Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended April 3, 2010
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-7087
ASTRONICS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
16-0959303
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
130 Commerce Way, East Aurora, New York
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
14052
(Zip code) |
(716) 805-1599
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
NOT APPLICABLE
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
$.01 par value Common Stock, $.01 par value Class B Stock
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer and a smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of April 3, 2010 10,804,347 shares of common stock were outstanding consisting of
8,565,743 shares of common stock ($.01 par value) and 2,238,604 shares of Class B common stock
($.01 par value).
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
ASTRONICS CORPORATION
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets
April 3, 2010 with Comparative Figures for December 31, 2009
(dollars in thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 3, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
$ |
12,678 |
|
|
$ |
14,949 |
|
Accounts Receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
30,831 |
|
|
|
30,560 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
31,716 |
|
|
|
31,909 |
|
Other Current Assets |
|
|
4,966 |
|
|
|
5,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
80,191 |
|
|
|
82,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization of $24,881 and $23,859, respectively |
|
|
31,174 |
|
|
|
31,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
7,916 |
|
|
|
8,131 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
3,697 |
|
|
|
3,763 |
|
Intangible Assets, net of accumulated amortization |
|
|
5,453 |
|
|
|
5,591 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
7,610 |
|
|
|
7,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
136,041 |
|
|
$ |
138,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Maturities of Long-term Debt |
|
$ |
5,245 |
|
|
$ |
6,238 |
|
Accounts Payable |
|
|
6,982 |
|
|
|
7,405 |
|
Accrued Expenses |
|
|
9,344 |
|
|
|
8,620 |
|
Accrued Income Taxes |
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
Billings in Excess of Recoverable Costs and Accrued Profits on
Uncompleted Contracts |
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
Customer Advance Payments and Deferred Revenue |
|
|
2,169 |
|
|
|
4,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
26,205 |
|
|
|
29,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
36,523 |
|
|
|
38,538 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
9,285 |
|
|
|
10,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
72,013 |
|
|
|
78,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value Authorized 20,000,000 Shares, issued
8,744,181 in 2010 and 8,684,088 in 2009 |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Convertible Class B Stock, $.01 par value Authorized 5,000,000
Shares, issued 2,540,479 in 2010 and 2,571,245 in 2009 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
|
|
12,679 |
|
|
|
12,340 |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
Retained Earnings |
|
|
53,499 |
|
|
|
50,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,309 |
|
|
|
62,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Treasury Stock: 480,313 shares in both 2010 and 2009 |
|
|
2,281 |
|
|
|
2,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
64,028 |
|
|
|
60,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
136,041 |
|
|
$ |
138,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes
to consolidated condensed financial statements.
3
ASTRONICS CORPORATION
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations and Retained Earnings
Three Months Ended April 3, 2010
With Comparative Figures
for 2009
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 3, |
|
|
April 4, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
46,936 |
|
|
$ |
50,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
35,390 |
|
|
|
41,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
11,546 |
|
|
|
8,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
5,466 |
|
|
|
6,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
6,080 |
|
|
|
2,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net of interest income of $12 in 2010 and $ in 2009 |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
Other expense (income) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
5,519 |
|
|
|
2,054 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
2,119 |
|
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
3,400 |
|
|
$ |
1,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
50,099 |
|
|
|
53,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
53,499 |
|
|
$ |
55,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Common Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
10,797 |
|
|
|
10,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
10,966 |
|
|
|
10,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
4
ASTRONICS CORPORATION
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended April 3, 2010
with Comparative Figures
for 2009
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 3, |
|
|
April 4, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
3,400 |
|
|
$ |
1,401 |
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Cash Provided by Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
1,740 |
|
Provision for Non-Cash Losses on Inventory and Receivables |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
Stock Compensation Expense |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
Deferred Tax Expense (Benefit) |
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
Cash Flows from Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
(2,886 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
2,738 |
|
Accounts Payable |
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
(451 |
) |
Other Current Assets and Liabilities |
|
|
(713 |
) |
|
|
(345 |
) |
Billings in Excess of Recoverable Costs and Accrued Profits on
Uncompleted Contracts |
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
(596 |
) |
Customer Advanced Payments and Deferred Revenue |
|
|
(2,783 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
Income Taxes |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
Supplemental Retirement and Other Liabilities |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
1,573 |
|
|
|
2,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,655 |
) |
Capital Expenditures |
|
|
(875 |
) |
|
|
(968 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Used For Investing Activities |
|
|
(915 |
) |
|
|
(41,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds (Payments) Long-term Debt |
|
|
(3,058 |
) |
|
|
37,943 |
|
Net Proceeds from Note Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
Debt Acquisition Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,342 |
) |
Other |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (Used For) Provided By Financing Activities |
|
|
(2,931 |
) |
|
|
36,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rates on Cash |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(2,271 |
) |
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
14,949 |
|
|
|
3,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
12,678 |
|
|
$ |
1,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
5
ASTRONICS CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
April 3, 2010
(Unaudited)
1) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include
all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
Operating Results
The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for
the full year. Operating results for the three month period ended April 3, 2010 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited financial statements
at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in
Astronics Corporations 2009 annual report on Form 10-K.
Description of the Business
Astronics is a leading supplier of advanced, high-performance lighting systems, electrical
power generation systems, aircraft safety systems, electronics systems for the global aerospace
industry as well as test, training and simulation systems primarily for the military. We sell our
products to airframe manufacturers (OEMs) in the commercial transport, business jet, military
markets, FAA/Airport, OEM suppliers, and aircraft operators around the world. The Company has two
reportable segments, Aerospace and Test Systems. The Aerospace segment designs and manufactures
products for the global aerospace industry. The Test Systems segment designs, develops,
manufactures and maintains communications and weapons test systems and training and simulation
devices for military applications.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Acquisitions are accounted for under the purchase method and, accordingly, the operating results
for the acquired companies are included in the consolidated statements of earnings from the
respective dates of acquisition.
Revenue and Expense Recognition
In the Aerospace segment, revenue is recognized on the accrual basis at the time of shipment
of goods and transfer of title. There are no significant contracts allowing for right of return.
In the Test Systems segment, revenue is recognized from long-term, fixed-price contracts using
the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, measured by multiplying the estimated total
contract value by the ratio of actual contract costs incurred to date to the estimated total
contract costs. Substantially all long-term contracts are with U.S. government agencies and
contractors thereto. The Company makes significant estimates involving its usage of
percentage-of-completion accounting to recognize contract revenues. The Company periodically
reviews contracts in process for estimates-to-completion, and revises estimated gross profit
accordingly. While the Company believes its estimated gross profit on contracts in process is
reasonable, unforeseen events and changes in circumstances can take place in a subsequent
accounting period that may cause the Company to revise its estimated gross profit on one or more of
its contracts in process. Accordingly, the ultimate gross profit realized upon completion of such
contracts can vary significantly from estimated amounts between accounting periods.
Cost of products sold includes the costs to manufacture products such as direct materials and
labor and manufacturing overhead as well as all engineering and developmental costs. Shipping and
handling costs are expensed as incurred and are included in costs of products sold. The Company is
engaged in a variety of engineering and design activities as well as basic research and development
activities directed to the substantial improvement or new application of the Companys existing
technologies. These costs are expensed when incurred and included in cost of sales. Research and
development,
design and related engineering amounted to $7.1 million and $7.4 million for the three months ended
April 3, 2010 and April 4, 2009 respectively.
6
Selling, general and administrative expenses include costs primarily related to our sales and
marketing departments and administrative departments.
Fair Value
ASC Topic 820, Fair value Measurements and Disclosures, (ASC Topic 820) defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the related disclosure
requirements. This statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit
fair value measurements. The statement indicates, among other things, that a fair value measurement
assumes that the transaction to sell an asset or transfer a liability occurs in the principal
market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous
market for the asset or liability. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value based upon an exit price model.
ASC Topic 820 establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used
to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities. |
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active
markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or
indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument. |
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions used to measure
assets and liabilities at fair value. |
A financial asset or liabilitys classification within the hierarchy is determined based on
the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following table
provides the financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis
as of April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 3, 2010 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( 465 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(465 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps are securities with no quoted readily available Level 1 inputs, and
therefore are measured at fair value using inputs that are directly observable in active markets
and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy, using the income approach.
In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 350 Intangibles Goodwill and Other the
Company estimates the fair value of reporting units, utilizing unobservable Level 3 inputs. Level
3 inputs require significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices or
observable inputs for assets of a similar nature.
At December 31, 2009, the fair value of goodwill and intangible assets classified using Level
3 inputs were as follows:
|
|
|
The fair value measurement of goodwill in the Test Systems reporting unit is $2.4
million. Inputs used to calculate the fair value were a combination of revenue growth rates
and profit margins based on internal forecasts, terminal value, and weighted-average cost of
capital used to discount future cash flows. There was no change in fair value from December
31, 2009. |
|
|
|
The fair value measurement of indefinite-lived trade name intangible assets in the Test
Systems reporting unit is $0.5 million. Inputs used to calculate the fair value were
internal forecasts used to estimate discounted future cash flows. There was no change in
fair value from December 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
The fair value measurement of amortized intangible assets in the Test Systems reporting
unit is $3.5 million. Inputs used to calculate the fair value were internal forecasts used
to estimate discounted future cash flows. There was no change in fair value from December
31, 2009. |
As of April 3, 2010, the Company concluded that no indicators of goodwill impairment existed
and an interim test was not performed.
7
Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, notes payable, long-term debt and interest rate swaps. The Company
performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers financial condition and generally does not
require collateral and the Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for trading
purposes. Due to their short-term nature the carrying value of cash and equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, and notes payable approximate fair value. The carrying value of the
Companys variable rate long-term debt also approximates fair value due to the variable rate
feature of these instruments. The carrying value of the subordinated promissory note approximates
its fair value based on managements estimation that a current interest rate would not differ
materially from the stated rate. The Companys interest rate swaps are recorded at fair value as
described under Fair Value.
Derivatives
The Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value with the related gains
or losses deferred in shareholders equity as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
(Loss) (AOCI). The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended
use and resulting designation. The Companys use of derivative instruments was limited to a cash
flow hedge for interest rate risk associated with long-term debt. Interest rate swaps are used to
adjust the proportion of total debt that is subject to variable and fixed interest rates. The
interest rate swaps are designated as hedges of the amount of future cash flows related to interest
payments on variable-rate debt that, in combination with the interest payments on the debt, convert
a portion of the variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt. At April 3, 2010, we had interest rate
swaps consisting of the following:
|
a) |
|
An interest rate swap with a notional amount of approximately $2.9 million,
entered into on February 2006, related to the Companys Series 1999 New York Industrial
Revenue Bond which effectively fixes the rate at 3.99% plus a spread based on the
Companys leverage ratio on this obligation through 2016. |
|
b) |
|
An interest rate swap with a notional amount of $15.0 million. The swap
effectively fixes the LIBOR rate at 2.115% on the notional amount (which decreases in
concert with the scheduled note repayment schedule).The swap agreement became effective
October 1, 2009 and expires January 30, 2014. |
To the extent the interest rate swaps are not perfectly effective in offsetting the change in
the value of the payments being hedged; the ineffective portion of these contracts is recognized in
earnings immediately. All of the Companys cash flow hedges are considered to be highly effective.
Amounts to be reclassified to income through the remainder of 2010 are not expected to be
significant.
Long-term Debt and Notes Payable
The Companys obligations under the Credit Agreement are jointly and severally guaranteed by
Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems Corp., Luminescent Systems, Inc. and DME Corporation, each a
wholly-owned domestic subsidiary of the Company. The obligations are secured by a first priority
lien on substantially all of the Companys and the guarantors assets and 100% of the issued and
outstanding equity interest of each subsidiary.
The Company had no balance outstanding on its revolving credit facility at April 3, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively. The revolving credit facility provides for borrowing up to $35.0
million. For working capital requirements, the Company had available on its credit facility,
$32.6 million and $15.5 million at April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The credit
facility allocates up to $20 million of the revolving credit line for the issuance of letters of
credit, including certain existing letters of credit totaling approximately $13.5 million at April
3, 2010.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Company accounts for its foreign currency translation in accordance with ASC Topic 830,
Foreign Currency Translation. The aggregate transaction gain or loss included in determining net
income was insignificant for the periods ending April 3, 2010 and April 4, 2009.
