e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Commission File Number
|
August 3, 2008
|
|
1-3822
|
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
|
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
21-0419870
|
(State of
Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
No.)
|
1 Campbell Place
Camden, New Jersey
08103-1799
Principal Executive Offices
Telephone
Number:
(856) 342-4800
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
Capital Stock, par value $.0375
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Act. o Yes þ No
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant: (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past
90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). o Yes þ No
As of January 25, 2008 (the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal
quarter), the aggregate market value of capital stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately
$6,903,370,673. There were 360,615,505 shares of capital
stock outstanding as of September 15, 2008.
Portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement for the Annual
Meeting of Shareowners to be held on November 20, 2008, are
incorporated by reference into Part III.
PART I
The
Company
Campbell Soup Company (Campbell or the
company), together with its consolidated
subsidiaries, is a global manufacturer and marketer of
high-quality, branded convenience food products. Campbell was
incorporated as a business corporation under the laws of New
Jersey on November 23, 1922; however, through predecessor
organizations, it traces its heritage in the food business back
to 1869. The companys principal executive offices are in
Camden, New Jersey
08103-1799.
In fiscal 2008, the company continued its focus on achieving
long-term sustainable sales and earnings growth by executing
against the following seven key strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
Expanding the companys icon brands within simple meals,
baked snacks and healthy beverages;
|
|
|
|
Trading consumers up to higher levels of satisfaction centering
on wellness, quality and convenience;
|
|
|
|
Making the companys products more broadly available in
existing and new markets;
|
|
|
|
Strengthening the companys business through outside
partnerships and acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
Increasing margins by improving price realization and
company-wide productivity;
|
|
|
|
Improving overall organizational excellence, diversity,
engagement and innovation; and
|
|
|
|
Advancing a powerful commitment to sustainability and corporate
social responsibility.
|
Consistent with these strategies, the company has undertaken
several portfolio adjustments. The company divested its Godiva
Chocolatier business on March 18, 2008 and certain
Australian salty snack food brands and assets on May 12,
2008. On July 31, 2008, the company announced that it had
entered into an agreement to divest its French sauce and
mayonnaise business, which is marketed under the Lesieur
brand. The sale of the French sauce and mayonnaise business
was completed on September 29, 2008. These portfolio
adjustments are designed to enhance the companys focus on
the core simple meals, baked snacks and healthy beverages
businesses in markets with the greatest potential for growth.
For additional information relating to the companys seven
key strategies, see Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
Prior to the second quarter of fiscal 2008, the companys
operations were organized and reported in the following
segments: U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages; Baking and
Snacking; International Soup, Sauces and Beverages; and Other.
Other included the Godiva Chocolatier business and the
companys Away From Home operations. As of the second
quarter of fiscal 2008, the results of the Godiva Chocolatier
business were reported as discontinued operations for the
periods presented due to the previously discussed divestiture.
See Note 3 for additional information on the sale.
Beginning with the second quarter of fiscal 2008, the Away From
Home business was reported as North America Foodservice.
The segments are discussed in greater detail below.
U.S.
Soup, Sauces and Beverages
The U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment includes the
following retail businesses: Campbells condensed
and ready-to-serve soups; Swanson broth and canned
poultry; Prego pasta sauce; Pace Mexican sauce;
Campbells Chunky chili; Campbells
canned pasta, gravies, and beans; Campbells Supper
Bakes meal kits; V8 juice and juice drinks; and
Campbells tomato juice.
Baking
and Snacking
The Baking and Snacking segment includes the following
businesses: Pepperidge Farm cookies, crackers, bakery and
frozen products in U.S. retail; Arnotts
biscuits in Australia and Asia Pacific; and Arnotts
salty snacks in
Australia. As previously discussed, in May 2008, the company
completed the divestiture of certain salty snack food brands and
assets in Australia, which were historically included in this
segment.
International
Soup, Sauces and Beverages
The International Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment includes
the soup, sauce and beverage businesses outside of the United
States, including Europe, Mexico, Latin America, the Asia
Pacific region and the retail business in Canada. The
segments operations include Erasco and Heisse
Tasse soups in Germany, Liebig and Royco soups
in France, Devos Lemmens mayonnaise and cold sauces and
Campbells and Royco soups in Belgium, and
Blå Band soups and sauces in Sweden. In Asia
Pacific, operations include Campbells soup and
stock, Swanson broths and V8 beverages. In Canada,
operations include Habitant and Campbells
soups, Prego pasta sauce, V8 beverages and certain
Pepperidge Farm products. The French sauce and mayonnaise
business, which was marketed under the Lesieur brand and
divested on September 29, 2008, was historically included
in this segment.
North
America Foodservice
The North America Foodservice segment includes the
companys Away From Home operations, which represent the
distribution of products such as soup, specialty entrees,
beverage products, other prepared foods and Pepperidge Farm
products through various food service channels in the United
States and Canada.
Ingredients
The ingredients required for the manufacture of the
companys food products are purchased from various
suppliers. While all such ingredients are available from
numerous independent suppliers, raw materials are subject to
fluctuations in price attributable to a number of factors,
including changes in crop size, cattle cycles, product scarcity,
demand for raw materials, energy costs, government-sponsored
agricultural programs, import and export requirements and
weather conditions during the growing and harvesting seasons. To
help reduce some of this volatility, the company uses various
commodity risk management tools for a number of its ingredients
and commodities, such as soybean oil, wheat, soybean meal, corn,
cocoa and natural gas. Ingredient inventories are at a peak
during the late fall and decline during the winter and spring.
Since many ingredients of suitable quality are available in
sufficient quantities only at certain seasons, the company makes
commitments for the purchase of such ingredients during their
respective seasons. At this time, the company does not
anticipate any material restrictions on availability or
shortages of ingredients that would have a significant impact on
the companys businesses. For additional information on the
impact of inflation on the company, see Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition.
Customers
In most of the companys markets, sales activities are
conducted by the companys own sales force and through
broker and distributor arrangements. In the United States,
Canada and Latin America, the companys products are
generally resold to consumers in retail food chains, mass
discounters, mass merchandisers, club stores, convenience
stores, drug stores and other retail, commercial and
non-commercial establishments. In Europe, the companys
products are generally resold to consumers in retail food
chains, mass discounters, mass merchandisers, club stores,
convenience stores and other retail, commercial and
non-commercial establishments. In Mexico, the companys
products are generally resold to consumers in retail food
chains, mass merchandisers, club stores, convenience stores,
drug stores and other retail establishments. In the Asia Pacific
region, the companys products are generally resold to
consumers through retail food chains, convenience stores and
other retail, commercial and non-commercial establishments. The
company makes shipments promptly after receipt and acceptance of
orders.
The companys largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and
its affiliates, accounted for approximately 16% of the
companys consolidated net sales during fiscal 2008 and 15%
during fiscal 2007. All of the companys segments sold
products to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. or its affiliates. No other
customer accounted for 10% or more of the companys
consolidated net sales.
2
Trademarks
And Technology
As of September 15, 2008, the company owned over 4,400
trademark registrations and applications in over 150 countries
and believes that its trademarks are of material importance to
its business. Although the laws vary by jurisdiction, trademarks
generally are valid as long as they are in use
and/or their
registrations are properly maintained and have not been found to
have become generic. Trademark registrations generally can be
renewed indefinitely as long as the trademarks are in use. The
company believes that its principal brands, including
Campbells, Erasco, Liebig,
Pepperidge Farm, V8, Pace, Prego,
Swanson, and Arnotts, are protected by
trademark law in the companys relevant major markets. In
addition, some of the companys products are sold under
brands that have been licensed from third parties.
Although the company owns a number of valuable patents, it does
not regard any segment of its business as being dependent upon
any single patent or group of related patents. In addition, the
company owns copyrights, both registered and unregistered, and
proprietary trade secrets, technology, know-how processes, and
other intellectual property rights that are not registered.
Competition
The company experiences worldwide competition in all of its
principal products. This competition arises from numerous
competitors of varying sizes, including producers of generic and
private label products, as well as from manufacturers of other
branded food products, which compete for trade merchandising
support and consumer dollars. As such, the number of competitors
cannot be reliably estimated. The principal areas of competition
are brand recognition, quality, price, advertising, promotion,
convenience and service.
Working
Capital
For information relating to the companys cash and working
capital items, see Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
Capital
Expenditures
During fiscal 2008, the companys aggregate capital
expenditures were $298 million. The company expects to
spend approximately $400 million for capital projects in
fiscal 2009. The anticipated major fiscal 2009 capital projects
include the previously announced expansion and enhancement of
the companys corporate headquarters in Camden, New Jersey,
which is expected to continue into fiscal years following 2009,
and expansion of the companys beverage production capacity.
Research
And Development
During the last three fiscal years, the companys
expenditures on research activities relating to new products and
the improvement and maintenance of existing products for
continuing operations were $115 million in 2008,
$111 million in 2007 and $103 million in 2006. The
increase from 2007 to 2008 was primarily due to the impact of
currency. The increase from 2006 to 2007 was primarily due to
expenses related to new product development, higher incentive
compensation costs and the impact of currency. The company
conducts this research primarily at its headquarters in Camden,
New Jersey, although important research is undertaken at various
other locations inside and outside the United States.
Environmental
Matters
The company has requirements for the operation and design of its
facilities that meet or exceed applicable environmental rules
and regulations. Of the companys $298 million in
capital expenditures made during fiscal 2008, approximately
$6 million was for compliance with environmental laws and
regulations in the United States. The company further estimates
that approximately $7 million of the capital expenditures
anticipated during fiscal 2009 will be for compliance with
United States environmental laws and regulations. The company
believes that continued compliance with existing environmental
laws and regulations will not have a material effect on capital
expenditures, earnings or the competitive position of the
company.
3
Seasonality
Demand for the companys products is somewhat seasonal,
with the fall and winter months usually accounting for the
highest sales volume due primarily to demand for the
companys soup and sauce products. Demand for the
companys beverage, baking and snacking products, however,
is generally evenly distributed throughout the year.
Regulation
The manufacture and marketing of food products is highly
regulated. In the United States, the company is subject to
regulation by various government agencies, including the Food
and Drug Administration, the U.S. Department of Agriculture
and the Federal Trade Commission, as well as various state and
local agencies. The company is also regulated by similar
agencies outside the United States and by voluntary
organizations such as the National Advertising Division and the
Childrens Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative of the
Council of Better Business Bureaus.
Employees
On August 3, 2008, there were approximately
19,400 employees of the company.
Financial
Information
For information with respect to revenue, operating profitability
and identifiable assets attributable to the companys
business segments and geographic areas, see Note 6 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Company
Website
The companys primary corporate website can be found at
www.campbellsoupcompany.com. The company makes available
free of charge at this website (under the Investor
Center Financial Reports SEC
Filings caption) all of its reports filed or furnished
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, including its annual report on
Form 10-K,
its quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and its current reports on
Form 8-K.
These reports are made available on the website as soon as
reasonably practicable after their filing with, or furnishing
to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere in this Report,
the following risks and uncertainties could materially adversely
affect the companys business, financial condition and
results of operations. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known to the company or that the company currently
deems immaterial also may impair the companys business
operations and financial condition.
The
company operates in a highly competitive industry
The company operates in the highly competitive food industry and
experiences worldwide competition in all of its principal
products. A number of the companys primary competitors
have substantial financial, marketing and other resources. A
strong competitive response from one or more of these
competitors to the companys marketplace efforts, or a
consumer shift towards private label offerings, could result in
the company reducing pricing, increasing marketing or other
expenditures, or losing market share. These changes may have a
material adverse effect on the business and financial results of
the company.
The
companys results may be adversely impacted by increases in
the price of raw and packaging materials
The raw and packaging materials used in the companys
business include tomato paste, grains, beef, poultry,
vegetables, steel, glass, paper and resin. Many of these
materials are subject to price fluctuations from a number of
factors, including product scarcity, demand for raw materials,
commodity market speculation, energy costs, currency
fluctuations, weather conditions, import and export requirements
and changes in government-sponsored agricultural programs. To
the extent any of these factors result in an increase in raw and
packaging material prices,
4
the company may not be able to offset such increases through
productivity or price increases. In such cases, the
companys business or financial results could be negatively
impacted.
The
companys results are dependent on successful marketplace
initiatives and acceptance by consumers of the companys
products
The companys results are dependent on successful
marketplace initiatives and acceptance by consumers of the
companys products. The companys product
introductions and product improvements, along with its other
marketplace initiatives, are designed to capitalize on new
customer or consumer trends. In order to remain successful, the
company must anticipate and react to these new trends and
develop new products or processes to address them. While the
company devotes significant resources to meeting this goal, the
company may not be successful in developing new products or
processes, or its new products or processes may not be accepted
by customers or consumers. These results could have a material
adverse effect on the business and financial results of the
company.
The
company may be adversely impacted by the increased significance
of some of its customers
The disruption of supply to any of the companys large
customers, such as Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., for an extended period
of time could adversely affect the companys business or
financial results. In addition, the retail grocery trade
continues to consolidate, and mass market retailers continue to
become larger. In such an environment, large retail customers
may attempt to increase their profitability by seeking lower
prices or increased promotional programs funded by their
suppliers. If the company is unable to use its scale, marketing
expertise, product innovation and category leadership positions
to respond to these customer demands, the companys
business or financial results could be negatively impacted.
The
company may be adversely impacted by inadequacies in, or failure
of, its information technology systems
Each year the company engages in several billion dollars of
transactions with its customers and vendors. Because the amount
of dollars involved is so significant, the companys
information technology resources must provide connections among
its marketing, sales, manufacturing, logistics, customer
service, and accounting functions. If the company does not
allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build
and sustain an appropriate technology infrastructure and to
maintain the related computerized and manual control processes,
the companys business or financial results could be
negatively impacted.
The
company may not properly execute, or realize anticipated cost
savings or benefits from, its ongoing supply chain, information
technology or other initiatives
The companys success is partly dependent upon properly
executing, and realizing cost savings or other benefits from,
its ongoing supply chain, information technology and other
initiatives. These initiatives are primarily designed to make
the company more efficient in the manufacture and distribution
of its products, which is necessary in the companys highly
competitive industry. These initiatives are often complex, and a
failure to implement them properly may, in addition to not
meeting projected cost savings or benefits, result in an
interruption to the companys sales, manufacturing,
logistics, customer service or accounting functions. Any of
these results could have a material adverse effect on the
business and financial results of the company.
Disruption
to the companys supply chain could adversely affect its
business
Damage or disruption to the companys suppliers or to the
companys manufacturing or distribution capabilities due to
weather, natural disaster, fire, terrorism, pandemic, strikes,
or other reasons could impair the companys ability to
manufacture
and/or sell
its products. Failure to take adequate steps to mitigate the
likelihood or potential impact of such events, or to effectively
manage such events if they occur, particularly when a product is
sourced from a single location, could adversely affect the
companys business or financial results.
5
The
company may be adversely impacted by the failure to successfully
execute acquisitions and divestitures
From time to time, the company undertakes acquisitions or
divestitures. The success of any such acquisition or divestiture
depends, in part, upon the companys ability to identify
suitable buyers or sellers, negotiate favorable contractual
terms and, in many cases, obtain governmental approval. For
acquisitions, success is also dependent upon efficiently
integrating the acquired business into the companys
existing operations. In cases where acquisitions or divestitures
are not successfully implemented or completed, the
companys business or financial results could be negatively
impacted.
The
companys results may be impacted negatively by political
and/or economic conditions in the United States or other
nations
The company is a global manufacturer and marketer of
high-quality, branded convenience food products. Because of its
global reach, the companys performance may be impacted
negatively by political
and/or
economic conditions in the United States, as well as other
nations. A change in any one or more of the following factors in
the United States, or in other nations, could impact the
company: currency exchange rates, tax rates, interest rates,
legal or regulatory requirements, tariffs, export and import
restrictions or equity markets. The company may also be impacted
by recession, political instability, civil disobedience, armed
hostilities, natural disasters and terrorist acts in the United
States or throughout the world. Any one of the foregoing could
have a material adverse effect on the business and financial
results of the company.
If the
companys food products become adulterated or are
mislabeled, the company might need to recall those items and may
experience product liability claims if consumers are
injured
The company may need to recall some of its products if they
become adulterated or if they are mislabeled. The company may
also be liable if the consumption of any of its products causes
injury. A widespread product recall could result in significant
losses due to the costs of a recall, the destruction of product
inventory and lost sales due to the unavailability of product
for a period of time. The company could also suffer losses from
a significant product liability judgment against it. A
significant product recall or product liability case could also
result in adverse publicity, damage to the companys
reputation and a loss of consumer confidence in the
companys food products, which could have a material
adverse effect on the business and financial results of the
company.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
6
The companys principal executive offices and main research
facilities are company-owned and located in Camden, New Jersey.
The following table sets forth the companys principal
manufacturing facilities and the business segment that primarily
uses each of the facilities:
Principal
Manufacturing Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inside the U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
Outside the U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California
Dixon (SSB)
Sacramento (SSB/NAFS)
Stockton (SSB)
Connecticut
Bloomfield (BS)
Florida
Lakeland (BS)
Illinois
Downers Grove (BS)
Michigan
Marshall (SSB)
New Jersey
South Plainfield (SSB)
North Carolina
Maxton (SSB/NAFS)
|
|
Ohio
Napoleon (SSB/NAFS)
Wauseon (SSB/ISSB)
Willard (BS)
Pennsylvania
Denver (BS)
Downingtown (BS)
South Carolina
Alken (BS)
Texas
Paris (SSB/NAFS)
Utah
Richmond (BS)
Washington
Everett (NAFS)
Wisconsin
Milwaukee (SSB)
|
|
|
Australia
Huntingwood (BS)
Marleston (BS)
Shepparton (ISSB)
Virginia (BS)
Miranda (BS)*
Belgium
Puurs (ISSB)
Canada
Listowel* (ISSB/NAFS)
Toronto (ISSB/NAFS)
France
LePontet (ISSB)
|
|
Germany
Luebeck (ISSB)
Indonesia
Jawa Barat (BS)
Malaysia
Selangor Darul Ehsan (ISSB)
Mexico
Villagran (ISSB)
Guasave (SSB)
Netherlands
Utrecht (ISSB)
Sweden
Kristianstadt (ISSB)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSB U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages
BS Baking and Snacking
ISSB International Soup, Sauces and Beverages
NAFS North America Foodservice
|
|
|
* Expected to be closed
|
Each of the foregoing manufacturing facilities is company-owned,
except that the Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia, facility is
leased. The Utrecht, Netherlands, facility is subject to a
ground lease. The company also operates retail bakery thrift
stores in the United States and other plants, facilities and
offices at various locations in the United States and abroad,
including additional executive offices in Norwalk, Connecticut,
Puurs, Belgium, and North Strathfield, Australia. The following
facilities were sold during fiscal year 2008: Reading,
Pennsylvania in the United States, Brussels in Belgium, and
Smithfield and Scoresby in Australia. These facilities were sold
as part of the divestiture of their respective businesses. The
Dunkirk, France, facility was sold as part of the companys
divestiture of the Lesieur branded sauce and mayonnaise
business, which was completed on September 29, 2008. The
Gerwisch, Germany, facility was closed during fiscal 2008. The
company expects to close the Listowel, Canada, and the Miranda,
Australia, facilities in fiscal 2009.
Management believes that the companys manufacturing and
processing plants are well maintained and are generally adequate
to support the current operations of the businesses.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
None.
7
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
None.
Executive
Officers of the Company
The following list of executive officers as of
September 17, 2008, is included as an item in Part III
of this
Form 10-K:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appointed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
Name
|
|
Present Title
|
|
Age
|
|
Officer
|
|
Patrick J. Callaghan
|
|
Vice President
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Douglas R. Conant
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Anthony P. DiSilvestro
|
|
Vice President Controller
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
M. Carl Johnson, III
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Ellen Oran Kaden
|
|
Senior Vice President Law and Government Affairs
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
Larry S. McWilliams
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Denise M. Morrison
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Nancy A. Reardon
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Joseph C. Spagnoletti
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Archbold D. van Beuren
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
David R. White
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Nancy A. Reardon served as Executive Vice President of Human
Resources, Comcast Cable Communications (2002
2004) and Executive Vice President Human
Resources/Corporate Affairs (1997 2002) of
Borden Capital Management Partners prior to joining Campbell in
2004. David R. White served as Vice President, Product
Supply Global Family Care Business
(1999-2004)
of The Procter & Gamble Company prior to joining
Campbell in 2004. The company has employed Patrick J. Callaghan,
Douglas R. Conant, Anthony P. DiSilvestro,
M. Carl Johnson, III, Ellen Oran Kaden, Larry S.
McWilliams, Denise M. Morrison, Joseph C. Spagnoletti and
Archbold D. van Beuren in an executive or managerial capacity
for at least five years.
There is no family relationship among any of the companys
executive officers or between any such officer and any director
that is first cousin or closer. All of the executive officers
were elected at the November 2007 meeting of the Board of
Directors, except that Joseph C. Spagnoletti was appointed
Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer at the May
2008 meeting of the Board of Directors (effective as of
August 1, 2008).
8
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Capital Stock, Related Shareowner Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Market
for Registrants Capital Stock
The companys capital stock is listed and principally
traded on the New York Stock Exchange. The companys
capital stock is also listed on the SWX Swiss Exchange. On
September 15, 2008, there were 28,018 holders of record of
the companys capital stock. Market price and dividend
information with respect to the companys capital stock are
set forth in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements. In September 2008, the company increased the
quarterly dividend to be paid in the second quarter of fiscal
2009 to $0.25 per share. Future dividends will be dependent upon
future earnings, financial requirements and other factors.
Return to
Shareowners* Performance Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareowner
return (TSR) on the companys stock with the cumulative
total return of the Standard & Poors Packaged
Foods Index (the S&P 500 Packaged Foods) and
the Standard & Poors 500 Stock Index (the
S&P 500). The graph assumes that $100 was
invested on August 1, 2003, in each of company stock, the
S&P 500 Packaged Foods group and the S&P 500, and
that all dividends were reinvested. The total cumulative dollar
returns shown on the graph represent the value that such
investments would have had on August 1, 2008.
