10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
Commission file number: 0-21039
STRAYER EDUCATION,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
MARYLAND
|
|
52-1975978
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|
1100 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 2500, Arlington, VA
22209
(Address of principal executive offices)
REGISTRANTS TELEPHONE NUMBER INCLUDING AREA CODE:
(703) 247-2500
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE
ACT:
|
|
|
COMMON STOCK, $.01 PAR
VALUE
|
|
THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET
LLC
|
|
(Title of class)
|
|
(Name of each exchange on
which registered)
|
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE
ACT:
NONE
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act:
x
Yes
o
No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act:
o
Yes
x
No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days.
x
Yes
o
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x Large accelerated filer
|
|
o Accelerated filer
|
|
o Non-accelerated filer
|
|
o Smaller reporting company
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Securities Exchange
Act). o
Yes
x
No
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
stock held by non-affiliates (computed by reference to the price
at which the common stock was last sold) as of June 30,
2008, the last business day of the Registrants most
recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately
$2.9 billion.
The total number of shares of common stock outstanding as of
January 30, 2009 was 14,089,189.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain portions of the Registrants Definitive Proxy
Statement for its 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (which is
expected to be filed with the Commission within 120 days
after the end of the Registrants 2008 fiscal year) are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
FORM 10-K
INDEX
PART I
CAUTIONARY
NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS:
This document and the documents incorporated by reference herein
include forward-looking statements, within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), including, in particular, the
statements about our plans, strategies and prospects under the
headings Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and
Business. We have typically used the words
may, will, expect,
believe, estimate, plan,
intend and similar expressions in this document and
the documents incorporated by reference herein to identify
forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking
statements on our current views with respect to future events
and financial performance. Actual results could differ
materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to many
risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
the pace of growth of student enrollment;
|
|
|
|
our continued compliance with Title IV of the Higher
Education Act and the regulations thereunder, as well as state
regulatory requirements and accrediting agency requirements;
|
|
|
|
risks related to the timing of regulatory approvals;
|
|
|
|
competitive factors;
|
|
|
|
our ability to continue to implement our online growth strategy;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with the opening of new campuses;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with the offering of new educational programs
and adapting to other program changes;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with the acquisition of existing educational
institutions;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with the ability of our students to finance
their education in a timely manner; and
|
|
|
|
general economic and market conditions.
|
You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking
statements. You should understand that many important factors,
including those discussed under the headings
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and
Business, could cause our results to differ
materially from those expressed or suggested in any
forward-looking statements. Further information about these and
other relevant risks and uncertainties may be found in
Item 1A (Risk Factors) below and elsewhere in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. We undertake no obligation to update or revise
forward-looking statements.
1
Overview
Our company is a for-profit post-secondary education services
corporation. Our mission is to make high quality, post-secondary
education achievable and convenient for working adults in
todays economy. We work to fulfill this mission by
offering a variety of academic programs through our wholly-owned
subsidiary Strayer University, Inc., both in traditional
classroom courses and online via the Internet. Strayer
University prides itself on making post-secondary education
accessible to working adults who were previously unable to take
advantage of higher education opportunities.
Founded in 1892, Strayer University is an institution of higher
learning that offers undergraduate and graduate degree programs
in business administration, accounting, information technology,
education, and public administration at 65 physical campuses in
Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, New
Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Washington, D.C. As of
December 31, 2008, we had more than 44,000 students
enrolled in our programs. Strayer University is accredited by
the Middle States Commission on Higher Education (Middle
States), one of the six regional collegiate accrediting
agencies recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education. As
part of its program offering, the University also offers classes
online via the Internet, providing its working adult students a
flexible and convenient alternative. Strayer University, with
its online offerings, attracts students from around the country
and throughout the world.
Over the last several years, we have experienced significant
growth, primarily by expanding geographically by opening new
campuses. Since our initial public offering in 1996, we have
grown from eight campuses in one state and
Washington, D.C., to 65 campuses in 14 states and
Washington, D.C. Our mission is to serve working
adults demand for post-secondary education. We accomplish
this by opening new campuses in the promising areas in those
states in which we currently operate physical campuses, as well
as by expanding into contiguous states that exhibit strong
demand for adult education in business and information
technology programs. We have opened 51 of our campuses since the
beginning of 2001 and currently plan to open 11 new campuses in
2009, including five already opened. We have also developed a
robust online education program. Since receiving regulatory
approval to offer our degree programs online in 1997, our online
programs have experienced rapid growth, with over 32,000
students enrolled in at least one class online during the 2008
fall term. To better serve students who do not reside or work
near one of our physical campus locations, we plan to open a
second Global Online Operations Center in 2009.
In May 2001, we hired a new senior management team, made
significant investments in information technology infrastructure
to support planned growth in our online programs, and embarked
on a long term program to open new campuses in areas where there
is a strong demand for adult education. As a result of these
efforts, between 2000 and 2008 our revenues grew 23% on a
compound annual basis, as our revenues increased from
$78 million in 2000 to $396 million in 2008. During
the same period, diluted earnings per share grew at a compound
annual rate of 19% including the impact of stock-based
compensation which we began recording in 2006, as we continued
to invest heavily in our various initiatives to serve working
adult students. For more information relating to our revenues,
profits and total assets, please refer to
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Industry
Background and Outlook
The market for post-secondary education is large, growing and
highly fragmented. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics has
reported that approximately 61 million working adults in
the United States do not have more than a high school education
and approximately 32 million people have some college
experience but no degree. We believe that the demand for
post-secondary education
2
will continue to increase during the next several years as a
result of demographic, economic and social trends, including:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in demand by employers for professional and skilled
workers;
|
|
|
|
a projected 18% growth in the annual number of high school
graduates from 2.8 million in 2000 to 3.3 million in
2010;
|
|
|
|
the significant and measurable income premium attributable to
post-secondary education; and
|
|
|
|
budgetary constraints at traditional colleges and universities.
|
The adult education market is a significant and growing
component of the post-secondary education market. We believe
that the market for post-secondary adult education should
continue to increase as working adults seek additional education
to update and improve their skills. In addition, we believe that
many working adults will seek regionally accredited degree
programs that provide flexibility to accommodate the fixed
schedules and time commitments associated with their
professional, family and personal obligations.
In addition to Strayer, there are currently several hundred
not-for-profit
universities, several public companies and numerous smaller
private companies operating in the post-secondary education
market in which we operate.
Company
Strengths
We have a
117-year
operating history and a track record of providing practical and
convenient education programs for working adults. We believe the
following strengths position us to capitalize on the growing
demand for post-secondary education among working adults:
|
|
|
|
|
Consistent operating history. We have
been in continuous operation since 1892 and have demonstrated an
ability to operate consistently and grow profitably. Our
enrollment and revenue have grown each year since our initial
public offering in 1996.
|
|
|
|
Practical and diversified curricula. We
offer core curricula in stable, high-demand areas of adult
education. In order to keep pace with a changing knowledge-based
economy, we constantly strive to meet the evolving needs of our
working adult students and their employers by regularly refining
and updating our existing educational programs. Additionally, we
replicate programs that are successful in a given campus at
additional locations throughout our network of campuses. Strayer
University currently offers 91 different degree, diploma and
certificate programs, including emphases and concentrations, to
its students.
|
|
|
|
Focus on working adults pursuing degree
programs. We focus on serving working adults
who are pursuing college degrees in order to advance their
career and employment opportunities. We believe this is an
attractive market within the post-secondary education sector due
to the growing number of adult students enrolling in
post-secondary education programs and the highly motivated
nature of adult students. We consider adult students to be our
primary customers, with the various business and government
organizations that provide tuition assistance to their employees
as our secondary customers. In addition, we believe that the
structure of our curriculum, featuring associate,
bachelors and graduate-level degree programs, encourages
students to continue their education and results in extended
periods of student enrollment which positively impacts the
visibility and predictability of our future revenues.
Approximately 92% of our students were enrolled in degree
programs for the 2008 fall term.
|
|
|
|
Flexible program offerings. We maintain
flexible quarterly programs that allow working adult students to
attend classes and complete coursework on a convenient evening
and weekend schedule throughout the calendar year. Additionally,
we developed online programs to enable students to pursue a
degree partially or entirely via the Internet, thereby
increasing the convenience, accessibility and flexibility of our
educational programs. Approximately 72% of
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
our students enrolled for the 2008 fall term were taking at
least one course online. We believe that these flexible
offerings distinguish us from many traditional universities that
currently do not effectively address the special requirements of
working adults.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attractive and convenient campus
locations. Our campuses are located in
growing metropolitan areas, mostly in the Mid-Atlantic and
Southern regions where there are large populations of working
adults with demographic characteristics similar to those of our
typical students. Strayer Universitys campuses are
attractive and modern, offering conducive learning environments
in convenient locations.
|
|
|
|
Established brand name and alumni
support. With a
117-year
operating history, Strayer University is an established brand
name in post-secondary adult education, and our students and
graduates work throughout corporate America. Our alumni network
fosters additional recruitment opportunities for students.
|
|
|
|
Strong owner-oriented management
team. In connection with our recapitalization
in 2001, we developed a new growth strategy and hired a new
senior management team to implement this strategy. As described
below, under the leadership of Robert S. Silberman, our Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer, we embarked on various initiatives
to serve the working adult market by expanding our campuses and
developing an online learning platform. In addition, all of our
senior officers have made investments in Strayer through
outright share purchases, in addition to any compensatory stock
awards.
|
Company
Strategy
Our goal is to be a leading, nationwide provider of high quality
post-secondary education programs for working adults primarily
in the areas of business administration, accounting and
information technology. We have identified the following factors
as key to executing our growth strategy:
|
|
|
|
|
Maintain stable enrollment in our mature
markets. We have 37 mature campuses (those in
operation for more than three years) out of a total number of 65
campuses (including two new campuses opened for the 2009 winter
term in Augusta, Georgia and Huntsville, Alabama and three new
campuses opened for the 2009 spring term in Allentown,
Pennsylvania; Charleston, West Virginia; and Salt Lake City,
Utah). Our goal is to maintain stable campus enrollments in our
mature markets, while increasing revenues by continuing
market-based tuition increases.
|
|
|
|
Open new campuses. Our goal is to open
new campuses every year by meeting unmet demand in states in
which we currently operate physical campuses, and by expanding
into contiguous states that exhibit strong demand for adult
education in business and information technology programs. Since
our initial public offering in 1996, we have grown from eight
campuses to 65 campuses while expanding into 14 states and
Washington, D.C. The Company has opened 51 new campuses
since the beginning of 2001. These campuses are set forth in the
table below:
|
New
Campuses Opened
(since the beginning of 2001)
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Baltimore, MD (Owings Mills Campus)
|
|
|
Norfolk, VA (Chesapeake Campus)
|
|
|
Norfolk, VA (Newport News Campus)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Charlotte, NC (North Charlotte Campus)
|
|
|
Charlotte, NC (South Charlotte Campus)
|
|
|
Raleigh-Durham, NC (Cary Campus)
|
4
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Memphis, TN (Thousand Oaks Campus)
|
|
|
Nashville, TN
|
|
|
Raleigh-Durham, NC (North Raleigh Campus)
|
|
|
Philadelphia, PA (Lower Bucks Campus)
|
|
|
Philadelphia, PA (Delaware County Campus)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Greenville, SC
|
|
|
Memphis, TN (Shelby Oaks Campus)
|
|
|
Atlanta, GA (Cobb County Campus)
|
|
|
Atlanta, GA (Chamblee Campus)
|
|
|
Philadelphia, PA (King of Prussia Campus)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Tampa, FL (Tampa East Campus)
|
|
|
Tampa, FL (Tampa West Campus)
|
|
|
Greensboro, NC
|
|
|
Columbia, SC
|
|
|
Atlanta, GA (Morrow Campus)
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Wilmington, DE
|
|
|
Philadelphia, PA (Center City Campus)
|
|
|
Pittsburgh, PA (Penn Center West Campus)
|
|
|
Pittsburgh, PA (Cranberry Woods Campus)
|
|
|
Norfolk, VA (Virginia Beach Campus)
|
|
|
Atlanta, GA (Roswell Campus)
|
|
|
Charleston, SC
|
|
|
Birmingham, AL
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Louisville, KY
|
|
|
Lexington, KY
|
|
|
Orlando, FL (Maitland Campus)
|
|
|
Orlando, FL (Orlando East Campus)
|
|
|
Atlanta, GA (Douglasville Campus)
|
|
|
Cherry Hill, NJ
|
|
|
Willingboro, NJ
|
|
|
Knoxville, TN
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Charlotte, NC (Huntersville Campus)
|
|
|
Raleigh, NC (Garner Campus)
|
|
|
Atlanta, GA (Lithonia Campus)
|
|
|
Orlando, FL (Sandlake Campus)
|
|
|
Jacksonville, FL
|
|
|
Palm Beach, FL
|
|
|
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
|
|
|
Ft. Lauderdale, FL (Coral Springs Campus)
|
|
|
Savannah, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 (to date)
|
|
Augusta, GA
|
|
|
Huntsville, AL
|
|
|
Allentown, PA
|
|
|
Charleston, WV
|
|
|
Salt Lake City, UT
|
In 2009, we plan to open a total of 11 new campuses. Two of the
planned new campuses were opened in Augusta, Georgia and
Huntsville, Alabama for the 2009 winter term. Another three
5
campuses have been opened for the 2009 spring term in Allentown,
Pennsylvania; Charleston, West Virginia; and Salt Lake City,
Utah. The locations of the remaining six campuses planned for
this year will be announced after all necessary regulatory
approvals are obtained.
We continue to apply to operate in other states generally
adjacent to our current operating region and expect to pursue
approvals in those states and open campuses in favorable
demographic locations in such states as part of our multi-year
expansion plan, with our ultimate goal to become a nationwide
university.
|
|
|
|
|
Expand Online. We actively market our
online programs to students throughout the U.S. and to
international students on a global basis. Strayer has
demonstrated its success with both asynchronous (on
demand) and synchronous (real time) course
offerings that are favored by working adult students because of
their quality and convenience. We believe that the added
flexibility of being able to offer both traditional and online
courses allows us to better serve our working adult students.
Due to the convenience and flexibility of online courses,
particularly in the asynchronous format, this medium has rapidly
grown in acceptance and is expected to continue to grow. There
were over 32,000 students taking at least one online course for
the 2008 fall term. We intend to make additional investments in
our online programs to support the continued growth in this
area, including opening a second Global Online Operations Center
in Salt Lake City, Utah planned for 2009.
|
|
|
|
Develop corporate/institutional
alliances. We believe we are well positioned
to pursue significant opportunities in the large
corporate/institutional market. Our convenient evening, weekend
and online courses provide an attractive solution for the
education and training needs of employers and their employees.
We currently have employer agreements or billing arrangements of
various types with many corporations and government
organizations, including Bank of America, FedEx Inc., Northrop
Grumman, SAIC, Sodexo USA, UPS, FBI, United States Postal
Service, Verizon, Verizon Wireless and Wachovia. We are actively
working with other corporations and institutions, such as
community colleges, to increase the number of such arrangements
and to further develop existing relationships. These
relationships, once established, provide an ongoing source of
new and continuing students.
|
|
|
|
Optimize the use of stockholders
capital. We compare all uses of our capital
(including but not limited to organic growth investments,
acquisitions, share repurchases and dividends) in terms of
return on our owners capital and enhancing shareholder
value. In 2008, we repurchased approximately 600,000 shares
of our common stock and increased our annual dividend from $1.50
to $2.00 per share, effective December 2008. We periodically
evaluate opportunities to acquire other providers of
post-secondary education. Currently, we have no commitments with
regard to potential acquisitions.
|
Strayer
University
Curriculum
Strayer University offers business, information technology and
professional-oriented curricula to equip students with
specialized and practical knowledge and skills for careers in
business, industry and government. Our Academic School Deans and
Program Curriculum Committees regularly review and revise the
Universitys course offerings to improve the educational
programs and respond to competitive changes in job markets. We
regularly evaluate new programs and degrees to ensure that we
stay current with the needs of our students and their employers.
6
Strayer University offers programs in the following areas:
|
|
|
Graduate Programs
|
|
Undergraduate Programs
|
|
Master of Business Administration (M.B.A.) Degree*
Master of Education (M.Ed.) Degree
Master of Health Services Administration (M.H.S.A.) Degree
Master of Public Administration (M.P.A.) Degree
|
|
Bachelor of Science (B.S.) Degree Accounting Information Systems Economics International Business Criminal Justice (begins Spring 2009)
Bachelor of Business Administration (B.B.A.) Degree
|
Master of Science
(M.S.) Degree
Information Systems
Accounting
|
|
Associate in Arts
(A.A.) Degree
Accounting
Acquisition and Contract Management
Business Administration
Information Systems
Economics
General Studies Marketing Criminal Justice (begins Spring 2009)
|
Executive Graduate
Certificate Programs Business Administration
Information Systems
Accounting
|
|
Diploma Programs
Accounting
Acquisition and Contract Management Information Systems
|
|
|
Undergraduate
Certificate Programs
Accounting
Business Administration
Information Systems
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
In 2008, Strayer University
redesigned its Master of Business Administration program. In
doing so, Strayer University expanded its offerings with new
concentrations including International Business, Project
Management, Professional Studies (Custom Concentration),
Accounting, IS Management, Health Services Administration and
Public Administration.
|
Each undergraduate degree program includes courses in oral and
written communication skills as well as mathematics and various
disciplines in the humanities and social sciences. In addition
to our degree, diploma and certificate programs, we offer
classes to non-degree and non-program students wishing to take
courses for personal or professional enrichment.
Although all of our programs are generally offered at each
campus, the University adapts its course offerings to the
demands of the student population at each location. Strayer
University students may enroll in courses at more than one
campus and take courses online.
Strayer University structures its curricula to allow students to
advance sequentially from one learning level to another by
applying credits earned in one program toward attainment of a
more advanced degree. For example, a student originally pursuing
a diploma in computer information systems can extend his or her
original educational objective by taking additional courses
leading to an associates degree in computer information
systems, a bachelors degree in computer information
systems, and ultimately a masters degree in computer
information systems. This curriculum design provides students a
level of competency and a measure of attainment in the event
they interrupt their education or choose to work in their field
of concentration prior to obtaining their final degree.
Online
Programs
In August 1997, we began offering our programs online via the
Internet. The University offers courses and degree programs
online using both synchronous (real time) and
asynchronous (on demand) approaches to online
learning. The asynchronous format was first introduced by the
University in the summer 2001 quarter and has grown rapidly due
to increasing demand. Students may take all of their courses
online or may take online courses as a supplement to
traditional, site-based courses. A student
7
taking classes online has the same admission and financial aid
requirements, policies and procedures and receives the same
student services as other Strayer University students. Tuition
for online courses is the same as for campus courses. During the
fall 2008 quarter, Strayer University had over 32,000 students
participating in its online programs, approximately 27,300 of
whom took classes solely online.
Faculty
The University appoints faculty who hold appropriate academic
credentials, are dedicated, active professionals in their field
and are enthusiastic and committed to teaching working adults.
In accordance with our educational mission, the University
faculty focuses its efforts on teaching. The normal course load
for a full-time faculty member is four courses per quarter for
each of three quarters, or 12 courses per academic year. In
addition, the University requires full-time faculty members to
provide eight hours per week of student academic counseling and
other student support services. Further, full-time faculty
members participate actively in the life of the University
through service on curricular and assessment committees.
We provide financial support for faculty members seeking to
update their skills and knowledge. The University maintains a
tuition plan that typically reimburses full-time faculty
enrolled in advanced degree programs for 75% of the tuition for
one new course per term when taken at institutions other than
Strayer. Deans pursuing doctorate degrees may be eligible for up
to 100% tuition reimbursement. Full-time faculty (and all other
employees) receive a 90% discount for all Strayer courses. The
University also conducts annual in-house faculty workshops in
each discipline. We believe that our dedicated and capable
faculty is one of the keys to our success.
Organization
of Strayer University
The Universitys annual financial budget and overall
academic and business decisions are directed by its Board of
Trustees. The Board of Trustees consists of Dr. Charlotte
F. Beason, Chairwoman of the Board of Trustees, and 10 other
members. The University By-Laws prescribe that a majority of
voting members be unaffiliated with either University management
or Strayer Education, Inc. to assure independent oversight of
all academic programs and services. With the exception of the
University President and the Companys President, all of
our trustees are independent, non-management members. The
current Board of Trustees members are listed below:
Board of
Trustees
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Charlotte F. Beason
|
|
Dr. Beason is the Chairwoman of the Board of Trustees. She
has served as a member of the Board of Trustees since 1996. She
has extensive experience in education, distance learning, and
the accreditation of education programs. (See Item 10 below for
additional biographical information.)
|
|
|
|
Mr. Daniel R. Abbasi
|
|
Mr. Abbasi has served as a member of the Board of Trustees since
2005. He is Director of MissionPoint Capital Partners, a private
equity firm specializing in clean energy. Previously, Mr. Abbasi
was Associate Dean of the Yale School of Forestry and
Environmental Studies, where he remains affiliated. In
addition, he has also held management positions with Kaplan,
Inc., Time Warner, Inc., the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and the Stanford Center on Conflict and Negotiation. Mr.
Abbasi holds a bachelors degree in government and an MBA,
both from Harvard University. Mr. Abbasi also holds a
masters degree in political science from Stanford
University.
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Dennis H. Blumer
|
|
Mr. Blumer was elected to the Board of Trustees in 2007. He is
of counsel in the Washington, D.C. office of the law firm
of Arent Fox LLP. He is also Vice President Emeritus at The
George Washington University, where he served from 1995 until
his retirement in 2007. He has more than 40 years of
experience in higher education including previously serving as
Executive Assistant to the President of the University of
Maryland, College Park and in a similar capacity at the
University of Wisconsin. Mr. Blumer holds a bachelors
degree in history and a juris doctorate degree from Yale
University.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Roland Carey
|
|
Mr. Carey has served as a member of the Board of Trustees since
1990. He served for 23 years as a U.S. Army Officer in the
specialties of Air Defense Missile Evaluation and Military
Education. He retired in 1986 as a Lieutenant Colonel. Mr. Carey
served 12 years as a mathematics instructor and as an
Intervention Program Coordinator with Fairfax County Public
Schools. Additionally, he has served on two other organizational
management and supervisory boards. Mr. Carey holds a
bachelors degree in mathematics from Florida A&M
University and a masters degree in educational leadership
from George Mason University.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Karl McDonnell
|
|
Mr. McDonnell was elected to the Board of Trustees in 2007. Mr.
McDonnell joined Strayer Education, Inc. in July 2006 as
President and Chief Operating Officer. (See Item 10 below for
additional biographical information.)
|
|
|
|
Mr. Todd A. Milano
|
|
Mr. Milano has served as a member of the Board of Trustees since
1992 and has more than 30 years of experience in
post-secondary education. Since 1989, he has served as President
of Central Pennsylvania College near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
(See Item 10 below for additional biographical information.)
|
|
|
|
Dr. William C. Reha, MD
|
|
Dr. Reha was elected to the Board of Trustees in 2007. He
is a Board certified urologic surgeon affiliated with Potomac
Hospital in Woodbridge, Virginia. He also currently serves as
Vice-Speaker for the Medical Society of Virginia. Dr. Reha
is active in Strayer University alumni affairs and is the 2005
Outstanding Alumni Award winner. He holds a bachelors
degree in biochemistry from Binghamton University, an M.D. from
New York Medical College, and an MBA from Strayer University.
|
|
|
|
Dr. Peter D. Salins
|
|
Dr. Salins has served as a member of the Board of Trustees
since 2002. Having served as Provost and Vice Chancellor for
Academic Affairs of the State University of New York (SUNY)
system from 1997 to 2006, he is currently University Professor
of Political Science at SUNYs Stony Brook University.
Dr. Salins also serves on the Advisory Board of Syracuse
University School of Architecture, is a Trustee of the
Lavanburg Foundation, and is a Director of the
Citizens Housing and Planning Council of New York.
Dr. Salins holds a bachelors degree in architecture,
and a doctorate in metropolitan studies and regional planning,
both from Syracuse University.
|
|
|
|
Dr. Sondra F. Stallard
|
|
Dr. Stallard was elected to the Board of Trustees in 2007
shortly after joining Strayer University as University
President. Prior to joining Strayer, Dr. Stallard had a
long and distinguished career at the University of Virginia.
(See Item 10 below for additional biographical information.)
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Donald R. Stoddard*
|
|
Dr. Stoddard has served as a member of the Board of
Trustees since 1996. He served as President of Strayer
University from 1997 to 2002. His background includes serving in
the United States Army, university teaching with a specialty in
American literature, higher education administration, a
Fulbright Lectureship in Romania, and authoring many articles on
literary topics. Dr. Stoddard holds a bachelors
degree in business administration and a masters degree in
English, both from Northeastern University. He also holds a
doctorate in English from the University of Pennsylvania.
|
|
|
|
Dr. J. Chris Toe*
|
|
Dr. Toe has served as a member of the Board of Trustees
since 2003. He served as President of Strayer University from
2003 to April 2006. Dr. Toe now serves as the Minister of
Agriculture for the Republic of Liberia. Dr. Toe holds a
bachelors degree in economics from the University of
Liberia, and a masters degree in agricultural economics
and a doctorate in economics, both from Texas Tech University.
|
Within the academic, strategic and financial parameters set by
the Board of Trustees, the University is managed on a daily
basis by the University President. The President is charged with
the responsibility of overseeing the implementation of the
policies established by the Board of Trustees and is supported
in this function by senior administrative officers, including
the Provost. The majority of the Universitys operations
are centralized within the Presidents office or the
Universitys senior administrative staff offices, such as
faculty development, curriculum development, institutional
research and assessments, and library administration, student
records, student affairs, accounting and auditing, human
resources, operations, marketing, public relations, facilities,
information technology, and regulatory compliance, including
oversight of the Universitys participation in federal
financial aid programs.
Within this centralized structure is a division of
responsibilities into two broad categories: academics and
administrative operations. For the academic functions, the
President is supported by the Provost and the deans of schools,
and oversees a group of senior administrative deans including
the Dean of Student Affairs, the Director of Libraries, and the
Dean of Institutional Research, Assessment, and Evaluation. The
President is also responsible for the general curriculum,
University policies, as well as many regulatory compliance
matters and student affairs. The Provost is responsible for
implementing academic policies and programs of the University,
including the supervision of the Academic Deans, Director of
Programs and the Dean of Academic Development and Training.
On administrative operations, the Senior Vice
President Academic Administration works closely with
the Regional Directors, who are responsible for ensuring that
campus and online operations meet the annual University budget
and financial goals established by the Board of Trustees, and
the Regional Deans, who are responsible for academic operations
on a local level. Other senior administrative officers also
support the President in areas such as legal compliance,
accounting and auditing, computer technology, insurance and
human resources.
University
Senior Management
Dr. Sondra F. Stallard University
President
Dr. Joel O. Nwagbaraocha Provost and
Chief Academic Officer
Randi Reich Cosentino Senior Vice
President Academic Administration
Biographical information regarding the above senior members of
University management is set forth in Item 10 below.
10
Similarly, at the campus level, the
day-to-day
business operations are managed by a Campus Director and the
academic functions are overseen by a Campus Dean. Each campus is
staffed with personnel performing instructional, admissions,
academic advising, financial aid, student services and career
development functions. A learning resource center at each campus
supports the Universitys instructional programs. Each
learning resource center contains a library and computer
laboratories and is operated by a full-time manager and support
staff who assist students in the use of research resources.
Strayer
Education, Inc. Executive Officers
For a description of Strayer Education, Inc.s senior
management, see the biographical information set forth in
Item 10 below.
Marketing
To generate interest among potential students, we engage in a
broad range of activities to inform the working adult public and
their employers about the programs we offer. These activities
include direct mail, Internet marketing, marketing to our
existing students and graduates, print and broadcast
advertising, student referrals, and corporate and government
outreach activities. Direct response methods (direct mail and
Internet advertising) are used to generate inquiries from
potential students. Strayer University maintains booths and
information tables at appropriate conferences and expos, as well
as at transfer days at community colleges. Through our
business-to-business
outreach efforts, we market our programs to corporations with
personal sales calls, distribution of information through
corporate intranets and human resource departments and
on-site
information meetings. We implement a continuous marketing
strategy to record inquiries in our database and track them
through to application and registration. Additionally, we market
information about new programs and new locations to students and
alumni to encourage them to return for further education.
Student
Profile
The majority of Strayer University students are working adults
completing their first college degree to improve their job
skills and advance their careers. Of the students enrolled in
Strayer Universitys programs at the beginning of the 2008
fall quarter, approximately 60% were age 31 or older and
approximately 82% were engaged in part-time study (fewer than
three courses each quarter). In the 2008 fall quarter, our
students registered for an average of 8.2 course credits (about
two classes per student).
Strayer University has a very diverse student population. At the
beginning of the 2008 fall quarter, approximately 71% of
students were minorities and approximately 67% of students were
women. Approximately 3% of the Universitys students were
international, and approximately 3% were active duty military
personnel. Strayer University prides itself on making
post-secondary education accessible to working adults who missed
or were previously unable to take advantage of educational
opportunities.
11
The following is a breakdown of our students by program level as
of the 2008 fall term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
Program
|
|
students
|
|
|
total students
|
|
|
Bachelors
|
|
|
24,273
|
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
Masters
|
|
|
12,169
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
Associate
|
|
|
4,726
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Degree
|
|
|
41,168
|
|
|
|
92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diploma
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Undergraduate Certificate
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Graduate Certificate
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Undeclared
|
|
|
2,716
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Degree
|
|
|
3,396
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Students
|
|
|
44,564
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Represents less than 1%.
|
Our business is seasonal and as a result, our quarterly results
of operations tend to vary within a year due to student
enrollment patterns. Enrollment generally is highest in the
fourth quarter, or fall term, and lowest in the third quarter,
or summer term.
Student
Admissions
Students attending Strayer Universitys undergraduate
programs must possess a high school diploma or a General
Educational Development (GED) Certificate. Students attending
Strayer Universitys graduate programs must have a
bachelors degree from an accredited institution and meet
certain other requirements. If a students undergraduate
major varies widely from the students proposed graduate
course of study, certain undergraduate prerequisite courses may
also be necessary for admission. To maximize undergraduate
students chances for academic success and to ensure they
receive the support they need, Strayer University evaluates
incoming students proficiency in fundamental English and
math prior to the first quarters registration.
International students applying for admission must meet the same
admission requirements as other students. Those students whose
native language is not English must provide evidence that they
are able to use the English language with sufficient facility to
perform college-level work in an English-speaking institution.
Tuition
and Fees
Strayer charges tuition by the course. Each course is 4.5 credit
hours. As of January 1, 2009, undergraduate full-time
students are charged $1,435 per course. Undergraduate part-time
students are charged $1,510 per course. Students in graduate
programs are charged at the rate of $1,945 per course.
Accordingly, a full-time student seeking to obtain a
bachelors degree in four years currently would pay
approximately $14,000 per year in tuition. Strayer University
implemented a tuition price increase of approximately 5% per
course effective January 1, 2009, which is reflected in the
above tuition rates. Under a variety of different programs,
Strayer University offers scholarships and tuition discounts to
active duty military students and in connection with various
corporate and government sponsorship and tuition reimbursement
arrangements.
Career
Development Services
Although most of Strayer Universitys students are already
employed, the University actively assists its students and
alumni with job placement and other career-related matters
through career development offices in each region where the
University has campuses. Strayers career development
12
personnel conduct workshops on employment-related topics
(including resume preparation, interviewing techniques and job
search strategies), maintain job listings, arrange campus
interviews by employers and provide other placement assistance.
Strayer University sponsors career fairs in the fall and spring
quarters for students and alumni to discuss career opportunities
with companies and governmental agencies.
We regularly conduct alumni surveys to monitor the career
progression of our graduates and to support outcome assessment
efforts required by Middle States and state regulators.
Employees
As of December 31, 2008, Strayer University employed 2,407
faculty members, of whom 184 were full-time and approximately
2,223 were part-time. Full-time faculty members teach on average
4-5 courses per quarter compared to adjunct faculty who normally
teach 1-2 courses per quarter (not all part-time faculty teach
every quarter). The University also employed 1,456 non-faculty
staff in information systems, financial aid, recruitment and
admissions, student administration, marketing and human
resources, corporate accounting and other administrative
functions. Of the Universitys non-faculty staff, 1,304
were employed full-time and 152 were employed part-time.
Intellectual
Property
In the ordinary course of its business, Strayer develops many
kinds of intellectual property that are or will be the subject
of copyright, trademark, service mark, patent, trade secret or
other protections. Such intellectual property includes
Strayers courseware materials for classes taught via the
Internet or other distance-learning means and business know-how
and internal processes and procedures developed to respond to
the requirements of its operations and various education
regulatory agencies. Strayer also claims rights to the mark
STRAYER for educational services and has obtained
federal registration of the mark.
Regulation
Regulatory
Environment
The Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (the Higher
Education Act), and the regulations promulgated thereunder
require all higher education institutions that participate in
the various financial aid programs under Title IV of the
Higher Education Act (Title IV programs),
including Strayer University, both to comply with detailed
substantive and reporting requirements and to undergo periodic
regulatory scrutiny. The Higher Education Act mandates specific
regulatory responsibility for each of the following components
of the higher education regulatory triad: (1) the federal
government through the U.S. Department of Education
(Department of Education); (2) the
institutional accrediting agencies recognized by the
U.S. Secretary of Education (Secretary of
Education) and (3) state education regulatory bodies.
The regulations, standards and policies of these regulatory
agencies are subject to frequent change.
Accreditation
Strayer University has been institutionally accredited since
1981 by Middle States, a regional accrediting agency recognized
by the Secretary of Education. Strayer University is accredited
by Middle States through 2017. Accreditation is a system for
recognizing educational institutions and their programs for
integrity, educational quality, faculty, physical resources,
administrative capability and financial stability that signifies
that they merit the confidence of the educational community and
the public. In the United States, this recognition comes
primarily through private voluntary associations of institutions
and programs of higher education. These associations establish
criteria for accreditation, conduct peer-review evaluations of
institutions and programs, and publicly designate those
institutions that meet their standards. Accredited schools are
subject to periodic review by accrediting bodies to
13
determine whether such schools maintain the performance,
integrity and quality required for accreditation.
Middle States accredits degree-granting public and private
colleges and universities in its region (including Delaware,
Washington, D.C., Maryland, New Jersey, New York,
Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands),
including distance education programs offered by those
institutions. Accreditation by Middle States is an important
attribute of Strayer University. Colleges and universities
depend on accreditation in evaluating transfers of credit and
applications to graduate schools. Employers rely on the
accredited status of institutions when evaluating a
candidates credentials, and students and corporate and
government sponsors under tuition reimbursement programs look to
accreditation for assurance that an institution maintains
quality educational standards. Moreover, institutional
accreditation is necessary to qualify for eligibility to
participate in federal student financial assistance programs.
As with all its regulatory relationships, Strayer University
strives to maintain close contact with, and to provide frequent
status updates to, Middle States. This regular contact keeps
Middle States informed of the Universitys planned
activities and aims to ensure that the Universitys
performance continues to meet Middle States expectations.
To this end, Strayer University is committed to evaluating
periodically its own performance, submitting reports to Middle
States and making any necessary improvements to continue meeting
Middle States accreditation standards as the University
grows and expands geographically. If an institutions
performance were ever not to meet its accrediting agencys
(or other regulators) expectations or failed to meet
applicable standards, then its operations could be conditioned,
or severely constrained or even curtailed, depending on the
severity of the non-compliance. Accordingly, Strayer University
endeavors to proactively keep Middle States (and all of its
other regulators) fully informed and satisfied with its
performance and strives to maintain good regulatory
relationships as a key University priority.
In 2006, Strayer University completed a comprehensive self study
report, which was submitted to Middle States to support Strayer
Universitys request for early reaffirmation of
accreditation prior to Middle States next scheduled
accreditation review in 2011. The Companys objective is to
provide a high quality post-secondary education to working adult
students, and participation in academic peer review processes is
an important way to help it meet that objective. Middle States
reviewed Strayer Universitys report and on June 28,
2007, reaffirmed Strayer Universitys accreditation for
10 years through 2017. All of Strayer Universitys new
campus locations require Middle States approval before students
are enrolled.
In 2000, the agencies that accredit higher education
institutions in various regions of the United States adopted a
Policy Statement on Evaluation of Institutions Operating
Interregionally. Under that policy, both the
home regional accreditor and the host
regional accreditor cooperate to evaluate an institution that
delivers education at a physical site in the host
accreditors region. Although the home region is solely
responsible for final accreditation actions, as we open campuses
in regions outside Middle States region, the host regional
accreditors may elect to participate in the accreditation
process of such expansion operations.
State
Education Licensure
We are authorized to offer our programs, including those offered
through Strayer University Online, by the applicable educational
regulatory agencies in all states where our campuses and Strayer
University Online facilities are located. We are dependent upon
the authorization of each state where we are physically located
to allow us to operate and to grant degrees or diplomas to
students in those states. We are subject to extensive regulation
in each of the 15 jurisdictions (Alabama, Delaware, Florida,
Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, West
Virginia and Washington, D.C.) in which we currently
maintain or are authorized to maintain campuses and in which we
are authorized to offer educational programs, and we will be
subject to similar extensive regulation in those additional
states in which we may expand
14
our operations in the future. State laws and regulations affect
our operations and may limit our ability to introduce
educational programs or establish new campuses. We are required
by the Higher Education Act to maintain appropriate state
education licensure in each state where we maintain a campus
that participates in Title IV programs.
The increasing popularity and use of the Internet and other
online services for the delivery of education has led and may
lead to the adoption of new laws and regulatory practices in the
United States or foreign countries or to interpretation of the
application of existing laws and regulations to such services.
These new laws and interpretations may relate to issues such as
the requirement that online education institutions be licensed
as a school in one or more jurisdictions even where they have no
physical location. New laws, regulations, or interpretations
related to doing business over the Internet could increase
Strayer Universitys cost of doing business, affect its
ability to increase enrollments and revenues, or otherwise have
a material adverse effect on our business.
Other
Approvals
We are approved by appropriate authorities for the education of
veterans and members of the selective reserve and their
dependents, as well as for the rehabilitation of veterans. In
addition, we are authorized by the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security to admit foreign students for study in the
United States subject to applicable requirements. The
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, working with the
U.S. Department of State, has implemented a mandatory
electronic reporting system for schools that enroll foreign
students and exchange visitors.
Financing
Student Education
Students finance their Strayer University education in a variety
of ways. A significant number of students borrow money from
banks through a federally guaranteed loan or receive loans
directly from the Department of Education. In the 2008 fall
term, approximately 66% of Strayer Universitys students
participated in one or more Title IV programs. In addition,
many of our working adult students finance their own education
or receive full or partial tuition reimbursement from their
employers. Congress has enacted several tax credits for students
pursuing higher education and has provided for a tax deduction
for interest on student loans and exclusions from income of
certain tuition reimbursement amounts.
Many financial aid programs are designed to assist eligible
students whose financial resources are inadequate to meet the
cost of education. With these programs, financial aid is awarded
on the basis of financial need, generally defined under the
Higher Education Act as the difference between the cost of
attending a program of study and the amount a student reasonably
can be expected to contribute to those expenses. All recipients
of financial aid must maintain a satisfactory grade point
average and progress in a timely manner toward completion of a
program of study.
Title IV
Programs
Strayer University maintains eligibility for its students to
participate in the following Title IV programs:
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Pell Grants. Grants under the Federal
Pell Grant (Pell) program are available to eligible
students based on financial need and other factors.
|
|
|
|
Campus-Based Programs. The
campus-based Title IV programs include the
Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant program and
the Federal Perkins Loan (Perkins) program.
|
|
|
|
Federal Family Education Loans. Pursuant to
the Federal Family Education Loan Program (the FFEL
Program), which currently includes the Federal Stafford
Loan (Stafford) program, the Federal Parent Loan for
Undergraduate Students (PLUS) program, and the
Federal Consolidation Loan Program, students and their parents
can obtain from lending
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
institutions subsidized and unsubsidized student loans, which
are guaranteed by a guaranty agency and ultimately by the
federal government. Students who demonstrate financial need may
qualify for a subsidized Stafford loan. With a subsidized
Stafford loan, the federal government will pay the interest on
the loan while the student is in school and during any approved
periods of deferment, until the students obligation to
repay the loan begins. Unsubsidized Stafford loans are available
to students who do not qualify for a subsidized Stafford loan
or, in some cases, in addition to a subsidized Stafford loan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Direct Student Loans. Under the
William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program (the Direct
Loan Program), the Department of Education makes loans
directly to students rather than guaranteeing loans made by
lending institutions.
|
Return
of Federal Funds
Under the Higher Education Acts
return-of-funds
provision, an institution must return in a timely manner
Title IV funds to programs from which a student who
withdraws received aid that he or she did not earn due to such
withdrawal. The institution must first determine the amount of
Title IV program funds that the student earned.
