rate changes for the periods indicated. Changes not solely attributable to rate or
volume has been allocated to volume. The yield on tax-exempt securities has not been adjusted to a
tax-equivalent yield basis.
Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income
Years ended December 31,
Years ended December 31,
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2008 over 2007 | 2007 over 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Variance due to | Variance due to | Variance due to | Variance due to | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average Volume | Average Rate | Total | Average Volume | Average Rate | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In Interest Income: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio loans |
$ | 5,279 | (7,831 | ) | ($2,552 | ) | $ | 3,559 | 180 | $ | 3,739 | ||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt securities |
(310 | ) | 278 | (32 | ) | 385 | 57 | 442 | |||||||||||||||||||
US government securities |
(533 | ) | (26 | ) | (559 | ) | (531 | ) | 50 | (481 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage backed securities |
(297 | ) | 240 | (57 | ) | 30 | 115 | 145 | |||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
82 | (460 | ) | (378 | ) | (209 | ) | 18 | (191 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other securities |
44 | 5 | 49 | (48 | ) | 2 | (46 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Increase (Decrease) |
4,265 | (7,794 | ) | (3,529 | ) | 3,186 | 422 | 3,608 | |||||||||||||||||||
(Decrease) Increase |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In Interest Expense: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing demand |
273 | (835 | ) | (562 | ) | 298 | 933 | 1,231 | |||||||||||||||||||
Savings accounts |
480 | (120 | ) | 360 | 459 | 468 | 927 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
692 | (2,711 | ) | (2,019 | ) | 1,223 | 862 | 2,085 | |||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements |
(255 | ) | (749 | ) | (1,004 | ) | 92 | (53 | ) | 39 | |||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
1,228 | (867 | ) | 361 | (1,683 | ) | 1,032 | (651 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Increase (Decrease) |
2,418 | (5,282 | ) | (2,864 | ) | 389 | 3,242 | 3,631 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) |
1,847 | (2,512 | ) | (665 | ) | $ | 2,797 | $ | (2,820 | ) | $ | (23 | ) | ||||||||||||||
40
Noninterest Income
The following table sets forth a summary of noninterest income for the periods indicated.
| (Dollars in thousands) | Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Noninterest income: |
||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
$ | 311 | $ | 278 | $ | 346 | ||||||
Payroll and benefit processing fees |
453 | 383 | 386 | |||||||||
Earnings on cash surrender- |
||||||||||||
Bank owned life insurance |
340 | 331 | 329 | |||||||||
Life Insurance policy benefits |
0 | 2,400 | 0 | |||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on sale of securities
available-for-sale |
628 | 46 | (171 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss on sale of derivative swap transaction |
(225 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Net gain on sale of loans |
0 | 0 | 90 | |||||||||
Merchant credit card service income, net |
364 | 388 | 380 | |||||||||
Mortgage brokerage fee income |
21 | 50 | 71 | |||||||||
Other income |
731 | 659 | 497 | |||||||||
Total Noninterest income |
$ | 2,623 | $ | 4.535 | $ | 1,928 | ||||||
Total noninterest income in 2008 was $2.6 million compared to $4.5 million in 2007 and $1.9 million
in 2006.
The Company’s noninterest income consists of earnings on key life, payroll and benefit processing
fees, gains on sales of investment securities, processing fees for merchants who accept credit card
payments for goods and services, service charge on deposit accounts, mortgage servicing fees and
other service fees. A significant portion of the drop in other noninterest income in 2008 is
attributed to the recorded life insurance policy benefits of $2.4 million during 2007. Payroll and
benefit processing fees increased by 18.3% or $70,000 over the prior period related to increased
processing services. The Company recorded gains of $628,000 in sales of investment securities
during 2008, relating to interest rate risk management positions and increasing liquidity
positions. In addition, the Company recorded a net loss of $225,000 to cancel a derivative swap
transaction during the first quarter of 2008.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, non-interest income represented 6.5% of the Company’s
revenues (interest income plus noninterest income) versus 9.9% in 2007 and 4.9% in 2006.
Noninterest Expense
The following table sets forth a summary of noninterest expense for the periods indicated.
| (Dollars in thousands) | Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Salaries & related benefits |
$ | 7,751 | $ | 8,666 | $ | 8,020 | ||||||
Occupancy & equipment expense |
2,501 | 2,373 | 1,846 | |||||||||
OREO expense |
735 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
FDIC insurance premium |
383 | 51 | 48 | |||||||||
Data processing fees |
276 | 395 | 216 | |||||||||
Professional service fees |
667 | 1,027 | 684 | |||||||||
Payroll and benefit fees |
116 | 108 | 104 | |||||||||
Deferred compensation expense |
461 | 411 | 369 | |||||||||
Stationery & supplies |
262 | 257 | 231 | |||||||||
Postage |
134 | 138 | 113 | |||||||||
Directors’ expenses |
294 | 312 | 243 | |||||||||
Other expenses |
1,716 | 2,006 | 1,459 | |||||||||
Total Noninterest expense |
$ | 15,296 | $ | 15,744 | $ | 13,333 | ||||||
41
Noninterest expense consists of salaries and related employee benefits, occupancy and equipment
expenses, data processing fees, professional fees, directors’ fees and other operating expenses.
The decrease in salary and related benefits is related to a one-time severance package paid during
2007. FDIC insurance premiums grew significantly up $332,000 over the prior year and are expected
to continue to grow through 2009 and beyond.
After a property is taken into OREO future write-downs in value will be reflected in other
operating expense. The $735,000 write-down taken in the fourth quarter 2008 reflects The Company’s
current valuation of the OREO. OREO consists of one commercial development property valued at $2.9
million.
Professional fees declined in 2008 by 35.0% or $360,000 related the prior year investment in new
logos, marketing support and the development of our new Buenaventura office located in Redding,
California.
Income Taxes
The Company’s provision for income taxes includes both federal and state income taxes and reflects
the application of federal and state statutory rates to the Company’s income before taxes. The
principal difference between statutory tax rates and the Company’s effective tax rate is the
benefit derived investing in tax-exempt securities and preferential state tax treatment for
qualified enterprise zone loans.
During 2007 — 2008, the Company has participated in a California Affordable Housing project which
affords federal and state tax credits. Increases and decreases in the provision for taxes reflect
changes in the Company’s income before taxes.
The following table reflects the Company’s tax provision and the related effective tax rate
for the periods indicated.
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||
Income tax provision |
($40 | ) | $ | 1,405 | $ | 3,837 | ||||||
Effective tax rate |
-1.83 | % | 18.7 | % | 36.9 | % | ||||||
Asset Quality
The Company concentrates its lending activities primarily within El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento,
Shasta, Tehama, Sutter and Yuba counties, California, and the location of the Bank’s five full
services branches, specifically identified as Upstate California. The Company manages its credit
risk through diversification of its loan portfolio and the application of underwriting policies and
procedures and credit monitoring practices. Although The Company has a diversified loan portfolio,
a significant portion of its borrowers’ ability to repay the loans is dependent upon the
professional services and investor commercial real estate sectors. Generally, the loans are secured
by real estate or other assets located in California and are expected to be repaid from cash flows
of the borrower’s business or cash flows from real estate investments. The following table sets
forth the amounts of loans outstanding by category as of the dates indicated:
| As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2008 | % | 2007 | % | 2006 | % | 2005 | % | 2004 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial & industrial |
$ | 164,083 | 31.11 | % | $ | 173,704 | 35.11 | % | $ | 125,725 | 30.36 | % | $ | 115,401 | 31.36 | % | $ | 105,545 | 32.64 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate-construction |
84,218 | 15.97 | % | 106,977 | 21.62 | % | 110,693 | 26.73 | % | 105,094 | 28.56 | % | 77,439 | 23.95 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate-commercial |
217,914 | 41.31 | % | 175,013 | 35.37 | % | 159,370 | 38.48 | % | 129,202 | 35.11 | % | 128,317 | 39.69 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate- mortgage |
20,285 | 3.85 | % | 10,787 | 2.18 | % | 4,278 | 1.04 | % | 3,669 | 1.00 | % | 4,423 | 1.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate — other |
39,915 | 7.57 | % | 26,818 | 5.42 | % | 12,986 | 3.14 | % | 13,790 | 3.75 | % | 6,943 | 2.14 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Installment |
145 | 0.03 | % | 226 | 0.05 | % | 202 | 0.05 | % | 439 | 0.12 | % | 300 | 0.10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other loans |
903 | 0.16 | % | 1,223 | 0.25 | % | 937 | 0.20 | % | 446 | 0.10 | % | 353 | 0.11 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Loans |
527,463 | 100.00 | % | 494,748 | 100.00 | % | $ | 414,191 | 100.00 | % | $ | 368,041 | 100.00 | % | $ | 323,320 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred loan fees and
costs |
87 | 232 | 298 | 420 | 653 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan losses |
8,429 | 8,233 | 4,904 | 4,316 | 3,866 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Loans |
$ | 518,947 | $ | 486,283 | $ | 408,989 | $ | 363,305 | $ | 318,801 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
42
Net portfolio loans increased $32.6 million or 6.7%, to $518.9 million at December 31, 2008 over
$486.3 million at December 31, 2007. The increase is primarily due to increased activity in the
commercial real estate sector, mortgage and other real estate. Commercial real estate increased
$42.9 million with the balance of other real estate loans decreasing. Other real estate reflects an
increased investment in home equity lines of credit. The portfolio mix remained consistent with the
prior year. The Company’s practice is to place an asset on nonaccrual status when one of the
following events occurs:(i) Any installment of principal or interest is 90 days or more past due
(unless in management’s opinion the loan is well-secured and in the process of collection), (ii)
management determines the ultimate collection of principal or interest to be unlikely or (iii) the
terms of the loan have been renegotiated due to a serious weakening of the borrower’s financial
condition. Nonperforming and impaired loans may be on nonaccrual, are 90 days past due and still
accruing, or have been restructured.
Nonperforming Assets
The
following table sets forth a summary of the Company’s
nonperforming and impaired loans and other
assets as of the dates indicated:
| (Dollars in thousands) | As of December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans |
$ | 20,154 | $ | 12,409 | $ | 0 | $ | 372 | $ | 2,383 | ||||||||||
90 days past due and still accruing interest |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Total nonperforming loans |
20,154 | 12,409 | 0 | 372 | 2,383 | |||||||||||||||
Other real estate owned |
2,934 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Total nonperforming assets |
$ | 23,088 | $ | 12,409 | $ | 0 | $ | 372 | $ | 2,383 | ||||||||||
The Company’s practice is to place an asset on nonaccrual status when one of the following events
occurs: (i) Any installment of principal or interest is 90 days or more past due (unless in
management’s opinion the loan is well-secured and in the process of collection), (ii) management
determines the ultimate collection of principal or interest to be unlikely or (iii) the terms of
the loan have been renegotiated due to a serious weakening of the borrower’s financial condition.
Nonperforming loans may be on nonaccrual, are 90 days past due and still accruing, or have been
restructured. Accruals are resumed on loans only when they are brought fully current with respect
to interest and principal and when the loan is estimated to be fully collectible. Restructured
loans are those loans on which concessions in terms have been granted because of the borrower’s
financial or legal difficulties. Nonaccrual loans consisted of five credits at year end 2008. The
gross interest income that would have been recorded during the period had the loans been current in
accordance with their original terms was approximately $147,000. Interest collected prior to
non-accrual status was approximately $627,000. The Company’s OREO consists of one commercial
development property at $2.9 million during 2008, and $0 for 2007 and 2006.
Loan Maturity Schedule
The following table sets forth the maturity and repricing distribution of the Company’s commercial,
real estate and other loans outstanding as of December 31, 2008, which, based on remaining
scheduled repayments of principal, were due within the periods indicated.
| After One through | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | Within One Year | Five Years | After Five Years | Total | ||||||||||||
Commercial & industrial |
$ | 77,673 | $ | 57,280 | $ | 29,130 | $ | 164,083 | ||||||||
Real Estate — construction |
64,494 | 15,065 | 4,659 | 84,218 | ||||||||||||
Real Estate — commercial |
7,556 | 43,656 | 166,703 | 217,914 | ||||||||||||
Real Estate — mortgage |
206 | 2,030 | 18,050 | 20,285 | ||||||||||||
Real Estate — other |
1,729 | 11,876 | 26,310 | 39,915 | ||||||||||||
Installment loans |
116 | 29 | 0 | 145 | ||||||||||||
Other loans |
858 | 45 | 0 | 903 | ||||||||||||
Total gross loans |
$ | 152,632 | $ | 129,981 | $ | 244,852 | $ | 527,463 | ||||||||
Loans due after one year
with: |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed Rates |
$ | 57,133 | $ | 32,860 | $ | 89,993 | ||||||||||
Variable Rates |
72,848 | 211,992 | 284,840 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 129,981 | $ | 244,852 | $ | 374,833 | ||||||||||
43
Available-for-sale securities
The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of the Company’s securities held as
available-for-sale at their amortized cost basis and their weighted-average yields at December 31,
2008. The yield on tax-exempt securities has not been adjusted to a tax-equivalent yield basis.
| Over One through Five | Over Five through Ten | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | Within One Year | Years | Years | Over Ten Years | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government & agencies |
$ | 1,010 | 2.19 | % | $ | 8,000 | 3.62 | % | $ | 1,996 | 5.02 | % | $ | 5,000 | 5.42 | % | $ | 16,006 | 4.04 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
0 | 0.00 | % | 5,377 | 3.73 | % | 3,974 | 3.57 | % | 22,827 | 4.15 | % | 32,178 | 4.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage backed securities |
0 | 0.00 | % | 5,800 | 4.08 | % | 6,504 | 4.19 | % | 71,353 | 5.34 | % | 83,657 | 5.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other bonds |
0 | 0.00 | % | 0 | 0.00 | % | 0 | 0.00 | % | 0 | 0.00 | % | 0 | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bankers Acceptances |
0 | 0.00 | % | 0 | 0.00 | % | 0 | 0.00 | % | 0 | 0.00 | % | 0 | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,010 | 2.19 | % | $ | 19,177 | 3.79 | % | $ | 12,474 | 4.12 | % | $ | 99,180 | 5.29 | % | $ | 131,841 | 4.94 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deposit Structure
The Company primarily obtains deposits from local businesses and professionals as well as through
certificates of deposits, savings and checking accounts. The following table sets forth the
distribution of the Company’s average daily balances for the periods indicated.
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | |||||||||||||||||||
NOW accounts |
$ | 51,215 | 0.88 | % | $ | 61,391 | 1.58 | % | $ | 79,885 | 1.22 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings |
56,914 | 2.77 | % | 39,518 | 3.08 | % | 24,633 | 1.17 | % | |||||||||||||||
Money market accounts |
87,528 | 1.97 | % | 59,814 | 2.95 | % | 28,181 | 1.90 | % | |||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
234,493 | 3.65 | % | 215,498 | 4.94 | % | 190,568 | 4.45 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest bearing deposits |
430,150 | 2.87 | % | 376,221 | 4.00 | % | 323,267 | 3.69 | % | |||||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing deposits |
70,933 | 72,545 | 79,245 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average Total Deposits |
$ | 501,083 | $ | 448,766 | $ | 402,512 | ||||||||||||||||||
Average Other borrowings |
$ | 111,561 | 3.62 | % | 78,852 | 4.57 | % | 98,722 | 5.37 | % | ||||||||||||||
The following table sets forth the remaining maturities of certificates of deposit in amounts of
$100,000 or more as of December 31, 2008:
Deposit Maturity Schedule
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||
| 2008 | ||||
Three months or less |
$ | 77,037 | ||
Three through six months |
21,072 | |||
Six through twelve months |
27,543 | |||
Over twelve months |
43,158 | |||
Total |
$ | 168,810 | ||
44
Capital Management and Adequacy
The Company uses capital to fund organic growth, pay dividends and repurchase its shares. The
objective of effective capital management is to produce above market long-term returns by using
capital when returns are perceived to be high and issuing capital when costs are perceived to be
low. The Company’s potential sources of capital include retained earnings, common and preferred
stock issuance, and issuance of subordinated debt and trust preferred securities.