RETURN TO
SHAREOWNERS*
* Stock appreciation plus dividend reinvestment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
Campbell
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
169
|
S&P 500
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
141
|
S&P 500 Packaged Foods
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Shares that may yet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
be Purchased
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Under the Plans or
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Announced Plans or
|
|
|
Programs ($ in
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased(1)
|
|
|
per Share(2)
|
|
|
Programs(3)
|
|
|
Millions)(3)
|
|
|
4/28/08 5/31/08
|
|
|
3,720,656
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
34.52
|
(4)
|
|
|
3,619,700
|
|
|
$
|
319
|
|
6/1/08 6/30/08
|
|
|
4,821,423
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
33.45
|
(5)
|
|
|
4,475,160
|
|
|
$
|
1,369
|
|
7/1/08 8/3/08
|
|
|
5,120,455
|
(6)
|
|
$
|
34.93
|
(6)
|
|
|
4,836,640
|
|
|
$
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
13,662,534
|
|
|
$
|
34.30
|
|
|
|
12,931,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes (i) 680,500 shares repurchased in open-market
transactions to offset the dilutive impact to existing
shareowners of issuances under the companys stock
compensation plans, and (ii) 50,534 shares owned and
tendered by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations on
the vesting of restricted shares. Unless otherwise indicated,
shares owned and tendered by employees to satisfy tax
withholding obligations were purchased at the closing price of
the companys shares on the date of vesting. |
|
(2) |
|
Average price paid per share is calculated on a settlement basis
and excludes commission. |
|
(3) |
|
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the company had two
publicly announced share repurchase programs. Under the first
program, which was announced on March 18, 2008, the
companys Board of Directors authorized using approximately
$600 million of the net proceeds from the sale of the
Godiva Chocolatier business to purchase company stock. The March
2008 program was completed during the fourth quarter of fiscal
2008. Under the second program, which was announced on
June 30, 2008, the companys Board of Directors
authorized the purchase of up to an additional $1.2 billion
of company stock through the end of fiscal 2011. In addition to
the publicly announced share repurchase programs, the company
will continue to purchase shares, under separate authorization,
as part of its practice of buying back shares sufficient to
offset shares issued under incentive compensation plans. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes (i) 76,300 shares repurchased in open-market
transactions at an average price of $33.15 to offset the
dilutive impact to existing shareowners of issuances under the
companys stock compensation plans, and
(ii) 24,656 shares owned and tendered by employees at
an average price per share of $34.76 to satisfy tax withholding
requirements on the vesting of restricted shares. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes (i) 336,840 shares repurchased in open-market
transactions at an average price of $33.45 to offset the
dilutive impact to existing shareowners of issuances under the
companys stock compensation plans, and
(ii) 9,423 shares owned and tendered by employees at
an average price per share of $33.60 to satisfy tax withholding
requirements on the vesting of restricted shares. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes (i) 267,360 shares repurchased in open-market
transactions at an average price of $35.28 to offset the
dilutive impact to existing shareowners of issuances under the
companys stock compensation plans, and
(ii) 16,455 shares owned and tendered by employees at
an average price per share of $33.52 to satisfy tax withholding
requirements on the vesting of restricted shares. |
10
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
FIVE-YEAR
REVIEW CONSOLIDATED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2007(2)
|
|
|
2006(3)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004(4)
|
|
|
|
(Millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Summary of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
7,998
|
|
|
$
|
7,385
|
|
|
$
|
6,894
|
|
|
$
|
6,652
|
|
|
$
|
6,288
|
|
Earnings before interest and taxes
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
Earnings before taxes
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
|
1,099
|
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
902
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
792
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
Financial Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant assets net
|
|
$
|
1,939
|
|
|
$
|
2,042
|
|
|
$
|
1,954
|
|
|
$
|
1,987
|
|
|
$
|
1,901
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
6,474
|
|
|
|
6,445
|
|
|
|
7,745
|
|
|
|
6,678
|
|
|
|
6,596
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
2,615
|
|
|
|
2,669
|
|
|
|
3,213
|
|
|
|
2,993
|
|
|
|
3,353
|
|
Shareowners equity
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
Per Share Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations basic
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
$
|
1.34
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations assuming dilution
|
|
|
1.76
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
1.33
|
|
Net earnings basic
|
|
|
3.12
|
|
|
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
1.73
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
Net earnings assuming dilution
|
|
|
3.06
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
|
|
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
Other Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
298
|
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(All per share amounts below are on a diluted basis) |
|
|
|
As of August 1, 2005, the company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised
2004) Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R). Under SFAS No. 123R,
compensation expense is to be recognized for all stock-based
awards, including stock options. Had all stock-based
compensation been expensed in 2005, earnings from continuing
operations would have been $587 and earnings per share from
continuing operations would have been $1.42. Net earnings would
have been $678 and earnings per share would have been $1.64. Had
all stock-based compensation been expensed in 2004, earnings
from continuing operations would have been $522 or $1.27 per
share and net earnings would have been $618, or $1.50 per share. |
|
(1) |
|
The 2008 earnings from continuing operations were impacted by
the following: a $107 ($.28 per share) restructuring charge and
related costs associated with initiatives to improve operational
efficiency and long-term profitability and a $13 ($.03 per
share) benefit from the favorable resolution of a tax
contingency. The 2008 results of discontinued operations
included a $462 ($1.21 per share) gain from the sale of the
Godiva Chocolatier business. The 2008 fiscal year consisted of
fifty-three weeks. All other periods had fifty-two weeks. |
|
(2) |
|
The 2007 earnings from continuing operations were impacted by
the following: a $13 ($.03 per share) benefit from the reversal
of legal reserves due to favorable results in litigation; a $25
($.06 per share) benefit from a tax settlement of bilateral
advance pricing agreements; and a $14 ($.04 per share) gain from
the sale of an idle manufacturing facility. The 2007 results of
discontinued operations included a $24 ($.06 per share) gain
from the sale of the businesses in the United Kingdom and
Ireland and $7 ($.02 per share) tax benefit from the resolution
of audits in the United Kingdom. On July 29, 2007, the
company adopted SFAS No. 158 Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements |
11
|
|
|
|
|
No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). As a result, total assets
were reduced by $294, shareowners equity was reduced by
$230, and total liabilities were reduced by $64. |
|
(3) |
|
The 2006 earnings from continuing operations were impacted by
the following: a $60 ($.14 per share) benefit from the favorable
resolution of a U.S. tax contingency; an $8 ($.02 per share)
benefit from a change in inventory accounting method;
incremental tax expense of $13 ($.03 per share) associated with
the repatriation of
non-U.S.
earnings under the American Jobs Creation Act; and a $14 ($.03
per share) tax benefit related to higher levels of foreign tax
credits, which could be utilized as a result of the sale of the
businesses in the United Kingdom and Ireland. The 2006
results of discontinued operations included $56 of deferred tax
expense due to book/tax basis differences and $5 of after-tax
costs associated with the sale of the businesses (aggregate
impact of $.15 per share). |
|
(4) |
|
2004 earnings from continuing operations included a pre-tax
restructuring charge of $24 ($17 after tax or $.04 per share)
related to a reduction in workforce and the implementation of a
distribution and logistics realignment in Australia. Earnings
from discontinued operations included an after-tax effect of $5
($.01 per share) associated with a reduction in workforce. |
|
|
|
Five-Year Review should be read in conjunction with the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition
|
Overview
Description
of the Company
Campbell Soup Company is a global manufacturer and marketer of
high-quality, branded convenience food products. Prior to the
second quarter of fiscal 2008, the companys operations
were organized and reported in the following segments:
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages; Baking and Snacking;
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages; and Other. Other
included the Godiva Chocolatier worldwide business and the
companys Away From Home operations. As of the second
quarter of fiscal 2008, the results of the Godiva Chocolatier
business were reported as discontinued operations for the
periods presented due to the divestiture of the business.
Beginning with the second quarter of fiscal 2008, the Away From
Home business was reported as North America Foodservice. See
Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information on segments.
The companys well-known brands are sold in approximately
120 countries. Its principal geographies are North America,
France, Germany, Belgium, and Australia.
Key
Strategies
To achieve its financial goal of long-term sustainable sales and
earnings growth, the company is focused on executing seven
strategies:
1. expand its icon brands within simple meals, baked snacks
and healthy beverages;
2. trade consumers up to higher levels of satisfaction
centering on wellness, quality and convenience;
3. make its products more broadly available in existing and
new markets;
4. strengthen its business through outside partnerships and
acquisitions;
5. increase margins by improving price realization and
company-wide productivity;
6. improve overall organizational excellence, diversity,
engagement, and innovation; and
7. advance a powerful commitment to sustainability and
corporate social responsibility.
Expand the companys icon brands within simple meals,
baked snacks and healthy beverages. The
companys overarching business strategy is focused on
driving profitable growth in three large, global
categories simple meals, baked snacks, and healthy
beverages that are well aligned with consumer
trends, and are growing in most of the markets in which the
company does business. Principal brands in these core categories
include Campbells, Swanson, Pace, Liebig, Erasco,
Pepperidge Farm, Goldfish, Arnotts, and V8. The
company
12
has strong market positions in the segments within these
categories in the geographies in which it competes, and its
businesses in these categories respond well to product
innovation and consumer support.
Recent portfolio changes have been intended to enhance the
companys focus in these three core categories, in markets
with the greatest potential for growth. In fiscal 2008, the
company announced the divestiture of the Godiva Chocolatier
business, which was completed in the third quarter of the fiscal
year, and the divestiture of certain salty snack food brands and
assets in Australia, which was completed in the fourth fiscal
quarter. The company also announced the divestiture of its sauce
and mayonnaise business in France marketed under the Lesieur
brand, which was completed on September 29, 2008.
Trade consumers up to higher levels of satisfaction centering
on wellness, quality and convenience. Within its
core categories, the company is focused on meeting the demand
for products that respond to growing consumer interest in health
and nutrition, quality and convenience. In the past two years,
the company introduced new and reformulated condensed and
ready-to-serve
soups with reduced sodium in the U.S., Canada, Australia and
Europe. In fiscal 2008, it introduced Campbells Select
Harvest soups, a new line of
ready-to-serve
soups with lower sodium, and a line of 100% vegetable soups in
aseptic packaging marketed under the V8 brand. Responding
to consumer interest in weight management, in fiscal 2008 the
company also introduced Campbells Select Harvest
Light soups and other lower calorie offerings. In the
category of baked snacks, the company expanded the health
credentials of its product lines through the introduction of
Pepperidge Farm whole-grain breads, rolls and bagels and
whole-grain Arnotts Vita-Weat biscuits. It also
expanded its healthy beverage portfolio with new varieties of
V8 V-Fusion vegetable and fruit juice, a fast-growing
extension of the V8 vegetable juice franchise. In the
convenience arena, the company continues to focus on
single-serve microwavable soups in North America, Europe and
Australia, portable packages of cookie and cracker products, and
merchandising innovations, such as gravity-feed shelving, that
enhance the convenience of the shopping experience for the
consumer.
Make the companys products more broadly available in
existing and new markets. The company is pursuing
strategies designed to expand the availability of its products
in existing markets and to capitalize on opportunities in
emerging channels and markets around the globe. In North
America, for example, it is developing distribution in
convenience and other channels through its agreement with The
Coca-Cola
Company and
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc. for the distribution of refrigerated
single-serve beverages. To realize the potential of emerging
markets, the company is implementing its previously announced
plans to establish soup businesses in Russia and the
Peoples Republic of China.
Strengthen the companys business through outside
partnerships and acquisitions. In fiscal 2008,
the company announced a new commitment to enhance sales and
earnings growth through value-creating external development. In
July 2008, it acquired the existing Wolfgang Puck U.S. soup
business and entered into a license agreement for the
Wolfgang Puck brand on soup, stock and broth products in
North America retail locations. Wolfgang Puck is one of
the leading organic soup brands in the U.S.
Increase margins by improving price realization and
company-wide productivity. The company remains
focused on increasing margins though a combination of pricing
and productivity improvements that are intended to cover cost
increases and build margins over time. In April 2008, it
announced a series of initiatives designed to improve
operational efficiency and long-term profitability, including
(i) plans for the closure of its plant in Listowel,
Ontario, Canada; (ii) the sale of certain salty snack food
brands and assets in Australia; (iii) plans for the
discontinuation of private label biscuit and industrial
chocolate production at the companys Miranda, Australia
facility, and the closure of the facility; and
(iv) streamlining of the companys management
structure.
Improve overall organizational excellence, diversity,
engagement and innovation. The company remains
committed to building a diverse and engaged workforce that is
focused on excellence and innovation. Its efforts span three
primary areas: (1) capabilities, including improving
skills, innovation capabilities, and manager and team
effectiveness; (2) culture, including values, workplace
flexibility and employee wellness, and (3) human resources
infrastructure, including processes and technology. Ensuring an
effective, motivated, inclusive and diverse workplace will be
the foundation of all organizational initiatives. The company
will continue to use annual employee surveys to assess its
progress in building employee satisfaction and engagement.
Advance a powerful commitment to sustainability and corporate
social responsibility. In August 2008, the
company affirmed its commitment to corporate social
responsibility and environmental sustainability and issued its
13
first corporate social responsibility report, Nourishing
Peoples Lives, which describes the companys
strategies, policies, programs and initiatives. The report
focuses on four areas of primary importance to the
companys stakeholders: Campbells consumers; the
planet; Campbells employees; and Campbells
communities.
Basis
of Presentation
On March 18, 2008, the company completed the sale of its
Godiva Chocolatier business for $850 million, pursuant to a
Sale and Purchase Agreement dated December 20, 2007. The
purchase price was subject to certain post-closing adjustments,
which resulted in an additional $20 million of proceeds.
The company has reflected the results of this business as
discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of
earnings for all years presented. The company used approximately
$600 million of the net proceeds to purchase company stock.
See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information.
In the third quarter of 2008, the company entered into an
agreement to sell certain Australian salty snack food brands and
assets. The transaction, which was completed on May 12,
2008, included salty snack brands such as Cheezels,
Thins, Tasty Jacks, French Fries, and
Kettle Chips, certain other assets and the assumption of
liabilities. Proceeds of the sale were nominal. The business had
annual net sales of approximately $150 million. This
transaction is included in the restructuring initiatives
described in Note 7.
In July 2008, the company entered into an agreement to sell its
sauce and mayonnaise business comprised of products sold under
the Lesieur brand in France. The business had annual net
sales of approximately $70 million. The assets and
liabilities of this business were reflected as assets and
liabilities held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet as
of August 3, 2008. The sale was completed on
September 29, 2008. See Note 3 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information.
In June 2008, the company acquired the Wolfgang Puck soup
business from Country Gourmet Foods for approximately
$10 million of which approximately $1 million will be
paid in the next two years. The company also entered into a
master licensing agreement with Wolfgang Puck Worldwide, Inc.
for the use of the Wolfgang Puck brand on soup, stock,
and broth products in North America retail locations. This
business is included in the U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages
segment. The business had annual sales of approximately
$20 million. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information.
On August 15, 2006, the company completed the sale of its
businesses in the United Kingdom and Ireland for
£460 million, or approximately $870 million,
pursuant to a Sale and Purchase Agreement dated July 12,
2006. The United Kingdom and Ireland businesses included
Homepride sauces, OXO stock cubes, Batchelors
soups and McDonnells and Erin soups. The
purchase price was subject to certain post-closing adjustments,
which resulted in an additional $19 million of proceeds.
The company has reflected the results of these businesses as
discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of
earnings for all years presented. The company used approximately
$620 million of the net proceeds to purchase company stock.
See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information.
In June 2007, the company completed the sale of its ownership
interest in Papua New Guinea operations for approximately
$23 million. This business had annual sales of
approximately $20 million.
Results
of Operations
2008
Net earnings were $1,165 million in 2008 ($3.06 per share)
and $854 million ($2.16 per share) in 2007. (All earnings
per share amounts included in Managements Discussion and
Analysis are presented on a diluted basis.)
The following items impacted the comparability of net earnings
and net earnings per share:
Continuing
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2008, the company recorded a pre-tax restructuring
charge of $175 million ($102 million after tax or $.27
per share) in earnings from continuing operations associated
with initiatives to improve operational efficiency and long-term
profitability, including selling certain salty snack food brands
and assets in
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
Australia, closing certain production facilities in Australia
and Canada, and streamlining the companys management
structure. In addition, in connection with these initiatives,
the company recorded $7 million ($5 million after tax
or $.01 per share) of accelerated depreciation in Cost of
products sold. The aggregate impact was $182 million
($107 million after tax or $.28 per share). See Note 7
to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Restructuring
Charges for additional information;
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the second quarter of fiscal 2008, the company recorded a
non-cash tax benefit of $13 million ($.03 per share) from
the favorable resolution of a state tax contingency in the
United States;
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the third quarter of fiscal 2007, the company recorded a
pre-tax non-cash benefit of $20 million ($13 million
after tax or $.03 per share) in earnings from continuing
operations from the reversal of legal reserves due to favorable
results in litigation;
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the third quarter of fiscal 2007, the company recorded a tax
benefit of $22 million resulting from the settlement of
bilateral advance pricing agreements (APA) among the
company, the United States, and Canada related to royalties. In
addition, the company reduced net interest expense by
$4 million ($3 million after tax). The aggregate
impact on earnings from continuing operations was
$25 million or $.06 per share; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the second quarter of 2007, the company recorded a pre-tax
gain of $23 million ($14 million after tax or $.04 per
share) from the sale of an idle manufacturing facility.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
In 2008, the company recognized a pre-tax gain of
$698 million ($462 million after tax or $1.21 per
share) in earnings from discontinued operations from the sale of
the Godiva Chocolatier business;
|
|
|
|
In 2007, the company recognized a pre-tax gain of
$39 million ($24 million after tax or $.06 per share)
from the sale of the businesses in the United Kingdom and
Ireland. In addition, a tax benefit of $7 million ($0.02
per share) was recognized from the favorable resolution of tax
audits in the United Kingdom.
|
The items impacting comparability are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
EPS
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
EPS
|
|
|
|
Impact
|
|
|
Impact
|
|
|
Impact
|
|
|
Impact
|
|
|
|
(Millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
671
|
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
|
$
|
792
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
494
|
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
1,165
|
|
|
$
|
3.06
|
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
|
$
|
2.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges and related costs
|
|
$
|
(107
|
)
|
|
$
|
(.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Benefit from resolution of state tax contingency
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of legal reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
Benefit from settlement of the APA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
Gain on the sale of the facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of Godiva Chocolatier business
|
|
$
|
462
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Gain on sale of U.K./Ireland businesses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
Benefit from settlement of tax audits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of significant items on net earnings(1)
|
|
$
|
368
|
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The sum of the individual per share amounts does not equal due
to rounding. |
15
Earnings from continuing operations were $671 million in
2008 ($1.76 per share) and $792 million
($2.00 per share) in 2007.
After factoring in the items impacting comparability, earnings
from continuing operations increased primarily due to higher
sales, productivity improvements, the impact of currency and the
benefit of the
53rd
week, partially offset by a reduction of gross margin as a
percentage of sales and a higher effective tax rate. The
additional week contributed approximately $.02 per share to
earnings from continuing operations in 2008. Earnings per share
from continuing operations also benefited from a reduction in
weighted average diluted shares outstanding.
Earnings from discontinued operations were $494 million in
2008 ($1.30 per share) and $62 million ($.16 per share) in
2007. After factoring items impacting comparability, earnings at
Godiva increased slightly.
2007
Earnings from continuing operations were $792 million
($2.00 per share) in 2007 and $720 million ($1.74 per
share) in 2006.
In addition to the 2007 items that impacted the comparability of
Earnings from continuing operations and Earnings per share from
continuing operations, the following items also impacted
comparability:
|
|
|
|
|
In the first quarter of 2006, a $13 million pre-tax gain
was recognized due to a change in the method of accounting for
certain U.S. inventories from the LIFO method to the
average cost method. The impact on Earnings from continuing
operations was $8 million ($.02 per share). Prior periods
were not restated since the impact of the change on previously
issued financial statements was not considered material. (See
Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements);
|
|
|
|
In the first quarter of 2006, the company recorded a non-cash
tax benefit of $47 million resulting from the favorable
resolution of a U.S. tax contingency related to
transactions in government securities in a prior period. In
addition, the company reduced interest expense and accrued
interest payable by $21 million and adjusted deferred tax
expense by $8 million ($13 million after tax). The
aggregate non-cash impact of the settlement on Earnings from
continuing operations was $60 million, or $.14 per share.
(See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements);
|
|
|
|
In 2006, incremental tax expense of $13 million ($.03 per
share) was recognized associated with incremental dividends of
$294 million as the company finalized its plan to
repatriate earnings from
non-U.S. subsidiaries
under the provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act (the
AJCA); and
|
|
|
|
In the fourth quarter of 2006, the company recorded a deferred
tax benefit of $14 million ($.03 per share) from the
anticipated use of higher levels of foreign tax credits, which
could be utilized as a result of the sale of the companys
United Kingdom and Ireland businesses in August 2006.
|
16
The items impacting comparability are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
EPS
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
EPS
|
|
|
|
Impact
|
|
|
Impact
|
|
|
Impact
|
|
|
Impact
|
|
|
|
(Millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
792
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
720
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of legal reserves
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Benefit from the settlement of the APA
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on the sale of the facility
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of change in inventory accounting method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
Favorable resolution of a U.S. tax contingency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
Tax expense on repatriation of earnings under the AJCA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
Tax benefit related to the anticipated use of foreign tax credits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of significant items on continuing operations(1)
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The sum of the individual per share amounts does not equal due
to rounding. |
In addition, the comparability of Earnings per share from
continuing operations was impacted by the use of proceeds from
the sale of the United Kingdom and Ireland businesses in the
first quarter of 2007. During the first quarter of 2007, the
company completed its previously announced program utilizing
$620 million of the net proceeds to repurchase shares. The
impact in 2007 of utilizing those proceeds to repurchase shares
and reduce shares outstanding in the calculation of Earnings per
share from continuing operations was a benefit of approximately
$.07 in Earnings per share from continuing operations.
The remaining increase in Earnings from continuing operations in
2007 from 2006 was primarily due to an increase in sales, a
higher gross margin as a percentage of sales, and lower net
interest expense, partially offset by increased marketing
expenses and a higher effective tax rate.
Sales
An analysis of net sales by reportable segment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008/2007
|
|
|
2007/2006
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages
|
|
$
|
3,674
|
|
|
$
|
3,495
|
|
|
$
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Baking and Snacking
|
|
|
2,058
|
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages
|
|
|
1,610
|
|
|
|
1,402
|
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
North America Foodservice
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,998
|
|
|
$
|
7,385
|
|
|
$
|
6,894
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The additional week in fiscal 2008 contributed to approximately
2 percentage points of the increase from 2007.
See also Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for information on modifications in 2008 to the companys
segments.
17
An analysis of percent change of net sales by reportable segment
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup,
|
|
|
Baking
|
|
|
Soup,
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sauces and
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Sauces and
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverages
|
|
|
Snacking
|
|
|
Beverages
|
|
|
Foodservice
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2008/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume and Mix
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Price and Sales Allowances
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Increased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promotional Spending(1)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Impact of 53rd week
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume and Mix
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Price and Sales Allowances
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Increased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promotional Spending(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents revenue reductions from trade promotion and consumer
coupon redemption programs. |
In 2008, U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages sales increased
5%. As reported, U.S. soup sales increased 2% as condensed
soup sales increased 1%,
ready-to-serve
soup sales increased 1%, and broth sales increased 12%.
Excluding the benefit of the
53rd
week, U.S. soup sales increased 1% as condensed soup sales
were flat,
ready-to-serve
soup sales increased 1%, and broth sales increased 11%. Within
condensed soup, gains in cooking varieties were offset by
declines in eating varieties. In
ready-to-serve,
sales gains in Campbells Chunky and
Campbells Select canned soups were partially offset
by a decline in the convenience platform, which includes soups
in microwavable bowls and cups. Condensed and
ready-to-serve
soups benefited from the lower sodium varieties. Swanson
broth sales increased due to continued growth of
aseptically-packaged varieties. Excluding the impact of the
53rd
week, beverage sales increased double digits, primarily due to
consumer demand for healthy beverages. V8 vegetable
juice, V8 V-Fusion vegetable and fruit juice, and V8
Splash juice drinks contributed to the sales growth. Sales
of Campbells tomato juice declined. Beverage sales
benefited from expanded distribution of single-serve beverages
due to the distribution agreement for refrigerated single-serve
beverages with The
Coca-Cola
Company and
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc. Sales of Prego pasta sauces and
Pace Mexican sauces increased.
In 2007, U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages sales increased
7%. U.S. soup sales increased 5% as condensed soup sales
increased 3%,
ready-to-serve
soup sales increased 5% and broth sales increased 12%. The
introduction in 2007 of new lower sodium varieties of condensed
and
ready-to-serve
soups contributed to the sales growth. Within condensed soup,
both eating and cooking varieties delivered solid sales gains.
Sales growth in
ready-to-serve
soup was driven by gains in Campbells Chunky and
Campbells Select soups which benefited from higher
levels of advertising. In the convenience platform, which
includes soups in microwavable bowls and cups, sales grew double
digits. Swanson broth sales grew due to increased
advertising and continued growth of aseptically-packaged
products. Beverage sales grew significantly as V8
vegetable juice and V8 V-Fusion vegetable and fruit
juice, introduced in the second quarter of 2006, responded
favorably to new advertising campaigns and increased levels of
advertising. V8 Splash juice drinks also experienced
sales growth. Sales of Prego pasta sauces and Pace
Mexican sauces increased.
18
In 2008, Baking and Snacking sales increased 11%. Excluding the
impact of the
53rd
week, Pepperidge Farm sales increased with growth in all
businesses: cookies and crackers, bakery, and frozen. The sales
increase in the cookies and crackers business was primarily due
to the growth of Pepperidge Farm Goldfish snack crackers,
the launch of Baked Naturals, a line of adult savory snack
crackers, and growth in Distinctive cookie varieties. Bakery
sales increased driven by gains in whole-grain varieties and
sandwich rolls. Arnotts sales increased due to the
favorable impact of currency, growth in biscuits, and the
benefit of the
53rd
week, partially offset by the divestitures of certain salty
snack food brands and the business in Papua New Guinea.
In 2007, Baking and Snacking sales increased 6%. Pepperidge Farm
sales increased primarily as a result of gains in the bakery and
cookies and crackers businesses. The bakery business sales
growth was driven by gains in Pepperidge Farm whole-grain
breads and sandwich rolls. The cookies and crackers sales growth
was primarily due to Pepperidge Farm Goldfish snack
crackers, partially offset by a decline in cookies.
Arnotts sales increased, primarily due to the favorable
impact of currency and strong branded biscuits sales
performance, partially offset by volume declines in the
Australian snack foods business.
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages sales increased 15% in
2008 from 2007. In Europe, sales increased due to the favorable
impact of currency, the benefit of the
53rd
week, and volume gains in Belgium, partially offset by a decline
in Germany. In the Asia Pacific region, sales increased due to
the favorable impact of currency, growth in the Australian soup
business and the benefit of the
53rd
week. In Canada, sales increased primarily due to the favorable
impact of currency, the benefit of the
53rd
week, and growth in soup and beverages.
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages sales increased 12% in
2007 versus 2006. In Europe, sales increased primarily due to
the favorable impact of currency and strong wet soup growth in
France, Germany and Belgium. In Canada, sales increased due to
growth in soup and the favorable impact of currency.
In 2008, sales in North America Foodservice increased 3%
primarily due to the benefit of the
53rd
week and the impact of currency. Excluding the impact of
currency and the benefit of the
53rd
week, sales declined due primarily to weakness in the food
service sector.
In North America Foodservice, sales increased 2% in 2007 versus
2006 primarily due to strong growth of frozen soups and
beverages.
Gross
Profit
Gross profit, defined as Net sales less Cost of products sold,
increased by $170 million in 2008 from 2007 and by
$207 million in 2007 from 2006. As a percent of sales,
gross profit was 39.6% in 2008, 40.6% in 2007 and 40.5% in 2006.
The percentage point decrease in 2008 was due to the impact of
cost inflation and other factors (approximately
3.8 percentage points), a higher level of promotional
spending (approximately 0.5 percentage points), partially
offset by higher selling prices (approximately
1.5 percentage points), productivity improvements
(approximately 1.7 percentage points) and mix
(approximately 0.1 percentage points). The percentage point
increase in 2007 was due to productivity improvements
(approximately 2.0 percentage points) and higher selling
prices (approximately 1.3 percentage points), partially
offset by mix (approximately 0.1 percentage point), a
higher level of promotional spending (approximately
0.1 percentage points), costs associated with the
relocation and
start-up of
a replacement refrigerated soup facility (approximately
0.1 percentage points), a benefit from a change in the
method of accounting for inventory in 2006 (approximately
0.2 percentage points), and the impact of cost inflation
and other factors (approximately 2.7 percentage points).
Marketing
and Selling Expenses
Marketing and selling expenses as a percent of sales were 14.5%
in 2008 and 15.0% in both 2007 and 2006. Marketing and selling
expenses increased 5% in 2008 from 2007. The increase was
primarily due to the impact of currency (approximately
3 percentage points) and higher advertising (approximately
1 percentage point). Marketing and selling expenses
increased 7% in 2007 from 2006. The increase was primarily due
to higher advertising and consumer promotion expense
(approximately 5 percentage points), higher selling
expenses (approximately 1 percentage point) and the impact
of currency (approximately 1 percentage point).
19
Administrative
Expenses
Administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 7.6% in 2008,
7.7% in 2007 and 8.0% in 2006. Administrative expenses increased
6% in 2008 from 2007. Administrative expenses in 2007 included
the reversal of $20 million of legal reserves from
favorable results in litigation, which accounted for
approximately 4 percentage points of the increase from 2007
to 2008. The remaining increase in 2008 was primarily due to the
impact of currency (approximately 3 percentage points).
Administrative expenses increased 3% in 2007 from 2006. The
increase was due to higher incentive compensation costs
(approximately 3 percentage points), costs associated with
the ongoing implementation of the SAP enterprise-resource
planning system in North America (approximately
1 percentage point), costs to establish businesses in
Russia and China (approximately 1 percentage point), the
impact of currency (approximately 1 percentage point) and
higher general administrative expenses (approximately
1 percentage point), partially offset by the reversal of
$20 million of legal reserves resulting from favorable
results in litigation (approximately 4 percentage points).
Research
and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses increased $4 million or
4% in 2008 from 2007. The increase was primarily due to the
impact of currency (approximately 3 percentage points).
Research and development expenses increased $8 million or
8% in 2007 from 2006 primarily due to expenses related to new
product development (approximately 5 percentage points),
higher incentive compensation costs (approximately
1 percentage point) and the impact of currency
(approximately 1 percentage point).
Other
Expenses/(Income)
Other expense in 2008 included $6 million of impairment
charges associated with certain trademarks used in the
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment and the pending
sale of the sauce and mayonnaise business comprised of products
sold under the Lesieur brand in France. See also
Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Other income of $30 million in 2007 included a
$23 million gain on the sale of an idle manufacturing
facility, a $10 million gain on a settlement in lieu of
condemnation of a refrigerated soup facility, and a
$3 million gain on the sale of the companys business
in Papua New Guinea.
Other expense of $9 million in 2006 included the cost of
acquiring the rights to the Goldfish trademark in certain
non-U.S. countries
and an impairment charge on a trademark used in the Australian
snack foods market.
Operating
Earnings
Segment operating earnings decreased 9% in 2008 from 2007. The
2008 results included $182 million of restructuring charges
and related costs.
Segment operating earnings increased 12% in 2007 from 2006.
An analysis of operating earnings by reportable segment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008/2007
|
|
|
2007/2006
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages
|
|
$
|
891
|
|
|
$
|
861
|
|
|
$
|
814
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Baking and Snacking
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
North America Foodservice
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
1,345
|
|
|
|
1,202
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
Unallocated corporate expenses
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,098
|
|
|
$
|
1,243
|
|
|
$
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating earnings by segment include the effect of a 2008
restructuring charge and related costs of $182 million as
follows: Baking and Snacking $144 million;
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages
$9 million; and North America Foodservice
$29 million. See Note 7 for additional information. |
Earnings from U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages increased 3%
in 2008 from 2007 primarily due to higher sales volume,
productivity savings, and higher price realization, partially
offset by cost inflation.
Earnings from U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages increased 6%
in 2007 from 2006. The 2006 results included an $8 million
benefit from the change in the method of accounting for
inventories. The remaining increase in earnings was primarily
due to the increase in sales and productivity improvements,
partially offset by cost inflation and higher advertising
expense.
Earnings from Baking and Snacking decreased 50% in 2008 from
2007. Earnings in 2008 included $144 million in
restructuring charges. Earnings in 2007 included a
$23 million gain from the sale of an idle Pepperidge Farm
manufacturing facility. Excluding these items, the remaining
increase in earnings was due to earnings growth in the
Australian biscuit business, the favorable impact of currency
and gains in Pepperidge Farm.
Earnings from Baking and Snacking increased 29% in 2007 from
2006. The 2007 results included a $23 million gain from the
sale of an idle Pepperidge Farm manufacturing facility. The 2006
results included a $5 million benefit from the change in
the method of accounting for inventories. The remaining increase
was primarily due to higher earnings at Pepperidge Farm and the
favorable impact of currency. Within Arnotts, excluding
the impact of currency, an earnings increase in the biscuit
business was offset by a decline in the Australian snack foods
business.
Earnings from International Soup, Sauces, and Beverages
increased 7% in 2008 from 2007. The 2008 earnings included
$9 million of restructuring charges. Excluding this item,
the remaining increase was due to the favorable impact of
currency and growth in Canada and Australia soup, partially
offset by costs to launch products in Russia and China and
impairment charges on certain trademarks.
Earnings from International Soup, Sauces and Beverages increased
17% in 2007 from 2006. The increase in earnings was primarily
due to earnings growth in the businesses in Europe and Canada
and the favorable impact of currency, partially offset by costs
to establish businesses in Russia and China.
Earnings from North America Foodservice decreased 49%, or
$38 million, in 2008 from 2007. Earnings in 2008 included
$29 million of restructuring charges and related costs.
Earnings in 2007 included a $10 million gain related to a
settlement in lieu of condemnation of a refrigerated soup
facility, which was partially offset by relocation and
start-up
costs associated with the replacement facility. Earnings in 2008
were also adversely impacted by cost inflation, partially offset
by higher selling prices and productivity gains.
Earnings from North America Foodservice increased 32% in 2007
from 2006 due to higher net sales, productivity improvements,
and a gain on settlement in lieu of condemnation of a
refrigerated soup facility, partially offset by cost inflation
and relocation and
start-up
costs associated with the replacement facility.
Unallocated corporate expenses increased $30 million from
$102 million in 2007 to $132 million in 2008. The
increase was primarily due to the reversal of $20 million
of legal reserves in 2007 due to favorable results in
litigation, a gain on the sale of the Papua New Guinea business
in 2007 and an impairment charge in 2008 associated with the
pending sale of the sauce and mayonnaise business sold under the
Lesieur brand in France.
Unallocated corporate expenses decreased $3 million from
$105 million in 2006 to $102 million in 2007. The
decrease was primarily due to the reversal of $20 million
of legal reserves resulting from favorable results in
litigation, mostly offset by higher incentive compensation
expenses and higher expenses associated with the ongoing
implementation of the SAP enterprise-resource planning system in
North America.
Interest
Expense/Income
Interest expense increased 2% in 2008 from 2007. The prior year
included a $4 million reduction in interest related to the
APA settlement. The remaining increase was due to a reduction in
interest in 2007 related to the favorable settlement of
U.S. federal income tax audits and lower capitalized
interest, partially offset by lower debt
21
levels. Interest income declined to $8 million in 2008 from
$19 million in 2007 primarily due to lower levels of cash
and cash equivalents.
Interest expense decreased 1% in 2007 from 2006. In 2007, the
company recognized a $4 million reduction in interest
associated with the APA settlement. In 2006, interest expense
included a non-cash reduction of $21 million related to a
favorable tax settlement of a U.S. tax contingency. The
remaining net reduction in 2007 was primarily due to lower debt
levels and lower interest expense associated with tax matters,
partially offset by higher interest rates. Interest income
increased to $19 million in 2007 from $15 million in
2006 due to higher levels of cash and cash equivalents.
Taxes
on Earnings
The effective tax rate was 28.5% in 2008, 27.9% in 2007 and
24.0% in 2006. The following factors impacted the comparability
of the tax rate in 2008 versus 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
In 2008, the company recognized a tax benefit of
$75 million on the $182 million pre-tax restructuring
charge and related costs.
|
|
|
|
In 2008, the company recognized a $13 million benefit from
the resolution of a state tax contingency.
|
|
|
|
In 2007, the company recognized a $22 million benefit from
the favorable settlement of the APA among the company, the
United States and Canada related to royalties.
|
In 2007, the company also recognized an additional net benefit
of $40 million, following the finalization of the
2002-2004
U.S. federal tax audits.
The increase in the rate from 2006 to 2007 was primarily
attributable to lower tax settlement amounts and higher taxes on
foreign earnings in 2007. The 2007 effective rate included a
benefit of $22 million resulting from the favorable
settlement of the APA and an additional net benefit of
$40 million following the finalization of the
2002-2004
U.S. federal tax audits. The 2006 effective rate included a
benefit of $47 million resulting from the favorable
resolution of a U.S. tax contingency and a benefit of
$21 million related to the favorable resolution of the
1996-2001
U.S. federal tax audits. After factoring in these items,
the increase in the 2007 effective rate from 2006 was primarily
due to higher taxes on foreign earnings.
Restructuring
Charges
On April 28, 2008, the company announced a series of
initiatives to improve operational efficiency and long-term
profitability, including selling certain salty snack food brands
and assets in Australia, closing certain production facilities
in Australia and Canada, and streamlining the companys
management structure. As a result of these initiatives, the
company expects to incur aggregate pre-tax costs of
approximately $230 million, consisting of the following:
approximately $120 million associated with a loss on the
sale of certain Australian salty snack food brands and assets;
approximately $62 million in employee severance and benefit
costs, including the estimated impact of curtailment and other
pension charges; approximately $38 million in asset
write-offs and accelerated depreciation of property, plant and
equipment; and approximately $10 million in other exit
costs. Of the aggregate $230 million of pre-tax costs, the
company expects approximately $65 million will be cash
expenditures, the majority of which will be spent in 2009. The
cash outflows related to these programs are not expected to have
a material adverse impact on the companys liquidity.
Annual pre-tax benefits are expected to be approximately
$15-$20 million beginning in 2009. In 2008, the company
recorded a restructuring charge of $175 million
($102 million after tax or $.27 per share) related to these
initiatives. The charge consisted of a net loss of
$120 million ($64 million after tax) on the sale of
certain Australian salty snack food brands and assets,
$45 million ($31 million after tax) of employee
severance and benefit costs, including the estimated impact of
curtailment and other pension charges, and $10 million
($7 million after tax) of property, plant and equipment
impairment charges. In addition, approximately $7 million
($5 million after tax or $.01 per share) of costs related
to these initiatives were recorded in Cost of products sold,
primarily representing accelerated depreciation on property,
plant and equipment. The aggregate after-tax impact of
restructuring charges and related costs was $107 million,
or $.28 per share.
In the third quarter of 2008, as part of the previously
discussed initiatives, the company entered into an agreement to
sell certain Australian salty snack food brands and assets. The
transaction was completed on May 12,
22
2008. Proceeds of the sale were nominal. In connection with this
transaction, the company recognized a net loss of
$120 million ($64 million after tax). The terms of the
agreement require the company to provide a loan facility to the
buyer of AUD $10 million, or approximately USD
$9 million. The facility can be drawn down in AUD
$5 million increments, six months and nine months after the
closing date. Any borrowings under the facility are to be repaid
five years after the closing date. The company will also provide
transition services for approximately one year. See also
Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information.
In April 2008, as part of the previously discussed initiatives,
the company announced plans to close the Listowel, Ontario,
Canada food plant. The Listowel facility produces primarily
frozen products, including soup, entrees, and Pepperidge Farm
products, as well as ramen noodles. The facility employs
approximately 500 people. The company plans to operate the
facility through April 2009 and transition production to its
network of North American contract manufacturers and to its
Downingtown, Pennsylvania plant. As a result, the company
recorded $20 million ($14 million after tax) of
employee severance and benefit costs, including the estimated
impact of curtailment and other pension charges, and
$7 million ($5 million after tax) in accelerated
depreciation of property, plant and equipment in 2008. The
company expects to incur approximately $15 million in
additional employee severance and benefit costs, approximately
$19 million in accelerated depreciation of property, plant
and equipment, and approximately $6 million in other exit
costs.
In April 2008, as part of the previously discussed initiatives,
the company also announced plans to discontinue the private
label biscuit and industrial chocolate production at its
Miranda, Australia facility. The company plans to close the
Miranda facility, which employs approximately 150 people,
by the second quarter of 2009. In connection with this action,
the company recorded $10 million ($7 million after
tax) of property, plant and equipment impairment charges and
$8 million ($6 million after tax) in employee
severance and benefit costs. The company expects to incur an
additional $2 million in accelerated depreciation of
property, plant, and equipment, and approximately
$4 million in other exit costs.
As part of the previously discussed initiatives, the company
also plans to streamline its management structure and eliminate
certain overhead costs. These actions began in the fourth
quarter of 2008 and will be substantially completed in 2009. In
connection with this action, the company recorded
$17 million ($11 million after tax) in employee
severance and benefit costs. The company expects to incur
approximately $2 million of additional employee severance
and benefit costs.
The total pre-tax costs of $230 million expected to be
incurred by segment are as follows: Baking and
Snacking $151 million, International Soup,
Sauces and Beverages $7 million, North America
Foodservice $69 million, and $3 million to
be allocated among all segments. The company incurred pre-tax
costs of approximately $182 million in 2008 by segment as
follows: Baking and Snacking $144 million,
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages
$9 million and North America Foodservice
$29 million.
See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information.
Discontinued
Operations
On March 18, 2008, the company completed the sale of its
Godiva Chocolatier business for $850 million, pursuant to a
Stock Purchase Agreement dated December 20, 2007. The
purchase price was subject to working capital and other
post-closing adjustments, which resulted in an additional
$20 million of proceeds. The company has reflected the
results of this business as discontinued operations in the
consolidated statements of earnings for all years presented.
This business was historically included in Other for segment
reporting purposes. The company recognized a pre-tax gain of
$698 million ($462 million after tax or $1.21 per
share) on the sale. The company used $600 million of the
net proceeds from the sale to purchase company stock.
23
The results of the companys businesses in the United
Kingdom and Ireland sold in August 2006 are included in
discontinued operations. Results of the businesses are
summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Godiva
|
|
|
UK/Ireland
|
|
|
Godiva
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
UK/Ireland
|
|
|
Godiva
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
482
|
|
|
$
|
498
|
|
|
$
|
435
|
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
|
$
|
884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations before taxes
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
Taxes on earnings operations
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Gain on sale
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense/after-tax costs associated with sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
Tax impact of gain on sale
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
494
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2007 results included a $24 million after-tax gain, or
$.06 per share, on the sale of the businesses in the United
Kingdom and Ireland. The 2007 results also included a
$7 million tax benefit from the favorable resolution of tax
audits in the United Kingdom.
The 2006 results included $56 million of deferred tax
expense, which was recognized in accordance with Emerging Issues
Task Force Issue
No. 93-17
Recognition of Deferred Tax Assets for a Parent
Companys Excess Tax Basis in the Stock of a Subsidiary
That is Accounted for as a Discontinued Operation. Results
also included $7 million pre tax ($5 million after
tax) of costs associated with the sale of the businesses.
The company used $620 million of the net proceeds from the
sale of the United Kingdom and Ireland businesses to purchase
company stock. The remaining net proceeds were used to settle
foreign currency hedging contracts associated with intercompany
financing transactions of the business, to pay taxes and
expenses associated with the sale, and to repay debt.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The company expects that foreseeable liquidity and capital
resource requirements, including cash outflows to repurchase
shares and pay dividends, will be met through cash and cash
equivalents, anticipated cash flows from operations, long-term
borrowings under shelf registration statements and short-term
borrowings, including commercial paper. Over the last three
years, operating cash flows totaled approximately
$2.7 billion. This cash generating capability provides the
company with substantial financial flexibility in meeting its
operating and investing needs. The company expects that its
sources of financing are adequate to meet its future liquidity
and capital resource requirements. The cost and terms of any
future financing arrangements depend on the market conditions
and the companys financial position at that time.
Net cash flows from operating activities provided
$766 million in 2008, compared to $674 million in
2007. The increase was primarily due to a reduction in payments
to settle foreign currency hedging transactions and lower
investments in working capital, partially offset by tax payments
associated with the divestiture of Godiva.
Net cash flows from operating activities provided
$674 million in 2007, compared to $1,226 million in
2006. The reduction was due primarily to an increase in working
capital in 2007 as compared to a decline in 2006 and payments of
$186 million to settle hedging transactions, primarily
related to foreign currency.
Capital expenditures were $298 million in 2008,
$334 million in 2007 and $309 million in 2006. Capital
expenditures are expected to be approximately $400 million
in 2009. The increase in 2009 is primarily due to the previously
announced expansion and enhancements of the companys
corporate headquarters (approximately $40 million in total)
and expansion of the U.S. beverage production capacity
(approximately $60 million in total). Capital expenditures
in 2008 included investments to expand the Pepperidge Farm
bakery production capacity, implement the SAP
enterprise-resource planning system in North America, expand the
U.S. beverage production capacity, and expand the warehouse
at the Maxton, North Carolina facility. Capital expenditures in
2007 and 2006
24
included investments to increase the manufacturing capacity for
refrigerated soups in a new facility, implement the SAP
enterprise-resource planning system in North America, and
implement certain productivity and quality projects in
manufacturing facilities.