If the student withdraws during the first 60% of any period of
enrollment or payment period, the amount of Title IV
program funds that the student earned is equal to a pro rata
portion of the funds for which the student would otherwise be
eligible. If the student withdraws after the 60% point, then the
student has earned 100% of the Title IV program funds. The
institution must return to the appropriate Title IV
programs, in a specified order and excluding the Federal
Work-Study Program, the lesser of the unearned Title IV
program funds or the institutional charges incurred by the
student for the period multiplied by the percentage of unearned
Title IV program funds. An institution must return the
funds no later than 45 days after the date of the
institutions determination that a student withdrew. If
such payments are not made in a timely manner, an institution
may be subject to adverse action, including being required to
submit a letter of credit equal to 25% of the refunds the
institution should have made in its most recently completed
fiscal year. Under Department of Education regulations, if late
returns of Title IV program funds constitute 5% or more of
students sampled in the institutions annual compliance
audit for either of its two most recently completed fiscal
years, an institution generally must submit an irrevocable
letter of credit payable to the Secretary of Education. In June
2008, the University issued the Department of Education an
irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $1.4 million,
which expires in June 2009, in connection with this regulation.
Other
Financial Aid Programs
Eligible students at Strayer University may also participate in
educational assistance programs administered by the
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the
U.S. Department of Defense, the District of Columbia, the
State of Pennsylvania, and private organizations.
Financial
Aid Regulation
To be eligible to participate in Title IV programs, Strayer
University must comply with specific standards and procedures
set forth in the Higher Education Act and the regulations issued
thereunder by the Department of Education. An institution must,
among other things, be authorized by each state within which it
is physically located to offer its educational programs and
maintain institutional accreditation by a recognized accrediting
agency. The institution also must be certified by the Department
of Education to participate in Title IV programs, based on
a determination that, among other things, the institution meets
certain standards of administrative capability and financial
responsibility. For purposes of the Title IV programs,
Strayer University and all of its campuses are considered to be
a single institution of higher education so that
Department of Education requirements applicable to an
institution of higher education are generally
applied to all of Strayer Universitys campuses in the
aggregate rather than on an individual basis. Strayer University
and each of its campuses are currently certified to participate
in Title IV programs.
16
Congress reauthorizes the Higher Education Act approximately
every five to six years. On July 31, 2008, Congress
completed the reauthorization process by passing the Higher
Education Opportunity Act or HEOA, which President Bush signed
into law on August 14, 2008. HEOA provisions are effective
upon enactment, unless otherwise specified in the law. In
addition to HEOA, three other laws to amend and reauthorize
aspects of the Higher Education Act have been enacted. In
February 2006, President Bush signed the Deficit Reduction Act
of 2005, which includes the Higher Education Reconciliation Act
of 2005, or HERA. Among other measures, HERA reauthorized the
Higher Education Act with respect to the federal guaranteed
student loan programs. In September 2007, President Bush signed
the College Cost Reduction and Access Act, which increased
benefits to students under the Title IV programs and
reduced payments to and raised costs for lenders that
participate in the federal student loan programs. In May 2008,
President Bush signed the Ensuring Continued Access to Student
Loans Act of 2008, or ECASLA, which was designed to facilitate
student loan availability and to increase student access to
federal financial aid in light of current market conditions.
Congress recently extended ECASLA for an additional year, to
June 30, 2010.
HEOA includes numerous new and revised requirements for higher
education institutions. The Department of Education has stated
that affected parties are responsible for taking steps to comply
with HEOA by the effective dates established in HEOA, even
though the Department of Education has yet to issue regulations
to implement HEOAs provisions. The Department of Education
has started the process for development of regulations to
implement HEOA changes to Title IV of the Higher Education
Act. We cannot predict how the Department of Education will
interpret HEOAs provisions through rulemaking or otherwise.
In addition, Congress reviews and determines appropriations for
Title IV programs on an annual basis. An elimination of
certain Title IV programs, a reduction in federal funding
levels of such programs, material changes in the requirements
for participation in such programs, or the substitution of
materially different programs could reduce the ability of
certain students to finance their education. This, in turn,
could lead to lower enrollments at Strayer University or require
Strayer University to increase its reliance upon alternative
sources of student financial aid. Given the significant
percentage of Strayer Universitys revenues that are
derived indirectly from the Title IV programs, the loss of
or a significant reduction in Title IV program funds
available to Strayer Universitys students could have a
material adverse effect on Strayer.
The regulations applicable to Strayer University have been
subject to frequent revisions, many of which have increased the
level of scrutiny to which higher education institutions are
subjected and have raised applicable standards. If Strayer
University were not to continue to comply with such regulations,
such non-compliance might affect the operations of the
University and its ability to participate in Title IV
programs.
Certain elements of the regulations applicable to Strayer
University are described below.
Administrative
Capability
Department of Education regulations specify extensive criteria
by which an institution must establish that it has the requisite
administrative capability to participate in
Title IV programs. To meet the administrative capability
standards, an institution, among other things, must comply with
all applicable Title IV program regulations, must not have
cohort default rates above specified levels, must have various
procedures in place for safeguarding federal funds, must not be,
and not have any principal or affiliate who is, debarred or
suspended from federal contracting or engaging in activity that
is cause for debarment or suspension, must submit in a timely
manner all reports and financial statements required by the
regulations and must not otherwise appear to lack administrative
capability.
Provisional
Certification
In certain circumstances, including a change in ownership
resulting in a change of control, the Department of Education
may certify an institutions continuing eligibility to
participate in Title IV
17
programs on a provisional basis that may extend no longer than
through the end of the third complete award year (July
1 June 30) from the date of provisional
certification. During the period of provisional certification,
the institution must comply with any additional conditions
included in its program participation agreement. If the
Department of Education determines that a provisionally
certified institution is unable to meet its responsibilities
under its program participation agreement, it may seek to revoke
or further condition the institutions certification to
participate in Title IV programs with fewer due process
protections for the institution than if it were fully certified.
Strayer Universitys current program participation
agreement is not provisional and does not expire until
September 30, 2010, assuming compliance with its terms.
Third
Party Servicers
Department of Education regulations permit an institution to
enter into a written contract with a third-party servicer for
the administration of any aspect of the institutions
participation in Title IV programs. The third-party
servicer must, among other obligations, comply with
Title IV requirements and be jointly and severally liable
with the institution to the Secretary of Education for any
violation by the servicer of any Title IV provision. An
institution must report to the Department of Education new
contracts or any significant modifications to contracts with
third-party servicers as well as other matters related to
third-party servicers. Strayer University has written contracts
with three third-party servicers: Global Financial Aid Services,
Inc., Post-secondary Education Assistance Corporation, and
Financial Aid Management for Education, Inc. The servicers each
perform activities related to Strayer Universitys
participation in Title IV programs, such as certifying FFEL
Program loan applications, preparing reports from Strayer
University to the Department of Education, issuing payments for
the Pell and campus-based programs and issuing and collecting
Perkins loans. Because Strayer University is jointly and
severally liable to the Department of Education for the actions
of third-party servicers, failure of such servicers to comply
with applicable regulations could have a material adverse effect
on Strayer University.
Financial
Responsibility
The Higher Education Act and Department of Education regulations
establish extensive standards of financial responsibility that
institutions such as Strayer University must satisfy in order to
participate in Title IV programs. These standards generally
require that an institution provide the services described in
its official publications and statements, properly administer
the Title IV programs in which it participates and meet all
of its financial obligations, including required refunds and any
repayments to the Department of Education for debts and
liabilities incurred in programs administered by the Department
of Education.
Department of Education standards utilize a complex formula to
assess financial responsibility. The standards focus on three
financial ratios: (1) equity ratio (which measures the
institutions capital resources and ability to borrow);
(2) primary reserve ratio (which measures the
institutions financial viability and liquidity) and
(3) net income ratio (which measures the institutions
ability to operate at a profit or within its means). An
institutions financial ratios must yield a composite score
of at least 1.5 for the institution to be deemed financially
responsible without the need for further federal oversight.
Strayer University has applied the financial responsibility
standards to its audited financial statements as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2007 and calculated a composite
score of 3.0, the highest score available. Based on its
composite score and other relevant factors, Strayer believes
that Strayer University meets the Department of Educations
financial responsibility standards.
Student
Loan Defaults
Under the Higher Education Act, an educational institution may
lose its eligibility to participate in some or all of the
Title IV programs if defaults on the repayment of FFEL
Program or Direct Loan Program loans by its students exceed
certain levels. For each federal fiscal year, a rate of student
defaults (known as a cohort default rate) is
calculated for each institution with 30 or more borrowers
18
entering repayment in a given federal fiscal year by determining
the rate at which borrowers who become subject to their
repayment obligation in that federal fiscal year default by the
end of the following federal fiscal year. For such institutions,
the Department of Education calculates a single cohort default
rate for each federal fiscal year that includes in the cohort
all current or former student borrowers at the institution who
entered repayment on any FFEL Program or Direct Loan Program
loan during that year.
Under applicable regulations, if the Department of Education
notifies an institution that its three most recent cohort
default rates are each 25% or greater, the institutions
participation in the FFEL Program, Direct Loan Program and
Federal Pell Grant Program ends 30 days after the
notification, unless the institution timely appeals that
determination on specified grounds and according to specified
procedures. An institutions participation in the FFEL
Program and Direct Loan Program ends 30 days after
notification that its most recent cohort default rate is greater
than 40%, unless the institution timely appeals that
determination on specified grounds and according to specified
procedures. An institution whose participation ends under these
provisions may not participate in the relevant programs for the
remainder of the fiscal year in which the institution receives
the notification, as well as for the next two fiscal years. The
regulations also address cohort default rates for institutions
that have undergone a change in status, such as acquisition or
merger of institutions and acquisition of another
institutions branches or locations.
Under certain circumstances, the Department of Education may
decide to place an institution on provisional certification if
the institutions cohort default rate equals or exceeds 25%
in any of the three most recent federal fiscal years.
Provisional certification does not limit an institutions
access to Title IV program funds; however, an institution
with provisional status is subject to closer review by the
Department of Education and may be subject to summary adverse
action if it violates Title IV program requirements.
Strayer Universitys cohort default rates on FFEL Program
loans for the 2004, 2005, and 2006 federal fiscal years, the
three most recent years for which this information is available,
were 4.5%, 3.9%, and 3.8%, respectively. The average cohort
default rates for proprietary institutions nationally were 8.6%,
8.2%, and 9.7% in federal fiscal years 2004, 2005, and 2006,
respectively.
HEOA modified the Higher Education Acts cohort default
rate provisions related to FFEL Program and Direct Loan Program
loans. Beginning with cohort default rate calculations for
federal fiscal year 2009, the cohort default rate will be
calculated by determining the rate at which borrowers who become
subject to their repayment obligation in the relevant federal
fiscal year default by the end of the second federal fiscal year
following that fiscal year. The current method of calculating
rates will remain in effect and will be used to determine
institutional eligibility until three consecutive years of
cohort default rates calculated under the new formula are
available. In addition, effective as of federal fiscal year
2012, the cohort default rate threshold of 25% will be increased
to 30%. An institution whose cohort default rate is equal to or
greater than 30% for each of the three most recent federal
fiscal years for which data are available will be ineligible to
participate in the Title IV programs. If an
institutions cohort default rate is 30% or more in a given
fiscal year, the institution will be required to assemble a
default prevention task force and submit to the
Department of Education a default improvement plan. Institutions
that exceed 30% for two consecutive years will be required to
review, revise and resubmit their default improvement plans, and
the Department of Education may direct that such plan be amended
to include actions, with measurable objectives, that it
determines will promote loan repayment. An institution whose
cohort default rate is 30% or more for any two consecutive
federal fiscal years may file an appeal to demonstrate
exceptional mitigating circumstances and, if the Secretary of
Education determines that the institution demonstrated such
circumstances, the Secretary may not subject the institution to
provisional certification based solely on the institutions
cohort default rate.
19
The
90/10 Rule
A requirement of the Higher Education Act, commonly referred to
as the 90/10 Rule, applies only to proprietary
institutions of higher education, which includes Strayer
University. Under the Higher Education Act, a proprietary
institution is prohibited from deriving, on a cash accounting
basis, more than 90% of its revenues for any fiscal year from
Title IV funds. Prior to enactment of HEOA, an institution
that violated the rule became ineligible to participate in
Title IV programs as of the first day of the fiscal year
following the fiscal year in which it exceeded 90%, and it was
unable to apply to regain its eligibility until the next fiscal
year. HEOA changed the 90/10 Rule from an eligibility
requirement to a compliance obligation that is part of an
institutions program participation agreement with the
Department of Education. Under HEOA, a proprietary institution
of higher education that violates the 90/10 Rule for any fiscal
year will be placed on provisional status for two fiscal years.
Proprietary institutions of higher education that violate the
90/10 Rule for two consecutive fiscal years will become
ineligible to participate in Title IV programs for at least
two fiscal years and will be required to demonstrate compliance
with Title IV eligibility and certification requirements
for at least two fiscal years prior to resuming Title IV
program participation. HEOA also generally codifies the formula
for 90/10 Rule calculations as set forth in current Department
of Education regulations, but also expands on the Department of
Educations formula in certain respects, including by
broadening the categories of funds that may be counted as
revenue for 90/10 Rule purposes. HEOAs changes to the
90/10 Rule are effective upon enactment, which occurred on
August 14, 2008. Using the formula in effect prior to
enactment of HEOA, Strayer University derived approximately 72%
of its cash-basis revenues from eligible programs in 2007
compared to 72% in 2006 and 71% in 2005.
Incentive
Compensation
As a part of an institutions program participation
agreement with the Department of Education and in accordance
with the Higher Education Act, the institution may not provide
any commission, bonus or other incentive payment based directly
or indirectly on success in securing enrollments or financial
aid to any person or entity engaged in any student recruitment,
admissions or financial aid awarding activity. Department of
Education regulations set forth 12 safe harbors,
which describe payments or arrangements that do not violate the
incentive payment rule. Failure to comply with the incentive
payment rule could result in loss of certification to
participate in federal student financial aid programs,
limitations on participation in the federal student financial
aid programs, or financial penalties. Although there can be no
assurance that the Department of Education would not find
deficiencies in Strayer Universitys present or former
employee compensation and third-party contractual arrangements,
Strayer University believes that its employee compensation and
third-party contractual arrangements comply with the incentive
compensation provisions of the Higher Education Act in all
material respects.
Compliance
Reviews
Strayer University is subject to announced and unannounced
compliance reviews and audits by various external agencies,
including the Department of Education, its Office of Inspector
General, state licensing agencies, guaranty agencies and
accrediting agencies. The Higher Education Act and Department of
Education regulations also require an institution to submit
annually to the Secretary of Education a compliance audit of its
administration of the Title IV programs conducted by an
independent certified public accountant in accordance with
Government Auditing Standards and applicable audit guides of the
Department of Educations Office of Inspector General. In
addition, to enable the Secretary of Education to make a
determination of financial responsibility, an institution must
submit annually to the Secretary of Education audited financial
statements prepared in accordance with Department of Education
regulations.
In 2008, the Department of Education conducted a regular,
periodic program review of Strayer University to assure
compliance with all requirements of the Title IV programs.
The program review
20
was in addition to the annual Title IV compliance audit.
There were no material findings resulting from the program
review, which has now been completed.
Potential
Effect of Regulatory Violations
If Strayer University fails to comply with the regulatory
standards governing Title IV programs, the Department of
Education could impose one or more sanctions, including
transferring Strayer University from the advance payment method
to the reimbursement or cash monitoring system of payment,
seeking to require repayment of certain Title IV funds,
requiring the University to post a letter of credit in favor of
the Department of Education as a condition for continued
Title IV certification, taking emergency action against the
University, referring the matter for criminal prosecution or
initiating proceedings to impose a fine or to limit, condition,
suspend or terminate Strayer Universitys participation in
Title IV programs. In addition, agencies that guarantee
FFEL Program loans for Strayer University students could
initiate proceedings to limit, suspend or terminate Strayer
Universitys eligibility to provide guaranteed student
loans in the event of certain regulatory violations. Although
there are no such sanctions currently in force, and Strayer
University does not believe any such sanctions or proceedings
are presently contemplated, if such sanctions or proceedings
were imposed against Strayer University and resulted in a
substantial curtailment, or termination, of the
Universitys participation in Title IV programs,
Strayer University would be materially and adversely affected.
If Strayer University lost its eligibility to participate in
Title IV programs, or if Congress reduced the amount of
available federal student financial aid, the University would
seek to arrange or provide alternative sources of revenue or
financial aid for students. Although the University believes
that one or more private organizations would be willing to
provide financial assistance to students attending Strayer
University, there is no assurance that this would be the case,
and the interest rate and other terms of such student financial
aid are unlikely to be as favorable as those for Title IV
program funds. Strayer University might be required to guarantee
all or part of such alternative assistance or might incur other
additional costs in connection with securing alternative sources
of financial aid. Accordingly, the loss of eligibility of
Strayer University to participate in Title IV programs, or
a reduction in the amount of available federal student financial
aid, would be expected to have a material adverse effect on
Strayer University even if it could arrange or provide
alternative sources of revenue or student financial aid.
In addition to the actions that may be brought against us as a
result of our participation in Title IV programs, we also
may be subject, from time to time, to complaints and lawsuits
relating to regulatory compliance brought not only by our
regulatory agencies, but also by other government agencies and
third parties.
Restrictions
on Adding Locations and Educational Programs
State requirements and accrediting agency standards limit the
ability of Strayer University to establish additional locations
and programs. Most states require approval before institutions
can add new programs, campuses or teaching locations. Middle
States requires institutions that it accredits to notify it in
advance of implementing new programs or locations, which may
require additional approval. At its discretion, Middle States
may also conduct site visits to additional locations to ensure
that accredited institutions that experience rapid growth in the
number of additional locations maintain educational quality. All
new Strayer University campus locations require Middle States
approval before students are enrolled (see
Accreditation, above). In addition, recent
amendments to the Higher Education Act require Middle States to
monitor institutions that are undergoing significant enrollment
growth.
The Higher Education Act requires proprietary institutions of
higher education to be in full operation for two years before
qualifying to participate in Title IV programs. However,
the applicable regulations in many circumstances permit an
institution that is already qualified to participate in
21
Title IV programs to establish additional locations that
are exempt from the two-year rule. Such additional locations
generally may qualify immediately for participation in the
Title IV programs, unless the location was acquired from
another institution that has ceased offering educational
programs at that location and has Title IV liabilities that
it is not repaying in accordance with an agreement to do so, and
the acquiring institution does not agree, among other matters,
to be responsible for certain liabilities of the acquired
institution. The new location must satisfy all other applicable
requirements for institutional eligibility, including approval
of the additional location by the relevant state authorizing
agency and the institutions accrediting agency. Strayer
Universitys expansion plans assume its continued ability
to establish new campuses as additional locations of Strayer
University under such applicable regulations and thereby to
avoid incurring the two-year delay in participation in
Title IV programs. The loss of state authorization or
accreditation of Strayer University or an existing campus, or
the failure of Strayer University or a new campus to obtain
state authorization or accreditation, would render Strayer
University ineligible to participate in Title IV programs
at least in that state or at that location.
Department of Education regulations require institutions to
report to the Department of Education a new additional location
at which at least 50% of an eligible program will be offered, if
the institution wants to disburse Title IV program funds to
students enrolled at that location. For an institution like
Strayer University for which notice only is required, once the
institution reports the location to the Department of Education,
the institution may disburse Title IV program funds to
eligible students at that location if the location is licensed
and accredited. Institutions are responsible for knowing whether
they need approval, and institutions that add locations and
disburse Title IV program funds without having obtained any
necessary approval may be subject to administrative repayments
and other sanctions.
Generally, if an institution eligible to participate in
Title IV programs adds an educational program after it has
been designated as an eligible institution, the institution must
apply to the Department of Education to have the additional
program designated as eligible. However, a degree-granting
institution such as Strayer University is not obligated to
obtain Department of Education approval of additional programs
that lead to an associate, bachelors, professional or
graduate degree at a level already granted. Similarly, an
institution is not required to obtain advance approval for new
programs that both prepare students for gainful employment in
the same or related recognized occupation as an educational
program that has previously been designated as an eligible
program at that institution and meet certain minimum-length
requirements. In the event that an institution that does not
have the Department of Educations express approval for the
addition of a new program erroneously determines that the new
educational program is eligible for Title IV funds, the
institution may be liable for repayment of Title IV aid
received by the institution or students in connection with that
program. Strayer does not believe that the Department of
Educations regulations will create significant obstacles
to Strayer Universitys plans to add new programs.
Change
in Ownership Resulting in a Change of Control
Many states and accrediting agencies require institutions of
higher education to report or obtain approval of certain changes
in ownership or other aspects of institutional status, but the
types of and triggers for such reporting or approval vary among
states and accrediting agencies. In addition, Strayer
Universitys accrediting agency, Middle States, requires
institutions that it accredits to inform it in advance of any
substantive change, including a change that significantly alters
the ownership or control of the institution. Examples of
substantive changes requiring advance notice to and approval of
Middle States include changes in the legal status, ownership or
form of control of the institution, such as the sale of a
proprietary institution. Middle States must approve a
substantive change in advance in order to include the change in
the institutions accreditation status. Middle States will
undertake a site visit to an institution that has undergone a
change in ownership or control no later than six months after
the change.
22
The Higher Education Act provides that an institution that
undergoes a change in ownership resulting in a change of control
loses its eligibility to participate in the Title IV
programs and must apply to the Department of Education in order
to reestablish such eligibility. An institution is ineligible to
receive Title IV program funds during the period prior to
recertification. The Higher Education Act provides that the
Department of Education may temporarily, provisionally certify
an institution seeking approval of a change of ownership and
control based on preliminary review by the Department of
Education of a materially complete application received by the
Department of Education within 10 business days after the
transaction. The Department of Education may continue such
temporary, provisional certification on a
month-to-month
basis until it has rendered a final decision on the
institutions application. If the Department of Education
determines to approve the application after a change in
ownership and control, it issues a provisional certification,
which extends for a period expiring not later than the end of
the third complete award year following the date of provisional
certification. The Higher Education Act defines one of the
events that would trigger a change in ownership resulting in a
change of control as the transfer of the controlling interest of
the stock of the institution or its parent corporation. For a
publicly traded corporation, the securities of which are
required to be registered under the Exchange Act, such as
Strayer, the Department of Education regulations implementing
the Higher Education Act define a change in ownership resulting
in a change of control as occurring when a person acquires
ownership and control of a corporation such that the corporation
is required to file a
Form 8-K
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
notifying that agency of the change of control. The regulations
also provide that a change in ownership and control of a
publicly traded corporation occurs if a person who is a
controlling stockholder of the corporation ceases to be a
controlling stockholder. A controlling stockholder is a
stockholder who holds or controls through agreement both 25% or
more of the total outstanding voting stock of the corporation
and more shares of voting stock than any other stockholder.
Strayer University currently has Department of Homeland Security
approval to admit foreign students for U.S. study, subject
to applicable regulations. In certain circumstances, the
Department of Homeland Security may require an institution to
obtain approval for a change in ownership and control.
Pursuant to federal law providing benefits for veterans and
reservists, some of the programs offered by Strayer University
are approved for the enrollment of persons eligible to receive
Veterans Administration educational benefits by the state
approving agency in Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Georgia,
Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania,
South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Washington, D.C.
In certain circumstances, state approving agencies may require
an institution to obtain approval for a change in ownership and
control.
If Strayer University underwent a change of control that
required approval by any state authority, Middle States or any
federal agency, and any required regulatory approval were
significantly delayed, limited or denied, there could be a
material adverse effect on Strayer Universitys ability to
offer certain educational programs, award certain degrees,
diplomas or certificates, operate one or more of its locations,
admit certain students or participate in Title IV programs,
which in turn would materially and adversely affect Strayer
Universitys operations. A change that required approval by
a state regulatory authority, Middle States or a federal agency
could also delay Strayer Universitys ability to establish
new campuses or educational programs and may have other adverse
regulatory effects. Furthermore, the suspension from
Title IV programs and the necessity of obtaining regulatory
approvals in connection with a change of control may materially
limit Strayer Universitys flexibility in future financing
or acquisition transactions.
Additional
Information
We maintain a website at www.strayereducation.com. The
information on our website is not incorporated by reference in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and our web address is included as an inactive textual reference
only. We make available on our website our Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to those reports
23
filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we
electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the
SEC.
The
Form 10-K
and other reports filed with the SEC can be read or copied at
the SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street,
NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of
the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and
information statements, and other information regarding issuers
that file electronically with the SEC; the website address is
www.sec.gov.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the following risk factors and all
other information contained in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
or in the documents incorporated by reference herein before
deciding to purchase our common stock. The occurrence of any of
the following risks could materially harm our business,
adversely affect the market price of our common stock and could
cause you to suffer a partial or complete loss of your
investment. See Cautionary Notice Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements.
Risks
Related to Extensive Regulation of Our Business
If we
fail to comply with the extensive regulatory requirements for
our business, we could face significant monetary liabilities,
fines and penalties, including loss of access to federal student
loans and grants for our students.
As a provider of higher education, we are subject to extensive
regulation on both the federal and state levels. In particular,
the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (the Higher
Education Act), and related regulations subject Strayer
University and all other higher education institutions that
participate in the various federal student financial aid
programs under Title IV of the Higher Education Act
(Title IV programs) to significant regulatory
scrutiny.
The Higher Education Act mandates specific regulatory
responsibilities for each of the following components of the
higher education regulatory triad: (1) the federal
government through the U.S. Department of Education (the
Department of Education); (2) the accrediting
agencies recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education
(Secretary of Education) and (3) state
education regulatory bodies.
The regulations, standards and policies of these regulatory
agencies frequently change, and changes in, or new
interpretations of, applicable laws, regulations, standards or
policies could have a material adverse effect on our
accreditation, authorization to operate in various states,
permissible activities, receipt of funds under Title IV
programs or costs of doing business.
Because we operate in a highly regulated industry, we are
subject to compliance reviews and claims of non-compliance and
related lawsuits by government agencies, regulatory agencies and
third parties, including claims brought by third parties on
behalf of the federal government. For example, the Department of
Education regularly conducts program reviews of educational
institutions that are participating in Title IV programs
and the Office of Inspector General of the Department of
Education regularly conducts audits and investigations of such
institutions.
If we are found to be in noncompliance with any of these laws,
regulations, standards or policies, we could lose our access to
Title IV program funds, which would have a material adverse
effect on our business. In the 2008 fall term, approximately 66%
of our students participated in one or more Title IV
programs. Findings of noncompliance also could result in our
being required to pay monetary damages, or being subjected to
fines, penalties, injunctions, restrictions on our access to
Title IV program funds or other censure that could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
24
If we
fail to maintain our institutional accreditation, we would lose
our ability to participate in Title IV
programs.
Strayer University is institutionally accredited by the Middle
States Commission on Higher Education (Middle
States), one of the six regional accrediting agencies
recognized by the Secretary of Education as a reliable authority
as to educational quality. Institutional accreditation by an
accrediting agency recognized by the Secretary of Education is
required in order for an institution to become and remain
eligible to participate in Title IV programs. The loss of
accreditation would, among other things, render Strayer
University ineligible to participate in Title IV programs
and would have a material adverse effect on our business. In
addition, an adverse action by Middle States other than loss of
accreditation, such as issuance of a warning, could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
If we
fail to maintain any of our state authorizations, we would lose
our ability to operate in that state and to participate in
Title IV programs there.
With respect to each campus, Strayer University is authorized to
operate and to grant degrees, diplomas or certificates by the
applicable education agency of the state where the campus is
located. Such state authorization is required in order for
students at the campus to be eligible to participate in
Title IV programs. The loss of authorization in a state
would, among other things, render Strayer University ineligible
to participate in Title IV programs at least at those state
campus locations, limit Strayer Universitys ability to
operate in that state and could have a material adverse effect
on our business.
If we
fail to obtain recertification by the Department of Education
when required, we would lose our ability to participate in
Title IV programs.
An institution generally must seek recertification from the
Department of Education at least every six years and possibly
more frequently depending on various factors, such as whether it
is provisionally certified. The Department of Education may also
review an institutions continued eligibility and
certification to participate in Title IV programs, or scope
of eligibility and certification, in the event the institution
undergoes a change in ownership resulting in a change of control
or expands its activities in certain ways, such as the addition
of certain types of new programs, or, in certain cases, changes
to the academic credentials that it offers. In certain
circumstances, the Department of Education must provisionally
certify an institution. The Department of Education may withdraw
our certification if it determines that we are not fulfilling
material requirements for continued participation in
Title IV programs. If the Department of Education does not
renew or withdraws our certification to participate in
Title IV programs, our students would no longer be able to
receive Title IV program funds, which would have a material
adverse effect on our business. Strayer Universitys
current program participation agreement is effective until
September 30, 2010, assuming continued compliance with its
terms.
A
failure to demonstrate administrative capability or
financial responsibility may result in the loss of
eligibility to participate in Title IV
programs.
If we fail to maintain administrative capability as
defined by the Department of Education, we could lose our
eligibility to participate in Title IV programs or have
that eligibility adversely conditioned, which would have a
material adverse effect on our business. Furthermore, if we fail
to demonstrate financial responsibility under the
Department of Educations regulations, we could lose our
eligibility to participate in Title IV programs or have
that eligibility adversely conditioned, which would have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Student
loan defaults could result in the loss of eligibility to
participate in Title IV programs.
In general, under the Higher Education Act, an educational
institution may lose its eligibility to participate in some or
all Title IV programs if, for three consecutive federal
fiscal years, 25% or more of its students who were required to
begin repaying their student loans in the relevant federal
fiscal
25
year default on their payment by the end of the next federal
fiscal year. In addition, an institution may lose its
eligibility to participate in some or all Title IV programs
if its default rate for a federal fiscal year was greater than
40%. In addition, the Higher Education Act, as recently amended,
requires certain default prevention action by an institution
with a default rate of 30% or more. If we lose eligibility to
participate in Title IV programs because of high student
loan default rates, it would have a material adverse effect on
our business. Strayer Universitys default rates calculated
by the Department of Education on Federal Family Education Loan
Program loans for the 2004, 2005, and 2006 federal fiscal years,
the three most recent years for which this information is
available, were 4.5%, 3.9%, and 3.8%, respectively. The average
default rates for proprietary institutions nationally, as
calculated by the Department of Education, were 8.6%, 8.2%, and
9.7% in federal fiscal years 2004, 2005, and 2006, respectively.
We are
subject to sanctions if we fail to calculate and make timely
payment of refunds of Title IV program funds for students
who withdraw before completing their educational
program.
The Higher Education Act and Department of Education regulations
require us to calculate refunds of unearned Title IV
program funds disbursed to students who withdraw from their
educational program before completing it. If refunds are not
properly calculated or timely paid, we may be sanctioned or
subject to other adverse actions by the Department of Education,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are
dependent on the renewal and maintenance of Title IV
programs.
Congress reauthorizes the Higher Education Act, which is the law
governing Title IV programs, approximately every five to
six years. Additionally, Congress determines the funding level
for each Title IV program on an annual basis. Any action by
Congress that significantly reduces funding for Title IV
programs or the ability of our school or students to participate
in these programs could materially harm our business. A
reduction in government funding levels could lead to lower
enrollments at our school and require us to arrange for
alternative sources of financial aid for our students. Lower
student enrollments or our inability to arrange such alternative
sources of funding could adversely affect our business.
Investigations,
legislative, and regulatory developments and general credit
market conditions related to the student loan industry may
result in fewer lenders and loan products and increased
regulatory burdens and costs.
The recently enacted Higher Education Opportunity Act contains
new requirements pertinent to relationships between lenders and
institutions. The Department of Education also recently
promulgated regulations that address these relationships, and
state legislators have also passed or may be considering
legislation related to relationships between lenders and
institutions. These legislative and regulatory developments as
well as general credit market conditions may cause some lenders
to decide not to participate in the Federal Family Education
Loan Program or not to provide certain loan products and may
impose increased administrative and regulatory costs. Such
actions could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our
school could lose its eligibility to participate in federal
student financial aid programs or be provisionally certified
with respect to such participation if the percentage of our
revenues derived from those programs were too
high.
A proprietary institution may lose its eligibility to
participate in the federal student financial aid programs if it
derives more than 90% of its revenues, on a cash basis, from
these programs for two consecutive fiscal years. A proprietary
institution of higher education that violates this so-called
90/10 Rule for any fiscal year will be placed on
provisional status for two fiscal years. Using the Department of
Educations formula in current regulations, we derived
approximately 72% of our cash-basis revenues from these programs
in 2007.
26
Our
failure to comply with the Department of Educations
incentive compensation rules could result in
sanctions.
If we pay a bonus, commission or other incentive payment in
violation of applicable Department of Education rules, we could
be subject to sanctions, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
Risks
Related to Our Business
We may
not be able to sustain our recent growth rate, and we may not be
able to manage future growth effectively.
We have experienced a period of significant growth since the
beginning of 2001. Over this period, we opened 51 new campuses
and our revenue increased 23% between 2000 and 2008 on a
compound annual basis. Our ability to sustain our current rate
of growth depends on a number of factors, including our ability
to obtain regulatory approvals, our ability to recruit and
retain high quality academic and administrative personnel at new
campuses and competitive factors. In addition, growth and
expansion of our operations may place a significant strain on
our resources and increased demands on our management
information and reporting systems, financial management controls
and personnel. Although we have made a substantial investment in
augmenting our financial and management information systems and
other resources to support future growth, we cannot assure you
that we will be able to manage further expansion effectively.
Failure to do so could adversely affect our business.
Our
future success depends in part upon our ability to recruit and
retain key personnel.
In connection with our May 2001 recapitalization, we hired a new
management team, including Robert S. Silberman, our Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer, to implement our growth strategy. Our
success to date has been, and our continuing success will be,
substantially dependent upon our ability to attract and retain
highly qualified executive officers, faculty and administrators
and other key personnel. If we cease to employ any of these
integral personnel or fail to manage a smooth transition to new
personnel, our business could suffer.
Our
success depends in part on our ability to update and expand the
content of existing academic programs and develop new programs
in a cost-effective manner and on a timely basis.
Our success depends in part on our ability to update and expand
the content of our academic programs, develop new programs in a
cost-effective manner and meet students needs in a timely
manner. Prospective employers of our graduates increasingly
demand that their entry-level employees possess appropriate
technological and other skills. The update and expansion of our
existing programs and the development of new programs may not be
received favorably by students, prospective employers or the
online education market. If we cannot respond to changes in
industry requirements, our business may be adversely affected.
Even if we are able to develop acceptable new programs, we may
not be able to introduce these new programs as quickly as
students require due to regulatory constraints or as quickly as
our competitors introduce competing new programs.
Our
strategy of opening new campuses and adding new services is
dependent on regulatory approvals and requires significant
resources.
Establishing new locations and adding new services require us to
make human capital and financial capital investments, incur
marketing expenses and reallocate other resources. To open a new
location, we are required to obtain appropriate federal, state,
and accrediting agency approvals, which may be conditioned or
delayed in a manner which could significantly affect our growth
plans. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully
open new campus locations or add new services in the future. Our
failure to manage effectively the operations of newly
established locations could adversely affect our business.
27
Our
financial performance depends in part on our ability to continue
to develop awareness of the academic programs we offer among
working adult students.
The continued development of awareness of the academic programs
we offer among working adult students is critical to the
continued acceptance and growth of our programs. If we are
unable to continue to develop awareness of the programs we
offer, this could limit our enrollments and negatively impact
our business. The following are some of the factors that could
prevent us from successfully marketing our programs:
|
|
|
|
|
the emergence of more successful competitors;
|
|
|
|
customer dissatisfaction with our services and programs;
|
|
|
|
performance problems with our online systems; and
|
|
|
|
our failure to maintain or expand our brand or other factors
related to our marketing.
|
We
face strong competition in the post-secondary education
market.
Post-secondary education in our market area is highly
competitive. We compete with traditional public and private
two-year and four-year colleges, other for-profit schools and
alternatives to higher education, such as employment and
military service. Public colleges may offer programs similar to
those of Strayer University at a lower tuition level as a result
of government subsidies, government and foundation grants,
tax-deductible contributions and other financial sources not
available to proprietary institutions. Some of our competitors
in both the public and private sectors have substantially
greater financial and other resources than we do. This strong
competition could adversely affect our business.
Strayer
University relies on exclusive proprietary rights and
intellectual property, and competitors may attempt to duplicate
Strayer programs and methods.
Third parties may attempt to develop competing programs or
duplicate or copy aspects of Strayer Universitys
curriculum, online library, quality management and other
proprietary content. Any such attempt, if successful, could
adversely affect our business. In the ordinary course of its
business, Strayer develops intellectual property of many kinds
that is or will be the subject of copyright, trademark, service
mark, patent, trade secret or other protections. Such
intellectual property includes but is not limited to
Strayers courseware materials for classes taught via the
Internet or via other distance learning means and business
know-how and internal processes and procedures developed to
respond to the requirements of its various education regulatory
agencies.
Seasonal
and other fluctuations in our operating results could adversely
affect the trading price of our common stock.
Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations, which cause
our operating results to fluctuate from quarter to quarter. This
fluctuation may result in volatility or have an adverse effect
on the market price of our common stock. We experience, and
expect to continue to experience, seasonal fluctuations in our
revenue. Historically, our quarterly revenues and income have
been lowest in the third quarter (July through September)
because fewer students are enrolled during the summer months. We
also incur significant expenses in preparing for our peak
enrollment in the fourth quarter (October through December),
including investing in online and campus infrastructure
necessary to support increased usage. These investments result
in fluctuations in our operating results which could result in
volatility or have an adverse effect on the market price of our
common stock. In addition, because of the recent increase in the
use of personal computers and access to the Internet, the online
education market is a rapidly evolving market, and we may not be
able to accurately forecast future enrollment growth and
revenues.
28
Regulatory
requirements may make it more difficult to acquire
us.
A change in ownership resulting in a change of control of
Strayer would trigger a requirement for recertification of
Strayer University by the Department of Education for purposes
of participation in federal student financial aid programs, a
review of Strayer Universitys accreditation by Middle
States and reauthorization of Strayer University by certain
state licensing and other regulatory agencies. If we underwent a
change of control that required approval by any state authority,
Middle States or any federal agency, and any required regulatory
approval were significantly delayed, limited or denied, there
could be a material adverse effect on our ability to offer
certain educational programs, award certain degrees, diplomas or
certificates, operate one or more of our locations, admit
certain students or participate in Title IV programs, which
in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business.
These factors may discourage takeover attempts.
Capacity
constraints or system disruptions to Strayer Universitys
computer networks could damage the reputation of Strayer
University and limit our ability to attract and retain
students.
The performance and reliability of Strayer Universitys
computer networks, especially the online educational platform,
is critical to our reputation and ability to attract and retain
students. Any system error or failure, or a sudden and
significant increase in traffic, could result in the
unavailability of Strayer Universitys computer networks.
We cannot assure you that Strayer University, including its
online educational platform, will be able to expand its program
infrastructure on a timely basis sufficient to meet demand for
its programs. Strayer Universitys computer systems and
operations could be vulnerable to interruption or malfunction
due to events beyond its control, including natural disasters
and telecommunications failures. Any interruption to Strayer
Universitys computer systems or operations could have a
material adverse effect on our ability to attract and retain
students.
Strayer
Universitys computer networks may be vulnerable to
security risks that could disrupt operations and require it to
expend significant resources.
Strayer Universitys computer networks may be vulnerable to
unauthorized access, computer hackers, computer viruses and
other security problems. A user who circumvents security
measures could misappropriate proprietary information or cause
interruptions or malfunctions in operations. As a result,
Strayer University may be required to expend significant
resources to protect against the threat of these security
breaches or to alleviate problems caused by these breaches.
Strayer
University, with its online programs, operates in a highly
competitive market with rapid technological changes and it may
not compete successfully.
Online education is a highly fragmented and competitive market
that is subject to rapid technological change. Competitors vary
in size and organization from traditional colleges and
universities, many of which have some form of online education
programs, to for-profit schools, corporate universities and
software companies providing online education and training
software. We expect the online education and training market to
be subject to rapid changes in technologies. Strayer
Universitys success will depend on its ability to adapt to
these changing technologies.
We may
not be able to successfully complete or integrate any future
acquisitions.
As part of our growth strategy, we expect to consider selective
acquisitions. We cannot assure you that we will be able to
complete successfully any acquisitions on favorable terms, or
that if we do, we will be able to integrate successfully the
personnel, operations and technologies of any such acquisitions.
Our failure to complete or integrate successfully future
acquisitions could disrupt our business and materially and
adversely affect our profitability and liquidity by distracting
our management and employees and increasing our expenses. In
addition, because an acquisition is considered a change in
ownership and control of the acquired institution under
applicable regulatory standards, we must seek approval from the
Department of Education, if the acquired institution
29
participates in Title IV programs, and most applicable
state agencies and accrediting agencies and possibly other
regulatory bodies when we acquire an institution. If we were
unable to obtain such approvals of an institution we acquired,
depending on the size of that acquisition, that failure could
have a material adverse effect on our business.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
There are no SEC staff comments on the Companys periodic
SEC reports which are unresolved.
We lease all of our campus and administrative facilities except
for five campus facilities which we own. Our campuses are
located in Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South
Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and
Washington, D.C., and our corporate headquarters is located
in Virginia. Our leases generally range from five to
10 years with one to two renewal options for extended
terms. As of December 31, 2008, we leased 67 campus and
administrative facilities consisting of approximately
985,000 square feet. The facilities that we own consist of
approximately 110,000 square feet.
We evaluate current utilization of our facilities and projected
enrollment growth to determine facility needs. We anticipate
that approximately an additional 200,000 square feet will
be leased in 2009. We also signed a lease for approximately
100,000 square feet in Herndon, Virginia for our corporate
headquarters. Occupancy of the space is scheduled for 2010.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation and
other legal proceedings arising out of the ordinary course of
its business. There are no pending material legal proceedings to
which the Company is subject or to which the Companys
property is subject.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
No matters were voted upon by stockholders during the fourth
quarter of 2008.
30
PART II
Item 5. Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ National Market under
the symbol STRA. The following table sets forth, for
the periods indicated, the high, low, and closing sale prices of
the Companys common stock, as reported on the NASDAQ
National Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Close
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
179.86
|
|
|
$
|
142.14
|
|
|
$
|
152.50
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
224.99
|
|
|
$
|
150.83
|
|
|
$
|
209.07
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
229.48
|
|
|
$
|
195.51
|
|
|
$
|
200.26
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
239.99
|
|
|
$
|
161.78
|
|
|
$
|
214.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
126.19
|
|
|
$
|
104.62
|
|
|
$
|
125.00
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
133.64
|
|
|
$
|
119.19
|
|
|
$
|
131.71
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
175.90
|
|
|
$
|
131.65
|
|
|
$
|
168.63
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
195.91
|
|
|
$
|
167.00
|
|
|
$
|
170.58
|
|
Peer
Group Performance Graph
The following performance graph compares the Companys
cumulative stockholder return on its common stock since
December 31, 2003 with The NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) Index
and a self-determined peer group consisting of Apollo Group,
Inc. (APOL), Career Education Corporation (CECO), Corinthian
Colleges, Inc. (COCO), DeVry, Inc. (DV), and ITT Educational
Services, Inc. (ESI). At present, there is no comparative index
for the education industry. This graph is not deemed to be
soliciting material or to be filed with the SEC or
subject to the SECs proxy rules or to the liabilities of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and the graph
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
prior or subsequent filing by the Company under the Securities
Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
31
Comparison
of 60 Month Cumulative Total Return*
Among Strayer Education, Inc.
The NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) Index and a Peer Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
12/31/03
|
|
12/31/04
|
|
12/31/05
|
|
12/31/06
|
|
12/31/07
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
Strayer Education, Inc.
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Peer Group
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
The comparison assumes $100 was
invested on December 31, 2003 in the Companys common
stock, the NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) Index and the peer
companies selected by the Company.
|
Note: Peer group consists of Apollo Group, Inc., Career
Education Corporation, Corinthian Colleges, Inc., DeVry, Inc.
and ITT Educational Services, Inc.
As of January 30, 2009, there were 14,089,189 shares
of common stock outstanding, and approximately 63 holders of
record. In addition, there are a number (approximately 16,300)
of institutional and other holders of common stock whose shares
are held in nominee accounts by brokers.
In November 2003, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized the Company to repurchase shares of common stock in
open market purchases from time to time at the discretion of the
Companys management, depending on market conditions and
other corporate considerations. The Companys Board of
Directors amended the program on various dates, increasing the
repurchase amount authorized and extending the expiration date.
At December 31, 2008, approximately $70 million of the
Companys share repurchase authorization was remaining. All
of the Companys share repurchases were effected in
compliance with
Rule 10b-18
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This
share repurchase plan may be modified, suspended or terminated
at any time by the Company without notice.
32
A summary of the Companys share repurchases since the
inception of the plan is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
number of
|
|
|
dollar price
|
|
|
Cost of share
|
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
paid per
|
|
|
repurchases
|
|
|
|
repurchased
|
|
|
share
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
32,350
|
|
|
$
|
99.57
|
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
2004
|
|
|
346,444
|
|
|
|
106.13
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
2005
|
|
|
410,071
|
|
|
|
92.59
|
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
2006
|
|
|
349,066
|
|
|
|
100.39
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
2007
|
|
|
260,818
|
|
|
|
146.05
|
|
|
|
38.1
|
|
2008
|
|
|
603,382
|
|
|
|
180.86
|
|
|
|
109.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,002,131
|
|
|
$
|
129.97
|
|
|
$
|
260.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the Companys share repurchases during the
three months ended December 31, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
number of
|
|
|
dollar price
|
|
|
authorization
|
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
paid per
|
|
|
under the plan
|
|
|
|
repurchased1
|
|
|
share
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
October
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November
|
|
|
138,100
|
|
|
$
|
216.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
138,100
|
|
|
$
|
216.21
|
|
|
$
|
70.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. All shares repurchased were part
of a publicly announced plan.
We have established a policy of declaring quarterly cash
dividends on our common stock. Consistent with this policy, we
have paid common stock dividends on a quarterly basis for over
eight years. The Company announced in October 2008 that,
commencing with its fourth quarter dividend paid on
December 10, 2008, it was increasing its annual dividend by
33% to $2.00 per share from $1.50 per share. This increase in
annual dividends resulted in a quarterly dividend payment of
$0.50 per share. In October 2007, the Company announced that its
Board of Directors had declared a special dividend of $2.00 per
share which was paid on January 16, 2008. Whether to
declare dividends and the amount of dividends to be paid in the
future will be reviewed periodically by our Board of Directors
in light of the Companys earnings, cash flow, financial
condition, capital needs, investment opportunities and
regulatory considerations. There is no requirement or assurance
that common dividends will continue to be paid.
33
Set forth in the table below is information pertaining to
securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation
plans. There are options but no warrants or other rights
existing under these plans.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
available for future
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
issuance under
|
|
|
|
Number of securities to
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
equity compensation
|
|
|
|
be issued upon exercise
|
|
|
price of outstanding
|
|
|
plans (excluding
|
|
|
|
of outstanding options,
|
|
|
options, warrants
|
|
|
securities reflected
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
|
and rights
|
|
|
in column (a))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans previously approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. 1996 Stock Option Plan as
amended at the May 2001, the May 2005, and the May 2006 annual
shareholders meetings
|
|
|
167,084
|
|
|
$
|
102.98
|
|
|
|
420,533
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
previously approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
167,084
|
|
|
$
|
102.98
|
|
|
|
420,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The following table sets forth, for the periods and at the dates
indicated, selected consolidated financial and operating data.
The financial information has been derived from our consolidated
financial statements.
The information set forth below is qualified by reference to and
should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and other information included elsewhere or
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share, enrollment and campus
data)
|
|
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
183,194
|
|
|
$
|
220,507
|
|
|
$
|
263,648
|
|
|
$
|
318,012
|
|
|
$
|
396,275
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruction and educational support
|
|
|
63,860
|
|
|
|
76,977
|
|
|
|
91,120
|
|
|
|
108,852
|
|
|
|
130,836
|
|
Selling and promotion
|
|
|
29,435
|
|
|
|
41,090
|
|
|
|
52,269
|
|
|
|
60,760
|
|
|
|
76,162
|
|
General and administration
|
|
|
24,416
|
|
|
|
27,576
|
|
|
|
40,723
|
|
|
|
50,843
|
|
|
|
62,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
65,483
|
|
|
|
74,864
|
|
|
|
79,536
|
|
|
|
97,557
|
|
|
|
126,851
|
|
Investment and other income
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
|
|
2,982
|
|
|
|
4,542
|
|
|
|
6,495
|
|
|
|
4,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
67,078
|
|
|
|
77,846
|
|
|
|
84,078
|
|
|
|
104,052
|
|
|
|
131,378
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
25,838
|
|
|
|
29,781
|
|
|
|
31,771
|
|
|
|
39,115
|
|
|
|
50,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
41,240
|
|
|
|
48,065
|
|
|
|
52,307
|
|
|
|
64,937
|
|
|
|
80,808
|
|
Preferred stock dividends and
accretion(a)
|
|
|
1,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
39,851
|
|
|
$
|
48,065
|
|
|
$
|
52,307
|
|
|
$
|
64,937
|
|
|
$
|
80,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.91
|
|
|
$
|
3.32
|
|
|
$
|
3.69
|
|
|
$
|
4.56
|
|
|
$
|
5.77
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.74
|
|
|
$
|
3.26
|
|
|
$
|
3.61
|
|
|
$
|
4.47
|
|
|
$
|
5.67
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
13,674
|
|
|
|
14,472
|
|
|
|
14,187
|
|
|
|
14,248
|
|
|
|
14,015
|
|
Diluted(b)
|
|
|
15,057
|
|
|
|
14,741
|
|
|
|
14,492
|
|
|
|
14,517
|
|
|
|
14,242
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
5,375
|
|
|
$
|
6,619
|
|
|
$
|
7,059
|
|
|
$
|
8,523
|
|
|
$
|
10,761
|
|
Stock-based compensation
expense(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
8,049
|
|
|
$
|
10,207
|
|
|
$
|
11,127
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
11,063
|
|
|
$
|
12,275
|
|
|
$
|
13,183
|
|
|
$
|
14,869
|
|
|
$
|
20,657
|
|
Cash dividends per common share (paid):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regular
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.63
|
|
Special
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
Average
enrollment(d)
|
|
|
20,340
|
|
|
|
23,903
|
|
|
|
27,554
|
|
|
|
32,087
|
|
|
|
38,449
|
|
Campuses(e)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
|
|
$
|
122,757
|
|
|
$
|
119,806
|
|
|
$
|
128,426
|
|
|
$
|
171,335
|
|
|
$
|
107,331
|
|
Working
capital(f)
|
|
|
112,726
|
|
|
|
110,886
|
|
|
|
122,204
|
|
|
|
131,734
|
|
|
|
112,679
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
210,114
|
|
|
|
225,845
|
|
|
|
270,844
|
|
|
|
343,778
|
|
|
|
324,563
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
5,784
|
|
|
|
6,569
|
|
|
|
7,689
|
|
|
|
10,922
|
|
|
|
11,663
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
61,192
|
|
|
|
74,005
|
|
|
|
99,317
|
|
|
|
155,271
|
|
|
|
148,482
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
148,922
|
|
|
|
151,840
|
|
|
|
171,527
|
|
|
|
188,507
|
|
|
|
176,081
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
In 2001, the Company issued
Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock in
conjunction with the Companys recapitalization. As of July
2004, all outstanding and accrued shares of the Series A
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock had been converted into
shares of common stock.
|
35
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares
outstanding include common shares issued and outstanding, the
assumed conversion of Series A Preferred Stock issued in
May 2001, accrued
payment-in-kind
dividends on and assumed conversion of the Series A
Preferred Stock, and the dilutive impact of restricted stock and
outstanding stock options using the Treasury Stock Method.
|
|
(c)
|
|
In 2006, the Company adopted
SFAS 123(R), Share-based Payment, and began
recording expense for all forms of stock-based compensation.
Prior to 2006, only stock-based compensation expense for
restricted stock grants was being recorded.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Reflects average student enrollment
for the four academic terms for each year indicated.
|
|
(e)
|
|
Reflects number of campuses
offering classes during the fourth quarter of each year
indicated.
|
|
(f)
|
|
Working capital is calculated by
subtracting current liabilities from current assets.
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with
Selected Historical Financial and Other Information,
our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, the
Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements, Item 1A entitled Risk Factors
and the other information appearing elsewhere, or incorporated
by reference, in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Background
and Overview
We are an education services holding company that owns Strayer
University, Inc. The University is an institution of higher
education which offers undergraduate and graduate degree
programs at 65 campuses (including two new campuses opened for
the 2009 winter term enrollment and three new campuses opened
for the 2009 spring term enrollment) in Alabama, Delaware,
Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, North
Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah,
Virginia, West Virginia, Washington, D.C., and worldwide
via the Internet. The Company is planning to open a total of 11
new campuses in 2009, including the five that have already been
opened. The Company is also planning to open a second Global
Online Operations Center in Salt Lake City, Utah in 2009.
As set forth below, average enrollment, full-time tuition rates,
revenues, income from operations, net income, and diluted net
income per share have all increased in each of the last three
years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Average enrollment
|
|
|
27,554
|
|
|
|
32,087
|
|
|
|
38,449
|
|
% Change from prior year
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Full-time tuition (per course)
|
|
$
|
1,215
|
|
|
$
|
1,280
|
|
|
$
|
1,355
|
|
% Change from prior year
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Revenues (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
263,648
|
|
|
$
|
318,012
|
|
|
$
|
396,275
|
|
% Change from prior year
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Income from operations (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
79,536
|
|
|
$
|
97,557
|
|
|
$
|
126,851
|
|
% Change from prior year
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Net income (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
52,307
|
|
|
$
|
64,937
|
|
|
$
|
80,808
|
|
% Change from prior year
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
Diluted net income per share
|
|
$
|
3.61
|
|
|
$
|
4.47
|
|
|
$
|
5.67
|
|
% Change from prior year
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
Strayer University derives approximately 97% of its revenue from
tuition collected from its students. The academic year of the
University is divided into four quarters, which approximately
coincide with the four quarters of the calendar year. Students
make payment arrangements for the tuition for each course prior
to the beginning of the quarter. When students register for
courses, tuition is recorded as unearned tuition, and is
recognized in the quarter of instruction. If a student withdraws
from a course prior to completion, the University refunds a
portion of the tuition depending on when the withdrawal occurs.
Tuition revenue is shown net of any refunds, withdrawals,
corporate discounts, employee tuition discounts and
scholarships. The University also derives revenue from other
sources
36
such as textbook-related income, application fees, commencement
fees, placement test fees, withdrawal fees, loan administration
fees, and other income, which are all recognized when earned.
At the time of registration, unearned tuition (a liability) is
recorded for academic services to be provided and a tuition
receivable is recorded for the portion of the tuition not paid
upfront in cash. Because the Universitys academic quarters
coincide with the calendar quarters, tuition receivable at the
end of any calendar quarter largely represents student tuition
due for the following academic quarter. Based upon past
experience and judgment, the University establishes an allowance
for doubtful accounts with respect to accounts receivable not
included in unearned tuition. Any uncollected account more than
six months past due for students who have left the University is
charged against the allowance. Our bad debt expense as a
percentage of revenues for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2007, and 2008 was 2.9%, 3.3%, and 3.2%, respectively.
Strayer Universitys expenses consist of instruction and
educational support expenses, selling and promotion expenses,
and general and administration expenses. Instruction and
educational support expenses generally contain items of expense
directly attributable to the educational activity of the
University. This expense category includes salaries and benefits
of faculty and academic administrators and, beginning in 2006,
stock-based compensation expense. Instruction and educational
support expenses also include costs of educational supplies and
facilities, including rent for campus facilities, certain costs
of establishing and maintaining computer laboratories and all
other physical plant and occupancy costs, with the exception of
costs attributable to the corporate offices.
Selling and promotion expenses include salaries, benefits and,
beginning in 2006, stock-based compensation expense of personnel
engaged in recruitment, admissions, retention, promotion and
development, as well as costs of advertising and production of
marketing materials.
General and administration expenses include salaries, benefits
and, beginning in 2006, stock-based compensation expense of
management and employees engaged in student services,
accounting, human resources, compliance and other corporate
functions, along with the occupancy costs attributable to such
functions. Bad debt expense is also included as a general and
administration expense.
Investment and other income consists primarily of earnings and
realized gains or losses on investments.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations discusses our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated
financial statements requires management to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses and the related disclosures
of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis,
management evaluates its estimates and judgments related to its
allowance for uncollectible accounts, income tax provisions,
valuation of deferred tax assets, forfeiture rates for
stock-based compensation plans and accrued expenses. Management
bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and
various other factors and assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for making judgments regarding the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
Management believes that the following critical accounting
policies are its more significant judgments and estimates used
in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.
Tuition revenue is deferred at the time of registration and is
recognized as income, net of any refunds or withdrawals, in the
respective quarter of instruction. Advance registrations for the
next quarter are recorded as unearned tuition. We record
estimates for our allowance for uncollectible accounts for
tuition receivable from students. If the financial condition of
our students were to deteriorate, resulting
37
in impairment of their ability to make required payments for
tuition payable to us, additional allowances may be required. We
record estimates for our accrued expenses and income tax
liabilities. We periodically review our assumed forfeiture rates
for stock-based awards and adjust them as necessary. Should
actual results differ from our estimates, revisions to our
accrued expenses, stock-based compensation expense, and income
tax liabilities may be required.
New
Campuses
The Companys goal is to serve the demand for post
secondary adult education nationwide by opening new campuses
every year. A new campus typically requires up to
$1 million in upfront capital costs for leasehold
improvements, furniture and fixtures, and computer equipment. In
the first year of operation, assuming a midyear opening, the
Company expects to incur operating losses of approximately
$1 million including depreciation related to the upfront
capital costs. A new campus is typically expected to begin
generating operating income on a quarterly basis in four to six
quarters of operation, which is generally upon reaching an
enrollment level of about 300 students. The Companys new
campus notional model assumes an increase of average enrollment
by 100-150
students per year until reaching a level of about 1,000
students. Given the potential internal rate of return achieved
with each new campus (an estimated 70%), opening new campuses is
an important part of the Companys strategy. The Company
believes it has sufficient capital resources from cash, cash
equivalents, marketable securities and cash generated from
operating activities to continue to open new campuses for at
least the next 12 months.
The Company plans to open 11 new campuses in 2009 including five
already opened. The Company opened nine new campuses in 2008 and
eight in 2007. See New Campuses Opened table in
Item 1 for information regarding the locations of these new
campuses.
Second
Global Online Operations Center
The Company also plans to open its second Global Online
Operations Center in 2009 to accommodate the demand among
students who neither live nor work near a physical campus
location. This new operations center will be located in Salt
Lake City, Utah.
Results
of Operations
In 2008, the Company generated $396.3 million in revenue, a
25% increase compared to 2007, primarily as a result of average
enrollment growth of 20% and a 5% tuition increase which
commenced in January 2008. Income from operations was
$126.9 million in 2008, an increase of 30% compared to
2007. Net income in 2008 was $80.8 million, an increase of
24% compared to 2007. Earnings per diluted share was $5.67 in
2008 compared to $4.47 in 2007, an increase of 27%.
38
The following table sets forth certain income statement data as
a percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruction and educational support
|
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
33.0
|
|
Selling and promotion
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
General and administration
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
Investment and other income
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
31.9
|
|
|
|
32.7
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
19.8
|
%
|
|
|
20.4
|
%
|
|
|
20.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
37.8
|
%
|
|
|
37.6
|
%
|
|
|
38.5
|
%
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2008 Compared To Year Ended
December 31, 2007
Enrollment. Average enrollment increased 20%
to 38,449 students for the year ended December 31, 2008
from 32,087 students for the same period in 2007. This growth is
principally due to new campus openings, stable growth in our
mature markets and the rapid growth in markets outside of
commuting distance to a Strayer University physical campus
through the Universitys online programs.
Revenues. Revenues increased 25% to
$396.3 million in 2008 from $318.0 million in 2007
principally due to a 20% increase in the average enrollment and
a 5% tuition increase which commenced in January 2008.
Instruction and educational support
expenses. Instruction and educational support
expenses increased $21.9 million, or 20%, to
$130.8 million in 2008 from $108.9 million in 2007.
This increase was principally due to direct costs necessary to
support the increase in student enrollments including faculty
compensation, related academic staff salaries, and campus
facility costs which increased $7.1 million,
$4.9 million, and $5.0 million, respectively. These
costs as a percentage of revenues decreased to 33.0% in 2008
from 34.2% in 2007 largely attributable to faculty costs and
facility costs growing at a lower rate than tuition revenue.
Selling and promotion expenses. Selling and
promotion expenses increased $15.4 million, or 25%, to
$76.2 million in 2008 from $60.8 million in 2007. This
increase was principally due to the increased cost of
advertising in new markets and the addition of admissions
personnel, particularly at new campuses and for online programs,
which increased $5.5 million and $6.6 million,
respectively. These expenses as a percentage of revenues
increased slightly to 19.2% in 2008 from 19.1% in 2007.
General and administration expenses. General
and administration expenses increased $11.6 million, or
23%, to $62.4 million in 2008 from $50.8 million in
2007. The increase is largely attributable to increased employee
compensation and related expenses at both corporate and campus
locations, higher bad debt expense, and information
technology-related expenses, which increased by
$4.6 million, $2.2 million, and $1.1 million,
respectively. General and administration expenses as a
percentage of revenues decreased slightly to 15.8% in 2008 from
16.0% in 2007.
Income from operations. Income from operations
increased $29.3 million, or 30%, to $126.9 million in
2008 from $97.6 million in 2007 due to the aforementioned
factors.
Investment and other income. Investment and
other income decreased $2.0 million, or 30%, to
$4.5 million in 2008 from $6.5 million in 2007. This
decrease was principally due to lower investment yields and a
lower average cash balance, partly offset by a gain on sale of
marketable securities of $0.8 million recognized in 2008.
39
Provision for income taxes. Income tax expense
increased $11.5 million, or 29%, to $50.6 million in
2008 from $39.1 million in 2007 primarily due to the
increase in income before taxes attributable to the factors
discussed above. Another contributing factor was the
Companys higher effective tax rate of 38.5% in 2008 as
compared to 37.6% in 2007 primarily driven by lower income from
tax exempt securities in 2008.
Net income. Net income increased
$15.9 million, or 24%, to $80.8 million in 2008 from
$64.9 million in 2007 because of the factors discussed
above.
Year
Ended December 31, 2007 Compared To Year Ended
December 31, 2006
Enrollment. Average enrollment increased 16%
from 27,554 students for the year ended December 31, 2006
to 32,087 students for the same period in 2007. This growth is
principally due to new campus openings, stable growth in our
mature markets and the rapid growth in markets outside of
commuting distance to a Strayer University physical campus
through the Universitys online programs.
Revenues. Revenues increased 21% from
$263.6 million in 2006 to $318.0 million in 2007
principally due to a 16% increase in the average enrollment and
a 5% tuition increase which commenced in January 2007.
Instruction and educational support
expenses. Instruction and educational support
expenses increased $17.8 million, or 19%, from
$91.1 million in 2006 to $108.9 million in 2007. This
increase was principally due to direct costs necessary to
support the increase in student enrollments including faculty
compensation, related academic staff salaries, and campus
facility costs which increased $6.0 million,
$4.7 million, and $3.7 million, respectively. These
costs as a percentage of revenues decreased to 34.2% in 2007
from 34.6% in 2006.
Selling and promotion expenses. Selling and
promotion expenses increased $8.5 million, or 16%, from
$52.3 million in 2006 to $60.8 million in 2007. This
increase was principally due to the increased cost of
advertising in new markets and the addition of admissions
personnel, particularly at new campuses and for online programs,
which increased $5.3 million and $2.0 million,
respectively. These expenses as a percentage of revenues
decreased from 19.8% in 2006 to 19.1% in 2007 largely
attributable to both marketing costs and staffing costs growing
slower than tuition revenue, as the Company maintained the same
number of new campuses openings (eight in both years).
General and administration expenses. General
and administration expenses increased $10.1 million, or
25%, from $40.7 million in 2006 to $50.8 million in
2007. The increase is largely attributable to increased employee
compensation and related expenses at both corporate and campus
locations, higher bad debt expense, and higher stock-based
compensation expense, which increased by $3.5 million,
$2.9 million, and $2.0 million, respectively. General
and administration expenses as a percentage of revenues
increased to 16.0% in 2007 from 15.4% in 2006 primarily due to
the aforementioned factors.
Income from operations. Income from operations
increased $18.1 million, or 23%, from $79.5 million in
2006 to $97.6 million in 2007 due to the aforementioned
factors.
Investment and other income. Investment and
other income increased $2.0 million, or 43%, from
$4.5 million in 2006 to $6.5 million in 2007. This
increase was principally due to higher yields from the
Companys investments in a short-term tax-exempt bond fund
and tax-exempt money market funds, and a higher average cash
balance.
Provision for income taxes. Income tax expense
increased $7.3 million, or 23%, from $31.8 million in
2006 to $39.1 million in 2007 primarily due to the increase
in income before taxes attributable to the factors discussed
above. This was partly offset by a lower effective tax rate of
37.6% in 2007, compared to 37.8% in 2006, resulting primarily
from higher income from tax-exempt securities.
Net income. Net income increased
$12.6 million, or 24%, from $52.3 million in 2006 to
$64.9 million in 2007 because of the factors discussed
above.
40
Seasonality
Our quarterly results of operations tend to vary significantly
within a year because of student enrollment patterns. Enrollment
generally is highest in the fourth quarter, or fall term, and
lowest in the third quarter, or summer term. In 2008, enrollment
by term were as follows:
2008
Enrollment by Term
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Enrollment
|
|
|
Winter
|
|
|
37,323
|
|
Spring
|
|
|
37,733
|
|
Summer
|
|
|
34,176
|
|
Fall
|
|
|
44,564
|
|
Average
|
|
|
38,449
|
|
The following table sets forth our revenues on a quarterly basis
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008:
Quarterly
Revenues
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
$
|
67,090
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
$
|
80,193
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
$
|
97,074
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
June 30
|
|
|
65,558
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
78,875
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
97,928
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
56,693
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
69,813
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
86,993
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
74,307
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
89,131
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
114,280
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for Year
|
|
$
|
263,648
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
318,012
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
396,275
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs generally are not affected by the seasonal factors as much
as enrollment and revenue, and do not vary significantly on a
quarterly basis.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2008, the Company had cash, cash
equivalents and marketable securities of $107.3 million
compared to $171.3 million at December 31, 2007. Most
of the Companys excess cash is invested in tax-exempt
money market funds and a diversified, short-term, investment
grade, tax-exempt bond fund to minimize the Companys
principal risk and to benefit from the tax efficiency of the
funds underlying securities. As of December 31, 2008,
the Company had $51.0 million invested in the short-term,
tax-exempt bond fund. At December 31, 2008, the 577 issues
in this fund had an average credit rating of AA, an average
maturity of 1.3 years, an average duration of
1.1 years, and an average yield to maturity of 2.4%. The
Company had no debt as of December 31, 2008 or
December 31, 2007.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company generated
$88.6 million net cash from operating activities compared
to $80.8 million for the same period in 2007. Capital
expenditures were $20.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared to $14.9 million for the
same period in 2007. Capital expenditures for the year ending
December 31, 2009 are expected to be in the range of
7 - 8%
of 2009 revenues inclusive of the expected openings of 11 new
campuses and a second Global Online Operations Center. For the
year ended December 31, 2008, the Company paid
$23.1 million in regular cash dividends and
$28.9 million in special cash dividends to our common
stockholders. The Company invested $109.1 million
repurchasing common shares in the open market and received
$10.6 million upon the exercise of stock options.
Commencing in the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company increased
its annual cash dividend to $2.00 per share from $1.50 per
share, or to $0.50 per share quarterly from $0.375 per share.
41
In 2008, bad debt expense as a percentage of revenue was 3.2%
compared to 3.3% for the same period in 2007. Days sales
outstanding, adjusted to exclude tuition receivable related to
future quarters, was 14 days at the end of the fourth
quarter 2008 compared to 12 days in 2007.
Currently, the Company invests its cash in bank overnight
deposits, money market funds and a short-term tax-exempt bond
fund. In addition, the Company has available two
$10.0 million credit facilities from two banks. There have
been no borrowings by the Company under these credit facilities.
The Company believes that existing cash, cash equivalents, and
marketable securities, cash generated from operating activities,
and if necessary, cash borrowed under the credit facilities,
will be sufficient to meet the Companys requirements for
at least the next 12 months.
The table below sets forth the Companys cash and cash
equivalents and marketable securities as of December 31,
2006, 2007 and 2008:
Cash and
Marketable Securities
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
52.7
|
|
|
$
|
95.0
|
|
|
$
|
56.3
|
|
Marketable securities (short-term bond fund)
|
|
|
75.7
|
|
|
|
76.3
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
128.4
|
|
|
$
|
171.3
|
|
|
$
|
107.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Investment and other income
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below sets forth our contractual commitments
associated with operating leases as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
$
|
190,889
|
|
|
$
|
21,290
|
|
|
$
|
47,292
|
|
|
$
|
42,668
|
|
|
$
|
79,639
|
|
Impact of
Inflation
Inflation has not had a significant impact on the Companys
historical operations.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2008, the Company does not have any
off-balance sheet arrangements as defined by Item 303(a)(4)
of the Securities Exchange Commission
Regulation S-K.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
The Company is subject to the impact of interest rate changes
and may be subject to changes in the market values of its
current and future investments. The Company invests its excess
cash in bank overnight deposits, money market funds and a
short-term tax-exempt bond fund. The Company has not used
derivative financial instruments in its investment portfolio.
Earnings from investments in bank overnight deposits, money
market mutual funds and short-term tax-exempt bond funds may be
adversely affected in the future should interest rates change.
The Companys future investment income may fall short of
expectations due to changes in interest rates or the Company may
suffer losses in principal if forced to sell securities that
have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates.
As of December 31, 2008, a 10% increase or decrease in
interest rates will not have a material impact on the
Companys future earnings, fair values or cash flows
related to investments in cash equivalents or interest earning
marketable securities.
42
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Strayer Education, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable
or the required information is included in the consolidated
financial statements or notes thereto.
43
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To Board of Directors and Stockholders
Strayer Education, Inc.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in
the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Strayer Education, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (the Company) at December 31, 2008
and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition,
in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the
accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects,
the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with
the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible
for these financial statements and financial statement schedule,
for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, included in
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to
express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial
statement schedule, and on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts
for share-based compensation in 2006.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
McLean, Virginia
February 17, 2009
44
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
95,036
|
|
|
$
|
56,379
|
|
Marketable securities available for sale, at fair value
|
|
|
76,299
|
|
|
|
50,952
|
|
Tuition receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of
$3,206 and $4,776 in 2007 and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
100,651
|
|
|
|
131,458
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,534
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
4,097
|
|
|
|
7,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
276,083
|
|
|
|
249,498
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
57,946
|
|
|
|
66,304
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
8,830
|
|
|
|
7,799
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
343,778
|
|
|
$
|
324,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
15,682
|
|
|
$
|
17,099
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
3,303
|
|
|
|
4,567
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
4,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
28,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned tuition
|
|
|
91,476
|
|
|
|
114,872
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
144,349
|
|
|
|
136,819
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
10,922
|
|
|
|
11,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
155,271
|
|
|
|
148,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.01; 20,000,000 shares authorized;
14,426,634 and 14,089,189 shares issued and outstanding as
of December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
87,080
|
|
|
|
17,185
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
101,102
|
|
|
|
158,834
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
188,507
|
|
|
|
176,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
343,778
|
|
|
$
|
324,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
45
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
263,648
|
|
|
$
|
318,012
|
|
|
$
|
396,275
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruction and educational support
|
|
|
91,120
|
|
|
|
108,852
|
|
|
|
130,836
|
|
Selling and promotion
|
|
|
52,269
|
|
|
|
60,760
|
|
|
|
76,162
|
|
General and administration
|
|
|
40,723
|
|
|
|
50,843
|
|
|
|
62,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
79,536
|
|
|
|
97,557
|
|
|
|
126,851
|
|
Investment and other income
|
|
|
4,542
|
|
|
|
6,495
|
|
|
|
4,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
84,078
|
|
|
|
104,052
|
|
|
|
131,378
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
31,771
|
|
|
|
39,115
|
|
|
|
50,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
52,307
|
|
|
$
|
64,937
|
|
|
$
|
80,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
3.69
|
|
|
$
|
4.56
|
|
|
$
|
5.77
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
3.61
|
|
|
$
|
4.47
|
|
|
$
|
5.67
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
14,187
|
|
|
|
14,248
|
|
|
|
14,015
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
14,492
|
|
|
|
14,517
|
|
|
|
14,242
|
|
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
52,307
|
|
|
$
|
64,937
|
|
|
$
|
80,808
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net of taxes
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
52,409
|
|
|
$
|
65,262
|
|
|
$
|
80,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
46
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Par Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
14,292,249
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
104,923
|
|
|
$
|
47,020
|
|
|
$
|
(246
|
)
|
|
$
|
151,840
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
149,334
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,595
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,595
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(349,066
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(35,038
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,041
|
)
|
Restricted stock grant
|
|
|
201,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,413
|
|
Common stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,284
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,284
|
)
|
Change in net unrealized gains on marketable securities, net of
income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
14,293,584
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
87,487
|
|
|
$
|
84,043
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
$
|
171,527
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
372,250
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
15,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,178
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,678
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(260,818
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(38,091
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,094
|
)
|
Restricted stock grant
|
|
|
21,618
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,834
|
|
Common stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,878
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,878
|
)
|
Change in net unrealized gains on marketable securities, net of
income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
14,426,634
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
87,080
|
|
|
$
|
101,102
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
188,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
223,000
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
10,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,633
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,033
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(603,382
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(109,119
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109,125
|
)
|
Restricted stock grant
|
|
|
42,937
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,561
|
|
Common stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,076
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,076
|
)
|
Change in net unrealized losses on marketable securities, net of
income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
14,089,189
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
17,185
|
|
|
$
|
158,834
|
|
|
$
|
(79
|
)
|
|
$
|
176,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
47
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
52,307
|
|
|
$
|
64,937
|
|
|
$
|
80,808
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(281
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred rent
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
Gain on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(785
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,059
|
|
|
|
8,523
|
|
|
|
10,761
|
|
Provision for student loan losses
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(4,034
|
)
|
|
|
(5,700
|
)
|
|
|
226
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
7,413
|
|
|
|
9,834
|
|
|
|
10,561
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuition receivable, net
|
|
|
(24,818
|
)
|
|
|
(19,898
|
)
|
|
|
(30,807
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(1,710
|
)
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
(2,217
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
4,581
|
|
|
|
2,911
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
4,801
|
|
|
|
12,453
|
|
|
|
9,745
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based payment arrangements
|
|
|
(3,595
|
)
|
|
|
(12,678
|
)
|
|
|
(18,033
|
)
|
Unearned tuition
|
|
|
18,118
|
|
|
|
17,580
|
|
|
|
23,396
|
|
Deferred lease incentives
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
1,547
|
|
Student loans originated or acquired
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collections on student loans receivable
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
61,769
|
|
|
|
80,753
|
|
|
|
88,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(13,183
|
)
|
|
|
(14,869
|
)
|
|
|
(20,657
|
)
|
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
(30,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,969
|
)
|
Proceeds from the sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(43,183
|
)
|
|
|
(9,115
|
)
|
|
|
5,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regular common dividends paid
|
|
|
(15,284
|
)
|
|
|
(19,027
|
)
|
|
|
(23,076
|
)
|
Special common dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,853
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
6,595
|
|
|
|
15,178
|
|
|
|
10,633
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based payment arrangements
|
|
|
3,595
|
|
|
|
12,678
|
|
|
|
18,033
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(35,041
|
)
|
|
|
(38,094
|
)
|
|
|
(109,125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(40,135
|
)
|
|
|
(29,265
|
)
|
|
|
(132,388
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(21,549
|
)
|
|
|
42,373
|
|
|
|
(38,657
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year
|
|
|
74,212
|
|
|
|
52,663
|
|
|
|
95,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of year
|
|
$
|
52,663
|
|
|
$
|
95,036
|
|
|
$
|
56,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment included in accounts payable
|
|
$
|
501
|
|
|
$
|
2,349
|
|
|
$
|
811
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
48
Strayer Education, Inc. (the Company), a Maryland
corporation, conducts its operations through its wholly owned
subsidiary, Strayer University, Inc. (the
University). The University is an accredited
institution of higher education that provides undergraduate and
graduate degrees in various fields of study through 65 campuses
(including two campuses opened for the 2009 winter term and
three opened for the 2009 spring term) in Alabama, Delaware,
Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, North
Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah,
Virginia, West Virginia, and Washington, D.C., and
worldwide via the Internet. With the Companys focus on the
customer, regardless of whether he or she chooses to take
classes at a physical campus or online, we have only one
reporting segment.
|
|
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its subsidiaries, the University, Education Loan
Processing, Inc., and Professional Education, Inc. (The
University is the only subsidiary that is currently active). All
inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
the consolidated financial statements.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash invested in bank
overnight deposits and money market mutual funds. The Company
places its cash and temporary cash investments with various
financial institutions. The Company considers all highly liquid
instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less at
the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Marketable
Securities
Most of the Companys excess cash is invested in tax-exempt
money market funds and a diversified, short-term, investment
grade, tax-exempt bond fund to minimize the Companys
principal risk and to benefit from the tax efficiency of the
funds underlying securities. As of December 31, 2008,
the Company had $51.0 million, as determined by the quoted
market price, invested in the short-term tax-exempt bond fund.
The investments are considered available-for-sale as
they are not held for trading and will not be held to maturity,
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities. The Company records the net unrealized
gains and losses for changes in fair value as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders
equity. Realized gains and losses from the sale of marketable
securities are based on the specific identification method.
Revenues
The Companys educational programs are offered on a
quarterly basis. Approximately 97% of the Companys
revenues during the year ended December 31, 2008 consisted
of tuition revenue. Tuition revenue is recognized in the quarter
of instruction. Tuition revenue is shown net of any refunds,
withdrawals, corporate discounts, scholarships and employee
tuition discounts. At the time of registration, a liability
(unearned tuition) is recorded for academic services to be
provided and a tuition receivable is recorded for the portion of
the tuition not paid upfront in cash. Revenues also include
textbook-related income, application fees, commencement fees,
placement test fees, withdrawal fees, loan administration fees
and other income, which are all recognized when incurred.
49
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Concentration
of Credit Risk
The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments in
money market mutual funds and bank overnight deposits with
various financial institutions. Cash and cash equivalent
balances are in excess of the FDIC insurance limit. The Company
has not experienced any losses on its cash and cash equivalents.
At December 31, 2008, most of the Companys cash and
cash equivalents were invested in money market funds which are
participating in the U.S. Treasury Departments Guarantee
Program. This program provides coverage up to certain thresholds
to account holders in the event that a funds net asset
value drops below $1.00. The Company has also invested its
excess cash in a diversified, short-term, investment grade,
tax-exempt bond fund that is classified under Marketable
Securities.
Tuition receivables are not collateralized; however, credit risk
is minimized as a result of the diverse nature of the
Universitys student base. The University establishes an
allowance for doubtful tuition accounts based upon historical
trends and other information.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. In accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the carrying
values of the Companys assets are re-evaluated when events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
an asset may not be recoverable. If it is determined that an
impairment loss has occurred based on expected undiscounted
future cash flows, then a loss is recognized using a fair-value
based model. Through 2008, no such impairment loss had occurred.
Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives ranging
from 3 to 40 years. Depreciation and amortization amounted
to $7.1 million, $8.5 million, and $10.8 million
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
respectively.
Purchases of property and equipment and changes in accounts
payable for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008 in the Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows have been adjusted to exclude non-cash purchases of
property and equipment transactions during that period.
Income
Taxes
The Company provides for deferred income taxes based on
temporary differences between financial statement and income tax
bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in
effect in the year in which the differences are expected to
reverse.
The Company adopted the provisions of Financial Standards
Accounting Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48), an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(SFAS 109), on January 1, 2007. As a
result of the implementation of FIN 48, no material
adjustment in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits
was recognized. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits at the
adoption date of January 1, 2007 and at December 31,
2007 and 2008 are immaterial. The Company recognizes interest
and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax
expense. As of December 31, 2008, the amount of accrued
interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions was
immaterial. The tax years
2005-2007
remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to
which the Company is subject.
Advertising
Costs
The Company expenses advertising costs in the quarter in which
incurred, except for costs associated with the production of
television commercials which are expensed when the commercial is
first used.
50
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Long-Term
Liabilities
The Company has no debt; most of its long-term liabilities are
for lease incentives related to the opening of new campuses, the
straight-lining of rent expense, and a deferred gain related to
the sale and lease back of a campus facility. In conjunction
with the opening of some new campuses and other facilities, the
Company was reimbursed by the lessors for improvements made to
those leased properties. In accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board Technical
Bulletin No. 88-1,
these reimbursements were capitalized as leasehold improvements
and a long-term liability established. The leasehold
improvements and the long-term liability are amortized on a
straight-line basis over the corresponding lease terms, which
range from five to ten years. In accordance with the FASB
Technical
Bulletin No. 85-3,
Accounting for Operating Leases with Schedule Rent
Increases, the Company records rent expense on a
straight-line basis over the initial term of a lease. The
difference between the rent payment and the straight-line rent
expense is recorded as a long-term liability. The Company also
records the non-current portion of the gain related to the sale
and lease back of a campus facility as a long-term liability.
(See Note 7 below for more information.)
Stock-Based
Compensation
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-based
Payment (SFAS 123(R)), which requires the
measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all
share-based payment awards made to employees and directors,
including employee stock options and employee stock purchases
related to the Companys Employee Stock Purchase Plan based
on estimated fair values. SFAS 123(R) supersedes the
Companys previous accounting under Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (APB 25) for periods beginning
January 1, 2006. In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange
Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107
(SAB 107) relating to SFAS 123(R). The
Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its
adoption of SFAS 123(R).