Overall capital adequacy is monitored on a day-to-day basis by the Company’s management and
reported to the Company’s Board of Directors on a monthly basis. The regulators of the Bank
measure capital adequacy by using a risk-based capital framework and by monitoring compliance with
minimum leverage ratio guidelines. Under the risk-based capital standard, assets reported on the
Company’s balance sheet and certain off-balance sheet items are assigned to risk categories, each
of which is assigned a risk weight.
This standard characterizes an institution’s capital as being “Tier 1” capital (defined as
principally comprising stockholders’ equity) and “Tier 2” capital (defined as principally
comprising the qualifying portion of the ALLL). The minimum ratio of total risk-based capital to
risk-adjusted assets, including certain off-balance sheet items, is 8%. At least one-half (4%) of
the total risk-based capital is to be comprised of common equity; the balance may consist of debt
securities and a limited portion of the ALLL.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and
the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and
Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets and of Tier 1 capital to
average assets. Management believes as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, that the Company and the Bank
met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
As of December 31, 2008, the most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, an institution must maintain minimum
total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the following table.
There are no conditions or events since the notification that management believes have changed the
Bank’s category. The Company’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31,
2008 are presented in the table.
| Actual | Well Capitalized | Minimum Capital | ||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2008 | Capital | Ratio | Requirement | Requirement | ||||||||||||
The Company
Leverage |
$ | 73,983,019 | 10.66 | % | n/a | 4.0 | % | |||||||||
Tier 1 Risk-Based |
73,983,019 | 11.87 | % | n/a | 4.0 | % | ||||||||||
Total Risk-Based |
81,787,582 | 13.12 | % | n/a | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||
Redding Bank of
Commerce |
||||||||||||||||
Leverage |
$ | 72,204,835 | 10.45 | % | 5.0 | % | 4.0 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 Risk-Based |
72,204,835 | 11.58 | % | 6.0 | % | 4.0 | % | |||||||||
Total Risk-Based |
80,009,398 | 12.84 | % | 10.00 | % | 8.0 | % | |||||||||
Cash dividends of $0.08, $0.08, $0.08 and $0.08 were paid on January 11, 2008, April 11, 2008, July
11, 2008 and October 10, 2008, respectively, to stockholders of record as of December 31, 2007,
March 31, 2008, June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2008.
In September, the Company announced approval of its application for the United States Treasury to
invest $17.0 million in the Company’s preferred stock and common stock warrants.
45
The U.S. Treasury introduced the Capital Purchase Program on October 14, 2008, under which the
Treasury will make up to $250 billion in equity capital available to qualifying healthy financial
institutions. Bank of Commerce Holdings qualified for this highly selective program and received
the capital investment in November of 2008.
The capital investment enabled the Company to leverage investments of $50.0 million in mortgage
backed securities intended to support the housing markets, as well as to increase local lending
limits to support our communities.
With our strong capital position, we find significantly more opportunities now for loan growth,
investment portfolio purchases and attractive loan and asset purchases.
Lending Transactions with Related Parties
The Company’s conduct of business with director’s, officers, significant stockholders and other
related parties (collectively, “Related Parties”) is restricted and governed by various laws and
regulations, including Regulation O as promulgated and enforced by the Federal Reserve.
Furthermore, it is the Company’s policy to conduct business with Related Parties on an arm’s length
basis at current market prices with terms and conditions no more favorable than the Company
provides in its normal course of business.
Some of the directors, officers and principal stockholders of the Company and their associates were
customers of and had banking transactions with the Bank in the ordinary course of the Bank’s
business during 2008 and the Bank expects to have such transactions in the future. All loans and
commitments to loans included in such transactions were made in compliance with the applicable laws
on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at
the time for comparable transactions with other persons of similar creditworthiness, and in the
opinion of the Company, did not involve more than a normal risk of collectibility or present other
unfavorable features.
An analysis of the activity in related party loans consists of the following:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 3,600,342 | $ | 2,849,533 | ||||
New loan additions |
153,737 | 25,312 | ||||||
Advances on existing lines of credit |
826,080 | 2,184,045 | ||||||
Principal repayments |
(405,735 | ) | (1,458,548 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of year |
$ | 4,174,424 | $ | 3,600,342 | ||||
Impact of Inflation
Inflation affects the Company’s financial position as well as its operating results. It is
management’s opinion that the effects of inflation for the three years ended December 31, 2008 on
the financial statements have not been material.
Commitments
Off-Balance
Sheet Financial Instruments — In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters
various types of transactions, which involve financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk.
These instruments include commitments to extend credit and stand-by letters of credit, which are
not reflected in the consolidated balance sheets. These transactions may involve, to varying
degrees, credit and interest rate risk more than the amount, if any recognized in the consolidated
balance sheets.
The off-balance sheet credit risk exposure of the Company is the contractual amount of commitments
to extend credit and stand-by letters of credit. The Company applies the same credit standards to
these contracts as it uses for loans recorded on the balance sheet.
46
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Off-balance sheet commitments: |
||||||||
Commitments to extend credit |
$ | 156,707,887 | $ | 192,815,902 | ||||
Standby letters of credit |
8,556,547 | 6,627,409 | ||||||
Guaranteed commitments outstanding |
1,350,399 | 1,375,999 | ||||||
| $ | 166,614,833 | $ | 200,819,310 | |||||
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers. These commitments have specified
interest rates and generally have fixed expiration dates but may be terminated by the Company if
certain conditions of the contract are violated.
Although currently subject to draw down, many of the commitments do not necessarily represent
future cash requirements. Collateral held relating to these commitments varies, but generally
includes real estate, securities and cash.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. Credit risk arises in these transactions from the
possibility that a customer may not be able to repay the Company upon default of performance.
Collateral held for standby letters of credit is based on an individual evaluation of each
customer’s creditworthiness, but may include cash and securities. Commitments to extend credit and
standby letters of credit bear similar credit risk characteristics as outstanding loans.
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
The Company has certain financial commitments. Future financial commitments are outlined below:
(Dollars in thousands)
| Less than | More than 5 | Indeterminate | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contractual Obligations | Total | One Year | 1 —3 Years | 3—5 Years | years | Maturity (1) | ||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock and Warrants |
$ | 17,000 | — | — | $ | 17,000 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Junior
Subordinated Debentures |
$ | 15,465 | — | — | — | $ | 15,465 | — | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB Borrowings |
$ | 120,000 | $ | 105,000 | $ | 15,000 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations |
$ | 2,534 | $ | 515 | $ | 978 | $ | 434 | $ | 607 | — | |||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements |
$ | 13,853 | $ | 13,853 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Deposits (1) |
$ | 555,282 | $ | 169,782 | $ | 58,668 | $ | 35,846 | 0 | 290,986 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 724,134 | $ | 289,150 | $ | 74,646 | $ | 53,280 | $ | 16,072 | $ | 290,986 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents interest-bearing and non-interest bearing checking, money market, savings and time accounts. |
47
ITEM 7-A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk that values of assets and liabilities or revenues will be adversely
affected by changes in market conditions such as market movements. The risk is inherent in the
financial instruments associated with our operations and activities including loans, deposits,
securities, short-term borrowings, long-term debt and derivatives. Market-sensitive assets and
liabilities are generated through loans and deposits associated with our banking business, our
Asset Liability Management (“ALM”) process, and credit risk mitigation activities. Traditional loan
and deposit products are reported at amortized cost for assets or the amount owed for liabilities.
These positions are subject to changes in economic value based on varying market conditions.
Interest rate risk is the effect of changes in economic value of our loans and deposits, as well as
our other interest rate sensitive instruments and is reflected in the levels of future income and
expense produced by these positions versus levels that would be generated by current levels of
interest rates. We seek to mitigate interest rate risk as part of the ALM process.
Interest rate risk represents the most significant market risk exposure to our financial
instruments. Our overall goal is to manage interest rate sensitivity so that movements in interest
rates do not adversely affect net interest income. Interest rates risk is measured as the potential
volatility in our net interest income caused by changes in market interest rates. Lending and
deposit taking create interest rate sensitive positions on our balance sheet. Interest rate risk
from these activities as well as the impact of ever changing market conditions is mitigated using
the ALM process. The Company does not operate a trading account and does not hold a position with
exposure to foreign currency exchange or commodities. The Company faces market risk through
interest rate volatility.
The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the Company’s interest rate risk management
policies. The Company has an Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) which establishes and
monitors guidelines to control the sensitivity of earnings to changes in interest rates. The
internal ALCO Roundtable group maintains a net interest income forecast using different rate
scenarios utilizing a simulation model. This group updates the net interest income forecast for
changing assumptions and differing outlooks based on economic and market conditions.
The simulation model used includes measures of the expected repricing characteristics of
administered rate (NOW, savings and money market accounts) and non-related products (demand deposit
accounts, other assets and other liabilities). These measures recognize the relative sensitivity of
these accounts to changes in market interest rates, as demonstrated through current and historical
experience, recognizing the timing differences of rate changes. In the simulation of net interest
margin and net income the forecast balance sheet is processed against five rate scenarios. These
five rate scenarios include a flat rate environment, which assumes interest rates are unchanged in
the future and four additional rate ramp scenarios ranging for + 200 to - 200 basis points in 100
basis point increments, unless the rate environment cannot move in these basis point increments
before reaching zero.
The formal policies and practices adopted by the Company to monitor and manage interest rate risk
exposure measure risk in two ways: (i) repricing opportunities for earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities and (ii) changes in net interest income for declining interest rate
shocks of 100 to 200 basis points. Because of the Company’s predisposition to variable rate pricing
and noninterest bearing demand deposit accounts, the Company is asset sensitive. As a result,
management anticipates that, in a declining interest rate environment, the Company’s net interest
income and margin would be expected to decline, and, in an increasing interest rate environment,
the Company’s net interest income and margin would be expected to increase. However, no assurance
can be given that under such circumstances the Company would experience the described relationships
to declining or increasing interest rates. Because the Company is asset sensitive, the Company is
adversely affected by declining rates rather than rising rates.
48
To estimate the effect of interest rate shocks on the Company’s net interest income, management
uses a model to prepare an analysis of interest rate risk exposure. Such analysis calculates the
change in net interest income given a change in the federal funds rate of 100 or 200 basis points
up or down. All changes are measured in dollars and are compared to projected net interest income.
At December 31, 2008, the estimated annualized reduction in net interest income attributable to a
100 and 200 basis point decline in the federal funds rate was $741,121 and $1,036,979,
respectively. At December 31, 2007, the estimated annualized reduction in net interest income
attributable to a 100 and 200 basis point decline in the federal funds rate was $330,889 and
675,089, respectively, with a similar and opposite result attributable to a 100 and 200 basis point
increase in the federal funds rate.
The ALCO has established a policy limitation to interest rate risk of -14% of the net interest
margin and -20% of the present value of equity. The securities portfolio is integral to our asset
liability management process. The decision to purchase or sell securities is based upon the current
assessment of economic and financial conditions, including the interest rate environment,
liquidity, regulatory requirements and the relative mix of our cash positions.
The Company’s approach to managing interest rate risk may include the use of derivatives. This
helps to minimize significant, unplanned fluctuations in earnings, fair values of assets and
liabilities and cash flows caused by interest rate volatility. This approach involves an
off-balance sheet instrument with the same characteristics of certain assets and liabilities so
that changes in interest rates do not have a significant adverse effect on the net interest margin
and cash flows. As a result of interest rate fluctuations, hedged assets and liabilities will gain
or lose market value. In a fair value hedging strategy, the effect of this unrealized gain or loss
will generally be offset by income or loss on the derivatives linked to the hedged assets and
liabilities. For a cash flow hedge, the change in the fair value of the derivative to the extent
that it is effective is recorded through other comprehensive income.
We may use derivatives as part of our interest rate risk management, including interest rate swaps,
caps and floors. At inception, the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items is
formally documented with our risk management objective, strategy and our evaluation of
effectiveness of the hedge transactions. This includes linking all derivatives designated as fair
value or cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific
transactions. Periodically, as required, we formally assess whether the derivative we designated
in the hedging relationship is expected to be and has been highly effective in offsetting changes
in fair values or cash flows of the hedged item.
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2008, the distribution of repricing
opportunities for the Bank’s earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. It also reports the
GAP (different volumes of rate sensitive assets and liabilities) repricing interest earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities at different time intervals, the cumulative GAP, the ratio of rate
sensitive assets to rate sensitive liabilities for each repricing interval, and the cumulative GAP
to total assets.
49
| At December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Within 3 | 3 Months to | One Year to | ||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | Months | One Year | Five Years | Over Five Years | Total | |||||||||||||||
Interest-Earning Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Held-to-maturity securities |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities |
0 | 1,010 | 19,401 | 111,500 | 131,911 | |||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
51,475 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51,475 | |||||||||||||||
Loans, gross |
284,735 | 152,342 | 57,133 | 33,253 | 527,463 | |||||||||||||||
Total Interest-earning Assets |
$ | 336,210 | $ | 153,352 | $ | 76,534 | $ | 144,753 | $ | 710,849 | ||||||||||
Interest-Bearing Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demand — Interest bearing |
$ | 71,936 | $ | 43,161 | $ | 28,774 | $ | 0 | $ | 143,871 | ||||||||||
Savings Accounts |
40,282 | 13,427 | 13,427 | 0 | 67,136 | |||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
84,891 | 84,881 | 94,514 | 0 | 264,286 | |||||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements |
13,853 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13,853 | |||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
70,000 | 35,000 | 15,000 | 0 | 120,000 | |||||||||||||||
Total Interest-bearing Liabilities |
$ | 280,962 | $ | 176,469 | $ | 151,715 | $ | 0 | $ | 609,146 | ||||||||||
GAP in dollars |
$ | 55,249 | ($23,118 | ) | ($75,181 | ) | $ | 144,753 | $ | 101,703 | ||||||||||
Cumulative GAP in dollars |
$ | 32,131 | ($43,050 | ) | $ | 101,703 | ||||||||||||||
As a percentage of earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
GAP Ratio |
1.20 | 0.87 | 0.50 | 0.97 | 1.17 | |||||||||||||||
Cumulative GAP Ratio |
1.20 | (0.15 | ) | (0.98 | ) | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||
Gap as % of Earning Assets |
7.77 | % | -3.25 | % | -10.58 | % | 20.36 | % | 14.31 | % | ||||||||||
Cumulative Gap as % of Earning
Assets |
7.77 | % | 4.52 | % | -6.06 | % | 14.31 | % | ||||||||||||
The model utilized by management to create the analysis described in the preceding paragraph uses
balance sheet simulation to estimate the impact of changing rates on the projected annual net
interest income of the Company. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing,
magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and
management strategies. Management believes that the short duration of its rate-sensitive assets and
liabilities contributes to its ability to reprice a significant amount of its rate-sensitive assets
and liabilities and mitigate the impact of rate changes in excess of 100 or 200 basis points. The
model’s primary benefit to management is its assistance in evaluating the impact that future
strategies with respect to the Company’s mix and level of rate-sensitive assets and liabilities
will have on the Company’s net interest income.
50
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
| Page | ||||
| 52 | ||||
| 53 | ||||
| 54 | ||||
| 55 | ||||
| 57 | ||||
| 59 | ||||
51
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Directors of
Bank of Commerce Holdings
Bank of Commerce Holdings
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bank of Commerce Holdings and
subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The
Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control
over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but
not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Bank of Commerce Holdings and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2008 and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.
As
discussed in Notes 2 and 20 to the Consolidated financial
statements, effective January 1, 2008, the Company
Adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements.”
/s/ Moss Adams LLP
Stockton, California
March 13, 2009
Stockton, California
March 13, 2009
52
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 and 2007
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 and 2007
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 33,716,062 | $ | 13,839,123 | ||||
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
51,475,000 | 8,395,000 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
85,191,062 | 22,234,123 | ||||||
Securities available-for-sale (including pledged collateral of
$68,735,000 at December 31, 2008 and $61,329,000 at December 31,
2007) |
131,686,600 | 67,906,386 | ||||||
Securities held-to-maturity, at cost (estimated fair value of $0 at
December 31, 2008 and $10,632,208 at December 31, 2007) |
— | 10,558,765 | ||||||
Loans, net of the allowance for loan and lease losses of $8,429,383
at December 31, 2008 and $8,232,970 at December 31, 2007 |
518,946,461 | 486,282,571 | ||||||
Bank premises and equipment, net |
10,672,211 | 10,963,975 | ||||||
Other assets |
27,717,626 | 20,381,095 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 774,213,960 | $ | 618,326,915 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Demand — noninterest bearing |
$ | 79,988,122 | $ | 75,717,742 | ||||
Demand — interest bearing |
143,871,441 | 142,820,773 | ||||||
Savings accounts |
67,135,736 | 41,376,296 | ||||||
Certificates of deposit |
264,286,604 | 213,716,486 | ||||||
Total Deposits |
555,281,903 | 473,631,297 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
13,853,255 | 15,513,211 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
120,000,000 | 60,000,000 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
7,036,161 | 7,553,559 | ||||||
Junior subordinated debt payable to unconsolidated subsidiary grantor
trust |
15,465,000 | 15,465,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
711,636,319 | 572,163,067 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17) |
||||||||
Stockholders’ equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock (liquidation preference of $1,000 per share; issued
2008); 2,000,000 shares authorized; 17,000 shares issued and
outstanding in 2008 and no shares outstanding in 2007 |
16,551,268 | — | ||||||
Common stock, no par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 8,711,495
shares issued and outstanding in 2008 and 8,757,445 shares issued
and outstanding in 2007 |
9,649,673 | 9,995,517 | ||||||
Common Stock Warrant |
448,732 | — | ||||||
Retained earnings |
36,008,865 | 36,604,902 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
(80,897 | ) | (436,571 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity |
62,577,641 | 46,163,848 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
$ | 774,213,960 | $ | 618,326,915 | ||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
53
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans |
$ | 33,582,112 | $ | 36,134,170 | $ | 32,394,766 | ||||||
Interest on tax-exempt securities |
1,196,662 | 1,228,944 | 786,972 | |||||||||
Interest on U.S. government securities |
2,468,749 | 3,084,672 | 3,421,191 | |||||||||
Interest on federal funds sold and securities purchased
under agreement to resell |
303,227 | 680,578 | 871,879 | |||||||||
Interest on other securities |
138,645 | 89,686 | 135,651 | |||||||||
Total interest income |
37,689,395 | 41,218,050 | 37,610,459 | |||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||
Interest on demand deposits |
2,172,704 | 2,735,170 | 1,504,180 | |||||||||
Interest on savings deposits |
1,576,351 | 1,215,920 | 288,883 | |||||||||
Interest on certificates of deposit |
8,552,217 | 10,570,776 | 8,485,799 | |||||||||
Interest on securities sold under repurchase agreements |
172,743 | 1,177,417 | 1,138,242 | |||||||||
Interest on FHLB borrowings |
2,811,982 | 2,421,636 | 3,079,432 | |||||||||
Interest on junior subordinated debt payable to
unconsolidated subsidiary grantor trusts |
1,056,284 | 1,084,990 | 1,078,884 | |||||||||
Total interest expense |
16,342,281 | 19,205,909 | 15,575,420 | |||||||||
Net interest income |
21,347,114 | 22,012,141 | 22,035,039 | |||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
6,520,000 | 3,291,250 | 225,900 | |||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease
losses |
14,827,114 | 18,720,891 | 21,809,139 | |||||||||
Noninterest income: |
||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
311,266 | 277,769 | 345,737 | |||||||||
Payroll and benefit processing fees |
452,852 | 382,738 | 385,867 | |||||||||
Earnings on
cash surrender value —
Bank owned life insurance |
340,220 | 331,251 | 328,743 | |||||||||
Life Insurance policy benefits |
— | 2,400,000 | — | |||||||||
Net gain (loss) on sale of securities available-for-sale |
627,879 | 45,670 | (170,524 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss on sale of derivative swap transaction |
(225,442 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Net gain on sale of loans |
— | — | 89,851 | |||||||||
Merchant credit card service income, net |
364,391 | 388,438 | 380,066 | |||||||||
Mortgage brokerage fee income |
21,019 | 49,995 | 71,350 | |||||||||
Other income |
731,233 | 658,893 | 497,141 | |||||||||
Total noninterest income |
2,623,418 | 4,534,754 | 1,928,231 | |||||||||
Noninterest expense: |
||||||||||||
Salaries and related benefits |
7,750,980 | 8,665,679 | 8,020,136 | |||||||||
Occupancy and equipment expense |
2,500,557 | 2,372,617 | 1,845,664 | |||||||||
OREO expense |
735,000 | — | — | |||||||||
FDIC insurance premium |
382,722 | 51,077 | 47,670 | |||||||||
Data processing fees |
276,165 | 395,558 | 216,313 | |||||||||
Professional service fees |
667,015 | 1,027,671 | 683,602 | |||||||||
Payroll processing fees |
115,932 | 107,856 | 103,518 | |||||||||
Deferred compensation expense |
461,640 | 411,191 | 368,809 | |||||||||
Stationery and supplies |
262,087 | 256,799 | 230,843 | |||||||||
Postage |
133,909 | 137,740 | 112,740 | |||||||||
Directors’ expenses |
293,918 | 311,777 | 243,428 | |||||||||
Other expenses |
1,715,747 | 2,005,729 | 1,460,008 | |||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
15,295,672 | 15,743,694 | 13,332,731 | |||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
2,154,860 | 7,511,951 | 10,404,639 | |||||||||
(Benefit) Provision for income taxes |
(39,526 | ) | 1,405,053 | 3,836,930 | ||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 2,194,386 | $ | 6,106,898 | $ | 6,567,709 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.75 | ||||||
Weighted average shares |
8,712,873 | 8,857,627 | 8,759,568 | |||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 0.74 | ||||||
Weighted average shares — diluted |
8,724,550 | 8,937,736 | 8,931,584 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
54
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive | Common | Stock | Retained | Comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Income | Shares | Amount | Earnings | (Loss), net of tax | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
6,567,709 | 6,567,709 | 6,567,709 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized (loss) gain
arising during the period
on derivative transactions,
net |
(27,280 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net holding loss on
derivatives |
(27,280 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains on
securities, net of
reclassification adjustment |
279,692 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: reclassification
adjustment for gains
included in net income, net
of tax |
100,524 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income |
352,936 | 352,936 | 352,936 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Comprehensive Income |
$ | 6,920,645 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends ($0.29 per share) |
(2,650,320 | ) | (2,650,320 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation expense associated
with stock options |
64,493 | 64,493 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Share Repurchase |
(92,000 | ) | (1,089,868 | ) | (1,089,868 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
281,146 | 879,279 | 879,279 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit on exercise of options |
654,118 | 654,118 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
8,847,042 | $ | 11,517,368 | $ | 33,336,032 | ($937,150 | ) | $ | 43,916,250 | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
6,106,898 | 6,106,898 | 6,106,898 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains arising
during the period on
derivative transactions,
net |
49,425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: reclassification
adjustment for gains
included in net income, net
of tax |
(25,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net holding gain on
derivatives |
24,425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains on
securities |
503,026 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net of reclassification
adjustment for gains
included in net income, net
of tax |
(26,872 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income |
500,579 | 500,579 | 500,579 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Comprehensive Income |
$ | 6,607,477 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends ($0.33 per share) |
(2,838,028 | ) | (2,838,028 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation expense associated
with stock options |
116,880 | 116,880 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Share Repurchase |
(200,000 | ) | (2,270,242 | ) | (2,270,242 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
110,403 | 486,881 | 486,881 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit on exercise of options |
144,630 | 144,630 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
8,757,445 | $ | 9,995,517 | $ | 36,604,902 | ($436,571 | ) | $ | 46,163,848 | |||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements (Continues)
55
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| Accumulated Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive | Preferred | Preferred | Common | Stock | Retained | (Loss), | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Earnings | net of tax | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
0 | 0 | 8,757,445 | $ | 9,995,517 | $ | 36,604,902 | ($436,571 | ) | $ | 46,163,848 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
2,194,386 | 2,194,386 | 2,194,386 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
(loss) gain arising during the period on
derivative transactions, net
|
2,854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net holding loss on derivatives |
2,854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gains on securities, net of
reclassification adjustment |
708,627 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included
in net income, net of tax |
(355,807 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income |
355,674 | 355,674 | 355,674 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Comprehensive Income |
2,550,061 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock Issued |
16,551 | 16,551,268 | 16,551,268 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warrants |
448,732 | 448,732 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends ($0.29 per share) |
(2,790,423 | ) | (2,790,423 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation expense associated with
stock options |
116,446 | 116,446 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share Repurchase |
(58,800 | ) | (503,796 | ) | (503,796 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
12,850 | 41,506 | 41,506 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
16,551 | 16,551,268 | 8,711,495 | $ | 10,098,404 | $ | 36,008,865 | ($80,897 | ) | $ | 62,577,641 | |||||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
56
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,194,386 | $ | 6,106,898 | $ | 6,567,709 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
6,520,000 | 3,291,250 | 225,900 | |||||||||
Provision for depreciation and amortization |
1,145,000 | 1,035,660 | 732,906 | |||||||||
Compensation expense associated with stock options |
116,446 | 116,880 | 64,494 | |||||||||
Tax benefits from the exercise of stock options |
— | (144,630 | ) | (654,118 | ) | |||||||
(Gain) Loss on sale of securities available-for-sale |
(627,879 | ) | (45,670 | ) | 170,524 | |||||||
Amortization of securities premiums and accretion of discounts, net |
97,783 | (3,687 | ) | 15,402 | ||||||||
Loss (Gain) on sale of derivative |
225,442 | (41,000 | ) | — | ||||||||
(Gain) on sale of loans |
— | — | (89,851 | ) | ||||||||
Loss (Gain) on sale of fixed assets |
3,125 | (48,398 | ) | 8,158 | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of loans |
— | — | 2,089,851 | |||||||||
Loans originated for sale |
— | — | (2,000,000 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
29,120 | (1,646,563 | ) | (408,197 | ) | |||||||
(Increase) in cash surrender value of bank owned life policies |
(285,786 | ) | (1,256,708 | ) | (3,295,772 | ) | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
(7,671,976 | ) | (514,427 | ) | (616,829 | ) | ||||||
Changes in deferred compensation |
391,707 | |||||||||||
Decrease in deferred loan fees |
(127,999 | ) | (65,385 | ) | (122,449 | ) | ||||||
Other liabilities |
(1,064,976 | ) | 367,188 | (342,423 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
944,393 | 7,151,408 | 3,030,151 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities |
9,125,749 | 6,313,987 | 10,049,495 | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities |
44,828,323 | 47,072,143 | 10,258,020 | |||||||||
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
(105,861,274 | ) | (24,486,679 | ) | (21,736,709 | ) | ||||||
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities |
— | — | (4,418,146 | ) | ||||||||
Maturities of held-to-maturity securities |
97,786 | 248,569 | 549,809 | |||||||||
Key life benefit proceeds |
— | 2,400,000 | — | |||||||||
Loan originations, net of principal repayments |
(39,055,891 | ) | (80,519,208 | ) | (45,787,518 | ) | ||||||
Purchase of Bank premises and equipment, net |
(865,084 | ) | (3,439,403 | ) | (4,036,100 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds on sale of fixed assets |
5,000 | 83,210 | 330,676 | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(91,725,391 | ) | (52,327,381 | ) | (54,790,473 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Net increase in demand deposits and savings accounts |
31,080,488 | 32,949,640 | 4,105,641 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in certificates of deposit |
50,570,118 | 1,274,228 | 63,186,019 | |||||||||
Net(decrease) increase in securities sold under agreements to
repurchase |
(1,659,956 | ) | (21,603,399 | ) | 14,230,952 | |||||||
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
120,000,000 | 75,000,000 | 70,000,000 | |||||||||
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
(60,000,000 | ) | (55,000,000 | ) | (85,000,000 | ) | ||||||
Junior subordinated debt payable to unconsolidated subsidiary
grantor trust |
— | — | 155,000 | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of Preferred Stock |
17,000,000 | — | — | |||||||||
Cash dividends paid on common stock |
(2,790,423 | ) | (2,838,028 | ) | (2,650,320 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
41,506 | 486,881 | 879,279 | |||||||||
Common Stock Repurchased |
(503,796 | ) | (2,270,242 | ) | (1,089,868 | ) | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options |
— | 144,630 | 651,118 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
153,737,937 | 28,143,710 | 64,470,821 | |||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
62,956,939 | (17,032,263 | ) | 12,710,499 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
22,234,123 | 39,266,386 | 26,555,887 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
$ | 85,191,062 | $ | 22,234,123 | $ | 39,266,386 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements
57
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006 (Continued)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006 (Continued)
| Supplemental disclosures: | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: |
||||||||||||
Income taxes |
$ | 316,000 | $ | 2,752,860 | $ | 3,507,000 | ||||||
Interest |
$ | 16,510,235 | $ | 19,279,879 | $ | 15,164,624 | ||||||
Transfer of loans to OREO |
$ | 2,934,000 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Reclassification of
held-to-maturity securities to
available-for-sale |
$ | 8,804,998 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
58
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| 2. | THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY | ||
| Bank of Commerce Holdings (the “Holding Company”), is a financial holding company (“FHC”) with its principal offices in Redding, California. A financial holding company may engage in commercial banking, insurance, securities business and offer other financial products to customers. The Company received notification from the Federal Reserve Board approving the election to change to a financial holding company on April 22, 2001. The election to change to a financial holding company has had no impact to date on the operations of the Company. As a financial holding company, Bank of Commerce Holdings is subject to the Financial Holding Company Act and to supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”). The Holding Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries are Redding Bank of Commerce (the “Bank”) and Bank of Commerce Mortgage, (collectively the “Company”). The Company has an unconsolidated subsidiary in Bank of Commerce Holdings Trust and Bank of Commerce Holdings Trust II. Bank of Commerce Mortgage offers mortgage brokerage services through an affiliate agreement with BWC Mortgage Services. The Bank is principally supervised and regulated by the California Department of Financial Institutions (“DFI”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). Substantially all of the Company’s activities are carried out through the Bank. The Bank was incorporated as a California banking corporation on November 25, 1981. The Bank operates four full service branches in Redding, and Roseville, California. | |||
| The Bank conducts a general commercial banking business in the counties of El Dorado, Placer, Shasta, Sacramento, and Tehama, California. The Company considers Northern California to be the major market area of the Bank. The services offered by the Bank include those traditionally offered by commercial banks of similar size and character in California, including checking, interest-bearing (“NOW”) and savings accounts, money market deposit accounts; commercial, real estate, and construction loans; travelers checks, safe deposit boxes, collection services and electronic banking activities. The primary focus of the Bank is to provide services to the business and professional community of its major market area, including Small Business Administration loans, payroll and accounting packages, benefit administration and billing programs. The Bank does not offer trust services or international banking services and does not plan to do so in the near future. Most of the customers of the Bank are small to medium sized businesses and individuals with medium to high net worth. | |||
| 2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | ||
| The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and general practices within the banking industry. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current financial statement presentation. | |||
| Principles of Consolidation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Holding Company, the Bank and Bank of Commerce Mortgage. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
59
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| Cash and Cash Equivalents — For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include amounts due from correspondent banks and the Federal Reserve Bank, federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell. Generally, federal funds sold are for a one-day period and securities purchased under agreements to resell are for no more than a 90-day period. | |||
| Balances held in federal funds sold may exceed FDIC Insurance limits. | |||
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell- The Company enters into purchases of securities under agreements to resell substantially identical securities. Securities purchased under agreements to resell consist primarily of U.S. Treasury, Agency and Municipal securities. The amounts advanced under these agreements are reflected as assets in the consolidated balance sheet. It is the Company’s policy to take possession of securities purchased under agreements to resell. Agreements with third parties specify the Company’s rights to request additional collateral, based on its monitoring of the fair value of the underlying securities on a daily basis. The securities are delivered by appropriate entry into the Company’s account maintained at the Federal Reserve Bank or into a third-party custodian’s account designated by the Company under a written custodial agreement that explicitly recognizes the Company’s interest in the securities. In general, these agreements mature within 90 days and no material amount of agreements to resell securities purchased is outstanding with any individual dealer. | |||
| Securities — At the time of purchase, the Company designates the security as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale, based on its investment objectives, operational needs and intent to hold. The Company does not engage in trading activity. Securities designated as held-to-maturity are carried at cost adjusted for the accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums. The Company has the ability and intent to hold these securities to maturity. Securities designated as available-for-sale may be sold to implement the Company’s asset/liability management strategies and in response to changes in interest rates, prepayment rates and similar factors. Securities designated as available-for-sale are recorded at fair value and unrealized gains or losses, net of income taxes, are reported as part of accumulated other comprehensive income(loss), a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Gains or losses on sale of securities are based on the specific identification method. The market value and underlying rating of the security is monitored for quality. Securities may be adjusted to reflect changes in valuation as a result of other-than-temporary declines in value. Investments with fair values that are less than amortized cost are considered impaired. Impairment may result from either a decline in the financial condition of the issuing entity or, in the case of fixed rate investments, from changes in interest rates. At each financial statement date, management assesses each investment to determine if impaired investments are temporarily impaired or if the impairment is other than temporary based upon the positive and negative evidence available. Evidence evaluated includes, but is not limited to, industry analyst reports, credit market conditions, and interest rate trends. If negative evidence outweighs positive evidence that the carrying amount is recoverable within a reasonable period of time, the impairment is deemed other-than-temporary and the security is written down in the period in which such determination is made. | |||
| Loans — Loans are stated at the principal amounts outstanding less deferred loan fees and costs and the allowance for loan losses. Interest on commercial, installment and real estate loans is accrued daily based on the principal outstanding. Loan origination and commitment fees and certain origination costs are deferred and the net amount is amortized over the contractual life of the loans as an adjustment of their yield. A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, management believes it is probable that the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured based upon the present value of future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective rate, the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Interest on impaired loans is recognized on a cash basis, and only when the principal is not considered impaired. |
60
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| The Company’s practice is to place an asset on nonaccrual status when one of the following events occurs: (i) Any installment of principal or interest is 90 days or more past due (unless in management’s opinion the loan is well-secured and in the process of collection), (ii) management determines the ultimate collection of principal or interest to be unlikely or (iii) the terms of the loan have been renegotiated due to a serious weakening of the borrower’s financial condition. Nonperforming loans may be on nonaccrual, are 90 days past due and still accruing, or have been restructured. Accruals are resumed on loans only when they are brought fully current with respect to interest and principal and when the loan is estimated to be fully collectible. Restructured loans are those loans on which concessions in terms have been granted because of the borrower’s financial or legal difficulties. Interest is generally accrued on such loans in accordance with the new terms. | |||
| Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses — The allowance for loan and lease losses are established through a provision charged to expense. Loans are charged off against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the collectibility of the principal is unlikely. The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb losses inherent in existing loans and overdrafts based on evaluations of collectibility and prior loss experience. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio, overall portfolio quality, loan concentrations, specific problem loans, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers’ ability to pay. Material estimates relating to the determination of the allowance for loan losses are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, the FDIC and DFI, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance for loan losses. The FDIC or DFI may require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgment about information available to them at the time of their examination. | |||
| Bank Premises and Equipment — Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Expenditures for major renewals and improvements are capitalized and those for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. | |||
| Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase — At December 31, 2008 and 2007, securities sold under agreements to repurchase consist of commercial repurchase agreements, where the Company has an agreement with the depositor to sell and repurchase, on a daily basis, a proportionate interest in municipal securities. These securities are held as collateral for non-FDIC insured deposits. | |||
| Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings — As part of its asset/liability management strategy the Company has obtained advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank. The Company has pledged collateral of commercial real estate loans and specific securities to support the borrowings. | |||
| Goodwill and Other Intangibles — Net assets of companies acquired in purchase transactions are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition, as such, the historical cost basis of individual assets and liabilities are adjusted to reflect their fair value. Identified intangibles are amortized on a straight-line basis over the period benefited. In June 2001, the Company purchased a bank branch office. The Company recorded core deposit intangibles, which are amortized over seven years by the straight-line method. Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $154,209 and $106,800, respectively. The premium was fully amortized in 2007. |
61
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| Earnings Per Share — The table below illustrates basic earnings per share excluding dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that subsequently shared in the earnings of the entity. The following table reconciles the numerator and denominator used in computing both basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31. |
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
| Earnings Per Share | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||
Basic EPS Calculation: |
||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 2,194,386 | $ | 6,106,898 | $ | 6,567,709 | ||||||
Less: preferred dividend |
— | — | — | |||||||||
Numerator: Earnings available to
common stockholders |
$ | 2,194,386 | $ | 6,106,898 | $ | 6,567,709 | ||||||
Denominator (average common
shares outstanding) |
8,712,873 | 8,857,627 | 8,759,568 | |||||||||
Basic earnings per Share |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.75 | ||||||
Diluted EPS Calculation: |
||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 2,194,386 | $ | 6,106,898 | $ | 6,567,709 | ||||||
Less: preferred dividend |
— | — | — | |||||||||
Numerator: Earnings available to
common stockholders |
$ | 2,194,386 | $ | 6,106,898 | $ | 6,567,709 | ||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||
Average
common shares outstanding Plus incremental shares from
assumed conversions |
8,712,873 | 8,857,627 | 8,759,568 | |||||||||
Stock Options |
11,677 | 80,109 | 172,016 | |||||||||
Warrants |
— | — | — | |||||||||
| 8,724,550 | 8,937,736 | 8,931,584 | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings per Share |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 0.74 | ||||||
Anti-dilutive options not included in EPS Calculation |
185,666 | 120,884 | 128,615 | |||||||||
Anti-dilutive warrants not included in EPS Calculation |
405,405 | — | — | |||||||||
| Other Real Estate Owned — Real estate acquired by foreclosure, is carried at the lower of the recorded investment in the property or its fair value less estimated selling costs. Prior to foreclosure, the value of the underlying loan is written down to the fair value of the real estate to be acquired, less costs to sell, by a charge to the allowance for loan losses, if necessary. Fair value of other real estate is generally determined based on an appraisal of the property. Any subsequent write-downs are charged against noninterest expenses. Operating expenses of such properties, net of related income, and gains and losses on their disposition are included in other expenses. Gain recognition on the disposition of real estate is dependent upon the transaction meeting certain criteria relating to the nature of the property sold and the terms of the sale. This includes the buyer’s initial and continuing investment, the degree of continuing involvement by the Company with the property after the sale, and other matters. Under certain circumstances, revenue recognition may be deferred until these criteria are met. |
62
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| Income Taxes — The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using currently enacted tax rates applied to such taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. | |||
| Stock Option Plan — The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R (FAS 123R), “Share-Based Payment,” on January 1, 2006. The scope of FAS 123R includes a wide range of stock-based compensation arrangements including stock options, restricted stock plans, performance-based awards, stock appreciation rights, and employee stock purchase plans. FAS 123R requires the Company to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments. The cost is determined based on the fair value of the award on the grant date. That cost must be recognized in the income statement over the service period of the award. Under the ‘modified prospective’ transition method, awards that are granted, modified or settled beginning at the date of adoption will be measured and accounted for in accordance with FAS 123R. In addition, expense must be recognized in the income statement for unvested awards that were granted prior to the date of adoption. | |||
| During 2008, the fair value of options granted was determined on the date of the grant using a binomial option-pricing model with the following assumptions: a current volatility rate of 32.10%, a risk-free interest rate of 2.97% (based upon the five year treasury coupon rate at the time the options were issued), expected dividends of $0.32 per share per year, an annual dividend rate of 4.56%, an assumed forfeiture rate of zero and an expected life of seven years. | |||
| Description of stock-based compensation plan | |||
| The 1998 Stock Option Plan which was approved by the Company’s stockholders on April 21, 1998, expired on May 1, 2008. The 2008 Stock Option Plan (‘the Plan’) which was approved by the Company’s stockholders on May 15, 2007 replaced the 1998 Stock Option Plan. | |||
| The Plan provides for awards in the form of options, which may constitute incentive stock options (“Incentive Options”) under Section 422(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), or non-statutory stock options (“NSOs”) to key personnel of the Company, including directors. The Plan provides that Incentive Options under the Plan may not be granted at less than 100% of fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. The strike price of NSOs may not be granted at less than 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant. | |||
| The Company’s stock option plans provide for awards of incentive and nonqualified stock options. Incentive options must have an exercise price at or above fair market value of the stock at the date of the grant and a term of no more than 10 years. Options generally become exercisable over five years from the date of the grant. Nonqualified stock options must have an exercise price of no less than 85% of the fair market value of the stock at the date of the grant and for a term of no more than 10 years. Nonqualified stock options generally become exercisable over five years from the date of the grant. |
63
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| A total of 620,000 shares of the Company’s common stock are reserved for grant under the Plan. At December 31, 2008, 588,500 shares were available for future grants under the Plan. At December 31, 2008, 209,485 shares were available to be exercised. The weighted average grant exercise price for options at December 31, 2008 was $6.35. The total intrinsic value (which is the amount by which the stock price exceeded the exercise price) of options exercised during the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008 was $40,863. | |||
| Comprehensive Income (Loss) — Comprehensive income represents net earnings and any revenues, expenses, gains and losses that, under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, are excluded from net earnings and recognized directly as a component of stockholders’ equity. The Company’s sources of other comprehensive income (loss) include unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale and unrealized gains and losses on derivative activities. Reclassification adjustments result from gains or losses on securities that were realized and included in net income of the current period that also had been included in other comprehensive income (loss) as unrealized holding gains or losses in the period in which they arose. | |||
| Operating Segments — Reportable operating segments are generally defined as components of an enterprise for which discrete financial information is available, whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the organizations management and whose revenue is 10 percent or more of total revenue. Under this definition the Company does not have reportable operating segments. In the years 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company accounted for its operations as one operating segment. | |||
| Transfer of Financial Assets — Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Corporation, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the Corporation does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity. The Company services, for others, SBA loans that are sold with a principal balance of $4,635,027, $5,316,219 and $3,494,130 as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. | |||
| Preferred Stock — The Company is authorized to issue up to 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock without par value. Preferred shares outstanding rank senior to common shares both as to dividends and liquidation preference, but have no voting rights. The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (“EESA”) authorizes the United States Treasury Department to use appropriated funds to restore liquidity and stability to the U.S. financial system. As part of this authority, and pursuant to a Letter Agreement dated November 14, 2008, and the Securities Purchase Agreement — Standard Terms, the Company issued to the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury Department”) 17,000 shares of Bank of Commerce Holdings Series A Fixed Rate Perpetual Preferred Stock, without par value (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), having a liquidation amount per share equal to $1,000 for a total price of $17 million. | |||
| Warrants — As part of its purchase of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Treasury Department received a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 405,405 shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial per share exercise price of $6.29. The Warrant provides for the adjustment of the exercise price and the number of shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise pursuant to customary anti-dilution provisions, such as upon stock splits or distributions of securities or other assets to holders of our common stock, and upon certain issuances of our common stock at or below a specified price relative to the initial exercise price. |
64
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| The Warrant expires ten years from the issuance date. If, on or prior to December 31, 2009, the Company receives aggregate gross cash proceeds of not less than $17 million from “qualified equity offerings” announced after November 14, 2008, the number of shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the Treasury Department’s exercise of the Warrant will be reduced by one-half of the original number of shares, taking into account all adjustments, underlying the Warrant. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Treasury Department has agreed not to exercise voting power with respect to any shares of common stock issued upon exercise of the Warrant. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On October 10, 2008, the FASB issued FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset
When the Market for That Asset is Not Active.” FAS 157-3 is a FASB Staff Position that clarifies
the application of FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” for a non-active market and
provides an illustrative example of key considerations in determining the fair value of financial
assets under such conditions. FAS 157-3 is currently under management review with the impact on the
Company yet to be determined.
The FASB has decided to amend SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125” (SFAS 140),
impacting the accounting for qualifying special-purpose entities (“QSPS”), and make certain changes
to FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 46 (revised December 2003) “Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities — an interpretation of ARB No. 51” (FIN 46R). Exposure drafts of the proposed
requirements are expected in the third quarter of 2008. The impact on the Company and the timing
of adoption cannot be determined until the FASB issues the final amendments to SFAS 140 and FIN
46R.
On March 19, 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB No. 133” (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires expanded
qualitative, quantitative and credit-risk disclosures about derivatives and hedging activities and
their effects on the Companies financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161
also clarifies that derivatives are subject to credit risk disclosures as required by SFAS No. 107,
“Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” SFAS 161 is effective for the Companies
financial statements for the year beginning on January 1, 2009.
On December 4, 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (SFAS
141R). SFAS 141R modifies the accounting for business combinations and requires, with limited
exceptions, the acquirer in a business combination to recognize 100 percent of the assets acquired,
liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition-date fair
value. In addition, SFAS 141R requires the expensing of acquisition-related transaction and
restructuring costs, and certain contingent assets and liabilities acquired, as well as contingent
consideration, to be recognized at fair value. SFAS 141R also modifies the accounting for certain
acquired income tax assets and liabilities. SFAS 141R is effective for new acquisitions consummated
on or after January 1, 2009 and earlier adoption is not permitted.
On February 15, 2007 the FASB issued FAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, Including an amendment of FASB Statement 115. FAS 159 provides an
alternative measurement treatment for certain financial assets and financial liabilities, under an
instrument-by-instrument election, that permits fair value to be used for both initial and
subsequent measurement, with changes in fair values recognized in earnings. FAS 159 will be
effective beginning January 1, 2008. The adoption of FAS 159 did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
65
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| 3. | RESTRICTIONS ON CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS | ||
| The Bank maintains compensating balances with its primary correspondent, which totaled $2,000,000 at December 31, 2008, December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006. | |||
| 4. | SECURITIES | ||
| The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available-for-sale are summarized as follows: |
| December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
| Gross | Gross | Estimated | ||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
| Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities
and obligations of U.S.
agencies |
$ | 16,006,571 | $ | 69,080 | $ | 0 | $ | 16,075,651 | ||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
32,177,891 | 145,647 | (1,302,628 | ) | 31,020,910 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
83,657,023 | 1,278,263 | (345,247 | ) | 84,590,039 | |||||||||||
| $ | 131,841,485 | $ | 1,492,990 | ($1,647,875 | ) | $ | 131,686,600 | |||||||||
| December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
| Gross | Gross | Estimated | ||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
| Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities
and obligations of U.S.
agencies |
$ | 15,988,936 | $ | 26,031 | $ | (103,535 | ) | $ | 15,911,432 | |||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
19,016,813 | 27,424 | (262,596 | ) | 18,781,641 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
31,637,544 | 10,250 | (353,929 | ) | 31,293,865 | |||||||||||
Corporate Bonds |
2,000,204 | 0 | (80,756 | ) | 1,919,448 | |||||||||||
| $ | 68,643,497 | $ | 63,705 | $ | (800,816 | ) | $ | 67,906,386 | ||||||||
| All held-to-maturity securities were transferred to available-for-sale in the third quarter 2008 to provide the Company greater liquidity resources. The following table represents the amortized cost and fair value of securities held-to-maturity at the time of transfer: |
| September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
| Gross | Gross | Estimated | ||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
| Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
Obligations of
state and political
subdivisions |
$ | 8,804,998 | $ | 106,665 | $ | (203,335 | ) | $ | 8,708,328 | |||||||
| $ | 8,804,998 | $ | 106.665 | $ | (203,335 | ) | $ | 8,708,328 | ||||||||
66
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities held-to-maturity are summarized as follows: |
| December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
| Gross | Gross | Estimated | ||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
| Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
Mortgage backed securities |
$ | 1,632,816 | $ | 13,706 | $ | $ | 1,646,522 | |||||||||
Obligations of state and
political Subdivisions |
8,925,949 | 62,107 | (2,370 | ) | 8,985,686 | |||||||||||
| $ | 10,558,765 | $ | 75,813 | $ | (2,370 | ) | $ | 10,632,208 | ||||||||
| The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities at December 31, 2008 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or repay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. |
| Available-for-Sale | ||||||||
| Estimated | ||||||||
| Amortized | Fair | |||||||
| Cost | Value | |||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 1,010,193 | $ | 1,029,063 | ||||
Due after one year through five years |
19,331,317 | 19,445,179 | ||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
12,319,780 | 12,433,476 | ||||||
Due after ten years |
99,180,195 | 98,778,882 | ||||||
| $ | 131,841,485 | $ | 131,686,600 | |||||
| The following tables present the current fair value and associated unrealized losses on investments with unrealized losses at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008. The tables also disclose whether these securities have had unrealized losses for less than 12 months or for 12 months or longer. |
December 31, 2007
| Less than 12 months | 12 months or more | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair | Fair | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Value | Unrealized Losses | Value | Unrealized Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury
securities and
Obligations of U.
S. Agencies |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 12,894,359 | ($103,535 | ) | $ | 12,894,359 | ($103,535 | ) | ||||||||||||
Obligations of
state and political
subdivisions |
$ | 11,047,188 | ($228,589 | ) | $ | 3,360,969 | ($36,378 | ) | $ | 14,408,156 | ($264,967 | ) | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities |
$ | 4,779,905 | ($29,487 | ) | $ | 21,557,410 | ($324,441 | ) | $ | 26,337,315 | ($353,928 | ) | ||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,919,448 | ($80,756 | ) | $ | 1,919,448 | ($80,756 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total temporarily
impaired securities |
$ | 15,827,093 | ($258,076 | ) | $ | 39,732,186 | ($545,110 | ) | $ | 55,559,279 | ($803,186 | ) | ||||||||||||
67
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
December 31, 2008
| Less than 12 months | 12 months or more | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair | Fair | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Value | Unrealized Losses | Value | Unrealized Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury
securities and
Obligations of U.
S. Agencies |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Obligations of
state and political
subdivisions |
$ | 21,125,047 | ($1,140,217 | ) | $ | 843,658 | ($162,412 | ) | $ | 21,968,705 | ($1,302,628 | ) | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities |
$ | 16,666,493 | ($105,783 | ) | $ | 5,375,203 | ($239,463 | ) | $ | 22,041,696 | ($345,247 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total temporarily
impaired securities |
$ | 37,791,540 | ($1,246,000 | ) | $ | 6,218,861 | ($401,875 | ) | $ | 44,010,401 | ($1,647,875 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Invested assets are exposed to various risks, such as interest rate, market and credit risks. Due to the level of risk associated with certain invested assets and the level of uncertainty related to changes in the fair value of these assets, it is possible that changes in risks in the near term could have an adverse material impact on our results of operations or equity. Our investment portfolio is subject to market declines below amortized cost that may be other-than-temporary. A significant judgment in the valuation of investments is the determination of when an ‘other-than-temporary’ impairment has occurred. The ALCO Committee reviews the investment portfolio on at least a quarterly basis, with ongoing analysis as new information becomes available. Any decline that is determined to be other-than-temporary is recorded as an ‘other-than-temporary’ impairment loss in the results of operations in the period in which the determination occurred. | |||
| An investment is impaired if the fair value of the investment is less than its cost adjusted for accretion, amortization and OTTI, otherwise defined as an unrealized loss. When an investment is impaired, the impairment is evaluated to determine whether it is temporary or other-than-temporary. Significant judgment is required in the determination of whether an OTTI has occurred for an investment. The Company follows a consistent and systematic process for determining and recording an OTTI loss. The Company has designated the ALCO Committee responsible for the OTTI process. | |||
| The ALCO Committee’s assessment of whether an OTTI loss should be recognized incorporates both quantitative and qualitative information. The ALCO Committee considers a number of factors including, but not limited to: (a) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost, (b) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, (c) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in value, (d) whether the debtor is current on interest and principal payments and (e) general market conditions and industry or sector specific outlook. For securities considered to be OTTI, the security is adjusted to fair value and the resulting losses are recognized in Realized investment gains (losses) on the Consolidated Statement of Income. |
68
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| The Company maintains that it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of debt securities will be repaid. The Company does not hold equity securities. | |||
| At December 31, 2008 forty securities were in a loss position. Management has evaluated each security in an unrealized loss position to determine if the impairment is other-than-temporary. Management has determined that no security is other than temporarily impaired. The unrealized losses are due to interest rate changes and the Company has the ability and intent to hold all securities with identified impairments to the earlier of the forecasted recovery or the maturity of the underlying security. | |||
| At December 31, 2008, the Company has pledged book values of $1,000,000 in securities for treasury, tax and loan accounts, $17,218,434 for deposits of public funds, $12,453,000 for collateralized repurchase agreements, and $38,063,566 for Federal Home Loan borrowings. | |||
| Gross realized gains and gross realized losses, respectively, on available-for-sale securities were $632,639 and $4,760 in 2008, $268,078 and $222,408 in 2007, and $5,062 and $175,586 in 2006. | |||
| 5. | LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES | ||
| Outstanding loan balances consist of the following at: |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Commercial and industrial loans |
$ | 164,082,996 | $ | 173,703,638 | ||||
Real estate — construction loans |
84,217,532 | 106,976,522 | ||||||
Real estate — commercial |
217,914,475 | 175,013,372 | ||||||
Real estate — mortgage |
20,285,225 | 10,787,433 | ||||||
Real estate — other |
39,915,224 | 26,817,909 | ||||||
Installment loans |
144,634 | 226,102 | ||||||
Other |
902,584 | 1,223,036 | ||||||
| 527,462,670 | 494,748,012 | |||||||
Less: |
||||||||
Deferred loan fees, net |
86,826 | 232,471 | ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
8,429,383 | 8,232,970 | ||||||
| $ | 518,946,461 | $ | 486,282,571 | |||||
| Included in total loans are nonaccrual loans of $20,153,737 and $12,408,613 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, management believes it is probable that the Bank will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. If interest on nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2008 and 2007 had been accrued, such interest income would have approximated $147,100 and $92,000, respectively. |
69
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| The average outstanding balances of impaired loans were $23,078,874, $13,001,847 and $0, for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 respectively. There was interest of $627,000, $0 and $20,000 recognized on impaired loans during the year ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. At December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 impairment allowances were $1,103,290, $3,200,000, and $0 held towards impaired loans at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 respectively. | |||
| The Company concentrates its lending activities primarily within Shasta, El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento and Tehama counties, in California, and the location of the four full service offices of the Bank. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, a significant portion of its customers’ ability to repay the loans is dependent upon the professional services and investor commercial real estate sectors. Generally, the loans are secured by real estate or other assets and are expected to be repaid from cash flows of the borrower’s business or cash flows from real estate investments. | |||
| The Company’s exposure to credit loss, if any, is the difference between the fair value of the collateral, and the outstanding balance of the loan. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had pledged $96,721,113 and $58,343,819, respectively, in loans as available collateral for Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings. In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters various types of transactions, which involve financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. These instruments include commitments to extend credit and stand-by letters of credit, which are not reflected in the consolidated balance sheets. These transactions may involve, to varying degrees, credit and interest rate risk more than the amount, if any recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit bear similar credit risk characteristics as outstanding loans. An allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit is determined using estimates of the probability of funding. This reserve is carried as a liability on the consolidated balance sheet. | |||
| Changes in the allowance for loan losses consist of the following: |
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 8,232,970 | $ | 4,904,266 | $ | 4,316,379 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
6,520,000 | 3,291,250 | 225,900 | |||||||||
Loans charged off |
(6,329,176 | ) | 0 | (299,421 | ) | |||||||
Recoveries of loans
previously charged off |
5,589 | 37,454 | 661,408 | |||||||||
Balance at end of year |
$ | 8,429,383 | $ | 8,232,970 | $ | 4,904,266 | ||||||
70
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| 6. | BANK PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT | ||
| Bank premises and equipment consist of the following: |
| Estimated | December 31, | |||||||||||
| Lives | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Land |
$ | 1,507,628 | $ | 1,507,628 | ||||||||
Land Improvements |
188,845 | 188,845 | ||||||||||
Bank buildings |
39.0 years | 8,138,044 | 8,114,721 | |||||||||
Furniture, fixtures and
equipment |
3 - 7 years | 6,703,866 | 6,163,236 | |||||||||
| 16,538,383 | 15,974,430 | |||||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(5,933,372 | ) | (5,919,593 | ) | ||||||||
| 10,605,011 | 10,054,837 | |||||||||||
Construction in progress |
67,200 | 909,138 | ||||||||||
| $ | 10,672,211 | $ | 10,963,975 | |||||||||
| Depreciation expense, included in net occupancy and equipment expense, is $1,145,000, $1,035,660, and $732,906 for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. | |||
| 7. | OTHER ASSETS | ||
| Other assets consist of the following: |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance policies |
$ | 7,415,413 | $ | 7,129,627 | ||||
Deferred tax asset, net |
4,932,051 | 5,209,973 | ||||||
Accrued interest on loans |
2,051,386 | 2,497,124 | ||||||
Accrued interest on investment securities |
1,079,110 | 538,410 | ||||||
California Affordable Housing Credits |
2,414,517 | 933,659 | ||||||
Other Real Estate Owned |
2,934,152 | — | ||||||
Goldman Sachs Sweep account receivable |
— | 267,984 | ||||||
Taxes receivable |
447,865 | 181,911 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock |
5,640,000 | 2,852,200 | ||||||
Investment in junior subordinated debt payable to
subsidiary grantor trust |
465,000 | 465,000 | ||||||
Other |
338,132 | 305,207 | ||||||
| $ | 27,717,626 | $ | 20,381,095 | |||||
| 8. | DEPOSITS | ||
| Time certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more totaled $168,810,092 and $153,583,629 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Interest expense on such deposits was $5,785,386, $6,062,259 and $5,025,273 during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
71
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| At December 31, 2008, the scheduled maturities for all time deposits are as follows: |
| Time Deposit Maturity Schedule | ||||
One year or less |
$ | 169,782,140 | ||
One to three years |
58,668,045 | |||
Three to five years |
35,836,419 | |||
Over five years |
0 | |||
Total |
$ | 264,286,604 | ||
| 9. | OTHER LIABILITIES | ||
| Other liabilities consist of the following: |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Deferred Compensation — Retired Officers |
931,777 | $ | 1,035,064 | |||||
Deferred Compensation — Directors fees |
2,600,231 | 2,310,824 | ||||||
Deferred Compensation — Salary Continuation |
1,235,605 | 1,030,020 | ||||||
Employee incentive payable |
0 | 476,843 | ||||||
FHLB accrued interest payable |
154,396 | 242,637 | ||||||
Accrued 401(k) match payable |
66,365 | 71,981 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
618,890 | 787,844 | ||||||
Reserve for off-balance sheet commitments |
421,877 | 421,877 | ||||||
Interest payable Junior Subordinated Debentures |
158,621 | 112,538 | ||||||
Dividend payable |
696,920 | 700,460 | ||||||
Other |
151,479 | 363,471 | ||||||
| $ | 7,036,161 | $ | 7,553,559 | |||||
| 10. | FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES | ||
| Included in other borrowings are advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (“FHLB”) totaling $120,000,000 as of December 31, 2008 and $60,000,000 as of December 31, 2007. The FHLB advances bear fixed rates of interest ranging from 0.80% to 3.97%. |
| Amount | Interest Rate | Maturity | ||||||
$15,000,000 |
2.89 | % | 01/22/2009 | |||||
$55,000,000 |
0.80 | % | 01/26/2009 | |||||
$35,000,000 |
3.97 | % | 11/23/2009 | |||||
$15,000,000 |
3.41 | % | 04/29/2011 | |||||
$120,000,000 |
||||||||
72
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| These borrowings are secured by an investment in FHLB stock and certain real estate mortgage loans which have been specifically pledged to the FHLB pursuant to their collateral requirements. Based upon the level of FHLB advances, the Company was required to hold a minimum investment in FHLB stock of $5,640,000 at December 31, 2008 and to pledge $96,721,113, $58,343,819 and $52,365,899 of its real estate mortgage loans to the FHLB as collateral as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. At December 31, 2008 the Bank had available borrowing lines at the FHLB of $58,020,207 and additional federal fund borrowing lines at two correspondent banks totaling $20,000,000. | |||
| 11. | PREFERRED STOCK AND WARRANTS | ||
| Pursuant to a Letter Agreement dated November 14, 2008, and the Securities Purchase Agreement — Standard Terms the Company issued to the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury Department”) 17,000 shares of Bank of Commerce Holdings Series A Fixed Rate Perpetual Preferred Stock, without par value (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), having a liquidation amount per share equal to $1,000 for a total price of $17 million. The Series A Preferred Stock pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per year for the first five years and thereafter at a rate of 9% per year. The Company may not redeem the Series A Preferred Stock during the first three years except with the proceeds from a “qualified equity offering” (as defined in the Certificate of Determination described in Item 5.03). After three years, the Company may, at our option, redeem the Series A Preferred Stock at par value plus accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series A Preferred Stock is generally non-voting. Prior to November 14, 2011, unless the Company has redeemed the Series A Preferred Stock or the Treasury Department has transferred the Series A Preferred Stock to a third party, the consent of the Treasury Department will be required for the Company to increase our common stock dividend or repurchase our common stock or other equity or capital securities, other than in connection with benefit plans consistent with past practice and certain other circumstances specified in the Securities Purchase Agreement. A consequence of the Series A Preferred Stock purchase includes certain restrictions on executive compensation that could limit the tax deductibility of compensation we pay to executive management. | |||
| As part of its purchase of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Treasury Department received a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 405,405 shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial per share exercise price of $6.29. The Warrant provides for the adjustment of the exercise price and the number of shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise pursuant to customary anti-dilution provisions, such as upon stock splits or distributions of securities or other assets to holders of our common stock, and upon certain issuances of our common stock at or below a specified price relative to the initial exercise price. The Warrant expires ten years from the issuance date. If, on or prior to December 31, 2009, the Company receives aggregate gross cash proceeds of not less than $17 million from “qualified equity offerings” announced after November 14, 2008, the number of shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the Treasury Department’s exercise of the Warrant will be reduced by one-half of the original number of shares, taking into account all adjustments, underlying the Warrant. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Treasury Department has agreed not to exercise voting power with respect to any shares of common stock issued upon exercise of the Warrant. | |||
| Both the Series A Preferred Stock and Warrant will be accounted for as components of Tier 1 capital. |
73
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| The Series A Preferred Stock and the Warrant were issued in a private placement exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Upon the request of the Treasury Department at any time, we have agreed to promptly enter into a deposit arrangement pursuant to which the Series A Preferred Stock may be deposited and depositary shares (“Depositary Shares”) may be issued. Neither the Series A Preferred Stock nor the Warrant will be subject to any contractual restrictions on transfer, except that the Treasury Department may only transfer or exercise an aggregate of one-half of the Warrant Shares prior to the earlier of the redemption of 100% of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock and December 31, 2009. | |||
| In the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed that, until such time as the Treasury Department ceases to own any securities acquired from us pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company will take all necessary action to ensure that our benefit plans with respect to our senior executive officers comply with Section 111(b) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”) as implemented by any guidance or regulation under Section 111(b) of EESA that has been issued and is in effect as of the date of issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock and the Warrant and not adopt any benefit plans with respect to, or which cover, our senior executive officers that do not comply with EESA. The applicable executives have consented to the foregoing. | |||
| Prior to November 14, 2011, unless the Company has redeemed the Series A Preferred Stock or the Treasury Department has transferred the Series A Preferred Stock to a third party, the consent of the Treasury Department will be required for us to (1) declare or pay any dividend or make any distribution on our common stock (other than regular quarterly cash dividends of not more than $0.08 per share of common stock) or (2) redeem, purchase or acquire any shares of the Company’s common stock or other equity or capital securities, other than in connection with benefit plans consistent with past practice and certain other circumstances specified in the Securities Purchase Agreement. | |||
| Capital Purchase Plan participants may “opt out” by repaying the capital without raising additional capital subject to consultation with the appropriate Federal regulator. | |||
| 12. | JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBT PAYABLE TO UNCONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY GRANTOR TRUSTS | ||
| During the first quarter 2003, Bank of Commerce Holdings formed a wholly-owned Delaware statutory business trust, Bank of Commerce Holdings Trust (the “grantor trust”), which issued $5.0 million of guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in Bank of Commerce Holdings’ junior subordinated debentures (the “trust notes”) to the public and $155,000 common securities to the Company. These debentures qualify as Tier 1 capital under Federal Reserve Board guidelines. The proceeds from the issuance of the trust notes were transferred from the grantor trust to the Holding Company and from the Holding Company to the Bank as surplus capital. The trust notes accrue and pay distributions on a quarterly basis at three month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 3.30%. The rate at December 31, 2008 was 8.12%. The rate increase is capped at 2.75% annually and the lifetime cap is 12.5%. The final maturity on the trust notes is March 18, 2033, and the debt allows for prepayment after five years on the quarterly payment date. |
74
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| On July 29, 2005, Bank of Commerce Holdings (the “Company”) participated in a private placement to an institutional investor of $10 million of fixed rate trust preferred securities (the “Trust Preferred Securities”); through a newly formed Delaware trust affiliate, Bank of Commerce Holdings Trust II (the “Trust”). The Trust Preferred Securities mature on September 15, 2035, and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any March 15, June 15, September 15 or December 15 on or after September 15, 2010. In addition, the Trust Preferred Securities require quarterly distributions by the Trust to the holder of the Trust Preferred Securities at a rate of 6.115%, until September 10, 2010 after which the rate will reset quarterly to equal three month LIBOR plus 1.58%. The Trust simultaneously issued $310,000 common securities to the Company. | |||
| The proceeds from the sale of the Trust Preferred Securities were used by the Trust to purchase from the Company the aggregate principal amount of $10,310,000 of the Company’s floating rate junior subordinate notes (the “Notes”). The net proceeds to the Company from the sale of the Notes to the Trust were used by the Company for general corporate purposes, including funding the growth of the Company’s various financial services. | |||
| The Notes were issued pursuant to a Junior Subordinated Indenture (the “Indenture”), dated July 29, 2005, by and between the Company and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee. Like the Trust Preferred Securities, the Notes bear interest at a floating rate, at 6.115% until September 10, 2010, after which the rate will reset on a quarterly basis to equal three month LIBOR plus 1.58%. The interest payments by the Company will be used to pay the quarterly distributions payable by the Trust to the holder of the Trust Preferred Securities. However, so long as no event of default, as described below, has occurred under the Notes, the Company may, at any time and from time to time, defer interest payments on the Notes (in which case the Trust will be entitled to defer distributions otherwise due on the Trust Preferred Securities) for up to twenty (20) consecutive quarters. | |||
| The Notes are subordinated to the prior payment of other indebtedness of the Company that, by its terms, is not similarly subordinated. Although the Notes will be recorded as a long term liability on the Company’s balance sheet, for regulatory purposes, the Notes are expected to be treated as Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital under rulings of the Federal Reserve Board, the Company’s primary federal regulatory agency. | |||
| The Notes mature on September 15, 2035, but may be redeemed at the Company’s option at any time on or after September 15, 2010 or at any time upon certain events, such as a change in the regulatory capital treatment of the Notes, the Trust being deemed to be an investment company or the occurrence of certain adverse tax events. In each case, the Company may redeem the Notes for their aggregate principal amount, plus accrued interest, if any. |
75
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| 13. | INCOME TAXES |
| Provision for income taxes consists of the following: |
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 158,421 | $ | 2,448,140 | $ | 3,260,200 | ||||||
State |
(227,067 | ) | 603,476 | 984,927 | ||||||||
Total currently payable |
(68,646 | ) | 3,051,616 | 4,245,127 | ||||||||
Deferred: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
102,507 | (1,167,545 | ) | (315,359 | ) | |||||||
State |
(73,387 | ) | (479,018 | ) | (92,838 | ) | ||||||
Total deferred provision |
29,120 | (1,646,563 | ) | (408,197 | ) | |||||||
Total (benefit) provision for income taxes |
($39,526 | ) | $ | 1,405,053 | $ | 3,836,930 | ||||||
| In October 2006, the Company invested in the California Affordable Housing Fund -2006 I, LLC. The investment provides funding for low income housing projects in our local markets in return for federal and state tax credits. The original commitment of $2.5 million will be fully disbursed during 2009. The tax benefit summary as of December 2008 is $159,340 for federal and $167,822 for state. | ||
| Income tax expense attributable to income before income taxes differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 34 percent to income before income taxes because of the following: |
| % of Pretax Income | ||||||||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Income tax at the Federal statutory rate |
34.00 | % | 34.00 | % | 34.00 | % | ||||||
State franchise tax, net of Federal tax benefit |
(12.16 | ) | 1.09 | 5.66 | ||||||||
Tax-exempt interest |
(15.79 | ) | (4.48 | ) | (2.02 | ) | ||||||
Key Life benefit proceeds |
(0.00 | ) | (8.84 | ) | (0.00 | ) | ||||||
Officer Life Insurance |
(4.51 | ) | (1.54 | ) | (0.97 | ) | ||||||
Affordable Housing credits |
(7.39 | ) | (2.51 | ) | (0.00 | ) | ||||||
Other |
4.02 | .98 | .21 | |||||||||
| (1.83 | %) | 18.70 | % | 36.88 | % | |||||||
76
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities consist of the following: |
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Deferred compensation |
2,137,799 | 1,962,157 | ||||||
Loan loss reserves |
3,779,735 | 3,585,204 | ||||||
Net
unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale |
56,590 | 305,392 | ||||||
Other |
24,767 | 217,417 | ||||||
Total deferred tax assets |
5,998,891 | 6,070,170 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
State franchise taxes |
($72,046 | ) | $ | 186,193 | ||||
Depreciation |
(68,095 | ) | (180,882 | ) | ||||
Deferred loan origination costs |
(426,715 | ) | (452,281 | ) | ||||
Deferred state taxes |
(443,992 | ) | (413,227 | ) | ||||
Other — California Affordable Housing |
(55,992 | ) | (0 | ) | ||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
(1,066,840 | ) | (860,197 | ) | ||||
Net deferred tax asset |
$ | 4,932,051 | $ | 5,209,973 | ||||
| The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, on January 1, 2007. The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits which would have required an adjustment to the January 1, 2007 beginning balance of retained earnings. The Company has no unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2008 and at December 31, 2008. The Company recognizes interest accrued and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 the Company recognized no interest and penalties. | ||
| The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and the State of California. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal or State and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for the years before 2005. | ||
| 14. | STOCK OPTION PLAN | |
| On May 1, 2008 the 1998 Stock Option Plan which was approved by the Company’s stockholders on April 21, 1998 expired and was replaced by the 2008 Stock Option Plan (“the Plan”) which was approved by the Company’s stockholders on May 15, 2007. The Plan provides for awards in the form of options, which may constitute incentive stock options (“Incentive Options”) under Section 422(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), or non-statutory stock options (“NSOs”) to key personnel of the Company, including directors. The Plan provides that Incentive Options under the Plan may not be granted at less than 100% of fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. NSOs may not be granted at less than 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant. The purpose of the plan is to promote the long-term success of the Company and the creation of stockholder value by (a) encouraging key personnel to focus on critical long range objectives, (b) increasing the ability of the Company to attract and retain key personnel and (c) linking key personnel directly to stockholder interests through increased stock ownership. |
77
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| A total of 620,000 shares of the Company’s common stock are reserved for grant under the Plan. | ||
| The Plan provides that all options under the Plan shall vest at a rate of at least 20% per year from the date of the grant. Vesting may be accelerated in case of an optionee’s death, disability, and retirement or in case of a change of control. | ||
| During 2008, stock option compensation expense charged against income was $116,446 ($68,500 net of tax), or less than one cent per diluted share. At December 31, 2008, there was $271,723 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested share based payments which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years. Twelve new options totaling 31,500 shares were granted during 2008. | ||
| Activity in stock-based compensation plan | ||
| The following table presents the changes in outstanding stock options for the periods indicated: |
| Weighted | Aggregate | |||||||||||
| Number of | Average | Intrinsic | ||||||||||
| Shares | Exercise Price | Value | ||||||||||
Options outstanding, December 31, 2006 |
377,745 | $ | 6.93 | $ | 1,793,156 | |||||||
Granted |
32,500 | $ | 10.98 | $ | 0 | |||||||
Exercised |
(110,403 | ) | $ | 4.65 | $ | 452,652 | ||||||
Forfeited |
(20,412 | ) | $ | 10.20 | — | |||||||
Options outstanding, December 31, 2007 |
279,430 | $ | 8.65 | $ | 27,943 | |||||||
Granted |
31,500 | $ | 6.50 | 0 | ||||||||
Exercised |
(12,850 | ) | $ | 3.23 | $ | 40,863 | ||||||
Forfeited |
0 | — | — | |||||||||
Options outstanding December 31, 2008 |
298,080 | $ | 6.35 | 0 | ||||||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2008 |
209,485 | |||||||||||
| The total intrinsic value (which is the amount by which the stock price exceeded the exercise price on the date of exercise) of options exercised during 2008 and 2007 was $40,863 and $452,652, respectively. At December 31, 2008, 588,500 shares were available for future grants under the Plan. As of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, 209,485, 200,993 and 300,631 shares respectively were available to be exercised. The weighted average exercise price for outstanding options for December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, was $6.35, $8.65 and $6.93, respectively. | ||
| The fair value of the options granted during 2008, 2007 and 2006, is estimated as $44,236, $91,539 and $194,745, respectively, on the date of grant using a binomial option-pricing model with the following assumptions: volatility of 32.10%, 29.98% and 32.03%, respectively, risk-free interest rate of 2.97%, 3.40% and 4.65%, respectively, expected dividends of $0.32 per share per year for 2008 and $0.33 per share in 2007, annual dividend rate of 4.56%, 2.89% and 3.07%, assumed forfeiture rate of zero and an expected life of seven years. There were 31,500 options granted in 2008, 32,500 options granted in 2007 and 52,000 options granted in 2006. The fair value per share of the 2008, 2007 and 2006 awards was $1.38, $2.82 and $3.75, respectively. |
78
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| 15. | CAPITAL STOCK | |
| The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.08, $0.08, $0.08 and $0.08 on January 11, 2008, April 11, 2008, July 11, 2008 and October 10, 2008, respectively, to stockholders of record as of December 31, 2007, March 31, 2008, June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2008, respectively. On April 20, 1999, the Board of Directors authorized 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock. As of December 31, 2008, Pursuant to a Letter Agreement dated November 14, 2008, and the Securities Purchase Agreement — Standard Terms the Company issued to the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury Department”) 17,000 shares of Bank of Commerce Holdings Series A Fixed Rate Perpetual Preferred Stock, without par value (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), having a liquidation amount per share equal to $1,000 for a total price of $17 million. | ||
| In January 2008, the Board of Directors authorized a common stock repurchase of approximately 550,000 shares, of the Company’s common stock. During the first quarter 2008, 58,800 shares were repurchased at an average price of $8.57. There were 200,000 shares repurchased during 2007 at an average price of $11.35 per share. There were 92,000 shares repurchased during 2006 at an average price of $11.85. Shares purchased are retired by a charge to common stock for the cost. To date, the Company has repurchased 2,219,107 shares at an average price of $7.85. | ||
| 16. | RETIREMENT BENEFITS | |
| Profit Sharing Plan -In 1985, the Company adopted a profit sharing 401(k) plan for eligible employees to be funded out of the earnings of the Company. The employees’ contributions are limited to the maximum amount allowable under IRS Section 402(G). The Company’s contributions include a matching contribution of 100% of the first 3% of salary deferred and 50% of the next 2% of salary deferred. Discretionary contributions are also permitted. The Company made matching contributions aggregating $233,922, $247,500 and $224,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. No discretionary contributions were made in 2007, 2006 or 2005. | ||
| Salary Continuation Plan — In April 2001, the Board of Directors approved the implementation of the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP), which is a non-qualified executive benefit plan in which the Bank agrees to pay the executives covered by the SERP plan additional benefits in the future in return for continued satisfactory performance by the executives. Benefits under the salary continuation plan include a benefit generally payable commencing upon a designated retirement date for a fixed period of ten to twenty years; disability or termination of employment, and a death benefit for the participants designated beneficiaries. Key-man life insurance policies were purchased as an investment to provide for the Bank’s contractual obligation to pay pre-retirement death benefits and to recover the Bank’s cost of providing benefits. The executive is the insured under the policy, while the Bank is the owner and beneficiary. The assets of the SERP, under Internal Revenue Service Regulations, are the property of the Company and are available to the Company’s general creditors. The insured executive has no claim on the insurance policy, its cash value or the proceeds thereof. |
79
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| The retirement benefit is derived from accruals to a benefit account during the participant’s employment. At the end of the executive’s period of service, the aggregate amount accrued should equal the then present value of the benefits expected to be paid to the executive. Accrued compensation expense under the salary continuation plan totaled $179,063, $240,745 and $160,917 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the vested benefit payable was $1,235,605, $1,030,020, and $706,391 respectively. | ||
| Retired Employees deferred compensation — Effective April 1, 1990, the Board of Directors approved an Employee Deferred Compensation plan for two executives, which is a non-qualified plan in which the selected employees may elect to defer all or any part of their compensation to be payable to the employee upon retirement over a period not to exceed fifteen years. Interest on Retired Employees deferred compensation is fixed at ten percent (10%) per the plan. Participants in this plan have since retired and funds are being disbursed. As of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the vested benefit payable was $931,777, $1,035,064 and $1,128,911, respectively. | ||
| Directors deferred fee compensation — Effective January 1, 1993, the Board of Directors approved the implementation of the Directors Deferred Fee Compensation Plan, which is a non-qualified plan in which a Director may elect to defer the payment of all or any part of the fee compensation to which such director would otherwise be entitled to as director’s fees or committee fees to be payable upon retirement of the director in a lump sum distribution or over a period not to exceed fifteen years. Interest on Directors deferred compensation is fixed at ten percent (10%) per the plan. Deferred compensation expense totaled $461,640, $411,191 and $368,809 at December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 respectively. As of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the vested benefit payable was $2,600,231, $2,310,824 and $2,035,218, respectively. | ||
| 17. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS | |
| Some of the directors, officers and principal stockholders of the Company and their associates were customers of and had banking transactions with the Bank in the ordinary course of the Bank’s business during 2008 and the Bank expects to have such transactions in the future. All deposits, loans and commitments to loans included in such transactions were made in compliance with the applicable laws on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons of similar creditworthiness, and in the opinion of the Company, did not involve more than a normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. |
An analysis of the activity in related party loans consists of the following:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 3,600,342 | $ | 2,849,533 | ||||
New loan additions |
153,737 | 25,312 | ||||||
Advances on existing lines of credit |
826,080 | 2,184,045 | ||||||
Principal repayments |
(405,735 | ) | (1,458,548 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of year |
$ | 4,174,424 | $ | 3,600,342 | ||||
| As of December 31, 2008 and 2007 there were no related party loans, which were past due or classified. At December 31, 2008 there was $237,991 available in commitments to related party loans. |
80
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| 18. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | |
| Lease Commitments — The Company leases certain facilities where it conducts its operations. Future minimum lease commitments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2008 are below: |
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||
2009 |
515 | |||
2010 |
524 | |||
2011 |
454 | |||
2012 |
279 | |||
2013 |
155 | |||
Thereafter |
607 | |||
Total |
2,534 | |||
| Rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $588,866, $482,994 and $453,450, respectively. | ||
| Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments — In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters various types of transactions, which involve financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. These instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letter of credits, which are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. These transactions may involve, to varying degrees, credit and interest rate risk more than the amount, if any recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. | ||
| The off-balance sheet credit risk exposure of the Company is the contractual amount of commitments to extend credit and stand-by letters of credit. The Company applies the same credit standards to these contracts as it uses for loans recorded on the balance sheet. |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Off-balance sheet commitments: |
||||||||
Commitments to extend credit |
$ | 156,707,887 | $ | 192,815,902 | ||||
Standby letters of credit |
8,556,547 | 6,627,409 | ||||||
Guaranteed commitments outstanding |
1,350,399 | 1,375,999 | ||||||
| $ | 166,614,833 | $ | 200,819,310 | |||||
| Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers. These commitments have specified interest rates and generally have fixed expiration dates but may be terminated by the Company if certain conditions of the contract are violated. Although currently subject to draw down, many of the commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Collateral held relating to these commitments varies, but generally includes real estate, securities and cash. |
81
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Credit risk arises in these transactions from the possibility that a customer may not be able to repay the Bank upon default of performance. Collateral held for standby letters of credit is based on an individual evaluation of each customer’s creditworthiness, but may include cash and securities. | ||
| Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit bear similar credit risk characteristics as outstanding loans. | ||
| Litigation — The Company is subject to various pending and threatened legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company maintains reserves for losses from legal actions that are both probable and estimable. In the opinion of management the disposition of claims currently pending will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. | ||
| 19. | REGULATORY MATTERS | |
| The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal and state banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and Consolidated Financial Statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. | ||
| The capital amounts and the Bank’s prompt corrective action classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to Bank Holding Companies. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. Management believes as of December 31, 2008 that the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject. | ||
| As of December 31, 2008, the most recent notification from the FDIC categorized the Bank as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, an institution must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the following table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category. The Company’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 are also presented in the table. |
82
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| To Be | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Categorized as | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Well Capitalized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For Capital | Under Prompt | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Actual | Adequacy Purposes | Corrective Action | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||
| At December 31, 2008: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leverage capital (to
average assets)
|
$ | 73,983,019 | 10.66 | % | $ | 19,800,000 | 4.00 | % | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital (to
risk-weighted
assets)
|
73,983,019 | 11.87 | % | 16,734,380 | 4.00 | % | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
Total capital (to
risk-weighted
assets)
|
81,787,582 | 13.12 | % | 33,468,760 | 8.00 | % | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
Bank |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leverage capital (to
average assets)
|
$ | 72,204,835 | 10.45 | % | $ | 19,783,694 | 4.00 | % | $ | 24,729,617 | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital (to
risk-weighted
assets)
|
72,204,835 | 11.58 | % | 16,734,380 | 4.00 | % | 25,101,570 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total capital (to
risk-weighted
assets)
|
80,009,398 | 12.84 | % | 33,468,760 | 8.00 | % | 41,835,950 | 10.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2007: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leverage capital (to
average assets)
|
$ | 56,857,387 | 9.26 | % | $ | 19,800,000 | 4.00 | % | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital (to
risk-weighted
assets)
|
56,857,387 | 10.12 | % | 16,734,380 | 4.00 | % | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
Total capital (to
risk-weighted
assets)
|
63,881,556 | 11.37 | % | 33,468,760 | 8.00 | % | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
Bank |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leverage capital (to
average assets)
|
$ | 56,025,174 | 9.20 | % | $ | 19,783,694 | 4.00 | % | $ | 24,729,617 | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital (to
risk-weighted
assets)
|
56,025,174 | 9.97 | % | 16,734,380 | 4.00 | % | 25,101,570 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total capital (to
risk-weighted
assets)
|
63,049,343 | 11.22 | % | 33,468,760 | 8.00 | % | 41,835,950 | 10.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
| The principal sources of cash for the Holding Company are dividends from the Bank. Dividends from the Bank to the Holding Company are restricted under California law to the lesser of the Bank’s retained earnings or the Bank’s net income for the latest three fiscal years, less dividends previously declared during that period, or, with the approval of California Superintendent of Banks, to the greater of the retained earnings of the Bank, the net income of the Bank for its last fiscal year, or the net income of the Bank for its current fiscal year. As of December 31, 2008, the maximum amount available for dividend distribution under this restriction was approximately $7,681,000. | ||
| The Bank is subject to certain restrictions under the Federal Reserve Act, including restrictions on the extension of credit to affiliates. In particular, it is prohibited from lending to an affiliated company unless the loans are secured by specific types of collateral. Such secured loans and other advances from the subsidiaries are limited to 10 percent of the subsidiary’s equity. No such loans or advances were outstanding during 2008 or 2007. |
83
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| 20. | FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS | |
| SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. Effective 1/1/08 the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, which enhances the disclosures about financial instruments carried at fair value. | ||
| In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. | ||
| In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. | ||
| The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2008, and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value. |
(Dollars
in thousands)
| Recurring Basis | Fair Value Measurements | |||||||||||||||
| At December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
| Quoted Prices in | Significant Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
| Active Markets For | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
| Fair Value | Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
| Description | December 31, 2008 | Level (1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Available for sale securities |
$ | 131,686,600 | $ | — | $ | 131,686,600 | $ | — | ||||||||
Total Assets Measured at fair value |
$ | 131,686,600 | $ | — | $ | 131,686,600 | $ | — | ||||||||
Total Liabilities Measured at fair
value |
$ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
84
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument above: | ||
| Securities available-for-sale — Securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions among other things. | ||
| Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis | ||
| The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period. Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are included in the table below. |
Non Recurring Basis
| Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
| At December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
| Quoted Prices in | Significant Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
| Active Markets For | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
| Fair Value | Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
| Description | December 31, 2008 | Level (1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Impaired Loans |
$ | 23,078,874 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 23,078,874 | ||||||||
Total Assets Measured at fair value |
$ | 23,078,874 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 23,078,874 | ||||||||
Liabilities |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Total Liabilities Measured at fair
value |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
85
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| Impaired loans — When available, we use observable market data, including pricing on recent closed market transactions, to value loans. The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with SFAS 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” (SFAS 114). | ||
| The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At December 31, 2008, substantially all of the total impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral. In accordance with SFAS 157, impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3. | ||
| The Company had outstanding balances of $23 million and $13 million in impaired loans as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Impairment allowances totaled $1.1 million and $3.2 million at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. | ||
| The fair value measurements recorded during the period | ||
| The Company recognized a $6.3 million write-down related to non-recurring fair value measurements of impaired loans during 2008. Interest reversed from income during 2008 due to impaired loans was $147,100. | ||
| Method for determining fair values | ||
| The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments: | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents — The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents are a reasonable estimate of fair value. | ||
| Securities — Fair values for securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments. Securities available-for-sale are carried at their aggregate fair value, while securities held-to-maturity are carried at amortized cost. | ||
| Loans receivable — For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair values for fixed rate loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value. |
86
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit — The fair value of commitments is the off-balance sheet amount of loan commitments and outstanding letters of credit. | ||
| Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings — The fair value of borrowed funds is based on carrying amounts due to the short term nature of the borrowing. | ||
| Junior subordinated debt payable to unconsolidated subsidiary grantor trust — The fair value of variable rate junior subordinated debt payable to subsidiary grantor trust is based on carrying amounts. | ||
| Deposit liabilities — The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and noninterest checking, passbook savings, and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). The fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits. The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value. | ||
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell — The fair value of securities purchased under agreements to resell is estimated by discounting the contractual cash flows under outstanding borrowings at rates prevailing in the marketplace today for similar borrowings, rates and collateral. | ||
| Limitations — Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and other information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. | ||
| Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. | ||
| These estimates are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment, and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates. | ||
| Fair value estimates are based on current on and off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Other significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial assets or liabilities include deferred tax assets and liabilities, and property, plant and equipment. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of the estimates. |
87
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are approximately as
follows:
| December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||
| Contract | Carrying | |||||||||||
| Amount | Amount | Fair Value | ||||||||||
Financial Assets: |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 85,191,062 | $ | 85,191,062 | ||||||||
Securities |
131,686,600 | 131,686,600 | ||||||||||
Loans, net |
518,946,461 | 522,674,555 | ||||||||||
Accrued interest on loans |
2,051,386 | 2,051,386 | ||||||||||
Accrued interest on securities |
1,079,110 | 1,079,110 | ||||||||||
Financial Liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Demand and savings |
$ | 290,995,299 | $ | 290,995,299 | ||||||||
Fixed rate certificates |
256,084,780 | 258,684,915 | ||||||||||
Variable certificates |
8,201,824 | 8,201,824 | ||||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
618,890 | 618,890 | ||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
13,853,255 | 13,853,255 | ||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Borrowings |
120,000,000 | 120,000,000 | ||||||||||
Junior subordinated debt payable to unconsolidated subsidiary grantor trust |
15,465,000 | 15,465,000 | ||||||||||
Off balance sheet financial instruments: |
||||||||||||
Commitments to extend credit |
$ | 156,707,887 | $ | 156,707,887 | ||||||||
Standby letters of credit |
8,556,547 | 8,556,547 | ||||||||||
Guaranteed commitments outstanding |
1,350,399 | 1,350,399 | ||||||||||
88
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||
| Contract | Carrying | |||||||||||
| Amount | Amount | Fair Value | ||||||||||
Financial Assets: |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 22,234,123 | $ | 22,234,123 | ||||||||
Securities |
78,465,151 | 78,538,594 | ||||||||||
Loans, net |
486,282,571 | 487,801,021 | ||||||||||
Accrued interest on loans |
2,497,124 | 2,497,124 | ||||||||||
Accrued interest on securities |
538,410 | 538,410 | ||||||||||
Financial Liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Demand and savings |
$ | 259,914,811 | $ | 259,914,811 | ||||||||
Fixed rate certificates |
185,517,044 | 187,227,845 | ||||||||||
Variable certificates |
28,199,442 | 28,199,442 | ||||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
787,844 | 787,844 | ||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
15,513,211 | 15,513,211 | ||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Borrowings |
60,000,000 | 60,000,000 | ||||||||||
Junior
subordinated debt payable to unconsolidated subsidiary grantor trust |
15,465,000 | 15,465,000 | ||||||||||
Off balance sheet financial instruments: |
||||||||||||
Commitments to extend credit |
$ | 192,815,902 | $ | 192,815,902 | ||||||||
Standby letters of credit |
6,627,409 | 6,627,409 | ||||||||||
Guaranteed commitments outstanding |
1,375,999 | 1,375,999 | ||||||||||
89
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| 21. | BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS (PARENT COMPANY ONLY) FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Condensed Balance Sheets |
||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||
Cash |
$ | 1,663,934 | $ | 1,196,921 | ||||
Time deposit with subsidiary |
0 | 0 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
1,663,934 | 1,196,921 | ||||||
Participation loans, net of allowance for
loan and lease losses of $38,850 in 2008 and
2007 |
4,640,017 | 5,174,536 | ||||||
Investment in subsidiaries |
72,519,180 | 56,070,932 | ||||||
Other assets |
86,000 | 7,500 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 78,909,131 | $ | 62,449,889 | ||||
Junior subordinated debt payable to
unconsolidated subsidiary grantor trust |
15,465,000 | 15,465,000 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
866,490 | 821,042 | ||||||
Stockholders’ equity |
62,577,641 | 46,163,848 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
$ | 78,909,131 | $ | 62,449,889 | ||||
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Condensed Statements of Income |
||||||||||||
Income: |
||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 1,097,452 | $ | 53,488 | $ | 93,167 | ||||||
Dividends from subsidiaries |
1,496,583 | 6,738,029 | 4,641,352 | |||||||||
| 2,594,035 | 6,791,517 | 4,734,519 | ||||||||||
Expenses: |
1,010,641 | 1,809,492 | 1,405,409 | |||||||||
Income before income taxes and equity in
undistributed net income of subsidiaries |
1,583,394 | 4,982,025 | 3,329,110 | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
800 | 800 | 800 | |||||||||
Income before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries |
1,582,594 | 4,981,225 | 3,328,310 | |||||||||
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries |
611,793 | 1,125,673 | 3,239,399 | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,194,386 | $ | 6,106,898 | $ | 6,567,709 | ||||||
90
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Statements of Cash Flows |
||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,194,386 | $ | 6,106,898 | $ | 6,567,709 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
0 | 19,950 | 18,900 | |||||||||
Compensation associated with stock options |
33,116 | 32,637 | 7,672 | |||||||||
Effect of changes in: |
||||||||||||
Other Assets |
78,500 | 30,000 | 30,000 | |||||||||
Other Liabilities |
45,249 | (97,439 | ) | 134,958 | ||||||||
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries |
(611,793 | ) | (1,125,673 | ) | (3,239,399 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
1,739,458 | 4,966,373 | 3,519,840 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiary trust |
0 | 0 | (155,000 | ) | ||||||||
Capital contribution to Bank |
(14,200,000 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Participation loan payments |
2,934,519 | 272,058 | 0 | |||||||||
Participation loan purchased |
(2,400,000 | ) | (1,861,603 | ) | (981,523 | ) | ||||||
Net cash
(used) provided by investing activities |
(13,665,481 | ) | (1,589,545 | ) | (1,136,523 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Equity transactions, net |
15,183,459 | (1,758,656 | ) | (210,589 | ) | |||||||
Cash dividends |
(2,790,423 | ) | (2,838,029 | ) | (2,650,320 | ) | ||||||
Net cash
provided (used) by financing activities |
12,393,036 | (4,596,685 | ) | (2,860,909 | ) | |||||||
(Decrease) Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
467,013 | (1,219,857 | ) | (477,592 | ) | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
1,196,921 | 2,416,778 | 2,894,370 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
$ | 1,663,934 | $ | 1,196,921 | $ | 2,416,778 | ||||||
91
BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
| 22. | UNAUDITED QUARTERLY RESULTS |
UNAUDITED QUARTERLY STATEMENTS OF INCOME DATA
| For the Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands, except per | March 31, | June 30, | September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||||
| share data) | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 5,420 | $ | 5,046 | $ | 5,240 | $ | 5,642 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
(600 | ) | (1,000 | ) | (1,300 | ) | (3,620 | ) | ||||||||
Noninterest income |
565 | 717 | 751 | 590 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
(3,565 | ) | (3,613 | ) | (3,612 | ) | (4,507 | ) | ||||||||
Income before taxes |
1,820 | 1,150 | 1,079 | 1,895 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income tax |
(591 | ) | (244 | ) | (362 | ) | 1,237 | |||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 1,229 | $ | 906 | $ | 717 | ($658 | ) | ||||||||
Per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.08 | ($0.07 | ) | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.08 | ($0.07 | ) | ||||||||
Dividends per share |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.08 | ||||||||
| For the Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands, except per | March 31, | June 30, | September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||||
| share data) | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 5,327 | $ | 5,461 | $ | 5,641 | $ | 5,584 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
(6 | ) | 0 | (115 | ) | (3,170 | ) | |||||||||
Noninterest income |
498 | 618 | 526 | 2,893 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
(3,488 | ) | (3,701 | ) | (4,028 | ) | (4,528 | ) | ||||||||
Income before taxes |
2,331 | 2,378 | 2,024 | 779 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income tax |
(844 | ) | (778 | ) | (693 | ) | 910 | |||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 1,487 | $ | 1,600 | $ | 1,331 | $ | 1,689 | ||||||||
Per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.17 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.19 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.17 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.18 | ||||||||
Dividends per share |
$ | 0.09 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.08 | ||||||||
| For the Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands, except per | March 31, | June 30, | September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||||
| share data) | 2006 | 2006 | 2006 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 5,413 | $ | 5,674 | $ | 5,530 | $ | 5,418 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
(11 | ) | (143 | ) | (72 | ) | (0 | ) | ||||||||
Noninterest income |
448 | 512 | 428 | 541 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
(3,238 | ) | (3,310 | ) | (3,299 | ) | (3,486 | ) | ||||||||
Income before taxes |
2,612 | 2,733 | 2,587 | 2,473 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income tax |
(1,020 | ) | (1,044 | ) | (915 | ) | (858 | ) | ||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 1,592 | $ | 1,689 | $ | 1,672 | $ | 1,615 | ||||||||
Per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.19 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.18 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.18 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.18 | ||||||||
Dividends per share |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.07 | ||||||||
92
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
There have been no changes in or disagreements with accountants or auditors on accounting and
financial disclosure.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Bank of Commerce Holdings Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the
effectiveness of the Company disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on
that evaluation the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded
that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management recognizes its responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control
over financial reporting and has designed internal controls and procedures to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated
financial statements and related notes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
in the United States of America.
Management assessed the effectiveness of Bank of Commerce Holdings internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set
forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework. Based on that assessment, our management concluded that Bank of
Commerce Holdings did maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2008.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change in Bank of Commerce Holdings internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter
of 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
The registrant must disclose under this item any information required to be disclosed in a report
on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of the year covered by this Form 10-K, but not reported.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
The registrant must disclose under this item any information required to be disclosed in a report
on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of the year covered by this Form 10-K, but not reported.
None to report.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive
Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the
solicitation of proxies for the Company’s 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Proxy
Statement”).
93
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The executive officers of the Company and their ages as of December 31, 2008, are as follows:
| Name | Age | Position(s) | ||||
Patrick J. Moty
|
51 | President and Chief Executive Officer Redding Bank of Commerce and Director of Redding Bank of Commerce | ||||
Linda J. Miles
|
55 | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary | ||||
Patrick J. Moty was born in 1957. Prior to his election as President and Chief Executive Officer,
he served as Executive Vice President & Chief Credit Officer for the Company since December 2005.
Prior to that, he served as the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Officer since
2000; Senior Vice President and Senior Loan Officer since 1998; Vice President and Senior Loan
Officer since 1993; Vice President and Loan Officer since 1988; and Assistant Vice President and
Loan Officer since 1987. Mr. Moty joined the company in 1985 as a Loan Officer following four years
in lending at a large regional financial institution.
Linda J. Miles was born in 1953. She has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Assistant Secretary of the Company since October 1989. Before joining the Company, Ms.
Miles served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for another independent bank. Ms.
Miles serves on the Asset/Liability committee and attends audit, executive, and long range planning
committee meetings of the Board of Directors.
Audit Committee Information
The Audit and Qualified Legal Compliance Committee is a standing audit committee of the Board of
Directors established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. The Committee has five members: David H. Scott, Chairman; Gary Burks; Russell L. Duclos; Lyle
Tullis and Jon Halfhide, CPA. Each member is independent, as independence of audit committee
members is defined by the NASDAQ National Market rules. The Board of Directors has determined, in
its business judgment, that two members of the committee are ‘financial experts’ as required by the
Securities and Exchange Commission rules.
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of its directors, officers (including
its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Director of Risk
Management, Controller and any person performing similar functions) and employees. The Company has
made the Code of ethics available on its website at http://www.bankofcommerceholdings.com.
94
Additional Information
Additional information required by this section is incorporated by reference to the information in
the section entitled “Election of Directors” and “Executive Compensation” in the 2009 Proxy
Statement.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this section is incorporated by reference to the information in the
sections entitled “Election of Directors—Directors’ Compensation” and “Executive Compensation” in
the 2009 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The information required by this section is incorporated by reference to the information in the
section entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Company’s
2009 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
Some of the directors, officers and principal stockholders of the Company and their associates were
customers of and had banking transactions with the Company in the ordinary course of the Company’s
business during 2008 and the Company expects to have such transactions in the future.
All loans and commitments included in such transactions were made in compliance with the applicable
laws on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing
at the time for comparable transactions with other persons of similar creditworthiness, and in the
opinion of the Company, did not involve more than a normal risk of collectibility or present other
unfavorable features.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees billed by Moss Adams LLP., for professional services rendered for the audit of
the Company’s annual financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and
for the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q for those fiscal years were $166,426 and $152,290 respectively.
Audit-Related Fees
Moss Adams LLP., did not render any professional services for information technology services
relating to financial information systems design and implementation for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
Tax Fees
Moss Adams LLP., did not render any professional services for tax compliance, tax advice, or tax
planning during 2008.
All Other Fees
The aggregate fees billed by Moss Adams LLP. for services rendered to the Company, other that the
services described under “Audit Fees” and “Audit-Related Fees” and tax fees amount to $0 and $0 for
the fiscal years December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
95
In discharging its oversight responsibility with respect to the audit process, the Audit Committee
of the Board of Directors obtained from the independent auditors a formal written statement
describing all relationships between the auditors and the Company that might bear on the auditors’
independence consistent with Independence Standards Board Standard No.1, “Independence Discussions
with Audit Committees”, discussed with the auditors any relationships that may impact their
objectivity and independence and satisfied itself as to the auditors’ independence. The Committee
also discussed with management and the independent auditors the quality and adequacy of Bank of
Commerce Holdings’ internal controls and the outsourced audit functions, responsibilities,
budgeting and staffing. The Committee reviewed with the independent auditors their audit plans,
audit scope and identification of audit risks.
The Committee discussed and reviewed with the independent auditors all communications required by
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, including those described in
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, “Communication with Audit Committees”, and
discussed and reviewed the results of the independent auditor’s audit of the financial statements.
The Committee also discussed the results of the internal audit examinations.
96
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES
| (a) | The following documents are filed as a part of this Form 10-K: |
| (1) | Financial Statements: |
Reference is made to the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 in
Part II of this Form 10-K.
| (2) | Financial Statement Schedules: |
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information
is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
| (3) | Exhibits: |
| Exhibit | ||
| Number | Description of Document | |
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation, as amended filed 12/4/1998.* | |
3.2
|
Bylaws, as amended filed 05/15/2007.* | |
4.1
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate filed 12/4/1998.* | |
4.2
|
Certificate of determination for the Series A Preferred Stock filed 11/17/08* | |
4.3
|
Form of Certificate for the Series A Preferred Stock filed 11/17/08* | |
4.4
|
Warrant for purchase of shares of Common stock filed 11/17/08* | |
10.1
|
Letter Agreement, dated November 14, 2008, between Bank of Commerce Holdings and the United States Department of the Treasury, which includes the Securities Purchase Agreement — Standard Terms attached thereto, with respect to the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock and Warrant filed 11/17/08* | |
10.2
|
Office Building Lease between Garian Partnership/First Avenue Square and Redding Bank of Commerce dated July 16, 1998 filed 12/4/1998.* | |
10.3
|
1998 Stock Option Plan filed 12/4/1998.* | |
10.4
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement used in connection with 1998 Stock Option Plan filed 12/4/1998.* | |
10.5
|
Form of Non-statutory Stock Option Agreement used in connection with 1998 Stock Option Plan filed 12/4/1998.* | |
10.7
|
Directors Deferred Compensation Plan filed 12/4/1998.* | |
10.8
|
Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement Used In Connection With Directors Deferred Compensation Plan filed 12/4/1998.* | |
10.10
|
Employment contracts dated April 2001 filed 9/27/2001.* | |
10.11
|
Affiliated Business Arrangement Agreement filed 8/20/2004* | |
10.12
|
Office building lease by and between Wainright #3 Partners and Redding Bank of Commerce dated 9/23/2005 and filed 9/26/2005* | |
10.13
|
Amendment to Employment contracts dated April 2001, filed 12/20/2005* | |
10.14
|
Change in Control Agreements filed on 12/21/2005* | |
10.15
|
Salary Continuation — Blais filed on 12/19/2006* | |
10.16
|
Salary Continuation — Moty filed on 12/19/2006* | |
10.17
|
Salary Continuation — Eslick filed on 12/19/2006* | |
10.19
|
Employment Agreement — Miles filed on 12/29/06* | |
10.21
|
Salary Continuation — Miles filed on 12/29/06* | |
10.22
|
Employment Agreement — Moty filed on 9/28/07* | |
10.23
|
Salary Continuation — Moty filed on 9/28/07* | |
10.24
|
Employment contracts dated October 14, 2008 filed on 10/16/08* | |
10.25
|
Employment Agreement — Matranga filed on 11/25/08* | |
11.1
|
Statement re: Computation of Earnings per Share (see page _63_). | |
14.0
|
Bank of Commerce Code of Ethics filed on 2/26/2003* | |
16.1
|
Letter on Change in Certifying Accountants filed 12/4/1998. * | |
21.1
|
Subsidiaries of the Company filed 12/4/1998. * | |
23.1
|
Consent of Moss Adams LLP | |
24.1
|
Power of Attorney (see page ___100___) | |
31.1
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. | |
31.2
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. | |
32.1
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ___ |
| * | Previously filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 and by the Company’s filing of reports on Form 8-K. |
| (b) | Reports on Form 8-K: |
97
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, on March 13, 2009.
| BANK OF COMMERCE HOLDINGS |
||||
| By | /s/ Patrick J. Moty | |||
| Patrick J. Moty | ||||
| President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Redding Bank of Commerce | ||||
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes
and appoints Patrick J. Moty and Linda J. Miles, and each of them, his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact, each with full power of substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities,
to sign any amendments to this report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or substitutes
may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
98
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated:
| Name | Title | Date | ||
/s/ Patrick J. Moty
|
President, Chief Executive
Officer Redding Bank of Commerce and Director of Redding Bank of Commerce |
March 13, 2009 | ||
/s/ Linda J. Miles
|
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
March 13, 2009 | ||
/s/ Kenneth R. Gifford, Jr.
|
Chairman of the Board | March 13, 2009 | ||
/s/ Welton L. Carrel
|
Director | March 13, 2009 | ||
/s/ Russell L. Duclos
|
Director | March 13, 2009 | ||
/s/ David H. Scott
|
Director | March 13, 2009 | ||
/s/ Lyle L. Tullis
|
Director | March 13, 2009 | ||
/s/ Jon Halfhide
|
Director | March 13, 2009 | ||
/s/ Orin Bennett
|
Director | March 13, 2009 | ||
/s/ Gary Burks
|
Director | March 13, 2009 | ||
/s/ Dave Bonuccelli
|
Director | March 13, 2009 |
99
EXHIBIT INDEX
| Exhibit | ||
| Number | Description of Document | |
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation, as amended filed 12/4/1998.* | |
3.2
|
Bylaws, as amended filed 05/15/2007.* | |
4.1
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate filed 12/4/1998.* | |
4.2
|
Certificate of determination for the Series A Preferred Stock filed 11/17/08* | |
4.3
|
Form of Certificate for the Series A Preferred Stock filed 11/17/08* | |
4.4
|
Warrant for purchase of shares of Common stock filed 11/17/08* | |
10.1
|
Letter Agreement, dated November 14, 2008, between Bank of Commerce Holdings and the United States Department of the Treasury, which includes the Securities Purchase Agreement — Standard Terms attached thereto, with respect to the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock and Warrant filed 11/17/08* | |
10.2
|
Office Building Lease between Garian Partnership/First Avenue Square and Redding Bank of Commerce dated July 16, 1998 filed 12/4/1998.* | |
10.3
|
1998 Stock Option Plan filed 12/4/1998.* | |
10.4
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement used in connection with 1998 Stock Option Plan filed 12/4/1998.* | |
10.5
|
Form of Non-statutory Stock Option Agreement used in connection with 1998 Stock Option Plan filed 12/4/1998.* | |
10.7
|
Directors Deferred Compensation Plan filed 12/4/1998.* | |
10.8
|
Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement Used In Connection With Directors Deferred Compensation Plan filed 12/4/1998.* | |
10.10
|
Employment contracts dated April 2001 filed 9/27/2001.* | |
10.11
|
Affiliated Business Arrangement Agreement filed 8/20/2004* | |
10.12
|
Office building lease by and between Wainright #3 Partners and Redding Bank of Commerce dated 9/23/2005 and filed 9/26/2005* | |
10.13
|
Amendment to Employment contracts dated April 2001, filed 12/20/2005* | |
10.14
|
Change in Control Agreements filed on 12/21/2005* | |
10.15
|
Salary Continuation — Blais filed on 12/19/2006* | |
10.16
|
Salary Continuation — Moty filed on 12/19/2006* | |
10.17
|
Salary Continuation — Eslick filed on 12/19/2006* | |
10.19
|
Employment Agreement — Miles filed on 12/29/06* | |
10.21
|
Salary Continuation — Miles filed on 12/29/06* | |
10.22
|
Employment Agreement — Moty filed on 9/28/07* | |
10.23
|
Salary Continuation — Moty filed on 9/28/07* | |
10.24
|
Employment contracts dated October 14, 2008 filed on 10/16/08* | |
10.25
|
Employment Agreement — Matranga filed on 11/25/08* | |
11.1
|
Statement re: Computation of Earnings per Share (see page _63_). | |
14.0
|
Bank of Commerce Code of Ethics filed on 2/26/2003* | |
16.1
|
Letter on Change in Certifying Accountants filed 12/4/1998. * | |
21.1
|
Subsidiaries of the Company filed 12/4/1998. * | |
23.1
|
Consent of Moss Adams LLP | |
24.1
|
Power of Attorney (see page ___100___) | |
31.1
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the company’s Chiek Executive Officer. | |
31.2
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the company’s Chiek Executive Officer. | |
32.1
|
Certification pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| * | Previously filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 and by the Company’s filing of reports on Form 8-K. |