e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-13926
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
76-0321760 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
15415 Katy Freeway
Houston, Texas
77094
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(281) 492-5300
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 25, 2008
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
|
139,001,050 shares |
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE NO. |
COVER PAGE |
|
1 |
|
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements.
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
541,580 |
|
|
$ |
637,961 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
199,086 |
|
|
|
1,301 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
674,091 |
|
|
|
522,808 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
135,999 |
|
|
|
103,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,550,756 |
|
|
|
1,265,190 |
|
Drilling and other property and equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation |
|
|
3,278,724 |
|
|
|
3,040,063 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
37,055 |
|
|
|
36,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,866,535 |
|
|
$ |
4,341,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,563 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
84,969 |
|
|
|
132,243 |
|
Payable for securities purchased |
|
|
197,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
287,536 |
|
|
|
235,521 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
52,527 |
|
|
|
81,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
622,869 |
|
|
|
453,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
503,158 |
|
|
|
503,071 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
419,894 |
|
|
|
397,629 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
109,731 |
|
|
|
110,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,655,652 |
|
|
|
1,464,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock (par value $0.01, 500,000,000 shares authorized,
143,906,598 shares issued and 138,989,798 shares outstanding
at June 30, 2008; 143,787,206 shares issued and 138,870,406
shares outstanding at December 31, 2007) |
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,841,529 |
|
|
|
1,831,492 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,482,295 |
|
|
|
1,158,535 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive gain |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost (4,916,800 shares at June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007) |
|
|
(114,413 |
) |
|
|
(114,413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
3,210,883 |
|
|
|
2,877,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
4,866,535 |
|
|
$ |
4,341,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
3
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract drilling |
|
$ |
936,626 |
|
|
$ |
635,927 |
|
|
$ |
1,706,966 |
|
|
$ |
1,225,839 |
|
Revenues related to reimbursable expenses |
|
|
17,746 |
|
|
|
12,948 |
|
|
|
33,508 |
|
|
|
31,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
954,372 |
|
|
|
648,875 |
|
|
|
1,740,474 |
|
|
|
1,257,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract drilling |
|
|
273,436 |
|
|
|
221,941 |
|
|
|
558,443 |
|
|
|
434,398 |
|
Reimbursable expenses |
|
|
17,346 |
|
|
|
12,361 |
|
|
|
32,534 |
|
|
|
29,977 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
70,661 |
|
|
|
58,335 |
|
|
|
139,711 |
|
|
|
114,040 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
15,768 |
|
|
|
12,174 |
|
|
|
31,490 |
|
|
|
24,140 |
|
Gain on disposition of assets |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(3,553 |
) |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(5,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
376,985 |
|
|
|
301,258 |
|
|
|
761,901 |
|
|
|
597,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
577,387 |
|
|
|
347,617 |
|
|
|
978,573 |
|
|
|
659,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
2,941 |
|
|
|
7,599 |
|
|
|
7,314 |
|
|
|
17,392 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,895 |
) |
|
|
(3,770 |
) |
|
|
(3,237 |
) |
|
|
(14,625 |
) |
Loss on sale of marketable securities, net |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
12,490 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
14,196 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
590,921 |
|
|
|
352,453 |
|
|
|
996,843 |
|
|
|
662,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(174,638 |
) |
|
|
(100,526 |
) |
|
|
(289,935 |
) |
|
|
(186,646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
416,283 |
|
|
$ |
251,927 |
|
|
$ |
706,908 |
|
|
$ |
476,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
3.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.82 |
|
|
$ |
5.09 |
|
|
$ |
3.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
2.99 |
|
|
$ |
1.81 |
|
|
$ |
5.08 |
|
|
$ |
3.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of common stock |
|
|
138,959 |
|
|
|
138,447 |
|
|
|
138,916 |
|
|
|
136,875 |
|
Dilutive potential shares of common stock |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
2,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
139,083 |
|
|
|
138,928 |
|
|
|
139,068 |
|
|
|
138,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
4
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
706,908 |
|
|
$ |
476,077 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
139,711 |
|
|
|
114,040 |
|
Gain on disposition of assets |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(5,055 |
) |
Loss on sale of marketable securities, net |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Deferred tax provision |
|
|
22,762 |
|
|
|
4,845 |
|
Accretion of discounts on marketable securities |
|
|
(838 |
) |
|
|
(4,702 |
) |
Amortization/write-off of debt issuance costs |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
9,115 |
|
Amortization of debt discounts |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
3,209 |
|
|
|
1,921 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based payment arrangements |
|
|
(1,081 |
) |
|
|
(3,475 |
) |
Deferred income, net |
|
|
2,113 |
|
|
|
5,025 |
|
Deferred expenses, net |
|
|
(4,650 |
) |
|
|
(16,318 |
) |
Other items, net |
|
|
(2,477 |
) |
|
|
4,403 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(150,283 |
) |
|
|
61,593 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(27,292 |
) |
|
|
(18,051 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(69,927 |
) |
|
|
(72,959 |
) |
Taxes payable |
|
|
(24,219 |
) |
|
|
27,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
594,086 |
|
|
|
583,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(319,879 |
) |
|
|
(230,321 |
) |
Proceeds from disposition of assets, net of disposal costs |
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
7,677 |
|
Proceeds from sale and maturities of marketable securities |
|
|
650,022 |
|
|
|
1,146,719 |
|
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
(649,107 |
) |
|
|
(842,597 |
) |
Proceeds from settlement of forward contracts |
|
|
7,496 |
|
|
|
3,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(310,337 |
) |
|
|
84,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends |
|
|
(382,648 |
) |
|
|
(587,980 |
) |
Proceeds from stock plan exercises |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
7,657 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based payment arrangements |
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
3,475 |
|
Redemption of 1.5% Debentures |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(380,130 |
) |
|
|
(576,848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(96,381 |
) |
|
|
92,039 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
637,961 |
|
|
|
524,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
541,580 |
|
|
$ |
616,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
5
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. General Information
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and
subsidiaries, which we refer to as Diamond Offshore, we, us or our, should be read in
conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (File No.
1-13926).
As of July 25, 2008, Loews Corporation, or Loews, owned 50.4% of the outstanding shares of our
common stock.
Interim Financial Information
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S., or GAAP, for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Accordingly, pursuant to such rules and regulations,
they do not include all disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The
consolidated financial information has not been audited but, in the opinion of management, includes
all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of
the consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations and statements of cash flows at the dates
and for the periods indicated. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of results of operations for the respective full years.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Marketable Securities
We consider short-term, highly liquid investments that have an original maturity of three
months or less and deposits in money market mutual funds that are readily convertible into cash to
be cash equivalents. See Note 5.
We classify our investments in marketable securities as available for sale and they are stated
at fair value in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Accordingly, any unrealized gains and losses,
net of taxes, are reported in our Consolidated Balance Sheets in Accumulated other comprehensive
gains (losses) until realized. The cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of
premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity and such adjustments are included in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations in Interest income. The sale and purchase of securities are
recorded on the date of the trade. The cost of debt securities sold is based on the specific
identification method. Realized gains or losses, as well as any declines in value that are judged
to be other than temporary, are reported in our Consolidated Statements of Operations in Other
income (expense).
Derivative Financial Instruments
At June 30, 2008, our derivative financial instruments included foreign currency forward
exchange contracts. See Notes 4 and 5.
Supplementary Cash Flow Information
We paid interest on long-term debt totaling $12.6 million and $12.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
We paid $235.0 million and $126.7 million in U.S. income taxes during the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We paid $62.1 million and $24.4 million in foreign income
taxes, net of foreign tax refunds, during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Cash payments for capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2008, included $43.0
million of capital expenditures that were accrued but unpaid at December 31, 2007. Cash payments
for capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2007 included $32.9 million of capital
expenditures that were accrued but unpaid at December 31, 2006. Capital expenditures that were
accrued but not paid as of June 30, 2008, totaled $101.3
6
million. We have included this amount in Accrued liabilities in our Consolidated Balance
Sheets at June 30, 2008.
We recorded income tax benefits of $1.3 million and $4.4 million related to employee stock
plan exercises during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the holders of $3.5 million in aggregate principal
amount of our 1.5% Senior Convertible Debentures Due 2031, or 1.5% Debentures, and the holders of
approximately $33,000 accreted, or carrying, value through the date of conversion of our Zero
Coupon Convertible Debentures due 2020, or Zero Coupon Debentures, elected to convert their
outstanding debentures into shares of our common stock. See Note 9.
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the holders of $450.4 million in aggregate
principal amount of our 1.5% Debentures and the holders of $1.5 million accreted, or carrying,
value through the date of conversion of our Zero Coupon Debentures elected to convert their
outstanding debentures into shares of our common stock.
Capitalized Interest
We capitalize interest cost for the construction and upgrade of qualifying assets. During the
six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we capitalized interest on qualifying expenditures related
to the upgrade of the Ocean Monarch for ultra-deepwater service and the construction of our two
jack-up rigs, the Ocean Scepter and the Ocean Shield (through its completion in May 2008). In
addition, we capitalized interest costs on qualifying expenditures related to the upgrade of the
Ocean Endeavor through completion of the upgrade in March 2007.
A reconciliation of our total interest cost to Interest expense as reported in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Total interest cost including
amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
$ |
7,186 |
|
|
$ |
6,856 |
|
|
$ |
14,052 |
|
|
$ |
23,140 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
(5,291 |
) |
|
|
(3,086 |
) |
|
|
(10,815 |
) |
|
|
(8,515 |
) |
|
|
|
Total interest expense as reported |
|
$ |
1,895 |
|
|
$ |
3,770 |
|
|
$ |
3,237 |
|
|
$ |
14,625 |
|
|
|
|
Debt Issuance Costs
Debt issuance costs are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets in Prepaid expenses and
other current assets and Other assets, depending on the maturity of the associated debt, and are
amortized over the respective terms of the related debt. Interest expense for both the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008 included $84,000, in debt issuance costs that we wrote-off in
connection with the conversions and final redemption of our 1.5% Debentures and the conversions of
our Zero Coupon Debentures into shares of our common stock during 2008. Interest expense for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007 included $48,000 and $8.9 million, respectively, in debt
issuance costs that were written off in connection with conversions of our 1.5% Debentures and Zero
Coupon Debentures during the respective periods of 2007.
Treasury Stock
Depending on market conditions, we may, from time to time, purchase shares of our common stock
in the open market or otherwise. We account for the purchase of treasury stock using the cost
method, which reports the cost of the shares acquired in Treasury stock as a deduction from
stockholders equity in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We did not repurchase any shares of our
outstanding common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2008 or 2007.
7
Comprehensive Income
A reconciliation of net income to comprehensive income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Net income |
|
$ |
416,283 |
|
|
$ |
251,927 |
|
|
$ |
706,908 |
|
|
$ |
476,077 |
|
Other comprehensive gains (losses), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension adjustment upon plan termination |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,526 |
|
Unrealized holding (loss) gain on investments |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for gain
included in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
416,292 |
|
|
$ |
256,371 |
|
|
$ |
706,926 |
|
|
$ |
480,497 |
|
|
|
|
The tax related to the change in unrealized holding gains on investments was approximately
$5,000 and $10,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
The tax related to the change in unrealized holding loss on investments was approximately
$1,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The tax related to the change in unrealized
holding gains on investments was approximately $46,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The
tax effect on the reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income was $43,000 and
$103,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. The tax related to the
pension adjustment upon plan termination for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 was $2.4
million.
Currency Translation
Our functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Currency translation adjustments and transaction
gains and losses, including gains and losses from the settlement of foreign currency forward
exchange contracts, are reported as Other income (expense) in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we recognized net foreign currency
exchange gains of $12.5 million and $14.4 million, respectively. For the three and six months
ended June 30, 2007, we recognized net foreign currency exchange gains of $0.9 million and $0.3
million, respectively. See Note 4.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from our dayrate drilling contracts is recognized as services are performed. In
connection with such drilling contracts, we may receive fees (either lump-sum or dayrate) for the
mobilization of equipment. These fees are earned as services are performed over the initial term
of the related drilling contracts. We defer mobilization fees received, as well as direct and
incremental mobilization costs incurred, and amortize each, on a straight line basis, over the term
of the related drilling contracts (which is the period estimated to be benefited from the
mobilization activity). Straight line amortization of mobilization revenues and related costs over
the initial term of the related drilling contracts (which generally range from two to 60 months) is
consistent with the timing of net cash flows generated from the actual drilling services performed.
Absent a contract, mobilization costs are recognized as incurred.
From time to time, we may receive fees from our customers for capital improvements to our
rigs. We defer such fees received in Accrued liabilities and Other liabilities in our
Consolidated Balance Sheets and recognize these fees into income on a straight-line basis over the
period of the related drilling contract. We capitalize the costs of such capital improvements and
depreciate them over the estimated useful life of the asset.
We record reimbursements received for the purchase of supplies, equipment, personnel services
and other services provided at the request of our customers in accordance with a contract or
agreement, for the gross amount billed to the customer, as Revenues related to reimbursable
expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
8
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimated.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts applicable to the prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the
classifications currently followed. Such reclassifications do not affect earnings.
Previously reported amounts for Reimbursable expenses in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 have been adjusted to include $1.8
million and $3.3 million, respectively, in reimbursable catering expense to conform to the current
year presentation. These amounts were previously reported as Contract drilling expense in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations. This reclassification had no effect on total operating
expenses, operating income or net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, or SFAS 162. SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the
framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP (the GAAP hierarchy). The FASB
does not expect SFAS 162 to result in a change in current practice, as the intent of SFAS 162 is to
direct the GAAP hierarchy to the reporting entity (rather than its auditor) and to place the GAAP
hierarchy within the accounting literature established by the FASB. This statement is effective
60 days following SEC approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Amendments to AU
Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position, or FSP, Accounting Principles Board, or APB,
14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion
(Including Partial Cash Settlement), or FSP APB 14-1. FSP APB 14-1 applies to convertible debt
instruments that, by their stated terms, may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial
cash settlement). The FSP requires bifurcation of the instrument into a debt component that is
initially valued at fair value and an equity component. The debt component is accreted to par
value using the effective yield method, and accretion is reported as a component of interest
expense. The equity component is not subsequently revalued as long as it continues to qualify for
equity treatment. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and
interim periods within those fiscal years on a retrospective basis for all periods presented. We
are currently evaluating the impact that adopting FSP APB 14-1 will have on our results of
operations and financial position.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, or SFAS 161. SFAS 161 changes the reporting requirements for derivative
instruments and hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging
Activities, or SFAS 133, by requiring enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments are accounted for under SFAS 133 and (c) the
effect of derivative instruments and hedging activities on an entitys financial position,
financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008; however, early application is
encouraged. We are in the process of reviewing the enhanced disclosure requirements under SFAS
161.
9
2. Earnings Per Share
A reconciliation of the numerators and the denominators of our basic and diluted per-share
computations follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
Net income basic (numerator): |
|
$ |
416,283 |
|
|
$ |
251,927 |
|
|
$ |
706,908 |
|
|
$ |
476,077 |
|
Effect of dilutive potential shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5% Debentures |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3,829 |
|
Zero Coupon Debentures |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
Net income including conversions
diluted (numerator) |
|
$ |
416,298 |
|
|
$ |
251,970 |
|
|
$ |
706,927 |
|
|
$ |
479,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic (denominator): |
|
|
138,959 |
|
|
|
138,447 |
|
|
|
138,916 |
|
|
|
136,875 |
|
Effect of dilutive potential shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5% Debentures |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
1,893 |
|
Zero Coupon Debentures |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Stock options/SARs |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares including conversions -
diluted (denominator) |
|
|
139,083 |
|
|
|
138,928 |
|
|
|
139,068 |
|
|
|
138,879 |
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
3.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.82 |
|
|
$ |
5.09 |
|
|
$ |
3.48 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
2.99 |
|
|
$ |
1.81 |
|
|
$ |
5.08 |
|
|
$ |
3.46 |
|
|
|
|
Our computation of diluted earnings per share, or EPS, for the three and six months ended June
30, 2008 excludes 140,607 and 149,178 stock appreciation rights, or SARs, respectively. The
inclusion of such potentially dilutive shares in the computation of diluted EPS would have been
antidilutive for the periods presented.
Our computation of diluted EPS for the three months ended June 30, 2007 excludes stock options
representing 25,278 shares of common stock and 188,342 SARs. Our computation of diluted EPS for
the six months ended June 30, 2007 excludes stock options representing 46,253 shares of common
stock and 171,564 SARs. The inclusion of such potentially dilutive shares in the computation of
diluted EPS would have been antidilutive for the periods presented.
10
3. Marketable Securities
We report our investments as current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets in Marketable
securities, representing the investment of cash available for current operations. See Note 5.
Our investments in marketable securities are classified as available for sale and are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gain |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Debt securities issued by the U.S.
Treasury due within one year |
|
$ |
197,837 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
197,855 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
199,036 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
199,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
|
|
Cost |
|
Gain |
|
Value |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
1,277 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
1,301 |
|
|
|
|
Our investments at June 30, 2008 included $197.8 million in U.S. Treasury Bills purchased at
month end that did not settle until July 2008. Accordingly, we have recorded a $197.8 million
liability in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as a Payable for securities purchased relating to
these investments.
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities and gross realized gains and
losses are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Proceeds from sales |
|
$ |
99,992 |
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
$ |
100,022 |
|
|
$ |
696,719 |
|
Proceeds from maturities |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
550,000 |
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
Gross realized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
Gross realized losses |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
4. Derivative Financial Instruments
Foreign Currency Forward Exchange Contracts
Our international operations expose us to foreign exchange risk associated with our costs
payable in foreign currencies for employee compensation and purchases from foreign suppliers. We
utilize foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce our forward exchange risk. A foreign currency
forward exchange contract obligates a contract holder to exchange predetermined amounts of foreign
currencies on specified dates.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we settled several of our obligations
under various foreign currency forward exchange contracts, which resulted in net realized gains
totaling $6.7 million and $7.5 million, respectively. During the three and six months ended June
30, 2007, we recognized net realized gains of $1.0 million and $3.5 million, respectively, on
settlement of foreign currency forward exchange contracts during the period. As of June 30, 2008,
we had foreign currency forward exchange contracts outstanding, which aggregated $227.5 million,
that require us to purchase the equivalent of $64.4 million in Australian dollars, $59.7 million in
Brazilian reais, $72.6 million in British pounds sterling, $10.5 million in Mexican pesos and $20.3
million in Norwegian kroner at various times through January 2009. See Note 5.
11
These forward contracts are derivatives as defined by SFAS 133. SFAS 133 requires that each
derivative be stated in the balance sheet at its fair value with gains and losses reflected in the
income statement except that, to the extent the derivative qualifies for hedge accounting, the
gains and losses are reflected in income in the same period as offsetting losses and gains on the
qualifying hedged positions. None of the forward contracts that we entered into qualified for
hedge accounting. In accordance with SFAS 133, we recorded net pre-tax unrealized gains of $8.3
million and $9.5 million in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, respectively, as Other income (expense) to adjust the carrying value of
these derivative financial instruments to their fair value. We have presented the $9.6 million
fair value of our outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts as Prepaid expenses and
other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2008.
We recorded net pre-tax unrealized gains of $1.4 million and $2.0 million for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, as Other income (expense) to adjust the carrying
value of our derivative financial instruments held at June 30, 2007 to their fair value.
5. Fair Value Disclosures
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, or SFAS 157,
which requires additional disclosures about our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair
value. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or
paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the
asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
SFAS 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The
standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. Level 1
assets include short-term investments such as money market funds
and U.S. Treasury Bills. Our Level 1 assets at June 30, 2008
included cash held in money market funds of $528.0 million and
investments in U.S. Treasury Bills of $197.8 million. |
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Quoted market prices for similar instruments in active markets;
quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets
that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all
significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable
in active markets. Level 2 assets and liabilities include
over-the-counter foreign currency forward exchange contracts that
are valued using a model-derived valuation technique and
mortgage-backed securities. |
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more
significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
Level 3 assets and liabilities generally include financial
instruments whose value is determined using pricing models,
discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well
as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires
significant management judgment or estimation or for which there
is a lack of transparency as to the inputs used. |
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
Assets at Fair |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
value |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
$ |
725,824 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
725,824 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
Forward exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,563 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
725,824 |
|
|
$ |
10,794 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
736,618 |
|
|
|
|
12
6. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Rig spare parts and supplies |
|
$ |
50,599 |
|
|
$ |
50,699 |
|
Deferred mobilization costs |
|
|
22,807 |
|
|
|
17,295 |
|
Prepaid insurance |
|
|
24,035 |
|
|
|
11,444 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
9,006 |
|
|
|
9,006 |
|
Vendor prepayments |
|
|
8,093 |
|
|
|
7,296 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
5,012 |
|
|
|
2,292 |
|
Prepaid taxes |
|
|
2,616 |
|
|
|
1,681 |
|
Forward exchange contracts |
|
|
9,563 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,268 |
|
|
|
3,405 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
135,999 |
|
|
$ |
103,120 |
|
|
|
|
7. Drilling and Other Property and Equipment
Cost and accumulated depreciation of drilling and other property and equipment are summarized
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Drilling rigs and equipment |
|
$ |
4,932,364 |
|
|
$ |
4,540,797 |
|
Construction work-in-progress |
|
|
435,166 |
|
|
|
453,093 |
|
Land and buildings |
|
|
26,591 |
|
|
|
24,123 |
|
Office equipment and other |
|
|
32,006 |
|
|
|
29,742 |
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
5,426,127 |
|
|
|
5,047,755 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(2,147,403 |
) |
|
|
(2,007,692 |
) |
|
|
|
Drilling and other property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
3,278,724 |
|
|
$ |
3,040,063 |
|
|
|
|
Construction work-in-progress at June 30, 2008 consisted of $285.9 million related to the
major upgrade of the Ocean Monarch to ultra-deepwater service and $149.3 million related to the
construction of the Ocean Scepter, including accrued capital expenditures aggregating $69.0 million
related to these two projects. We anticipate that the Ocean Scepter will begin drilling operations
in the third quarter of 2008 and that the upgrade of the Ocean Monarch will be completed in late
2008. Construction of the Ocean Shield was completed in the second quarter of 2008.
8. Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Accrued project/upgrade expenses |
|
$ |
139,365 |
|
|
$ |
95,778 |
|
Payroll and benefits |
|
|
65,491 |
|
|
|
52,975 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
32,389 |
|
|
|
36,134 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
10,385 |
|
|
|
10,413 |
|
Personal injury and other claims |
|
|
9,714 |
|
|
|
8,692 |
|
Other |
|
|
30,192 |
|
|
|
31,529 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
287,536 |
|
|
$ |
235,521 |
|
|
|
|
13
9. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Zero Coupon Debentures (due 2020) |
|
$ |
3,967 |
|
|
$ |
3,931 |
|
1.5% Debentures (due 2031) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,563 |
|
5.15% Senior Notes (due 2014) |
|
|
249,594 |
|
|
|
249,566 |
|
4.875% Senior Notes (due 2015) |
|
|
249,597 |
|
|
|
249,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503,158 |
|
|
|
506,634 |
|
Less: Current maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,563 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
503,158 |
|
|
$ |
503,071 |
|
|
|
|
The aggregate maturities of long-term debt for each of the five years subsequent to June 30,
2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
3,967 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
499,191 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
503,158 |
|
|
Debt Conversions. During the period from January 1, 2008 to April 14, 2008, the holders of
$3.5 million in aggregate principal amount of our 1.5% Debentures elected to convert their
outstanding debentures into shares of our common stock. We issued 71,144 shares of our common
stock pursuant to these conversions. On April 15, 2008, we completed the redemption of all of our
outstanding 1.5% Debentures, and, as a result, redeemed for cash the remaining $73,000 aggregate
principal amount of our 1.5% Debentures.
During the first six months of 2008, the holders of approximately $33,000 accreted, or
carrying, value through the date of conversion of our Zero Coupon Debentures elected to convert
their outstanding debentures into shares of our common stock. We issued 430 shares of our common
stock pursuant to these conversions during the first six months of 2008. The aggregate principal
amount at maturity of our Zero Coupon Debentures converted during the six months ended June 30,
2008 was $50,000.
At June 30, 2008, there was $6.0 million aggregate principal amount at maturity, or $4.0
million accreted, or carrying, value, of our Zero Coupon Debentures outstanding.
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Various claims have been filed against us in the ordinary course of business, including claims
by offshore workers alleging personal injuries. In accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, we have assessed each claim or exposure to determine the likelihood that the
resolution of the matter might ultimately result in an adverse effect on our financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows. When we determine that an unfavorable resolution of a matter
is probable and such amount of loss can be determined, we record a reserve for the estimated loss
at the time that both of these criteria are met. Our management believes that we have established
adequate reserves for any liabilities that may reasonably be expected to result from these claims.
Litigation. We are a defendant in a lawsuit filed in January 2005 in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana on behalf of Total E&P USA, Inc. and several oil companies
alleging that our semisubmersible rig, the Ocean America, damaged a natural gas pipeline in the
Gulf of Mexico during Hurricane Ivan. The plaintiffs seek damages from us including, but not
limited to, loss of revenue, that are currently estimated to be in excess of $100 million, together
with interest, attorneys fees and costs. We deny any liability for plaintiffs alleged loss.
14
We are one of several unrelated defendants in lawsuits filed in the Circuit Courts of the
State of Mississippi alleging that defendants manufactured, distributed or utilized drilling mud
containing asbestos and, in our case, allowed such drilling mud to have been utilized aboard our
offshore drilling rigs. The plaintiffs seek, among other things, an award of unspecified
compensatory and punitive damages. We expect to receive complete defense and indemnity from Murphy
Exploration & Production Company pursuant to the terms of our 1992 asset purchase agreement with
them.
Various other claims have been filed against us in the ordinary course of business. In the
opinion of our management, the pending or known threatened claims, actions or proceedings against
us are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
Other. Our operations in Brazil have exposed us to various claims and assessments related to
our personnel, customs duties and municipal taxes, among other things, that have arisen in the
ordinary course of business. At June 30, 2008, our loss reserves related to our Brazilian
operations aggregated $7.1 million, of which $2.0 million and $5.1 million were recorded in
Accrued liabilities and Other liabilities, respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Loss reserves related to our Brazilian operations totaled $8.5 million at December 31, 2007, of
which $1.9 million was recorded in Accrued liabilities and $6.6 million was recorded in Other
liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We intend to defend these matters vigorously; however, we cannot predict with certainty the
outcome or effect of any litigation matters specifically described above or any other pending
litigation or claims. There can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of these lawsuits.
Personal Injury Claims. Our deductible for liability coverage for personal injury claims,
which primarily results from Jones Act liability in the Gulf of Mexico, is $5.0 million per
occurrence, with no aggregate deductible. The Jones Act is a federal law that permits seamen to
seek compensation for certain injuries during the course of their employment on a vessel and
governs the liability of vessel operators and marine employers for the work-related injury or death
of an employee. We estimate our aggregate reserve for personal injury claims based on our
historical losses and utilizing various actuarial models. At June 30, 2008, our estimated
liability for personal injury claims was $29.7 million, of which $9.2 million and $20.5 million
were recorded in Accrued liabilities and Other liabilities, respectively, in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2007, we had recorded loss reserves for personal injury claims
aggregating $32.0 million, of which $8.5 million and $23.5 million were recorded in Accrued
liabilities and Other liabilities, respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The
eventual settlement or adjudication of these claims could differ materially from our estimated
amounts due to uncertainties such as:
|
|
|
the severity of personal injuries claimed; |
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the volume of personal injury claims; |
|
|
|
|
the unpredictability of legal jurisdictions where the claims will ultimately be
litigated; |
|
|
|
|
inconsistent court decisions; and |
|
|
|
|
the risks and lack of predictability inherent in personal injury litigation. |
Purchase Obligations. As of June 30, 2008, we had purchase obligations aggregating
approximately $109 million related to the major upgrade of the Ocean Monarch and construction of
the Ocean Scepter. We expect to complete funding of these projects in 2008. However, the actual
timing of these expenditures will vary based on the completion of various construction milestones,
which are beyond our control.
We had no other purchase obligations for major rig upgrades or any other significant
obligations at June 30, 2008, except for those related to our direct rig operations, which arise
during the normal course of business.
15
11. Segments and Geographic Area Analysis
Although we provide contract drilling services with different types of offshore drilling rigs
and also provide such services in many geographic locations, we have aggregated these operations
into one reportable segment based on the similarity of economic characteristics among all divisions
and locations, including the nature of services provided and the type of customers of such
services, in accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information.