8
Income Taxes
The FASB issued ASC Topic 740-10 Overall Uncertainty in Income Taxes (ASC Topic 740-10)
which clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertainty in tax positions, as defined. ASC
Topic 740-10 seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspects of the
recognition and measurement related to accounting for income taxes. The Company is subject to the
provisions of ASC Topic 740-10 and has analyzed filing positions in all of the federal and state
jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns, as well as all open tax years in
these jurisdictions.
Should the Company need to accrue a liability for unrecognized tax benefits, any interest
associated with that liability will be recorded as interest expense. Penalties, if any, would be
recognized as operating expenses. There are no penalties or
interest liability accrued as of April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The years under which we
conducted our evaluation coincided with the tax years currently still subject to examination by
major federal and state tax jurisdictions, those being 2005 through 2010.
Accounting
Pronouncements Adopted in 2010
On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the new provisions of ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820), Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU
No. 2010-06). ASU No. 2010-06 provides revised guidance on improving disclosures about valuation
techniques and inputs to fair value measurements. The impact on the Companys disclosures was not
significant.
2) Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined in accordance
with the first-in, first-out method. Inventories are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 3, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Finished Goods |
|
$ |
6,431 |
|
|
$ |
6,075 |
|
Work in Progress |
|
|
5,399 |
|
|
|
3,275 |
|
Raw Material |
|
|
19,886 |
|
|
|
22,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,716 |
|
|
$ |
31,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company records valuation reserves to provide for excess, slow moving or
obsolete inventory or to reduce inventory to the lower of cost or market value. In determining the
appropriate reserve, the Company considers the age of inventory on hand, the overall inventory
levels in relation to forecasted demands as well as reserving for specifically identified inventory
that the Company believes is no longer salable.
3) Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The following table summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
April 3, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
Translation |
|
|
2010 |
|
Aerospace |
|
$ |
5,093 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
5,210 |
|
Test Systems |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,493 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
7,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes acquired intangible assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 3, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Average Life |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Patents |
|
12 Years |
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
|
$ |
513 |
|
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
Trade Names |
|
N/A |
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
Completed and
Unpatented Technology |
|
10 15 Years |
|
|
3,177 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
3,177 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
Government Contracts |
|
6 Years |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
Backlog and Customer
Relationships |
|
3 20 Years |
|
|
3,385 |
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
3,385 |
|
|
|
2,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,233 |
|
|
$ |
3,780 |
|
|
$ |
9,233 |
|
|
$ |
3,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
All acquired intangible assets other than goodwill and trade names are being amortized.
Amortization expense was approximately $0.1 million and $0.6 million for the three months ended
April 3, 2010 and April 4, 2009, respectively. Amortization expense for each of the next five
years is estimated to be approximately $0.4 million for the balance of 2010 and $0.4 million for
2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014.
4) Comprehensive Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 3, |
|
|
April 4, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,400 |
|
|
$ |
1,401 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Accumulated Retirement Liability Adjustment, net of tax of $13
and $17 in 2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Loss on derivatives, net of tax of $31 in 2010 and $14 in 2009 |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
3,576 |
|
|
$ |
1,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 3, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Accumulated foreign currency translation |
|
$ |
1,319 |
|
|
$ |
1,105 |
|
Accumulated loss on derivative adjustment |
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
Accumulated retirement liability adjustment |
|
|
(998 |
) |
|
|
(1,021 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5) Supplemental Retirement Plan and Related Post Retirement Benefits
The Company has a non-qualified supplemental retirement defined benefit plan for certain
executives. The following table sets forth information regarding the net periodic pension cost for
the plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 3, |
|
|
April 4, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost |
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participants in the non-qualified supplemental retirement plan are entitled to paid medical,
dental and long-term care insurance benefits upon retirement under the plan. The following table
sets forth information regarding the net periodic cost recognized for those benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 3, |
|
|
April 4, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial losses |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
6) Sales to Major Customers
The Company has a significant concentration of business with two customers.
Sales to Panasonic Avionics Corporation amounted to approximately 31% and 18% of revenue
during the first quarter 2010 and 2009, respectively. Accounts receivable from this customer
amounted to $5.7 and $2.4 million as of April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Sales to the United States Government amounted to approximately 12% and 18% of revenue during
the first quarter 2010 and 2009, respectively. Accounts receivable from this customer amounted to
$2.8 and $4.7 million as of April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
7) Product Warranties
In the ordinary course of business, the Company warrants its products against defects in
design, materials and workmanship typically over periods ranging from twelve to sixty months. The
Company determines warranty reserves needed by product line based on experience and current facts
and circumstances. Activity in the warranty accrual is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 3, |
|
|
April 4, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
3,147 |
|
|
$ |
1,212 |
|
Warranties issued |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Warranties settled |
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Reassessed warranty exposure |
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
2,445 |
|
|
$ |
1,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8) Segment Information
Below
are the sales and operating profit by segment for the three months
ended April 3, 2010 and April 4, 2009
and a reconciliation of segment operating profit to earnings before income taxes. Operating profit
is the net sales less cost of sales and other operating expenses excluding interest and other
expenses and corporate expenses. Cost of sales and other operating expenses are directly
identifiable to the respective segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 3, |
|
|
April 4, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace |
|
$ |
43,190 |
|
|
$ |
41,818 |
|
Test Systems |
|
|
3,746 |
|
|
|
8,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
46,936 |
|
|
$ |
50,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Profit and Margins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace |
|
$ |
6,742 |
|
|
$ |
3,395 |
|
|
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test Systems |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Profit |
|
|
6,929 |
|
|
|
3,593 |
|
|
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
Deductions from Operating Profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
Corporate Expenses and Other |
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
$ |
5,519 |
|
|
$ |
2,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Identifiable Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 3, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Aerospace |
|
$ |
93,009 |
|
|
$ |
92,472 |
|
Test Systems |
|
|
15,168 |
|
|
|
16,073 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
27,864 |
|
|
|
30,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
136,041 |
|
|
$ |
138,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9) Earnings Per Share
Basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 3, |
|
|
April 4, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share weighted average shares |
|
|
10,797 |
|
|
|
10,612 |
|
Net effect of dilutive stock options |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share weighted average shares |
|
|
10,966 |
|
|
|
10,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10) Income Taxes
The effective tax rate was approximately 38.4% for the first quarter of 2010 and
31.8% for the first quarter of 2009. The effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2010 was
impacted by an increase in the reserve against R&D tax credits in the amount of $0.1 million. The
lower effective rate in 2009 was due primarily to decreased foreign taxes of approximately $0.1
million offset slightly by increases in state taxes.
11) Acquisition
On January 30, 2009, the Company acquired 100% of the common stock of DME Corporation (DME).
DME is a designer and manufacturer of military test training and simulation equipment and aviation
safety products. The following summary, prepared on a pro forma basis, combines the consolidated
results of operations of the Company with those of the acquired business as if the acquisition took
place on January 1, 2009. The pro forma consolidated results include the impact of certain
adjustments, including increased interest expense on acquisition debt, amortization of purchased
intangible assets and income taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 4, 2009 |
|
|
April 4, 2009 |
|
(in thousands, except earnings per share) |
|
as reported |
|
|
Proforma |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
50,015 |
|
|
$ |
54,764 |
|
Net Income |
|
|
1,401 |
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what actually would have occurred if
the acquisition had been in effect for the three months ended April 4, 2009. The pro forma results
not intended to be a projection of future results.
12
Item 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(The following should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations contained in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.)
OVERVIEW
Astronics Corporation, through its subsidiaries Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems Corp.,
Luminescent Systems Inc., Luminescent Systems Canada Inc. and DME Corporation designs and
manufactures electrical power generation systems, control and distribution systems, lighting
systems and components, aircraft safety products and test, training and simulation systems. The
Company operates in two distinct segments, Aerospace and Test Systems and has six principal
facilities located in New York State, Washington State, New Hampshire, two in Florida and one in
Quebec, Canada.
Our Aerospace segment serves four primary markets. They are the military, commercial transport,
business jet and FAA/airport markets. We serve one primary market in the Test Systems segment,
which is the military. Our strategy is to develop and maintain positions of technical leadership
in chosen aerospace and test system markets, to leverage those positions to grow the amount of
content and volume of product it sells to the markets in those segments and to selectively acquire
businesses with similar technical capabilities that could benefit from our leadership position and
strategic direction.
Key factors affecting our growth and profitability are the rate at which new aircraft are
produced, government funding of military programs, our ability to have our products designed into
the plans for new aircraft and the rates at which aircraft owners, including commercial airlines,
refurbish or install upgrades to their aircraft. Once designed into a new aircraft, the spare parts
business is frequently retained by the Company. Each of the markets that we serve is presenting
opportunities for our product lines that we expect will provide growth for the Company over the
long-term. We continue to look for opportunities in all of our markets to capitalize on our core
competencies to expand our existing business and to grow through strategic acquisitions.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND OUTLOOK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 3, |
|
|
April 4, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
46,936 |
|
|
$ |
50,015 |
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
SG&A Expenses as a Percentage of Sales |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
Interest Expense |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
Effective Tax Rate |
|
|
38.4 |
% |
|
|
31.8 |
% |
Net Earnings |
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
1,401 |
|
Consolidated sales for the first quarter of 2010 decreased 6.2% to $46.9 million compared to $50.0
million for the same period last year. Increased Aerospace sales of $1.4 million were more than
offset by decreased Test Systems sales of $4.5 million. Revenue in 2009 includes only two months of
revenue from DME, which was acquired on January 30, 2009.
Consolidated gross margins improved from 17.1% in the first quarter of 2009 to 24.6% in the first
quarter of 2010. The improved margins were a result of improved margins in our Aerospace segment
as leverage was achieved from increased sales volumes and reductions to our cost structure as well
as a favorable sales mix as compared with the first quarter of last year.
Selling, general and administrative and other (SG&A) expenses were approximately $5.4 million, or
11.5% of sales in the first quarter of 2010, when compared to $6.1 million, or 12.1% of sales in
the same period last year. Last years first quarter included higher amortization costs relating
to the acquired DME intangible assets of $0.5 million and costs related to that acquisition of $0.2
million.
Net interest expense increased by $0.2 million from $0.4 million to $0.6 million, due to increased
interest rates and higher deferred financing fees when compared with the same period last year.
13
The effective tax rate was approximately 38.4% for the first quarter of 2010 and 31.8% for the
first quarter of 2009. The effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2010 was impacted by an increase in the reserve against
R & D tax credits in the amount of $0.1 million. The lower effective rate in 2009 was due primarily to decreased foreign
taxes of approximately $0.1 million offset slightly by increases in state taxes and the 2010 tax
rate includes an increase to our reserve for research and development tax credits.
Net income for the first quarter of 2010 was $3.4 million or $0.31 per diluted share, an increase
of $2.0 million from $1.4 million, or $0.13 per diluted share in the first quarter of 2009. The
earnings per share increase in 2010 was due to the increased net income compared with last years
first quarter.
SEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND OUTLOOK
Operating profit, as presented below, is sales less cost of sales and other operating expenses,
excluding interest expense and other corporate expenses. Cost of sales and other operating expenses
are directly identifiable to the respective segment. Operating profit is reconciled to earnings
before income taxes in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements included
in this report.
AEROSPACE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 3, |
|
|
April 4, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
43,190 |
|
|
$ |
41,818 |
|
Operating profit |
|
$ |
6,742 |
|
|
$ |
3,395 |
|
Operating Margin |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
Total Assets |
|
$ |
93,009 |
|
|
$ |
102,130 |
|
Backlog |
|
$ |
83,116 |
|
|
$ |
85,400 |
|
Aerospace Sales by Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 3, |
|
|
April 4, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Commercial Transport |
|
$ |
27,445 |
|
|
$ |
23,006 |
|
Military |
|
|
8,398 |
|
|
|
10,486 |
|
Business Jet |
|
|
5,592 |
|
|
|
6,522 |
|
FAA/Airport |
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
1,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43,190 |
|
|
$ |
41,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace Sales by Product Line
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 3, |
|
|
April 4, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cabin Electronics |
|
$ |
21,496 |
|
|
$ |
16,502 |
|
Aircraft Lighting |
|
|
15,733 |
|
|
|
18,051 |
|
Airframe Power |
|
|
4,206 |
|
|
|
5,461 |
|
Airfield Lighting |
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
1,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43,190 |
|
|
$ |
41,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sales increase to the commercial transport market was a result of increased volume due in part
to the timing of shipments and in part to a general improvement of the commercial transport market,
as airlines increased their procurement and installation of in-flight entertainment and in-seat
power systems. Sales to the business jet market were lower due to lower volumes, as the business
jet manufacturers build rates were lower than last year and demand for our products decreased.
Military sales are lower primarily as a result of the conclusion of shipments of our power
conditioning unit for the Tactical Tomahawk missile in the third quarter of 2009 and lower shipment
rates for lighting products.
Aerospace operating profit for the first quarter of 2010 was $6.7 million, or 15.6% of sales,
compared with $3.4 million, or 8.1% of sales, in the same period last year. Margin improvement was
due to the leverage provided on the increased sales volume, the effect of cost reductions and
favorable product mix.
14
2010 Outlook for Aerospace We are maintaining our sales forecast for 2010 for our Aerospace
segment to be in the range of $145 million to $155 million.
TEST SYSTEMS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 3, |
|
|
April 4, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,746 |
|
|
$ |
8,197 |
|
Operating profit |
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
198 |
|
Operating Margin |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Total Assets |
|
$ |
15,168 |
|
|
$ |
49,104 |
|
Backlog |
|
$ |
9,644 |
|
|
$ |
26,300 |
|
All of the Test Systems segment revenue is from the Military market. Sales for our Test
Systems segment were $3.7 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to $8.2 million in the
first quarter of 2009. The decrease in the Test Systems segment sales reflects the low rate of new
orders received during the past year and the resulting low backlog level compared to last year.
Operating profit was $0.2 million in the first quarter of 2010 or 5.0% compared to $0.2 million in
the first quarter of 2009 or 2.4% of sales. Amortization costs decreased by $0.4 million as
compared with the same period last year and savings have been realized by cost reductions.
Additionally, the operating profit reflects a reduction in our estimated warranty liability of $0.7
million.
2010 Outlook for Test Systems We are maintaining our sales forecast for 2010 for our Test
Systems segment to be in the range of $25 million to $35 million. Bookings improved over the fourth
quarter of 2009 to $3.6 million but remain low. The backlog at the end of the first quarter of 2010
is $9.6 million. We remain hopeful that the opportunities we have identified will become part of
our backlog during the year but the new order rate has been slower than expected. To achieve this
level of sales for 2010 new sales orders need to increase during the next two quarters as compared
with the first quarter of 2010. Our 2010 sales forecast for the Test Systems segment includes $6.3
million of our backlog at the end of the first quarter and an additional $10.0 million to $20.0
million for new orders yet to be received.
LIQUIDITY
Cash provided by operating activities totaled $1.6 million during the first three months of 2010,
as compared with $2.9 million of cash provided by operations during the first three months of
2009. The change was due primarily to the increased net income being offset by increased
investment in net working capital components.
Cash used in investing activities was $0.9 million in the first three months of 2010, a decrease
in use of $40.7 million when compared to $41.6 million used in the first three months of 2009.
This decrease was primarily due to the acquisition of DME in the prior year.
In the first three months of 2010 cash used by financing activities totaled $2.9 million compared
to cash provided by financing activities of $36.8 million in the first three months of 2009. The
change was due primarily to the additional debt in 2009 used to acquire DME and the use of cash in
2010 to pay down debt.
Our expectation for 2010 is that capital equipment expenditures will approximate $2.5 million to
$3.5 million. Future capital requirements depend on numerous factors, including expansion of
existing product lines and introduction of new products. Management believes that the Companys
cash flow from operations and revolving credit facility will be sufficient to provide funding for
future capital requirements.
The Companys obligations under its Credit Agreement are jointly and severally
guaranteed by Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems Corp., Luminescent Systems, Inc. and DME
Corporation, each a wholly-owned domestic subsidiary of the Company. The obligations are secured
by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Companys and the guarantors assets and 100%
of the issued and outstanding equity interest of each subsidiary.
The Company had no balance outstanding on its revolving credit facility at April 3, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively. For working capital requirements, the Company had available on its
credit facility, $32.6 million and $15.5 million at April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. The credit facility allocates up to $20 million of the revolving credit line for the
issuance of letters of credit, including certain existing letters of credit totaling approximately
$13.5 million at April 3, 2010. At April 3, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all of the
covenants pursuant to the credit facility.
15
BACKLOG
The Companys backlog at April 3, 2010 was $92.8 million compared with $85.4 million at December
31, 2009 and $111.7 million at April 4, 2009.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
Companys contractual obligations and commercial commitments have not changed materially from those
disclosed in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
MARKET RISK
The Company believes that there have been no material changes in the current year regarding the
market risk information for its exposure to currency exchange rates or interest rate fluctuations.
Refer to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for a
complete discussion of the Companys market risk.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Refer to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for a
complete discussion of the Companys critical accounting policies.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Part 1, Note 1 to the Financial Statements Basis of Presentation, Accounting Pronouncements
Adopted in 2010
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report contains certain forward looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involves uncertainties and risks. These
statements are identified by the use of the may, will, should, believes, expects,
expected, intends, plans, projects, estimates, predicts, potential, outlook,
forecast, anticipates, presume and assume, and words of similar import. Readers are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward looking statements as various uncertainties
and risks could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in these
statements. These uncertainties and risks include the success of the Company with effectively
executing its plans; successfully integrating its acquisitions; the timeliness of product
deliveries by vendors and other vendor performance issues; changes in demand for our products from
the U.S. government and other customers; the acceptance by the market of new products developed;
our success in cross-selling products to different customers and markets; changes in government
contracts; the state of the commercial and business jet aerospace market; the Companys success at
increasing the content on current and new aircraft platforms; the level of aircraft build rates; as
well as other general economic conditions and other factors. Certain of these factors, risks and
uncertainties are discussed in the sections of this report entitled Risk Factors and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
See Market Risk in Item 2, above.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures as of April 3, 2010. Based on that evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of April 3, 2010.
16
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
None.
Item 1a Risk Factors.
In addition to other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the
factors discussed in Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
results of operations. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks
facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem
to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or
results of operations.
In the Test Systems segment, revenue is recognized from long-term, fixed-price contracts using the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting, measured by multiplying the estimated total contract
value by the ratio of actual contract costs incurred to date to the estimated total contract costs.
Substantially all long-term contracts are with U.S. government agencies and contractors thereto.
The Company has significant estimates involving its usage of percentage-of-completion accounting to
recognize contract revenues. While the Company believes its estimated gross profit on contracts in
process is reasonable, unforeseen events and changes in circumstances can take place in a
subsequent accounting period that may cause the Company to prospectively revise its estimated gross
profit on one or more of its contracts in process. Accordingly, the ultimate gross profit realized
upon completion of such contracts can vary significantly from estimated amounts between accounting
periods.
The Company has a significant concentration of business with two customers, Panasonic Avionics
Corporation and the US Government, where a significant reduction in sales would negatively impact
our sales and earnings. We provide Panasonic with cabin electronics products which, in total were
approximately 31% of revenue during the 1st quarter of 2010. We provide the US Government with
military products which, in total were approximately 12% of revenue during the 1st quarter of 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds.
(c) The following table summarizes the Companys purchases of its common stock for the
quarter ended April 3, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total number of |
|
|
(d) Maximum |
|
|
|
(a) Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares Purchased as |
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
number of |
|
|
(b) Average |
|
|
part of Publicly |
|
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Plans or Programs |
|
January 1
January 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
541,195 |
|
January 31 February 27, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
541,195 |
|
February 28 April 3, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
541,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
541,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6
Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
17
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASTRONICS CORPORATION |
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: May 7, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ David C. Burney
|
|
|
|
David C. Burney |
|
|
|
Vice President-Finance and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
18