FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period From to
Commission File Number 1-12001
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
25-1792394 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1000 Six PPG Place |
|
|
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
|
|
15222-5479 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
At July 29, 2009, the registrant had outstanding 98,073,310 shares of its Common Stock.
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
SEC FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
850.7 |
|
|
$ |
469.9 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
398.2 |
|
|
|
530.5 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
692.9 |
|
|
|
887.6 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
2,018.0 |
|
|
|
1,929.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1,787.0 |
|
|
|
1,633.6 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
197.3 |
|
|
|
190.9 |
|
Prepaid pension asset |
|
|
122.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
281.6 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
147.0 |
|
|
|
134.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,321.4 |
|
|
$ |
4,170.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
236.4 |
|
|
$ |
278.5 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
229.6 |
|
|
|
322.0 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
35.3 |
|
|
|
78.2 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
518.8 |
|
|
|
693.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,055.9 |
|
|
|
494.6 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits |
|
|
449.8 |
|
|
|
446.9 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
378.2 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
114.8 |
|
|
|
127.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
2,173.8 |
|
|
|
2,141.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATI Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.10: authorized-
50,000,000 shares; issued-none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.10: authorized-500,000,000
shares; issued-102,404,256 shares at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008; outstanding- 98,073,010 shares at
June 30, 2009 and 97,330,969 shares at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
641.5 |
|
|
|
651.8 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,227.2 |
|
|
|
2,286.7 |
|
Treasury stock: 4,331,246 shares at June 30, 2009 and
5,073,287 shares at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(208.7 |
) |
|
|
(244.8 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(594.7 |
) |
|
|
(746.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ATI Stockholders Equity |
|
|
2,075.5 |
|
|
|
1,957.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
72.1 |
|
|
|
71.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
2,147.6 |
|
|
|
2,029.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Equity |
|
$ |
4,321.4 |
|
|
$ |
4,170.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
3
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
710.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,461.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,541.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,804.6 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
634.8 |
|
|
|
1,128.9 |
|
|
|
1,385.7 |
|
|
|
2,181.7 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
64.4 |
|
|
|
79.2 |
|
|
|
145.2 |
|
|
|
149.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before interest, other income (expense)
and income taxes |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
253.1 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
473.5 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Debt extinguishment costs |
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
252.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
474.0 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
81.2 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
159.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
|
|
171.2 |
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
314.9 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to ATI |
|
$ |
(13.4 |
) |
|
$ |
168.9 |
|
|
$ |
(7.5 |
) |
|
$ |
310.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share
attributable to ATI common stockholders |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
3.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common share
attributable to ATI common stockholders |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
3.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(6.4 |
) |
|
$ |
314.9 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
64.4 |
|
|
|
56.5 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
108.3 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
194.6 |
|
|
|
(255.1 |
) |
Accounts receivable |
|
|
132.3 |
|
|
|
(86.1 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(42.1 |
) |
|
|
62.8 |
|
Retirement benefits |
|
|
(299.4 |
) |
|
|
(13.8 |
) |
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
(42.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
(28.2 |
) |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
81.3 |
|
|
|
96.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(211.5 |
) |
|
|
(255.4 |
) |
Asset disposals and other |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(212.8 |
) |
|
|
(255.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on long-term debt |
|
|
752.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
(188.6 |
) |
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
Net repayments under credit facilities |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
(35.3 |
) |
|
|
(36.4 |
) |
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Shares repurchased for income tax withholding on share-based compensation |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
Exercises of stock options |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Tax benefit on share-based compensation |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
512.3 |
|
|
|
(153.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
380.8 |
|
|
|
(313.1 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year |
|
|
469.9 |
|
|
|
623.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
850.7 |
|
|
$ |
310.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN CONSOLIDATED EQUITY
(In millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATI Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
Paid-In |
|
Retained |
|
Treasury |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Comprehensive |
|
controlling |
|
Total |
|
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Stock |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Income |
|
Interests |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
693.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,830.7 |
|
|
$ |
(75.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(237.2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
57.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,279.2 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310.9 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
314.9 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of
tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans and other
postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Foreign currency translation gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Unrealized gains on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
$ |
338.7 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
348.7 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88.4 |
) |
Effect of changing the
measurement date for pension
plans and other postretirement
benefits, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Cash dividends on common stock
($0.36 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36.4 |
) |
Employee stock plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
Balance, June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
644.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,104.8 |
|
|
$ |
(127.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(208.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,490.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
651.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,286.7 |
|
|
$ |
(244.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(746.5 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
71.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,029.0 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss),
net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans and other
postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.7 |
|
|
|
99.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.7 |
|
Foreign currency translation
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
Unrealized gains on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
151.8 |
|
|
$ |
144.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
145.6 |
|
Cash dividends on common stock
($0.36 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.3 |
) |
Cash dividends paid to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Employee stock plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
641.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,227.2 |
|
|
$ |
(208.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(594.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,147.6 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Unaudited
Note 1. Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Allegheny Technologies
Incorporated and its subsidiaries. Unless the context requires otherwise, Allegheny
Technologies, ATI and the Company refer to Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and its
subsidiaries.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the
instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all
of the information and note disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
for complete financial statements. In managements opinion, all adjustments (which include only
normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. The results of operations for these interim periods are not necessarily indicative of
the operating results for any future period. In preparing the financial statements for the period
ended June 30, 2009, the Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issue, which
was August 3, 2009. The December 31, 2008 financial information has been derived from our audited
financial statements, which were revised in the current period to reflect changes in the
presentation of noncontrolling interests (formerly minority interests) in accordance with the
required adoption of the accounting standard discussed below. Certain amounts from prior years have
been reclassified to conform with the 2009 presentation.
New Accounting Pronouncement Adopted
As required, in the first quarter 2009, the Company adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 160 (FAS 160), Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.
Early adoption of this standard was prohibited. FAS 160 changes the classification of
noncontrolling (minority) interests on the balance sheet and the accounting for and reporting of
transactions between the reporting entity and holders of such noncontrolling interests. Under the
new standard, noncontrolling interests are considered equity and are reported as an element of
stockholders equity rather than within the mezzanine or liability sections of the balance sheet.
In addition, the practice of reporting minority interest expense or benefit changed. Under the new
standard, net income encompasses the total income before noncontrolling interest expense or
benefit. The income statement includes separate disclosure of the attribution of income or loss
between the controlling and noncontrolling interests. Absent a change in control, increases and
decreases in the noncontrolling ownership interest amount are accounted for as equity transactions.
As a result of adopting FAS 160, the balance sheet and the income statement have been recast
retrospectively for the presentation of noncontrolling interest in our STAL joint venture.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157
(FAS 157), Fair Value Measurements, as it relates to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities. FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that
require or permit fair value measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited
exceptions. The adoption of FAS 157, as it relates to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities, had no impact on the financial statements. The provisions of FAS 157 will be applied
at such time a fair value measurement of a nonfinancial asset or nonfinancial liability is
required, which may result in a fair value that is materially different than would have been
calculated prior to the adoption of FAS 157.
7
Note 2. Inventories
Inventories at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Raw materials and supplies |
|
$ |
138.3 |
|
|
$ |
163.6 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
580.1 |
|
|
|
772.6 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
129.9 |
|
|
|
164.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories at current cost |
|
|
848.3 |
|
|
|
1,101.1 |
|
Less allowances to reduce current cost values to LIFO basis |
|
|
(151.1 |
) |
|
|
(205.6 |
) |
Progress payments |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories, net |
|
$ |
692.9 |
|
|
$ |
887.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (last-in, first-out (LIFO), first-in, first-out
(FIFO), and average cost methods) or market, less progress payments. Most of the Companys
inventory is valued utilizing the LIFO costing methodology. Inventory of the Companys non-U.S.
operations is valued using average cost or FIFO methods. The effect of using the LIFO methodology
to value inventory, rather than FIFO, decreased cost of sales by $54.5 million for the first six
months of 2009 compared to an increase to cost of sales of $4.7 million for the first six months of
2008.
Note 3. Supplemental Financial Statement Information
The estimated fair value of financial instruments at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
(In millions) |
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
850.7 |
|
|
$ |
850.7 |
|
|
$ |
469.9 |
|
|
$ |
469.9 |
|
Derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
61.5 |
|
|
|
61.5 |
|
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allegheny Technologies $402.5 million 4.25% Convertible
Notes due 2014 |
|
$ |
402.5 |
|
|
|
442.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allegheny Technologies $350 million 9.375% Notes due 2019 |
|
|
350.0 |
|
|
|
367.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allegheny Technologies $300 million 8.375% Notes due 2011, net (a) |
|
|
118.1 |
|
|
|
125.9 |
|
|
|
304.2 |
|
|
|
306.6 |
|
Allegheny Ludlum 6.95% debentures due 2025 |
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
126.4 |
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
144.3 |
|
Promissory note for J&L asset acquisition |
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
Foreign credit agreements |
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
Industrial revenue bonds, due through 2020 |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
Capitalized leases and other |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes fair value adjustments for settled interest rate swap contracts of $2.2 million at
June 30, 2009, and $6.7 million at December 31, 2008. |
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of
its financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amount on the balance sheet approximates fair value.
Derivative financial instruments: Fair values for derivatives were measured using
exchange-traded prices for the hedged items. The fair value was determined using Level 2
information, including consideration of counterparty risk and the Companys credit risk.
Short-term and long-term debt: The fair values of the Allegheny Technologies 4.25% Convertible
Notes, the Allegheny Technologies 9.375% Notes, the Allegheny Technologies 8.375% Notes, and the
Allegheny Ludlum
6.95% debentures were based on quoted market prices. The carrying amounts of the other
short-term and long-term debt approximate fair value.
8
Property, plant and equipment at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
23.6 |
|
|
$ |
23.1 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
321.0 |
|
|
|
310.9 |
|
Equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
|
2,707.7 |
|
|
|
2,508.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,052.3 |
|
|
|
2,842.5 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(1,265.3 |
) |
|
|
(1,208.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
1,787.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,633.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4. Debt
Debt at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Allegheny Technologies $402.5 million 4.25% Convertible
Notes due 2014 |
|
$ |
402.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Allegheny Technologies $350 million 9.375% Notes due 2019 |
|
|
350.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allegheny Technologies $300 million 8.375% Notes
due 2011, net (a) |
|
|
118.1 |
|
|
|
304.2 |
|
Allegheny Ludlum 6.95% debentures due 2025 |
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
Domestic Bank Group $400 million unsecured credit agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory note for J&L asset acquisition |
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
Foreign credit agreements |
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
Industrial revenue bonds, due through 2020 |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term and long-term debt |
|
|
1,073.4 |
|
|
|
509.8 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
|
|
(15.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,055.9 |
|
|
$ |
494.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes fair value adjustments for settled interest rate swap contracts of $2.2
million at June 30, 2009 and $6.7 million at December 31, 2008. |
Convertible Notes
In June 2009, the Company issued and sold $402.5 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.25%
Convertible Senior Notes due 2014 (the Convertible Notes). Interest is payable semi-annually on
June 1 and December 1 of each year. The Convertible Notes were issued under ATIs shelf
registration statement and are not listed on any national securities exchange. Net proceeds of
$390.2 million from the sale of the Convertible Notes were used to make a $350 million voluntary
cash contribution to the Companys U.S. defined benefit pension plan, and the balance was used for
general corporate purposes including funding of contributions to trusts established to fund retiree
medical benefits. The Convertible Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the Company
and equally ranked with all of its existing and future senior unsecured debt. The underwriting fees
and other third-party expenses for the issuance of the Convertible Notes were $12.3 million and
will be amortized to interest expense over the 5-year term of the Convertible Notes.
The Company does not have the right to redeem the Convertible Notes prior to the stated
maturity date. Holders of the Convertible Notes have the option to convert their notes into shares
of ATI common stock at any time prior to the close of business on the second scheduled trading day
immediately preceding the stated maturity date (June 1, 2014). The initial conversion rate for the
Convertible Notes is 23.9263 shares of ATI common stock per $1,000 (in whole dollars) principal
amount of notes (9,630,335 shares), equivalent to a conversion price of
approximately $41.795 per share, subject to adjustment, as defined in the Convertible Notes.
Other than receiving cash in lieu of fractional shares, holders do not have the option to receive
cash instead of shares of common stock upon conversion. Accrued and unpaid interest that exists
upon conversion of a note will be deemed paid by the delivery of shares of ATI common stock and no
cash payment or additional shares will be given to holders.
9
If the Company undergoes a fundamental change, as defined in the Convertible Notes, holders
may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of their notes at a price equal to 100% of
the principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest up to, but
excluding, the repurchase date. Such a repurchase will be made in cash.
2019 Notes
In June 2009, the Company issued $350 million in aggregate principal amount of 9.375% unsecured
Senior Notes with a maturity of June 2019 (the 2019 Notes). Interest is payable semi-annually on
June 1 and December 1 of each year. The 2019 Notes were issued under ATIs shelf registration
statement and are not listed on any national securities exchange. Net proceeds of $344.2 million
from the sale of the 2019 Notes were used to retire $183.3 million of the Companys 2011 Notes, as
discussed below, and for general corporate purposes. The underwriting fees, discount, and other
third-party expenses for the issuance of the 2019 Notes were $5.8 million and will be amortized to
interest expense over the 10-year term of the 2019 Notes. The 2019 Notes are unsecured and
unsubordinated obligations of the Company and equally ranked with all of its existing and future
senior unsecured debt. The 2019 Notes restrict the Companys ability to create certain liens, to
enter into sale leaseback transactions, and to consolidate, merge or transfer all, or substantially
all, of our assets. The Company has the option to redeem the 2019 Notes, as a whole or in part, at
any time or from time to time, on at least 30 days, but not more than 60 days, prior notice to the
holders of the Notes at a redemption price specified in the 2019 Notes. The 2019 Notes are subject
to repurchase upon the occurrence of a change in control repurchase event (as defined in the 2019
Notes) at a repurchase price in cash equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes
repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest on the 2019 Notes repurchased.
Retirement of 2011 Notes
In June 2009, the Company completed a tender offer for the Companys 8.375% Notes due in 2011 (the
2011 Notes) of which $300 million in aggregate principal amount was outstanding prior to the
tender offer. As a result of the tender offer, the Company retired $183.3 million of the 2011 Notes
and recognized a pre-tax charge of $9.2 million in the 2009 second quarter for the costs of
acquiring the 2011 Notes. As of June 30, 2009, $116.7 million in face value of the 2011 Notes
remain outstanding.
Amendment to Unsecured Credit Agreement
In May 2009, the Company amended its $400 million domestic bank group credit agreement to redefine
the two financial covenants to provide additional financial flexibility. The amendment restates
the definition of consolidated earnings before interest and taxes, and consolidated earnings before
income, taxes, depreciation and amortization as used in the interest coverage and leverage ratios
to exclude any non-cash pension expense or income and restates the definition of consolidated
indebtedness used in the leverage ratio, which previously was based on gross indebtedness, to be
net of cash on hand in excess of $50 million. As of June 30, 2009, there had been no borrowings
made under the facility, although a portion of the facility was used to support approximately $12
million in letters of credit.
The Company has an additional separate credit facility for the issuance of letters of credit.
As of June 30, 2009, $30 million in letters of credit was outstanding under this facility.
In addition, STAL, the Companys Chinese joint venture company in which ATI has a 60%
interest, had approximately $5 million in letters of credit outstanding as of June 30, 2009 related
to the expansion of its operations in Shanghai, China. These letters of credit are supported
solely by STALs financial capability without any guarantees from the joint venture partners.
10
Note 5. Per Share Information
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per
common share (in millions, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic and diluted net income (loss)
per common share net income (loss)
attributable to ATI common stockholders |
|
$ |
(13.4 |
) |
|
$ |
168.9 |
|
|
$ |
(7.5 |
) |
|
$ |
310.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per common
share-weighted average shares |
|
|
97.2 |
|
|
|
100.7 |
|
|
|
97.2 |
|
|
|
100.7 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Contingently issuable shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per
common share adjusted weighted average shares
and assumed conversions |
|
|
97.2 |
|
|
|
101.5 |
|
|
|
97.2 |
|
|
|
101.5 |
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share
attributable to ATI common stockholders |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
3.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common share
attributable to ATI common stockholders |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
3.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock which would be issuable that relate to the assumed conversion of the 2014 Notes
and other option equivalents and contingently issuable shares were excluded from the computation of
contingently issuable shares, and therefore the denominator for diluted earnings per share, for the
three months and six months ended June 30, 2009, because the effect of inclusion would have been
anti-dilutive. Excluded shares for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009 were 4.3
million and 2.4 million, respectively.
Note 6. Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging
As part of its risk management strategy, the Company, from time-to-time, utilizes derivative
financial instruments to manage its exposure to changes in raw material prices, energy costs,
foreign currencies, and interest rates. In accordance with applicable accounting standards, the
Company accounts for all of these contracts as hedges. In general, hedge effectiveness is
determined by examining the relationship between offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows
attributable to the item being hedged, and the financial instrument being used for the hedge.
Effectiveness is measured utilizing regression analysis and other techniques to determine whether
the change in the fair market value or cash flows of the derivative exceeds the change in fair
value or cash flow of the hedged item. Calculated ineffectiveness, if any, is immediately
recognized on the statement of operations.
The Company sometimes uses futures and swap contracts to manage exposure to changes in prices
for forecasted purchases of raw materials, such as nickel, and natural gas. Generally under these
contracts, which are accounted for as cash flow hedges, the price of the item being hedged is fixed
at the time that the contract is entered into and the Company is obligated to make or receive a
payment equal to the net change between this fixed price and the market price at the date the
contract matures.
11
The majority of ATIs products are sold utilizing raw material surcharges and index
mechanisms. However, as of June 30, 2009, the Company had entered into financial hedging
arrangements primarily at the request of its customers, related to firm orders, for approximately
6% of the Companys total annual nickel requirements through 2010. Any gain or loss associated
with these hedging arrangements is included in the selling price to the customer requesting the
hedge over the designated hedge period.
At June 30, 2009, the outstanding financial derivatives used to hedge the Companys exposure
to natural gas cost volatility represented approximately 40% of our forecasted requirements for the
next three years.
While the majority of the Companys direct export sales are transacted in U.S. dollars,
foreign currency exchange contracts are used, from time-to-time, to limit transactional exposure to
changes in currency exchange rates for those transactions denominated in a non-U.S. currency. The
Company sometimes purchases foreign currency forward contracts that permit it to sell specified
amounts of foreign currencies expected to be received from its export sales for pre-established
U.S. dollar amounts at specified dates. The forward contracts are denominated in the same foreign
currencies in which export sales are denominated. These contracts are designated as hedges of the
variability in cash flows of a portion of the forecasted future export sales transactions which
otherwise would expose the Company to foreign currency risk. At June 30, 2009, the outstanding
financial derivatives used to hedge the Companys exposure to foreign currency, primarily euros,
represented approximately 7% of our forecasted total international sales through 2011. In
addition, the Company may also designate cash balances held in foreign currencies as hedges of
forecasted foreign currency transactions.
The Company may enter into derivative interest rate contracts to maintain a reasonable balance
between fixed- and floating-rate debt. There were no unsettled derivative financial instruments
related to debt balances for the periods presented, although previously settled contracts remain a
component of the recorded value of debt. See Note 4. Debt, for further information.
The fair values of the Companys derivative financial instruments are presented below. All
fair values for these derivatives were measured using Level 2 information as defined by the
accounting standard hierarchy, which includes quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in
active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are
not active, and inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
Balance sheet location |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Asset derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other raw material contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Nickel and other raw material contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
23.7 |
|
|
$ |
17.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
Nickel and other raw material contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Nickel and other raw material contracts |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liability derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
26.2 |
|
|
$ |
61.5 |
|
For derivative financial instruments that are designated as cash flow hedges, the
effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other
comprehensive income (OCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during
which the hedged item affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing
either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness
are recognized in current period results. The Company did not use fair value or net
investment hedges for the periods presented.
12
Activity with regard to derivatives designated as cash flow hedges for the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2009 was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Recognized in Income |
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
on Derivatives (Ineffective |
|
Derivatives in FAS 133 |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
Portion and Amount |
|
Cash Flow Hedging |
|
OCI on Derivatives |
|
|
into Income |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
Relationships |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective Portion) (a) |
|
|
Effectiveness Testing) (b) |
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Nickel and other raw
material contracts |
|
$ |
16.2 |
|
|
$ |
(5.5 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange
contracts |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
|
$ |
(8.3 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months ended |
|
|
Six Months ended |
|
|
Six Months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Nickel and other raw
material contracts |
|
$ |
16.1 |
|
|
$ |
(12.0 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange
contracts |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
$ |
(17.4 |
) |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The gains (losses) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income related to the
effective portion of the derivatives are presented in cost of sales. |
|
(b) |
|
The gains (losses) recognized in income on derivatives related to the ineffective
portion and the amount excluded from effectiveness testing are presented in selling and
administrative expenses. |
Assuming market prices remain constant with the rates at June 30, 2009, a loss of $2.5 million
is expected to be recognized over the next 12 months.
The disclosures of gains or losses presented above for nickel and other raw material contracts
and foreign currency contracts do not take into account the anticipated underlying transactions.
Since these derivative contracts represent hedges, the net effect of any gain or loss on results of
operations may be fully or partially offset.
There are no credit risk-related contingent features in our derivative contracts, and the
contracts contained no provisions under which we have posted, or would be required to post,
collateral. The counterparties to our derivative contracts were substantial and creditworthy
commercial banks that are recognized market makers. We control our credit exposure by diversifying
across multiple counterparties and by monitoring credit ratings and credit default swap spreads of
our counterparties. We also enter into master netting agreements with counterparties when possible.
Note 7. Income Taxes
Second quarter 2009 results included a provision for income taxes of $11.7 million compared to
an income tax provision of $81.2 million, or 32.2% of income before tax, for the comparable 2008
period. The second quarter 2009 tax provision included a non-recurring tax charge of $11.5
million, primarily associated with the tax consequences of the June 2009 $350 million voluntary
contribution to the pension plan. The effective tax rate, excluding the non-recurring tax charge,
was 41.1% for 2009. The second quarter 2008 tax provision included a favorable discrete net tax
benefit of $11.2 million, primarily associated with a tax refund related to prior years.
13
For the first half 2009, the provision of income taxes was $6.7 million compared to $159.1
million, or 33.6% of income before tax, for the first half 2008. The 2009 first quarter benefited
from a lower income tax provision due primarily to $5.1 million of discrete adjustments associated
primarily with prior years taxes. The 2008 first quarter included a discrete benefit of $2.6
million related to foreign taxes.
As a result of the $350 million voluntary pension contribution in June 2009 which was
designated to pertain to the 2008 tax year, the Company received a U.S. Federal income tax refund
of $108.5 million in the second quarter 2009.
Note 8. Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company has defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans covering
substantially all employees. Benefits under the defined benefit pension plans are generally based
on years of service and/or final average pay. The Company funds the U.S. pension plans in
accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and the Internal
Revenue Code.
The Company also sponsors several postretirement plans covering certain salaried and hourly
employees. The plans provide health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees. In
most plans, Company contributions towards premiums are capped based on the cost as of a certain
date, thereby creating a defined contribution. For the non-collectively bargained plans, the
Company maintains the right to amend or terminate the plans at its discretion.
In June 2009, the Company made a $350 million voluntary cash contribution to its U.S. defined
benefit pension plan to improve the plans funded position. As a result of this significant
voluntary pension contribution and the associated remeasurement of plan assets and liabilities,
2009 pension expense is expected to be reduced by $27.5 million to $98.7 million, compared to a
previous estimate of $126.2 million. As a result, retirement benefit expense, which includes
pension expense and other post-retirement expense, is now expected to be approximately $25.5
million in both the third and fourth quarters of 2009.
For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the components of pension
(income) expense and components of other postretirement benefit expense for the Companys defined
benefit plans included the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Pension Benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost benefits earned during the year |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
Interest cost on benefits earned in prior years |
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
68.9 |
|
|
|
65.3 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(37.2 |
) |
|
|
(50.2 |
) |
|
|
(71.9 |
) |
|
|
(100.4 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
41.8 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension (income) expense |
|
$ |
27.6 |
|
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
|
$ |
59.1 |
|
|
$ |
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Other Postretirement Benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost benefits earned during the year |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
Interest cost on benefits earned in prior years |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
(10.6 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other postretirement benefit expense |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retirement benefit expense defined benefit plans |
|
$ |
32.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
69.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other postretirement benefit costs for a defined contribution plan were $0.5 million and $1.0
million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. For 2008, other
postretirement costs for a defined contribution plan were $3.1 million for both the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008.
14
Note 9. Business Segments
Following is certain financial information with respect to the Companys business segments for
the periods indicated (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Total sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
$ |
336.7 |
|
|
$ |
560.2 |
|
|
$ |
743.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,085.3 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
342.1 |
|
|
|
851.0 |
|
|
|
729.0 |
|
|
|
1611.6 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
60.1 |
|
|
|
135.7 |
|
|
|
135.7 |
|
|
|
264.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
738.9 |
|
|
|
1,546.9 |
|
|
|
1,608.4 |
|
|
|
2,961.1 |
|
Intersegment sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
|
|
|
99.8 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
|
|
66.8 |
|
|
|
156.5 |
|
Sales to external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
|
320.5 |
|
|
|
504.5 |
|
|
|
708.4 |
|
|
|
985.5 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
335.2 |
|
|
|
834.1 |
|
|
|
713.4 |
|
|
|
1581.0 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
54.3 |
|
|
|
122.6 |
|
|
|
119.8 |
|
|
|
238.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
710.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,461.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,541.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,804.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
$ |
41.0 |
|
|
$ |
150.8 |
|
|
$ |
95.3 |
|
|
$ |
282.2 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
113.6 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
216.5 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit |
|
|
53.9 |
|
|
|
275.4 |
|
|
|
109.8 |
|
|
|
515.4 |
|
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
(33.1 |
) |
Interest income, net |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Other expense, net of gains on asset sales |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
Debt extinguishment costs |
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Retirement benefit expense |
|
|
(33.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(70.7 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
252.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
474.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement benefit expense represents defined benefit plan pension expense, and other
postretirement benefit expense for both defined benefit and defined contribution plans. Operating
profit with respect to the Companys business segments excludes any retirement benefit expense.
Corporate expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2009 were $8.6 million, compared to
$15.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. This decrease is due primarily to lower
expenses associated with long-term performance-based cash incentive compensation programs.
Other expense, net of gains on asset sales, primarily includes charges incurred in connection
with closed operations and other non-operating income or expense. These items are presented
primarily in selling and administrative expenses and in other expense in the statement of income.
These items resulted in net charges of $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and
$3.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. This increase was primarily related to
lower foreign currency gains, and higher franchise and other non-income related taxes.
15
Note 10. Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
The payment obligations under the $150 million 6.95% debentures due 2025 issued by Allegheny
Ludlum Corporation (the Subsidiary) are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Allegheny
Technologies Incorporated (the Guarantor Parent). In accordance with positions established by the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the following financial information sets forth separately
financial information with respect to the Subsidiary, the non-guarantor subsidiaries and the
Guarantor Parent. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries and
certain intercompany balances and transactions. Investments in subsidiaries, which are eliminated
in consolidation, are included in other assets on the balance sheets.
Allegheny Technologies is the plan sponsor for the U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan
(the Plan) which covers certain current and former employees of the Subsidiary and the
non-guarantor subsidiaries. As a result, the balance sheets presented for the Subsidiary and the
non-guarantor subsidiaries do not include any Plan assets or liabilities, or the related deferred
taxes. The Plan assets, liabilities and related deferred taxes and pension income or expense are
recognized by the Guarantor Parent. Management and royalty fees charged to the Subsidiary and to
the non-guarantor subsidiaries by the Guarantor Parent have been excluded solely for purposes of
this presentation.
Cash flows related to intercompany activity between the Guarantor Parent, the Subsidiary, and
the non-guarantor subsidiaries are presented as financing activities on the condensed statements of
cash flows.
16
Note 10. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Balance Sheets
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
637.5 |
|
|
$ |
212.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
850.7 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
143.4 |
|
|
|
254.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398.2 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
103.8 |
|
|
|
589.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
692.9 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
895.4 |
|
|
|
1,089.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,018.0 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
408.0 |
|
|
|
1,376.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,787.0 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.1 |
|
|
|
85.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197.3 |
|
Prepaid pension asset |
|
|
122.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.9 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries and other
assets |
|
|
3,839.0 |
|
|
|
1,278.2 |
|
|
|
1,161.6 |
|
|
|
(6,131.8 |
) |
|
|
147.0 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,046.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,693.7 |
|
|
$ |
3,713.3 |
|
|
$ |
(6,131.8 |
) |
|
$ |
4,321.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
103.7 |
|
|
$ |
129.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
236.4 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
935.3 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
|
719.1 |
|
|
|
(1,481.9 |
) |
|
|
229.6 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
35.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.3 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
974.0 |
|
|
|
171.3 |
|
|
|
855.4 |
|
|
|
(1,481.9 |
) |
|
|
518.8 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
870.6 |
|
|
|
366.5 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
(200.0 |
) |
|
|
1,055.9 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
271.3 |
|
|
|
178.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449.8 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
48.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114.8 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,898.6 |
|
|
|
833.6 |
|
|
|
1,123.5 |
|
|
|
(1,681.9 |
) |
|
|
2,173.8 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,147.6 |
|
|
|
1,860.1 |
|
|
|
2,589.8 |
|
|
|
(4,449.9 |
) |
|
|
2,147.6 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
4,046.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,693.7 |
|
|
$ |
3,713.3 |
|
|
$ |
(6,131.8 |
) |
|
$ |
4,321.4 |
|
|
|
|
17
Note 10. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Statements of Income
For the six months ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
659.5 |
|
|
$ |
882.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,541.6 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
616.1 |
|
|
|
729.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,385.7 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
52.9 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
74.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145.2 |
|
Interest income (expense), net |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Debt extinguishment costs |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Other income (expense) including
equity in income of unconsolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
98.8 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
(103.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
81.8 |
|
|
|
(103.1 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
(48.4 |
) |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
42.5 |
|
|
|
(54.7 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to ATI |
|
$ |
(7.5 |
) |
|
$ |
12.2 |
|
|
$ |
41.4 |
|
|
$ |
(53.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
$ |
(29.3 |
) |
|
$ |
136.8 |
|
|
$ |
(26.2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
81.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(130.9 |
) |
|
|
(35.8 |
) |
|
|
(176.1 |
) |
|
|
130.0 |
|
|
|
(212.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by financing
activities |
|
|
158.1 |
|
|
|
254.7 |
|
|
|
229.5 |
|
|
|
(130.0 |
) |
|
|
512.3 |
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(2.1 |
) |
|
$ |
355.7 |
|
|
$ |
27.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
380.8 |
|
|
|
|
18
Note 10. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Balance Sheets
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
281.8 |
|
|
$ |
184.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
469.9 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
191.9 |
|
|
|
338.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
530.5 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
190.4 |
|
|
|
697.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
887.6 |
|
Prepaid expenses, and other current
assets |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
668.8 |
|
|
|
1,256.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,929.4 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
395.2 |
|
|
|
1,236.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,633.6 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
281.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281.6 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.1 |
|
|
|
78.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190.9 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries and other
assets |
|
|
4,666.3 |
|
|
|
1,514.7 |
|
|
|
1,304.3 |
|
|
|
(7,350.4 |
) |
|
|
134.9 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,953.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,690.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,876.5 |
|
|
$ |
(7,350.4 |
) |
|
$ |
4,170.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
83.7 |
|
|
$ |
191.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
278.5 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
2,132.3 |
|
|
|
74.5 |
|
|
|
798.1 |
|
|
|
(2,682.9 |
) |
|
|
322.0 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
78.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78.2 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,214.2 |
|
|
|
168.7 |
|
|
|
993.9 |
|
|
|
(2,682.9 |
) |
|
|
693.9 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
304.2 |
|
|
|
371.8 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
(200.0 |
) |
|
|
494.6 |
|
Postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
270.9 |
|
|
|
176.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
446.9 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
351.2 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378.2 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
54.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127.8 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,924.5 |
|
|
|
832.9 |
|
|
|
1,266.9 |
|
|
|
(2,882.9 |
) |
|
|
2,141.4 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,029.0 |
|
|
|
1,857.9 |
|
|
|
2,609.6 |
|
|
|
(4,467.5 |
) |
|
|
2,029.0 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
4,953.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,690.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,876.5 |
|
|
$ |
(7,350.4 |
) |
|
$ |
4,170.4 |
|
|
|
|
19
Note 10. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Statements of Income
For the six months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,463.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,341.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,804.6 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
1,238.6 |
|
|
|
948.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181.7 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
47.6 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149.4 |
|
Interest income (expense), net |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Other income (expense) including
equity in income of unconsolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
517.5 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(529.8 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
474.0 |
|
|
|
215.5 |
|
|
|
314.3 |
|
|
|
(529.8 |
) |
|
|
474.0 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
159.1 |
|
|
|
79.6 |
|
|
|
100.5 |
|
|
|
(180.1 |
) |
|
|
159.1 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
314.9 |
|
|
|
135.9 |
|
|
|
213.8 |
|
|
|
(349.7 |
) |
|
|
314.9 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ATI |
|
$ |
310.9 |
|
|
$ |
135.9 |
|
|
$ |
209.8 |
|
|
$ |
(345.7 |
) |
|
$ |
310.9 |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
$ |
(19.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(65.0 |
) |
|
$ |
180.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
96.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(26.1 |
) |
|
|
(229.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(255.6 |
) |
Cash flows provided by (used in)
financing activities |
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
(52.5 |
) |
|
|
(128.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(153.8 |
) |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
(143.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(177.4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(313.1 |
) |
|
|
|
Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is subject to various domestic and international environmental laws and
regulations that govern the discharge of pollutants and disposal of wastes, and which may require
that it investigate and remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials at sites
associated with past and present operations. The Company could incur substantial cleanup costs,
fines, and civil or criminal sanctions, third party property damage or personal injury claims as a
result of violations or liabilities under these laws or noncompliance with environmental permits
required at its facilities. The Company is currently involved in the investigation and remediation
of a number of its current and former sites, as well as third party sites.
