FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

[X]     QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013

 

Or

 

[   ]     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from __________ to______________

 

Commission File Number 0-25045

 

CENTRAL FEDERAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

2923 Smith Road, Fairlawn, Ohio  44333

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

(330) 666-7979

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

                                                                                                          

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes [X]        No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     Yes [X]   No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer [  ]            Accelerated filer [  ]              Non-accelerated filer [  ]              Smaller reporting company [X]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes [  ]     No[X]

 

As of May 15, 2013, there were 15,823,710 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Basis of Presentation: 

The consolidated financial statements include Central Federal Corporation (the Holding Company) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, CFBank, Ghent Road, Inc., and Smith Ghent LLC (together with the Holding Company referred to as the Company).  The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) and in compliance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).  Because this report is based on an interim period, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted.

 

In the opinion of the management of the Company, the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial condition and the results of operations for the periods presented.  These adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, unless otherwise disclosed in this Form 10-Q. The financial performance reported for the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2013 is not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.  This information should be read in conjunction with the Company’s latest Annual Report to Stockholders and Form 10-K. Reference is made to the accounting policies of the Company described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report that was filed as Exhibit 13.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.  The Company has consistently followed those policies in preparing this Form 10-Q.

 

Reclassifications and Reverse Stock Split:  Some items in the prior period financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation.  Reclassifications did not impact prior period net loss or total stockholders' equity.  On May 4, 2012, the Company completed a 1-for-5 reverse stock split, whereby every 5 shares of the Company’s common stock were reclassified into one share of common stock. All share and per share amounts for all periods presented have been adjusted to reflect the reverse split as though it had occurred prior to the earliest period presented.

 

Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share: The two-class method is used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share.  Under the two-class method, earnings available to common stockholders for the period are allocated between common stockholders and participating securities (unvested share-based payment awards) according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings.  The factors used in the earnings per share computation follow:

---

 

 

 

The following stock options and warrant were not considered in computing diluted earnings (loss) per common share because the options or warrant were anti-dilutive or the Company reported a net loss for the periods presented.

 

Adoption of New Accounting Standards:

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220); Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The objective of this Update is to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income.  The amendments in this Update require an entity to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. For public entities, the amendments are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company, however, disclosures have been presented as part of notes to the financial statements.    

 

NOTE 2- REGULATORY ORDER CONSIDERATIONS

Regulatory Order Considerations: On May 25, 2011, the Holding Company and CFBank each consented to the issuance of an Order to Cease and Desist (the Holding Company Order and the CFBank Order, respectively, and collectively, the Orders) by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), the primary regulator of the Holding Company and CFBank at the time the Orders were issued.  In July 2011, in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act), the FED replaced the OTS as the primary regulator of the Holding

---

 

Company and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) replaced the OTS as the primary regulator of CFBank.

 

The Holding Company Order requires it, among other things, to: (i) submit by every December 31 a capital plan to regulators that establishes a minimum tangible capital ratio commensurate with the Holding Company’s consolidated risk profile, reduces the risk from current debt levels and addresses the Holding Company’s cash flow needs; (ii) not pay cash dividends, redeem stock or make any other capital distributions without prior regulatory approval; (iii) not pay interest or principal on any debt or increase any Holding Company debt or guarantee the debt of any entity without prior regulatory approval; (iv) obtain prior regulatory approval for changes in directors and senior executive officers; and (v) not enter into any new contractual arrangement related to compensation or benefits with any director or senior executive officer without prior notification to regulators. 

The CFBank Order requires it, among other things, to: (i) maintain 8% core capital and 12% total risk-based capital, after establishing an adequate allowance for loan and lease losses; (ii) submit every December 31 a capital and business plan to regulators that describes strategies to meet these required capital ratios and contains operating strategies to achieve realistic core earnings; (iii) raise capital to reach the required levels; (iv) not originate, participate in or acquire any nonresidential real estate loans or commercial loans not in line with agreed Board approval conditions, loan policies and credit administration procedures; (v) adopt a revised credit administration policy, problem asset reduction plan, management succession plan and liquidity management policy; (vi) limit asset growth in line with the Business Plan absent prior regulatory approval for additional growth; (vii) not pay cash dividends or make any other capital distributions without prior regulatory approval; (viii) obtain prior regulatory approval for changes in directors and senior executive officers; (ix) not enter into any new contractual arrangement related to compensation or benefits with any director or senior executive officer without prior notification to regulators; (x) not enter into any significant arrangement or contract with a third party service provider without prior regulatory approval; and (xi) comply with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) limits on brokered deposits.  As a result of the CFBank Order, we are prohibited from offering above-market interest rates and are subject to market rates published by the FDIC when offering deposits to the general public.  As a result of the CFBank Order, CFBank is considered “adequately capitalized” for regulatory purposes.  If CFBank’s capital falls below the levels to be considered adequately capitalized, it may be subject to substantially greater regulatory scrutiny, including the imposition of additional restrictions on our operations. 

 

The Company has been unprofitable for the past three years.  If we do not generate profits in the future, our capital levels will be negatively impacted and the regulators could take additional enforcement action against us, including the imposition of further operating restrictions.

 

Because CFBank is under a regulatory order, it is prohibited from accepting or renewing brokered deposits, including reciprocal deposits in the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) program, without FDIC approval.  CFBank received limited waivers from the prohibition on renewal of reciprocal CDARS deposits from the FDIC, each for 90 day periods, commencing in June, 2011, through the current 90-day waiver period which runs through June 12, 2013.  Management intends to submit additional requests for waivers in the future; however, there can be no assurance that the additional requests will be granted by the FDIC or that customers will roll over their CDARS deposits even if CFBank is granted additional waivers.

 

The prohibition on brokered deposits significantly limits CFBank’s ability to participate in the CDARS program and impacts CFBank’s liquidity management.  The Company monitors on-balance-sheet liquidity to deal with scheduled brokered deposit maturities and the potential impact of other regulatory restrictions on liquidity.  At March 31, 2013, CFBank had $27,760 in brokered deposits with maturity dates from April 2013 through August 2016. At March 31, 2013, cash, unpledged securities and deposits in other financial institutions totaled $18,781. Brokered deposit maturities over the next four years are as follows:

 

 

Pursuant to the CFBank Order, CFBank may not declare or pay dividends or make any other capital distributions without receiving the prior written approval of the OCC.  Future dividend payments by CFBank to the Holding Company would be

---

 

based on future earnings and the approval of the OCC. The payment of dividends from CFBank to the Holding Company is not likely to be approved by the OCC while CFBank is suffering losses.

The directives contained in the Orders, including higher capital requirements, requirements to reduce the level of our classified and criticized assets and various operating restrictions, may impede our full ability to operate our business and compete effectively in our markets.

We have taken such actions as we believe are necessary to comply with all requirements of the Orders which are currently effective and we are continuing to work toward compliance with the provisions of the Orders having future compliance dates. 

We have received or provided all required approvals, non-objections, notifications and waivers with regard to the Orders.  Details of these items are disclosed in Note 2- Regulatory Order Considerations, filed in the December 31, 2012 Form 10-K.

 

 The requirements of the Orders will remain in effect until terminated, modified or suspended by our regulators.

 

Capital Raise: The Company announced the terms of a registered common stock offering on August 9, 2011.  This offering was unsuccessful and in April 2012, the Company suspended this offering and returned all subscriptions received.  The Company subsequently modified the terms of the offering and filed post-effective amendments to its registration statement with the SEC, and the amended registration statement was declared effective on June 14, 2012. 

The restructured registered common stock offering consisted of a rights offering of up to $18,000 and a $4,500 offering to a group of standby purchasers, as well as a public offering of any unsold shares.  Under the terms of the rights offering, all holders of the Company’s common stock as of the record date, June 14, 2012, received, at no charge, one subscription right for each share of common stock held as of the record date, which was after the 1 for 5 reverse stock split effective May 4, 2012.  Each subscription right entitled the holder of the right to purchase 14.5329 shares of Company common stock (post-split) at a subscription price of $1.50 per share (post-split).  The rights offering period expired on July 16, 2012, and unsubscribed shares were made available to the public beginning on July 17, 2012, at $1.50 per share. The public offering of unsubscribed shares of common stock ended on August 14, 2012.  The Company separately entered into a series of standby purchase agreements with a group of investors led by Timothy T. O’Dell, Thad R. Perry and Robert E. Hoeweler.  Under the standby purchase agreements, the standby purchasers agreed to purchase 3.0 million shares of Company common stock at a price of $1.50 per share. The standby purchasers had conditioned their purchase of shares of common stock upon the receipt by the Company of at least $13,500 in net proceeds from the rights offering and public offering.

On August 20, 2012, the Company announced the successful completion of its restructured registered common stock offering.  The Company sold 15.0 million shares of its common stock (including shares sold to the standby purchasers) at $1.50 per share, resulting in gross proceeds of $22,500 before expenses of $2,279.

A portion of the proceeds from the restructured registered common stock offering was retained by the Holding Company for general corporate purposes and is estimated to be sufficient to support the Holding Company’s cash requirements for the foreseeable future based on its current business plan.    Holding Company cash provided from net proceeds of the stock offering was reduced by $3,000 for redemption of the Company’s TARP obligations from the U.S. Treasury and a $13,500 capital contribution to CFBank to improve its capital ratios and support future growth and expansion, bringing CFBank into compliance with the capital ratios required by the CFBank Order. See Note 10 – Preferred Stock for additional information on redemption of the TARP obligations.  The Holding Company’s current cash requirements include debt service on the subordinated debentures and operating expenses.  See Note 8 –  Subordinated Debentures for additional information on debt service requirements of the subordinated debentures.  Management believes the Holding Company’s liquidity is sufficient at March 31, 2013. 

 

---

 

NOTE 3 – SECURITIES 

 

The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of the available-for-sale securities portfolio at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and the corresponding amounts of unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

There was no other-than-temporary impairment recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for securities available for sale at March 31, 2013 or March 31, 2012.

There were no sales of Securities for the three months ended March 31, 2013 or March 31, 2012.

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at March 31, 2013 are shown by contractual maturity.  Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.  Securities not due at a single maturity date are shown separately.

 

Fair value of securities pledged was as follows:

---

 

 

 

At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of stockholders’ equity.

 

The following table summarizes securities with unrealized losses at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 aggregated by major security type and length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position.

 

 

 

 

 

The unrealized losses in Corporate debt and State and Municipal Securities at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, are related to multiple securities.  Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in market conditions, and not credit quality, and because the Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell these securities before their anticipated recovery, the Company did not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.  

 

The unrealized loss at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 in Collateralized Mortgage Obligations is related to two Ginnie Mae collateralized mortgage obligations. These securities carry the full faith and credit guarantee of the U.S. government.   Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in market conditions, and not credit quality, and because the Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell these securities before their anticipated recovery, the Company did not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

 

NOTE 4 – LOANS 

 

The following table presents the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment.  The recorded investment in loans includes the principal balance outstanding adjusted for purchase premiums and discounts, deferred loan fees and costs and includes accrued interest.

 

---

 

 

Commercial loans included $13,880 and $11,782, respectively, of commercial lines of credit which required interest only payments at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

 

Home equity lines of credit included $10,340 and $10,447, respectively, of loans which required interest only payments at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

 

Mortgage Purchase Program

On December 11, 2012 the Bank entered into a Mortgage Purchase Program with Northpointe Bank (Northpointe), a Michigan banking corporation.  At March 31, 2013 and December 31,2012, CFBank held $27,434 and $25,373, respectively, of such loans which have been included in single family residential loan totals above.  Through a participation agreement, CFBank agreed to purchase from Northpointe 75% interest in fully underwritten and pre-sold mortgage loans originated by various prescreened mortgage brokers located throughout the U.S. The participation agreement provides for CFBank to purchase individually (MERS registered) loans from Northpointe and hold them until funded by the end investor.  The mortgage loan investors include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and other major financial institutions such as Wells Fargo Bank.  This process on average takes approximately 14 days.  Given the short term nature of each of these individual loans, common credit risks such as past due, impairment and trouble debt restructure (TDR), nonperforming, and nonaccrual classification are substantially reduced.  The maximum aggregate purchase interest shall not exceed $45,000.  Northpointe maintains a 25% ownership interest in each loan it participates.  The agreement further calls for full control to be relinquished by the Broker to Northpointe and its participants with recourse to the broker after 120 days, at the sole discretion of Northpointe. As such, these purchased loans are classified as portfolio loans.  These loans are 100% risk rated for CFBank capital adequacy purposes.

 

The ALLL is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses in the loan portfolio based on management’s evaluation of various factors including past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions and other factors. A provision for loan losses is charged to operations based on management’s periodic evaluation of these and other pertinent factors described in Note 1 contained in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report. 

---

 

 

The following tables present the activity in the ALLL by portfolio segment for the three months ended March 31, 2013:

 

 

The following tables present the activity in the ALLL by portfolio segment for the three months ended March, 2012:

 

 

---

 

 

The following table presents the balance in the ALLL and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on the impairment method as of March 31, 2013:

 

 

The following table presents the balance in the ALLL and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on the impairment method as of December 31, 2012: 

 

 

---

 

 

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans at March 31, 2013.  The unpaid principal balance is the contractual principal balance outstanding.  The recorded investment is the unpaid principal balance adjusted for partial charge-offs, purchase premiums and discounts, deferred loan fees and costs and includes accrued interest. The table presents accrual basis interest income recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2013.  Cash payments of interest during the three months ended March 31, 2013 totaled $57.

 

 

---

 

 

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans at December 31, 2012.  The unpaid principal balance is the contractual principal balance outstanding.  The recorded investment is the unpaid principal balance adjusted for partial charge-offs, purchase premiums and discounts, deferred loan fees and costs and includes accrued interest. The table presents accrual basis interest income recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2012.  Cash payments of interest during the three months ended March 31, 2012 totaled $88.

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

The following table presents the recorded investment in nonaccrual loans by class of loans:

 

 

 

Nonaccrual loans include both smaller balance single-family mortgage and consumer loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans. There were no loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest at March 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

---

 

The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans by class of loans as of March 31, 2013:

 

 

 

---

 

The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans by class of loans as of December 31, 2012: 

 

 

 

Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs):

 

As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, TDR’s totaled $6.4 and $7.0, respectively.  The Company allocated $842 and $830 of specific reserves to loans whose terms had been modified in TDRs as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.  The Company had not committed to lend any additional amounts as of March 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012 to customers with outstanding loans classified as nonaccrual TDRs.

 

During the quarter ended March 31, 2013, no loans were modified as a TDR, where concessions were granted to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the terms of one loan was modified as a TDR, where concessions were granted to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. One single-family residential loan was modified as a TDR during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and included a reduction in the stated interest rate of the loan from 10% to 5%, a waiver of a portion of the accrued and unpaid interest, addition of the remaining accrued and unpaid interest to the principal balance and extension of the maturity date from 2034 to 2042. This modification involved a reduction in the stated interest rate of the loan for a period of 30 years.

There were no TDRs in payment default or that became nonperforming during the period ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.  A loan is considered to be in payment default once it is 90 days contractually past due under the modified terms, at which time the loan is re-evaluated to determine whether an impairment loss should be recognized, either through a write-off or specific valuation allowance, so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows, or at the fair value of collateral, less cost to sell, if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. 

The terms of certain other loans were modified during the quarter ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 that did not meet the definition of a TDR. These loans had a total recorded investment of $6,635 and $2,815 as of March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The modification of these loans involved either a modification of the terms of a loan to borrowers who were not experiencing financial difficulties, a delay in a  payments that was considered to be insignificant or there were no concessions granted.

---

 

In order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed of the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. This evaluation is performed under the Company’s internal underwriting policy.

 

Nonaccrual loans include loans that were modified and identified as TDRs and the loans are not performing.  At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, nonaccrual TDRs were as follows:

 

 

 

Nonaccrual loans at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 do not include $3,588 and $3,684, respectively, of TDRs where customers have established a sustained period of repayment performance, generally six months, the loans are current according to their modified terms and repayment of the remaining contractual payments is expected. These loans are included in total impaired loans.

 

---

 

Credit Quality Indicators:

 

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt, such as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information and current economic trends, among other factors.  Management analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk.  This analysis includes commercial, commercial real estate and multi-family residential real estate loans.  Internal loan reviews for these loan types are performed at least annually, and more often for loans with higher credit risk. Adjustments to loan risk ratings are made based on the reviews and at any time information is received that may affect risk ratings.  The following definitions are used for risk ratings:

 

Special Mention.  Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention.  If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of CFBank’s credit position at some future date.

 

Substandard.  Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any.  Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt.  They are characterized by the distinct possibility that there will be some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

 

Doubtful.  Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable.

 

Loans not meeting the criteria to be classified into one of the above categories are considered to be not rated or pass-rated loans.  Loans listed as not rated are primarily groups of homogeneous loans.  Past due information is the primary credit indicator for groups of homogenous loans.  Loans listed as pass-rated loans are loans that are subject to internal loan reviews and are determined not to meet the criteria required to be classified as special mention, substandard or doubtful. 

 

The recorded investment in loans by risk category and by class of loans as of March 31, 2013 and based on the most recent analysis performed follows.  There were no loans rated doubtful at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. 

 

 

 

The recorded investment in loans by risk category and by class of loans as of December 31, 2012 follows. 

 

---

 

 

 

NOTE 5 - FAIR VALUE 

 

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.  There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:

            Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

 

            Level 2 – Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

 

            Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

 

The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value:

 

Securities available for sale:  The fair value of securities available for sale is determined using pricing models that vary based on asset class and include available trade, bid and other market information or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2).

 

Loans held for sale, at fair value: Loans held for sale are carried at fair value, as determined by outstanding commitments from third party investors (Level 2).

 

Derivatives:  The fair value of derivatives is based on valuation models using observable market data as of the measurement date (Level 2).

 

Impaired loans: The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the ALLL is generally based on recent real estate appraisals.  These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers

---

 

to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available.  Such adjustments are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

 

Appraisals for both collateral-dependent impaired loans and foreclosed assets are performed by certified general appraisers (for commercial properties) or certified residential appraisers (for residential properties) whose qualifications and licenses have been reviewed and verified by a third-party appraisal management company approved by the Board of Directors annually. Once received, the loan officer or a member of the credit department reviews the assumptions and approaches utilized in the appraisal as well as the overall resulting fair value in comparison with independent data sources such as recent market data or industry-wide statistics. Appraisals are updated as needed based on facts and circumstances associated with the individual properties.  Real estate appraisals typically incorporate measures such as recent sales prices for comparable properties.  Appraisers may make adjustments to the sales prices of the comparable properties as deemed appropriate based on the age, condition or general characteristics of the subject property.  Management applies an additional discount to real estate appraised values, typically to reflect changes in market conditions since the date of the appraisal and to cover disposition costs (including selling expenses) based on the intended disposition method of the property.

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial assets and liabilities for which the Company has elected the fair value option, are summarized below:

 

 

---

 

 

 

The Company had no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis that were measured using Level 1 or Level 3 inputs at March 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

---

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:

 

 

 

 

The Company had no assets or liabilities, that were material, measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis that were measured using Level 1 or Level 2 inputs at March 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012. 

 

The Impaired loan servicing rights, which are carried at fair value at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, are not material based on the value of the asset. 

Impaired loans carried at the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had an unpaid principal balance of $5,511, with a valuation allowance of $603, at March 31, 2013. There were $0 and $865 in write-downs of impaired collateral dependent loans during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Impaired loans carried at the fair value of collateral had an unpaid principal balance of $5,909, with a valuation allowance of $611 at December 31, 2012. 

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company did not have any significant transfers of assets or liabilities between those measured using Level 1, 2 or 3 inputs.  The Company recognizes transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 and 2 inputs based on the information relating to those assets and liabilities at the end of the reporting period.

 

---

 

The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at March 31, 2013:

 

 

 

---

 

The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measures at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2012:

 

 

 

Financial Instruments Recorded Using Fair Value Option

 

The Company has elected the fair value option for loans held for sale.  These loans are intended for sale and the Company believes that the fair value is the best indicator of the resolution of these loans.  Interest income is recorded based on the contractual terms of the loan and in accordance with the Company’s policy on loans held for investment.  None of these loans were 90 days or more past due or on nonaccrual as of March 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012. 

 

As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the aggregate fair value, contractual balance (including accrued interest) and gain or loss were as follows:

 

---

 

The total amount of gains and losses from changes in fair value included in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 for loans held for sale were:

 

 

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at March 31, 2013 were as follows:

 

 

---

 

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at December 31, 2012 were as follows:

 

 

The methods and assumptions, not previously presented, used to estimate fair values are described as follows:

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximate fair values and are classified as Level 1.

 

Interest-Bearing Deposits in Other Financial Institutions

The carrying amounts of interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions approximate fair values and are classified as Level 1.

 

FHLB Stock

It is not practical to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.   

 

Loans

Fair values of loans, excluding loans held for sale, are estimated as follows:  For variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values resulting in a Level 3 classification. Fair values for other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality resulting in a Level 3 classification.  Impaired loans are valued at the lower of cost or fair value as described previously. The methods utilized to estimate the fair value of loans do not necessarily represent an exit price.

 

Deposits

The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and noninterest bearing checking, passbook savings, and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their

---

 

carrying amount) resulting in a Level 1 classification. Fair values for fixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flows calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits resulting in a Level 2 classification.

 

Other Borrowings

The fair values of the Company’s long-term FHLB advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements resulting in a Level 2 classification.  The fair values of the commercial line of credit and FHLB short-term variable rate advance are equal to the carrying value due to their short-term nature.  The maturities on these outstanding borrowings would be less than 30 days.    

 

The fair values of the Company’s subordinated debentures are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements resulting in a Level 2 classification.

 

Accrued Interest Receivable/Payable

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value resulting in a Level 1 or 2 classification, consistent with the asset or liability with which they are associated.

 

Off-Balance-Sheet Instruments

The fair value of off-balance-sheet items is not considered material.

 

---

 

NOTE 6 –FHLB ADVANCES 

 

Variable and Fixed Rate Advances from the FHLB were as follows: 

 

 

 

Each advance is payable at its maturity date, with a prepayment penalty for fixed-rate advances. 

 

The advances were collateralized as follows:    

 

 

 

Based on the collateral pledged to FHLB and CFBank’s holdings of FHLB stock, CFBank was eligible to borrow up to a total of $16,276 from the FHLB at March 31, 2013.  In May 2011, CFBank was notified by the FHLB that, due to regulatory considerations, CFBank was only eligible for future advances with a maximum maturity of one year. CFBank was subsequently notified by the FHLB that the maximum maturity for future advances was further reduced to 180 days in November 2011 and 30 days in April 2012 .

 

As of March 31, 2013, all variable rate advance payments are due in April 2013. All fixed rate advance payments are due in 2014.

 

 

---

 

NOTE 7 - OTHER BORROWINGS

 

There were no outstanding borrowings with the Federal Reserve Bank (the FRB) at March 31, 2013 or at December 31, 2012. 

 

Assets pledged as collateral with the FRB were as follows:

 

 

 

Based on the collateral pledged, CFBank was eligible to borrow up to $17,283 from the FRB at March 31, 2013. 

CFBank had a $1.0 million line of credit with a commercial bank at both March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2013, there was a balance of $1,000 on the line which was paid off the following day.  There was no outstanding balance on this line of credit at December 31, 2012.  Interest on this line accrues daily and is variable based on the commercial bank’s cost of funds and current market returns.

 

NOTE 8 – SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES

 

In December 2003, Central Federal Capital Trust I, a trust formed by the Holding Company, closed a pooled private offering of 5,000 trust preferred securities with a liquidation amount of $1 per security.  The Holding Company issued $5,155 of subordinated debentures to the trust in exchange for ownership of all of the common stock of the trust and the proceeds of the preferred securities sold by the trust.  The Holding Company is not considered the primary beneficiary of this trust (variable interest entity); therefore, the trust is not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements, but rather the subordinated debentures are shown as a liability.  The Holding Company’s investment in the common stock of the trust was $155 and is included in other assets.

 

The Holding Company may redeem the subordinated debentures, in whole or in part, in a principal amount with integral multiples of $1, on or after December 30, 2008 at 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.  The subordinated debentures mature on December 30, 2033.  The subordinated debentures are also redeemable in whole or in part, from time to time, upon the occurrence of specific events defined within the trust indenture.  There are no required principal payments on the subordinated debentures over the next five years. The Holding Company has the option to defer interest payments on the subordinated debentures for a period not to exceed five consecutive years. The Company’s Board of Directors elected to defer interest payments on the subordinated debt in 2010. 

 

Cumulative deferred interest payments through September 30, 2012 totalling $348 were paid current in December 2012 with the approval of the FED. Cumulative deferred payments subsequent to September 30, 2012 have been accrued and totaled $83 as of March 31, 2013. Cumulative deferred interest payments were $42 at December 31, 2012. Pursuant to the Holding Company Order, the Holding Company may not, directly or indirectly, incur, issue, renew, rollover, or pay interest or principal on any debt (including the subordinated debentures) or commit to do so, increase any current lines of credit, or guarantee the debt of any entity, without prior written notice to and written non-objection from the FED.

The subordinated debentures have a variable rate of interest, reset quarterly, equal to the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate plus 2.85%, which was 3.16% at March 31, 2013 and 3.21% at December 31, 2012.

---

 

 

NOTE 9 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

 

The Company has three stock-based compensation plans (the Plans), as described below.  Total compensation cost that was charged to income for those Plans totaled $21 and $6, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.  The total income tax (expense) benefit was not material for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.

 

The original Plans, which are stockholder-approved, provide for stock option grants and restricted stock awards to directors, officers and employees. The 1999 Stock-Based Incentive Plan, which expired July 13, 2009, provided 38,778 shares for stock option grants and 15,511 shares for restricted stock awards.  The 2003 Equity Compensation Plan (2003 Plan), as amended and restated, provided an aggregate of 100,000 shares for stock option grants and restricted stock awards, of which up to 30,000 shares could be awarded in the form of restricted stock awards.  The 2009 Equity Compensation Plan, which was approved by stockholders on May 21, 2009, replaced the 2003 Plan and provides 200,000 shares, plus any remaining shares available to grant or that are later forfeited or expire under the 2003 Plan, that may be issued as stock option grants, stock appreciation rights or restricted stock awards. 

 

 

Stock Options

 

The Plans permit the grant of stock options to directors, officers and employees for up to 338,778 shares of common stock.  Option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, generally have vesting periods ranging from one to three years, and are exercisable for ten years from the date of grant.  Unvested stock options immediately vest upon a change in control.

 

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a closed form option valuation (Black-Scholes) model that uses the assumptions noted in the table below.  Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of the Company’s common stock.  The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and post-vesting termination behavior.  Employee and management options are tracked separately.  The expected term of options granted is based on historical data and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, which takes into account that the options are not transferable.  The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.

 

The fair value of the options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2013 was determined using the following weighted‑average assumptions as of the grant dates as listed in the table below.  There were no options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

 

 

 

---

 

A summary of stock option activity in the Plans for the three months ended March 31, 2013 follows:

 

 

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, there were 5,620 stock options canceled or forfeited.  Previously recognized expense associated with nonvested forfeited shares is reversed.

 

Information related to the Plans during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 follows.  There were 30,000 shares granted during the three month ended March 31, 2013 and  no stock options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2012. There were no options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2013 or 2012.

 

 

 

As of March 31, 2013, there was $154 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under the Plans.  The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years.  Substantially all of the 237,880 nonvested stock options at March 31, 2013 are expected to vest.

---

 

 

Restricted Stock Awards

 

The Plans permit the grant of restricted stock awards to directors, officers and employees. Compensation is recognized over the vesting period of the awards based on the fair value of the stock at grant date.  The fair value of the stock was determined using the closing share price on the date of grant and shares generally have vesting periods of one to three years.  There were 15,962 shares available to be issued, net of option awards under the Plans at March 31, 2013.  There were no shares of restricted stock issued during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.    

 

A summary of changes in the Company’s nonvested restricted shares for the three months ended March 31, 2013 follows:

 

 

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, 1,000 shares were forfeited, which resulted in the reversal of previously recognized expense associated with the nonvested shares. As of March 31, 2013, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted shares granted under the Plans was immaterial.  There were no shares vested during the three months ended, March 31, 2013 and 2012.

 

---

 

NOTE 10 – PREFERRED STOCK

 

On December 5, 2008, in connection with the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Program, the Company issued to Treasury 7,225 shares of Central Federal Corporation Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (Preferred Stock) for $7,225.  The Preferred Stock initially paid quarterly dividends at a five percent annual rate. 

 

The Company’s Board of Directors elected to defer dividend payments on the Preferred Stock beginning with the dividend payable on November 15, 2010. 

Pursuant to the Holding Company Order, as described in Note 2, the Holding Company may not declare, make, or pay any cash dividends (including dividends on the Preferred Stock, or the Holding Company’s common stock) or other capital distributions or purchase, repurchase or redeem or commit to purchase, repurchase, or redeem any Holding Company equity stock without the prior written non-objection of the FED.  On July 13, 2012, the Company received approval from the FRB of Cleveland of an agreement with U.S. Treasury to redeem the Preferred Stock, including all accrued but unpaid dividends and the common stock warrant issued in connection with the TARP Capital Purchase Program (together, the “TARP obligations”) using proceeds of the Holding Company’s common stock offering. On August 23, 2012, the Holding Company received regulatory non-objection for redemption of the TARP obligations from the OCC. 

On September 26, 2012, pursuant to the agreement with U.S. Treasury, the Holding Company utilized $3,000 of the proceeds from its stock offering to redeem the TARP obligations including deferred dividends totaling $801.  The redemption included satisfaction of common stock warrants associated with the preferred stock. The redemption was completed at a discount and resulted in an increase in common stockholders’ equity of $4,960. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the preferred stock was fully redeemed. Preferred stock dividend and accretions totaled $0 at March 31, 2013 and $110 at March 31, 2012.

 

 

 

---

 

NOTE 11 – REGULATORY CAPITAL MATTERS 

 

CFBank is subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies.  Prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off‑balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices.  Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators.  Failure to meet capital requirements can initiate regulatory action. 

 

Prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications:  well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition.  If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits.  If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required.

The CFBank Order required CFBank to have by September 30, 2011, and maintain thereafter, 8% Tier 1 (Core) Capital to adjusted total assets and 12% Total Capital to risk weighted assets. CFBank met the capital requirement at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 as a result of a $13,500 capital contribution from the Holding Company using net proceeds of the stock offering. However, CFBank will not be considered “well-capitalized” under applicable regulatory capital standards as long as it is subject to individual minimum capital requirements under the CFBank Order.

 

Actual and required capital amounts and ratios of CFBank are presented below:

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Qualified Thrift Lender test requires at least 65% of assets be maintained in housing‑related finance and other specified areas.  If this test is not met, limits are placed on growth, branching, new investments, FHLB advances and dividends, or CFBank must convert to a commercial bank charter.  Management believes that this test has been met at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

 

CFBank converted from a mutual to a stock institution in 1998, and a “liquidation account” was established in the amount of $14,300, which was the net worth reported in the conversion prospectus.  The liquidation account represents a calculated amount for the purposes described below, and it does not represent actual funds included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company.  Eligible depositors who have maintained their accounts, less annual reductions to the extent they have reduced their deposits, would receive a distribution from this account if CFBank liquidated and its assets exceeded its liabilities.  Dividends may not reduce CFBank’s stockholder’s equity below the required liquidation account balance.

 

Dividend Restrictions

Banking regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid without prior approval of regulatory agencies. Under these regulations, the amount of dividends that may be paid in any calendar year is limited to the current year's net profits, combined with the retained net profits of the preceding two years, subject to the capital requirements described above. CFBank must receive regulatory approval prior to any dividend payments. 

 

NOTE 12 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS 

 

 

Interest-rate swaps:  CFBank utilizes interest-rate swaps as part of its asset/liability management strategy to help manage its interest rate risk position, and does not use derivatives for trading purposes.  The notional amount of the interest-rate swaps does not represent amounts exchanged by the parties.  The amount exchanged is determined by reference to the notional amount and the other terms of the individual interest-rate swap agreements.  CFBank was party to interest-rate swaps with a combined notional amount of $7,696 at March 31, 2013 and $7,750 at December 31, 2012.

---

 

 

The objective of the interest-rate swaps is to protect the related fixed rate commercial real estate loans from changes in fair value due to changes in interest rates.  CFBank has a program whereby it lends to its borrowers at a fixed rate with the loan agreement containing a two-way yield maintenance provision, which will be invoked in the event of prepayment of the loan, and is expected to exactly offset the fair value of unwinding the swap.  The yield maintenance provision represents an embedded derivative which is bifurcated from the host loan contract and, as such, the swaps and embedded derivatives are not designated as hedges.  Accordingly, both instruments are carried at fair value and changes in fair value are reported in current period earnings. CFBank currently does not have any derivatives designated as hedges. 

 

Contingent Features:  The counterparty to CFBank’s interest-rate swaps is exposed to credit risk whenever the interest-rate swaps are in a liability position.  At March 31, 2013, CFBank had pledged $1,253 in securities as collateral for these derivatives.   Should the liability increase, CFBank will be required to pledge additional collateral. 