Business acquired, as presented in the Statement of Cash Flows,
represents the acquisition of the Wolfgang Puck soup business in
the fourth quarter of 2008.
Net cash provided by investing activities includes
$828 million of proceeds from the sale of the Godiva
Chocolatier business and certain Australian salty snack food
brands and assets, net of cash divested. Net cash provided by
investing activities in 2007 includes $906 million of
proceeds from the sale of the businesses in the United Kingdom,
Ireland and Papua New Guinea, net of cash divested.
There were no new long-term borrowings in 2008 and 2007.
Long-term borrowings in 2006 included the issuance of
$202 million of five-year variable-rate debt in Australia
due July 2011. The proceeds were used to repatriate earnings
pursuant to the AJCA. While planning for the issuance of the
debt, the company entered into interest rate swap agreements to
effectively fix the interest rate on $149 million of the
debt prior to its issuance.
Dividend payments were $329 million in 2008,
$308 million in 2007 and $292 million in 2006. Annual
dividends declared in 2008 were $.88 per share, $.80 per share
in 2007 and $.72 per share in 2006. The 2008 fourth quarter rate
was $.22 per share.
Excluding shares owned and tendered by employees to satisfy tax
withholding requirements on the vesting of restricted shares,
the company repurchased 26 million shares at a cost of
$903 million during 2008. During fiscal 2008, the company
purchased shares pursuant to two publicly announced share
repurchase programs. Under the first program, which was
announced on November 21, 2005, the companys Board of
Directors authorized the purchase of up to $600 million of
company stock through the end of fiscal 2008. The November 2005
program was completed during the third quarter of fiscal 2008.
Under the second program, which was announced on March 18,
2008, the companys Board of Directors authorized using
approximately $600 million of the net proceeds from the
sale of the Godiva Chocolatier business to purchase company
stock. The March 2008 program was completed during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2008. Under a new program, which was announced
on June 30, 2008 and will begin in fiscal 2009, the
companys Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up
to $1.2 billion of company stock through the end of fiscal
2011. In addition to the publicly announced share repurchase
programs, the company also purchased shares to offset the impact
of dilution from shares issued under the companys stock
compensation plans. The company expects to continue this
practice in the future. Of the 2008 repurchases, approximately
23 million shares at a cost of $800 million were made
pursuant to publicly announced share repurchase programs. The
remaining shares were repurchased to offset the impact of
dilution from shares issued under the companys stock
compensation plans.
Excluding shares owned and tendered by employees to satisfy tax
withholding requirements on vesting of restricted shares, the
company repurchased 30 million shares at a cost of
$1,140 million during 2007. Of the 2007 repurchases,
approximately 21 million shares at a cost of
$820 million were made pursuant to the companys then
two publicly announced share repurchase programs. The remaining
shares were repurchased to offset the impact of dilution from
shares issued under the companys stock compensation plans.
The first share repurchase program was the previously discussed
Board of Directors authorization announced on November 21,
2005. Under the second share repurchase program, which was
announced on August 15, 2006, the companys Board of
Directors authorized using up to $620 million of the net
proceeds from the sale of United Kingdom and Ireland businesses
to purchase company stock. The August 2006 program terminated at
the end of fiscal 2007. See Market for Registrants
Capital Stock, Related Shareowner Matters and Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities for more information.
At August 3, 2008, the company had $982 million of
notes payable due within one year and $33 million of
standby letters of credit issued on behalf of the company. The
company has a $1.5 billion committed revolving credit
facility maturing in 2011, which was unused at August 3,
2008, except for $33 million of standby letters of credit.
This agreement supports the companys commercial paper
programs.
As of August 3, 2008, the company had $300 million
available for issuance under a $1 billion shelf
registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission in June 2002. Under the registration statement, the
company may issue debt securities, depending on market
conditions. The June 2002 registration statement will expire in
December 2008.
25
The company is in compliance with the covenants contained in its
revolving credit facilities and debt securities.
Contractual
Obligations and Other Commitments
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes the companys obligations
and commitments to make future payments under certain
contractual obligations. For additional information on debt, see
Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Operating
leases are primarily entered into for warehouse and office
facilities and certain equipment. Purchase commitments represent
purchase orders and long-term purchase arrangements related to
the procurement of ingredients, supplies, machinery, equipment
and services. These commitments are not expected to have a
material impact on liquidity. Other long-term liabilities
primarily represent payments related to deferred compensation
obligations. For additional information on other long-term
liabilities, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Payments Due by Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 -
|
|
|
2012 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Debt obligations(1)
|
|
$
|
2,615
|
|
|
$
|
982
|
|
|
$
|
705
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
Interest payments(2)
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Purchase commitments
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Derivative and forward payments(3)
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Uncertain tax positions(4)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities(5)
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term cash obligations
|
|
$
|
4,850
|
|
|
$
|
2,212
|
|
|
$
|
1,168
|
|
|
$
|
616
|
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes capital lease obligations totaling $6 million,
unamortized net premium on debt issuances, unamortized gain on a
terminated interest rate swap, gain on cash-flow interest rate
swaps and a gain on fair-value interest rate swaps. For
additional information on debt obligations, see Note 11 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest payments for notes payable, long-term debt and
derivative instruments are calculated as follows. For notes
payable, interest is based on par values and rates of
contractually obligated issuances at fiscal year end. For
fixed-rate long-term debt, interest is based on principal
amounts and fixed coupon rates at fiscal year end. Interest on
fixed-rate derivative instruments is based on notional amounts
and fixed interest rates contractually obligated at fiscal year
end. Interest on variable-rate derivative instruments is based
on notional amounts contractually obligated at fiscal year end
and rates estimated over the instruments life using
forward interest rates plus applicable spreads. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents payments of cross-currency swaps and forward exchange
contracts. |
|
(4) |
|
The company has an additional $59 million of unrecognized
tax benefits recorded in long-term liabilities. The company is
unable to reasonably estimate when settlement with the taxing
authorities may occur. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents other long-term liabilities, excluding deferred
taxes, unrecognized tax benefits and minority interest. This
table does not include postretirement benefits, payments related
to pension plans or unvested stock-based compensation. For
additional information on pension and postretirement benefits,
see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements and Other Commitments
The company guarantees approximately 1,800 bank loans to
Pepperidge Farm independent sales distributors by third party
financial institutions used to purchase distribution routes. The
maximum potential amount of the future payments the company
could be required to make under the guarantees is
$151 million. The companys
26
guarantees are indirectly secured by the distribution routes.
The company does not believe that it is probable that it will be
required to make guarantee payments as a result of defaults on
the bank loans guaranteed. In connection with the sale of
certain Australian salty snack food brands and assets, the
company agreed to provide a loan facility to the buyer of AUD
$10 million, or approximately USD $9 million. The
facility can be drawn down in AUD $5 million increments,
six and nine months after the closing date, which was
May 12, 2008. Any borrowings under the facility are to be
repaid five years after the closing date. See also Note 14
to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on
off-balance sheet arrangements.
Inflation
In fiscal 2008, inflation, on average, has been significantly
higher than previous years. The company uses a number of
strategies to mitigate the effects of cost inflation. These
strategies include increasing prices, pursuing cost productivity
initiatives such as global procurement strategies, commodity
hedging and making capital investments that improve the
efficiency of operations.
Market
Risk Sensitivity
The principal market risks to which the company is exposed are
changes in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency
exchange rates. In addition, the company is exposed to equity
price changes related to certain deferred compensation
obligations. The company manages its exposure to changes in
interest rates by optimizing the use of variable-rate and
fixed-rate debt and by utilizing interest rate swaps in order to
maintain its variable-to-total debt ratio within targeted
guidelines. International operations, which accounted for
approximately 32% of 2008 net sales, are concentrated
principally in Australia, Canada, France and Germany. The
company manages its foreign currency exposures by borrowing in
various foreign currencies and utilizing cross-currency swaps
and forward contracts. Swaps and forward contracts are entered
into for periods consistent with related underlying exposures
and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures.
The company does not enter into contracts for speculative
purposes and does not use leveraged instruments.
The company principally uses a combination of purchase orders
and various short- and long-term supply arrangements in
connection with the purchase of raw materials, including certain
commodities and agricultural products. The company also enters
into commodity futures contracts, as considered appropriate, to
reduce the volatility of price fluctuations for commodities such
as soybean oil, wheat, soybean meal, corn, cocoa and
natural gas.
The information below summarizes the companys market risks
associated with debt obligations and other significant financial
instruments as of August 3, 2008. Fair values included
herein have been determined based on quoted market prices or
pricing models using current market rates. The information
presented below should be read in conjunction with Notes 11
and 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
27
The table below presents principal cash flows and related
interest rates by fiscal year of maturity for debt obligations.
Interest rates disclosed on variable-rate debt maturing in 2009
represent the weighted-average rates at the period end. Notional
amounts and related interest rates of interest rate swaps are
presented by fiscal year of maturity. For the swaps, variable
rates are the weighted-average forward rates for the term of
each contract.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Fiscal Year of
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
701
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
|
$
|
1,936
|
|
|
$
|
2,051
|
|
Weighted-average interest rate
|
|
|
5.87
|
%
|
|
|
5.21
|
%
|
|
|
6.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.71
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.15
|
%
|
|
|
6.08
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate
|
|
$
|
679
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
679
|
|
|
$
|
679
|
|
Weighted-average interest rate
|
|
|
2.38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed to variable
|
|
$
|
175
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
300
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
200
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
675
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
Average pay rate
|
|
|
4.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
%
|
|
|
4.42
|
%
|
|
|
4.42
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Average receive rate
|
|
|
5.88
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.88
|
%
|
|
|
5.19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable to fixed
|
|
$
|
200
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Average pay rate
|
|
|
4.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Average receive rate
|
|
|
5.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents $661 million of USD borrowing and
$18 million equivalent of borrowings in other currencies. |
|
(2) |
|
Hedges $175 million of 5.875% notes due in 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Hedges $300 million of 5.00% notes due in 2013. |
|
(4) |
|
Hedges $200 million of 4.875% notes due in 2014. |
|
(5) |
|
The company has entered into forward starting interest rate swap
agreements that have the effect of fixing the underlying
interest rate on up to $200 million of an anticipated debt
issuance in fiscal 2009. |
As of July 29, 2007, fixed-rate debt of approximately
$1.9 billion with an average interest rate of 6.17% and
variable-rate debt of approximately $756 million with an
average interest rate of 6.40% were outstanding. As of
July 29, 2007, the company had swapped $675 million of
fixed-rate debt to variable. The average rate to be received on
these swaps was 5.17% and the average rate paid was estimated to
be 5.88% over the remaining life of the swaps. As of
July 29, 2007, the company had also swapped
$85 million of variable-rate debt to fixed. The average
rate estimated to be received on these swaps was 7.15% and the
average rate to be paid was 6.73%.
The company is exposed to foreign exchange risk related to its
international operations, including non-functional currency
intercompany debt and net investments in subsidiaries.
28
The table below summarizes the cross-currency swaps outstanding
as of August 3, 2008, which hedge such exposures. The
notional amount of each currency and the related
weighted-average forward interest rate are presented in the
Cross-Currency Swaps table.
Cross-Currency
Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Pay fixed CAD
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
5.13
|
%
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
Receive fixed USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay variable EUR
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
5.26
|
%
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
Receive variable USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay variable CAD
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
5.03
|
%
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
Receive variable USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed SEK
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
4.53
|
%
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
Receive fixed USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay variable EUR
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
5.13
|
%
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
Receive variable USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.53
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay variable AUD
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
7.51
|
%
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
Receive variable USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.61
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay variable AUD
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
7.51
|
%
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
Receive variable USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay variable EUR
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
5.82
|
%
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Receive variable USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.65
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed EUR
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
4.33
|
%
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
Receive fixed USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed CAD
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
6.24
|
%
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
Receive fixed USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.66
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
699
|
|
|
$
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cross-currency swap contracts outstanding at July 29,
2007 represented one pay fixed SEK/receive fixed USD swap with a
notional value of $32 million, one pay variable SEK/receive
variable USD swap with a notional value of $9 million, two
pay fixed CAD/receive fixed USD swaps with notional values
totaling $120 million, one pay variable CAD/receive
variable USD swap with a notional value of $38 million, two
pay fixed EUR/receive fixed USD swaps with notional values
totaling $171 million and two pay variable EUR/receive
variable USD swaps with notional values totaling
$171 million. The aggregate notional value of these swap
contracts was $541 million as of July 29, 2007, and
the aggregate fair value of these swap contracts was a loss of
$62 million as of July 29, 2007.
The company is also exposed to foreign exchange risk as a result
of transactions in currencies other than the functional currency
of certain subsidiaries, including subsidiary debt. The company
utilizes foreign exchange forward purchase and sale contracts to
hedge these exposures. The table below summarizes the foreign
exchange forward contracts outstanding and the related
weighted-average contract exchange rates as of August 3,
2008.
29
Forward
Exchange Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
Average Contractual
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Exchange Rate
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Receive USD/Pay EUR
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
0.67
|
|
Receive AUD/Pay USD
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
0.96
|
|
Receive USD/Pay CAD
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
Receive AUD/Pay NZD
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
1.15
|
|
Receive GBP/Pay AUD
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
Receive EUR/Pay USD
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
1.56
|
|
Receive CAD/Pay USD
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
The company had an additional $10 million in a number of
smaller contracts to purchase or sell various other currencies,
such as the Australian dollar, euro, British pound, Japanese
yen, and Swedish krona, as of August 3, 2008. The aggregate
fair value of all contracts was a gain of $1 million as of
August 3, 2008. The total forward exchange contracts
outstanding as of July 29, 2007 were $228 million with
a fair value of a loss of $4 million.
The company principally uses a combination of purchase orders
and various short- and long-term supply arrangements in
connection with the purchase of raw materials, including certain
commodities and agricultural products. The company also enters
into commodity futures and options contracts, as considered
appropriate, to reduce the volatility of price fluctuations for
commodities. The notional value of these contracts was
$146 million and the aggregate fair value of these
contracts was a loss of $3 million as of August 3,
2008.
The company had swap contracts outstanding as of August 3,
2008, which hedge a portion of exposures relating to certain
deferred compensation obligations linked to the total return of
the Standard & Poors 500 Index, the total return
of the companys capital stock and the total return of the
Puritan Fund. Under these contracts, the company pays variable
interest rates and receives from the counterparty either the
Standard & Poors 500 Index total return, the
Puritan Fund total return, or the total return on company
capital stock. The notional value of the contract that is linked
to the return on the Standard & Poors 500 Index
was $16 million at August 3, 2008 and $22 million
at July 29, 2007. The average interest rate applicable to
the contract, which expires in 2009, was 3.19% at August 3,
2008. The notional value of the contract that is linked to the
return on the Puritan Fund was $9 million at August 3,
2008 and $13 million at July 29, 2007. The average
interest rate applicable to the contract, which expires in 2009,
was 3.59% at August 3, 2008. The notional value of the
contract that is linked to the total return on company capital
stock was $31 million at August 3, 2008 and
$29 million at July 29, 2007. The average interest
rate applicable to this contract, which expires in 2009, was
3.39% at August 3, 2008. The fair value of these contracts
was a $1 million gain at August 3, 2008 and a
$2 million loss at July 29, 2007.
The companys utilization of financial instruments in
managing market risk exposures described above is consistent
with the prior year. Changes in the portfolio of financial
instruments are a function of the results of operations, debt
repayment and debt issuances, market effects on debt and foreign
currency, and the companys acquisition and divestiture
activities.
Significant
Accounting Estimates
The consolidated financial statements of the company are
prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. The preparation of these
financial statements requires the use of estimates, judgments
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented.
Actual results could differ from those estimates and
assumptions. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for a discussion of significant accounting policies.
The following areas all require the use of subjective or complex
judgments, estimates and assumptions:
Trade and consumer promotion programs The
company offers various sales incentive programs to customers and
consumers, such as cooperative advertising programs, feature
price discounts, in-store display incentives and coupons. The
recognition of the costs for these programs, which are
classified as a reduction of revenue, involves use of judgment
related to performance and redemption estimates. Estimates are
made based on
30
historical experience and other factors. Actual expenses may
differ if the level of redemption rates and performance vary
from estimates.
Valuation of long-lived assets Long-lived
assets, including fixed assets and intangibles, are reviewed for
impairment as events or changes in circumstances occur
indicating that the carrying amount of the asset may not be
recoverable. Discounted cash flow analyses are used to assess
nonamortizable intangible asset impairment, while undiscounted
cash flow analyses are used to assess other long-lived asset
impairment. The estimates of future cash flows involve
considerable management judgment and are based upon assumptions
about expected future operating performance. Assumptions used in
these forecasts are consistent with internal planning. The
actual cash flows could differ from managements estimates
due to changes in business conditions, operating performance,
and economic conditions.
Pension and postretirement benefits The
company provides certain pension and postretirement benefits to
employees and retirees. Determining the cost associated with
such benefits is dependent on various actuarial assumptions,
including discount rates, expected return on plan assets,
compensation increases, turnover rates and health care trend
rates. Independent actuaries, in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States, perform the
required calculations to determine expense. Actual results that
differ from the actuarial assumptions are generally accumulated
and amortized over future periods.
The discount rate is established as of the companys fiscal
year-end measurement date. In establishing the discount rate,
the company reviews published market indices of high-quality
debt securities, adjusted as appropriate for duration. In
addition, independent actuaries apply high-quality bond yield
curves to the expected benefit payments of the plans. The
expected return on plan assets is a long-term assumption based
upon historical experience and expected future performance,
considering the companys current and projected investment
mix. This estimate is based on an estimate of future inflation,
long-term projected real returns for each asset class, and a
premium for active management. Within any given fiscal period,
significant differences may arise between the actual return and
the expected return on plan assets. The value of plan assets,
used in the calculation of pension expense, is determined on a
calculated method that recognizes 20% of the difference between
the actual fair value of assets and the expected calculated
method. Gains and losses resulting from differences between
actual experience and the assumptions are determined at each
measurement date. If the net gain or loss exceeds 10% of the
greater of plan assets or liabilities, a portion is amortized
into earnings in the following year.
Net periodic pension and postretirement expense was
$54 million in 2008, $57 million in 2007 and
$77 million in 2006. The 2008 expense included
$2 million of special termination benefits and curtailment
costs related to the Godiva divestiture, which was recorded in
discontinued operations. The 2008 expense also included
$4 million of special termination and curtailment costs
related to the restructuring initiatives. Significant
weighted-average assumptions as of the end of the year are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate for benefit obligations
|
|
|
6.87
|
%
|
|
|
6.40
|
%
|
|
|
6.15
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.60
|
%
|
|
|
8.79
|
%
|
|
|
8.81
|
%
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate for obligations
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
Initial health care trend rate
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
Ultimate health care trend rate
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
Estimated sensitivities to annual net periodic pension cost are
as follows: a 50 basis point reduction in the discount rate
would increase expense by approximately $11 million; a
50 basis point reduction in the estimated return on assets
assumption would increase expense by approximately
$10 million. A one percentage point increase in assumed
health care costs would increase postretirement service and
interest cost by approximately $1 million.
Although there were no mandatory funding requirements to the
U.S. plans in 2008, 2007 and 2006, the company made
voluntary contributions of $70 million in 2008,
$22 million in 2007 and $35 million in 2006 to a
U.S. plan based on expected future funding requirements.
Contributions to international plans were $8 million in
31
2008, $10 million in 2007 and $17 million in 2006. The
company does not expect to make any contributions to the
U.S. plans in 2009. Contributions to
non-U.S. plans
are expected to be approximately $9 million in 2009.
As of July 29, 2007, the company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 158
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). SFAS No. 158
requires an employer to recognize the funded status of defined
benefit postretirement plans as an asset or liability on the
balance sheet and requires any unrecognized prior service cost
and actuarial gains/losses to be recognized in other
comprehensive income.
See also Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional information on pension and postretirement
expenses.
Income taxes The effective tax rate reflects
statutory tax rates, tax planning opportunities available in the
various jurisdictions in which the company operates and
managements estimate of the ultimate outcome of various
tax audits and issues. Significant judgment is required in
determining the effective tax rate and in evaluating tax
positions. Income taxes are recorded based on amounts refundable
or payable in the current year and include the effect of
deferred taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the future impact of differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
and their respective tax bases, as well as for operating loss
and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those differences
are expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances
are established for deferred tax assets when it is more likely
than not that a tax benefit will not be realized.
In 2008, the tax reserves are established in accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No.
(FIN) 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109, which was adopted at the beginning of fiscal
2008. Upon adoption, the company recognized a cumulative-effect
adjustment of $6 million as an increase in the liability
for unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties,
and a reduction in retained earnings. Prior to the adoption of
FIN 48, tax reserves were established to reflect the
probable outcome of known tax contingencies. As of
August 3, 2008, the liability for unrecognized tax
benefits, including interest and penalties, was $61 million.
See also Notes 1 and 10 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for further discussion on income taxes.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157
Fair Value Measurements, which provides guidance for
using fair value to measure assets and liabilities.
SFAS No. 157 establishes a definition of fair value,
provides a framework for measuring fair value and expands the
disclosure requirements about fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 as issued is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is
permitted. On February 12, 2008, FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 157-2
was issued which delays the effective date to fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008 for certain nonfinancial
assets and liabilities. The company is currently evaluating the
impact of SFAS No. 157.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115. SFAS No. 159 allows companies to
choose, at specific election dates, to measure eligible
financial assets and liabilities at fair value that are not
otherwise required to be measured at fair value. If a company
elects the fair value option for an eligible item, changes in
that items fair value in subsequent reporting periods must
be recognized in current earnings. SFAS No. 159 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. The company is currently evaluating the impact of
SFAS No. 159.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(revised 2007) Business Combinations, which
establishes the principles and requirements for how an acquirer
recognizes the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date.
This Statement applies to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier
adoption is not permitted. The company is currently evaluating
the impact of SFAS No. 141 as revised.
32
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an Amendment of ARB No. 51.
SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest
in the consolidated entity that should be recorded as equity in
the consolidated financial statements. This Statement also
requires that consolidated net income shall be adjusted to
include the net income attributed to the noncontrolling
interest. Disclosure on the face of the income statement of the
amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent
and to the noncontrolling interest is required.
SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is not permitted.
The company is currently evaluating the impact of
SFAS No. 160.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133, which enhances the disclosure requirements
for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are
required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) the
location and amounts of derivative instruments in an
entitys financial statements, (b) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under
Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an
entitys financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows. The guidance in SFAS No. 161 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early
application encouraged. This Statement encourages, but does not
require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial
adoption. The company is currently evaluating the impact of
SFAS No. 161.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162 The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting
principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be
used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United
States (the GAAP hierarchy). This Statement is effective
60 days following the SECs approval of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU
Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in
Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The
company is currently evaluating the impact of
SFAS No. 162.
Cautionary
Factors That May Affect Future Results
This Report contains forward-looking statements that
reflect the companys current expectations regarding future
results of operations, economic performance, financial condition
and achievements of the company. The company tries, wherever
possible, to identify these forward-looking statements by using
words such as anticipate, believe,
estimate, expect, will and
similar expressions. One can also identify them by the fact that
they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts.
These statements reflect the companys current plans and
expectations and are based on information currently available to
it. They rely on a number of assumptions regarding future events
and estimates which could be inaccurate and which are inherently
subject to risks and uncertainties.
The company wishes to caution the reader that the following
important factors and those important factors described in
Part 1, Item 1A and elsewhere in the commentary, or in
the Securities and Exchange Commission filings of the company,
could affect the companys actual results and could cause
such results to vary materially from those expressed in any
forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, the company:
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of strong competitive response to the companys
efforts to leverage its brand power with product innovation,
promotional programs and new advertising, and of changes in
consumer demand for the companys products;
|
|
|
|
the risks in the marketplace associated with trade and consumer
acceptance of product improvements, shelving initiatives and new
product introductions;
|
|
|
|
the companys ability to achieve sales and earnings
guidance, which are based on assumptions about sales volume,
product mix, the development and success of new products, the
impact of marketing and pricing actions and product costs;
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
the companys ability to realize projected cost savings and
benefits, including those contemplated by restructuring programs
and other cost-savings initiatives;
|
|
|
|
the companys ability to successfully manage changes to its
business processes, including selling, distribution, product
capacity, information management systems and the integration of
acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
the increased significance of certain of the companys key
trade customers;
|
|
|
|
the impact of fluctuations in the supply and inflation in
energy, raw and packaging materials cost;
|
|
|
|
the risks associated with portfolio changes and completion of
acquisitions and divestitures;
|
|
|
|
the uncertainties of litigation described from time to time in
the companys Securities and Exchange Commission filings;
|
|
|
|
the impact of changes in currency exchange rates, tax rates,
interest rates, debt and equity markets, inflation rates,
economic conditions and other external factors; and
|
|
|
|
the impact of unforeseen business disruptions in one or more of
the companys markets due to political instability, civil
disobedience, armed hostilities, natural disasters or other
calamities.
|
This discussion of uncertainties is by no means exhaustive but
is designed to highlight important factors that may impact the
companys outlook. The company disclaims any obligation or
intent to update forward-looking statements made by the company
in order to reflect new information, events or circumstances
after the date they are made.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
The information presented in the section entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition Market Risk
Sensitivity is incorporated herein by reference.
34
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
Consolidated
Statements of Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
53 Weeks
|
|
|
52 Weeks
|
|
|
52 Weeks
|
|
|
|
(Millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
7,998
|
|
|
$
|
7,385
|
|
|
$
|
6,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
4,827
|
|
|
|
4,384
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
Marketing and selling expenses
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Other expenses/(income) (Note 15)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
Restructuring charges (Note 7)
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
6,900
|
|
|
|
6,142
|
|
|
|
5,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Interest and Taxes
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
Interest expense (Note 15)
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before taxes
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
|
1,099
|
|
|
|
947
|
|
Taxes on earnings (Note 10)
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
792
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings
|
|
$
|
1,165
|
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
|
$
|
766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
|
|
.16
|
|
|
|
.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings
|
|
$
|
3.12
|
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Assuming Dilution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
|
|
.16
|
|
|
|
.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings
|
|
$
|
3.06
|
|
|
$
|
2.16
|
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
35
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 3,
|
|
|
July 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
Accounts receivable (Note 15)
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
Inventories (Note 15)
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
Other current assets (Note 15)
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
Current assets held for sale
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,693
|
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant Assets, Net of Depreciation (Note 15)
|
|
|
1,939
|
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
Goodwill (Note 5)
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
|
1,872
|
|
Other Intangible Assets, Net of Amortization (Note 5)
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
Other Assets (Note 15)
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
Non-current Assets Held for Sale
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
6,474
|
|
|
$
|
6,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable (Note 11)
|
|
$
|
982
|
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
Payable to suppliers and others
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
Accrued liabilities (Note 15)
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
Dividend payable
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Current liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt (Note 11)
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
2,074
|
|
Other Liabilities (Note 15)
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
Non-current Liabilities Held for Sale
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,156
|
|
|
|
5,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareowners Equity (Note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock; authorized 40 shares; none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock, $.0375 par value; authorized
560 shares; issued 542 shares
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
Earnings retained in the business
|
|
|
7,909
|
|
|
|
7,082
|
|
Capital stock in treasury, 186 shares in 2008 and
163 shares in 2007, at cost
|
|
|
(6,812
|
)
|
|
|
(6,015
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareowners equity
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareowners equity
|
|
$
|
6,474
|
|
|
$
|
6,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
36
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
1,165
|
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
|
$
|
766
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to operating cash flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accounting method (Note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Restructuring charges (Note 7)
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Resolution of tax matters (Note 10)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
Reversal of legal reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Gain on sale of businesses (Note 3)
|
|
|
(698
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net (Note 15)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Changes in working capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Prepaid assets
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
168
|
|
Pension fund contributions
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
Payments for hedging activities
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Other (Note 15)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of plant assets
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
|
|
(334
|
)
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
Sales of plant assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Businesses acquired (Note 8)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of businesses, net of cash divested (Note 3)
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term borrowings (repayments)
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
202
|
|
Repayments of notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net short-term borrowings
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
(308
|
)
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
Treasury stock purchases
|
|
|
(903
|
)
|
|
|
(1,140
|
)
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
Treasury stock issuances
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
Excess tax benefits on stock-based compensation
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
|
|
|
(1,300
|
)
|
|
|
(1,863
|
)
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(586
|
)
|
|
|
617
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents Beginning of Period
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents End of Period
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
37
Consolidated
Statements of Shareowners Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
In Treasury
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
in the
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Shareowners
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(Millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2005
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,832
|
)
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
|
$
|
6,069
|
|
|
$
|
(223
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Cash-flow hedges, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Minimum pension liability, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends ($.72 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
Treasury stock purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
Treasury stock issued under management incentive and stock
option plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 30, 2006
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
(5,147
|
)
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
6,539
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Cash-flow hedges, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Minimum pension liability, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of adoption of SFAS No. 158, net of tax
(Note 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
Dividends ($.80 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
Treasury stock purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(1,098
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,140
|
)
|
Treasury stock issued under management incentive and stock
option plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 29, 2007
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
(6,015
|
)
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
7,082
|
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Cash-flow hedges, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of adoption of FIN 48 (Note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Dividends ($.88 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
Treasury stock purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(903
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(903
|
)
|
Treasury stock issued under management incentive and stock
option plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at August 3, 2008
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,812
|
)
|
|
$
|
337
|
|
|
$
|
7,909
|
|
|
$
|
(136
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
38
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
1.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis of Presentation The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of the company and its
majority-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions are
eliminated in consolidation. Certain amounts in prior year
financial statements were reclassified to conform to the
current-year presentation. The companys fiscal year ends
on the Sunday nearest July 31. There were 53 weeks in
2008 and 52 weeks in 2007 and 2006. There will be
52 weeks in 2009.
On March 18, 2008, the company completed the sale of its
Godiva Chocolatier business for $850, pursuant to a Sale and
Purchase Agreement dated December 20, 2007. The company has
reflected the results of this business as discontinued
operations in the consolidated statements of earnings for all
years presented. See Note 3 for additional information on
the sale.
On August 15, 2006, the company completed the sale of its
United Kingdom and Ireland businesses for £460, or
approximately $870, pursuant to a Sale and Purchase Agreement
dated July 12, 2006. The company has reflected the results
of these businesses as discontinued operations in the
consolidated statements of earnings for all years presented. See
Note 3 for additional information on the sale.
Revenue Recognition Revenues are recognized
when the earnings process is complete. This occurs when products
are shipped in accordance with terms of agreements, title and
risk of loss transfer to customers, collection is probable and
pricing is fixed or determinable. Revenues are recognized net of
provisions for returns, discounts and allowances. Certain sales
promotion expenses, such as coupon redemption costs, cooperative
advertising programs, new product introduction fees, feature
price discounts and in-store display incentives are classified
as a reduction of sales.
Cash and Cash Equivalents All highly liquid
debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or
less are classified as cash equivalents.
Inventories All inventories are valued at the
lower of average cost or market. Prior to 2006, substantially
all U.S. inventories were valued based on the last in,
first out (LIFO) method. As of August 1, 2005, the company
changed the method of accounting for certain
U.S. inventories from the LIFO method to the average cost
method. The company believes the average cost method of
accounting for inventories is preferable and improves financial
reporting by better matching revenues and expenses as average
cost reflects the physical flow of inventory and current cost.
The impact of the change was a pre-tax $13 benefit ($8 after tax
or $.02 per share). Prior periods were not restated since the
impact of the change on previously issued financial statements
was not considered material.
Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant
and equipment are recorded at historical cost and are
depreciated over estimated useful lives using the straight-line
method. Buildings and machinery and equipment are depreciated
over periods not exceeding 45 years and 15 years,
respectively. Assets are evaluated for impairment when
conditions indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Such conditions include significant adverse changes
in business climate or a plan of disposal.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but rather
are tested at least annually for impairment in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Intangible
assets with finite lives are amortized over the estimated useful
life and reviewed for impairment in accordance with
SFAS No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-lived Assets. Goodwill impairment testing
first requires a comparison of the fair value of each reporting
unit to the carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds fair
value, goodwill is considered impaired. The amount of impairment
is the difference between the carrying value of goodwill and the
implied fair value, which is calculated as if the
reporting unit had just been acquired and accounted for as a
business combination. Impairment testing for indefinite-lived
intangible assets requires a comparison between the fair value
and carrying value of the asset. If carrying value exceeds the
fair value, the asset is reduced to fair value. Fair values are
primarily determined using discounted cash flow analyses. See
Note 5 for information on goodwill and other intangible
assets.
39
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Derivative Financial Instruments The company
uses derivative financial instruments primarily for purposes of
hedging exposures to fluctuations in interest rates, foreign
currency exchange rates, commodities and equity-linked employee
benefit obligations. All derivatives are recognized on the
balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of
derivatives are recorded in earnings or other comprehensive
income, based on whether the instrument is designated as part of
a hedge transaction and, if so, the type of hedge transaction.
Gains or losses on derivative instruments reported in other
comprehensive income are reclassified to earnings in the period
in which earnings are affected by the underlying hedged item.
The ineffective portion of all hedges is recognized in earnings
in the current period. See Note 12 for additional
information.
Stock-Based Compensation In December 2004,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) Share-Based
Payment (SFAS No. 123R), which requires
stock-based compensation to be measured based on the grant-date
fair value of the awards and the cost to be recognized over the
period during which an employee is required to provide service
in exchange for the award. The company adopted the provisions of
SFAS No. 123R as of August 1, 2005. The company
provides compensation benefits by issuing unrestricted stock,
restricted stock (including EPS performance restricted stock and
total shareowner return (TSR) performance restricted stock) and
restricted stock units. In previous fiscal years, the company
also issued stock options and stock appreciation rights to
provide compensation benefits.
Prior to August 1, 2005, the company accounted for
stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25 Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees and related Interpretations.
Accordingly, no compensation expense had been recognized for
stock options since all options granted had an exercise price
equal to the market value of the underlying stock on the grant
date. SFAS No. 123R was adopted using the modified
prospective transition method. Under this method, the provisions
of SFAS No. 123R apply to all awards granted or
modified after the date of adoption. In addition, compensation
expense must be recognized for any unvested stock option awards
outstanding as of the date of adoption.
Total pre-tax stock-based compensation recognized in Earnings
from continuing operations was $83 for 2008 and $79 for 2007 and
2006. Tax related benefits of $31 were recognized for 2008 and
$29 were recognized for 2007 and 2006. Stock-based compensation
associated with discontinued operations was $3, $2 and $4
after-tax in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. See also
Note 13.
Use of Estimates Generally accepted
accounting principles require management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect assets and liabilities, contingent
assets and liabilities, and revenues and expenses. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for
in accordance with SFAS No. 109 Accounting for Income
Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized
for the future impact of differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases, as well as for operating loss and tax
credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation
allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is
more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48
(FIN 48) Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No.
109. FIN 48 clarifies the criteria that must be met
for financial statement recognition and measurement of tax
positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This
Interpretation also addresses derecognition, recognition of
related penalties and interest, classification of liabilities
and disclosures of unrecognized tax benefits. FIN 48 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006. The company adopted FIN 48 as of July 30, 2007
(the beginning of fiscal 2008). See Note 10 for additional
information.
In October 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act (the AJCA) was
signed into law. The AJCA provides for a deduction of 85% of
certain
non-U.S. earnings
that are repatriated, as defined by the AJCA, and a phased-in
tax deduction related to profits from domestic manufacturing
activities. In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB
40
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Staff Position
FAS 109-1
and 109-2 to
address the accounting and disclosure requirements related to
the AJCA. The total amount repatriated in 2006 under the AJCA
was $494 and the related tax cost was $20. In 2005, the company
recorded $7 in tax expense for $200 of anticipated earnings to
be repatriated. In 2006, the company finalized its plan under
the AJCA and recorded tax expense of $13 for $294 of earnings
repatriated.
|
|
2.
|
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157
Fair Value Measurements, which provides guidance for
using fair value to measure assets and liabilities.
SFAS No. 157 establishes a definition of fair value,
provides a framework for measuring fair value and expands the
disclosure requirements about fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 as issued is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is
permitted. On February 12, 2008, FASB Staff Position
No. FAS
157-2 was
issued which delays the effective date to fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2008 for certain nonfinancial assets and
liabilities. The company is currently evaluating the impact of
SFAS No. 157.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115. SFAS No. 159 allows companies to
choose, at specific election dates, to measure eligible
financial assets and liabilities at fair value that are not
otherwise required to be measured at fair value. If a company
elects the fair value option for an eligible item, changes in
that items fair value in subsequent reporting periods must
be recognized in current earnings. SFAS No. 159 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. The company is currently evaluating the impact of
SFAS No. 159.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(revised 2007) Business Combinations, which
establishes the principles and requirements for how an acquirer
recognizes the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date.
This Statement applies to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier
adoption is not permitted. The company is currently evaluating
the impact of SFAS No. 141 as revised.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an Amendment of ARB No. 51.
SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards
for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest
in the consolidated entity that should be recorded as equity in
the consolidated financial statements. This Statement also
requires that consolidated net income shall be adjusted to
include the net income attributed to the noncontrolling
interest. Disclosure on the face of the income statement of the
amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent
and to the noncontrolling interest is required.
SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is not permitted.
The company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No.
160.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No.
133, which enhances the disclosure requirements for
derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are
required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) the
location and amounts of derivative instruments in an
entitys financial statements, (b) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under
Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an
entitys financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows. The guidance in SFAS No. 161 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early
application encouraged. This Statement encourages, but does not
require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial
adoption. The company is currently evaluating the impact of
SFAS No. 161.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162 The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting
principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be
used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with
41
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United
States (the GAAP hierarchy). This Statement is effective
60 days following the SECs approval of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU
Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in
Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The
company is currently evaluating the impact of
SFAS No. 162.
Discontinued
Operations
On March 18, 2008, the company completed the sale of its
Godiva Chocolatier business for $850. The purchase price was
subject to certain post-closing adjustments, which resulted in
an additional $20 of proceeds. The company has reflected the
results of this business as discontinued operations in the
consolidated statements of earnings for all years presented. The
business was historically included in Other for segment
reporting purposes. The company used approximately $600 of the
net proceeds to purchase company stock.
On August 15, 2006, the company completed the sale of its
businesses in the United Kingdom and Ireland for £460, or
approximately $870, pursuant to a Sale and Purchase Agreement
dated July 12, 2006. The United Kingdom and Ireland
businesses included Homepride sauces, OXO stock
cubes, Batchelors soups and McDonnells and Erin
soups. The Sale and Purchase Agreement provides for working
capital and other post-closing adjustments. Additional proceeds
of $19 were received from the finalization of the post-closing
adjustment. The company has reflected the results of these
businesses as discontinued operations in the consolidated
statements of earnings for all years presented. The businesses
were historically included in the International Soup, Sauces and
Beverages segment.
Results of discontinued operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Godiva
|
|
|
UK/Ireland
|
|
|
Godiva
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
UK/Ireland
|
|
|
Godiva
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
482
|
|
|
$
|
498
|
|
|
$
|
435
|
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
|
$
|
884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations before taxes
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
Taxes on earnings operations
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Gain on sale
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense/after-tax costs associated with sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
Tax impact of gain on sale
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
494
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2008 results included a $462 after-tax gain, or $1.21 per
share, on the Godiva Chocolatier sale.
The 2007 results included a $24 after-tax gain, or $.06 per
share, on the United Kingdom and Ireland sale. The 2007 results
also included a $7 tax benefit from the favorable resolution of
tax audits in the United Kingdom.
The 2006 results included deferred tax expense of $56, which was
recognized in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 93-17
Recognition of Deferred Tax Assets for a Parent
Companys Excess Tax Basis in the Stock of a Subsidiary
That is Accounted for as a Discontinued Operation due to
book/tax basis differences of these businesses as of
July 30, 2006. The 2006 results also included $7 pre tax
($5 after tax) of costs associated with the sale, for a total
net after-tax cost of $61 (or $.15 per share) recognized in
connection with the sale in 2006.
The company used approximately $620 of the net proceeds from the
sale of the United Kingdom and Ireland businesses to repurchase
shares. Upon completion of the sale, the company paid $83 to
settle cross-currency swap contracts and foreign exchange
forward contracts which hedged exposures related to the
businesses. The remaining net proceeds were used to pay taxes
and expenses associated with the business and to repay debt.
42
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other
Divestitures
In the third quarter of 2008, the company entered into an
agreement to sell certain Australian salty snack food brands and
assets. The transaction, which was completed on May 12,
2008, included the following salty snack brands:
Cheezels, Thins, Tasty Jacks, French
Fries, and Kettle Chips, certain other assets and the
assumption of liabilities. Proceeds of the sale were nominal.
The business had annual net sales of approximately $150. In
connection with this transaction, the company recognized a
pre-tax loss of $120 ($64 after tax or $.17 per share). This
charge is included in the Restructuring charges on the
Statements of Earnings. See also Note 7. The terms of the
agreement require the company to provide a loan facility to the
buyer of AUD $10, or approximately USD $9. The facility can be
drawn down in AUD $5 increments, six months and nine months
after the closing date. Any borrowings under the facility are to
be repaid five years after the closing date. The company will
also provide transition services for approximately one year.
In July 2008, the company entered into an agreement to sell its
sauce and mayonnaise business comprised of products sold under
the Lesieur brand in France. The company recorded a
pre-tax impairment charge of $2 to adjust the net assets to
estimated realizable value. The sale was completed on
September 29, 2008. The business had annual net sales of
approximately $70.
The assets and liabilities of this business were reflected as
assets and liabilities held for sale in the consolidated balance
sheet as of August 3, 2008 and are comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
8
|
|
Prepaids
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2007, the company completed the sale of its ownership
interest in Papua New Guinea operations for approximately $23.
The company recognized a $3 gain on the sale. This business was
historically included in the Baking and Snacking segment and had
annual sales of approximately $20.
The company has provided certain indemnifications in connection
with the divestitures. As of August 3, 2008, known
exposures related to such matters are not material.
Total comprehensive income is comprised of net earnings, net
foreign currency translation adjustments, pension and
postretirement benefit adjustments (see Note 9), and net
unrealized gains and losses on cash-flow hedges (see
Note 12). Accumulated other comprehensive loss at
July 29, 2007 also includes the impact of adoption of
SFAS No. 158 (See Note 9). Total comprehensive
income for the twelve months ended August 3, 2008,
July 29, 2007 and July 30, 2006 was $1,152, $957 and
$993, respectively.
43
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),
as reflected in the Statements of Shareowners Equity,
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax(1)
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
Cash-flow hedges, net of tax(2)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Unamortized pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(136
|
)
|
|
$
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes a tax expense of $10 in 2008 and $5 in 2007. Foreign
currency translation adjustments of divested businesses were $14
in 2008 and $38 in 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes a tax expense of $3 in 2008 and a tax benefit of $2 in
2007. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes a tax benefit of $205 in 2008 and $135 in 2007. |
|
|
5.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
The following table sets forth balance sheet information for
intangible assets, excluding goodwill, subject to amortization
and intangible assets not subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 3, 2008
|
|
|
July 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets not subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
$
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization was less than $1 in 2008, 2007 and 2006. The
estimated aggregated amortization expense for each of the five
succeeding fiscal years is less than $1 per year. Asset useful
lives range from ten to twenty years.
The company recognized an impairment loss of approximately $4 in
2008 related to the performance of certain trademarks used in
the International Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment.
The company recognized an impairment loss of approximately $2 in
2006 due to the performance of an Australian trademark used in
the Baking and Snacking segment.
44
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Changes in the carrying amount for goodwill for the period are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Other/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soup, Sauces
|
|
|
Baking and
|
|
|
Soup, Sauces
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Beverages
|
|
|
Snacking
|
|
|
and Beverages
|
|
|
Foodservice(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at July 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
428
|
|
|
$
|
617
|
|
|
$
|
569
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
1,765
|
|
Divestiture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
428
|
|
|
$
|
683
|
|
|
$
|
610
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
1,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition(2)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Divestiture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Impairment(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Reclassification to assets held for
sale(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at August 3, 2008
|
|
$
|
434
|
|
|
$
|
744
|
|
|
$
|
674
|
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
$
|
1,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of July 29, 2007, the company managed and reported the
results of operations in the following segments: U.S. Soup,
Sauces and Beverages, Baking and Snacking, International Soup,
Sauces and Beverages, and the balance of the portfolio in Other.