Environmental liabilities are recorded when the Companys liability is probable and the costs
are reasonably estimable. In many cases, however, the Company is not able to determine whether it
is liable or, if liability is probable, to reasonably estimate the loss or range of loss. Estimates
of the Companys liability remain subject to additional uncertainties, including the nature and
extent of site contamination, available remediation alternatives, the extent of corrective actions
that may be required, and the number, participation, and financial condition of other potentially
responsible parties (PRPs). The Company expects that it will adjust its accruals to reflect new
information as appropriate. Future adjustments could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations in a given period, but the Company cannot reliably predict the
amounts of such future adjustments.
20
Based on currently available information, the Company does not believe that there is a
reasonable possibility that a loss exceeding the amount already accrued for any of the sites with
which the Company is currently associated (either individually or in the aggregate) will be an
amount that would be material to a decision to buy or sell the Companys securities. Future
developments, administrative actions or liabilities relating to environmental matters, however,
could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
At June 30, 2009, the Companys reserves for environmental remediation obligations totaled
approximately $18 million, of which $8 million was included in other current liabilities. The
reserve includes estimated probable future costs of $5 million for federal Superfund and comparable
state-managed sites; $7 million for formerly owned or operated sites for which the Company has
remediation or indemnification obligations; $3 million for owned or controlled sites at which
Company operations have been discontinued; and $3 million for sites utilized by the Company in its
ongoing operations. The Company continues to evaluate whether it may be able to recover a portion
of future costs for environmental liabilities from third parties.
The timing of expenditures depends on a number of factors that vary by site. The Company
expects that it will expend present accruals over many years and that remediation of all sites with
which it has been identified will be completed within thirty years.
See Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies to the Companys consolidated financial statements
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 for a
discussion of legal proceedings affecting the Company.
A number of other lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be asserted against the
Company relating to the conduct of its currently and formerly owned businesses, including those
pertaining to product liability, patent infringement, commercial,
government contract work,
employment, employee benefits, taxes, environmental and health and safety, and stockholder matters.
While the outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and some of these lawsuits,
claims or proceedings may be determined adversely to the Company, management does not believe that
the disposition of any such pending matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial condition or liquidity, although the resolution in any reporting period of one
or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of
operations for that period.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) is a Delaware corporation with its principal
executive offices located at 1000 Six PPG Place, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-5479, telephone
number (412) 394-2800. References to Allegheny Technologies, ATI, the Company, the
Registrant, we, our and us and similar terms mean Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and
its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.
Allegheny Technologies is one of the largest and most diversified specialty metals producers
in the world. We use innovative technologies to offer global markets a wide range of specialty
metals solutions. Our products include titanium and titanium alloys, nickel-based alloys and
superalloys, zirconium, hafnium, and niobium, stainless and specialty steel alloys, grain-oriented
electrical steel, tungsten-based materials and cutting tools, carbon alloy impression die forgings,
and large grey and ductile iron castings. Our specialty metals are produced in a wide range of
alloys and product forms and are selected for use in applications that demand metals having
exceptional hardness, toughness, strength, resistance to heat, corrosion or abrasion, or a
combination of these characteristics.
21
Results of Operations
We operate in three business segments: High Performance Metals, Flat-Rolled Products, and
Engineered Products. These segments represented the following percentages of our total revenues and
segment operating profit for the first six months of 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Profit |
|
Revenue |
|
Profit |
High Performance Metals |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
87 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
(14 |
%) |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
Sales for the second quarter 2009 were $710.0 million, a decrease of 51% compared to the
second quarter 2008, as the challenging business conditions resulting from the severe global
economic recession lead to significantly lower shipments and raw material surcharges and indices,
and reduced base selling prices for most products. Compared to the 2008 second quarter, sales for
the 2009 second quarter decreased 36% in the High Performance Metals segment, 60% in the
Flat-Rolled Products segment, and 56% in the Engineered Products segment. For the six months ended
June 30, 2009, sales were $1,541.6 million, a decrease of 45% compared to same period of 2008.
2009 first half sales decreased 28% in the High Performance Metals segment, 55% in the Flat-Rolled
Products segment, and 50% in the Engineered Products segment compared to the 2008 period.
Demand from the global aerospace and defense, electrical energy, chemical process industry,
oil and gas, and medical markets accounted for nearly 77% of our first half 2009 sales. Aerospace
and defense was the largest of our markets at 34% of first half 2009 sales, with the electrical
energy market representing 20% of total sales, and sales to the chemical process industry and oil
and gas markets representing 19%. Commercial aerospace continued to be impacted by schedule
pushouts and uncertainties as the supply chain adjusted to revised 2009 commercial airplane build
schedules, uncertain 2010 build schedules, and reduced demand from the aeroengine aftermarket due
primarily to the global recession. In the electrical energy market, demand for our grain-oriented
electrical steel held up well despite reduced demand from the housing market due to our long-term
agreements with major customers. In addition, demand for our industrial titanium products for
electrical power plants remained at a good level, and demand for our exotic alloys for nuclear
energy applications continued to grow. In the oil and gas market, downhole drilling was sluggish
during the second quarter as drill rig activity decreased significantly due to the global recession
and lower crude oil prices. On the other hand, demand for our products for offshore and large
pipeline projects held up well as these long-term projects remained on track. In the chemical
process industry, demand remained good for our exotic alloys. Demand for our large castings for
wind energy applications was nearly nonexistent. Demand from consumer-related markets, such as
automotive, appliance, and residential construction, was very weak.
For the first half 2009, direct international sales were $475.0 million, or 31% of total
sales. Sales of our key high-value products (titanium and titanium alloys, nickel-based alloys and
specialty alloys, exotic alloys, and grain-oriented electrical steel) represented over 65% of total
sales compared to nearly 52% of sales in the first half 2008. Titanium product shipments,
including ATI-produced products for our Uniti titanium joint venture, were 20.2 million pounds in
the first half 2009, which represents 23% of total sales, and compares to 23.6 million pounds in
the first half 2008.
Segment operating profit for the second quarter 2009 was $53.9 million, or 7.6% of sales,
compared to $275.4 million, or 18.8% of sales, in the second quarter 2008. For the first half
2009, segment operating profit was $109.8 million, or 7.1% of sales, compared to $515.4 million in
the comparable period 2008. Segment operating profit for 2009 was adversely affected by the
decline in shipments and reduced base selling prices for most products due primarily to the global
economic recession. In our High Performance Metals segment, operating profit deteriorated compared
to the first quarter 2009 primarily due to jet engine supply chain adjustments, reduced demand for
jet engine spare parts, and the competitive pricing pressures for titanium alloys and nickel-based
alloys and superalloys. This was partially offset by good demand for our exotic alloys as the
nuclear electrical energy build cycle begins to grow. Operating profit in our Flat-Rolled products
segment improved compared to the 2009 first quarter primarily due to reduced out-of phase raw
material surcharges and some improvement in base prices for our stainless sheet products. Three of
the four operating companies in our Engineered Products segment were not profitable for the 2009
first half due to weak demand from nearly all markets and costs associated with workforce
reductions and idle facilities.
22
The selling prices for many of our products include surcharges or indices by which we attempt
to match changes in raw material costs, and in some cases energy costs, with shipments. The second
quarter 2009 and the first half 2009 results were adversely impacted by approximately $17 million
and $83 million, respectively, in out-of-phase raw material surcharges and indices due primarily to
the rapid decrease in the cost of raw materials in late 2008. This was partially offset by a LIFO
inventory valuation reserve benefit of $27.0 million in the 2009 second quarter, and $54.5 million
in the first half 2009 as a result of a decline in raw material costs in 2009. Results for the
second quarter and first half 2008 included a LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $3.4
million and $4.7 million, respectively. Second quarter 2009 benefited from gross cost reductions,
before the effects of inflation, of $39.2 million bringing gross cost reductions for the first half
2009 to $74.2 million. Segment operating profit (loss) as a
percentage of sales for the three month and six month
periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
29.9 |
% |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
28.6 |
% |
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
Engineered Products |
|
|
(17.3 |
%) |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
(12.9 |
%) |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
Our measure of segment operating profit, which we use to analyze the performance and results
of our business segments, excludes income taxes, corporate expenses, net interest income or
expense, retirement benefit expense, and other costs net of gains on asset sales. We believe
segment operating profit, as defined, provides an appropriate measure of controllable operating
results at the business segment level.
In June 2009, we completed several proactive liability management actions including the
issuance of $350 million of 9.375% 10-year Senior Notes and $402.5 million of 4.25% 5-year
Convertible Senior Notes with the stated intent of repurchasing the existing $300 million of 8.375%
Notes due in 2011 and improving the funded position of our U.S. defined benefit pension plan. As a
result of the tender offer, in June 2009 we retired $183.3 million of the outstanding 8.375% Notes
which resulted in a charge of $9.2 million pre-tax, or $5.5 million after-tax, being recognized in
the 2009 second quarter. In addition, we made a $350 million voluntary cash contribution to our
domestic pension plan to significantly improve the plans funded position. The second quarter 2009
tax provision included an unfavorable discrete tax charge of $11.5 million, primarily associated
with the tax consequences of the $350 million voluntary second quarter 2009 pension contribution.
As a result of the $350 million voluntary pension contribution, which was designated to pertain to
the 2008 tax year, we received a U.S. Federal tax refund of $108.5 million in the second quarter
2009.
Income before tax for the second quarter 2009 was break-even compared to $252.4 million for
the second quarter 2008. For the first half 2009, income before tax was $0.3 million compared to
$474.0 million for the comparable period of 2008. In addition to the factors discussed above,
income before tax was adversely impacted by an increase in retirement benefit expenses of $30.1
million, and $67.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively,
resulting from lower returns on benefit plan assets in 2008 notwithstanding the positive impact of
the voluntary pension contributions made over the last several years. As a result of the voluntary
second quarter 2009 pension contribution, annual pension expense for 2009 is expected to be reduced
by $27.5 million to $98.7 million.
Net loss attributable to common stockholders for the second quarter 2009 was $13.4 million, or
$0.14 per share, compared to the second quarter 2008 net income attributable to common stockholders
of $168.9 million, or $1.66 per share. As discussed above, the second quarter 2009 included
non-recurring after-tax charges of $17.0 million, or $0.17 per share, related to debt retirement
and the tax implications of the $350 million voluntary pension contribution. Excluding these
special charges, net income attributable to common stockholders was $3.6 million or $0.03 per share
for the second quarter 2009. The second quarter 2008 included a favorable one-time net tax benefit
of $11.2 million, or $0.11 per share. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net loss
attributable to common stockholders, including special charges, was $7.5 million, or $0.08 per
share compared to net income of $310.9 million, or $3.06 per share, for the comparable 2008 period.
Excluding special charges, for the six months ended June 30, 2009, net income attributable to
common stockholders was $9.5 million, or $0.09 per share.
23
We continued to maintain our solid balance sheet. We ended the 2009 first half with cash on
hand of approximately $850 million. During the 2009 first half, cash flow was $323 million,
excluding the voluntary cash contribution to the pension plan and the federal tax refund associated
with the pension contribution. This strong cash flow was used, in part, to self-fund approximately
$212 million in strategic capital investments. In addition to the proactive liability management
actions discussed above, in June 2009 we also amended our $400 million domestic credit facility to
increase financial flexibility. At the end of the 2009 second quarter, we had no borrowings under
this credit facility and no significant near-term debt maturities. Net debt to total
capitalization was 9.7% and total debt to total capitalization was 34.1%.
We expect business conditions in the 2009 third quarter to remain challenging. While we see
some signs of stabilization in a few markets, in general, demand remains low, the pricing
environment is challenging, and visibility is limited. We expect ATIs third quarter 2009 earnings
to be at or near break even. We expect to end the third quarter 2009 with a significant amount of
cash on hand while continuing to self fund our strategic capital investments.
We remain confident in the intermediate and long-term growth potential of our core global
markets. We intend to use the current difficult market conditions to continue to positively
differentiate ATI as a uniquely positioned, diversified, technology-driven global specialty metals
company with unsurpassed manufacturing capabilities. ATI has the financial resources and
flexibility to continue our strategic investments and growth initiatives, and to introduce
important new alloys and products. Our focus is to continue to develop or expand new strategic
relationships with key global customers to be ready to meet their needs as economic conditions
improve and our core markets recover. We continue to deploy and execute our plan to effectively
compete and we are strengthening and positioning ATI for long-term success. Our strategic
direction and vision remain intact.
High Performance Metals Segment
Second quarter 2009 sales decreased 36% to $320.5 million compared to the same 2008 period.
Shipments decreased 23% for titanium and titanium alloys and 29% for nickel-based and specially
alloys primarily due to lower demand from commercial aerospace and oil and gas markets. We
temporarily idled our titanium sponge facility in Albany, OR, effective July 31, 2009, to adjust
production to market conditions. Shipments of exotic alloys decreased 8% primarily due to product
mix. Average selling prices declined 19% for titanium and titanium alloys and 29% for nickel-based
and specialty alloys. Average selling prices for titanium and titanium alloys and nickel-based and
specialty alloys decreased primarily due to lower raw material indices as a result of lower raw
material costs, and a more competitive pricing environment. Average selling prices for exotic
alloys increased 20% due to increased demand for certain products and favorable product mix.
Segment operating profit in the 2009 second quarter decreased to $41.0 million, or 12.8% of
sales compared to $150.8 million, or 29.9% of sales, in the second quarter 2008. The decrease in
operating profit primarily resulted from lower base selling prices for most products due to reduced
demand and competitive pricing pressures, and reduced shipments for most products. In addition,
operating profit was adversely affected by approximately $5 million from the impact of higher cost
raw materials, primarily nickel and titanium, purchased in prior periods flowing through cost of
sales and not being in phase with the raw material indices included in our selling prices. This
was due primarily to the rapid decrease in raw material costs in late 2008 and the long
manufacturing times of some of our products. These negative impacts were partially offset by
higher margins on exotic alloys and the benefits of gross cost reductions. The second quarter 2009
was impacted by a LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $0.5 million compared to a LIFO
inventory valuation benefit of $14.7 million in the second quarter 2008.
Segment results benefited from $20.1 million of gross cost reductions, bringing first half
2009 gross cost reductions to $40.6 million.
24
Certain comparative information on the segments major products for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
|
5,960 |
|
|
|
7,707 |
|
|
|
(23 |
)% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
|
8,171 |
|
|
|
11,493 |
|
|
|
(29 |
)% |
Exotic alloys |
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per pound): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
$ |
21.30 |
|
|
$ |
26.34 |
|
|
|
(19 |
)% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
$ |
13.04 |
|
|
$ |
18.30 |
|
|
|
(29 |
)% |
Exotic alloys |
|
$ |
58.42 |
|
|
$ |
48.64 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, segment sales decreased 28% to $708.4 million.
Shipments of titanium mill products and nickel-based and specialty alloys declined due to inventory
reduction actions in the jet engine supply chain. The aerospace supply chain has been responding
to lower 2009 aircraft build rates, uncertain 2010 build rates, and reduced demand from the
aftermarket due to the global recession. While demand for our exotic alloys remained good from
the chemical process industry and the growing nuclear electrical energy market, shipments of exotic
alloys decreased 7% primarily due to product mix. Average selling prices declined 15% for titanium
and titanium alloys and 24% for nickel-based and specialty alloys. The average selling prices for
titanium and titanium alloys and nickel-based and specialty alloys decreased primarily due to lower
raw material indices as a result of lower raw material costs, and a more competitive pricing
environment. Average selling prices for exotic alloys increased 24% due to increased demand for
certain products and favorable product mix.
Operating profit was $95.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, or 13.5% of sales,
compared to $282.2 million, or 28.6% of sales, for the comparable prior year. The decrease in
operating profit primarily resulted from lower base selling prices for most products due to reduced
demand and competitive pricing pressures, and reduced shipments for most products. In addition,
operating profit was adversely affected by approximately $24 million from the impact of higher cost
raw materials, primarily nickel and titanium, purchased in prior periods flowing through cost of
sales and not being in phase with the raw material indices included in our selling prices. This
was due primarily to the rapid decrease in raw material costs in late 2008 and the long
manufacturing times of some of our products. These negative impacts were partially offset by
higher margins on exotic alloys and the benefits of gross cost reductions. In addition, there was
a $0.5 million LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge recognized in the 2009 first half compared
to a LIFO inventory valuation benefit of $13.4 million recognized in the first half 2008.
Certain comparative information on the segments major products for the six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008 is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
|
12,898 |
|
|
|
16,477 |
|
|
|
(22 |
)% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
|
18,141 |
|
|
|
21,030 |
|
|
|
(14 |
)% |
Exotic alloys |
|
|
2,636 |
|
|
|
2,829 |
|
|
|
(7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per pound): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
$ |
21.94 |
|
|
$ |
25.92 |
|
|
|
(15 |
)% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
$ |
13.97 |
|
|
$ |
18.42 |
|
|
|
(24 |
)% |
Exotic alloys |
|
$ |
57.76 |
|
|
$ |
46.70 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
25
Flat-Rolled Products Segment
Second quarter 2009 sales were $335.2 million, 60% lower than the second quarter 2008, due
primarily to significantly lower shipments and raw material surcharges, and reduced base selling
prices for most products. Shipments of standard stainless products (sheet and plate) decreased 34%
while total high-value products shipments decreased 37%. Average transaction prices for all
products, which include surcharges, were 39% lower due to a combination of significantly reduced
raw material surcharges and lower base prices for most products due to competitive pricing
pressures.
Segment operating profit decreased to $22.3 million, or 6.7% of sales compared to the second
quarter 2008. The decline in operating profit primarily resulted from lower shipments and average
base selling prices for most of our products and the negative impact from $12 million of higher
cost material purchased in prior periods flowing through cost of sales and not being in phase with
raw material surcharges included in selling prices. This was due primarily to the rapid decrease
in raw material costs in late 2008 and the long manufacturing times of some of our products.
Segment operating profit was also impacted by costs associated with workforce reductions and idle
facilities. In addition, there was a $26.1 million decrease in the LIFO inventory valuation
reserve in the second quarter 2009. The second quarter 2008 included an increase in the LIFO
inventory valuation reserve of $16.4 million.
Segment results benefited from $15.9 million in gross cost reductions, bringing first half
2009 gross cost reductions in this segment to $28.0 million.
Comparative information on the segments products for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
|
84,190 |
|
|
|
132,999 |
|
|
|
(37 |
)% |
Standard |
|
|
118,211 |
|
|
|
179,864 |
|
|
|
(34 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
202,401 |
|
|
|
312,863 |
|
|
|
(35 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per lb.): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
$ |
2.40 |
|
|
$ |
3.21 |
|
|
|
(25 |
)% |
Standard |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
|
(54 |
)% |
Combined Average |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
2.64 |
|
|
|
(39 |
)% |
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, Flat-Rolled Products sales were $713.4 million or 55%
lower compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008. The decline in sales was due primarily to
significantly lower shipments and raw material surcharges, and reduced base selling prices for most
products. Shipments of standard stainless products (sheet and plate) decreased 37% while total
high-value products shipments decreased 30%. Average transaction prices for all products, which
include surcharges, were 32% lower due to a combination of significantly reduced raw material
surcharges and lower base prices for most products due to competitive pricing pressures. Demand
from the electrical energy, chemical process industry, oil and gas, and aerospace and defense
accounted for over 64% of sales in the 2009 first half.
Segment operating profit for the first six months of 2009 declined to $30 million, or 4.2% of
sales, compared to the prior year period. The decline in operating profit primarily resulted from
lower shipments and average base selling prices for most of our products and the negative impact
from $59 million of higher cost material purchased in prior periods flowing through cost of sales
and not being in phase with raw material surcharges included in selling prices. This was due
primarily to the rapid decrease in raw material costs in late 2008 and the long manufacturing times
of some of our products. Segment operating profit was also impacted by costs associated with
workforce reductions and idle facilities. In addition, the segment benefited from a $52.3 million
decrease in the LIFO inventory valuation reserve in the first half 2009. First half 2008 results
included an increase in the LIFO inventory valuation reserve of $16.4 million.
26
Comparative information on the segments products for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
|
178,118 |
|
|
|
252,791 |
|
|
|
(30 |
)% |
Standard |
|
|
219,785 |
|
|
|
350,484 |
|
|
|
(37 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
397,903 |
|
|
|
603,275 |
|
|
|
(34 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per lb.): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
$ |
2.53 |
|
|
$ |
3.21 |
|
|
|
(21 |
)% |
Standard |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
2.15 |
|
|
|
(48 |
)% |
Combined Average |
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
$ |
2.59 |
|
|
|
(32 |
)% |
Engineered Products Segment
Sales for the second quarter and first half of 2009 were $54.3 million and $119.8 million,
respectively, which were 56% and 50% lower than the same periods of 2008. Demand for our tungsten
and tungsten carbide products, forged products, and cast products remained weak. Demand for our
precision finishing business was good. Segment operating results for the second quarter 2009 was a
loss of $9.4 million compared to income of $11.0 million, or 9.0% of sales, for the comparable 2008
period. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, operating loss was $15.5 million, compared to
income of $16.7 million, or 7.0% of sales in 2008. The decrease in 2009 operating profit was
primarily due to the significantly lower shipments, reduced selling prices, and costs associated
with workforce reductions and idle facilities. The segment benefited from a $1.4 million decrease
in the LIFO inventory valuation reserve for the 2009 second quarter and a $2.7 million decrease for
the first half 2009. The second quarter and first half 2008 included a LIFO inventory valuation
reserve charge of $1.7 million.
Results for 2009 also benefited from $3.2 million of gross cost reductions in the second
quarter 2009, bringing first half 2009 gross cost reductions to $5.6 million.
Corporate Items
Corporate expenses decreased to $8.6 million for the second quarter of 2009, compared to $15.4
million in the year-ago period. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, corporate expenses
decreased to $23.0 million compared to $33.1 million in the prior year-to-date period. These
decreases in corporate expenses in the 2009 second quarter and six month period were primarily due
to lower expenses associated with annual and long-term performance-based cash incentive
compensation programs.
Interest expense, net of interest income, in the second quarter 2009 and 2008 was $1.3 million
in each period. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net interest expense was $1.2 million
compared to $1.1 million in the prior year-to-date period. Interest expense benefited from the
capitalization of interest costs on strategic capital projects of $19.7 million in the first six
months of 2009 and by $11.6 million in the first six months of 2008.
In June 2009, we completed a tender offer resulting in the retirement of $183.3 million of the
Companys 8.375% notes due in December 2011, which left $116.7 million in face value of the 2011
Notes outstanding at the end of June 2009. As a result of this transaction, we recognized a
pre-tax charge of $9.2 million in the 2009 second quarter for the costs of the debt retirement.
Other expense, net of gains on asset sales, primarily includes charges incurred in connection
with closed operations and other assets, and other non-operating income or expense. These items
are presented primarily in selling and administration expenses, and in other income (expense) in
the statement of operations and resulted in other expense of $1.4 million for the second quarter
2009 and $3.0 million for the second quarter 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, other
expense, net of gains on asset sales was $5.4 million, compared to $3.9 million for the comparable
2008 period. The changes in expenses primarily related to the recognition of foreign currency
gains and losses, and legal expenses.
27
Retirement benefit expense, which includes pension expense and other postretirement expense,
increased to $33.4 million in the second quarter 2009, compared to $3.3 million in the second
quarter 2008. This increase is primarily a result of lower returns on plan assets in 2008
partially offset by the positive benefits of voluntary pension contributions made over the last
several years. For the second quarter 2009, retirement benefit expense of $23.6 million was
included in cost of sales and $9.8 million was included in selling and administrative expenses.
For the second quarter 2008, the amount of retirement benefit expense included in cost of sales was
$2.1 million, and the amount included in selling and administrative expenses was $1.2 million.
Retirement benefit expense increased to $70.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009,
compared to $3.3 million in the second quarter 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2009,
retirement benefit expense of $51.3 million was included in cost of sales and $19.4 million was
included in selling and administrative expenses. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the
amount of retirement benefit expense included in cost of sales was $1.8 million, and the amount
included in selling and administrative expenses was $1.5 million.
In June 2009, we made a $350 million voluntary cash contribution to our U.S. defined benefit
pension plan to improve the plans funded position. As a result of this voluntary pension
contribution, 2009 pension expense is expected to be reduced by $27.5 million to $98.7 million,
compared to the previous estimate of $126.2 million. Retirement benefit expense is now expected to
be approximately $25.5 million in both the third and fourth quarters of 2009.
Income Taxes
Second quarter 2009 results included a provision for income taxes of $11.7 million compared to
an income tax provision of $81.2 million, or 32.2% of income before tax, for the comparable 2008
period. The second quarter 2009 tax provision included a non-recurring tax charge of $11.5
million, primarily associated with the tax consequences of the June 2009 $350 million voluntary
contribution to the pension plan. The second quarter 2008 tax provision included a favorable
discrete net tax benefit of $11.2 million, primarily associated with a tax refund related to prior
years.
For the first half of 2009, the provision for income taxes was $6.7 million compared to $159.1
million, or 33.6% of income before tax, for the first half 2008. The 2009 first quarter benefited
from a lower income tax provision due primarily to $5.1 million of discrete adjustments associated
primarily with prior years taxes. The 2008 first quarter included a discrete benefit of $2.6
million related to foreign taxes.
Primarily as a result of the $350 million voluntary pension contribution in June 2009 which
was designated to pertain to the 2008 tax year, the Company received a U.S. Federal income tax
refund of $108.5 million in the 2009 second quarter.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
We believe that internally generated funds, current cash on hand, and available borrowings
under existing credit lines will be adequate to meet foreseeable liquidity needs, including a
substantial expansion of our production capabilities over the next few years. We did not borrow
funds under our domestic senior unsecured credit facility during the first six months of 2009.
However, as of June 30, 2009 approximately $12 million of this facility was utilized to support
letters of credit.
Our ability to access the credit markets in the future to obtain additional financing, if
needed, may be influenced by our credit rating. As of June 30, 2009, Moodys Investor Services
senior unsecured debt rating for our Company was Baa3 with a stable ratings outlook. As of June
30, 2009, Standard & Poors Ratings Services corporate credit and senior unsecured debt rating for
our Company was BBB- with a stable ratings outlook. Changes in our credit rating do not impact our
access to, or the cost of, our existing credit facilities.
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of SEC Regulation S-K.
Cash Flow and Working Capital
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, cash provided by operating activities was $81.3
million which includes a reduction in managed working capital of $352.8 million due to lower
business activity and raw material costs, partially offset by a voluntary net cash pension
contribution of $241.5 million ($350 million contribution less $108.5 million federal income tax
refund). Excluding the voluntary net cash pension contribution, cash flow from operations was
$322.8 million for the first half of 2009. Cash used in investing activities was $212.8
million in the
28
2009 first half and consisted primarily of capital expenditures. Cash provided by
financing activities was $512.3 million in the 2009 first half due to receipt of $734.4 million of
net proceeds from the second quarter 2009 debt issuances, partially offset by debt retirements of
$188.6 million and dividend payments of $35.3 million. At June 30, 2009, cash and cash equivalents
on hand totaled $850.7 million, an increase of $380.8 million from year end 2008.
As part of managing the liquidity of our business, we focus on controlling managed working
capital, which is defined as gross accounts receivable and gross inventories, less accounts
payable. In measuring performance in controlling this managed working capital, we exclude the
effects of LIFO inventory valuation reserves, excess and obsolete inventory reserves, and reserves
for uncollectible accounts receivable which, due to their nature, are managed separately. At June
30, 2009, managed working capital was 36.0% of annualized sales, compared to 35.2% of annualized
sales at December 31, 2008. During the first six months of 2009, managed working capital decreased
by $352.8 million, to $1,058.9 million. The decrease in managed working capital from December 31,
2008, was due to decreased accounts receivable of $134.1 million, and decreased inventory of $260.6
million, partially offset by decreased accounts payable of $41.9 million. While accounts
receivable balances decreased during first half 2009, days sales outstanding, which measures actual
collection timing for accounts receivable, remained comparable to year end 2008. Gross inventory
turns, which excludes the effect of LIFO inventory valuation reserves, declined across all of our
business segments due to significantly lower business activity.
The components of managed working capital were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
398.2 |
|
|
$ |
530.5 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
692.9 |
|
|
|
887.6 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(236.4 |
) |
|
|
(278.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
854.7 |
|
|
|
1,139.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
LIFO reserves |
|
|
151.1 |
|
|
|
205.6 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
|
60.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed working capital |
|
$ |
1,058.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,411.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized prior two months sales |
|
$ |
2,941.8 |
|
|
$ |
4,008.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed working capital as a % of annualized sales |
|
|
36.0 |
% |
|
|
35.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in managed working capital from December
31, 2008 |
|
$ |
(352.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures
We currently expect capital expenditures for 2009 to be in the range of approximately $425
million to $450 million, of which approximately $212 million was expended in the first six months
of 2009. We are significantly expanding our manufacturing capabilities to meet expected
intermediate and long-term increased demand from the aerospace (engine and airframe) and defense,
chemical process industry, oil and gas, electrical energy, and medical markets, especially for
titanium and titanium-based alloys, nickel-based alloys and superalloys, specialty alloys, and
exotic alloys. We are committed to continuing to self-fund these projects and can further adjust
the timing of any project, if necessary. These self-funded capital investments include:
|
|
|
The expansion of ATIs aerospace quality titanium sponge production capabilities.
Titanium sponge is an important raw material used to produce our titanium mill products.
Our greenfield premium-grade titanium sponge (jet engine rotating parts) facility in
Rowley, UT is expected to begin initial production in the 2009 third quarter. When this
Utah sponge facility is fully operational, our total annual sponge production capacity
including our Albany, OR sponge facility is projected to be approximately 46 million
pounds; these secure supply sources are intended to reduce our purchased titanium sponge
and purchased titanium scrap
requirements. In addition, the Utah facility will have the infrastructure in place to
further expand annual capacity by approximately 18 million pounds, bringing the total annual
capacity at that facility to 42 million pounds, if needed. We temporarily idled our Albany,
OR titanium sponge facility, effective July 31, 2009, to adjust production and inventory
levels to current market demand for titanium and titanium-based products. |
29
|
|
|
The expansion of ATIs mill products processing and finishing capabilities for titanium
and titanium-based alloys, nickel-based alloys and superalloys, and specialty alloys.
Announced projects include a $260 million expansion of our titanium and superalloy forging
capacity at our Bakers, NC facility through the addition of an integrated 10,000 ton press
forge, 700mm rotary forge, and conditioning, finishing and inspection facilities to produce
large diameter products needed for certain demanding applications. The conditioning,
finishing and inspection facilities began operations in the third quarter 2008, and the
forging operations are expected to be operational by the third quarter 2009. Forging is a
hot-forming process that produces wrought forging billet and forged machining bar from an
ingot. |
|
|
|
|
A new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing facility at our existing
Brackenridge, PA site. The project is estimated to cost approximately $1.16 billion and
take at least four years to complete. Our new advanced hot-rolling and processing facility
is designed to be the most powerful mill in the world for production of specialty metals.
It is designed to produce exceptional quality, thinner, and wider hot-rolled coils at
reduced cost with shorter lead times, and require lower working capital requirements. When
completed, we believe ATIs new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing
facility will provide unsurpassed manufacturing capability and versatility in the
production of a wide range of flat-rolled specialty metals. We expect improved
productivity, lower costs, and higher quality for our diversified product mix of
flat-rolled specialty metals, including nickel-based and specialty alloys, titanium and
titanium alloys, zirconium alloys, Precision Rolled Strip® products, and stainless sheet
and coiled plate products. It is designed to roll and process exceptional quality hot bands
of up to 78.62 inches, or 2 meters, wide. |
|
|
|
|
In connection with the new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing
facility, we announced the consolidation of our Natrona, PA grain-oriented electrical steel
melt shop into ATIs Brackenridge, PA melt shop. This consolidation is expected to improve
the overall productivity of ATIs flat-rolled grain-oriented electrical steel and other
stainless and specialty alloys, and reduce the cost of producing slabs and ingots. The
investment should also result in significant reduction of particulate emissions. We expect
to realize considerable cost savings from this project to begin in late 2010. |
|
|
|
|
We are increasing our capacity to produce zirconium products through capital expansions
of zirconium sponge production and VAR melting. This new zirconium sponge and melting
capacity better positions ATI for the current and expected strong growth in demand from the
nuclear electrical energy and chemical process industry markets. |
|
|
|
|
Our STAL joint venture commenced an expansion of its operations in Shanghai, China in
late 2006. This expansion, which is expected to more than triple STALs rolling and
slitting capacity to produce Precision Rolled Strip® products, is estimated to cost
approximately $100 million. The additional slitting capacity commenced operations in June
2009 and the remainder of the facility is expected to be operational in the third quarter
2009. |
Debt
At June 30, 2009, we had $1,073.4 million in total outstanding debt, compared to $509.8
million at December 31, 2008, an increase of $563.6 million. The increase in debt was primarily
due to new debt issuances, net of debt retirements, discussed below.
Convertible Notes
In June 2009, we issued and sold $402.5 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.25%
Convertible Senior Notes due 2014 (the Convertible Notes). Interest is payable semi-annually on
June 1 and December 1 of each year. The Convertible Notes were issued under ATIs shelf
registration statement and are not listed on any national securities exchange. Net proceeds of
$390.2 million from the sale of the Convertible Notes were used to make a $350 million voluntary
cash contribution to our U.S. defined benefit pension plan, and the balance was used for general
corporate purposes including funding of contributions to trusts established to fund retiree medical
benefits. The
Convertible Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the Company and equally
ranked with all of its existing and future senior unsecured debt. The underwriting fees and other
third-party expenses for the issuance of the Convertible Notes were $12.3 million and will be
amortized to interest expense over the 5-year term of the Convertible Notes.
30
We do not have the right to redeem the Convertible Notes prior to the stated maturity date.
Holders of the Convertible Notes have the option to convert their notes into shares of ATI common
stock at any time prior to the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately
preceding the stated maturity date (June 1, 2014). The initial conversion rate for the Convertible
Notes is 23.9263 shares of ATI common stock per $1,000 (in whole dollars) principal amount of notes
(9,630,335 shares), equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $41.795 per share, subject to
adjustment, as defined in the Convertible Notes. Other than receiving cash in lieu of fractional
shares, holders do not have the option to receive cash instead of shares of common stock upon
conversion. Accrued and unpaid interest that exists upon conversion of a note will be deemed paid
by the delivery of shares of ATI common stock and no cash payment or additional shares will be
given to holders.
If the Company undergoes a fundamental change, as defined in the Convertible Notes, holders
may require us to repurchase all or a portion of their notes at a price equal to 100% of the
principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest up to, but
excluding, the repurchase date. Such a repurchase will be made in cash.
2019 Notes
In June 2009, we issued $350 million aggregate principal amount of 9.375% unsecured Senior
Notes with a maturity of June 2019 (the 2019 Notes). ). Interest is payable semi-annually on
June 1 and December 1 of each year. The 2019 Notes were issued under ATIs shelf registration
statement and are not listed on any national securities exchange. Net proceeds of $344.2 million
from the sale of the 2019 Notes were used to retire $183.3 million of the Companys 2011 Notes, as
discussed below, and for general corporate purposes. The underwriting fees, discount and other
third-party expenses for the issuance of the 2019 Notes were $5.8 million and will be amortized to
interest expense over the 10-year term of the 2019 Notes. The 2019 Notes are unsecured and
unsubordinated obligations of the Company and equally ranked with all of its existing and future
senior unsecured debt. The 2019 Notes restrict our ability to create certain liens, to enter into
sale leaseback transactions, and to consolidate, merge or transfer all, or substantially all, of
our assets. We have the option to redeem the 2019 Notes, as a whole or in part, at any time or
from time to time, on at least 30 days, but not more than 60 days, prior notice to the holders of
the Notes at a redemption price specified in the 2019 Notes. The 2019 Notes are subject to
repurchase upon the occurrence of a change in control repurchase event (as defined in the 2019
Notes) at a repurchase price in cash equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes
repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest on the 2019 Notes repurchased.
Retirement of 2011 Notes
In June 2009, we completed a tender offer for our 8.375% Notes due in 2011 (the 2011 Notes)
of which $300 million in aggregate principal amount was outstanding prior to the tender offer. As a
result of the tender offer, we retired $183.3 million of the 2011 Notes and recognized a pre-tax
charge of $9.2 million in the 2009 second quarter for the costs of acquiring the 2011 Notes. As of
June 30, 2009, $116.7 million in face value of the 2011 Notes remain outstanding.
In managing our overall capital structure, some of the measures on which we focus are net debt
to total capitalization, which is the percentage of our debt, net of cash that may be available to
reduce borrowings, to our total invested and borrowed capital, and total debt to total
capitalization, which excludes cash balances. Net debt as a percentage of capitalization was 9.7%
at June 30, 2009, compared to 2.0% at December 31, 2008. The net debt to capitalization was
determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
1,073.4 |
|
|
$ |
509.8 |
|
Less: cash |
|
|
(850.7 |
) |
|
|
(469.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt |
|
$ |
222.7 |
|
|
$ |
39.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt |
|
$ |
222.7 |
|
|
$ |
39.9 |
|
Total ATI stockholders equity |
|
|
2,075.5 |
|
|
|
1,957.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ATI capital |
|
$ |
2,298.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,997.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt to capital ratio |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
31
Total debt to total capitalization increased to 34.1% at June 30, 2009 from 20.7% at December
31, 2008. Total debt to total capitalization was determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
1,073.4 |
|
|
$ |
509.8 |
|
Total ATI stockholders equity |
|
|
2,075.5 |
|
|
|
1,957.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ATI capital |
|
$ |
3,148.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,467.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt to total capital ratio |
|
|
34.1 |
% |
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In May 2009, we amended our $400 million senior unsecured domestic bank group credit agreement
to redefine the two financial covenants to provide additional financial flexibility. The amendment
restates the definition of consolidated earnings before interest and taxes, and consolidated
earnings before income, taxes, depreciation and amortization as used in the interest coverage and
leverage ratios to exclude any non-cash pension expense or income and restates the definition of
consolidated indebtedness used in the leverage ratio, which previously was based on gross
indebtedness, to be net of cash on hand in excess of $50 million. As of June 30, 2009, there had
been no borrowings made under the facility, although approximately $12 million of the facility was
used to support letters of credit. The unsecured facility requires us
to maintain a leverage ratio (consolidated total indebtedness divided by consolidated earnings
before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization) of not greater than 3.25, and maintain an
interest coverage ratio (consolidated earnings before interest and taxes divided by interest
expense) of not less than 2.0. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2009, our leverage ratio was
0.53, and our interest coverage ratio was 55.72.
The Company has an additional separate credit facility for the issuance of letters of credit.
As of June 30, 2009, $30 million in letters of credit were outstanding under this facility.
STAL, our Chinese joint venture company in which ATI has a 60% interest, has a 585 million
renminbi (approximately $86 million at June 30, 2009 exchange rates) revolving credit facility with
a group of banks. This credit facility is supported solely by STALs financial capability without
any guarantees from the joint venture partners, and is intended to be utilized in the future for
the expansion of STALs operations, which are located in Shanghai, China. As of June 30, 2009,
there were no borrowings under this credit facility although STAL had approximately $5 million in
letters of credit outstanding related to the expansion of its operations.
Dividends
A regular quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share of common stock was declared on May 7, 2009,
payable on June 18, 2009 to stockholders of record at the close of business on May 28, 2009. The
payment of dividends and the amount of such dividends depends upon matters deemed relevant by our
Board of Directors, such as our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements,
future prospects, any limitations imposed by law, credit agreements or senior securities, and other
factors deemed relevant and appropriate.
Share Repurchase Program
On November 1, 2007, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program of $500
million. Repurchases of Company common stock are expected to be made on the open market or in
unsolicited or privately negotiated transactions. Share repurchases are expected to be funded from
internal cash flow and cash on hand. The number of shares to be purchased, and the timing of the
purchases, will be based on several factors, including other investment opportunities, the level of
cash balances, and general business conditions. No shares of common stock were purchased during the
three or six months ended June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, 6,837,000 shares of common stock had
been purchased under this program at a cost of $339.5 million.
32
Critical Accounting Policies
Inventory
At June 30, 2009, we had net inventory of $692.9 million. Inventories are stated at the lower
of cost (last-in, first-out (LIFO), first-in, first-out (FIFO) and average cost methods) or market,
less progress payments. Costs include direct material, direct labor and applicable manufacturing
and engineering overhead, and other direct costs. Most of our inventory is valued utilizing the
LIFO costing methodology. Inventory of our non-U.S. operations is valued using average cost or FIFO
methods. Under the LIFO inventory valuation method, changes in the cost of raw materials and
production activities are recognized in cost of sales in the current period even though these
material and other costs may have been incurred at significantly different values due to the length
of time of our production cycle. The prices for many of the raw materials we use have been
volatile. Since we value most of our inventory utilizing the LIFO inventory costing methodology, a
rise in raw material costs has a negative effect on our operating results, while conversely, a fall
in material costs results in a benefit to operating results. For example, in 2008, the effect of
falling raw material costs on our LIFO inventory valuation method resulted in cost of sales which
was $169.0 million lower than would have been recognized if we utilized the FIFO methodology to
value our inventory. In a period of rising prices, cost of sales expense recognized under LIFO is
generally higher than the cash costs incurred to acquire the inventory sold. Conversely, in a
period of declining raw material prices, cost of sales recognized under LIFO is generally lower
than cash costs incurred to acquire the inventory sold.
Since the LIFO inventory valuation methodology is designed for annual determination, interim
estimates of the annual LIFO valuation are required. We recognize the effects of the LIFO
inventory valuation method on an interim basis by projecting the expected annual LIFO cost and
allocating that projection to the interim quarters equally. These projections of annual LIFO
inventory valuation reserve changes are updated quarterly and are evaluated based upon material,
labor and overhead costs and projections for such costs at the end of the year plus projections
regarding year-end inventory levels. For the first six months of 2009, we recognized a $54.5
million benefit associated with utilizing the LIFO inventory valuation methodology.
The LIFO inventory valuation methodology is not utilized by many of the companies with which
we compete, including foreign competitors. As such, our results of operations may not be
comparable to those of our competitors during periods of volatile material costs due, in part, to
the differences between the LIFO inventory valuation method and other acceptable inventory
valuation methods.
We evaluate product lines on a quarterly basis to identify inventory values that exceed
estimated net realizable value. The calculation of a resulting reserve, if any, is recognized as
an expense in the period that the need for the reserve is identified. At June 30, 2009, no
significant reserves were required.
Other Critical Accounting Policies
A summary of other significant accounting policies is discussed in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008.
The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions regarding
uncertainties that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Significant areas of
uncertainty that require judgments, estimates and assumptions include the accounting for
derivatives, retirement plans, income taxes, environmental and other contingencies as well as asset
impairment, inventory valuation and collectibility of accounts receivable. We use historical and
other information that we consider to be relevant to make these judgments and estimates. However,
actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions that are used to prepare our
financial statements.
New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
As required, in the first quarter 2009, we adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 160 (FAS 160), Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.
Early adoption of this standard was prohibited. FAS 160 changes the classification of
noncontrolling (minority) interests on the balance sheet and the
accounting for and reporting of transactions between the reporting entity and holders of such
noncontrolling interests. Under the new standard, noncontrolling interests are considered equity
and are reported as an element of
33
stockholders equity rather than within the mezzanine or
liability sections of the balance sheet. In addition, the practice of reporting minority interest
expense or benefit changed. Under the new standard, net income encompasses the total income before
minority interest expense or benefit. The income statement includes separate disclosure of the
attribution of income or loss between the controlling and noncontrolling interests. Increases and
decreases in the noncontrolling ownership interest amount are accounted for as equity transactions.
As a result of adopting FAS 160, the balance sheet and the income statement have been recast
retrospectively for the presentation of noncontrolling (minority) interest in our STAL joint
venture.
On January 1, 2009, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS
157), Fair Value Measurements, as it relates to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities. FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that
require or permit fair value measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited
exceptions. The adoption of FAS 157, as it relates to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities, had no impact on the financial statements. The provisions of FAS 157 will be applied
at such time a fair value measurement of a nonfinancial asset or nonfinancial liability is
required, which may result in a fair value that is materially different than would have been
calculated prior to the adoption of FAS 157.
Forward-Looking and Other Statements
From time to time, we have made and may continue to make forward-looking statements within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain statements in this
report relate to future events and expectations and, as such, constitute forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements include those containing such words as anticipates,
believes, estimates, expects, would, should, will, will likely result, forecast,
outlook, projects, and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on
managements current expectations and include known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors, many of which we are unable to predict or control, that may cause our actual results,
performance or achievements to materially differ from those expressed or implied in the
forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those in the forward-looking statements include: (a) material adverse changes in economic or
industry conditions generally, including credit market conditions and related issues, and global
supply and demand conditions and prices for our specialty metals; (b) material adverse changes in
the markets we serve, including the aerospace and defense, construction and mining, automotive,
electrical energy, chemical process industry, oil and gas, medical and other markets; (c) our
inability to achieve the level of cost savings, productivity improvements, synergies, growth or
other benefits anticipated by management, including those anticipated from strategic investments,
whether due to significant increases in energy, raw materials or employee benefits costs, the
possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses, or other factors; (d)
volatility of prices and availability of supply of the raw materials that are critical to the
manufacture of our products; (e) declines in the value of our defined benefit pension plan assets
or unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that govern pension plan funding; (f) significant
legal proceedings or investigations adverse to us; and (g) other risk factors summarized in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and in other reports filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. We assume no duty to update our forward-looking statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As part of our risk management strategy, we utilize derivative financial instruments, from
time to time, to hedge our exposure to changes in raw material prices, foreign currencies, and
interest rates. We monitor the third-party financial institutions which are our counterparty to
these financial instruments on a daily basis and diversify our transactions among counterparties to
minimize exposure to any one of these entities. Fair values for derivatives were measured using
exchange-traded prices for the hedged items including consideration of counterparty risk and the
Companys credit risk.
Interest Rate Risk. We attempt to maintain a reasonable balance between fixed- and floating-rate
debt to keep financing costs as low as possible. At June 30, 2009, we had approximately $44 million
of floating rate debt outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of approximately 2.0%.
Approximately $26 million of this floating rate debt is capped at a 6% maximum interest rate. Since
the interest rate on floating rate debt changes with the short-term market rate of interest, we are
exposed to the risk that these interest rates may increase, raising our interest
expense in situations where the interest rate is not capped. For example, a hypothetical 1%
increase in the rate of interest on the $18 million of our outstanding floating rate debt not
subjected to a cap would result in increased annual financing costs
of approximately $0.2 million.
34
Volatility of Energy Prices. Energy resources markets are subject to conditions that create
uncertainty in the prices and availability of energy resources. The prices for and availability of
electricity, natural gas, oil and other energy resources are subject to volatile market conditions.
These market conditions often are affected by political and economic factors beyond our control.
Increases in energy costs, or changes in costs relative to energy costs paid by competitors, have
and may continue to adversely affect our profitability. To the extent that these uncertainties
cause suppliers and customers to be more cost sensitive, increased energy prices may have an
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. We use approximately 10 to 12
million MMBtus of natural gas annually, depending upon business conditions, in the manufacture of
our products. These purchases of natural gas expose us to risk of higher gas prices. For example, a
hypothetical $1.00 per MMBtu increase in the price of natural gas would result in increased annual
energy costs of approximately $10 to $12 million. We use several approaches to minimize any
material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations from volatile energy
prices. These approaches include incorporating an energy surcharge on many of our products and
using financial derivatives to reduce exposure to energy price volatility.
At June 30, 2009, the outstanding financial derivatives used to hedge our exposure to natural
gas cost volatility represented approximately 40% of our forecasted requirements for the next three
years. The net mark-to-market valuation of these outstanding hedges at June 30, 2009 was an
unrealized pre-tax loss of $22.5 million, of which $13.4 million was presented in accrued
liabilities on the balance sheet with the remainder included in other long-term liabilities. The
effects of the hedging activity will be recognized in income over the designated hedge periods.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, the effects of natural gas hedging activity increased
cost of sales by $7.2 million.
Volatility of Raw Material Prices. We use raw materials surcharge and index mechanisms to offset
the impact of increased raw material costs; however, competitive factors in the marketplace can
limit our ability to institute such mechanisms, and there can be a delay between the increase in
the price of raw materials and the realization of the benefit of such mechanisms. For example, in
2008 we used approximately 80 million pounds of nickel; therefore a hypothetical change of $1.00
per pound in nickel prices would result in increased costs of approximately $80 million. In
addition, in 2008 we also used approximately 500 million pounds of ferrous scrap in the production
of our flat-rolled products and a hypothetical change of $0.01 per pound would result in increased
costs of approximately $5 million. While we enter into raw materials futures contracts from
time-to-time to hedge exposure to price fluctuations, such as for nickel, we cannot be certain that
our hedge position adequately reduces exposure. We believe that we have adequate controls to
monitor these contracts, but we may not be able to accurately assess exposure to price volatility
in the markets for critical raw materials.
The majority of our products are sold utilizing raw material surcharges and index mechanisms.
However as of June 30, 2009, we had entered into financial hedging arrangements primarily at the
request of our customers related to firm orders for approximately 6% of our total annual nickel
requirements through 2010. Any gain or loss associated with these hedging arrangements is included
in the selling price to the customer requesting the hedge over the designated hedge period. At
June 30, 2009, the net mark-to-market valuation of our outstanding raw material hedges was an
unrealized pre-tax gain of $7.8 million, comprised of $7.5 million included in prepaid expenses and
other current assets, $3.9 million in other long-term assets, and $3.6 million included in accrued
liabilities on the balance sheet.
Foreign Currency Risk. Foreign currency exchange contracts are used, from time-to-time, to limit
transactional exposure to changes in currency exchange rates. We sometimes purchase foreign
currency forward contracts that permit us to sell specified amounts of foreign currencies expected
to be received from our export sales for pre-established U.S. dollar amounts at specified dates.
The forward contracts are denominated in the same foreign currencies in which export sales are
denominated. These contracts are designated as hedges of the variability in cash flows of a portion
of the forecasted future export sales transactions which otherwise would expose the Company to
foreign currency risk. At June 30, 2009, the outstanding financial derivatives used to hedge our
exposure to foreign currency, primarily euros, represented approximately 7% of our forecasted total
international sales through 2011. In addition, we may also designate cash balances held in foreign
currencies as hedges of forecasted foreign currency transactions. At June 30, 2009, the net
mark-to-market valuation of the outstanding foreign currency forward contracts was an unrealized
pre-tax gain of $12.2 million, of which $5.6 million is included in other current assets, $6.7
million in other long-term assets, and $0.1 million in accrued liabilities on the balance sheet.
35
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
|
(a) |
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures as of June 30, 2009, and they concluded that these controls and
procedures are effective.
|
(b) |
|
Changes in Internal Controls |
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection
with the evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2009,
conducted by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, that occurred during the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
A number of lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be asserted against the Company
relating to the conduct of its business, including those pertaining to product liability, patent
infringement, commercial, government contract work, employment,
employee benefits, taxes, environmental
and health and safety, and stockholder matters. Certain of such lawsuits, claims and proceedings
are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and addressed
in Note 11 to the unaudited interim financial statements included herein. While the outcome of
litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and some of these lawsuits, claims or proceedings
may be determined adversely to the Company, management does not believe that the disposition of any
such pending matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition or liquidity, although the resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these
matters could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations for that
period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks
facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we
currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and/or operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Set forth below is information regarding the Companys stock repurchases during the period
covered by this report, including shares repurchased by ATI from employees to satisfy employee-owed
taxes on share-based payments.
36
ATIs Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program of $500 million on November 1,
2007. Repurchases of Company common stock are made in the open market or in unsolicited or
privately negotiated transactions. Share repurchases are funded from internal cash flow and cash on
hand. The number of shares purchased, and the timing of the purchases, are based on several
factors, including other investment opportunities, the level of cash balances, and general business
conditions. No shares of common stock were purchased during the three months ended June 30, 2009.
As of June 30, 2009, 6,837,000 shares of common stock had been purchased under this program at a
cost of $339.5 million. All of these purchases were made in the open market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
Value) of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part |
|
(or Units) that May |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
of Publicly |
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
Average Price Paid |
|
Announced Plans or |
|
Under the Plans or |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
per Share (or Unit) |
|
Programs |
|
Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1-30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
160,505,939 |
|
May 1-31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939 |
|
June 1-30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
160,505,939 |
|
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Our 2009 annual meeting of stockholders was held on May 7, 2009. Proxies for the meeting were
solicited by us pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. At that
meeting, two proposals were submitted to a vote of the stockholders.
Item A Election of Directors. The four nominees for election as directors named in the proxy
statement for the meeting were elected, having received the following number of votes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Number of Votes For |
|
Number of Votes Withheld |
Diane C. Creel |
|
|
85,323,418 |
|
|
|
796,965 |
|
James E. Rohr |
|
|
80,000,260 |
|
|
|
6,120,123 |
|
Louis J. Thomas |
|
|
85,589,175 |
|
|
|
531,208 |
|
Barbara S. Jeremiah |
|
|
85,625,861 |
|
|
|
494,522 |
|
Item B Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent auditors of the Company for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Votes For |
|
Number of Votes Against |
|
Number of Votes Abstained |
85,234,971
|
|
774,315
|
|
111,096 |
37
Item 6. Exhibits
|
4.1 |
|
Indenture, dated June 1, 2009, between Allegheny Technologies
Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 3, 2009
(File No. 1-12001)). |
|
|
4.2 |
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated June 1, 2009, between Allegheny
Technologies Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated
June 3, 2009 (File No. 1-12001)). |
|
|
4.3 |
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated June 2, 2009, between Allegheny
Technologies Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated
June 3, 2009 (File No. 1-12001)). |
|
|
4.4 |
|
Form of 9.375% Senior Note due 2019 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 3, 2009 (File
No. 1-12001)). |
|
|
4.5 |
|
Form of 4.25% Convertible Senior Note due 2014 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated June
3, 2009 (File No. 1-12001)). |
|
|
10.1 |
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated May 29, 2009, by and among
ATI Funding Corporation, TDY Holdings, LLC, the guarantors party thereto, the
lenders party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as administrative agent
for the lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 3, 2009 (File No. 1-12001)). |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a) (filed herewith). |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a) (filed herewith). |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (filed herewith). |
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: August 3, 2009 |
By |
/s/ Richard J. Harshman
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Harshman |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 3, 2009 |
By |
/s/ Dale G. Reid
|
|
|
|
Dale G. Reid |
|
|
|
Vice President, Controller and
Chief Accounting
Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
39
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
4.1 |
|
Indenture, dated June 1, 2009, between Allegheny Technologies
Incorporated and The Bank
of New York Mellon, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 3, 2009 (File No. 1-12001)). |
|
|
4.2 |
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated June 1, 2009, between Allegheny
Technologies Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated
June 3, 2009 (File No. 1-12001)). |
|
|
4.3 |
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated June 2, 2009, between Allegheny
Technologies Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated
June 3, 2009 (File No. 1-12001)). |
|
|
4.4 |
|
Form of 9.375% Senior Note due 2019 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 3, 2009 (File
No. 1-12001)). |
|
|
4.5 |
|
Form of 4.25% Convertible Senior Note due 2014 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated June
3, 2009 (File No. 1-12001)). |
|
|
10.1 |
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated May 29, 2009, by and among
ATI Funding Corporation, TDY Holdings, LLC, the guarantors party thereto, the
lenders party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as administrative agent
for the lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 3, 2009 (File No. 1-12001)). |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a). |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a). |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
40