 

Additionally, CFBank’s interest-rate swap instruments contain provisions that require CFBank to remain well capitalized under regulatory capital standards. The interest-rate swaps could be called by the counterparty as a result of CFBank’s failure to maintain well-capitalized status under regulatory capital standards due to the CFBank Order. While the counterparty has not requested payment at this time, it may elect to do so at any time while CFBank fails to qualify as “well capitalized” under regulatory capital standards. If the counterparty elected to request payment, CFBank would be required to remit $907 based on the March 31, 2013 valuation of the interest-rate swaps. The yield maintenance provisions may not be unwound to offset the repayment of the interest-rate swaps, as they may only be invoked in the event of prepayment of the borrowers’ loans.  Should market interest rates decrease from March 31, 2013 levels, the payment may increase in the event the swaps are called.   In the event the interest-rate swaps are called and CFBank is unable to replace them, CFBank will be exposed to the market risk of the valuation of the yield maintenance provisions and, absent the borrowers prepaying the loans, as of March 31, 2013 would incur a net $907 expense, subject to valuation fluctuations, over the remaining lives of the related loans.

 

 

Summary information about the derivative instruments is as follows:

 

 

 

The fair value of the yield maintenance provisions and interest-rate swaps is recorded in other assets and other liabilities, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheet.  Changes in the fair value of the yield maintenance provisions and interest-rate swaps are reported currently in earnings, as other noninterest income in the consolidated statements of operations.  There were no net gains or losses recognized in earnings related to yield maintenance provisions or interest-rate swaps for the three months ended March 31, 2013 or 2012.

 

Mortgage banking derivatives: Commitments to fund certain mortgage loans (interest rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market are considered derivatives.  These mortgage banking derivatives are not designated in hedge relationships.  The Company had approximately $5,611 and $2,079 of interest rate lock commitments related to residential mortgage loans at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  The fair value of these mortgage banking derivatives was reflected by a derivative asset of $35 and $45 at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, which was included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. Fair values were estimated based on

---

 

anticipated gains on the sale of the underlying loans. Changes in the fair values of these mortgage banking derivatives are included in net gains on sales of loans. 

 

NOTE 13 – CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

CFBank participates in a multi-employer contributory trusteed pension plan.  On August 17, 2012, CFBank was notified by the trustees of the plan that, due to CFBank’s financial performance and the CFBank Order, it was required to make a contribution or provide a letter of credit in the amount of the funding shortfall plus estimated cost of annuitization of benefits in the plan, which was determined to be $908.   CFBank obtained a letter of credit from Comerica Bank for this amount.  The cost of obtaining the letter of credit was $9. CFBank may be required to make additional contributions or provide additional amounts via an expanded letter of credit if the funding shortfall increases in the future.  If CFBank’s financial condition should worsen in the future, the trustee may execute the letter of credit, resulting in a charge to CFBank. 

 

 

NOTE 14 – INCOME TAXES 

 

The Company maintained a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, based on its estimate of future reversal and utilization. When determining the amount of deferred tax assets that are more-likely-than-not to be realized, and therefore recorded as a benefit, the Company conducts a regular assessment of all available information.  This information includes, but is not limited to, taxable income in prior periods, projected future income and projected future reversals of deferred tax items. Based on these criteria, the Company determined that it was necessary to establish a full valuation allowance against the entire net deferred tax asset.

 

As a result of the change in stock ownership associated with the stock offering completed in August 2012, within the guidelines of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Company incurred an ownership change. At year-end 2012, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of $25,941, which expire at various dates from 2024 to 2032, and alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of $60, which do not expire. As a result, its ability to utilize carryforwards that arose before the stock offering closed is limited to $163 per year.  Due to this limitation, management determined it is more likely than not that $20,342 of net operating loss carryforwards will expire unutilized and, as required by accounting standards, reduced deferred tax assets and the valuation allowance by $6,916 to reflect this lost realizability as of December 31, 2012.  

 

Federal income tax laws provided additional deductions, totaling $2,250, for thrift bad debt reserves established before 1988. Accounting standards do not require a deferred tax liability to be recorded on this amount, which otherwise would total $765 at year-end 2012.  However, if CFBank were wholly or partially liquidated or otherwise ceases to be a bank, or if tax laws were to change, this amount would have to be recaptured and a tax liability recorded.  Additionally, any distributions in excess of CFBank’s current or accumulated earnings and profits would reduce amounts allocated to its bad debt reserve and create a tax liability for CFBank. The amount of additional taxable income created by such a distribution is an amount that, when reduced by the tax attributable to the income, is equal to the amount of the distribution. Thus, if CFBank makes a distribution that reduces the amount allocated to its bad debt reserve, then approximately one and one-half times the amount used would be includible in gross income for federal income tax purposes, assuming a 34% corporate income tax rate. CFBank does not intend to make distributions that would result in a recapture of any portion of its bad debt reserve.

 

At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits.  The Company does not expect the amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly change within the next twelve months.

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax and is no longer subject to federal examination for years prior to 2009. 

 

NOTE 15- ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

---

 

The following table summarizes the changes within each classification of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and summarizes the significant amounts reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income: