e10vk
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal
year ended December 31,
2010.
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
|
Commission File Number:
000-24643
DIGITAL RIVER, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
|
41-1901640
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or organization)
|
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.
|
)
|
9625 WEST 76TH STREET
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344
(Address of principal executive
offices)
(952) 253-1234
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each
Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on
Which Registered
|
Common Stock $0.01 par value
|
|
Nasdaq Global Select Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned
issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicated by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting
company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
As of June 30, 2010, there were 39,637,738 shares of
Digital River, Inc. common stock, issued and outstanding. As of
such date, based on the closing sales price as quoted by The
Nasdaq Global Select Market, 38,438,690 shares of common
stock, having an aggregate market value of approximately
$919,069,000 were held by non-affiliates. For purposes of the
above statement only, all directors and executive officers of
the registrant are assumed to be affiliates.
The number of shares of common stock outstanding at
February 1, 2011 was 39,024,595 shares.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain sections of the Registrants definitive Proxy
Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
to the extent stated herein.
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. All statements, other than statements of historical
fact, regarding our strategy, future operations, financial
position, estimated revenue, projected costs, projected savings,
prospects, plans, opportunities and objectives constitute
forward-looking statements. The words
may, will, expect,
plan, anticipate, believe,
estimate, potential, or
continue and similar types of expressions identify
forward-looking statements, although not all such statements
contain these identifying words. These forward-looking
statements are based upon information that is currently
available to us
and/or
managements current expectations, speak only as of the
date hereof, and are subject to risks and uncertainties. We
expressly disclaim any obligation, except as required by law, or
undertaking to update or revise any forward-looking statements
contained or incorporated by reference herein to reflect any
change or expectations with regard thereto or to reflect any
change in events, conditions, or circumstances on which any such
forward-looking statement is based, in whole or in part. Our
actual results may differ materially from the results discussed
in or implied by such forward-looking statements. We are subject
to a number of risks, some of which may be similar to those of
other companies of similar size in our industry, including rapid
technological changes, competition, customer concentration,
failure to successfully integrate acquisitions, adverse
government regulations, failure to manage international
activities, income we may not realize from our Microsoft
relationship and loss of key individuals. Risks that may affect
our operating results include, but are not limited to, those
discussed in Part I Item 1A, titled Risk
Factors. Readers should carefully review the risk factors
described in this document and in other documents that we file
from time to time with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
PART I
Overview
We provide
end-to-end
global
e-commerce
and marketing solutions to a wide variety of companies in
software, consumer electronics, computer games, video games, and
other markets. We offer our clients a broad range of services
that enable them to quickly and cost effectively establish an
online sales channel capability and to subsequently manage and
grow online sales on a global basis while mitigating risks. Our
services include design, development and hosting of online
stores and shopping carts, store merchandising and optimization,
order management, denied parties screening, export controls and
management, tax compliance and management, fraud management,
digital product delivery via download, physical product
fulfillment, subscription management, online marketing including
e-mail
marketing, management of affiliate programs, paid search
programs, payment processing services, website optimization, web
analytics and reporting, and CD production and delivery.
Our products and services allow our clients to focus on
promoting and marketing their products and brands while
leveraging our investments in technology and infrastructure to
facilitate the purchase of products through their online
websites. When shoppers visit one of our clients branded
websites they are transferred to an
e-commerce
store and/or
shopping cart operated by us on our
e-commerce
platforms. Once on our system, shoppers can browse for products
and make purchases online. We typically are the seller of record
for transactions through our client branded stores. After a
purchase is made, we either deliver the product digitally via
download over the Internet or transmit instructions to a third
party for physical fulfillment of the order. We also typically
process the buyers payment as the merchant of record,
including collection and remittance of applicable taxes and
compliance with various regulatory matters. We have invested
substantial resources to develop our
e-commerce
and marketing platforms, including
business-to-business
software, and we provide access and use of our platforms to our
clients as a service as opposed to selling the software to be
operated on their own in-house computer hardware. Our
e-commerce
store solutions range from simple remote control models to more
comprehensive online store models.
3
In addition to the services we provide that facilitate the
completion of an online transaction, we also offer services
designed to increase traffic to our clients websites and
the associated online stores and to improve the sales
productivity of those stores. Our services include paid search
advertising, search engine optimization, affiliate marketing,
store optimization, multi-variant testing, web analytic services
and e-mail
optimization. All of our services are designed to help our
clients acquire customers more effectively, sell to those
customers more often and more efficiently, and increase the
lifetime value of each customer.
On September 1, 2010, we announced an amendment of our
agreement with Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft) to
extend the term of the Microsoft Operations Digital Distribution
Agreement through October 31, 2013. On August 30,
2010, we entered into the Microsoft Store USA statement of work
with Microsoft whereby we will build, host and manage
Microsoft®
Store, an
e-commerce
store that supports the sale and fulfillment of Microsoft and
third party software as well as consumer electronics products to
customers in the United States. The agreement contemplates
Digital River providing
e-commerce
hosting and payment processing services in connection with
Microsoft Store in addition to Digital River maintaining its
role as a reseller of Microsoft products via Digital
Rivers existing online stores. Currently, we are providing
e-commerce
services, ranging from transaction and payment processing, to
e-marketing, digital downloads, fraud prevention and
multi-lingual customer support in support of some of the popular
Microsoft software titles, including
Microsoft©
Office. The global arrangement incorporates digital fulfillment
across multiple geographies, including North America, Asia,
Europe and Latin America.
As announced on October 12, 2009, Symantec Corporation
informed us that it elected not to renew its
e-commerce
agreement with us. As a consequence, their
e-commerce
agreement terminated on June 30, 2010. We recorded
$25.2 million in overall revenues from the Symantec
contract in 2010.
We view our operations and manage our business as one reportable
segment, providing outsourced
e-commerce
solutions globally to a variety of companies, primarily in the
software and high-tech products markets.
We were incorporated in Delaware in February 1994. Our
headquarters are located at 9625 West 76th Street, Eden
Prairie, Minnesota and our telephone number is
952-253-1234.
General information about us can be found at
www.digitalriver.com under the Company/Investor
Relations link or follow the Company on Twitter at
twitter.com/digitalriverinc. Our annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and current reports on
Form 8-K,
as well as any amendments or exhibits to those reports, are
available free of charge through our website as soon as
reasonably practicable after we file them with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
Industry
Background
Growth of the Internet and
E-Commerce. E-Commerce
sales continue to grow. The U.S. Commerce Department
reported that
e-commerce
sales in 2010 rose 14.8% compared to 2009. We believe there are
a number of factors that are contributing to the continued
growth of
e-commerce:
(i) adoption of the Internet continues to increase
globally; (ii) broadband technology is increasingly being
used to deliver Internet service enabling the delivery of richer
content as well as larger files to consumers;
(iii) Internet users are becoming increasingly comfortable
with the process of buying products online; (iv) the
functionality of online stores continues to improve, offering a
broader assortment of payment options with more promotion
alternatives; (v) businesses are placing more emphasis on
their online channel, reaching a larger audience at
comparatively lower costs than other methods; and
(vi) concerns about conflicts between online and
traditional sales channels continue to subside. Additionally, we
believe that current economic conditions have led to increased
retail store closings which should drive more shoppers online as
they shift to other channels, filling the void created by retail
downsizings and bankruptcies.
Growing Interest in Direct Sales of Products to
Consumers. Increasingly, companies are selling
their products directly to consumers via online sales channels.
This is due to increased competition for shelf space in the
traditional retail channels as well as recognition that direct
sales channels can co-exist with traditional
4
sales channels. There is also a growing recognition of the value
inherent in developing behavioral or personalized marketing
campaigns relevant to a consumers interests.
Opportunities for Outsourced
E-Commerce. We
believe the market for outsourced
e-commerce
will continue to grow as there are advantages to outsourced
e-commerce
that will continue to make it an attractive alternative to
building and maintaining this capability in-house. These
advantages include: (i) eliminating the substantial
up-front and ongoing costs of computer hardware, network
infrastructure, specialized application software and training
and support costs; (ii) reducing the time it takes to get
online stores live and productive; (iii) shifting the
ongoing technology, financial, personal information security
protections, regulatory and compliance risks to a proven service
provider; (iv) leveraging the direct marketing expertise of
an
e-commerce
service provider to accelerate growth of an online business; and
(v) allowing businesses to focus on their specific core
competencies.
Once an online store is established, it is immediately
accessible to Internet users around the world. Web pages must be
presented and customer service inquiries handled in multiple
languages, and a variety of currencies and payment options must
be accepted. The appropriate taxes must be collected and paid,
payment fraud risk mitigated, fulfillment provided, and
assurances made that products are not shipped to banned
locations. These and other requirements of a global
e-commerce
system make it an expensive and potentially risky undertaking
for any business. These factors also make a comprehensive
outsourced offering, such as that provided by Digital River, an
attractive alternative.
Shift from Physical to Electronic Delivery of
Software. Consumers have grown increasingly
comfortable with the electronic delivery of digital products,
such as software,
e-books,
computer games, video games, music, and video. This shift from
physical to electronic delivery is being driven by benefits to
both buyers and sellers of these products. For buyers,
downloaded products are immediately available for use and a
wider variety of products are available than can be found in
most retail stores. For sellers, electronic delivery eliminates
inventory-stocking requirements, shipping, handling, storage and
inventory-carrying costs as well as the risk of product
obsolescence.
The
Digital River Solution
Our solution combines a robust
e-commerce
technology platform and a suite of services to help businesses
worldwide grow their online revenues and avoid the costs and
risks of running an integrated global
e-commerce
operation in-house. We offer a comprehensive
e-commerce
solution that operates seamlessly as part of a clients
website. We provide services that facilitate
e-commerce
transactions and drive traffic to our clients online
stores. Our services include design, development and hosting of
online stores, merchandising, order management, fraud prevention
screening, popular online payment methods, export controls and
management, denied parties screening, tax compliance and
management, digital product delivery via download, physical
product fulfillment, CD production, multi-lingual customer
service, subscription management, online marketing services
including email marketing, paid search program management,
website optimization, web analytics and reporting. We also
provide our clients with increased product visibility and sales
opportunities through our large network of online channel
partners, including retailers and affiliates. We generate a
significant proportion of our revenue on a revenue-share basis,
meaning that we are paid a percentage of the selling price of
each product sold at a clients online store that is being
managed by Digital River. We believe this revenue share model
aligns our interests with those of our clients.
Benefits
to Clients
Reduced
Total Cost of Ownership and Risk
Utilizing the Digital River solution, businesses can
dramatically reduce or eliminate upfront and ongoing hardware,
software, maintenance and support costs associated with
developing, customizing, deploying, maintaining and upgrading an
in-house global
e-commerce
solution. They can have a global
e-commerce
presence without assuming the costs and risks of internal
development and leverage the investments we make in our
e-commerce
system. In addition, we help mitigate the risks of global
e-commerce,
including risks associated with payment fraud, data security,
tax compliance, and regulatory compliance. Our ongoing
5
investments in the latest technologies and
e-commerce
functionality help ensure our clients maintain pace with
industry advances.
Revenue
Growth
We can assist our clients in growing their online businesses by
(i) facilitating the acquisition of new customers,
improving the retention of existing customers, and increasing
the lifetime value of each customer; (ii) extending their
businesses into international markets; and (iii) expanding
the visibility and sales of their products through new online
sales channels. We have developed substantial expertise in
online marketing and merchandising which we apply to help our
clients increase traffic to their online stores, and improve
order close ratios, average order sizes and repeat purchases,
all of which result in higher revenues for our clients and
Digital River.
We provide the technology and services required to establish,
grow and support international sales, both for U.S-based clients
seeking to reach customers overseas, and
non-U.S.-based
clients looking to access the U.S. and other markets. Our
technology platform enables transactions to be completed in
numerous currencies using a variety of payment methods. In
addition, we provide localized online content and payment
methods, and offer customer service in a variety of languages,
extending our clients reach beyond their home markets.
Through our large online affiliate network marketplace, which we
call
oneNetworkDirecttm,
we provide our clients access to a new sales channel which can
help grow their online businesses. Clients can offer any part of
their product catalogs to our network of online channel
partners, including online retailers and affiliates. This
increases the exposure these products receive and can result in
higher sales volumes. Our channel partners benefit because we
eliminate the need for each of them to manage hundreds of
relationships with product developers, while increasing the
depth and breadth of products they can sell, all without
requiring the management of physical product inventory.
Deployment
Speed
Businesses can reduce the time required to develop an
e-commerce
presence by utilizing our outsourced business model. Typically,
a new client can have an online store live in a matter of weeks
compared with months or longer if they decide to build, test
deploy and integrate the
e-commerce
capability in-house. Once they are operational on our platform,
most clients can utilize our remote control toolset to make
real-time changes to their online store, allowing them to take
advantage of opportunities without technical assistance from
Digital River.
Focus on
Core Competency
By utilizing our outsourced
e-commerce
services, clients can focus on developing, marketing and selling
their products rather than devoting time and resources to
building and maintaining an
e-commerce
infrastructure. This allows client management time to focus on
what they know best while ensuring they have access to the
latest technologies, tools and expertise for running a
successful
e-commerce
operation.
Benefits
to Buyers
Our solution emphasizes convenience as it enables products to be
purchased online at anytime from anywhere in the world via a
connection to the Internet. In the case of software, video games
and other digital products, buyers can immediately download
their purchase and, depending on file size, begin using it in a
matter of minutes. Search technology allows shoppers to browse
our entire catalog to find the products they are looking for
quickly and easily. Our extended download service, which
guarantees replacement of products accidentally destroyed
through computer error or malfunction, and our 24/7 customer
service provided on behalf of our clients, offer shoppers
additional assurance that their
e-commerce
experience will be a positive one. Our CD2Go service gives
buyers the ability to obtain, for a fee, a copy of the product
they have purchased and downloaded on a CD.
6
Strategy
Our objective is to be the global leader in outsourced
e-commerce
activities for software and digital products developers,
high-tech product and computer manufacturers, and video game
publishers. Our strategy for achieving this objective includes
the following key components:
Attract New Clients and Expand Relationships with Existing
Clients. We have focused our efforts on securing
new clients and expanding our relationships with existing
clients primarily in the software, consumer electronics,
computer game and video game markets. Our clients include
software publishers, other digital content providers, high-tech
product manufacturers and online channel partners.
We believe we can attract new clients and gain additional
business with existing clients by expanding the range of
services we offer. This includes services to enhance the
e-commerce
transaction as well as additional online marketing and payment
services. We believe that by expanding the size and breadth of
the catalog of products we offer, we will attract additional
online retailers and affiliates seeking to offer their customers
a wide range of quality products. We currently provide
e-commerce
services for thousands of software and digital products
publishers, consumer electronic product manufacturers, game
publishers and affiliates.
Expand International Sales. We believe there
is a substantial opportunity to grow our business by enabling
our clients to expand their sales through international online
stores. Internet adoption and broadband deployment continue to
increase rapidly, especially in the European and Asia Pacific
regions. We have seen significant growth in sales for clients
that have created international online stores. We intend to
continue to enhance our technology platform, payment options and
localized service offerings to increase sales in international
markets.
Provide Clients with Strategic Marketing
Services. We proactively develop and deliver new
strategic marketing services that are designed to help our
clients improve customer acquisition and retention and maximize
the lifetime value of customers. These services currently
include paid search advertising, search engine optimization,
affiliate marketing, store optimization, web analytics, and
e-mail
marketing and optimization. In general, we manage these programs
for our clients and have achieved significant increases in
client revenue,
return-on-investment
or both, compared to what clients experienced when running these
programs and supporting technologies in-house or through other
service providers. We intend to continue to develop
and/or
acquire new value-added strategic marketing services and
technologies to create additional sources of revenue for our
clients and for Digital River.
Maintain Technology Leadership. We believe our
technology platform and infrastructure afford us a competitive
advantage in the market for outsourced
e-commerce
solutions. We intend to continue to invest in and enhance our
platform to improve scalability, efficiency, reliability,
security and performance. By leveraging our infrastructure, we
can improve our ability to provide low-cost, high-value services
while continuing to deploy the latest technologies.
Additionally, we plan to continue investing in our
infrastructure to enable our clients to further penetrate
international markets, enhance their relationships with their
customers, better manage the
return-on-investment
across all their online marketing activities, successfully adopt
new selling models such as subscriptions, Software as a Service
(SaaS), trial programs and volume licensing programs.
Continue to Seek Strategic
Acquisitions. Historically, we have been an
active acquirer of businesses, and we expect to continue
actively pursuing acquisitions that further our business
strategy. Some of the strategic factors we consider when
evaluating an acquisition opportunity include: expanding our
base of clients, improving the breadth and depth of our product
offering, improving the catalog of content, extending our
strategic marketing and other services offerings, expanding our
geographic reach and diversifying our revenue stream into
complementary or adjacent market segments.
Services
We provide a broad range of services to our clients, including
design, development and hosting of online stores, merchandising,
order management, fraud prevention screening, popular localized
online payment
7
methods, export controls and management, denied parties
screening, tax compliance and management, digital product
delivery via download, physical product fulfillment, CD
production, multi-lingual customer service, subscription
management, online marketing services including email marketing,
paid search program management, website optimization, web
analytics and reporting. Most of these offerings can be managed
through client-facing, remote control self-service tools that
are easily used by business users without specialized training.
Since clients utilize our centralized system and processes, we
can consistently offer best practices across our entire client
base.
Store Design, Development and Hosting. We
offer our clients website design services utilizing our
experience and expertise to create efficient and effective
online stores. Our
e-commerce
solutions can be deployed quickly and implemented in a variety
of ways from fully-functioning shopping carts through completely
merchandised online stores. The online stores we operate for our
clients often match their branding and website design to provide
a seamless experience for shoppers. When a shopper navigates
from a clients website (operated by them) to their store
(operated by us), the transition is seamless and the customer is
unaware they are then being served by our technology platform.
We manage the order process through payment processing, fraud
screening and fulfillment (either digital or physical) and
notify the buyer via
e-mail once
the transaction is completed. Transaction information is
captured and stored in our database systems, an increasingly
valuable source of information used to create highly targeted
merchandising programs,
e-mail
marketing campaigns, product offers and test marketing programs.
For many of our clients, the solution we provide is critical to
their businesses and therefore we operate global data centers
that perform and scale for continuous
e-commerce
operation in a high-demand environment. We operate multiple data
centers globally, which feature fully redundant high-speed
connections to the Internet, server capacity to handle
unpredictable spikes in traffic and transactions, 24/7 security
and monitoring,
back-up
electric generators and dedicated power supplies.
Store Merchandising. Our technology platforms
support a wide range of merchandising activities. This enables
our clients to effectively execute promotions, up-sell, and
cross-sell activities and to feature specific products and
services during any phase of the shopping process. From the home
page of our clients online stores through the checkout and
thank you pages, our solution allows clients to
deliver targeted offers designed to increase order close ratios
and average order sizes.
Order Management and Fraud Screening. We
manage all phases of a shoppers order on our clients
e-commerce
stores. We process payment transactions for orders placed
through our technology platform and support a wide variety of
payment types, including credit cards, wire transfers, purchase
orders, money orders, direct debit cards and many other payment
methods popular both in the United States and around the world.
As part of the payment process, we ensure that the correct taxes
are displayed, collected, remitted and reported.
The fraud screening component of our platform uses both
rules-based and heuristic scoring methods which use observations
of known fraudulent activities to make a determination regarding
the validity of the order, buyer and payment information. As the
order is entered, hundreds of data reviews can be processed in
real time. We also provide denied-parties screening and export
controls, which are designed to ensure that persons
and/or
organizations appearing on government denied-parties lists are
blocked from making purchases through our system. Once a
transaction is approved and the digital product has been
delivered via download or the physical product(s) has been
shipped, we submit the transaction for payment.
Digital and Physical Fulfillment Services. We
provide both digital and physical fulfillment services to our
clients. We offer our clients a broad array of electronic
delivery capabilities that enable delivery of digital products
directly to customers computers via the Internet. Delivery
is completed when a copy of the purchased digital product is
made from a master generally stored on our technology platform
and then securely downloaded to the purchaser. Optionally,
buyers can, for an additional fee, request that a CD be created
and shipped as a backup for their order.
In addition to electronic fulfillment via download, we offer
physical distribution services to our clients as well. We have
contracted with third-party fulfillment agents that maintain
inventories of physical products for
8
shipment to buyers. These products are held by the fulfillment
agent on consignment from our clients. We provide notification
of product shipment to the buyer as well as shipment tracking,
order status and inventory information. We also provide a
service called Physical on Demand (POD), which
utilizes robotic systems to create a client-branded product CD
and packaging materials after a POD order has been placed. This
eliminates the requirement for inventory to be stored in a
warehouse as physical product is created only when needed. We
provide extended download services for digital products for an
additional fee, which enables buyers to download the products
they have purchased more than once in the event of a computer
failure or other unexpected problem. We believe physical
fulfillment services are important to providing a complete
e-commerce
solution to our clients, particularly for non-digital products
markets where digital fulfillment is not possible.
In connection with the sales of consumer electronic goods, we
offer management services relating to regulatory matters such as
the Waste Electronics and Electrical Equipment laws.
Customer Service. At our clients option
and for an additional fee, we provide telephone and
e-mail
customer support for products sold through our platforms. We
provide assistance to buyers regarding ordering and delivery
questions on a 24/7 basis in multiple languages. We continue to
invest in technology and infrastructure to provide fast and
efficient responses to customer inquiries as well as provide
online self-help options.
Advanced Reporting and Analytics. We capture
and store detailed information about visitor traffic for sales
in the online stores we manage for our clients. This information
is stored in our database systems where it is available for
analysis and reporting. We provide clients access to a large
collection of standard and customizable reports via our web
analytics technology. This enables our clients to track and
analyze sales, products, transactions, customer behavior and the
results of marketing campaigns so they can optimize their
marketing efforts to increase traffic, order close ratios and
average order values. We also believe this information is
valuable in establishing a metric for the lifetime value of the
customer.
Strategic Marketing Services. We offer a range
of strategic marketing services designed to increase customer
acquisition, improve customer retention and enhance the lifetime
value of each customer. Through a combination of web analytics,
analytics-based statistical testing, optimization and proven
direct marketing practices, our team of strategic marketing
experts develops, delivers and manages programs such as paid
search advertising, search engine optimization, affiliate
marketing, store optimization and
e-mail
optimization on behalf of our clients. We generally charge an
incremental percentage of the selling price of merchandise for
sales driven by our strategic marketing services activities. We
believe our ability to capture and analyze integrated traffic
and
e-commerce
sales data enhances the value of our strategic marketing
services as we can precisely determine the effectiveness of
specific marketing activities, website changes, and other
actions taken by our clients.
Payment Services. We offer full service
payment provider solutions for online merchants around the
world. We connect businesses to the local payment methods that
their customers prefer and support businesses to expand into new
markets through enabling the acceptance and processing of a
diverse range of payment methods and options. We offer a broad
range of back office payment reconciliation services that result
in a highly cost efficient and secure program for
e-payments.
We sell and market these services through a direct sales channel
located in offices in the United States and Europe. Our
technology platform provides for high transaction throughput in
a highly secure and data sensitive environment. These services
are provided either via a direct interface between the
clients commerce system and our payment services platform
or via a Payment Card Industry (PCI) compliant wrapped secure
web based payment page that is served to the clients
commerce system on a transaction by transaction basis.
Clients
We serve distinct groups of clients: (1) software, consumer
electronics, and computer and video game product manufacturers;
and (2) online channel partners including retailers and
affiliates. We believe that the breadth of our catalog of
products is a competitive advantage in selling
e-commerce
services to online channel partners as they can access a huge
volume of products to sell without negotiating contract terms
with every
9
product provider. At the same time, we believe the breadth of
our channel partner group is attractive to product manufacturers
since it provides access to distribution through a single source.
Sales and
Marketing
We sell products and services primarily to consumers through the
Internet. We sell and market our services for clients through a
direct sales force located in offices in the United States,
Europe and Asia Pacific. These offices include staff dedicated
to pre-sales, sales and sales support activities. Our client
sales organization sells to executives within software, consumer
electronics, computer and game manufacturers and online channel
partners who are looking to create or expand their online
businesses. During the sales process, our sales staff delivers
demonstrations, presentations, collateral material,
return-on-investment
analyses, proposals and contracts.
We also design, implement and manage marketing and merchandising
programs to help our clients drive traffic to their online
stores and increase order close ratios, average order values and
repeat purchases at those stores. Our strategic
e-marketing
team delivers a range of marketing and merchandising programs
such as paid search advertising, search engine optimization,
affiliate marketing, site and store optimization,
e-mail
marketing and optimization and site merchandising, which
includes promotions, cross-sells and up-sells. This team
integrates their marketing domain expertise with our suite of
technology, including reporting, analytics, optimization and
e-mail to
drive increased sales for our clients.
We market our products and services directly to clients and
prospective clients. We focus our efforts on generating
awareness of our brand and capabilities, establishing our
position as a global leader in
e-commerce
outsourcing, generating leads in our target markets, and
providing sales tools for our direct sales force. We conduct a
variety of highly integrated marketing programs to achieve these
objectives in an efficient and effective manner. We currently
market our products and services to clients and prospects via
direct marketing, print and electronic advertising, trade shows
and events, public relations, media events and speaking
engagements.
Technology
We deliver our outsourced
e-commerce
solutions on several platforms, each of which has been
architected to solve our clients multi-faceted
e-commerce
needs. The following is a brief description of the technology
standards utilized by the family of Digital River
e-commerce
platforms:
Architecture. Our platforms are highly
scalable and designed to handle tens of thousands of individual
e-commerce
stores and millions of products available for sale within those
stores. These platforms consist of Digital River developed
proprietary software applications running on multiple pods of
Sun Microsystems and Dell servers that serve dynamic web pages
using Oracle, SQL server and MySQL databases, .net Microsoft IIS
and Oracle application servers. Our platforms are designed to
support growth by adding servers, CPUs, memory and bandwidth
without substantial changes to the software applications. We
believe this level of scalability is a competitive advantage.
The application software is written in modular layers, enabling
us to quickly respond to industry changes, payment processing
changes, changes to international requirements for taxes and
export screening, banking procedures, encryption technologies,
and new and emerging web technologies, including AJAX, Web
Services, DHTML and web Caches.
The platforms include search capabilities that allow shoppers to
search for items across millions of products and thousands of
categories based on specific product characteristics or
specifications while maintaining page response times acceptable
to the user. We use database indexing combined with a dynamic
cache system to provide flexibility and speed. The platforms
have been designed to index, retrieve and manage all transaction
data that flows through the system, including detailed commerce
transactions and consumer interaction data. This enables us to
create proprietary market profiles of each shopper and groups of
shoppers that can then be used to create merchandising campaigns
that are relevant to the end consumer and more successful. We
also use our platforms internally for fraud detection and
10
prevention, management of physical shipping, return
authorizations, backorder processing, transaction auditing and
reporting.
E-Commerce
System Maintenance. Our platforms have a
centralized maintenance management system that we use to build
and manage our clients
e-commerce
systems. Changes that affect all of our clients
e-commerce
sites or groups of
e-commerce
sites can be made centrally, dramatically reducing maintenance
time and complexity. Most of our clients
e-commerce
sites include a central store and many have additional web pages
where highly targeted traffic is routed. Clients also may choose
to link specific locations on their
e-commerce
stores to detailed product or category information within their
stores to more effectively address a shoppers specific
areas of interest.
Security. We have security systems in place to
control access to our internal systems and commerce data.
Log-ins and passwords are required for all systems with
additional levels of log-in, password and Internet Protocol
security in place to control access on an individual basis.
Access is only granted to commerce areas for which an individual
is responsible. Multiple levels of firewalls prevent
unauthorized access from the outside or access to confidential
data from the inside. Our security system does not allow direct
access to any client or customer data. We license certain
encryption and authentication technology from third parties to
provide secure transmission of confidential information such as
credit card data. The security system is designed not to
interfere with the consumers experience on our
clients
e-commerce
sites.
Data Center Operations. Continuous data center
operations are crucial to our success. We currently maintain
major data center operations in seven facilities: California and
Minnesota, USA; and Germany, Ireland and Sweden. All major data
center locations are currently processing transactions and
serving downloads.
All data centers currently utilize multiple levels of redundant
systems, including load balancers managing traffic volumes
across web and application server farms, database servers, and
enterprise disk storage arrays. For the majority of these
systems, we have automatic failover procedures in place such
that when a fault is detected, a process automatically takes
that portion of the system offline and processing continues on
the remaining redundant portions of the system, or in an
alternate data center. In the event of an electrical power
failure, we have redundant power generators and uninterruptible
power supplies that protect our facilities. Fire suppression
systems are present in each data center.
Our network software constantly monitors our clients
e-commerce
sites and internal system functions, and notifies systems
engineers if any unexpected conditions arise. We lease multiple
lines from diverse Internet service providers and maintain a
policy of adding additional capacity if more than
40 percent of our capacity is consistently utilized.
Accordingly, if one line fails, the other lines are able to
assume the traffic load of the failed line. We also utilize
content distribution networks operated by our vendors to serve
appropriate types of traffic; currently, the majority of our
image traffic and a substantial portion of our download traffic
is served via the Akamai networks.
Product
Research and Development
Our primary product research and development strategy is to
maintain our technology and feature set for our commerce
platforms and related technologies. To this end, we continually
have numerous development projects in process, including ongoing
enhancement of our commerce platforms, improvements in our
remote control capabilities, enhanced international support,
advanced product distribution capabilities, sophisticated
reporting functionality and new marketing technologies.
We believe that the functionality and capabilities of our
commerce platforms are a competitive advantage and that we must
continue to invest in them to maintain our competitive position.
The Internet and
e-commerce,
in particular, are subject to rapid technological change,
changes in user and client requirements and expectations, new
technologies and evolving industry standards. To remain
successful, we must continually adapt to these and other
changes. We rely on internally developed, acquired and licensed
technologies to maintain the technological sufficiency of our
e-commerce
platforms.
11
Competition
The market for
e-commerce
solutions is highly competitive. We compete with
e-commerce
solutions that our customers develop internally or contract with
third parties to develop on their behalf. We also compete with
other outsourced
e-commerce
providers. The competition we encounter includes:
|
|
|
|
|
In-house development of
e-commerce
capabilities using tools or applications from companies, such as
Art Technology Group, Inc. and IBM Corporation;
|
|
|
|
E-Commerce
capabilities custom-developed by companies, such as IBM Global
Services and Accenture, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Other providers of outsourced
e-commerce
solutions, such as GSI Commerce, Inc., asknet Inc. and Arvato, a
division of Bertelsmann AG;
|
|
|
|
Companies that provide technologies, services or products that
support a portion of the
e-commerce
process, such as payment processing, including CyberSource
Corporation and PayPal Corp.;
|
|
|
|
Companies that offer various online marketing services,
technologies and products, including ValueClick, Inc. and
aQuantive, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
High-traffic, branded websites that generate a substantial
portion of their revenue from
e-commerce
and may offer or provide to others the means to offer their
products for sale, such as Amazon.com, Inc. and Buy.com,
Inc.; and
|
|
|
|
Web hosting, web services and infrastructure companies that
offer portions of our solution and are seeking to expand the
range of their offering, such as Network Solutions, LLC, Akamai
Technologies, Inc., Yahoo!, Inc., eBay, Inc. and Hostopia.com,
Inc.
|
We believe that the principal competitive factors in our market
are the breadth of consumer products and services offered, the
number of clients and online channel partnerships, brand
recognition, system reliability and scalability, price, customer
service, ease of use, speed to market, convenience, and quality
of delivery. Some of the companies described above are clients
or potential clients, but they may also choose to compete with
us by adopting a similar business model.
Intellectual
Property
We believe the protection of our trademarks, copyrights, trade
secrets and other intellectual property is critical to our
success. We rely on patent, copyright and trademark enforcement,
contractual restrictions, service mark and trade secret laws to
protect our proprietary rights. We have entered into
confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our
employees and contractors, and nondisclosure agreements with
certain parties with whom we conduct business in order to limit
access to and disclosure of our proprietary information. We also
seek to protect our proprietary position by filing U.S. and
foreign patent applications related to our proprietary
technology, inventions and improvements that are important to
our business. We currently have twenty-five U.S patents issued
with four to seventeen years remaining prior to expiration. We
also have over sixty-two U.S. and foreign patent
applications pending. We pursue the registration of our
trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and
internationally. We have a number of registered trademarks in
the U.S., European Union and other countries.
Government
Regulation
We are subject to a number of foreign and domestic laws and
regulations that affect companies conducting business on the
Internet. In addition, laws and regulations relating to user
privacy, information security and intellectual property rights
are being debated and considered for adoption by many countries
throughout the world. We face risks from some of the proposed
legislation that could be passed in the future.
A range of laws and new interpretations of existing laws could
have an impact on our business. For example, the Digital
Millennium Copyright Act has provisions that limit, but do not
necessarily eliminate, our liability for listing, linking or
hosting third-party content that includes materials that
infringe copyrights. The Child Online Protection Act and the
Childrens Online Privacy Protection Act restrict the
distribution of materials considered harmful to children and
impose additional restrictions on the ability of online services
to collect information from children under 13. In the area of
data protection, many states have passed laws
12
requiring notification to users when there is a security breach
for personal data, such as Californias Information
Practices Act. The costs of compliance with these laws may
increase in the future as a result of changes in interpretation.
Furthermore, any failure on our part to comply with these laws
may subject us to significant liabilities.
We are also subject to federal, state and foreign laws regarding
privacy and protection of user data. We post on our web site our
privacy policies and practices concerning the use and disclosure
of user data. Any failure by us to comply with our posted
privacy policies or privacy-related laws and regulations could
result in proceedings against us by governmental authorities or
others, which could potentially harm our business. In addition,
the interpretation of data protection laws, and their
application to the Internet, in Europe and other foreign
jurisdictions is unclear and in a state of flux. There is a risk
that these laws may be interpreted and applied in conflicting
ways from country to country and in a manner that is not
consistent with our current data protection practices. Complying
with these varying international requirements could cause us to
incur additional costs. Further, any failure by us to protect
our users privacy and data could result in a loss of user
confidence in our services.
Employees
As of February 1, 2011, we employed 1,280 associates. We
also employ independent contractors and other temporary
employees. None of our employees are represented by a labor
union, and we consider our employee relations to be good.
Competition for qualified personnel in our industry is intense.
We believe that our future success will continue to depend, in
part, on our continued ability to attract, hire and retain
qualified personnel.
Executive
Officers
The following table sets forth information regarding our
executive officers at February 1, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
|
|
Joel A. Ronning
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
Thomas M. Donnelly
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
Kevin L. Crudden
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
VP/General Counsel
|
|
|
Mr. Ronning founded Digital River in February 1994
and has been our Chief Executive Officer and a director since
that time. From February 1994 to July 1998, Mr. Ronning
served as President of Digital River.
Mr. Donnelly joined Digital River in February 2005
as Vice President of Finance and Treasurer and was named Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary in July 2005. From March 1997 to
May 2004, he held various positions, including President, Chief
Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer with Net
Perceptions, Inc., a developer of software systems used to
improve the effectiveness of various customer interaction
systems.
Mr. Crudden joined Digital River in January 2006 as
Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. From
1987 until joining Digital River, Mr. Crudden was with the
law firm of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P.,
Minneapolis, Minnesota, and served as a partner practicing in
the areas of corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions, and
corporate governance.
The risks described below are not the only ones facing our
company. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we
currently deem immaterial also may impair our business
operations. Our business, financial condition or results of
operations could be materially adversely affected by any of
these risks and the value of our common stock could decline due
to any of these risks, and you could lose all or part of the
money you paid to buy our common stock. The following discussion
of our risk factors should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto, and
managements discussion and analysis, contained in this
report. These risks are current as of the date of this
Form 10-K,
and will be updated in subsequent
Form 10-Qs
to the extent required by law. Our business is also subject to
general risks and uncertainties that affect many other
companies.
13
This annual report also contains forward-looking statements
that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could
differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors,
including the risks faced by us described below and elsewhere in
this report.
Risks
Related to Our Business
We may
experience significant fluctuations in our revenues, operating
results, growth rate and stock price.
Our quarterly and annual revenues, operating results, and growth
rate have fluctuated significantly in the past and are likely to
do so in the future due to a variety of factors, some of which
are outside our control. As a result, we believe that
quarter-to-quarter
and
year-to-year
comparisons of our revenue and operating results are not
necessarily meaningful, and that these comparisons may not be
accurate indicators of future performance. If our annual or
quarterly operating results fail to meet the guidance we provide
to securities analysts and investors or otherwise fail to meet
their expectations, the trading price of our common stock may be
impacted.
Factors that may affect our revenues, operating results,
continued growth, and our stock price include the risks
described elsewhere herein, as well as the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Client Development and Retention. We generate
revenue by providing services to a wide variety of companies,
primarily in the software and high-tech products markets.
Therefore, it is important to our ongoing success that we
maintain our key client relationships and, at the same time,
both develop new client relationships and increase the number
and type of products offered through our services. If we cannot
develop and maintain satisfactory relationships with software
and digital products publishers, manufacturers of consumer
electronics and other goods, online retailers and online channel
partners on acceptable commercial terms, or if clients elect to
end their relationships with us and we are unable to generate
sufficient additional revenue to compensate for the loss of
those relationships, we will likely experience a decline in
revenue and operating profit. New product verticals or market
segments, and further penetration of existing product verticals
and market segments, may require us to work with companies which
have a limited operating history or greater risks than more
established companies. This may result in the offering of
products which are subject to higher chargeback rates or legal
exposure and may generally expose us to greater legal
and/or
business risk. We may not be able to fully anticipate or
mitigate all such risks. In the event claims are brought against
us in connection with products offered by clients, especially
clients with a limited operating history, weak sales, or who are
or may become insolvent or bankrupt, we may not be successful in
seeking indemnification for such claims from such clients and
may be ultimately responsible for such claims.
|
|
|
|
We also depend on our clients to create and support products
that consumers will purchase. We generally purchase products for
resale from consignment or from distributors at the time of the
resale to the consumer, and do not maintain an inventory of
products available for sale. If we are unable to obtain
sufficient quantities of products for any reason, or if the
quality of service provided by these publishers and
manufacturers falls below a satisfactory level, we could also
experience a decline in revenue, operating profit and consumer
satisfaction, and our reputation could be harmed.
|
|
|
|
Our contracts with our clients are generally one to two years in
duration, with an automatic renewal provision for additional
one-year periods, unless we are provided with a written notice
before the end of the contract. Some of our contracts are for
longer periods, but may provide for early termination upon
certain notice. For example, we recently amended our contract
with Microsoft to extend the term through October 2013, but the
amendment did not modify the previously negotiated termination
provisions. We have no material long-term or exclusive contracts
or arrangements with any clients that guarantee the availability
of products. Clients that currently supply products to us may
not continue to do so, and we may be unable to establish new
relationships with clients to supplement or replace existing
relationships. Clients may elect to cease offering certain
products through online commerce, or cease allowing us to resell
certain of their products. A client who believes we have failed
to deliver the contractually-required services and benefits
could terminate their agreements and bring claims against
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
us for substantial damages, these claims could exceed the level
of any insurance coverage that may be available to us, and if
successful could adversely affect our operating results and
financial condition. If an existing significant customer elects
to end their relationship with us or if our sales of a
significant customers products materially decreases, our
revenue would decline and it may have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition, results of operations,
growth rate and stock price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, a limited number of our other software and physical
goods clients contribute a large portion of our annual revenue.
If any one of these key contracts is not renewed or otherwise
terminates, or if revenues from these clients decline for any
other reason (such as competitive developments), our revenue
would decline and our ability to sustain profitability would be
impaired. For example, please see the risk factor below
regarding the termination of Microsofts
e-commerce
agreement with us.
|
|
|
|
Dependence on Key Personnel and Employee
Turnover. Our future success significantly
depends on our ability to continue to identify, attract, hire,
train, retain and motivate highly skilled personnel, including
the continued services and performance of our senior management.
Competition for these personnel is intense, particularly in the
Internet industry. Our performance also depends on our ability
to retain and motivate our key technical employees who are
skilled in maintaining our proprietary technology platforms. The
loss of the services of any of our executive officers or key
employees could harm our business if we are unable to
effectively replace that officer or employee, or if that person
should decide to join a competitor or otherwise directly or
indirectly compete with us. Employee turnover may increase in
light of the risks, uncertainties, expenses, delays and
difficulties associated with operating a business in a
relatively rapidly changing industry and environment. Further,
we may need to incur additional operating expenses and divert
other management time in order to search for a replacement for
members of senior management or personnel with specialized
skills.
|
|
|
|
Organizational Changes. In order to remain
competitive and to control our costs, we have implemented in the
past, and may be required to implement in the future,
organizational changes within our company, such as the
consolidation of
e-commerce
platforms or offices, utilization of subcontractors or
outsourcing relationships, reorganization of business units, and
reductions in force. We may incur significant costs in order to
implement organizational changes to achieve efficiencies in our
cost structure in the long term. Failure to effectively manage
our subcontractors and outsourcing relationships may harm our
business. These organizational changes may impact our ability to
execute our business plans and could affect our operating
results.
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses. Our operating expenses are
based on our expectations of future revenue. These expenses are
relatively fixed in the short-term. If our revenue for a quarter
falls below our expectations and we are unable to quickly reduce
spending in response, our operating results for that quarter
would be harmed.
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure. The introduction by us of new
websites, web stores or services, new features and
functionality, and the continued upgrading, development and
maintenance of our systems and infrastructure to meet emerging
market needs, leverage technical innovations, and remain
competitive in our service and product offerings, may require a
substantial investment of our resources and result in
significant capital expenditures and operating costs and expose
us to additional risk and legal liability despite efforts to
control such risks and liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in Demand. Our quarterly and
annual operating results are subject to fluctuations in demand
for the products or services offered by us or our clients, such
as personal computer software and consumer electronics. In
particular, sales of personal computer software represented a
significant portion of our revenues in recent years, and
continue to be very important to our business. The introduction
of products and services competitive to those offered by our
current clients may materially adversely affect our revenues. In
addition, revenue generated by our software and digital commerce
services is likely to fluctuate on a seasonal basis that is
typical for the markets for our clients products,
including the software publishing, consumer electronics, and
computer and video games markets. Softening or weakening of
traditionally high-volume periods, such as the holiday season,
can materially adversely affect our revenues and operating
results.
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the
E-commerce
Industry. The nature of our business and the
e-commerce
industry in which we operate has undergone, and continues to
undergo, rapid development and change. For example, new
protocols or technologies and new rules and regulations
applicable to our business and the
e-commerce
industry can be introduced which could affect the ways in which
e-commerce
operates and products are sold online. It may be difficult for
us to predict such developments. Thus, our chances of financial
and operational success should be evaluated in light of the
risks, uncertainties, expenses, delays and difficulties
associated with operating a business in a relatively rapidly
changing industry and environment. If we are unable to address
these issues, we may not be financially or operationally
successful.
|
|
|
|
Other Factors. Additional industry risks that
may affect our revenues, operating results, continued growth and
our stock price include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competitive developments, including the introduction of new
products and services and the announcement of new client and
strategic relationships by our competitors;
|
|
|
|
Changes that affect our clients or the viability of their
product lines, and client decisions to delay new product
launches, invest in
e-commerce
initiatives, utilize the services of a competitor, or
internalize their currently outsourced
e-commerce
operations;
|
|
|
|
The cost of compliance with U.S. and foreign laws, rules
and regulations relating to our business, including the
potential effect of new laws, rules and regulations, or
interpretations of existing laws, rules and regulations, that
affect our business operations or otherwise restrict or affect
online commerce
and/or the
Internet as a whole, as well as our compliance with the rules
and policies of entities whose services are critical for our
continued operations, such as banks and credit card associations;
|
|
|
|
Our announcement of significant acquisitions, strategic
partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments or results
of operations or other developments related to those
acquisitions, and our ability to successfully integrate and
manage acquired businesses;
|
|
|
|
Required changes in generally accepted accounting principles and
disclosures;
|
|
|
|
Sales or other transactions involving our common stock or our
convertible notes;
|
|
|
|
General macroeconomic conditions, including severe downturns or
recessions in the United States and elsewhere, global unrest,
terrorist activities and particularly those economic conditions
affecting the
e-commerce
and retailer industries; and
|
|
|
|
Conditions or trends in the Internet and online commerce
industries in the United States and around the world, including
slower-than-anticipated
growth of the online market as a vehicle for the purchase of
software products, changes in consumer confidence in the safety
and security of online commerce, and changes in the usage of the
Internet and
e-commerce.
|
The following risks may also have a material adverse impact on
our business, financial condition, results of operations and
stock price:
Our
stock price is volatile.
The stock market as a whole and the trading prices of companies
in the electronic commerce industry in particular, has been
notably volatile. The operating results of companies in the
electronic commerce industry have experienced significant
quarter-to-quarter
fluctuations. This broad market and industry volatility could
significantly reduce the price of our common stock at any time,
without regard to our own operating performance.
The market price for our common stock has varied between a high
of $39.10 and a low of $23.22 in the year ended
December 31, 2010. This volatility may affect the price at
which you could sell your common stock. Our stock price is
likely to continue to be volatile and subject to significant
price and volume fluctuations in response to market and other
factors; variations in our quarterly operating results from our
16
expectations or those of securities analysts or investors;
downward revisions in securities analysts estimates; and
announcement by us or our competitors of significant
acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital
commitments.
In addition, the price of our common stock may be impacted by
the short sales and actions of other parties who may disseminate
misleading information about us in an effort to profit from
fluctuations in the price of our common stock. Further, the
price of our common stock may be impacted by the announcement of
the financial results or other decisions by our larger clients
whose products represent a significant portion of our sales. For
example, the price of our common stock experienced a significant
decline on October 12, 2009 in connection with the
announcement by us that Symantec had informed us that it has
elected not to renew its
e-commerce
agreement with us.
A material decline in the price of our common stock may result
in the assertion of certain claims against us,
and/or the
commencement of inquiries
and/or
investigations against us. A prolonged decline in the price of
our common stock could result in a reduction in the liquidity of
our common stock and a reduction in our ability to raise
capital, and the inability for you to obtain a favorable selling
price for your shares. Any reduction in our ability to raise
equity capital in the future may force us to reallocate funds
from other planned uses and could have a significant negative
effect on our business plans and operations.
The
termination of our
e-commerce
agreement with Microsoft may materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition or results of operations and stock
price.
Sales of products for one client, Microsoft, accounted for
approximately 24.7% of our revenue in 2010. In addition, a
limited number of other software and physical goods clients
contribute a large portion of our annual revenue. If any one of
these key contracts is not renewed or otherwise terminates, or
if revenues from these clients decline for any other reason
(such as competitive developments), our revenue would decline
and our ability to sustain profitability would be impaired. If
our contract with Microsoft is not renewed, renegotiated or
otherwise terminated, or if revenues from Microsoft decline for
any other reason, our revenue and our ability to sustain
profitability could be materially adversely impaired.
Loss
of our credit card acceptance privileges, or changes to payment
networks, fees, rules or practices, would seriously hamper our
ability to process the sale of merchandise and materially
adversely affect our business.
The payment by consumers for the purchase of goods and services
through our
e-commerce
systems is typically made by credit card or similar payment
method. As a result, we must rely on banks and payment
processors to process transactions, and must pay a fee for this
service. From time to time, credit card associations may
increase the per-transaction fees that they charge. In addition,
reductions in the volume of transactions processed by us may
result in increased per-transaction processing fees. Any such
increased fees will increase our operating costs and reduce our
profit margins. We also are required by our processors to comply
with credit card association operating rules, and we have agreed
to reimburse our processors for any fines they are assessed by
credit card associations as a result of processing payments for
us. The credit card associations and their member banks set and
interpret the credit card rules. Visa, MasterCard, American
Express, Discover, and other card associations whose cards we
accept could adopt new operating rules or re-interpret existing
rules that we, or our processors, might find difficult to
follow. Although we have been able to successfully switch to new
payment processors in the past, such migrations require
significant attention from our personnel, and may not achieve
the anticipated cost savings or other desired results. Any
disputes or problems associated with our payment processors
could impair our ability to give customers the option of using
credit or debit cards to fund their payments. If we were unable
to accept credit or debit cards or other widely accepted forms
of payment, our business would be seriously damaged. We also
could be subject to fines or increased fees from Visa and
MasterCard if we fail to detect that our clients are engaging in
activities that are illegal or activities that are considered
high risk, primarily the sale of certain types of
digital content, or if the percentage of our sales transactions
subject to chargeback increases as an absolute percentage of our
overall transaction volume. We may be required to expend
significant capital and other resources to monitor these
activities.
17
Security
breaches could hinder our ability to securely transmit
confidential information and could materially affect our
reputation, business operations, operating results and financial
condition.
Our business depends in large part on the secure transmission of
confidential information over public networks, including
customers credit card and other payment account
information, and the secure storage of confidential information.
We rely on encryption and authentication technology licensed
from third parties to provide the security and authentication
necessary for secure transmission of confidential information,
such as customer credit and debit card numbers. While we take
significant steps to protect the security of confidential
information in our possession, we cannot guarantee our security
measures will prevent security breaches, or that future advances
in computer and software capabilities and encryption technology,
new cryptography tools and discoveries, and other events will
enable us to prevent the breach or compromise of our security
even if implemented by us. Further, the technology utilized in
credit and debit cards, and the systems used for the
transmission of payment card transactions, are controlled by the
payment card industry, and vulnerabilities in these systems and
technology can place payment card data at risk.
Any breach or compromise of our security could have a material
adverse effect on our reputation, business, operating results
and financial condition, dissuade existing and new clients from
using our services, dissuade customers from transacting business
through our systems, and expose us to significant costs, fines,
losses, litigation, governmental investigations and liabilities.
A party who circumvents our security measures could
misappropriate proprietary information or interrupt our
operations. We may be required to expend significant capital and
other resources to protect against security breaches or address
problems caused by such breaches. Security breaches could expose
us to lawsuits from affected persons and companies, and to
governmental inquiries. Concerns over the security of the
Internet and other online transactions and the privacy of users
could deter people from using the Internet to conduct
transactions that involve transmitting personally identifiable
and other confidential information, inhibiting the growth of our
business.
We are
exposed to foreign currency exchange risk.
Sales outside the United States accounted for approximately
46.4% of our total sales in 2010. A significant portion of our
cash and marketable securities are held in non-U.S domiciled
countries, primarily Ireland and Germany. The results of
operations of, and certain of our intercompany balances
associated with, our internationally focused websites are
exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Upon translation,
net sales and other operating results from our international
operations may differ materially from expectations, and we may
record significant gains or losses on the re-measurement of
intercompany balances. If the U.S. dollar weakens against
foreign currencies, the translation of these
foreign-currency-denominated transactions will result in
increased net revenues and operating expenses. Similarly, our
net revenues and operating expenses will decrease if the
U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies. As we
have expanded our international operations, our exposure to
exchange rate fluctuations has become more pronounced. We may
enter into short-term currency forward contracts to offset the
foreign exchange gains and losses generated by the
re-measurement of certain assets and liabilities recorded in
non-functional currencies. The use of such hedging activities
may not offset more than a portion of the adverse financial
impact resulting from unfavorable movements in foreign exchange
rates. See Item 7A of Part II, for information
demonstrating the effect on our consolidated statements of
operations from changes in exchange rates versus the
U.S. dollar.
Failure
to enhance and expand our technology, systems and business
offerings to accommodate increased traffic and to remain
competitive could reduce demand for our services and impair the
growth of our business.
We periodically enhance and expand our technology and
transaction-processing systems, network infrastructure and other
technologies to accommodate increases and spikes in the volume
of traffic on our technology platforms due to factors including
launches of new products and new commerce websites on our
technology platforms, and seasonal fluctuations in consumer
demand. To remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and
improve the responsiveness, functionality and features of our
e-commerce
platforms and the underlying network infrastructure, and develop
and introduce new business offerings and programs. Any inability
to enhance and expand our existing technology,
transaction-processing systems or network
18
infrastructure to manage such increased traffic and traffic
spikes may cause unanticipated systems disruptions, slower
response times and degradation in client services, including
impaired quality and speed of order fulfillment. Failure to
manage increased traffic and traffic spikes or an inability to
maintain our competitiveness could harm our reputation and
significantly reduce demand for our services, which would impair
the growth of our business. If we incur significant costs
without adequate results, or are unable to adapt rapidly to
technological changes, we may fail to achieve our business plan.
We may be unable to improve and increase the capacity of our
network infrastructure sufficiently or to anticipate and react
to expected increases in the use of the platform to handle
increased volume, or to obtain needed related services from
third party suppliers. Our network and our suppliers
networks may be unable to maintain an acceptable data
transmission capability, especially if demands on our platform
increase. We may fail to use new technologies effectively or
fail to adapt our proprietary technology and systems to client
requirements or emerging industry standards.
If we
are unable to enter into, achieve desired results from, or
maintain our marketing and promotional agreements with third
party marketing or technology providers to generate sales
traffic and sales for our clients, our ability to generate
revenue and our business could be adversely
affected.
We have entered into multiple marketing and promotional
agreements and operate certain affiliate networks and programs
which are designed to increase both traffic to the
e-commerce
stores we operate and the number of customers purchasing
products through such stores, including agreements with search
engine providers, display advertising networks, comparison
shopping engines, affiliate networks, operators of websites and
marketing technology providers. Our ability to attract new
clients and retain existing clients is based in part on our
ability to generate increased traffic or better conversion rates
resulting in increased online sales of their products through
these agreements and programs. If we are unable to enter into
such agreements on favorable terms, are unable to achieve the
desired results under these agreements and programs, are unable
to maintain these relationships, or fail to generate sufficient
traffic or generate sufficient revenue from purchases pursuant
to these agreements and programs, our ability to generate sales
and our ability to attract and retain our clients may be
impacted, negatively affecting our business and operating
results.
New
obligations to collect or pay transaction taxes could
substantially increase the cost to us of doing
business.
Many of the laws and regulations regarding the application of
sales tax, use tax, value added tax (VAT) or other similar
transaction taxes predate the growth of the Internet and online
commerce. The application of transaction taxes to interstate and
international sales over the Internet is complex and evolving.
We currently collect taxes on certain product and service
offerings in tax jurisdictions where we have taxable presence. A
successful assertion by one or more tax jurisdictions that we
should collect or were obligated to collect transaction taxes on
the products we sell could harm our results of operations. The
imposition by state and local governments of various taxes upon
Internet commerce and related
e-commerce
activities could create administrative burdens for us, put us at
a competitive disadvantage if they do not impose similar
obligations on all of our online competitors, and decrease our
future sales.
Changes
in our tax rates could affect our future results.
Our future effective tax rates could be favorably or unfavorably
affected by changes in the mix of earnings in countries with
differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of our
deferred tax assets and liabilities, or by changes in tax laws
or their interpretation. In addition, we are subject to the
continuous examination of our income tax returns by the Internal
Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We regularly assess
the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these
examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for
income taxes. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from
these continuous examinations will not have an adverse effect on
our results of operations and financial condition.
19
Failure
to properly manage and sustain our expansion efforts could
strain our management and other resources.
Through acquisitions and organic growth, we are rapidly and
significantly expanding our operations, both domestically and
internationally. We will continue to expand further to pursue
growth of our service offerings and customer base. This
expansion increases the complexity of our business and places a
significant strain on our management, operations, technical
performance, financial resources, and internal financial control
and reporting functions, and there can be no assurance that we
will be able to manage it effectively. Our personnel, systems,
procedures and controls may not be adequate to effectively
manage our future operations, especially as we employ personnel
in multiple domestic and international locations. We may not be
able to hire, train, retain and manage the personnel required to
address our growth. Failure to effectively manage our growth
opportunities could damage our reputation, limit our future
growth, negatively affect our operating results and harm our
business.
Our
international expansion efforts may not be successful in
generating additional revenue.
We sell products and services to consumers outside the United
States and we intend to continue expanding our international
presence. In 2010, our sales to international consumers
represented approximately 46.4% of our total sales. Continued
expansion into international markets, particularly the European
and Asia-Pacific regions, requires significant resources that we
may fail to recover through generating additional revenue.
Conducting business internationally is subject to risks that may
have a material adverse effect on our ability to increase or
maintain foreign sales, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in regulatory requirements and tariffs;
|
|
|
|
Difficulties in staffing and managing foreign subsidiary
operations, and the increased costs of international operations;
|
|
|
|
Uncertainty of application of, and the burden and cost of
complying with, local, commercial, tax, privacy and other laws
and regulations;
|
|
|
|
Reduced protection of intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
|
Difficulties in physical distribution and logistics for
international sales;
|
|
|
|
Higher incidences of credit card fraud and difficulties in
accounts receivable collection;
|
|
|
|
Difficulties in transferring funds from certain countries;
|
|
|
|
Difficulties in enforcing contracts against international
clients, especially in emerging markets;
|
|
|
|
Lower rates of Internet usage in certain countries, especially
in emerging markets;
|
|
|
|
The possibility of unionization of our workforce outside the
United States, particularly in Europe;
|
|
|
|
Political, social and economic instability and constraints on
international trade; and
|
|
|
|
Import and export license requirements and restrictions of the
United States and every other country in which we operate.
|
We may be unable to successfully and cost-effectively market,
sell and distribute our services in foreign markets. Doing so
may be more difficult or take longer than anticipated especially
due to international challenges, such as language barriers,
currency exchange issues and the fact that the Internet
infrastructure in some foreign countries may be less advanced
than the U.S. Internet infrastructure. If we are unable to
successfully expand our international operations, or manage this
expansion, our operating results and financial condition could
be harmed.
20
Implementing
our acquisition and strategic partnership strategy could result
in dilution and operating difficulties leading to a decline in
revenue and operating profit.
A key element of our business strategy involves expansion
through the acquisitions of businesses, assets, products or
technologies that allow us to complement our existing product
offerings, expand our market coverage, increase our engineering
workforce or enhance our technological capabilities. In the last
five years we acquired or invested in 11 companies. We
continually evaluate and explore strategic opportunities as they
arise, including business combination transactions, strategic
partnerships, and the purchase or sale of assets, including
tangible and intangible assets such as intellectual property. We
have acquired, and intend to continue engaging in strategic
acquisitions of businesses, technologies, services and products.
Most recently, in August 2010, we acquired certain assets and
liabilities of Journey Education Marketing, Inc., a reseller of
software and other products to students, educational
institutions in the US K-12 and post-secondary academic markets.
Acquisitions, strategic investments and strategic partnership
agreements may require significant capital infusions, typically
entail many risks, and could result in unforeseen difficulties,
disruptions, distractions, and expenditures in assimilating and
integrating with the operations, personnel, technologies,
products and information systems of acquired companies or
businesses. We have in the past and may in the future experience
delays in the timing and successful completion of such
activities. These challenges are magnified as the size of the
acquisition increases. Furthermore, these challenges would be
even greater if we acquired a business or entered into a
business combination transaction with a company that was larger
and more difficult to integrate than the companies we have
historically acquired. Moreover, the anticipated benefits of any
acquisition or strategic investment may not be realized. If a
significant number of clients of the acquired businesses cease
doing business with us, we would experience lost revenue and
operating profit, and any synergies from the acquisition may be
lost. In addition, key personnel of an acquired company may
decide not to work for us. The acquisition of another company or
its products and technologies may also require us to enter into
a geographic or business market in which we have little or no
prior experience. Future acquisitions could result in
potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the
incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities, amortization of
intangible assets or impairment of goodwill. Acquisitions could
also result in a dilutive impact to our earnings.
Our
clients sales cycles and the implementation process for
our commerce solution are time-consuming, which may cause us to
incur substantial expenses and expend management time without
generating corresponding consumer revenue, which would impair
our cash flow.
We market our services directly to software publishers, online
retailers, consumer electronics companies and other prospective
customers. These relationships are typically complex and take
time to finalize. Due to operating procedures in many
organizations, a significant amount of time may pass between
selection of our products and services by key decision-makers,
the signing of a contract, and the launch of a
revenue-generating commerce store. The period between the
initial client sales call and the signing of a contract with
significant sales potential is difficult to predict and
typically ranges from six to twelve months, and completion of
the implementation process typically ranges from one to four
months. If at the end of a sales effort a prospective client
does not purchase our products or services, we may have incurred
substantial expenses and expended management time that cannot be
recovered and that will not generate corresponding revenue. As a
result, our cash flow and our ability to fund expenditures
incurred during the sales cycle and implementation process may
be impaired. We can incur substantial front-end cost to launch
client sites and it may require a substantial time before those
costs are recouped by us, if at all.
We may
become liable for fraudulent, improper or illegal uses of our
platforms and services.
In recent years revenues from our remote control
platforms have grown as a percentage of our overall business,
and we plan to continue to emphasize our self service
e-commerce
solutions. These platforms typically have an automated structure
that allows customers to sign up for and use our
e-commerce
services without significant participation from Digital River
personnel. Despite our efforts to contractually prohibit the
sale of inappropriate and illegal goods and services and our
efforts to detect the same, the remote control nature of these
platforms increases the risk that transactions involving the
sale of unlawful goods or services
21
or the violation of the proprietary rights of others may occur
before we become aware of them. Furthermore, unscrupulous
individuals may offer for sale, or attempt to purchase, illegal
products via such platforms under innocuous names, further
frustrating our attempts to prevent inappropriate use of our
services. Failure to detect inappropriate or illegal uses of our
platforms by third parties could expose us to a number of risks,
including fines, increased fees or termination of services by
payment processors or credit card associations, risks of
lawsuits, and civil and criminal penalties.
Compliance
with and changes to applicable laws, rules, regulations, and
certification requirements, may substantially increase our costs
of doing business, limit our activities, or otherwise adversely
affect our ability to offer our services.
We are subject to the same international, federal, state and
local laws as other companies conducting business over the
Internet. Because our services are accessible worldwide, and we
facilitate sales of products to customers worldwide,
international jurisdictions may claim that we are required to
comply with their laws, rules and regulations. Laws regulating
Internet companies outside of the United States may be less
favorable than those in the United States, giving greater rights
to consumers, content owners and users. Compliance with
international, federal, state and local laws may be costly or
may require us to change our business practices or restrict our
service offerings relative to those provided in the United
States. As our services are available over the Internet in
multiple states and foreign countries, these jurisdictions may
claim that we are required to qualify to do business as a
foreign corporation in each state or foreign country. Failure to
qualify as a foreign corporation in a required jurisdiction
could subject us to taxes and penalties and could result in our
inability to enforce contracts in these jurisdictions. Laws,
rules and regulations applicable to our business cover issues
such as:
|
|
|
|
|
User privacy with respect to adults and minors;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to collect
and/or share
necessary information that allows us to conduct business on the
Internet;
|
|
|
|
Export compliance;
|
|
|
|
Pricing, taxation, and regulatory fees;
|
|
|
|
Fraud;
|
|
|
|
Advertising;
|
|
|
|
Intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
|
Information security;
|
|
|
|
Quality of products and services; and
|
|
|
|
Recycling of consumer products.
|
Our acceptance of credit cards and similar payment methods
requires us to maintain certain certifications, most notably
Payment Card Industry (PCI) Level 1 compliance. Maintaining
this certification requires an annual audit by a qualified third
party auditor and a review and assessment of our security
controls and a significant commitment of internal resources. Our
loss of such certification may result in our inability to
process credit card transactions and have a material adverse
affect on our ability to do business.
Violation of any laws, rules or regulations applicable to our
business could result in fines or other actions by regulatory
agencies, increased costs of doing business, reduced profits, or
restrictions on our ability to conduct business such as our
ability to export products or bans on our ability to offer
certain services. In addition, any significant changes,
developments, or new interpretations of laws, rules, and
regulations applicable to our business will increase our costs
of compliance and may further restrict our overseas client base,
may require significant management and other resources to
respond appropriately, and may harm our operating results.
22
Failure
to protect our intellectual property may jeopardize our
competitive position and require us to incur significant
expenses to enforce our rights.
We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark,
service mark and trade secret laws, and contractual restrictions
with our employees and other parties with which we do business,
to protect our proprietary rights and to limit access to and
disclosure of our proprietary information. We also seek to
protect our proprietary position by filing U.S. patent
applications related to our proprietary technology, inventions
and improvements that are important to the development of our
business, and the registration of our trademarks and service
marks in the U.S. and internationally.
The steps we have taken to protect our proprietary rights may be
inadequate and third parties may infringe or misappropriate our
trade secrets, trademarks and similar proprietary rights. Our
contractual arrangements and the other steps taken by us to
protect our intellectual property may not prevent
misappropriation of our technology or deter independent
third-party development of similar technologies. We may not be
able to successfully obtain patents or trademarks for our
technologies or brands. Effective protection of our intellectual
property rights may not be available in every country in which
our services are made available online, or cost-effective for us
to obtain on a worldwide basis. Any significant failure on our
part to protect our intellectual property could make it easier
for our competitors to offer similar services and thereby
adversely affect our market opportunities. In addition,
litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our
intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets or to
determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of
others. Litigation could result in substantial costs and
diversion of management and technical resources.
Claims
against us related to infringement of other parties
intellectual property rights, by our products and services or
the products we resell or deliver, could require us to expend
significant resources, enter into unfavorable licenses, pay
damages, prevent us from using certain technology, or require us
to change our business plans.
From time to time we are notified of potential patent disputes,
and expect that we will increasingly be subject to the assertion
of patent infringement claims against us
and/or our
customers as our services expand in scope and complexity. We
have been, and from
time-to-time
may be, named as a defendant in lawsuits claiming that we have,
in some way, violated the intellectual property rights of
others. For example, we are currently a party to patent
litigation in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Texas brought against us and various other
defendants by DDR Holdings, LLC, seeking injunctive and monetary
relief. That litigation was initiated in 2006; the proceedings
in the case were stayed until very recently pending a
re-examination of the patents in question by the United States
Patent and Trademark Office, which was completed in July 2010
and resulted in no changes to the asserted patent claims. On
October 6, 2010, the Court granted DDR Holdings
unopposed motion to lift the stay. On December 8, 2010, DDR
filed a third amended complaint adding claims of infringement
related to a more recently issued patent. On February 11,
2011, Digital River filed its answer to the third amended
complaint. We intend to vigorously defend ourselves in the DDR
Holdings matters, however, given the relatively early stage of
the proceedings, no assurances can be given at this time as to
the ultimate outcome of this case, or the range of potential
loss should the outcome be unfavorable.
Litigation over patents and other intellectual property rights
is not uncommon with respect to
e-commerce
technologies, and often involves patent holding companies or
other adverse patent owners who have no relevant product
revenues and against whom our own patents may therefore provide
little or no deterrence.
Claims may be made against us for negligence, copyright or
trademark infringement, products liability or other theories
based on the nature and content of software products or tangible
goods that we deliver electronically and physically. Because we
did not create these products, we are generally not in a
position to know the quality or nature of the content of these
products.
Any assertions or prosecutions of intellectual property claims
could require us to expend significant financial, managerial and
personnel resources. Although we carry general liability
insurance and typically require that our customers indemnify us
against consumer claims, our insurance and indemnification
measures
23
may not cover potential claims of this type, may not adequately
cover all costs incurred in defense of potential claims, or may
not reimburse us for all liability that may be imposed. We may
elect to self-insure against certain claims. The defense of any
claims, with or without merit, could be time-consuming, result
in costly litigation and diversion of technical and management
personnel, cause product enhancement delays or require that we
develop non-infringing technology or enter into royalty or
licensing agreements. Royalty or licensing agreements, if
required, may be unavailable on terms acceptable to us or at
all. In the event of a successful claim of infringement against
us and our failure or inability to develop non-infringing
technology or license the infringed or similar technology on a
timely basis, we may be unable to continue to pursue our current
business plan. We expect that we will increasingly be subject to
patent infringement claims as our services expand in scope and
complexity, and our results of operations and financial
condition could be materially adversely affected.
We are
subject to regulations relating to consumer
privacy.
We collect and maintain customer data from our customers, which
subjects us to increasing international, federal and state
regulations related to online privacy and the use of personal
user information. Congress has enacted anti-spam
legislation with which we must comply when providing email
campaigns for our clients. Legislation and regulations are
pending in various domestic and international governmental
bodies that address online privacy protections. Several
governments have proposed, and some have enacted, legislation
that would limit the use and transfer of personal user
information or require online service providers to establish
privacy policies. In addition, the U.S. Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) has urged Congress to adopt legislation
regarding the collection and use of personal identifying
information obtained from individuals when accessing websites,
including both adults and minors.
Even in the absence of laws requiring companies to establish
these procedures, the FTC has settled several proceedings
resulting in consent decrees in which Internet companies have
been required to establish programs regarding the manner in
which personal information is collected from users and provided
to third parties. We could become a party to a similar
enforcement proceeding. These regulatory and enforcement efforts
could limit our collection of
and/or
ability to share with our clients demographic and personal
information from customers, which could adversely affect our
ability to comprehensively serve our clients.
The European Union has adopted a privacy directive that
regulates the collection and use of information that identifies
an individual person. These regulations may inhibit or prohibit
the collection and sharing of personal information in ways that
could harm our clients or us. Failure to comply with member
state implementations of these directives may result in fines,
private lawsuits and enforcement actions. These enforcement
actions can include interruption or shutdown of operations
relating to the collection and sharing of information pertaining
to citizens of the European Union. Other countries may introduce
or expand their existing data privacy laws, rules and
regulations, which could require us to expend significant
resources to implement procedures and processes to ensure our
compliance.
System
failures, outages or errors could reduce the attractiveness of
our service offerings.
We provide commerce, marketing and delivery services to our
clients and consumers through our proprietary technology
transaction processing and client management systems. These
systems also maintain an electronic inventory of products and
gather consumer marketing information. The satisfactory
performance, reliability and availability of the technology and
the underlying network infrastructure are critical to our
operations, level of client service, reputation and ability to
attract and retain clients. We have experienced periodic
interruptions and have identified errors, affecting all or a
portion of our systems, which we believe will continue to occur
from
time-to-time.
While we attempt to correct every system error we identify, not
all errors may be identified or corrected. Any systems damage,
errors, or interruption that impairs our ability to accept and
fill client orders could result in an immediate loss of revenue
to us, and could cause some clients to purchase services offered
by our competitors. In addition, frequent systems failures could
harm our reputation.
24
Although we maintain system redundancies in multiple physical
locations, our systems and operations are vulnerable to damage
or interruption from:
|
|
|
|
|
Fire, flood, natural disasters, and other events beyond our
control;
|
|
|
|
Operator negligence, improper operation by, or supervision of,
employees, physical and electronic break-ins, misappropriation,
computer viruses and similar events; and
|
|
|
|
Power loss, computer systems failures,
denial-of-service
attacks and Internet and telecommunications failure.
|
We may not carry sufficient business interruption insurance to
fully compensate us for losses that may occur.
The
listing of our network addresses on anti-spam lists could harm
our ability to service our clients and deliver goods over the
Internet.
Certain privacy and anti-email proponents have engaged in a
practice of gathering, and publicly listing, network addresses
that they believe have been involved in sending unwanted,
unsolicited emails commonly known as spam. In response to user
complaints about spam, Internet service providers have, from
time to time, blocked such network addresses from sending emails
to their users. If our network addresses mistakenly end up on
these spam lists, our ability to provide services for our
clients and consummate the sales of digital and physical goods
over the Internet could be harmed.
If our
internal control over financial reporting or disclosure controls
and procedures are not effective, there may be errors in our
financial statements that could require a restatement or our
filings may not be timely and investors may lose confidence in
our reported financial information, which could lead to a
decline in our stock price.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us
to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of the end of each year, and to include a
management report assessing the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting in each Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, does not expect that our internal control
over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A
control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
control systems objectives will be met. Further, the
design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are
resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs. Controls can be circumvented
by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or
more people, or by management override of the controls. Over
time, controls may become inadequate because changes in
conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with
policies or procedures may occur. Implementation of new
technology related to the control system, such as our current
ongoing implementation of an SAP Enterprise Resource Planning,
or ERP, system, may result in misstatements due to
errors that are not detected and corrected during testing.
Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control
system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may
not be detected.
As a result, we cannot assure you that significant deficiencies
or material weaknesses in our internal control over financial
reporting will not be identified in the future. Any failure to
maintain or implement required new or improved controls, or any
difficulties we encounter in their implementation, could result
in significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, cause us to
fail to timely meet our periodic reporting obligations, or
result in material misstatements in our financial statements.
Any such failure could also adversely affect the results of
periodic management evaluations and annual auditor reports
regarding disclosure controls and the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting required under
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules
proclaimed after that. The existence of a material weakness
could result in errors in our financial statements that could
result in a restatement of financial statements, cause us to
fail to timely meet our reporting obligations and cause
investors to lose confidence in our reported financial
information, leading to a decline in our stock price.
25
Developments
in accounting standards may cause us to increase our recorded
expenses, which in turn would jeopardize our ability to
demonstrate sustained profitability.
In January 2002, we adopted new Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) guidance that establishes that goodwill and
intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but
are to be tested on an annual basis for impairment and, if
impaired, are recorded as an impairment charge in income from
operations. As of December 31, 2010, we had goodwill with
an indefinite life of $283.9 million from our acquisitions.
If our goodwill is determined for any reason to be impaired, the
subsequent accounting of the impaired portion as an expense
would lower our earnings and jeopardize our ability to
demonstrate sustained profitability. In January 2008, we adopted
new FASB guidance that requires the reporting of assets at fair
value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date. The fair value of
assets can shift significantly and can cause a permanent or
temporary impairment.
Anti-takeover
provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could
make an acquisition of us, which may be beneficial to our
stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our
stockholders to replace or remove our current
management.
We are incorporated in Delaware. Certain anti-takeover
provisions under Delaware law and in our certificate of
incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, as currently in
effect, may make a change of control of our company more
difficult, even if a change in control would be beneficial to
our stockholders. Our anti-takeover provisions include
provisions such as a prohibition on stockholder actions by
written consent, a classified board of directors and the
authority of our board of directors to issue preferred stock
without stockholder approval. In addition, we are governed by
the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, which generally prohibits stockholders owning
15% or more of our outstanding voting stock from merging or
combining with us in certain circumstances. These provisions may
delay or prevent an acquisition of us, even if the acquisition
may be considered beneficial by some of our stockholders. In
addition, they may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our
stockholders to replace or remove our current management by
making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of
our board of directors, which is responsible for appointing the
members of our management.
Risks
Related to Our Industry
Because
the
e-commerce
industry is highly competitive and has low barriers to entry, we
may be unable to compete effectively.
The market for
e-commerce
solutions is extremely competitive and we may find ourselves
unable to compete effectively. Because there are relatively low
barriers to entry in the
e-commerce
market, we expect continued intense competition as current
competitors expand their product offerings and new competitors
enter the market. In addition, our clients and partners may
become competitors in the future. Increased competition is
likely to result in price reductions, reduced margins, longer
sales cycles and a decrease or loss of our market share, any of
which could negatively impact our revenue and earnings. We face
competition from the following sources:
|
|
|
|
|
In-house development of
e-commerce
capabilities using tools or applications from companies, such as
Oracle Corporation (which recently acquired Art Technology
Group, Inc.) and IBM Corporation or through internally developed
solutions (e.g. as announced in October 2009, Symantec had
elected not to renew its
e-commerce
agreement with us and migrated its online store traffic to an
internally developed
e-commerce
system, which resulted in the termination of our
e-commerce
agreement with Symantec on June 30, 2010);
|
|
|
|
E-Commerce
capabilities custom-developed by companies, such as IBM Global
Services and Accenture, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Other providers of outsourced
e-commerce
solutions, such as GSI Commerce, Inc., asknet Inc. and Arvato, a
division of Bertelsmann AG;
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
Companies that provide technologies, services or products that
support a portion of the
e-commerce
process, such as payment processing, including CyberSource
Corporation and PayPal Corp.;
|
|
|
|
Companies that offer various online marketing services,
technologies and products, including ValueClick, Inc. and
aQuantive, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
High-traffic, branded websites that generate a substantial
portion of their revenue from
e-commerce
and may offer or provide to others the means to offer their
products for sale, such as Amazon.com, Inc. and Buy.com,
Inc.; and
|
|
|
|
Web hosting, web services and infrastructure companies that
offer portions of our solution and are seeking to expand the
range of their offering, such as Network Solutions, LLC, Akamai
Technologies, Inc., Yahoo!, Inc., eBay, Inc. and Hostopia.com,
Inc.
|
The online channel partners and the other companies described
above may compete directly with us by adopting a business model
similar to ours. Many of our competitors have, and new potential
competitors may have, more experience developing Internet-based
software and
e-commerce
solutions, larger technical staffs, larger customer bases, more
established distribution channels and customer relationships,
greater brand recognition and greater financial, marketing and
other resources than we have. Some of our clients may also
compete with us. In addition, competitors or our clients may be
able to develop services that are superior to our services,
achieve greater customer acceptance or have significantly
improved functionality as compared to our existing and future
products and services, which could result in the loss of
existing clients
and/or our
inability to pursue and sign new clients. Our competitors may be
able to respond more quickly to technological developments and
changes in customers needs. Our inability to compete
successfully against current and future competitors could cause
our revenue and earnings to decline.
The
global recession, and political and economic conditions, may
adversely affect our revenue and results of operations and stock
price.
The U.S. and other global economies continue to experience
slow recovery from the recent recession that affected the
economy as a whole, resulting in continued issues with the pace
of economic growth, loss of consumer confidence and uncertainty
about economic stability, and increased unemployment.
U.S. and foreign credit and financial markets continue to
experience instability, resulting in increased volatility in the
stock market and reduced availability of credit. Our revenue and
growth is dependent on the continued growth in demand for our
clients products and the continued growth of Internet
commerce, and depends significantly on geopolitical economic and
business conditions. The continuing effects of this recession
and the instability in the credit and financial markets may
continue to negatively impact our business and our clients,
demand for our clients products, and consumer spending, such as
causing delays in new product introductions, changes in
clients outsourcing behavior, increasing our difficulty in
collecting client receivables, and increasing the risk of client
bankruptcies
and/or
interruption or cessation of business, which may have a negative
impact on our business, operating results and financial
condition. Instability in the credit and equity markets
increases the risk that the actual amounts realized in the
future on our financial instruments and investments may
significantly differ from the fair values currently assigned to
them. If macroeconomic and market conditions affecting us or our
clients remain uncertain, weaken further, or otherwise fail to
improve, they may have a material adverse effect on our
business, operating results, financial condition and stock price.
Risks
Related to the Securities Markets
We may
need to raise additional capital to achieve our business
objectives, which could result in dilution to existing investors
or increase our debt obligations.
We require substantial working capital to fund our business. In
February 2009, we filed a shelf registration that would allow us
to sell an undetermined amount of equity or debt securities in
accordance with the rules applying to well-known seasoned
issuers. In addition, we filed an acquisition shelf
registration statement for up to approximately 1.5 million
shares. On November 1, 2010, we sold and issued
$345.0 million in aggregate principal amount of senior
convertible notes (2010 Notes), in a private, unregistered
offering. If
27
additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity
securities, the percentage ownership of our stockholders will be
reduced and these equity securities may have rights, preferences
or privileges senior to those of our common stock. Our capital
requirements depend on several factors, including the rate of
market acceptance of our products, the ability to expand our
client base, the growth of sales and marketing and opportunities
for acquisitions of other businesses. We have experienced
significant operating losses and negative cash flow from
operations during our operating history and may do so in the
future. Additional financing may not be available when needed,
on terms favorable to us or at all. If adequate funds are not
available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may be
unable to develop or enhance our services, take advantage of
future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, which
would harm our operating results and adversely affect our
ability to sustain profitability.
The
investment of our substantial cash balance and our investments
in marketable debt securities are subject to risks which may
cause losses and affect the liquidity of these
investments.
As of December 31, 2010, we held $90.6 million of
investments at par value, $83.7 million fair value, in
auction-rate securities (ARS), all are AAA/Aaa rated and
105%-115% over collateralized by student loans guaranteed by the
U.S. government with the exception of one security which is
rated AAA/A3 and one security which is rated AAA/Aa1. Almost all
of these securities continue to fail at auction due to illiquid
market conditions.
Due to the illiquid market conditions, we have recorded a
temporary fair value reduction of our ARS in the amount of
$6.9 million (7.6% of par value) in our year end 2010
balance sheet under Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss).
The investment principal associated with failed auctions will
not be accessible until successful auctions occur, a buyer is
found outside of the auction process, the issuers establish a
different form of financing to replace these securities, or
final payments come due according to the contractual maturities
of the debt issues. If none of these events occur or if the
credit markets deteriorate, we may in the future be required to
take a larger fair value discount and may be required to take a
permanent impairment resulting in a reduction of earnings and
liquidity. We intend to hold our auction-rate securities until
we can recover the full principal amount and have the ability to
do so based on our other sources of liquidity. Based on our
expected operating cash flows, and our other sources of cash, we
do not anticipate the potential lack of liquidity on these
investments will affect our ability to execute our current
business plan.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
28
The following table summarizes the various facilities that we
lease for our business operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
|
|
|
Description of Use
|
|
Primary Locations
|
|
Footage(1)
|
|
Lease Expirations
|
|
Corporate Office Facilities
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
162,500
|
|
|
2011
|
Other U.S. Office Facilities
|
|
California, Florida,
|
|
|
110,018
|
|
|
From 2011 to 2015
|
|
|
Illinois, Nebraska,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Dakota, Oregon,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania, Texas,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S.
Office Facilities
|
|
Austria, Brazil, China,
|
|
|
67,697
|
|
|
From 2011 to 2024
|
|
|
Germany, Ireland,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan, Korea,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luxembourg, Sweden,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taiwan, United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off Site U.S. Data Centers
|
|
California, Minnesota
|
|
|
2,280
|
|
|
From 2011 to 2012
|
Off Site non U.S. Data Centers
|
|
Germany, Ireland, Sweden
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
From 2011 to 2012
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes
sub-leased
space. |
In the second half of 2010, we entered into an agreement to
lease 132,600 square feet for general office purposes at
10350 Bren Road West, Minnetonka, MN 55343. The operating lease
contains a ten year term and will commence in the second quarter
of 2011. We intend to relocate our corporate office facilities
to the new location by the end of the third quarter of 2011. We
have a right to renew the term for one five year period
subsequent to the original term. Significant provisions of the
lease include a rent holiday for the first eighteen months of
occupancy, subsequent rent escalations and leasehold improvement
allowances. The rent holiday and escalations will be amortized
over the life of the agreement. Leasehold improvement allowances
will be classified as a reduction to rent and will be recorded
as a function of property and equipment, net, with amortization
recorded over the life of the lease. There are no other unusual
provisions or conditions, such as contingent rent payments or
rent concessions. The lease of 10350 Bren Road West has not been
incorporated into the table above, as we did not utilize the
facility for business operations as of December 31, 2010.
Lease payment obligations are included in the table at
Note 8 Commitments and Contingencies.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
DDR Holdings, LLC (DDR Holdings) has brought a claim against us
and several other defendants regarding U.S. Patents
No. 6,629,135 (the 135 patent) and
6,993,572 (the 572 patent), which are owned by
DDR Holdings. These patents claim
e-commerce
outsourcing systems and methods relating to the provision of
outsourced
e-commerce
support pages having a common look and feel with a hosts
website. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for
the Eastern District of Texas on January 31, 2006. The
complaint seeks injunctive relief, declaratory relief, damages
and attorneys fees. We have denied infringement of any
valid claim of the
patents-in-suit,
and have asserted counter-claims which seek a judicial
declaration that the patents are invalid and not infringed. In
September 2006, DDR Holdings filed an application for
reexamination of its patents based upon the prior art produced
by us and the other defendants in the case. As part of that
application, DDR Holdings asserted that this prior art raised a
substantial question as to the patentability of the inventions
claimed in the patents. In December 2006, the Court stayed the
litigation pending a decision on the reexamination application.
In February 2007, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
ordered reexamination of DDR Holdings patents.
On January 5, 2009, the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office issued a final office action rejecting the claims in the
135 patent which were subject to reexamination. On
January 14, 2009, the U.S. Patent and Trademark
29
Office issued a final office action rejecting all but two of the
claims in the 572 patent which were subject to
reexamination. On April 16, 2010, the Board of Patent
Appeals and Interferences reversed the decision of the Examiner
to reject the claims in the 135 patent and the 572
patent which were subject to reexamination. On July 20,
2010, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued
Reexamination Certificates for the 135 and 572
patents with no changes to the asserted patent claims. On
October 6, 2010, the Court granted DDR Holdings
unopposed motion to lift the stay in the Texas litigation. On
December 8, 2010, DDR filed a third amended complaint
adding claims of infringement related to a more recently issued
patent. On February 11, 2011, Digital River filed its
answer to the third amended complaint. We intend to vigorously
defend ourselves in the DDR Holdings matters, however, given the
relatively early stage of the proceedings, no assurances can be
given at this time as to the ultimate outcome of this case, or
the range of potential loss should the outcome be unfavorable.
We are subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation
arising in the ordinary course of business. While the final
outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, we
believe there is no ordinary course litigation pending against
us that is likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position,
results of operation or cash flows. Because of the uncertainty
inherent in litigation, it is possible that unfavorable
resolutions of these lawsuits, proceedings and claims could
exceed the amount we have currently reserved for these matters.
From time to time, we are involved in other disputes or
regulatory inquiries that arise in the ordinary course of
business. Any claims or regulatory actions against us, whether
meritorious or not, could be time consuming, result in costly
litigation, damage awards, injunctive relief or increased costs
of doing business through adverse judgment or settlement,
require us to change our business practices in expensive ways,
require significant amounts of management time, result in the
diversion of significant operational resources or otherwise harm
our business. These matters are subject to inherent
uncertainties and managements view of these matters may
change in the future.
Third parties have from
time-to-time
claimed, and others may claim in the future, that we have
infringed their intellectual property rights. We have been
notified of several potential patent disputes, and expect that
we will increasingly be subject to patent infringement claims as
our services expand in scope and complexity. We have in the past
been forced to litigate such claims. We may also become more
vulnerable to third-party claims as laws, such as the Digital
Millennium Copyright Act, the Lanham Act and the Communications
Decency Act are interpreted by the courts and as we expand
geographically into jurisdictions where the underlying laws with
respect to the potential liability of online intermediaries like
ourselves are either unclear or less favorable. These claims,
whether meritorious or not, could be time consuming and costly
to resolve, cause service upgrade delays, require expensive
changes in our methods of doing business, or could require us to
pay damages or enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements.
30
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Price
Range of Common Stock
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market
under the symbol DRIV. The following table sets
forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sale price
per share of our common stock on that market. These
over-the-counter
market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail
mark-up,
markdown or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual
transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
31.16
|
|
|
$
|
19.07
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
41.20
|
|
|
$
|
29.25
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
41.17
|
|
|
$
|
32.90
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
41.00
|
|
|
$
|
21.83
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
31.84
|
|
|
$
|
23.59
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
32.36
|
|
|
$
|
23.79
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
34.31
|
|
|
$
|
23.22
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
39.10
|
|
|
$
|
33.50
|
|
Holders
As of February 1, 2011, there were approximately 289
holders of record of our common stock. On February 1, 2011,
the last sale price reported on The Nasdaq Global Select Market
for our common stock was $31.92 per share.
Dividend
Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital
stock. We intend to retain any future earnings to support
operations and to finance the growth and development of our
business and do not anticipate paying cash dividends for the
foreseeable future.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Set forth below is information regarding the Companys
stock repurchases during 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Shares that
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Average
|
|
Purchased as
|
|
may yet be
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
Purchased
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
per Share
|
|
Announced Plan
|
|
Under the Plan
|
|
November 1, 2010
|
|
|
943,881
|
|
|
$
|
37.08
|
|
|
|
943,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation
Plans
The information required in the table of Securities Authorized
for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans will be
incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement in connection
with our 2011 Annual Meeting to be filed in accordance with
Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended.
31
Securities
Performance Measurement
Comparison1
The SEC requires a comparison on an indexed basis of cumulative
total stockholder return for the Company, a relevant broad
equity market index and a published industry
line-of-business
index. The following graph shows a total stockholder return of
an investment of $100 in cash on December 31, 2005 for
(i) the Companys Common Stock; (ii) the CRSP
Total Return Index for the Nasdaq Stock Market
(U.S. companies) (the Nasdaq Composite Index);
and (iii) the RDG Technology Composite Index. The RDG
Technology Composite Index is composed of approximately 500
technology companies in the semiconductor, electronics, medical
and related technology industries. Historic stock price
performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price
performance. All values assume reinvestment of the full amount
of all dividends.
COMPARISON
OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Digital River, Inc., The NASDAQ Composite Index
And The RDG Technology Composite Index
|
|
|
* |
|
$100 invested on
12/31/05 in
stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. |
Fiscal year ending December 31.
1 This
Section is not soliciting material, is not deemed
filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by
reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act
or the Exchange Act whether made before or after the date hereof
and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any
such filing.
32
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of
results of future operations, and should be read in conjunction
with Item 7, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and the consolidated financial statements and related notes
thereto included in Item 15 of this
Form 10-K
to fully understand factors that may affect the comparability of
the information presented below.
The financial information that has been previously filed or
otherwise reported for these periods is superseded by the
information in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
and the financial statements and related financial information
contained in previously-filed reports should no longer be relied
upon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
$
|
820,040
|
|
|
$
|
483,389
|
|
|
$
|
603,686
|
|
|
$
|
774,814
|
|
|
$
|
704,046
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
280,176
|
|
|
|
267,113
|
|
|
|
443,662
|
|
|
|
245,102
|
|
|
|
206,159
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
539,864
|
|
|
|
216,276
|
|
|
|
160,024
|
|
|
|
529,712
|
|
|
|
497,887
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,333,767
|
|
|
|
985,642
|
|
|
|
1,070,252
|
|
|
|
1,127,744
|
|
|
|
1,006,263
|
|
Long-term obligations
|
|
|
369,843
|
|
|
|
24,310
|
|
|
|
24,517
|
|
|
|
206,362
|
|
|
|
196,345
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
683,748
|
|
|
$
|
694,219
|
|
|
$
|
602,073
|
|
|
$
|
676,280
|
|
|
$
|
603,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
363,226
|
|
|
$
|
403,766
|
|
|
$
|
394,226
|
|
|
$
|
349,275
|
|
|
$
|
307,632
|
|
Costs and expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
expense shown separately below):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct cost of services
|
|
|
17,789
|
|
|
|
17,625
|
|
|
|
16,417
|
|
|
|
10,243
|
|
|
|
7,709
|
|
Network and infrastructure
|
|
|
46,909
|
|
|
|
45,996
|
|
|
|
41,040
|
|
|
|
32,309
|
|
|
|
29,250
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
150,041
|
|
|
|
157,475
|
|
|
|
150,118
|
|
|
|
134,401
|
|
|
|
113,462
|
|
Product research and development
|
|
|
60,844
|
|
|
|
54,463
|
|
|
|
51,184
|
|
|
|
39,179
|
|
|
|
32,341
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
43,392
|
|
|
|
37,707
|
|
|
|
39,525
|
|
|
|
38,937
|
|
|
|
34,158
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
23,413
|
|
|
|
19,438
|
|
|
|
15,980
|
|
|
|
12,706
|
|
|
|
10,983
|
|
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles
|
|
|
7,845
|
|
|
|
7,561
|
|
|
|
8,391
|
|
|
|
7,586
|
|
|
|
12,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
350,233
|
|
|
|
340,265
|
|
|
|
322,655
|
|
|
|
275,361
|
|
|
|
240,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
12,993
|
|
|
|
63,501
|
|
|
|
71,571
|
|
|
|
73,914
|
|
|
|
67,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3,035
|
|
|
|
3,210
|
|
|
|
18,019
|
|
|
|
32,167
|
|
|
|
22,836
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,688
|
)
|
|
|
(5,339
|
)
|
|
|
(2,528
|
)
|
|
|
(2,439
|
)
|
|
|
(2,486
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(1,067
|
)
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
(791
|
)
|
|
|
(567
|
)
|
|
|
1,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
13,273
|
|
|
|
61,796
|
|
|
|
86,271
|
|
|
|
103,075
|
|
|
|
89,482
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(2,462
|
)
|
|
|
12,025
|
|
|
|
22,676
|
|
|
|
32,261
|
|
|
|
28,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
15,735
|
|
|
$
|
49,771
|
|
|
$
|
63,595
|
|
|
$
|
70,814
|
|
|
$
|
60,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
$
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.55
|
|
|
$
|
1.58
|
|
|
$
|
1.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per-share calculation basic
|
|
|
37,518
|
|
|
|
36,975
|
|
|
|
37,016
|
|
|
|
40,444
|
|
|
|
38,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per-share calculation diluted
|
|
|
38,339
|
|
|
|
37,704
|
|
|
|
42,106
|
|
|
|
45,914
|
|
|
|
44,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The discussion in this Annual Report contains forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual
results could differ materially from those discussed below.
Additional factors that could cause or contribute to such
differences include, but are not limited to, those identified
below, and those discussed in the section entitled Risk
Factors, included elsewhere in this Annual Report. When
used in this document, the words believes,
expects, anticipates,
intends, plans, and similar expressions,
are intended to identify certain of these forward-looking
statements. However, these words are not the exclusive means of
identifying such statements. In addition, any statements that
refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of
future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements.
The cautionary statements made in this document should be read
as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements
wherever they appear in this document.
Overview
We provide
end-to-end
global
e-commerce
and marketing solutions to a wide variety of companies in
software, consumer electronics, computer games, video games, and
other markets. We offer our clients a broad range of services
that enable them to quickly and cost effectively establish an
online sales channel capability and to subsequently manage and
grow online sales on a global basis while mitigating risks. Our
services include design, development and hosting of online
stores and shopping carts, store merchandising and optimization,
order management, denied parties screening, export controls and
management, tax compliance and management, fraud management,
digital product delivery via download, physical product
fulfillment, subscription management, online marketing including
e-mail
marketing, management of affiliate programs, paid search
programs, payment processing services, website optimization, web
analytics and reporting, and CD production and delivery.
Our products and services allow our clients to focus on
promoting and marketing their products and brands while
leveraging our investments in technology and infrastructure to
facilitate the purchase of products through their online
websites. When shoppers visit one of our clients branded
websites and purchase goods, they are transferred to an
e-commerce
store and/or
shopping cart operated by us on our
e-commerce
platforms. Once on our system, shoppers can browse for products
and make purchases online. We typically are the seller of record
for transactions through our client branded stores. After a
purchase is made, we either deliver the product digitally via
download over the Internet or transmit instructions to a third
party for physical fulfillment of the order. We also typically
process the buyers payment as the merchant of record,
including collection and remittance of applicable taxes and
compliance with various regulatory matters. We have invested
substantial resources to develop our
e-commerce
and marketing platforms, including
business-to-business
software, and we provide access and use of our platforms to our
clients as a service as opposed to selling the software to be
operated on their own in-house computer hardware. Our
e-commerce
store solutions range from simple remote control models to more
comprehensive online store models.
In addition to the services we provide that facilitate the
completion of an online transaction, we also offer services
designed to increase traffic to our clients websites and
the associated online stores and to improve the sales
productivity of those stores. Our services include paid search
advertising, search engine optimization, affiliate marketing,
store optimization, multi-variant testing, web analytic services
and e-mail
optimization. All of our services are designed to help our
clients acquire customers more effectively, sell to those
customers more often and more efficiently, and increase the
lifetime value of each customer.
On September 1, 2010, we announced an amendment of our
agreement with Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft) to
extend the term of the Microsoft Operations Digital Distribution
Agreement through October 31, 2013. On August 30,
2010, we entered into the Microsoft Store USA statement of work
with Microsoft whereby we will build, host and manage
Microsoft®
Store, an
e-commerce
store that supports the sale and fulfillment of Microsoft and
third party software as well as consumer electronics products to
customers in the United States. The agreement contemplates
Digital River providing
e-commerce
hosting and payment processing services in connection with
Microsoft Store in addition to Digital River maintaining its
34
role as a reseller of Microsoft products via Digital
Rivers existing online stores. Currently, we are providing
e-commerce
services, ranging from transaction and payment processing, to
e-marketing,
digital downloads, fraud prevention and multi-lingual customer
service in support of some of the popular Microsoft software
titles, including
Microsoft©
Office. The global arrangement incorporates digital fulfillment
across multiple geographies, including North America, Asia,
Europe and Latin America.
As announced on October 12, 2009, Symantec Corporation
informed us that it elected not to renew its
e-commerce
agreement with us. As a consequence, their
e-commerce
agreement terminated on June 30, 2010. We recorded
$25.2 million in overall revenues from the Symantec
contract in 2010.
We view our operations and manage our business as one reportable
segment, providing outsourced
e-commerce
solutions globally to a variety of companies, primarily in the
software and high-tech products markets.
We were incorporated in Delaware in February 1994. Our
headquarters are located at 9625 West 76th Street, Eden
Prairie, Minnesota and our telephone number is
952-253-1234.
General information about us can be found at
www.digitalriver.com under the Company/Investor
Relations link or follow the Company on Twitter at
twitter.com/digitalriverinc. Our annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and current reports on
Form 8-K,
as well as any amendments or exhibits to those reports, are
available free of charge through our website as soon as
reasonably practicable after we file them with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
Current
Year Results
The Company reported net income of $15.7 million, or $0.41
per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2010.
This compared with net income of $49.8 million, or $1.32
per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Critical
Accounting Policies
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (U.S. GAAP). As such, we are required to
make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that we
believe are reasonable based upon the information available.
These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
periods presented. The significant accounting policies that we
believe are the most critical in fully understanding and
evaluating our reported financial results are the following:
Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue from
services rendered once all the following criteria for revenue
recognition have been met: (1) persuasive evidence
of an agreement exists; (2) the services have been
rendered; (3) the fee is fixed and determinable; and
(4) collection of the amounts due is reasonably assured.
We also determine whether it is appropriate to record the gross
amount of product sales and related costs or the net amount
earned as net revenue. We typically are the seller and merchant
of record on most of the transactions we process and have
contractual relationships with our clients, which obligate us to
pay to the client a specified percentage of each sale. We derive
our revenue primarily from transaction fees based on a
percentage of the products sale price and fees from services
rendered associated with the
e-commerce
and other services provided to our clients and end customers.
Our revenue is recorded net as generally our clients are subject
to inventory risks and control customers product choices.
We sell both physical and digital products. Revenue is
recognized upon fulfillment and based upon when products are
shipped and title and significant risk of ownership passes to
the customer.
The Company also provides customers with various proprietary
software backup services. We recognize revenue for these backup
services based upon historical usage within the contract period
of the digital backup services when this information is
available. Digital backup services are recognized straight-line
35
over the life of the backup service when historical usage
information is unavailable. Shipping revenues are recorded net
of any associated costs.
We also, to a lesser extent, provide fee-based client services,
which include website design, custom development and
integration, analytical marketing, affiliate marketing and email
marketing services. If we receive payments for fee-based
services in advance of delivery, these amounts, if significant,
are deferred and recognized over the service period.
Provisions for doubtful accounts and transaction losses and
authorized credits are made at the time of revenue recognition
based upon our historical experience. The provision for doubtful
accounts and transaction losses are recorded as charges to
operating expense, while the provision for authorized credits is
recognized as a reduction of net revenues.
Taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are directly
imposed on a revenue-producing transaction between a seller and
a customer may be presented on either a gross basis (included in
revenues and costs) or on a net basis (excluded from revenues).
The Company presents these taxes on a net basis in its financial
statements.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We must make
estimates and assumptions that can affect the amount of assets
and liabilities and the amounts of revenues and expenses we
report in any financial reporting period. We use estimates in
determining our allowance for doubtful accounts which are based
on our historical experience and current trends. We must
estimate the collectability of our billed accounts receivable.
We analyze accounts receivable and consider our historical bad
debt experience, customer credit-worthiness, current economic
trends and changes in our customer payment terms when evaluating
the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. We must
make significant judgments and estimates in connection with the
allowance in any accounting period. There may be material
differences in our operating results for any period if we change
our estimates or if the estimates are not accurate.
Credit Card Chargeback Reserve. We use
estimates based on historical experience and current trends to
determine accrued chargeback expenses. Significant management
judgments are used and estimates made in connection with these
expenses in any accounting period. The following table
illustrates our provision for chargeback losses as a percentage
of revenue for 2010, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands, except
percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
363,226
|
|
|
$
|
403,766
|
|
|
$
|
394,226
|
|
Provision for Credit Card Chargebacks
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
Provision for Credit Card Chargebacks as a % of Revenue
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Determining appropriate reserves for chargeback transactions is
an inherently uncertain process. The reserves are maintained at
a level we deem appropriate to provide for losses incurred on
revenue earned in 2010. There may be material differences in our
operating results for any period if we change our estimates or
if the estimates are not accurate. An aggregate 0.25% deviation
in our estimates would have resulted in an increase or decrease
in operating income of approximately $0.9 million in 2010,
resulting in an approximate $0.02 change in diluted net income
per share.
Goodwill, Intangibles and Other Long-Lived
Assets. We depreciate property, plant and
equipment; amortize certain intangibles and certain other
long-lived assets with definite lives over their useful lives.
Useful lives are based on our estimates of the period of time
over which the assets will generate revenue or benefit our
business. We review assets with definite lives for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
value we are carrying on our financial statements for an asset
may not be recoverable. Our evaluation considers non-financial
data such as changes in the operating environment and business
strategy, competitive information, market trends and operating
performance. We review goodwill for impairment on an annual
basis or more frequently if events occur or circumstances change
that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the
reporting unit below its carrying amount. As we only have one
business segment, goodwill is evaluated for impairment by
comparing our carrying value to our market capitalization, which
is determined to approximate fair value. If there are
indications
36
that impairment may be necessary, we use an undiscounted cash
flow analysis to determine the impairment amount, if any. Assets
with indefinite lives are reviewed for impairment annually (or
more frequently if there are indications that an impairment may
be necessary) utilizing a two-step approach. There have been no
material impairments of goodwill and other intangible assets for
the years 2010, 2009 and 2008.
Income Taxes and Deferred Taxes. Deferred
income taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for
financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax
purposes. We record deferred tax assets for favorable tax
attributes, including tax loss carryforwards. We currently have
U.S. tax loss carryforwards, consisting solely of acquired
operating tax loss carryforwards, and a lesser amount of
acquired foreign operating tax loss carryforwards. A portion of
the benefit of the acquired tax loss carryforwards has been
reserved by a valuation allowance pursuant to U.S. GAAP.
These valuation allowances of the deferred tax asset will be
reversed if and when it is more likely than not that the
deferred tax asset will be realized. We evaluate the need for a
valuation allowance of the deferred tax asset on a quarterly
basis. Any future release of valuation allowance will reduce
income tax expense.
As of December 31, 2010, we had U.S. tax loss
carryforwards of approximately $9.8 million and foreign tax
loss carryforwards of $9.9 million. All of the
U.S. tax loss carryforwards consist of acquired net
operating losses and $9.3 million of the foreign tax loss
carryforwards are acquired net operating losses. The
U.S. tax loss carryforwards expire in the years 2021
through 2028. However, we anticipate most U.S. tax loss
carryforwards will be utilized in the next few years.
There is uncertainty of future realization of the deferred tax
assets resulting from tax loss carryforwards due to anticipated
limitations. Therefore, a valuation allowance was recorded
against the tax effect of such tax loss carryforwards. During
2010, the Company released $0.9 million of valuation
allowance recorded on its acquired foreign tax loss
carryforwards because we believe it is more likely than not that
these deferred tax assets will be realized. This reduction in
the valuation allowance reduced tax expense. The Company also
recorded $0.6 million of valuation allowance on tax loss
carryforwards and other tax attributes because we believe it is
more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will not be
realized. At December 31, 2010, the Company has a valuation
allowance on approximately $0.5 million of deferred tax
assets related to operating losses as we believe it is more
likely than not that these deferred tax assets will not be
realized. Any future release of this valuation allowance will
reduce income tax expense.
During 2010, we repatriated approximately $26 million of
earnings from our German subsidiary, resulting in a US tax
benefit driven by the generation of excess foreign tax credits.
This was a one-time distribution as we plan to indefinitely
reinvest all remaining foreign earnings. No provision has been
made for federal income taxes on approximately
$117.6 million of our foreign subsidiaries undistributed
earnings as of December 31, 2010, since we plan to
indefinitely reinvest all such earnings. If these earnings were
distributed to the U.S. in the form of dividends or
otherwise, we would be subject to U.S. income taxes on such
earnings. The amount of U.S. income taxes would be subject
to adjustment for foreign tax credits and for the impact of the
step-up in
the basis of assets resulting from elections made at the time of
acquisitions. If these earnings were to be distributed, the
income tax liability would be approximately $28.3 million.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense. We account
for share-based payments made to our employees and directors
including stock options, restricted stock grants and employee
stock purchases made through our Employee Stock Purchase Plan
based on estimated fair values.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period is
based on the value of the portion of share-based awards that are
ultimately expected to vest during the period. The fair value of
each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of
restricted stock is determined based on the number of shares
granted and the closing price of our common stock on the date of
grant. Compensation expense for all share-based payment awards
is recognized over the requisite service period.
37
As stock-based compensation expense recognized in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations is based on awards
ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated
forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and
revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. Benefits of tax
deductions in excess of recognized stock-based compensation
expense are reported as a financing cash flow. Stock-based
compensation expense of $20.8 million, $18.3 million
and $12.5 million was charged to operating expenses during
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth certain items from our
consolidated statements of operations as a percentage of total
revenue for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Costs and expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
expense shown separately below):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct cost of services
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Network and infrastructure
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
38.1
|
|
Product research and development
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
96.4
|
|
|
|
84.3
|
|
|
|
81.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue. Our revenue was $363.2 million
in 2010 compared to $403.8 million and $394.2 million
in 2009 and 2008, respectively. The revenue decrease is
primarily attributable to the decline in Symantec revenue of
$89.6 million compared to the prior year. Excluding
Symantec, revenue increased 17.0% for 2010, compared to the
prior year. The increase is attributed to increased traffic,
growth in the number of consumer electronic clients, growth in
our digital software business and expanded strategic marketing
activities with a larger number of clients. The revenue increase
was also partially offset by foreign currency impact year over
year.
International
e-commerce
sales are approximately 46.4%, 41.1% and 42.8% of revenue in
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in international
sales during 2010 has been attributed to a change in product mix
in 2010.
Microsoft Corporation accounted for approximately 24.7%, 11.8%
and 7.1% of our revenue in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Sales of products from one software publisher client, Symantec
Corporation, accounted for approximately 5.8%, 21.5% and 24.3%
of our total revenue in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In
addition, revenues derived from proprietary Digital River
services sold to Symantec consumers and dealer network sales of
Symantec products amounted to approximately 1.1%, 6.9% and 9.4%
of total Digital River revenue in 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
38
Direct Cost of Services. Direct cost of
services expense primarily includes costs related to product
fulfillment,
back-up CD
production and delivery solutions and certain client-specific
costs. Direct cost of service expense was $17.8 million,
$17.6 million and $16.4 million in 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The increase in 2010 compared with 2009 was
primarily driven by revenue growth partially offset by lower CD
supply costs. The increase in 2009 compared with 2008 was
primarily driven by revenue growth and increased CD supply.
As a percentage of revenue, direct cost of services was 4.9%,
4.4% and 4.2% in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Network and Infrastructure. Our network and
infrastructure expenses primarily include costs to operate and
maintain our technology platforms, customer service, data
communication and data center operations. Network and
infrastructure expenses were $46.9 million in 2010,
compared to $46.0 million and $41.0 million in 2009
and 2008, respectively. The increase in 2010 from 2009 was due
to an increase in data communication expenses related to an
acquisition in the second half of 2010. The increase in 2009
from 2008 was due to an increase in data communication expenses,
increased global data center operations costs and increased
workforce related costs.
As a percentage of revenue, network and infrastructure expenses
were 12.9%, 11.4% and 10.4% in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Sales and Marketing. Our sales and marketing
expenses include credit card transaction and other payment
processing fees, personnel and related costs, advertising,
promotional and product marketing expenses, credit card
chargebacks and bad debt expense. Sales and marketing expenses
were $150.0 million, $157.5 million and
$150.1 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
decrease in sales and marketing in 2010 compared to 2009 was
attributable to lower payment processing costs and paid search
fees. The increase in sales and marketing in 2009 compared to
2008 was due to additional workforce related costs to support
our global growth initiatives and higher marketing and
advertising costs due to new or expanded client paid search
marketing programs.
As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expenses were
41.3%, 39.0% and 38.1% in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Product Research and Development. Our product
research and development expenses include costs associated with
developing and enhancing our technology platforms and related
systems. Product research and development expenses were
$60.8 million in 2010, compared to $54.5 million and
$51.2 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase
in 2010 compared to 2009 was due to higher research and
development workforce related costs to support the
Companys on-going initiatives in our
e-commerce
infrastructure. These initiatives are designed to advance global
system scalability,
e-marketing
capabilities, data management and services standardization. The
increases in 2009 compared to 2008 were due to higher research
and development workforce related costs to support increased
investment in our
e-commerce
platform and ERP technologies, offset by the benefit of foreign
currency translation and increased capitalization of internal
and consulting labor relating to our ERP implementation.
As a percentage of revenue, product research and development
expenses were 16.8%, 13.5% and 13.0% in 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
General and Administrative. Our general and
administrative expenses primarily include executive, accounting
and administrative functions, professional services and
insurance. General and administrative expenses were
$43.4 million in 2010 compared to $37.7 million and
$39.5 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase
in 2010 compared to 2009 was primarily due to increased
workforce related costs. The decrease in 2009 compared to 2008
was primarily due to lower total workforce related costs as a
result of targeted cost control measures.
As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expenses
were 11.9%, 9.3% and 10.0% in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
39
Depreciation and Amortization. Our
depreciation and amortization expenses include the depreciation
of computer equipment and office furniture and the amortization
of purchased and internally developed software and leasehold
improvements. Computer equipment, software and furniture are
depreciated under the straight-line method using three to seven
year lives and leasehold improvements are amortized over the
shorter of the asset life or the remaining length of the lease.
Depreciation and amortization expenses were $23.4 million
in 2010 compared to $19.4 million and $16.0 million in
2009 and 2008, respectively. The increased expenses in 2010
resulted primarily due to the higher levels of computer
equipment and capitalized software as a result of technology
development and enhancements, including full-year amortization
of our new enterprise resource planning system. The increased
expenses in 2009 were attributable to the investment in our new
enterprise resource planning system and a new data management
and reporting infrastructure.
As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization was
6.4%, 4.8% and 4.0% in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Amortization of Acquisition-Related
Intangibles. In 2010, our amortization of
acquisition-related intangibles consists of the amortization of
intangible assets recorded from our ten acquisitions in the past
six years. Amortization of acquisition related intangibles was
$7.8 million in 2010 compared to $7.6 million and
$8.4 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase
in 2010 reflects our acquisitions of Journey Education
Marketing, Inc. and fatfoogoo, AG; offset by the full
amortization of several intangible assets from past
acquisitions. The decrease in 2009 to 2008 reflects the full
amortization of several past acquisitions and includes a benefit
from foreign currency translation. We complete our annual
goodwill impairment test using a two-step approach in the fourth
quarter of each year. Our assessment has indicated that there is
no impairment of goodwill for the years ended December 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008. We have purchased, and expect to continue
purchasing, assets or businesses, which may include the purchase
of intangible assets.
As a percentage of revenue, amortization of acquisition-related
intangibles was 2.2%, 1.9% and 2.1% in 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Income from Operations. Our income from
operations in 2010 was $13.0 million, compared to
$63.5 million and $71.6 million in 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Income from operations decreased during 2010 from
2009 due to lower overall revenues related to the loss of
Symantec, partially offset by revenue growth across other
software, online game and consumer electronic clients in the
second half of the year. Income from operations decreased during
2009 from 2008 mainly due to maintaining our resource levels and
investment in products.
As a percentage of revenue, income from operations was 3.6%,
15.7% and 18.2% in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Interest Income. Our interest income
represents the total of interest income on our cash, cash
equivalents, short-term investments and certain long-term
investments. Interest income was $3.0 million,
$3.2 million and $18.0 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The decrease in interest income in 2009 compared
to 2008 was due to the use of approximately $188 million of
cash in January 2009 to satisfy the majority of holders of our
2004 Senior Convertible Notes who exercised their put option to
require the Company to repurchase their notes. Also, interest
income declined in 2009 due to significantly lower market yields
on our portfolio.
Interest Expense. Our interest expense
includes the total of cash and non-cash interest expense
attributable to our outstanding convertible debt. Interest
expense was $1.7 million in 2010, which included
$0.3 million of debt financing cost amortization, compared
to $5.3 million in 2009 and $2.5 million in 2008. In
2009 we wrote-off $5.2 million of debt amortization costs
associated with the January 2009 cash settlement of our 2004
Senior Convertible Notes.
Other Income (Expense), Net. Our other income
(expense), net includes foreign currency transaction gains and
losses, asset disposal gains and losses,
other-than-temporary
impairment of investments and dividend income. Other income
(expense) was expense of $1.1 million in 2010, compared to
income of $0.4 million and expense of $0.8 million in
2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in other income in
2010 was
40
attributable to the $2.2 million
other-than-temporary
impairment of an equity investment offset by dividend income and
foreign currency remeasurement gains.
Income Tax Expense. In 2010, our tax benefit
was $2.5 million, consisting of approximately
$4.6 million of current tax expense offset by approximately
$7.1 million of deferred tax benefit. In 2009, our tax
expense was $12.0 million, consisting of approximately
$17.2 million of current tax expense offset by
approximately $5.2 million of deferred tax benefit. In
2008, our tax expense was $22.7 million, consisting of
approximately $26.9 million of current tax expense offset
by $4.2 million of deferred tax benefit. Our effective tax
rate was negative a 18.6% in 2010, compared to 19.5% in 2009 and
26.3% in 2008. Differences in our effective tax rate from the US
statutory rate are primarily due to our mix of earnings from
international operations and the differences in statutory rates
in these countries from the US rate. The tax benefit in 2010 was
driven by excess foreign tax credits generated by the
repatriation of earnings from our German subsidiary.
As of December 31, 2010, we had U.S. tax loss
carryforwards of approximately $9.8 million and foreign tax
loss carryforwards of $9.9 million. All of the
U.S. tax loss carryforwards consist of acquired net
operating losses and $9.3 million of the foreign tax loss
carryforwards are acquired net operating losses. The
U.S. tax loss carryforwards expire in the years 2021
through 2028. However, we anticipate most U.S. tax loss
carryforwards will be utilized in the next few years.
There is uncertainty of future realization of the deferred tax
assets resulting from tax loss carryforwards due to anticipated
limitations. Therefore, a valuation allowance was recorded
against the tax effect of such tax loss carryforwards. During
2010, the Company released $0.9 million of valuation
allowance recorded on its acquired foreign tax loss
carryforwards because we believe it is more likely than not that
these deferred tax assets will be realized. This reduction in
the valuation allowance reduced tax expense. The Company also
recorded $0.6 million of valuation allowance on tax loss
carryforwards and other tax attributes because we believe it is
more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will not be
realized. At December 31, 2010, the Company has a valuation
allowance on approximately $0.5 million of deferred tax
assets related to operating losses and $0.3 million of
deferred tax assets related to other tax attributes as we
believe it is more likely than not that these deferred tax
assets will not be realized. Any future release of this
valuation allowance will reduce expense.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2010, we had $565.1 million of cash
and cash equivalents. Our primary source of internal liquidity
is our operating activities. Net cash provided by operating
activities in 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $57.8 million,
$137.1 million and $95.2 million, respectively. Net
cash provided by operating activities in 2010 was primarily the
result of net income adjusted for non-cash expenses offset by
balance sheet changes such as a decrease in accounts payable.
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2009 was primarily
the result of net income adjusted for non-cash expenses offset
by balance sheet changes such as a decrease in prepaid and other
assets, and an increase in accounts payable. Net cash provided
by operating activities in 2008 was primarily the result of net
income adjusted for non-cash expenses offset by balance sheet
changes such as a decrease in accounts receivable and an
increase in prepaid and other assets.
Net cash used in investing activities was $180.7 million in
2010 and was the result of net purchases of investments of
$145.4 million, cash paid for acquisitions of
$14.6 million, purchases of capital equipment of
$18.6 million and funding of $2.2 million in
restricted cash. Net cash used in investing activities was
$62.2 million in 2009 and was the result of net sales of
investments of $1.5 million, cash paid for cost-method
investments of $26.8 million, cash paid for earn-outs
related to prior year acquisitions of $4.9 million, and
purchases of capital equipment of $31.9 million. Net cash
provided by investing activities was $144.8 million in 2008
and was the result of net sales of investments of
$195.2 million, cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash
received, of $23.5 million, and purchases of capital
equipment of $26.9 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities in 2010 was
$307.0 million, net cash used in financing activities in
2009 was $174.1 million, net cash used in financing
activities in 2008 was $124.2 million. In 2010 our cash
provided by financing increased primarily due to
$345.0 million of convertible notes issued, offset by debt
issuance costs of $9.5 million and $35.0 million
repurchase of common stock. In 2009, the net cash used in
41
financing activities was primarily due to the settlement of
$186.7 million convertible notes in cash. In 2008, the net
cash used in financing activities was primarily due to our
common stock repurchase of $137.9 million.
As of December 31, 2010, we held $90.6 million of
auction rate securities (ARS) at par value which we have
recorded at $83.7 million fair value. As of
December 31, 2009, we held $99.1 million of ARS at par
which was recorded at $92.8 million fair value. All of the
ARS are AAA/Aaa rated and 105%-115% over collateralized by
student loans guaranteed by the U.S. government with the
exception of one security which is rated AAA/A3 and one security
which is rated AAA/Aa1. Almost all of these securities continue
to fail at auction due to continued illiquid market conditions.
Due to the illiquid market conditions, we have recorded a
temporary fair value reduction of our ARS in the amount of
$6.9 million (7.6% of par value) in our year end 2010
balance sheet under Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss), compared to $6.3 million temporary fair value
reduction in 2009 (6.4% of par value). The determination of fair
value required management to make estimates and assumptions
about the ARS. The discounted cash flow model we used to value
these securities included the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
determination of the penalty coupon rate, frequency of reset
period associated with each ARS
|
|
|
|
an average redemption period of seven years
|
|
|
|
a contribution of the ARS paying its contractually stated
interest rate
|
|
|
|
determination of the risk adjusted discount rate based on LIBOR
rates for these maturities plus market information on student
loan credit spreads
|
The aggregate ARS portfolio yielded 1.7% and 1.8% in 2010 and
2009, respectively. We continue to receive 100% of the
contractually required interest payments. The portfolio has a
weighted average maturity of 29.3 and 28.8 years in 2010
and 2009, respectively. We continue to believe that we will be
able to liquidate at par over time. We do not intend to sell the
investments prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis nor
do we believe it is more likely than not we may be required to
sell the investments prior to recovery of their amortized cost
basis. Accordingly, we treated the fair value decline as
temporary. We anticipate we will have sufficient cash flow from
operations to execute our business strategy and fund our
operational needs. We believe that capital markets are also
available if we need to finance other investing alternatives.
We classify our ARS as Level 3 long-term investments until
we receive a call or partial call on the securities. Upon
receipt of a call or partial call, we classify the securities
subject to the call or partial call, as Level 1 short term
investments. As of December 31, 2010, and December 31,
2009, our entire ARS portfolio was classified as Level 3
long-term investments. As of December 31, 2010, the
difference between fair value and par value of the ARS was
$6.9 million, or 0.8% of total assets measured at fair
value or 0.5% of total assets reported in our financial
statements. In 2010 and 2009, weve liquidated
$8.5 million and $10.4 million of ARS due to full or
partial calls at par.
In addition to the contractual obligations included in the table
below, we will have significant cash obligations associated with
the purchase of hardware and capitalized software to support our
business. Cash outflows associated with the purchase of
equipment and capitalized software were $18.6 million,
$31.9 million and $26.9 million in calendar years
2010, 2009 and 2008 respectively and we have projected our 2011
requirements at $30 million. We are also parties to legally
binding contracts regarding goods and services under which the
actual commitment is contingent on certain factors that are
unknown or uncertain at this time. Therefore, these items are
not included in the table. Uncertain income tax position
liabilities of $10.0 million are not included in the table
because we cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate of the
period of cash settlement with the respective tax authorities.
In addition, purchase orders made in the ordinary course of
business are excluded from the table and any amounts which we
are liable for under the purchase orders are included in current
liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
42
The following table summarizes our principal contractual
commitments as of December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment due by period (In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Total Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015 and
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Committed
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013-2014
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
$
|
36,834
|
|
|
$
|
5,871
|
|
|
$
|
2,444
|
|
|
$
|
6,857
|
|
|
$
|
21,662
|
|
Senior Convertible Notes, including interest
|
|
|
493,291
|
|
|
|
7,010
|
|
|
|
7,010
|
|
|
|
14,020
|
|
|
|
465,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
530,125
|
|
|
$
|
12,881
|
|
|
$
|
9,454
|
|
|
$
|
20,877
|
|
|
$
|
486,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Senior Convertible Notes. On
November 1, 2010, we sold and issued $345.0 million in
aggregate principal amount of senior convertible notes (2010
Notes), in a private, unregistered offering. The 2010 Notes are
unsecured obligations and rank equally with all of our existing
and future senior unsecured debt. The 2010 Notes were sold at
100% of their principal amount. The 2010 Notes bear interest at
the rate of 2.00% per annum from the date of issuance, payable
semi-annually on May 1 and November 1, commencing on
May 1, 2011. The 2010 Notes will mature, unless earlier
repurchased, redeemed or converted in accordance with their
terms, on November 1, 2030.
Holders have the right to convert some or all of the 2010 Notes
at any time prior to the maturity date into shares of our common
stock at the initial conversion rate of 20.3537 shares per
$1,000 in principal amount of the 2010 Notes, which is equal to
an initial conversion price of approximately $49.13 per share.
At the initial conversion rate, assuming the conversion of all
$345 million in aggregate principal amount, the 2010 Notes
may be converted into approximately 7,022,026 shares of our
common stock. We will adjust the conversion price if certain
events occur, as specified in the related indenture, such as the
issuance of our common stock as a dividend or distribution or
the occurrence of a stock subdivision or combination. If we
undergo certain types of fundamental changes, as defined in the
indenture, on or before November 1, 2015, we will be
required to pay a fundamental change make-whole premium on 2010
Notes converted in connection with such make-whole fundamental
change by increasing the conversion rate. The amount of the
fundamental change make-whole premium, if any, will be based on
our common stock price and the effective date of the make-whole
fundamental change.
At any time on or after November 1, 2015, and prior to the
maturity date, we may redeem for cash some or all of the 2010
Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the 2010 Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid
interest to, but excluding, the redemption date.
Holders have the right to require us to repurchase some or all
of their 2010 Notes for cash on each of November 1, 2015,
November 1, 2020 and November 1, 2025 at a repurchase
price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2010 Notes to
be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but
excluding, the relevant repurchase date. If we undergo certain
types of fundamental changes prior to the maturity date, holders
of the 2010 Notes will have the right, at their option, to
require us to repurchase some or all of their 2010 Notes at a
repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the
2010 Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest
to, but excluding, the repurchase date.
Proceeds from the 2010 Note were used to fund a
$35.0 million common stock repurchase buy-back program
completed in 2010 and the remainder of the net proceeds from the
sale will be used for general corporate and strategic purposes.
2004 Senior Convertible Notes. In 2004 we sold
and issued $195.0 million in aggregate principal amount of
1.25% senior convertible notes due January 1, 2024
(2004 Notes), in a private, unregistered offering. The 2004
Notes were sold at 100% of their principal amount. On
January 5, 2009, we announced that holders of 95.5% of the
2004 Notes exercised the option to require us to repurchase
those Notes on January 2, 2009, at a purchase price of
100.25% of the principal amount of each tendered 2004 Note.
Notes with an aggregate principal amount of approximately
$8.8 million remain outstanding. Holders of the remaining
outstanding 2004 Notes have the right to require us to
repurchase their 2004 Notes prior to maturity on January 1,
2014 and 2019.
We are required to pay interest on the 2004 Notes on January 1
and July 1 of each year so long as the 2004 Notes are
outstanding. The 2004 Notes bear interest at a rate of 1.25%
and, if specified conditions are
43
met, are convertible into our common stock at a conversion price
of $44.063 per share. The 2004 Notes may be surrendered for
conversion under certain circumstances, including the
satisfaction of a market price condition, such that the price of
our common stock reaches a specified threshold; the satisfaction
of a trading price condition, such that the trading price of the
2004 Notes falls below a specified level; the redemption of the
2004 Notes by us, the occurrence of specified corporate
transactions, as defined in the related indenture; and the
occurrence of a fundamental change, as defined in the related
indenture. The initial conversion price is equivalent to a
conversion rate of approximately 22.6948 shares per $1,000
of principal amount of the 2004 Notes. We will adjust the
conversion price if certain events occur, as specified in the
related indenture, such as the issuance of our common stock as a
dividend or distribution or the occurrence of a stock
subdivision or combination.
2011
Outlook
We believe the outlook for our business remains positive for
2011. Global online sales continue to strengthen across most
categories and buyers appear to be increasingly comfortable
shopping online. In our core markets, software, consumer
electronics and games, trends continue to favor the migration
toward online shopping. Additionally, we see opportunities to
grow our share of business in adjacent and complementary markets
such as
business-to-business
software and educational services. We expect to expand our core
service offerings in payment processing. We anticipate investing
in our strategic growth initiatives while leveraging our base of
business. We believe the initiatives outlined in our strategic
plan will enable us to: 1) continue to be a leader in the
software delivery market, 2) strengthen our product and
service offering by investing in our core business,
3) continue to expand into new vertical markets such as
consumer electronics, and computer and video games and
4) supplement our growth through strategic acquisitions.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Update (ASU)
2009-13
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements: In
October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued ASU
2009-13.
This update provides amendments to Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 605 Revenue Recognition
that enables vendors to account for products or services
(deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. The
amendments eliminate the residual method of allocation and
require that arrangement consideration be allocated at the
inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the
relative selling price method. The amendments also require that
a vendor determine its best estimate of selling price in a
manner that is consistent with that used to determine the price
to sell the deliverable on a standalone basis. Additionally,
disclosures related to multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements
have also been expanded. The provisions will be effective for
fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, and we
will adopt in the first quarter of 2011. We have evaluated the
impact of ASU
2009-13 and
have concluded that the adoption did not have a material impact
on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
ASU
2010-06
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements: In January 2010, the FASB issued
ASU 2010-06.
This update provides amendments to ASC Topic 820
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures that requires additional
disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2
in the fair value hierarchy and additional disclosures about
purchases, sales, issuances and settlements relating to
Level 3 fair value measurements. Additionally, it clarifies
existing fair value disclosures about the level of
disaggregation of inputs and valuation techniques used to
measure fair value. We adopted the new disclosure requirements
in ASU
2010-06 as
of the period ended March 31, 2010, and it did not have a
material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
ASU
2010-09
Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure
Requirements: In February 2010, the FASB issued
ASU 2010-09.
This amendment to ASC Topic 855 Subsequent Events
removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose the date
through which subsequent events are evaluated. This includes
both issued and revised financial statements. We adopted the new
disclosure requirements in ASU
2010-09 as
of the period ended March 31, 2010, and it did not have a
material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
44
ASC 810 Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities: In June 2009, FASB issued additional
guidance related to ASC Topic No. 810,
Consolidation (ASC 810). ASC 810 requires an
analysis to determine whether a variable interest gives the
entity a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity. This guidance requires an ongoing reassessment and
eliminates the quantitative approach previously required for
determining whether an entity is the primary beneficiary. We
adopted the additional guidance as of the period ended
March 31, 2010, and it did not have a material impact on
our Consolidated Financial Statements.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
standards will not have a material impact on our Consolidated
Financial Statements, or do not apply to our operations.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
None.
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUALITATIVE
AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Interest
Rate Risk
Our portfolio of cash equivalents, short-term and long-term
investments is maintained in a variety of securities, including
government agency obligations and money market funds.
Investments are classified as
available-for-sale
securities and carried at their market value with cumulative
unrealized gains or losses recorded as a component of
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within
stockholders equity. A sharp rise in interest rates could
have an adverse impact on the market value of certain securities
in our portfolio. We do not currently hedge our interest rate
exposure and do not enter into financial instruments for trading
or speculative purposes. A hypothetical and immediate one
percent (1%) increase in interest rates would decrease the fair
value in our investment portfolio held at December 31, 2010
and 2009, by $2.6 million and by $0.3 million,
respectively. A hypothetical and immediate one percent (1%)
decrease in interest rates would increase the fair value in our
investment portfolio held at December 31, 2010 and 2009, by
$2.6 million and by $0.3 million, respectively. The
approximate gains or losses in earnings are estimates, and
actual results could vary due to the assumptions used.
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had long-term debt of
$353.8 million and $8.8 million, respectively,
associated with our Senior Convertible Notes, which are fixed
rate instruments. The market value of our long-term debt will
fluctuate with movements of interest rates, increasing in
periods of declining rates of interest and declining in periods
of increasing rates of interest.
Foreign
Currency Risk
Growth in our international operations will incrementally
increase our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations as well
as other risks typical of international operations, including,
but not limited to, differing economic conditions, changes in
political climate, differing tax structures and other
regulations and restrictions.
Foreign exchange rate fluctuations may adversely impact our
consolidated results of operations as exchange rate fluctuations
on transactions denominated in currencies other than our
functional currencies result in gains and losses that are
reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. To the
extent the U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies,
the translation of these foreign currency-denominated
transactions will result in increased net revenues and operating
expenses. Conversely, our net revenues and operating expenses
will decrease when the U.S. dollar strengthens against
foreign currencies.
45
The effect on our consolidated statements of operations from
changes in exchange rates versus the U.S. Dollar is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
At Prior
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Prior
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Prior
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Rates(1)
|
|
|
Effect(2)
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Rates(1)
|
|
|
Effect(2)
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Rates(1)
|
|
|
Effect(2)
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
363,446
|
|
|
$
|
(220
|
)
|
|
$
|
363,226
|
|
|
$
|
411,922
|
|
|
$
|
(8,156
|
)
|
|
$
|
403,766
|
|
|
$
|
391,481
|
|
|
$
|
2,745
|
|
|
$
|
394,226
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
351,746
|
|
|
|
(1,513
|
)
|
|
|
350,233
|
|
|
|
346,514
|
|
|
|
(6,249
|
)
|
|
|
340,265
|
|
|
|
318,471
|
|
|
|
4,184
|
|
|
|
322,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
11,700
|
|
|
$
|
1,293
|
|
|
$
|
12,993
|
|
|
$
|
65,408
|
|
|
$
|
(1,907
|
)
|
|
$
|
63,501
|
|
|
$
|
73,010
|
|
|
$
|
(1,439
|
)
|
|
$
|
71,571
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the outcome that would have resulted had exchange
rates in the current period been the same as those in effect in
the comparable prior-year period for operating results. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the increase (decrease) in reported amounts resulting
from changes in exchange rates from those in effect in the
comparable prior-year period for operating results. |
Transaction
Exposure
The Company enters into short-term foreign currency forward
contracts to offset the foreign exchange gains and losses
generated by the re-measurement of certain assets and
liabilities recorded in non-functional currencies. Changes in
the fair value of these derivatives, as well as re-measurement
gains and losses, are recognized in current earnings in
Other income (expense), net. Foreign currency
transaction gains and losses were a gain of $0.4 million in
2010, a gain of $0.4 million in 2009 and a gain of
$0.3 million in 2008.
Translation
Exposure
Foreign exchange rate fluctuations may adversely impact our
consolidated financial position as the assets and liabilities of
our foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars in
preparing our consolidated balance sheet. These gains or losses
are recognized as an adjustment to stockholders equity
which is reflected in our balance sheet under Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss). The potential loss in
fair value resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse currency
movement is $11.7 million and $12.4 million for 2010
and 2009, respectively.
Other
Market Risks
Investments
in Auction Rate Securities
At December 31, 2010, we held approximately
$90.6 million of ARS at par. In light of current conditions
in the ARS market as described in Item 7, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, in this
Form 10-K,
we may incur temporary unrealized losses, or
other-than-temporary
realized losses, in the future if market conditions persist and
we are unable to recover the investment principal in our ARS.
46
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Our Financial Statements and Notes thereto appear beginning at
page 58 of this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
98,726
|
|
|
$
|
81,832
|
|
|
$
|
84,987
|
|
|
$
|
97,681
|
|
Direct cost of services(1)
|
|
|
4,637
|
|
|
|
4,356
|
|
|
|
4,548
|
|
|
|
4,248
|
|
Network and infrastructure(1)
|
|
|
11,432
|
|
|
|
12,118
|
|
|
|
11,146
|
|
|
|
12,213
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
8,127
|
|
|
|
(5,495
|
)
|
|
|
2,478
|
|
|
|
7,883
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
6,967
|
|
|
|
(2,480
|
)
|
|
|
5,861
|
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31 (2)
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
102,931
|
|
|
$
|
96,564
|
|
|
$
|
99,419
|
|
|
$
|
104,852
|
|
Direct cost of services(1)
|
|
|
3,942
|
|
|
|
3,951
|
|
|
|
4,582
|
|
|
|
5,150
|
|
Network and infrastructure(1)
|
|
|
10,313
|
|
|
|
10,963
|
|
|
|
11,786
|
|
|
|
12,934
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
22,918
|
|
|
|
12,948
|
|
|
|
14,563
|
|
|
|
13,072
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
13,320
|
|
|
|
11,769
|
|
|
|
11,043
|
|
|
|
13,639
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Gross profit is calculated as revenue less direct cost of
services and network and infrastructure expenses and excludes
depreciation and amortization expense |
|
(2) |
|
The Company reported net income of $16.6 million, or $0.45
per diluted share for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, in
its first quarter 2009
Form 10-Q
filed on May 8, 2009. This compares with net income of
$13.3 million, or $0.36 per diluted share for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009, as presented above. In performing its
detailed review of the financial statements and notes at year
end, management identified an additional adjustment associated
with its January 2, 2009, senior convertible note
repurchase. After the Company filed its year end 2009 press
release it determined that a $5.2 million non-cash expense
for debt financing costs ($3.3 million net of tax),
previously deferred and amortized over the period of the note,
was to be written off to earnings in conjunction with the note
repurchase. The impact of the note repurchase on diluted
earnings per share was anti-dilutive and has been excluded as a
result. |
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
47
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We are committed to maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in our periodic reports filed under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. Our management, with the participation of our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2010. The term
disclosure controls and procedures means controls
and other procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports
that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls
and procedures include, without limitation, controls and
procedures designed to ensure that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Companys management,
including its principal executive and principal financial
officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives,
and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating
the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures. Based on their evaluation of our disclosure controls
and procedures as of December 31, 2010, our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of
that date, our disclosure controls were effective at the
reasonable assurance level.
Managements
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and
maintaining an adequate system of internal control over
financial reporting. This system of internal accounting controls
is designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are
safeguarded, transactions are properly recorded and executed in
accordance with managements authorization and financial
statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A control system, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system
are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect
the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits
of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because
of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our
company have been detected. These inherent limitations include
the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty,
and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or
mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more
people, or by management override of the control. The design of
any system of controls also is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can
be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its
stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time,
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a
cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.
Management conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the system of
internal control over financial reporting based on the framework
in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, management
concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of December 31, 2010, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, has audited the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010,
as stated in their report in which they expressed an unqualified
opinion, which is included herein.
48
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We are in the process of converting to a new enterprise resource
planning (ERP) system. Implementation of the new ERP system is
scheduled to occur in phases. During the year ended
December 31, 2010, no new phases of the new ERP system were
implemented. There were no changes in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during
the year ended December 31, 2010, that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Digital River, Inc.
We have audited Digital River, Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).
Digital River, Incs management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting,
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting included in the accompanying
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on Digital River, Incs internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Digital River, Inc. maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2010, based on the COSO criteria.
49
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Digital River, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2010, of Digital
River, Inc. and subsidiaries and our report dated
February 24, 2011, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 24, 2011
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None.
50
PART III
Certain information required in Part III of this report is
incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement in connection
with our 2011 Annual Meeting to be filed in accordance with
Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended.
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Directors
The information relating to directors and the Audit Committee of
the Board of Directors required by this item will be contained
under the captions Proposal 1. Election of
Directors and Board Committees and Meetings in
a definitive proxy statement involving the election of
directors, by reference to the Proxy Statement for the 2011
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days
after the end of the Companys fiscal year.
The information required by Items 405, 407(d)(4) and
407(d)(5) of
Regulation S-K
will be included under the captions Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance and Board
Committees and Meetings in the 2011 Proxy Statement, and
that information is incorporated by reference herein.
Executive
Officers
The information relating to executive officers required by this
item is included herein in Part I under the caption
Executive Officers.
Code of
Conduct
We have adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics, a copy of which we
undertake to provide to any person, without charge, upon
request. Such requests can be made in writing to the attention
of Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices
address. To the extent permitted by the rules promulgated by
NASDAQ, we intend to disclose any amendments to, or waivers
from, the Code provisions applicable to our principal executive
officer or senior financial officers, including our chief
financial officer and controller, or with respect to the
required elements of the Code, on our website,
www.digitalriver.com under the Investor Relations
link.
Other
Disclosures
Other disclosures required by this Item will be incorporated
herein by reference to the Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days after
the end of the Companys fiscal year.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
Information concerning Executive Compensation,
including information concerning Compensation Committee
Interlocks and Compensation Committee Report,
will be incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement
for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within
120 days after the end of the Companys fiscal year.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
The information as to Securities Authorized for Issuance
under Equity Compensation Plans and Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management will
be incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement for
the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within
120 days after the end of the Companys fiscal year.
51
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
The information as to Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions, and Director Independence will
be incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement for
the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within
120 days after the end of the Companys fiscal year.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
The information as to principal accountant fees and services
will be incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement
for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within
120 days after the end of the Companys fiscal year.
52
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this
report:
(1) Financial Statements.
The consolidated financial statements required by this item are
submitted in a separate section beginning on page 58 of
this report.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules.
All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable
accounting regulations of the SEC have been omitted as not
required or not applicable, or the information required has been
included elsewhere by reference in the financial statements and
related notes, except for Schedule II, which is included
with this
Form 10-K,
as filed with the SEC.
(3) Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
3
|
.1(2)
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant, as currently in effect.
|
|
3
|
.2(4)
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as currently in
effect.
|
|
4
|
.1(5)
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate.
|
|
4
|
.2(9)
|
|
Indenture dated as of June 1, 2004, between Digital River,
Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as trustee, including therein
the form of the 2004 Note.
|
|
4
|
.3(17)
|
|
Indenture dated as of November 1, 2010, between Digital
River, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as trustee, including
therein the form of the 2010 Note.
|
|
10
|
.1(5)
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement between Registrant and each of its
directors and executive officers.
|
|
10
|
.3(5)
|
|
Consent to Assignment and Assumption of Lease dated
April 22, 1998, by and between CSM Investors, Inc.,
IntraNet Integration Group, Inc. and Registrant.
|
|
10
|
.4(3)
|
|
Assignment of Lease dated April 21, 1998, by and between
Intranet Integration Group, Inc. and Registrant.
|
|
10
|
.5(3)
|
|
Lease Agreement dated January 18, 2000, between Property
Reserve, Inc. and Registrant.
|
|
10
|
.6(4)
|
|
First Amendment of Lease dated January 31, 2001, to that
certain Lease dated April 24, 1996, between CSM Investors,
Inc. and Registrant (as assignee of Intranet Integration Group,
Inc.).
|
|
10
|
.7(6)
|
|
1998 Stock Option Plan, as amended and superseded by
Exhibit 10.18.*
|
|
10
|
.8(7)
|
|
1999 Stock Option Plan, formerly known as the 1999 Non-Officer
Stock Option Plan, as amended and superseded by
Exhibit 10.18.*
|
|
10
|
.9(6)
|
|
2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, and offering.*
|
|
10
|
.11(8)
|
|
Second Amendment of Lease dated April 22, 2002, to that
certain Lease dated April 24, 1996, between CSM Investors,
Inc. and Registrant (as assignee of Intranet Integration Group,
Inc.) as amended.
|
|
10
|
.12(8)
|
|
Second Amendment of Lease dated April 28, 2003, to that
certain Lease dated January 18, 2000, between Property
Reserve Inc. and Registrant.
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
10
|
.15(9)
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of June 1, 2004,
between Digital River, Inc. and the initial purchasers of Senior
Convertible Notes due January 1, 2024.
|
|
10
|
.16(13)
|
|
Summary of Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors.
|
|
10
|
.17(14)
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Symantec Online Store Agreement, by
and among Symantec Corporation, Symantec Limited, Digital River,
Inc. and Digital River Ireland Limited effective April 1,
2006
|
|
10
|
.18(10)
|
|
1998 Equity Incentive Plan (formerly known as 1998 Stock Option
Plan).*
|
|
10
|
.19(13)
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement for Joel A. Ronning.*
|
|
10
|
.20(13)
|
|
Change of Control and Severance Agreement for Thomas M.
Donnelly.*
|
|
10
|
.21(11)
|
|
Form of Amendment to Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement.*
|
|
10
|
.22(12)
|
|
Inducement Equity Incentive Plan.*
|
|
10
|
.23(15)
|
|
2007 Equity Incentive Plan.*
|
|
10
|
.24(13)
|
|
Change of Control and Severance Agreement for Kevin L. Crudden.*
|
|
10
|
.25(16)
|
|
Microsoft Operations Digital Distribution Agreement, by and
among Digital River, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation effective
September 1, 2006
|
|
10
|
.26(16)
|
|
Direct Reseller Addendum to the Microsoft Operations Digital
Distribution Agreement, by and among Digital River, Inc. and
Microsoft Corporation effective September 1, 2006
|
|
10
|
.27(16)
|
|
Omnibus Amendment to the Microsoft Operations Digital
Distribution Agreement, by and among Digital River, Inc. and
Microsoft Corporation effective October 4, 2007
|
|
10
|
.28(16)
|
|
Amendment to the Microsoft Operations Digital Distribution
Agreement, by and among Digital River, Inc. and Microsoft
Corporation effective December 2, 2008
|
|
10
|
.29(16)
|
|
Amendment to the Microsoft Operations Digital Distribution
Agreement, by and among Digital River, Inc. and Microsoft
Corporation effective September 9, 2009
|
|
10
|
.30(17)
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2010, among
Digital River, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated, as representatives of the
initial purchasers named in Schedule A thereto.
|
|
10
|
.31(18)
|
|
Second Omnibus Amendment to the Microsoft Operations Digital
Distribution Agreement
|
|
12
|
.1++
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
|
21
|
.1++
|
|
Subsidiaries of Digital River, Inc.
|
|
23
|
.1++
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated
February 24, 2011.
|
|
24
|
.1++
|
|
Power of Attorney, pursuant to which amendments to this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
may be filed, is included on the signature pages of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
31
|
.1++
|
|
Certification of Digital River, Inc.s Chief Executive
Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2++
|
|
Certification of Digital River, Inc.s Chief Financial
Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
32++
|
|
|
Certification of Digital River, Inc.s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
101(19)
|
|
|
The following financial information from Digital River,
Inc.s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2010, formatted in
Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL):
(i) Consolidated Balance Sheet, (ii) Consolidated
Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows, (vi) Consolidated Statements of
Stockholders Equity, and (v) Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (tagged as blocks of text).
|
|
|
|
++ |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan. |
54
|
|
|
|
|
Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this
agreement, which portions have been filed separately with
the SEC. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on May 4, 2004. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on June 1, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999, filed on
March 30, 2000. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2000, filed on
March 27, 2001. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
(File No.
333-56787),
declared effective on August 11, 1998. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Registration
Statement on
Form S-8
(File No.
333-105864)
filed on June 5, 2003. |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, filed on
August 14, 2003. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, filed on May 15,
2003. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on July 13, 2004. |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on May 31, 2005. |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, filed on
August 9, 2005. |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on December 20, 2005. |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on March 10, 2008. |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on
March 1, 2007. |
|
(15) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed on
February 29, 2008. |
|
(16) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Annual Report
on
Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on
August 19, 2010. |
|
(17) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on November 1, 2010. |
|
(18) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, filed on
November 2, 2010. |
|
(19) |
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of
Regulation S-T,
the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, and shall not be deemed part of a
registration statement, prospectus or other document filed under
the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be
expressly set forth by specific reference in such filings. |
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report on
Form 10-K
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Eden Prairie, State of Minnesota, on
February 24, 2011.
DIGITAL RIVER, INC.
Joel A. Ronning
Chief Executive Officer
We, the undersigned, directors and officers of Digital River,
Inc., do hereby severally constitute and appoint Joel A. Ronning
and Thomas M. Donnelly and each or any of them, our true and
lawful attorneys and agents, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any
and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, and to file
the same with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys and agents, and each or
any of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully
to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys and
agents, and each of them, or his substitute or substitutes, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this
Form 10-K
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joel
A. Ronning
Joel
A. Ronning
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive
Officer)
|
|
February 24, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas
M. Donnelly
Thomas
M. Donnelly
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
|
|
February 24, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas
F. Madison
Thomas
F. Madison
|
|
Director
|
|
February 24, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Cheryl
F. Rosner
Cheryl
F. Rosner
|
|
Director
|
|
February 24, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Douglas
M. Steenland
Douglas
M. Steenland
|
|
Director
|
|
February 24, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Perry
W. Steiner
Perry
W. Steiner
|
|
Director
|
|
February 24, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alfred
F. Castino
Alfred
F. Castino
|
|
Director
|
|
February 24, 2011
|
56
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Digital River, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Digital River, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010.
Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed
in Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedule
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Digital River, Inc. and subsidiaries at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also,
in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken
as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth herein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Digital River, Inc.s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
February 24, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 24, 2011
57
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
565,086
|
|
|
$
|
392,704
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
163,029
|
|
|
|
15,228
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $4,902 and $2,222
|
|
|
50,922
|
|
|
|
50,657
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
10,628
|
|
|
|
9,901
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
30,375
|
|
|
|
14,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
820,040
|
|
|
|
483,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
49,599
|
|
|
|
54,343
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
283,940
|
|
|
|
279,538
|
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $80,106
and $74,158
|
|
|
37,911
|
|
|
|
25,605
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
110,736
|
|
|
|
119,581
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
17,721
|
|
|
|
22,416
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
13,820
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
1,333,767
|
|
|
$
|
985,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
188,915
|
|
|
$
|
192,301
|
|
Accrued payroll
|
|
|
21,117
|
|
|
|
16,131
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
10,446
|
|
|
|
17,879
|
|
Accrued acquisition liabilities
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
|
|
2,001
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
58,083
|
|
|
|
38,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
280,176
|
|
|
|
267,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior convertible notes
|
|
|
353,805
|
|
|
|
8,805
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
16,038
|
|
|
|
15,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
369,843
|
|
|
|
24,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
650,019
|
|
|
|
291,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 120,000,000 shares
authorized; 46,323,799 and 44,917,986 shares issued
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
Treasury stock at cost; 7,297,174 and 6,238,166 shares
|
|
|
(255,196
|
)
|
|
|
(216,880
|
)
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
683,307
|
|
|
|
653,956
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
254,602
|
|
|
|
238,867
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
17,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
683,748
|
|
|
|
694,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
1,333,767
|
|
|
$
|
985,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
58
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
363,226
|
|
|
$
|
403,766
|
|
|
$
|
394,226
|
|
Costs and expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
expense shown separately below):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct cost of services
|
|
|
17,789
|
|
|
|
17,625
|
|
|
|
16,417
|
|
Network and infrastructure
|
|
|
46,909
|
|
|
|
45,996
|
|
|
|
41,040
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
150,041
|
|
|
|
157,475
|
|
|
|
150,118
|
|
Product research and development
|
|
|
60,844
|
|
|
|
54,463
|
|
|
|
51,184
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
43,392
|
|
|
|
37,707
|
|
|
|
39,525
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
23,413
|
|
|
|
19,438
|
|
|
|
15,980
|
|
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles
|
|
|
7,845
|
|
|
|
7,561
|
|
|
|
8,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
350,233
|
|
|
|
340,265
|
|
|
|
322,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
12,993
|
|
|
|
63,501
|
|
|
|
71,571
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3,035
|
|
|
|
3,210
|
|
|
|
18,019
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,688
|
)
|
|
|
(5,339
|
)
|
|
|
(2,528
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(1,067
|
)
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
(791
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
13,273
|
|
|
|
61,796
|
|
|
|
86,271
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(2,462
|
)
|
|
|
12,025
|
|
|
|
22,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
15,735
|
|
|
$
|
49,771
|
|
|
$
|
63,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per-share calculation basic
|
|
|
37,518
|
|
|
|
36,975
|
|
|
|
37,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per-share calculation diluted
|
|
|
38,339
|
|
|
|
37,704
|
|
|
|
42,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
59
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
40,550
|
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
(77,707
|
)
|
|
$
|
597,128
|
|
|
$
|
30,933
|
|
|
$
|
125,501
|
|
|
$
|
676,280
|
|
|
$
|
90,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,595
|
|
|
|
63,595
|
|
|
|
63,595
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net of tax benefit of
$6,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,822
|
)
|
|
|
(10,822
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,181
|
)
|
|
|
(15,181
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(4,239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137,858
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137,858
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock issued under equity incentive plans, net of
forfeitures
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax withheld in restricted stock vesting
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(598
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(598
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit (deficiency) of stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
37,014
|
|
|
$
|
432
|
|
|
$
|
(216,163
|
)
|
|
$
|
623,778
|
|
|
$
|
4,930
|
|
|
$
|
189,096
|
|
|
$
|
602,073
|
|
|
$
|
37,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,771
|
|
|
|
49,771
|
|
|
|
49,771
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net of tax expense of
$3,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,273
|
|
|
|
6,273
|
|
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock issued under equity incentive plans, net of
forfeitures
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax withheld in restricted stock vesting
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(717
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(717
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit (deficiency) of stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
38,680
|
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
|
$
|
(216,880
|
)
|
|
$
|
653,956
|
|
|
$
|
17,827
|
|
|
$
|
238,867
|
|
|
$
|
694,219
|
|
|
$
|
62,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,735
|
|
|
|
15,735
|
|
|
|
15,735
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net of tax benefit of $329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(551
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(551
|
)
|
|
|
(551
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,704
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,704
|
)
|
|
|
(16,704
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,999
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,999
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock issued under equity incentive plans, net of
forfeitures
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax withheld in restricted stock vesting
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,317
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,317
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit (deficiency) of stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
39,027
|
|
|
$
|
463
|
|
|
$
|
(255,196
|
)
|
|
$
|
683,307
|
|
|
$
|
572
|
|
|
$
|
254,602
|
|
|
$
|
683,748
|
|
|
$
|
(1,520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
60
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,735
|
|
|
$
|
49,771
|
|
|
$
|
63,595
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles
|
|
|
7,845
|
|
|
|
7,561
|
|
|
|
8,391
|
|
Change in accounts receivable allowance, net of acquisitions
|
|
|
2,666
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
23,413
|
|
|
|
19,438
|
|
|
|
15,980
|
|
Debt issuance cost amortization
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt financing costs write-off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
20,773
|
|
|
|
18,270
|
|
|
|
12,548
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(2,474
|
)
|
|
|
(690
|
)
|
|
|
(4,390
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(2,841
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
4,971
|
|
Impairment of equity investment
|
|
|
2,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
2,735
|
|
|
|
11,332
|
|
Prepaid and other assets
|
|
|
(6,540
|
)
|
|
|
23,263
|
|
|
|
(26,505
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(11,554
|
)
|
|
|
7,083
|
|
|
|
6,531
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(2,749
|
)
|
|
|
4,109
|
|
|
|
3,235
|
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
(1,491
|
)
|
|
|
1,377
|
|
|
|
(5,366
|
)
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
12,331
|
|
|
|
(1,115
|
)
|
|
|
4,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
57,800
|
|
|
|
137,056
|
|
|
|
95,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(198,673
|
)
|
|
|
(21,922
|
)
|
|
|
(480,917
|
)
|
Sales of investments
|
|
|
53,299
|
|
|
|
23,400
|
|
|
|
676,108
|
|
Cash paid for cost method investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Funding of restricted cash
|
|
|
(2,156
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash received
|
|
|
(14,585
|
)
|
|
|
(4,910
|
)
|
|
|
(23,465
|
)
|
Purchases of equipment and capitalized software
|
|
|
(18,579
|
)
|
|
|
(31,949
|
)
|
|
|
(26,898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(180,694
|
)
|
|
|
(62,161
|
)
|
|
|
144,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received (paid) for convertible senior notes
|
|
|
345,000
|
|
|
|
(186,660
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(9,529
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
5,004
|
|
|
|
10,050
|
|
|
|
7,171
|
|
Sales of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
2,374
|
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
|
|
2,715
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(34,999
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137,858
|
)
|
Repurchase of restricted stock to satisfy tax withholding
obligation
|
|
|
(3,317
|
)
|
|
|
(717
|
)
|
|
|
(598
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
4,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
307,007
|
|
|
|
(174,148
|
)
|
|
|
(124,180
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH
|
|
|
(11,731
|
)
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
(7,335
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
172,382
|
|
|
|
(97,631
|
)
|
|
|
108,547
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year
|
|
|
392,704
|
|
|
|
490,335
|
|
|
|
381,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year
|
|
$
|
565,086
|
|
|
$
|
392,704
|
|
|
$
|
490,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest on Convertible Senior Notes
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
1,274
|
|
|
$
|
2,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
5,883
|
|
|
$
|
16,615
|
|
|
$
|
20,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
61
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
December 31, 2010 and 2009
|
|
1.
|
Nature of
Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
We provide outsourced
e-commerce
solutions globally to a wide variety of companies primarily in
the software, consumer electronics, computer game and video game
markets. We were incorporated in 1994 and began building and
operating online stores for our clients in 1996. We generate
revenue primarily based on the sales of products made in those
stores, and in addition, offer services designed to increase
traffic to our clients online stores and to improve the
sales effectiveness of those stores.
Principles
of Consolidation and Classification
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Digital River, Inc. and our wholly owned subsidiaries. All
material intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with
United States generally accepted accounting principles
(U.S. GAAP) requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Foreign
Currency Translation
Substantially all of our foreign subsidiaries use the local
currency of their respective countries as their functional
currency. Assets and liabilities are translated at exchange
rates prevailing at the balance sheet dates. Revenues, costs and
expenses are translated at the average exchange rates for the
reported period. Gains and losses resulting from translation are
recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) within stockholders equity. Gains and
losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are
recognized as Other income (expense), net.
We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. Our primary risk is the effect of foreign
currency exchange rate fluctuations on the U.S. dollar
value of foreign currency denominated operating sales and
expenses. During 2010, these exposures were mitigated by the use
of foreign exchange forward contracts with maturities of
approximately one week. Our derivatives are not designated as
hedges and are adjusted to fair value through income each
period. The principal exposures mitigated were euro, pound
sterling and Australian dollar currencies. For the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, derivative exposures were
immaterial. The notional amounts held and the underlying
gain/loss were determined to be immaterial when compared to our
overall cash and cash equivalents and the net income reported
for the respective periods.
Our foreign currency contracts contain credit risk to the extent
that our bank counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of
the agreements. We minimize such risk by limiting our
counterparties to major financial institutions of high credit
quality.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
We consider all short-term, highly liquid investments, primarily
high grade commercial paper and money market accounts, that are
readily convertible into known amounts of cash and that have
original or remaining maturities of three months or less at the
date of purchase to be cash equivalents. As of December 31,
2010 and 2009, cash balances of $0.1 million and
$0.1 million, respectively, were held by banks or credit
card processors to secure potential future credit card fees,
fines and chargebacks or for other payments. In addition,
62
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
at December 31, 2010, and 2009, $0.3 million and
$0.3 million were restricted by letter of credit and
agreements required by international tax jurisdictions as
security for potential tax liabilities.
Restricted
Cash
Restricted cash consists of cash and cash equivalents that are
held in escrow accounts and restricted by agreements with third
parties for a particular purpose. Restricted cash and cash
equivalents are included in current assets under prepaid
expenses and other on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and
are recorded at fair value. As of December 31, 2010, we had
$2.1 million of restricted cash, and no restricted cash as
of December 31, 2009.
Short-Term
Investments
Our short-term investments consist of debt securities that are
classified as
available-for-sale
and are carried on our balance sheet at their market value with
cumulative unrealized gains or losses recorded net of tax as a
component of Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) within stockholders equity. We classify all
of our
available-for-sale
securities, except for our auction- rate securities, as current
assets, as these securities represent investments available for
current corporate purposes. Upon the sale of a security
classified as available for sale, the amount reclassified out of
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into
earnings is based on the average cost method.
Long-Term
Investments
Our long-term investments consist of cost-based investments and
auction-rate debt securities. The auction-rate debt securities
are classified as
available-for-sale
and are carried on our balance sheet at their market value with
cumulative unrealized gains or losses recorded net of tax as a
component of Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) within stockholders equity. Upon the sale of
a security classified as available for sale, the amount
reclassified out of Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) into earnings is based on the average cost method.
We also have equity investments that are accounted for under the
cost method included in long-term investments. We review the key
characteristic of our other investments and their classification
in accordance with U.S. GAAP on an annual basis, or when
indications of potential impairment exist. If a decline in the
fair value of a security is deemed by management to be
other-than-temporary,
we write down the cost basis of the investment to fair value,
and the amount of the write-down is included in net earnings.
Property
and Equipment
Computer equipment, software and furniture are depreciated under
the straight-line method using estimated useful lives of three
to seven years and leasehold improvements are amortized over the
shorter of the asset life or remaining length of the lease.
Property and equipment at December 31 consisted of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Computer hardware and software
|
|
$
|
124,300
|
|
|
$
|
108,287
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
15,975
|
|
|
|
15,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
$
|
140,275
|
|
|
$
|
123,978
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(90,676
|
)
|
|
|
(69,635
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
$
|
49,599
|
|
|
$
|
54,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Depreciation and amortization expense was $23.4 million,
$19.4 million and $16.0 million in 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
Repairs and maintenance costs are charged directly to expense as
incurred. Major renewals or replacements that substantially
extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized and
depreciated.
Software
Development
Costs to develop software for internal use are required to be
capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life of the
software. We capitalized $4.6 million and
$16.9 million related to software development during 2010
and 2009, respectively. This capitalization is primarily related
to the development of our new enterprise resource planning (ERP)
system, new data management and reporting infrastructure. We
expect these investments to drive long-term operational
efficiencies across the organization and provide further
competitive differentiation.
Purchased
Intangible Assets
Through both domestic and international acquisitions, we have
continued to expand our global online businesses. Tangible net
assets for our acquisitions were valued at their respective
carrying amounts as we believe these amounts approximated their
current fair values at the respective acquisition dates. The
valuation of identifiable intangible assets acquired reflects
managements estimates based on, among other factors, use
of established valuation methods. Such assets consist of
customer lists and user base, trademarks and trade names,
developed technologies and other acquired intangible assets,
including contractual agreements. Identifiable intangible assets
are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives, generally three to ten years. We believe the
straight-line method of amortization best represents the
distribution of the economic value of the identifiable
intangible assets acquired to date. We review assets with
definite lives for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the value we are carrying on our
financial statements for an asset may not be recoverable. Our
evaluation considers non-financial data such as changes in the
operating environment and business strategy, competitive
information, market trends and operating performance. If there
are indications that impairment may be necessary, we use an
undiscounted cash flow analysis to determine the impairment
amount, if any.
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the
fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible
assets acquired in each business combination. We review goodwill
for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if events
occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not
reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying
amount. As we only have one business segment, goodwill is
evaluated for impairment by comparing our carrying value to our
market capitalization, which is determined to approximate fair
value. If there are indications that impairment may be
necessary, we use an undiscounted cash flow analysis to
determine the impairment amount, if any. Assets with indefinite
lives are reviewed for impairment annually (or more frequently
if there are indications that an impairment may be necessary)
utilizing a two-step approach. There have been no material
impairments of goodwill and other intangible assets for the
years 2010, 2009 and 2008.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets and Costs Associated with Exit
Activities
We review all long-lived assets, including intangible assets
with definite lives, for impairment. Impairment losses are
recorded whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. For
long-lived assets used in operations, impairment losses are only
recorded if the assets carrying amount is not recoverable
through its undiscounted, probability-weighted cash flows. We
measure the impairment loss based on the difference between the
carrying amount and estimated fair value. An impairment loss is
recognized when estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to
result from the use of the asset plus net proceeds expected from
disposition of the asset (if any) are less than the carrying
value of the asset. As
64
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
part of our evaluation, we consider certain non-financial data
as indicators of impairment such as changes in the operating
environment and business strategy, competitive information,
market trends and operating performance. When an impairment loss
is identified, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to
its estimated fair value. There were no significant impairments
of long-lived assets, including definite-lived intangible
assets, recorded in 2010, 2009 or 2008.
The present value of costs associated with facility closings,
primarily future lease costs (net of expected sublease income),
are charged to earnings when a location is vacated. We
accelerate depreciation on property, equipment and leasehold
improvements we expect to retire when a decision is made to
abandon a location.
Other
Assets
The following table summarizes our other assets as of December
31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Debt financing costs, net
|
|
$
|
9,405
|
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,415
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
$
|
13,820
|
|
|
$
|
770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Accrued Liabilities
The following table summarizes our other accrued liabilities as
of December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
39,271
|
|
|
$
|
26,386
|
|
Sales, value-added and transaction taxes
|
|
|
15,523
|
|
|
|
13,741
|
|
Current deferred and other income taxes
|
|
|
3,289
|
|
|
|
(1,326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
58,083
|
|
|
$
|
38,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes revenues, expenses, and
gains and losses that are excluded from net earnings under GAAP.
Items of comprehensive income (loss) are unrealized gains and
losses on investments and foreign currency translation
adjustments which are added to net income to compute
comprehensive income (loss). Comprehensive income (loss) is net
of income tax benefit or expense excluding cumulative
translation adjustments as these funds are indefinitely invested.
65
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The components of comprehensive income (loss) are (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Gain/Loss on
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
30,335
|
|
|
$
|
598
|
|
|
$
|
30,933
|
|
Before tax amount
|
|
|
(15,181
|
)
|
|
|
(17,232
|
)
|
|
|
(32,413
|
)
|
Tax Effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,410
|
|
|
|
6,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net-of-tax
amount
|
|
|
(15,181
|
)
|
|
|
(10,822
|
)
|
|
|
(26,003
|
)
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
15,154
|
|
|
$
|
(10,224
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,930
|
|
Before tax amount
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
9,988
|
|
|
|
16,612
|
|
Tax Effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,715
|
)
|
|
|
(3,715
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net-of-tax
amount
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
6,273
|
|
|
|
12,897
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
21,778
|
|
|
$
|
(3,951
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,827
|
|
Before tax amount
|
|
|
(16,704
|
)
|
|
|
(880
|
)
|
|
|
(17,584
|
)
|
Tax Effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net-of-tax
amount
|
|
|
(16,704
|
)
|
|
|
(551
|
)
|
|
|
(17,255
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
5,074
|
|
|
$
|
(4,502
|
)
|
|
$
|
572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenue from services rendered once all the
following criteria for revenue recognition have been met:
(1) persuasive evidence of an agreement exists;
(2) the services have been rendered; (3) the fee is
fixed and determinable; and (4) collection of the amounts
due is reasonably assured.
We also determine whether it is appropriate to record the gross
amount of product sales and related costs or the net amount
earned as net revenue. We typically are the seller and merchant
of record on most of the transactions we process and have
contractual relationships with our clients, which obligate us to
pay to the client a specified percentage of each sale. We derive
our revenue primarily from transaction fees based on a
percentage of the products sale price and fees from services
rendered associated with the
e-commerce
and other services provided to our clients and end customers.
Our revenue is recorded net as generally our clients are subject
to inventory risks and control customers product choices.
We sell both physical and digital products. Revenue is
recognized upon fulfillment and based upon when products are
shipped and title and significant risk of ownership passes to
the customer.
The Company also provides customers with various proprietary
software backup services. We recognize revenue for these backup
services based upon historical usage within the contract period
of the digital backup services when this information is
available. Digital backup services are recognized straight-line
over the life of the backup service when historical usage
information is unavailable. Shipping revenues are recorded net
of any associated costs.
We also, to a lesser extent, provide fee-based client services,
which include website design, custom development and
integration, analytical marketing, affiliate marketing and email
marketing services. If we receive payments for fee-based
services in advance of delivery, these amounts, if significant,
are deferred and recognized over the service period.
Provisions for doubtful accounts and transaction losses and
authorized credits are made at the time of revenue recognition
based upon our historical experience. The provision for doubtful
accounts and transaction losses are recorded as charges to
operating expense, while the provision for authorized credits is
recognized as a reduction of net revenues.
66
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are directly
imposed on a revenue-producing transaction between a seller and
a customer may be presented on either a gross basis (included in
revenues and costs) or on a net basis (excluded from revenues).
The Company presents these taxes on a net basis in its financial
statements.
Deferred
Revenue
Deferred revenue is recorded when service payment is received in
advance of performing our service obligation. Revenue is
recognized over either the estimated usage period when usage
information is available, or ratably over the service period
when usage information is not available.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
We must make estimates and assumptions that can affect the
amount of assets and liabilities and the amounts of revenues and
expenses we report in any financial reporting period. We use
estimates in determining our allowance for doubtful accounts
which are based on our historical experience and current trends.
We must estimate the collectability of our billed accounts
receivable. We analyze accounts receivable and consider our
historical bad debt experience, customer credit-worthiness,
current economic trends and changes in our customer payment
terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful
accounts. We must make significant judgments and estimates in
connection with the allowance in any accounting period. There
may be material differences in our operating results for any
period if we change our estimates or if the estimates are not
accurate.
Credit
Card Chargeback Reserve
We use estimates based on historical experience and current
trends to determine accrued chargeback expenses. Significant
management judgments are used and estimates made in connection
with these expenses in any accounting period. Determining
appropriate reserves for chargeback transactions is an
inherently uncertain process. The reserves are maintained at a
level we deem appropriate to provide for losses incurred on
revenue earned in 2010. There may be material differences in our
operating results for any period if we change our estimates or
if the estimates are not accurate.
Stock-Based
Compensation Expense
We account for share-based payments made to our employees and
directors including stock options, restricted stock grants and
employee stock purchases made through our Employee Stock
Purchase Plan based on estimated fair values.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period is
based on the value of the portion of share-based awards that are
ultimately expected to vest during the period. The fair value of
each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of
restricted stock is determined based on the number of shares
granted and the closing price of our common stock on the date of
grant. Compensation expense for all share-based payment awards
is recognized over the requisite service period.
As stock-based compensation expense recognized in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations is based on awards
ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated
forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and
revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. Benefits of tax
deductions in excess of recognized stock-based compensation
expense are reported as a financing cash flow. Stock-based
compensation expense of $20.8 million, $18.3 million
and $12.5 million was charged to operating expenses during
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
67
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Advertising
Costs
The costs of advertising are charged to sales and marketing
expense as incurred. We incurred advertising expense of
$1.0 million, $1.0 million and $0.7 million in
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Interest
Income
Our interest income represents the total of interest income on
our cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and certain
long-term investments. Interest income was $3.0 million,
$3.2 million and $18.0 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The decrease in interest income in 2009 compared
to 2008 was due to the use of approximately $188 million of
cash in January 2009 to satisfy the majority of holders of our
2004 Senior Convertible Notes who exercised their put
option to require the Company to repurchase their notes. Also,
interest income declined in 2009 due to significantly lower
market yields on our portfolio.
Interest
Expense
Our interest expense includes the total of cash and non-cash
interest expense attributable to our outstanding convertible
debt. Interest expense was $1.7 million in 2010, which
included $0.3 million of debt financing cost amortization,
compared to $5.3 million in 2009 and $2.5 million in
2008. In 2009 we wrote-off $5.2 million of debt
amortization costs associated with the January 2009 cash
settlement of our 2004 Senior Convertible Notes.
Other
Income (Expense), Net
Our other income (expense), net line item includes foreign
currency transaction gains and losses, asset disposal gains and
losses,
other-than-temporary
impairment of investments and dividend income. Other income
(expense) was expense of $1.1 million in 2010, compared to
income of $0.4 million and expense of $0.8 million in
2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in other income in
2010 was attributable to the $2.2 million
other-than-temporary
impairment of an equity investment offset by dividend income and
foreign currency remeasurement gains.
Income
Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. We record deferred tax assets for
favorable tax attributes, including tax loss carryforwards. We
currently have U.S. tax loss carryforwards, consisting
solely of acquired operating tax loss carryforwards, and a
lesser amount of acquired foreign operating tax loss
carryforwards. A portion of the benefit of the acquired tax loss
carryforwards has been reserved by a valuation allowance
pursuant to U.S. GAAP. These valuation allowances of the
deferred tax asset will be reversed if and when it is more
likely than not that the deferred tax asset will be realized. We
evaluate the need for a valuation allowance of the deferred tax
asset on a quarterly basis.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Update (ASU)
2009-13
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements: In
October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued ASU
2009-13.
This update provides amendments to Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 605 Revenue Recognition
that enables vendors to account for products or services
(deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. The
amendments eliminate the residual method of allocation and
require that arrangement consideration be allocated at the
inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the
relative selling price method. The amendments also require that
a vendor determine its best estimate of selling price in a
manner that is consistent with that used to determine the price
to sell the deliverable on a standalone basis. Additionally,
68
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
disclosures related to multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements
have also been expanded. The provisions will be effective for
fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, and we
will adopt in the first quarter of 2011. We have evaluated the
impact of ASU
2009-13 and
have concluded that the adoption did not have a material impact
on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
ASU
2010-06
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements: In January 2010, the FASB issued
ASU 2010-06.
This update provides amendments to ASC Topic 820
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures that requires additional
disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2
in the fair value hierarchy and additional disclosures about
purchases, sales, issuances and settlements relating to
Level 3 fair value measurements. Additionally, it clarifies
existing fair value disclosures about the level of
disaggregation of inputs and valuation techniques used to
measure fair value. We adopted the new disclosure requirements
in ASU
2010-06 as
of the period ended March 31, 2010, and it did not have a
material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
ASU
2010-09
Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure
Requirements: In February 2010, the FASB issued
ASU 2010-09.
This amendment to ASC Topic 855 Subsequent Events
removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose the date
through which subsequent events are evaluated. This includes
both issued and revised financial statements. We adopted the new
disclosure requirements in ASU
2010-09 as
of the period ended March 31, 2010, and it did not have a
material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
ASC 810 Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities: In June 2009, FASB issued additional
guidance related to ASC Topic No. 810,
Consolidation (ASC 810). ASC 810 requires an
analysis to determine whether a variable interest gives the
entity a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity. This guidance requires an ongoing reassessment and
eliminates the quantitative approach previously required for
determining whether an entity is the primary beneficiary. We
adopted the additional guidance as of the period ended
March 31, 2010, and it did not have a material impact on
our Consolidated Financial Statements.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
standards will not have a material impact on our Consolidated
Financial Statements, or do not apply to our operations.
69
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes the computation of basic and
diluted net income per share (in thousands, except per share
data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income basic
|
|
$
|
15,735
|
|
|
$
|
49,771
|
|
|
$
|
63,595
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
37,518
|
|
|
|
36,975
|
|
|
|
37,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income basic
|
|
$
|
15,735
|
|
|
$
|
49,771
|
|
|
$
|
63,595
|
|
Exclude: Interest expense and amortized financing cost of
convertible senior notes, net of tax benefit
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
1,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income diluted
|
|
$
|
15,814
|
|
|
$
|
49,855
|
|
|
$
|
65,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
37,518
|
|
|
|
36,975
|
|
|
|
37,016
|
|
Dilutive impact of non-vested stock and options outstanding
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
Dilutive impact of convertible senior notes
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
4,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
38,339
|
|
|
|
37,704
|
|
|
|
42,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase 1,304,744, 1,298,087 and 778,034 shares
for 2010, 2009 and 2008, were not included in the computation of
diluted net income per share, because their effect on diluted
net income per share would have been anti-dilutive.
The unissued shares underlying our 2010 senior convertible
notes, 1,173,544 weighted average shares for 2010, were excluded
for the purposes of calculating GAAP diluted net income per
share, because their effect on diluted net income per share
would have been anti-dilutive.
The impact of the convertible note repurchase was anti-dilutive
for the year ending December 31, 2009, and has been
excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share as
a result.
|
|
3.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
Financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and
reported at fair value at each reporting period are classified
and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1 Observable inputs such as quoted prices
in active markets;
Level 2 Other observable inputs available at
the measurement date, other than quoted prices included in
Level 1, either directly or indirectly, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets;
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices for identical or similar assets in non-active
markets;
|
|
|
|
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for assets
or liabilities; and
|
|
|
|
Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by
other observable market data.
|
70
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that cannot be
corroborated by observable market data and reflect the use of
significant management judgment. These values are generally
determined using pricing models for which the assumptions
utilize managements estimate of market participant
assumptions.
Assets
and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring
Basis
The fair value hierarchy requires the use of observable market
data when available. In instances in which the inputs used to
measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value
hierarchy, the fair value measurement has been determined based
on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance
of a particular item to the fair value measurement in its
entirety requires judgment, including the consideration of
inputs specific to the asset or liability. The Companys
policy is to recognize transfers between levels at the end of
the quarter.
The following table sets forth by level within the fair value
hierarchy, our financial assets that were accounted for at fair
value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
(in thousands), according to the valuation techniques we used to
determine their fair values. There have been no transfers of
assets between the fair value hierarchies presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
565,086
|
|
|
$
|
565,086
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
2,070
|
|
|
|
2,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored entities
|
|
|
34,965
|
|
|
|
34,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
121,944
|
|
|
|
121,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset backed securities
|
|
|
6,027
|
|
|
|
6,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student loan bonds
|
|
|
83,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,678
|
|
Market basis equity investments
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
817,681
|
|
|
$
|
734,003
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
83,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
392,704
|
|
|
$
|
392,704
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored entities
|
|
|
3,997
|
|
|
|
3,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
11,231
|
|
|
|
11,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student loan bonds
|
|
|
92,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
500,733
|
|
|
$
|
407,932
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
92,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following is a reconciliation of assets measured at fair
value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3 inputs) (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
|
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
119,750
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
119,750
|
|
Total unrealized gain (loss) included in other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,287
|
)
|
|
|
(16,287
|
)
|
Purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(10,250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,250
|
)
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
|
|
|
(109,500
|
)
|
|
|
109,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
93,213
|
|
|
$
|
93,213
|
|
Total unrealized gain (loss) included in other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,988
|
|
|
|
9,988
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,400
|
)
|
|
|
(10,400
|
)
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
92,801
|
|
|
$
|
92,801
|
|
Total unrealized gain (loss) included in other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
Purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,500
|
)
|
|
|
(8,500
|
)
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
83,678
|
|
|
$
|
83,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair
value of each class of financial instrument. There have been no
changes in the valuation techniques used by the Company to fair
value our financial instruments:
Cash and Cash equivalents. Consist of cash on
hand in bank deposits, highly liquid investments, primarily high
grade commercial paper and money market accounts. The fair value
was measured using quoted market prices and is classified as
Level 1. The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Restricted Cash. Consist of cash and cash
equivalents that are held in escrow accounts and restricted by
agreements with third parties for a particular purpose. The
carrying amount approximates fair value and is classified as
Level 1.
Certificates of Deposit. Consist of time
deposit accounts with original maturities of less than one year
and various yields. The carrying amount approximates fair value
and is classified as Level 1.
U.S government sponsored entities. Consist of
Fannie Mae and Federal Home Loan Bank investment grade bonds
that trade with sufficient frequency and volume to enable us to
obtain pricing information on an
72
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
ongoing basis. The fair value of these bonds was measured using
quoted market prices and is classified as Level 1. The
contractual maturity of these investments is within one year.
Corporate Bonds. Consist of investment grade
corporate bonds that trade with sufficient frequency and volume
to enable us to obtain pricing information on an ongoing basis.
The fair value of these bonds was measured using quoted market
prices and is classified as Level 1. The contractual
maturity of these investments is within three years.
Asset Backed Securities. Consist of securities
that are backed by automobile loan receivables that trade with
sufficient frequency and volume to enable us to obtain pricing
information on an ongoing basis. The fair value of these
securities was measured using quoted market prices and is
classified as Level 1. The contractual maturity of these
investments is within one year.
Auction Rate Securities (Student loan bonds in
table). As of December 31, 2010, we held
$90.6 million of auction rate securities (ARS) at par value
which we have recorded at $83.7 million fair value. As of
December 31, 2009, we held $99.1 million of ARS at par
which was recorded at $92.8 million fair value. All of the
ARS are AAA/Aaa rated and 105%-115% over collateralized by
student loans guaranteed by the U.S. government with the
exception of one security which is rated AAA/A3 and one security
which is rated AAA/Aa1. Almost all of these securities continue
to fail at auction due to continued illiquid market conditions.
Due to the illiquid market conditions, we have recorded a
temporary fair value reduction of our ARS in the amount of
$6.9 million (7.6% of par value) in our year end 2010
balance sheet under Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss), compared to $6.3 million temporary fair value
reduction in 2009 (6.4% of par value). The determination of fair
value required management to make estimates and assumptions
about the ARS. The discounted cash flow model we used to value
these securities included the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
determination of the penalty coupon rate, frequency of reset
period associated with each ARS
|
|
|
|
an average redemption period of seven years
|
|
|
|
a contribution of the ARS paying its contractually stated
interest rate
|
|
|
|
determination of the risk adjusted discount rate based on LIBOR
rates for these maturities plus market information on student
loan credit spreads
|
The aggregate ARS portfolio yielded 1.7% and 1.8% in 2010 and
2009, respectively. We continue to receive 100% of the
contractually required interest payments. The portfolio has a
weighted average maturity of 29.3 and 28.8 years in 2010
and 2009, respectively. We continue to believe that we will be
able to liquidate at par over time. We do not intend to sell the
investments prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis nor
do we believe it is more likely than not we may be required to
sell the investments prior to recovery of their amortized cost
basis. Accordingly, we treated the fair value decline as
temporary. We anticipate we will have sufficient cash flow from
operations to execute our business strategy and fund our
operational needs. We believe that capital markets are also
available if we need to finance other investing alternatives.
We classify our ARS as Level 3 long-term investments until
we receive a call or partial call on the securities. Upon
receipt of a call or partial call, we classify the securities
subject to the call or partial call, as Level 1 short term
investments. As of December 31, 2010, and December 31,
2009, our entire ARS portfolio was classified as Level 3
long-term investments. As of December 31, 2010, the
difference between fair value and par value of the ARS was
$6.9 million, or 0.8% of total assets measured at fair
value or 0.5% of total assets reported in our financial
statements. In 2010 and 2009, weve liquidated
$8.5 million and $10.4 million of ARS due to full or
partial calls at par.
Market Basis Equity Investments. Consist of
available for sale equity securities that trade with sufficient
frequency and volume to enable us to obtain pricing information
on an ongoing basis. The fair value of these
73
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
investments was measured using quoted market prices and is
classified as Level 1. In 2010, we incurred a
$2.2 million non-cash
other-than-temporary
impairment on an equity investment historically held at cost
basis.
Assets
and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a
Nonrecurring Basis
In 2010, we had no significant measurements of assets or
liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to
their initial recognition.
The aggregate carrying value and fair value of the
Companys cost method equity investments at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, was $23.2 million and
$26.8 million, respectively, and is included in the
long-term investments line item on the balance sheet. The
December 31, 2009, balance included an investment in
fatfoogoo, AG. We acquired the remaining 81% of our investment
in fatfoogoo during 2010; see Note 5 Business
Combination, Goodwill and Intangible Assets for more details.
The remaining decrease in carrying value was due to translation
adjustments from investments we acquired in late 2009 and we
believe the entity valuations completed at acquisition and the
investees subsequent performance against those projections
indicates that the acquisition price continues to represent fair
value.
As of December 31, 2010, the fair value of our
$345.0 million 2.0% fixed rate senior convertible notes was
valued at $338.3 million, based on the quoted fair market
value of the debt.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the fair value of our
$8.8 million 1.25% fixed rate senior convertible notes was
valued at $9.0 million and $7.5 million, respectively,
based on the quoted fair market value of the debt.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, our
available-for-sale
securities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities/Reset Dates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12
|
|
|
Greater than 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12
|
|
|
Greater than 12
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored entities
|
|
|
35,021
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,965
|
|
|
|
34,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
122,132
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,944
|
|
|
|
8,330
|
|
|
|
113,614
|
|
Asset backed securities
|
|
|
6,033
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,027
|
|
|
|
6,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student loan bonds
|
|
|
90,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,922
|
)
|
|
|
83,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,678
|
|
Market basis equity investments(1)
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
$
|
257,697
|
|
|
$
|
(250
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,922
|
)
|
|
$
|
250,525
|
|
|
$
|
49,415
|
|
|
$
|
201,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored entities
|
|
$
|
3,999
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,997
|
|
|
$
|
1,993
|
|
|
$
|
2,004
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
11,221
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,231
|
|
|
|
3,112
|
|
|
|
8,119
|
|
Student loan bonds
|
|
|
99,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,299
|
)
|
|
|
92,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
$
|
114,320
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
(6,299
|
)
|
|
$
|
108,029
|
|
|
$
|
5,105
|
|
|
$
|
102,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cost is net of a $2.2 million non-cash other than temporary
impairment recorded in the 2010 statements of operations. |
We consider the fair value decline of our investments in
U.S. government sponsored entities, corporate bonds and
asset backed securities to be temporary, as we do not intend to
sell the investments and it is not
74
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
likely that we will be required to sell the investments before
recovery of their amortized cost basis. See
Note 3 Fair Value Measurements, regarding the
fair value decline in student loan bonds.
Realized gains or losses on investments are recorded in our
statements of operations within Other income (expense),
net. In 2010, 2009 and 2008, our proceeds on sales of
investment equaled par value. Upon the sale of a security
classified as available for sale, the amount reclassified out of
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into
earnings is based on the average cost method. We reclassified
$0.4 million and $0.9 million from Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) to net assets in
relation to securities settled at par within 2010 and 2009,
respectively. No reclassifications from Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) occurred in 2008. Realized
losses on sales of investments were immaterial in 2010, 2009 and
2008.
|
|
5.
|
Business
Combinations, Goodwill and Intangible Assets
|
Business
Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued additional guidance on
business combinations contained in ASC Topic No. 805,
Business Combinations (ASC 805). The additional
guidance is intended to simplify existing guidance and converge
rulemaking under U.S. GAAP with international accounting
rules. ASC 805 changes the accounting for business
combinations in a number of areas, including the treatment of
contingent consideration, contingencies, acquisition costs and
restructuring costs. Also under this guidance, changes in
deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax
uncertainties in a business combination after the measurement
period will impact income tax expense. The additional guidance
under ASC 805 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. We adopted the new guidance as of
January 1, 2009 and the impact was immaterial to our
financial statements.
Acquisitions
completed in 2010
On August 31, 2010, we entered an agreement to acquire
substantially all of the assets and assume certain liabilities
of Journey Education Marketing, Inc. for approximately
$21.0 million. In conjunction with the transaction, we paid
$7.0 million in cash and assumed certain liabilities. Of
the purchase price, $1.0 million is held in escrow to
address potential purchase price adjustments and indemnification
claims. Prior to this asset acquisition, the Company held no
investment in Journey Education Marketing, Inc. The agreement
secures us access to academic distribution channels in the
U.S. K-12 and post-secondary academic markets.
The asset purchase will be accounted for as a business
combination under GAAP. The assets and liabilities related to
the agreement have been recorded in Digital River Educational
Services, Inc.; the results of operations of this entity and the
preliminary estimated fair value of the acquired assets and
assumed liabilities have been included in our Consolidated
Financial Statements. The preliminary allocation of the purchase
price was based upon preliminary valuations for certain assets
and assumed liabilities and will be completed in subsequent
quarters. The final allocation of the purchase price may be
different from our preliminary allocation.
On April 29, 2010, we entered an agreement to acquire all
of the capital stock of fatfoogoo, AG, a privately held company
based in Vienna, Austria, for $7.0 million in cash. The
agreement provides us with the opportunity to offer game
publishers and developers a single
e-commerce
connection for managing their online product sales both in-store
and in-game. The purchase agreement provides fatfoogoo
shareholders with an earn-out opportunity based on achieving
certain earnings targets during the first two years subsequent
to the acquisition. We recorded contingent consideration of
$0.7 million based on probability-weighted estimates
determined during the year. Prior to this acquisition, we held a
19% investment in fatfoogoo; this investment was recorded using
the cost method in our financial statements and included in our
year end 2009 balance sheet under long-term
investments, which was carried at a cost of
$1.7 million.
75
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The results of operations of fatfoogoo and the estimated fair
value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities have been
included in our Consolidated Financial Statements. The
allocation of the purchase price was based upon valuations for
certain assets and assumed liabilities and was completed during
the third quarter.
Acquisitions
completed in 2009
No acquisitions in 2009.
Acquisitions
completed in 2008
On September 1, 2008, we acquired all of the capital stock
of THINK Subscription, Inc. (Think Subscription), a
privately-held company based in Provo, Utah, for approximately
$5.1 million in cash. Think Subscription provides
subscription management and fulfillment software to content
publishers, online service providers, media vendors and other
subscription-based businesses. The agreement provided Think
Subscription shareholders with an earn-out opportunity that was
settled at $1.25 million in 2009. This earn-out was
recorded as goodwill as it was considered incremental to the
purchase price. No future earn-out obligations exist.
On January 1, 2008, we acquired all of the capital stock of
DigitalSwift Corporation (DigitalSwift), a privately-held
company based in Madison, Georgia, for approximately
$9.2 million in cash. DigitalSwift is a manufacturer and
fulfiller of on-demand, dynamic and
build-to-order
CDs and DVDs to consumers. The agreement also provides
DigitalSwift shareholders with an earn-out opportunity based on
DigitalSwift achieving certain revenue and earnings targets
during the first year subsequent to the acquisition. Earn-out
payments of $1.0 million and $3.0 million were made in
2008 and 2009, respectively, no future earn-out obligations
exist. These earn-outs were recorded as goodwill as they were
considered incremental to the purchase price.
On January 1, 2008, we acquired the assets of IA Users Club
d.b.a. CustomCD, Inc. (CustomCD), a privately held company based
in Portland, Oregon and Krefeld, Germany, for approximately
$7.0 million in cash. This acquisition involved an asset
purchase of the US-based business and a stock purchase of the
business located in Germany. CustomCD creates, sells and
delivers to consumers custom CDs and DVDs containing software,
games, and other licensed content. The agreement also provides
CustomCD shareholders with an earn-out opportunity based on
CustomCD achieving certain revenue and earnings targets during
the first two years subsequent to the acquisition. In 2008, we
paid earn-outs of $1.3 million. Earn-outs were recorded as
goodwill in 2008 as they were considered incremental to the
purchase price. Any future earn-out will result in additional
goodwill.
Accrued
Acquisition Liabilities
As of December 31, 2010, there were estimated future
earn-outs and additional consideration of $1.6 million in
accrued acquisition liabilities.
76
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes the purchase acquisitions
completed during the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2010. It includes a preliminary valuation of
the Journey Education Marketing, Inc. asset purchase (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial
|
|
|
Initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology/
|
|
|
Customer
|
|
|
Non-compete
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Consideration
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Tradename
|
|
|
Relationships
|
|
|
Agreements
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Journey Education Marketing, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,437
|
|
|
$
|
(23,874
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,437
|
|
|
$
|
4,124
|
|
|
$
|
7,654
|
|
|
$
|
2,222
|
|
fatfoogoo, AG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,616
|
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
(3,158
|
)
|
|
|
4,847
|
|
|
|
4,851
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,616
|
|
|
$
|
9,785
|
|
|
$
|
(27,032
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,284
|
|
|
$
|
8,975
|
|
|
$
|
8,382
|
|
|
$
|
2,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No acquisitions in 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Think Subscription, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,100
|
|
|
$
|
644
|
|
|
$
|
(1,019
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,007
|
|
|
$
|
1,209
|
|
|
$
|
1,813
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
CustomCD, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
3,136
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
1,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
DigitalSwift Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,200
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
4,673
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
4,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,300
|
|
|
$
|
1,835
|
|
|
$
|
(1,833
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,816
|
|
|
$
|
3,755
|
|
|
$
|
7,606
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Balances as of acquisition date and do not reflect
subsequent earn-outs, adjustments or currency translation.
Recorded goodwill associated with the Companys acquisition
of Digital Swift Corporation is deductible for tax purposes,
remaining acquisitions goodwill is not deductible . All
goodwill is assigned to the Companys one reporting unit.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the amount of the purchase price in excess
of the fair values assigned to the underlying identifiable net
assets of acquired businesses. Goodwill is not amortized, but is
subject to an annual impairment test. Tests are performed more
frequently if events occur or circumstances change that would
more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit
below its carrying amount.
We complete our annual impairment test using a two-step approach
during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and reassess any
intangible assets, including goodwill, recorded in connection
with earlier acquisitions. Our assessment has indicated that
there is no impairment of goodwill for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.
The changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill for the years
ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows (in
thousands). This table includes a preliminary valuation of the
Journey Education Marketing, Inc. asset purchase:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
273,788
|
|
Goodwill from acquisitions and earn-outs
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
Adjustments from foreign currency translation(1)
|
|
|
3,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
279,538
|
|
Goodwill from acquisitions and earn-outs
|
|
|
13,239
|
|
Adjustments from foreign currency translation(1)
|
|
|
(8,837
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
283,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Adjustments to goodwill during the year ended December 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009, resulted from foreign currency
translation current and prior period acquisitions. |
77
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Intangible
Assets
Information regarding our other intangible assets is as follows
(in thousands). This table includes a preliminary valuation of
the Journey Education Marketing, Inc. asset purchase:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
71,700
|
|
|
$
|
47,225
|
|
|
$
|
24,475
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
7,381
|
|
|
|
5,315
|
|
|
|
2,066
|
|
Technology/tradename
|
|
|
38,936
|
|
|
|
27,566
|
|
|
|
11,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
118,017
|
|
|
$
|
80,106
|
|
|
$
|
37,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
63,319
|
|
|
$
|
42,764
|
|
|
$
|
20,555
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
5,227
|
|
|
|
5,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology/tradename
|
|
|
31,217
|
|
|
|
26,167
|
|
|
|
5,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
99,763
|
|
|
$
|
74,158
|
|
|
$
|
25,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense was $7.8 million, $7.6 million
and $8.4 million, for the years ended 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The result of the allocation of the purchase price
between amortizable costs and goodwill could have an impact on
our future operating results. The components of intangible
assets acquired during the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008, are as follows (in thousands). This table
includes a preliminary valuation of the Journey Education
Marketing, Inc. asset purchase. No significant residual value is
estimated for these assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
8,382
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,606
|
|
|
|
6 years
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology/tradename
|
|
|
8,975
|
|
|
|
6 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,755
|
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
19,579
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,361
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated amortization expense for the remaining life of the
intangible assets, based on intangible assets as of
December 31, 2010, is as follows (in thousands). This table
includes a preliminary valuation of the
78
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Journey Education Marketing, Inc. asset purchase; estimated
amortization expense could change as the preliminary valuation
is finalized.
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
7,724
|
|
2012
|
|
|
7,621
|
|
2013
|
|
|
5,787
|
|
2014
|
|
|
5,675
|
|
2015
|
|
|
4,933
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
6,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
37,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following is an allocation of the net assets acquired from the
acquisitions consummated and amounts paid under earn-out
arrangements in 2010 (in thousands). There were no acquisitions
in 2009. This table includes a preliminary valuation of Journey
Education Marketing, Inc. asset purchase:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Assets acquired
|
|
$
|
9,785
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(27,032
|
)
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
8,382
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
Technology/tradename
|
|
|
8,975
|
|
Goodwill (year of acquisition)
|
|
|
13,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
15,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
Option
and Restricted Stock Awards
2007
Plan
Our stockholders approved the Digital River, Inc. 2007 Equity
Incentive Plan (the 2007 Plan) at the Companys
annual stockholder meeting held on May 31, 2007. The number
of shares issuable under the 2007 Plan equals
4,650,000 shares of our common stock. In addition, shares
not issued under the 1998 Plan shall become available for
issuance under the 2007 Plan to the extent a stock option or
other stock award under the 1998 Plan expires or terminates
before shares of common stock are issued under the award. Under
our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan we have the flexibility to grant
incentive and non-statutory stock options, restricted stock
awards, restricted stock unit awards and performance shares to
our directors, employees, and consultants.
1998
Plan
The 1998 Equity Incentive Plan expired in June 2008 except as to
options still outstanding under the Plan.
General
Stock Award Information
As of December 31, 2010, there were 1,711,619 shares
available for future awards under our 2007 Plan. Awards that
expire or are canceled without delivery of shares generally
become available for issuance under the Plan. We issue new
shares to satisfy exercises and vestings of awards granted under
the stock award plan.
79
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The number of shares available has been reduced by three shares
for every two shares granted under the stock award plan that
does not provide for full payment by the participant.
Options granted to employees typically expire no later than ten
years after the date of grant. Incentive stock option grants
must have an exercise price of at least 100% of the fair market
value of a share of common stock on the grant date. Incentive
stock options granted to employees who, immediately before such
grant, owned stock directly or indirectly representing more than
10% of the voting power of our stock, will have an exercise
price of 110% of the fair market value of a share of common
stock on the grant date and will expire no later than five years
from the date of grant.
A summary of the changes in outstanding options is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
for Grant
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,848,728
|
|
|
|
2,778,310
|
|
|
$
|
2.59 - $57.36
|
|
|
$
|
28.41
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
(807,000
|
)
|
|
|
807,000
|
|
|
|
19.28 - 41.44
|
|
|
|
31.10
|
|
Restricted stock effect on shares available for grant
|
|
|
(278,952
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(425,774
|
)
|
|
|
4.56 - 38.17
|
|
|
|
16.84
|
|
Canceled/expired
|
|
|
213,686
|
|
|
|
(213,686
|
)
|
|
|
9.13 - 56.61
|
|
|
|
38.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,976,462
|
|
|
|
2,945,850
|
|
|
$
|
2.59 - $57.36
|
|
|
$
|
30.08
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
(95,000
|
)
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
|
|
24.07 - 39.62
|
|
|
|
26.43
|
|
Restricted stock effect on shares available for grant
|
|
|
(1,715,555
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(436,631
|
)
|
|
|
4.56 - 32.33
|
|
|
|
23.02
|
|
Canceled/expired
|
|
|
106,994
|
|
|
|
(106,994
|
)
|
|
|
4.65 - 55.39
|
|
|
|
36.23
|
|
Additional shares reserved
|
|
|
2,650,000
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
2,922,901
|
|
|
|
2,497,225
|
|
|
$
|
2.59 - $57.36
|
|
|
$
|
30.91
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock effect on shares available for grant
|
|
|
(1,442,827
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(328,717
|
)
|
|
|
2.59 - 32.33
|
|
|
|
15.23
|
|
Canceled/expired
|
|
|
231,545
|
|
|
|
(231,545
|
)
|
|
|
6.38 - 55.39
|
|
|
|
31.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,711,619
|
|
|
|
1,936,963
|
|
|
$
|
3.88 - $57.36
|
|
|
$
|
33.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding
and exercisable options under our 1998 Plan and 2007 Plan as of
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Life Remaining
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
$ 3.88 - $7.55
|
|
|
22,048
|
|
|
|
1.3 years
|
|
|
$
|
5.55
|
|
|
$
|
636,528
|
|
|
|
22,048
|
|
|
$
|
5.55
|
|
|
$
|
636,528
|
|
9.55 - 13.92
|
|
|
239,599
|
|
|
|
1.7 years
|
|
|
|
12.09
|
|
|
|
5,350,732
|
|
|
|
239,599
|
|
|
|
12.09
|
|
|
|
5,350,732
|
|
16.72 - 22.98
|
|
|
195,680
|
|
|
|
3.3 years
|
|
|
|
22.66
|
|
|
|
2,301,490
|
|
|
|
187,680
|
|
|
|
22.80
|
|
|
|
2,180,370
|
|
23.01 - 30.69
|
|
|
295,018
|
|
|
|
4.7 years
|
|
|
|
28.72
|
|
|
|
1,682,408
|
|
|
|
271,518
|
|
|
|
29.08
|
|
|
|
1,449,845
|
|
31.84 - 39.62
|
|
|
686,070
|
|
|
|
6.6 years
|
|
|
|
33.06
|
|
|
|
1,148,986
|
|
|
|
508,273
|
|
|
|
33.32
|
|
|
|
738,758
|
|
40.10 - 57.36
|
|
|
498,548
|
|
|
|
6.2 years
|
|
|
|
52.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457,347
|
|
|
|
53.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 3.88 - $57.36
|
|
|
1,936,963
|
|
|
|
5.2 years
|
|
|
$
|
33.53
|
|
|
$
|
11,120,144
|
|
|
|
1,686,465
|
|
|
$
|
33.43
|
|
|
$
|
10,356,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents
the total pretax intrinsic value, based on options with an
exercise price less than the Companys closing stock price
of $34.42 as of December 31, 2010, which would have been
received by the option holders had those option holders
exercised their options as of that date. The total intrinsic
value of options exercised during the twelve months ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $6.2 million,
$5.6 million and $8.2 million, respectively,
determined as of the date of exercise. The weighted average life
remaining on exercisable options is 4.9 years.
Restricted stock awards are subject to forfeiture if employment
terminates prior to the release of the restrictions. Performance
based awards (performance shares) are subject to forfeiture if
employment terminates prior to the release of the restrictions
or if established performance goals are not met. During the
vesting period, ownership of the shares cannot be transferred.
Restricted stock and performance shares are considered issued
and outstanding at the grant date and have the same dividend and
voting rights as other common stock, such dividend rights are
forfeitable during the vesting period. A summary of the changes
in restricted stock and performance shares under our 1998 Plan
and 2007 Plan as of December 31, 2010, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock and
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Performance Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Non-Vested Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
233,404
|
|
|
$
|
50.64
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
498,550
|
|
|
|
29.04
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(66,010
|
)
|
|
|
49.42
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(312,582
|
)
|
|
|
33.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Vested Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
353,362
|
|
|
$
|
35.45
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,286,100
|
|
|
|
26.23
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(126,243
|
)
|
|
|
37.32
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(142,396
|
)
|
|
|
26.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Vested Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,370,823
|
|
|
$
|
27.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,260,050
|
|
|
|
27.81
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(377,201
|
)
|
|
|
29.35
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(298,164
|
)
|
|
|
26.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Vested Balance, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,955,508
|
|
|
$
|
27.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
We also sponsor an employee stock purchase plan under which
1,200,000 shares have been reserved for purchase by
employees. The purchase price of the shares under the plan is
the lesser of 85% of the fair market value on the first or last
day of the offering period. Offering periods are currently every
six months ending on June 30 and December 31. Employees may
designate up to ten percent of their compensation for the
purchase of shares under the plan. Total shares purchased by
employees under the plan were 115,710, 113,675 and 111,640 in
the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. There were 139,392 shares still reserved
under the plan as of December 31, 2010.
Inducement
Equity Incentive Plan
Effective on December 14, 2005, we adopted an Inducement
Equity Incentive Plan (the Inducement Plan)
initially for Commerce5, Inc. executives who joined Digital
River as a result of the acquisition, or other personnel who
join us after the date of the Inducement Plan adoption. A total
of 87,500 restricted shares of Digital River stock may be issued
under the Inducement Plan, subject to vesting. In accordance
with the
81
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
NASDAQ rules, no stockholder approval was required for the
Inducement Plan. There were 34,608 shares still reserved
under the plan as of December 31, 2010.
Expense
Information
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense,
net of tax, related to employee stock options, awards and
employee stock purchases recognized (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct cost of services
|
|
$
|
621
|
|
|
$
|
658
|
|
|
$
|
785
|
|
Network and infrastructure
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
6,997
|
|
|
|
6,742
|
|
|
|
4,562
|
|
Product research and development
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
|
|
2,439
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
9,013
|
|
|
|
7,680
|
|
|
|
5,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation included in costs and expenses
|
|
|
20,773
|
|
|
|
18,270
|
|
|
|
12,548
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
(7,396
|
)
|
|
|
(6,420
|
)
|
|
|
(4,260
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax
|
|
$
|
13,377
|
|
|
$
|
11,850
|
|
|
$
|
8,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
Information
During the twelve months ending ended December 31, 2009 and
2008, we estimated the fair value of each stock option on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with
the following weighted average assumptions. No stock options
were granted in 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
3.37
|
|
Volatility factor
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted
|
|
$
|
8.68
|
|
|
$
|
10.74
|
|
The risk-free interest rate assumption is based on observed
interest rates appropriate for the term of our stock options.
The expected life of stock options represents the
weighted-average period the stock options are expected to remain
outstanding and is based on historical exercise patterns. We
used historical closing stock price volatility for a period
equal to the expected term of the options granted. The dividend
yield assumption is based on our history and expectation of
future dividend payouts.
As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2010, is based on awards ultimately
expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures.
U.S. GAAP requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time
of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if
actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures were
estimated based on historical experience.
At December 31, 2010, there was approximately
$2.4 million of total unrecognized stock-based compensation
expense, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, related to unvested
stock option awards that we expect to recognize over a
weighted-average period of 1.1 years. At December 31,
2010, there was approximately $32.7 million of total
unrecognized stock-based compensation expense, adjusted for
estimated
82
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
forfeitures, related to unvested restricted stock and
performance share awards that we expect to recognize over a
weighted-average period of 2.7 years.
During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, we
estimated the fair value of stock-based compensation expense
associated with our employee stock purchase plans on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing valuation model
with the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Volatility factor
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of employee stock purchase plan
shares
|
|
$
|
7.62
|
|
|
$
|
8.90
|
|
|
$
|
9.35
|
|
The components of pretax income are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
9,553
|
|
|
$
|
27,418
|
|
|
$
|
46,988
|
|
International
|
|
|
3,720
|
|
|
|
34,378
|
|
|
|
39,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13,273
|
|
|
$
|
61,796
|
|
|
$
|
86,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision (benefit) for income taxes is composed of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Current tax expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States federal
|
|
$
|
1,675
|
|
|
$
|
12,886
|
|
|
$
|
18,792
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
International
|
|
|
2,548
|
|
|
|
3,647
|
|
|
|
6,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current provision for income taxes
|
|
|
4,658
|
|
|
|
17,259
|
|
|
|
26,873
|
|
Deferred tax expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States federal
|
|
|
(5,171
|
)
|
|
|
(4,021
|
)
|
|
|
(3,926
|
)
|
State and local
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
International
|
|
|
(1,624
|
)
|
|
|
(983
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
(7,120
|
)
|
|
|
(5,234
|
)
|
|
|
(4,197
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(2,462
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,025
|
|
|
$
|
22,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following is a reconciliation of the difference between the
actual provision for income taxes and the provision computed by
applying the federal statutory rate of 35% to income before
income taxes (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Tax expense at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
4,646
|
|
|
$
|
21,629
|
|
|
$
|
30,195
|
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
International rate differential
|
|
|
(1,364
|
)
|
|
|
(9,662
|
)
|
|
|
(7,860
|
)
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
(8,612
|
)
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
(955
|
)
|
Nondeductible expense and other
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(940
|
)
|
Valuation allowance release
|
|
|
(974
|
)
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
2,928
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(2,462
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,025
|
|
|
$
|
22,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. Significant components of deferred
income taxes are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss and credit carryforwards
|
|
$
|
6,641
|
|
|
$
|
7,444
|
|
Nondeductible reserves and accruals
|
|
|
28,456
|
|
|
|
22,859
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,716
|
|
|
|
3,158
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(816
|
)
|
|
|
(1,144
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
37,997
|
|
|
|
32,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(2,054
|
)
|
|
|
(1,374
|
)
|
Other intangibles
|
|
|
(11,657
|
)
|
|
|
(10,805
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(13,711
|
)
|
|
|
(12,179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
24,286
|
|
|
$
|
20,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, we had U.S. tax loss
carryforwards of approximately $9.8 million and foreign tax
loss carryforwards of $9.9 million. All of the
U.S. tax loss carryforwards consist of acquired net
operating losses and $9.3 million of the foreign tax loss
carryforwards are acquired net operating losses. The
U.S. tax loss carryforwards expire in the years 2021
through 2028. However, we anticipate most U.S. tax loss
carryforwards will be utilized in the next few years.
There is uncertainty of future realization of the deferred tax
assets resulting from tax loss carryforwards due to anticipated
limitations. Therefore, a valuation allowance was recorded
against the tax effect of such tax loss carryforwards. During
2010, the Company released $0.9 million of valuation
allowance recorded on its acquired foreign tax loss
carryforwards because we believe it is more likely than not that
these deferred tax assets will be realized. This reduction in
the valuation allowance reduced tax expense. The Company also
recorded $0.6 million of valuation allowance on tax loss
carryforwards and other tax attributes because we believe it is
more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will not be
realized. At December 31, 2010, the Company has a valuation
allowance on approximately $0.5 million of deferred tax
assets related to operating
84
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
losses and $0.3 million of deferred tax assets related to
other tax attributes as we believe it is more likely than not
that these deferred tax assets will not be realized. Any future
release of this valuation allowance will reduce expense.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
5,447
|
|
Increases for tax positions taken during current year
|
|
|
2,957
|
|
Increases for tax positions taken during prior years
|
|
|
613
|
|
Decreases as a result of settlements with taxing authorities
|
|
|
(2,622
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
6,395
|
|
Increases for tax positions taken during current year
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
Increases for tax positions taken during prior years
|
|
|
10
|
|
Decreases for tax positions taken during prior years
|
|
|
(983
|
)
|
Decreases as a result of settlements with taxing authorities
|
|
|
(639
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
6,574
|
|
Increases for tax positions taken during current year
|
|
|
4,195
|
|
Decreases for tax positions taken during prior years
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
Decreases for expiration of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
Decreases as a result of settlements with taxing authorities
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
10,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of these unrecognized tax benefits would affect our
effective tax rate if recognized. We recognize interest and
penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax
expense. We had approximately $0.4 million and
$0.9 million of accrued interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Interest on unrecognized tax benefits was
($0.5) million, $0.1 million and $0.7 million in
years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in
U.S. federal and various state jurisdictions, and foreign
jurisdictions. The tax years
2006-2009
remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to
which we are subject. Several of the Companys
international subsidiaries were under examination during 2010,
resulting in only minor agreed upon adjustments. Due to the
potential resolution of examinations currently being performed
by taxing authorities, and the expiration of various statutes of
limitation, it is reasonably possible that our gross
unrecognized tax benefits balance may change within the next
twelve months by a range of zero to $2.9 million. Beyond
this estimate, it is not practical to determine the timing of
any cash flows related to these uncertain tax positions.
During 2010, we repatriated approximately $26 million of
earnings from our German subsidiary, resulting in a US tax
benefit driven by the generation of excess foreign tax credits.
This was a one-time distribution as we plan to indefinitely
reinvest all remaining foreign earnings. No provision has been
made for federal income taxes on approximately
$117.6 million of our foreign subsidiaries undistributed
earnings as of December 31, 2010, since we plan to
indefinitely reinvest all such earnings. If these earnings were
distributed to the U.S. in the form of dividends or
otherwise, we would be subject to U.S. income taxes on such
earnings. The amount of U.S. income taxes would be subject
to adjustment for foreign tax credits and for the impact of the
step-up in
the basis of assets resulting from elections made at the time of
acquisitions. If these earnings were to be distributed, the
income tax liability would be approximately $28.3 million.
85
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Leases
We currently have 44 facility leases in addition to leasing
certain computer equipment under non-cancelable operating
leases. Total rent expense, including common area maintenance
charges, recognized under all leases was $7.3 million,
$7.4 million and $7.1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We did not
incur contingent or sublease rental expense in 2010, 2009 or
2008. The minimum annual rent payments under long-term leases at
December 31, 2010, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31,
|
|
Lease Obligations
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
5,871
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,444
|
|
2013
|
|
|
3,887
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2,970
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2,762
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
18,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total future minimum obligations
|
|
$
|
36,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the second half of 2010, we entered into an agreement to
lease 132,600 square feet for general office purposes at
10350 Bren Road West, Minnetonka, MN 55343. The operating lease
contains a ten year term and will commence in the second quarter
of 2011. We intend to relocate our corporate office facilities
to the new location by the end of the third quarter of 2011. We
have a right to renew the term for one five year period
subsequent to the original term. Significant provisions of the
lease include a rent holiday for the first eighteen months of
occupancy, subsequent rent escalations and leasehold improvement
allowances. The rent holiday and escalations will be amortized
over the life of the agreement. Leasehold improvement allowances
will be classified as a reduction to rent and will be recorded
as a function of property and equipment, net, with amortization
recorded over the life of the lease. There are no other unusual
provisions or conditions, such as contingent rent payments or
rent concessions. The lease of 10350 Bren Road West has been
included in the above table.
Litigation
DDR Holdings, LLC (DDR Holdings) has brought a claim against us
and several other defendants regarding U.S. Patents
No. 6,629,135 (the 135 patent) and
6,993,572 (the 572 patent), which are owned by
DDR Holdings. These patents claim
e-commerce
outsourcing systems and methods relating to the provision of
outsourced
e-commerce
support pages having a common look and feel with a hosts
website. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for
the Eastern District of Texas on January 31, 2006. The
complaint seeks injunctive relief, declaratory relief, damages
and attorneys fees. We have denied infringement of any
valid claim of the
patents-in-suit,
and have asserted counter-claims which seek a judicial
declaration that the patents are invalid and not infringed. In
September 2006, DDR Holdings filed an application for
reexamination of its patents based upon the prior art produced
by us and the other defendants in the case. As part of that
application, DDR Holdings asserted that this prior art raised a
substantial question as to the patentability of the inventions
claimed in the patents. In December 2006, the Court stayed the
litigation pending a decision on the reexamination application.
In February 2007, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
ordered reexamination of DDR Holdings patents.
On January 5, 2009, the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office issued a final office action rejecting the claims in the
135 patent which were subject to reexamination. On
January 14, 2009, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
issued a final office action rejecting all but two of the claims
in the 572 patent which were subject to reexamination. On
April 16, 2010, the Board of Patent Appeals and
Interferences reversed the decision of the
86
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Examiner to reject the claims in the 135 patent and the
572 patent which were subject to reexamination. On
July 20, 2010, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
issued Reexamination Certificates for the 135 and
572 patents with no changes to the asserted patent claims.
On October 6, 2010, the Court granted DDR Holdings
unopposed motion to lift the stay in the Texas litigation. On
December 8, 2010, DDR filed a third amended complaint
adding claims of infringement related to a more recently issued
patent. On February 11, 2011, Digital River filed its
answer to the third amended complaint. We intend to vigorously
defend ourselves in the DDR Holdings matters, however, given the
relatively early stage of the proceedings, no assurances can be
given at this time as to the ultimate outcome of this case, or
the range of potential loss should the outcome be unfavorable.
We are subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation
arising in the ordinary course of business. While the final
outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, we
believe there is no ordinary course litigation pending against
us that is likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position,
results of operation or cash flows. Because of the uncertainty
inherent in litigation, it is possible that unfavorable
resolutions of these lawsuits, proceedings and claims could
exceed the amount we have currently reserved for these matters.
From time to time, we are involved in other disputes or
regulatory inquiries that arise in the ordinary course of
business. Any claims or regulatory actions against us, whether
meritorious or not, could be time consuming, result in costly
litigation, damage awards, injunctive relief or increased costs
of doing business through adverse judgment or settlement,
require us to change our business practices in expensive ways,
require significant amounts of management time, result in the
diversion of significant operational resources or otherwise harm
our business. These matters are subject to inherent
uncertainties and managements view of these matters may
change in the future.
Third parties have from
time-to-time
claimed, and others may claim in the future, that we have
infringed their intellectual property rights. We have been
notified of several potential patent disputes, and expect that
we will increasingly be subject to patent infringement claims as
our services expand in scope and complexity. We have in the past
been forced to litigate such claims. We may also become more
vulnerable to third-party claims as laws, such as the Digital
Millennium Copyright Act, the Lanham Act and the Communications
Decency Act are interpreted by the courts and as we expand
geographically into jurisdictions where the underlying laws with
respect to the potential liability of online intermediaries like
ourselves are either unclear or less favorable. These claims,
whether meritorious or not, could be time consuming and costly
to resolve, cause service upgrade delays, require expensive
changes in our methods of doing business, or could require us to
pay damages or enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements.
Indemnification
Provisions
In the ordinary course of business we have included limited
indemnification provisions in certain of our agreements with
parties with whom we have commercial relations. Under these
contracts, we generally indemnify, hold harmless and agree to
reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred
by the indemnified party in connection with claims by any third
party with respect to our domain names, trademarks, logos and
other branding elements to the extent that such marks are
applicable to our performance under the subject agreement. In
certain agreements, including both agreements under which we
have developed technology for certain commercial parties and
agreements with our clients, we have provided an indemnity for
other types of third-party claims. To date, no significant costs
have been incurred, either individually or collectively, in
connection with our indemnification provisions.
In addition, we are required by our credit card processors to
comply with credit card association operating rules, and we have
agreed to indemnify our processors for any fines they are
assessed by credit card associations as a result of processing
payments for us. The credit card associations and their member
banks set and interpret the credit card rules. Visa, MasterCard,
American Express, or Discover could adopt new
87
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
operating rules or re-interpret existing rules that we or our
credit card processors might find difficult to follow. We also
could be subject to fines or increased fees from MasterCard and
Visa.
2010 Senior Convertible Notes. On
November 1, 2010, we sold and issued $345.0 million in
aggregate principal amount of senior convertible notes (2010
Notes), in a private, unregistered offering. The 2010 Notes are
unsecured obligations and rank equally with all of our existing
and future senior unsecured debt. The 2010 Notes were sold at
100% of their principal amount. The 2010 Notes bear interest at
the rate of 2.00% per annum from the date of issuance, payable
semi-annually on May 1 and November 1, commencing on
May 1, 2011. The 2010 Notes will mature, unless earlier
repurchased, redeemed or converted in accordance with their
terms, on November 1, 2030.
Holders have the right to convert some or all of the 2010 Notes
at any time prior to the maturity date into shares of our common
stock at the initial conversion rate of 20.3537 shares per
$1,000 in principal amount of the 2010 Notes, which is equal to
an initial conversion price of approximately $49.13 per share.
At the initial conversion rate, assuming the conversion of all
$345 million in aggregate principal amount, the 2010 Notes
may be converted into approximately 7,022,026 shares of our
common stock. We will adjust the conversion price if certain
events occur, as specified in the related indenture, such as the
issuance of our common stock as a dividend or distribution or
the occurrence of a stock subdivision or combination. If we
undergo certain types of fundamental changes, as defined in the
indenture, on or before November 1, 2015, we will be
required to pay a fundamental change make-whole premium on 2010
Notes converted in connection with such make-whole fundamental
change by increasing the conversion rate. The amount of the
fundamental change make-whole premium, if any, will be based on
our common stock price and the effective date of the make-whole
fundamental change.
At any time on or after November 1, 2015, and prior to the
maturity date, we may redeem for cash some or all of the 2010
Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the 2010 Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid
interest to, but excluding, the redemption date.
Holders have the right to require us to repurchase some or all
of their 2010 Notes for cash on each of November 1, 2015,
November 1, 2020 and November 1, 2025, at a repurchase
price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2010 Notes to
be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but
excluding, the relevant repurchase date. If we undergo certain
types of fundamental changes prior to the maturity date, holders
of the 2010 Notes will have the right, at their option, to
require us to repurchase some or all of their 2010 Notes at a
repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the
2010 Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest
to, but excluding, the repurchase date.
Proceeds from the 2010 Note were used to fund a
$35.0 million common stock repurchase buy-back program
completed in 2010 and the remainder of the net proceeds from the
sale will be used for general corporate and strategic purposes.
2004 Senior Convertible Notes. In 2004 we sold
and issued $195.0 million in aggregate principal amount of
1.25% senior convertible notes due January 1, 2024
(2004 Notes), in a private, unregistered offering. The 2004
Notes were sold at 100% of their principal amount. On
January 5, 2009, we announced that holders of 95.5% of the
2004 Notes exercised the option to require us to repurchase
those Notes on January 2, 2009, at a purchase price of
100.25% of the principal amount of each tendered 2004 Note.
Notes with an aggregate principal amount of approximately
$8.8 million remain outstanding. Holders of the remaining
outstanding 2004 Notes have the right to require us to
repurchase their 2004 Notes prior to maturity on January 1,
2014 and 2019.
We are required to pay interest on the 2004 Notes on January 1
and July 1 of each year so long as the 2004 Notes are
outstanding. The 2004 Notes bear interest at a rate of 1.25%
and, if specified conditions are
88
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
met, are convertible into our common stock at a conversion price
of $44.063 per share. The 2004 Notes may be surrendered for
conversion under certain circumstances, including the
satisfaction of a market price condition, such that the price of
our common stock reaches a specified threshold; the satisfaction
of a trading price condition, such that the trading price of the
2004 Notes falls below a specified level; the redemption of the
2004 Notes by us, the occurrence of specified corporate
transactions, as defined in the related indenture; and the
occurrence of a fundamental change, as defined in the related
indenture. The initial conversion price is equivalent to a
conversion rate of approximately 22.6948 shares per $1,000
of principal amount of the 2004 Notes. We will adjust the
conversion price if certain events occur, as specified in the
related indenture, such as the issuance of our common stock as a
dividend or distribution or the occurrence of a stock
subdivision or combination.
We incurred interest expense of $1.7 million in 2010 and
made interest payments of $0.1 million. We incurred
interest expense of $5.3 million in 2009, which included
the write-off of $5.2 million in debt financing costs
related to the 2004 Senior Convertible Note repurchase in
January 2009, and made interest payments of $1.3 million.
We incurred interest expense of $2.5 million in 2008 and
made interest payments of $2.4 million.
Share
Repurchase Program
Set forth below is information regarding the Companys
stock repurchases during 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
Average
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
Maximum Number of
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
Shares that may yet
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Announced Plan
|
|
be Purchased Under the Plan
|
|
November 1, 2010
|
|
|
943,881
|
|
|
$
|
37.08
|
|
|
|
943,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT PLAN
|
401K
Plan
We have a defined contribution 401(k) retirement plan for
eligible employees. Employees may contribute up to 15% of their
pretax compensation to the plan, with us providing a
discretionary match of up to 50% of the total employee
contribution. Amounts charged to expense related to our matching
contributions were $2.7 million in 2010, $2.3 million
in 2009 and $2.2 million in 2008.
We view our operations and manage our business as one reportable
segment, providing outsourced
e-commerce
solutions globally to a variety of companies, primarily in the
software and high-tech products markets. Factors used to
identify our single operating segment include the financial
information available for evaluation by the chief operating
decision maker in making decisions about how to allocate
resources and assess performance. We market our products and
services through our offices in the United States and our
wholly-owned branches and subsidiaries operating in Austria,
Brazil, China, Germany, Korea, Ireland, Japan, Luxembourg,
Sweden, Taiwan and the United Kingdom.
Sales to international customers accounted for 46.4%, 41.1% and
42.8% of revenue for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Sales
are attributed to a geographic region based on the ordering
location of the customer. Summarized revenue information by
region for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 is outlined below (dollars
in thousands). If revenue earned in any individual country
exceeds 10% of the revenue reported for the period, the country
is separately listed. The remaining balance is segregated to
Europe and other. Currently, no non-U.S country exceeds the 10%
threshold.
89
DIGITAL
RIVER, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
194,689
|
|
|
$
|
237,726
|
|
|
$
|
225,385
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
110,784
|
|
|
|
109,329
|
|
|
|
112,211
|
|
Other
|
|
|
57,753
|
|
|
|
56,711
|
|
|
|
56,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
363,226
|
|
|
$
|
403,766
|
|
|
$
|
394,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of products from one software publisher client, Symantec
Corporation, accounted for approximately 5.8%, 21.5% and 24.3%
of our total revenue in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In
addition, revenues derived from proprietary Digital River
services sold to Symantec consumers and dealer network sales of
Symantec products amounted to approximately 1.1%, 6.9% and 9.4%
of total Digital River revenue in 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Microsoft Corporation accounted for approximately
24.7%, 11.8% and 7.1% of our revenue in 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
The following table presents selected asset information by
geographic area based on the physical location of the assets (in
thousands). If assets in any individual country exceed 10% of
the assets reported for the period, the country is separately
listed. The remaining balance is segregated to Europe and other.
Currently, no non-U.S country exceeds the 10% threshold.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Europe and Other
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Europe and Other
|
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
$
|
121,743
|
|
|
$
|
18,532
|
|
|
$
|
107,026
|
|
|
$
|
16,951
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(76,995
|
)
|
|
|
(13,681
|
)
|
|
|
(58,015
|
)
|
|
|
(11,619
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
$
|
44,748
|
|
|
$
|
4,851
|
|
|
$
|
49,011
|
|
|
$
|
5,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
Schedule
Digital
River, Inc.
Schedule II
For Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009
and 2008
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
2010
|
|
Beginning of Year
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Deductions
|
|
End of Year
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
2,222
|
|
|
$
|
7,284
|
|
|
$
|
(4,604
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,902
|
|
Accrued chargeback reserve
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
9,881
|
|
|
|
(9,232
|
)
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
2009
|
|
Beginning of Year
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Deductions
|
|
End of Year
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
2,457
|
|
|
$
|
4,954
|
|
|
$
|
(5,189
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,222
|
|
Accrued chargeback reserve
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
11,114
|
|
|
|
(11,435
|
)
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
2008
|
|
Beginning of Year
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Deductions
|
|
End of Year
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
2,489
|
|
|
$
|
5,214
|
|
|
$
|
(5,246
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,457
|
|
Accrued chargeback reserve
|
|
|
1,186
|
|
|
|
9,514
|
|
|
|
(9,092
|
)
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged /
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged /
|
|
(Credited) to
|
|
|
Deferred income tax asset
|
|
Balance at
|
|
(Credited) to
|
|
Other
|
|
Balance at
|
valuation allowance
|
|
Beginning of Year
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Accounts
|
|
End of Year
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
1,144
|
|
|
$
|
(914
|
)
|
|
$
|
586
|
|
|
$
|
816
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
91
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
3
|
.1(2)
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant, as currently in effect.
|
|
3
|
.2(4)
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as currently in
effect.
|
|
4
|
.1(5)
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate.
|
|
4
|
.2(9)
|
|
Indenture dated as of June 1, 2004, between Digital River,
Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as trustee, including therein
the form of the 2004 Note.
|
|
4
|
.3(17)
|
|
Indenture dated as of November 1, 2010, between Digital
River, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as trustee, including
therein the form of the 2010 Note.
|
|
10
|
.1(5)
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement between Registrant and each of its
directors and executive officers.
|
|
10
|
.3(5)
|
|
Consent to Assignment and Assumption of Lease dated
April 22, 1998, by and between CSM Investors, Inc.,
IntraNet Integration Group, Inc. and Registrant.
|
|
10
|
.4(3)
|
|
Assignment of Lease dated April 21, 1998, by and between
Intranet Integration Group, Inc. and Registrant.
|
|
10
|
.5(3)
|
|
Lease Agreement dated January 18, 2000, between Property
Reserve, Inc. and Registrant.
|
|
10
|
.6(4)
|
|
First Amendment of Lease dated January 31, 2001, to that
certain Lease dated April 24, 1996, between CSM Investors,
Inc. and Registrant (as assignee of Intranet Integration Group,
Inc.).
|
|
10
|
.7(6)
|
|
1998 Stock Option Plan, as amended and superseded by
Exhibit 10.19.*
|
|
10
|
.8(7)
|
|
1999 Stock Option Plan, formerly known as the 1999 Non-Officer
Stock Option Plan, as amended and superseded by
Exhibit 10.19.*
|
|
10
|
.9(6)
|
|
2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, and offering.*
|
|
10
|
.11(8)
|
|
Second Amendment of Lease dated April 22, 2002, to that
certain Lease dated April 24, 1996, between CSM Investors,
Inc. and Registrant (as assignee of Intranet Integration Group,
Inc.) as amended.
|
|
10
|
.12(8)
|
|
Second Amendment of Lease dated April 28, 2003, to that
certain Lease dated January 18, 2000, between Property
Reserve Inc. and Registrant.
|
|
10
|
.15(9)
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of June 1, 2004,
between Digital River, Inc. and the initial purchasers of Senior
Convertible Notes due January 1, 2024.
|
|
10
|
.16(13)
|
|
Summary of Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors.
|
|
10
|
.17(14)
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Symantec Online Store Agreement, by
and among Symantec Corporation, Symantec Limited, Digital River,
Inc. and Digital River Ireland Limited effective April 1,
2006
|
|
10
|
.18(10)
|
|
1998 Equity Incentive Plan (formerly known as 1998 Stock Option
Plan).*
|
|
10
|
.19(13)
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement for Joel A. Ronning.*
|
|
10
|
.20(13)
|
|
Change of Control and Severance Agreement for Thomas M.
Donnelly.*
|
|
10
|
.21(11)
|
|
Form of Amendment to Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement.*
|
|
10
|
.22(12)
|
|
Inducement Equity Incentive Plan.*
|
|
10
|
.23(15)
|
|
2007 Equity Incentive Plan.*
|
|
10
|
.24(13)
|
|
Change of Control and Severance Agreement for Kevin L. Crudden.*
|
|
10
|
.25(16)
|
|
Microsoft Operations Digital Distribution Agreement, by and
among Digital River, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation effective
September 1, 2006
|
|
10
|
.26(16)
|
|
Direct Reseller Addendum to the Microsoft Operations Digital
Distribution Agreement, by and among Digital River, Inc. and
Microsoft Corporation effective September 1, 2006
|
|
10
|
.27(16)
|
|
Omnibus Amendment to the Microsoft Operations Digital
Distribution Agreement, by and among Digital River, Inc. and
Microsoft Corporation effective October 4, 2007
|
|
10
|
.28(16)
|
|
Amendment to the Microsoft Operations Digital Distribution
Agreement, by and among Digital River, Inc. and Microsoft
Corporation effective December 2, 2008
|
|
10
|
.29(16)
|
|
Amendment to the Microsoft Operations Digital Distribution
Agreement, by and among Digital River, Inc. and Microsoft
Corporation effective September 9, 2009
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
10
|
.30(17)
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2010, among
Digital River, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated, as representatives of the
initial purchasers named in Schedule A thereto.
|
|
10
|
.31(18)
|
|
Second Omnibus Amendment to the Microsoft Operations Digital
Distribution Agreement
|
|
12
|
.1++
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
|
21
|
.1++
|
|
Subsidiaries of Digital River, Inc.
|
|
23
|
.1++
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated
February 24, 2011.
|
|
24
|
.1++
|
|
Power of Attorney, pursuant to which amendments to this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
may be filed, is included on the signature pages of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
31
|
.1++
|
|
Certification of Digital River, Inc.s Chief Executive
Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2++
|
|
Certification of Digital River, Inc.s Chief Financial
Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
32++
|
|
|
Certification of Digital River, Inc.s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
101(19)
|
|
|
The following financial information from Digital River,
Inc.s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2010, formatted in
Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL):
(i) Consolidated Balance Sheet, (ii) Consolidated
Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows, (vi) Consolidated Statements of
Stockholders Equity, and (v) Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (tagged as blocks of text).
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan. |
|
|
|
Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this
agreement, which portions have been filed separately with
the SEC. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on May 4, 2004. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on June 1, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999, filed on
March 30, 2000. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2000, filed on
March 27, 2001. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
(File No.
333-56787),
declared effective on August 11, 1998. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Registration
Statement on
Form S-8
(File No.
333-105864)
filed on June 5, 2003. |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, filed on
August 14, 2003. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, filed on May 15,
2003. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on July 13, 2004. |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on May 31, 2005. |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, filed on
August 9, 2005. |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on December 20, 2005. |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on March 10, 2008. |
93
|
|
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on
March 1, 2007. |
|
(15) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed on
February 29, 2008. |
|
(16) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Annual Report
on
Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on
August 19, 2010. |
|
(17) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on November 1, 2010. |
|
(18) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, filed on
November 2, 2010. |
|
(19) |
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of
Regulation S-T,
the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, and shall not be deemed part of a
registration statement, prospectus or other document filed under
the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be
expressly set forth by specific reference in such filings. |
94