The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified
prospective transition method provided under the rule, which
requires the application of the accounting standard as of
January 1, 2006. In adopting SFAS 123(R), the Company
used the long-form method of calculating the accumulated
windfall tax benefit. The Companys consolidated financial
statements as of and for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2006, 2007, and 2008 reflect the impact of
SFAS 123(R). In accordance with the modified prospective
transition method provided under the rule, the Companys
consolidated financial statements for prior periods have not
been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of
SFAS 123(R). Stock-based compensation expense related to
restricted stock grants is expensed over the vesting period
using the straight-line method for Company employees and the
graded-vesting method for members of the Board of Directors.
SFAS 123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value
of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an
option-pricing model. The Company has elected to estimate fair
value using the Black-Scholes option pricing valuation model.
The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately
expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite
service periods in the Companys Consolidated Statements of
Income. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company
accounted for stock-based awards to employees and directors
using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB 25
pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation
(FAS 123). Under the intrinsic value
method, no stock-based compensation expense was recognized in
the Companys Consolidated Statements of Income for stock
options because the exercise price of the Companys stock
options granted to employees and directors equaled the fair
market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant.
51
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Income for the twelve
months ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 included
compensation expense for share-based payment awards granted
prior to, but not yet vested as of December 31, 2005, based
on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the
pro forma provisions of FAS 123 and compensation expense
for the share-based payment awards granted subsequent to
December 31, 2005, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R).
As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 is based on awards
ultimately expected to vest, the amounts have been reduced for
estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to
be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in
subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on historical
experience.
The Companys determination of fair value of share-based
payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing
model is affected by the Companys stock price as well as
assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective
variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the
Companys expected stock price volatility over the term of
the awards, and actual and projected employee stock option
exercise behaviors.
No stock options were granted in 2006, 2007 or 2008.
Net
Income Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the periods. Diluted earnings per share
reflects the potential dilution that could occur assuming
conversion or exercise of all dilutive unexercised stock options
and restricted stock. The dilutive effect of stock options was
determined using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury
stock method, the proceeds received from the exercise of stock
options, the amount of compensation cost for future service not
yet recognized by the Company and the amount of tax benefits
that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital when the
stock options become deductible for income tax purposes are all
assumed to be used to repurchase shares of the Companys
common stock. Stock options are not included in the computation
of diluted earnings per share when the stock option exercise
price of an individual grant exceeds the average market price
for the period. At December 31, 2008, the Company had no
issued and outstanding stock options that were excluded from the
calculation.
Set forth below is a reconciliation of shares used to calculate
basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding used to compute basic
earnings per share
|
|
|
14,187
|
|
|
|
14,248
|
|
|
|
14,015
|
|
Incremental shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Unvested restricted stock
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
14,492
|
|
|
|
14,517
|
|
|
|
14,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
expenses during the period reported. The most significant
management estimates
52
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
included allowances for uncollectible accounts, accrued
expenses, forfeiture rates for stock-based awards, and the
provision for income taxes. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Comprehensive
Income
Comprehensive income consists of net income and unrealized gains
(losses) on investments in marketable securities, net of income
taxes.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 157 (SFAS 157),
Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value,
establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures regarding fair value measurements. SFAS 157
does not require any new fair value measurements but rather
eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior
accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. Earlier adoption
is permitted, provided that the company has not yet issued
financial statements, including for interim periods, for that
fiscal year. The adoption of SFAS 157, effective
January 1, 2007, did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 158. Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans (SFAS 158), an amendment to
FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). SFAS 158
requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded
status of a defined benefit pension and other postretirement
benefit plan as an asset or liability in its statement of
financial position and to recognize changes in that funded
status in the year in which the changes occur through other
non-owner changes in equity. The standard also requires
disclosure in the notes to the financial statements of
additional information about certain effects on net periodic
benefit costs of the next fiscal year that arise from delayed
recognition of gains or losses, prior services costs and
transition asset or obligation. An employer with publicly traded
equity securities is required to initially recognize the funded
status of a defined benefit postretirement plan and to provide
the required disclosures as of the end of the fiscal year ending
after December 15, 2006. The adoption of SFAS 158 did
not have a material effect on the Companys financial
position or results of operations since it has no defined
benefit pension or other postretirement plan.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS 159). This statement permits entities
to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain
other items at fair value that are not currently required to be
measured at fair value. This statement also establishes
presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate
comparisons between entities that choose different measurement
attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities.
SFAS 159 is effective for the first fiscal year beginning
after November 15, 2007. The adoption of SFAS 159,
effective January 1, 2007, did not have a material effect
on the Companys financial position or results of
operations.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. EITF
03-6-1 (FSP
EITF 03-6-1),
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.
This staff position sets forth requirements related to certain
share-based payment awards that entitle holders to receive
non-forfeitable dividends before they vest and will also be
treated as participating securities in basic and diluted EPS
calculations. FSP
EITF 03-6-1
is effective for the first fiscal year beginning after
December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact
of FSP EITF 03-6-1 on our consolidated financial statements.
53
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
3.
|
Investments
Marketable Securities
|
The cost and fair value for investments in marketable securities
as of December 31, 2007 and 2008 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
$
|
76,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,969
|
|
Gross unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
$
|
76,299
|
|
|
$
|
50,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has invested some of its excess cash in a
diversified, no load, short-term, investment grade, tax-exempt
bond fund. At December 31, 2008, the 577 issues in this
fund had an average credit rating of AA, an average maturity of
1.3 years, an average duration of 1.1 years, and an
average yield to maturity of 2.4%.
|
|
4.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
The composition of property and equipment as of
December 31, 2007 and 2008 is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated useful life
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(years)
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
5,726
|
|
|
$
|
5,726
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
18,144
|
|
|
|
18,610
|
|
|
5-40
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
48,647
|
|
|
|
62,078
|
|
|
5-7
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
18,672
|
|
|
|
25,689
|
|
|
3-10
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
2,786
|
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,975
|
|
|
|
113,094
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(36,029
|
)
|
|
|
(46,790
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,946
|
|
|
$
|
66,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2007 and 2008, the Company recorded leasehold improvements of
$968,000 and $1,547,000, respectively, which were reimbursed by
lessors as lease incentives. In 2007 and 2008, the Company
wrote-off $530,000 and $0, respectively, in fixed assets that
were fully depreciated and no longer in service.
In 2003, as part of commencing operations in Pennsylvania, the
Company was required to maintain a minimum protective
endowment of at least $500,000 in an interest-bearing
account. These funds are required as long as the Company
operates its campuses in the state. The Company accounts for
these funds as a long-term asset.
|
|
6.
|
Stock
Options and Restricted Stock
|
In July 1996, the Companys stockholders approved
1,500,000 shares of common stock for grants under the
Companys 1996 Stock Option Plan (as amended, the
Plan). This Plan was amended by the stockholders at
the May 2001 Annual Stockholders Meeting and at the May
2005 Annual Stockholders Meeting to increase the number of
shares authorized for issuance thereunder by 1,000,000 and
500,000, respectively. A total of 3,000,000 shares have
therefore been approved for grant under the Plan. The Plan was
again amended at the May 2006 Annual Stockholders Meeting
to
54
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
authorize a one-time exchange of stock options for restricted
stock by employees (excluding the five highest compensated
executive officers) and to permit restricted stock and cash
awards to qualify for favorable tax treatment under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan
provides for the grant of options intended to qualify as
incentive stock options, and also provides for the grant of
non-qualifying options and restricted stock to employees,
officers and directors of the Company. Options and restricted
stock may be granted to eligible employees, officers or
directors of the Company at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. Vesting provisions are also at the discretion of the
Board of Directors. Options may be granted at option prices
based at or above the fair market value of the shares at the
date of grant. The maximum term of the options granted under the
Plan is ten years.
In February 2006, the Companys Board of Directors approved
cash payments to the holders of vested stock options in an
amount equivalent to the Companys common stock dividends.
These cash payments are remitted on the same dates as the
Companys dividends and amounted to $0.6 million in
2006, $0.4 million in 2007, and $0.6 million in 2008.
In February 2008, the Companys Board of Directors approved
a grant of 42,536 shares of restricted stock to certain
employees. These shares vest over a 3 - 5 year period. The
Companys stock price closed at $162.10 on the date of the
restricted stock grant.
In April 2008, the Company awarded 2,617 shares of
restricted stock to various non-employee members of the
Companys Board of Directors as part of its annual director
compensation program. These shares vest over three years, with
one-third of the stock vesting each year. The Companys
stock price closed at $179.89 on the date of this restricted
stock grant.
Stock
Options
All stock options granted after 2000 vest over three to four
years with exercise prices ranging from $33.69 to $119.72. These
options expire within six to eight years from date of grant and
had a weighted-average contractual life of 3.8 years as of
December 31, 2008.
55
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The table below sets forth the stock option activity for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 and other
stock option information at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
intrinsic
value(1)
|
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
life (yrs.)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
1,103,334
|
|
|
$
|
62.79
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
38,620
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercises
|
|
|
(149,334
|
)
|
|
|
44.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures/Exchanges
|
|
|
(191,666
|
)
|
|
|
102.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
762,334
|
|
|
$
|
56.42
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
37,338
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercises
|
|
|
(372,250
|
)
|
|
|
40.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
390,084
|
|
|
$
|
71.35
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
38,710
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercises
|
|
|
(223,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
47.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
167,084
|
|
|
$
|
102.98
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
18,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
16,667
|
|
|
$
|
64.22
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
2,503
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
16,667
|
|
|
$
|
64.22
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
2,503
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in
the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value
(the difference between the Companys closing stock price
on December 31 of each year and the exercise price, multiplied
by the number of in-the- money options) that would have been
received by the option holders had all option holders exercised
their options on December 31 of that year. The amount of
aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market
value of our stock.
|
The number of shares exercisable as of December 31, 2006,
2007, and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
561,917
|
|
|
$
|
41.88
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
229,667
|
|
|
$
|
45.71
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
16,667
|
|
|
$
|
64.22
|
|
The following table summarizes information regarding share-based
payment arrangements for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2007 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
$
|
6,595
|
|
|
$
|
15,178
|
|
|
$
|
10,633
|
|
Excess tax benefits related to share-based payment arrangements
|
|
$
|
3,595
|
|
|
$
|
12,678
|
|
|
$
|
18,033
|
|
Intrinsic value of stock options
exercised(1)
|
|
$
|
9,225
|
|
|
$
|
32,588
|
|
|
$
|
28,581
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Intrinsic value of stock options
exercised is estimated by taking the difference between the
Companys closing stock price on the date of exercise and
the exercise price, multiplied by the number of options
exercised for each option holder and then aggregated.
|
56
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes information about the stock
options to purchase the Companys common stock at
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
exercisable
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
Exercise prices
|
|
at 12/31/08
|
|
|
life (yrs.)
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
at 12/31/08
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
$61.81
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
61.81
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
61.81
|
|
$67.84
|
|
|
6,667
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
67.84
|
|
|
|
6,667
|
|
|
$
|
67.84
|
|
$107.28
|
|
|
150,417
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
$
|
107.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,084
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
102.98
|
|
|
|
16,667
|
|
|
$
|
64.22
|
|
Restricted
Stock
The table below sets forth the restricted stock activity for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
grant price
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
$
|
100.58
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
208,567
|
|
|
|
102.01
|
|
Vested shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures
|
|
|
(7,500
|
)
|
|
|
91.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
205,567
|
|
|
$
|
102.37
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
24,878
|
|
|
|
117.09
|
|
Vested shares
|
|
|
(1,543
|
)
|
|
|
103.60
|
|
Forfeitures
|
|
|
(3,260
|
)
|
|
|
103.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
225,642
|
|
|
$
|
103.97
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
45,153
|
|
|
|
163.13
|
|
Vested shares
|
|
|
(146,484
|
)
|
|
|
101.79
|
|
Forfeitures
|
|
|
(2,216
|
)
|
|
|
115.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
122,095
|
|
|
$
|
124.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation and Expense Information Under SFAS 123(R) and
Pro forma Information Under SFAS 123 for Periods Prior to
January 1, 2006.
At December 31, 2008, total stock-based compensation cost
which has not yet been recognized was $7.6 million,
representing $7.4 million for unvested restricted stock and
$0.2 million for unvested stock options. This cost is
expected to be recognized over the next 31 months on a
weighted-average basis.
57
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the amount of stock-based
compensation expense recorded in each of the expense line items
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Instruction and educational support
|
|
$
|
638
|
|
|
$
|
680
|
|
|
$
|
1,218
|
|
Selling and promotion
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
General and administration
|
|
|
6,866
|
|
|
|
8,893
|
|
|
|
9,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense included in operating expense
|
|
|
8,049
|
|
|
|
10,207
|
|
|
|
11,127
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
2,992
|
|
|
|
3,879
|
|
|
|
4,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax
|
|
$
|
5,057
|
|
|
$
|
6,328
|
|
|
$
|
6,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
Incentives
In conjunction with the opening of new campuses during 2007 and
2008, the Company recorded reimbursements by the lessors for
improvements made to the leased properties in the amount of
$1.0 million and $1.5 million, respectively. In
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Technical
Bulletin No. 88-1,
these reimbursements were capitalized as leasehold improvements
and a long-term liability established. The leasehold
improvements and the long-term liability will be amortized on a
straight-line basis over the corresponding lease terms, which
range from five to 10 years. As of December 31, 2007
and 2008, the Company had deferred lease incentives of
$3.9 million and $4.5 million, respectively.
Lease
Obligations
In accordance with the FASB Technical
Bulletin No. 85-3,
Accounting for Operating Leases with Schedule Rent
Increases, the Company records rent expense on a
straight-line basis over the initial term of a lease. The
difference between the rent payment and the straight-line rent
expense is recorded as a long-term liability. As of
December 31, 2007 and 2008, the Company had lease
obligations of $4.6 million and $5.1 million,
respectively.
Deferred
Gain
In conjunction with the sale and lease back of its Loudoun,
Virginia campus building in June 2007, the Company realized a
gain of $2.8 million before tax, which is deferred and
recognized over the
10-year
lease term. The non-current portion of this gain, which is
recorded as a long-term liability, was $2.4 million and
$2.1 million at December 31, 2007 and 2008,
respectively.
|
|
8.
|
Sale of
Campus Building
|
In June 2007, the Company sold its Loudoun, Virginia campus
building for $5.8 million. The Company is leasing back most
of the campus building over a
10-year
period. The transaction resulted in a gain of $2.8 million
before tax, which is to be recognized over the
10-year
lease term.
|
|
9.
|
Other
Employee Benefit Plans
|
The Company has a 401(k) plan covering all eligible employees of
the Company. Participants may contribute up to $16,500
(effective January 1, 2009) of their base compensation
annually. Employee contributions are voluntary. Discretionary
contributions were made by the Company in 2006, matching 100% of
employee deferrals up to a maximum of 3% of the employees
annual salary.
58
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Beginning in 2007, the Company matched an additional 50% of
employee deferrals between 3% and 5% of annual salary. The
Companys contributions totaled $0.7 million,
$1.1 million, and $1.4 million for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively.
In May 1998, the Company adopted the Strayer Education, Inc.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). Under the ESPP,
eligible employees may purchase shares of the Companys
common stock, subject to certain limitations, at 90% of its
market value at the date of purchase. Purchases are limited to
10% of an employees eligible compensation. The aggregate
number of shares of common stock that may be made available for
purchase by participating employees under the ESPP is
2,500,000 shares. Shares purchased in the open market for
employees for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007, and
2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price
|
|
|
|
Shares purchased
|
|
|
per share
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
4,767
|
|
|
$
|
91.33
|
|
2007
|
|
|
3,830
|
|
|
$
|
136.33
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3,208
|
|
|
$
|
175.86
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Stock
Repurchase Plan
|
As announced on November 3, 2003, the Companys Board
of Directors initially authorized the Company to repurchase up
to an aggregate of $15 million in value of common stock
through December 31, 2004 in open market purchases from
time to time at the discretion of the Companys management
depending on market conditions and other corporate
considerations. The Companys Board of Directors amended
the program on various dates, increasing the repurchase amount
authorized and extending the expiration date. At
December 31, 2008, approximately $70 million of the
Companys share repurchase authorization was remaining for
repurchases through December 31, 2009. All of the
Companys share repurchases were effected in compliance
with
Rule 10b-18
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This
stock repurchase plan may be modified, suspended or terminated
at any time by the Company without notice.
A summary of the Companys stock repurchase activity for
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007, and 2008, all of
which was part of a publicly announced plan, is set forth in the
table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount available for
|
|
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
Average price paid
|
|
|
future repurchases
|
|
|
|
repurchased
|
|
|
per share
|
|
|
(mil.)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
349,066
|
|
|
$
|
100.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
260,818
|
|
|
$
|
146.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
603,382
|
|
|
$
|
180.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,213,266
|
|
|
$
|
150.22
|
|
|
$
|
70.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The University participates in various federal student financial
assistance programs which are subject to audit. Management
believes that the potential effects of audit adjustments, if
any, for the periods currently under audit will not have a
material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company had 67 long-term
operating leases for campuses and other administrative
locations. Rent expense was $12,828,000, $15,327,000, and
$19,690,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and
2008, respectively.
59
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The rents on the Companys leases are subject to annual
increases. The minimum rental commitments for the Company as of
December 31, 2008 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
rental
|
|
|
|
commitments
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
21,290
|
|
2010
|
|
|
22,965
|
|
2011
|
|
|
24,327
|
|
2012
|
|
|
22,243
|
|
2013
|
|
|
20,425
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
79,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
190,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the Company has available two $10 million
credit facilities from two banks. Interest on any borrowings
under either facility will accrue at an annual rate not to
exceed 0.75% above the London Interbank Offered Rate. The
Company does not pay any fees for these facilities. There have
been no borrowings by the Company under these credit facilities.
An unsecured letter of credit in the amount of
$1.4 million, which expires in June 2009, was provided by
Strayer University in favor of regulators in connection with
their periodic approval activities.
On October 30, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
declared a special common stock dividend of $2.00 per share, or
$28.9 million, which was paid on January 16, 2008 to
all shareholders of record on January 2, 2008.
The income tax provision for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2007 and 2008 is summarized below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
29,486
|
|
|
$
|
36,500
|
|
|
$
|
41,670
|
|
State
|
|
|
6,319
|
|
|
|
8,159
|
|
|
|
8,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
35,805
|
|
|
|
44,659
|
|
|
|
50,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(3,680
|
)
|
|
|
(4,935
|
)
|
|
|
89
|
|
State
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
(609
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
(4,034
|
)
|
|
|
(5,544
|
)
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
31,771
|
|
|
$
|
39,115
|
|
|
$
|
50,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The tax effects of the principal temporary differences that give
rise to the Companys deferred tax assets are as follows as
of December 31, 2007 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Tuition receivable and student loans
|
|
$
|
1,264
|
|
|
$
|
1,884
|
|
Accrued vacation payable
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
Deferred gain on sale of property
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Unrealized gains on marketable securities
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current net deferred tax asset
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
2,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student loans
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(687
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
Deferred leasing costs
|
|
|
1,816
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
6,762
|
|
|
|
5,083
|
|
Deferred gain on sale of property
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term net deferred tax asset
|
|
|
8,830
|
|
|
|
7,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
10,326
|
|
|
$
|
10,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation between the Companys statutory tax rate
and the effective tax rate for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2007 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Statutory federal rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefits
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Non-taxable interest income
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
37.8
|
%
|
|
|
37.6
|
%
|
|
|
38.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments for income taxes were $31.0 million in 2006,
$32.4 million in 2007, and $40.6 million in 2008.
61
STRAYER
EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
Summarized
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
Quarterly financial information for 2007 and 2008 is as follows
(in thousands except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
2007
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
80,193
|
|
|
$
|
78,875
|
|
|
$
|
69,813
|
|
|
$
|
89,131
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
28,947
|
|
|
|
26,351
|
|
|
|
13,058
|
|
|
|
29,201
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
18,806
|
|
|
|
17,360
|
|
|
|
9,275
|
|
|
|
19,496
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
1.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
2008
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
97,074
|
|
|
$
|
97,928
|
|
|
$
|
86,993
|
|
|
$
|
114,280
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
35,559
|
|
|
|
33,607
|
|
|
|
18,251
|
|
|
|
39,435
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
23,522
|
|
|
|
21,323
|
|
|
|
11,762
|
|
|
|
24,202
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
1.71
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bad debt
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
expense as
|
|
|
|
beginning of
|
|
|
charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
end of
|
|
|
a % of
|
|
Description
|
|
period
|
|
|
expense
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
period
|
|
|
revenue
|
|
|
Deduction from asset account:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
3,206
|
|
|
$
|
12,707
|
|
|
$
|
(11,137
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,776
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
3,029
|
|
|
|
10,547
|
|
|
|
(10,370
|
)
|
|
|
3,206
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,927
|
|
|
|
7,776
|
|
|
|
(6,674
|
)
|
|
|
3,029
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
The Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2008.
Based upon such review, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that the Company had in place,
as of December 31, 2008, effective controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
the Company (including consolidated subsidiaries) in the reports
it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and the rules thereunder, is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
an issuer in reports it files or submits under the Securities
Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the
Companys management, including its principal executive
officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers,
or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Companys management is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f).
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
63
Under the supervision and with the participation of the
Companys principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, the Companys management assessed the
effectiveness of the registrants internal control over
financial reporting, as of December 31, 2008 based on the
framework in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our
assessment under the framework in Internal
Control Integrated Framework, our management
concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of December 31, 2008.
The effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 has been
audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears
herein.
Changes
in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
The Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have evaluated any changes in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the quarter ended December 31, 2008, and have concluded
that there was no change during such quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
On February 10, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Company
approved and adopted an amendment to the Companys By-laws
to implement a majority voting policy, as well as a related
corporate governance policy concerning the holdover
of any directors not elected by a majority vote, replacing the
Companys current plurality voting standard. To
address the concern of a failed election, i.e., that
in any specific election no director nominee would receive the
requisite majority vote, the new majority voting policy provides
that: (1) in the case of any contested election, where
shareholders are given a choice between candidates, the
plurality voting rule would still apply so that the director
candidate receiving the highest vote total would prevail, and
(2) in an uncontested election, a director who fails to
receive the requisite majority vote would be required to
promptly offer his resignation and the Board, following the
recommendation of the Companys Nominating and Governance
Committee, would have up to 90 days to decide whether to
accept such offer, during which time the director nominee would
continue to serve on the Board as a holdover
director. Such period would provide the Board with time to seek
an alternative director and ensure compliance with applicable
NASDAQ and SEC requirements.
A copy of the amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit 3.03
and is incorporated by reference. A copy of this new corporate
governance policy is available on our website at
www.strayereducation.com.
64
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to the Companys directors and executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert S. Silberman
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Charlotte F. Beason
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. Brock
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David A. Coulter
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert R. Grusky
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert L. Johnson
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Todd A. Milano
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Thomas Waite, III
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. David Wargo
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Karl McDonnell
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark C. Brown
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lysa A. Hlavinka
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory Ferenbach
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sonya G. Udler
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Corporate Communications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
University Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Sondra F. Stallard
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
University President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Joel O. Nwagbaraocha
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Provost and Chief Academic Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randi Reich Cosentino
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Academic Administration
|
Directors
Mr. Robert S. Silberman has been Chairman of the
Board since February 2003 and Chief Executive Officer since
March 2001. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. Silberman served in a
variety of senior management positions at CalEnergy Company,
Inc., including as President and Chief Operating Officer. From
1993 to 1995, Mr. Silberman was Assistant to the Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of International Paper Company. From
1989 to 1993, Mr. Silberman served in several senior
positions in the U.S. Department of Defense, including as
Assistant Secretary of the Army. Mr. Silberman has been a
Director of Strayer since March 2001. He serves on the Board of
Directors of Covanta Holding Company, NewPage Holding
Corporation, and on the Management Advisory Board of New
Mountain Capital, LLC. He also serves on the Board of Visitors
of The Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International
Studies. Mr. Silberman is a member of the Council on
Foreign Relations. Mr. Silberman holds a bachelors
degree in history from Dartmouth College and a masters
degree in international policy from The Johns Hopkins University.
Dr. Charlotte F. Beason is a former consultant in
education and health care administration. From 1988 to 1996, she
was Director of Health Professions Education Service and the
Health Professional Scholarship Program at the Department of
Veterans Affairs. From 2000 to 2003, Dr. Beason was Chair
65
and Vice Chair of the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education
(an autonomous agency accrediting baccalaureate and graduate
programs in nursing); she is an evaluator for the Commission on
Collegiate Nursing Education. Dr. Beason has served on the
Board since 1996 and is a member of the Nominating/Governance
Committee of the Board. She is also Chairwoman of the Strayer
University Board of Trustees. Dr. Beason holds a
bachelors degree in nursing from Berea College, a
masters degree in psychiatric nursing from Boston
University and a doctorate in clinical psychology and public
practice from Harvard University.
Mr. William E. Brock is the Founder and Chairman of
the Brock Offices, a firm specializing in international trade,
investment and human resources. From 1985 to 1987,
Mr. Brock served in the Presidents Cabinet as the
U.S. Secretary of Labor, and from 1981 to 1985, as the
U.S. Trade Representative. Elected Chairman of the
Republican National Committee from 1977 to 1981, Mr. Brock
previously served as a Member of Congress and, subsequently, as
U.S. Senator for the State of Tennessee. Mr. Brock
serves as a Counselor and Trustee of the Center for Strategic
and International Studies, and as a member of the Board of
Directors of On Assignment, Inc., and Health Extras, Inc., and
ResCare, Inc. Mr. Brock has been a member of the Board
since 2001 and is Chair of the Nominating/Governance Committee
of the Board. He holds a bachelors degree in commerce from
Washington and Lee University. Mr. Brock has also received
a number of honorary degrees.
Mr. David A. Coulter is currently Managing Director
and Senior Advisor at Warburg Pincus, LLC. He was Vice Chairman
of J.P. Morgan & Chase Co. from December 2000 to
December 2005. Mr. Coulter was Vice Chairman of The Chase
Manhattan Corporation from July 2000 to December 2000.
Prior to joining Chase, Mr. Coulter led the West Coast
operations of the Beacon Group, a private investment and
strategic advisory firm, and prior to that, Mr. Coulter
served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
BankAmerica Corporation. Mr. Coulter is a member of the
Board of Directors of The Irvine Company, Metavante
Technologies, Inc., Aeolus Re, and MBIA, Inc. Mr. Coulter
is currently serving as the Presiding Independent Director of
the Strayer Education, Inc. Board of Directors, on which he has
served since 2002. Mr. Coulter holds a bachelors
degree in mathematics and economics and a masters degree
in industrial administration, both from Carnegie Mellon
University.
Mr. Robert R. Grusky is the Founder and Managing
Member of Hope Capital Management, LLC, an investment manager,
since 2000. He co-founded New Mountain Capital, LLC, a private
equity firm, in 2000 and was a Principal and Member from 2000 to
2005, and has been a Senior Advisor since then. From 1998 to
2000, Mr. Grusky served as President of RSL Investments
Corporation. From 1985 to 1997, with the exception of 1990 to
1991 when he was on a leave of absence to serve as a White House
Fellow and Assistant for Special Projects to the Secretary of
Defense, Mr. Grusky served in a variety of capacities at
Goldman, Sachs & Co., first in its Mergers &
Acquisitions Department and then in its Principal Investment
Area. He is also on the Board of Directors of AutoNation, Inc.,
and AutoZone, Inc., as well as a member of the Board of Trustees
of Hackley School. Mr. Grusky has served on the Board since
2001, and is a member of the Audit Committee of the Board. He
holds a bachelors degree in history from Union College and
an MBA from Harvard University.
Mr. Robert L. Johnson is the Founder and Chairman of
The RLJ Companies, which owns or holds interests in companies
operating in the banking/financial services, real estate,
hospitality, professional sports, film production, gaming and
automotive industries. Mr. Johnson is the founder of Black
Entertainment Television (BET), a subsidiary of Viacom and the
leading
African-American
operated media and entertainment company in the United States,
and served as its Chief Executive Officer until January 2006. In
2002, Mr. Johnson became the first
African-American
majority owner of a major sports franchise, the Charlotte
Bobcats of the NBA. From 1976 to 1979, he served as Vice
President of Governmental Relations for the National
Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA).
Mr. Johnson also served as Press Secretary for the
Honorable Walter E. Fauntroy, Congressional Delegate from the
District of Columbia. He also serves on the following boards: KB
Home, Lowes Companies, Inc., NBA Board of Governors,
Deutsche Bank Advisory Committee, The Business Council, The
Johns Hopkins University, and the Smithsonian Institutions
National Museum of African
66
American History and Culture. Mr. Johnson has served on the
Board since 2003, and is a member of the Compensation Committee
of the Board. He holds a bachelors degree in social
studies from the University of Illinois and a masters
degree in international affairs from the Woodrow Wilson School
of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University.
Mr. Todd A. Milano has been President and Chief
Executive Officer of Central Pennsylvania College since 1989.
Mr. Milano has served on the Board since 1996 and is a
member of the Compensation Committee of the Board and is also a
member of the Strayer University Board of Trustees.
Mr. Milano holds a bachelors degree in industrial
management from Purdue University.
Mr. G. Thomas Waite, III has been Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Humane Society of the United
States since 1993. In 1992, Mr. Waite was the Director of
Commercial Management of The National Housing Partnership.
Mr. Waite has served on the Board since 1996, is a member
of the Audit Committee of the Board and is a former member of
the Strayer University Board of Trustees. Mr. Waite holds a
bachelors degree in commerce from the University of
Virginia and is a Certified Public Accountant.
Mr. J. David Wargo has been President of Wargo and
Company, Inc., an investment management company, since 1993.
Mr. Wargo is a co-founder and has been a Member of New
Mountain Capital, LLC, since January 2000. From 1989 to 1992,
Mr. Wargo was a Managing Director and Senior Analyst of The
Putnam Companies, a Boston-based investment management company.
From 1985 to 1989, Mr. Wargo was a partner and held other
positions at Marble Arch Partners. Mr. Wargo is a Director
of Liberty Global, Inc. and Discovery Communications, Inc.
Mr. Wargo has served on the Board since 2001 and is Chair
of the Compensation Committee of the Board. Mr. Wargo holds
a bachelors degree in physics and a masters degree
in nuclear engineering, both from the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology. He also holds a masters degree in management
science from the Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology.
Executive
Officers
Mr. Karl McDonnell joined Strayer Education in July
2006 as President and Chief Operating Officer. Previously, he
served as Chief Operating Officer of InteliStaf Healthcare,
Inc., one of the nations largest privately-held healthcare
staffing firms, from 2003 to 2005. Prior to his tenure at
InteliStaf, he served as Vice President of the Investment
Banking Division at Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Mr. McDonnell has held senior management positions with
several Fortune 100 companies, including The Walt Disney
Company. Mr. McDonnell holds a bachelors degree in
political science and American history from Virginia Wesleyan
College and an MBA from Duke University.
Mr. Mark C. Brown is Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, having joined Strayer in 2001.
Mr. Brown was previously the Chief Financial Officer of the
Kantar Group, the information and consultancy division of WPP
Group, a multi-national communications services company. Prior
to that, for nearly 12 years, Mr. Brown held a variety
of management positions at PepsiCo, Inc., including Director of
Corporate Planning for Pepsi Bottling Group and Business Unit
Chief Financial Officer for Pepsi-Cola International.
Mr. Brown is a Certified Public Accountant who started his
career with PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP. Mr. Brown holds a
bachelors degree in accounting from Duke University and an
MBA from Harvard University.
Ms. Lysa A. Hlavinka is Executive Vice President and
Chief Administrative Officer. Ms. Hlavinka has been working
in the for-profit education field for the past 17 years and
joined Strayer in May 2001 as Vice President
Marketing. Ms. Hlavinka started her career as an account
executive at an advertising agency and joined the University of
Phoenix in 1990. As that company grew, Ms. Hlavinka held
positions as Marketing Manager, Director of Administrative
Services, and, most recently, National Director of Advertising.
She has taught marketing and public relations classes both at
the University of Phoenix and Strayer University.
Ms. Hlavinka holds a bachelors degree in advertising
from Arizona State University and an MBA from the University of
Phoenix.
67
Mr. Gregory Ferenbach has served as Senior Vice
President and General Counsel for the Company since September
2006. Mr. Ferenbach joined Strayer in 2002 and was
previously General Counsel of Strayer University, where he was
responsible for obtaining regulatory approvals to begin
operations in new states. Mr. Ferenbach has more than
20 years of experience in the practice of law. Prior to
joining Strayer, Mr. Ferenbach was Senior Vice President
and General Counsel of the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) and
an attorney in corporate practice at the law firms of
Piper & Marbury in Baltimore, Md., and Dow,
Lohnes & Albertson in Washington, D.C.
Mr. Ferenbach holds a bachelors degree in history
from Yale University and a juris doctorate degree from the
University of Virginia School of Law.
Ms. Sonya G. Udler is Senior Vice President,
Corporate Communications. Ms. Udler joined Strayer in 2002,
and brings more than 15 years of public relations and
marketing communications experience to Strayer. For the two
years prior to joining Strayer, she served as a public relations
and media strategies consultant. She previously served as Senior
Vice President at Young & Associates, Inc., a public
relations agency, where she developed communications strategies
and media programs for Bell Atlantic, Siemens, Verizon and other
leading technology companies. Ms. Udler holds a
bachelors degree in journalism from the University of
Maryland.
University
Officers
Dr. Sondra F. Stallard is the University President
and joined Strayer University in September 2007. For the
previous 11 years, she was Dean of the School of Continuing
and Professional Studies at the University of Virginia (UVA).
Prior to that, she served in a series of leadership positions at
UVA, including Director of Corporate and Foundation Relations at
the business school, Director of Development for the school of
engineering, and Director of the Office of Equal Opportunity
Programs. Concurrently, she held faculty appointments throughout
her 32-year
career at UVA. Dr. Stallard holds a bachelors degree
in history and government from West Virginia University
Institute of Technology, a masters degree in history from
Morehead State University, and a Ph.D. in education from the
University of Virginia.
Dr. Joel O. Nwagbaraocha serves as University
Provost and Chief Academic Officer. Dr. Nwagbaraocha joined
Strayer University in 1994 as Adjunct Faculty. He has since held
several positions at the University, including Campus Dean.
Dr. Nwagbaraocha has more than 35 years of experience
as an academician, education administrator and education
consultant. Prior to joining Strayer, he was President of
Barber-Scotia College in Concord, N.C. Dr. Nwagbaraocha
advises graduate students at Strayer Universitys
Washington Campus on their Directed Research Projects and
teaches education courses at the campus. He holds a
bachelors degree in mathematics from Norfolk State
University and masters and doctoral degrees in education
planning and management from Harvard University.
Ms. Randi Reich Cosentino is Senior Vice
President Academic Administration.
Ms. Cosentino has been with the University since 2001 and
has served as Director of Online Operations, Director of
Business Processes, Director of New Campus Openings, and as an
Adjunct Faculty Member. Prior to joining Strayer,
Ms. Cosentino co-founded and managed business and strategic
development for Mascot Network, an application service provider
serving the higher education market. Ms. Cosentino also
served several years in city government with the City of New
York as the Assistant Director in the Mayors Office of
Transportation. Ms. Cosentino holds a bachelors
degree in psychology and political science from the University
of Pennsylvania and an MBA from Harvard University.
Audit
Committee and Audit Committee Financial Experts
The Company has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee
established in accordance with section 3(a)(58)(A) of the
Exchange Act. In 2008, the Audit Committee was composed of
Gary Gensler, Robert R. Grusky, and G. Thomas Waite, each
of whom is independent as that term is defined under NASDAQ
Listing Standards and Rule
10A-3(b)(1)
of the Exchange Act.
68
On February 2, 2009, Gary Gensler resigned from the Board
of Directors and the Audit Committee in view of his nomination
by President Obama to serve as Chair of the Commodities Futures
Trading Commission. On February 10, 2009, the Board of
Directors elected J. David Wargo to serve on the Audit
Committee. Mr. Wargo is independent as that term is defined
under NASDAQ Listing Standards and Rule
10A-3(b)(1)
of the Exchange Act. Also on February 10, 2009, the Board
of Directors appointed Mr. Grusky, a current member of the
Audit Committee, as Chair of the Audit Committee.
The Board of Directors has determined that each of
Mr. Grusky, Mr. Waite and Mr. Wargo qualifies as
an audit committee financial expert, as defined by
SEC regulations, based on their education, experience and
respective backgrounds.
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Companys
directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders to file
reports of beneficial ownership of equity securities of the
Company and to furnish copies of such reports to the Company.
Based on a review of such reports, and upon written
representations from certain reporting persons, the Company
believes that, during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008, all such filing requirements were met.
Code of
Ethics
The Board of Directors adopted a Code of Ethics in February
2004, meeting the requirements of Section 406 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and applicable NASDAQ requirements.
The Code of Conduct was amended on February 12, 2008 to
provide updates and clarifications but was not amended in any
material respect. The Company will provide to any person without
charge, upon request, a copy of such Code of Conduct. Persons
wishing to make such a request should contact Sonya G. Udler,
Senior Vice President of Corporate Communications, 1100 Wilson
Blvd. Suite 2500, Arlington, VA 22209,
(703) 247-2500.
Copies are also available on our website,
www.strayereducation.com in the Investor Relations
section. In the event that we make any amendment to, or grant
any waiver from, a provision of the Code of Conduct that applies
to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
principal accounting officer or controller and requires
disclosure under applicable SEC rules, we intend to disclose
such amendment or waiver and the reasons for the amendment or
waiver on our website, located at
www.strayereducation.com, and as required by NASDAQ, file
a Current Report on
Form 8-K
with the SEC reporting the amendment or waiver.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by
reference from the information to be contained in the
Companys Proxy Statement, which will be filed no later
than 120 days following December 31, 2008.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
|
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by
reference from the information contained under the caption
Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock in the
Companys Proxy Statement, which will be filed no later
than 120 days following December 31, 2008.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
|
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by
reference from the information contained under the caption
Certain Transactions with Related Parties in the
Companys Proxy Statement, which will be filed no later
than 120 days following December 31, 2008.
69
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
Set forth below are the services rendered and related fees
billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP for 2007 and 2008. All of
such services have been pre-approved by the Companys Audit
Committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated financial statements audit
|
|
$
|
374,100
|
|
|
$
|
389,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preparation of corporate tax returns
|
|
|
48,450
|
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
Other tax compliance/tax advice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,469
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License fee for accounting research database
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
424,950
|
|
|
$
|
457,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(A)(1)
Financial Statements
All required financial statements of the registrant are set
forth under Item 8 of this report on
Form 10-K.
(A)(2)
Financial Statement Schedule
The required financial statement schedule of the registrant is
set forth under Item 8 of this report on
Form 10-K.
(A)(3)
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.01
|
|
Amended Articles of Incorporation and
Articles Supplementary of the Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.01 of the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 28, 2002).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.02
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.02 at the Company Annual Report on
form 10-K
filed with the Commission on February 14, 2008).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.03*
|
|
Amendment to Bylaws of the Company dated February 10, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.01
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.01 of Amendment No. 3 to the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-3967)
filed with the Commission on July 16, 1996).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.03
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2001, between
Strayer Education, Inc. and Robert S. Silberman (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.03 of the Companys Annual
Report on From
10-K filed
with the Commission on March 28, 2002).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.04
|
|
1996 Amended Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit B of the Companys Proxy Statement filed with
the Commission on April 27, 2001 and
Exhibits B & C to the Companys Proxy
Statement filed with the Commission on April 3, 2006).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
.01
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 21.01 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 28, 2002).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
.1*
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
.1*
|
|
Power of Attorney (included in signature page hereto).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
of the Securities Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
of the Securities Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
71
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert
S. Silberman
|
Robert S. Silberman
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 17, 2009
POWER OF
ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Robert S. Silberman,
Gregory Ferenbach and Mark C. Brown, and each of them
individually, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for
him and his name, place and stead in any and all capacities, to
sign the report and any and all amendments to this report, and
to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents,
full power and authority to perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as
fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the date
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
TITLE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
S. Silberman
(Robert
S. Silberman)
|
|
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
February 17, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark
C. Brown
(Mark
C. Brown)
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
|
|
February 17, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Charlotte
F. Beason
(Charlotte
F. Beason)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 17, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William
E. Brock
(William
E. Brock)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 17, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
A. Coulter
(David
A. Coulter)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 17, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
R. Grusky
(Robert
R. Grusky)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 17, 2009
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
TITLE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
L. Johnson
(Robert
L. Johnson)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 17, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Todd
A. Milano
(Todd
A. Milano)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 17, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ G.
Thomas Waite, III
(G.
Thomas Waite, III)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 17, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ J.
David Wargo
(J.
David Wargo)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 17, 2009
|
73