Revenues from contract drilling services by equipment-type are listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
High Specification Floaters |
|
$ |
354,218 |
|
|
$ |
264,027 |
|
|
$ |
635,289 |
|
|
$ |
510,408 |
|
Intermediate Semisubmersibles |
|
|
464,598 |
|
|
|
246,232 |
|
|
|
837,820 |
|
|
|
469,958 |
|
Jack-ups |
|
|
117,810 |
|
|
|
125,668 |
|
|
|
233,857 |
|
|
|
245,473 |
|
|
|
|
Total contract drilling revenues |
|
|
936,626 |
|
|
|
635,927 |
|
|
|
1,706,966 |
|
|
|
1,225,839 |
|
Revenues related to reimbursable
expenses |
|
|
17,746 |
|
|
|
12,948 |
|
|
|
33,508 |
|
|
|
31,220 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
954,372 |
|
|
$ |
648,875 |
|
|
$ |
1,740,474 |
|
|
$ |
1,257,059 |
|
|
|
|
Geographic Areas
At June 30, 2008, our drilling rigs were located offshore eleven countries in addition to the
United States. As a result, we are exposed to the risk of changes in social, political and
economic conditions inherent in foreign operations and our results of operations and the value of
our foreign assets are affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Revenues by
geographic area are presented by attributing revenues to the individual country or areas where the
services were performed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
United States |
|
$ |
396,048 |
|
|
$ |
356,506 |
|
|
$ |
719,561 |
|
|
$ |
688,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe/Africa/Mediterranean |
|
|
172,077 |
|
|
|
121,283 |
|
|
|
309,608 |
|
|
|
219,744 |
|
South America |
|
|
158,067 |
|
|
|
53,325 |
|
|
|
285,604 |
|
|
|
104,738 |
|
Australia/Asia/Middle East |
|
|
147,793 |
|
|
|
87,432 |
|
|
|
254,768 |
|
|
|
181,742 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
80,387 |
|
|
|
30,329 |
|
|
|
170,933 |
|
|
|
62,085 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
954,372 |
|
|
$ |
648,875 |
|
|
$ |
1,740,474 |
|
|
$ |
1,257,059 |
|
|
|
|
12. Income Taxes
Our net income tax expense or benefit is a function of the mix between our domestic and
international pre-tax earnings or losses, respectively, as well as the mix of international tax
jurisdictions in which we operate. Certain of our international rigs are owned and operated,
directly or indirectly, by Diamond Offshore International Limited, a Cayman Islands subsidiary,
which we wholly own. Because it was our intention to indefinitely reinvest the earnings of the
subsidiary in foreign activities, no U.S. federal income taxes were provided on these earnings in
years subsequent to its formation until December 2007, except to the extent that such earnings were
immediately subject to U.S. federal income taxes. In December 2007, this subsidiary made a
non-recurring distribution of $850.0 million to its U.S. parent and we recognized U.S. federal
income tax on the portion of the earnings of the subsidiary that had not previously been subjected
to U.S. federal income tax. As of December 31, 2007, the amount of previously untaxed earnings of
this subsidiary was zero. Notwithstanding the non-recurring distribution made in December
16
2007, it remains our intention to indefinitely reinvest future earnings of this subsidiary to
finance foreign activities. Consequently no U.S. federal income taxes were provided in the six
months ended June 30, 2008 on the earnings of this subsidiary except to the extent that such
earnings were immediately subject to U.S. federal income taxes.
We adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, on January 1, 2007. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 we recognized tax
expense of $1.9 million and $2.8 million, respectively, for uncertain tax positions related to
fiscal 2008. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 we recognized tax expense of $1.7
million and $2.0 million, respectively, for uncertain tax positions related to fiscal 2007. There
were no new uncertain tax positions or significant changes in existing uncertain tax positions
during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
17
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated
financial statements (including the notes thereto) included elsewhere in this report and our
audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, Item 7, Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 1A, Risk Factors included
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. References to Diamond
Offshore, we, us or our mean Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and
its subsidiaries.
We are a leader in deep water drilling with a fleet of 45 offshore drilling rigs. Our fleet
currently consists of 30 semisubmersibles, 14 jack-ups and one drillship. We expect to take
delivery of the premium jack-up drilling rig, the Ocean Scepter, in the third quarter of 2008. The
rig is currently located in Brownsville, Texas, where it is being commissioned and waiting for the
arrival of a heavy-lift vessel for its mobilization to an international destination for a term
contract expected to begin in the third quarter of 2008.
Overview
Industry Conditions
Demand for crude oil remained strong against tight commodity supply during the second quarter
of 2008, contributing to record high oil prices and providing continuing and increasing incentive
for oil and gas exploration worldwide. In response, our customers are continuing the push into
virgin, deepwater horizons that rising commodity prices initiated in mid-2004, and that has been
more recently bolstered by major new domestic and international discoveries and significant
additional lease acquisitions of offshore acreage.
This is the most extensive up-cycle the offshore drilling industry has experienced. It has
led to record high demand for all types of offshore drilling rigs, and with demand for equipment
exceeding supply, unprecedented high dayrates for our rigs.
Floaters
As a result, the majority of our mid-water (intermediate) and deepwater (high-specification)
semisubmersible rigs are fully contracted for the remainder of 2008, and 92% of our floater
equipment is contracted or subject to Letters of Intent, or LOIs, for 2009. Additionally,
contracts or LOIs for 66% of our floating rigs extend at least until 2010, with 8% of our floating
units having contracts or LOIs extending into the 2014-2015 timeframe. At the same time, we
continue to see customer demand for multi-year contracts at competitive dayrates for our entire
floater fleet, particularly for floater rigs with relatively near-term availability. Collectively,
the actions of our customers, together with the other discussed market factors, support our belief
that the outlook for mid-water and deepwater drilling rigs remains favorable.
International Jack-ups
The industrys jack-up market is divided between an international sector and a domestic
sector, with the international sector generally characterized by contracts of longer duration and
higher prices, compared to the generally shorter term and lower priced domestic sector. To date in
2008, we have seen relatively steady demand for jack-ups worldwide with generally level pricing
internationally. As a result, we believe that the increase in rig supply due to the delivery of
speculative new-build units can be absorbed by the international sector through the end of 2008.
However, we believe that jack-up rig supply growth could be of concern in the international sector
during 2009 and beyond.
U.S. Gulf of Mexico Jack-ups
In the domestic jack-up sector, higher natural gas prices and tighter rig supply allowed the
domestic jack-up fleet to experience improved utilization and dayrates during the first and second
quarters of 2008, compared to the second half of 2007. As a result, all of our domestic jack-up
units are now contracted at least through the third quarter of 2008, which includes the typical
peak of the hurricane season. We believe the outlook for domestic jack-ups remains favorable,
absent a decline in natural gas pricing; however, the well-to-well nature of the market persists.
18
Contract Drilling Backlog
The following table reflects our contract drilling backlog as of July 24, 2008, February 7,
2008 (the date reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007) and
July 26, 2007 (the date reported in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2007) and reflects both firm commitments (typically represented by signed contracts), as well
as previously-disclosed LOIs. An LOI is subject to customary conditions, including the execution
of a definitive agreement, and as such may not result in a binding contract. Contract drilling
backlog is calculated by multiplying the contracted operating dayrate by the firm contract period
and adding one-half of any potential rig performance bonuses. Our calculation also assumes full
utilization of our drilling equipment for the contract period (excluding scheduled shipyard and
survey days); however, the amount of actual revenue earned and the actual periods during which
revenues are earned will be different than the amounts and periods shown in the tables below due to
various factors. Utilization rates, which generally approach 95-98% during contracted periods, can
be adversely impacted by downtime due to various operating factors including, but not limited to,
weather conditions and unscheduled repairs and maintenance. Contract drilling backlog excludes
revenues for mobilization, demobilization, contract preparation and customer reimbursables. No
revenue is generally earned during periods of downtime for regulatory surveys. Changes in our
contract drilling backlog between periods is a function of both the performance of work on term
contracts, as well as the extension or modification of existing term contracts and the execution of
additional contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 24, |
|
|
February 7, |
|
|
July 26, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Contract Drilling Backlog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-Specification Floaters (1) |
|
$ |
4,535,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,448,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,888,000 |
|
Intermediate Semisubmersibles (1) |
|
|
6,199,000 |
|
|
|
5,985,000 |
|
|
|
4,712,000 |
|
Jack-ups |
|
|
543,000 |
|
|
|
421,000 |
|
|
|
452,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,277,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,854,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,052,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Contract drilling backlog as of July 24, 2008 includes an aggregate $1.0 billion in
contract drilling revenue relating to expected future work under LOIs of which $672.0
million and $351.0 million is expected to be earned by our high-specification floaters
and intermediate semisubmersibles, respectively. |
The following table reflects the amount of our contract drilling backlog by year as of July
24, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ending December 31, |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2008 (1) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 - 2015 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Contract Drilling Backlog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-Specification Floaters (2) |
|
$ |
4,535,000 |
|
|
$ |
677,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,478,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,092,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,288,000 |
|
Intermediate Semisubmersibles (3) |
|
|
6,199,000 |
|
|
|
836,000 |
|
|
|
1,762,000 |
|
|
|
1,446,000 |
|
|
|
2,155,000 |
|
Jack-ups |
|
|
543,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
279,000 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,277,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,763,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,519,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,552,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,443,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents a six-month period beginning July 1, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes an aggregate $672.0 million in contract drilling revenue of which $17.0
million, $401.0 million and $254.0 million are expected to be earned during the remainder
of 2008 and during 2009 and 2010, respectively, relating to expected future work under
LOIs. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes an aggregate $351.0 million in contract drilling revenue of which $21.0
million is expected to be earned during the remainder of 2008 and $99.0 million, $95.0
million, $95.0 million and $41.0 million are expected to be earned in 2009 to 2012,
respectively, relating to future work under LOIs. |
19
The following table reflects the percentage of rig days committed by year as of July 24, 2008.
The percentage of rig days committed is calculated as the ratio of total days committed under
contracts and LOIs, as well as scheduled shipyard, survey and mobilization days for all rigs in our
fleet to total available days (number of rigs multiplied by the number of days in a particular
year). Total available days have been calculated based on the expected delivery dates for the
Ocean Scepter and Ocean Monarch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ending December 31, |
|
|
2008 (1) |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 - 2015 |
Rig Days Committed (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-Specification Floaters |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Intermediate Semisubmersibles |
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
93 |
% |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
Jack-ups |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents a six-month period beginning July 1, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes approximately 900 and 600 scheduled shipyard, survey and mobilization days
for the remainder of 2008 and 2009, respectively, or 12% and 5% or our total rig days
committed for the remainder of 2008 and 2009, respectively. |
General
Our revenues vary based on the number of days our fleet is utilized and the dayrates earned.
Utilization and dayrates earned are a function of global and regional balance between supply of
rigs and demand. When a rig is idle, no dayrate is earned and revenues will decrease as a result.
Revenues can also be affected as a result of the acquisition or disposal of rigs, required surveys
and shipyard upgrades. In order to improve utilization or realize higher dayrates, we may mobilize
our rigs from one market to another. However, during periods of mobilization, revenues may be
adversely affected. As a response to changes in the balance of supply and demand, we may withdraw
a rig from the market by stacking it or may reactivate a rig stacked previously, which may decrease
or increase revenues, respectively.
The two most significant variables affecting revenues are dayrates for rigs and rig
utilization rates, each of which is a function of rig supply and demand in the marketplace. As
utilization rates increase, dayrates tend to increase as well, reflecting the lower supply of
available rigs, and vice versa. Demand for drilling services is dependent upon the level of
expenditures set by oil and gas companies for offshore exploration and development, as well as a
variety of political and economic factors. The availability of rigs in a particular geographical
region also affects both dayrates and utilization rates. These factors are not within our control
and are difficult to predict.
Operating Income. Our operating income is primarily affected by revenue factors, but is also
a function of varying levels of operating expenses. Our operating expenses represent all direct
and indirect costs associated with the operation and maintenance of our drilling equipment. The
principal components of our operating costs are, among other things, direct and indirect costs of
labor and benefits, repairs and maintenance, freight, regulatory inspections, boat and helicopter
rentals and insurance. Labor and repair and maintenance costs represent the most significant
components of our operating expenses. In general, our labor costs increase primarily due to higher
salary levels, rig staffing requirements, and costs associated with labor regulations in the
geographic regions in which our rigs operate. We have experienced and continue to experience
upward pressure on salaries and wages as a result of the strengthening offshore drilling market and
increased competition for skilled workers. In response to these market conditions we have
implemented retention programs, including increases in compensation.
Costs to repair and maintain our equipment fluctuate depending upon the type of activity the
drilling unit is performing, as well as the age and condition of the equipment and the regions in
which our rigs are working.
Operating expenses generally are not affected by changes in dayrates, and short-term
reductions in utilization do not necessarily result in lower operating expenses. For instance, if
a rig is to be idle for a short period of time, few decreases in operating expenses may actually
occur since the rig is typically maintained in a prepared or ready-stacked state with a full
crew. In addition, when a rig is idle, we are responsible for certain operating expenses such as
rig fuel and supply boat costs, which are typically costs of the operator when a rig is under
contract. However, if the rig is to be idle for an extended period of time, we may reduce the size
of a rigs crew and take steps to cold stack the rig, which lowers expenses and partially offsets
the impact on operating income. We recognize, as incurred, operating expenses related to
activities such as inspections, painting projects and routine overhauls that meet certain criteria
and which maintain rather than upgrade our rigs. These expenses vary from period to period. Costs
of rig enhancements are capitalized and depreciated over the expected useful lives of the
enhancements. Higher depreciation expense decreases operating income in periods subsequent to
capital upgrades.
20
Periods of high, sustained utilization may result in cost increases for maintenance and
repairs in order to maintain our equipment in proper, working order. In addition, during periods
of high activity and dayrates, higher prices generally pervade the entire offshore drilling
industry and its support businesses, which causes our costs for goods and services to increase.
Our operating income is negatively impacted when we perform certain regulatory inspections,
which we refer to as a 5-year survey, or special survey, that are due every five years for each of
our rigs. Operating revenue decreases because these surveys are performed during scheduled
downtime in a shipyard. Operating expenses increase as a result of these surveys due to the cost
to mobilize the rigs to a shipyard, inspection costs incurred and repair and maintenance costs.
Repair and maintenance costs may be required resulting from the survey or may have been previously
planned to take place during this mandatory downtime. The number of rigs undergoing a 5-year
survey will vary from year to year, as well as from quarter to quarter.
In addition, operating income may be negatively impacted by intermediate surveys, which are
performed at interim periods between 5-year surveys. Intermediate surveys are generally less
extensive in duration and scope than a 5-year survey. Although an intermediate survey may require
some downtime for the drilling rig, it normally does not require dry-docking or shipyard time,
except for rigs located in the United Kingdom, or U.K., and Norwegian sectors of the North Sea.
During the second half of 2008, we expect that nine of our rigs will undergo regulatory
inspections and will be out of service for approximately 500 days in the aggregate, including
downtime for planned maintenance projects. (We expect to spend an additional approximately 400
days during the second half of 2008 for the mobilization of rigs, completion of contract
modifications and for extended maintenance projects not performed in conjunction with regulatory
surveys. See Overview Contract Drilling Backlog.)
Under our current insurance policy that expires on May 1, 2009, our deductible for physical
damage is $75.0 million per occurrence (or lower for some rigs if they are declared a constructive
total loss). For physical damage due to named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, there is an
annual aggregate limit of $125.0 million. Accordingly, our insurance coverage for all physical
damage to our rigs and equipment caused by named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico for the
policy period ending May 1, 2009 is limited to $125.0 million. If named windstorms in the U.S.
Gulf of Mexico cause significant damage to our rigs or equipment or to the property of others for
which we may be liable, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results
of operations and cash flows.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 of our notes to consolidated
financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this report and in Note 1 of our notes to
audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007. There were no material changes to these policies during the six months
ended June 30, 2008.
21
Results of Operations
Although we perform contract drilling services with different types of drilling rigs and in
many geographic locations, there is a similarity of economic characteristics among all our
divisions and locations, including the nature of services provided and the type of customers for
our services. We believe that the combination of our drilling rigs into one reportable segment is
the appropriate aggregation in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB,
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. However, for purposes of this discussion and analysis of our
results of operations, we provide greater detail with respect to the types of rigs in our fleet and
the geographic regions in which they operate to enhance the readers understanding of our financial
condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Comparative data relating to our revenue and operating expenses by equipment type are listed
below. We have reclassified certain amounts applicable to the prior period to conform to the
classifications we currently follow. These reclassifications do not affect earnings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
CONTRACT DRILLING REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-Specification Floaters |
|
$ |
354,218 |
|
|
$ |
264,027 |
|
|
$ |
90,191 |
|
Intermediate Semisubmersibles |
|
|
464,598 |
|
|
|
246,232 |
|
|
|
218,366 |
|
Jack-ups |
|
|
117,810 |
|
|
|
125,668 |
|
|
|
(7,858 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Contract Drilling Revenue |
|
$ |
936,626 |
|
|
$ |
635,927 |
|
|
$ |
300,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues Related to Reimbursable Expenses |
|
$ |
17,746 |
|
|
$ |
12,948 |
|
|
$ |
4,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACT DRILLING EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-Specification Floaters |
|
$ |
89,503 |
|
|
$ |
69,722 |
|
|
$ |
(19,781 |
) |
Intermediate Semisubmersibles |
|
|
131,539 |
|
|
|
108,049 |
|
|
|
(23,490 |
) |
Jack-ups |
|
|
48,834 |
|
|
|
42,362 |
|
|
|
(6,472 |
) |
Other |
|
|
3,560 |
|
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
(1,752 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Contract Drilling Expense |
|
$ |
273,436 |
|
|
$ |
221,941 |
|
|
$ |
(51,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursable Expenses |
|
$ |
17,346 |
|
|
$ |
12,361 |
|
|
$ |
(4,985 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-Specification Floaters |
|
$ |
264,715 |
|
|
$ |
194,305 |
|
|
$ |
70,410 |
|
Intermediate Semisubmersibles |
|
|
333,059 |
|
|
|
138,183 |
|
|
|
194,876 |
|
Jack-ups |
|
|
68,976 |
|
|
|
83,306 |
|
|
|
(14,330 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(3,560 |
) |
|
|
(1,808 |
) |
|
|
(1,752 |
) |
Reimbursable expenses, net |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
(187 |
) |
Depreciation |
|
|
(70,661 |
) |
|
|
(58,335 |
) |
|
|
(12,326 |
) |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
(15,768 |
) |
|
|
(12,174 |
) |
|
|
(3,594 |
) |
Gain on disposition of assets |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
3,553 |
|
|
|
(3,327 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Operating Income |
|
$ |
577,387 |
|
|
$ |
347,617 |
|
|
$ |
229,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
2,941 |
|
|
|
7,599 |
|
|
|
(4,658 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,895 |
) |
|
|
(3,770 |
) |
|
|
1,875 |
|
Loss on sale of marketable securities |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
12,490 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
11,478 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
590,921 |
|
|
|
352,453 |
|
|
|
238,468 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(174,638 |
) |
|
|
(100,526 |
) |
|
|
(74,112 |
) |
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
416,283 |
|
|
$ |
251,927 |
|
|
$ |
164,356 |
|
|
|
|
Demand remained strong for our high-specification floaters and intermediate semisubmersible
rigs in all markets and geographic regions during the second quarter of 2008. The continued high
overall utilization and
22
historically high dayrates for our floater fleet contributed to an overall
increase in our net income of $164.4 million, or 65%, to $416.3 million in the second quarter of
2008 compared to $251.9 million in the same period of 2007.
In many of the floater markets in which we operate, average dayrates increased as our rigs
began operating under contracts at higher dayrates than those earned during the second quarter of
2007, resulting in the generation of additional contract drilling revenues by our fleet. Although
the market is currently improving, our jack-up rigs in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, or GOM, earned
lower dayrates during the second quarter of 2008 compared to the same quarter in 2007 when rates
for our jack-ups averaged in the low $90,000 range. Utilization, however, improved slightly
compared to the second quarter of 2007. Total contract drilling revenues in the second quarter of
2008 increased $300.7 million, or 47%, to $936.6 million compared to $635.9 million in the same
period a year earlier.
Total contract drilling expenses increased $51.5 million, or 23%, in the second quarter of
2008, compared to the same period in 2007. Overall cost increases for maintenance and repairs
between the 2008 and 2007 periods reflect the impact of high, sustained utilization of our drilling
units across our fleet, higher maintenance costs, contract preparation and mobilization costs, as
well as the inclusion of normal operating costs for the recently upgraded Ocean Endeavor, which
returned to service in the GOM in the third quarter of 2007, and the newly constructed Ocean
Shield, which began operating offshore Malaysia in the second quarter of 2008. The increase in
overall operating and overhead costs also reflects the impact of higher prices throughout the
offshore drilling industry and its support businesses, including higher costs associated with
hiring and retaining skilled personnel for our worldwide offshore fleet.
Depreciation and general and administrative expense increased $15.9 million to $86.4 million
in the aggregate during the second quarter of 2008, or 23% compared to the second quarter of 2007,
due to a higher depreciable asset base and higher compensation and consulting costs during 2008.
High-Specification Floaters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
HIGH-SPECIFICATION FLOATERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACT DRILLING REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOM |
|
$ |
282,074 |
|
|
$ |
216,236 |
|
|
$ |
65,838 |
|
Australia/Asia/Middle East |
|
|
20,552 |
|
|
|
16,555 |
|
|
|
3,997 |
|
South America |
|
|
51,592 |
|
|
|
31,236 |
|
|
|
20,356 |
|
|
|
|
Total Contract Drilling Revenue |
|
$ |
354,218 |
|
|
$ |
264,027 |
|
|
$ |
90,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACT DRILLING EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOM |
|
$ |
50,394 |
|
|
$ |
41,782 |
|
|
$ |
(8,612 |
) |
Australia/Asia/Middle East |
|
|
7,928 |
|
|
|
6,743 |
|
|
|
(1,185 |
) |
South America |
|
|
31,181 |
|
|
|
21,197 |
|
|
|
(9,984 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Contract Drilling Expense |
|
$ |
89,503 |
|
|
$ |
69,722 |
|
|
$ |
(19,781 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
$ |
264,715 |
|
|
$ |
194,305 |
|
|
$ |
70,410 |
|
|
|
|
GOM. Revenues generated by our high-specification floaters operating in the GOM increased
$65.8 million during the second quarter of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. Average
operating revenue per day for our rigs in this market, excluding the Ocean Endeavor, increased to
$410,000 during the second quarter of 2008 compared to $359,800 in the second quarter of 2007,
resulting in additional revenues of $30.8 million. Excluding the Ocean Endeavor, six of our seven
other high-specification semisubmersible rigs in the GOM are currently operating at dayrates higher
than those they earned during the second quarter of 2007. The Ocean Endeavor generated revenues of
$22.9 million in the GOM in the second quarter of 2008.
Average utilization for our high-specification rigs operating in the GOM, excluding the Ocean
Endeavor, increased from 94% in the second quarter of 2007 to 99% in the second quarter of 2008,
resulting in a $12.1 million
increase in revenues comparing the quarters. The increase in utilization was primarily the result
of scheduled
23
downtime for special surveys for the Ocean Star (19 days) and the Ocean Baroness (5
days) during the second quarter of 2007 compared to full utilization for both of these rigs during
the second quarter of 2008.
Operating costs during the second quarter of 2008 for our high-specification floaters in the
GOM increased $8.6 million to $50.4 million (including $3.7 million in incremental operating
expenses for the Ocean Endeavor) compared to the second quarter of 2007. Operating costs for the
second quarter of 2008 also include higher labor, benefits and other personnel-related costs for
all of our rigs operating in the GOM as compared to the same period in 2007.
Australia/Asia/Middle East. Revenues generated by the Ocean Rover, our high-specification rig
operating offshore Malaysia, increased $4.0 million in the second quarter of 2008, as compared to
the same period in 2007, primarily due to a higher operating dayrate earned by the rig during the
2008 period.
South America. Revenues earned by our high-specification floaters operating offshore Brazil
increased $20.4 million compared to the second quarter of 2007 to $51.6 million in the second
quarter of 2008, primarily due to a higher dayrate earned by the Ocean Alliance. Average operating
revenue per day increased from $182,600 during the second quarter of 2007 to $451,600 during the
second quarter of 2008 and contributed additional revenues of $31.1 million. The increase in
revenue was partially offset by a decline in utilization as a result of 64 days of unpaid downtime
during the second quarter of 2008 for repairs to the propulsion system on the Ocean Clipper ($10.7
million).
Contract drilling expense for our operations in Brazil increased $10.0 million during the
second quarter of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This increase was primarily due to
inspection and repair costs for the Ocean Clipper.
Intermediate Semisubmersibles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
INTERMEDIATE SEMISUBMERSIBLES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACT DRILLING REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOM |
|
$ |
47,832 |
|
|
$ |
60,142 |
|
|
$ |
(12,310 |
) |
Mexico |
|
|
53,443 |
|
|
|
15,406 |
|
|
|
38,037 |
|
Australia/Asia/Middle East |
|
|
110,825 |
|
|
|
49,814 |
|
|
|
61,011 |
|
Europe/Africa/Mediterranean |
|
|
146,023 |
|
|
|
98,781 |
|
|
|
47,242 |
|
South America |
|
|
106,475 |
|
|
|
22,089 |
|
|
|
84,386 |
|
|
|
|
Total Contract Drilling Revenue |
|
$ |
464,598 |
|
|
$ |
246,232 |
|
|
$ |
218,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACT DRILLING EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOM |
|
$ |
11,270 |
|
|
$ |
14,856 |
|
|
$ |
3,586 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
11,931 |
|
|
|
13,777 |
|
|
|
1,846 |
|
Australia/Asia/Middle East |
|
|
30,479 |
|
|
|
27,039 |
|
|
|
(3,440 |
) |
Europe/Africa/Mediterranean |
|
|
37,942 |
|
|
|
35,118 |
|
|
|
(2,824 |
) |
South America |
|
|
39,917 |
|
|
|
17,259 |
|
|
|
(22,658 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Contract Drilling Expense |
|
$ |
131,539 |
|
|
$ |
108,049 |
|
|
$ |
(23,490 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
$ |
333,059 |
|
|
$ |
138,183 |
|
|
$ |
194,876 |
|
|
|
|
GOM. Revenues generated during the second quarter of 2008 by our intermediate semisubmersible
fleet decreased $12.3 million compared to the same period in 2007, primarily as a result of the
relocation of three of our rigs (Ocean Voyager and Ocean New Era to Mexico and Ocean Concord to
Brazil) from the GOM during the fourth quarter of 2007. These rigs generated revenues of $52.6
million during the second quarter of 2007. The Ocean Ambassador relocated to the GOM from offshore
Mexico during the second quarter of 2008 and generated revenue of $20.7 million. The Ocean
Saratoga (which remained in the GOM for both the 2007 and 2008 periods) generated
$19.6 million in additional revenues during the second quarter of 2008 compared to the same period
in 2007 when it was out of service for 26 days completing a service life extension project.
24
Contract drilling expenses in the GOM decreased by $3.6 million during the second quarter of
2008 compared to the second quarter of 2007 primarily due to the absence of operating costs ($10.8
million) for the Ocean Voyager, Ocean New Era and Ocean Concord. The overall decrease in contract
drilling expenses for the second quarter of 2008 was partially offset by the inclusion of normal
operating expenses for the Ocean Ambassador and costs associated with contract preparation
activities for the Ocean Yorktown.
Mexico. Transfers of our intermediate semisubmersibles into and out of the Mexico region
prior to or during the second quarter of 2008 resulted in a net reduction of one rig in the region.
We currently have two intermediate semisubmersible rigs working for PEMEX Exploración Y
Producción, or PEMEX, at higher dayrates than those previously earned in the region. The aggregate
changes in our offshore fleet in Mexico resulted in a net increase in revenues of $38.0 million
during the second quarter of 2008 compared to the same quarter of 2007.
Australia/Asia/Middle East. Our intermediate semisubmersibles working in the
Australia/Asia/Middle East region generated revenues of $110.8 million in the second quarter of
2008 compared to revenues of $49.8 million in the same period of 2007. The $61.0 million increase
in operating revenue was primarily due to an increase in average operating revenue per day from
$147,000 during the second quarter of 2007 to $306,100 during the second quarter in 2008, which
generated additional revenues of $57.3 million during the 2008 period. The increase in average
operating revenue per day is attributable to our three intermediate semisubmersibles operating
offshore Australia earning a higher contractual dayrate during the second quarter of 2008, as
compared to the same period in 2007.
Average utilization in this region increased to 99% during the second quarter of 2008 from 91%
during the second quarter of 2007, resulting in the generation of $4.1 million in additional
revenues during the 2008 period.
Contract drilling expense for the Australia/Asia/Middle East region increased $3.4 million in
the second quarter of 2008 compared to the second quarter of 2007. Operating costs for the Ocean
Patriot increased $3.1 million, primarily due to inspection costs related to the rigs special
survey in 2008 and higher normal operating costs associated with operating offshore Australia
during the second quarter of 2008. During the comparable quarter of 2007, the Ocean Patriot
operated offshore New Zealand at a lower cost structure.
Europe/Africa/Mediterranean. Operating revenue for our intermediate semisubmersibles working
in the Europe/Africa/Mediterranean region increased $47.2 million in the second quarter of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007 primarily due to higher dayrates earned by three of our four
rigs operating in the North Sea (both U.K. and Norwegian sectors). Average operating revenue per
day for our three U.K. semisubmersibles increased from $217,300 in the second quarter of 2007 to
$323,100 in the second quarter of 2008, contributing $28.8 million in additional revenue in the
2008 quarter. The Ocean Vanguard began a two-year contract early in the second quarter of 2008 at
a higher dayrate than previously contracted and contributed $19.1 million in additional revenues.
Contract drilling expense for our intermediate semisubmersible rigs operating in the
Europe/Africa/Mediterranean markets increased $2.8 million in the second quarter of 2008 compared
to the second quarter of 2007, primarily due to higher labor and benefits costs, repairs and normal
operating costs incurred in 2008 for our rigs operating in the North Sea (both U.K. and Norwegian
sectors).
South America. Revenues generated by our intermediate semisubmersibles working in the South
American region increased $84.4 million to $106.5 million in the second quarter of 2008 from $22.1
million in the second quarter of 2007. During the second quarter of 2008, we had five rigs
operating in the region compared to only two rigs operating in the region during the same period in
2007. During 2007, we relocated the Ocean Whittington (Brazil), Ocean Concord (Brazil) and the
Ocean Worker (Trinidad and Tobago) to this region where they generated aggregate revenues of $85.1
million in the second quarter of 2008. None of these rigs generated revenues in the South America
region during the second quarter of 2007.
Operating expenses for our operations in the South American region increased $22.7 million in
the second quarter of 2008, as compared to the second quarter of 2007, primarily due to normal
operating costs for the three additional rigs that we moved to the region in 2007 ($18.9 million).
In addition, we incurred $1.7 million of operating expenses for the Ocean Yorktown, which we moved
to Brazil from the GOM in the second quarter of 2008.
25
Jack-Ups.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
JACK-UPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACT DRILLING REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOM |
|
$ |
48,395 |
|
|
$ |
67,180 |
|
|
$ |
(18,785 |
) |
Mexico |
|
|
26,943 |
|
|
|
14,923 |
|
|
|
12,020 |
|
Australia/Asia/Middle East |
|
|
16,417 |
|
|
|
21,063 |
|
|
|
(4,646 |
) |
Europe/Africa/Mediterranean |
|
|
26,055 |
|
|
|
22,502 |
|
|
|
3,553 |
|
|
|
|
Total Contract Drilling Revenue |
|
$ |
117,810 |
|
|
$ |
125,668 |
|
|
$ |
(7,858 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACT DRILLING EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOM |
|
$ |
23,048 |
|
|
$ |
27,768 |
|
|
$ |
4,720 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
7,913 |
|
|
|
3,666 |
|
|
|
(4,247 |
) |
Australia/Asia/Middle East |
|
|
11,621 |
|
|
|
6,619 |
|
|
|
(5,002 |
) |
Europe/Africa/Mediterranean |
|
|
6,252 |
|
|
|
4,309 |
|
|
|
(1,943 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Contract Drilling Expense |
|
$ |
48,834 |
|
|
$ |
42,362 |
|
|
$ |
(6,472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
$ |
68,976 |
|
|
$ |
83,306 |
|
|
$ |
(14,330 |
) |
|
|
|
GOM. Revenue generated by our jack-up rigs operating in the GOM decreased $18.8 million during
the second quarter of 2008 compared to the second quarter of 2007. The decline in revenues is
primarily due to the relocation of two of our jack-up rigs from the GOM to other markets, namely,
the Ocean King to Croatia in the third quarter of 2007 and the Ocean Columbia to Mexico in the
first quarter of 2008. These two rigs generated $13.8 million in revenues while operating in the
GOM during the second quarter of 2007. In addition, average operating revenue per day in the
second quarter of 2008, excluding the Ocean King and Ocean Columbia, decreased to $76,500 from
$91,100 in the second quarter of 2007, resulting in an $8.2 million decrease in revenue from the
same period a year earlier.
Average utilization (excluding the Ocean King and Ocean Columbia) increased from 92% during
the second quarter of 2007 to 99% during the second quarter of 2008, resulting in an increase in
revenues of $3.2 million. The increase in utilization was primarily due to an improvement in
market conditions in the GOM. Our jack-up fleet in the GOM had no ready-stack days during the
second quarter of 2008 compared to an aggregate 45 ready-stack days during the same period in 2007.
Contract drilling expense in the GOM decreased $4.7 million during the second quarter of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007. The overall decrease in operating costs during the second
quarter of 2008 was primarily attributable to the absence of operating costs in the GOM for the
Ocean King and Ocean Columbia, which reduced operating expenses by $3.8 million.
Mexico. Revenue and contract drilling expense from our jack-up rigs operating in Mexico
increased $12.0 million and $4.2 million, respectively, in the second quarter of 2008 compared to
the second quarter of 2007 primarily due to the operation of the Ocean Columbia offshore Mexico.
The Ocean Columbia generated $11.5 million in revenues and incurred $4.0 million in operating
expenses during the second quarter of 2008.
Australia/Asia/Middle East. Revenue generated by our jack-up rigs operating in the
Australia/Asia/Middle East region decreased $4.6 million in the second quarter of 2008 compared to
the same period in 2007 primarily due to the temporary ready-stacking of the Ocean Heritage ($13.0
million) at the end of the first quarter of 2008 until its mobilization to Egypt in late June 2008.
Our newly constructed jack-up rig, the Ocean Shield, began operating offshore Malaysia during
the second quarter of 2008, generating $7.3 million in revenues and $4.1 in contract drilling
expenses.
26
Europe/Africa/Mediterranean. Revenue generated by our jack-up rigs operating in the
Europe/Africa/Mediterranean region increased $3.6 million during the second quarter of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007. The Ocean King, which relocated to Croatia in the third
quarter of 2007, generated $10.1 million in incremental revenues in the region. The favorable
contribution by the Ocean King was partially offset by a $6.6 million reduction in revenues
generated by the Ocean Spur. During the second quarter of 2007, revenues for the Ocean Spur
included a $6.6 million lump-sum demobilization fee earned in connection with the completion of its
contract offshore Tunisia.
Depreciation.
Depreciation expense increased $12.3 million to $70.7 million during the second quarter of
2008 compared to $58.3 million during the same period in 2007 primarily due to depreciation
associated with capital additions in 2007 and 2008.
General and Administrative Expense.
We incurred general and administrative expense of $15.8 million in the second quarter of 2008
compared to $12.2 million in the same period in 2007. The $3.6 million increase in overhead costs
between the periods was primarily due to an increase in payroll costs resulting from higher
compensation, staffing increases and engineering consulting fees, partially offset by lower legal
fees resulting from an insurance reimbursement related to certain litigation.
Interest Expense.
We recorded interest expense during the second quarter of 2008 of $1.9 million, representing a
$1.9 million decrease in interest cost compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease was
primarily attributable to more interest cost capitalized to our qualifying rig upgrades and
construction projects as compared to the same period in 2007.
Other Income and Expense (Other, net).
Included in Other, net are foreign currency translation adjustments and transaction gains
and losses and other income and expense items, among other things, which are not attributable to
our drilling operations. The components of Other, net fluctuate based on the level of activity,
as well as fluctuations in foreign currencies. During the three months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007, we recognized net foreign currency exchange gains of $12.6 million and $0.9 million,
respectively.
Income Tax Expense.
Our estimated annual effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 29.1%,
compared to the 28.2% effective tax rate for the comparable period in 2007.
We adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, on January 1, 2007. During the three months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007 we
recognized tax expense of $1.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively, for uncertain tax positions
related to the respective fiscal periods. There were no new uncertain tax positions or significant
changes in existing uncertain tax positions during the quarter ended June 30, 2008.
27
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Comparative data relating to our revenue and operating expenses by equipment type are listed
below. We have reclassified certain amounts applicable to the prior period to conform to the
classifications we currently follow. These reclassifications do not affect earnings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
CONTRACT DRILLING REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-Specification Floaters |
|
$ |
635,289 |
|
|
$ |
510,408 |
|
|
$ |
124,881 |
|
Intermediate Semisubmersibles |
|
|
837,820 |
|
|
|
469,958 |
|
|
|
367,862 |
|
Jack-ups |
|
|
233,857 |
|
|
|
245,473 |
|
|
|
(11,616 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Contract Drilling Revenue |
|
$ |
1,706,966 |
|
|
$ |
1,225,839 |
|
|
$ |
481,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues Related to Reimbursable Expenses |
|
$ |
33,508 |
|
|
$ |
31,220 |
|
|
$ |
2,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACT DRILLING EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-Specification Floaters |
|
$ |
180,458 |
|
|
$ |
131,508 |
|
|
$ |
(48,950 |
) |
Intermediate Semisubmersibles |
|
|
275,510 |
|
|
|
210,035 |
|
|
|
(65,475 |
) |
Jack-ups |
|
|
95,101 |
|
|
|
82,956 |
|
|
|
(12,145 |
) |
Other |
|
|
7,374 |
|
|
|
9,899 |
|
|
|
2,525 |
|
|
|
|
Total Contract Drilling Expense |
|
$ |
558,443 |
|
|
$ |
434,398 |
|
|
$ |
(124,045 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursable Expenses |
|
$ |
32,534 |
|
|
$ |
29,977 |
|
|
$ |
(2,557 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-Specification Floaters |
|
$ |
454,831 |
|
|
$ |
378,900 |
|
|
$ |
75,931 |
|
Intermediate Semisubmersibles |
|
|
562,310 |
|
|
|
259,923 |
|
|
|
302,387 |
|
Jack-ups |
|
|
138,756 |
|
|
|
162,517 |
|
|
|
(23,761 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(7,374 |
) |
|
|
(9,899 |
) |
|
|
2,525 |
|
Reimbursable expenses, net |
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
(269 |
) |
Depreciation |
|
|
(139,711 |
) |
|
|
(114,040 |
) |
|
|
(25,671 |
) |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
(31,490 |
) |
|
|
(24,140 |
) |
|
|
(7,350 |
) |
Gain on disposition of assets |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
5,055 |
|
|
|
(4,778 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Operating Income |
|
$ |
978,573 |
|
|
$ |
659,559 |
|
|
$ |
319,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
7,314 |
|
|
|
17,392 |
|
|
|
(10,078 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,237 |
) |
|
|
(14,625 |
) |
|
|
11,388 |
|
Loss on sale of marketable securities |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
14,196 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
13,791 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
996,843 |
|
|
|
662,723 |
|
|
|
334,120 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(289,935 |
) |
|
|
(186,646 |
) |
|
|
(103,289 |
) |
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
706,908 |
|
|
$ |
476,077 |
|
|
$ |
230,831 |
|
|
|
|
Demand remained strong for our high-specification floaters and intermediate semisubmersible
rigs in all markets and geographic regions during the first half of 2008. The continued high
overall utilization and historically high dayrates for our floater fleet contributed to an overall
increase in our net income of $230.8 million, or 48%, to $706.9 million in the first six months of
2008 compared to $476.1 million in the same period of 2007.
In many of our floater markets, average dayrates increased as our rigs began operating under
contracts at higher dayrates than those earned during the first half of 2007, resulting in the
generation of additional contract drilling revenues. However, overall revenue increases were
negatively impacted by the effect of downtime associated with scheduled shipyard projects and
mandatory inspections or surveys. In addition, although the GOM jack-up market is currently
improving, our jack-ups earned lower dayrates during the first half of 2008 compared to the same
period
of 2007 despite an increase in utilization during the 2008 period. Total contract drilling
revenues in the first half of 2008 increased $481.1 million, or 39%, to $1.7 billion compared to
$1.2 billion in the same period a year earlier.
28
Total contract drilling expenses increased $124.0 million, or 29%, in the first six months of
2008, compared to the same period in 2007. Overall cost increases for maintenance and repairs
between the 2008 and 2007 periods reflect the impact of high, sustained utilization of our drilling
units across our fleet, additional survey and related maintenance costs, contract preparation and
mobilization costs, as well as the inclusion of normal operating costs for the Ocean Endeavor and
the Ocean Shield. The increase in overall operating and overhead costs also reflects the impact of
higher prices throughout the offshore drilling industry and its support businesses, including
higher costs associated with hiring and retaining skilled personnel for our worldwide offshore
fleet.
Depreciation and general and administrative expense increased $33.0 million to $171.2 million
in the aggregate during the first half of 2008, or 24%, compared to the first half of 2007, due to
a higher depreciable asset base and higher payroll and consulting costs during 2008.
High-Specification Floaters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
HIGH-SPECIFICATION FLOATERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACT DRILLING REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOM |
|
$ |
518,057 |
|
|
$ |
410,606 |
|
|
$ |
107,451 |
|
Australia/Asia/Middle East |
|
|
38,195 |
|
|
|
36,320 |
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
South America |
|
|
79,037 |
|
|
|
63,482 |
|
|
|
15,555 |
|
|
|
|
Total Contract Drilling Revenue |
|
$ |
635,289 |
|
|
$ |
510,408 |
|
|
$ |
124,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACT DRILLING EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOM |
|
$ |
103,757 |
|
|
$ |
78,124 |
|
|
$ |
(25,633 |
) |
Australia/Asia/Middle East |
|
|
14,377 |
|
|
|
12,549 |
|
|
|
(1,828 |
) |
South America |
|
|
62,324 |
|
|
|
40,835 |
|
|
|
(21,489 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Contract Drilling Expense |
|
$ |
180,458 |
|
|
$ |
131,508 |
|
|
$ |
(48,950 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
$ |
454,831 |
|
|
$ |
378,900 |
|
|
$ |
75,931 |
|
|
|
|
GOM. Revenues generated by our high-specification floaters operating in the GOM increased
$107.5 million during the first half of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to
higher average dayrates earned during the 2008 period ($65.7 million). Average operating revenue
per day for our rigs in this market, excluding the Ocean Endeavor, increased to $394,200 during the
first half of 2008 compared to $337,700 in the first half of 2007. Excluding the Ocean Endeavor,
six of our seven other high-specification semisubmersible rigs in the GOM are currently operating
at dayrates higher than those earned during the first half of 2007. The Ocean Endeavor began
operating in the GOM during the third quarter of 2007 and generated revenues of $44.1 million
during the first six months of 2008.
Average utilization for our high-specification rigs operating in the GOM, excluding the Ocean
Endeavor, decreased slightly from 95% in the first half of 2007 to 94% in the first half of 2008,
resulting in a $2.3 million decline in revenues comparing the periods.
Operating costs during the first half of 2008 for our high-specification floaters in the GOM
increased $25.6 million to $103.8 million (including $11.5 million in incremental operating
expenses for the Ocean Endeavor) compared to the first half of 2007. Operating costs for the first
six months of 2008 also included costs associated with a special survey of the Ocean Victory, as
well as higher labor, benefits and other personnel-related costs for our rigs operating in the GOM
compared to the same period in 2007.
Australia/Asia/Middle East. Revenues generated by the Ocean Rover, our high-specification rig
operating offshore Malaysia, increased $1.9 million in the first half of 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007. The revenue increase is primarily due to the Ocean Rover earning a higher average
rate per day during the first six
months of 2008, compared to the same period in 2007, as it alternated to a higher dayrate drilling
program for a greater period of time during 2008.
29
South America. Revenues earned by our high-specification floaters operating offshore Brazil
during the first half of 2008 increased $15.6 million compared to the first half of 2007. Average
operating revenue per day increased from $182,900 during the first half of 2007 to $325,300 during
the first half of 2008 due to a higher dayrate earned by the Ocean Alliance during the 2008 period,
contributing additional revenues of $35.4 million. A decline in utilization from 96% for the
first half of 2007 to 67% for the comparable period in 2008 reduced revenues by $19.8 million
during the first six months of 2008. The decrease in utilization during 2008 is primarily the
result of 106 days of incremental unpaid downtime for the Ocean Clipper for a planned special
survey and repairs to its propulsion system.
Contract drilling expense for our operations in Brazil increased $21.5 million during the
first half of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The increase in costs is primarily due to
inspection, related repair and other costs associated with the surveys for both the Ocean Alliance
and the Ocean Clipper, equipment repairs and higher personnel and related costs.
Intermediate Semisubmersibles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
INTERMEDIATE SEMISUBMERSIBLES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACT DRILLING REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOM |
|
$ |
75,132 |
|
|
$ |
107,897 |
|
|
$ |
(32,765 |
) |
Mexico |
|
|
119,672 |
|
|
|
31,526 |
|
|
|
88,146 |
|
Australia/Asia/Middle East |
|
|
179,956 |
|
|
|
104,835 |
|
|
|
75,121 |
|
Europe/Africa/Mediterranean |
|
|
256,493 |
|
|
|
184,444 |
|
|
|
72,049 |
|
South America |
|
|
206,567 |
|
|
|
41,256 |
|
|
|
165,311 |
|
|
|
|
Total Contract Drilling Revenue |
|
$ |
837,820 |
|
|
$ |
469,958 |
|
|
$ |
367,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACT DRILLING EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOM |
|
$ |
17,235 |
|
|
$ |
33,592 |
|
|
$ |
16,357 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
31,302 |
|
|
|
27,150 |
|
|
|
(4,152 |
) |
Australia/Asia/Middle East |
|
|
71,557 |
|
|
|
50,050 |
|
|
|
(21,507 |
) |
Europe/Africa/Mediterranean |
|
|
75,853 |
|
|
|
67,881 |
|
|
|
(7,972 |
) |
South America |
|
|
79,563 |
|
|
|
31,362 |
|
|
|
(48,201 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Contract Drilling Expense |
|
$ |
275,510 |
|
|
$ |
210,035 |
|
|
$ |
(65,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
$ |
562,310 |
|
|
$ |
259,923 |
|
|
$ |
302,387 |
|
|
|
|
GOM. Revenues generated during the first six months of 2008 by our intermediate
semisubmersible fleet decreased $32.8 million compared to the same period in 2007, primarily as a
result of the relocation of three of our rigs from the GOM (Ocean Voyager and Ocean New Era to
Mexico and Ocean Concord to Brazil) after the second quarter of 2007. During the first half of
2007, these three rigs generated revenues of $100.3 million while operating in the GOM. The
decline in revenues was partially offset by the addition of $20.7 million in revenues earned by the
Ocean Ambassador, which relocated to the GOM during the second quarter of 2008. In addition, the
Ocean Saratoga generated $46.9 million in additional revenues during the first half of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007 when it was out of service for 116 days completing a service
life extension project.
Contract drilling expenses in the GOM decreased by $16.4 million during the first half of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to the absence of operating costs for the Ocean
Voyager, Ocean New Era and Ocean Concord ($21.2 million) which relocated to other markets during
2007 and costs associated with the life extension project for the Ocean Whittington that was
completed in the second quarter of 2007. The overall decrease in contract drilling expenses in the
first half of 2008 was partially offset by normal operating expenses for the Ocean
Ambassador and Ocean Saratoga and costs associated with contract preparations for the Ocean
Yorktown prior to its mobilization to Brazil in May 2008.
30
Mexico. Offshore Mexico, three of our intermediate semisubmersible rigs completed their
contracts with PEMEX after the second quarter of 2007 and relocated out of the region. In
addition, during the fourth quarter of 2007, we relocated two semisubmersible units from the GOM to
Mexico; the Ocean New Era and Ocean Voyager are currently working for PEMEX at dayrates
substantially higher than rates earned by our semisubmersible rigs in this region in the first half
of 2007. Average operating revenue per day increased to $281,800 for the six months ended June 30,
2008 compared to $60,200 per day for the comparable period in 2007. The net change in rigs between
periods, combined with higher dayrates, generated $88.1 million additional revenues during the
first six months of 2008 compared to the 2007 period.
Our operating costs in Mexico increased by $4.2 million in the first six months of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to the inclusion of costs to mobilize the Ocean
Ambassador from Mexico to the GOM after completion of its contract with PEMEX at the end of the
first quarter of 2008 and amortization of deferred mobilization costs associated with the
mobilization of the Ocean New Era and Ocean Voyager into Mexico. In addition, we incurred higher
agency fees, which are generally based on a percentage of revenue, during the first half of 2008 as
a result of the increase in revenue generated in the region.
Australia/Asia/Middle East. Our intermediate semisubmersibles working in the
Australia/Asia/Middle East region generated revenues of $180.0 million during the first half of
2008 compared to revenues of $104.8 million in the same period in 2007. The $75.1 million increase
in operating revenue was primarily due to an increase in average operating revenue per day from
$151,300 during the first half of 2007 to $273,700 during the first half of 2008, which generated
additional revenues of $77.1 million during 2008. The increase in average operating revenue per
day is primarily attributable to our three intermediate semisubmersibles operating offshore
Australia commencing long-term contracts during the 2008 period at higher dayrates than those
previously earned during the first half of 2007. A slight decrease in utilization from 94% for the
first six months of 2007 to 90% for the comparable period of 2008 was due to differences in
scheduled downtime for surveys, shipyard work and mobilizations and resulted in a revenue reduction
of $1.0 million during the first half of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.
Contract drilling expense for the Australia/Asia/Middle East region increased $21.5 million in
the first six months of 2008 compared to the first six months of 2007, primarily due to higher
normal operating costs for the Ocean Patriot operating offshore Australia during the first half of
2008 compared to operating offshore New Zealand during the comparable period of 2007 and inspection
and related repair costs associated with its 5-year survey during early 2008. In addition,
operating costs in this region reflected higher labor and personnel-related costs during the first
half of 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase in overall operating
costs was partially offset by lower costs for the Ocean General during the first six months of 2008
due to the absence of shipyard and mobilization costs incurred during the first half of 2007.
Europe/Africa/Mediterranean. Operating revenue for our intermediate semisubmersibles working
in the Europe/Africa/Mediterranean region increased $72.0 million in the first half of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007 primarily due to higher dayrates earned by our four rigs
operating in the North Sea (both U.K. and Norwegian sectors). Average operating revenue per day
for our North Sea semisubmersibles increased from $190,000 in the first half of 2007 to $293,100 in
the first half of 2008, contributing $72.7 million in additional revenue in 2008 compared to the
same period in 2007.
Contract drilling expense for our intermediate semisubmersible rigs operating in the
Europe/Africa/Mediterranean markets increased $8.0 million in the first half of 2008 compared to
the first half of 2007, primarily due to higher labor and benefits costs for all of our rigs in
these markets, higher repair and normal operating costs incurred in 2008 for our North Sea rigs and
higher costs related to the Ocean Vanguard operating offshore Ireland for a portion of the first
six months of 2008.
South America. Revenues generated by our intermediate semisubmersibles working in the South
American region increased $165.3 million to $206.6 million in the first six months of 2008 from
$41.3 million in the first six months of 2007. During the first half of 2008, we had five rigs
operating in the region compared to only two rigs operating in the region during the same period in
2007. Following the first quarter of 2007, we relocated the Ocean Whittington (Brazil), Ocean
Concord (Brazil) and the Ocean Worker (Trinidad and Tobago) to this region where they generated
aggregate revenues of $162.1 million in the first half of 2008.
31
Operating expenses for our operations in the South American region increased $48.2 million in
the first half of 2008, compared to the first half of 2007, primarily due to the inclusion of
normal operating costs for the three additional rigs in the region ($41.0 million), as well as
higher labor and other personnel-related expenses, freight, repair and maintenance costs for our
other two semisubmersible rigs in this market. In addition, we incurred $1.7 million in costs
associated with the mobilization and ready-stacking of the Ocean Yorktown, which relocated from the
GOM in the second quarter of 2008 for long-term work expected to commence in the third quarter of
2008.
Jack-Ups.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
JACK-UPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACT DRILLING REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOM |
|
$ |
92,864 |
|
|
$ |
139,027 |
|
|
$ |
(46,163 |
) |
Mexico |
|
|
51,260 |
|
|
|
30,559 |
|
|
|
20,701 |
|
Australia/Asia/Middle East |
|
|
36,617 |
|
|
|
40,587 |
|
|
|
(3,970 |
) |
Europe/Africa/Mediterranean |
|
|
53,116 |
|
|
|
35,300 |
|
|
|
17,816 |
|
|
|
|
Total Contract Drilling Revenue |
|
$ |
233,857 |
|
|
$ |
245,473 |
|
|
$ |
(11,616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACT DRILLING EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOM |
|
$ |
47,203 |
|
|
$ |
52,882 |
|
|
$ |
5,679 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
16,938 |
|
|
|
7,465 |
|
|
|
(9,473 |
) |
Australia/Asia/Middle East |
|
|
18,773 |
|
|
|
14,146 |
|
|
|
(4,627 |
) |
Europe/Africa/Mediterranean |
|
|
12,187 |
|
|
|
8,463 |
|
|
|
(3,724 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Contract Drilling Expense |
|
$ |
95,101 |
|
|
$ |
82,956 |
|
|
$ |
(12,145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
$ |
138,756 |
|
|
$ |
162,517 |
|
|
$ |
(23,761 |
) |
|
|
|
GOM. Revenue generated by our jack-up rigs operating in the GOM decreased $46.2 million during
the first half of 2008 compared to the first half of 2007. The decline in revenues is primarily
due to the relocation of the Ocean King (Croatia) and the Ocean Columbia (Mexico) after the second
quarter of 2007. These two rigs generated $34.9 million in revenues while operating in the GOM
during the first six months of 2007. In addition, average operating revenue per day in the first
half of 2008, excluding the Ocean King and Ocean Columbia, decreased to $75,400 from $93,200 in the
first half of 2007, resulting in a $20.1 million decrease in revenue from the same period a year
earlier.
Average utilization (excluding the Ocean King and Ocean Columbia) increased from 88% during
the first half of 2007 to 97% during the first half of 2008, resulting in an increase in revenues
of $8.8 million. The increase in utilization was primarily due to an improvement in market
conditions in the GOM that resulted in fewer ready-stack days for our jack-up fleet between wells
during the first six months of 2008 (22 days) compared to the same period in 2007 (135 days).
Contract drilling expense in the GOM decreased $5.7 million during the first half of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007. The overall decrease in operating costs during the first half
of 2008 was due to the absence of operating costs in the GOM for the Ocean King and Ocean Columbia,
which reduced operating expenses by $11.1 million. The reduction in overall operating costs was
partially offset by higher labor and benefits costs, higher maintenance and repair costs and higher
overhead costs for our remaining rigs in the GOM during the first half of 2008 compared to the
first half of 2007. In addition, we incurred $0.8 million in start-up costs associated with the
anticipated completion of the Ocean Scepter.
Mexico. Revenue and contract drilling expense from our rigs operating in Mexico increased
$20.7 million and $9.5 million, respectively, in the first half of 2008 compared to the first half
of 2007 primarily due to the operation of the Ocean Columbia offshore Mexico, beginning in the
first quarter of 2008. The Ocean Columbia generated $20.0 million in revenues and incurred $9.0
million in operating expenses during the first half of 2008.
Australia/Asia/Middle East. Revenue generated by our jack-up rigs operating in the
Australia/Asia/Middle East region decreased $4.0 million in the first half of 2008 compared to the
same period in 2007, primarily due to the
32
temporary ready-stacking of the Ocean Heritage in a shipyard in Qatar beginning in March 2008 prior
to its departure for Egypt in late June 2008 ($12.5 million).
In addition, our newly constructed jack-up rig, the Ocean Shield, began operating in Malaysia
during the second quarter of 2008 and generated $7.3 million in revenues and $4.1 million in
contract drilling expenses.
Europe/Africa/Mediterranean. Revenue generated by our jack-up rigs operating in the
Europe/Africa/Mediterranean region increased $17.8 million during the first half of 2008 compared
to the same period in 2007. The Ocean King, operating under a two-year bareboat charter offshore
Croatia that began in the third quarter of 2007, generated $20.7 million revenues during the first
half of 2008.
In addition, the Ocean Spur, which operated offshore Egypt during the first half of 2008 and
in both Tunisia and Egypt during the first half of 2007, generated $2.9 million less in revenues
during the 2008 period compared to 2007, primarily due to the recognition of other operating
revenues associated with its contract offshore Tunisia in 2007. The overall decrease in the Ocean
Spurs revenue during the first half of 2008 was partially offset by the effect of a higher
contracted dayrate operating offshore Egypt compared to operating offshore Tunisia during the
majority of the first six months of 2007.
Contract drilling expense in the Europe/Africa/Mediterranean region increased by $3.7 million
during the first half of 2008 compared to the first half of 2007 primarily due to the inclusion of
operating costs for the Ocean King. Operating costs for the Ocean Spur included costs associated
with an intermediate survey during 2008 and higher labor and benefits costs, agency fees and
overhead costs associated with operating in Egypt during 2008 compared to operating in Tunisia
during the majority of the first half of 2007.
Depreciation.
Depreciation expense increased $25.7 million to $139.7 million during the first half of 2008
compared to $114.0 million during the same period in 2007 primarily due to depreciation associated
with capital additions in 2007 and 2008.
General and Administrative Expense.
We incurred general and administrative expense of $31.5 million in the first half of 2008
compared to $24.1 million in the same period in 2007. The $7.4 million increase in overhead costs
between the periods was primarily due to an increase in payroll costs resulting from higher
compensation and staffing increases and engineering and tax consulting fees, partially offset by
lower legal fees resulting from an insurance reimbursement related to certain litigation.
Gain on Disposition of Assets.
We recognized a net gain of $0.3 million on the sale and disposition of assets during the
first half of 2008 compared to a net gain of $5.1 million in the first half of 2007 primarily for
the recognition of gains on insurance settlements.
Interest Expense.
We recorded interest expense during the first six months of 2008 of $3.2 million, representing
an $11.4 million decrease in interest cost compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease was
primarily attributable to lower interest cost associated with our 1.5% Convertible Senior
Debentures Due 2031, or 1.5% Debentures, which we redeemed in April 2008 and a greater amount of
interest capitalized in the first half of 2008 related to our qualifying rig upgrades and
construction of our two new jack-up rigs. Interest expense for the first half of 2007 included
$8.9 million in debt issuance costs that we wrote off in connection with conversions during the
period of our 1.5% Debentures and our Zero Coupon Convertible Debentures due 2020, or Zero Coupon
Debentures, into shares of our common stock.
33
Other Income and Expense (Other, net).
Included in Other, net are foreign currency translation adjustments and transaction gains
and losses and other income and expense items, among other things, which are not attributable to
our drilling operations. The components of Other, net fluctuate based on the level of activity,
as well as fluctuations in foreign currencies. During the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
we recognized net foreign currency exchange gains of $14.4 million and net foreign currency
exchange losses of $0.3 million, respectively.
Income Tax Expense.
Our estimated annual effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 29.1%,
compared to the 28.2% effective tax rate for the same period in 2007.
We adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, on January 1, 2007. During the six months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007 we
recognized tax expense of $2.8 million and $2.0 million, respectively, for uncertain tax positions
related to the respective fiscal periods. There were no new uncertain tax positions or significant
changes in existing uncertain tax positions during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Sources of Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity and capital resources are cash flows from our operations
and our cash reserves. We may also make use of our $285 million credit facility for cash
liquidity. See $285 Million Revolving Credit Facility.
At June 30, 2008, we had $541.6 million in Cash and cash equivalents and $199.1 million in
Marketable securities, representing our investment of cash available for current operations. Our
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2008 also included a $197.8 million Payable for securities
purchased relating to investments purchased on June 30, 2008 that did not settle until the
subsequent month.
Cash Flows from Operations. Our internally generated cash flow is directly related to our
business and the geographic regions in which we operate. Deterioration in the offshore drilling
market or poor operating results may result in reduced cash flows from operations. The dayrates we
receive for our drilling rigs and rig utilization rates are a function of rig supply and demand in
the marketplace, which is generally correlated with the price of oil and natural gas. Demand for
drilling services is dependent upon the level of expenditures by oil and gas companies for offshore
exploration and development, a variety of political and economic factors and availability of rigs
in a particular geographic region. As utilization rates increase, dayrates tend to increase as
well as reflecting the lower supply of available rigs, and vice versa. These external factors
which affect our cash flows from operations are not within our control and are difficult to
predict. For a description of other factors that could affect our cash flows from operations, see
Overview Industry Conditions, Forward-Looking Statements.
$285 Million Revolving Credit Facility. We maintain a $285 million syndicated, 5-year senior
unsecured revolving credit facility, or Credit Facility, for general corporate purposes, including
loans and performance or standby letters of credit.
Loans under the Credit Facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our election,
either (i) the higher of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus 0.5% or (ii) the London
Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin, varying from 0.20% to 0.525%, based on
our current credit ratings. Under our Credit Facility, we also pay, based on our current credit
ratings, and as applicable, other customary fees, including, but not limited to, a facility fee on
the total commitment under the Credit Facility regardless of usage and a utilization fee that
applies if the aggregate of all loans outstanding under the Credit Facility equals or exceeds 50%
of the total commitment under the facility. Changes in credit ratings could lower or raise the
fees that we pay under the Credit Facility.
The Credit Facility contains customary covenants, including, but not limited to, the
maintenance of a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to total capitalization, as defined in the
Credit Facility, of not more than 60% at the end of each fiscal quarter and limitations on liens,
mergers, consolidations, liquidation and dissolution, changes in lines of business, swap
agreements, transactions with affiliates and subsidiary indebtedness.
34
Based on our current credit ratings at June 30, 2008, the applicable margin on LIBOR loans
would have been 0.24%. As of June 30, 2008, there were no loans outstanding under the Credit
Facility; however, $54.2 million in letters of credit were issued and outstanding under the Credit
Facility.
Liquidity and Capital Requirements
Our liquidity and capital requirements are primarily a function of our working capital needs,
capital expenditures and debt service requirements. We determine the amount of cash required to
meet our capital commitments by evaluating the need to upgrade rigs to meet specific customer
requirements and by evaluating our ongoing rig equipment replacement and enhancement programs,
including water depth and drilling capability upgrades. We believe that our operating cash flows
and cash reserves will be sufficient to meet both our working capital requirements and our capital
commitments over the next twelve months; however, we will continue to make periodic assessments
based on industry conditions and will adjust capital spending programs if required.
In addition, we may, from time to time, issue debt or equity securities, or a combination
thereof, to finance capital expenditures, the acquisition of assets and businesses or for general
corporate purposes. Our ability to effect any such issuance will be dependent on our results of
operations, our current financial condition, current market conditions and other factors beyond our
control. Additionally, we may also make use of our Credit Facility to finance capital expenditures
or for other general corporate purposes.
Purchase Obligations Related to Rig Construction/Modifications.
Purchase Obligations. As of June 30, 2008 we had purchase obligations aggregating
approximately $109 million related to the major upgrade of the Ocean Monarch and construction of
the Ocean Scepter. We expect to complete funding of these projects in 2008. However, the actual
timing of these expenditures will vary based on the completion of various construction milestones
and the timing of the delivery of equipment, which are beyond our control.
We had no other purchase obligations for major rig upgrades or any other significant purchase
obligations at June 30, 2008 except for those related to our direct rig operations, which arise
during the normal course of business.
Other Commercial Commitments Letters of Credit.
We were contingently liable as of June 30, 2008 in the amount of $154.2 million under certain
performance, bid, supersedeas and custom bonds and letters of credit, including $54.2 million in
letters of credit issued under our Credit Facility. During 2008 we purchased two additional bonds
totaling $11.9 million from a related party after obtaining competitive quotes. Premiums and fees
associated with these bonds totaled $57,000. Agreements relating to approximately $89.8 million of
performance bonds can require collateral at any time. As of June 30, 2008, we had not been
required to make any collateral deposits with respect to these agreements. The remaining
agreements do not require collateral except in events of default. On our behalf, banks have issued
letters of credit securing certain of these bonds.
Credit Ratings.
Our current credit rating is Baa1 for Moodys Investors Services and A- for Standard & Poors.
Although our long-term ratings continue at investment grade levels, lower ratings would result in
higher rates for borrowings under our Credit Facility and could also result in higher interest
rates on future debt issuances.
Capital Expenditures.
The upgrade of the Ocean Monarch continues in Singapore with expected delivery of the upgraded
rig late in the fourth quarter of 2008. We expect to spend approximately $310 million to modernize
this rig of which $229.4 million had been spent through June 30, 2008.
Construction of our two high-performance, premium jack-up rigs, the Ocean Scepter and the
Ocean Shield, has been completed. The Ocean Shield is currently operating offshore Malaysia while
the Ocean Scepter is being commissioned. We expect the Ocean Scepter to begin operating under
contract during the third quarter of 2008. The aggregate expected cost for both rigs is
approximately $320 million, including drill pipe and capitalized interest, of which $293.7 million
had been spent through June 30, 2008.
35
We have budgeted approximately $540 million in additional capital expenditures in 2008
associated with our ongoing rig equipment replacement and enhancement programs, equipment required
for our long-term international contracts and other corporate requirements. During the first six
months of 2008, we spent approximately $190 million on our continuing rig capital maintenance
program (other than rig upgrades and new construction) and to meet other corporate capital
expenditure requirements, including approximately $37 million towards modification of certain of
our rigs to meet contractual requirements. We expect to finance our 2008 capital expenditures
through the use of our existing cash balances or internally generated funds. From time to time,
however, we may also make use of our Credit Facility to finance capital expenditures.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.
At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had no off-balance sheet debt or other
arrangements.
Historical Cash Flows
The following is a discussion of our historical cash flows from operating, investing and
financing activities for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same quarter in 2007.
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Net income |
|
$ |
706,908 |
|
|
$ |
476,077 |
|
|
$ |
230,831 |
|
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
(271,721 |
) |
|
|
(2,052 |
) |
|
|
(269,669 |
) |
Loss on sale of marketable securities |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Depreciation and other non-cash items, net |
|
|
158,896 |
|
|
|
109,919 |
|
|
|
48,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
594,086 |
|
|
$ |
583,952 |
|
|
$ |
10,134 |
|
|
|
|
Our cash flow from operations increased $10.1 million, or 2%, during the six months ended June
30, 2008 compared to the first six months of 2007. The increase in cash flow from operations is
primarily due to an increase in net income and higher favorable adjustments for depreciation and
other non-cash items, partially offset by an increase in net cash required to satisfy our working
capital requirements. Trade and other receivables used $150.3 million during the first six months
of 2008 compared to providing $61.6 million during the first six months of 2007 due to normal
changes in the billing cycle combined with the effect of higher dayrates earned by our rigs
subsequent to June 30, 2007 in many of the markets in which we operate. During the first six
months of 2007, we also received insurance proceeds of $49.6 million related to the settlement of
certain hurricane-related insurance claims (we received total insurance proceeds of $54.5 million
of which $4.9 million was included in net cash used in investing activities). During the first
six months of 2008, we made estimated U.S. federal income tax payments and paid foreign income
taxes of $235.0 million and $62.1 million, respectively.
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Purchase of marketable securities |
|
$ |
(649,107 |
) |
|
$ |
(842,597 |
) |
|
$ |
193,490 |
|
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities |
|
|
650,022 |
|
|
|
1,146,719 |
|
|
|
(496,697 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(319,879 |
) |
|
|
(230,321 |
) |
|
|
(89,558 |
) |
Proceeds from disposition of assets |
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
7,677 |
|
|
|
(6,546 |
) |
Proceeds from settlement of forward contracts |
|
|
7,496 |
|
|
|
3,457 |
|
|
|
4,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(310,337 |
) |
|
$ |
84,935 |
|
|
$ |
(395,272 |
) |
|
|
|
Our investing activities used $310.3 million during the first six months of 2008 compared to
providing $84.9 million during the comparable period in 2007. During the first six months of 2008,
we sold marketable securities, net of purchases, of $0.9 million compared to net sales of $304.1
million during the comparable period in 2007. Our level of investment activity is dependent on our
working capital and other capital requirements during the year, as well as responses to actual or
anticipated events or conditions in the securities or other markets.
36
During the first six months of 2008, we spent approximately $93.2 million related to the major
upgrade of the Ocean Monarch and construction of the Ocean Scepter and Ocean Shield compared to
$90.2 million during the first six months of 2007 for major upgrades and rig construction.
Expenditures for our ongoing capital maintenance programs, including rig modifications to meet
contractual requirements, were $226.7 million during the first six months of 2008 compared to
$140.1 million during the comparable period in 2007. The increase in expenditures related to our
ongoing capital maintenance program in 2008 compared to 2007 is related to an increase in
discretionary funds available for capital spending in 2008, as well as a response to customer and
capital maintenance requirements. See Liquidity and Capital Requirements Capital
Expenditures.
As of June 30, 2008, we had foreign currency forward exchange contracts outstanding, which
aggregated $227.5 million, that require us to purchase the equivalent of $64.4 million in
Australian dollars, $59.7 million in Brazilian reais, $72.6 million in British pounds sterling,
$10.5 million in Mexican pesos and $20.3 million in Norwegian kroner at various times through
January 2009.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Payment of dividends |
|
$ |
(382,648 |
) |
|
$ |
(587,980 |
) |
|
$ |
205,332 |
|
Proceeds from stock plan exercises |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
7,657 |
|
|
|
(6,147 |
) |
Other |
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
3,475 |
|
|
|
(2,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(380,130 |
) |
|
$ |
(576,848 |
) |
|
$ |
196,718 |
|
|
|
|
During the first six months of 2008, we paid cash dividends totaling $382.6 million
(consisting of aggregate regular cash dividends of $34.7 million, or $0.125 per share of our common
stock per quarter, and aggregate special cash dividends of $1.25 per share of our common stock per
quarter, totaling $347.9 million). During the first six months of 2007, we paid cash dividends
totaling $588.0 million (consisting of aggregate regular dividends of $34.6 million, or $0.125 per
share of our common stock per quarter, and a special cash dividend of $4.00 per share of our common
stock, totaling $553.4 million).
On July 23, 2008, we declared a regular quarterly cash dividend and a special cash dividend of
$0.125 and $1.25, respectively, per share of our common stock. Both the regular quarterly and
special cash dividends are payable on September 1, 2008 to stockholders of record on August 1,
2008.
Any future determination to declare a special dividend, as well as the amount of any special
dividend which may be declared, will be based on our financial position, earnings, earnings
outlook, capital spending plans and other relevant factors at that time.
On April 15, 2008, we completed the redemption of all of our outstanding 1.5% Debentures, and,
as a result, redeemed for cash $73,000 aggregate principal amount of our 1.5% Debentures.
Depending on market conditions, we may, from time to time, purchase shares of our common stock
in the open market or otherwise. We did not repurchase any shares of our outstanding common stock
during the six months ended June 30, 2008 or in 2007.
Other
Currency Risk. Some of our subsidiaries conduct a portion of their operations in the local
currency of the country where they conduct operations. Currency environments in which we have
significant business operations include Mexico, Brazil, the U.K., Australia and Malaysia. When
possible, we attempt to minimize our currency exchange risk by seeking international contracts
payable in local currency in amounts equal to our estimated operating costs payable in local
currency with the balance of the contract payable in U.S. dollars. At present, however, only a
limited number of our contracts are payable both in U.S. dollars and the local currency.
We also utilize foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce our forward exchange risk. A
forward currency exchange contract obligates a contract holder to exchange predetermined amounts of
specified foreign currencies at specified foreign exchange rates on specific dates.
37
We record currency translation adjustments and transaction gains and losses as Other income
(expense) in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The effect on our results of operations
from these translation adjustments and transaction gains and losses has not been material and we do
not expect them to have a significant effect in the future.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, or SFAS 162. SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the
framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles in the U.S., or GAAP (the GAAP hierarchy). The FASB does not expect SFAS 162 to result
in a change in current practice, as the intent of SFAS 162 is to direct the GAAP hierarchy to the
reporting entity (rather than its auditor) and to place the GAAP hierarchy within the accounting
literature established by the FASB. This statement is effective 60 days following the Securities
and Exchange Commission, or SEC, approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position, or FSP, Accounting Principles Board, or APB,
14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion
(Including Partial Cash Settlement), or FSP APB 14-1. FSP APB 14-1 applies to convertible debt
instruments that, by their stated terms, may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial
cash settlement). The FSP requires bifurcation of the instrument into a debt component that is
initially valued at fair value and an equity component. The debt component is accreted to par
value using the effective yield method, and accretion is reported as a component of interest
expense. The equity component is not subsequently revalued as long as it continues to qualify for
equity treatment. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and
interim periods within those fiscal years on a retrospective basis for all periods presented. We
are currently evaluating the impact that adopting FSP APB 14-1 will have on our results of
operations and financial position.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, or SFAS 161. SFAS 161 changes the reporting requirements for derivative
instruments and hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging
Activities, or SFAS 133, by requiring enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments are accounted for under SFAS 133 and (c) the
effect of derivative instruments and hedging activities on an entitys financial position,
financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008; however, early application is
encouraged. We are in the process of reviewing the enhanced disclosure requirements under SFAS
161.
Forward-Looking Statements
We or our representatives may, from time to time, make or incorporate by reference certain
written or oral statements that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. All statements other than statements of
historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements include, without limitation, any statement that may project, indicate or imply future
results, events, performance or achievements, and may contain or be identified by the words
expect, intend, plan, predict, anticipate, estimate, believe, should, could,
may, might, will, will be, will continue, will likely result, project, forecast,
budget and similar expressions. Statements made by us in this report that contain
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, information concerning our possible or
assumed future results of operations and statements about the following subjects:
|
|
|
future market conditions and the effect of such conditions on our future results of
operations (see Overview Industry Conditions); |
|
|
|
|
future uses of and requirements for financial resources (see Liquidity and Capital
Requirements and Sources of Liquidity and Capital Resources); |
|
|
|
|
interest rate and foreign exchange risk (see Liquidity and Capital Requirements
Credit Ratings and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk); |
|
|
|
|
future contractual obligations (see Overview Industry Conditions and
Liquidity and Capital Requirements); |
|
|
|
|
future operations outside the United States including, without limitation, our
operations in Mexico; |
38
|
|
|
business strategy; |
|
|
|
|
growth opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
competitive position; |
|
|
|
|
expected financial position; |
|
|
|
|
future cash flows (see Overview Contract Drilling Backlog); |
|
|
|
|
future regular or special dividends (see Historical Cash Flows); |
|
|
|
|
financing plans; |
|
|
|
|
tax planning; |
|
|
|
|
budgets for capital and other expenditures (see Liquidity and Capital
Requirements); |
|
|
|
|
timing and cost of completion of rig upgrades and other capital projects (see
Liquidity and Capital Requirements); |
|
|
|
|
delivery dates and drilling contracts related to rig conversion and upgrade projects
(see Overview Industry Conditions and Liquidity and Capital Requirements); |
|
|
|
|
timing and duration of required regulatory inspections (see Overview Contract
Drilling Backlog and Overview General); |
|
|
|
|
plans and objectives of management; |
|
|
|
|
performance of contracts (see Overview Industry Conditions and Overview
Contract Drilling Backlog); |
|
|
|
|
outcomes of legal proceedings; |
|
|
|
|
compliance with applicable laws; and |
|
|
|
|
adequacy of insurance or indemnification. |
These types of statements inherently are subject to a variety of assumptions, risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expected, projected
or expressed in forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among others,
the following:
|
|
|
general economic and business conditions; |
|
|
|
|
worldwide demand for oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
|
changes in foreign and domestic oil and gas exploration, development and production
activity; |
|
|
|
|
oil and natural gas price fluctuations and related market expectations; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, commonly called
OPEC; to set and maintain production levels and pricing, and the level of production in
non-OPEC countries; |
|
|
|
|
policies of various governments regarding exploration and development of oil and gas
reserves; |
|
|
|
|
advances in exploration and development technology; |
|
|
|
|
the worldwide political and military environment, including in oil-producing regions; |
|
|
|
|
casualty losses; |
|
|
|
|
operating hazards inherent in drilling for oil and gas offshore; |
|
|
|
|
industry fleet capacity; |
|
|
|
|
market conditions in the offshore contract drilling industry, including dayrates and
utilization levels; |
|
|
|
|
competition; |
|
|
|
|
changes in foreign, political, social and economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
risks of international operations, compliance with foreign laws and taxation policies
and expropriation or nationalization of equipment and assets; |
|
|
|
|
risks of potential contractual liabilities pursuant to our various drilling contracts
in effect from time to time; |
|
|
|
|
the risk that an LOI may not result in a definitive agreement; |
|
|
|
|
foreign exchange and currency fluctuations and regulations, and the inability to
repatriate income or capital; |
|
|
|
|
risks of war, military operations, other armed hostilities, terrorist acts and
embargoes; |
|
|
|
|
changes in offshore drilling technology, which could require significant capital
expenditures in order to maintain competitiveness; |
|
|
|
|
regulatory initiatives and compliance with governmental regulations; |
|
|
|
|
compliance with environmental laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
|
development and exploitation of alternative fuels; |
|
|
|
|
customer preferences; |
|
|
|
|
effects of litigation; |
|
|
|
|
cost, availability and adequacy of insurance; |
39
|
|
|
the risk that future regular or special dividends may not be declared; |
|
|
|
|
adequacy of our sources of liquidity; |
|
|
|
|
the availability of qualified personnel to operate and service our drilling rigs; and |
|
|
|
|
various other matters, many of which are beyond our control. |
The risks and uncertainties included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report
and our other filings with the SEC include additional factors that could adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial performance. Given these risks and uncertainties,
investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements included in this report speak only as of the date of this report. We expressly disclaim
any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking
statement to reflect any change in our expectations with regard to the statement or any change in
events, conditions or circumstances on which any forward-looking statement is based.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The information included in this Item 3 is considered to constitute forward-looking
statements for purposes of the statutory safe harbor provided in Section 27A of the Securities Act
and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Forward-Looking Statements in Item 2 of Part I of this
report.
Our measure of market risk exposure represents an estimate of the change in fair value of our
financial instruments. Market risk exposure is presented for each class of financial instrument
held by us at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, assuming immediate adverse market movements of
the magnitude described below. We believe that the various rates of adverse market movements
represent a measure of exposure to loss under hypothetically assumed adverse conditions. The
estimated market risk exposure represents the hypothetical loss to future earnings and does not
represent the maximum possible loss or any expected actual loss, even under adverse conditions,
because actual adverse fluctuations would likely differ. In addition, since our investment
portfolio is subject to change based on our portfolio management strategy as well as in response to
changes in the market, these estimates are not necessarily indicative of the actual results that
may occur.
Exposure to market risk is managed and monitored by our senior management. Senior management
approves the overall investment strategy that we employ and has responsibility to ensure that the
investment positions are consistent with that strategy and the level of risk acceptable to us. We
may manage risk by buying or selling instruments or entering into offsetting positions.
Interest Rate Risk
We have exposure to interest rate risk arising from changes in the level or volatility of
interest rates. Our investments in marketable securities are primarily in fixed maturity
securities. We monitor our sensitivity to interest rate risk by evaluating the change in the value
of our financial assets and liabilities due to fluctuations in interest rates. The evaluation is
performed by applying an instantaneous change in interest rates by varying magnitudes on a static
balance sheet to determine the effect such a change in rates would have on the recorded market
value of our investments and the resulting effect on stockholders equity. The analysis presents
the sensitivity of the market value of our financial instruments to selected changes in market
rates and prices which we believe are reasonably possible over a one-year period.
The sensitivity analysis estimates the change in the market value of our interest sensitive
assets and liabilities that were held on June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, due to instantaneous
parallel shifts in the yield curve of 100 basis points, with all other variables held constant.
The interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of
changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in
market rates. Accordingly, the analysis may not be indicative of, is not intended to provide, and
does not provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates on our
earnings or stockholders equity. Further, the computations do not contemplate any actions we could
undertake in response to changes in interest rates.
Loans under our $285 million syndicated, five-year senior unsecured revolving Credit Facility
bear interest at our option at a rate per annum equal to (i) the higher of the prime rate or the
federal funds rate plus 0.5% or (ii) LIBOR plus an applicable margin, varying from 0.20% to 0.525%,
based on our current credit ratings. As of June
40
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, there were no loans outstanding under the Credit Facility (however,
$54.2 million in letters of credit were issued and outstanding under the Credit Facility at both
June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007).
Our long-term debt, as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, is denominated in U.S. dollars.
Our debt has been primarily issued at fixed rates, and as such, interest expense would not be
impacted by interest rate shifts. The impact of a 100-basis point increase in interest rates on
fixed rate debt would result in a decrease in market value of $27.4 million and $35.8 million as of
June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. A 100-basis point decrease would result in an
increase in market value of $20.1 million and $11.6 million as of June 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively.
Foreign Exchange Risk
Foreign exchange rate risk arises from the possibility that changes in foreign currency
exchange rates will impact the value of financial instruments. It is customary for us to enter
into foreign currency forward exchange contracts in the normal course of business that require us
to purchase predetermined amounts of foreign currencies at predetermined dates. As of June 30,
2008, we had foreign currency forward exchange contracts outstanding, which aggregated $227.5
million, that require us to purchase the equivalent of $64.4 million in Australian dollars, $59.7
million in Brazilian reais, $72.6 million in British pounds sterling, $10.5 million in Mexican
pesos and $20.3 million in Norwegian kroner at various times through January 2009.
We have presented the $9.6 million fair value of our outstanding foreign currency forward
exchange contracts in accordance with SFAS 133 as Prepaid expenses and other current assets in
our Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2008.
The sensitivity analysis assumes an instantaneous 20% change in foreign currency exchange
rates versus the U.S. dollar from their levels at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
The following table presents our exposure to market risk by category (interest rates and
foreign currency exchange rates):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Asset (Liability) |
|
Market Risk |
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities |
|
$ |
199,086 |
(a) |
|
$ |
1,301 |
(a) |
|
$ |
1,100 |
(c) |
|
$ |
100 |
(c) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
(486,300 |
) (b) |
|
|
(500,300 |
) (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward exchange contracts |
|
|
9,600 |
(d) |
|
|
2 |
(d) |
|
|
49,100 |
(e) |
|
|
100 |
(e) |
Forward exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93 |
) (d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,300 |
(e) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The fair market value of our investment in marketable securities, excluding repurchase
agreements, is based on the quoted closing market prices on June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. |
|
(b) |
|
The fair values of our 4.875% Senior Notes and 5.15% Senior Notes are based on the quoted
closing market prices on June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 from brokers of these instruments.
The fair value of our Zero Coupon Debentures is based on the closing market price of our common
stock on June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 and the stated conversion rate for the debentures.
The fair value of our 1.5% Debentures is based on the closing market price of our common stock on
December 31, 2007 and the stated conversion rate for the debentures. There were no 1.5%
Debentures outstanding at June 30, 2008. |
|
(c) |
|
The calculation of estimated market risk exposure is based on assumed adverse changes in
the underlying reference price or index of an increase in interest rates of 100 basis points at
June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. |
|
(d) |
|
The fair value of our foreign currency forward exchange contracts is based on the quoted
market prices on June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. |
41
|
|
|
(e) |
|
The calculation of estimated foreign exchange risk is based on assumed adverse changes in
the underlying reference price or index of an increase in foreign exchange rates of 20% at June 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007. |
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures.
We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures which are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the federal
securities laws, including this report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely
basis. These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by us under the federal securities laws is accumulated
and communicated to our management on a timely basis to allow decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, participated in an
evaluation by our management of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of June 30, 2008. Based on their
participation in that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of June 30, 2008.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the foregoing evaluation that occurred during our second fiscal quarter of 2008
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
We held our Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or Annual Meeting, on May 20, 2008 in New York,
New York. At the Annual Meeting, the holders of 131,473,172 shares of common stock out of
138,876,045 shares entitled to vote as of the record date were represented in person or by proxy,
constituting a quorum. The following matters were voted on and adopted by the margins indicated:
|
a. |
|
To elect eight directors to serve until our 2009 annual meeting of
stockholders. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
For |
|
Withheld |
|
|
|
James S. Tisch
|
|
|
114,422,931 |
|
|
|
17,050,241 |
|
Lawrence R. Dickerson
|
|
|
112,581,074 |
|
|
|
18,892,098 |
|
John R. Bolton
|
|
|
130,359,018 |
|
|
|
1,114,154 |
|
Charles L. Fabrikant
|
|
|
100,867,126 |
|
|
|
30,606,046 |
|
Paul G. Gaffney, II
|
|
|
130,323,491 |
|
|
|
1,149,681 |
|
Herbert C. Hofmann
|
|
|
114,323,697 |
|
|
|
17,149,475 |
|
Arthur L. Rebell
|
|
|
114,233,132 |
|
|
|
17,240,040 |
|
Raymond S. Troubh
|
|
|
129,722,986 |
|
|
|
1,750,186 |
|
|
b. |
|
To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors
for fiscal year 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
|
131,011,171 |
|
Against
|
|
|
429,642 |
|
Abstain
|
|
|
32,359 |
|
Broker Non-Vote
|
|
|
0 |
|
ITEM 6. Exhibits.
See the Exhibit Index for a list of those exhibits filed or furnished herewith.
42
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date July 29, 2008
|
|
By:
|
|
\s\ Gary T. Krenek |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary T. Krenek |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date July 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
\s\ Beth G. Gordon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beth G. Gordon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controller (Chief Accounting Officer) |
|
|
43
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2003). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws (as amended through October 22, 2007) of Diamond Offshore
Drilling, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K
filed October 26, 2007). |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed or furnished herewith. |
44