Other included the Godiva Chocolatier worldwide business and the
companys Away From Home operations, which represent the
distribution of products such as soup, specialty entrees,
beverage products, other prepared foods and Pepperidge Farm
products through various food service channels in the United
States and Canada. In fiscal 2008, the Godiva Chocolatier
business was sold. See Note 3 for additional information on
the sale. Beginning with the second quarter of fiscal 2008, the
Away From Home business was reported as North America
Foodservice. |
|
(2) |
|
In June 2008, the company acquired the Wolfgang Puck soup
business from Country Gourmet Foods for approximately $10. See
Note 8 for additional information. |
|
(3) |
|
In July 2008, the company entered into an agreement to sell its
sauce and mayonnaise business comprised of products sold under
the Lesieur brand in France. The company recorded a
pre-tax impairment charge of $2 to adjust the net assets to
estimated net realizable value. The assets and liabilities of
this business were reflected as assets and liabilities held for
sale in the consolidated balance sheet as of August 3,
2008. The sale was completed on September 29, 2008. |
|
|
6.
|
Business
and Geographic Segment Information
|
Campbell Soup Company, together with its consolidated
subsidiaries, is a global manufacturer and marketer of
high-quality, branded convenience food products. Prior to the
second quarter of fiscal 2008, the company managed and reported
the results of operations in the following segments:
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages, Baking and Snacking,
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages, and the balance of the
portfolio in Other. Other included the Godiva Chocolatier
worldwide business and the companys Away From Home
operations, which represent the distribution of products such as
soup, specialty entrees, beverage products, other prepared foods
and Pepperidge Farm products through various food service
channels in the United States and Canada. As of the second
quarter of fiscal 2008, the results of the Godiva Chocolatier
business were reported as discontinued operations for the years
presented due to the sale. See Note 3 for additional
information on the sale. Beginning with the second quarter of
fiscal 2008, the Away From Home business was reported as North
America Foodservice.
In connection with the sale of the Godiva Chocolatier business,
the company modified the allocation methodology of certain
corporate expenses to the remaining segments. In addition,
following the recent distribution
45
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
agreement with The
Coca-Cola
Company and
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc., sales and earnings from certain beverage
products historically included in North America Foodservice
segment are now reported in U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages
and International Soup, Sauces and Beverages. Segment results of
prior periods have been adjusted to conform to the current
presentation.
The U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment includes the
following retail businesses: Campbells condensed
and ready-to-serve soups; Swanson broth and canned
poultry; Prego pasta sauce; Pace Mexican sauce;
Campbells Chunky chili; Campbells
canned pasta, gravies, and beans; Campbells Supper
Bakes meal kits; V8 juice and juice drinks; and
Campbells tomato juice.
The Baking and Snacking segment includes the following
businesses: Pepperidge Farm cookies, crackers, bakery and
frozen products in U.S. retail; Arnotts
biscuits in Australia and Asia Pacific; and
Arnotts salty snacks in Australia. In May 2008, the
company sold certain salty snack food brands and assets in
Australia, which historically were included in this segment. In
June 2007, the company sold its ownership interest in Papua New
Guinea operations, which historically were included in this
segment.
The International Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment includes
the soup, sauce and beverage businesses outside of the United
States, including Europe, Mexico, Latin America, the Asia
Pacific region and the retail business in Canada. See also
Note 3 for information on the sale of the businesses in the
United Kingdom and Ireland. These businesses were historically
included in this segment. The results of operations of these
businesses have been reflected as discontinued operations for
all years presented.
Accounting policies for measuring segment assets and earnings
before interest and taxes are substantially consistent with
those described in Note 1. The company evaluates segment
performance before interest and taxes. North America Foodservice
products are principally produced by the tangible assets of the
companys other segments, except for refrigerated soups,
which are produced in a separate facility, and certain other
products, which are produced under contract manufacturing
agreements. Accordingly, with the exception of a refrigerated
soup facility, plant assets are not allocated to the North
America Foodservice operations. Depreciation, however, is
allocated to North America Foodservice based on production hours.
The companys largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and
its affiliates, accounted for approximately 16% of consolidated
net sales in 2008, 15% in 2007 and 14% in 2006. All of the
companys segments sold products to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
or its affiliates.
Business
Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages
|
|
$
|
3,674
|
|
|
$
|
3,495
|
|
|
$
|
3,265
|
|
Baking and Snacking
|
|
|
2,058
|
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages
|
|
|
1,610
|
|
|
|
1,402
|
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
North America Foodservice
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,998
|
|
|
$
|
7,385
|
|
|
$
|
6,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008(2)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(3)
|
|
|
Earnings before interest and taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages
|
|
$
|
891
|
|
|
$
|
861
|
|
|
$
|
814
|
|
Baking and Snacking
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
North America Foodservice
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Corporate(1)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,098
|
|
|
$
|
1,243
|
|
|
$
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
Baking and Snacking
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
North America Foodservice
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Corporate(1)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
|
$
|
283
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
Baking and Snacking
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
North America Foodservice
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Corporate(1)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
298
|
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Segment Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages
|
|
$
|
2,301
|
|
|
$
|
2,208
|
|
|
$
|
2,104
|
|
Baking and Snacking
|
|
|
1,695
|
|
|
|
1,702
|
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages
|
|
|
1,805
|
|
|
|
1,630
|
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
North America Foodservice
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
Corporate(1)
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,474
|
|
|
$
|
6,445
|
|
|
$
|
7,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents unallocated corporate expenses and unallocated
assets, including corporate offices, deferred income taxes and
prepaid pension assets. |
|
(2) |
|
Contributions to earnings before interest and taxes by segment
included the effect of a 2008 restructuring charge and related
costs of $182 as follows: Baking and Snacking $144,
International Soup, Sauces and Beverages $9, and
North America Foodservice $29. See Note 7 for
additional information. |
|
(3) |
|
Contributions to earnings before interest and taxes by segment
included the effect of a $13 benefit due to a change in the
method of accounting for certain U.S. inventories from the LIFO
method to the average cost method as follows: U.S. Soup, Sauces
and Beverages $8 and Baking and Snacking
$5. |
47
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Geographic
Area Information
Information about operations in different geographic areas is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
5,448
|
|
|
$
|
5,133
|
|
|
$
|
4,834
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
Australia/Asia Pacific
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
Other countries
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,998
|
|
|
$
|
7,385
|
|
|
$
|
6,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008(2)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(3)
|
|
|
Earnings before interest and taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,080
|
|
|
$
|
1,077
|
|
|
$
|
972
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Australia/Asia Pacific
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Other countries
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment earnings before interest and taxes
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
1,345
|
|
|
|
1,202
|
|
Corporate(1)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,098
|
|
|
$
|
1,243
|
|
|
$
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
3,101
|
|
|
$
|
2,976
|
|
|
$
|
2,744
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
Australia/Asia Pacific
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
Other countries
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
Corporate(1)
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,474
|
|
|
$
|
6,445
|
|
|
$
|
7,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents unallocated corporate expenses and unallocated
assets, including corporate offices, deferred income taxes and
prepaid pension assets. |
|
(2) |
|
Contributions to earnings before interest and taxes by
geographic area included the effect of a 2008 restructuring
charge and related costs of $182 as follows: Australia/Asia
Pacific $145, Other countries $27,
Europe $8, and United States $2. See
Note 7 for additional information. |
|
(3) |
|
Contributions to earnings before interest and taxes by segment
included the effect of a $13 benefit due to a change in the
method of accounting for certain U.S. inventories from the LIFO
method to the average cost method as follows: U.S. Soup, Sauces
and Beverages $8 and Baking and Snacking
$5. |
Transfers between geographic areas are recorded at cost plus
markup or at market. Identifiable assets are those assets,
including goodwill, which are identified with the operations in
each geographic region.
48
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On April 28, 2008, the company announced a series of
initiatives to improve operational efficiency and long-term
profitability, including selling certain salty snack food brands
and assets in Australia, closing certain production facilities
in Australia and Canada, and streamlining the companys
management structure. As a result of these initiatives, the
company expects to incur aggregate pre-tax costs of
approximately $230, consisting of the following: approximately
$120 associated with a loss on the sale of certain Australian
salty snack food brands and assets; approximately $62 in
employee severance and benefit costs, including the estimated
impact of curtailment and other pension charges; approximately
$38 in asset write-offs and accelerated depreciation of
property, plant and equipment; and approximately $10 in other
exit costs. Of the aggregate $230 of pre-tax costs, the company
expects approximately $65 will be cash expenditures, the
majority of which will be spent in 2009. In 2008, the company
recorded a restructuring charge of $175 ($102 after tax or $.27
per share) related to these initiatives. The charge consisted of
a net loss of $120 ($64 after tax) on the sale of certain
Australian salty snack food brands and assets, $45 ($31 after
tax) of employee severance and benefit costs, including the
estimated impact of curtailment and other pension charges, and
$10 ($7 after tax) of property, plant and equipment impairment
charges. In addition, approximately $7 ($5 after tax or $.01 per
share) of costs related to these initiatives were recorded in
Cost of products sold, primarily representing accelerated
depreciation on property, plant and equipment. The aggregate
after-tax impact of restructuring charges and related costs was
$107, or $.28 per share.
A summary of the pre-tax costs is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Costs to be
|
|
|
|
Program
|
|
|
August 3, 2008
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Severance pay and benefits
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
Asset impairment/accelerated depreciation
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
230
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the third quarter of 2008, as part of the previously
discussed initiatives, the company entered into an agreement to
sell certain Australian salty snack food brands and assets. The
transaction was completed on May 12, 2008. Proceeds of the
sale were nominal. See also Note 3.
In April 2008, as part of the previously discussed initiatives,
the company announced plans to close the Listowel, Ontario,
Canada food plant. The Listowel facility produces primarily
frozen products, including soup, entrees, and Pepperidge Farm
products, as well as ramen noodles. The facility employs
approximately 500 people. The company plans to operate the
facility through April 2009 and transition production to its
network of North American contract manufacturers and to its
Downingtown, Pennsylvania plant. As a result, the company
recorded $20 ($14 after tax) of employee severance and benefit
costs, including the estimated impact of curtailment and other
pension charges, and $7 ($5 after tax) in accelerated
depreciation of property, plant and equipment in 2008. The
company expects to incur approximately $15 in additional
employee severance and benefit costs, approximately $19 in
accelerated depreciation of property, plant and equipment, and
approximately $6 in other exit costs.
In April 2008, as part of the previously discussed initiatives,
the company also announced plans to discontinue the private
label biscuit and industrial chocolate production at its
Miranda, Australia facility. The company plans to close the
Miranda facility, which employs approximately 150 people,
by the second quarter of 2009. In connection with this action,
the company recorded $10 ($7 after tax) of property, plant and
equipment impairment charges and $8 ($6 after tax) in employee
severance and benefit costs. The company expects to incur an
additional $2 in accelerated depreciation of property, plant,
and equipment, and approximately $4 in other exit costs.
As part of the previously discussed initiatives, the company
also plans to streamline its management structure and eliminate
certain overhead costs. These actions began in the fourth
quarter of 2008 and will be substantially completed in 2009. In
connection with this action, the company recorded $17 ($11 after
tax) in employee severance and benefit costs. The company
expects to incur approximately $2 of additional employee
severance and benefit costs.
49
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of restructuring activity and related reserves at
August 3, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
July 29, 2007
|
|
|
Charge
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Benefits(1)
|
|
|
August 3, 2008
|
|
|
Severance pay and benefits
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
Asset impairment/accelerated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pension termination benefits are recognized in Other Liabilities
and in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(loss). See
Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
A summary of restructuring charges by reportable segment is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Soup,
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sauces and
|
|
|
Baking and
|
|
|
Soup, Sauces
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverages
|
|
|
Snacking
|
|
|
and Beverages
|
|
|
Foodservice
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Severance pay and benefits
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
Asset impairment/accelerated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The company expects to incur additional pre-tax costs of
approximately $48 by segment as follows: Baking and
Snacking $7, North America Foodservice
$40, and $1 to be allocated among all segments. The total
pre-tax costs of $230 expected to be incurred by segment is as
follows: Baking and Snacking $151, International
Soup, Sauces and Beverages $7, North America
Foodservice $69, and $3 to be allocated among all
segments.
In June 2008, the company acquired the Wolfgang Puck soup
business from Country Gourmet Foods for approximately $10, of
which approximately $1 will be paid in the next two years. The
company also entered into a master licensing agreement with
Wolfgang Puck Worldwide, Inc. for the use of the Wolfgang
Puck brand on soup, stock, and broth products in North
America retail locations. Wolfgang Puck is one of the
leading organic soup brands in the United States. This business
is included in the U.S. Soup, Sauces and Beverages segment.
The pro forma impact on sales, net earnings or earnings per
share for the prior periods would not have been material.
|
|
9.
|
Pension
and Postretirement Benefits
|
Pension Benefits Substantially all of the
companys U.S. and certain
non-U.S. employees
are covered by noncontributory defined benefit pension plans. In
1999, the company implemented significant amendments to certain
U.S. plans. Under a new formula, retirement benefits are
determined based on percentages of annual pay and age. To
minimize the impact of converting to the new formula, service
and earnings credit continues to accrue for active employees
participating in the plans under the formula prior to the
amendments through the year 2014. Employees will receive the
benefit from either the new or old formula, whichever is higher.
Benefits become vested upon the completion of three years of
service. Benefits are paid from funds previously provided to
trustees and insurance companies or are paid directly by the
company from general funds. Plan assets consist primarily of
investments in equities, fixed income securities, and real
estate.
Postretirement Benefits The company provides
postretirement benefits including health care and life insurance
to substantially all retired U.S. employees and their
dependents. In 1999, changes were made to the postretirement
benefits offered to certain U.S. employees. Participants
who were not receiving postretirement benefits as of May 1,
1999 will no longer be eligible to receive such benefits in the
future, but the company will provide access to health care
coverage for non-eligible future retirees on a group basis.
Costs will be paid by the
50
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
participants. To preserve the economic benefits for employees
near retirement as of May 1, 1999, participants who were at
least age 55 and had at least 10 years of continuous
service remain eligible for postretirement benefits.
In 2005, the company established retiree medical account
benefits for eligible U.S. retirees, intended to provide
reimbursement for eligible health care expenses.
On July 29, 2007, the company adopted
SFAS No. 158 Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and
132(R). SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to
recognize the funded status of defined postretirement benefit
plans as an asset or liability on the balance sheet and requires
any unrecognized prior service cost and actuarial gains/losses
to be recognized in other comprehensive income.
SFAS No. 158 does not affect the companys
consolidated results of operations or cash flows. As a result of
the adoption in 2007, total assets were reduced by $294,
shareowners equity was reduced by $230, and total
liabilities were reduced by $64.
The company uses the fiscal year end as the measurement date for
the benefit plans.
Components
of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Curtailment gain
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension expense
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The curtailment gain and special termination benefits include a
curtailment gain of $3 and a special termination benefit of $3
for the fiscal year ended August 3, 2008 related to the
sale of the Godiva Chocolatier business. These amounts are
included in earnings from discontinued operations.
The curtailment gain and special termination benefits include a
curtailment loss of $2 and a special termination benefit of $2
for the fiscal year ended August 3, 2008 related to the
closure of the plant in Canada and are included in the
restructuring charge. See also Note 7.
The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service cost that
will be amortized from Accumulated other comprehensive loss into
net periodic pension cost during 2009 are $21 and $1,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Curtailment loss
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic postretirement expense
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The curtailment loss and special termination benefits relate to
the sale of the Godiva Chocolatier business and are included in
earnings from discontinued operations.
51
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The estimated prior service cost that will be amortized from
Accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic
postretirement expense during 2009 is $1.
Change
in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
1,902
|
|
|
$
|
2,119
|
|
|
$
|
335
|
|
|
$
|
365
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Plan amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial gain
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Medicare subsidies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Divestiture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency adjustment
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
1,882
|
|
|
$
|
1,902
|
|
|
$
|
327
|
|
|
$
|
335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in the fair value of pension plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Fair value at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
2,025
|
|
|
$
|
2,003
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
295
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
Divestiture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
Foreign currency adjustment
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at end of year
|
|
$
|
1,854
|
|
|
$
|
2,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts
recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
(327
|
)
|
|
$
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
558
|
|
|
$
|
345
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
558
|
|
|
$
|
345
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides information for pension plans with
accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The accumulated benefit obligation for all pension plans was
$1,736 at August 3, 2008 and $1,767 at July 29, 2007.
Weighted-average
assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the end of
the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.87
|
%
|
|
|
6.40
|
%
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
3.97
|
%
|
|
|
3.97
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the
years ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.40
|
%
|
|
|
6.15
|
%
|
|
|
5.44
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.79
|
%
|
|
|
8.81
|
%
|
|
|
8.71
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
3.97
|
%
|
|
|
3.95
|
%
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
The expected rate of return on assets for the companys
global plans is a weighted average of the expected rates of
return selected for the various countries where the company has
funded pension plans. These rates of return are set annually and
are based upon an estimate of future long-term investment
returns for the projected asset allocation.
The discount rate used to determine net periodic postretirement
expense was 6.50% in 2008, 6.25% in 2007 and 5.5% in 2006.
Assumed
health care cost trend rates at the end of the
year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline
(ultimate trend rate)
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care costs would
have the following effects on 2008 reported amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Decrease
|
|
|
Effect on service and interest cost
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Effect on the 2008 accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
53
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Plan
Assets
The companys year-end pension plan weighted-average asset
allocations by category were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Real estate and other
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fundamental goal underlying the pension plans
investment policy is to ensure that the assets of the plans are
invested in a prudent manner to meet the obligations of the
plans as these obligations come due. Investment practices must
comply with applicable laws and regulations.
The companys investment strategy is based on an
expectation that equity securities will outperform debt
securities over the long term. Accordingly, in order to maximize
the return on assets, a majority of assets are invested in
equities. Additional asset classes with dissimilar expected
rates of return, return volatility, and correlations of returns
are utilized to reduce risk by providing diversification
relative to equities. Investments within each asset class are
also diversified to further reduce the impact of losses in
single investments. The use of derivative instruments is
permitted where appropriate and necessary to achieve overall
investment policy objectives and asset class targets.
The company establishes strategic asset allocation percentage
targets and appropriate benchmarks for each significant asset
class to obtain a prudent balance between return and risk. The
interaction between plan assets and benefit obligations is
periodically studied to assist in the establishment of strategic
asset allocation targets.
Estimated
future benefit payments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
2014-2018
|
|
$
|
807
|
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
The benefit payments include payments from funded and unfunded
plans.
Estimated future Medicare subsidy receipts are $3-$4 annually
from 2009 through 2013, and $19 for the period 2014 through 2018.
The company made voluntary contributions of $70 to a
U.S. pension plan during the fiscal year ended
August 3, 2008. The company is not required to make
additional contributions to the U.S. plans in fiscal 2009.
Contributions to
non-U.S. plans
are expected to be approximately $9 in 2009.
Savings Plan The company sponsors employee
savings plans which cover substantially all U.S. employees.
The company provides a matching contribution of 60% (50% at
certain locations) of the employee contributions up to 5% of
compensation after one year of continued service. Amounts
charged to Costs and expenses were $18 in 2008, $17 in 2007 and
$16 in 2006.
54
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The provision for income taxes on earnings from continuing
operations consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
State
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
912
|
|
|
$
|
876
|
|
|
$
|
730
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
939
|
|
|
$
|
1,099
|
|
|
$
|
947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of the effective income tax
rate on continuing operations with the U.S. federal
statutory income tax rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Federal statutory income tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes (net of federal tax benefit)
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Tax effect of international items
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
Settlement of tax contingencies
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
Taxes on AJCA repatriation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Federal manufacturing deduction
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
Divestiture of Australian snack foods(1)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
28.5
|
%
|
|
|
27.9
|
%
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 7 for information on the divestiture of certain
Australian salty snack foods brands. |
In the second quarter of 2008, the company recorded a tax
benefit of $13 resulting from the resolution of a state tax
contingency.
In the third quarter of 2007, the company recorded a tax benefit
of $22 resulting from the settlement of bilateral advance
pricing agreements (APA) among the company, the United States,
and Canada related to royalties. In addition, the company
reduced net interest expense by $4 ($3 after tax). The aggregate
impact on Earnings from continuing operations was $25, or $.06
per share. In 2007, the company also recognized an additional
tax benefit of $40 following the finalization of the
2002-2004
U.S. federal tax audits.
55
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In 2006, the tax effect of international items in 2006 included
a $14 deferred tax benefit related to foreign tax credits, which
could be utilized as a result of the sale of the United Kingdom
and Ireland businesses. See also Note 3 for information on
the divestiture.
The company received an Examination Report from the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) on December 23, 2002, which included
a challenge to the treatment of gains and interest deductions
claimed in the companys fiscal 1995 federal income tax
return, relating to transactions involving government
securities. If the proposed adjustment were upheld, it would
have required the company to pay a net amount of over $100 in
taxes, accumulated interest and penalties. The company had
maintained a reserve for a portion of this contingency. In
November 2005, the company negotiated a settlement of this
matter with the IRS. As a result of the settlement in the first
quarter ended October 30, 2005, the company adjusted tax
reserves and recorded a $47 tax benefit. In addition, the
company reduced interest expense and accrued interest payable by
$21 and adjusted deferred tax expense by $8 ($13 after tax). The
aggregate non-cash impact of the settlement on Earnings from
continuing operations was $60, or $.14 per share. The settlement
did not have a material impact on the companys
consolidated cash flow. In 2006, the company also recognized an
additional tax benefit of $21 related to the resolution of
certain U.S. tax issues for open tax years through 2001.
See also Note 1 for additional information on the tax
impact of the repatriation of earnings under the AJCA.
Deferred tax liabilities and assets are comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
Pension benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits and compensation
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
Pension benefits
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax loss carryforwards
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Capital loss carryforward
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Other
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At August 3, 2008,
non-U.S. subsidiaries
of the company have tax loss carryforwards of approximately
$168. Of these carryforwards, $41 expire between 2009 and 2018
and $127 may be carried forward indefinitely. The current
statutory tax rates in these countries range from 20% to 31%. At
August 3, 2008, valuation allowances have been established
to offset $51 of these tax loss carryforwards. Additionally, at
August 3, 2008,
non-U.S. subsidiaries
of the company have capital loss carryforwards of approximately
$346, which are fully offset by valuation allowances. The
company also has approximately $2 of foreign tax credit
carryforwards, which expire in 2018.
The company has undistributed earnings of
non-U.S. subsidiaries
of approximately $315. U.S. income taxes have not been
provided on undistributed earnings, which are deemed to be
permanently reinvested. It is not practical to estimate the tax
liability that might be incurred if such earnings were remitted
to the U.S.
The company adopted the provisions of FIN 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 as of
July 30, 2007 (the beginning of fiscal 2008). The company
identified approximately $58 of unrecognized tax benefits as of
July 30, 2007, of which $42 would impact the effective rate
if
56
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
recognized. In addition, the company had accrued interest and
penalties of approximately $9 (net of a tax benefit of $2). Upon
adoption, the company recognized a cumulative-effect adjustment
of $6 as an increase in the liability for unrecognized tax
benefits, including interest and penalties, and a corresponding
reduction in retained earnings. A reconciliation of the activity
related to unrecognized tax benefits follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
Increases related to prior year tax positions
|
|
|
5
|
|
Decreases related to prior year tax positions
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Increases related to current year tax positions
|
|
|
12
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Lapse of statute
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at August 3, 2008
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized tax benefits were $61 at August 3, 2008,
including $7 of interest and penalties.
The balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of August 3,
2008 was $54, of which $37 would impact the effective tax rate
if recognized in future periods. The total amount of
unrecognized tax benefits can change due to audit settlements,
tax examination activities, statute expirations and the
recognition and measurement criteria under FIN 48. The
company is unable to estimate what this change could be within
the next twelve months, but does not believe it would be
material to the financial statements.
Approximately $2 of the unrecognized tax benefit liabilities,
including interest and penalties, are expected to be settled
within the next twelve months and are classified in accrued
income taxes on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The remaining
$59 of unrecognized tax benefit liabilities are reported as
other non-current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The companys accounting policy with respect to interest
and penalties attributable to income taxes is to reflect any
expense or benefit as a component of its income tax provision.
The total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the
current year Statement of Earnings was a benefit of $4. The
total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of August 3, 2008 was $7 (net
of a tax benefit of $2).
The company does business globally and, as a result, files
income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and
various state and foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of
business, the company is subject to examination by taxing
authorities throughout the world, including such major
jurisdictions as the United States, Australia, Canada, Belgium,
France and Germany. The tax years 2005 and 2006 are currently
under audit by the IRS. In addition, several state income tax
examinations are in progress for fiscal years 2000 to 2007.
In Australia, the company has been subject to a limited scope
audit by the Australian tax office for fiscal years through
2002. The statue of limitation is open for fiscal years 2003
forward. With limited exceptions, the company is no longer
subject to income tax audits in Canada for fiscal years before
2004. The company is no longer subject to income tax audits for
fiscal years 2005 and prior for Belgium and France, and for
fiscal years 2007 and prior for Germany.
|
|
11.
|
Notes
Payable and Long-term Debt
|
Notes payable consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
$
|
546
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-rate bank borrowings
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Fixed-rate borrowings
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
982
|
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of August 3, 2008, the weighted-average interest rate of
commercial paper, which consisted of U.S. borrowings, was
2.25%. As of July 29, 2007, the weighted-average interest
rate of commercial paper, which primarily consisted of
Australian borrowings, was 6.25%.
The company has a committed revolving credit facility of $1,500
that supports commercial paper borrowings and remains unused at
August 3, 2008, except for $33 of standby letters of credit.
Long-term Debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Fiscal Year of Maturity
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
2009
|
|
|
5.88
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
Notes
|
|
2011
|
|
|
6.75
|
%
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
Notes
|
|
2013
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Notes
|
|
2014
|
|
|
4.88
|
%
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Debentures
|
|
2021
|
|
|
8.88
|
%
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Australian dollar loan facility
|
|
2011
|
|
|
6.81
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,633
|
|
|
$
|
2,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the companys long-term debt including
the current portion of long-term debt in Notes payable was
$2,051 at August 3, 2008 and $2,152 at July 29, 2007.
The company has $300 of long-term debt available to issue as of
August 3, 2008 under a shelf registration statement filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Principal amounts of debt mature as follows: 2009-$982 (in
current liabilities); 2010-$4; 2011-$701; 2012-$1; 2013-$400 and
beyond-$527.
|
|
12.
|
Financial
Instruments
|
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and
notes receivable, accounts payable and short-term debt
approximate fair value. The fair values of long-term debt, as
indicated in Note 11, and derivative financial instruments
are based on quoted market prices or pricing models using
current market rates.
The company accounts for derivatives under
SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities as amended by
SFAS No. 138 and SFAS No. 149. The standard
requires that all derivative instruments be recorded on the
balance sheet at fair value and establishes criteria for
designation and effectiveness of the hedging relationships.
The company utilizes certain derivative financial instruments to
enhance its ability to manage risk, including interest rate,
foreign currency, commodity and certain equity-linked deferred
compensation exposures that exist as part of ongoing business
operations. Derivative instruments are entered into for periods
consistent with related underlying exposures and do not
constitute positions independent of those exposures. The company
does not enter into contracts for speculative purposes, nor is
it a party to any leveraged derivative instrument.
The company is exposed to credit loss in the event of
nonperformance by the counterparties on derivative contracts.
The company minimizes its credit risk on these transactions by
dealing only with leading, credit-worthy financial institutions
having long-term credit ratings of A or better and,
therefore, does not anticipate nonperformance. In addition, the
contracts are distributed among several financial institutions,
thus minimizing credit risk concentration.
All derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair
value. On the date the derivative contract is entered into, the
company designates the derivative as (1) a hedge of the
fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an
unrecognized firm commitment (fair-value hedge), (2) a
hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of
58
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset
or liability (cash-flow hedge), (3) a foreign-currency
fair-value or cash-flow hedge (foreign-currency hedge), or
(4) a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation.
Some derivatives may also be considered natural hedging
instruments (changes in fair value are recognized to act as
economic offsets to changes in fair value of the underlying
hedged item and do not qualify for hedge accounting under
SFAS No. 133).
Changes in the fair value of a fair-value hedge, along with the
loss or gain on the hedged asset or liability that is
attributable to the hedged risk (including losses or gains on
firm commitments), are recorded in current-period earnings.
Changes in the fair value of a cash-flow hedge are recorded in
other comprehensive income, until earnings are affected by the
variability of cash flows. Changes in the fair value of a
foreign-currency hedge are recorded in either current-period
earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on whether the
hedge transaction is a fair-value hedge (e.g., a hedge of a firm
commitment that is to be settled in foreign currency) or a
cash-flow hedge (e.g., a hedge of a foreign-currency-denominated
forecasted transaction). If, however, a derivative is used as a
hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation, its changes in
fair value, to the extent effective as a hedge, are recorded in
the cumulative translation adjustments account within
Shareowners equity.
The company finances a portion of its operations through debt
instruments primarily consisting of commercial paper, notes,
debentures and bank loans. The company utilizes interest rate
swap agreements to minimize worldwide financing costs and to
achieve a targeted ratio of variable-rate versus fixed-rate debt.
In June 2008, the company entered into two forward starting
interest rate swap contracts with a combined notional value of
$200 to hedge an anticipated debt offering in fiscal 2009.
In June 2008, the company terminated an interest rate swap
contract with a notional value of $33 that converted variable
Australian debt to fixed. The amount received was not material.
In July 2006, the company entered into three interest rate swaps
that converted $154 of the $207 Australian variable-rate debt to
a weighted-average fixed rate of 6.73%, all of which have been
settled as of August 3, 2008.
Fixed-to-variable interest rate swaps are accounted for as
fair-value hedges. Gains and losses on these instruments are
recorded in earnings as adjustments to interest expense,
offsetting gains and losses on the hedged item. The notional
amount of fair-value interest rate swaps was $675 at
August 3, 2008 and at July 29, 2007. The swaps had a
fair value of a gain of $14 at August 3, 2008 and a loss of
$19 at July 29, 2007.
Variable-to-fixed interest rate swaps are accounted for as
cash-flow hedges. Consequently, the effective portion of
unrealized gains (losses) is deferred as a component of
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is recognized
in earnings at the time the hedged item affects earnings. The
amounts paid or received on the hedge are recognized as
adjustments to interest expense. There were no variable-to-fixed
interest rate swaps outstanding as of August 3, 2008. The
fair value of the swaps was not material as of July 29,
2007. The notional amount was $85 at July 29, 2007.
The company is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk as a
result of transactions in currencies other than the functional
currency of certain subsidiaries, including subsidiary financing
transactions. The company utilizes foreign currency forward
purchase and sale contracts and cross-currency swaps in order to
manage the volatility associated with foreign currency purchases
and sales and certain intercompany transactions in the normal
course of business.
Qualifying foreign exchange forward and cross-currency swap
contracts are accounted for as cash-flow hedges when the hedged
item is a forecasted transaction, or when future cash flows
related to a recognized asset or liability are expected to be
received or paid. The effective portion of the changes in fair
value on these instruments is recorded in Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) and is reclassified into the
Statements of Earnings on the same line item and in the same
period or periods in which the hedged transaction affects
earnings. The assessment of effectiveness for contracts is based
on changes in the spot rates. The fair value of these
instruments was a loss of $68 and $56 at August 3, 2008 and
July 29, 2007, respectively. The notional amount was $307
and $437 as of August 3, 2008 and July 29, 2007,
respectively.
59
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Qualifying foreign exchange forward contracts are accounted for
as fair-value hedges when the hedged item is a recognized asset,
liability or firm commitment. These contracts were not material
at July 29, 2007. There were no such contracts outstanding
as of August 3, 2008.
The company also enters into certain foreign exchange forward
contracts and variable-to-variable cross-currency swap contracts
that are not designated as accounting hedges. These instruments
are primarily intended to reduce volatility of certain
intercompany financing transactions. Gains and losses on
derivatives not designated as accounting hedges are typically
recorded in Other expenses/(income), as an offset to gains
(losses) on the underlying transactions. Cross-currency
contracts mature in 2009 through 2014. The fair value of these
instruments was a loss of $48 and $10 at August 3, 2008 and
July 29, 2007, respectively. The notional amount of all
instruments was $582 and $331 at August 3, 2008 and
July 29, 2007, respectively.
Foreign exchange forward contracts typically have maturities of
less than eighteen months. Principal currencies include the
Australian dollar, British pound, Canadian dollar, euro,
Japanese yen, New Zealand dollar and Swedish krona.
As of August 3, 2008, the accumulated derivative net gain
in other comprehensive income for cash-flow hedges, including
the foreign exchange forward and cross-currency contracts,
forward-starting swap contracts and treasury lock agreements and
commodity futures, was $5, net of tax. As of July 29, 2007,
the accumulated derivative net loss in other comprehensive
income was $6, net of tax. At August 3, 2008, the maximum
maturity date of any cash-flow hedge was approximately
5 years. The amount expected to be reclassified into the
Statements of Earnings in 2009 is a gain of approximately $5.
The company principally uses a combination of purchase orders
and various short- and long-term supply arrangements in
connection with the purchase of raw materials, including certain
commodities and agricultural products. The company also enters
into commodity futures contracts, as considered appropriate, to
reduce the volatility of price fluctuations for commodities such
as soybean oil, wheat, soybean meal, corn, cocoa and natural
gas. As of August 3, 2008, the notional value and the fair
value loss related to commodity hedging activity were $146 and
$3, respectively.
The company is exposed to equity price changes related to
certain deferred compensation obligations. Swap contracts are
utilized to hedge exposures relating to certain deferred
compensation obligations linked to the total return of the
Standard & Poors 500 Index, the total return of
the companys capital stock and the total return of the
Puritan Fund. The company pays a variable interest rate and
receives the equity returns under these instruments. The
notional value of the equity swap contracts, which mature in
2009, was $56 at August 3, 2008. These instruments are not
designated as accounting hedges. Gains and losses are recorded
in the Statements of Earnings as an offset to gains and losses
on the underlying transactions. The net asset recorded under
these contracts at August 3, 2008 was $1.
The company has authorized 560 million shares of Capital
stock with $.0375 par value and 40 million shares of
Preferred stock, issuable in one or more classes, with or
without par as may be authorized by the Board of Directors. No
Preferred stock has been issued.
Share
Repurchase Programs
In November 2005, the companys Board of Directors
authorized the purchase of up to $600 of company stock through
fiscal 2008. This program was completed during the third quarter
of 2008. In August 2006, the companys Board of Directors
authorized using up to $620 of the net proceeds from the sale of
the United Kingdom and Ireland businesses to purchase company
stock. This program was completed at the end of fiscal 2007. In
March 2008, the companys Board of Directors authorized
using approximately $600 of the net proceeds from the sale of
the Godiva Chocolatier business to purchase company stock. This
program was completed during the fourth quarter of 2008. In June
2008, the companys Board of Directors authorized the
purchase of up to $1,200 of company stock through fiscal 2011.
This program will begin in fiscal 2009. In addition to these
publicly announced programs, the company
60
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
repurchases shares to offset the impact of dilution from shares
issued under the companys stock compensation plans.
In 2008, the company repurchased 26 million shares at a
cost of $903. Of the 2008 repurchases, approximately
23 million shares at a cost of $800 were made pursuant to
the companys publicly announced share repurchase programs.
In 2007, the company repurchased 30 million shares at a
cost of $1,140. Of the 2007 repurchases, approximately
21 million shares at a cost of $820 were made pursuant to
the companys then publicly announced share repurchase
programs, with a portion executed under two accelerated share
repurchase agreements (Agreements) with Lehman Brothers
Financial S.A. (Lehman), an affiliate of Lehman Brothers Inc.,
covering approximately $600 of common stock. The Agreements were
entered into on September 28, 2006.
Under the first Agreement, the company purchased approximately
8.3 million shares of its common stock from Lehman for
$300, or $35.95 per share, subject to a purchase price
adjustment payable upon settlement of the Agreement. Lehman was
expected to purchase an equivalent number of shares during the
term of the Agreement. On July 5, 2007, upon conclusion of
the Agreement, the company made a settlement payment of $22 to
Lehman, which was recorded as a reduction of Additional paid-in
capital, based upon the difference between the volume
weighted-average price of the companys common stock during
the Agreements term of $38.90 and the purchase price of
$35.95.
Under the second Agreement, the company purchased approximately
$300 of its common stock from Lehman. Under this Agreement,
Lehman made an initial delivery of 6.3 million shares on
September 29, 2006 at $35.95 per share and a second
delivery of 1.3 million shares on October 25, 2006 at
$36.72 per share. Under the Agreement, the number of additional
shares (if any) to be delivered to the company at settlement
would be based on the volume weighted-average price of company
stock during the term of the Agreement, subject to a minimum and
maximum price for the purchased shares. The volume
weighted-average price during the term of the Agreement was
$38.90. On July 5, 2007, upon conclusion of the Agreement,
Lehman delivered approximately 200,000 shares to the
company as a final settlement. Approximately $20 paid under the
Agreement was recorded as a reduction of Additional paid-in
capital.
Stock
Plans
In 2003, shareowners approved the 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan,
which authorized the issuance of 28 million shares to
satisfy awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights,
unrestricted stock, restricted stock (including performance
restricted stock) and performance units. Approximately
3.2 million shares available under a previous long-term
plan were rolled into the 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan, making
the total number of available shares approximately
31.2 million. In November 2005, shareowners approved the
2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which authorized the issuance of
an additional 6 million shares to satisfy the same types of
awards.
Awards under the 2003 and 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plans may be
granted to employees and directors. The term of a stock option
granted under these plans may not exceed ten years from the date
of grant. Options granted under these plans vest cumulatively
over a three-year period at a rate of 30%, 60% and 100%,
respectively. The option price may not be less than the fair
market value of a share of common stock on the date of the
grant. Restricted stock granted in fiscal 2004 and 2005 vests in
three annual installments of
1/3
each, beginning
21/2
years from the date of grant.
Pursuant to the 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan, in July 2005 the
company adopted a long-term incentive compensation program which
provides for grants of total shareowner return (TSR) performance
restricted stock, EPS performance restricted stock, and
time-lapse restricted stock. Initial grants made in accordance
with this program were approved in September 2005. Under the
program, awards of TSR performance restricted stock will be
earned by comparing the companys total shareowner return
during a three-year period to the respective total shareowner
returns of companies in a performance peer group. Based upon the
companys ranking in the performance peer group, a
recipient of TSR performance restricted stock may earn a total
award ranging from 0% to 200% of the initial grant. Awards of
EPS performance restricted stock will be earned based upon the
61
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
companys achievement of annual earnings per share goals.
During the three-year vesting period, a recipient of EPS
performance restricted stock may earn a total award ranging from
0% to 100% of the initial grant. Awards of time-lapse restricted
stock will vest ratably over the three-year period. Annual stock
option grants are not part of the long-term incentive
compensation program for 2006, 2007 and 2008. However, stock
options may still be granted on a selective basis under the 2003
and 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plans.
Information about stock options and related activity is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(Options in thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
22,889
|
|
|
$
|
27.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,807
|
)
|
|
$
|
25.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminated
|
|
|
(377
|
)
|
|
$
|
43.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
|
20,705
|
|
|
$
|
27.42
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
20,628
|
|
|
$
|
27.42
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2008, 2007
and 2006 was $17, $76 and $35, respectively. As of
August 3, 2008, total remaining unearned compensation
related to unvested stock options was not material. There were
no options granted during 2008 and 2007. Options granted in 2006
were not material. The weighted-average fair value of options
granted in 2006 was estimated as $6.85. The fair value of each
option grant at grant date is estimated using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. The following weighted-average assumptions
were used for grants in 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
6
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
The following table summarizes time-lapse restricted stock and
EPS performance restricted stock activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(Restricted stock in thousands)
|
|
|
Nonvested at July 29, 2007
|
|
|
3,108
|
|
|
$
|
31.18
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
$
|
36.57
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(1,959
|
)
|
|
$
|
31.01
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
$
|
34.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at August 3, 2008
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
$
|
34.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of time-lapse restricted stock and EPS
performance restricted stock is determined based on the number
of shares granted and the quoted price of the companys
stock at the date of grant. Time-lapse restricted stock granted
in fiscal 2004 and 2005 is expensed on a graded-vesting basis.
Time-lapse restricted stock granted in fiscal 2006, 2007 and
2008 is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting
period, except for awards issued to retirement-eligible
participants, which are expensed on an accelerated basis. EPS
performance restricted stock is expensed on a graded-vesting
basis, except for awards issued to retirement-eligible
participants, which are expensed on an accelerated basis.
62
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of August 3, 2008, total remaining unearned compensation
related to nonvested time-lapse restricted stock and EPS
performance restricted stock was $38, which will be amortized
over the weighted-average remaining service period of
1.7 years. The fair value of restricted stock vested during
2008, 2007 and 2006 was $70, $53 and $16, respectively. The
weighted-average grant-date fair value of restricted stock
granted during 2007 and 2006 was $36.14 and $29.48, respectively.
The following table summarizes TSR performance restricted stock
activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(Restricted stock in thousands)
|
|
|
Nonvested at July 29, 2007
|
|
|
2,735
|
|
|
$
|
27.58
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
$
|
34.64
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
$
|
28.73
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
$
|
30.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at August 3, 2008
|
|
|
3,549
|
|
|
$
|
30.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of TSR performance restricted stock is estimated
at the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation. Expense is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period. As
of August 3, 2008, total remaining unearned compensation
related to TSR performance restricted stock was $43 which will
be amortized over the weighted-average remaining service period
of 1.8 years. The grant-date fair value of TSR performance
restricted stock granted during 2007 and 2006 was $26.31 and
$28.73, respectively.
Employees can elect to defer all types of restricted stock
awards. These awards are classified as liabilities because of
the possibility that they may be settled in cash. The fair value
is adjusted quarterly. The total cash paid to settle the
liabilities in 2008, 2007 and 2006 was not material. The
liability for deferred awards was $19 at August 3, 2008.
The excess tax benefits on the exercise of stock options and
vested restricted stock presented as cash flows from financing
activities in 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $8, $25 and $11,
respectively. Cash received from the exercise of stock options
was $47, $165 and $236 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively,
and is reflected in cash flows from financing activities in the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
For the periods presented in the Consolidated Statements of
Earnings, the calculations of basic earnings per share and
earnings per share assuming dilution vary in that the weighted
average shares outstanding assuming dilution include the
incremental effect of stock options and restricted stock
programs, except when such effect would be antidilutive. The
dilutive impact of the accelerated share repurchase agreements
described under Share Repurchase Programs was not
material. Stock options to purchase approximately 1 million
shares of capital stock for 2008 and for 2007 and 3 million
shares of capital stock for 2006 were not included in the
calculation for diluted earnings per share because the exercise
price of the stock options exceeded the average market price of
the capital stock, and therefore, would be antidilutive.
|
|
14.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
In February 2002, VFB L.L.C., an entity representing the
interests of the unsecured creditors of Vlasic Foods
International Inc., a company spun off by Campbell in March
1998, commenced a lawsuit against the company and several of its
subsidiaries in the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware alleging, among other things, fraudulent
conveyance, illegal dividends and breaches of fiduciary duty by
Vlasic directors alleged to be under the companys control.
In September 2005, the District Court ruled in favor of
Campbell, finding that Vlasic Foods was solvent at the time of
the spin off transaction, and that Campbell is not liable to the
plaintiff for the claims of Vlasics unsecured creditors or
for any other claims or damages. The judgment of the District
Court was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the
Third Circuit in March of 2007. The case is closed.
63
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The company is a party to legal proceedings and claims arising
out of the normal course of business.
Management assesses the probability of loss for all legal
proceedings and claims and has recognized liabilities for such
contingencies, as appropriate. Although the results of these
matters cannot be predicted with certainty, in managements
opinion, the final outcome of legal proceedings and claims will
not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results
of operations or financial condition of the company.
The company has certain operating lease commitments, primarily
related to warehouse and office facilities, retail store space
and certain equipment. Rent expense under operating lease
commitments was $80 in 2008 and $82 in 2007 and in 2006. These
amounts included $33, $42 and $41 in 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, related to discontinued operations. Future minimum
annual rental payments under these operating leases are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$40
|
|
|
|
$35
|
|
|
|
$30
|
|
|
|
$25
|
|
|
|
$23
|
|
|
|
$51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The company guarantees approximately 1,800 bank loans made to
Pepperidge Farm independent sales distributors by third party
financial institutions for the purchase of distribution routes.
The maximum potential amount of future payments the company
could be required to make under the guarantees is $151. The
companys guarantees are indirectly secured by the
distribution routes. The company does not believe it is probable
that it will be required to make guarantee payments as a result
of defaults on the bank loans guaranteed. The amounts recognized
as of August 3, 2008 and July 29, 2007 were not
material.
In connection with the sale of certain Australian salty snack
food brands and assets, the company agreed to provide a loan
facility to the buyer of AUD $10, or approximately USD $9. The
facility can be drawn down in AUD $5 increments, six and nine
months after the closing date, which was May 12, 2008. Any
borrowings under the facility are to be repaid five years after
the closing date.
The company has provided certain standard indemnifications in
connection with divestitures, contracts and other transactions.
Certain indemnifications have finite expiration dates.
Liabilities recognized based on known exposures related to such
matters were not material at August 3, 2008.
|
|
15.
|
Supplemental
Financial Statement Data
|
Balance
Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
526
|
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
Other
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials, containers, and supplies
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
Finished products
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
829
|
|
|
$
|
775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
Other
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Plant assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
3,415
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
Projects in progress
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost
|
|
|
4,766
|
|
|
|
4,809
|
|
Accumulated depreciation(1)
|
|
|
(2,827
|
)
|
|
|
(2,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,939
|
|
|
$
|
2,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Other
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
211
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
Fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Accrued trade and consumer promotion programs
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
655
|
|
|
$
|
622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
$
|
354
|
|
|
$
|
354
|
|
Pension benefits
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Deferred compensation(2)
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Postretirement benefits
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
Fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
|
$
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Depreciation expense was $288 in 2008, $283 in 2007 and $286 in
2006. Depreciation expense of continuing operations was $271 in
2008, $263 in 2007 and $254 in 2006. Buildings are depreciated
over periods ranging from 10 to 45 years. Machinery and
equipment are depreciated over periods generally ranging from 2
to 15 years. |
|
(2) |
|
The deferred compensation obligation represents unfunded plans
maintained for the purpose of providing the companys
directors and certain of its executives the opportunity to defer
a portion of their compensation. All forms of compensation
contributed to the deferred compensation plans are accounted for
in accordance with the underlying program. Contributions are
credited to an investment account in the participants
name, although no funds are actually contributed to the
investment account and no investment choices are actually
purchased. Six |
65
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
investment choices are available, including: (1) a book
account that tracks the total return on company stock;
(2) a book account that tracks performance of
Fidelitys Spartan U.S. Equity Index Fund; (3) a book
account that tracks the performance of Fidelitys Puritan
Fund; (4) a book account that tracks the performance of
Fidelitys Spartan International Index Fund; (5) a
book account that tracks the performance of Fidelitys
Spartan Extended Market Index Fund; and (6) a book account
that credits interest based on the Wall Street Journal indexed
prime rate. Participants can reallocate investments daily and
are entitled to the gains and losses on investment funds. The
company recognizes an amount in the Statements of Earnings for
the market appreciation/depreciation of each fund. |
Statements
of Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Other Expenses/(Income)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gains/losses
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Amortization/impairment of intangible and other assets
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Gain on sale of facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain from settlement in lieu of condemnation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
Less: Interest capitalized
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
|
$
|
163
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In 2007, a non-cash reduction of $4 was recognized in connection
with the favorable settlement of the APA. |
|
|
In 2006, a non-cash reduction of $21 was recognized in
connection with the favorable settlement of a U.S. tax
contingency. See also Note 10. |
Statements
of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Other non-cash charges to net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash compensation/benefit related expense
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
Gain from settlement in lieu of condemnation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit related payments
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(61
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
Interest received
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
521
|
|
|
$
|
365
|
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
66
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
16.
|
Quarterly
Data (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,185
|
|
|
$
|
2,218
|
|
|
$
|
1,880
|
|
|
$
|
1,715
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations(1)
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations(2)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Per share basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
1.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
0.73
|
|
|
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
Per share assuming dilution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations(1)
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
0.67
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations(2)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
1.40
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
Market price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
38.59
|
|
|
$
|
37.79
|
|
|
$
|
35.55
|
|
|
$
|
37.24
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
34.70
|
|
|
$
|
30.19
|
|
|
$
|
30.83
|
|
|
$
|
32.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,051
|
|
|
$
|
2,064
|
|
|
$
|
1,750
|
|
|
$
|
1,520
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations(3)
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations(4)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Per share basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
0.67
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
Per share assuming dilution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations(3)
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations(4)
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
Market price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
38.49
|
|
|
$
|
39.98
|
|
|
$
|
42.65
|
|
|
$
|
40.87
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
35.55
|
|
|
$
|
36.37
|
|
|
$
|
38.00
|
|
|
$
|
37.46
|
|
The sum of the individual per share amounts does not equal due
to rounding.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes a non-cash tax benefit of $13 (0.03 per diluted share)
in the second quarter from the favorable resolution of a state
tax contingency in the United States, a $100 ($0.26 per diluted
share) restructuring charge |
67
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
in the third quarter and a $7 ($.02 per diluted share)
restructuring charge and related costs in the fourth quarter
associated with initiatives to improve operational efficiency
and long-term profitability. See also Note 7. |
|
(2) |
|
In the third quarter of 2008, results of discontinued operations
included a $467 ($1.23 per diluted share) gain from the sale of
the Godiva Chocolatier business. In the second quarter of 2008,
results of discontinued operations included $5 ($.01 per diluted
share) of costs associated with the sale of the Godiva
Chocolatier business. The total gain on the sale was $462 ($1.21
per diluted share). |
|
(3) |
|
Includes a $14 ($.04 per diluted share) gain from the sale of an
idle manufacturing facility in the second quarter and a $25
($.06 per diluted share) benefit from a tax settlement from the
APA (see also Note 10). The third quarter included a $13
($.03 per diluted share) benefit from the reversal of legal
reserves due to favorable results in litigation. |
|
(4) |
|
In the first quarter of 2007, results of discontinued operations
included a $23 ($.06 per diluted share) gain from the sale of
businesses in the United Kingdom and Ireland. In the fourth
quarter of 2007, results of discontinued operations included a
$1 gain from the sale of businesses in the United Kingdom and
Ireland and a $7 ($.02 per diluted share) tax benefit from the
resolution of audits in the United Kingdom. The total gain on
the sale was $24 ($.06 per diluted share). |
68
Reports
of Management
Managements
Report on Financial Statements
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared by the
companys management in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles to reflect the financial position of the
company and its operating results. The financial information
appearing throughout this Annual Report is consistent with the
financial statements. Management is responsible for the
information and representations in such financial statements,
including the estimates and judgments required for their
preparation. The financial statements have been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears herein.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed
entirely of Directors who are not officers or employees of the
company, meets regularly with the companys worldwide
internal auditing department, other management personnel, and
the independent auditors. The independent auditors and the
internal auditing department have had, and continue to have,
direct access to the Audit Committee without the presence of
other management personnel, and have been directed to discuss
the results of their audit work and any matters they believe
should be brought to the Committees attention. The
internal auditing department and the independent auditors report
directly to the Audit Committee.
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The companys management is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America.
The companys internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the company;
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and
Directors of the company; and
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of
the companys assets that could have a material effect on
the financial statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The companys management assessed the effectiveness of the
companys internal control over financial reporting as of
August 3, 2008. In making this assessment, management used
the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control Integrated Framework. Based on this
assessment using those criteria, management concluded that the
companys internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of August 3, 2008.
69
The effectiveness of the companys internal control over
financial reporting as of August 3, 2008 has been audited
by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears herein.
Douglas R. Conant
President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Anthony
P. DiSilvestro
Anthony P. DiSilvestro
Vice President Controller
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)
September 30, 2008
70
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareowners and Directors of Campbell Soup Company
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of earnings, of
shareowners equity and of cash flows present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Campbell Soup
Company and its subsidiaries at August 3, 2008 and
July 29, 2007, and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the
period ended August 3, 2008 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of August 3, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible
for these financial statements, for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in the accompanying Managements Report
on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility
is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement and
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial
statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal
control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also
included performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinions.
As discussed in Note 1 and Note 9, the company changed
the manner in which it accounts for uncertainty in income taxes
in 2008, and the manner in which it accounts for defined benefit
pension and other postretirement plans in 2007.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewatershouseCoopers
LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
September 30, 2008
71
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
The company, under the supervision and with the participation of
its management, including the President and Chief Executive
Officer and Vice President Controller (Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), has
evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure
controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)) as of August 3, 2008 (the
Evaluation Date). Based on such evaluation, the
President and Chief Executive Officer and the Vice
President Controller (Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer) have concluded that, as of the
Evaluation Date, the companys disclosure controls and
procedures are effective.
The annual report of management on the companys internal
control over financial reporting is provided under
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data on
pages 69-70.
The attestation report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the
companys independent registered public accounting firm,
regarding the companys internal control over financial
reporting is provided under Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data on page 71.
During the quarter ended August 3, 2008, as part of the
previously announced North American SAP enterprise-resource
planning system implementation, the company implemented SAP
software at its Napoleon, Ohio, facility and at its Pepperidge
Farm facility in Denver, Pennsylvania. In conjunction with these
SAP implementations, the company modified the design, operation
and documentation of its internal control over financial
reporting. Specifically, the company modified controls in the
business processes impacted by the new system, such as user
access security, system reporting and authorization and
reconciliation procedures. There were no other changes in the
companys internal control over financial reporting that
materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially
affect, such internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
The sections entitled Election of Directors,
Security Ownership of Directors and Executive
Officers and Directors and Executive Officers Stock
Ownership Reports in the companys Proxy Statement
for the Annual Meeting of Shareowners to be held on
November 20, 2008 (the 2008 Proxy) are
incorporated herein by reference. The information presented in
the section entitled Corporate Governance
Board Committees in the 2008 Proxy relating to the members
of the companys Audit Committee and the Audit
Committees financial expert is incorporated herein by
reference.
Certain of the information required by this Item relating to the
executive officers of the company is set forth under the heading
Executive Officers of the Company.
The company has adopted a Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive
Officer and Senior Financial Officers that applies to the
companys Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
Controller and members of the Chief Financial
Officers financial leadership team. The Code of Ethics for
the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers is
posted on the companys website,
www.campbellsoupcompany.com (under the
Governance caption). The company intends to satisfy
the disclosure requirement regarding any amendment to, or a
waiver of, a provision of the Code of Ethics for the Chief
Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers by posting such
information on its website.
The company has also adopted a separate Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics applicable to the Board of Directors, the
companys officers and all of the companys employees.
The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on the
companys website, www.campbellsoupcompany.com
(under the Governance caption). The
72
companys Corporate Governance Standards and the charters
of the companys four standing committees of the Board of
Directors can also be found at this website. Printed copies of
the foregoing are available to any shareowner requesting a copy
by:
|
|
|
|
|
writing to Investor Relations, Campbell Soup Company, 1 Campbell
Place, Camden, NJ
08103-1799;
|
|
|
|
calling 1-888-SIP-SOUP (1-888-747-7687); or
|
|
|
|
leaving a message on the Contact Campbell
Investor Relations section of the companys home page
at www.campbellsoupcompany.com.
|
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information presented in the sections entitled
Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Summary
Compensation Table Fiscal 2008, Grants
of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2008, Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End, Option Exercises
and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2008, Pension
Benefits, Nonqualified Deferred Compensation,
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in
Control, Director Compensation,
Corporate Governance Compensation and
Organization Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation and Compensation and Organization
Committee Report in the 2008 Proxy is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Shareowner Matters
|
The information presented in the sections entitled
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans, Security Ownership of Directors
and Executive Officers and Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners in the 2008 Proxy is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The information presented in the section entitled
Transactions with Related Persons, Corporate
Governance Director Independence and
Corporate Governance Board Committees in
the 2008 Proxy is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
The information presented in the section entitled
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and
Services in the 2008 Proxy is incorporated herein by
reference.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this
report:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of August 3, 2008 and
July 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareowners Equity for 2008,
2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
73
|
|
2.
|
Financial
Statement Schedules
|
None.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
(a)
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2007, between
Yildiz Holdings A.S. and Campbell Investment Company was filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on
a Form 8-K (SEC file number 1-3822) on December 26, 2007, and is
incorporated herein by reference. The registrant agrees to file
a copy of any omitted attachment to Exhibit 2.1 upon the request
of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
|
3
|
|
(i)
|
|
Campbells Restated Certificate of Incorporation as amended
through February 24, 1997 was filed with the SEC with
Campbells Form 10-K (SEC file number 1-3822) for the
fiscal year ended July 28, 2002, and is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
3
|
|
(ii)
|
|
Campbells By-Laws, as amended through March 27, 2008, were
filed with the SEC on a Form 8-K (SEC file number 1-3822)
on March 28, 2008, and are incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
4
|
|
(a)
|
|
With respect to Campbells 6.75% notes due 2011, the
form of Indenture between Campbell and Bankers Trust Company, as
Trustee, and the associated form of security were filed with the
SEC with Campbells Registration Statement No. 333-11497,
and are incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
4
|
|
(b)
|
|
Except as described in 4(a) above, there is no instrument with
respect to long-term debt of the company that involves
indebtedness or securities authorized thereunder exceeding
10 percent of the total assets of the company and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The company agrees to
file a copy of any instrument or agreement defining the rights
of holders of long-term debt of the company upon request of the
SEC.
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
Major Stockholders Voting Trust Agreement dated June 2,
1990, as amended, was filed with the SEC by (i) Campbell as
Exhibit 99.C to Campbells Schedule 13E-4 (SEC file number
5-7735) filed on September 12, 1996, and (ii) with respect to
certain subsequent amendments, the Trustees of the Major
Stockholders Voting Trust as Exhibit 99.G to Amendment No.
7 to their Schedule 13D (SEC file number 5-7735) dated March 3,
2000, and as Exhibit 99.M to Amendment No. 8 to their Schedule
13D (SEC file number 5-7735) dated January 26, 2001, and as
Exhibit 99.P to Amendment No. 9 to their Schedule 13D (SEC
file number 5-7735) dated September 30, 2002, and is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
|
(a)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company 1994 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended
on November 17, 2000, was filed with the SEC with
Campbells 2000 Proxy Statement (SEC file number 1-3822),
and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
|
(b)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended
and restated on September 25, 2008.
|
|
10
|
|
(c)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan was filed
with the SEC with Campbells 2005 Proxy Statement (SEC file
number 1-3822), and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
|
(d)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company Annual Incentive Plan, as amended on
November 18, 2004, was filed with the SEC with Campbells
2004 Proxy Statement (SEC file number 1-3822), and is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
|
(e)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company Mid-Career Hire Pension Program, amended
effective as of January 25, 2001, was filed with the SEC with
Campbells Form 10-K (SEC file number 1-3822) for the
fiscal year ended July 29, 2001, and is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
10
|
|
(f)
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan, effective November 18, 1999, was
filed with the SEC with Campbells Form 10-K (SEC file
number 1-3822) for the fiscal year ended July 30, 2000, and is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
|
(g)
|
|
Severance Protection Agreement dated January 8, 2001, with
Douglas R. Conant, President and Chief Executive Officer,
was filed with the SEC with Campbells Form 10-Q (SEC file
number 1-3822) for the fiscal quarter ended January 28, 2001,
and is incorporated herein by reference. Agreements with the
other executive officers listed under the heading
Executive Officers of the Company are in all
material respects the same as Mr. Conants agreement.
|
|
10
|
|
(h)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company Severance Pay Plan for Salaried Employees,
as amended and restated effective January 1, 2006, was filed
with the SEC with Campbells Form 10-Q (SEC file number
1-3822) for the fiscal quarter ended January 29, 2006, and is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
(i)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company Supplemental Severance Pay Plan for Exempt
Salaried Employees, as amended and restated effective January 1,
2006, was filed with the SEC with Campbells Form 10-Q
(SEC file number 1-3822) for the fiscal quarter ended
January 29, 2006, and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
|
(j)
|
|
A special long-term incentive grant of 54,667
performance-restricted shares made to the Senior Vice President
and Chief Information Officer, in lieu of grants under the
companys regular long-term incentive program, was
described in a Form 8-K (SEC file number 1-3822) filed on
November 22, 2005, and such description is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
10
|
|
(k)
|
|
Severance Agreement and General Release, dated October 29, 2007,
by and between Mark A. Sarvary and Campbell Soup Company was
filed with the SEC with Campbells Form 10-Q (SEC file
number 1-3822) for the fiscal quarter ended October 28, 2007,
and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
|
(l)
|
|
2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Performance-Restricted Stock Grant
Agreement, dated April 22, 2008, between the Company and Robert
A. Schiffner was filed with the SEC with a Campbell Form 8-K
filed on April 22, 2008 announcing the retirement of Robert A.
Schiffner, and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries (Direct and Indirect) of the company.
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
Power of Attorney.
|
|
31
|
|
(a)
|
|
Certification of Douglas R. Conant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
|
|
31
|
|
(b)
|
|
Certification of Anthony P. DiSilvestro pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a).
|
|
32
|
|
(a)
|
|
Certification of Douglas R. Conant pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350.
|
|
32
|
|
(b)
|
|
Certification of Anthony P. DiSilvestro pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
75
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Campbell has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Anthony
P. DiSilvestro
|
Anthony P. DiSilvestro
Vice President Controller
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: October 1, 2008
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of Campbell and in the capacity and on the date
indicated.
/s/ Anthony
P. DiSilvestro
Anthony P. DiSilvestro
Vice President Controller
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: October 1, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harvey Golub
|
|
Chairman and Director
|
|
}
|
|
|
Douglas R. Conant
|
|
President, Chief Executive
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Officer and Director
|
|
}
|
|
|
Edmund M. Carpenter
|
|
Director
|
|
}
|
|
|
Paul R. Charron
|
|
Director
|
|
}
|
|
|
Bennett Dorrance
|
|
Director
|
|
}
|
|
|
Randall W. Larrimore
|
|
Director
|
|
}
|
|
Ellen Oran Kaden
|
Philip E. Lippincott
|
|
Director
|
|
}
|
|
Senior Vice
President
|
Mary Alice D. Malone
|
|
Director
|
|
}
|
|
Law and
Government
|
Sara Mathew
|
|
Director
|
|
}
|
|
Affairs
|
David C. Patterson
|
|
Director
|
|
}
|
|
|
Charles R. Perrin
|
|
Director
|
|
}
|
|
|
A. Barry Rand
|
|
Director
|
|
}
|
|
|
George Strawbridge, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
}
|
|
|
Les C. Vinney
|
|
Director
|
|
}
|
|
|
Charlotte C. Weber
|
|
Director
|
|
}
|
|
|
76
INDEX OF EXHIBITS
Document
|
|
|
2 (a)
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2007, between Yildiz
Holdings A.S. and Campbell Investment Company was filed with the SEC on a
Form 8-K (SEC file number 1-3822) on December 26, 2007, and is
incorporated herein by reference. The registrant agrees to file a copy of
any omitted attachment to Exhibit 2.1 upon the request of the Securities
and Exchange Commission. |
|
|
|
3 (i)
|
|
Campbells Restated Certificate of Incorporation as amended through
February 24, 1997 was filed with the SEC with Campbells Form 10-K (SEC
file number 1-3822) for the fiscal year ended July 28, 2002, and is
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
3 (ii)
|
|
Campbells By-Laws, as amended through March 27, 2008, were filed with the
SEC on a Form 8-K (SEC file number 1-3822) on March 28, 2008, and are
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4 (a)
|
|
With respect to Campbells 6.75% notes due 2011, the form of Indenture
between Campbell and Bankers Trust Company, as Trustee, and the associated
form of security were filed with the SEC with Campbells Registration
Statement No. 333-11497, and are incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4 (b)
|
|
Except as described in 4(a) above, there is no instrument with respect to
long-term debt of the company that involves indebtedness or securities
authorized thereunder exceeding 10 percent of the total assets of the
company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The company agrees
to file a copy of any instrument or agreement defining the rights of
holders of long-term debt of the company upon request of the SEC. |
|
|
|
9
|
|
Major Stockholders Voting Trust Agreement dated June 2, 1990, as amended,
was filed with the SEC by (i) Campbell as Exhibit 99.C to Campbells
Schedule 13E-4 (SEC file number 5-7735) filed on September 12, 1996, and
(ii) with respect to certain subsequent amendments, the Trustees of the
Major Stockholders Voting Trust as Exhibit 99.G to Amendment No. 7 to
their Schedule 13D (SEC file number 5-7735) dated March 3, 2000, and as
Exhibit 99.M to Amendment No. 8 to their Schedule 13D (SEC file number
5-7735) dated January 26, 2001, and as Exhibit 99.P to Amendment No. 9 to
their Schedule 13D (SEC file number 5-7735) dated September 30, 2002, and
is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10 (a)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company 1994 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended on
November 17, 2000, was filed with the SEC with Campbells 2000 Proxy
Statement (SEC file number 1-3822), and is incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
10 (b)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and
restated on September 25, 2008. |
|
|
|
10 (c)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan was filed with the SEC
with Campbells 2005 Proxy Statement (SEC file number 1-3822), and is
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10 (d)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company Annual Incentive Plan, as amended on November 18,
2004, was filed with the SEC with Campbells 2004 Proxy Statement (SEC
file number 1-3822), and is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10 (e)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company Mid-Career Hire Pension Program, as amended
effective as of January 25, 2001, was filed with the SEC with Campbells
Form 10-K (SEC file number 1-3822) for the fiscal year ended July 29,
2001, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10 (f)
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan, effective November 18, 1999, was filed with
the SEC with Campbells Form 10-K (SEC file number 1-3822) for the fiscal
year ended July 30, 2000, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10 (g)
|
|
Severance Protection Agreement dated January 8, 2001, with Douglas R.
Conant, President and Chief Executive Officer, was filed with the SEC with
Campbells Form 10-Q (SEC file number 1-3822) for the fiscal quarter ended
January 28, 2001, and is incorporated herein by reference. Agreements
with the other executive officers listed under the heading Executive
Officers of the Company are in all material respects the same as Mr.
Conants agreement. |
|
|
|
10 (h)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company Severance Pay Plan for Salaried Employees, as
amended and restated effective January 1, 2006, was filed with the SEC
with Campbells Form 10-Q (SEC file number 1-3822) for the fiscal quarter
ended January 29, 2006, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10 (i)
|
|
Campbell Soup Company Supplemental Severance Pay Plan for Exempt Salaried
Employees, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2006, was filed
with the SEC with Campbells Form 10-Q (SEC file number 1-3822) for the
fiscal quarter ended January 29, 2006, and is incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
10 (j)
|
|
A special long-term incentive grant of 54,667 performance-restricted
shares made to the Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, in
lieu of grants under the companys regular long-term incentive program,
was described in a Form 8-K (SEC file number 1-3822) filed on November 22,
2005, and such description is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10 (k)
|
|
Severance Agreement and General Release, dated October 29, 2007, by and
between Mark A. Sarvary and Campbell Soup Company was filed with the SEC
with Campbells Form 10-Q (SEC file number 1-3822) for the fiscal quarter
ended October 28, 2007, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10 (l)
|
|
2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Performance-Restricted Stock Grant
Agreement, dated April 22, 2008, between the Company and Robert A.
Schiffner was filed with the SEC |
|
|
|
|
|
with a Campbell Form 8-K filed on April
22, 2008 announcing the retirement of Robert A. Schiffner, and is
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries (Direct and Indirect) of the company. |
|
|
|
23
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
|
|
|
24
|
|
Power of Attorney. |
|
|
|
31 (a)
|
|
Certification of Douglas R. Conant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
|
31 (b)
|
|
Certification of Anthony P. DiSilvestro pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
|
32 (a)
|
|
Certification of Douglas R. Conant pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
32 (b)
|
|
Certification of Anthony P. DiSilvestro pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |