e20vf
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
November 28, 2007
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
|
|
|
|
o
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
OR
|
|
|
|
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007.
OR
|
|
|
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period
from
to
OR
|
|
|
|
o
|
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Date of event requiring this
shell company
report
Commission file number:
1-15174
Siemens
Aktiengesellschaft
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
Federal Republic of
Germany
(Jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
Wittelsbacherplatz 2
D-80333 Munich
Federal Republic of
Germany
(Address of principal executive
offices)
Securities registered or to be
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
American Depositary Shares, each representing one
|
|
|
Common Share, no par value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Common Shares, no par value*
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
|
*
|
Listed, not for trading or
quotation purposes, but only in connection with the registration
of American Depositary Shares pursuant to the requirements of
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
Securities registered
or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Securities for which
there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Act: None
The number of
outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of
capital or common stock as of September 30, 2007: 914,203,038
common shares, no par value.
Indicate by check mark
if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes þ No o
If this report is an
annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the
registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark
whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.
Yes þ No o Not
applicable o
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated o
Indicate by check mark
which financial statement item the registrant has elected to
follow.
Item 17 þ
Item 18 o
If this is an annual
report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell
company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Information
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information on the Company
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors, Senior Management and Employees
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Information
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Offer and Listing
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Information
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use
of Proceeds
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Committee Financial Expert
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
Code of Ethics
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated
Purchasers
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
III-1
|
|
Exhibit 1.1 |
Exhibit 4.1 |
Exhibit 8.1 |
Exhibit 12.1 |
Exhibit 12.2 |
Exhibit 13.1 |
Exhibit 13.2 |
Exhibit 14.1 |
FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Form 20-F
contains forward-looking statements and information
that is, statements related to future, not past, events. These
statements may be identified by words such as
expects, looks forward to,
anticipates, intends, plans,
believes, seeks, estimates,
will, project or words of similar
meaning. Such statements are based on our current expectations
and certain assumptions, and are, therefore, subject to certain
risks and uncertainties. A variety of factors, many of which are
beyond Siemens control, affect our operations,
performance, business strategy and results and could cause the
actual results, performance or achievements of Siemens to be
materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements that may be expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. For us, particular uncertainties
arise, among others, from: the factors listed above under
Item 3: Key InformationRisk Factors;
changes in general economic and business conditions (including
margin developments in major business areas); the challenges of
integrating major acquisitions and implementing joint ventures
and other significant portfolio measures; changes in currency
exchange rates and interest rates; introduction of competing
products or technologies by other companies; lack of acceptance
of new products or services by customers targeted by Siemens;
changes in business strategy; the outcome of pending
investigations and legal proceedings, especially the corruption
investigations we are currently subject to in Germany, the
United States and elsewhere; the potential impact of such
investigations and proceedings on our ongoing business including
our relationships with governments and other customers; the
potential impact of such matters on our financial statements; as
well as various other factors. More detailed information about
certain of these factors is contained throughout this report and
in our other filings with the SEC, which are available on the
Siemens website, www.siemens.com, and on the SECs website,
www.sec.gov. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties
materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect,
actual results may vary materially from those described in the
relevant forward-looking statement as expected, anticipated,
intended, planned, believed, sought, estimated or projected.
Siemens does not intend or assume any obligation to update or
revise these forward-looking statements in light of developments
which differ from those anticipated.
In this
Form 20-F,
references to we, us, our,
Company, Siemens or Siemens
AG are to Siemens Aktiengesellschaft and, unless the
context otherwise requires, to its consolidated subsidiaries. In
Item 4: Information on the Company Description
of Business, we use the terms we and
us to refer to a specific Siemens Group. Throughout
this annual report, whenever a reference is made to our
Companys website, such reference does not incorporate
information from the website by reference into this annual
report.
i
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
ii
PART I
ITEM 1: IDENTITY
OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2: OFFER
STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
Selected
Consolidated Financial and Statistical Data
Effective with the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we prepare our
primary financial reporting according to International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) and its interpretations issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), as adopted by
the European Union (EU). The Consolidated Financial Statements
of Siemens also comply with IFRS as published by the IASB.
Therefore, there are no differences and a reconciliation between
IFRS as adopted by the EU and IFRS as published by the IASB is
not needed. Until fiscal year end 2006, our primary financial
reporting was prepared in accordance with United States
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP). In
addition, we published our first IFRS Consolidated Financial
Statements as supplemental information in December 2006.
The IFRS selected financial data set forth below as of and for
each of the years in the three-year period ended
September 30, 2007 should be read in conjunction with, and
are qualified in their entirety by reference to, the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto
presented elsewhere in this document.
We have also presented the selected financial data below as of
and for each of the years in the five-year period ended
September 30, 2007 in accordance with U.S. GAAP. For fiscal
years 2005 to 2007, the selected financial data has been derived
from a reconciliation of our IFRS Consolidated Financial
Statements to U.S. GAAP. For fiscal 2003 and 2004, we present
our Consolidated Financial Statements prepared in accordance
with U.S. GAAP. For information with respect to the major
differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP see Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
Income
Statement Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
2006(1)(3)
|
|
|
2005(1)(3)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Amounts in accordance with IFRS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
72,448
|
|
|
|
66,487
|
|
|
|
55,781
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
5,101
|
|
|
|
3,418
|
|
|
|
3,594
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
3,909
|
|
|
|
2,642
|
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4,038
|
|
|
|
3,345
|
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4.24
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
|
|
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
|
|
|
2.85
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
3.51
|
|
|
|
2.62
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007(2)
|
|
|
2006(2)(3)
|
|
|
2005(2)(3)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
78,890
|
|
|
|
77,559
|
|
|
|
66,089
|
|
|
|
61,480
|
|
|
|
61,624
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
3,728
|
|
|
|
3,549
|
|
|
|
3,807
|
|
|
|
2,902
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
2,650
|
|
|
|
2,543
|
|
|
|
3,006
|
|
|
|
2,058
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
2,164
|
|
|
|
3,405
|
|
|
|
2,445
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
|
|
2.85
|
|
|
|
3.37
|
|
|
|
2.31
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
|
|
3.42
|
|
|
|
2.43
|
|
|
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
2.29
|
|
|
|
2.85
|
|
|
|
2.74
|
|
|
|
3.23
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2.68
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
2.33
|
|
|
|
3.66
|
|
|
|
2.71
|
|
2
Balance
Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Amounts in accordance with IFRS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
91,555
|
|
|
|
87,528
|
(3)
|
|
|
81,579
|
(3)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
9,860
|
|
|
|
13,122
|
|
|
|
8,040
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
29,627
|
|
|
|
25,895
|
(3)
|
|
|
23,791
|
(3)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
2,743
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
93,470
|
|
|
|
90,770
|
(3)
|
|
|
85,884
|
(3)
|
|
|
79,239
|
(3)
|
|
|
77,378
|
(3)
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
9,853
|
|
|
|
13,399
|
|
|
|
8,436
|
|
|
|
9,785
|
|
|
|
11,433
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
30,379
|
|
|
|
28,926
|
(3)
|
|
|
26,632
|
(3)
|
|
|
26,454
|
(3)
|
|
|
23,404
|
(3)
|
Common stock
|
|
|
2,743
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Under IFRS, the historical results of the former operating
segment Communications (Com) are reported as discontinued
operations in the Companys Consolidated Statements of
Income for all periods presented and the assets and liabilities
were classified on the balance sheet as held for disposal. These
Com activities include (i) the previous Mobile Devices
(MD) business, which has meanwhile been sold, (ii) the
carrier-related operations, which were contributed to Nokia
Siemens Networks in April 2007, and (iii) the enterprise
networks business, for which the Company is actively pursuing
its plan to dispose of. Not included in discontinued operations
are certain Com business activities which are now part of Other
Operations and Automation & Drives (A&D). The
financial information for fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005 presents
comparable amounts.
|
On July 25, 2007, Siemens signed an agreement with
Continental AG, Hanover, Germany, to sell its entire Siemens VDO
Automotive (SV) activities. The historical results of SV are
reported as discontinued operations in the Consolidated
Statements of Income for all periods presented. The assets and
liabilities of SV are presented as held for disposal on the
balance sheet as of September 30, 2007.
|
|
(2)
|
Under U.S. GAAP, the historical results of the previous MD
business and the SV activities mentioned above are reported as
discontinued operations in the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Income for all periods presented and the assets
and liabilities were classified on the balance sheet as held for
disposal on September 30, 2005 for MD and
September 30, 2007 for SV.
|
|
(3)
|
In connection with the investigation launched by Munich
prosecutors in 2006, Siemens identified a large volume of
payments made in connection with a number of Business Consultant
Agreements and similar sales-related arrangements with
third-party intermediaries as well as other payments within the
former Com Group, the Companys other Groups and regional
companies, for which the Company has not been able either to
establish a valid business purpose or to clearly identify the
recipient. The payments identified were recorded as deductible
business expenses in prior periods in determining income tax
provisions. During fiscal 2007, the Company determined that
certain of these payments were non-deductible under tax
regulations of Germany and other jurisdictions. Further, the
Company identified certain commission liability accounts at the
Medical Solutions (Med) Group which were created in fiscal years
prior to 2005 and subsequently released in a manner that did not
comply with applicable accounting principles. These matters were
accounted for in fiscal 2007, by adjusting the comparative
amounts for fiscal years 2005 and 2006. The adjustments had the
effect of reducing Income from continuing operations before
income taxes by 24 million and
25 million in fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively, and
of reducing Income from continuing operations, net of income
taxes by 58 million and 71 million in
fiscal 2006 and 2005 respectively. The effect on Net
income was an increase of 10 million in fiscal
2006 and a decrease of 84 million in fiscal 2005. The
total adjustments relating to years prior to fiscal 2005 had the
effect of decreasing Shareholders equity as of
October 1, 2004 by 306 million (thereof
90 million refers to fiscal 2004 and
59 million refers to fiscal 2003). For further
information see Notes 2 and 29 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. Total assets and
Shareholders equity at September 30, 2004 and
2003 have been adjusted; however, income statement data for the
years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 have not been
adjusted as the impact on net income and earnings per share in
each of these years was also not material.
|
The number of shares outstanding at September 30, 2007,
2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was 914,203,038, 891,086,826,
891,076,457, 891,075,461 and 890,865,117, respectively.
3
Dividends
The following table sets forth in euros and in dollars the
dividend paid per share for the years ended September 30,
2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and the proposed dividend per share for
the year ended September 30, 2007. Owners of our shares who
are United States residents should be aware that they will be
subject to German withholding tax on dividends received. See
Item 10: Additional InformationTaxation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend paid
|
|
|
|
per share
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
1.40
|
|
2004
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
1.63
|
|
2005
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
1.88
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1.60
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Proposed by the Managing Board and the Supervisory Board; to be
approved by the shareholders at the shareholders annual
meeting on January 24, 2008.
|
Exchange
Rate Information
We publish our Consolidated Financial Statements in euros. As
used in this document, euro or
means the single unified currency that was introduced in the
Federal Republic of Germany on January 1, 1999. U.S.
dollar, U.S.$, USD or
$ means the lawful currency of the United States of
America. The currency translations made in the case of dividends
we have paid have been made at the noon buying rate at the date
of the Annual Shareholders Meeting at which the dividends
were approved. As used in this document, the term noon
buying rate refers to the rate of exchange for euro,
expressed in U.S. dollar per euro, as announced by the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York for customs purposes as the rate in The
City of New York for cable transfers in foreign currencies.
In order that you may ascertain how the trends in our financial
results might have appeared had they been expressed in U.S.
dollars, the table below shows the average noon buying rates in
The City of New York for cable transfers in foreign currencies
as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York for U.S. dollar per euro for our fiscal years. The
average is computed using the noon buying rate on the last
business day of each month during the period indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30,
|
|
Average
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
1.0919
|
|
2004
|
|
|
1.2199
|
|
2005
|
|
|
1.2727
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1.2361
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1.3420
|
|
The following table shows the noon buying rates for euro in U.S.
dollars for the last six months.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
May
|
|
|
1.3616
|
|
|
|
1.3419
|
|
June
|
|
|
1.3526
|
|
|
|
1.3295
|
|
July
|
|
|
1.3831
|
|
|
|
1.3592
|
|
August
|
|
|
1.3808
|
|
|
|
1.3402
|
|
September
|
|
|
1.4219
|
|
|
|
1.3606
|
|
October
|
|
|
1.4468
|
|
|
|
1.4092
|
|
November
|
|
|
1.4829
|
|
|
|
1.4435
|
|
On November 23, 2007, the noon buying rate was U.S.$1.4825
per 1.00.
4
Our shares are traded on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange in euro.
Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the euro and the U.S.
dollar will affect the U.S. dollar equivalent of the euro price
of the shares on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange and, as a result,
are likely to affect the market price of the American Depositary
Shares (ADS) on the New York Stock Exchange. We will declare any
cash dividends in euro and exchange rate fluctuations will
affect the U.S. dollar amounts received by holders of ADSs on
conversion of cash dividends on the shares represented by the
ADSs.
Risk
Factors
Our business, financial condition or results of operations could
suffer material adverse effects due to any of the following
risks. We have described below all the risks that we consider
material, but those risks are not the only ones we face.
Additional risks not known to us or that we currently consider
immaterial may also impair our business operations.
Strategic
Market
Dynamics
Our business is affected by the uncertainties of economic
and political conditions: Our business
environment is influenced by conditions in the domestic and
global economies. Numerous factors, such as global political
conflicts, including situations in the Middle East and other
regions, continue to impact macroeconomic parameters and the
international capital markets. The uncertainty of economic and
political conditions can impact the demand for our products and
services and can also make our budgeting and forecasting more
difficult.
Our Groups are affected by market conditions. For example
Medical Solutions (Med) is dependent on the healthcare markets,
particularly in the U.S. Some of our Groups are affected
considerably by the markets in Asia as well as Middle East, such
as Power Generation (PG) and Power Transmission &
Distribution (PTD). In addition, the financial condition of our
customers may negatively impact our Groups.
Our financial results and cash flows may be adversely
affected by continued strategic reorientations and cost-cutting
initiatives: We are in the process of
strategic reorientations and constantly perform cost-cutting
initiatives, including headcount reduction, capacity adjustments
through consolidation of business activities and manufacturing
facilities, as well as streamlining product portfolios. These
measures impact our earnings results and any future contribution
of these measures to our profitability will be influenced by the
actual savings achieved and by our ability to sustain these
ongoing efforts.
We operate in highly competitive markets, which are
subject to price pressures and rapid
changes: The worldwide markets for our
products are highly competitive in terms of pricing, product and
service quality, development and introduction time, customer
service and financing terms. We face strong competitors, some of
which are larger and may have greater resources in a given
business area. Siemens faces downward price pressure and is
exposed to market downturns or slower growth. Some industries in
which we operate are undergoing consolidation, which may result
in stronger competitors and a change in our relative market
position. In some of our markets, new products must be developed
and introduced rapidly in order to capture available
opportunities and this can lead to quality problems. Our
operating results depend to a significant extent on our
abilities to adapt to changes in markets and to reduce the costs
of producing high-quality new and existing products. Any
inability to do so could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition or results of operations.
Our businesses must keep pace with technological changes
and develop new products and services to remain
competitive: The markets in which our
businesses operate experience rapid and significant changes due
to the introduction of innovative technologies. To meet our
customers needs in these businesses, we must continuously
design new, and update existing, products and services and
invest in and develop new technologies. This is especially true
for our Group Med. Introducing new offerings and technologies
requires a significant commitment to research and development,
which may not always result in success. Our sales and profits
may suffer if we invest in technologies that do not function as
expected or are not accepted in the marketplace as anticipated,
if our products or systems are not brought to market in a timely
manner, or as they become obsolete.
5
Our financial results and cash flows may be adversely
affected by cost overruns or additional payment obligations
particularly with respect to our long-term
contracts: A majority of our operating
Groups, including Siemens IT Solutions and Services (SIS),
Industrial Solutions and Services (I&S), Siemens Building
Technologies (SBT), PG, PTD and Transportation Systems (TS),
perform a significant portion of their business, especially
large projects, under long-term contracts that are awarded on a
competitive bidding basis. The profit margins realized on such
fixed-priced contracts may vary from original estimates as a
result of changes in costs and productivity over their term. We
sometimes bear the risk of quality problems, cost overruns or
contractual penalties caused by unexpected technological
problems, unforeseen developments at the project sites,
performance problems with our subcontractors or other logistical
difficulties. Certain of our multi-year contracts also contain
demanding installation and maintenance requirements, in addition
to other performance criteria relating to timing, unit cost
requirements and compliance with government regulations, which,
if not satisfied, could subject us to substantial contractual
penalties, damages, non-payment and contract termination. There
can be no assurance that all of our fixed-priced contracts can
be completed profitably. For additional information, see
Item 5: Operating and Financial Review and
ProspectsCritical Accounting Estimates.
Planning
& Resources
We may be adversely affected by our equity interests and
strategic alliances: Our strategy includes
strengthening our business interests through joint ventures and
associate companies, as well as strategic alliances. Certain of
our strategic investments accounted for using the equity method
are included in our Strategic Equity Investments (SEI), which
consist of Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN), BSH Bosch und Siemens
Hausgeräte GmbH (BSH) and Fujitsu Siemens Computers
(Holding) BV (FSC). Any factors negatively influencing the
profitability of our equity investments could have a negative
impact on our own results, and may also negatively affect our
cash flow and our ability to recover the full amount of our
investments. In addition, such portfolio transactions are
inherently risky because of the difficulties of integrating
people, operations, technologies and products that may arise.
Strategic alliances may also pose risks for us because we
compete in some business areas with companies with which we have
strategic alliances.
Acquisitions
and Dispositions
Our financial results and cash flows may be adversely
affected by portfolio measures: Our strategy
includes divesting our interests in some business areas and
strengthening others through portfolio measures, including
mergers and acquisitions.
With respect to dispositions, we may not be able to divest some
of our activities as planned and our divesting activities could
have a negative impact on our results of operations, our cash
flow at closing, as well as in the future, and on our
reputation. For example, we plan to dispose of our enterprise
networks business. The assets and liabilities of the enterprise
networks business were classified on the balance sheet as held
for disposal and measured at the lower of their carrying amount
and fair value less costs to sell and the historical results are
reported as discontinued operations. Further impairments may be
necessary and we may not be able to achieve the planned purchase
price for the disposal group. For additional information with
respect to the enterprise networks business, see Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Mergers and acquisitions are inherently risky because of the
difficulties of integrating people, operations, technologies and
products that may arise. There can be no assurance that any of
the businesses we acquire can be successfully integrated or that
they will perform well once integrated. In addition, we may
incur significant acquisition, administrative and other costs in
connection with these transactions, including costs related to
integration of acquired businesses. Furthermore, portfolio
activities may result in additional financing needs and
adversely affect our financial leverage and our
debt-to-equity
ratio. Acquisitions may also lead to substantial increases in
long-lived assets, including goodwill. Write-downs of these
assets due to unforeseen business developments may materially
and adversely affect our earnings. Particularly Med, Automation
and Drives (A&D), PG and I&S have significant amounts
of goodwill.
6
Operations
Supply
Chain Management
We are dependent upon the ability of third parties to
deliver parts, components and services on
time: We rely on third parties to supply us
with parts, components and services. Using third parties to
manufacture, assemble and test our products reduces our control
over manufacturing yields, quality assurance, product delivery
schedules and costs. The third parties that supply us with parts
and components also have other customers and may not have
sufficient capacity to meet all of their customers needs,
including ours, during periods of excess demand. Component
supply delays can affect the performance of certain of our
operating Groups. Although we work closely with our suppliers to
avoid supply-related problems, there can be no assurance that we
will not encounter supply problems in the future or that we will
be able to replace a supplier that is not able to meet our
demand. This risk is particularly evident in businesses with a
very limited number of suppliers. Shortages and delays could
materially harm our business. Unanticipated increases in the
price of components due to market shortages or other reasons
could also adversely affect the performance of certain of our
business Groups.
We may be adversely affected by rising raw material
prices: Our operating Groups are exposed to
fluctuations in energy and raw material prices. In the recent
past, oil, steel and copper prices in particular have increased
on a worldwide basis. If we are not able to compensate for or
pass on our increased costs to customers, such price increases
could have a material adverse impact on our financial results.
Product
Lifecycle Management
We face operational risks in our value chain
processes: Our value chain comprises all
steps, from research and development, to production, marketing
and sales up to services. Operational failures in our value
chain processes could result in quality problems or potential
product, labor safety, regulatory or environmental risks. Such
risks are particularly present in relation to our production
facilities, which are located all over the world and have a high
degree of organizational and technological complexity. From time
to time, some of the products we sell have quality issues
resulting from the design or manufacture of such products, or
from the software integrated into them. Such operational
failures or quality issues could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition or results of operations.
Human
Resources
We are dependent upon hiring and retaining highly
qualified management and technical
personnel: Competition for highly qualified
management and technical personnel remains intense in the
industries and regions in which our business Groups operate. In
many of our business areas, we further intend to extend our
service businesses significantly, for which we will need highly
skilled employees. Our future success depends in part on our
continued ability to hire, assimilate and retain engineers and
other qualified personnel. There can be no assurance that we
will continue to be successful in attracting and retaining
highly qualified employees and key personnel in the future and
any inability to do so could have a material adverse effect on
our business.
Financial
Market
We are exposed to currency risks and interest rate
risks: We are particularly exposed to
fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and
the euro, because a high percentage of our business volume is
conducted in the U.S. and as exports from Europe. As a result, a
strong euro in relation to the U.S. dollar can have a material
impact on our revenues and results. Certain currency
risksas well as interest rate risksare hedged on a
company-wide basis using derivative financial instruments.
Depending on the development of foreign currency exchange rates,
our hedging activities can have significant effects on our cash
flow, particularly for our treasury activities (Corporate
Treasury). Our Groups engage in currency hedging activities
which sometimes do not qualify for hedge accounting. In
addition, our Corporate Treasury has interest rate hedging
activities which also do not qualify for hedge accounting, and
are subject to changes in interest rates. Accordingly, exchange
rate and interest
7
rate fluctuations may influence our financial results and lead
to earnings volatility. A strengthening of the euro particularly
against the U.S. dollar may also change our competitive
position, as many of our competitors may benefit from having a
substantial portion of their costs based in weaker currencies,
enabling them to offer their products at lower prices. For more
details regarding currency risks, interest rate risks, hedging
activities and other market risks, please see Item 11:
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market
Risk.
Liquidity
and Credit
Our Corporate Treasury financing is affected by the
uncertainties of economic conditions and the development of
capital markets: Our Corporate Treasury is
responsible for the financing of the Company and our Groups. A
negative development in the capital markets increases our cost
of capital and limits our financing flexibility. For example,
the recent development in the subprime mortgage market in the
U.S. has had a global impact on the capital markets. Such
developments could limit our possibilities of debt financial
instruments financing.
Our financing activities subject us to various risks
including credit and interest rate risk: We
provide to our customers various forms of direct and indirect
financing in connection with large projects such as those
undertaken by PG and TS. We finance a large number of smaller
customer orders, for example the leasing of medical equipment,
in part, through Siemens Financial Services (SFS). SFS also
incurs credit risk by financing third-party equipment. We also
sometimes take a security interest in the projects we finance.
We may lose money if any of our customers are not able to pay
us, if the value of the property that we have taken a security
interest in declines, if interest rates or foreign exchange
rates fluctuate, or if the projects in which we invest are
unsuccessful, and such losses could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Downgrades of our ratings may increase our cost of capital
and could negatively affect our
businesses: Our financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows are influenced significantly by the
actual and expected performance of the operating Groups, as well
as the Companys portfolio measures. An actual or expected
negative development of our results of operations or cash flows
or an increase in our net debt position may result in the
deterioration of our credit rating. Downgrades by rating
agencies may increase our cost of capital and could negatively
affect our businesses.
Capital
Structure
The funded status of our off-balance sheet pension benefit
plans and its financial statement impact is dependent on several
factors: The funded status of our pension
plans may be affected by an increase or decrease of the Defined
Benefit Obligation (DBO), as well as by an increase or decrease
in the valuation of plan assets. Pensions are accounted in
accordance with actuarial valuations, which rely on statistical
and other factors in order to anticipate future events. These
factors include key pension plan valuation assumptions like the
discount rate, expected rate of return on plan assets, rate of
future compensation increases and pension progression.
Assumptions may differ from actual developments due to changing
market and economic conditions, thereby resulting in an increase
or decrease of the DBO. Significant changes in investment
performance or a change in the portfolio mix of invested assets
can result in corresponding increases and decreases in the
valuation of plan assets, particularly equity securities, or in
a change of the expected rate of return on plan assets. Also,
changes in pension plan assumptions can affect net periodic
pension cost. For example, a change in discount rates or in the
expected return on plan assets assumption may result in changes
in the net benefit pension cost in the following financial year.
For additional information, see Item 5: Operating and
Financial Review and ProspectsCritical Accounting
Estimates and Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Compliance
Code of
Conduct
Public prosecutors and other government authorities in
jurisdictions around the world, including the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the U.S. Department of Justice
(DOJ), are conducting investigations of Siemens and certain of
its current and former employees regarding allegations of public
8
corruption and other illegal acts. The results of these
and any future investigations may have a material adverse effect
on the development of future business opportunities, our
financial results and condition, the price of our shares and
ADSs and our reputation: Public prosecutors
and other government authorities in jurisdictions around the
world are investigating allegations of corruption at a number of
Siemens business Groups and regional companies. In
addition to ongoing investigations, there could be additional
investigations launched in the future by governmental
authorities in these or other jurisdictions and existing
investigations may be expanded. These governmental authorities
may take action against us or some of our employees. These
actions could include criminal and civil fines, in addition to
those already imposed on the Company, as well as penalties,
sanctions, injunctions against future conduct, profit
disgorgement, disqualifications from engaging in certain types
of business, the loss of business licenses or permits or other
restrictions. In addition to monetary and other penalties, a
monitor could be appointed to review future business practices
with the goal of ensuring compliance with applicable laws and we
may otherwise be required to further modify our business
practices and compliance programs. Tax authorities may also
impose certain remedies, including potential tax penalties.
Depending on the development of these investigations, we may be
required to accrue additional material amounts for such
penalties, damages, profit disgorgement or other possible
actions that may be taken by various governmental authorities.
Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial results and condition, the price of our
shares and our reputation.
Additionally, we engage in a substantial amount of business with
governments and government-owned enterprises around the world.
We also participate in a number of projects funded by government
agencies and non-governmental organizations such as the World
Bank. If we or our subsidiaries are found to have engaged in
illegal acts or not to have taken effective steps to address the
allegations or findings of corruption in our business, this may
impair our ability to participate in business with governments
or non-governmental organizations and may result in formal
exclusions from such business, which may have a material adverse
effect on our business. As described more fully in Item 4:
Information on the CompanyLegal Proceedings,
we or our subsidiaries have in the past been excluded from
government contracting as a result of findings of corruption or
other misconduct. Debarment from participating in contracting
with governments or non-governmental organizations in one
jurisdiction may also lead to debarment in other jurisdictions
or by other non-governmental organizations. Even if we are not
formally excluded from participating in government business,
government agencies or non-governmental organizations may
informally exclude us from tendering for or participating in
certain contracts. From time to time, we have received requests
for information from government customers and non-governmental
organizations regarding the investigations described above and
our response to those investigations. We expect such requests to
continue.
In addition, our involvement in existing and potential
corruption proceedings could also damage our reputation
generally and have an adverse impact on our ability to compete
for business from both public and private sector customers. The
investigations could also impair our relationship with business
partners on whom we depend and our ability to obtain new
business partners and could also adversely affect our ability to
pursue strategic projects and transactions which could be
important to our business, such as alliances, joint ventures or
other combinations. Current or future investigations could
result in the cancellation of certain of our existing contracts,
and the commencement of significant third-party litigation,
including by our competitors.
The governmental investigations as well as the investigation
conducted by Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, the independent
law firm mandated by the Company, are at this time incomplete
and we cannot predict when they will be completed or what their
outcome will be, including the potential effect that their
results or the reactions of third parties thereto, may have on
our business. Future developments in these investigations,
responding to the requests of governmental authorities and
cooperating with these investigations, especially if we are not
able to resolve the investigations in a timely manner, could
divert managements attention and resources from other
issues facing our business. Management is in the process of
implementing a remediation plan to address corruption and
compliance risk in our business. If this remediation plan is
unsuccessful, or if we cannot implement it in a timely manner,
there could be an increased risk that one or more of the risks
described above could materialize.
We have concluded that our internal control over financial
reporting was not effective as of September 30, 2007. As a
result, our ability to report our results of operations
accurately and in a timely manner, including our ability to make
required filings with government authorities, may be adversely
affected. In addition, the trading
9
price of our shares and ADSs may be adversely affected by
a related negative market reaction: We have
identified a material weakness in our internal control over
financial reporting. Our management, including the CEO and CFO,
has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
not effective as of September 30, 2007 to achieve their
intended objectives. Following the guidelines stipulated by the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, we have identified
the following material weakness in our internal control over
financial reporting: The Companys internal control in the
area of anti-corruption was not sufficiently robust to prevent
certain members of management from circumventing or overriding
elements of the Companys financial control environment and
misusing funds contrary to Company policies. As of
September 30, 2007, the investigations of this failure, and
the implementation of the Companys remediation plan to
address it, were not far enough advanced to provide a sufficient
level of assurance that such circumvention or override of
controls and misuse of funds by management would be prevented.
For more information, see Item 15: Controls and
Procedures. As of the date of this annual report on
Form 20-F,
the process of designing, implementing and validating remedial
measures related to the material weakness is ongoing. Although
we have identified a material weakness, we have not yet
identified all of the areas in which the relevant controls were
deficient, and as a result have not been in a position to
remediate them. If our efforts to remediate this material
weakness are not successful, we may be unable to report our
results of operations accurately and in a timely manner and make
our required filings with government authorities, including the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Furthermore, our
business and operating results and the price of our shares and
ADSs may be adversely affected by related negative market
reactions. We cannot be certain that in the future additional
material weaknesses will not exist or otherwise be discovered.
Legal
Our business could suffer as a result of current or future
litigation: We are subject to numerous risks
relating to legal proceedings to which we are currently a party
or that could develop in the future. In the ordinary course of
our business, we become party to lawsuits, including suits
involving allegations of improper delivery of goods or services,
product liability, product defects, quality problems and
intellectual property infringement. For additional information
with respect to legal proceedings, see Item 4:
Information on the CompanyLegal Proceedings.
There can be no assurance that the results of these or other
legal proceedings will not materially harm our business,
reputation or brand. We record a provision for litigation risks
when (i) a present obligation as a result of a past event
exists; (ii) it is probable that an outflow of resources
embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the
obligation; and (iii) a reliable estimate can be made of
the amount of the obligation. We maintain liability insurance
for certain legal risks at levels our management believes are
appropriate and consistent with industry practice. We may incur
losses relating to litigation beyond the limits, or outside the
coverage, of such insurance and such losses may have a material
adverse effect on the results of our operations or financial
condition and our provisions for litigation related losses may
not be sufficient to cover our ultimate loss or expenditure.
Regulatory
We are subject to risks associated with our international
operations: Changes in regulatory
requirements, tariffs and other trade barriers and price or
exchange controls could impact our sales and profitability and
make the repatriation of profits difficult. In addition, the
uncertainty of the legal environment in some regions could limit
our ability to enforce our rights. We expect that sales to
emerging markets will continue to be an increasing portion of
total sales, as our business naturally evolves and as developing
nations and regions around the world increase their demand for
our offerings. Emerging market operations present several risks,
including civil disturbances, health concern, cultural
differences such as employment and business practices,
volatility in gross domestic product, economic and governmental
instability, the potential for nationalization of private
assets, and the imposition of exchange controls. In particular,
the Asian markets are important for our long-term growth
strategy and our sizeable operations in China are influenced by
a legal system that is still developing and is subject to
change. Our growth strategy could be limited by governments
supporting local industries. The demand for many of the products
of our business Groups, particularly those that derive their
revenue from large projects, can be affected by expectations of
future demand, prices and gross domestic product in the markets
in which those Groups operate. If any of these risks or similar
risks associated with our international operations were to
materialize, it could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition.
10
We are subject to environmental and other government
regulations: Some of the industries in which
we operate in are highly regulated. Current and future
environmental and other government regulations, or changes
thereto, may result in significant increases in our operating or
product costs. We could also face liability for damage or
remediation for environmental contamination at the facilities we
design or operate. See Item 4: Information on the
CompanyEnvironmental Matters for a discussion of
significant environmental matters. We accrue for environmental
risks when (i) a present obligation as a result of a past
event exists; (ii) it is probable that an outflow of
resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle
the obligation; and (iii) a reliable estimate can be made
of the amount of the obligation. With regard to certain
environmental risks, we maintain liability insurance at levels
that our management believes are appropriate and consistent with
industry practice. We may incur environmental losses beyond the
limits, or outside the coverage, of such insurance and such
losses may have a material adverse effect on the results of our
operations or financial condition and our provisions for
environmental remediation may not be sufficient to cover the
ultimate losses or expenditures.
Changes in tax regulations could result in lower earnings
and cash flows: We operate in approximately
190 countries and therefore are subject to different tax
regulations. Changes in tax regulation could result in higher
tax expenses and payments. Furthermore, changes in tax
regulation could impact our tax liabilities as well as deferred
tax assets.
ITEM 4: INFORMATION
ON THE COMPANY
Overview
Siemens traces its origins to 1847. Beginning with advances in
telegraph technology, the Company quickly expanded its product
line and geographic scope, and was already a multi-national
business by the end of the
19th century.
The Company formed a partnership under the name
Siemens & Halske in 1847, reorganized as a limited
partnership in 1889 and as a stock corporation in 1897. The
Company moved its headquarters from Berlin to Munich in 1949,
and assumed its current name as Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, a
stock corporation under the Federal laws of Germany, in 1966.
The address of our principal executive offices is
Wittelsbacherplatz 2,
D-80333
Munich, Germany; telephone number +49 (89) 636 00.
During fiscal 2007, Siemens employed an average of 386,200
people and operates in approximately 190 countries
worldwide. In fiscal 2007, we had revenue of
72.448 billion. Our balanced business portfolio is
based on leadership in electronics and electrical engineering.
We have combined this expertise with a commitment to original
research and development (R&D) to build strong global
market positions in the sectors energy, industry and healthcare.
While the energy sector comprises our Groups Power Generation
(PG) and Power Transmission and Distribution (PTD), the industry
sector encompasses our Groups Automation and Drives (A&D),
Industrial Solutions and Services (I&S), Siemens Building
Technologies (SBT), Osram and Transportation Systems (TS).
Healthcare consists of our Group Medical (Med), providing
medical solutions including diagnostics. Besides these
activities, Siemens IT Solutions and Services (SIS) provides
information and communication services to customers and to other
Siemens Groups. Also, in fiscal 2007, the Company had a Real
Estate business comprising the activities of Siemens Financial
Services (SFS) and Siemens Real Estate (SRE). As a result of our
strategic reorientation, SIS and SFS will be cross-functional
activities and SRE will become an internal Company unit. Our
businesses operate under a range of regional and economic
conditions. In internationally-oriented long-cycle industries,
for example, customers have multi-year planning and
implementation horizons that tend to be independent of
short-term economic trends. Our activities in these areas
include PG, PTD, Med and TS. In fields with more
industry-specific cycles, customers tend to have shorter
horizons for their spending decisions and greater sensitivity to
current economic conditions. Our activities in these areas
include A&D and Osram. Some Groups, especially Med are also
influenced by technological change and the rate of acceptance of
new technologies by end users.
As a globally operating organization, we also conduct business
with customers in Iran, Sudan, Syria, Cuba and North Korea. The
U.S. Department of State designates these countries as state
sponsors of terrorism and subjects them to export controls. Our
activities with customers in these states are insignificant
relative to our size (less than 1% of our sales in fiscal 2007)
and do not, in our view, represent either individually or in
aggregate a material investment risk. In light of current
humanitarian conditions in Sudan, Siemens ceased its business
activities in that
11
country as of June 30, 2007. However, we may participate in
humanitarian efforts of internationally recognized organizations
in Sudan. We actively employ systems and procedures for
compliance with applicable export control programs, including
those in the United States, the European Union and Germany.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2007, we successfully concluded
our Fit4More program, which we initiated in fiscal
2005. Its goal was to increase profitability and growth. The
main areas of the program were: Performance and Portfolio,
Operational Excellence, People Excellence and Corporate
Responsibility. The overall objective of the program was to
increase profitability, as measured by specific margin targets
for our business Groups. Beginning with the second quarter of
fiscal 2007, we started a new program called Fit for
2010 which is based on the pillars of the Fit4More program.
In the remainder of this section, we detail the Fit for 2010
strategy, highlight portfolio optimization activities in recent
years and describe the various segments of our business in more
detail.
Fit
for 2010 program
The overall objectives of Fit for 2010, defined as
Performance targets, are to achieve profitable growth and
to increase the value of the company. Drivers of
Performance are Portfolio, People Excellence,
Corporate Responsibility and Operational Excellence.
Performancesets medium-term goals for
Siemens to further enhance our competitiveness and our company
value by defining return, growth, cash and capital structure
targets for the company and margin ranges for our business
Groups.
Portfolioinvolves reaching or holding
leading positions in all our businesses. Predominantly in the
three sectors energy, industry and healthcare we intend to round
out our portfolio with new products and technologies by organic
growth as well as acquisitions.
People Excellencemeans achieving and
maintaining a high-performance culture. We are committed to
systematically developing top talent, especially emerging
leaders and technical, subject matter experts. People Excellence
entails fostering outstanding knowledge and unique skills in
every individual and developing the capability to work in
high-performance teams across organizational boundaries.
Corporate Responsibilitycomprises our
commitment to the society. This includes Corporate
Governance, Compliance, Climate Protection, Corporate
Citizenship and Portfolio. Corporate
Governance is as the basis of all our decision-making and
monitoring processes. With our Compliance system, we are
seeking to set the standard for high integrity and transparency.
With binding rules and guidelines we intend to ensure that our
employees and managers always conduct themselves in a legal and
ethical manner in relation to each other and to our business
partners. Climate Protection is an obligation to society
but also a business opportunity with significant growth rates.
Siemens is developing technological innovations that help save
energy and limit greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore we have
launched an energy efficiency program for our production
facilities worldwide. Within Corporate Citizenship the
global rollout of both Siemens-wide citizenship programs,
Siemens Generation21 in the field of education and Siemens
Caring Hands for social assistance services, will be continued
and intensified. A further goal is to implement projects that
foster social and business benefits by more strongly integrating
Siemens specific expertisefor example by providing
support for infrastructure deficiencies.
Operational Excellenceis executing our
Siemens Management System initiative which focuses on
Innovation, Customer Focus and Global Competitiveness.
Innovation has been a hallmark of Siemens since its inception,
and our commitment to innovation remains strong, with increasing
R&D expenses in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006.
Customer Focus means meeting a customers needs rather than
simply selling a product or service. We market our products,
solutions and services not only through our business Groups but
also by taking advantage of cross-selling opportunities. Global
Competitiveness relates to our ability to compete and market our
products on a worldwide basis. As mentioned above, Siemens is
present in approximately 190 countries and benefits from its
multicultural mix of managers and employees in these countries.
It is our primary goal to secure competitive strength by
utilizing and improving all parts of our worldwide value chain
including procurement, production and hardware, development of
software, shared services and back-office functions.
12
Portfolio
Activities
Since fiscal 2005, we have completed the following significant
transactions to optimize our business portfolio for sustainable
profitability and growth:
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
A&Ds acquisition of
U.S.-based
UGS Corp. (UGS), one of the leading providers of product
lifecycle management (PLM) software and services for
manufacturers, in May 2007;
|
|
|
|
Meds acquisition of the diagnostics division of Bayer
Aktiengesellschaft (Bayer) in January 2007, enabling Siemens to
expand its position in the molecular diagnostics market;
|
|
|
|
Meds acquisition of the immunodiagnostics provider
Diagnostics Products Corporation (DPC), USA, in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2006;
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of a number of entities in fiscal 2006, which were
not significant individually: the coal gasification business of
the Swiss Sustec-Group, Wheelabrator Air Pollution Control,
Inc., USA, a supplier of air pollution control and reduction
products and solutions for the coal-fired power and industrial
market, both at PG; Electrium, UK, vendor of electrical
installation systems at A&D; and Bewator, Sweden, a
supplier of products and systems for access control solutions at
SBT;
|
|
|
|
Acquisition completed in July 2005 of the Austrian engineering
group VA Technologie AG (VA Tech), primarily integrated into
I&S and PTD; in May 2006, in order to comply with a
European antitrust ruling, the Company sold the majority of the
VA Tech power generation business, including the hydropower
activities, to Andritz AG, Austria;
|
|
|
|
A&Ds acquisition in July 2005 of Flender Holding
GmbH, Germany (Flender), a supplier of gear systems;
|
|
|
|
Meds acquisition of CTI Molecular Imaging, Inc., U.S.
(CTI) in May 2005 to strengthen Siemens commitment to
molecular imaging development; and
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of two entities at Power Generation (PG) and
A&D in fiscal 2005, which were not significant
individually: Bonus Energy A/S (Bonus), Denmark, a supplier of
wind energy systems, and Robicon Corporation (Robicon), U.S., a
manufacturer of medium-voltage converters for AC motors.
|
On July 25, 2007, Siemens also signed an agreement with
Dade Behring Holdings, Inc. (Dade Behring), USA, to acquire all
issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Dade Behring by
submitting a cash tender offer of U.S.$77 per share. The
transaction closed at the beginning of November 2007 (see also
Subsequent events).
Dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2007, Siemens contributed its carrier-related
operations and Nokia Corporation (Nokia), Finland contributed
its Networks Business Group into Nokia Siemens Networks BV, the
Netherlands (NSN), in exchange for shares in NSN. Siemens and
Nokia each own an economic share of approximately 50% of NSN.
The transaction resulted in a preliminary pre-tax non-cash gain
of 1.627 billion which is included in discontinued
operations. Siemens has the ability to exercise significant
influence over operating and financial policies of NSN and
beginning April 2007 reports its equity interest in NSN in
Investments accounted for using the equity method and its
share of income (loss) in NSN in Income (loss) from
investments accounted for using the equity method, net. For
periods prior to April 2007 the carrier-related operations are
reported in discontinued operations;
|
|
|
|
In August 2006, Siemens sold the majority of its Dematic
business, which consisted of the Distribution and Industry
Logistics (DI) and Material Handling Products (MHP) divisions,
formerly of the Logistics and Assembly Systems Group (L&A)
to Trition Managers II Limited, Jersey; and
|
|
|
|
At the beginning of April 2006, the former operating segment
Siemens Business Services (SBS) closed the sale of its Product
Related Services (PRS) business to Fujitsu Siemens Computers
(Holding) BV.
|
13
Discontinued
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
On July 25, 2007, we signed an agreement with Continental
AG, Hanover, Germany, to sell our entire SV activities. These
business activities are reported in discontinued operations for
both the current and prior periods;
|
|
|
|
The business activities of the enterprise networks business,
which were part of Com, are reported in discontinued operations
for both the current and prior periods; and
|
|
|
|
In September 2005, we sold our Mobile Device business, which
lacked the necessary scale to compete effectively in a
consolidating market. These business activities are reported in
discontinued operations for both the current and prior periods.
|
For a detailed discussion of our acquisitions, dispositions and
discontinued operations, see Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Economic
Value Added (EVA)
A core element of our strategy has been an emphasis on EVA as a
measurement of the success of each of our business Groups and of
our Company as a whole. Economic value added provides a measure
of the return of a business Group over its cost of capital. We
believe that our management incentive compensation, which is
based on economic value added targets, plays a key role in
keeping us focused on our profitability goals.
14
Description
of Business
In fiscal 2007, our segments* were comprised of our operating
Groups, our Financing and Real Estate business, as well as our
Strategic Equity Investments and were as follows:
|
|
* |
In fiscal 2006, Siemens announced portfolio changes that
resulted in dissolving Communications (Com) as a Group and
reportable segment.
|
A new segment called Strategic Equity Investments (SEI) was
created as of October 1, 2006 and includes certain
strategic investments accounted for under the equity method.
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2007, NSN is also
reported in SEI.
SIS was created effective April 2007 and consists primarily of
the activities of the former segment Siemens Business Services
(SBS) that were bundled with other information technology (IT)
activities.
In fiscal 2007, Siemens signed an agreement to sell its entire
Siemens VDO Automotive (SV) activities to Continental AG. The
SV business is reported as discontinued operations.
Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, SV ceased to
represent a reportable segment.
15
Industry
Automation
and Drives (A&D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
15.389 billion
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
13.695 billion
|
|
External revenue as percentage of Siemens revenue
|
|
|
18.90%
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
2.090 billion
|
|
A&D offers products, solutions and services primarily
targeted at three main end-customer segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Factory automation serves customers in the factory
automation industry. Typical customers for these durable goods
are the automotive and machinery industries.
|
|
|
|
Process automation serves mainly customers in the process
automation industry, e.g. the chemical, pharmaceutical, food and
beverage industries.
|
|
|
|
Electrical Equipment for buildings serves customers in
the industrial and private building engineering industry
(construction markets).
|
In May 2007, we acquired UGS Corp., a U.S. company based in
Texas, for an estimated purchase price, including the assumption
of debt, of 2.7 billion (including
75 million cash acquired). UGS is a leading provider
of Product Lifecycle Management software and services, a
software concept including construction, simulation and plant
management for factory automation solutions like automotive
plants, aeroplane plants, machinery production etc.
The products, solutions and services that we offer to our
customers can be grouped in five technological segments:
Low voltage control and installation technology products include
low voltage switchboards, circuit protection and distribution
products and command and signaling devices. These products are
used in the control cabinets of switchgear and control gear
manufacturers and automation providers, who in turn serve
producers of mechanical and electrical machinery and companies
in the construction industry. We also offer electrical
installation products such as circuit protection systems, small
distribution board systems, wiring devices, switches and sockets
for the distribution of electricity in residential and
industrial buildings. Our modern bus-systems for communication
and monitoring link products and systems together and further
link these to building automation systems. The bus-systems are
used principally in residential buildings and large commercial
facilities such as plants and office buildings.
Manufacturing automation products include programmable logic
controllers, human machine interfaces for integrated automated
systems using a single system platform, industrial
communications systems and industrial software. Our main
customers for these products are the durable goods and capital
equipment industries, especially mechanical engineering
companies. In addition, we integrate these products into
industry- or customer-specific hardware and software solutions
and, for the automotive industry, we plan, engineer and sell
complete manufacturing automation solutions. The acquisition of
UGS Corp. in May 2007 strengthens our position in the
manufacturing automation market.
Motion control and drive system products include motors, drives,
gears and computerized numerical controls for machine tools, as
well as automation and drive equipment for all types of
production machines and material handling equipment. We also
sell motors and drives, from low to high voltage, and gears for
various applications in different industries and in
infrastructure facilities. Applications include rolling mills
and ships, engines for all kinds of rail vehicles and
ventilation and water and wastewater transportation systems.
Process automation products and services include process
instrumentation and analytics and wireless modules for companies
in the raw materials and other materials processing and capital
equipment industries. We plan, engineer and sell complete
solutions that integrate these products for specific
applications in the chemical,
16
pharmaceutical, food and beverage, and non-metallic minerals
industries. We use our computerized process control system as
the basis for our batch and process solutions.
Electronic assembly systems products are mainly surface mount
technology (SMT) placement systems that automate the mounting of
components onto printed circuit boards.
We sell our products primarily through our sales force in
Germany and through dedicated personnel in Siemens
worldwide network of regional sales units. We also sell a
significant proportion of our products to original equipment
manufacturers (OEM), system and software houses and third-party
distributors for resale to end users. The majority of our sales
to third parties goes to industrial customers in the mechanical
and electrical machines industries. A significant portion is
also made to distributors, system and software houses and
engineering companies.
The following chart shows the geographic distribution of
A&Ds external revenue in fiscal 2007:
Consolidation in our industry is occurring on multiple levels.
Suppliers of automation solutions to manufacturing companies
have supplemented their activities with drives technology.
Suppliers of manufacturing and process control systems are
cooperating or combining through acquisitions or cooperative
ventures with suppliers of field technology and outsource
facility operation and monitoring activities to establish
comprehensive automation suppliers.
Intense competition and rapid technical progress within our
industry place significant pressure on prices. Average product
lifetimes in our businesses tend to be short, typically from one
to five years after introduction, and are even shorter where
software and electronics play an important role. Product
lifetimes tend to be longer in motors, gears and
electromechanical devices.
Each of our principal competitors ABB, Schneider Electric and
Emerson has a broad business portfolio similar to ours. We also
compete with specialized companies such as Rockwell, Eaton,
Honeywell and Fanuc, as well as with local companies,
particularly in the Chinese and Indian markets. Our U.S.
competitors traditionally have had strong positions in software
technologies, while Asian competitors have generally focused on
large-scale production and cost cutting. Nevertheless, most of
our major competitors have established global bases for their
businesses. In addition, competition in the field has become
increasingly focused on technological improvements to
electronics and software. As a result of the acquisition of UGS,
we compete in the Product Lifecycle Management software business
with Dassault Systemes and in the emerging market of Enterprise
Ressource Planning (ERP) software with companies such as SAP and
Oracle.
Industrial
Solutions and Services (I&S)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
8.894 billion
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
7.824 billion
|
|
External revenue as percentage of Siemens revenue
|
|
|
10.80%
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
415 million
|
|
17
I&S develops solutions and services for industrial and
infrastructure facilities from planning and installation through
to operation and the whole equipment lifecycle. Our systems and
processes are applied for iron and steel production, treatment
of potable water and wastewater, as well as for traffic systems,
airport logistics and postal automation. We are also involved in
the pulp and paper sector, oil and gas, shipbuilding and mining.
During fiscal 2007, we provided our solutions and services
through the following seven divisions:
Industrial Services is responsible for our industrial
technical services activities, providing a wide range of
technical services covering each stage of the lifecycle of
industrial plants, infrastructure facilities and utilities. We
serve customers in a variety of industries. Under the trade name
Siemens Industrial Services, we provide engineering and general
contracting services for plant construction and modernization
and deliver on-call and logistics services, maintenance
services, including predictive maintenance, as well as auxiliary
process management services globally on a local basis.
Water Technologies provides water and wastewater
treatment products (filters, membranes and resin), integrated
solutions (membrane systems, filtration solutions, chemical
feed, ion exchange systems, disinfections systems and biological
treatment) and outsourcing solutions (contract operations,
build-own-operate solutions and customer asset
management) and services (carbon and resin regeneration, mobile
water treatment and maintenance).
Intelligent Traffic Systems offers automated systems for
urban and inter-urban traffic control and management. These
systems include information technology for traffic detection,
information and guidance and parking space management, in
addition to solutions for electronic tolls and tunnel traffic
guidance and access control. Our airfield technologies business
provides systems and solutions for the accurate monitoring,
navigation and control of aircraft ground movement, as well as a
variety of lighting systems for the visual guidance of airfield
traffic.
Metals Technologies provides process technology solutions
and services for the mining and metals industries. The four sub
divisions (Iron and Steelmaking, Rolling and Processing, Mining
and Metal and Mining Services) offer plants and equipment
(products), electrics and automation (systems) and services
(life cycle management).
Airport Logistics offers systems to track and control
cargo in and around airport terminals, as well as a full range
of baggage handling functions, from the check-in counter and
screening, to baggage reclaim, including services and parts for
such systems. We also provide security solutions for the
aviation industry, integrating baggage screening and explosives
detection technologies.
Postal Automation provides equipment for sorting of both
standard and large letters (so-called flats), as well as
parcels; reading and coding systems; postal information
technology; mail security solutions; and postal services such as
product-related after-sales services and general contracting.
As of October 1, 2007, the Airport Logistics and Postal
Automation divisions will be merged to form a new division
called Infrastructure Logistics.
Oil, Gas & Marine uses industry-specific
expertise to design, engineer and deliver solutions tailored to
the needs of customers in the oil & gas and marine
industries.
Our Metals Technologies, Airport Logistics and Postal Automation
divisions derive their sales revenues primarily from projects
awarded on the basis of internationally solicited tenders. These
projects tend to be performed under long-term, high-value
contracts with a relatively limited number of customers. Our
Water Technologies division focuses on industrial and municipal
customers. Intelligent Traffic Systems works predominantly with
state and municipal customers. Siemens businesses collectively
continue to be I&S largest customer.
The large size of the projects performed by our divisions
occasionally exposes us to risks related to our technical
performance, to a customer or to a country. For additional
information with respect to our long-term contracts, see
Item 3: Key InformationRisk Factors.
We market our services to our customers primarily through our
dedicated sales force, supplemented by Siemens worldwide
network of regional sales units.
18
The following chart shows the geographic distribution of
I&S external revenue in fiscal 2007:
Our competitors vary by business area and region. They range
from large, diversified multinationals to small, highly
specialized local companies. I&S main competitors
internationally include ABB, General Electric, Honeywell,
Invensys and Alstom. Our Industrial Services division also
competes with a large variety of small locally based suppliers
of contracting, maintenance and support services.
Siemens
Building Technologies (SBT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
5.062 billion
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
4.952 billion
|
|
External revenue as percentage of Siemens revenue
|
|
|
6.84%
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
354 million
|
|
SBT provides products, systems, solutions and services for
monitoring and regulating the temperature, fire safety,
ventilation, electricity, lighting and security of commercial
and industrial property, tunnels, ships and aircraft.
During fiscal 2007, SBT consisted of the following four
divisions:
Security Systems offers electronic security solutions and
services for buildings and critical environments (e.g. ports and
stadiums), including intruder detection and alarm systems,
closed-circuit television video-surveillance, personal
identification and building access control systems, as well as
managed services such as centralized monitoring and control of
each of these individual systems. The division further enhanced
its product portfolio and solutions business through the
acquisition of a leading Indian system provider during fiscal
2007.
Fire Safety and Security Products manufactures and sells
system components for the global fire safety and security
industry and offers systems, solutions and services to the
non-residential markets for fire detection and protection,
including computerized gas leakage and fire alarms and non-water
based fire extinguishing systems, as well as comprehensive
computer-based danger management systems which centrally monitor
and control each of these individual systems. Our products serve
to protect against fire, burglary, unauthorized access and loss
of assets.
Building Automation offers systems, solutions and
services to the non-residential markets for automating and
regulating heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC),
electricity and lighting, including computerized building
automation systems that integrate and manage all of these
functions for an entire building. The division offers
maintenance and training services for its systems and also
provides energy solutions and services, aiming to improve a
buildings energy costs, reliability and performance while
minimizing impact on the environment. For example, we refurbish
buildings to improve their energy efficiency and provide our
customers with a guaranteed level of energy cost savings. We
also arrange for financing of the refurbishments.
HVAC Products manufactures and sells controls, sensors,
detectors, valves and actuators used in systems that regulate
heating, ventilation and air conditioning, electricity and
lighting in buildings and factories.
19
Our customers consist of a large, widely-dispersed group of
locally-based building owners, operators and tenants, building
construction general contractors, mechanical and electrical
contractors, HVAC systems OEMs, wholesalers, specialized system
builders and installers.
SBT has a decentralized business organization that combines a
small central headquarters, design and manufacturing at sites in
six countries in Europe, North America and Asia and our own
branch network. For some markets, we also distribute our
products and systems through a network of independent field
offices and distributors. Our services businesses and sales
network have significant local presences.
The large size of the projects performed by our divisions
occasionally exposes us to risks related to our technical
performance, to a customer or to a country. For additional
information with respect to our long-term contracts, see
Item 3: Key InformationRisk Factors.
We sell our products and systems throughout the world.
The following chart shows the geographic distribution of
SBTs external revenue in fiscal 2007:
The main global competitors of our solutions businesses (e.g.
security systems, fire safety & security solutions and
building automation) are large system integrators such as Tyco,
Honeywell, Johnson Controls, UTC and Bosch, as well as Schneider
Electric in some markets. The fire safety products market
consolidated considerably in recent years, creating heightened
competition between major players. In addition, competitors
continuously shift their production to low-cost countries. Due
to the resulting comparative lower production costs, we continue
to experience increased price pressure in the products market,
as well as in fire safety solutions. The main competitors of our
products business (e.g. HVAC products and fire
safety & security products) are large multi-national
suppliers such as GE, Johnson Controls, Honeywell, Bosch and
Schneider Electric. In the HVAC market, we also see
consolidation (including significant acquisitions by Honeywell,
Schneider Electric, Danfoss and Daikin) and increased price
competition for the same reasons as in the fire safety solutions
market. We also face competition from niche competitors offering
web-based solutions and from new entrants, such as utility
companies and consulting firms, exploiting an increased demand
for energy cost management. Consolidation also is continuing in
the building automation market and vertical integration of
mechanical equipment and controls is an important industry trend.
Osram
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
4.690 billion
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
4.677 billion
|
|
External revenue as percentage of Siemens revenue
|
|
|
6.46%
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
492 million
|
|
20
Our Lighting Group, Osram, offers a full spectrum of lighting
products for a variety of applications. Osram designs,
manufactures or sells the following types of lighting products
and related materials, components and equipment through the
following divisions:
|
|
|
|
|
General Lighting: incandescent, halogen,
compact fluorescent, fluorescent and high-intensity discharge
lamps for household and commercial applications, and public
buildings, spaces and streets;
|
|
|
|
Automotive Lighting: halogen, incandescent and
xenon discharge lamps for use in motor vehicle headlights, brake
lights, turn signals and instrument panels, and, through an
equal joint venture with Valeo, completed head- and tail-light
assemblies for distribution in North America;
|
|
|
|
Display/Optic: special purpose halogen and
high-intensity discharge lamps for lighting airport runways,
film studios, lighting for microchip manufacturing, video and
overhead projectors and medical and other applications requiring
very intense lighting;
|
|
|
|
Opto-Semiconductors/LED systems: light
emitting diodes (LED), organic light emitting diodes (OLED),
high power laser diodes and other semiconductor devices and LED
systems that generate visible light and ultraviolet and infrared
radiation for use in interior and exterior automotive lighting
and other applications, electronic equipment displays, traffic
and signal lighting, signs and decorative lighting and infrared
transmitters and sensors for industrial and consumer electronics;
|
|
|
|
Ballasts and Luminaires: electronic ballasts
for optimized operation of compact fluorescent, fluorescent,
high-intensity discharge, low-voltage halogen lamps and LED
systems, as well as consumer fixtures and, increasingly,
lighting control systems; and
|
|
|
|
Precision Materials and Components: glass for
bulbs, phosphor powders for fluorescent lamps, computer monitors
and television screens, tungsten and other metals for filaments
in incandescent lamps and heavy duty tools and electronic
components and materials for lamps and applications in the
automotive industry, as well as equipment used in the production
of lighting products.
|
As of October 1, 2007, the activities of the
division Ballasts and Luminaires will be transferred into
two divisions, Luminaires, and Electronics and Controls. Also,
as of October 1, 2007, the division Precision
Materials and Components will be renamed Global Tungsten Powder.
We market our products worldwide and have manufacturing
locations throughout North and South America, Western and
Eastern Europe and Asia, allowing us to stay close to our major
customer regions and keep shipping charges low. We produce most
of our own key precision materials and components to ensure that
we have access to basic components in the necessary amounts,
prices and levels of quality. We also sell precision materials
and components of our production to third parties.
In the coming years, we expect the importance of electronics to
continue to increase across all areas of the lighting industry,
and we expect that Osrams revenue accounted for by
electronic ballasts, electronically-driven lighting systems and
opto-semiconductors will continue to increase.
Our customers include primarily wholesalers, retailers and
manufacturers of lighting fixtures, lamp components and
automotive systems. We distribute our products through
Osrams own network of subsidiaries, sales offices and
local independent agents in approximately 150 countries. The
importance of the Internet as a sales channel is also steadily
increasing. Osram has successfully implemented
business-to-business
extranet services in several countries and we continue to
process over one third of our revenue electronically.
In recent years, the world market for lighting products has
grown at moderate rates, with relatively higher growth in
Asia-Pacific and Eastern Europe. In North America, we market
most of our lighting products under the brand name Sylvania.
21
The following chart shows the geographic distribution of
Osrams external revenue in fiscal 2007:
As a result of acquisitions and consolidations over the last
decades, Osram, Philips and General Electric are today the key
players in the worldwide lighting market. Osram holds a number
one or number two position worldwide in most of its product
markets, such as lamps, electronic ballasts, automotive lamps
and opto-semiconductors, competing principally with Philips and
General Electric, as well as Nichia in the field of
opto-semiconductors. Through joint ventures with Mitsubishi and
Toshiba, we are the largest foreign manufacturer of lighting
products in Japan, where Matsushita and Toshiba also hold strong
market positions.
Price competition is intense in some areas of both the
traditional and innovative lighting product markets, due to
competition among Philips, Osram, General Electric, and the
Japanese LED manufacturer Nichia, as well as rising competition
from new entrants, including a growing number of Chinese
manufacturers.
We continue to work on reducing the use of hazardous materials
(e.g. mercury or lead) or to substitute for these in our
products and processes. Sustainable products play a major role
in our innovation strategy. Examples are our energy-saving lamps
and lighting systems and our market introduction of mercury-free
xenon lamps for motor vehicle headlamps.
Transportation
Systems (TS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
4.452 billion
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
4.418 billion
|
|
External revenue as percentage of Siemens revenue
|
|
|
6.10%
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
191 million
|
|
We are a leader in the global rail industry, offering a full
range of products and services for railway transportation. We
offer our customers innovative solutions and systems in such
areas as modular vehicle concepts for mass transit and mainline
systems; technology for driverless metros and
computer-controlled electronic switches; optical sensor systems;
and global positioning system (GPS)-based service and diagnostic
concepts, among others. We combine rolling stock with automation
and power product offerings in our turnkey systems business, and
combined service and maintenance activities in our integrated
services unit. Rolling stock refers to all major components of
rail vehicles, including locomotives, railway cars, subway cars
and streetcars.
We develop, manufacture and sell a full range of rolling stock
in three product-focused divisions:
|
|
|
|
|
Mass TransitOur products include subway and
suburban rapid transit trains, subway cars, as well as their
subsystems and components and streetcars, light rail vehicles
and their components.
|
|
|
|
LocomotiveOur products include electric and
diesel-electrical locomotives for passenger or freight rail. In
addition to our manufacturing operations, we also refurbish and
maintain locomotives and locomotive pools.
|
|
|
|
TrainsOur products comprise rail vehicles with
traction equipment integrated into the running gear and
distributed over the entire train, including high speed trains,
tilting trains, regional and rapid transit units and passenger
coaches, as well as subsystems and components.
|
22
In our automation and power business, we conduct our operations
in two divisions:
|
|
|
|
|
Rail AutomationFor passenger and freight railway
operations, we develop, manufacture and sell central control
systems, signaling systems and equipment, interlockings and
automated train control systems that regulate a trains
speed through automatic application of its brakes when it
exceeds speed limits or fails to respond to a signal. We sell
entire systems and networks, as well as individual products for
integration into existing signaling systems. For mass transit,
we develop, manufacture and sell operation control centers for
the operation of signals and switches in rail yards and between
destinations, and signaling and vehicle control systems
(including automated, driverless systems).
|
|
|
|
ElectrificationFor high speed, main line and mass
transit, we supply products and systems for contact line and
rail power supply.
|
In our Turnkey Systems division, we aim to optimize the design
and construction of entire railway systems. We cooperate closely
with the other TS businesses, integrating their products and
services to offer turnkey projects from a single source. We also
assist our customers with arranging financing in cooperation
with SFS.
Our primary customers are transport authorities and national and
private rail companies worldwide. Deutsche Bahn was again our
largest customer in fiscal 2007, although the Chinese Ministry
of Railways was nearly equally important as a percentage of our
total revenue. We distribute our products through our own sales
force in Germany and through dedicated personnel in the local
Siemens companies worldwide.
Germany and other European countries have traditionally been our
most important regional markets. We believe the most important
regional growth markets are in the Asia-Pacific region. Demand
in the German market for railway transportation products has
continued to decline in recent years, as a result of reduced
government funding of, and low investment in, the German rail
transportation systems, and we expect that trend to continue for
the foreseeable future.
The following chart shows the geographic distribution of
TS external revenue in fiscal 2007:
Despite the trend toward privatizing state-owned railways and
liberalization of the railways markets, national authorities
continue to have influence in areas such as security and
deregulation, or as general watchdog authorities over transport
or railway facilities. In many countries, governments impose
local content requirements, the fulfillment of which is often a
basic precondition for market entry. The number of rail
operators continues to increase, and both new and traditional
operators are focusing not only on quality but also on price and
low life-cycle costs that drive their own profitability. Price
pressure is further influenced by budget constraints faced by
many state operators, requiring innovative financing solutions.
Our customers show a growing trend towards the outsourcing of
servicing and maintenance of systems and equipment.
The large size of our projects occasionally exposes us to risks
associated with technical performance, a customer or a country.
In the past, we have experienced losses in connection with such
risks. For additional information with respect to our long-term
contracts, Item 3: Key InformationRisk
Factors.
We compete in our industry, on a global scale, with a relatively
small number of large companies and with numerous small to
midsized competitors who are either active on a regional level
or specialize within narrow product spectrums. Our principal
competitors are Alstom and Bombardier.
23
Energy
Power
Generation (PG)
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
12.194 billion
|
External revenue
|
|
12.159 billion
|
External revenue as percentage of Siemens revenue
|
|
16.78%
|
Group profit
|
|
1.147 billion
|
PG provides customers worldwide with a full range of equipment
necessary for the efficient conversion of energy into
electricity and heat. We also customize gas and steam turbines
in the smaller output range, which can be used as drives for
compressors or large pumps, to meet specific project needs. We
offer a broad range of power plant technology, with activities
that include: development and manufacture of key components,
equipment, and systems; planning, engineering and construction
of new power plants; and comprehensive servicing, retrofitting
and modernizing of existing facilities.
PG consists of four businesses, each with a clear market focus
on specific customer groups and technologies: Fossil Power
Generation; Oil & Gas and Industrial Applications;
Instrumentation and Controls; and Wind Power.
A power plants function is the efficient conversion of
primary energy, such as coal or natural gas, into electricity.
In a fossil fuel plant, the power generation process begins with
working media such as water, steam or compressed air, which are
initially transferred to high pressure states by heating in
boilers or combustion sections of gas turbines. Thereafter,
steam and gas turbines convert this energy into mechanical
energy, which in turn is converted into electricity by
generators. In so-called combined cycle plants, a combination of
gas and steam turbines is used to reach highly efficient
conversion rates of nearly 60%. At the end of the process,
electricity is fed into transmission grids from the plant site.
Fossil Power Generation includes power plants and systems
engineering, as well as components and equipment engineering and
manufacturing, such as fossil fuel-fired power plants and
co-generation heat and power plants. Our fossil fuel power
generation business concentrates on turbo generators, gas and
steam turbines in the larger power range, with an emphasis on
combined-cycle gas and steam power plants. We also perform power
plant service, such as maintenance, rehabilitation and
operations.
Oil & Gas and Industrial Applications includes
steam and gas turbines in the small and medium power ranges, as
well as turbo generators, turbo compressors and compressor
solutions for the oil and gas industry. Our activities encompass
design, engineering, supply and service.
Instrumentation and Controls designs, installs and
commissions instrumentation and control systems and related
equipment for use in power generation, including information
technology solutions providing management applications from the
plant to the enterprise level. We also provide a wide variety of
related services.
Wind Power includes wind turbines from 1.3 MW to
3.6 MW for on- and offshore sites, as well as wind turbine
service.
Additional areas of PGs activity include the development
and production of systems based on emerging technologies such as
fuel cells and fuel gasification. We also have minority stakes
in joint ventures in the areas of nuclear and hydropower
generation, which we account for under the equity method.
Although we aim to expand primarily through internal growth, we
will continue to make acquisitions and form alliances where
appropriate to increase market penetration, share costs or
technologies and adapt to market changes. In the first quarter
of 2007, we completed the acquisition of Kühnle
Kopp & Kausch, a German manufacturer of small steam
turbines and turbocompressors.
PGs principal customers are large power utilities and
independent power producers, as well as construction engineering
firms and developers. Because certain areas of our business,
such as power plant construction, involve working on medium- or
longer-term projects for customers who may not require our
services again in the short term,
24
our most significant customers may vary significantly from year
to year. In fiscal 2007, Shuaibah Water and Electricity Company
in Saudi Arabia, Eskom in South Africa, Taweelah Asia Power
Company in the United Arab Emirates, Lilama Corp. in Vietnam and
Torrent Power Ltd. in India were among our largest customers. We
also generate an increasing portion of revenue from industrial
customers, who represent an important market for smaller
turbines and compressor solutions.
Our business activities vary widely in size from component
delivery and comparatively small projects to turnkey contracts
for new power plant construction with contract values of more
than half a billion euros each. The large size of some of our
projects occasionally exposes us to risks related to technical
performance, a customer or a country. For additional information
with respect to our long-term contracts, see Item 3:
Key InformationRisk Factors.
The following chart shows the geographic distribution of
PGs external revenue in fiscal 2007:
Our sales efforts are conducted primarily by our own dedicated
sales organizations, supported by Siemens worldwide
network of regional sales units.
Todays worldwide market for new power plants is near the
high level experienced in the early 2000s. The development in
2007 was driven primarily by strong economic development in
China, which again was the strongest single market for worldwide
power equipment orders in fiscal 2007. In the next several
years, we estimate that the demand for power generation products
in China might slow down, although this might be compensated by
rising demand in other regional markets including Middle East,
Russia, India and rest of Asia. Additionally, the strong
economic growth and the increasing need to replace older, mainly
coal fired units in industrialized countries have contributed to
increased demand. This relatively high level of demand causes
tight external supply markets, which are expected to relax
within the next several years. The sustained and significant
increase in oil and gas prices in recent years, ongoing
ecological discussions and uncertainty relating to fuel markets
create uncertainty surrounding the expected distribution of
demand between gas, steam and nuclear power plants.
Our industry is one in which a relatively small number of
companies, some with very strong positions in their domestic
markets, play a key role. Our principal competitors vary by
business. In Fossil Power Generation, our main competitors are
General Electric, Alstom Power, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, as
well as Hitachi and Toshiba. Within Oil & Gas and
Industrial Applications, we face competition from General
Electric, Solar, MAN Turbo and Dresser Rand. In Instrumentation
and Controls, where the market is more fragmented, ABB is our
main competitor. Our main competitors in Wind Power, where the
industry continues to consolidate, are Vestas, Gamesa, Enercon
and General Electric.
Power
Transmission and Distribution (PTD)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
7.689 billion
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
7.126 billion
|
|
External revenue as percentage of Siemens revenue
|
|
|
9.84%
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
650 million
|
|
25
PTD supplies energy utilities and large industrial power users
with equipment, systems and services used to process and
transmit electrical power from the source, typically a power
plant, to various points along the power transmission network
and to distribute power via a distribution network to the
end-user.
At the first step of the power transmission and distribution
process, power generated by a power plant is transformed to a
high voltage that can be transported efficiently over long
distances along overhead lines or underground cables. This step
occurs at or near the site of the power plant, and requires
transformation, control, transmission, switching and protection
systems. At the second stage of the process, the power passes
through one or more substations, which use distribution
switchgear to control the amounts delivered and circuit breakers
and surge arresters to protect against hazards in transmitting
the power. At this stage, transformers step-down the voltage to
a medium level at which it can be safely distributed in
populated areas. In the final stage of the process, distribution
transformers step-down the voltage again to a level usable by
end-users and metering systems measure and record the locations
and amounts of power transmitted.
We provide our customers with: turn-key transmission systems and
distribution substations; discrete products and equipment for
integration by our customers into larger systems; information
technology systems and consulting services relating to the
design and construction of power transmission and distribution
networks. We offer the following solutions, products and
services, presented roughly in the order in which they are used
in a power transmission and distribution network. Our internal
divisions are organized around the following products:
|
|
|
|
|
power systems control equipment and information
technology systems, including computerized power management
systems used to operate power transmission networks, determine
customer needs and regulate the flow of power from power plants
to the distribution network (offered through our Energy
Automation division);
|
|
|
|
transformers including both the power transformers used
at the beginning of the transmission process to
step-up the
voltage of the power generated by power plants to a voltage that
can be carried efficiently on the power network, and the
distribution transformers and their components used at the end
of the distribution process to step-down power from high voltage
to lower voltage levels for the end-user;
|
|
|
|
high voltage products and
ready-to-use
systems, in both alternating and direct current, used in the
physical transmission of power from power plants to the
distribution network before the voltage is stepped-down for
distribution in populated areas, including
ready-to-operate
indoor and outdoor high voltage substations and the switchgear
and protection systems required to control the flow of power and
prevent damage to the power transmission network;
|
|
|
|
protection and substation control systems including
equipment and systems used at power distribution network
substations, such as relays and computerized protection and
control equipment (offered through our Energy Automation
division); and
|
|
|
|
medium voltage equipment including circuit breakers and
distribution switchgear systems and components that regulate the
flow of power on the distribution network before it is
stepped-down to a low voltage level for the end-user.
|
In addition to our equipment and systems, we offer a growing
range of services and integrated solutions for various stages in
the power transmission and distribution process. These include:
technical support and maintenance services and, to an increasing
extent, outsourcing projects and operations; consulting relating
to the planning, design and optimization of power transmission
and distribution networks; information technology services and
solutions to support customer management and energy trading;
training programs; and metering services for electricity, gas
and heat. We also provide analytical and consulting services, as
well as equipment and systems, in the power quality field that
are designed to improve the availability and reliability of
power transmitted by analyzing and reducing the causes of power
fluctuations and failures. Power quality systems and services
have become increasingly important with the growing use of
sensitive computerized, electronic and other equipment requiring
continuous power with very little fluctuation in voltage or
frequency. Our PTD Services division aims specifically at
responding to our customers increasing demands for these
services.
26
Our power transmission and distribution customers are primarily
power utilities and independent power distributors. Due to
ongoing deregulation in the power industry, our customer base
continues to diversify from one formerly composed almost
exclusively of power utilities responsible for all stages in
power transmission and distribution to one that includes an
increasing number of independent system operators and power
distributors supplying services at different points of the power
transmission and distribution network. We have further increased
our sales to industrial customers, providing them with equipment
and systems for power networks associated with manufacturing
facilities. We distribute our systems and components through our
sales force in Germany and through dedicated personnel in the
regional Siemens sales units worldwide.
We generate our revenue from project business, as well as from
sales of systems, components and services. In fiscal 2007, we
received an order of approximately 0.7 billion from
the Qatar General Electricity & Water Corporation.
Aside from this order, a relatively small portion of our project
business involves construction of large power networks and other
projects with values of more than 50 million.
Although the order volume from larger projects increased
compared to the previous fiscal year, in fiscal 2007, still most
of our business was generated from smaller projects and sales of
systems and components to a variety of smaller customers.
The following chart shows the geographic distribution of
PTDs external revenue in fiscal 2007:
Our revenue are evenly distributed throughout the world with
large portions in Europe, Asia and the Americas. While regions
in the developing world represent growth markets for power
transmission and distribution products and systems, our
activities there can also expose us to risks associated with
economic, financial and political disruptions that could result
in lower demand or affect our customers abilities to pay.
Competition in our markets comes primarily from a small group of
large, multinational companies offering a wide variety of
products, systems and services, although a few notable
specialists maintain strong positions in certain niches.
Globally, our most significant competitors include ABB, the
Areva Group and to some extent Schneider, as well as General
Electric. In some of our markets, increasing international
competition is emerging from low-cost countries such as China
and India. We are party to several joint ventures in China, our
largest single market.
The large size of some of our projects occasionally exposes us
to risks related to our technical performance, to a customer or
to a country. For additional information with respect to our
long-term contracts, see Item 3: Key
InformationRisk Factors.
Healthcare
Medical
Solutions (Med)
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
9.851 billion
|
External revenue
|
|
9.798 billion
|
External revenue as percentage of Siemens revenue
|
|
13.52%
|
Group profit
|
|
1.323 billion
|
27
Med develops, manufactures and markets diagnostic and
therapeutic systems, devices and consumables, as well as
information technology systems for clinical and administrative
purposes. We provide technical maintenance, professional and
consulting services. We also work with Siemens Financial
Services to provide financing and related services to our
customers. We are one of the leading companies in our field.
Our offerings include:
|
|
|
|
|
medical imaging systems, representing a full range of
systems including x-ray, computed tomography, magnetic
resonance, molecular imaging and ultrasound, as well as related
computer-based workstations enabling the health care
professional to retrieve and process relevant information. Our
imaging systems are used to generate morphological and
functional images of the human body. This information is used
both for diagnostic purposes and in preparation for potential
treatment, including interventional and minimally-invasive
procedures;
|
|
|
|
information technology systems, which are used to
digitally store, retrieve and transmit medical images and other
clinical and administrative information, facilitating efficient
workflows in health care environments;
|
|
|
|
oncology care systems, including linear accelerators,
which are used for cancer treatment;
|
|
|
|
hearing aids and related products and supplies;
|
|
|
|
in-vitro diagnostics, representing a full range of
systems for immunodiagnostics, clinical chemistry, hematology,
point-of-care
testing, molecular diagnostics (i.e. testing for nucleic acids)
and clinical laboratory automation solutions. In-vitro
diagnostics is based on the analysis of bodily fluids such as
blood or urine, and supplies vital information for the detection
and management of disease, and also for an individual
patients risk assessment. We entered the in-vitro
diagnostics business through the acquisitions of Diagnostic
Products Corporation (DPC) for approximately
U.S.$1.9 billion (1.4 billion), which closed in
fiscal 2006, and the Diagnostics division of Bayer AG for
4.5 billion, which closed in the first quarter of
fiscal 2007. For additional information on these acquisitions,
see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements; and
|
|
|
|
electromedical systems, which are primarily used in
critical care situations and during surgery for the purpose of
patient transport, monitoring vital functions via body sensors,
supporting breathing and administering anesthetic agents. Our
product portfolio also includes respiratory machines designed
for systems for intensive neonatal care and home care. We
provide such electromedical systems primarily through our joint
venture Dräger Medical of Lübeck, Germany, in which we
hold a 25% share as of September 30, 2007. In January 2007,
we sold a 10%-share of the joint venture to
Drägerwerke AG for a sales price of
110 million and announced our plans to acquire a 2.5%
share of Drägerwerke AG.
|
In July 2007, Siemens signed an agreement with Dade Behring,
Inc. (Dade Behring), USA, to acquire all issued and outstanding
shares of common stock of Dade Behring by submitting a cash
tender offer of U.S.$77 per share. Dade Behring is a leading
manufacturer and distributor of diagnostic products and services
to clinical laboratories, supplying fully integrated testing
systems for clinical chemistry and immunodiagnostics. Dade
Behring also has a leading market position in hemostasis and in
automated microbiology solutions. The aggregate consideration,
including the assumption of debt, amounts to approximately
U.S.$7 billion (approximately 5 billion). The
transaction closed at the beginning of November 2007. For
additional information, see Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements. With our recent acquisitions, we
formed the worlds first integrated diagnostics company,
with a leading market position in in-vitro diagnostics, medical
imaging (in-vivo diagnostics) and healthcare IT.
Our customers include health care providers such as hospital
groups and individual hospitals, group and individual medical
practices, reference and physician office laboratories and
outpatient clinics. We typically sell the majority of our
product spectrum through direct sales persons who are located in
the individual countries where our products are sold and
supported by product specialists. In addition, in some countries
we sell primarily low-end products (such as low-end ultrasound
and low-end x-ray) through dealers. A small portion of our
revenue involve delivery of certain of our products and
components to competitors on an OEM basis. Our products are
serviced primarily through our own dedicated personnel.
28
We have a strong worldwide presence. The following chart shows
the geographic distribution of Meds external revenue in
fiscal 2007:
We have research and development and OEM cooperation agreements
with various companies, including with Bruker, in the field of
magnetic resonance imaging; Toshiba, in the field of ultrasound
and magnetic resonance imaging; and Matsushita, for low- and
mid-range ultrasound systems. We also have joint ventures with
Philips and Thales, to manufacture flat panel detectors for
medical imaging; and with Mochida Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., in
the field of ultrasound in Japan.
Our principal competitors in medical imaging are General
Electric, Philips, Toshiba, Hitachi and Hologic. Other
competitors include McKesson and Cerner, for information
technology systems; Phonak, GN Resound (a subsidiary of Great
Nordic), William Demant and Starkey, for hearing aids; Elekta
and Varian Medical, for oncology care systems; and Roche, Abbott
and Beckman Coulter, for in-vitro diagnostics. The trend toward
consolidation in our industry continues. In May 2007, Hologic
announced a merger agreement with Cytyc Corporation, a
diagnostics and medical device company focusing on womens
health; in June 2007 Roche launched a tender offer for Ventana
Medical Systems, an in-vitro diagnostics company with a focus on
anatomic pathology. Competition among the leading companies in
our field is strong, including with respect to price.
Siemens
IT Solutions and Services (SIS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
5.360 billion
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
3.988 billion
|
|
External revenue as percentage of Siemens revenue
|
|
|
5.50%
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
252 million
|
|
SIS was formed in fiscal 2007 through the previously announced
pooling of the former Siemens Business Services (SBS) Group and
the four software development entities Program and System
Engineering (PSE), Siemens Information Systems Ltd. (SISL),
Development Innovation and Projects (DIP) and the Business
Innovation Center (BIC). SIS has been a segment in our external
reporting structure since April 1, 2007. In terms of
relative importance within SIS, the activities of the former
Group SBS accounted for approximately 90% of the external
revenue of SIS in fiscal 2007.
SIS designs, builds and operates both discrete and large scale
information and communications systems. SIS offers comprehensive
information technology and communications solutions from a
single source. While mostly performing operations related
services, SIS creates solutions for customers by drawing on our
management consulting resources to redesign customer processes;
on our professional services to integrate, upgrade, build and
install information technology systems; and on our operational
capabilities to run these systems on an ongoing basis.
SIS offers its solutions and services to external customers in
the following sectors:
|
|
|
|
|
The manufacturing industry, including automotive, discrete
manufacturing, process industry and chemical/pharmaceutical;
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
Telecommunications and media (including broadcasting);
|
|
|
|
The public sector, including defense & intelligence,
public security, employment services and public administration;
|
|
|
|
Service industries, including financial services and software;
|
|
|
|
Healthcare;
|
|
|
|
Transportation/Airports; and
|
|
|
|
Utilities
|
On a combined basis, other Siemens Groups are the largest
customer of SIS with a share of 26% in total SIS revenue in
fiscal 2007.
The types of services offered by SIS include:
|
|
|
|
|
project-oriented consulting, design and implementation services,
such as selecting, adapting and introducing new solutions to
support business processes, as well as integration of systems
and enterprise applications.
|
|
|
|
outsourcing services (full-scale IT operations spanning hosting,
call center, network and desktop services) as well as operation
of selected business processes (e.g. financial services
back-office operations).
|
|
|
|
software development such as design and implementation of
software solutions for Siemens Groups.
|
SIS solutions and services are designed to support the
following core processes of our customers:
|
|
|
|
|
customer relationship management, to assist businesses in
aligning their organizations to better serve the needs and
requirements of their customers;
|
|
|
|
business information management, to improve our customers
business processes, including services and solutions for
business information, document and product data management;
|
|
|
|
supply chain management, to facilitate the efficient interplay
of all of a business operational processes with those of
its suppliers;
|
|
|
|
enterprise resource management, to optimize a customers
internal management and production processes; and
|
|
|
|
e-commerce
systems and solutions in a range of industries, to allow
customers to offer a variety of Internet-based services through
design and implementation of software for communications and
transactions applications.
|
Most of SIS consulting and design services involve
information technology and communications systems that we also
build and operate. At the same time, SIS also designs and builds
systems and provides services using the software of several
companies with which it has established relationships, such as
SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and Computer Associates.
The largest customers of SIS in fiscal 2007 included Nokia
Siemens Networks (NSN), the BBC, Deutsche Bank, National
Savings & Investment and RAG AG.
We have our own sales and delivery force. We operate worldwide
in more than 40 countries.
30
The following chart shows the geographic distribution of
SIS external revenue in fiscal 2007:
Our most significant competitors vary by region and type of
service. A few are global, full-service IT providers such as
IBMs Global Services division, EDS, Accenture, CSC and HP
Services. One of our competitors that focuses more narrowly on
specific regions or customers is
T-Systems, a
unit of Deutsche Telekom, in Germany. As a service business, SIS
requires strong local presences and the ability to build close
customer relationships and provide customized solutions while
achieving economies of scale and successfully managing risks in
large projects.
The IT services market has recovered but continues to be highly
competitive; in fiscal 2007 ongoing commoditization of the IT
services industry and the entry of new players such as Indian
companies into the European market kept price pressure and the
need for cost reduction at a high level, and we expect these
trends to continue. According to Gartner, Inc., the
IT service market is further consolidating.
We enter into large scale, and sometimes long-term projects. The
large size of some of these projects, as well as the long-term
frame contracts with our largest customers occasionally expose
us to technical performance, customer- or country-related risks.
Risks associated with long-term outsourcing contracts remain a
management priority at SIS. For additional information with
respect to our long-term contracts, see Item 3: Key
InformationRisk Factors.
Strategic
Equity Investments (SEI)
SEI was created as of October 1, 2006 and includes the
following three strategic equity investments accounted for under
the equity method:
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Siemens Networks BV (NSN): NSN began operations in
the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and includes the
carrier-related operations of Siemens and the Networks Business
Group of Nokia. NSN is a leading supplier in the
telecommunications infrastructure industry.
|
|
|
|
BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (BSH): is a
leading manufacturer of household appliances, offering an
extensive range of innovative products tailored to customer
needs and global megatrends alike. BSH was founded as a joint
venture in 1967 between Robert Bosch GmbH and Siemens. Prior to
fiscal 2007, BSH was included in Other Operations.
|
|
|
|
Fujitsu Siemens Computers (Holding) BV (FSC): is one of
the Europes leading IT manufacturer, offering a broad
array of innovative products, services and infrastructure
solutions. FSC was established as a joint venture holding
company by Fujitsu Limited and Siemens in 1999. In fiscal 2006,
the FSC acquired the Product Related Services (PRS), the service
and maintenance business of the former Siemens Business Services
(SBS). Prior to fiscal 2007, FSC was included in Other
Operations.
|
For additional information on NSN, BSH and FSC, see Item 5:
Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsFiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006Segment Information
AnalysisStrategic equity Investments, Item 7:
Major Shareholders and Related Party
TransactionsRelated Party Transactions, as well as
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
31
Financing
and Real Estate
Siemens
Financial Services (SFS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
8.912 billion
|
|
Total assets as percentage of Siemens assets
|
|
|
9.73%
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
329 million
|
|
SFS provides a variety of financial services and products both
to third parties and, on arms-length terms, to other
Siemens business Groups and their customers. SFS is organized in
eight business divisions, which can be classified as either
capital businesses (consisting of the Equipment Finance
Europe/APAC division, the Equipment Finance U.S. division, the
Working Capital Finance division and the Equity division) or fee
businesses (consisting of the Project & Export
Finance, Investment Management, Insurance and
Treasury & Financing Services divisions). The capital
businesses offer vendor programs to external manufacturers and
support Siemens sales with leasing and lending programs. The
capital businesses also provide receivable financing to Siemens
groups and external parties and makes equity investments in
infrastructure projects where Siemens is a principal supplier.
The fee businesses support and advise Siemens concerning
financial risk management and investment management and provide
an important contribution to Siemens by arranging financing for
Siemens projects. Most of our fee business is generated
internally (i.e. with other Siemens Groups as the customer), and
most of our capital business is generated externally. Within the
equipment finance business, which is our largest capital
business, we use internal vendors (the Siemens group), but also
external vendors and other indirect origination channels as
intermediators to generate leasing and lending business.
Total assets declined from 10.543 billion to
8.912 billion at September 30, 2007 compared to
the end of fiscal 2006, due to a significant reduction in
accounts receivable related to the carve-outs of SV and carrier
activities that were transferred into Nokia Siemens Networks.
Lease receivables and equipment leased under operating leases
(together accounting for approximately 63% of our assets) were
our principal assets at September 30, 2007. The main
sources of our earnings are interest income, dividends and fee
income, with the latter stemming primarily from our internal
advisory businesses. SFS acts according to banking industry
standards in the international financial markets in its
transactions with both Siemens and third parties.
Equipment Finance Europe/APAC and Equipment Finance
U.S. Our principal product in these divisions is
equipment lease financing, where we typically purchase equipment
supplied by various Siemens Groups or third-party manufacturers
and lease it to the customer for a specified term, generally
with an option for the customer to purchase the equipment or
renew the lease at the end of the term. Finance leases account
for the largest portion of our leasing business (approximately
80% of the total book value of our leased assets at
September 30, 2007). We also offer our clients services
complementary to our leasing business, including services
relating to the management of their leased equipment base and
product upgrade services.
These divisions finance both Siemens and third-party equipment.
The associated Siemens products are delivered primarily by Med,
SIS and SBT. The Equipment Finance Europe/APAC division
increased its external business with flow and
small ticket leasing products, which involve leases
of relatively small amounts and with a high level of automation
and standardized procedures for such third-party products as
computers and office equipment.
Working capital finance. Through this
division, we purchase, without recourse, receivables from third
parties and from other Siemens Groups. The selling companies
remain responsible for collection and documentation. Our
portfolio consists primarily of trade receivables. Centralizing
a portion of the Siemens Groups receivables risk allows
Siemens to more effectively manage its overall receivables
exposure. Furthermore, this division offers asset-based lending
solutions.
Equity. This division structures financing for
infrastructure projects for which Siemens provides capital goods
and participates in those projects as an equity investor. At
September 30, 2007, the equity investment in these projects
amounted to approximately 3% of the total assets of SFS and 0.3%
of the total assets of Siemens. In recent
32
years, the Equity division has expanded its strategic focus from
power to healthcare and airports. Effective October 1,
2007, Siemens Venture Capital will be integrated into the Equity
division.
Project and Export Financing. This division
advises other Siemens Groups on project and sales financing
transactions. We have a global network of established contacts
with multi-lateral financial institutions, such as the World
Bank and the Asian Development Bank, as well as with national
development and export banks and export credit agencies, such as
Hermes in Germany and Export-Import Bank in the United States.
By offering our services to other Siemens Groups, we ensure that
they benefit from our in-house know-how and market presence. We
also provide advice, management and documentation services in
connection with guarantees issued by Siemens, related
principally to certain long-term contracts of the Operating
Groups.
Treasury and Financing Services. This division
provides services to Siemens Corporate Treasury, including
cash management and payment (including inter-company payments)
and capital-market financing. In addition, we pool and manage
interest rate and currency risk exposure of the Operating Groups
and, in the name and for the account of Siemens Corporate
Treasury, enter into derivative financial instruments with
third-party financial institutions to offset pooled exposures.
Derivative activities in the name of Siemens Corporate
Treasury are described under Item 11: Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk. We also
offer consulting services with respect to treasury activities to
third-party customers.
Investment Management. This division manages
pension assets for Siemens and other institutional clients and
mutual funds for employees in Germany and Austria.
Effective October 1, 2007, the Treasury and Financing
Services division and the Investment Management division will be
merged to form a new division called Treasury &
Investment Management.
Insurance. This division acts as a broker and
provides Siemens Groups with liability, property, marine and
project insurance brokerage coverage via third-party insurers.
We provide these services not only to Siemens business
Groups, but also to external customers. We also act as an
insurance agent in offering private insurance policies to
Siemens employees. With these employee-related activities,
Insurance also acts as agent for fund and mortgage based
products.
SFS main sources of risk are our external customers
credit risk and the risk associated with SFS equity
portfolio. Interest rate and currency exposures are typically
matched. The funding for SFS is provided by Siemens
Corporate Treasury.
Our competition mainly includes captive finance companies,
independent commercial finance companies and leasing/receivables
financing operations related to banks as well as asset
management companies. Particularly in the equipment finance
business, competition consists of many local players and differs
from country to country. However, there are a few international
competitors such as General Electric Commercial Finance, CIT
Group, Societe Generale Equipment Finance and De Lage Landen.
Lately, competition from these international players has
significantly increased, especially in the area of small ticket
business.
Siemens
Real Estate (SRE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
1.686 billion
|
|
External revenue as percentage of Siemens revenue
|
|
|
0.66%
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
228 million
|
|
SRE offers the operating Groups of Siemens a range of services
encompassing real estate development, real estate disposal and
asset management, as well as lease and services management. The
overall goal of our activities is to manage Siemens real
estate needs in a professional and cost effective way.
Asset Management is responsible for the active management
of SREs real estate portfolio. It provides property
management and leasing services to Siemens Groups and, to a
limited extent, to third-party lessees. These services include
the provision of owned and leased space, billing and collecting
lease payments and related charges such as
33
utilities and providing other general services of a landlord.
Furthermore, it arranges facilities services to Siemens Groups
and external tenants on an arms-length contract basis. The
services arranged include heating and cooling where applicable,
cleaning, maintenance, security, catering and a variety of other
services. Generally these facility management services are
subcontracted with third-party suppliers, thereby leveraging the
purchasing power of the entire Siemens group.
Development & Construction is responsible for
developing building rights, feasibility studies, masterplans and
corporate architecture, and for coordinating construction of
marketable office buildings, as well as providing consultancy
for factories.
Purchase & Sales is responsible for the sale of
land, buildings and other real estate property rights, as well
as for the purchase of real estate.
In addition to the foregoing, SRE performs the Siemens
wide governance role for all real estate related matters by
providing support in real estate decision-making, portfolio
analysis, economic analysis, development of financing
alternatives, market research, risk analysis and valuation and
similar services, including preparing recommendations for
divestitures.
The book value of Siemens worldwide land and buildings, at
September 30, 2007, amounted to approximately
4.465 billion, of which approximately half was
managed by SRE. The following table sets forth the key balance
sheet and statistical data for SRE:
SRE
Balance Sheet and Statistical Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
( and square meters in millions)
|
|
Total assets (in euros)
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
|
|
3,221
|
|
Real estate assets under management (in euros)
|
|
|
2,478
|
|
|
|
2,733
|
|
Total site area (in square meters)
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
Total building area (in square meters)
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
Over the past few years, operational adjustments by some
Siemens Groups resulted in the consolidation of Siemens
locations and the divestment by SRE of surplus property. We will
continue to divest surplus property over the next years.
Siemens
VDO Automotive (SV)
In July 2007, Siemens signed an agreement with Continental AG,
Hanover, Germany to sell the entire SV activities for a purchase
price of approximately 11.4 billion. The closing of
the transaction is subject to receipt of regulatory approvals
and other customary closing conditions and is expected in the
current calendar year. The assets and liabilities of SV are
presented as held for disposal on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets until the sale is completed, and the historical results
of SV will be reported as discontinued operations in the
Consolidated Statements of Income for all periods presented. For
additional information with respect to the sale of SV, see
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
SV designs, manufactures and sells integrated electrical,
electronic and electromechanical systems and modules and
individual components used in automotive applications. Our
product range includes components and systems used in automobile
powertrains, body electronic systems, safety and chassis
systems, electric motor drives, information and cockpit systems,
and driver information, communication and multimedia systems.
In fiscal 2007, we offered our systems and products in the
following four divisions:
|
|
|
|
|
Powertrain, including components, modules and systems for
engine and fuel management for gasoline and diesel engines,
control units and components for hybrid electric vehicles and
other alternative drives (e.g. gas and ethanol), transmission
control units, sensors, actuators and fuel supply systems;
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
Chassis & Safety, including active and passive
safety electronics systems, electronics for steering and braking
(e.g. electrical steering and electronic wedge brake), electric
motor drives for windows and sunroofs, for heating, ventilation
and engine cooling systems and for electronic braking systems;
|
|
|
|
Interior Electronics & Infotainment, including
complete cockpit systems and instrument clusters, human machine
interface and
head-up
displays, car audio, navigation, telematics and high-end
multimedia systems, as well as interior controls, e.g. for
keyless entry, climate and seat systems; and
|
|
|
|
Commercial Vehicles, including cockpit instruments and
other solutions for the drivers workplace, sensors and
control units for engine management, tachographs and on-board
units for tolling and other telematic products.
|
Most of our customers are large automobile manufacturers,
including four of the worlds five largest automobile
manufacturers. We also sell components to suppliers of complete
automotive systems and modules. Our car manufacturer customers
frequently contract a supplier to provide a system or set of
components for the production run of a particular car model or
engine line. In fiscal 2007, our ten largest customers together
accounted for more than 80% of our total sales.
As in past years, base materials and components accounted for
about half of the total cost of our products in fiscal 2007. We
rely on a few suppliers to provide us with most of our
semiconductors, other electronic components and some other base
materials and components. These suppliers include Infineon,
Philips and ST Microelectronics and Freescale for
semiconductors; and Tyco for wire housings and connectors.
For the last several years, automobile manufacturers and their
suppliers have been going through a period of significant change
and consolidation, and we expect this trend to continue.
Manufacturers, in an effort to achieve cost efficiencies and
ease of production, are using more pre-assembled systems and
modules instead of individual components. Systems and modules
integrate all of the components needed for major automotive
subsystems, such as the cockpit or vehicle safety systems. The
trend toward greater use of modules and systems has increased
pressure on suppliers of individual components and smaller
companies to combine or form alliances, resulting especially in
growing convergence of electronics and mechanical component
suppliers and making the industry more capital intensive.
In fiscal 2007, the worldwide mass market was again
characterized by low growth rates. Automobile production levels
either remained constant or declined in the Americas and Western
Europe. In the Asia-Pacific region, growth continued at a lesser
rate, influenced particularly by Chinese demand. The truck
market is still growing. Globalization and the opening of
markets to competition continue to put downward pressure on
prices. Customers that incorporate our products into their own
equipment make ever-greater demands on both our performance and
the quality of our products. In the current market environment,
many automobile manufacturers extract price and other
concessions from their suppliers, including SV.
We are a first-tier supplier to automobile manufacturers in
North America, South America and Asia. Our most significant
competitors are generalists with a broad product range, systems
integration capabilities and global presence. These include
Bosch, Toyotas Denso and the independent, former in-house
suppliers Visteon and Delphi, each of which is significantly
larger than we are. Moreover, in Europe and Asia, Denso, Visteon
and Delphi continue to be aggressive competitors and attempt to
gain market share outside their home countries. We face
increased competition from consumer electronics and IT firms
that are increasingly active in the area of automotive
electronics and from certain Japanese firms. Competition from
low-cost suppliers from Asia and Eastern Europe is increasing in
commodity products, such as electrical motors.
35
Employees
and Labor Relations
The following tables show the division of our employees by
business Group and geographic region as of September 30 for each
of the years shown:
Employees
by Business
Group(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Siemens IT Solutions and Services
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Automation and Drives
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Industrial Solutions and Services
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Siemens Building Technologies
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Power Generation
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Power Transmission and Distribution
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Transportation Systems
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Medical Solutions
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Osram
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Siemens Financial Services
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Siemens Real Estate
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other(2)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Continuing Operations.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes employees in corporate functions and services and
business units not allocated to any business Group.
|
Employees
by Geographic Region*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Europe (other than Germany)
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Africa, Near and Middle East, CIS
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A significant percentage of our manufacturing employees,
especially in Germany, are covered by collective bargaining
agreements determining working hours and other conditions of
employment, and are represented by works councils. Works
councils have numerous rights to notification and of
codetermination in personnel, social and economic matters. Under
the German Works Constitution Act
(Betriebsverfassungsgesetz), works councils are required
to be notified in advance of any proposed employee termination,
they must confirm hiring and relocations and similar matters,
and they have a right to codetermine social matters such as work
schedules and rules of conduct. Management considers its
relations with the works councils to be good.
During the last three years, we have not experienced any major
labor disputes resulting in work stoppages.
36
Environmental
Matters
In each of the jurisdictions in which we operate, Siemens is
subject to national and local environmental and health and
safety laws and regulations that affect our operations,
facilities, products, and, in particular, our former nuclear
power generation business. These laws and regulations impose
limitations on the discharge of pollutants into the air, soil
and water, establish standards for the treatment, storage and
disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Whenever necessary,
remediation and clean up measures are implemented and budgeted
accordingly. Because of our commitments to protecting the
environment and conservation and because we recognize that
leadership in environmental protection is an important
competitive factor in the marketplace, we have incurred
significant costs to comply with these laws and regulations and
we expect to continue to incur significant compliance costs in
the future.
In 1994, we closed a site in Hanau, Germany, that we had used
for the production of uranium and mixed-oxide fuel elements. A
smaller related site in Karlstein, where we operated a nuclear
research and service center, was closed in 1989. We are in the
process of cleaning up both facilities in accordance with the
German Atomic Energy Act. We have developed a plan to
decommission the facilities that involves the following steps:
clean-out, decontamination and disassembly of equipment and
installations, decontamination of the facilities and buildings,
sorting of radioactive materials and intermediate and final
storage of radioactive waste. This process will be supported by
ongoing engineering studies and radioactive sampling under the
supervision of German federal and state authorities. The German
Atomic Energy Act requires that radioactive waste be transported
to a government-developed storage facility, which, in our case,
we do not expect to be available until 2030. We expect that the
process of decontamination, disassembly and sorting of
radioactive waste will continue until 2011. We will be
responsible for storing the material until the
government-developed storage facility is available. With respect
to the Hanau facility, the process of setting up intermediate
storage for radioactive waste has neared completion; on
September 21, 2006 we received official notification from
the competent authorities that the Hanau facility has been
released from the scope of application of the German Atomic
Energy Act and that its further use is unrestricted under that
Act. However, the State of Hesse still requires us to monitor
the ground water until uranium levels consistently meet targets
set by the State. The ultimate costs of this project will
depend, in part, on where the government-developed storage
facility is located and when it becomes available. We have an
accrual of 597 million at September 30, 2007,
with respect to this matter. This accrual is based on a number
of significant estimates and assumptions as to the ultimate
costs of this project. We evaluated this amount to be adequate
to cover the present value of the costs associated with this
project, based on current estimates. For additional information,
see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Two Directives of the European Parliament and of the Council on
Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (2002/96/ECWEEE)
and on the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous
Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment
(2002/95/ECRoHS) have an impact on some of our products.
The WEEE-Directive regulates the collection, financing of the
collection, reuse and recycling of waste from many electrical
and electronic products, and the RoHS-Directive bans the use in
electrical and electronic equipment of certain hazardous
substances. We are complying with the required collection
schemes and financing of the collection of waste electrical and
electronic equipment from end users in accordance with the
WEEE-Directive and with the substance bans of the
RoHS-Directive. Both directives are currently under review by
the EU-Commission, which may lead to changes in the scope of the
WEEE-Directive and exemptions currently granted by the
RoHS-Directive that are not yet known in detail. Restrictions on
the use of certain substances comparable to those of the
RoHS-Directive are under discussion in several other states,
such as the U.S., Australia, Argentina, China and South Korea.
The Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and
of the Council of December 18, 2006 concerning the
Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of
Chemicals (REACH), which entered into force in part on
June 1, 2007, has a certain impact on our business. We do
not expect the existing and the upcoming product related
regulations (REACH, WEEE, RoHS and similar) to have a material
adverse affect on our results of operations or financial
condition.
A significant number of our production sites are affected by the
EU-Directive (2004/35/CE) addressing the prevention and
remediation of environmental damage. In addition to the
previously applicable remediation measures, the directive
requires remediation for damage to protected species and natural
habitats. However, the
37
directive applies for damages caused by emissions made after
2007. We have obtained insurance coverage which is available in
the market for the increased risks.
It is our policy to comply with environmental requirements and
to provide workplaces for employees that are safe,
environmentally sound, and that do not adversely affect the
health or environment of their communities. We have obtained all
material environmental permits required for our operations and
all material environmental authorizations required for our
products. In fiscal 2007, as in previous years, we conducted an
audit of our environmental compliance, and on that basis we
believe that we are in substantial compliance with all
environmental and health and safety laws and regulations. In
principle, however, there is a risk that we may incur
expenditures significantly in excess of our expectations to
cover environmental liabilities, to maintain compliance with
current or future environmental and health and safety laws and
regulations and/or to undertake any necessary remediation.
Property
Siemens and its consolidated subsidiaries have, as of
September 30, 2007, approximately 253 production and
manufacturing facilities (more than 50% production space ratio)
throughout the world. Approximately 97 of these are located in
Europe, with approximately 44 in Germany, and approximately 117
are located in the Americas, with approximately 92 in the United
States. We also have 38 facilities in Asia. Siemens also owns or
leases other properties including office buildings, warehouses,
research and development facilities and sales offices in
approximately 190 countries.
Siemens principal executive offices are located in Munich,
Germany.
None of our properties in Germany is subject to mortgages or
other security interests granted to secure indebtedness to
financial institutions. We have granted security interests in
other jurisdictions.
We believe that our current facilities are in good condition and
adequate to meet the requirements of our present and foreseeable
future operations.
Intellectual
Property
Siemens as a whole has several thousand patents and licenses,
and research and development is a priority on a Siemens-wide and
business Group basis. For a discussion of the main focus of our
current research and development efforts of each business Group,
see Item 5: Operating and Financial Review and
ProspectsBusiness OverviewResearch and
Development. Siemens also has many thousand trademark
registrations worldwide. However, neither the Company, nor any
of our business Groups, are dependent on any single patent,
license or trademark or any group of related patents, licenses
or trademarks.
Legal
Proceedings
Public prosecutors and other government authorities in
jurisdictions around the world are conducting investigations of
Siemens and certain of our current and former employees
regarding allegations of public corruption, including criminal
breaches of fiduciary duty including embezzlement, as well as
bribery, money laundering and tax evasion, among others. These
investigations involve allegations of corruption at a number of
Siemens business Groups.
The Munich public prosecutor continues to conduct an
investigation of certain current and former employees of the
Company on suspicion of criminal breaches of fiduciary duty
including embezzlement, as well as bribery and tax evasion. To
date, the Munich prosecutor has conducted searches of Company
premises and private homes and several arrest warrants have been
issued for current and former employees, including former
members of senior management, who are or were associated with
the former Com Group and the Company. In addition, the Munich
prosecutor has recently sought and received information from two
German subsidiaries of the Company in connection with an
investigation of allegations of criminal breach of fiduciary
duty against a former employee and unnamed others.
38
On October 4, 2007, pursuant to the application of the
Munich prosecutor, the Munich district court imposed a fine of
201 million on Siemens. According to the courts
decision, a former manager of the former Com Group committed
bribery of foreign public officials in Russia, Nigeria and Libya
in 77 cases during the period from 2001 to 2004 for the purpose
of obtaining contracts on behalf of the Company, whereby he
acted in concert with others. In determining the fine, the court
based its decision on unlawfully obtained economic advantages in
the amount of at least 200 million which the court
determined the Company had derived from illegal acts of the
former employee, to which an additional fine in the amount of
1 million was added.
The decision of the Munich district court and the settlement
(tatsächliche Verständigung) entered into the
same day with the German tax authorities, which is described in
Item 5: Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects Financial Impact of Compliance Matters,
conclude the German investigations into illegal conduct and tax
violations only as they relate to Siemens AG and only as to the
former Com Group.
As previously reported, there are ongoing investigations in
Switzerland, Italy, and Greece. These investigations relate to
allegations that certain current and former employees of the
former Com Group opened slush fund accounts abroad and operated
a system to misappropriate funds from the Company and,
specifically, that these individuals siphoned off money from Com
via off-shore companies and their own accounts in Switzerland
and Liechtenstein. The Company has learned that Liechtenstein
prosecutors have transferred their investigation to Swiss and
Munich prosecutors.
As previously reported, Milan and Darmstadt prosecutors have
been investigating allegations that former Siemens employees
provided improper benefits to former employees of Enel in
connection with Enel contracts. In Italy, legal proceedings
against two former employees ended when the
patteggiamento (plea bargaining procedure
without the admission of guilt or responsibility) by the charged
employees and Siemens AG entered into force in November 2006.
Prosecutors in Darmstadt brought charges against two other
former employees not covered by the
patteggiamento. In May 2007, the Regional
Court of Darmstadt sentenced one former employee to two years in
prison, suspended on probation, on counts of commercial bribery
and embezzlement. Another former employee was sentenced to nine
months in prison, suspended on probation, on counts of aiding
and abetting commercial bribery. In connection with these
sentences, Siemens AG was ordered to disgorge
38 million of profits. The prosecutors and both
defendants have appealed the decision of the Regional Court of
Darmstadt. Siemens AG has also appealed the decision with
respect to the disgorgement.
As previously reported, in 2004 the public prosecutor in
Wuppertal initiated an investigation against Siemens employees
regarding allegations that they participated in bribery related
to the awarding of an EU contract for the refurbishment of a
power plant in Serbia in 2002. In August 2007, the public
prosecutor conducted searches of the premises of the PG Group in
Erlangen, Offenbach and Karlsruhe in relation to this
investigation. The investigation is ongoing.
In addition, there is a significant number of ongoing
investigations into allegations of public corruption involving
the Company, certain of our current and former employees or
projects in which the Company is involved in a number of
jurisdictions around the world, including China, Hungary,
Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Nigeria, Norway and Russia, among
others. Specific examples include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
There are currently numerous public corruption-related
governmental investigations in China, involving several
divisions of Siemens Ltd. China, primarily Med, but also
A&D and SIS. The investigations have been initiated by
prosecutors in several regions and provinces, including
Guangdong, Jilin, Xian, Wuxi, Shanghai, Ting Hu, Shandong,
Hunan, and Guiyang.
|
|
|
|
Siemens Zrt. Hungary and certain of its employees are being
investigated by Hungarian authorities in connection with
allegations concerning suspicious payments in connection with
consulting agreements with a variety of shell corporations and
bribery relating to the awarding of a contract for the delivery
of communication equipment to the Hungarian Armed Forces.
|
|
|
|
The public prosecutor in Kalimantan Province, Indonesia, has
charged the head of the Med division of Siemens PT Indonesia in
connection with allegations that he participated in bribery,
fraud, and overcharging related to the awarding of a contract
for the delivery of medical equipment to a hospital in 2003.
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
Authorities in Nigeria have conducted a search of Siemens
premises in connection with an investigation into alleged
illegal payments.
|
|
|
|
The Norwegian government is investigating allegations of bribery
and overcharging of the Norwegian Department of Defense related
to the awarding of a contract for the delivery of communication
equipment in 2001.
|
|
|
|
The public prosecutor in Milan is investigating allegations as
to whether two employees of Siemens S.p.A. made illegal payments
to employees of the state-owned gas and power group ENI.
|
As previously reported, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is
conducting an investigation of possible criminal violations of
U.S. law by Siemens in connection with the matters described
above and other allegations of corruption. During the second
quarter of fiscal 2007, Siemens was advised that the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) enforcement
division had converted its informal inquiry into these matters
into a formal investigation. The Company is cooperating with
these investigations.
The SEC and the DOJ are also investigating possible violations
of U.S. law by Siemens in connection with the
Oil-for-Food
Program. The Company is cooperating with the SEC and DOJ. A
French investigating magistrate commenced a preliminary
investigation regarding the participation of French companies,
including Siemens France S.A.S., in the
Oil-for-Food
Program. German prosecutors also began an investigation in this
matter and conducted searches of Company premises and private
homes in Erlangen and Berlin in August 2007. Siemens is
cooperating with the authorities in France and Germany.
As a result of the above described matters and as a part of its
policy of cooperation, Siemens contacted the World Bank and
offered to assist the World Bank in any matter that might be of
interest to the World Bank. Since that time, Siemens has been in
contact with the World Bank Department of Institutional
Integrity and intends to continue its policy of cooperation.
In February 2007, the Company announced that public prosecutors
in Nuremberg are conducting an investigation of certain current
and former employees of the Company on suspicion of criminal
breach of fiduciary duties against Siemens, tax evasion and a
violation of the German Works Council Constitution Act
(Betriebsverfassungsgesetz). The investigation relates to
an agreement entered into by Siemens with an entity controlled
by the former head of the independent employee association AUB
(Arbeitsgemeinschaft Unabhängiger
Betriebsangehöriger). The prosecutors are investigating
payments made during the period 2001 to 2006 for which Siemens
may not have received commensurate services in return. The
former head of AUB was arrested in February 2007. Since
February, searches have been conducted at several Siemens AG
premises and private homes and an arrest warrant was issued for
a member of the Managing Board, in connection with this
investigation, who was taken into custody. This executives
term has expired and he therefore is no longer a member of the
Managing Board. In addition to this former member of the
Managing Board, other current and former members of the
Companys senior management have been named as suspects in
this matter. In April 2007, the former member of the Managing
Board posted bail in the amount of 5 million and was
released from custody. In this connection, a bank issued a bond
(Bankbürgschaft) in the amount of
5 million, 4.5 million of which was
guaranteed by the Company pursuant to provisions of German law.
The former member of the Managing Board has provided the Company
a personal undertaking to cooperate with and fully support the
independent investigation conducted by Debevoise &
Plimpton LLP (Debevoise), as described below, and to repay all
costs incurred and payments made by the Company in connection
with the bank guarantee in the event he is found to have
violated his obligations to the Company in connection with the
facts under investigation by the Nuremberg prosecutors. The
investigation into the allegations involving the Companys
relationship with the former head of AUB and the AUB has also
been included within the scope of the investigation being
conducted by Debevoise. In April 2007, the labor union IG Metall
lodged a criminal complaint against unknown individuals on
suspicion that the Company breached the provisions of
Section 119 of the Works Council Constitution Act by
providing undue preferential support to AUB in connection with
elections of the members of the Companys works councils.
In February 2007, an alleged holder of American Depositary
Shares of the Company filed a derivative lawsuit with the
Supreme Court of the State of New York against certain current
and former members of the Companys
40
Managing and Supervisory Boards as well as against the Company
as a nominal defendant, seeking various forms of relief relating
to the allegations of corruption and related violations at
Siemens. The suit is currently stayed.
The Company has engaged Debevoise, an independent external law
firm, to conduct an independent and comprehensive investigation
to determine whether anti-corruption regulations have been
violated and to conduct an independent and comprehensive
assessment of the compliance and control systems of Siemens.
Debevoise reports directly and exclusively to the Compliance
Committee of the Supervisory Board (see Item 10:
Additional InformationManagement and Control
StructureThe Supervisory Board) and is being
assisted by forensic accountants from the international
accounting firm Deloitte & Touche. Debevoises
investigation of allegations of corruption at the former Com
Group, the Companys other Groups and at regional Siemens
subsidiaries is ongoing. Information on the financial impact of
compliance matters is provided under Item 5:
Operating and Financial Review and
ProspectsFinancial Impact of Compliance Matters.
We have taken a number of significant steps to improve our
compliance procedures and internal controls in response to the
allegations of corruption. We are continuing to improve and
implement our anti-corruption program and related controls.
Please refer to Item 15: Control and Procedures
for a description of the initiatives we have implemented or are
in the process of implementing.
In addition to the proceedings described above, we are also
involved in a number of anti-trust and other legal proceedings:
A Mexican governmental control authority barred Siemens Mexico
from bidding on public contracts for a period of three years and
nine months beginning November 30, 2005. This proceeding
arose from allegations that Siemens Mexico did not disclose
alleged minor tax discrepancies when it was signing a public
contract in 2002. Upon appeal by Siemens Mexico, the execution
of the debarment was stayed on December 13, 2005 and
subsequently reduced to a period of four months. Upon further
appeal, the execution of the reduced debarment was stayed by the
competent Mexican court in April 2006. A final decision on the
appeal has not yet been announced.
In February 2007, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. (SMS)
announced that it had reached an agreement with the U.S.
Attorneys Office for the Northern District of Illinois to
settle allegations made in an indictment filed in January 2006.
The agreement resolves all allegations made against SMS in the
indictment. Under the agreement, SMS has pled guilty to a single
federal criminal charge of obstruction of justice in connection
with civil litigation that followed a bid to provide radiology
equipment to Cook County Hospital in 2001. In addition, SMS has
agreed to pay a fine of $1 million and restitution of
approximately $1.5 million.
In December 2006, the Japanese Fair Trade Commission (FTC)
searched the offices of more than ten producers and dealers of
healthcare equipment, including Siemens Asahi Medical
Technologies Ltd., in connection with an investigation into
possible anti-trust violations. Siemens Asahi Medical
Technologies is cooperating with the FTC in the ongoing
investigation.
In February 2007, the French Competition Authority launched an
investigation into possible anti-trust violations involving
several companies active in the field of suburban trains,
including Siemens Transportation Systems S.A.S. in Paris, and
the offices were searched. The Company is cooperating with the
French Competition Authority.
In February 2007, the Norwegian Competition Authority launched
an investigation into possible anti-trust violations involving
Norwegian companies active in the field of fire security,
including Siemens Building Technologies AS. The Company is
cooperating in the ongoing investigation with the Norwegian
Competition Authority. The Norwegian Competition Authority has
not yet announced a schedule for the completion of the
investigation.
In February 2007, the European Commission launched an
investigation into possible anti-trust violations involving
European producers of power transformers, including Siemens AG
and VA Tech, which Siemens acquired in July 2005. The German
Anti-trust Authority (Bundeskartellamt) has become
involved in the proceeding and is responsible for investigating
those allegations which relate to the German market. Power
transformers are electrical equipment used as major components
in electric transmission systems in order to adapt voltages. The
Company is
41
cooperating in the ongoing investigation with the European
Commission and the German Anti-trust Authority. The European
Commission and the German Anti-trust Authority have not yet
announced a schedule for the completion of their investigation.
In April 2007, Siemens AG and VA Tech filed actions before the
European Court of First Instance in Luxemburg against the
decisions of the European Commission dated January 24,
2007, to fine Siemens and VA Tech for alleged anti-trust
violations in the European Market of high-voltage gas-insulated
switchgear between 1988 and 2004. Gas-insulated switchgear is
electrical equipment used as a major component for turnkey power
substations. The fine imposed on Siemens amounted to
396.6 million. The fine imposed on VA Tech, which
Siemens AG acquired in July 2005, amounted to
22.1 million. VA Tech was declared jointly liable
with Schneider Electric for a separate fine of
4.5 million. The European Court of First Instance has
not yet issued a decision. Furthermore, authorities in Brazil,
New Zealand, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and South Africa are
conducting investigations into the same possible anti-trust
violations. On October 25, 2007, upon the Companys
appeal, a Hungarian competition court reduced administrative
fines imposed on Siemens AG from 320,000 to 120,000
and from 640,000 to 110,000 regarding VA Tech. We
have appealed this decision.
In April 2007, the Polish Competition Authority launched an
investigation against Siemens Sp. z o.o. Poland regarding
possible anti-trust violations in the market for the maintenance
of diagnostic medical equipment. The Company is cooperating in
the ongoing investigation with the Polish Competition Authority.
In June 2007, the Turkish Anti-trust Agency confirmed its
earlier decision to impose a fine of approximately
6 million on Siemens AS Turkey based on alleged
anti-trust violations in the traffic lights market. Siemens
Turkey has appealed this decision and this appeal is still
pending. It is possible that as a result of this decision,
Siemens could be debarred from participating in public sector
tender offers in Turkey for a one- to two-year period.
The Company requested arbitration against the Republic of
Argentina before the International Center for Settlement of
Investment Disputes (ICSID) of the World Bank. The Company
claimed that Argentina unlawfully terminated the Companys
contract for the development and operation of a system for the
production of identity cards, border control, collection of data
and voters registers and thereby violated the Bilateral
Investment Protection Treaty between Argentina and Germany
(BIT). The Company sought damages for expropriation and
violation of the BIT of approximately $500 million.
Argentina disputed jurisdiction of the ICSID arbitration
tribunal and argued in favor of jurisdiction of the Argentine
administrative courts. The arbitration tribunal rendered a
decision on August 4, 2004, finding that it had
jurisdiction over Siemens claims and that Siemens was
entitled to present its claims. A hearing on the merits of the
case took place before the ICSID arbitration tribunal in
Washington in October 2005. A unanimous decision on the merits
was rendered on February 6, 2007, awarding Siemens
compensation in the amount of $217.8 million on account of
the value of its investment and consequential damages, plus
compound interest thereon at a rate of 2.66% since May 18,
2001. The tribunal also ruled that Argentina is obligated to
indemnify Siemens against any claims of subcontractors in
relation to the project (amounting to approximately
$44 million) and, furthermore, that Argentina would be
obligated to pay Siemens the full amount of the contract
performance bond ($20 million) in the event this bond was
not returned within the time period set by the tribunal (which
period subsequently elapsed without delivery). On June 4,
2007, Argentina filed with the ICSID an application for the
annulment and stay of enforcement of the award, alleging serious
procedural irregularities. An ad hoc committee has been
appointed to consider Argentinas application. Siemens
currently expects that the ad hoc committee will not render a
decision before 2009.
Siemens AG and its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in
various other legal actions and proceedings arising in
connection with their activities as a global diversified group.
Some of these pending proceedings have been previously
disclosed. Some of the legal actions include claims for
substantial compensatory or punitive damages or claims for
indeterminate amounts of damages. Siemens is from time to time
also involved in regulatory investigations beyond those
described above. Siemens is cooperating with the relevant
authorities in several jurisdictions and, where appropriate,
conducts internal investigations regarding potential wrongdoing
with the assistance of in-house and external counsel. Given the
number of legal actions and other proceedings to which Siemens
is subject, some may result in adverse decisions. Siemens
contests actions and proceedings when it considers it
appropriate. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting
the outcome of such matters, particularly in cases in which
claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages, Siemens
often cannot predict what the eventual
42
loss or range of loss related to such matters will be. Although
the final resolution of these matters could have a material
effect on Siemens consolidated operating results for any
reporting period in which an adverse decision is rendered,
Siemens believes that its consolidated financial position should
not be materially affected by the matters discussed in this
paragraph.
ITEM 4A: UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
43
ITEM 5: OPERATING
AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
Introduction
This
Form 20-F
contains forward-looking statements and informationthat
is, statements related to future, not past, events. These
statements may be identified by words such as
expects, looks forward to,
anticipates, intends, plans,
believes, seeks, estimates,
will, project or words of similar
meaning. Such statements are based on our current expectations
and certain assumptions, and are, therefore, subject to certain
risks and uncertainties. A variety of factors, many of which are
beyond Siemens control, affect our operations,
performance, business strategy and results and could cause the
actual results, performance or achievements of Siemens to be
materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements that may be expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. For us, particular uncertainties
arise, among others, from: the factors listed above under
Item 3: Key InformationRisk Factors;
changes in general economic and business conditions (including
margin developments in major business areas); the challenges of
integrating major acquisitions and implementing joint ventures
and other significant portfolio measures; changes in currency
exchange rates and interest rates; introduction of competing
products or technologies by other companies; lack of acceptance
of new products or services by customers targeted by Siemens;
changes in business strategy; the outcome of pending
investigations and legal proceedings, especially the corruption
investigation we are currently subject to in Germany, the United
States and elsewhere; the potential impact of such
investigations and proceedings on our ongoing business including
our relationships with governments and other customers; the
potential impact of such matters on our financial statements; as
well as various other factors. More detailed information about
certain of these factors is contained throughout this report and
in our other filings with the SEC, which are available on the
Siemens website, www.siemens.com, and on the SECs website,
www.sec.gov. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties
materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect,
actual results may vary materially from those described in the
relevant forward-looking statement as expected, anticipated,
intended, planned, believed, sought, estimated or projected.
Siemens does not intend or assume any obligation to update or
revise these forward-looking statements in light of developments
which differ from those anticipated.
44
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
The following discussion of our financial condition and results
of operations should be read in conjunction with our
Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes prepared
in accordance with IFRS as described in Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements as of, and for the years
ended, September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005. In addition to
its primary financial reporting for fiscal 2006 under U.S. GAAP,
in December 2006 the Company also published its first IFRS
Consolidated Financial Statements (IFRS Consolidated Financial
Statements as of September 30, 2006). These IFRS
Consolidated Financial Statements were presented as supplemental
information and serve as a basis for Siemens primary IFRS
reporting beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2007. IFRS
differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. For a
discussion of the major differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP,
a reconciliation of net income and shareholders equity to
U.S. GAAP and information concerning the use of exceptions
permitted or required by IFRS 1, see Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In this report, we present a number of financial measures that
are or may be non-GAAP financial measures as defined
in the rules of the SEC. The following discussion explains these
non-GAAP financial measures and the reasons why we believe that
they provide useful information to investors. Measures bearing
the same or similar names disclosed by other companies may be
calculated differently and therefore may not be directly
comparable to the measures discussed below. None of the measures
discussed below should be viewed in isolation as alternatives to
measures of our financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows as presented in accordance with IFRS in our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Currency translation effects and portfolio
effectsThe comparability of our Consolidated Financial
Statements between different periods is affected by currency
translation effects resulting from our international operations.
In fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, foreign currency translation
effects impacted our results arising from the comparison of the
euro, in which our Consolidated Financial Statements are
denominated, to other currencies, most notably the U.S. dollar
and to a lesser extent the British pound. All of our business
Groups are subject to foreign currency translation effects;
however, some are particularly affected since they generate a
significant portion of their operations through subsidiaries
whose results are subject to foreign currency translation
effects, particularly in the U.S. In this report, we present, on
a worldwide basis and for our business Groups, the percentage
change in orders and revenue as adjusted for currency
translation effects and portfolio effects (i.e. the effects of
acquisitions and dispositions). We believe that meaningful
analysis of trends in orders and revenue from one year to the
next requires an understanding of these factors and accordingly
our management considers these factors in its management of our
business. For this reason, we believe that investors may find it
useful to have portfolio effects and currency translation
effects quantified and to consider the percentage change in
orders and revenue as adjusted
45
for these effects. Percentage changes in orders and revenue as
adjusted for currency translation effects and portfolio effects
should not be viewed in isolation as an alternative to the
corresponding unadjusted percentage changes in orders and
revenue. For significant quantitative effects of currency
translation and portfolio effects on revenue of the Company and
for our business Groups, see Fiscal 2007 Compared to
Fiscal 2006 and Fiscal 2006 Compared to Fiscal
2005. For additional information on foreign currency
translation, see Item 11: Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosure About Market RiskForeign Currency
Exchange Rate Risk and Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements. In addition, the effect of
acquisitions and dispositions on our consolidated revenues and
expenses also affects the comparability of our Consolidated
Financial Statements between different periods.
Free Cash FlowIn this report, we present free
cash flow, which we define as net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities less additions to intangible assets and
property, plant and equipment. We believe this measure is
helpful to investors to compare cash generation among the Groups.
46
Business
overview and Economic Environment
Fiscal
2007 Highlights
Fiscal 2007 was an eventful year that closed with one of
Siemens best operating quarters in history. Net income
rose 21% and earnings per share for the year rose 20% compared
to fiscal 2006, we exceeded our targets for revenue and order
growth, and profitability increased strongly throughout
Operations. We also completed the repurchase of the remaining
outstanding amount of a 2.5 billion convertible bond
issue which reduced dilution for Siemens shareholders by nearly
35 million shares. We expect the positive development of
Siemens to continue in the coming two fiscal years with revenue
growing by at least twice the rate of global gross domestic
product (GDP) and Group profit from Operations to grow at least
twice as fast as our revenue.
Higher net income and EPS. Siemens net
income in fiscal 2007 was 4.038 billion, a 21%
increase over 3.345 billion a year earlier. Earnings
per share (EPS) was 4.24, up from 3.52 in fiscal
2006. Net income in the current year was reduced by substantial
corporate costs associated with legal and regulatory matters,
which are discussed below. In addition, tax expense associated
with the carve-out of Siemens VDO Automotive (SV) reduced net
income by approximately 1.1 billion. This expense was
booked at SV when it was determined to be held for disposal and
therefore part of discontinued operations. Furthermore
discontinued operations included a preliminary non-cash pre-tax
gain of 1.6 billion generated by the transfer of the
former Communications Groups carrier-related businesses
into Nokia Siemens Networks B.V. (NSN). Discontinued operations
overall contributed 129 million to net income in
fiscal 2007 compared to 703 million a year earlier.
More detail on discontinued operations is provided below.
Increased profitability. Income from
continuing operations was 3.909 billion for the year,
48% higher than a year earlier. Basic and diluted EPS on a
continuing basis rose to 4.13 and 3.99,
respectively, compared to 2.78 and 2.77 a year
earlier. These increases were due to Group profit from
Operations, which climbed 70%
year-over-year
to 6.560 billion, even with negative equity
investment income of 429 million related to NSN,
which was formed by Nokia Corporation (Nokia) and Siemens in
April 2007. All Groups in Operations increased their Group
profit and Group profit margin. Automation and Drives
(A&D), Power Generation (PG), Medical Solutions (Med) and
Power Transmission and Distribution (PTD) had the highest levels
of Group profit. Siemens IT Solutions and Services (SIS)
benefited strongly from severance programs in fiscal 2006
totaling 576 million, and recorded Group profit of
252 million for the current year compared to a loss
of 731 million in the prior year.
Rapid growth in Group profit more than offset a significant
increase in Corporate items, pensions and eliminations
year-over-year,
which rose from a negative 527 million in fiscal 2006 to a
negative 1.672 billion in the current year. The
change is due primarily to the legal and regulatory matters
discussed below.
Earnings at Financing and Real Estate rose to
557 million for fiscal 2007, from
421 million a year earlier. Corporate Treasury
activities contributed earnings of 153 million
compared to a loss of 18 million in the same period a
year earlier, which includes a 143 million net
negative effect related to
mark-to-market
valuation of a cash settlement option associated with the
2.5 billion convertible bond issued in 2003. This
option was irrevocably waived in the third quarter of fiscal
2006, effectively eliminating subsequent earnings effects.
Strong global growth. Our revenue increased 9%
year-over-year,
to 72.448 billion, with higher revenue in every
region of the world. Both revenue and orders include new
business from acquisitions, particularly at Med and A&D,
which largely offset negative effects from currency translation
involving the U.S. dollar. On an organic basis (that is
excluding the net effect of currency translation and portfolio
transactions), revenue grew 10%. All our operating Groups
increased revenue organically
year-over-year,
highlighted by double-digit rises at A&D, PG and PTD.
Orders grew even faster, rising 12% to
83.916 billion, with double-digit increases at PG,
PTD, A&D, Industrial Services and Solutions (I&S) and
Med. On an organic basis, orders rose 13%
year-over-year.
Higher cash flows. Net cash provided by
operating activities was 7.328 billion in fiscal
2007, compared to 5.659 billion a year earlier. We
generated 6.755 billion in free cash flow (defined as
net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less
additions to intangible assets and property, plant and
equipment) from continuing operations in fiscal 2007, well above
1.820 billion in free cash flow a year earlier.
47
Completion of Fit4More. Many of our financial
and operating highlights during fiscal 2007 stem directly from
our multi-year Fit4More program, which we brought to a
successful close in the second quarter. In addition to setting
the growth and profitability targets mentioned above, Fit4More
also focused our business portfolio on strategic global markets
such as industrial infrastructure, energy, and healthcare. In
fiscal 2007, we exited the automotive market via the carve-out
of SV, with a sale to Continental expected to close in the first
quarter of fiscal 2008. We also transferred our former
telecommunications infrastructure businesses into NSN, and are
in the process of divesting our enterprise networking business
which is reported within discontinued operations. Meanwhile, we
completed or announced major acquisitions that add a successful
in-vitro healthcare diagnostics business to complement our
existing portfolio of diagnostics imaging solutions. In our
factory automation business, we added important product
life-cycle management (PLM) software capabilities. We also
reoriented our IT consulting and outsourcing business, combining
it with other strategic IT units within Siemens, and moving it
into the SIS Group.
At the completion of Fit4More we announced Fit for
2010, a new program that is founded on the same
performance pillars as Fit4More, including goals for
profitability and growth.
Progress with legal and regulatory matters. We
made substantial progress during the year in addressing issues
related to investigations of past misconduct by Siemens
employees. We take these matters very seriously and engaged them
vigorously as a top priority throughout the year. We gave
significant management attention and retained highly regarded
outside experts to help us cooperate fully with outside
investigations, conduct our own internal investigations, and act
upon the results of these investigations. We also issued
detailed, comprehensive public disclosures on these topics at
various points during the year. Taking continuing and
discontinued operations together, expenses for outside advisors
engaged by Siemens in connection with the investigations as well
as remediation activities totaled 347 million in
fiscal 2007, and we expect further expenses in fiscal 2008.
We paid a number of penalties related to the completion of
outside investigations during the year. These include European
Commission antitrust penalties related to gas-insulated
switchgear and a fine paid to German authorities related to past
actions at Com. Meanwhile we conducted our own internal
investigations throughout Siemens, particularly to identify
questionable payments made to outside parties under Business
Consulting Agreements (BCAs). We identified a substantial sum of
these payments, determined how much of the total of these
payments had been incorrectly booked as tax-deductible business
expenses, and adjusted the comparative amounts for fiscal 2005
and 2006 in the Consolidated Financial Statements included in
this report. Including the expenses associated with internal and
external investigations and the penalties mentioned above, the
total expense within Corporate items associated with legal and
regulatory matters during fiscal 2007 was
843 million. For more information with respect to
these legal and regulatory matters, see Legal
Proceedings.
Dividend. The Siemens Managing Board and
Supervisory Board have proposed a dividend of 1.60 per
share. The dividend in the prior year was 1.45.
Strategic
Overview
Our competitive strategy is to innovate through research and
development (R&D), improve our business portfolio to bring
that innovation to market on a global basis, and back these
efforts with a strong financial condition.
We continually balance our business portfolio to maintain our
leadership in established markets while penetrating new markets.
In some cases this involves acquiring complementary technology
that enables us to offer more complete solutions. We also use
acquisitions to gain scale in both established and new regional
markets. In fiscal 2007, we pursued both strategies, and also
exited or reduced our participation in markets that did not
belong to our focus areas. Major transactions included the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2007, we acquired the Diagnostics division of Bayer
AG, headquartered in the U.S. We integrated this business into
our own Diagnostics division at Med, following the fiscal 2006
acquisition of Diagnostic Products Corporation (DPC) in the
U.S., a leading provider of in vitro immunodiagnostics
solutions. We expect the Bayer transaction to significantly
strengthen our position in in-vitro diagnostics, a high-growth
segment of the healthcare market.
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2007, we transferred our mobile and fixed-line carrier
networks businesses into NSN. Our enterprise networks business
is held for disposal.
|
|
|
|
In May 2007, we acquired
U.S.-based
UGS Corp., one of the leading providers of product lifecycle
management (PLM) software and services for manufacturers. We
expect this transaction to complement and extend our existing
software capabilities in the factory automation industry, which
increasingly integrates information technology (IT) into
manufacturing facilities and processes.
|
|
|
|
In July 2007, we announced an agreement to acquire
U.S.-based
Dade Behring Holdings, Inc. (Dade Behring), a leading clinical
laboratory diagnostics company. The transaction closed in the
first quarter of fiscal 2008. We intend to integrate this
acquisition into the Diagnostics division at Med, making Siemens
the worlds first fully integrated diagnostics provider
with solutions for in-vitro diagnostics, in-vivo imaging, and
data- and image-management software.
|
|
|
|
In July 2007, we signed an agreement with Continental AG,
Hanover, Germany, to sell our entire SV activities. These
business activities are reported in discontinued operations for
both the current and prior periods.
|
We further improved our business portfolio in fiscal 2007
through smaller acquisitions and divestments. For a detailed
discussion of our acquisitions, dispositions and discontinued
operations, see Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Siemens operates in approximately 190 countries, making us one
of the most global companies in the world. In fiscal 2007, our
business outside Germany accounted for nearly
60 billion in revenues, representing 83% of total
revenue. In particular, we expanded our business in Europe and
Asia-Pacific at more than twice the rate of GDP growth in these
regions. Revenue rose even faster in the smaller Africa, Near
and Middle East, Commonwealth of Independent States region,
which grew to account for nearly 10% of our revenues in fiscal
2007.
We support our competitive strategy with all our corporate
resources, including our Financing and Real Estate Groups and
our Corporate Treasury which provide important capabilities for
financing and managing our assets. We also manage the capital
structure in our balance sheet to ensure cost-effective access
to the capital we need for building our business and sustaining
profitable growth that creates value for shareholders.
Worldwide
Economic Environment
According to estimates of Global Insight, Inc., gross domestic
product (GDP) in 2007 is expected to grow 3.6% on a global
basis. The decline compared to GDP growth of 3.9% in 2006 is due
to rising oil prices and higher interest rates among other
factors.
Europe is expected to experience a decline to 2.9% GDP growth in
2007 compared to 3.2% in 2006. Within Europe, 2.7% GDP expansion
is anticipated for the Western Europe nations, down from 3.0% in
2006, as the cooler global economy and a stronger euro combine
to weigh on export growth. In Germany, the appreciation of the
euro and higher taxes are expected to slow GDP growth to 2.6%
for the year, down from 2.9% a year earlier. As in 2006, the
economies of Central and Eastern Europe are expected to grow
faster than Europe overall, with aggregate GDP growth of 6.1%.
This represents a slight slowing from 6.3% in 2006.
In the Americas, GDP growth is expected to fall to 2.5% in 2007
from 3.2% in 2006, primarily because of a decline in U.S.
economic growth from 2.9% in 2006 to 2.0% in 2007. Among the
factors that are slowing growth of the U.S. economy are
downturns in real estate and housing construction, which are
eroding consumer spending as well as employment in construction
and related industries and uncertainty in financial markets
following large write-downs by major banks relating to exposures
to sub-prime
mortgage. While strong global demand for raw materials is
expected to support GDP growth of 4.8% in Latin America, that
level would still represent a decline from 5.0% in 2006.
In contrast, GDP growth is expected to rise to 5.7% in
Asia-Pacific, from 5.5% in 2006, with China and India continuing
as the primary growth engines. China is expected to expand GDP
by 11.5% in 2007, benefiting from booming infrastructure
investment, strong export industries, and significantly
increased participation in Chinese
49
equity markets by domestic households with globally high rates
of income savings. India is expected to post GDP growth rate of
8.8% in 2007, down from 9.4% in 2006, as the country develops
its manufacturing and construction industries and broadens its
service sector to complement its established strength in IT
outsourcing.
GDP growth for the region comprising Africa, the Near and Middle
East and the Commonwealth of Independent States (C.I.S.) is
anticipated to reach 6.6% in 2007, above last years growth
rate of 6.3%, as the countries of the region continue to benefit
from strong global demand for oil and raw materials.
Market
Development
The market for electronics and electrical engineering solutions
and infrastructure remained strong in 2007, with particular
interest in advanced technologies that could provide cleaner and
more efficient energy, increase manufacturing production
efficiency, improve diagnostic and preventive healthcare and
enhance transportation.
Siemens portfolio focus positioned it well to meet
customer demands in all these areas. Strong demand for
infrastructure investments, e.g. by the worlds emerging
and developing economies and oil-producing nations expanded the
opportunities for Siemens Groups in power generation,
power transmission and distribution, and transportation. Rapid
industrialization continued in Asia-Pacific, driven by
Chinas and Indias economic expansion. This in turn
fueled demand for Siemens offerings in factory and process
automation and electronics assembly. In developed nations,
trends such as aging populations, healthcare and homeland
security concerns and rising energy costs played to
Siemens established strengths in medical diagnostics and
building security, as well as to new capabilities in alternative
energy.
Market
Trends
Within the broad macroeconomic trends discussed above, there are
numerous technological, geographic and customer demand trends
that affect our business. Important trends that we are
monitoring closely for risks and opportunities are discussed in
the paragraphs that follow.
Demand continued to rise for factory and process automation as
well as infrastructure engineering solutions, particularly in
Asia-Pacific countries that are expanding manufacturing capacity
to meet the demands of their outsourcing customers in other
regions. In the U.S. and Europe, demand for automation and
control solutions was strong in sectors focused on exports. In
the building market, customers continued to seek technology
enabling more secure, energy-efficient structures. In all
regions, there is a growing trend toward reduced use of raw
materials and more energy-efficient production processes.
Demand in the global rail industry also increased, with energy
efficient solutions gaining importance. Asia-Pacifics
growing economies and concentration of population in cities
continued to increase demand for urban transit solutions.
Asia-Pacific led growth in the general lighting market as well,
and OEMs continued to shift manufacturing to these lower-cost,
faster-growing markets. Demand also grew for advanced solutions,
such as light emitting diodes (LEDs) and precision components,
and for energy-efficient, environmentally friendly products.
In the energy sector, Chinas rapid modernization continued
to drive global demand for fossil power generation and
transmission systems, followed by rising power infrastructure
needs in the Middle East and the CIS countries. In the U.S. and
Europe, concerns about rising energy costs and security of
supply continued to stimulate investment in alternative power
generation, particularly large offshore wind farms.
In healthcare, aging populations and increased emphasis on
preventative care in developed countries continued to fuel
demand for advanced diagnostic solutions, including medical
imaging such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) and the full spectrum of in-vitro diagnostic
testing. The need to improve the quality of care and reduce
healthcare costs leads to a growing importance of integrated
diagnostic solutions and the overall improvement of clinical
workflow, facilitated by integrated healthcare IT systems. In
the U.S. the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) took effect in January
2007, curtailing government reimbursement for medical imaging
procedures in the non-hospital (out-patient) setting, imposing
pressure on the U.S. medical imaging market.
50
Research
and Development
In fiscal 2007, Siemens increased its research and development
(R&D) expenses to 3.399 billion, compared to
3.091 billion in the prior year. The average number
of employees engaged in R&D in fiscal 2007 was
30.9 thousand, up from 26.4 thousand in fiscal 2006.
A&D focused its R&D activities on manufacturing
automation. Osram focused its R&D activities on fostering
sustainable products, increased brightness and lower production
costs of LEDs. PGs R&D activities emphasized rotating
machinery such as gas and steam turbines, generators,
compressors, wind turbines, instrumentation and control systems
for renewable, nuclear and fossil power generation and improved
power plant solutions, especially power plants with carbon
capture and other diversification of the power generation
portfolio, e.g. coal gasification, fuel cells and energy storage
technologies. Med invested in R&D particularly to improve
technology and clinical applications for medical imaging
systems, such as such as magnetic resonance imaging, computed
tomography, x-ray angiography, ultrasound and information
technology.
To help shareholders understand and follow our progress, we
present our financial results in aggregate and also break out
the major components. The sum of results for the components
equals the result for Siemens as a whole.
The majority of our business is devoted to providing products
and services to customers based on Siemens expertise in
innovative electrical engineering. We call this component of our
business Operations. The Groups in Operations design,
manufacture, market, sell, and service products and systems, or
help customers use and manage those products and systems. A
Group is equivalent to a reportable segment as defined by IFRS.
We measure the performance of the Groups in Operations using
Group profit, defined as earnings before financing interest,
certain pension costs and income taxes. Group profit therefore
excludes various categories of items which are not allocated to
the Groups since the Managing Board does not regard such items
as indicative of the Groups performance. The effect of
certain litigation and compliance issues is also not included in
Group profit when the Company concludes that such items are not
indicative of the Groups performance since the results of
operations of the Groups may be distorted by the amount and the
irregular nature of such events. This may also be the case for
items that refer to more than one Group or have a corporate or
central character. For additional information with respect to
Group profit, see Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. The Managing Board also determined Net capital
employed as additional information to assess the capital
intensity of the Operations Groups. Its definition corresponds
with the Group profit measure. In addition, Free cash flow is
used to compare cash generation among the Groups. For additional
information see Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In fiscal 2006, Siemens announced portfolio changes that
resulted in dissolving Com as a Group and reportable segment. As
discussed in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, the primary business components of the former
operating segment Com were either already disposed of (carrier
networks and MD) or still held for disposal (enterprise
networks) as of September 30, 2007. Beginning
October 1, 2006, A&D assumed responsibility for
Coms Wireless Modules business. Except for Wireless
Modules and other businesses including the former
division Siemens Home and Office Communication Devices that
was reclassified from Com to Other Operations in the third
quarter of fiscal 2006, the historical results of the former
operating segment Com are presented as discontinued operations.
Current and prior-year segment disclosures exclude the
applicable information included in the Companys financial
statement presentation.
Due to the increased importance of the Companys strategic
investments accounted for under the equity method, in particular
the creation of NSN (see Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for further information), Siemens has created a
new reportable segment Strategic Equity Investments (SEI)
beginning in fiscal 2007. SEI represents an operating segment,
having its own management that reports the results of the
segment to the Managing Board. In addition to the investments in
Fujitsu Siemens Computers (Holding) BV (FSC) and BSH Bosch und
Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (BSH), the Siemens investment in
NSN is also reported in SEI beginning in the third quarter of
fiscal 2007. The investments in FSC and BSH were included within
Other Operations until September 30, 2006. Prior-year
information was reclassified for comparability purposes for
these two investments.
51
A new Group called Siemens IT Solutions and Services (SIS) was
created effective April 1, 2007. SIS consists primarily of
the activities of the former segment Siemens Business Services
that were bundled with other information technology activities.
Prior-year information was reclassified for comparability
purposes.
In fiscal 2007, Siemens also signed an agreement to sell its
entire SV activities to Continental AG. The historical results
of the SV business are reported as discontinued operations.
Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, SV ceased to
represent a reportable segment. Current and prior-year segment
disclosures therefore exclude the applicable information
included in the Companys financial statement presentation.
Another component of our Company is made up of two Groups
involved in non-manufacturing activities such as financing,
leasing, investing and real estate. We call this component of
our business Financing and Real Estate. We evaluate the
profitability of our Financing and Real Estate Groups using
income before income taxes.
In breaking out the Operations and Financing and Real Estate
components and in order to show more clearly our external
performance, we exclude the business they conduct with each
other and with our Corporate Treasury, which provides cash
management services for our Groups and corporate finance
activities. These internal transactions are therefore included
into a component called Eliminations, reclassifications and
Corporate Treasury. This component is the difference between the
results for Operations and Financing and Real Estate and the
results of Siemens. For additional information, see Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements.
52
In this report we include information concerning new orders for
each of the years presented. Under our order recognition policy,
we generally recognize a new order when we enter into a contract
that we consider effective and binding based on our
review of a number of different criteria. As a general rule, if
a contract is considered effective and binding, we recognize the
total contract value as promptly as practicable, where total
contract value is defined as the agreed price for the goods to
be delivered and services to be rendered, or the agreed fee, in
each case for the irrevocable term of the contract. For service,
maintenance and outsourcing contracts with a contractual term of
greater than 12 months, if management determines that there
is a high degree of uncertainty concerning whether the customer
will adhere to the full contract term, the agreed fees for the
next 12 months are recognized as new orders on a revolving
basis. In the event an order is cancelled or modified in amount
during the ongoing fiscal year, we adjust our new order total
for the current period accordingly, rather than retroactively
adjust previously published new order totals. However, if an
order from the previous year is cancelled, it is generally not
adjusted from current period new orders, but instead from
existing orders on hand. There is no standard system among
companies in our areas of activity for the compilation of new
order information, with the result that our new order totals may
not be comparable with new order totals published by other
companies. Our new order totals are not audited by our external
auditors, but we do subject them to internal documentation and
review requirements. We may change our policies for recognizing
new orders in the future without previous notice.
53
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Consolidated
Operations Of Siemens
Results
of Siemens
The following discussion presents selected information for
Siemens for the fiscal years ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Orders (location of customer)
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
vs. previous year
|
|
|
therein
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
13,562
|
|
|
|
12,782
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
Europe (other than Germany)
|
|
|
26,648
|
|
|
|
22,351
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
22,831
|
|
|
|
20,202
|
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
(9)%
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
13,291
|
|
|
|
11,250
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
|
|
(3)%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
Africa, Near and Middle East, C.I.S.**
|
|
|
7,584
|
|
|
|
8,359
|
|
|
|
(9)%
|
|
|
|
(7)%
|
|
|
|
(3)%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens
|
|
|
83,916
|
|
|
|
74,944
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
(3)%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Excluding currency translation and portfolio effects.
|
|
**
|
Commonwealth of Independent States.
|
Siemens booked 83.916 billion in new orders in fiscal
2007. This 12% rise compared to fiscal 2006 resulted in a
book-to-bill
ratio of 1.16 for the year. Europe outside Germany and the
Americas were the two largest regions by volume, followed by
Germany and Asia Pacific. Europe outside Germany showed the
fastest growth of any region, with a 19% increase to
26.648 billion for the year led by strong demand at
PG, Med, PTD and A&D and numerous large new contracts.
Orders in Germany were 13.562 billion, up 6%
including strong contributions from A&D, PG and TS.
In the Americas region, orders rose 13% in fiscal 2007, to
22.831 billion, despite considerable weakening of the
U.S. dollar against the euro. Continuing demand for energy
solutions at PG, and for industrial automation solutions at
A&D and I&S, more than compensated for currency and
market conditions that led to reductions in orders in the U.S.
at TS, Med, Osram and SBT. As a result, the U.S. share of orders
in the region fell to 73% compared to 78% in fiscal 2006. On an
organic basis, excluding the net effect of portfolio
transactions and unusually strong negative currency translation
effects, orders were up 18% and 11% in the Americas and the U.S.
respectively.
Orders in Asia-Pacific came in at 13.291 billion, 18%
higher than in the prior year, with PG, A&D, PTD, Med and
I&S all winning at least 20% more new business in the
region. Orders in China and India were 4.871 billion
and 2.015 billion, and grew at 12% and 15%
respectively, and accounted for 52% of new Asia-Pacific orders.
A year earlier, their combined share was 54%. New orders in the
Africa, Near and Middle East, C.I.S. region came in 9% lower
year-over-year,
at 7.584 billion, primarily because the prior year
included a large order at TS for both trains and maintenance in
Russia. For the region as a whole, PTD, A&D and Osram saw
double-digit order growth for the current period.
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue (location of customer)
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
vs. previous year
|
|
|
therein
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
12,594
|
|
|
|
12,382
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
Europe (other than Germany)
|
|
|
22,801
|
|
|
|
20,489
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
19,321
|
|
|
|
18,371
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
(8)%
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
10,937
|
|
|
|
9,457
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
(3)%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
Africa, Near and Middle East, C.I.S.**
|
|
|
6,795
|
|
|
|
5,788
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
|
|
(3)%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens
|
|
|
72,448
|
|
|
|
66,487
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
(3)%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Excluding currency translation and portfolio effects.
|
|
**
|
Commonwealth of Independent States.
|
Revenue for fiscal 2007 totaled 72.448 billion, a 9%
increase compared to fiscal 2006. Revenue in Europe outside
Germany rose 11%
year-over-year,
to 22.801 billion, with A&D, PG and Med leading
the increase. Revenue growth was more restrained in the
Americas, affected by the considerable weakening of the U.S.
dollar against the euro during the year, coming in 5% higher
than in fiscal 2006 at 19.321 billion. Energy,
automation and medical solutions were the highlights for the
Americas overall as well as for the U.S., which accounted for
77% of the regions revenue for the year. On an organic
basis, revenue for the Americas and the U.S. climbed 9% and 7%
year-over-year,
respectively.
Revenue grew more rapidly in Asia-Pacific, reaching
10.937 billion on a 16% rise. Revenue in China was up
13% to 4.146 billion, as A&D, PG and TS
converted major orders from prior periods into current business.
While the majority of Groups booked more sales in China than in
India, revenue for India jumped 62%
year-over-year
from 1.034 billion to 1.676 billion and
every operating Group posted double-digit increases. Together
China and India accounted for 53% of Asia-Pacific revenue, up
from 50% in fiscal 2006. The Africa, Near and Middle East,
C.I.S. region saw 17% growth compared to the prior year,
benefiting from large infrastructure orders in prior years. Most
Groups posted double-digit increases in the region, with
Siemens energy businesses accounting for 63% of the total
volume of 6.795 billion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit on revenue
|
|
|
20,876
|
|
|
|
17,379
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
as percentage of revenue
|
|
|
28.8
|
%
|
|
|
26.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit for fiscal 2007 increased 20%
year-over-year,
as all Groups in Operations increased gross profit. Gross profit
margin increased to 28.8% from 26.1% a year earlier. This
increase is due to improved gross profit margins over all
groups, especially at SIS, benefiting from an improved cost
structure following severance charges in the prior year.
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
(3,399
|
)
|
|
|
(3,091
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
as percentage of revenue
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing, selling and general administrative expenses
|
|
|
(12,103
|
)
|
|
|
(11,897
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
as percentage of revenue
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Other operating expense
|
|
|
(1,053
|
)
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
305
|
%
|
Income from investments accounted for using the equity method,
net
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)%
|
Financial income (expense), net
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses increased to
3.399 billion, led by higher outlays at Med and
A&D. Despite the increase in our revenue
year-over-year,
R&D expenses as a percent of revenue increased slightly to
4.7% from 4.6% in fiscal 2006. For additional information with
respect to R&D, see Business Overview and
Economic EnvironmentResearch and Development and
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Marketing, selling and general administrative expenses declined
as a percent of revenue, to 16.7% from 17.9% a year earlier, due
to the substantial increase in our revenue
year-over-year.
Other operating income was 680 million in fiscal
2007, compared to 629 million a year earlier. Gains
on sales of property, plant and equipment and intangibles
increased from 208 million in fiscal 2006 to
289 million in fiscal 2007. In fiscal 2007, gains on
disposals of businesses were 196 million, benefiting
from a sale of a locomotive leasing business at TS, compared to
55 million in the prior year. Fiscal 2006 included a
gain of 70 million related to the settlement of an
arbitration proceeding.
Other operating expense increased significantly from
260 million in fiscal 2006 to
1.053 billion in fiscal 2007. The change
year-over-year
is due to expenses related to major legal and regulatory matters
in the current period. This included 440 million
stemming from sanctions on major suppliers of gas-isolated
switchgear, and 152 million in expenses for external
advisors and consultants related to legal and compliance issues,
as well as 81 million in funding primarily for job
placement companies for former Siemens employees affected by the
bankruptcy of BenQ Mobile GmbH & Co. OHG (BenQ). Other
operating expense in fiscal 2007 also included
60 million for goodwill impairment.
Income from investments accounted for using the equity method,
net decreased to 108 million from
404 million a year earlier, due to the loss of
429 million in fiscal 2007 from NSN. Financial income
(expense), net decreased from a positive contribution of
254 million in fiscal 2006 to a negative
8 million in fiscal 2007, primarily due to higher
interest for financial liabilities, which were raised primarily
at the end of the prior fiscal year. Fiscal 2006 benefited from
a pre-tax gain of 84 million related to the sale of
the Companys interest in SMS Demag AG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
5,101
|
|
|
|
3,418
|
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(1,192
|
)
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
as percentage of income from continuing operations before
income taxes
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
3,909
|
|
|
|
2,642
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)%
|
Net income
|
|
|
4,038
|
|
|
|
3,345
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Net income attributable to minority interest
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to shareholders of Siemens AG
|
|
|
3,806
|
|
|
|
3,135
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes increased
by 49% to 5.101 billion in fiscal 2007, from
3.418 billion a year earlier, driven by a combination
of increased revenue and margins, partly offset with
56
negative equity investment income of 429 million
related to NSN and expenses related to major legal and
regulatory matters totaled in the current period. Fiscal 2006
included severance charges at SIS of 576 million. In
the last quarter of fiscal 2007, all groups reached their group
profit margin targets.
Income from continuing operations in fiscal 2007 was
3.909 billion, up 48% from 2.642 billion
in fiscal 2006, due to an increased income from continuing
operations before income taxes. The effective tax rate was 23%
in fiscal 2007 and 2006. Income tax expenses include adjustments
related to the previously reported compliance investigation. As
a result of that investigation, payments were identified that
had been recorded as deductible business expenses in prior
periods when determining income tax provisions. The
Companys investigation has determined that certain of
these payments were non-deductible under the tax laws of Germany
and other jurisdictions. For further information, please refer
to Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Discontinued operations includes enterprise networks business,
which is held for disposal, the carrier-related business, which
was transferred into NSN, the Mobile Devices business sold to
BenQ Corporation, and SV, which is held for disposal pending the
closing of the sale of those operations to Continental AG. SV is
included within discontinued operations on a retroactive basis
to provide a meaningful comparison with prior periods. For
fiscal 2007, income from discontinued operations contributed
129 million to net income, compared to
703 million a year earlier. Contribution to net
income from SV activities was a negative 550 million
compared to a positive 410 million in fiscal 2006.
This decrease was due to an approximate 1.1 billion
tax expense as well as interest expense and closing costs
related to the carve-out. Full-year results at Com-related
activities contributed positively in both the current and prior
year, with 765 million and 357 million,
respectively. The current-year result was higher primarily due
to the 1.6 billion NSN non-cash gain. This gain was
partly offset by 567 million in impairments at the
enterprise networking business, a 201 million fine
imposed on us in Germany, of which 200 million was
tax deductible for tax purposes, and 104 million in
other costs related to compliance matters. The remainder of the
change
year-over-year
is due to an operating loss in the current year compared to
operating profit at Com a year earlier. While the profitable
carrier activities were included for all of fiscal 2006, they
were transferred out of discontinued operations and into NSN
midway through fiscal 2007. Effects related to BenQ reduced net
income by 86 million and 64 million,
respectively, in fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006. For additional
information with respect to discontinued operations, see
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net income for Siemens in fiscal 2007 was
4.038 billion, a 21% increase compared to
3.345 billion in the same period a year earlier. Net
income attributable to Shareholders of Siemens AG was
3.806 billion, up 21% from 3.135 billion
in fiscal 2006.
57
Segment
Information Analysis
Operations
Automation
and Drives (A&D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
2,090
|
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
|
|
33%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
|
16,794
|
|
|
|
14,312
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
15,389
|
|
|
|
13,041
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
13,695
|
|
|
|
11,564
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Therein:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
3,991
|
|
|
|
3,396
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe (other than Germany)
|
|
|
4,191
|
|
|
|
3,485
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
|
|
2,324
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
2,419
|
|
|
|
2,017
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Africa, Near and Middle East, C.I.S.
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
32%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Excluding currency translation effects of (2)% on revenue and
orders, and portfolio effects of 4% and 3% on revenue and
orders, respectively.
|
A&D increased its Group profit 33% compared to fiscal 2006,
to 2.090 billion. A&Ds largest divisions
led the increase, including significant earnings growth in the
Industrial Automation Systems, Mechanical Drives, Motion Control
Systems and Large Drives divisions. The Group gained operating
leverage on rising volume, particularly evident in lower selling
costs as a percent of revenue. As a result, A&Ds
Group profit margin rose compared to fiscal 2006, even though
the increase was held back by 143 million in purchase
price accounting (PPA) effects associated with the Groups
acquisitions of UGS Corp. (in May 2007) and Flender Holding
GmbH (in fiscal 2005) as well as 23 million in
integration costs. A&D saw a corresponding increase in
amortization for intangible assets
year-over-year.
Orders at A&D rose 17%
year-over-year,
to 16.794 billion, and revenue rose 18%, to
15.389 billion. Both orders and revenue included
double-digit increases in Germany and all major regions of the
world. A&D continued to generate the largest share of its
business in Europe (including Germany), which accounted for 60%
of revenue from external customers in both fiscal years. Revenue
and orders benefited from the acquisition of UGS, a leading
provider of product lifecycle management (PLM) software which
A&D acquired to complement and extend its existing software
capabilities. The PLM business got off to a good start within
A&D, launching its technology integration and winning new
customers for the Group.
58
Industrial
Solutions and Services (I&S)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
|
10,161
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
15%
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
8,894
|
|
|
|
8,819
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
3%
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
7,824
|
|
|
|
7,837
|
|
|
|
(0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Therein:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Europe (other than Germany)
|
|
|
2,178
|
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
|
2,549
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
1,364
|
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Africa, Near and Middle East, C.I.S.
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Excluding currency translation effects of (3)% on revenue and
orders, and portfolio effects of 1% on revenue and orders.
|
In fiscal 2007, Group profit at I&S climbed to
415 million, a 47% increase
year-over-year.
Both earnings and margins improved throughout the Group, with
the strongest increases coming in the Groups largest
businesses: industrial services, oil and gas and metal
technologies. Amortization during fiscal 2007 declined compared
to fiscal 2006, primarily on lower PPA effects from acquisitions
in prior years including VA Technologies AG (VA Tech).
Orders at I&S for fiscal 2007 rose to
10.161 billion, 13% higher than in fiscal 2006. This
growth was fueled by strong demand in Asia-Pacific and the
Americas, including large orders from Brazil and the U.S. While
revenue of 8.894 billion also included healthy growth
in Asia-Pacific, this was offset somewhat by the effects of
industry-wide resource constraints as well as lower revenue in
the postal automation and airport logistics businesses compared
to fiscal 2006.
Siemens
Building Technologies (SBT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
|
5,350
|
|
|
|
5,235
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
5%
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
5,062
|
|
|
|
4,796
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
8%
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
4,952
|
|
|
|
4,695
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Therein:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
972
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Europe (other than Germany)
|
|
|
1,885
|
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
1,715
|
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Africa, Near and Middle East, C.I.S.
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Excluding currency translation effects of (3)% and (4)% on
revenue and orders, respectively, and portfolio effects of 1% on
revenue and orders.
|
SBT increased Group profit in fiscal 2007 by 59%, to
354 million, demonstrating increased emphasis on its
higher-margin businesses in products and services and improved
execution including more selective order intake in its solutions
business. The Groups fire safety and heating, ventilation
and air conditioning businesses made the
59
largest contributions to Group profit. Earnings margins rose on
a Groupwide basis as well, strengthening Group profit margin for
SBT overall by well over two percentage points.
Orders of 5.350 billion grew modestly, rising 2%
compared to fiscal 2006, in part due to adverse currency
translation effects and slowing construction growth in the U.S.,
but also as a result of selective order intake. Revenue rose 6%
year-over-year,
to 5.062 billion, with SBTs largest markets in
Europe, the Americas and Germany all contributing solid
increases in external revenue compared to fiscal 2006. SBT
closed among others the acquisition of an Indian system provider
in fiscal 2007 and the acquisition of Bewator in Sweden in
fiscal 2006, each bringing the Group new capabilities in
building and infrastructure security.
Osram
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
|
4,690
|
|
|
|
4,563
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
4,690
|
|
|
|
4,563
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
External revenue
|
|
|
4,677
|
|
|
|
4,547
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Therein:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Europe (other than Germany)
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
1,947
|
|
|
|
1,982
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Africa, Near and Middle East, C.I.S.
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Excluding currency translation effects of (4)% on revenue and
orders.
|
Osrams Group profit of 492 million in fiscal
2007 was 8% higher than in the prior year. Along with strength
in its large general lighting business, Osram benefited from
higher earnings in its optical semiconductors business.
Broad-based demand throughout the Group took revenue and orders
up to 4.690 billion for the fiscal year. Excluding
adverse currency translation effects, primarily in Osrams
large U.S. market, revenue and orders rose 7% compared to the
prior year on rising demand in Europe and Asia-Pacific.
The trend towards energy-efficient lighting solutions had a
positive impact on the performance for the 2007 fiscal year.
Osram was successful in innovative compact fluorescent lamps,
high-intensity discharge lamps and LEDs. Energy-efficient
products already account for 60 percent of revenue, and
Osram intends to increase this to 80 percent over the next
ten years. Osrams main focus for research and development
is to make further advances in optical semiconductors (LED and
OLED) and energy efficiency, for example with energy-saving
lamps and with high-intensity discharge lamps.
60
Transportation
Systems (TS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
165
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
|
4,780
|
|
|
|
6,173
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
4,452
|
|
|
|
4,493
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
External revenue
|
|
|
4,418
|
|
|
|
4,429
|
|
|
|
(0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Therein:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Europe (other than Germany)
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
2,150
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Africa, Near and Middle East, C.I.S.
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Excluding currency translation effects of (1)% on revenue and
orders, and portfolio effects of (2)% on revenue and orders.
|
TS recorded Group profit of 191 million for fiscal
2007, including a net gain of 76 million on the sale
of its locomotive leasing business. Earnings and margins rose on
a Groupwide basis except for the mass transit business, which
took charges related to its Combino railcar and posted a larger
loss than in the prior year.
Orders of 4.780 billion reflect a significantly lower
level of large orders for the Group as a whole in the second and
third quarters compared to the same periods of the prior year.
Revenue of 4.452 billion came close to the prior-year
level despite a decline in revenue in the mass transit business.
The Groups large European market contributed solid growth
while business in Asia-Pacific continued to expand more rapidly
from a smaller base.
Power
Generation (PG)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
47%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
|
17,988
|
|
|
|
12,532
|
|
|
|
44%
|
|
|
|
43%
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
12,194
|
|
|
|
10,086
|
|
|
|
21%
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
12,159
|
|
|
|
10,068
|
|
|
|
21%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Therein:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
1,153
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe (other than Germany)
|
|
|
2,920
|
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
|
|
29%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
3,405
|
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
|
|
26%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
2,024
|
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
|
|
29%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Africa, Near and Middle East, C.I.S.
|
|
|
2,628
|
|
|
|
2,371
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Excluding currency translation effects of (3)% on revenue and
orders, and portfolio effects of 4% on revenue and orders.
|
Group profit at PG climbed 47%
year-over-year,
to 1.147 billion in fiscal 2007. All businesses in
PGs portfolio generated strong growth in earnings and
profitability. Highlights include a significant rise in earnings
in the fossil services business and a sharply higher 9.5% margin
in the wind power business, where earnings more than tripled.
While PG faced higher materials costs compared to fiscal 2006,
strong demand enabled the Group to offset the increase with
higher prices. Both fiscal years included charges at major
projects for PGs fossil power generation business. While
PG reduced these charges in fiscal 2007, the improvement was
partially offset by negative equity
61
investment income and lower cancellation gains compared to
fiscal 2006. In particular, equity investment income in fiscal
2007 was a negative 2 million due to a negative
45 million result related to PGs equity stake
in Areva NP, a nuclear power company. In fiscal 2006, equity
investment income was a positive 36 million despite a
negative 27 million result related to Areva NP. The
net effect of project charges, equity investment income and
other non-operating effects, including the settlement of an
arbitration proceeding and the sale of a business in fiscal 2007
and the effects of the bankruptcy of a consortium partner in
fiscal 2006 reduced PGs Group profit margin by more than
half a percentage point in the current fiscal year and by
approximately two percentage points in the prior year. PG
expects continued volatility in equity investment earnings in
coming quarters.
Demand for PGs power generation solutions was balanced
both regionally and among PGs divisions. This balance is
particularly notable in comparison to the previous cycle of high
global demand for gas turbine energy systems at the beginning of
the decade, before PG expanded its industrial turbine business
and built its wind power business. In fiscal 2007, PGs
non-fossil businesses generated 40% of revenues and 41% of new
orders. These total benefited from the acquisition of AG
Kühnle Kopp & Kausch in the first quarter of
fiscal 2007. Fiscal 2007 orders for PG overall climbed to
17.988 billion, up 44%
year-over-year,
and are expected to increase the earnings quality of PGs
order backlog as they replace older, lower-margin orders that
are being fulfilled in coming quarters. Revenue for the year
rose to 12.194 billion, 21% higher than in the prior
year. On a regional basis, Asia-Pacific, Europe (outside
Germany) and the Americas all contributed rapid revenue growth
for the year. PG closed one acquisition in fiscal 2007 and two
acquisitions in fiscal 2006, each bringing the Group new
capabilities for clean power generation.
Power
Transmission and Distribution (PTD)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
106%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
|
9,896
|
|
|
|
8,028
|
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
27%
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
7,689
|
|
|
|
6,509
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
21%
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
7,126
|
|
|
|
6,032
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Therein:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe (other than Germany)
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
1,601
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Africa, Near and Middle East, C.I.S.
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Excluding currency translation effects of (3)% and (4)% on
revenue and orders, respectively.
|
PTDs Group profit in fiscal 2007 was
650 million, more than double the level in the prior
year. Group profit margin for the year benefited from
25 million in hedging effects not qualifying for
hedge accounting. The prior-year results included charges
related to restructuring programs. Higher revenue in fiscal 2007
led to higher capacity utilization and other operating
efficiencies, which in turn enabled all divisions within PTD to
increase their earnings and margins compared to fiscal 2006.
In a strong global market for secure, high-efficiency power
transmission and distribution, PTDs orders increased 23%,
to 9.896 billion. The Groups high-voltage
direct current (HVDC) technology was a strong driver of large
orders during the year, including contract wins in China, India
and the U.S. Revenue rose 18%
year-over-year,
to 7.689 billion, with Europe (including Germany),
the Americas and Asia-Pacific all posting double-digit increases
in revenue to external customers and external revenue in Africa,
Near and Middle East, C.I.S. rose 50%
year-over-year.
62
Medical
Solutions (Med)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006*
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted**
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
34%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
|
10,271
|
|
|
|
9,334
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
9,851
|
|
|
|
8,227
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
External revenue
|
|
|
9,798
|
|
|
|
8,164
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Therein:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
28%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe (other than Germany)
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
1,843
|
|
|
|
34%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
4,578
|
|
|
|
4,044
|
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
1,468
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Africa, Near and Middle East, C.I.S.
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Group profit has been adjusted. For further information see
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
**
|
Excluding currency translation effects of (5)% on revenue and
orders, and portfolio effects of 19% and 17% on revenue and
orders, respectively.
|
Group profit at Med climbed to 1.323 billion, 34%
higher than in fiscal 2006, and Group profit margin rose to
13.4%. These results demonstrate the competitive strength and
international success of Meds diagnostics imaging
businesses, which increased their earnings and profitability
compared to the prior year despite continuing market pressure in
the U.S., including effects from the U.S. Deficit Reduction Act
(DRA). Meds equity investment income in fiscal 2007 rose
to 60 million from 27 million a year
earlier, benefiting from a 23 million gain on the
sale of a portion of its stake in a joint venture, Draeger
Medical AG & Co. KG. These factors enabled Med to more
than offset the loss of 1.8 percentage points from Group
profit margin due to PPA effects of 91 million and
integration costs of 84 million stemming from two
major acquisitions. Diagnostic Products Corp. was acquired late
in fiscal 2006 for approximately 1.4 billion, and a
division of Bayer AG was acquired in the second quarter of
fiscal 2007 for approximately 4.5 billion. Med saw a
corresponding increase in amortization of intangible assets
compared to fiscal 2006.
During fiscal 2007, Med integrated the two acquisitions
mentioned above into its new Diagnostics division. This business
provides a wide range of in-vitro solutions, which
produce diagnostic information using samples taken from a
patients body and tested in a clinical laboratory. The
Diagnostics division thus strongly complements Meds
imaging businesses, which provide diagnostic information from
images of organs and tissues within the body
(in-vivo). With these two acquisitions Med created
the first integrated diagnostic company. During fiscal 2007 Med
announced a third acquisition for the Diagnostics division: Dade
Behring, Inc., a leading clinical laboratory diagnostics
company. The purchase price for this acquisition, which closed
in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, was approximately
$7 billion (5 billion).
The Diagnostics division brought significant new volume to Med
in fiscal 2007. Orders raised 10%, to 10.271 billion
and revenue climbed 20%
year-over-year,
to 9.851 billion, on double-digit growth in Germany
and all major regions of the world.
63
Siemens
IT Solutions and Services (SIS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
(731
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
|
5,156
|
|
|
|
5,574
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
5%
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
5,360
|
|
|
|
5,693
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
|
5%
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
3,988
|
|
|
|
4,466
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Therein:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Europe (other than Germany)
|
|
|
1,854
|
|
|
|
2,014
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Africa, Near and Middle East, C.I.S.
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Excluding currency translation effects of (1)% on revenue and
orders, and portfolio effects of (10)% and (11)% on revenue and
orders, respectively.
|
Fiscal 2007 was the first year of operation for SIS, which
combines the former Siemens Business Services (SBS) Group with
the four software development entities Program and System
Engineering (PSE), Siemens Information Systems Ltd. (SISL),
Development Innovation and Projects (DIP) and the Business
Innovation Center (BIC). Results for SIS are presented on a
retroactive basis, to provide a meaningful comparison with prior
periods.
Group profit of 252 million resulted largely from a
significantly improved cost structure at SIS, following
severance programs in prior-years, which in fiscal 2006 resulted
in severance charges of 576 million. The severance
charges were a major factor in the Groups loss of
731 million in fiscal 2006. Furthermore Group profit
in fiscal 2007 benefited from more selective order intake.
Equity investment income of 10 million in fiscal 2007
includes equity income related to BWI Informationstechnik GmbH,
which has been set up in connection with the
HERKULES project to modernize and manage the
non-military information and communications technology of the
German Federal Armed Forces. For additional information with
respect to HERKULES, see Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Revenue and orders of 5.360 billion and
5.156 billion, respectively, came in lower than the
prior-year totals due to the divestment of the Groups
Product Related Services (PRS) business halfway through fiscal
2006. For additional information with respect to the PRS
divestment, see Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. On an organic basis, revenue and orders were
up 5%
year-over-year.
The percentage of the business volume conducted within Siemens
rose to 26% from 22% in fiscal 2006. Externally, SIS conducted a
large majority of its business in Europe (including Germany) in
both years.
Strategic
Equity Investments (SEI)
SEI includes results at equity from three companies in which
Siemens holds a strategic equity stake: Nokia Siemens Networks
B.V. (NSN), BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (BSH),
and Fujitsu Siemens Computers (Holding) B.V. (FSC). In fiscal
2006, before NSN became part of SEI, equity investment income
related to BSH and FSC was 225 million. In fiscal
2007, equity investment income related to BSH and FHC increased
to 268 million. In contrast, NSN took
991 million in charges including
646 million for severance. As a result, Siemens
equity investment income related to NSN was a negative
429 million, and fiscal 2007 equity investment income
for SEI overall was a negative 161 million.
Other
Operations
Other Operations consist of centrally held operating businesses
not related to a Group, including Siemens Home and Office
Communication Devices (SHC) and, in fiscal 2006, the
distribution and industry logistics
64
(Dematic) businesses carved out of the former Logistics and
Assembly Systems Group. Other Operations improved to a negative
193 million in fiscal 2007 compared to a negative
317 million in fiscal 2006, when the Dematic business
lost 159 million and SHC also posted a negative
result. In fiscal 2007, SHC turned its business around and
contributed 13 million in profit for the year.
Centrally carried regional costs not allocated to the Groups
totaled 96 million in the current period, up from
59 million in the prior year. In addition, fiscal
2007 included an impairment of 52 million at a
regional payphone company in Europe. Revenue for Other
Operations for fiscal 2007 was 2.884 billion, down
from 3.944 billion a year earlier primarily due to
the Dematic divestment. Within these totals, revenue at SHC
remained stable near 790 million.
Reconciliation
to Financial Statements
Reconciliation to financial statements includes various
categories of items, which are not allocated to the Groups
because the Managing Board has determined that such items are
not indicative of the performance of the individual Groups.
Corporate
items, pensions and eliminations
Corporate items, pensions and eliminations was a negative
1.672 billion in fiscal 2007 compared to a negative
527 million a year earlier. The major factor in this
change was Corporate items, which increased to a negative
1.728 billion from a negative 553 million
in fiscal 2006 due largely to 843 million in costs
related to legal and regulatory matters. Within this figure,
significant effects included 440 million stemming
from sanctions on major suppliers of gas-isolated switchgear,
152 million in expenses for outside experts engaged
to assist with internal and external investigations, and
81 million in funding primarily for job placement
companies for former Siemens employees affected by the
bankruptcy of BenQ Mobile GmbH & Co. OHG (BenQ).
Corporate items also included higher expenses related to a major
asset retirement obligation. Finally, Corporate items in fiscal
2007 also includes 106 million related to
Siemens regional sales organization in Germany, primarily
including an impairment. A year earlier, Corporate items
benefited from a 95 million gain on the sale of an
investment, as well as 70 million in positive effects
from settlement of an arbitration proceeding.
Other
interest expense
Other interest expense of Operations for fiscal 2007 was
497 million compared to interest expense of
325 million a year earlier. The change was mainly due
to increased intra-company financing of Operations by Corporate
Treasury
year-over-year.
Financing
and Real Estate
Siemens
Financial Services (SFS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Total assets
|
|
|
8,912
|
|
|
|
10,543
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
Income before income taxes (IBIT) at SFS rose to
329 million in fiscal 2007 from
306 million in fiscal 2006. The current year
benefited from gains on sales of shares in the Equity division
and special dividends resulting from divestment gains by a
company in which SFS holds an equity position. IBIT in the prior
period included the special dividend mentioned above. Total
assets declined compared to the end of fiscal 2006, due to a
significant reduction in accounts receivable related to the
carve-out of SV and the transfer of carrier activities into NSN.
With respect to the capital structure of SFS, see
Capital Resources and RequirementsContractual
Obligations.
65
Siemens
Real Estate (SRE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
Revenue
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
|
|
3,221
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
Income before income taxes at SRE was 228 million in
fiscal 2007, compared to 115 million in the prior
year. A year earlier, SREs results included significantly
higher vacancy charges and a lower level net gains from real
estate disposals.
With respect to the capital structure of SRE, see
Capital Resources and RequirementsContractual
Obligations.
Eliminations,
reclassifications and Corporate Treasury
Income before income taxes from eliminations, reclassifications
and Corporate Treasury was 153 million in fiscal 2007
compared to a negative 18 million in fiscal 2006. The
difference is due mainly to negative net effects in the prior
year from a
mark-to-market
valuation of a cash settlement option associated with
2.5 billion of convertible bonds issued in 2003.
Economic
Value Added
Siemens ties a portion of its executive incentive compensation
to achieving economic value added (EVA) targets. EVA measures
the profitability of a business (using Group profit for the
operations Groups and income before income taxes for the
Financing and Real Estate businesses as a base) against the
additional cost of capital used to run a business (using Net
capital employed for the operations Groups and risk-adjusted
equity for the Financing and Real Estate businesses as a base).
A positive EVA means that a business has earned more than its
cost of capital, whereas a negative EVA means that a business
has earned less than its cost of capital. Depending on the EVA
development
year-over-year,
a business is defined as value-creating or value-destroying.
Other companies that use EVA may define and calculate EVA
differently.
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Consolidated
Operations Of Siemens
Results
of Siemens
The following discussion presents selected information for
Siemens for the fiscal years ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Orders (location of customer)
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
vs. previous year
|
|
therein
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Actual
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
Currency
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
12,782
|
|
|
|
12,544
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
(2)%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
Europe (other than Germany)
|
|
|
22,351
|
|
|
|
19,475
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
20,202
|
|
|
|
16,854
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
11,250
|
|
|
|
8,853
|
|
|
|
27%
|
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
Africa, Near and Middle East, C.I.S.
|
|
|
8,359
|
|
|
|
5,587
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
38%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens
|
|
|
74,944
|
|
|
|
63,313
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue (location of customer)
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
vs. previous year
|
|
therein
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Actual
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
Currency
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
12,382
|
|
|
|
11,788
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
Europe (other than Germany)
|
|
|
20,489
|
|
|
|
18,064
|
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
18,371
|
|
|
|
14,857
|
|
|
|
24%
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
9,457
|
|
|
|
7,175
|
|
|
|
32%
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
Africa, Near and Middle East, C.I.S.
|
|
|
5,788
|
|
|
|
3,897
|
|
|
|
49%
|
|
|
|
32%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens
|
|
|
66,487
|
|
|
|
55,781
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Excluding currency translation and portfolio effects.
|
Orders in fiscal 2006 were 74.944 billion, a 18%
increase from 63.313 billion in the prior year. A
majority of the Groups in Operations posted double-digit growth
in orders compared to fiscal 2005. Revenues of
66.487 billion were up 19% from
55.781 billion a year earlier, led by substantial
increases at I&S, A&D, PTD and PG. Excluding currency
translation and the net effect of acquisitions and dispositions
(organic growth), orders climbed 7% and revenue rose 10%
year-over-year.
Growth was driven by international markets, where major orders
were both numerous and well-distributed. International orders
were up 22%
year-over-year,
to 62.162 billion; international revenue rose 23%, to
54.105 billion. In Germany, orders were up 2% and
revenues increased 5%
year-over-year,
to 12.782 billion and 12.382 billion,
respectively, primarily due to acquisitions between the periods
under review.
On a regional basis, international growth was fastest in Middle
East/Africa/C.I.S., including a 50% rise in orders, to
8.359 billion, and a 49% increase in revenue, to
5.788 billion. Growth was nearly as rapid in
Asia-Pacific, where orders climbed 27%, to
11.250 billion, and revenue rose 32%, to
9.457 billion. Within Asia-Pacific, orders in China
increased 25%, to 4.357 billion, and revenue was up
44%, at 3.667 billion. Orders in India rose 72%, to
1.757 billion, and revenue climbed 52%, to
1.034 billion. In the Americas, orders and revenue
grew 20% and 24%, respectively, benefiting from strong portfolio
and currency translation effects. Within this trend, the U.S.
posted orders of 15.819 billion and revenue of
14.609 billion, for increases of 20% and 21%,
respectively. In Europe outside Germany, orders and revenue
increased by 15% and 13%, to 22.351 billion and
20.489 billion, respectively, benefiting strongly
from portfolio effects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit on revenue
|
|
|
17,379
|
|
|
|
15,683
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
as percentage of revenue
|
|
|
26.1
|
%
|
|
|
28.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit for fiscal 2006 increased 11%
year-over-year,
as a majority of the Groups in Operations increased both
revenues and profit compared to fiscal 2005. In contrast, gross
profit margin declined to 26.1% from 28.1% a year earlier. Major
factors were a sharp decline at PG, which took substantial
charges in its fossil power generation business, and lower gross
profit margins at SIS, which took higher severance charges
compared to a year earlier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
(3,091
|
)
|
|
|
(2,750
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
as percentage of revenue
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing, selling and general administrative expenses
|
|
|
(11,897
|
)
|
|
|
(10,316
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
as percentage of revenue
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Other operating expense
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
(422
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)%
|
Income from investments accounted for using the equity method,
net
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
Financial income (expense), net
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)%
|
67
Research and development expenses increased to
3.091 billion from 2.750 billion in the
prior year. Due to the significant increase in our revenue
year-over-year,
R&D expenses as a percent of revenue declined to 4.6% from
4.9% in fiscal 2005. Marketing, selling and administrative
expenses also declined as a percent of revenue, to 17.9% from
18.5% a year earlier, even as expenses rose to
11.897 billion from 10.316 billion.
Other operating income was 629 million in fiscal
2006, compared to 550 million a year earlier. Gains
on sales of property, plant and equipment and intangibles in
fiscal 2006 were higher
year-over-year.
This increase was partially offset due to lower gains on
disposals of businesses. Other operating income include in
fiscal 2006 a gain of 70 million related to the
settlement of an arbitration proceeding.
Other operating expense decreased from 422 million in
fiscal 2005 to 260 million in fiscal 2006, due to a
goodwill impairment of 262 million at SIS in fiscal
2005.
Income from investments accounted for using the equity method,
net decreased to 404 million from
516 million a year earlier, due to a lower share of
profit in fiscal 2006.
Financial income, net was 254 million compared to
333 million a year earlier. Higher gains on sales,
net from
available-for-sale
financial assets and a higher expected return on plan assets
from pension plans and similar commitments could not compensate
higher interest expenses and the decrease in other financial
income, net.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
3,418
|
|
|
|
3,594
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
|
|
(781
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
as percentage of income from continuing operations before
income taxes
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,642
|
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
3,345
|
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Net income attributable to Minority interest
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
Net income attributable to Shareholders of Siemens AG
|
|
|
3,135
|
|
|
|
2,416
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes was
3.418 billion in fiscal 2006, compared to
3.594 billion a year earlier, as severance charges at
SIS increased to 576 million compared to
228 million in the prior year.
Income from continuing operations in fiscal 2006 was
2.642 billion, down 6% from 2.813 billion
in fiscal 2005, due to a decreased income from continuing
operations before income taxes. The effective tax-rate increased
to 23% in fiscal 2006 compared to 22% in the prior year. Income
tax expenses include adjustments related to the previously
reported compliance investigation. Accordingly, payments were
identified that were recorded as deductible business expenses in
prior periods in determining income tax provisions. The
Companys investigation determined that certain of these
payments were non-deductible under tax regulations of Germany
and other jurisdictions.
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
was a positive with 703 million in fiscal 2006
compared to a loss of 237 million a year earlier. In
fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 discontinued operations included
particularly the historical results of the former operating
Group SV as well as of the enterprise networks business and
carrier related operations. In addition fiscal 2005 included in
discontinued operations the historical results of the mobile
devices operations of the former operating Group Com, which had
a negative effect of 542 million in fiscal 2005. For
additional information with respect to discontinued operations,
see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Net
income was 3.345 billion, up 30% from
2.576 billion in fiscal 2005. Net income attributable
to Minority interest increased from 160 million in
fiscal 2005 to 210 million in fiscal 2006. Net income
attributable to Shareholders of Siemens AG was
3.135 billion, up 30% from 2.416 billion
in fiscal 2005.
68
Segment
Information Analysis
Operations
Automation
and Drives (A&D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
13,041
|
|
|
|
10,538
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
New orders
|
|
|
14,312
|
|
|
|
10,840
|
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
* |
Excluding currency translation effects of 1% and 2% on revenue
and orders, respectively, and portfolio effects of 13% and 16%
on revenue and orders, respectively.
|
A&D delivered Group profit of 1.575 billion, up
22% compared to the prior year even as the Group made
significant investments to build up distribution in major growth
markets. Acquisitions made late in fiscal 2005 and early fiscal
2006 contributed to earnings growth for the year. Revenue for
fiscal 2006 overall rose 24%, to 13.041 billion, and
orders climbed 32%, to 14.312 billion, as the Group
added acquired volume to organic growth on a Group-wide basis.
Demand was well distributed regionally, including topline growth
in Asia-Pacific well above 50%
year-over-year.
Industrial
Solutions and Services (I&S)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
8,819
|
|
|
|
6,307
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
New orders
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
7,189
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
* |
Excluding currency translation effects of 2% on revenue and
orders, and portfolio effects of 24% and 26% on revenue and
orders, respectively.
|
Group profit at I&S rose to 282 million, up 66%
compared to the prior year, due primarily to the metallurgy
business included in the VA Tech acquisition in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2005. Profitability improved in part due to
sales channel synergy associated with the acquisition. Revenue
for the fiscal year rose 40%, to 8.819 billion,
including double-digit organic growth, and orders were up 26%,
at 9.025 billion. For comparison, the prior year
included a particularly large order in the fourth quarter.
Siemens
Building Technologies (SBT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
4,796
|
|
|
|
4,415
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
New orders
|
|
|
5,235
|
|
|
|
4,518
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
* |
Excluding currency translation effects of 1% and 2% on revenue
and orders, respectively, and portfolio effects of 1% on revenue
and orders.
|
In fiscal 2006, SBT continued to improve its profitability,
posting a 21% increase in Group profit to
223 million. The Groups fire safety and
security business contributed strongly to the increase in Group
profit.
69
Revenue for the year rose 9% compared to the prior year, to
4.796 billion, and orders climbed 16% to
5.235 billion. All the Groups divisions
contributed to business growth, including greater penetration of
their installed base and success in services.
Osram
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
4,563
|
|
|
|
4,300
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
New orders
|
|
|
4,563
|
|
|
|
4,300
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
* |
Excluding currency translation effects of 2% on revenue and
orders.
|
In fiscal 2006, Osram stepped up its commitment to its
fastest-growing regional markets, including the build-out of a
new regional office and expanded revenue efforts in
Asia-Pacific. The Group also increased up-front investments in
innovative products. Group profit was stable
year-over-year
while revenue and orders rose 6%, to 4.563 billion,
on regionally balanced growth.
Transportation
Systems (TS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
4,493
|
|
|
|
4,186
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
New orders
|
|
|
6,173
|
|
|
|
4,599
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
* |
Excluding currency translation effects of 1% on orders, and
portfolio effects of 2% and 1% on revenue and orders,
respectively.
|
TS posted a solid increase in earnings in fiscal 2006, on
improved project execution. Group profit of
72 million was up 67%
year-over-year.
Group profit in both years included charges related to major
projects that are now moving toward or into the latter stages of
completion. Broad-based growth increased revenue for TS overall
by 7%, to 4.493 billion. The Groups order
backlog continued to rise on a 34% increase in orders, to
6.173 billion, including especially high order volume in
the first quarter. Highlights for the full year include large
contracts for trains in China, Russia (including a substantial
maintenance contract), Spain and Austria.
Power
Generation (PG)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
10,086
|
|
|
|
8,061
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
New orders
|
|
|
12,532
|
|
|
|
10,964
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
* |
Excluding currency translation effects of 1% on revenue and
orders, and portfolio effects of 5% and 8% on revenue and
orders, respectively.
|
A combination of focused acquisitions and robust organic growth,
particularly in the fossil power generation business, generated
a 25% increase in revenue
year-over-year,
to 10.086 billion. Orders of
12.532 billion were up
70
14% compared to fiscal 2005, including a very large fossil power
generation contract in the Middle East. The wind power business
significantly increased its earnings and profit margin, and won
two large contracts in the U.S. that nearly tripled orders
year-over-year.
Revenue and orders for the year also include the acquisition of
Wheelabrator, a provider of emissions reduction technology for
the energy industry. PGs fossil power generation business
saw a significant decline in earnings in fiscal 2006, due in
part to the bankruptcy of a consortium partner and charges
related to major projects. In addition, equity earnings from
PGs stake in a European joint venture declined by
95 million and turned negative. These factors limited
Group profit for PG overall to 779 million compared
to 969 million a year earlier.
Power
Transmission and Distribution (PTD)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
6,509
|
|
|
|
4,250
|
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
New orders
|
|
|
8,028
|
|
|
|
5,283
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
* |
Excluding currency translation effects of 3% and 4% on revenue
and orders, respectively, and portfolio effects of 23% and 19%
on revenue and orders, respectively.
|
In fiscal 2006, PTD recorded rapid growth in Group profit,
revenue and orders in a strong global market for secure,
high-efficiency power transmission and distribution. Group
profit rose 44%, to 315 million for the year, as PTD
leveraged improved operating performance into a much larger
revenue base resulting from its portion of the VA Tech
acquisition. For comparison, the prior year included charges
related to a project in the CIS and charges for capacity
adjustments at a transformer facility in Germany. Revenue rose
53%, to 6.509 billion, and orders increased 52%, to
8.028 billion, on a balance of Group-wide organic
growth and acquired volume.
Medical
Solutions (Med)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2006*
|
|
|
2005*
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted**
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
8,227
|
|
|
|
7,626
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
New orders
|
|
|
9,334
|
|
|
|
8,641
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
*
|
Group profit has been adjusted. For further information see
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
**
|
Excluding currency translation effects of 2% and 1% on revenue
and orders, respectively, and portfolio effects of 1% on revenue
and orders.
|
Med was again a top earnings performer, with
988 million in Group profit in fiscal 2006.
Broad-based earnings increases in the Groups diagnostics
imaging businesses more than offset increases in R&D
investments compared to the prior year. CTI Molecular Imaging,
Inc. (CTI), acquired in the third quarter of fiscal 2005, also
contributed to earnings growth for the year. Revenue and orders
both rose 8% compared to a year earlier, to
8.227 billion and 9.334 billion,
respectively.
71
Siemens
IT Solutions and Services (SIS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted*
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit
|
|
|
(731
|
)
|
|
|
(676
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Group profit margin
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
5,693
|
|
|
|
5,849
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
New orders
|
|
|
5,574
|
|
|
|
7,017
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
|
(14
|
)%
|
|
|
* |
Excluding currency translation effects of 1% on revenue and
orders, and portfolio effects of (6)% and (8)% on revenue and
orders, respectively.
|
SIS widened its loss
year-over-year
to 731 million, including 576 million in
severance charges. For comparison, the prior year included a
goodwill impairment of 262 million in the Operation
Related Services (ORS) business and 228 million in
severance charges, only partly offset by a 26 million
gain on the sale of an investment. As part of its strategic
reorientation, SIS divested its PRS business midway through the
fiscal year. For further information on the sale of PRS see
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Fiscal
2006 revenue of 5.693 billion were consequently lower
than the level a year earlier. Orders of
5.574 billion were also lower than the prior-year
level, due to the PRS divestment, as well as more selective
order intake and a reduction in major orders
year-over-year.
Strategic
Equity Investments (SEI)
In fiscal 2006 and 2005, SEI includes results at equity from two
companies in which Siemens holds a strategic equity stake: BSH
and FSC. SEI overall recorded equity investment income of
225 million for fiscal 2006 compared to
171 million in the prior-year period.
Other
Operations
Other Operations consist of centrally held operating businesses
not related to a Group, such as joint ventures and equity
investments. In fiscal 2006, Other Operations included SHC,
which was carved out of Com, and Dematic, which was carved out
of the former Logistics and Assembly Systems (L&A) Group.
Other Operations also included a portion of the VA Tech
acquisition. In aggregate, revenue from Other Operations was
3.944 billion compared to 3.484 billion in
the prior year, with VA Tech accounting for much of the
increase. A significant portion of our Dematic business was
divested at a loss of 32 million in the fourth
quarter. Group profit from Other Operations was a negative
317 million compared to a negative
148 million a year earlier. SHC posted a loss
compared to positive earnings in fiscal 2005 and Dematic
recorded losses in both periods including the loss on the sale
in fiscal 2006.
Reconciliation
to Financial Statements
Reconciliation to financial statements includes various
categories of items, which are not allocated to the Groups
because the Managing Board has determined that such items are
not indicative of Group performance.
Corporate
items, pensions and eliminations
Corporate items, pensions and eliminations totaled a negative
527 million in fiscal 2006 compared to a negative
618 million in fiscal 2005. Corporate items were a
negative 553 million in fiscal 2006 compared to a
negative 647 million a year earlier. Within Corporate
items, a significant investment in information technology
increased central costs in fiscal 2006 compared to the prior
year. Corporate items benefited in fiscal 2006 from a gain of
95 million on the sale of an investment and
70 million in positive effects from settlement of an
arbitration proceeding. Revenue of marketable securities
produced gains including 33 million on the sale of
Infineon shares
72
and 15 million on the sale of shares in Epcos AG
(Epcos), partly offset by a 20 million impairment on
shares in BenQ Corporation. In contrast, fiscal 2005 included
higher expenses related to a major asset retirement obligation.
Other
interest expense
Other interest expense of Operations for fiscal 2006 was
325 million compared to interest expense of
175 million a year earlier. The change was mainly due
to increased intra-company financing of Operations by Corporate
Treasury
year-over-year.
Financing
and Real Estate
Siemens
Financial Services (SFS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
Total assets
|
|
|
10,543
|
|
|
|
10,162
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Income before income taxes at SFS was 306 million in
fiscal 2006 compared to 319 million a year earlier.
While both periods included a special dividend related to an
investment, the prior year also benefited from gains on the sale
of an investment and the sale of a 51% stake in the real estate
funds management business of Siemens Kapitalanlagegesellschaft
mbH (SKAG). Total assets at the end of fiscal 2006 were 4%
higher than at the end of the prior year due to expansion of the
leasing business.
Siemens
Real Estate (SRE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
Revenue
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,221
|
|
|
|
3,490
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
Income before income taxes at SRE was 115 million in
fiscal 2006, compared to 131 million a year earlier.
While gains on sale of real estate increased
year-over-year,
SREs results for the year were influenced by higher costs
for development projects and vacancy, as well as lower rental
income in Germany. Total assets declined 8% primarily due to
real estate disposals.
Eliminations,
reclassifications and Corporate Treasury
In fiscal 2006, income before taxes from eliminations,
reclassifications and Corporate Treasury was a negative
18 million compared to a positive
368 million a year earlier. The main factors for the
difference were the
mark-to-market
valuation of the cash settlement option associated with the
2.5 billion convertible bond issued by Siemens in
2003 and negative effects from derivative activities not
qualifying for hedge accounting at Corporate Treasury, only
partly offset by increased interest income from intra-company
financing.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Financial
Strategy and Capital Structure
Financial
Strategy
Siemens is committed to a strong financial profile, which gives
us the financial flexibility to achieve our growth and portfolio
optimization goals.
73
Our principal source of Company financing are cash inflows from
operating activities. Our Corporate Treasury generally manages
cash and cash equivalents for the entire Company and has primary
responsibility for raising funds in the capital markets for the
entire Company, including the Financing and Real Estate
component, except in countries with conflicting capital market
controls. In these countries, the relevant Siemens subsidiary
companies obtain financing primarily from local banks. At
September 30, 2007 Siemens held 4.005 billion in
cash and cash equivalents in various currencies of which
approximately 68% were managed by Corporate Treasury. Corporate
Treasury carefully manages investments of cash and cash
equivalents subject to strict credit requirements and
counterparty limits. In addition, Corporate Treasury lends funds
via intragroup financing to the Operations and Financing and
Real Estate components. This intragroup financing, together with
intragroup liabilities between the components, is shown under
intragroup liabilities in the balance sheets. Under this
approach, at September 30, 2007, 2.886 billion
of such intragroup financing was directly attributable to the
Financing and Real Estate component and the remainder to the
Operations component. At September 30, 2007, the Financing
and Real Estate component additionally held
180 million in short-term and 411 million
in long-term debt from external sources.
In addition to the sources of liquidity described below, we
monitor funding options available in the capital markets, as
well as trends in the availability and cost of such funding,
with a view to maintaining financial flexibility and limiting
repayment risk.
Capital
Structure
As of September 30, 2007 and 2006, our capital structure
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
28,996
|
|
|
|
25,193
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
As a % of total capital
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
5,637
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
9,860
|
|
|
|
13,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
15,497
|
|
|
|
15,297
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
As a % of total capital
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (total debt and total equity)
|
|
|
44,493
|
|
|
|
40,490
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
In fiscal 2007, total equity increased by 15% compared to fiscal
2006 primarily due to an increase in retained earnings. Total
debt increased during the last fiscal year by 1%. This resulted
in an increase in equity as a percentage of total capital to 65%
compared to 62% in fiscal 2006. Debt as a percentage of total
capital decreased to 35% from 38% in the prior year.
Siemens is not subject to any statutory capital requirements.
Commitments exist to sell or otherwise issue common shares in
connection with established share-based payment plans. In fiscal
2007, commitments for share-based payment were fulfilled through
capital increases. Beginning in fiscal 2008, we plan to fulfill
commitments for share-based compensation through repurchases of
the Companys shares. For additional information with
respect to stock-based compensation and treasury shares, see
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Ratings
A key factor in maintaining a strong financial profile is
Siemens credit rating, which is affected among other
factors by the capital structure, the ability to generate cash
flow, geographic and product diversification, as well as our
competitive market position. Our current corporate credit
ratings from Moodys Investors Service and
Standard & Poors are noted below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys
|
|
|
Standard &
|
|
|
|
Investors Service
|
|
|
Poors
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
A1
|
|
|
|
AA−
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
P-1
|
|
|
|
A-1+
|
|
74
On November 9, 2007, Moodys Investors Service
downgraded Siemens long-term corporate credit rating from
Aa3 to A1 and set our outlook from negative to
stable. The rating action followed our announcements
regarding the share-buyback program and capital structure target
mentioned above. The rating classification of A1 is the third
highest rating within the agencys debt ratings category.
The numerical modifier 1 indicates that our long-term debt ranks
in the higher end of the A category. The Moodys rating
outlook is an opinion regarding the likely direction of an
issuers rating over the medium-term. Rating outlooks fall
into the following six categories: positive, negative, stable,
developing, ratings under review and no outlook.
Moodys Investors Services rating for our short-term
corporate credit and commercial paper is
P-1, the
highest available rating in the prime rating system, which
assesses issuers ability to honor senior financial
obligations and contracts. It applies to senior unsecured
obligations with an original maturity of less than one year.
In addition, Moodys Investors Service published a credit
opinion. The most recent credit opinion for Siemens as of
November 13, 2007 classified the liquidity profile of the
Company as very healthy.
Standard & Poors rates our long-term corporate
credit AA. On June 15, 2007 Standard &
Poors resolved the CreditWatch negative, dated
April 26, 2007 and kept a negative outlook.
Within Standard & Poors long-term issue and
issuer credit ratings, an obligation rated AA has the second
highest rating category assigned. The modifier
indicates that our long-term debt ranks in
the lower end of the AA category. The Standard &
Poors rating outlook is an opinion regarding the likely
direction of an issuers rating over the medium-term.
Rating outlooks fall into the following four categories:
Positive, Negative, Stable and Developing. Outlooks have a time
frame of typically two years. Ratings appear on CreditWatch when
an event or deviation from an expected trend has occurred or is
expected, and additional information is necessary to take a
rating action. A rating review will normally be completed within
approximately 90 days, unless the outcome of a specific
event is pending.
Our short-term debt and commercial paper is rated
A-1+ within
Standard & Poors short-term issue credit
ratings, giving Siemens the highest-ranking short-term rating.
Siemens has no other agreements with nationally recognized
statistical rating organizations to provide long-term and
short-term credit ratings.
Please be advised that security ratings are not a recommendation
to buy, sell or hold securities. Credit ratings may be subject
to revision or withdrawal by the rating agencies at any time.
You should evaluate each rating independently of any other
rating.
Cash
FlowFiscal 2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
The following discussion presents an analysis of Siemens
cash flows for fiscal 2007 and 2006. The first table presents
cash flows for continuing and discontinued operations. The
latter category includes cash flows relating to Siemens
enterprise networks business, which is held for sale, the
carrier-related business, which was transferred into NSN, the
Mobile Devices business sold to BenQ Corporation, and SV, which
is held for sale pending the closing of its sale to Continental
AG. For further information on discontinued operations, see
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The
second table focuses on cash flows from continuing operations
for the components of Siemens.
Since the third quarter of fiscal 2007, Siemens reports free
cash flow, defined as net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities less cash used for additions to intangible assets and
property, plant and equipment. We believe this measure is
helpful to our investors as an indicator of our ability to
generate cash from operations and to pay for discretionary and
non-discretionary expenditures not included in the measure, such
as dividends, debt repayment or strategic investments. We also
use free cash flow to compare cash generation among the segments
(for further information, refer to Consolidated Financial
StatementsSegment Information).
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
A
|
|
|
9,822
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
(2,494
|
)
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
7,328
|
|
|
|
5,659
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
(10,068
|
)
|
|
|
(4,315
|
)
|
|
|
(1,289
|
)
|
|
|
(381
|
)
|
|
|
(11,357
|
)
|
|
|
(4,696
|
)
|
Herein: Additions to intangible assets and property, plant and
equipment
|
|
B
|
|
|
(3,067
|
)
|
|
|
(3,183
|
)
|
|
|
(684
|
)
|
|
|
(869
|
)
|
|
|
(3,751
|
)
|
|
|
(4,052
|
)
|
Free cash flow*
|
|
A+B
|
|
|
6,755
|
|
|
|
1,820
|
|
|
|
(3,178
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
3,577
|
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
|
* |
The closest comparable financial measure under IFRS is Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities. Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities from
continuing operations as well as from continuing and
discontinued operations is reported within the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for Siemens as
a whole as well as for the components of Siemens (see table
below). Refer to Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for information on the reconciliation of cash
flow used for Additions to intangible assets and property,
plant and equipment as reported in this table and the
table below into the line item Additions to intangible
assets and property, plant and equipment as reported
within the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow.
Other companies that use Free cash flow may define and calculate
Free cash flow differently.
|
Operating activities provided net cash of
7.328 billion in fiscal 2007, compared to
5.659 billion in fiscal 2006. These results include
both continuing operations and discontinued operations. Within
the total, continuing operations provided net cash of
9.822 billion, up from 5.003 billion a
year earlier. Discontinued operations used net cash of
2.494 billion in the current period, including a
build-up of
net working capital, particularly receivables as well as
640 million tax payments related to the carve-out of
SV. A year earlier, discontinued operations provided net cash of
656 million.
Investing activities used net cash of
11.357 billion in fiscal 2007, a substantial increase
from 4.696 billion in the prior-year period. Within
these results, continuing operations were the primary factor in
the change
year-over-year,
using net cash of 10.068 billion compared to net cash
used of 4.315 billion in the same period a year
earlier. Discontinued operations used net cash of
1.289 billion compared to net cash used of
381 million in the prior-year period, which benefited
from 465 million in proceeds from the sale of our
shares in Juniper Networks, Inc (Juniper).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFS, SRE and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Treasury*
|
|
|
Siemens
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
A
|
|
|
6,407
|
|
|
|
3,405
|
|
|
|
3,415
|
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
|
|
9,822
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
(9,262
|
)
|
|
|
(2,995
|
)
|
|
|
(806
|
)
|
|
|
(1,320
|
)
|
|
|
(10,068
|
)
|
|
|
(4,315
|
)
|
Herein: Additions to intangible assets and property, plant and
equipment
|
|
B
|
|
|
(2,313
|
)
|
|
|
(2,415
|
)
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
|
|
(768
|
)
|
|
|
(3,067
|
)
|
|
|
(3,183
|
)
|
Free cash flow
|
|
A+B
|
|
|
4,094
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
2,661
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
6,755
|
|
|
|
1,820
|
|
|
|
* |
Also includes eliminations and reclassifications.
|
Operating activities provided net cash within continuing
Operations of 6.407 billion in fiscal 2007,
substantially up from 3.405 billion the year before.
This increase was driven by a significant higher income from
continuing operations
year-over-year
as well as by a substantial improvement in net working capital
compared to the prior-year period. Accordingly, cash outflows
relating to net inventories improved especially at I&S and
SBT and current liabilities increased primarily due to advanced
payments at PG. The current period also includes payments of
431 million relating to the antitrust investigation
involving suppliers of high-voltage gas-isolated switching
systems mentioned earlier, while the prior period included
substantially higher cash outflows related to
76
severance payments at SIS. Within Financing and Real Estate and
Corporate Treasury, the change
year-over-year
in net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations was due primarily to accounts receivable related to
the carve-outs of SV and the carrier activities transferred into
NSN. For Siemens overall, net cash provided by operating
activities on a continuing basis amounted to
9.822 billion in fiscal 2007 compared to
5.003 billion in fiscal 2006.
Investing activities in continuing operations used
9.262 billion within Operations in fiscal 2007.
Thereof, net cash outflows for acquisitions amounted to
7.334 billion, including approximately
4.2 billion spent for the Bayer acquisition at Med
and approximately 2.7 billion spent for the
acquisition of UGS Corp. at A&D. During the prior period,
investing activities in continuing operations used net cash of
2.995 billion, benefiting from
1.127 billion in net proceeds from the sale of our
shares in Infineon Technologies AG (Infineon). Net cash outflows
for acquisitions amounted to 2.049 billion in fiscal
2006, including the acquisition of DPC at Med with approximately
1.3 billion net of 94 million cash
acquired, as well as Electrium at A&D, Bewator at SBT, and
the coal gasification business of Sustec-Group and Wheelabrator
at PG with a combined preliminary purchase price of
approximately 0.4 billion. Investing activities on a
continuing basis at Corporate Treasury and Financing and Real
Estate used net cash of 806 million in fiscal 2007
compared to 1.320 billion in the prior period. The
change
year-over-year
is mainly related to
available-for-sale
financial assets. For Siemens overall, net cash used in
investing activities in continuing operations increased to
10.068 billion in fiscal 2007 from
4.315 billion in fiscal 2006.
Free cash flow from continuing operations for Siemens was
6.755 billion for fiscal 2007, a significant increase
from 1.820 billion in the same period a year earlier.
The change
year-over-year
is due to the increase in net cash provided by operating
activities mentioned above, combined with lower capital
expenditures (CAPEX), defined as spending for additions to
intangible assets and property, plant and equipment.
Accordingly, cash flow used for CAPEX decreased to
3.067 billion, down from 3.183 billion a
year before, especially due to reduced spendings at TS, SIS and
PG.
Financing activities from continuing and discontinued
operations in fiscal 2007 used net cash of
1.187 billion compared to net cash provided of
1.206 billion in fiscal 2006.
In the current period, changes in short-term debt provided net
cash of 4.386 billion, mainly due to the issuance of
commercial paper and medium term notes. These cash inflows were
compensated by cash outflows for the repayment of long-term debt
amounting to 4.595 billion in the current period,
including approximately 3.2 billion in cash used for
the redemption of the outstanding notes of the convertible bond
mentioned earlier as well as by cash used for the redemption of
a CHF250 million bond and a 991 million bond.
Dividends paid to shareholders increased in the current period
to 1.292 billion.
Financing activities in fiscal 2006 were characterized by
substantial raising of long-term debt, totaling
6.701 billion. This included the issuance of two
tranches of U.S. dollar-denominated bonds totaling
U.S.$1.0 billion (0.8 billion). Further we
issued four tranches of U.S. dollar-denominated bonds totaling
U.S.$5.0 billion (3.9 billion), as well as a
hybrid bond in two tranches, one denominated in euros (nominal
900 million) and one denominated in British pounds
(nominal £750 million, or 1.1 billion).
Repayment of long-term debt used 1.710 billion in
cash in fiscal 2006, including a 1.6 billion payment
for a bond, which was due on July 4, 2006. The repayment of
commercial paper programs was the major effect for cash outflows
of 1.762 billion related to changes in short term
debt. Dividends paid to shareholders amounted to
1.201 billion in fiscal 2006.
Cash
FlowFiscal 2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
The following discussion presents an analysis of Siemens
cash flows for fiscal 2006 and 2005. The first table presents
cash flow for continuing and discontinued operations. In order
to ensure comparability with the cash flow discussion for fiscal
2007, the latter category includes cash flows relating to
Siemens enterprise networks business, which is held for
sale, the carrier-related business, which was transferred into
NSN, the Mobile Devices business sold to BenQ Corporation as
well as SV, which is held for sale pending the closing of its
sale to Continental AG. For further information on discontinued
operations, see Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. The second table focuses on cash flow from
continuing operations for the components of Siemens.
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
A
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
3,198
|
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
5,659
|
|
|
|
3,642
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
(4,315
|
)
|
|
|
(5,052
|
)
|
|
|
(381
|
)
|
|
|
(852
|
)
|
|
|
(4,696
|
)
|
|
|
(5,904
|
)
|
Herein: Additions to intangible assets
and property, plant and equipment
|
|
B
|
|
|
(3,183
|
)
|
|
|
(2,670
|
)
|
|
|
(869
|
)
|
|
|
(954
|
)
|
|
|
(4,052
|
)
|
|
|
(3,624
|
)
|
Free cash flow
|
|
A+B
|
|
|
1,820
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(510
|
)
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Operating activities provided net cash of
5.659 billion in fiscal 2006, compared to
3.642 billion in fiscal 2005. These results include
both continuing operations and discontinued operations. Within
the total, continuing operations provided net cash of
5.003 billion, up from 3.198 billion a
year earlier. Discontinued operations provided net cash of
656 million in fiscal 2006, compared to
444 million a year earlier.
Investing activities used net cash of
4.696 billion in fiscal 2006, down from
5.904 billion in the prior-year period. Within these
results, continuing operations were the primary factor in the
change
year-over-year,
using net cash of 4.315 billion compared to net cash
used of 5.052 billion in the same period a year
earlier. In fiscal 2006, discontinued operations used net cash
of 381 million, benefiting from
465 million in proceeds from the sale of our shares
in Juniper Networks, Inc., compared to net cash used of
852 million in the prior-year period. In accordance
with the contracts relating to the sale of the mobile devices
business, cash outflows for operating and investing activities
in fiscal 2006 included payments for product platform transition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFS, SRE and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Treasury*
|
|
|
Siemens
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
A
|
|
|
3,405
|
|
|
|
2,322
|
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
|
|
876
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
3,198
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
(2,995
|
)
|
|
|
(4,133
|
)
|
|
|
(1,320
|
)
|
|
|
(919
|
)
|
|
|
(4,315
|
)
|
|
|
(5,052
|
)
|
Herein: Additions to intangible assets
and property, plant and equipment
|
|
B
|
|
|
(2,415
|
)
|
|
|
(1,997
|
)
|
|
|
(768
|
)
|
|
|
(673
|
)
|
|
|
(3,183
|
)
|
|
|
(2,670
|
)
|
Free cash flow
|
|
A+B
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
1,820
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
* |
Also includes eliminations and reclassifications.
|
Operating activities provided net cash within continuing
Operations of 3.405 billion in fiscal 2006, up from
2.322 billion the year before. Net cash outflows
associated with an increase in Net working capital amounted
approximately 1.3 billion in fiscal 2006 compared to
approximately 0.6 billion in fiscal 2005, reflecting
business growth
year-over-year.
Furthermore, fiscal 2005 included 1.496 billion in
cash outflows for supplemental pension contributions. Within
Corporate Treasury and Financing and Real Estate operating
activities provided on a continuing basis net cash of
1.598 billion, up from 876 million the
year before, primarily due to higher proceeds from foreign
currency exchange derivatives. For Siemens overall, operating
activities provided on a continuing basis net cash of
5.003 billion in fiscal 2006 compared to
3.198 billion in fiscal 2005.
Investing activities in operations used net cash of
2.995 billion on a continuing basis in fiscal 2006,
benefiting from 1.127 billion in net proceeds from
the sale of our shares in Infineon Technologies AG. Net cash
outflows for acquisitions amounted to 2.049 billion
in fiscal 2006, including the acquisition of DPC at Med with
approximately 1.3 billion net of
94 million cash acquired, as well as Electrium at
A&D, Bewator at SBT, and the coal gasification business of
Sustec-Group and Wheelabrator at PG with a combined preliminary
purchase price of approximately 0.4 billion. During
the prior period, investing activities in continuing operations
used net cash of
78
4.133 billion. Thereof, net cash used for
acquisitions amounted to 2.272 billion, including VA
Tech, allocated primarily to PTD and I&S, for a total of
514 million, net of 535 million cash
acquired; CTI at Med for 734 million, net of
60 million cash acquired; Flender and Robicon at
A&D, and Bonus at PG, in total for approximately
1.2 billion in fiscal 2005. Net cash used by
investing activities on a continuing basis at Corporate Treasury
and Financing and Real Estate increased to
1.320 billion in fiscal 2006 compared to
919 million in the prior period, mainly due to higher
net investments in
available-for-sale
financial assets. For Siemens overall, net cash used in
investing activities in continuing operations declined to
4.315 billion in fiscal 2006 from
5.052 billion in fiscal 2005.
Free cash flow from continuing operations for Siemens was
1.820 billion for fiscal 2006, up from
528 million in the same period a year earlier. The
change
year-over-year
is due to the increase in net cash provided by operating
activities mentioned above and was partly compensated by
increased cash outflows for intangible assets and property,
plant and equipment.
Financing activities from continuing and discontinued
operations in fiscal 2006 provided net cash of
1.206 billion compared to net cash used of
1.844 billion in fiscal 2005. The primary factor in
this change was 6.701 billion in proceeds from new
long-term debt in fiscal 2006. Accordingly, in fiscal 2006, we
issued two tranches of U.S. dollar-denominated bonds totaling
U.S.$1.0 billion (0.8 billion at this time).
Further we issued four tranches of U.S. dollar-denominated bonds
totaling U.S.$5.0 billion (3.9 billion at this
time), as well as a hybrid bond in two tranches, one denominated
in euros (900 million) and one denominated in British
pounds (£750 million, or 1.1 billion at
this time). Repayment of debt used 1.710 billion in
cash in fiscal 2006, including a 1.6 billion payment
for a bond, which was due on July 4, 2006. A year earlier,
repayment of long-term debt used 848 million. At the
end of fiscal 2006, Siemens had no amount outstanding under its
commercial paper program, which was the major effect for net
cash outflows for short-term debt of 1.762 billion. A
year earlier, issuance of commercial paper contributed to the
cash inflows from short-term debt of 711 million.
Dividends paid to shareholders of Siemens AG rose
year-over-year,
to 1.201 billion in fiscal 2006 from
1.112 billion in fiscal 2005.
Capital
Resources and Requirements
Our capital resources are comprised of cash and cash
equivalents, current
available-for-sale
financial assets, total equity and cash flow from operating
activities. Our capital requirements include scheduled debt
service, regular capital spending and ongoing cash requirements
from operating activities.
Net liquidity results from total liquidity, comprised of cash
and cash equivalents and
available-for-sale
financial assets, less total debt, comprised of short-term debt
and current maturities of long-term debt and long-term debt.
Total debt relates to our commercial papers, medium-term notes,
bonds, loans from banks and obligations under finance leases as
stated on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We use the net
liquidity measure for internal corporate finance management, as
well as external communication with investors, analysts and
rating agencies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
|
|
10,214
|
|
Current
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
Total liquidity
|
|
|
4,198
|
|
|
|
10,810
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
5,637
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
9,860
|
|
|
|
13,122
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
15,497
|
|
|
|
15,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liquidity
|
|
|
(11,299
|
)
|
|
|
(4,487
|
)
|
Our sources of liquidity consist of a variety of short and
long-term financial instruments including loans from financial
institutions, commercial papers, notes and bonds.
Credit facilitiesWe have three credit facilities at
our disposal, which are for general corporate purposes. Our
credit facilities at September 30, 2007 consist of
6.797 billion in committed lines of credit.
79
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$5.0 billion undrawn syndicated multi-currency
revolving credit facility expiring March 2012 provided by a
syndicate of international banks;
|
|
|
|
450 million undrawn revolving credit facility
expiring September 2012 provided by a domestic bank;
|
|
|
|
U.S.$4.0 billion syndicated multi-currency credit facility
expiring August 2013 provided by a syndicate of international
banks. The facility comprises a U.S.$1.0 billion term loan
which was drawn in January 2007 and an undrawn
U.S.$3.0 billion revolving tranche.
|
Commercial paper programIn fiscal 2007, we combined
our U.S.$5 billion commercial paper program and
3 billion European commercial paper program into a
U.S.$9 billion Global multi-currency commercial paper
program (6.347 billion), including extendable notes
capabilities. As of September 30, 2007, the nominal amount
outstanding under this program was U.S.$6.182 billion
(4.360 billion). Our issues of commercial paper have
a maturity of typically less than 90 days.
Medium-term note programWe have a medium-term note
program of 5.0 billion. During fiscal 2007, the
Company decided not to update the listing of the program.
Accordingly, we can issue debt as private placements but not as
listed debt. The nominal amount outstanding under this program
was 1.389 billion at September 30, 2007.
None of our credit facilities contain a material adverse change
provision of the type often found in facilities of such nature
and none of our global commercial paper and medium-term note
programs nor our credit facilities contain specific financial
covenants such as rating triggers or interest coverage, leverage
or capitalization ratios that could trigger remedies, such as
acceleration of repayment or additional collateral.
Other financing instrumentsIn fiscal 2006, Siemens
Financieringsmaatschappij N.V., a wholly owned Dutch subsidiary
of Siemens AG issued two series of notes of
U.S.$750 million maturing 2009 and 2012, as well as two
series of notes of U.S.$1.750 billion maturing 2016 and
2026. In addition, Siemens Financieringsmaatschappij N.V. issued
a Hybrid Capital bond in a euro tranche of
900 million and a British pound tranche of
£750 million. The total nominal amount of our Hybrid
bonds is approximately 2 billion. The reason for
these issuances was to better match fund capital and currency
requirements, to diversify our investor base and to strengthen
the overall balance sheet.
Further information about our bonds and the other components of
debt is given below and in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Capital expenditures for Operating GroupsThe
capital expenditure rate (expressed as a percentage of
depreciation and amortization) for property, plant and equipment
(PPE) and intangible assets for fiscal 2007 was 109%. We have
set a mid-term target to keep additions to PPE and intangible
assets as a percentage of depreciation and amortization to
95%-115%.
Cash flows related to portfolio activitiesAfter the
close of fiscal 2007, we occurred in November 2007 substantial
debt financed cash outflows in connection with the Dade Behring
acquisition. The preliminary purchase price for Dade Behring
amounts to approximately 5 billion. In contrast, we
will receive substantial cash inflows from the sale of SV
(preliminary purchase price of approximately
11.4 billion). For further information, see
Business Overview and Economic
EnvironmentStrategic Overview, as well as
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Share buyback programSubsequent to the close of the
fiscal year end 2007, we announced our planned share-buyback
program, which we will conduct over the next three years up to a
total cash outflow of approximately 10 billion. For
additional see Subsequent Events.
DividendsAt the Annual Shareholders Meeting
scheduled for January 24, 2008, the Managing Board, in
agreement with the Supervisory Board, will submit the following
proposal: to pay 1.60 per share as a dividend, which
aggregates to an expected total payout of
1.463 billion.
80
Contractual
Obligations
In the ordinary course of business, Siemens primary
contractual obligations regarding cash involve debt service,
purchase obligations and operating lease commitments.
The following table summarizes contractual obligations for
future cash outflows as of September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
|
4-5 years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
15,497
|
|
|
|
5,637
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
3,123
|
|
|
|
5,890
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
12,884
|
|
|
|
11,622
|
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
2,450
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
|
30,831
|
|
|
|
17,840
|
|
|
|
2,697
|
|
|
|
3,763
|
|
|
|
6,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DebtAt September 30, 2007, Siemens had
15.497 billion of short- and long-term debt, of which
5.637 billion will become due within the next
12 months. Short-term debt includes current maturities of
long-term debt, as well as loans from banks coming due within
the next 12 months. At September 30, 2007, the
weighted average maturity of our bonds and notes due after one
year was 8.24 years. At September 30, 2006, total debt
was 15.297 billion. Further information about the
components of debt is given in Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Debt for Siemens at September 30, 2007 consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Notes and bonds
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
8,196
|
|
|
|
8,889
|
|
Loans from banks
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
Other financial indebtedness
|
|
|
4,418
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
4,973
|
|
Obligations under finance leases
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
5,637
|
|
|
|
9,860
|
|
|
|
15,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The capital structure of the Financing and Real Estate component
at September 30, 2007 and 2006 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
SFS
|
|
|
SRE
|
|
|
SFS
|
|
|
SRE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
8,912
|
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
|
|
10,543
|
|
|
|
3,221
|
|
Allocated equity
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
920
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
7,081
|
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
8,819
|
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
Therein intragroup financing
|
|
|
6,822
|
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
8,487
|
|
|
|
928
|
|
Therein debt from external sources
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
Debt to equity ratio
|
|
|
6.80
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
7.80
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFS internally purchased receivables
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFS debt excluding SFS internally purchased receivables
|
|
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both Moodys and Standard & Poors view SFS
as a captive finance company. These ratings agencies generally
recognize and accept higher levels of debt attributable to
captive finance subsidiaries in determining long-term and
short-term credit ratings.
The allocated equity for SFS is determined and influenced by the
respective credit ratings of the rating agencies and by the
expected size and quality of its portfolio of leasing and
factoring assets and equity investments
81
and is determined annually. This allocation is designed to cover
the risks of the underlying business and is in line with common
credit risk management banking standards. The actual risk
profile of the SFS portfolio is monitored and controlled monthly
and is evaluated against the allocated equity.
Purchase obligationsAt September 30,
2007, Siemens had 12.884 billion in purchase
obligations. Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase
goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and
which specify all of the following items: (i) fixed or
minimum quantities, (ii) fixed, minimum or variable price
provisions and (iii) approximate timing of the transaction.
Operating leasesAt September 30, 2007,
Siemens had a total of 2.450 billion in total future
payment obligations under non-cancelable operating leases. For
additional information, see Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Siemens is subject to asset retirement obligations related to
certain items of property, plant and equipment. Such asset
retirement obligations are primarily attributable to
environmental
clean-up
costs which amounted to 597 million as of
September 30, 2007 and to costs primarily associated with
the removal of leasehold improvements at the end of the lease
term amounting to 38 million as of September 30,
2007. For additional information with respect to asset
retirement obligations, see Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
GuaranteesGuarantees are principally
represented by credit guarantees and guarantees of third-party
performance. As of September 30, 2007, the undiscounted
amount of maximum potential future payments for guarantees was
8.463 billion. Credit guarantees cover the financial
obligation of third-parties in cases where Siemens is the vendor
and/or contractual partner. In addition, Siemens provides credit
line guarantees with variable utilization to associated and
related companies. The total amount for credit guarantees was
386 million as of September 30, 2007.
Performance bonds and guarantees of advanced payments guarantee
the fulfillment of contractual commitments of partners in a
consortium where Siemens may be the general or subsidiary
partner. In the event of non-performance under the contract by
the consortium partner(s), Siemens will be required to pay up to
an
agreed-upon
maximum amount. Guarantees of third-party performance amounted
to 1.995 billion as of September 30, 2007. The
Federal Republic of Germany has commissioned a consortium
consisting of SIS and IBM Deutschland GmbH (IBM) to modernize
and operate the non-military information and communications
technology of the German Federal Armed Forces (Bundeswehr). This
project is called HERKULES. A project company, BWI
Informationstechnik GmbH (BWI) will provide the services
required by the terms of the contract. SIS is a shareholder in
the project company. The total contract value amounts to a
maximum of approximately 6 billion. In connection
with the consortium and execution of the contract between BWI
and the Federal Republic of Germany in December 2006, Siemens
issued several guarantees connected to each other legally and
economically in favor of the Federal Republic of Germany and of
the consortium member IBM. The guarantees ensure that BWI has
sufficient resources to provide the required services and to
fulfill its contractual obligations. These guarantees are listed
as a separate item HERKULES obligations due
to their compound and multilayer nature. Total future payments
potentially required by Siemens amount to 4.2 billion
and will be reduced by approximately 400 million per
year over the
10-year
contract period. Yearly payments under these guarantees are
limited to 400 million plus, if applicable, a maximum
of 90 million in unused guarantees carried forward
from the prior year. Furthermore, Siemens has provided
indemnification in connection with dispositions of certain
business entities, which protects the buyer from certain tax,
legal, and other risks related to the purchased business entity.
These other guarantees were 1.882 billion as of
September 30, 2007. In the event that it becomes probable
that Siemens will be required to satisfy these guarantees,
provisions are established. Such provisions are established in
addition to the liabilities recognized for the non-contingent
component of the guarantees. Most of the guarantees have fixed
or scheduled expiration dates, and in practice such guarantees
are rarely drawn. For additional information with respect to our
guarantees, see Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
82
Pension
Plan Funding
The defined benefit obligation (DBO) of Siemens principal
pension plans, which considers future compensation increases,
amounted to 25.0 billion on September 30, 2007,
compared to 26.7 billion on September 30, 2006.
The fair value of plan assets as of September 30, 2007 was
24.0 billion compared to 23.8 billion on
September 30, 2006. Accordingly, the combined funding
status of Siemens principal pension plans on September 30,
2007 showed an underfunding of 1.0 billion compared
to an underfunding of 2.9 billion at the end of the
prior fiscal year. The actual return on plan assets during the
last twelve months amounted to 1.295 billion. This
represents a 5.6% return, compared to the expected return of
6.5%. Siemens was able to generate this return mainly due to
strong equity markets (amongst others emerging markets) and good
real estate returns, despite of the negative impact of interest
rate increases on fixed income investments.
Siemens funding policy for its pension funds is part of
its overall commitment to sound financial management, which also
includes an ongoing analysis of the structure of its pension
liabilities, particularly the duration by class of
beneficiaries. To balance return and risk, Siemens has developed
a pension benefit risk management concept. As prime risk we have
identified a decline in the principle plans funded status
as a result of adverse developments of plan assets and/or
defined benefit obligations. We monitor our investments and our
defined benefit obligations in order to measure such prime risk.
The prime risk quantifies the expected maximum decline in the
funded status for a given confidence level over a given time
horizon. A risk budget on group level forms the basis for the
determination of our investment strategy, i.e. the strategic
assets class allocation of principle plan assets and the degree
of interest rate risk hedging. Both, risk budget and investment
strategy, are regularly reviewed by external experts of the
international insurance industry to allow for an integral view
on pension assets and pension liabilities. We select asset
managers based on our quantitative and qualitative analysis and
subsequently monitor their performance and risk, both on a
stand-alone basis, as well as in the broader portfolio context.
We review the asset allocation of each plan in light of the
duration of the related pension liabilities and analyze trends
and events that may affect asset values in order to initiate
appropriate measures at a very early stage.
Siemens also regularly reviews the design of its pension plans.
Historically, the majority of Siemens pension plans have
included significant defined benefits. However, in order to
reduce the Companys exposure to certain risks associated
with defined benefit plans, such as longevity, inflation,
effects of compensation increases and other factors, we
implemented new pension plans in some of our major subsidiaries
including Germany, the U.S. and the U.K. during the last several
years. The benefits of these new plans are based predominantly
on contributions made by the Company and, to a minor extent, the
effects of longevity, inflation adjustments and compensation
increases. We expect to continue to review the need for the
implementation of similar plan designs outside Germany in the
coming years to better control future benefit obligations and
related costs.
For more information on Siemens pension plans, see Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Overview
Financial Position
Our financial position in fiscal 2007 was predominantly
influenced by the pending sale of SV, the transfer of the
carrier-related operations of the former Group Com into NSN and
the integration of the diagnostics division of Bayer AG and UGS.
The assets and liabilities of SV-related operations of Siemens
are classified on the balance sheet as held for disposal and
measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value
less costs to sell, due to the pending sale. The assets and
liabilities of the carrier-related operations of the former Com
Group classified on September 30, 2006 on the balance sheet
as held for disposal have been transferred into NSN during
fiscal 2007, in return the value of the investments accounted
for using the equity method increased. The integration of the
Bayer and UGS businesses during fiscal 2007 increased assets and
liabilities, whereas the acquisitions themselves resulted in
significant cash outflows. For information on acquisitions and
dispositions and on the carrying amounts of major classes of
assets and liabilities held for disposal, see Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
83
The following table shows current assets at end of fiscal 2007
and fiscal 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
|
|
10,214
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
14,620
|
|
|
|
15,148
|
|
Other current financial assets
|
|
|
2,932
|
|
|
|
2,370
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
12,930
|
|
|
|
12,790
|
|
Income tax receivables
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
1,274
|
|
Assets classified as held for disposal
|
|
|
11,532
|
|
|
|
7,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
47,932
|
|
|
|
50,014
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents totaled 4.005 billion as of
September 30, 2007. The decrease of
6.209 billion was primarily driven by cash outflows
associated with investing activities, in particular due the
acquisitions mentioned above. For further information, see
Cash Flow-Fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006.
The decrease in trade and other receivables
year-over-year
was primarily driven by reclassification of SV assets in assets
held for disposal. Despite the same reclassification effect for
inventories, inventories increased due to the broad based order
growth at Operating Groups and the above-mentioned acquisitions.
Assets classified as held for disposal increased by
4.368 billion. This change primarily reflects the
transfer of assets of approximately 5 billion of the
carrier-related operations of the former Com Group into NSN
during fiscal 2007, and the reclassification of SV into assets
classified as held for disposal of 9 billion.
Long-term assets at the respective balance sheet dates for
fiscal 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
12,501
|
|
|
|
9,689
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
4,619
|
|
|
|
3,385
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
10,555
|
|
|
|
12,072
|
|
Investments accounted for using the equity method
|
|
|
7,016
|
|
|
|
2,956
|
|
Other financial assets
|
|
|
5,561
|
|
|
|
5,042
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
2,594
|
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term assets
|
|
|
43,623
|
|
|
|
37,514
|
|
In fiscal 2007, the net increase in goodwill and other
intangible assets primarily related to acquisitions and purchase
accounting adjustments with an offsetting effect from the
reclassification of SV. For further information see Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The net decrease in property, plant and equipment results from
the reclassification of SV assets into assets held for disposal.
The total decrease in current assets and the increase in
long-term assets were mainly related to the transfer of assets
of approximately 5 billion, classified as held for
disposal, of the carrier-related operations of the former Com
Group into NSN during fiscal 2007, as well as acquisitions that
caused a reduction in cash and cash equivalents and an increase
in long-term assets.
84
The table below shows current and long-term liabilities at the
respective balance sheet dates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
5,637
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
8,382
|
|
|
|
8,443
|
|
Other current financial liabilities
|
|
|
2,553
|
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
Current provisions
|
|
|
3,581
|
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
Income tax payables
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
17,058
|
|
|
|
15,591
|
|
Liabilities associated with assets classified as held for
disposal
|
|
|
4,542
|
|
|
|
5,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
43,894
|
|
|
|
38,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
9,860
|
|
|
|
13,122
|
|
Pension plans and similar commitments
|
|
|
2,780
|
|
|
|
5,083
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
1,858
|
|
Other financial liabilities
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
18,034
|
|
|
|
22,669
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt totaled
5.637 billion at the end of fiscal 2007, an increase
of 3.462 billion from the prior year-end. This
increase primarily results from the issuance of commercial paper
in fiscal 2007, with an outstanding amount of
4.332 billion as of September 30, 2007.
Compared to fiscal 2006, long-term debt decreased by
3.262 billion to 9.860 billion in fiscal
2007. In fiscal 2007 the Company repurchased a principal amount
of approximately 1.9 billion of its outstanding
convertible notes of the 2.5 billion 1.375%
-bond and paid approximately 3.2 billion in
cash and redeemed two outstanding bonds. Further information
about the notes and bonds is also provided underCapital
Resources andCapital Requirements as well as in the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Shareholders equity and total assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Total equity attributable to shareholders of Siemens AG
|
|
|
28,996
|
|
|
|
25,193
|
|
Equity ratio
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
Minority Interest
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
91,555
|
|
|
|
87,528
|
|
Total shareholders equity attributable to shareholders of
Siemens AG increased by 3.803 billion to
28.996 billion at the end of fiscal 2007. The
increase results mainly from net income attributable to
shareholders of Siemens AG of 3.806 billion and
actuarial gains on pension plans and similar commitments of
1.234 billion, less dividend payments of
1.292 billion.
Total assets increased by 5% in fiscal 2007, compared to fiscal
2006. Total shareholders equity increased by 15%, as a
result of which the equity ratio improved by almost three
percentage points, to 32%.
For additional information on the financial position, see
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
85
At the beginning of November 2007, Siemens completed the
acquisition of Dade Behring which will be integrated into
Meds Diagnostics division. For additional information, see
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
On November 7, 2007, the Company also announced a share
buyback program with a total volume of up to
10 billion by 2010.
On November 28, 2007, the Company announced changes to the
Managing Board of Siemens AG. The new Managing Board structure,
where the previous distinction between the Managing Board and
the Corporate Executive Committee will be eliminated, and the
new appointments will take effect on January 1, 2008.
Dr. Heinrich Hiesinger, who has been a member of the
Managing Board of Siemens AG since June 2007, will be CEO
of the Industry Sector. Wolfgang Dehen, previously CEO of
Siemens VDO Automotive AG, has been appointed a member of the
Managing Board of Siemens AG and will be CEO of the Energy
Sector. Prof. Dr. Erich R. Reinhardt, previously Group President
of Medical Solutions and a member of the Managing Board of
Siemens AG, will be CEO of the Healthcare Sector. In addition,
Dr. Siegfried Russwurm has been appointed a member of the
Managing Board of Siemens AG and will take over as head of Human
Resources and also as Labour Director, in accordance with
§ 33 of the German Codetermination Act. Rudi
Lamprecht, Eduardo Montes, Dr. Uriel J. Sharef and
Prof. Dr. Klaus Wucherer will resign from the Managing
Board at the end of the 2007 calendar year. They will be
available to the Company as consultants. Dr. Jürgen
Radomski, previously head of Corporate Personnel and Labour
Director, will retire on December 31, 2007.
Financial
Impact of Compliance Matters
The Company has conducted an analysis of the impact on the
Companys financial statements of issues raised by
allegations of violations of anti-corruption legislation. As
previously reported, within the former Com Group, the
Companys other Groups and regional companies a number of
Business Consultant Agreements (BCAs) and similar sales-related
arrangements have been identified. The Company has identified a
large volume of payments made in connection with these contracts
as well as other payments for which the Company has not been
able either to establish a valid business purpose or to clearly
identify the recipient. These payments raise concerns in
particular under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) in the
United States, anti-corruption legislation in Germany and
similar legislation in other countries. The payments identified
were recorded as deductible business expenses in prior periods
in determining income tax provisions. As previously reported,
the Companys investigation determined that certain of
these payments were non-deductible under tax regulations of
Germany and other jurisdictions.
In fiscal 2007, the Company substantially completed its analysis
of the tax deductibility of payments under the BCAs and other
sales-related agreements with third-party intermediaries
identified at the former Com Group, the remaining Groups and in
regional companies. In fiscal 2007, the Company also
substantially completed its risk-based analysis of cash and
check payments at the former Com Group, the Companys other
Groups and in regional companies, for which limited
documentation was available, and which may also raise concerns
under the FCPA and anti-corruption legislation in Germany and
other countries.
The Company has accounted for income tax-related charges with
respect to fiscal
2000-2006
and adjusted comparative amounts for fiscal 2005 and 2006 as
summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
In October 2007, the Company reached a final settlement
(tatsächliche Verständigung) with the German
tax authorities regarding the deductibility for tax purposes of
certain payments at the former Com Group at Siemens AG with
respect to fiscal
2000-2006.
Pursuant to the settlement, the Companys income tax
obligation relating to payments in connection with BCAs, other
sales-related agreements with third-party intermediaries and
other payments relating to the former Com Group at Siemens AG
was determined to be 179 million. Payments of
approximately 449 million were determined to be
non-deductible for tax purposes. The Company also recorded
interest charges of 12 million related to the tax
obligations.
|
|
|
|
In October 2007, the German tax authorities provided the
findings of the tax audit relating to payments under BCAs and
similar sales-related agreements with third-party intermediaries
by the Companys
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
German Non-Com Groups and entities for fiscal
2000-2005 in
the course of a final audit meeting (Schlussbesprechung).
The Company accepted the assessment of the tax authorities.
Based on this assessment, the Company determined non-deductible
payments relating to fiscal 2006 and considered this information
in the income tax return for fiscal 2006. Based on the above,
the Company recorded income tax expenses of
264 million for fiscal
2000-2006
with respect to payments with a total volume of approximately
599 million which were determined to be
non-deductible for tax purposes. The Company also recorded
interest charges of 11 million related to the tax
obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2007, the Company also recorded charges for fiscal
2000-2006 in
the amount of 77 million for estimated additional
income tax expenses outside of Germany relating to payments in
connection with BCAs, other sales-related agreements with
third-party intermediaries and other payments of approximately
258 million which were determined to be
non-deductible for tax purposes. The Company also recorded
interest charges of 5 million related to the tax
obligations.
|
As previously reported, in fiscal 2006, the Company recorded
income tax charges in the amount of 168 million
relating to German income tax liabilities with respect to
payments of approximately 417 million. In fiscal
2006, the Company also recorded certain immaterial charges with
respect to non-German tax obligations. Due to the matters
mentioned above, the Company accounted for an additional amount
of 352 million in income tax charges and
28 million in related interest charges related to
fiscal
2000-2006.
Siemens adjusted comparative amounts for fiscal 2005 and 2006 in
the consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2007. The
effect of these adjustments on net income for fiscal 2006 and
2005 and shareholders equity as of October 1, 2004
amounted to an increase of 25 million, a decrease of
69 million and a decrease of 336 million,
respectively. For further information, please refer to the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
In addition, in fiscal 2007, the Company also recorded an
immaterial charge in respect of certain non-German tax penalties
relating to the matters described above; the Company further
recorded an immaterial tax charge based on its estimate of
potential tax liabilities relating to sales-related intermediary
and other payments in fiscal 2007. The Company is in an ongoing
process of reviewing existing BCAs for purposes of compliance
risk in connection with their continued performance. The Company
has discontinued payment under a number of BCAs and, in certain
cases, has terminated BCAs, and recorded related charges in
immaterial amounts.
In the course of its independent investigation, Debevoise also
identified certain commission liability accounts at the Med
Group which were created in fiscal years prior to 2005 and
subsequently released in a manner that did not comply with
applicable accounting principles. The release of those
liabilities resulted in an increase in group profit at Med of
25 million and an increase in net income of
15 million in fiscal 2005 and an increase in group
profit of 24 million and an increase in net income of
15 million in fiscal 2006 with no impact on group
profit in fiscal 2007. As a result, opening shareholders
equity as of October 1, 2004 was understated by
30 million. In addition, these accounts may have been
used to fund payments in connection with BCAs. The Company
adjusted comparative amounts for prior periods in the
consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2007. For further
information, please refer to the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
The Company also became aware of additional bank accounts and
cash funds at various locations that were not previously
recorded in the Companys balance sheet and is currently
investigating whether Siemens is the economic owner of the
funds. Certain funds have been frozen by authorities.
Approximately 11 million was recorded in the
Companys consolidated balance sheet for fiscal 2007,
mostly relating to funds paid back by a former officer in
January 2007 and funds received from a trust account in October
and November 2007.
The Company remains subject to corruption-related investigations
in the U.S. and other jurisdictions around the world. As a
result, additional criminal or civil sanctions could be brought
against the Company itself or against certain of its employees
in connection with possible violations of law, including the
FCPA. In addition, the scope of pending investigations may be
expanded and new investigations commenced in connection with
allegations of bribery and other illegal acts. The
Companys operating activities, financial results and
reputation may also be negatively affected, particularly due to
imposed penalties, disgorgements, compensatory damages, the
formal or informal exclusion from public procurement contracts
or the loss of business licenses or permits. In addition to the
amounts mentioned above as well as the fine imposed by the
Munich district court as mentioned in the Notes to
87
Consolidated Financial Statements as well as under
Item 4: Information on the CompanyLegal
Proceedings, no material expenses or provisions for any
such penalties or damages have been recorded as management does
not yet have enough information to reliably estimate such
amounts. We expect that we will need to record expenses and
provisions in the future for fines, penalties or other charges,
which could be material, in connection with the investigations.
We will also have to bear the costs of continuing investigations
and related legal proceedings, as well as the costs of on-going
remediation efforts. Furthermore, changes affecting the
Companys course of business or changes to its compliance
programs beyond those already taken may turn out to be required.
For further information, please refer to Item 3: Key
InformationRisk FactorsCompliance.
Fiscal 2007 included a total of 347 million in
expenses for outside advisors engaged by Siemens in connection
with the investigations into alleged violations of
anti-corruption laws and related matters as well as remediation
activities.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
We have prepared our consolidated financial statements in
accordance with IFRS, as described in Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. Our significant
accounting policies, as described in Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements, are essential to understanding our
reported results of operations and financial condition. Certain
of these accounting policies require critical accounting
estimates that involve complex and subjective judgments and the
use of assumptions, some of which may be for matters that are
inherently uncertain and susceptible to change. Such critical
accounting estimates could change from period to period and have
a material impact on financial condition or results of
operations. Critical accounting estimates could also involve
estimates where management reasonably could have used a
different estimate in the current accounting period. Management
cautions that future events often vary from forecasts and that
estimates routinely require adjustment.
Revenue Recognition on Construction
ContractsThe Companys Groups, particularly
PG, TS, I&S, PTD and SBT, conduct a significant portion of
their business under construction contracts with customers. The
Company generally accounts for construction projects using the
percentage-of-completion
method, recognizing revenue as performance on a contract
progresses. This method places considerable importance on
accurate estimates of the extent of progress towards completion.
Depending on the methodology to determine contract progress, the
significant estimates include total contract costs, remaining
costs to completion, total contract revenues, contract risks and
other judgments. Management of the operating Groups continually
reviews all estimates involved in such construction contracts
and adjusts them as necessary. The Company also uses the
percentage-of-completion
method for projects financed directly or indirectly by Siemens.
In order to qualify for such accounting, the credit quality of
the customer must meet certain minimum parameters as evidenced
by the customers credit rating or by a credit analysis
performed by Siemens Financial Services (SFS), which performs
such reviews in support of the Companys Corporate
Executive Committee. At a minimum, a customers credit
rating must be single B from external rating agencies, or an
equivalent SFS-determined rating. In cases where the credit
quality does not meet such standards, the Company recognizes
revenue for construction contracts and financed projects based
on the lower of cash if irrevocably received, or contract
completion. The Company believes the credit factors used provide
a reasonable basis for assessing credit quality.
Trade and Other ReceivablesThe allowance for
doubtful accounts involves significant management judgment and
review of individual receivables based on individual customer
creditworthiness, current economic trends and analysis of
historical bad debts on a portfolio basis. For the determination
of the country-specific component of the individual allowance,
we also consider country credit ratings, which are centrally
determined based on information from external rating agencies.
Regarding the determination of the valuation allowance derived
from a portfolio-based analysis of historical bad debts, a
decline of receivables in volume results in a corresponding
reduction of such provisions and vice versa. As of
September 30, 2007 and 2006, Siemens recorded a total
valuation allowance for accounts receivable of
895 million and 956 million, respectively.
Siemens also selectively assists customers through arranging
financing from various third-party sources, including export
credit agencies, in order to be awarded supply contracts. In
addition, the Company provides direct vendor financing and
grants guarantees to banks in support of loans to Siemens
customers when necessary and deemed appropriate.
88
ImpairmentSiemens tests at least annually
whether goodwill has suffered any impairment, in accordance with
its accounting policy. The determination of the recoverable
amount of a division to which goodwill is allocated involves the
use of estimates by management. The recoverable amount is the
higher of the divisions fair value less costs to sell and
its value in use. The Company generally uses discounted cash
flow based methods to determine these values. These discounted
cash flow calculations use five-year projections that are based
on the financial budgets approved by management. Cash flow
projections take into account past experience and represent
managements best estimate about future developments. Cash
flows after the planning period are extrapolated using
individual growth rates. Key assumptions on which management has
based its determination of fair value less costs to sell and
value in use include estimated growth rates, weighted average
cost of capital and tax rates. These estimates, including the
methodology used, can have a material impact on the respective
values and ultimately the amount of any goodwill impairment.
Likewise, whenever property, plant and equipment and other
intangible assets are tested for impairment, the determination
of the assets recoverable amount involves the use of
estimates by management and can have a material impact on the
respective values and ultimately the amount of any impairment.
For more information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Pension and Postretirement Benefit
AccountingObligations for pension and other
post-employment benefits and related net periodic benefit costs
are determined in accordance with actuarial valuations. These
valuations rely on key assumptions including discount rates,
expected return on plan assets, expected salary increases,
mortality rates and health care trend rates. The discount rate
assumptions reflect the rates available on high-quality
fixed-income investments of appropriate duration at the balance
sheet date. The expected return on plan assets assumptions are
determined on a uniform basis, considering long-term historical
returns and asset allocations. Due to changing market and
economic conditions the underlying key assumptions may differ
from actual developments and may lead to significant changes in
pension and other post-employment benefit obligations. Such
differences are recognized in full directly in equity in the
period in which they occur without affecting profit or loss. For
a discussion of the current funding status and a sensitivity
analysis with respect to the impact of certain critical
assumptions on the net periodic benefit cost, see Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
ProvisionsSignificant estimates are involved
in the determination of provisions related to onerous contracts,
warranty costs and legal proceedings. A significant portion of
the business of certain of the operating Groups is performed
pursuant to long-term contracts, often for large projects, in
Germany and abroad, awarded on a competitive bidding basis.
Siemens records a provision for onerous sales contracts when
current estimates of total contract costs exceed expected
contract revenue. Such estimates are subject to change based on
new information as projects progress toward completion. Onerous
sales contracts are identified by monitoring the progress of the
project and updating the estimate of total contract costs which
also requires significant judgment relating to achieving certain
performance standards, for example in the IT service business,
and estimates involving warranty costs.
Siemens is subject to legal and regulatory proceedings and
government investigations in various jurisdictions. These
proceedings are, amongst others, related to the area of
competition law and to possible breaches of anticorruption
legislation in Germany, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in the
United States and similar legislation in other countries. Such
proceedings may result in criminal or civil sanctions, penalties
or disgorgements against the Company. If it is more likely than
not that an obligation of the Company exists and will result in
an outflow of resources, a provision is recorded if the amount
of the obligation can be reliably estimated. Regulatory and
legal proceedings as well as government investigations often
involve complex legal issues and are subject to substantial
uncertainties. Accordingly, management exercises considerable
judgment in determining whether it is more likely than not that
such a proceeding will result in an outflow of resources and
whether the amount of the obligation can be reliably estimated.
The Company periodically reviews the status of these proceedings
with both inside and outside counsel. These judgments are
subject to change as new information becomes available. The
required amount of a provision may change in the future due to
new developments in the particular matter. Revisions to
estimates may significantly affect results of future operations.
Upon resolution of any legal or regulatory proceeding or
government investigation, Siemens may incur charges in excess of
the recorded provisions for such matters. It can not be excluded
that the financial condition or results of operations of Siemens
will be materially affected by an unfavorable outcome of legal
or regulatory proceedings or government investigations. See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information.
89
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2006, the International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB) issued IFRS 8, Operating Segments. IFRS 8 replaces IAS
14, Segment Reporting, and aligns segment reporting with the
requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and
Related Information, except for some minor differences. IFRS 8
requires an entity to report financial and descriptive
information about its reportable segments. Reportable segments
are operating segments or aggregations of operating segments
that meet specified criteria. Operating segments are components
of an entity for which separate financial information is
available that is evaluated regularly by the entitys chief
operating decision maker in making decisions about how to
allocate resources and in assessing performance. Generally,
financial information is required to be reported on the same
basis as is used internally for evaluating operating segment
performance and deciding how to allocate resources to operating
segments. IFRS 8 is effective for fiscal periods beginning on or
after January 1, 2009. However, Siemens decided to early
adopt IFRS 8 in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for
further information on segment information.
In November 2006, the IFRIC issued IFRIC Interpretation 12,
Service Concession Arrangements, to provide guidance to
private sector entities on certain recognition and measurement
issues that arise in accounting for
public-to-private
service concession arrangements. Service concession arrangements
are arrangements whereby a government or other body grants
contracts for the supply of public services (e.g. roads, energy
distribution, transportation) to private operators. This
Interpretation applies to
public-to-private
service concession arrangements if (a) the grantor controls
or regulates what services the operator must provide with the
infrastructure, to whom it must provide them, and at what price;
and (b) the grantor controlsthrough ownership,
beneficial entitlement or otherwiseany significant
residual interest in the infrastructure at the end of the term
of the arrangement. Control of the asset remains in public hands
but the private sector operator is responsible for construction
activities, as well as for operating and maintaining the public
sector infrastructure. The operator does not recognize the
infrastructure as its property, plant and equipment if the
infrastructure is existing infrastructure of the grantor, or is
infrastructure constructed or purchased by the operator as part
of the service arrangement. The operator recognizes either a
financial asset or an intangible asset, or both, as compensation
for any construction services that it provides. Any concession
arrangements within the scope of IFRIC 12 are excluded from
the scope of IFRIC 4 Determining whether an
Arrangement Contains a Lease. The Company plans to adopt
IFRIC 12 beginning October 1, 2008. The involvement of
the Company in
public-to-private
service concession arrangements is currently being evaluated.
In September 2007, the International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB) issued IAS 1, Presentation of Financial
Statements (IAS 1). IAS 1 replaces IAS 1,
Presentation of Financial Statements (revised in 2003), as
amended in 2005. The revision is aimed at improving users
ability to analyze and compare the information given in
financial statements. IAS 1 sets overall requirements for
the presentation of financial statements, guidelines for their
structure and minimum requirements for their content. The new
standard is effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after
January 1, 2009, early adoption being permitted. The
Company will determine the expected effect of the revised
IAS 1 and determine an adoption date.
90
|
|
ITEM 6:
|
DIRECTORS,
SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
|
Management
In accordance with the German Stock Corporation Act
(Aktiengesetz), we have a Supervisory Board and a
Managing Board. The two boards are separate and no individual
may simultaneously be a member of both boards. The Managing
Board is responsible for managing our business in accordance
with applicable laws, our Articles of Association and the Bylaws
of the Managing Board. It represents us in our dealings with
third parties. The Supervisory Board appoints and removes the
members of the Managing Board. The Supervisory Board oversees
our management but is not permitted to make management decisions.
In carrying out their duties, each member of the Managing Board
and Supervisory Board must exercise the standard of care of a
prudent and diligent businessman, and is liable to Siemens for
damages if they fail to do so. Both boards are required to take
into account a broad range of considerations in their decisions,
including the interests of Siemens and those of its
shareholders, employees and creditors. The Managing Board is
required to respect the rights of shareholders to be treated on
an equal basis and to receive equal information. The Managing
Board is also required to ensure appropriate risk management
within Siemens and to establish an internal control system.
The Supervisory Board has comprehensive monitoring functions. To
ensure that these functions are carried out properly, the
Managing Board must, among other things, regularly report to the
Supervisory Board with regard to current business operations and
future business planning. The Supervisory Board is also entitled
to request special reports at any time.
As a general rule under German law, a shareholder has no direct
recourse against either the members of the Managing Board or the
Supervisory Board in the event that they are believed to have
breached a duty to Siemens. Apart from insolvency or other
special circumstances, only Siemens may assert a claim for
damages against members of either board. Moreover, we may only
waive these damages or settle these claims if at least three
years have passed and if the shareholders approve the waiver or
settlement at the shareholders meeting with a simple
majority of the votes cast, provided that opposing shareholders
do not hold, in the aggregate, one-tenth or more of our share
capital and do not have their opposition formally noted in the
minutes maintained by a German notary.
91
Supervisory
Board
As required by our Articles of Association and German law, our
present Supervisory Board consists of 20 members. Ten were
elected by our shareholders and ten were elected by our
employees. The shareholders may remove any member of the
Supervisory Board they have elected in a general meeting by a
simple majority of the votes cast by the shareholders in a
general meeting. The employee representatives may be removed by
the employee assembly which elected them with a majority of
three-quarters of the votes cast.
The Supervisory Board elects a chairman and two deputy chairmen
from among its members. The election of the chairman and the
first deputy chairman requires a two-thirds majority vote. If
either the chairman or the first deputy chairman is not elected
by a vote of two-thirds of the members of the Supervisory Board,
the shareholder representatives elect the chairman and the
employee representatives elect the first deputy chairman by a
simple majority of the votes cast. The board elects a second
deputy chairman by simple majority vote. The Supervisory Board
normally acts by simple majority vote, unless otherwise required
by law, with the chairman having a deciding vote in the event of
a second deadlock.
The Supervisory Board meets at least twice during each half
year, normally five times each year. Its main functions are:
|
|
|
|
|
to monitor the management of the Company;
|
|
|
|
to appoint and dismiss members of our Managing Board;
|
|
|
|
to represent the Company in its dealings with the Managing Board
or when its interests are adverse to those of the Managing
Board, for example, when the Company enters into an employment
agreement with a Managing Board member, the Supervisory Board
determines the salary and other compensation components,
including pension benefits; and
|
|
|
|
to approve matters in any areas that the Supervisory Board has
made subject to its approval, either generally or in a specific
case.
|
The members of the Supervisory Board are each elected for a
maximum term of about five years. The term expires at the end of
the Annual Shareholders Meeting in which the shareholders
discharge the Supervisory Board member for the fourth fiscal
year following the fiscal year in which he or she was elected.
Our Articles of Association establish the compensation of the
Supervisory Board members. For further details, see
Compensation.
The following table sets forth the names of the current members
of our Supervisory Board, their dates of birth, the expiration
of their respective terms, their board positions and principal
occupations, and their principal outside directorships at
September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies at which
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
Term
|
|
Board position and
|
|
Supervisory Board and similar
|
Name
|
|
birth
|
|
expires
|
|
principal occupation
|
|
positions were held
|
|
Dr. Gerhard
Cromme(1)
|
|
|
2/25/1943
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Chairman of the Supervisory Board; Chairman of the Supervisory
Board, ThyssenKrupp AG
|
|
Allianz SE; Axel Springer AG; ThyssenKrupp AG
|
Prof. Dr. Heinrich v.
Pierer(1)
|
|
|
1/26/1941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Supervisory Board
(until April 25, 2007)
|
|
Deutsche Bank AG; Hochtief AG; Münchener
Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG; ThyssenKrupp AG;
Volkswagen AG
|
Ralf
Heckmann(2)
|
|
|
7/19/1949
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
First Deputy Chairman; Chairman of the Central Works Council,
Siemens AG
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies at which
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
Term
|
|
Board position and
|
|
Supervisory Board and similar
|
Name
|
|
birth
|
|
expires
|
|
principal occupation
|
|
positions were held
|
|
Dr. Josef Ackermann
|
|
|
2/7/1948
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Second Deputy Chairman; Chairman of the Management Board;
Deutsche Bank AG
|
|
|
Lothar
Adler(2)
|
|
|
2/22/1949
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member; Chairman of the Combined Works Council, Siemens AG
|
|
|
Gerhard
Bieletzki(2)
|
|
|
5/16/1947
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member; Chairman of the Works Council of Siemens VDO Automotive
AG
|
|
|
John David Coombe
|
|
|
3/17/1945
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member; Chartered Accountant (FCA)
|
|
Hogg Robinson Group plc; Home Retail Group plc; HSBC
Holdings plc
|
Hildegard
Cornudet(2)
|
|
|
4/16/1949
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member; Computer Engineer
|
|
|
Birgit
Grube(2)
|
|
|
8/21/1945
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member; Office Clerk
|
|
|
Bettina
Haller(2)(3)
|
|
|
3/14/1959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member; Social Worker
|
|
|
Heinz
Hawreliuk(2)
|
|
|
3/20/1947
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member, Trade Union Secretary, IG Metall
|
|
DaimlerChrysler Luft- und Raumfahrt Holding AG; Eurocopter
Deutschland GmbH
|
Berthold
Huber(2)
|
|
|
2/15/1950
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member; Chairman, IG Metall
|
|
Audi AG
|
Prof. Dr. Walter Kröll
|
|
|
5/30/1938
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member; Consultant
|
|
MTU Aero Engines GmbH; Wincor Nixdorf AG
|
Prof. Dr. Michael
Mirow(2)
|
|
|
10/6/1938
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member; University Professor
|
|
|
Wolfgang
Müller(2)(4)
|
|
|
1/14/1948
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member; Labor Union Secretary, IG Metall
|
|
|
Georg
Nassauer(2)(3)
|
|
|
3/8/1948
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member; Steel casting constructor
|
|
|
Thomas
Rackow(2)
|
|
|
2/6/1952
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member; Industrial manager
|
|
|
Dieter
Scheitor(2)(4)
|
|
|
11/23/1950
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member; Member of the Executive Committee, IG Metall
|
|
|
Dr. Albrecht Schmidt
|
|
|
3/13/1938
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member; Retired Bank Director
|
|
Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG;
Thyssensche Handelsgesellschaft m.b.H.
|
Dr. Henning Schulte-Noelle
|
|
|
8/26/1942
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member; Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Allianz SE
|
|
Allianz SE; E.ON AG; ThyssenKrupp AG
|
Peter von Siemens
|
|
|
8/10/1937
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member; Industrial Manager
|
|
|
Jerry I. Speyer
|
|
|
6/23/1940
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member; Chairman & CEO, Tishman Speyer
|
|
|
Lord Iain Vallance of Tummel
|
|
|
5/20/1943
|
|
|
|
1/24/2008
|
|
|
Member; Chairman, Amsphere Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Prof. Dr. Heinrich v. Pierer resigned as Chairman of the
Supervisory Board effective April 25, 2007. In his place,
Dr. Gerhard Cromme was elected as Chairman of the
Supervisory Board for remaining term of office through to the
Annual General Meeting of Siemens AG on January 24, 2008.
Prof. Dr. Michael Mirow became a member of the Supervisory
Board as a replacement member in place of Prof.
Dr. Heinrich v. Pierer.
|
93
|
|
(2)
|
Elected by employees.
|
|
(3)
|
Bettina Haller, a former substitute member of the Supervisory
Board, succeeded Georg Nassauer as a member of the Supervisory
Board of Siemens AG on April 1, 2007.
|
|
(4)
|
Wolfgang Müller ceased to be a member of the Supervisory
Board effective January 25, 2007. In his place, Dieter
Scheitor was appointed by court order as a member of the
Supervisory Board.
|
There are six Supervisory Board committees: the Chairmans
Committee, the Audit Committee, the Compliance Committee, the
Ownership Rights Committee, the Nominating Committee and the
Mediation Committee. Set forth in the table below are the
current members of each committee. For a comprehensive
discussion of the functions of our committees, please refer to
Item 10: Additional InformationCorporate
Governance.
|
|
|
Name of committee
|
|
Current members
|
|
Chairmans Committee
|
|
Prof. Dr. Heinrich v. Pierer (Chairman until April 25, 2007),
Chairman Dr. Gerhard Cromme (Chairman as of April 25,
2007), Ralf Heckmann,* Dr. Josef Ackermann
|
Audit Committee
|
|
Dr. Gerhard Cromme (Chairman until April 25, 2007), Chairman
Dr. Henning Schulte-Noelle (Chairman as of April 25, 2007),
Ralf Heckmann,* John David Coombe (as of April 25, 2007), Heinz
Hawreliuk, Prof. Dr. Heinrich v. Pierer (until April 25,
2007)
|
Compliance Committee
|
|
Chairman Dr. Gerhard Cromme, Ralf Heckmann,* John David Coombe,
Heinz Hawreliuk,* Dr. Henning Schulte-Noelle
|
Ownership Rights Committee
|
|
Prof. Dr. Heinrich v. Pierer (Chairman until April 25, 2007),
Chairman Dr. Gerhard Cromme (Chairman as of April 25,
2007), Dr. Josef Ackermann, Dr. Albrecht Schmidt
|
Nominating Committee
|
|
Dr. Gerhard Cromme, Dr. Josef Ackermann, Dr. Henning
Schulte-Noelle
|
Mediation Committee
|
|
Prof. Dr. Heinrich v. Pierer (Chairman until April 25, 2007),
Chairman Dr. Gerhard Cromme (Chairman as of April 25,
2007), Ralf Heckmann,* Dr. Josef Ackermann, Heinz Hawreliuk*
|
The business address of the members of our Supervisory Board is
the same as our business address, Wittelsbacherplatz 2, D-80333
Munich, Germany, care of Dr. Gerhard Cromme.
Managing
Board
Our Managing Board currently consists of 11 members. Under our
Articles of Association, our Supervisory Board determines the
Managing Boards size, although it must have more than one
member. Under German law, the Managing Board is responsible for
all management matters, including the following which are
specifically reserved to the Managing Board:
|
|
|
|
|
preparation of the annual financial statements;
|
|
|
|
the calling of the Annual Shareholders Meeting and
preparation and execution of the resolutions; and
|
|
|
|
reports to the Supervisory Board and the Annual
Shareholders Meeting concerning certain matters.
|
The Managing Board, with the approval of the Supervisory Board,
has adopted Bylaws for the conduct of its affairs. Pursuant to
the current Bylaws of the Managing Board, a Corporate Executive
Committee has been created. This Corporate Executive Committee
consists exclusively of members of the Managing Board and is
authorized to make all management decisions, in particular
strategic decisions that are not specifically reserved to the
full Managing Board by law, our Articles of Association or the
Bylaws of the Managing Board. The Bylaws of the Managing Board
state that the maximum number of Corporate Executive Committee
members should not exceed nine. The Bylaws require that the
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and his deputies, if any, the
Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and the member of the Managing
Board who heads Corporate Human Resources (Corporate
94
Personnel Department) all be members of the Corporate Executive
Committee. Appointments of the remaining unspecified members of
the Corporate Executive Committee require the approval of the
Supervisory Board. Our current Corporate Executive Committee
consists of President and CEO Peter Löscher; Executive
Vice-President and CFO Joe Kaeser; as well as Executive
Vice-Presidents Heinrich Hiesinger, Rudi Lamprecht, Jürgen
Radomski, Hermann Requardt, Uriel J. Sharef, Peter Y. Solmssen
and Klaus Wucherer.
One other committee of our Managing Board is authorized to make
certain decisions without seeking the approval of the full
Managing Board. The Equity and Employee Stock Committee is
responsible for certain capital measures as well as for the
issuance of employee stock, including the determination of the
terms of such issuances. The members of this committee are
President and CEO Peter Löscher; Executive Vice-President
and CFO Joe Kaeser and Executive Vice-President Jürgen
Radomski.
The Supervisory Board appoints the members of the Managing Board
for a maximum term of five years. They may be re-appointed or
have their term extended for one or more terms of up to a
maximum of five years each. The Supervisory Board may remove a
member of the Managing Board prior to the expiration of his or
her term for good cause. According to the Managing Boards
Bylaws, the age of a member of the Managing Board shall not
exceed 65.
The Bylaws require the Managing Board to take action by a
two-thirds majority vote unless applicable law requires a larger
majority. In practice, the Managing Board reaches its decisions
by consensus.
The following table sets forth the names of the members of our
Managing Board, their dates of birth, the expiration of their
respective terms, their current positions and their principal
outside directorships at September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies at which
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
Term
|
|
|
|
Supervisory Board and similar
|
Name
|
|
birth
|
|
expires
|
|
Current position
|
|
positions were held
|
|
Peter
Löscher(1)
|
|
9/17/1957
|
|
3/31/2012
|
|
President and CEO
|
|
Smiths Group plc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Klaus
Kleinfeld(1)
|
|
11/06/1957
|
|
|
|
President and CEO (until June 30, 2007)
|
|
Bayer AG; Alcoa Inc.; Citigroup Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Johannes
Feldmayer(2)
|
|
10/16/1956
|
|
|
|
Former Executive Vice-President
|
|
ExxonMobil Central Europe Holding GmbH; Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Heinrich
Hiesinger(3)
|
|
5/25/1960
|
|
3/31/2012
|
|
Executive Vice-President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Kaeser
|
|
6/23/1957
|
|
3/31/2011
|
|
Executive Vice-President and CFO
|
|
Bayerische Börse AG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rudi Lamprecht
|
|
10/12/1948
|
|
3/31/2009
|
|
Executive Vice-President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eduardo Montes
|
|
10/02/1951
|
|
3/31/2011
|
|
Senior Vice-President
|
|
Mecalux, S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Jürgen Radomski
|
|
10/26/1941
|
|
12/31/2007
|
|
Executive Vice-President
|
|
ALBA AG; Deutsche Krankenversicherung AG; Dräger Medical AG
& Co. KG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Erich R. Reinhardt
|
|
10/03/1946
|
|
3/31/2011
|
|
Senior Vice-President
|
|
Dräger Medical AG & Co. KG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann Requardt
|
|
2/11/1955
|
|
3/31/2011
|
|
Executive
Vice-President(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Uriel J. Sharef
|
|
8/19/1944
|
|
3/31/2008
|
|
Executive Vice-President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Y.
Solmssen(4)
|
|
1/24/1955
|
|
3/31/2012
|
|
Executive Vice-President
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies at which
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
Term
|
|
|
|
Supervisory Board and similar
|
Name
|
|
birth
|
|
expires
|
|
Current position
|
|
positions were held
|
|
Prof. Dr. Klaus Wucherer
|
|
7/09/1944
|
|
3/31/2008
|
|
Executive Vice-President
|
|
Deutsche Messe AG; Infineon Technologies AG; LEONI AG; SAP AG
|
|
|
(1)
|
Effective June 30, 2007, Dr. Klaus Kleinfeld resigned
from his offices as a full member of the Managing Board and as
CEO and President of the Managing Board of Siemens AG. Effective
July 1, 2007, Peter Löscher was elected a full member
of the Managing Board and appointed Chief Executive Officer and
President of the Managing Board of Siemens AG.
|
|
(2)
|
Prof. Johannes Feldmayer had been suspended since March 28,
2007 and left the Managing Board, effective September 30,
2007.
|
|
(3)
|
Dr. Heinrich Hiesinger was elected a full member of the
Managing Board, effective June 1, 2007.
|
|
(4)
|
Peter Y. Solmssen was elected as a member of the Managing Board
and the Corporate Executive Committee effective October 1,
2007.
|
On November 28, 2007, the Company announced changes to the
Managing Board of Siemens AG. The new Managing Board structure,
where the previous distinction between the Managing Board and
the Corporate Executive Committee will be eliminated, and the
new appointments will take effect on January 1, 2008.
Dr. Heinrich Hiesinger, who has been a member of the
Managing Board of Siemens AG since June 2007, will be CEO
of the Industry Sector. Wolfgang Dehen, previously CEO of
Siemens VDO Automotive AG, has been appointed a member of the
Managing Board of Siemens AG and will be CEO of the Energy
Sector. Prof. Dr. Erich R. Reinhardt, previously Group President
of Medical Solutions and a member of the Managing Board of
Siemens AG, will be CEO of the Healthcare Sector. In addition,
Dr. Siegfried Russwurm has been appointed a member of the
Managing Board of Siemens AG and will take over as head of Human
Resources and also as Labour Director, in accordance with
§ 33 of the German Codetermination Act. Rudi
Lamprecht, Eduardo Montes, Dr. Uriel J. Sharef and
Prof. Dr. Klaus Wucherer will resign from the Managing
Board at the end of the 2007 calendar year. They will be
available to the Company as consultants. Dr. Jürgen
Radomski, previously head of Corporate Personnel and Labour
Director, will retire on December 31, 2007.
The business address of the members of our Managing Board is the
same as our business address, Wittelsbacherplatz 2,
D-80333
Munich, Germany.
Compensation
This section outlines the principles used for determining the
compensation of the Managing Board of Siemens AG and sets out
the level and structure of Managing Board remuneration. In
addition, this section describes the policies and levels of
compensation paid to Supervisory Board members.
This section is based on the recommendations and suggestions of
the German Corporate Governance Code and comprises data that, in
accordance with the requirements of the German Commercial Code
(HGB) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS),
are part of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and
of Managements discussion and analysis. It is thus part of
the audited consolidated financial statements.
Managing
Board Remuneration
The Chairmans Committee of the Supervisory Board is
responsible for determining the remuneration of the members of
the Managing Board. The Committee comprises Dr. Gerhard
Cromme (Chairman of the Supervisory Board), and Dr. Josef
Ackermann and Ralf Heckmann (both Deputy Chairmen of the
Supervisory Board). The structure of the Managing Boards
compensation is discussed and reviewed regularly by the
Supervisory Board in full session.
The remuneration of the members of the Managing Board of Siemens
is based on the Companys size and global presence, its
economic and financial position, and the level and structure of
managing board compensation paid by peer companies. In addition,
the compensation reflects each Managing Board members
responsibilities and performance. The level of Board
compensation is designed to be competitive in the market for
highly qualified executives and to provide incentives in a
high-performance culture.
96
In fiscal year 2007, the Managing Board remuneration had four
components: (i) a fixed annual salary, (ii) a variable
bonus which the Chairmans Committee may adjust upward or
downward by up to 20 percent of the amount of target
attainment, (iii) stock-based compensation, and (iv) a
pension benefit contribution. With regard to fixed salary and
bonus, an annual target compensation is determined, consisting
of 50% fixed and 50% variable components. The target
compensation is reviewed every two to three years on the basis
of an analysis of the compensation paid by peer companies to
their top managers. The last review was conducted as of
April 1, 2006.
In fiscal year 2007, the remuneration of the Managing Board
members is composed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The fixed compensation is paid as a monthly salary.
|
|
|
|
The variable bonus is based on the level of the Companys
attainment of certain Economic Value Added (EVA) and net cash
targets as well as other financial goals, if any, that are set
at the start of the fiscal year by the Chairmans Committee
of the Supervisory Board (for information about EVA as a
performance measure, see Item 5: Operating and
Financial Review and ProspectsFiscal 2007 Compared to
Fiscal 2006Economic Value Added). Net cash is the
difference between cash inflows and cash outflows from operating
and investing activities. One half of the bonus is paid as an
annual bonus and is contingent upon achieving the Company-wide
EVA targets and net cash targets established for the fiscal
year. The other half is granted as a long-term bonus (LT bonus),
the amount of which depends on the average attainment of EVA
targets or net cash targets over a three-year period. In fiscal
2007, the net cash target was given a significantly higher
priority and it was included in the LT bonus for the first time.
In any year, the annual bonus and the LT bonus may not exceed
275 percent of the base amount applicable to the variable
compensation component.
|
|
|
|
As of fiscal year 2006, the stock-based compensation has
consisted only of stock awards.
|
|
|
|
Under the Siemens Defined Contribution Benefit Plan (BSAV),
members of the Managing Board receive contributions, the
individual amounts of which are determined annually on the basis
of a percentage of their respective target annual compensation
established by the Chairmans Committee of the Supervisory
Board. A portion of these contributions is accounted for by
funding of pension commitments earned prior to transfer to the
BSAV. In addition, special contributions may be granted on the
basis of individual decisions.
|
Employment contracts with Managing Board members concluded
before June 1, 2007 generally do not include any explicit
severance commitment in the event of an early resignation from
office. However, severance payments may result from individually
agreed termination arrangements. Managing Board contracts
concluded on or after June 1, 2007 provide for a
compensation payment on premature resignation from office
without serious cause, the amount of which must not exceed the
value of two years compensation (severance payment cap).
In addition, non-monetary benefits are settled by a cash payment
equal to five percent of the severance payment.
Members of the Managing Board who were appointed to the Managing
Board before October 1, 2002 have a contractual right to
receive transitional payments for twelve months after leaving
the Managing Board. The transitional payments generally amount
to the fixed salary of the year of resignation and the average
of variable bonuses paid for the last three fiscal years before
resignation. In single cases, the transitional payments equal a
one-year target compensation.
In the event of a change of controli.e. if one or several
shareholders acting jointly or in concert acquire a majority of
the voting rights in Siemens AG and exercise a controlling
influence, or if Siemens AG becomes a dependent enterprise as a
result of entering into an enterprise contract within the
meaning of § 291 of the German Stock Corporation Act
(AktG), or if Siemens AG is to be merged into an existing
corporation or other entityany member of the Managing
Board has the right to terminate the contract of employment if
such change of control results in a substantial change in
position (e.g. due to a change in corporate strategy or a change
in the Managing Board members duties and
responsibilities). If this right of termination is exercised,
the Managing Board member will receive a severance payment which
amounts to the target annual compensation applicable at the time
of contract termination for the remaining contractual term of
office, but at least for a period of three years. In addition,
non-monetary benefits are settled by a cash payment equal to
five percent of the severance payment. No severance
97
payments are made if the Managing Board member receives benefits
from third parties in connection with a change of control. A
right of termination does not exist if the change of control
occurs within a period of twelve (12) months prior to a
Managing Board members retirement.
Upon leaving office as President and member of the Managing
Board, Dr. Klaus Kleinfeld agreed to a non-compete
arrangement not included in his original service agreement that
prevents him from working for Siemens major competitors,
including any of their affiliated companies. In addition,
Dr. Kleinfeld undertook to act as consultant to the
Managing and Supervisory Boards of Siemens AG in connection with
the Companys strategic direction and issues concerning its
organizational and personnel structure during Peter
Löschers job orientation phase. In consideration of
the non-compete arrangement, the additional consulting services,
and in settlement of other claims, Dr. Kleinfeld was
promised payments totaling 5.75 million and the
non-forfeiture of 11,437 stock awards.
On November 7, 2007 and November 17, 2007,
respectively, the Chairmans Committee of the Supervisory
Board determined the values of stock awards and the bonus awards
to be granted, after assessing the attainment of the targets set
at the start of the fiscal year.
For the fiscal year 2007, the aggregate cash compensation
amounted to 33.2 million (2006:
27.8 million) and total remuneration amounted to
41.7 million (2006: 30.4 million),
representing an increase in total remuneration of
37.2 percent.
The following compensation was determined for the members of the
Managing Board for fiscal year 2007 (individual disclosure):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of stock-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash compensation
|
|
|
based compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in
)(1)
|
|
|
Peter
Löscher(2)
|
|
|
1,710,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,710,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Klaus
Kleinfeld(2)
|
|
|
5,332,028
|
|
|
|
3,248,462
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
375,058
|
|
|
|
6,082,028
|
|
|
|
3,623,520
|
|
Prof. Johannes
Feldmayer(3)
|
|
|
3,006,107
|
|
|
|
2,363,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,016
|
|
|
|
3,006,107
|
|
|
|
2,613,233
|
|
Dr. Thomas
Ganswindt(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,420,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,420,147
|
|
Dr. Heinrich
Hiesinger(5)
|
|
|
763,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,513,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joe
Kaeser(6)
|
|
|
2,502,886
|
|
|
|
963,983
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
300,046
|
|
|
|
3,252,911
|
|
|
|
1,264,029
|
|
Prof. Dr. Edward G.
Krubasik(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,453,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,453,825
|
|
Rudi Lamprecht
|
|
|
2,993,188
|
|
|
|
2,272,986
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
250,016
|
|
|
|
3,743,213
|
|
|
|
2,523,002
|
|
Heinz-Joachim
Neubürger(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,422,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,422,636
|
|
Dr. Jürgen Radomski
|
|
|
2,993,142
|
|
|
|
2,351,448
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
250,016
|
|
|
|
3,743,167
|
|
|
|
2,601,464
|
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann
Requardt(7)
|
|
|
2,560,568
|
|
|
|
913,559
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
200,054
|
|
|
|
3,310,593
|
|
|
|
1,113,613
|
|
Dr. Uriel J. Sharef
|
|
|
3,002,607
|
|
|
|
2,360,975
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
250,016
|
|
|
|
3,752,632
|
|
|
|
2,610,991
|
|
Prof. Dr. Klaus Wucherer
|
|
|
3,006,413
|
|
|
|
2,350,989
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
250,016
|
|
|
|
3,756,438
|
|
|
|
2,601,005
|
|
Eduardo
Montes(8)
|
|
|
2,606,764
|
|
|
|
1,071,137
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
200,054
|
|
|
|
3,356,789
|
|
|
|
1,271,191
|
|
Prof. Dr. Erich R.
Reinhardt(8)
|
|
|
2,679,371
|
|
|
|
2,038,914
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
200,054
|
|
|
|
3,429,396
|
|
|
|
2,238,968
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus
Weyrich(4)(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,606,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,606,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
33,156,485
|
|
|
|
27,839,260
|
|
|
|
8,500,290
|
|
|
|
2,525,346
|
|
|
|
41,656,775
|
|
|
|
30,364,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The fair value of the stock-based compensation relates to stock
awards granted in November 2007 and 2006 for fiscal years 2007
and 2006, respectively. Dr. Klaus Kleinfelds
stock-based compensation is settled in cash. The amounts for
2006 shown in this table are those obtained after reducing the
variable cash bonus and the stock-based compensation in
connection with the transfer of Managing Board remuneration to
the hardship fund for BenQ Mobile employees in Germany.
|
|
(2)
|
Effective June 30, 2007, Dr. Klaus Kleinfeld resigned
from his offices as a full member of the Managing Board and as
CEO and President of the Managing Board of Siemens AG. The full
term of his service agreement would have expired on
September 30, 2007. Effective July 1, 2007, Peter
Löscher was elected a full member of the Managing Board and
appointed Chief Executive Officer and President of the Managing
Board of Siemens AG.
|
98
|
|
(3)
|
Prof. Johannes Feldmayer had been suspended since March 28,
2007 and left the Managing Board, effective September 30,
2007.
|
|
(4)
|
Dr. Thomas Ganswindt, Prof. Dr. Edward G. Krubasik and
Prof. Dr. Claus Weyrich resigned from the Managing Board,
effective September 30, 2006.
|
|
(5)
|
Dr. Heinrich Hiesinger was elected a full member of the
Managing Board, effective June 1, 2007.
|
|
(6)
|
On May 1, 2006, Joe Kaeser succeeded Heinz-Joachim
Neubürger, who resigned from the Managing Board on
April 30, 2006, as a full member of the Managing Board of
Siemens AG.
|
|
(7)
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann Requardt was elected a full member of the
Managing Board, effective October 1, 2006.
|
|
(8)
|
Deputy members of the Managing Board.
|
The following table describes the details of cash compensation
on an individual basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash compensation
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Annual bonus
|
|
|
LT bonus
|
|
|
Other(2)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in
)(1)
|
|
|
Peter
Löscher(3)
|
|
|
495,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,710,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Klaus
Kleinfeld(3)
|
|
|
1,704,320
|
|
|
|
1,160,480
|
|
|
|
1,796,750
|
|
|
|
1,055,707
|
|
|
|
1,796,750
|
|
|
|
998,721
|
|
|
|
34,208
|
|
|
|
33,554
|
|
|
|
5,332,028
|
|
|
|
3,248,462
|
|
Prof. Johannes
Feldmayer(4)
|
|
|
936,000
|
|
|
|
845,520
|
|
|
|
1,119,737
|
|
|
|
747,819
|
|
|
|
910,822
|
|
|
|
728,408
|
|
|
|
39,548
|
|
|
|
41,470
|
|
|
|
3,006,107
|
|
|
|
2,363,217
|
|
Dr. Thomas
Ganswindt(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
755,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
835,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
715,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,420,147
|
|
Dr. Heinrich
Hiesinger(6)
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
763,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joe
Kaeser(7)
|
|
|
780,000
|
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
933,114
|
|
|
|
337,448
|
|
|
|
756,990
|
|
|
|
291,460
|
|
|
|
32,782
|
|
|
|
10,075
|
|
|
|
2,502,886
|
|
|
|
963,983
|
|
Prof. Dr. Edward G.
Krubasik(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
755,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
835,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
817,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,453,825
|
|
Rudi Lamprecht
|
|
|
936,000
|
|
|
|
845,520
|
|
|
|
1,119,737
|
|
|
|
747,819
|
|
|
|
910,822
|
|
|
|
651,022
|
|
|
|
26,629
|
|
|
|
28,625
|
|
|
|
2,993,188
|
|
|
|
2,272,986
|
|
Heinz-Joachim
Neubürger(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
477,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,422,636
|
|
Dr. Jürgen Radomski
|
|
|
936,000
|
|
|
|
845,520
|
|
|
|
1,119,737
|
|
|
|
747,819
|
|
|
|
910,822
|
|
|
|
728,408
|
|
|
|
26,583
|
|
|
|
29,701
|
|
|
|
2,993,142
|
|
|
|
2,351,448
|
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann
Requardt(8)
|
|
|
780,000
|
|
|
|
291,750
|
|
|
|
933,114
|
|
|
|
321,558
|
|
|
|
814,320
|
|
|
|
292,633
|
|
|
|
33,134
|
|
|
|
7,618
|
|
|
|
2,560,568
|
|
|
|
913,559
|
|
Dr. Uriel J. Sharef
|
|
|
936,000
|
|
|
|
845,520
|
|
|
|
1,119,737
|
|
|
|
747,819
|
|
|
|
910,822
|
|
|
|
728,408
|
|
|
|
36,048
|
|
|
|
39,228
|
|
|
|
3,002,607
|
|
|
|
2,360,975
|
|
Prof. Dr. Klaus Wucherer
|
|
|
936,000
|
|
|
|
845,520
|
|
|
|
1,119,737
|
|
|
|
747,819
|
|
|
|
910,822
|
|
|
|
728,408
|
|
|
|
39,854
|
|
|
|
29,242
|
|
|
|
3,006,413
|
|
|
|
2,350,989
|
|
Eduardo
Montes(9)
|
|
|
780,000
|
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
933,114
|
|
|
|
400,416
|
|
|
|
824,499
|
|
|
|
330,411
|
|
|
|
69,151
|
|
|
|
15,310
|
|
|
|
2,606,764
|
|
|
|
1,071,137
|
|
Prof. Dr. Erich R.
Reinhardt(9)
|
|
|
780,000
|
|
|
|
714,990
|
|
|
|
1,026,051
|
|
|
|
658,513
|
|
|
|
843,024
|
|
|
|
633,237
|
|
|
|
30,296
|
|
|
|
32,174
|
|
|
|
2,679,371
|
|
|
|
2,038,914
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus
Weyrich(5) (9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
543,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
531,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,606,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10,259,320
|
|
|
|
9,500,840
|
|
|
|
12,135,998
|
|
|
|
9,214,892
|
|
|
|
10,383,391
|
|
|
|
8,652,925
|
|
|
|
377,776
|
|
|
|
470,603
|
|
|
|
33,156,485
|
|
|
|
27,839,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The amounts for 2006 shown in this table are those obtained
after reducing the variable cash bonus in connection with the
transfer of Managing Board remuneration to the hardship fund for
BenQ Mobile employees in Germany.
|
|
(2)
|
Other compensation includes non-cash benefits in the form of
company cars of 282,102 (2006: 300,753), subsidized
insurance of 48,634 (2006: 80,527), accommodation
and moving expenses of 47,040 (2006: 10,500), and a
cash settlement of stock awards of 0 (2006: 78,823).
|
|
(3)
|
Effective June 30, 2007, Dr. Klaus Kleinfeld resigned
from his offices as a full member of the Managing Board and as
CEO and President of the Managing Board of Siemens AG. The full
term of his service agreement would have expired on
September 30, 2007. Effective July 1, 2007, Peter
Löscher was elected a full member of the Managing Board and
appointed Chief Executive Officer and President of the Managing
Board of Siemens AG.
|
|
(4)
|
Prof. Johannes Feldmayer had been suspended since March 28,
2007 and left the Managing Board, effective September 30,
2007.
|
|
(5)
|
Dr. Thomas Ganswindt, Prof. Dr. Edward G. Krubasik and
Prof. Dr. Claus Weyrich resigned from the Managing Board,
effective September 30, 2006.
|
|
(6)
|
Dr. Heinrich Hiesinger was elected a full member of the
Managing Board, effective June 1, 2007.
|
|
(7)
|
On May 1, 2006, Joe Kaeser succeeded Heinz-Joachim
Neubürger, who resigned from the Managing Board on
April 30, 2006, as a full member of the Managing Board of
Siemens AG.
|
|
(8)
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann Requardt was elected a full member of the
Managing Board, effective October 1, 2006.
|
|
(9)
|
Deputy members of the Managing Board.
|
To compensate him for short-term and long-term pecuniary
disadvantages arising as a result of his change from
Merck & Co., Inc., USA, to Siemens AG, Peter
Löscher was promised a total amount of
8.5 million. It was agreed with Peter Löscher
that the Company will add this amount to his defined
contribution pension account (BSAV) in January 2008.
99
Both the number of units and the values of the stock-based
compensation components are shown in the following table. The
stock awards were recorded at the market price of the Siemens
stock on the date of commitment less the present value of
dividends expected during the holding period, because stock
awards are not eligible to receive dividends. The resulting
value amounted to 97.94 (2006: 67.70).
Accordingly, stock-based compensation was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
awards(2)
|
|
|
Fair value of stock
awards(2)
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Number of
units)(1)
|
|
|
(Expressed in
)(1)
|
|
|
Peter
Löscher(3)
|
|
|
10,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Klaus
Kleinfeld(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,540
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
375,058
|
|
Prof. Johannes
Feldmayer(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,016
|
|
Dr. Thomas
Ganswindt(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Heinrich
Hiesinger(6)
|
|
|
7,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joe
Kaeser(7)
|
|
|
7,658
|
|
|
|
4,432
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
300,046
|
|
Prof. Dr. Edward G.
Krubasik(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rudi Lamprecht
|
|
|
7,658
|
|
|
|
3,693
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
250,016
|
|
Heinz-Joachim
Neubürger(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Jürgen Radomski
|
|
|
7,658
|
|
|
|
3,693
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
250,016
|
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann
Requardt(8)
|
|
|
7,658
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
200,054
|
|
Dr. Uriel J. Sharef
|
|
|
7,658
|
|
|
|
3,693
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
250,016
|
|
Prof. Dr. Klaus Wucherer
|
|
|
7,658
|
|
|
|
3,693
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
250,016
|
|
Eduardo
Montes(9)
|
|
|
7,658
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
200,054
|
|
Prof. Dr. Erich R.
Reinhardt(9)
|
|
|
7,658
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
750,025
|
|
|
|
200,054
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus
Weyrich(5) (9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
79,133
|
|
|
|
37,302
|
|
|
|
8,500,290
|
|
|
|
2,525,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The fair value of the stock-based compensation relate to stock
awards granted in November 2007 and 2006 for fiscal years 2007
and 2006, respectively. The amounts for 2006 shown in this table
are those obtained after reducing the stock-based compensation
in connection with the transfer of Managing Board remuneration
to the hardship fund for BenQ Mobile employees in Germany.
|
|
(2)
|
After a holding period of three (2006: four) years, the stock
awards will be settled on November 8, 2010 (awards granted
for fiscal year 2006 on November 10, 2010). Under the stock
award agreement, the eligible recipients will receive a
corresponding number of Siemens shares without additional
payment. Dr. Klaus Kleinfelds stock-based
compensation is settled in cash.
|
|
(3)
|
Effective June 30, 2007, Dr. Klaus Kleinfeld resigned
from his offices as a full member of the Managing Board and as
CEO and President of the Managing Board of Siemens AG. The full
term of his service agreement would have expired on
September 30, 2007. Effective July 1, 2007, Peter
Löscher was elected a full member of the Managing Board and
appointed Chief Executive Officer and President of the Managing
Board of Siemens AG.
|
|
(4)
|
Prof. Johannes Feldmayer had been suspended since March 28,
2007 and left the Managing Board, effective September 30,
2007.
|
|
(5)
|
Dr. Thomas Ganswindt, Prof. Dr. Edward G. Krubasik and
Prof. Dr. Claus Weyrich resigned from the Managing Board,
effective September 30, 2006.
|
|
(6)
|
Dr. Heinrich Hiesinger was elected a full member of the
Managing Board, effective June 1, 2007.
|
|
(7)
|
On May 1, 2006, Joe Kaeser succeeded Heinz-Joachim
Neubürger, who resigned from the Managing Board on
April 30, 2006, as a full member of the Managing Board of
Siemens AG.
|
|
(8)
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann Requardt was elected a full member of the
Managing Board, effective October 1, 2006.
|
|
(9)
|
Deputy members of the Managing Board.
|
100
The following table contains information concerning the stock
awards and stock options held by members of the Managing Board
that were components of the stock-based compensation in fiscal
year 2007 and prior years. The stock options were issued in
fiscal years 1999 through 2005 under the terms and conditions of
the 1999 and 2001 Siemens Stock Option Plans approved by the
Annual Shareholders Meetings on February 18, 1999 and
February 22, 2001 (for details on the Siemens Stock Option
Plans Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock awards
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
Balance at end
|
|
|
|
of fiscal year 2007
|
|
|
during fiscal year
|
|
|
during fiscal year
|
|
|
during fiscal year
|
|
|
of fiscal year
2007(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted \
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted \
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
grant-date
|
|
|
|
|
|
grant-date
|
|
|
|
|
|
grant-date
|
|
|
|
|
|
grant-date
|
|
|
|
|
|
grant-date
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in number or in )
|
|
|
Peter
Löscher(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Klaus
Kleinfeld(1)
|
|
|
22,555
|
|
|
|
56.61
|
|
|
|
5,540
|
|
|
|
67.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,095
|
|
|
|
58.80
|
|
Prof. Johannes
Feldmayer(2)
|
|
|
21,149
|
|
|
|
56.45
|
|
|
|
3,693
|
|
|
|
67.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,254
|
|
|
|
61.49
|
|
|
|
16,588
|
|
|
|
56.44
|
|
Dr. Heinrich
Hiesinger(3)
|
|
|
1,942
|
|
|
|
56.45
|
|
|
|
2,481
|
|
|
|
67.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,423
|
|
|
|
62.76
|
|
Joe Kaeser
|
|
|
1,785
|
|
|
|
56.49
|
|
|
|
4,432
|
|
|
|
67.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,217
|
|
|
|
64.48
|
|
Rudi Lamprecht
|
|
|
10,211
|
|
|
|
57.06
|
|
|
|
3,693
|
|
|
|
67.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,904
|
|
|
|
59.89
|
|
Dr. Jürgen Radomski
|
|
|
22,788
|
|
|
|
56.71
|
|
|
|
3,693
|
|
|
|
67.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,481
|
|
|
|
58.24
|
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann
Requardt(4)
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
|
|
56.59
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
67.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,199
|
|
|
|
62.91
|
|
Dr. Uriel J. Sharef
|
|
|
22,912
|
|
|
|
56.73
|
|
|
|
3,693
|
|
|
|
67.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,605
|
|
|
|
58.25
|
|
Prof. Dr. Klaus Wucherer
|
|
|
22,912
|
|
|
|
56.73
|
|
|
|
3,693
|
|
|
|
67.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,605
|
|
|
|
58.25
|
|
Eduardo
Montes(5)
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
56.53
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
67.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,083
|
|
|
|
64.62
|
|
Prof. Dr. Erich R.
Reinhardt(5)
|
|
|
3,199
|
|
|
|
56.58
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
67.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,154
|
|
|
|
61.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
132,825
|
|
|
|
56.67
|
|
|
|
39,783
|
|
|
|
67.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,254
|
|
|
|
61.49
|
|
|
|
164,354
|
|
|
|
59.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
Balance at end
|
|
|
|
of fiscal year 2007
|
|
|
during fiscal year
|
|
|
during fiscal year
|
|
|
during fiscal year
|
|
|
of fiscal year
2007(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in number or in )
|
|
|
Peter
Löscher(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Klaus
Kleinfeld(1)
|
|
|
129,925
|
|
|
|
72.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,510
|
|
|
|
69.45
|
|
|
|
51,415
|
|
|
|
76.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Johannes
Feldmayer(2)
|
|
|
102,255
|
|
|
|
76.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,310
|
|
|
|
74.79
|
|
|
|
40,945
|
|
|
|
78.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Heinrich
Hiesinger(3)
|
|
|
53,255
|
|
|
|
72.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
|
66.73
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
87.19
|
|
|
|
23,755
|
|
|
|
73.56
|
|
Joe Kaeser
|
|
|
47,800
|
|
|
|
73.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
|
86.23
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
87.19
|
|
|
|
38,850
|
|
|
|
70.44
|
|
Rudi Lamprecht
|
|
|
101,965
|
|
|
|
72.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,500
|
|
|
|
67.65
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
87.19
|
|
|
|
45,465
|
|
|
|
73.85
|
|
Dr. Jürgen Radomski
|
|
|
143,730
|
|
|
|
72.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,785
|
|
|
|
69.42
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
87.19
|
|
|
|
28,945
|
|
|
|
74.59
|
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann
Requardt(4)
|
|
|
51,880
|
|
|
|
77.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,900
|
|
|
|
76.89
|
|
|
|
10,500
|
|
|
|
87.19
|
|
|
|
27,480
|
|
|
|
73.74
|
|
Dr. Uriel J. Sharef
|
|
|
139,980
|
|
|
|
71.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,500
|
|
|
|
86.23
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
87.19
|
|
|
|
111,480
|
|
|
|
68.16
|
|
Prof. Dr. Klaus Wucherer
|
|
|
139,980
|
|
|
|
71.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,500
|
|
|
|
63.80
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
87.19
|
|
|
|
81,480
|
|
|
|
73.49
|
|
Eduardo
Montes(5)
|
|
|
27,700
|
|
|
|
78.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
|
86.23
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
87.19
|
|
|
|
17,800
|
|
|
|
73.57
|
|
Prof. Dr. Erich R.
Reinhardt(5)
|
|
|
95,450
|
|
|
|
72.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
53.70
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
87.19
|
|
|
|
63,450
|
|
|
|
75.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,033,920
|
|
|
|
73.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,355
|
|
|
|
69.57
|
|
|
|
190,860
|
|
|
|
82.41
|
|
|
|
438,705
|
|
|
|
72.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Effective June 30, 2007, Dr. Klaus Kleinfeld resigned
from his offices as a full member of the Managing Board and as
CEO and President of the Managing Board of Siemens AG. The full
term of his service agreement would have expired on
September 30, 2007. Effective July 1, 2007, Peter
Löscher was elected a full member of the Managing Board and
appointed Chief Executive Officer and President of the Managing
Board of Siemens AG.
|
|
(2)
|
Prof. Johannes Feldmayer had been suspended since March 28,
2007 and left the Managing Board, effective September 30,
2007.
|
|
(3)
|
Dr. Heinrich Hiesinger was elected a full member of the
Managing Board, effective June 1, 2007.
|
|
(4)
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann Requardt was elected a full member of the
Managing Board, effective October 1, 2006.
|
101
|
|
(5)
|
Deputy members of the Managing Board.
|
|
(6)
|
Amounts do not include stock awards granted in November 2007 for
fiscal year 2007. For details see above. However, these amounts
may include stock awards or stock options received as
compensation by the Managing Board member before appointment to
the Managing Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
remaining life
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
remaining life
|
|
Stock options
|
|
Exercise price
|
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
exercisable
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in number of units or in )
|
|
|
Peter
Löscher(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Klaus
Kleinfeld(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Johannes
Feldmayer(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Heinrich
Hiesinger(3)
|
|
|
72.54
|
|
|
|
11,910
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
11,910
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Dr. Heinrich
Hiesinger(3)
|
|
|
74.59
|
|
|
|
11,845
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Kaeser
|
|
|
53.70
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Joe Kaeser
|
|
|
73.25
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Joe Kaeser
|
|
|
72.54
|
|
|
|
10,355
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
10,355
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Joe Kaeser
|
|
|
74.59
|
|
|
|
11,495
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rudi Lamprecht
|
|
|
72.54
|
|
|
|
16,520
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
16,520
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Rudi Lamprecht
|
|
|
74.59
|
|
|
|
28,945
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Jürgen Radomski
|
|
|
74.59
|
|
|
|
28,945
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann
Requardt(4)
|
|
|
72.54
|
|
|
|
11,390
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
11,390
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann
Requardt(4)
|
|
|
74.59
|
|
|
|
16,090
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Uriel J. Sharef
|
|
|
53.70
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Dr. Uriel J. Sharef
|
|
|
73.25
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Dr. Uriel J. Sharef
|
|
|
72.54
|
|
|
|
27,535
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
27,535
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Dr. Uriel J. Sharef
|
|
|
74.59
|
|
|
|
28,945
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Klaus Wucherer
|
|
|
73.25
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Prof. Dr. Klaus Wucherer
|
|
|
72.54
|
|
|
|
27,535
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
27,535
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Prof. Dr. Klaus Wucherer
|
|
|
74.59
|
|
|
|
28,945
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eduardo
Montes(5)
|
|
|
73.25
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Eduardo
Montes(5)
|
|
|
72.54
|
|
|
|
6,215
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
6,215
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Eduardo
Montes(5)
|
|
|
74.59
|
|
|
|
7,585
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Erich R.
Reinhardt(5)
|
|
|
86.23
|
|
|
|
8,775
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
8,775
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Prof. Dr. Erich R.
Reinhardt(5)
|
|
|
73.25
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Prof. Dr. Erich R.
Reinhardt(5)
|
|
|
72.54
|
|
|
|
16,250
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
16,520
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Prof. Dr. Erich R.
Reinhardt(5)
|
|
|
74.59
|
|
|
|
23,155
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
price on date
|
|
Stock options exercised in fiscal year 2007
|
|
Number of units
|
|
|
of exercise
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in number of units or in )
|
|
|
Peter
Löscher(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Klaus
Kleinfeld(1)
|
|
|
78,510
|
|
|
|
90.40
|
|
Prof. Johannes
Feldmayer(2)
|
|
|
61,310
|
|
|
|
90.49
|
|
Dr. Heinrich
Hiesinger(3)
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
|
86.09
|
|
Joe Kaeser
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
|
87.49
|
|
Rudi Lamprecht
|
|
|
45,500
|
|
|
|
89.84
|
|
Dr. Jürgen Radomski
|
|
|
99,785
|
|
|
|
91.71
|
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann
Requardt(4)
|
|
|
13,900
|
|
|
|
96.24
|
|
Dr. Uriel J. Sharef
|
|
|
13,500
|
|
|
|
88.40
|
|
Prof. Dr. Klaus Wucherer
|
|
|
43,500
|
|
|
|
95.32
|
|
Eduardo
Montes(5)
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
|
87.49
|
|
Prof. Dr. Erich R.
Reinhardt(5)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
89.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
404,355
|
|
|
|
91.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Effective June 30, 2007, Dr. Klaus Kleinfeld resigned
from his offices as a full member of the Managing Board and as
CEO and President of the Managing Board of Siemens AG. The full
term of his service agreement would have expired on
September 30, 2007. Effective July 1, 2007, Peter
Löscher was elected a full member of the Managing Board and
appointed Chief Executive Officer and President of the Managing
Board of Siemens AG.
|
|
(2)
|
Prof. Johannes Feldmayer had been suspended since March 28,
2007 and left the Managing Board, effective September 30,
2007.
|
|
(3)
|
Dr. Heinrich Hiesinger was elected a full member of the
Managing Board, effective June 1, 2007.
|
|
(4)
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann Requardt was elected a full member of the
Managing Board, effective October 1, 2006.
|
|
(5)
|
Deputy members of the Managing Board.
|
Pension benefit commitmentsWith the realignment of
the German pension plan of Siemens AG into a Defined
Contribution Benefit Plan (BSAV), the system of defined benefits
for members of the Managing Board was also replaced with effect
from October 1, 2004 by a pension benefit system based on
contributions by the Company. Pension benefits earned through
September 30, 2004 were not affected. The amount of the
contributions to the BSAV is determined annually by the
Chairmans Committee of the Supervisory Board. The
contributions under the BSAV are added to the personal pension
account each January following the close of the fiscal year,
with value date on January 1. Until the beneficiarys
time of retirement, the pension account is credited on January 1
each year with an annual interest payment (guaranteed interest).
For fiscal year 2007, the members of the Managing Board were
granted contributions under the BSAV totaling
13.6 million (2006: 4.2 million), based on
a resolution adopted by the Chairmans Committee of the
Supervisory Board on November 7, 2007. Of this amount,
0.7 million (2006: 0.7 million) relates to
funding of pension commitments earned prior to transfer to the
BSAV and the remaining 12.9 million (2006:
3.5 million) to contributions granted under the BSAV.
103
The following table shows on an individual basis, among other
things, the contributions (additions) under the BSAV
attributable to the members of the Managing Board for fiscal
year 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information pursuant to Section 4.2.5 para. 2, 2nd sentence
of the
|
|
|
|
German Corporate Governance Code
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which, funding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
of pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of BSAV account
|
|
|
|
|
|
commitments earned
|
|
|
Of which,
|
|
|
|
at September 30,
|
|
|
Total contribution
|
|
|
prior to transfer
|
|
|
contributions to
|
|
Defined Contribution Benefit Plan (BSAV)
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
for fiscal 2007
|
|
|
to the BSAV
|
|
|
the BSAV account
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in )
|
|
|
Peter
Löscher(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,500,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,500,000
|
|
Dr. Klaus
Kleinfeld(2)
|
|
|
1,095,556
|
|
|
|
805,000
|
|
|
|
154,700
|
|
|
|
650,300
|
|
Prof. Johannes
Feldmayer(4)
|
|
|
672,143
|
|
|
|
524,160
|
|
|
|
129,908
|
|
|
|
394,252
|
|
Dr. Heinrich
Hiesinger(5)
|
|
|
246,731
|
|
|
|
436,800
|
|
|
|
31,322
|
|
|
|
405,478
|
|
Joe Kaeser
|
|
|
544,341
|
|
|
|
436,800
|
|
|
|
24,097
|
|
|
|
412,703
|
|
Rudi Lamprecht
|
|
|
707,329
|
|
|
|
524,160
|
|
|
|
112,554
|
|
|
|
411,606
|
|
Dr. Jürgen
Radomski(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann
Requardt(7)
|
|
|
496,554
|
|
|
|
436,800
|
|
|
|
27,816
|
|
|
|
408,984
|
|
Dr. Uriel J. Sharef
|
|
|
673,800
|
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
Prof. Dr. Klaus Wucherer
|
|
|
673,800
|
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
Eduardo
Montes(8)
|
|
|
138,011
|
|
|
|
436,800
|
|
|
|
74,375
|
|
|
|
362,425
|
|
Prof. Dr. Erich R.
Reinhardt(8)
|
|
|
571,513
|
|
|
|
436,800
|
|
|
|
102,637
|
|
|
|
334,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,819,778
|
|
|
|
13,557,320
|
|
|
|
657,409
|
|
|
|
12,899,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
In each case, including the additions in January 2007, but
without reflecting minimum interest of currently 2.25% accrued
in the meantime.
|
|
(2)
|
Effective June 30, 2007, Dr. Klaus Kleinfeld resigned
from his offices as a full member of the Managing Board and as
CEO and President of the Managing Board of Siemens AG. The full
term of his service agreement would have expired on
September 30, 2007. Effective July 1, 2007, Peter
Löscher was elected a full member of the Managing Board and
appointed Chief Executive Officer and President of the Managing
Board of Siemens AG.
|
|
(3)
|
Special addition as of January 2008, for details see above
(p. 99).
|
|
(4)
|
Prof. Johannes Feldmayer had been suspended since March 28,
2007 and left the Managing Board, effective September 30,
2007.
|
|
(5)
|
Dr. Heinrich Hiesinger was elected a full member of the
Managing Board, effective June 1, 2007.
|
|
(6)
|
Dr. Jürgen Radomski was not transferred to the BSAV.
|
|
(7)
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann Requardt was elected a full member of the
Managing Board, effective October 1, 2006.
|
|
(8)
|
Deputy members of the Managing Board.
|
The defined benefit obligation (DBO) of all pension commitments
to members of the Managing Board as of September 30, 2007
amounted to 46.0 million (2006:
54.8 million), which amount is included in
Note 23 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Former members of the Managing Board and their surviving
dependents received emoluments within the meaning of
§ 314 (1), no. 6 b of the HGB totaling
16.0 million (2006: 14.4 million) for the
year ended September 30, 2007.
The defined benefit obligation (DBO) of all pension commitments
to former members of the Managing Board and their surviving
dependents as of September 30, 2007 amounted to
134.8 million (2006: 125.6 million), which
amount is included in Note 23 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
No loans from the Company are provided to members of the
Managing Board.
The Company has provided a guarantee in the amount of
4.5 million as security for a collateral guarantee in
the total amount of 5 million to be provided by a
former member of the Managing Board (for details see
Item 4: Information about the CompanyLegal
Proceedings.)
104
Supervisory
Board Remuneration
The remuneration of the members of the Supervisory Board was
determined at the Annual Shareholders Meeting through
shareholder approval of a proposal by the Managing and
Supervisory Boards. Details of the remuneration are set forth in
the Articles of Association of Siemens AG.
The remuneration of the members of the Supervisory Board is
based on the Companys size, the assignments and
responsibilities of the Supervisory Board members, and the
Companys overall business position and performance. In
addition to a fixed compensation component, the remuneration
includes variable compensation based on the Companys
short-term and long-term performance. The Chairman, the Deputy
Chairmen, as well as the Chairman and the members of the Audit
Committee receive additional compensation. The members of the
Compliance Committee and the Nominating Committee do not receive
additional compensation for these services in fiscal year 2007.
The current remuneration policies for the Supervisory Board were
authorized at the Annual Shareholders Meeting of
January 27, 2005. Details are set out in § 17 of
the Articles of Association of Siemens AG.
As a result, the remuneration of Supervisory Board members for
fiscal year 2007 includes three components:
|
|
|
|
|
a fixed compensation component,
|
|
|
|
a short-term compensation component based on earnings per share,
and
|
|
|
|
a long-term compensation component based on earnings per share.
|
In accordance with these remuneration policies, each Supervisory
Board member receives fixed compensation of 50,000 per
year and short-term variable compensation of 150 per year
for each 0.01 of earnings per share as disclosed in the
Consolidated Financial Statements in excess of a minimum amount
of 1.00. This minimum amount will be increased annually by
10 percent, beginning with the fiscal year starting on
October 1, 2005. In addition, long-term compensation in the
amount of 50,000 is granted, payable after expiration of
the then applicable five-year term of the Supervisory Board.
This long-term compensation will only be paid if earnings per
share at the end of the Supervisory Boards term of office
have increased by more than 50 percent compared to the
beginning of the term of office. Earnings per share, on which
the calculation of the Supervisory Boards remuneration is
based, has to be adjusted for significant extraordinary items.
For fiscal year 2007, the Supervisory Boards remuneration
was determined on the basis of earnings per share in the amount
of 4.76, after adjustment for significant extraordinary
items. The long-term compensation which was introduced as of the
fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2004 will be payable on
a pro rata basis upon expiration of the current Supervisory
Boards term of office, i.e. after the close of the Annual
Shareholders Meeting on January 24, 2008. The
required increase, determined on a pro rata basis, in earnings
per share compared to the beginning of the term of office was
achieved.
The Chairman of the Supervisory Board receives double, and each
Deputy Chairman 1.5 times, the amounts of the fixed compensation
and the short-term variable compensation of an ordinary member.
Each member of the committees and additionally the chairmen of
these committees (in each case other than the Chairmans
Committee, the Mediation Committee, and the Ownership Rights
Committee) each receive an additional half of the fixed and the
short-term variable compensation. The members of the Supervisory
Board are reimbursed for any
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with their duties and for any
sales taxes to be paid on their remuneration. In consideration
for the performance of his duties, the Chairman of the
Supervisory Board is furthermore entitled to an office with
secretarial support and use of the Siemens carpool service.
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
variable
|
|
|
variable
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
variable
|
|
|
variable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
compensation
|
|
|
compensation
|
|
|
compensation(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
compensation
|
|
|
compensation
|
|
|
compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Gerhard
Cromme(2) (3)
|
|
|
114,583
|
|
|
|
122,031
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
269,947
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,000
|
|
Prof. Dr. Heinrich v.
Pierer(2) (3)
|
|
|
72,917
|
|
|
|
77,656
|
|
|
|
23,333
|
|
|
|
173,906
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
86,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,250
|
|
Ralf
Heckmann(3)
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
106,500
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
239,833
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,000
|
|
Dr. Josef
Ackermann(3)
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
79,875
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
188,208
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
51,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,750
|
|
Lothar Adler
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
53,250
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
136,583
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
Gerhard Bieletzki
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
53,250
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
136,583
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
John David Coombe
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
|
66,563
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
162,396
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
Hildegard Cornudet
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
53,250
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
136,583
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
Birgit Grube
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
53,250
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
136,583
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
Bettina
Haller(4)
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
26,625
|
|
|
|
8,333
|
|
|
|
59,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heinz
Hawreliuk(3)
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
79,875
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
188,208
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
51,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,750
|
|
Berthold Huber
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
53,250
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
136,583
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
Prof. Dr. Walter Kröll
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
53,250
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
136,583
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
Prof. Dr. Michael
Mirow(2)
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
26,625
|
|
|
|
8,333
|
|
|
|
59,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wolfgang
Müller(5)
|
|
|
16,667
|
|
|
|
17,750
|
|
|
|
23,333
|
|
|
|
57,750
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
Georg
Nassauer(4)
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
26,625
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
76,625
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
Thomas
Rackow(6)
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
53,250
|
|
|
|
20,833
|
|
|
|
124,083
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
25,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,375
|
|
Dieter
Scheitor(5)
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
39,938
|
|
|
|
10,833
|
|
|
|
88,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Albrecht Schmidt
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
53,250
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
136,583
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
Dr. Henning
Schulte-Noelle(3)
|
|
|
87,500
|
|
|
|
93,188
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
214,021
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
51,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,750
|
|
Peter von Siemens
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
53,250
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
136,583
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
Jerry I. Speyer
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
53,250
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
136,583
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
Lord Iain Vallance of Tummel
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
53,250
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
136,583
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
Klaus
Wigand(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,333
|
|
|
|
13,333
|
|
|
|
16,667
|
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,266,667
|
|
|
|
1,349,001
|
|
|
|
666,659
|
|
|
|
3,282,327
|
|
|
|
1,254,167
|
|
|
|
865,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,119,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The amounts are subject to continuing membership on the
Supervisory Board until the close of the Annual
Shareholders Meeting on January 24, 2008. In the
event of prior resignation from the Supervisory Board, the
amount payable will be reduced on a pro rata basis. Supervisory
Board members who left the Supervisory Board after
October 1, 2004 receive long-term variable compensation on
a pro rata basis. For his services on the Supervisory Board
until January 27, 2005, the former Chairman of the
Supervisory Board, Dr. Karl-Hermann Baumann, is entitled to
receive long-term variable pro rata compensation of 3,333.
|
|
(2)
|
At the beginning of the Supervisory Board meeting on
April 25, 2007, Prof. Dr. Heinrich v. Pierer tendered
his resignation as a member and as Chairman of the Supervisory
Board. In his stead, Dr. Gerhard Cromme was elected
Chairman of the Supervisory Board for the remaining term of
office of his predecessor until the Annual Shareholders
Meeting on January 24, 2008. Prof. Dr. Michael Mirow,
who had been elected a substitute member, succeeded Prof.
Dr. Heinrich v. Pierer as a member of the Supervisory Board.
|
|
(3)
|
Each of Dr. Gerhard Cromme as Chairman of the Supervisory
Board and member of the Audit Committee; Ralf Heckmann as Deputy
Chairman of the Supervisory Board and a member of the Audit
Committee; Dr. Josef Ackermann as Deputy Chairman of the
Supervisory Board; Dr. Henning Schulte-Noelle as Chairman
and member of the Audit Committee (based on length of service in
each position); Heinz Hawreliuk and John David Coombe as members
of the Audit Committee receive higher fixed and variable
compensation. For his period of office on the Supervisory Board,
Prof. Dr. Heinrich v. Pierer, as former Chairman of the
Supervisory Board and member of the Audit Committee, also
receives higher compensation on a pro rata basis. For his period
of office as Chairman of the Audit Committee, Dr. Gerhard
Cromme also receives higher compensation on a pro rata basis.
|
|
(4)
|
Bettina Haller, formerly a substitute member of the Supervisory
Board, became a member of the Supervisory Board of Siemens AG as
a successor to Georg Nassauer with effect from April 1,
2007.
|
|
(5)
|
Dieter Scheitor was appointed a member of the Supervisory Board
by court order as a successor to Wolfgang Müller, who
resigned from the Supervisory Board at the close of the Annual
Shareholders Meeting on January 25, 2007.
|
|
(6)
|
Thomas Rackow, formerly a substitute member of the Supervisory
Board, became a member of the Supervisory Board as a successor
to Klaus Wigand with effect from January 26, 2006.
|
Under an existing agreement that was extended after the Annual
Shareholders Meeting 2003 on unchanged terms and
conditions and that will expire after the Annual
Shareholders Meeting on January 24, 2008, Peter von
Siemens, as a member of the founders family, is entitled
to reimbursement of expenses and the provision of a
106
company car and office with secretarial support for representing
the Company at official events in Germany and abroad, as well as
in various associations.
No loans from the Company are provided to members of the
Supervisory Board.
Other
The members of the governing bodies of Siemens and all board
members of its domestic and foreign subsidiaries are indemnified
by Siemens or its subsidiaries against third-party liability
claims to the extent permitted by law. For this purpose, the
Company provides a group insurance policy for board and
committee members and employees of the Siemens organization
which is taken out for one year and renewed annually. The
insurance covers the personal liability of the insured in the
case of a financial loss associated with employment functions.
In such a case, the Company may, with effect from
October 1, 2005, hold members of the Managing Board liable
for such loss up to an amount equivalent to 20 percent of
the fixed salary. In the same way, each member of the
Supervisory Board has individually agreed to be held liable up
to an amount equivalent to 20 percent of the fixed
compensation component (i.e. a deductible within the meaning of
Section 3.8, paragraph 2, of the German Corporate
Governance Code).
Stock-Based
Compensation
Stock
Option Plan
We have a stock option plan, the 2001 Siemens Stock Option Plan,
for members of our Managing Board, members of the top
managements of domestic and foreign subsidiaries and other
eligible employees. The authority to distribute options under
this plan expired on December 13, 2006. This plan enabled
the issuance of non-transferable options exercisable for up to
an aggregate of 55 million of our shares, of which options
exercisable for no more than 3.3 million shares could have
been granted to members of the Managing Board, options
exercisable for up to an aggregate of 8.8 million shares
could have been granted to members of the top managements of
domestic and foreign subsidiaries, and options exercisable for
up to 42.9 million shares could have been granted to other
eligible employees.
Under the 2001 Stock Option Plan, the Supervisory Board decided
annually after the end of each fiscal year how many options to
grant to the members of the Managing Board and the Managing
Board decided annually how many options to grant to members of
the top managements of domestic and foreign subsidiaries and
eligible employees. As of October 31, 2007, we had
outstanding options exercisable for 8,484,502 shares under
our option plans. Options to members of the top managements of
domestic and foreign subsidiaries and eligible employees could
have been granted within 30 days after publication of
quarterly, half-year or yearly results. Options to Managing
Board members could have been granted only once a year after
publication of the yearly results.
Both the Supervisory Board and the Managing Board decided not to
grant any stock options in fiscal 2007. Since the authority to
distribute options under this plan expired on December 13,
2006, no further options will be granted under this plan.
The following table sets forth information as to the options we
issued to members of our Managing Board during fiscal 2008, 2007
and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With respect to
|
|
|
With respect to
|
|
|
With respect to
|
|
|
options granted in
|
|
|
options granted in
|
|
|
options granted in
|
|
|
fiscal 2008
|
|
|
fiscal 2007
|
|
|
fiscal 2006
|
|
Number of options granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315,495
|
Exercise price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.59
|
Expiration date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 18, 2010
|
For further details, including the number of stock options
granted to the individual members of our Managing Board and
their fair value, see Compensation.
107
The 2001 Stock Option Plan replaced our 1999 Stock Option Plan.
The right to exercise options issued under the 1999 Plan expired
on November 24, 2007. The exercise price for options issued
under the 1999 Plan was equal to the average market price of the
Siemens stock during the five trading days preceding the day of
grant of the options. Holders of options under the 1999 Plan
were able to exercise them during fixed time periods after the
publication of our quarterly, half-year or yearly results within
a five-year period following a holding period of two years. In
addition, these options were exercisable only if the trading
price of our shares on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange had reached
an exercise threshold, which was based on the Dow Jones
Stoxx-Index, at least once during the five-year term of the
options. However, options were exercisable only if the threshold
had been reached within the six-week period prior to the
exercise date. For further information about the terms of these
options and the related compensation expenses, see Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The exercise price for options under the 2001 Plan is 120% of
the average opening price of our shares on the Xetra-system of
the Frankfurt Stock Exchange during the five trading days
preceding the day of grant of the options. Holders of options
under the 2001 Plan may exercise them during fixed time periods
after the publication of our quarterly, half-year or yearly
results within a three-year period following a holding period of
two years plus one week. In addition, options under the 2001
Plan may be exercised only if the trading price of our shares on
the Frankfurt Stock Exchange reaches the option exercise price
at least once during the five-year term of the options.
The options may be settled in newly issued shares of common
stock of Siemens AG from the conditional capitals reserved for
this purpose, in treasury stock or in cash. The alternatives
available to optionees are determined by the Managing Board and
subsequently approved by the Supervisory Board.
Stock
Awards
In November 2004, we introduced stock awards as another means
for providing stock-based compensation to our Managing Board,
members of the top managements of domestic and foreign
subsidiaries, and other eligible employees. Stock awards are
commitments to issue or transfer shares of Siemens AG to the
grantee. Each stock award is subject to a waiting period of four
years (if granted on or before September 30, 2007) or
three years (if granted thereafter). Upon expiration of the
waiting period, the grantee receives a corresponding number of
shares of Siemens AG without additional payment.
Stock awards cannot be transferred, sold, pledged or otherwise
encumbered. They can be inherited only by spouses orin
absence of a spouseby children of the grantee. Stock
awards are not entitled to dividends issued during the waiting
period.
The Supervisory Board decides annually after the end of each
fiscal year how many stock awards to grant to the members of the
Managing Board, and the Managing Board decides annually how many
stock awards to grant to members of the top managements of
domestic and foreign subsidiaries and eligible employees. Stock
awards may be granted only once a year within 30 days after
publication of the yearly results.
On November 7, 2007, the Supervisory Board decided to grant
79,133 stock awards to members of our Managing Board with a
grant date of November 9, 2007. On November 9, 2007,
the Managing Board decided to grant 658,488 stock awards to
members of the top managements of domestic and foreign
subsidiaries and other eligible employees of the Company with a
grant date of November 9, 2007.
The fair value of the stock awards is recorded at the market
price of the Siemens share on the grant date less the present
value of dividends expected during the waiting period. The
following table sets forth information as to the stock awards we
granted during fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With respect to
|
|
With respect to
|
|
With respect to
|
|
|
stock awards granted in
|
|
stock awards granted in
|
|
stock awards granted in
|
|
|
fiscal 2008
|
|
fiscal 2007
|
|
fiscal 2006
|
|
Number of stock awards granted
|
|
737,621
|
|
1,232,893
|
|
1,076,860
|
Value per stock award at grant date
|
|
97.94
|
|
67.70
|
|
57.28
|
Total value of stock awards granted
|
|
72.2 million
|
|
83.5 million
|
|
61.7 million
|
108
For further details, including the number of awards granted to
the individual members of our Managing Board and their fair
value, see Compensation.
Stock awards may be settled in newly issued shares of common
stock of Siemens AG from authorized capital which may be
reserved for this purpose, in treasury stock or in cash. The
settlement method will be determined subsequently by the
Managing Board and the Supervisory Board.
Share
ownership
As of October 12, 2007, the Managing Board members serving
on the board during the fiscal year held a total of 468,410
Siemens shares as well as stock options and stock awards on
Siemens shares (exercisable within sixty days), representing
0.051 percent of the capital stock of Siemens AG. As of the
same day, members of the Supervisory Board serving on the board
during the fiscal year held a total of 89,580 Siemens shares as
well as stock options and stock awards on Siemens shares
(exercisable within sixty days), representing 0.01 percent
of the capital stock of Siemens AG. These figures do not include
9,904,856 shares, or 1.08 percent of the capital
stock, that are held by the von Siemens-Vermögensverwaltung
GmbH (vSV)a German limited liability entity that functions
much like a trustand 24,673,050 shares, or some
2.70 percent of the capital stock, over which the vSV has
voting control under a power of attorney. Mr. Peter von
Siemens is authorized to vote these shares as a representative
of the founders family. The vSV is described in more
detail under Item 7: Major Shareholders and Related
Party TransactionsMajor Shareholders.
Pursuant to § 15a of the German Securities Trading Act
(WpHG), members of the Managing and Supervisory Boards are
required to disclose purchases or sales of shares of Siemens AG
or financial instruments based on such shares if the total
amount of transactions of a board member and any closely
associated person is at least 5,000 during any calendar
year.
The following transactions were executed in fiscal 2007 and
reported to Siemens:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Function/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Status at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
|
Time of
|
|
|
|
WKN/
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Day
|
|
Name
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Security
|
|
ISIN
|
|
Trade
|
|
Securities
|
|
in
|
|
Comment
|
|
2/20/2007
|
|
Ralf
Heckmann
|
|
Supervisory Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
234
|
|
85.25
|
|
Regular Sale of Siemens Shares
|
4/30/2007
|
|
Rudi
Lamprecht
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
35,000
|
|
89.20
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 2001
|
4/30/2007
|
|
Johannes
Feldmayer
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
25,000
|
|
89.20
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 2001
|
4/30/2007
|
|
Erich R.
Reinhardt
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
20,000
|
|
89.20
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 2001
|
5/2/2007
|
|
Jürgen
Radomski
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
30,000
|
|
90.77
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 2001
|
5/2/2007
|
|
Klaus
Kleinfeld
|
|
President of Managing Board
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
69,735
|
|
90.77
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 2001
|
5/3/2007
|
|
Johannes
Feldmayer
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
27,535
|
|
91.12
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 2001
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Function/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Status at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
|
Time of
|
|
|
|
WKN/
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Day
|
|
Name
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Security
|
|
ISIN
|
|
Trade
|
|
Securities
|
|
in
|
|
Comment
|
|
5/3/2007
|
|
Jürgen
Radomski
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
52,535
|
|
91.12
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 2001
|
5/4/2007
|
|
Thomas
Rackow
|
|
Supervisory Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
5,295
|
|
90.19
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 2001
|
5/22/2007
|
|
Rudi
Lamprecht
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Purchase
|
|
2,170
|
|
92.00
|
|
Regular Purchase of Siemens Shares
|
5/25/2007
|
|
Hermann
Requardt
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
10,000
|
|
97.91
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 2001
|
6/5/2007
|
|
Klaus
Wucherer
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
30,000
|
|
98.43
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 2001
|
6/8/2007
|
|
Jürgen
Radomski
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
3,000
|
|
94.557
|
|
Regular Sale of Siemens Shares
|
6/20/2007
|
|
Thomas
Rackow
|
|
Supervisory Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
2,250
|
|
107.38
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 1999
|
7/30/2007
|
|
Jürgen
Radomski
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
17,250
|
|
95.12
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 1999
|
8/24/2007
|
|
Johannes
Feldmayer
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
8,775
|
|
92.18
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 1999
|
9/5/2007
|
|
Hermann
Requardt
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
3,900
|
|
91.97
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 1999
|
9/5/2007
|
|
Rudi
Lamprecht
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
10,500
|
|
91.97
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 1999
|
9/7/2007
|
|
Klaus
Wucherer
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
13,500
|
|
88.40
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 1999
|
9/7/2007
|
|
Uriel
Jonathan Sharef
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
13,500
|
|
88.40
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 1999
|
9/7/2007
|
|
Heinrich
Hiesinger
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
3,000
|
|
88.40
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 1999
|
9/10/2007
|
|
Eduardo
Montes
|
|
Managing Board Member
|
|
Siemens
Share
|
|
7236101
|
|
Sale
|
|
3,900
|
|
87.49
|
|
Sale in the context of the Siemens Stock Option Plan 1999
|
These transactions were duly published on the Companys
Internet website at
www.siemens.com/directors-dealings.
110
ITEM 7: MAJOR
SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Major
Shareholders
The vSV holds approximately 1.08% of our outstanding shares in
trust for, and, in addition, has a power of attorney allowing it
to vote approximately 2.70% of our outstanding shares on behalf
of members of the Siemens family and family-sponsored
foundations. To the extent these shares are voted on behalf of
members of the Siemens family or family-sponsored foundations,
these shares are voted together by the vSV. The vSV exercises
its voting power in respect of these shares upon approval by the
chairman of its shareholders meeting. As a result, the
chairman has voting power over these Siemens shares. The current
chairman is Mr. Peter von Siemens, who is also a member of
our Supervisory Board. To our knowledge and based on public
filings, there is no other single person that may be considered
a beneficial owner of 5% or more of our outstanding shares.
As of November 12, 2007, we had approximately 642,000
shareholders. Approximately 75,800 were U.S. holders, of which
approximately 366 were registered holders. Based on our share
register, U.S. holders held approximately 17.1% of our ordinary
shares as of September 30, 2007.
Related
Party Transactions
As reflected in the information in the tables above under
Item 6: Directors, Senior Management and
EmployeesManagementSupervisory Board and
Managing Board, some of our board members
hold, or in the last year have held, positions of significant
responsibility with other entities. We have relationships with
almost all of these entities in the ordinary course of our
business whereby we buy and sell a wide variety of products and
services on arms length terms. Dr. Josef Ackermann is
the Chairman of the Management Board of Deutsche Bank AG. Our
transactions with Deutsche Bank AG are conducted on arms
length basis and include securities underwriting, other
investment banking services, and credit, money market and
foreign exchange business.
During the last fiscal year, there were no loans outstanding to
members of our management.
We have a number of significant equity investments in large
companies. We have relationships with many of these entities in
the ordinary course of business whereby we buy and sell a wide
variety of products and services on arms length terms. Our
principal equity investments are BSH Bosch und Siemens
Hausgeräte, Fujitsu Siemens Computers and since April 2007
Nokia Siemens Networks B.V., the Netherlands (NSN), which are
included in our Strategic Equity Investments (SEI), and Areva
NP. For further information with respect to NSN, see Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements. For further
information with respect to SEI, see Item 5:
Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsFiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006Segment Information
AnalysisStrategic Equity Investments.
The Company has provided a guarantee in the amount of
4.5 million as security for a collateral guarantee in
the total amount of 5 million to be provided by a
former member of the Managing Board (for details see
Item 4: Information on the CompanyLegal
Proceedings.) In accordance with German law provisions,
the Company has also provided advancements of attorneys
fees to certain present and former members of the Managing and
Supervisory Boards in connection with ongoing legal proceedings.
These advancements are subject to repayment in the event a
member of the Managing Board is found to have violated his
obligations to the Company.
For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
ITEM 8: FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference
to Item 4: Information on the CompanyLegal
Proceedings, Item 5: Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects and Item 17: Financial
Statements.
111
ITEM 9: THE
OFFER AND LISTING
Trading
Markets
The principal trading market for our shares is the Frankfurt
Stock Exchange. Our shares are also traded on the other German
stock exchanges in Berlin, Düsseldorf, Hamburg, Hanover,
Munich and Stuttgart and on the London Stock Exchange, the Swiss
Stock Exchange in Zurich and the MTA International in Milan. The
ADRs of Siemens AG, each evidencing one ADS, which represents
one share, trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
SI.
Market
Price Information
The table below sets forth, for the calendar periods indicated,
the high and low closing sales prices on the Frankfurt Stock
Exchange for the ordinary shares of Siemens as reported by the
Electronic cash market trading system (Xetra). The table also
shows, for the periods indicated, the closing highs and lows of
the DAX, a German stock index which measures the performance of
the 30 largest German companies in terms of order book volume
and market capitalization, and the average daily trading volume
of our ordinary shares on Xetra. See the discussion under
Item 3: Key InformationExchange Rate
Information, for information with respect to rates of
exchange between the U.S. dollar and the euro applicable during
the periods set forth below.
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
ordinary share
|
|
|
DAX
|
|
|
daily trading
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
volume(1)
|
|
|
|
()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(millions of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares)
|
|
|
Annual highs and lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
78.52
|
|
|
|
32.05
|
|
|
|
5,462.6
|
|
|
|
2,597.9
|
|
|
|
6.226
|
|
2003
|
|
|
64.85
|
|
|
|
32.55
|
|
|
|
3,965.2
|
|
|
|
2,203.0
|
|
|
|
6.274
|
|
2004
|
|
|
68.30
|
|
|
|
53.40
|
|
|
|
4,261.8
|
|
|
|
3,647.0
|
|
|
|
4.783
|
|
2005
|
|
|
73.78
|
|
|
|
56.20
|
|
|
|
5,458.6
|
|
|
|
4,178.1
|
|
|
|
4.728
|
|
2006
|
|
|
79.77
|
|
|
|
61.37
|
|
|
|
6,611.8
|
|
|
|
5,292.1
|
|
|
|
5.313
|
|
2007(2)
|
|
|
111.17
|
|
|
|
75.32
|
|
|
|
8,150.7
|
|
|
|
6,447.7
|
|
|
|
7.567
|
|
Quarterly highs and lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
68.30
|
|
|
|
57.30
|
|
|
|
4,151.8
|
|
|
|
3,726.1
|
|
|
|
5.426
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
65.05
|
|
|
|
54.95
|
|
|
|
4,134.1
|
|
|
|
3,754.4
|
|
|
|
4.885
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
61.06
|
|
|
|
53.40
|
|
|
|
4,035.0
|
|
|
|
3,647.0
|
|
|
|
4.564
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
62.54
|
|
|
|
57.50
|
|
|
|
4,261.8
|
|
|
|
3,854.4
|
|
|
|
4.266
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
63.60
|
|
|
|
59.08
|
|
|
|
4,428.1
|
|
|
|
4,201.8
|
|
|
|
4.697
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
63.20
|
|
|
|
56.20
|
|
|
|
4,627.5
|
|
|
|
4,178.1
|
|
|
|
4.625
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
66.18
|
|
|
|
60.28
|
|
|
|
5,048.7
|
|
|
|
4,530.2
|
|
|
|
4.760
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
73.78
|
|
|
|
60.08
|
|
|
|
5,458.6
|
|
|
|
4,806.1
|
|
|
|
4.829
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
79.25
|
|
|
|
70.00
|
|
|
|
5,984.2
|
|
|
|
5,334.3
|
|
|
|
4.940
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
79.77
|
|
|
|
61.37
|
|
|
|
6,140.7
|
|
|
|
5,292.1
|
|
|
|
6.600
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
68.80
|
|
|
|
61.90
|
|
|
|
6,004.3
|
|
|
|
5,396.9
|
|
|
|
4.558
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
76.27
|
|
|
|
66.91
|
|
|
|
6,611.8
|
|
|
|
5,992.2
|
|
|
|
5.249
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
85.50
|
|
|
|
75.32
|
|
|
|
7,027.6
|
|
|
|
6,447.7
|
|
|
|
6.660
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
107.38
|
|
|
|
79.93
|
|
|
|
8,090.5
|
|
|
|
6,937.2
|
|
|
|
8.594
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
111.17
|
|
|
|
86.29
|
|
|
|
8,105.7
|
|
|
|
7,270.1
|
|
|
|
7.992
|
|
Fourth
quarter(2)
|
|
|
103.77
|
|
|
|
89.75
|
|
|
|
8,041.3
|
|
|
|
7,512.0
|
|
|
|
6.758
|
|
Monthly highs and lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
|
|
|
107.38
|
|
|
|
94.18
|
|
|
|
8,090.5
|
|
|
|
7,590.5
|
|
|
|
9.376
|
|
July
|
|
|
111.17
|
|
|
|
93.57
|
|
|
|
8,105.7
|
|
|
|
7,451.7
|
|
|
|
9.136
|
|
August
|
|
|
94.50
|
|
|
|
86.72
|
|
|
|
7,638.2
|
|
|
|
7,270.1
|
|
|
|
7.825
|
|
September
|
|
|
97.05
|
|
|
|
86.29
|
|
|
|
7,861.5
|
|
|
|
7,375.4
|
|
|
|
6.927
|
|
October
|
|
|
99.02
|
|
|
|
89.75
|
|
|
|
8,041.3
|
|
|
|
7,794.9
|
|
|
|
5.482
|
|
November(2)
|
|
|
103.77
|
|
|
|
91.99
|
|
|
|
7,880.9
|
|
|
|
7,512.0
|
|
|
|
8.485
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Data from Datastream International.
|
|
(2)
|
Up to and including November 23, 2007.
|
On November 23, 2007, the closing sale price per Siemens AG
ordinary share on Xetra was 98.23, which was equivalent to
$145.47 per ordinary share, translated at the noon buying rate
for euros on such date.
Trading
on the New York Stock Exchange
Official trading of Siemens AG ADSs on the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE) commenced on March 12, 2001. Siemens AG
ADRs trade under the symbol SI.
113
The following table sets forth, for the calendar periods
indicated, the high and low closing sales prices per Siemens AG
ADR as reported on the NYSE Composite Tape:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per ADS
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Annual highs and lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
70.45
|
|
|
|
30.85
|
|
2003
|
|
|
79.98
|
|
|
|
36.61
|
|
2004
|
|
|
87.50
|
|
|
|
65.48
|
|
2005
|
|
|
87.02
|
|
|
|
71.73
|
|
2006
|
|
|
98.76
|
|
|
|
76.66
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
155.16
|
|
|
|
98.21
|
|
Quarterly highs and lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
87.50
|
|
|
|
69.75
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
77.35
|
|
|
|
65.71
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
75.66
|
|
|
|
65.48
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
85.00
|
|
|
|
72.48
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
84.67
|
|
|
|
77.19
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
80.40
|
|
|
|
71.73
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
80.00
|
|
|
|
72.55
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
87.02
|
|
|
|
72.50
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
94.05
|
|
|
|
84.23
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
98.76
|
|
|
|
76.66
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
87.64
|
|
|
|
78.80
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
98.59
|
|
|
|
83.98
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
112.24
|
|
|
|
98.21
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
143.17
|
|
|
|
107.26
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
154.03
|
|
|
|
116.75
|
|
Fourth
quarter(1)
|
|
|
155.16
|
|
|
|
127.97
|
|
Monthly highs and lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
|
|
|
143.17
|
|
|
|
127.29
|
|
July
|
|
|
154.03
|
|
|
|
126.63
|
|
August
|
|
|
130.40
|
|
|
|
116.75
|
|
September
|
|
|
140.87
|
|
|
|
127.97
|
|
October
|
|
|
155.16
|
|
|
|
131.15
|
|
November(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Up to and including November 23, 2007.
|
On November 23, 2007, the closing sales price per Siemens
AG ADS on the New York Stock Exchange as reported on the NYSE
Composite Tape was $145.89.
114
ITEM 10: ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
Articles
of Association and Relevant Provisions of German Law
This section summarizes the material provisions of our Articles
of Association (Satzung) and German law to the extent
that they affect the rights of our shareholders. The description
is only a summary and does not describe everything that our
Articles of Association contain.
Organization
We are a stock corporation organized in the Federal Republic of
Germany under the German Stock Corporation Act
(Aktiengesetz). We are registered in the Commercial
Register (Handelsregister) maintained by the local courts
in Berlin Charlottenburg, Germany, under the entry number 12300,
and in Munich, Germany, under the entry number 6684. Copies of
our Articles of Association are publicly available from the
Commercial Register in Berlin and Munich, and an English
translation is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
in the United States. You can find both of them also on our
website www.siemens.com/corporate_governance.
Corporate
Governance
Siemens fully complies with the recommendations of the German
Corporate Governance Code (Code), which was first issued in 2002
and later expanded, most recently in June 2007. Our prior
exception is no longer applicable since the annual allocation to
accrued pension liabilities or pension funds for members of the
Managing Board in the case of pension plans is disclosed on an
individual basis in this Annual Report (see Item 6:
Directors, Senior Management and
EmployeesCompensation.)
The Managing Board and the Supervisory Board of Siemens,
respectively, discussed compliance with the recommendations of
the Code, in particular with regard to the amendments of
June 14, 2007. Based on these deliberations, the Boards
approved the Declaration of Conformity (with the Code) which is
set forth below, posted on our website and updated as necessary.
Siemens voluntarily complies with the Codes non-obligatory
suggestions, with only minor exceptions.
Our listing on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) subjects us to
certain U.S. capital market laws (including the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act (SOA)) and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) and rules of the NYSE. To facilitate our
compliance with the SOA, we have, among other things,
established a Disclosure Committee (comprised of nine central
department heads) that is responsible for reviewing certain
financial and non-financial information and advising the
Managing Board in its decision-making about disclosure. We have
also introduced procedures that require our Group and subsidiary
managements to certify various matters, providing a basis on
which our CEO and CFO certify our financial statements to the
SEC. Consistent with the SOA, Siemens has also implemented
procedures for handling accounting complaints and a Code of
Ethics for Financial Matters.
Management
and Control StructureThe Supervisory Board
As a German stock corporation, Siemens is subject to German
corporate law and has a two-tier management and oversight
structure, consisting of an 11-member Managing Board and a
20-member Supervisory Board. The German Codetermination Act
(Mitbestimmungsgesetz) requires that the Companys
shareholders and its employees each select one-half of the
Supervisory Boards members.
According to the Bylaws for the Supervisory Board, the
shareholder representatives must be independent. Some
Supervisory Board members hold, or held in the past year,
high-ranking positions at other companies; nevertheless, our
sales and purchases of products and/or services to or from such
companies are transacted on an arms length basis. We
believe that these dealings do not compromise the independence
of the associated Supervisory Board members.
The Supervisory Board oversees and advises the Managing Board in
its management of Company business. At regular intervals, it
discusses business development, planning, strategy and
implementation. It also discusses
115
Siemens quarterly and half-yearly reports and approves the
annual, stand-alone financial statements of Siemens AG, as
well as the Consolidated Financial Statements of Siemens, taking
into account both the audit reports provided by the independent
auditors and the results of the review conducted by the Audit
Committee. It monitors the Companys adherence to statutory
provisions, official regulations and internal Company policies
(compliance). In addition, the Supervisory Board appoints the
members of the Managing Board and allocates members
individual duties. Important Managing Board decisionssuch
as major acquisitions, divestments and financial
measuresrequire Supervisory Board approval. In the Bylaws
for the Managing Board, the Supervisory Board has established
rules that govern the work of the Managing Board, in particular
the allocation of duties among individual Managing Board
members, matters reserved for the Managing Board as a whole, and
the required majority for Managing Board resolutions.
The Supervisory Boards Bylaws provide for the
establishment of committeescurrently sixwhose
duties, responsibilities and procedures fulfill the requirements
of the Code, reflect applicable SOA requirements and incorporate
applicable NYSE rules, as well as certain NYSE rules not
mandatorily applicable to Siemens AG. Each committees
chairman provides the Supervisory Board with regular reports
regarding the activities of the relevant committee.
The Chairmans Committee performs the collective
tasks of a nominating, compensation and corporate governance
committee to the extent that the tasks are not performed by the
Nominating Committee (see below). In particular, it makes
proposals regarding the appointment of Managing Board members
and establishes guidelines for the conditions of employment and
for the structure and level of the remuneration of Managing
Board members.
The Audit Committee consists of three shareholder
representatives and two employee representatives. The
Supervisory Board monitors the independence of the members of
the committee and sees to it that they have special knowledge
and experience in the application of accounting principles and
internal control processes. Siemens relies on the exemption
afforded by
Rule 10A-3(b)(1)(iv)(C)
under the Securities Exchange Act. We believe that such reliance
does not materially adversely affect the ability of the Audit
Committee to act independently or to satisfy the other
requirements of
Rule 10A-3.
The Audit Committee oversees the appropriateness and the
effectiveness of the Companys external and internal
accounting processes. Together with the independent auditors, it
also reviews the Companys financial statements prepared
quarterly, half-yearly and annually by management. On the basis
of the independent auditors report on the annual financial
statements, the Audit Committee makes a recommendation to the
Supervisory Board whether or not it should approve those
financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee oversees
the Companys internal control system related to financial
reporting and its procedures for assessing, monitoring and
managing risk. The Companys Financial Audit department
reports regularly to the Audit Committee. In addition, the Audit
Committee monitors the independence, qualifications, rotation
and performance of the independent auditors and performs the
other functions required of it under the SOA.
The Compliance Committee, which was established in April
2007, comprises the Chairman of the Supervisory Board, two
shareholder representatives and two employee representatives.
During the currently ongoing compliance investigation, the
Compliance Committee is responsible for overseeing the
Companys adherence to statutory provisions, official
regulations and internal Company policies (compliance). In
addition, the Compliance Committee is responsible for overseeing
the currently ongoing compliance investigation, dealing with
reports on the independent investigation and reviewing the
internal compliance and control systems provided by the
independent advisors and other persons appointed by the
Compliance Committee.
In July 2007, the Supervisory Board established a Nominating
Committee. It is composed of the Chairman of the Supervisory
Board and two shareholder representatives. This Nominating
Committee is responsible for making recommendations to the
Supervisory Boards shareholder representatives on the
shareholder candidates for election to the Supervisory Board by
the Annual Shareholders Meeting.
The Mediation Committee submits proposals to the
Supervisory Board in the event that the Supervisory Board cannot
reach the two-thirds majority required to appoint a Managing
Board member. The Ownership Rights Committee is
responsible for decisions regarding the exercise of
Siemens shareholder rights in subsidiaries subject to the
German Codetermination Act.
116
The
Managing Board
The Managing Board, as the Companys top management body,
is obligated to promote the interests of the Company at all
times and to drive sustainable growth in company value. Its
nine-member Corporate Executive Committee cooperates with the
President and CEO to define overall Company policies and is also
responsible for determining the Companys strategic
orientation, planning and finalizing the Companys budget,
allocating resources, and monitoring the executive management of
each Group. The Managing Board also prepares the Companys
quarterly and half-yearly reports, the annual, stand-alone
financial statements of Siemens AG and the Consolidated
Financial Statements of Siemens. The Managing Board is
responsible for overseeing compliance by the Company with all
applicable provisions of law and official regulations and the
Companys internal policies and works to achieve compliance
with these provisions and policies within the Siemens group. For
further information about compliance-related activities in
fiscal 2007, please refer to Item 4: Information
about the CompanyLegal Proceedings and Item 15:
Controls and ProceduresRemediation Plan. The
Managing Board cooperates closely with the Supervisory Board,
informing it regularly, promptly and fully on all issues related
to Company strategy and strategy implementation, planning,
business development, financial position, earnings, compliance
and risks.
Shareholder
Relations
Four times each year, Siemens AG reports to its shareholders
regarding its business development, financial position and
earnings. An ordinary Annual Shareholders Meeting normally
takes place within the first four months of each fiscal year.
The Managing Board facilitates shareholder participation in the
meeting through electronic communicationsin particular the
Internetand enables shareholders who are unable to attend
the meeting to vote by proxy.
Among other things, the Annual Shareholders Meeting
decides on the appropriation of net income, ratification of the
acts of the Managing and Supervisory Boards, and the appointment
of the independent auditors. Amendments to the Articles of
Association and measures which change the Companys capital
stock are approved exclusively at the Annual Shareholders
Meeting and are implemented by the Managing Board. Shareholders
may submit counter-proposals to the proposals of the Managing
and Supervisory Boards and may contest decisions of the Annual
Shareholders Meeting. Shareholders owning Siemens stock
with an aggregate notional value of 100,000 or more may
also demand the appointment of special auditors to examine
specific occurrences.
As part of our investor relations activities, the CEO, the CFO
and individual members of the Groups executive managements
meet regularly with analysts and institutional investors. We
hold a conference for analysts at least once a year, as well as
telephone conferences with analysts upon the publication of our
quarterly results.
Business
Conduct Guidelines and Code of Ethics
Our Business Conduct Guidelines and our Code of Ethics for
Financial Matters form the basis of our Compliance Program.
The Business Conduct Guidelines, introduced by the Managing
Board in 2001, contain binding standards for law-abiding
behavior and precise rules regarding, among others, compliance
with applicable fair competition and anticorruption laws,
handling of donations and gifts, avoidance of conflicts of
interest, prohibition of insider trading, and protection of
Company assets. They also specify procedures for dealing with
complaints. The Business Conduct Guidelines are binding on all
Company employees and Managing Board members worldwide. The
members of our Supervisory Board also comply with these
Guidelines where applicable.
Furthermore, in 2003 the Managing Board and the Supervisory
Board implemented a Code of Ethics for Financial Matters, as
required by the SOA rules. Both the Business Conduct Guidelines
and the Code of Ethics for Financial Matters are available on
our Internet website.
The Business Conduct Guidelines and the Code of Ethics for
Financial Matters are complemented by numerous other rules that
are applicable Company-wide.
117
As required by the SOA rules, procedures for the receipt,
retention and treatment of potential complaints regarding
accounting practices as well as procedures for handling relevant
reports from specific attorneys (internal and external) have
been implemented. Such complaints and comments, including those
submitted anonymously, are processed by the Chief Compliance
Officer in the case of complaints related to accounting
practices, and by the General Counsel in the case of reports
form specific attorneys.
In addition to the existing internal procedures for reporting
and handling complaints, an external attorney has been engaged
to act as an independent ombudsman to provide a new protected
communication channel for Siemens employees and third parties.
Since August 2007, our customers, suppliers, business partners
and employees worldwide have been offered the opportunity to
submit reports on violations to the Tell Us
Compliance Helpdesk, either by telephone or online 24/7. The
external provider specializes in the secure and confidential
handling of sensitive information. In addition, the Company
encourages employees to use a centralized question-and-answer
platform. Since September 2007, the Ask Us
Compliance Helpdesk provides employees with an opportunity to
ask questions on compliance-relevant topics. This relates both
to the application of compliance-relevant regulations in the
day-to-day
business and the understanding of requirements for agreements
with external partners.
For further information about compliance-related activities in
fiscal 2007, please refer to Item 4: Information
about the CompanyLegal Proceedings and Item 15:
Controls and ProceduresRemediation Plan.
Corporate Governance GuidelinesOur Articles
of Association, the Bylaws for the Supervisory Board and those
of its most important committees, the Bylaws for the Managing
Board, all declarations of conformity, the report on our
fulfillment of the requirements of the Code, and various other
documents pertaining to our corporate governance may be found on
our Internet website at www.siemens.com/corporate_governance.
For details of the compensation of our members of the Managing
Board and the Supervisory Board please refer to Item 6:
Directors, Senior Management and
EmployeesCompensation.
Significant
Differences between Siemens Corporate Governance and NYSE
Corporate Governance Standards
Companies listed on the NYSE are subject to the Corporate
Governance Standards of Section 303A (the NYSE Standards)
of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. Under the NYSE Standards,
Siemens AG, as a foreign private issuer, is permitted to follow
its home-country corporate governance practices in lieu of the
NYSE Standards, except that it is required to comply with the
NYSE Standards relating to the having of an audit committee
(comprised of members who are independent under the
SOA) and to certain NYSE notification obligations. In addition,
the NYSE Standards require that foreign private issuers disclose
any significant ways in which their corporate governance
practices differ from those required of U.S. domestic companies
under the NYSE Standards.
As a company incorporated in Germany, Siemens AG has to comply
with the German law applicable to stock corporations (primarily
the German Stock Corporation Act) and the German Codetermination
Act and follows the recommendations of the German Corporate
Governance Code. Furthermore, Siemens complies with applicable
rules and regulations of the markets on which its securities are
listed, such as the NYSE, and also voluntarily complies with
many of the NYSE requirements that by their terms apply only to
U.S. domestic issuers. For additional information on our
corporate governance, please refer to Item 6:
Directors, Senior Management and Employees and to
the other subsections of this Item 10.
The significant differences between our governance practices and
those of U.S. domestic NYSE issuers are as follows:
Two-Tier BoardThe German Stock
Corporation Act requires Siemens AG to have a two-tier board
structure consisting of a Managing Board and a Supervisory
Board. The two-tier system provides a strict separation of
management and supervision. Roles and responsibilities of each
of the two boards are clearly defined by law. The composition of
the Supervisory Board is determined in accordance with the
Codetermination Act, which requires that one-half of the
required 20 Supervisory Board members must be elected by our
domestic employees. In the event of a tie vote at the
Supervisory Board, the Chairman of the Supervisory Board is
entitled to cast a deciding vote.
118
IndependenceIn contrast to the NYSE
Standards, which require the board to affirmatively determine
the independence of the individual directors with reference to
specific tests of independence, German law does not require the
Supervisory Board to make such affirmative findings on an
individual basis. At the same time, the Bylaws for Siemens
Supervisory Board contain several provisions to help ensure the
independence of the Supervisory Boards advice and
supervision. Furthermore, the members of the Supervisory and
Managing Boards are strictly independent from one another; a
member of one board is legally prohibited from being
concurrently active on the other. Supervisory Board members have
independent decision-making authority and are legally prohibited
from following the direction or instruction of any affiliated
party. Moreover, Supervisory Board members may not enter into
advisory, service or certain other contracts with Siemens,
unless approved by the Supervisory Board.
CommitteesIn contrast to the NYSE
Standards, which require the creation of several specified board
committees, composed of independent directors and operating
pursuant to written charters that set forth their tasks and
responsibilities, the Supervisory Board of Siemens AG has
combined the functions of a nominating, compensation and
corporate governance committee substantially in the
Chairmans Committee and has delegated the remaining
functions to the Nominating Committee. Both the Audit Committee
and the Chairmans Committee have written
bylawsadopted by the Supervisory Board based on the NYSE
Standardsaddressing their respective purposes and
responsibilities.
The Audit Committee of Siemens AG is subject to the standards of
the SOA and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable
to a foreign private issuer, and performsin cooperation
with the recently established Compliance
Committeefunctions similar to those of an audit committee
subject to the full NYSE Standards. Nevertheless, German law
precludes certain responsibilities from being delegated to a
committee, such as the selection of the independent auditors,
who are required by German law to be elected at the
shareholders meeting.
In addition, the Supervisory Board of Siemens AG has an
Ownership Rights Committee and a Mediation Committee, the latter
of which is required by German law. Neither of these two
committees is required under the NYSE Standards.
Shareholder Approval of Equity Compensation Plans; Stock
RepurchasesThe NYSE Standards generally
require U.S. domestic companies listed on the NYSE to obtain
shareholder approval of all equity compensation plans (including
stock option plans) and any material revisions to them.
Similarly, our adoption of stock option plans and any material
revisions thereto require the approval by our shareholders
insofar as any issuance of shares and/or stock options under
authorized or contingent capital authorizations requires
shareholder approval (which approval requires consideration of
the key elements of the applicable option plan or relevant
modifications). The 2001 Siemens Stock Option Plan, for example,
under which no further options can be issued after December
2006, was approved in 2001 by our shareholders. Similarly, under
German law, share buybacks generally require the prior
authorization by shareholders. Such approval was provided at our
January 25, 2007 Annual Shareholders Meeting, and
this matter will generally be voted upon annually.
Declaration
of Conformity with the Code
At their meetings on November 23 and 28, 2007, respectively, the
Managing Board and the Supervisory Board approved the following
Declaration of Conformity pursuant to § 161 of the
German Stock Corporation Act:
Siemens AG fully complies and will continue to comply with the
recommendations of the German Corporate Governance Code (Code)
in the version of June 14, 2007. Since making its last
Declaration of Conformity dated December 11, 2006, Siemens
AG has fully complied with the recommendations of the Code in
the version of June 12, 2006 with one exception (no
individual disclosure of the annual allocation to accrued
pension liabilities or pension funds for members of the Managing
Board in the case of pension plans, section 4.2.5
para. 2, 2nd sentence of the Code). This exception no
longer applies given the individual disclosure made in the
Annual Report 2007.
119
Objects
and Purposes
According to Section 2 of our Articles of Association, the
objects and purposes of our Company are:
|
|
|
|
|
to manufacture, distribute and supply industrial products in the
fields of electrical engineering and electronics, mechanical
engineering, precision mechanics as well as related sectors of
engineering, including research and development in these fields;
|
|
|
|
to develop, plan, distribute, supply, assemble and commission
trade-specific and customer-specific systems, solutions and
facilities in the fields of electrical engineering and
electronics, mechanical engineering, precision mechanics as well
as related sectors of engineering; and
|
|
|
|
to render industrial and other business-related services.
|
Our Articles of Association authorize us to engage in business
of any kind and to take any and all measures related to or which
are directly or indirectly useful in promoting our objects. We
may also operate both domestic and foreign factories, establish
branch offices, found, acquire, consolidate with, or participate
in other companies, conclude or participate in other management
contracts, and enter into joint ventures.
Directors
Under German law, our Supervisory Board members and Managing
Board members owe duties of loyalty and care to our Company.
They must exercise the standard of care of a prudent and
diligent businessman and bear the burden of proving they did so
if their actions are contested. Both boards have a duty to take
into account the interests of our shareholders and our workers
and, to some extent, are also required to observe the public
interest. Those who violate their duties are jointly and
severally liable to the Company for any damage that their
violations have caused unless their actions were validly
approved by a resolution at a prior shareholders meeting
with a simple majority of the votes cast.
No board member may vote on a matter that concerns formal
approval of his own acts or in which he has a material interest,
and no member of either our Supervisory Board or our Managing
Board may receive loans from us.
There is no mandatory retirement age for members of either board
under our Articles of Association. However, according to the
Managing Boards Bylaws, the age of a member of the
Managing Board shall not exceed 65. Likewise, the Bylaws of the
Supervisory Board recommend that members of the Supervisory
Board shall not be older than 70. There is no share ownership
requirement for the members of either of our boards.
See also Item 6: Directors, Senior Management and
EmployeesSupervisory Board andManaging Board,
for further information about the Supervisory Board and the
Managing Board.
Rights,
Preferences and Restrictions Attaching To Our Shares
Voting
Rights
Our shareholders vote at shareholders meetings. A
shareholders meeting may be called by either our Managing
Board or our Supervisory Board. The Annual Shareholders
Meeting must take place within the first eight months of each
fiscal year. In addition, shareholders who in the aggregate hold
5% or more of our registered share capital may require that the
Managing Board call a meeting or that particular items be placed
on the agenda for a meeting. Shareholders holding shares with an
aggregate value of at least 500,000 of our registered
share capital may also require that particular items be placed
on the agenda for a meeting.
Under German law and our Articles of Association, we must
publish notices of shareholders meetings in the Federal
Gazette at least 30 days prior to the deadline set by the
notice in which we ask our shareholders to notify us that they
intend to attend the meeting. In this respect, our articles of
association have been amended to adjust to new legislation.
German law now requires the approval from the annual
shareholders meeting as a prerequisite for electronic
delivery of shareholder meeting materials. Our Annual
Shareholders Meeting on January 25, 2007 has
120
approved that the Company shall be entitled to submit to
registered shareholders, with their approval, information by way
of remote data transmission.
In order to be entitled to participate and vote at the meeting,
a shareholder must be registered in the share register on the
meeting date, and must also have notified us in writing or
electronically that he or she wishes to attend the meeting no
later than six full days before the meeting date, or such lesser
period as the Managing Board may specify.
At our shareholders meetings, each share carries one vote.
In certain cases, a shareholder can be prevented from exercising
his or her voting rights. This rule applies, for example, if we
discharge one of our shareholders from liability or assert
claims against one of our shareholders. Resolutions are
generally passed with a simple majority of the votes cast at the
meeting. Resolutions that require a capital majority are passed
with a simple majority of the issued capital present at the
meeting, unless statutory law or our Articles of Association
require otherwise. Under the German Stock Corporation Act, a
number of significant resolutions must be passed by a vote of at
least 75% of the share capital present at the meeting. This 75%
majority requirement applies, among others, to the following
matters:
|
|
|
|
|
amendments of our Articles of Association (except amendments
that would impose an additional duty upon our shareholders or
change certain rights and obligations attaching to our shares,
which in addition require the approval of all shareholders
concerned);
|
|
|
|
capital increases and decreases;
|
|
|
|
exclusion of preemptive rights in connection with a capital
increase;
|
|
|
|
the creation of authorized capital or conditional capital or the
issue of convertible bonds and bonds with warrants attached;
|
|
|
|
the dissolution of our Company;
|
|
|
|
merger or consolidation of our Company with another stock
corporation or certain other corporate transformations;
|
|
|
|
transfer of all or virtually all of our assets; and
|
|
|
|
the approval of any direct control, profit and loss pooling or
similar intercompany agreements.
|
Although we must notify shareholders of an ordinary or
extraordinary shareholders meeting as described above,
neither the German Stock Corporation Act nor our Articles of
Association fix a minimum quorum requirement. Accordingly,
holders of a minority of our shares could control the outcome of
actions not requiring a specified majority of our outstanding
share capital.
Neither German law nor our Articles of Association restrict the
right of non-resident or foreign owners of our shares to hold or
vote the shares.
Dividend
Rights
Under applicable German law, we may declare and pay dividends
only from annual net profits as they are shown in the German
statutory, stand-alone annual financial statements of Siemens
AG. For each fiscal year, the Managing Board approves the annual
financial statements and submits them to the Supervisory Board
with its proposal as to the appropriation of the annual net
profit. The proposal will set forth what amounts of the annual
net profit should be paid out as dividends, transferred to
capital reserves, or carried forward to the next fiscal year.
Upon approval by the Supervisory Board, the Managing Board and
the Supervisory Board submit their combined proposal to the
shareholders at the Annual Shareholders Meeting. The
general assembly of shareholders ultimately determines the
appropriation of annual net profits, including the amount of the
annual dividends. Our Managing and Supervisory Boards may not
allocate more than one half of our annual surplus to profit
reserves if, following this allocation, our accumulated profit
reserves would exceed one half of our share capital. In
determining the distribution of profits, however, our
shareholders may allocate additional amounts to profit reserves
and may carry
121
forward profits in part or in full. Our shareholders participate
in profit distributions in proportion to the number of shares
they hold.
There are two different types of dividends: cash dividends and
dividends in kind. Dividends approved at a shareholders
meeting are payable on the first stock exchange trading day
after that meeting, unless otherwise decided at the
shareholders meeting. If an investor holds shares that are
entitled to dividends in a clearing system, the dividends will
be paid according to that clearing systems rules. If he or
she holds physical certificates, he or she is no longer able to
exercise dividend or other rights attaching to the shares
without first surrendering the physical certificates to a
financial institution that maintains securities accounts. We
will publish notice of dividends paid, and the paying agent or
agents that we have appointed, in the Federal Gazette.
Liquidation
Rights
In accordance with the German Stock Corporation Act, if we are
liquidated, any liquidation proceeds remaining after all our
liabilities have been paid off would be distributed among our
shareholders in proportion to the number of common shares held
by them.
Preemptive
Rights
Under the German Stock Corporation Act, our shareholders
generally have preemptive rights. Preemptive rights are
preferential rights to subscribe for issues of new shares in
proportion to the number of shares that a shareholder already
holds in the corporations existing share capital. These
rights do not apply to shares issued out of conditional capital
or if a capital increase has occurred and our shareholders have
waived their preemptive rights in connection with that increase.
Preemptive rights also apply to securities other than shares if
they may be converted into shares, such as options, securities
with warrants, profit-sharing certificates and securities with
dividend rights. Under German law, preemptive rights may be
transferred separately from the underlying shares and may be
traded on any of the German stock exchanges on which our shares
are traded until a certain number of days prior to the last date
on which the preemptive rights may be exercised.
The German Stock Corporation Act allows companies to exclude or
restrict preemptive rights in connection with capital increases
only in limited circumstances and only in the same
shareholders resolution that authorizes the capital
increase. At least 75% of the share capital represented at the
meeting that approves a capital increase has to vote for
exclusion or restriction of preemptive rights in connection with
that increase. In addition to being approved by the
shareholders, any exclusion or restriction of preemptive rights
requires a justification, which our Managing Board has to set
forth in a written report to our shareholders. The justification
requires a showing that our interest in excluding or restricting
preemptive rights outweighs the shareholders interest in
exercising these rights. If our Managing Board increases our
share capital for cash in accordance with our Articles of
Association, it may, for example, exclude preemptive rights:
|
|
|
|
|
to the extent that we have an obligation to grant new shares to
holders of warrants or convertible bonds that we or any of our
subsidiaries have issued;
|
|
|
|
if the newly issued shares represent 10% or less of our existing
share capital at the time we register the authorized capital or
issue the new shares, and the issue price of the new shares is
not substantially less than the stock exchange price as defined
under German law; or
|
|
|
|
to the extent necessary to avoid fractional amounts that may
arise in the case of share issuance upon the exercise of
preemptive rights.
|
In addition, our shareholders have waived their preemptive
rights with respect to shares issued to employees, with respect
to shares issued in exchange for an in-kind contribution out of
authorized capital and with respect to treasury stock; see also
Repurchase
of Our Own Shares. Additionally, our shareholders have
waived their preemptive rights in certain cases with respect to
the issuance of bonds with conversion rights or warrants:
|
|
|
|
|
if the issue price of the bond is not significantly lower than
its fair market value determined in accordance with generally
accepted actuarial methods;
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
if this is necessary with regard to small residual amounts that
result from the exchange ratio; or
|
|
|
|
to the extent holders of such rights are entitled, upon their
exercise, to subscribe for our common shares in order to avoid
dilution of the economic value of such rights.
|
Restrictions
on voting rights or transfer of shares
Shares of stock issued by Siemens AG to employees under its
employee stock scheme are subject to Company-imposed private law
restrictions on disposal for five years. As a matter of
principle, beneficiary employees may not dispose of any shares
transferred to them in this way prior to expiration of the
holding period.
Members of the von Siemens family signed a trust agreement with
the von Siemens-Vermögensverwaltung GmbH (vSV), under which
they transferred 9,904,856 (2006: 10,607,390) shares of stock
owned by them to the vSV as trust property. As a trustee, the
vSV holds the voting rights with respect to all shares
transferred to it, and exercises such voting rights in a uniform
manner at the Shareholders Meeting of Siemens AG at its
professional discretion. The vSV has to ensure that, as a rule,
all voting rights attached to the shares transferred as trust
property are represented at the Shareholders Meeting.
Several Siemens foundations that are not a party to the trust
agreement also authorize the vSV to exercise the voting rights
attached to the shares held by them in a fiduciary capacity in
the same manner as the voting rights attached to the shares
transferred to the vSV as trust property. In this way, the vSV
has voting control under a power of attorney over 24,673,050
(2006: 39,144,979) shares of stock.
In order to bundle and represent their interests, the family
members established a family partnership that makes proposals to
the vSV on the exercise of the voting rights at the
Shareholders Meeting of Siemens AG, which are taken into
account by the vSV when acting within the bounds of professional
discretion. In the event that a trust relationship is terminated
or interrupted by shareholders, they are required to continue to
manage the shares originally included in the trust relationship
in a manner that will not impair the intended purpose of the
trust agreement. In particular, they are required to ensure that
the voting rights attached to these shares, if possible, are
exercised at the Shareholders Meeting in line with the
intended purpose of the trust agreement, if this is legally
permissible and economically justifiable.
Disclosure
Requirement
Our Articles of Association do not require our shareholders to
advise us when their holdings exceed specified thresholds. Under
the German Securities Trading Act
(Wertpapierhandelsgesetz), however, holders of the voting
securities of an issuer whose home country is the Federal
Republic of Germany and whose securities are admitted to trading
on an organized market are required to notify without undue
delay and in writing the issuer in which they hold the
securities and the German Federal Financial Supervisory
Authority (Bundesanstalt für
Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) of the level of their
holdings whenever such holdings reach, exceed or fall below
certain thresholds. These thresholds are set at 3%, 5%, 10%,
15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 50% and 75% of the issuers outstanding
voting rights. In addition, anyone who holds, directly or
indirectly, financial instruments that result in an entitlement
to acquire, on ones own initiative alone and under a
legally binding agreement, shares in an issuer whose home
country is the Federal Republic of Germany that carry voting
rights and have already been issued, must, without undue delay,
notify this to the issuer and to the German Federal Financial
Supervisory Authority if the thresholds mentioned above have
been reached, exceeded or fallen below, with the exception of
the 3% threshold. The issuer shall publish the notifications
received without undue delay, but not later than three trading
days following receipt of the notification. A domestic issuer
shall also publish the total number of voting rights at the end
of each calendar month during which the number of voting rights
has increased or decreased. The calculation of the percentage of
voting rights shall be based on the latest publication of the
total number of voting rights of the issuer. If a shareholder
fails to notify the issuer or the German Federal Financial
Supervisory Authority as required, he or she cannot exercise any
rights associated with the shares for as long as the default
continues. Additionally, the German Takeover Act
(Wertpapiererwerbs- und Übernahmegesetz) requires
the publication of the acquisition of control, which
is defined as holding of at least 30% of the voting rights in a
target company, within seven days.
123
The German Securities Trading Act requires the reporting of
certain directors dealings. According to the Act, persons
discharging managerial responsibilities within a publicly-traded
issuer have to notify both the issuer and the German Federal
Financial Supervisory Authority about their transactions
relating to the issuers shares and derivatives or other
financial instruments linked to those shares. Certain persons
closely associated with these managers, for example spouses,
dependent children, or other relatives sharing the same
household, are under the same obligation. Similarly, the
reporting obligation also applies to legal entities, trusts and
partnerships that are managed or controlled by any such manager
or associated person, or that are set up for the benefit of such
a person, or whose economic interests are substantially
equivalent to those of such person. Nevertheless, there is no
notification obligation until the total amount of transactions
of a covered manager and all his associated persons is at least
5,000 during any calendar year. The issuer is obliged to
publish on its website all notifications it receives for a
period of at least one month. The respective information can be
found on our Internet website at
www.siemens.com/directors-dealings. For further information
about such transactions see also Item 6: Directors,
Senior Management and EmployeesShare Ownership.
Repurchase
of Our Own Shares
We may not acquire our own shares unless so authorized by a
resolution duly adopted by our shareholders at a general meeting
or in other very limited circumstances set forth in the German
Stock Corporation Act.
The German Stock Corporation Act generally limits share
repurchases to 10% of our share capital. In addition, any
shareholders resolution that authorizes us to repurchase
shares may not be in effect for a period of longer than
18 months. The resolution presently in effect is valid
until July 24, 2008. According to this resolution, shares
that are repurchased may be sold via a stock exchange; or
(i) retired with the approval of the Supervisory Board;
(ii) used to meet the Companys obligations under the
1999 and the 2001 Siemens Stock Option Plans; (iii) offered
for purchase to individuals currently or formerly employed by
the Company or any of its subsidiaries or granted and
transferred with a holding period of at least two years; or
(iv) used to service conversion or option rights granted by
the Company or any of its subsidiaries. In addition, the
Supervisory Board shall be authorized to offer repurchased
shares to the members of the Managing Board of Siemens AG for
purchase as stock-based compensation under the same terms and
conditions as those offered to employees of the Company.
Additionally, the Supervisory Board may grant and transfer such
shares to members of the Managing Board with a holding period of
at least two years.
Jurisdiction
Our Articles of Association provide that by subscription to or
by otherwise acquiring shares or temporary certificates for
shares, a shareholder submits to the jurisdiction of the courts
of our legal domicile in all disputes with us or our governing
bodies.
Material
Contracts
On July 25, 2007, Siemens signed an agreement with
Continental AG, Hanover, Germany, to sell its entire Siemens VDO
Automotive activities for a sales price of approximately
11.4 billion.
Siemens AG, Siemens International Holding B.V.
(SIH), Siemens Beteiligungen U.S.A. GmbH
(SIBUSA, and, together with SIH and Siemens AG,
Siemens) as sellers entered into a sale and purchase
agreement (SPA) with CAS Two Holdinggesellschaft
mbH, Hanover, Germany, as purchaser (Purchaser) and
Continental AG, Hanover, Germany (Continental) as
guarantor regarding the sale and purchase of the Siemens VDO
Automotive Group (VDO). For a description of the VDO
business, see Item 4: Information on the
CompanySiemens VDO Automotive (SV). Before Siemens
entered into the SPA, the VDO business was reorganized and
transferred from Siemens to VDO under three contribution
agreements entered into on May 23, 2007 and June 29,
2007, respectively, in exchange for the issuance of new shares
and claims for additional consideration for which payment was
deferred such that the respective amounts were owed as
shareholder loans. Under the SPA, Siemens sold 100% of the
outstanding shares as well as the shareholder loans granted in
connection with the contribution of the VDO business with
aggregate principal amount of approximately
4.4 billion to Purchaser for a total purchase price
(including the
124
amount outstanding under the shareholder loans) of approximately
11.4 billion. The SPA has economic effect as of
June 30, 2007. Further, Siemens is entitled to interest
payments on the shareholder loans and on the equity purchase
price. The closing of the transaction is subject to receipt of
regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions and
is expected for the first week of December 2007. As of the
closing, VDO must refrain from using the name, trademark or logo
Siemens as well as from the use of any other marks,
logos, names or reference indicating a connection to Siemens,
except for the use of existing material for an interim period.
Siemens, in turn, may no longer use certain VDO trademarks after
the closing. The SPA prohibits Siemens from engaging in certain
restricted activities for a period of 30 months after the
closing. However, the SPA does not prohibit Siemens from
continuing any of its current activities.
Exchange
Controls
At present, Germany does not restrict the movement of capital
between Germany and other countries or individuals except
certain persons and entities associated with Osama bin Laden,
the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban and certain other
individuals and countries subject to embargoes in accordance
with German law and applicable resolutions adopted by the United
Nations and the EU.
For statistical purposes, with certain exceptions, every
corporation or individual residing in Germany must report to the
German Central Bank any payment received from or made to a
non-resident corporation or individual if the payment exceeds
12,500 (or the equivalent in a foreign currency).
Additionally, corporations and individuals residing in Germany
must report to the German Central Bank any claims of a resident
against, or liabilities payable to, a non-resident corporation
or individual exceeding an aggregate of 5 million (or
the equivalent in a foreign currency) at the end of any calendar
month. In this case all items (i.e. also items with values below
5 million) have to be reported. Resident corporations
and individuals are also required to report annually to the
German Central Bank any stakes of 10% or more they hold in the
equity or voting power of non-resident corporations with a
balance sheet total of more than 3 million.
Corporations residing in Germany with a balance sheet total in
excess of 3 million must report annually to the
German Central Bank any stake of 10% or more in the company held
by an individual or a corporation located outside Germany.
Taxation
German
Taxation
The following discussion is a summary of the material German tax
consequences for beneficial owners of our shares or ADSs
(i) who are not German residents for German income tax
purposes (i.e., generally persons whose residence, habitual
abode (gewöhnlicher Aufenthalt), statutory seat
or place of effective management and control is not located in
Germany) and (ii) whose shares or ADSs do not form part of
the business property of a permanent establishment or fixed base
in Germany. Throughout this section we refer to these owners as
Non-German Holders.
This summary is based on German tax laws and typical tax
treaties to which Germany is a party as they are in effect on
the date hereof, and is subject to changes in German tax laws or
such treaties. Besides the description of the effective rules
applicable as of the reporting date, we address in short
material implications of the German Tax Reform 2008. Most
provisions of the amended tax laws have to be applied for the
2008 assessment period.
The following discussion does not purport to be a comprehensive
discussion of all German tax consequences that may be relevant
for Non-German Holders. You should consult your tax advisor
regarding the German tax consequences of the purchase, ownership
and disposition of our shares or ADSs and the procedures to
follow to obtain a refund of German taxes withheld from
dividends.
125
Taxation
of the Company in Germany
German corporations are subject to a corporate income tax rate
of 25%. Moreover, a solidarity surcharge of 5.5% on the net
assessed corporate income tax is levied, so that the corporate
income tax and the solidarity surcharge, in the aggregate,
amount to a tax rate of 26.375%.
In addition, German corporations are subject to profit-related
trade tax on income, the exact amount of which depends on the
municipality in which the corporation maintains its business
establishment(s). Trade tax on income is a deductible item in
computing the corporations tax base for corporate income
tax and trade tax purposes.
Beginning in fiscal year 2004, the deduction for a taxable loss
carryforward is limited to 60% of the taxable income for the
fiscal year if and to the extent that such income exceeds a
threshold of 1 million. The usability period of loss
carryforwards is unchanged and remains unlimited.
German
Tax Reform 2008 (Unternehmenssteuerreform)
On 14 August 2007 the new tax regulations of the tax reform
have been enacted. Most of the new rules will become effective
for the 2008 assessment period.
The overall objective of the German Business Tax Reform 2008 is
the reduction of the tax burden imposed on corporate enterprises
by reducing the corporate income tax rate. Conversely, some
measures have been adopted to increase the taxable assessment
basis. In the following, we address the material changes of the
new provisions implemented by the German Business Tax Reform
2008. For detailed information regarding the implications of the
reform, you should consult your tax advisor.
The corporate income tax rate will be reduced from 25% to 15%
plus solidarity surcharge of 5.5% thereon, resulting in an
aggregate tax rate of 15.825%. Trade tax on income will no
longer be deductible for corporate income tax and trade tax
purposes, which will result in a combined tax rate for German
corporate companies of
30-33%
(including solidarity surcharge), depending on the individual
municipal rates.
The following measures will possibly lead to an increase to the
taxable assessment basis:
|
|
|
|
|
Thin-capitalization rules are replaced. If the interest expenses
exceed the interest proceeds, the deductibility of interest
expenses is generally limited to 30% of the EBITDA for tax
purposes (i.e., taxable income for corporate income tax purposes
plus interest expenses, depreciations and amortizations, minus
interest proceedsso-called interest ceiling).
For entities being part of a group of companies, the limitation
rules are not to be applied if certain conditions concerning the
equity ratio of the group entity in relation to the equity ratio
of the entire group are met. If the actual interest expenses
exceed the limitation, they can be carried forward subject to
certain limitations.
|
|
|
|
The transfer of more than 25% of corporations shares or
voting rights within a period of 5 years to one purchaser,
a related party, or a group of purchaser pooling their interests
triggers limitation of loss-carryforward rules. As an effect, a
portion or even the entire loss carryforward and interest
carryforward (caused by the interest ceiling rules) are
forfeited for both corporate and trade taxation.
|
|
|
|
For trade tax purposes, one fourth of the sum of certain
payments (e.g. loan remuneration (interest expenses), recurring
payments, certain portions of rental payments concerning movable
and immovable fixed assets etc.) are considered non-deductible
expenses.
|
Imposition
of Withholding Tax
Dividend distributions made by Siemens are subject to a
withholding tax of 20%. Moreover, a solidarity surcharge of 5.5%
on the withholding tax is levied, resulting in a total
withholding tax rate from dividends of 21.1%. According to the
German Business Tax Reform 2008, the withholding tax rate on
dividends will increase to 25% starting January 1, 2009.
However, starting January 1, 2009, in case of corporate
Non-German Holders 2/5 of the withheld and remitted withholding
tax will be refunded upon application at the German Federal Tax
Office (at the address noted in the subsequent paragraph), which
finally results in a withholding of 15% (plus solidarity
126
surcharge). The entitlement of corporate Non-German Holders to
further reductions of the withholding tax under an applicable
income tax treaty remains unaffected. The solidarity surcharge
will remain unchanged.
For many Non-German Holders, e.g. U.S. Shareholders, the
withholding tax rate is currently reduced under applicable
income tax treaties. Under most income tax treaties to which
Germany is a party, the rate of dividend withholding tax is
reduced to 15%. To reduce the withholding to the applicable
treaty rate of 15%, a Non-German Holder must apply for a refund
of withholding taxes paid. The refund amounts to 6.1% of the
declared dividend for dividend distributions withheld at the
rate of 21.1%. The application for refund must be filed with the
German Federal Tax Office (Bundeszentralamt für Steuern, An
der Küppe 1, D-53225 Bonn, Germany;
http://www.bzst.bund.de/).
The relevant forms can be obtained from the German Federal Tax
Office or from German embassies and consulates. Special rules
apply to U.S. shareholders (see below).
Germany and the United States of America have agreed on a
Protocol amending the existing Income Tax Treaty. In order to
become effective, the Protocol needs to be ratified both by
Germany and the United States of America. Germany has already
ratified the Protocol, the US ratification has not yet taken
place.
Refund
Procedure for U.S. Shareholders
For shares and ADSs kept in custody with The Depository
Trust Company in New York or one of its participating
banks, the German tax authorities have introduced a collective
procedure for the refund of German dividend withholding tax and
the solidarity surcharge thereon on a trial basis. Under this
procedure, the Depository Trust Company may submit claims
for refunds payable to eligible U.S. holders under the Treaty
collectively to the German tax authorities on behalf of these
eligible U.S. holders. The German Federal Tax Office will pay
the refund amounts on a preliminary basis to The Depository
Trust Company, which will redistribute these amounts to the
eligible U.S. holders according to the regulations governing the
procedure. The German Federal Tax Office may review whether the
refund was made in accordance with the law within four years
after making the payment to The Depository Trust Company.
Details of this collective procedure are available from The
Depository Trust Company.
Individual claims for refunds may be made on a special German
form which must be filed with the German Federal Tax Office at
the address noted above. Copies of this form may be obtained
from the German Federal Tax Office at the same address or from
the Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany, 4645 Reservoir
Road, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20007-1998.
Claims must be filed within a four-year period from the end of
the calendar year in which the dividend was received.
As part of the individual refund claim, an eligible U.S. holder
must submit to the German tax authorities the original bank
voucher (or a certified copy thereof) issued by the paying agent
documenting the tax withheld, and an official certification on
IRS Form 6166 of its last United States federal income tax
return. U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors
regarding how to obtain an IRS Form 6166.
Capital
Gains
Under German domestic tax law as currently in effect, capital
gains derived by a Non-German Holder from the sale or other
disposition of shares or ADSs are subject to tax in Germany only
if such Non-German Holder has held, directly or indirectly,
shares or ADSs representing 1% or more of the registered share
capital of the company at any time during the five-year period
immediately preceding the disposition. Capital gains are not
taxable if the
1%-threshold
is not exceeded and the shares or ADSs are not sold or disposed
of in another way within one year after purchase.
In general, corporate Non-German Holders will be fully exempt
from German tax on capital gains derived from the sale or other
disposition of shares or ADSs. However, 5% of the capital gains
derived by such corporate shareholders will be treated as
non-deductible business expenses and are subject to German tax,
so effectively only 95% of the capital gains will be tax exempt.
U.S. holders that qualify for benefits under the Treaty are
exempt from taxation in Germany on capital gains derived from
the sale or disposition of shares or ADSs.
127
Inheritance
and Gift Tax
Under German law, in principle, German gift or inheritance tax
will be imposed only on transfers by a holder of shares or ADSs
at death or by way of gift, if
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
the decedent or donor, or the heir, donee or other transferee
has his residence or habitual abode (gewöhnlicher
Aufenthalt) in Germany at the time of the transfer;
|
|
|
(ii)
|
the shares or ADSs are part of the business property of a
permanent establishment in Germany;
|
|
|
(iii)
|
the decedent or donor, or the heir, donee or other transferee is
a citizen of Germany, is not a resident in Germany, but has not
been continuously outside of Germany for a period of more than
five years; or
|
|
|
(iv)
|
the shares or ADSs subject to such transfer form part of a
portfolio that represents 10% or more of the registered share
capital of the company and has been held, directly or
indirectly, by the decedent or donor, respectively, actually or
constructively together with related parties.
|
On January 31, 2007, the Federal Constitutional Court
(Bundesverfassungsgericht) has given a court decision
that certain provisions of the current Inheritance and Gift Tax
Law have to be adapted.
The right of the German government to impose inheritance or gift
tax on a Non-German Holder may be further limited by an
applicable estate tax treaty (such as the
U.S.-German
Inheritances and Gifts Tax Treaty of December 3, 1980).
Other
Taxes
No German transfer, stamp or similar taxes apply to the
purchase, sale or other disposition of shares or ADSs by a
Non-German Holder. Currently, net worth tax is not levied in
Germany.
U.S.
Federal income Taxation
This section describes the material United States federal income
tax consequences of owning our shares or ADSs. It applies to you
only if you are a U.S. holder (as defined below), you hold
shares or ADSs as capital assets for U.S. federal income tax
purposes and you are eligible for benefits as a U.S. resident
under the current income tax convention between the United
States and Germany (the Treaty) in respect of your
investment in the shares or ADSs. This section does not address
all material U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning
shares or ADSs. It does not address special classes of holders,
some of which may be subject to other rules, including:
|
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt entities;
|
|
|
|
life insurance companies;
|
|
|
|
dealers in securities;
|
|
|
|
traders in securities that elect a
mark-to-market
method of accounting for securities holdings;
|
|
|
|
investors liable for alternative minimum tax;
|
|
|
|
partnerships, or other entities classified as partnerships, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes;
|
|
|
|
investors that actually or constructively own 10% or more of our
voting stock;
|
|
|
|
investors that hold shares or ADSs as part of a straddle or a
hedging or conversion transaction; or
|
|
|
|
investors whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar.
|
This section is based on the tax laws of the United States,
including the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, its
legislative history, existing and proposed Treasury regulations,
and published rulings and court decisions, as well as on the
Treaty, all as currently in effect. These laws are subject to
change, possibly on a retroactive basis.
128
You are a U.S. holder if you are a beneficial owner
of shares or ADSs and you are, for United States federal income
tax purposes, a citizen or resident of the United States, a
domestic corporation or otherwise subject to United States
federal income taxation on a net income basis in respect of
shares or ADSs.
This discussion addresses only United States federal income
taxation. You should consult your own tax advisor regarding the
United States federal, state, local and other tax consequences
of owning and disposing of shares and ADSs in your particular
circumstances. In particular, you should confirm that you are
eligible as a U.S. resident for benefits under the Treaty in
respect of your investment in the shares or ADSs.
A U.S. holder of the ADSs generally will be treated for U.S.
federal income tax purposes as the beneficial owner of the
shares represented by those ADSs, in which case no gain or loss
will be recognized upon an exchange of the shares for ADSs or an
exchange of the ADSs for shares.
Taxation
of Dividends
U.S. holders must include the gross amount of dividends paid on
the shares, without reduction for German withholding tax, in
ordinary income as foreign source dividend income on the date
that they receive them (or, in the case of ADSs, on the date
that the depositary receives them), translating dividends paid
in euro into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate in effect on
such date, regardless of whether the payment in fact is
converted into U.S. dollars.
Subject to certain exceptions for short-term and hedged
positions, the U.S. dollar amount of dividends received by
an individual prior to January 1, 2011 with respect to the
shares or ADSs will be subject to taxation at a maximum rate of
15% if the dividends are qualified dividends.
Dividends paid on the shares or ADSs will be treated as
qualified dividends if we were not, in the year prior to the
year in which the dividend was paid, and are not, in the year in
which the dividend is paid, a passive foreign investment company
(PFIC). Based on our audited financial statements
and relevant market and shareholder data, we believe that we
were not treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax
purposes with respect to our 2006 taxable year. In addition,
based on our audited financial statements and our current
expectations regarding the value and nature of our assets, the
sources and nature of our income, and relevant market and
shareholder data, we do not anticipate becoming a PFIC for our
2007 taxable year. However, as PFIC status is a factual matter
that must be determined annually at the close of each taxable
year, there can be no certainty as to our actual PFIC status in
any particular year until the close of the taxable year in
question.
German tax withheld from dividends will be treated, up to the
15% rate provided under the Treaty, as a foreign income tax
that, subject to generally applicable limitations under
U.S. tax law, is eligible for credit against the
U.S. federal income tax liability of U.S. holders or,
if they have elected to deduct such taxes, may be deducted in
computing taxable income. The rules governing the foreign tax
credit are complex. Each U.S. Holder is urged to consult
its own tax advisor concerning whether, and to what extent, a
foreign tax credit will be available under the Treaty with
respect to dividends received from us. Fluctuations in the
dollar-euro exchange rate between the date that a
U.S. holder includes a dividend in taxable income and the
date when the related refund of German withholding tax is
received may give rise to foreign currency gain or loss, which
generally is treated as ordinary income or loss for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. See the description under
German Taxation-Refund Procedure for
U.S. Shareholders above for the procedures for
obtaining a tax refund.
Taxation
of Sales or Other Taxable Dispositions
Sales or other taxable dispositions of shares or ADSs by
U.S. holders generally will give rise to capital gain or
loss equal to the difference between the U.S. dollar value
of the amount realized on the disposition and the
U.S. holders U.S. dollar basis in the shares or
ADSs. Any such capital gain or loss generally will be long-term
capital gain or loss, subject to taxation at reduced rates for
non-corporate taxpayers, if the shares were held for more than
one year. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to
limitations.
129
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding
Dividend payments made to holders and proceeds paid from the
sale, exchange, redemption or disposal of shares or ADSs may be
subject to information reporting to the Internal Revenue
Service. Such payments may be subject to backup withholding
taxes unless the holder (i) is a corporation or other
exempt recipient or (ii) provides a taxpayer identification
number and certifies that no loss of exemption from backup
withholding has occurred. Holders that are not U.S. persons
generally are not subject to information reporting or backup
withholding. However, such a holder may be required to provide a
certification of its
non-U.S.
status in connection with payments received within the United
States or through a
U.S.-related
financial intermediary.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld as
backup withholding may be credited against a holders U.S.
federal income tax liability. A holder may obtain a refund of
any excess amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules
by filing the appropriate claim for refund with the Internal
Revenue Service and furnishing any required information.
Documents
on Display
We are subject to the informational requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In accordance with
these requirements, we file reports and other information with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. These materials,
including this annual report and the exhibits thereto, may be
inspected and copied at the Commissions Public Reference
Room at 100 F Street N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C.
20549. Copies of the materials may be obtained from the Public
Reference Room of the Commission at 100 F Street N.E.,
Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549 at prescribed rates. The
public may obtain information on the operation of the
Commissions Public Reference Room by calling the
Commission in the United States at
1-800-SEC-0330.
Our filings, including this annual report, are also available on
the Commissions website at www.sec.gov. In addition,
material filed by us can be inspected at the offices of the New
York Stock Exchange at 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.
|
|
ITEM 11:
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Market fluctuations may result in significant cash-flow and
profit volatility risk for Siemens. Our worldwide operating
business as well as our investment and financing activities are
affected by changes in foreign exchange rates, interest rates
and equity prices. To optimize the allocation of the financial
resources across the Groups, as well as to secure an optimal
return for our shareholders, we identify, analyze and
proactively manage the associated financial market risks. We
seek to manage and control these risks primarily through our
regular operating and financing activities, and when we deem it
appropriate, we use derivative instruments.
Management of financial market risk is a key priority for
Siemens Managing Board. As a member of this Board, the
Chief Financial Officer covers the specific responsibility for
this part of the overall risk management system. At the highest
level, the Managing Board retains ultimate accountability. For
practical business purposes, the Managing Board delegates
responsibilities to central functions and to the Groups. SFS
holds a minor trading portfolio which is subject to tight
limits. As of September 30, 2007 it has a
value-at-risk
close to zero.
Within the various methodologies to analyze and manage risk, we
have implemented a system based on sensitivity
analysis. This tool enables the risk managers to identify
the risk position of the entities. Sensitivity analysis provides
an approximate quantification of our exposure in the event that
certain specified parameters were to be met under a specific set
of assumptions. The risk estimates provided here assume:
|
|
|
|
|
a 20% decrease in equity prices of all investments traded in an
active market, which are classified as current
available-for-sale
financial assets;
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
a simultaneous, parallel foreign exchange rates shift in which
the euro appreciates against all currencies by 10%;
|
|
|
|
a parallel shift of 100 basis points of the interest rate yield
curves in all currencies.
|
The potential economic impact, due to these assumptions, is
based on the occurrence of adverse market conditions and
reflects estimated changes resulting from our sensitivity
analysis. Actual results that are included in our statement of
income may differ materially from these estimates due to actual
developments in the global financial market.
Any market sensitive instruments, including equity and interest
bearing investments, that our pension plans hold are not
included in the following quantitative and qualitative
disclosure. For additional information, see Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Financial
Market Risk Management
Equity
Price Risk
Our investment portfolio consists of direct and indirect
investments in publicly traded companies held for purposes other
than trading. These participations result from strategic
partnerships, spin-offs, IPOs of strategic venture capital
investments or compensation from M&A transactions.
We monitor the equity investments based on their current market
value and they are affected by the fluctuations in the volatile
stock markets worldwide. The market value of our portfolio as of
September 30, 2007 was 197 milliona
reduction of19 million compared to
September 30, 2006.
An adverse move in equity prices of 20% as of September 30,
2007 would reduce the value of these investments by
39 million compared to 43 million the year
before, meaning that the equity price risk has slightly
decreased
year-over-year.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Transaction
Risk and Currency Management
Our international operations expose us to foreign-currency
exchange risks in the ordinary course of business. We employ
various strategies discussed below involving the use of
derivative financial instruments to mitigate or eliminate
certain of those exposures.
Foreign exchange rate fluctuations may create unwanted and
unpredictable earnings and cash flow volatility. Each Siemens
unit conducting business with international counterparties that
leads to future cash flows denominated in a currency other than
its functional currency is exposed to the risk from changes in
foreign exchange rates (for further information see Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements). The risk is
mitigated by closing all types of business transactions (sales
and procurement of products and services as well as investment
and financing activities) mainly in the functional currency. In
addition, the foreign currency exposure is partly balanced by
purchasing of goods, commodities and services in the respective
currencies as well as production activities and other
contributions along the value chain in the local markets.
Operating units are prohibited from borrowing or investing in
foreign currencies on a speculative basis. Intercompany
financing or investments of operating units are preferably done
in their functional currency or on a hedged basis.
We have established a foreign exchange risk management system
that has an established track record for years. Each Siemens
unit is responsible for recording, assessing, monitoring,
reporting and hedging its foreign currency transaction exposure.
The Group-wide binding guideline developed by the Corporate
Finance department, provides the concept for the identification
and determination of the single net currency position and
commits the units to hedge it in a narrow band: at least 75% but
no more than 100% of their net foreign currency exposure. In
addition, the Corporate Finance department provides a framework
of the organizational structure necessary for foreign
131
currency exchange management, proposes hedging strategies and
defines the hedging instruments available to the entities:
forward contracts, currency put and call options and stop-loss
orders. The execution of the hedging transactions in the global
financial markets is done by SFS as exclusive service provider
for all Siemens entities on behalf of Corporate Treasury. SFS
executes hedging instruments used for hedge accounting
relationships individually with external counterparts. For other
hedging purposes Siemens has a Company-wide portfolio approach
which generate a benefit from any potential off-set of divergent
cash flows in the same currency, as well as optimized
transaction costs. For further information see Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
We calculate foreign exchange rate sensitivity by aggregating
the net foreign exchange rate exposure of the Operations,
Financing and Real Estate Groups and Corporate Treasury. The
values and risks disclosed here are the unhedged positions
multiplied by an assumed 10% appreciation of the euro against
all other currencies. As of September 30, 2007, a parallel
10% negative shift of all foreign currencies would have resulted
in a decline of 47 million in future cash flows
compared to a decline of 38 million the year before.
Such decline in euro values of future cash flows might reduce
the unhedged portion of revenues but would also decrease the
unhedged portion of cost of materials. Because our foreign
currency inflows exceed our outflows, an appreciation of the
euro against foreign currencies, would have a negative financial
impact to the extent that future sales are not already hedged.
Future changes in the foreign exchange rates can impact sales
prices and may lead to margin changes, the extent of which is
determined by the matching of foreign currency revenues and
expenses.
We define foreign currency exposure generally as balance sheet
items in addition to firm commitments which are denominated in
foreign currencies, as well as foreign currency denominated cash
inflows and cash outflows from anticipated transactions for the
following three months. This foreign currency exposure is
determined based on the respective functional currencies of our
exposed entities.
The tables below show the net foreign exchange transaction
exposure by major currencies as of September 30, 2007 and
2006. In some currencies we have both substantial sales and
costs, which have been off-set in the table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007*
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
GBP
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Gross balance sheet exposure
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
Thereof: Financial assets
|
|
|
7,858
|
|
|
|
3,642
|
|
|
|
4,769
|
|
|
|
16,269
|
|
Thereof: Financial liabilities
|
|
|
(7,635
|
)
|
|
|
(3,321
|
)
|
|
|
(4,561
|
)
|
|
|
(15,517
|
)
|
Gross exposure from firm commitments and anticipated transactions
|
|
|
3,730
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
|
5,315
|
|
Foreign exchange transaction exposure
|
|
|
3,952
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
6,063
|
|
Economically hedged exposure
|
|
|
(3,893
|
)
|
|
|
(567
|
)
|
|
|
(1,132
|
)
|
|
|
(5,592
|
)
|
Change in future cash flows after hedging activities resulting
from a 10% appreciation of the Euro
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006*
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
GBP
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Gross balance sheet exposure
|
|
|
2,210
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
3,095
|
|
Thereof: Financial assets
|
|
|
13,778
|
|
|
|
3,483
|
|
|
|
5,522
|
|
|
|
22,783
|
|
Thereof: Financial liabilities
|
|
|
(11,568
|
)
|
|
|
(3,151
|
)
|
|
|
(4,969
|
)
|
|
|
(19,688
|
)
|
Gross exposure from firm commitments and anticipated transactions
|
|
|
5,344
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
5,558
|
|
Foreign exchange transaction exposure
|
|
|
7,554
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
8,653
|
|
Economically hedged exposure
|
|
|
(7,291
|
)
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
|
(576
|
)
|
|
|
(8,276
|
)
|
Change in future cash flows after hedging activities resulting
from a 10% appreciation of the Euro
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
132
Effects
of Currency Translation
Many of our subsidiaries are located outside the euro zone.
Since our financial reporting currency is the euro, we translate
the financial statements of these subsidiaries into euros so
that we can include their financial results in our Consolidated
Financial Statements. To consider the effects of foreign
exchange translation risk in our risk management, our working
assumption is that investments in our foreign-based operations
are permanent and that reinvestment is continual. Whenever a
divestment of a particular asset or entity is made, we
incorporate the value of this transaction risk in our
sensitivity analyses. Effects from currency fluctuations on the
translation of net asset amounts into euro are reflected in the
Siemens consolidated equity position.
Interest
Rate Risk
Our interest rate risk exposure is mainly related to debt
obligations like bonds, loans, commercial paper programs and
interest bearing deposits and investments. We seek to limit this
risk through the use of derivative instruments which allow it to
hedge fair value changes by swapping fixed rates of interest
into variable rates of interest. For additional information see
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
To optimize our position with regard to interest income and
interest expenses and to minimize the overall financial interest
rate risk, Corporate Treasury performs corporate interest rate
risk management together with SFS as operating service provider.
Part of the interest rate risk management concept is a
Corporate-wide interest rate overlay management to match
interest periods of our hedges with intended maturities of
assets and liabilities. Where it is not contrary to
country-specific regulations, all Groups and affiliated
companies generally obtain any required financing through
Corporate Treasury in the form of loans or intercompany clearing
accounts. The same concept is adopted for deposits of cash
generated by the units.
We measure interest rate risk by using either fair value
sensitivity or cash flow sensitivity depending on whether the
instrument has a fixed or variable interest rate. We generate
total fair value sensitivity as well as the total cash flow
sensitivity by aggregating the sensitivities of the various
exposures denominated in different currencies. Depending on
whether we have a long or short interest rate position, interest
rate risk can arise on increasing or decreasing market moves in
the relevant yield curve.
The fair value sensitivity calculation for fixed interest rate
instruments shows the change in fair value, defined as present
value, caused by a hypothetical 100-basis point shift in the
yield curve. The first step in this calculation is to use the
yield curve to discount the gross cash flows, meaning the
present value of future interest and principal payments of
financial instruments with fixed interest rates. A second
calculation discounts the gross cash flows using a 100-basis
point shift of the yield curve. In all cases, we use the
generally accepted and published yield curves on the relevant
balance sheet date. The fair value interest rate risk results
primarily from long-term fixed rate debt obligations and
interest bearing investments. Assuming a 100-basis point
increase in interest rates, this risk was 40 million
as of September 30, 2007, increasing from the comparable
value of 24 million as of September 30, 2006
assuming a 100-basis point decrease.
For variable-rate instruments, the interest rate risk is
monitored by using the cash flow sensitivity also assuming a
100-basis point shift of the yield curves. Such risk mainly
results from hedges of fixed-rate debt obligations that swap
fixed rates of interest into variable-rates of interest. This
exposure leads to a cash flow interest rate risk of
72 million as of September 30, 2007, compared to
32 million the year before, assuming a 100-basis
point increase in interest rates.
|
|
ITEM 12:
|
DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Not applicable.
133
PART II
|
|
ITEM 13:
|
DEFAULTS,
DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
|
Not applicable.
|
|
ITEM 14:
|
MATERIAL
MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
|
Not applicable.
|
|
ITEM 15:
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Overview
As previously reported, as of September 30, 2006,
management identified a material weakness in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting relating to
significant evidence of collusion at the former Com Group to
misappropriate funds and abuse authority among certain members
of senior management along with others who had responsibility
for oversight of the financial reporting of this Group. Such
collusion had allowed elements of the Companys financial
control environment to be circumvented or overridden.
In December 2006, the Company retained Debevoise, who reports
directly and exclusively to the Compliance Committee of the
Supervisory Board, to conduct an independent and comprehensive
investigation to determine whether anti-corruption regulations
have been violated and to conduct an independent and
comprehensive assessment of the compliance and control systems
of Siemens. In fiscal 2007, management has been actively engaged
in the design and implementation of a remediation plan regarding
the material weakness identified with respect to fiscal 2006 and
related areas.
Through the independent investigation conducted by Debevoise,
the Companys remediation activities, and other procedures,
management has gained a greater understanding of the scope of
and factors contributing to the material weakness identified as
of September 30, 2006. As a result, the Company actively
designed, initiated, implemented or is in the process of
implementing remediation actions as further described below.
As a result of the annual evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, management has identified the following
material weakness in internal control over financial reporting
as of September 30, 2007: The Companys internal
control in the area of anti-corruption was not sufficiently
robust to prevent certain members of management from
circumventing or overriding elements of the Companys
financial control environment and misusing funds contrary to
Company policies. As of September 30, 2007, the
investigations of this failure, and the implementation of the
Companys remediation plan to address it, were not far
enough advanced to provide a sufficient level of assurance that
such circumvention or override of controls and misuse of funds
by management would be prevented.
This conclusion has also affected managements analysis of
the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. The
Company applied compensating procedures and processes to support
the reliability of financial reporting and related disclosure in
fiscal 2007.
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
As of September 30, 2007, Siemens performed an evaluation
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its
disclosure controls and procedures. The Companys
disclosure controls and procedures are designed so that
information required to be disclosed in reports filed or
submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported on a timely basis and accumulated and
communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. The evaluation was performed
134
with the participation of key corporate senior management,
senior management of each business Group and under the
supervision of the CEO, Peter Löscher, and CFO, Joe Kaeser.
There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any
system of disclosure controls and procedures. These limitations
include the possibility of human error and the circumvention or
overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, any such
system can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives.
As further described below, management identified a material
weakness in internal control over financial reporting, which is
an important part of disclosure controls and procedures. Based
on the foregoing, the Companys management, including the
CEO and CFO, concluded that Siemens disclosure controls
and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2007
to achieve their intended objectives.
In view of the foregoing, the Company applied compensating
procedures and processes that go beyond the Companys
routine procedures to support the reliability of financial
reporting and related disclosure. Such additional procedures and
processes included an analysis, for the period starting in
fiscal 2000, of payments related to BCAs and certain other
sales-related intermediary agreements, and cash and questionable
payments, as well as a review of compliance cases. Accordingly,
management believes that the consolidated financial statements
and related disclosure included in this report fairly present in
all material respects the Companys financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report.
Managements
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
The management of Siemens is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
The internal control over financial reporting is designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with applicable accounting
principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the Company;
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the Company; and
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
Companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
|
No system of internal control over financial reporting,
including one determined to be effective, may prevent or detect
all misstatements. It can provide only reasonable assurance
regarding financial statement preparation and presentation.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of
Siemens internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2007 excludes, in accordance with applicable
guidance provided by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the
acquisition of the diagnostic division of Bayer
Aktiengesellschaft completed in fiscal 2007. Total assets and
revenues of this business constituted less than 3% and 2%,
respectively, of the related Consolidated Financial Statement
line items as of and for the year ended September 30, 2007.
Siemens management assessed the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2007. In making this assessment, it used the
criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework.
As reported, within the former Com Group, the Companys
other Groups and regional companies, a number of BCAs and
similar sales-related arrangements have been identified. The
Company has identified a large volume of
135
payments made in connection with these contracts for which the
Company has not been able either to establish a valid business
purpose or to clearly identify the recipient. The Company also
identified cash and check payments at the former Com Group, the
Companys other Groups and in regional companies, for which
limited documentation was available. See Item 5:
Operating and Financial Review and
ProspectsFinancial Impact of Compliance Matters.
These payments raise concerns in particular under the FCPA in
the United States, anti-corruption legislation in Germany and
similar legislation in other countries. The payments were
recorded as deductible business expenses in prior periods in
determining income tax provisions.
As disclosed in Item 15 of the Companys 2006 annual
report on
Form 20-F,
management had identified a material weakness in internal
control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006.
As a result of the annual evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, management has identified the following
material weakness in internal control over financial reporting
as of September 30, 2007: The Companys internal
control in the area of anti-corruption was not sufficiently
robust to prevent certain members of management from
circumventing or overriding elements of the Companys
financial control environment and misusing funds contrary to
Company policies. As of September 30, 2007, the
investigations of this failure, and the implementation of the
Companys remediation plan to address it, were not far
enough advanced to provide a sufficient level of assurance that
such circumvention or override of controls and misuse of funds
by management would be prevented.
Management must thus conclude that the Companys internal
control over financial reporting was not effective as of
September 30, 2007.
The Company determined that certain of the payments described
above were non-deductible under tax regulations of Germany and
other jurisdictions. Based on its analysis, the Company
determined the financial statement effect resulting from the
material weakness and adjusted the shareholders equity
balance and consolidated statements of income as well as
deferred tax assets and tax accruals in priorperiod
financial statements, as further described in Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2. As
described in Item 4: Information on the
CompanyLegal Proceedings, the Company remains
subject to corruption-related investigations in the U.S. and
other jurisdictions around the world with regard to allegations
of bribery and other illegal acts. In addition to the amounts
disclosed in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, no material charges or provisions for
penalties or damages in connection with such investigations have
been accrued as management does not yet have enough information
to reliably estimate such amounts. As noted above, since the
independent investigation by Debevoise is still ongoing, there
remains the possibility that additional issues may be identified
that could impact managements assessment of internal
control over financial reporting. For more information on
possible risks, see Item 3: Key InformationRisk
Factors.
KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG), an independent
registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report concurring with managements assessment that
internal control over financial reporting was not effective, and
an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, as of September 30, 2007 (see below).
Remediation
Plan
Management has been actively engaged in the design and
implementation of remediation efforts to address the material
weakness, as well as other identified areas of risk. The
remediation efforts, which have been implemented or are in the
process of implementation and are outlined below, are intended
both to address the identified material weakness and related
areas. The design and implementation of these and other remedial
efforts are the responsibility of the Companys management.
The Company took the following immediate actions in response to
the material weakness:
|
|
|
|
|
As described above, in December 2006, the Company retained
Debevoise to conduct an independent and comprehensive
investigation to determine whether anti-corruption regulations
have been violated and to conduct an independent and
comprehensive assessment of the compliance and control systems
of Siemens. Debevoise reports directly and exclusively to the
Compliance Committee of the Supervisory Board.
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2007, the Company established a Compliance Program
Task Force responsible for supporting the Chief Compliance
Officer in updating and improving the overall compliance program
and related topics. The Company also established a Remediation
Task Force to oversee the process of the books and records
remediation, tax remediation, and internal control remediation.
|
|
|
|
The Company retained external advisors to assist the Company in
the implementation of its remediation plan described below.
|
Management identified the following areas of high priority for
the implementation of improvements:
|
|
|
|
|
Management commitment to compliance and integrity
|
|
|
|
Organizational reform of control functions (compliance, legal
and audit)
|
|
|
|
Anti-corruption program
|
|
|
|
Anti-corruption controls over third party intermediaries
|
|
|
|
Corruption risk assessment in project acquisition
|
|
|
|
Centralization of bank accounts and payment transactions
|
As described below, the Company has implemented or is in the
process of implementing remedial actions to address the
identified material weakness and related areas.
Management
commitment to compliance and integrity
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys management is committed to high ethical
standards, transparency, responsibility, financial reporting
integrity and no tolerance for illegal behavior. This commitment
has been, and will continue to be communicated to and reinforced
with every Siemens employee. This commitment is accompanied by a
renewed management focus on decision-making processes that are
intended to integrate compliance policies and practices into
business processes.
|
|
|
|
The Company has taken, and will continue to take, appropriate
remedial actions with respect to certain employees in case of
misconduct, including terminations, suspensions, formal and
informal warnings and imposition of financial penalties in the
form of compensation adjustments. The Company has also announced
a global amnesty program for employees, other than management
personnel above certain levels, subject to certain exceptions,
who voluntarily provide information regarding possible
violations of anti-public-corruption laws by January 31,
2008.
|
Organizational
reform of control functions (compliance, legal and
audit)
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2007, the Supervisory Board of the Company formed a
Compliance Committee of the Supervisory Board, which oversees
the ongoing investigations and remediation activities of the
Company. See Item 10: Additional
InformationManagement and Control StructureThe
Supervisory Board.
|
|
|
|
Effective October 2007, the Company established a new Managing
Board position for legal and compliance matters. To fill this
position, the Company hired and appointed a new member of
Siemens Managing Board, who is also the Companys
General Counsel, with overall responsibility for legal and
compliance issues.
|
|
|
|
The Company is in the process of reorganizing and strengthening
its Compliance department. Since January 2007, the Compliance
Legal department has been organizationally embedded in the Legal
department. Effective in September 2007, the Company appointed a
new Chief Compliance Officer who reports to the General Counsel,
and also reports directly to the Chief Executive Officer.
Effective October 2007, the Group Compliance Officers and
Regional Compliance Officers report to the Chief Compliance
Officer while remaining in the Group and regional organizations.
The compliance officer position has generally become a full-time
responsibility. A consistent and rigorous set of mission
statements and required skill sets have been established
for compliance officers. The Company is in the
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
process of hiring additional full-time compliance officers and
is implementing training programs to ensure that the Compliance
department has sufficient personnel with knowledge, experience
and training.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is in the process of reorganizing and integrating
its Audit department. All Company audit functions are in the
process of being merged into the Corporate Finance Audit unit,
which is assigned to the Corporate Finance Department. Effective
October 2007, the Company appointed a Chief Audit Officer who
heads Corporate Finance Audit and reports to the Chief Financial
Officer and has an independent reporting line to the Audit
Committee and its Chairman.
|
|
|
|
The Company established a Corporate Disciplinary Committee,
supplementing existing disciplinary processes, to determine the
appropriate consequences in case of alleged misconduct involving
employees above a certain level.
|
|
|
|
The Company has established a process to identify and record in
a consolidated manner all significant outstanding compliance
cases and is tracking the progress of these cases.
|
Anti-corruption
program
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has developed and, effective August 2007, adopted
several new policies. These policies include a new global
anti-public-corruption policy; new policies for the retention of
intermediaries who interact with government officials on
Siemens behalf; enhanced due diligence and other
anti-corruption guidelines in M&A transactions, joint
ventures and minority investments; enhanced compliance and
anti-corruption guidance regarding gifts and hospitality; and a
code of conduct for suppliers.
|
|
|
|
The Company has developed a compliance program implementation
kit to support Group and regional management in implementing
Siemens global anti-corruption standards. The
implementation kit presents clear steps to be taken to ensure
effective and consistent implementation of Siemens
anti-corruption policies and controls. The implementation kit is
in the process of being distributed to responsible management
worldwide. Central support will be provided for the
implementation in several phases during fiscal 2008 designed on
a risk-based approach. Specifically, this implementation kit
covers ten focus areas: (1) tone from the top;
(2) compliance organization; (3) case intake
(including whistleblowing), handling and tracking;
(4) anti-bribery policies, communication, training and
consultation; (5) use of government-facing intermediaries;
(6) controls over project acquisition and execution of
government contracts; (7) controls over gifts and
hospitality, donations; (8) controls over payments, cash
and bank accounts; (9) sanction, reward, personnel
screening and expatriate rotation; (10) independent testing
of compliance program effectiveness.
|
|
|
|
The Company is implementing initiatives to deliver and reinforce
the message that compliance is a crucial part of the corporate
and leadership culture, including a program to discuss the
importance of compliance at Company conferences and redesigning
both the Siemens intranet and internet sites to include a
greater focus on compliance.
|
|
|
|
The Company has conducted and substantially completed live
anti-corruption and compliance training programs for senior and
mid-level management worldwide. The Company also launched
web-based anti-corruption and compliance training programs for
employees in management positions. The Company is also in the
process of launching dedicated live anti-corruption and
compliance training programs for employees in management
positions, with signing authority and relevant customer-facing
employees, including employees in sales, project management,
business administration and finance and procurement functions.
|
|
|
|
In December 2006, the Company retained an external attorney to
act as an independent ombudsman to provide an additional and
protected communication channel for Siemens employees and third
parties to report violations of the criminal law or the Business
Conduct Guidelines. In August 2007, the Company implemented the
Tell us Helpdesk, which provides worldwide, 24/7
facilities, either online or by telephone, and in any of up to
150 languages to receive and track compliance-related complaints
from Siemens employees as well as from non-Siemens affiliated
individuals.
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2007, the Company implemented the Ask
Us Helpdesk, through which employees have the opportunity
to ask questions on
day-to-day
business compliance topics. With this service, Siemens helps its
employees to answer questions relevant to compliance.
|
|
|
|
The Company is in the process of enhancing the Enterprise Risk
Management process so that compliance, as well as strategic,
operational and financial risks, can be addressed proactively.
The Company will establish a process for a periodic compliance
program risk assessment, supported by the Corporate Compliance
Office, to feed into the Enterprise Risk Management process. The
enterprise risk assessment will be presented periodically to the
Managing Board and the Audit Committee.
|
Anti-corruption
controls over third-party intermediaries
|
|
|
|
|
In February 2007, the Company imposed a moratorium on entering
into new sales-related BCAs or making payments under existing
sales-related BCAs. Any exceptions require the prior written
consent of relevant senior management and the Chief Compliance
Officer. In May 2007, the Company also announced a due diligence
and approval process for new and existing BCAs.
|
|
|
|
The Company is in an ongoing process of conducting due diligence
on existing and proposed BCAs and sales-related agency
agreements for purposes of compliance risk in connection with
their continued or proposed performance. In certain cases, the
Company terminated BCAs.
|
|
|
|
The Company has developed and, effective in August 2007, adopted
enhanced policies, including policies for the retention of
intermediaries who interact with government representatives on
Siemens behalf, as described above.
|
Corruption
risk assessment in project acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is in the process of instituting a corruption risk
assessment and a compliance-related approval process in the
acquisition phase, among others, of most categories of projects,
including all significant projects and any project in which an
intermediary is involved. These controls are being integrated
into the Companys project management program that provides
global standards for the management of Siemens project
business across all of its groups and regional companies.
|
Centralization
of bank accounts and payment transactions
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2007, the Company adopted a new policy, which is in the
process of implementation, requiring that all new and existing
bank accounts must be centrally authorized and registered and
account statements for all accounts must be submitted into
Siemens in-house banking platform on a regular basis. The
Company will also continue to reduce the number of bank accounts
and the number of authorized signatories.
|
|
|
|
The Company is also in the process of extending the requirement
that outgoing payments be processed and executed centrally
through Siemens in-house banking platform. The requirement
is in the process of being extended from cross-border and
foreign currency payments to domestic payments in domestic
currencies.
|
|
|
|
The Company is developing and implementing additional
initiatives for the enhancement of the segregation of duties and
assurance requirements in the payment systems.
|
The design and implementation of the remediation measures
outlined above is ongoing and the validation of the implemented
remediation measures is still in the early stages. Management
will continue to monitor and, if necessary, modify its
remediation efforts going forward.
Attestation
Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
The Supervisory Board of Siemens AG:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Annual Report on Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting, that Siemens AG did not maintain
effective control over financial
139
reporting as of September 30, 2007, because of the effect
of the material weakness identified in managements
assessment, based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Siemens AGs management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of
deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such
that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of the companys annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
The following material weakness has been identified and included
in managements assessment: The Companys internal
control in the area of anti-corruption was not sufficiently
robust to prevent certain members of management from
circumventing or overriding elements of the Companys
financial control environment and misusing funds contrary to
Company policies. As of September 30, 2007, the
investigations of this failure, and the implementation of the
Companys remediation plan to address it, were not far
enough advanced to provide a sufficient level of assurance that
such circumvention or override of controls and misuse of funds
by management would be prevented. The financial statement impact
of this material weakness has been reflected in Siemens
AGs consolidated financial statements as of
September 30, 2007 and 2006 and for each of the years in
the three-year period ended September 30, 2007 as described
in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements,
Note 2. We also have audited, in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Siemens AG
and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2007 and 2006, and the
related consolidated statements of income, income and expense
recognized in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended September 30, 2007. This material
weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and
extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2007
consolidated financial statements, and this report does not
affect our report dated November 23, 2007, which expressed
an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Siemens AG did
not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting
as of September 30, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by COSO. Also in
our opinion, because of the effect of the
140
aforementioned material weakness on the achievement of the
objectives of the control criteria, Siemens AG has not
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of September 30, 2007, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by COSO.
We do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on
managements statements referring to corrective actions
taken after September 30, 2007, relative to the
aforementioned material weakness in internal control over
financial reporting.
KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft
Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Munich, Germany
November 23, 2007
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Changes in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during fiscal 2007, which have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting are described above.
|
|
ITEM 16A:
|
AUDIT
COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
|
Our Supervisory Board has determined that two members of the
Companys Audit Committee, Dr. Gerhard Cromme and
Dr. Henning Schulte-Noelle, are financial experts.
Dr. Cromme and Dr. Schulte-Noelle are independent, as
that term is defined in
Rule 10A-3
under the Securities Exchange Act for purposes of the listing
standards of the New York Stock Exchange that are applicable to
Siemens.
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for Financial Matters
that applies to the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial
Officer and the Head of its Financial Reporting and Controlling
Department, as well as to all of the Companys employees
performing similar functions in and outside Germany and to all
other senior financial personnel. The code of ethics for
financial matters is available on the Companys website at
www.siemens.com/corporate_governance.
ITEM 16C: PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Fees related to professional services rendered by the
Companys principal accountant, KPMG, for the fiscal years
2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Type of Fees
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
55.0
|
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
87.0
|
|
|
|
87.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
In the above table, audit fees are the aggregate
KPMG fees for professional services in connection with the audit
of the Companys annual consolidated financial statements
and their attestation and report concerning internal control
over financial reporting, opening balance sheet audits, reviews
of interim financial statements, as well as audits of statutory
financial statements of Siemens AG and its subsidiaries.
Audit-related fees are fees for due diligence
engagements related to acquisitions and carve-outs, including
consultation in accounting matters, post-closing audits,
carve-out audits and attestation services in the context of
carve-outs,, accounting advice on actual or contemplated
transactions or events, advice on the introduction and review of
new or revised accounting guidelines and requirements, training
regarding accounting-related topics, advice on the transition to
accounting according to IFRS or US GAAP, advice in the field of
financial risk management, comfort letters, employee benefit
plan audits, SAS 70 reports, IT system audits that are not part
of the annual audit, attestation services subject to regulatory
requirements, including regulatory advice, work related to the
investigation by the state prosecutors office and
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, attestation and audits in
connection with the European Community Directive on Waste
Electrical and Electronic Equipment, audits in connection with
liquidation and insolvency issues, attestation of compliance
with provisions or calculations required by agreements,
agreed-upon
procedures engagements in accordance with applicable standards
and voluntary audits and reviews of stand-alone financial
statements of subsidiaries. Tax fees are fees for
the preparation of tax returns, assistance with assessing
compliance with certain tax regulations, support in tax audits
and other inquiries by fiscal authorities, tax advice associated
with transfer prices, tax advice relating to indirect tax and
custom duties, tax advice and consultation relating to claiming
and utilization of investment grants, premiums, subsidies, tax
credits etc., payroll tax services, training regarding
tax-related issues and support with the harmonization of the tax
planning and reporting process. All other fees for
2007 are primarily fees for additional assistance relating to
the Com carve-out in the regional companies and for 2006 are
primarily fees for assistance with a program to assess the
management information processes.
Audit
Committee Pre-Approval Policies
In accordance with German law, Siemens independent
auditors are appointed at the Annual Shareholders Meeting
based on a recommendation of our Supervisory Board. The Audit
Committee of the Supervisory Board prepares the boards
recommendation on the selection of the independent auditors.
Subsequent to the auditors appointment, the Audit
Committee awards the contract and in its sole authority approves
the terms and scope of the audit and all audit engagement fees,
as well as monitors the auditors independence. On
January 25, 2007, at the Annual Shareholders Meeting
KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft was appointed to serve as
the Companys independent auditors for the 2007 fiscal year.
In order to assure the integrity of independent audits,
Siemens Audit Committee established a policy to approve
all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our
independent auditors prior to the auditors engagement. As
part of this approval process, the Audit Committee adopted
pre-approval policies and procedures pursuant to which the Audit
Committee annually pre-approves certain types of services to be
performed by Siemens independent auditors. Under the
policies, the Companys independent auditors are not
allowed to perform any non-audit services which may impair the
auditors independence under the rules of the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board. Furthermore, the Audit Committee has
limited the aggregate amount of non-audit fees incurred during a
fiscal year to a maximum of 40% of all KPMG fees in the
preceding fiscal year.
In fiscal 2007, the Audit Committee has pre-approved the
performance by KPMG of the following audit and permitted
non-audit services:
Audit
Services
|
|
|
|
|
Annual audit of Siemens Consolidated Financial Statements
and of internal control over financial reporting
|
|
|
|
Quarterly review of Siemens interim financial statements
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory audits of financial statements of Siemens AG and of
its subsidiaries under the rules of their respective countries
|
|
|
|
Opening balance sheet audits in connection with acquisitions
including audits with regard to the allocation of purchase prices
|
Audit-Related
Services
|
|
|
|
|
Due diligence relating to actual or contemplated acquisitions
and carve-outs, including consultation in accounting matters
|
|
|
|
Post-closing audits
|
|
|
|
Carve-out audits and attestation services in the context of
carve-outs
|
|
|
|
Accounting advice relating to actual or contemplated
transactions or events
|
|
|
|
Advice on the introduction and review of new or revised
accounting guidelines and requirements
|
|
|
|
Training regarding accounting-related topics
|
|
|
|
Advice on the transition to accounting according to IFRS or US
GAAP
|
|
|
|
Advice in the field of financial risk management
|
|
|
|
Comfort letters
|
|
|
|
Employee benefit plan audits
|
|
|
|
SAS 70 reports
|
|
|
|
IT system audits that are not part of the annual audit
|
|
|
|
Attestation services subject to regulatory requirements,
including regulatory advice
|
|
|
|
Attestation and audits in connection with the European Community
Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment
|
|
|
|
Audits in connection with liquidation and insolvency issues
|
|
|
|
Attestation of compliance with provisions or calculations
required by agreements
|
|
|
|
Agreed-upon
procedures engagements in accordance with applicable standards
|
|
|
|
Voluntary audits and reviews of stand-alone financial statements
of subsidiaries
|
Tax
Services
|
|
|
|
|
Preparation of tax returns
|
|
|
|
Assistance with assessing compliance with certain tax regulations
|
|
|
|
Support in tax audits and other inquiries by fiscal authorities
|
|
|
|
Tax advice associated with transfer prices
|
|
|
|
Tax advice relating to indirect tax and custom duties
|
|
|
|
Tax advice and consultation relating to claiming and utilization
of investment grants, premiums, subsidies, tax credits etc.
|
|
|
|
Payroll tax services
|
|
|
|
Training regarding tax-related issues
|
143
All
Other Services
|
|
|
|
|
Forensic services
|
|
|
|
Examinations/audits regarding compliance with industry standards
|
Services that are not included in one of the categories listed
above require specific pre-approval by the Audit
Committees chairman. Services for which the estimated fee
is above 0.3 million require, in addition, a specific
pre-approval by the chairman of the Supervisory Board. An
approval may not be granted if the service falls into a category
of services not permitted by current law or if it is
inconsistent with maintaining auditor independence, as expressed
in the four principles promulgated by the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission: An auditor may not function in the role of
management; an auditor may not audit his or her own work; an
auditor may not serve in an advocacy role for his or her client;
and an auditor may not provide services creating a mutual or
conflicting interest.
|
|
ITEM 16D:
|
EXEMPTIONS
FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
|
Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference
to Item 10: Additional InformationCorporate
GovernanceManagement and Control
StructureSupervisory Board.
|
|
ITEM 16E:
|
PURCHASES
OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED
PURCHASERS
|
The following table sets out certain information concerning
purchases by us during fiscal 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares purchased
|
|
|
(d) Maximum number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Average price
|
|
|
as part of publicly
|
|
|
of shares that may yet
|
|
|
|
(a) Total number of
|
|
|
paid per share
|
|
|
announced plans
|
|
|
be purchased under
|
|
Period
|
|
shares purchased*
|
|
|
(in )
|
|
|
or programs
|
|
|
the plans or programs
|
|
|
October 10/1/06-10/31/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
November 11/1/06-11/30/06
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
69.55
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
December 12/1/06-12/31/06
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
72.94
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
January 1/1/07-1/31/07
|
|
|
10,590
|
|
|
|
75.87
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
February 2/1/07-2/28/07
|
|
|
1,294,061
|
|
|
|
77.02
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
March 3/1/07-3/31/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
April 4/1/07-4/30/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
May 5/1/07-5/31/07
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
92.36
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
June 6/1/07-6/30/07
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
71.99
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
July 7/1/07-7/31/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
August 8/1/07-8/31/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
September 9/1/07-9/30/07
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
71.99
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,306,476
|
|
|
|
77.00
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Siemens repurchased its own common stock primarily to
accommodate the Siemens employee share purchase plan. This
includes the 1,290,000 shares relating to the capital
increase from Authorized Capital 2006. Additionally, Siemens
repurchased shares to accommodate and settle the share offer
made to former stockholders of Siemens Nixdorf
Informationssysteme AG. For further information on the
Companys purchases of its own common stock, including the
authorization to repurchase common stock see Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
The table above omits Siemens shares purchased by pension and
other postretirement benefit plans sponsored by Siemens. In
fiscal 2007, the principal Siemens sponsored pension and other
postretirement benefit plans purchased 1,909,659 shares of
Siemens AG common stock at an average price of 91.13 per
share.
144
PART III
ITEM 17: FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Siemens
Index to
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
|
|
|
F-10
|
|
F-1
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Supervisory Board of Siemens AG:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Siemens AG and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
September 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of income, income and expense recognized in equity
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended September 30, 2007. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Siemens AG and subsidiaries as of September 30,
2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
September 30, 2007, in conformity with International
Financial Reporting Standards.
Our audits of Siemens AGs consolidated financial
statements were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on
the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. The
accompanying consolidating information appearing on pages F-5,
F-7 and F-9 is presented for purposes of additional analysis of
the consolidated financial statements rather than to present the
balance sheet, statements of income and cash flows of the
individual entities. As discussed in Note 39 to the
consolidated financial statements certain information pertaining
to remuneration has been included in Item 6
Directors, Senior Management and Employees. The
consolidating information and remuneration information included
in Item 6 has been subjected to the auditing procedures
applied in the audits of the consolidated financial statements
and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects
in relation to the consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole.
International Financial Reporting Standards vary in certain
significant respects from accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Information relating
to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in
Note 40 to the consolidated financial statements.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2007, based on the
criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
November 23, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on
managements assessment of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting and an adverse opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft
Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Munich, Germany
November 23, 2007
F-2
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
F-3
SIEMENS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and
2005
(in millions of , per share amounts in )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,448
|
|
|
|
66,487
|
|
|
|
55,781
|
|
Cost of goods sold and services rendered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,572
|
)
|
|
|
(49,108
|
)
|
|
|
(40,098
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,876
|
|
|
|
17,379
|
|
|
|
15,683
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,399
|
)
|
|
|
(3,091
|
)
|
|
|
(2,750
|
)
|
Marketing, selling and general
administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,103
|
)
|
|
|
(11,897
|
)
|
|
|
(10,316
|
)
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
Other operating expense
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(1,053
|
)
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
(422
|
)
|
Income (loss) from investments accounted for
using the equity method, net
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
Financial income (expense), net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,101
|
|
|
|
3,418
|
|
|
|
3,594
|
|
Income
taxes(1)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(1,192
|
)
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
|
|
(781
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,909
|
|
|
|
2,642
|
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net
of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,038
|
|
|
|
3,345
|
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Shareholders of Siemens AG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,806
|
|
|
|
3,135
|
|
|
|
2,416
|
|
Basic earnings (losses) per share
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.24
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
|
|
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (losses) per share
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
|
|
|
2.85
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
3.51
|
|
|
|
2.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND EXPENSE RECOGNIZED IN EQUITY
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and
2005
(in millions of )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,038
|
|
|
|
3,345
|
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
Currency translation differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(536
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
460
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
Actuarial gains and losses on pension plans and similar
commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,237
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
(995
|
)
|
Revaluation effect related to step acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income and expense recognized directly in equity, net of
tax
(2)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
(615
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income and expense
recognized in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,872
|
|
|
|
2,949
|
|
|
|
1,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Shareholders of Siemens AG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,607
|
|
|
|
2,768
|
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The income taxes of Eliminations, reclassifications and
Corporate Treasury, Operations, and Financing and Real
Estate are based on the consolidated effective corporate tax
rate applied to income before income taxes.
|
(2)
|
Includes (26), (50) and 9 in 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively, resulting from investments accounted for
using the equity method.
|
(3)
|
Includes minority interest of 30, (29) and 24
in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, relating to currency
translation differences and of 3, and
in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, relating to
actuarial gains and losses on pension plans and similar
commitments.
|
The accompanying Notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations, reclassifications and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Treasury
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Financing and Real Estate
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(1,498
|
)
|
|
|
(1,429
|
)
|
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
|
|
71,553
|
|
|
|
65,576
|
|
|
|
54,885
|
|
|
|
2,393
|
|
|
|
2,340
|
|
|
|
2,153
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
1,429
|
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
(51,091
|
)
|
|
|
(48,525
|
)
|
|
|
(39,560
|
)
|
|
|
(1,979
|
)
|
|
|
(2,012
|
)
|
|
|
(1,795
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,462
|
|
|
|
17,051
|
|
|
|
15,325
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,399
|
)
|
|
|
(3,091
|
)
|
|
|
(2,750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(11,740
|
)
|
|
|
(11,545
|
)
|
|
|
(10,029
|
)
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1,013
|
)
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
4,391
|
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
2,776
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(1,026
|
)
|
|
|
(684
|
)
|
|
|
(603
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
3,365
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
2,173
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
3,496
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
SIEMENS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of September 30, 2007 and 2006
(in millions of )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
9/30/07
|
|
|
9/30/06
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
|
|
10,214
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
14,620
|
|
|
|
15,148
|
|
Other current financial assets
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2,932
|
|
|
|
2,370
|
|
Intragroup receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
12,930
|
|
|
|
12,790
|
|
Income tax receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
1,274
|
|
Assets classified as held for disposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,532
|
|
|
|
7,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,932
|
|
|
|
50,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
12,501
|
|
|
|
9,689
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
4,619
|
|
|
|
3,385
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
10,555
|
|
|
|
12,072
|
|
Investments accounted for using the equity method
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
7,016
|
|
|
|
2,956
|
|
Other financial assets
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
5,561
|
|
|
|
5,042
|
|
Intragroup receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2,594
|
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,555
|
|
|
|
87,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
5,637
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,382
|
|
|
|
8,443
|
|
Other current financial liabilities
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
2,553
|
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
Intragroup liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current provisions
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
3,581
|
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
Income tax payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
17,058
|
|
|
|
15,591
|
|
Liabilities associated with assets classified as held for
disposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,542
|
|
|
|
5,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,894
|
|
|
|
38,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
9,860
|
|
|
|
13,122
|
|
Pension plans and similar commitments
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
2,780
|
|
|
|
5,083
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
1,858
|
|
Other financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
Intragroup liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,928
|
|
|
|
61,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,743
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,080
|
|
|
|
5,662
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,453
|
|
|
|
16,702
|
|
Other components of equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(280
|
)
|
|
|
156
|
|
Treasury shares, at cost
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity attributable to shareholders of Siemens AG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,996
|
|
|
|
25,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,627
|
|
|
|
25,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,555
|
|
|
|
87,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Authorized: 1,137,913,421 and 1,116,087,241 shares,
respectively. Issued: 914,203,421 and 891,087,241 shares,
respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
383 and 415 shares, respectively.
|
The accompanying Notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations, reclassifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Corporate Treasury
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Financing and Real Estate
|
|
9/30/07
|
|
|
9/30/06
|
|
|
9/30/07
|
|
|
9/30/06
|
|
|
9/30/07
|
|
|
9/30/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,740
|
|
|
|
9,072
|
|
|
|
1,195
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,589
|
|
|
|
10,885
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
4,263
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
911
|
|
|
(10,401
|
)
|
|
|
(15,736
|
)
|
|
|
10,355
|
|
|
|
15,680
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
12,850
|
|
|
|
12,735
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
11,843
|
|
|
|
7,180
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,641
|
)
|
|
|
(6,076
|
)
|
|
|
51,956
|
|
|
|
50,630
|
|
|
|
3,617
|
|
|
|
5,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,375
|
|
|
|
9,557
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,605
|
|
|
|
3,368
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,896
|
|
|
|
8,310
|
|
|
|
3,659
|
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,791
|
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
|
3,754
|
|
|
|
3,595
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
2,488
|
|
|
|
3,329
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,648
|
)
|
|
|
(5,793
|
)
|
|
|
87,658
|
|
|
|
80,019
|
|
|
|
11,545
|
|
|
|
13,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,095
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
7,951
|
|
|
|
8,140
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
1,712
|
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
(15,170
|
)
|
|
|
(16,406
|
)
|
|
|
10,551
|
|
|
|
9,886
|
|
|
|
4,619
|
|
|
|
6,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,521
|
|
|
|
3,770
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,069
|
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
16,663
|
|
|
|
15,215
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
(4,211
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
8,753
|
|
|
|
5,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,334
|
)
|
|
|
(14,224
|
)
|
|
|
51,582
|
|
|
|
45,747
|
|
|
|
5,646
|
|
|
|
7,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,901
|
|
|
|
11,946
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,779
|
|
|
|
5,081
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
2,054
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
(2,965
|
)
|
|
|
(3,178
|
)
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
2,886
|
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,648
|
)
|
|
|
(5,793
|
)
|
|
|
59,992
|
|
|
|
56,175
|
|
|
|
9,584
|
|
|
|
11,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,666
|
|
|
|
23,844
|
|
|
|
1,961
|
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,648
|
)
|
|
|
(5,793
|
)
|
|
|
87,658
|
|
|
|
80,019
|
|
|
|
11,545
|
|
|
|
13,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
SIEMENS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and
2005
(in millions of )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
4,038
|
|
|
|
3,345
|
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization, depreciation and impairments
|
|
|
3,751
|
|
|
|
3,118
|
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
2,193
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
Interest (income) expense, net
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
(Gains) on sales and disposals of businesses, intangibles
and property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
(2,051
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
(Gains) on sales of investments,
net(1)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
(Gains) losses on sales and impairments of current
available-
for-sale
financial assets, net
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
(Income) from
investments(1)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
Other non-cash (income) expenses
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
Change in current assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in inventories
|
|
|
(986
|
)
|
|
|
(2,313
|
)
|
|
|
(717
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in trade and other receivables
|
|
|
(1,183
|
)
|
|
|
(1,027
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
(Increase) decrease in other current assets
|
|
|
(486
|
)
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
Increase (decrease) in trade payables
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
Increase (decrease) in current provisions
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in other current liabilities
|
|
|
2,858
|
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
Supplemental contributions to pension trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,496
|
)
|
Change in other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(883
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
|
|
(1,191
|
)
|
|
|
(1,093
|
)
|
Dividends received
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
Interest received
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activitiescontinuing and
discontinued operations
|
|
|
7,328
|
|
|
|
5,659
|
|
|
|
3,642
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activitiescontinuing
operations
|
|
|
9,822
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
3,198
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to intangible assets and property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(3,751
|
)
|
|
|
(4,052
|
)
|
|
|
(3,624
|
)
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(7,370
|
)
|
|
|
(2,055
|
)
|
|
|
(2,450
|
)
|
Purchases of
investments(1)
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
Purchases of current
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(1,489
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in receivables from financing activities
|
|
|
(907
|
)
|
|
|
(469
|
)
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of investments, intangibles and property,
plant and
equipment(1)
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
Proceeds from disposals of businesses
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
Proceeds from sales of current
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
3,104
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activitiescontinuing and discontinued operations
|
|
|
(11,357
|
)
|
|
|
(4,696
|
)
|
|
|
(5,904
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activitiescontinuing operations
|
|
|
(10,068
|
)
|
|
|
(4,315
|
)
|
|
|
(5,052
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(421
|
)
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
Proceeds from re-issuance of treasury stock
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
6,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt (including current maturities of
long-term debt)
|
|
|
(4,595
|
)
|
|
|
(1,710
|
)
|
|
|
(848
|
)
|
Change in short-term debt
|
|
|
4,386
|
|
|
|
(1,762
|
)
|
|
|
711
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
(1,169
|
)
|
|
|
(596
|
)
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(1,292
|
)
|
|
|
(1,201
|
)
|
|
|
(1,112
|
)
|
Dividends paid to minority shareholders
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
Intragroup financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activitiescontinuing and discontinued operations
|
|
|
(1,187
|
)
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
(1,844
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activitiescontinuing operations
|
|
|
(5,792
|
)
|
|
|
1,540
|
|
|
|
(2,241
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(5,274
|
)
|
|
|
2,093
|
|
|
|
(4,069
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
10,214
|
|
|
|
8,121
|
|
|
|
12,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
|
4,940
|
|
|
|
10,214
|
|
|
|
8,121
|
|
Less: Cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations at
end of period
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations at end of
period
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
|
|
10,214
|
|
|
|
8,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Investments include equity instruments either classified as
non-current
available-for-sale
financial assets or accounted for using the equity method.
|
The accompanying Notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations, reclassifications and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Treasury
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Financing and Real Estate
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
3,496
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
|
|
2,676
|
|
|
|
3,105
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
2,028
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
|
(308
|
)
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,867
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
(531
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(960
|
)
|
|
|
(2,321
|
)
|
|
|
(709
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
2,343
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(3,503
|
)
|
|
|
(1,115
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(321
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
2,578
|
|
|
|
1,734
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,496
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(753
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(1,749
|
)
|
|
|
(957
|
)
|
|
|
(901
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,330
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
3,913
|
|
|
|
4,061
|
|
|
|
2,761
|
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
2,330
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
6,407
|
|
|
|
3,405
|
|
|
|
2,322
|
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,997
|
)
|
|
|
(3,284
|
)
|
|
|
(2,951
|
)
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
|
|
(768
|
)
|
|
|
(673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,370
|
)
|
|
|
(2,052
|
)
|
|
|
(2,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
(631
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,409
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
(2,367
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,002
|
)
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(10,551
|
)
|
|
|
(3,376
|
)
|
|
|
(4,985
|
)
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
|
(827
|
)
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
|
(2,002
|
)
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(9,262
|
)
|
|
|
(2,995
|
)
|
|
|
(4,133
|
)
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
|
(827
|
)
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(421
|
)
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
6,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,486
|
)
|
|
|
(1,600
|
)
|
|
|
(596
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
4,516
|
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(419
|
)
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
(969
|
)
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,292
|
)
|
|
|
(1,201
|
)
|
|
|
(1,112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,444
|
)
|
|
|
(1,046
|
)
|
|
|
(4,722
|
)
|
|
|
8,541
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
4,597
|
|
|
|
(2,097
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,617
|
)
|
|
|
2,423
|
|
|
|
(4,555
|
)
|
|
|
7,673
|
|
|
|
(994
|
)
|
|
|
2,754
|
|
|
|
(2,243
|
)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
(6,617
|
)
|
|
|
2,423
|
|
|
|
(4,555
|
)
|
|
|
3,068
|
|
|
|
(660
|
)
|
|
|
2,357
|
|
|
|
(2,243
|
)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(6,332
|
)
|
|
|
2,469
|
|
|
|
(4,648
|
)
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
9,072
|
|
|
|
6,603
|
|
|
|
11,251
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
908
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,740
|
|
|
|
9,072
|
|
|
|
6,603
|
|
|
|
2,130
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,740
|
|
|
|
9,072
|
|
|
|
6,603
|
|
|
|
1,195
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-9
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and
2005
(in millions of )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
stock
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2004
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
5,121
|
|
|
|
14,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and expense recognized in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,112
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock and share-based payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re-issuance of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2005
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
5,167
|
|
|
|
14,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2005
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
5,167
|
|
|
|
14,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and expense recognized in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,384
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,201
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock and share-based payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re-issuance of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in equity*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
5,662
|
|
|
|
16,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2006
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
5,662
|
|
|
|
16,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and expense recognized in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,043
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,292
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock and share-based payment
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
1,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re-issuance of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in equity*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,168
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
2,743
|
|
|
|
6,080
|
|
|
|
20,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
For further information see also Notes 22 and 26.
|
F-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other components of equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
for-sale
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
attributable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
translation
|
|
|
financial
|
|
|
financial
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
to shareholders
|
|
|
Minority
|
|
|
Total
|
|
differences
|
|
|
assets
|
|
|
instruments
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
at cost
|
|
|
of Siemens AG
|
|
|
interest
|
|
|
equity
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,420
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
22,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
1,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,112
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
(1,220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
23,130
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
23,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
23,130
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
23,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(616
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,768
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
2,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,201
|
)
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(1,345
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(421
|
)
|
|
|
(421
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(421
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,193
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
25,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,193
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
25,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(566
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,607
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
4,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,292
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(1,438
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,168
|
)
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
(1,358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(475
|
)
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(280
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,996
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
29,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-11
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEGMENT INFORMATION (continuing operations)
As of and for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007,
2006 and 2005
(in millions of )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
intangible assets
|
|
|
Amortization,
|
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
and property, plant
|
|
|
depreciation and
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
revenue
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
Group
profit(1)
|
|
|
employed(2)
|
|
|
Free cash
flow(3)
|
|
|
and equipment
|
|
|
impairments(4)
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
9/30/07
|
|
|
9/30/06
|
|
|
9/30/05
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Operations Groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens IT Solutions and Services
(SIS)(5)
|
|
|
5,156
|
|
|
|
5,574
|
|
|
|
7,017
|
|
|
|
3,988
|
|
|
|
4,466
|
|
|
|
4,412
|
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
5,360
|
|
|
|
5,693
|
|
|
|
5,849
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
(731
|
)
|
|
|
(676
|
)
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(661
|
)
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
Automation and Drives (A&D)
|
|
|
16,794
|
|
|
|
14,312
|
|
|
|
10,840
|
|
|
|
13,695
|
|
|
|
11,564
|
|
|
|
9,282
|
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
15,389
|
|
|
|
13,041
|
|
|
|
10,538
|
|
|
|
2,090
|
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
7,026
|
|
|
|
3,837
|
|
|
|
3,292
|
|
|
|
1,857
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
Industrial Solutions and Services (I&S)
|
|
|
10,161
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
7,189
|
|
|
|
7,824
|
|
|
|
7,837
|
|
|
|
5,339
|
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
8,894
|
|
|
|
8,819
|
|
|
|
6,307
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
1,198
|
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Siemens Building Technologies (SBT)
|
|
|
5,350
|
|
|
|
5,235
|
|
|
|
4,518
|
|
|
|
4,952
|
|
|
|
4,695
|
|
|
|
4,318
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
5,062
|
|
|
|
4,796
|
|
|
|
4,415
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
1,807
|
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
|
1,402
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Power Generation (PG)
|
|
|
17,988
|
|
|
|
12,532
|
|
|
|
10,964
|
|
|
|
12,159
|
|
|
|
10,068
|
|
|
|
8,042
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
12,194
|
|
|
|
10,086
|
|
|
|
8,061
|
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
Power Transmission and Distribution (PTD)
|
|
|
9,896
|
|
|
|
8,028
|
|
|
|
5,283
|
|
|
|
7,126
|
|
|
|
6,032
|
|
|
|
3,933
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
7,689
|
|
|
|
6,509
|
|
|
|
4,250
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
1,701
|
|
|
|
1,634
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Transportation Systems (TS)
|
|
|
4,780
|
|
|
|
6,173
|
|
|
|
4,599
|
|
|
|
4,418
|
|
|
|
4,429
|
|
|
|
4,146
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
4,452
|
|
|
|
4,493
|
|
|
|
4,186
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(495
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Medical Solutions (Med)
|
|
|
10,271
|
|
|
|
9,334
|
|
|
|
8,641
|
|
|
|
9,798
|
|
|
|
8,164
|
|
|
|
7,577
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
9,851
|
|
|
|
8,227
|
|
|
|
7,626
|
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
8,234
|
|
|
|
4,975
|
|
|
|
3,384
|
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
Osram
|
|
|
4,690
|
|
|
|
4,563
|
|
|
|
4,300
|
|
|
|
4,677
|
|
|
|
4,547
|
|
|
|
4,282
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
4,690
|
|
|
|
4,563
|
|
|
|
4,300
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
1,977
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
Strategic Equity Investments
(SEI)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
4,891
|
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operations
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
|
|
4,068
|
|
|
|
3,564
|
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
|
|
3,427
|
|
|
|
3,242
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
2,884
|
|
|
|
3,944
|
|
|
|
3,484
|
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operations Groups
|
|
|
87,916
|
|
|
|
78,844
|
|
|
|
66,915
|
|
|
|
71,153
|
|
|
|
65,229
|
|
|
|
54,573
|
|
|
|
5,312
|
|
|
|
4,942
|
|
|
|
4,443
|
|
|
|
76,465
|
|
|
|
70,171
|
|
|
|
59,016
|
|
|
|
6,560
|
|
|
|
3,867
|
|
|
|
3,569
|
|
|
|
28,762
|
|
|
|
18,815
|
|
|
|
16,454
|
|
|
|
7,037
|
|
|
|
2,806
|
|
|
|
3,252
|
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
2,416
|
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
2,099
|
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
|
|
1,856
|
|
Reconciliation to financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate items, pensions and eliminations
|
|
|
(4,949
|
)
|
|
|
(4,855
|
)
|
|
|
(4,540
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
(5,078
|
)
|
|
|
(4,692
|
)
|
|
|
(4,246
|
)
|
|
|
(4,912
|
)
|
|
|
(4,595
|
)
|
|
|
(4,131
|
)
|
|
|
(1,672
|
)
|
|
|
(527
|
)
|
|
|
(618
|
)
|
|
|
(3,536
|
)
|
|
|
(6,392
|
)
|
|
|
(4,604
|
)
|
|
|
(2,943
|
)(7)
|
|
|
(1,816
|
)(7)
|
|
|
(2,927
|
)(7)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Other interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets related and miscellaneous
reconciling items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,432
|
|
|
|
67,596
|
|
|
|
64,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operations (for columns Group profit/Net capital
employed, i.e. Income before income taxes/Total assets)
|
|
|
82,967
|
|
|
|
73,989
|
|
|
|
62,375
|
|
|
|
71,319
|
|
|
|
65,326
|
|
|
|
54,688
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
71,553
|
|
|
|
65,576
|
|
|
|
54,885
|
|
|
|
4,391
|
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
2,776
|
|
|
|
87,658
|
|
|
|
80,019
|
|
|
|
76,635
|
|
|
|
4,094
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
2,313
|
|
|
|
2,415
|
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
2,187
|
|
|
|
1,882
|
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before
income taxes
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing and Real Estate Groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens Financial Services (SFS)
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
8,912
|
|
|
|
10,543
|
|
|
|
10,162
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
Siemens Real Estate (SRE)
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
|
|
3,221
|
|
|
|
3,490
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
(462
|
)
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
|
|
258
|
(7)
|
|
|
243
|
(7)
|
|
|
186
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Financing and Real Estate
|
|
|
2,394
|
|
|
|
2,340
|
|
|
|
2,153
|
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
2,393
|
|
|
|
2,340
|
|
|
|
2,153
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
11,545
|
|
|
|
13,302
|
|
|
|
13,313
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations, reclassifications and Corporate Treasury
|
|
|
(1,445
|
)
|
|
|
(1,385
|
)
|
|
|
(1,215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,498
|
)
|
|
|
(1,429
|
)
|
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
|
|
(1,498
|
)
|
|
|
(1,429
|
)
|
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
(7,648
|
)
|
|
|
(5,793
|
)
|
|
|
(8,369
|
)
|
|
|
2,330
|
(7)
|
|
|
561
|
(7)
|
|
|
(51
|
)(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens
|
|
|
83,916
|
|
|
|
74,944
|
|
|
|
63,313
|
|
|
|
72,448
|
|
|
|
66,487
|
|
|
|
55,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,448
|
|
|
|
66,487
|
|
|
|
55,781
|
|
|
|
5,101
|
|
|
|
3,418
|
|
|
|
3,594
|
|
|
|
91,555
|
|
|
|
87,528
|
|
|
|
81,579
|
|
|
|
6,755
|
|
|
|
1,820
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
3,067
|
|
|
|
3,183
|
|
|
|
2,670
|
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Group profit of the Operations Groups is earnings before
financing interest, certain pension costs and income taxes and
may exclude other categories of items which are not allocated to
the Groups since the Managing Board does not regard such items
as indicative of the Groups performance.
|
(2)
|
Net capital employed of the Operations Groups represents total
assets less tax assets, provisions and non-interest bearing
liabilities other than tax liabilities.
|
(3)
|
Free cash flow represents net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities less additions to intangible assets and
property, plant and equipment.
|
(4)
|
Amortization and impairments of intangible assets other than
goodwill and depreciation and impairments of property, plant and
equipment. Goodwill impairment and impairment of non-current
available-for-sale
financial assets and investments accounted for under the equity
method for Siemens amount to 158, 89 and 331
for the years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
|
(5)
|
SIS was created effective April 1, 2007 and consists
primarily of the activities of the former segment Siemens
Business Services that were bundled with other information
technology (IT) activities. Prior-year information was
reclassified for comparability purposes.
|
(6)
|
SEI was created as of October 1, 2006 and includes certain
strategic investments accounted for using the equity method.
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2007, the Siemens
investment in Nokia Siemens Networks is also reported in SEI.
|
(7)
|
Includes cash paid for income taxes according to the allocation
of income taxes to Operations, Financing and Real Estate, and
Eliminations, reclassifications and Corporate Treasury in the
Consolidated Statements of Income. Furthermore, the
reclassification of interest payments in the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flow from operating activities into financing
activities is shown in Eliminations. Interest payments are
external interest paid as well as intragroup interest paid and
received.
|
F-12
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements present the
operations of Siemens AG and its subsidiaries (the Company or
Siemens) and have been prepared in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and its interpretations
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB),
as adopted by the European Union (EU). In addition to its
primary financial reporting for fiscal 2006 under United States
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP), in
December 2006 the Company also published its first IFRS
Consolidated Financial Statements (IFRS Consolidated Financial
Statements as of September 30, 2006). The IFRS Consolidated
Financial Statements as of September 30, 2006 were
presented as supplemental information and serve as a basis for
Siemens primary IFRS reporting beginning with the first
quarter of fiscal 2007. The IFRS Consolidated Financial
Statements as of September 30, 2006 included a
reconciliation of equity and net income from U.S. GAAP to
IFRS for all balance sheet dates presented, as well as a
reconciliation of equity as of October 1, 2004, when IFRS
was adopted. For additional information see Explanation of
transition to IFRS in Note 40, Reconciliation
and additional U.S. GAAP disclosures.
Siemens has prepared and reported its Consolidated Financial
Statements in euros (). Siemens is a German based
multinational corporation with a balanced business portfolio of
activities predominantly in the field of electronics and
electrical engineering (for further information see
Note 36).
Siemens applied all standards and interpretations issued by the
IASB that were effective as of September 30, 2007. In
addition, the Company early adopted certain other standards,
amendments to standards and interpretations, including the
following standards which had a significant impact:
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS 7, Financial Instruments:
Disclosures. This standard requires extensive
disclosures about the significance of financial instruments for
an entitys financial position and results of operations,
and qualitative and quantitative disclosures on the nature and
extent of risks arising from financial instruments. It combines
disclosure requirements from IAS 32, Financial
Instruments: Presentation, and IAS 30, Disclosures
in the Financial Statements of Banks and Similar Financial
Institutions, and adds new disclosure requirements. The
standard is effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after
January 1, 2007. Siemens decided to early adopt IFRS 7 in
its 2006 financial statements and also presents comparative
information for 2005 according to IFRS 7. IFRS 7 was
also considered in determining the presentation of items on the
face of the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the Consolidated
Statements of Income.
|
|
|
|
IFRS 8, Operating Segments. IFRS 8
replaces IAS 14, Segment Reporting, and aligns
segment reporting with the requirements of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 131, Disclosures
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,
except for some minor differences. IFRS 8 requires an
entity to report financial and descriptive information about its
reportable segments. Reportable segments are operating segments
or aggregations of operating segments that meet specified
criteria. Operating segments are components of an entity for
which separate financial information is available that is
evaluated regularly by the entitys chief operating
decision maker in making decisions about how to allocate
resources and in assessing performance. Generally, financial
information is required to be reported on the same basis as is
used internally for evaluating operating segment performance and
deciding how to allocate resources to operating segments.
IFRS 8 is effective for fiscal periods beginning on or
after January 1, 2009. However, Siemens decided to early
adopt IFRS 8 in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. See
Note 36 for further information on segment information.
|
The Consolidated Financial Statements were authorised for issue
by the Managing Board on November 23, 2007.
All standards and interpretations issued by the IASB and applied
by Siemens in preparing its Consolidated Financial Statements
have been adopted for use in the EU until the date of
authorization for issue. The Consolidated
F-13
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Financial Statements of Siemens also comply with IFRS as
published by the IASB. Therefore, there are no differences and a
reconciliation between IFRS as adopted by the EU and IFRS as
published by the IASB is not necessary. IFRS as adopted by the
EU and IFRS as published by the IASB are referred to,
collectively, as IFRS in these Consolidated Financial Statements.
Financial
statement presentation
The presentation of the Companys worldwide financial data
is accompanied by a component model presentation breaking down
Siemens financial position, results of operations and cash
flows into three components (see below). These components
contain the Companys reportable segments (also referred to
as Groups). Siemens VDO Automotive (SV) no longer represents an
operating segment and will be dissolved in fiscal 2008 (for
further information see Note 4 and 36).
|
|
|
|
|
SiemensRepresents the Consolidated Financial
Statements of the Company.
|
|
|
|
OperationsDefined as Siemens nine operating
Groups and certain operating activities not associated with
these Groups, as well as Strategic Equity Investments (see
Note 36 for further information) and centrally managed
items including corporate headquarters, but excluding the
activities of the Financing and Real Estate Groups and
the Corporate Treasury.
|
|
|
|
Financing and Real EstateSiemens Financing
and Real Estate Groups are responsible for the
Companys international leasing, finance, credit and real
estate management activities.
|
|
|
|
Eliminations, reclassifications and Corporate
TreasuryCaptures separately the consolidation of
transactions among Operations and Financing and Real
Estate, as well as certain reclassifications. This component
also includes the Companys Corporate Treasury activities.
|
The Companys presentation of Operations, Financing and
Real Estate and Eliminations, reclassifications and
Corporate Treasury reflects the management of these
components as distinctly different business activities, with
different goals and requirements. Management believes that this
presentation provides a clearer understanding of the components
of the Companys financial position, results of operations
and cash flows. The accounting principles applied to these
components are generally the same as those used for
Siemens. The Company has allocated equity to the
Financing and Real Estate business based on a management
approach which takes into consideration the inherent risk
evident in the underlying assets. The remaining amount of total
equity is shown under Operations. Income taxes are
allocated to Operations, Financing and Real Estate and
Eliminations, reclassifications and Corporate Treasury by
applying the effective tax rate of Siemens to the income before
income taxes of each respective component. Deferred income tax
assets and liabilities are allocated to these components based
on available component specific information and applicable
proportions of such amounts to total assets and liabilities of
Siemens. The financial data presented for the
Operations and Financing and Real Estate and
Eliminations, reclassifications and Corporate Treasury
components are not intended to purport the financial position,
results of operations and cash flows as if they were separate
entities under IFRS.
The information disclosed in these Notes relates to
Siemens unless otherwise stated.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of significant accounting policies
|
The presentation of certain prior year information has been
reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
As previously reported, within the former Com Group, the
Companys other Groups and regional companies, a number of
Business Consultant Agreements and similar sales-related
arrangements with third-party intermediaries have been
identified. The Company identified a large volume of payments
relating to fiscal years 20002006 made
F-14
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
in connection with these agreements and other payments for which
the Company has not been able either to establish a valid
business purpose or to clearly identify the recipient. The
payments identified were recorded as deductible business
expenses in prior periods in determining income tax provisions.
During fiscal 2007, the Company determined that certain of these
payments were non-deductible under tax regulations of Germany
and other jurisdictions. Due to these matters, the Company
accounted in fiscal 2007 for an amount of 352 in income
tax charges and 28 in related interest charges in respect
of fiscal years 20002006. These income tax charges are in
addition to income tax charges recorded in fiscal 2006 in the
amount of 168 relating to income tax liabilities for
certain payments for which Siemens was not able to establish a
valid business purpose or to clearly identify the recipient. The
charges were considered to be immaterial under the rollover
method of quantifying misstatements and were accounted for in
fiscal 2007 by adjusting the comparative amounts for fiscal
years 2006 and 2005 and the opening balance of total equity as
of October 1, 2004. The effect of the adjustment of these
misstatements on net income for fiscal 2006 and 2005 and the
opening balance of total equity as of October 1, 2004
amounted to an increase of 25, a decrease of 69 and
a decrease of 336, respectively. These adjustments had no
impact on segment information.
Further, certain commission liability accounts were identified
at the Med Group which were created in fiscal years prior to
2005 and subsequently released in a manner that did not comply
with applicable accounting principles. The release of those
liabilities resulted in an overstatement of net income (loss) of
15 in both fiscal 2006 and 2005. As a result, the opening
balance of total equity as of October 1, 2004 was
understated by 30. Comparative amounts for fiscal 2006 and
2005 for net income (loss), equity and segment information for
the respective periods have been adjusted accordingly.
The following table summarizes the effect of all adjustments
described above on net income as reported for fiscal years 2006
and 2005 as well as the effect of correcting the cumulative
misstatements for fiscal years 20002004 within the opening
balance of total equity as of October 1, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
misstatements on
|
|
|
misstatements on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(loss)
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Fiscal Year
|
|
|
as of Oct. 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Misstatement(1),
related to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Com Germany
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
Non-Com Germany
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
International
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
Less: Income tax adjustments previously recorded at
September 30, 2006(2)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax
adjustments(3),(4)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
Med commission liability
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Misstatements adjusted September 30, 2007
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Including interest, where applicable.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes 31 recorded in fiscal 2006 that was determined to
relate to non-tax deductible expenses recorded in fiscal 2006
and 42 recorded in fiscal 2006 relating to misstatements
originating in fiscal years 2005 and 2004 of 17 and
25, respectively.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes income taxes related to continuing operations and
discontinued operations.
|
|
(4)
|
The effect of accumulated misstatements on Total Equity as of
Oct. 1, 2004 relates to fiscal years 2004: (82);
2003: (59); 2002: (55);
2001: (40); 2000: (100).
|
F-15
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
The following table summarizes the effect the corrections had on
the affected line-items on the face of the Consolidated
Statements of Income and Consolidated Balance Sheets for fiscal
years 2006 and 2005 as included in the fiscal 2007 Consolidated
Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005
|
|
|
|
prior to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prior to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjustment(1)
|
|
|
adjustment
|
|
|
adjusted
|
|
|
adjustment(1)
|
|
|
adjustment
|
|
|
adjusted
|
|
|
Misstated Statement of Income line-items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold and services rendered
|
|
|
(49,084
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(49,108
|
)
|
|
|
(40,073
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(40,098
|
)
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
17,403
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
17,379
|
|
|
|
15,708
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
15,683
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
3,418
|
|
|
|
3,619
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
3,594
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(742
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
|
|
(735
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(781
|
)
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
2,642
|
|
|
|
2,884
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes(2)
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
3,335
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3,345
|
|
|
|
2,660
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
2.85
|
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
2.96
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
3.51
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
|
|
|
2.81
|
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
2.84
|
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
2.77
|
|
|
|
2.93
|
|
|
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
2.85
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
3.51
|
|
|
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
2.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Misstated Balance Sheet line-items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
3,860
|
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
|
|
3,493
|
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
3,260
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
8,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,443
|
|
|
|
10,168
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
10,144
|
|
Income tax payables
|
|
|
1,487
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
26,275
|
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
25,895
|
|
|
|
24,181
|
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
23,791
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The figures reported for fiscal 2006 and 2005 as prior to
adjustment correspond to the figures as originally
reported after reclassifying SV which is reported as
discontinued operations in 2007. Accordingly, prior period
information has been reclassified for comparative purposes.
|
|
(2)
|
These adjustments are related to the former Com Group.
|
Basis of consolidationThe Consolidated Financial
Statements include the accounts of Siemens AG and its
subsidiaries which are directly or indirectly controlled.
Control is generally conveyed by ownership of the majority of
voting rights. Additionally, the Company consolidates special
purpose entities (SPEs) when, based on the evaluation of
the substance of the relationship with Siemens, the Company
concludes that it controls the SPE. Associated companies are
recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements using the
equity method of accounting. Companies in which Siemens has
joint control are also recorded using the equity method.
Business combinationsAll business combinations are
accounted for under the purchase method. The cost of an
acquisition is measured at the fair value of the assets given
and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of exchange plus
costs directly attributable to the acquisition. Identifiable
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a
F-16
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
business combination (including contingent liabilities) are
measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date,
irrespective of the extent of any minority interest. The excess
of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the
Companys share of the identifiable net assets acquired is
recorded as goodwill.
Associated companiesCompanies in which Siemens has
the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and
financial policies (generally through direct or indirect
ownership of 20% to 50% of the voting rights) are recorded in
the Consolidated Financial Statements using the equity method of
accounting and are initially recognized at cost. The excess of
Siemens initial investment in associated companies over
Siemens ownership percentage in the underlying net assets
of those companies is attributed to certain fair value
adjustments with the remaining portion recognized as goodwill.
Goodwill relating to the acquisition of associated companies is
included in the carrying amount of the investment and is not
amortized but is tested for impairment as part of the overall
investment in the associated company.
Siemens share of its associated companies
post-acquisition profits or losses is recognized in the income
statement, and its share of post-acquisition movements in equity
that have not been recognized in the associates profit or
loss is recognized directly in equity. The cumulative
post-acquisition movements are adjusted against the carrying
amount of the investment in the associated company. When
Siemens share of losses in an associated company equals or
exceeds its interest in the associate, Siemens does not
recognize further losses, unless it incurs obligations or makes
payments on behalf of the associate.
Material intercompany results arising from transactions between
Siemens and its associated companies are eliminated to the
extent of Siemens interest in the associated company.
Foreign currency translationThe assets and
liabilities of foreign subsidiaries, where the functional
currency is other than the euro, are translated using period-end
exchange rates, while the statements of income are translated
using average exchange rates during the period. Differences
arising from such translations are recognized within equity.
The exchange rates of the significant currencies of non-euro
countries used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial
Statements were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exchange rate
|
|
|
Annual average rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 quoted
|
|
|
1 quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
into currencies
|
|
|
into currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
specified below
|
|
|
specified below
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Fiscal year
|
|
Currency
|
|
ISO Code
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
British pound
|
|
|
GBP
|
|
|
|
0.697
|
|
|
|
0.678
|
|
|
|
0.676
|
|
|
|
0.685
|
|
|
|
0.688
|
|
U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
1.418
|
|
|
|
1.266
|
|
|
|
1.333
|
|
|
|
1.230
|
|
|
|
1.273
|
|
Revenue recognitionRevenue is recognized for
product sales when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the risks
and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the customer,
the amount of revenue can be measured reliably, and collection
of the related receivable is reasonably assured. If product
sales are subject to customer acceptance, revenues are not
recognized until customer acceptance occurs. Revenues from
construction-type projects are generally recognized under the
percentage-of-completion method, based on the percentage of
costs to date compared to the total estimated contract costs,
contractual milestones or performance. Revenues from service
transactions are recognized as services are performed. For
long-term service contracts, revenues are recognized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the contract or, if the
performance pattern is other than straight-line, as the services
are provided. Revenue from software arrangements is recognized
at the time persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred, the amount of revenue can be measured
reliably and collectibility is probable. Revenue from
F-17
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
maintenance, unspecified upgrades or enhancements and technical
support is allocated using the residual value method and is
recognized over the period such items are delivered. If an
arrangement to deliver software requires significant production,
modification, or customization of software, the entire
arrangement is accounted for under the
percentage-of-completion
method. Operating lease income for equipment rentals is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Interest is recognized using the effective interest method.
Dividends are recognized when the right to receive payment is
established. Royalties are recognized on an accrual basis in
accordance with the substance of the relevant agreement.
Sales of goods and services sometimes involve the provision of
multiple elements. In these cases, the Company determines
whether the contract or arrangement contains more than one unit
of accounting. An arrangement is separated if (1) the
delivered element(s) has value to the customer on a stand-alone
basis, (2) there is objective and reliable evidence of the
fair value of the undelivered element(s) and (3), if the
arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the
delivered element(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered
element(s) is considered probable and substantially in the
control of the Company. If all three criteria are fulfilled, the
appropriate revenue recognition convention is then applied to
each separate unit of accounting. Generally, the total
arrangement consideration is allocated to the separate units of
accounting based on their relative fair values. In cases where
there is objective and reliable fair value evidence of the
undelivered elements but not for one or more of the delivered
elements, the residual method is used, i.e. the amount allocated
to delivered elements equals the total arrangement consideration
less the aggregate fair value of the undelivered elements.
Objective and reliable fair values are sales prices for the
component when it is regularly sold on a stand-alone basis or
third-party prices for similar components. If the three criteria
are not met, revenue is deferred until such criteria are met or
until the period in which the last undelivered element is
delivered. The amount allocable to the delivered elements is
limited to the amount that is not contingent upon delivery of
additional elements or meeting other specified performance
conditions.
Product-related expenses and losses from onerous
contractsProvisions for estimated costs related to
product warranties are recorded in Cost of goods sold and
services rendered at the time the related sale is
recognized, and are established on an individual basis, except
for consumer products. The estimates reflect historic trends of
warranty costs, as well as information regarding product failure
experienced during construction, installation or testing of
products. In the case of new products, expert opinions and
industry data are also taken into consideration in estimating
product warranty provisions. Expected losses from onerous
contracts are recognized in the period when the current estimate
of total contract costs exceeds contract revenue.
Research and development costsCosts of research
activities undertaken with the prospect of gaining new
scientific or technical knowledge and understanding are expensed
as incurred.
Costs for development activities, whereby research findings are
applied to a plan or design for the production of new or
substantially improved products and processes, are capitalized
if development costs can be measured reliably, the product or
process is technically and commercially feasible, future
economic benefits are probable and Siemens intends, and has
sufficient resources, to complete development and to use or sell
the asset. The costs capitalized include the cost of materials,
direct labour and directly attributable general overhead
expenditure that serves to prepare the asset for use. Such
capitalized costs are included in Other intangible assets
as other internally generated intangible assets (see
Note 16). Other development costs are expensed as incurred.
Capitalized development costs are stated at cost less
accumulated amortization and impairment losses with an
amortization period of generally three to five years.
Earnings per shareBasic earnings per share is
computed by dividing income from continuing operations, income
from discontinued operations and net income, all attributable to
ordinary shareholders of Siemens AG by the weighted average
shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share
is calculated by assuming conversion or exercise of all
potentially dilutive securities, stock options and stock awards.
F-18
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
GoodwillGoodwill is not amortized, but instead
tested for impairment annually, as well as whenever there are
events or changes in circumstances (triggering
events) which suggest that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. Goodwill is carried at cost less accumulated
impairment losses.
The goodwill impairment test is based on cash-generating units,
which at Siemens are its divisions. For the purpose of
impairment testing, goodwill acquired in a business combination
is allocated to the division or divisions that are expected to
benefit from the synergies of the business combination in which
the goodwill arose. If the carrying amount of the division, to
which the goodwill is allocated, exceeds its recoverable amount
goodwill allocated to this division must be reduced accordingly.
The recoverable amount is the higher of the divisions fair
value less costs to sell and its value in use. Siemens generally
determines the recoverable amount of a division based on its
fair value less costs to sell. These values are generally
determined based on discounted cash flow calculations.
Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed in future periods
if the recoverable amount exceeds the carrying amount of the
cash-generating unit to which the goodwill is allocated. See
Note 15 for further information.
Other intangible assetsOther intangible assets
consist of software and other internally generated intangible
assets, patents, licenses and similar rights. The Company
amortizes intangible assets with finite useful lives on a
straight-line basis over their respective estimated useful lives
to their estimated residual values. Estimated useful lives for
software, patents, licenses and other similar rights generally
range from three to five years, except for intangible assets
with finite useful lives acquired in business combinations.
Intangible assets acquired in business combinations primarily
consist of customer relationships and technology. Weighted
average useful lives in specific acquisitions ranged from nine
to twenty-two years for customer relationships and from seven to
twelve years for technology. Intangible assets which are
determined to have indefinite useful lives as well as intangible
assets not yet available for use are not amortized, but instead
tested for impairment at least annually. See Note 16 for
further information.
Property, plant and equipmentProperty, plant and
equipment is valued at cost less accumulated depreciation and
impairment losses. If the costs of certain components of an item
of property, plant and equipment are significant in relation to
the total cost of the item, they are accounted for and
depreciated separately. Depreciation expense is recognized using
the straight-line method. Costs of construction of qualifying
long-term assets include capitalized interest, which is
amortized over the estimated useful life of the related asset.
The following useful lives are assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
Factory and office buildings
|
|
|
20 to 50 years
|
|
Other buildings
|
|
|
5 to 10 years
|
|
Technical machinery & equipment
|
|
|
5 to 10 years
|
|
Furniture & office equipment
|
|
|
generally 5 years
|
|
Equipment leased to others
|
|
|
generally 3 to 5 years
|
|
Impairment of property, plant and equipment and other
intangible assets with finite useful livesThe Company
reviews property, plant and equipment and other intangible
assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by the
comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the
recoverable amount, which is the higher of the assets
value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. If such
assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be
recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying
amount of the assets exceeds their recoverable amount. If the
fair value cannot be determined, the assets value in use
is applied as their recoverable amount. The assets value
in use is measured by discounting their estimated future cash
flows. If there is an indication that the reasons which caused
the impairment no longer exist, Siemens would consider the need
to reverse all or a portion of the impairment.
The Companys property, plant and equipment and other
intangible assets to be disposed of are recorded at the lower of
carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell and
depreciation is ceased.
F-19
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Discontinued operationsDiscontinued operations are
reported when a component of an entity comprising operations and
cash flows that can be clearly distinguished, operationally and
for financial reporting purposes, from the rest of the entity is
classified as held for sale or has been disposed of, if the
component either (a) represents a separate major line of
business or geographical area of operations or (b) is part
of a single co-ordinated plan to dispose of a separate major
line of business or geographical area of operations or
(c) is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to
resale.
Income taxesThe Company applies IAS 12, Income
Taxes. Under the liability method of IAS 12, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax bases. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
the income statement, unless related to items directly
recognized in equity, in the period the new laws are
substantively enacted. Deferred tax assets are recognized to the
extent that it is probable that future taxable income will be
available against which the deductible temporary differences,
unused tax losses and unused tax credits can be utilized.
InventoriesInventory is valued at the lower of
acquisition or production cost or net realizable value, cost
being generally determined on the basis of an average or
first-in,
first-out method. Production costs comprise direct material and
labor and applicable manufacturing overheads, including
depreciation charges. Net realizable value is the estimated
selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the
estimated costs of completion and selling expenses.
ProvisionsA provision is recognized in the balance
sheet when the Company has a present legal or constructive
obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that an
outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the
obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of
the obligation. If the effect is material, provisions are
recognized at present value by discounting the expected future
cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market
assessments of the time value of money. Provisions for onerous
contracts are measured at the lower of the expected cost of
fulfilling the contract and the expected cost of terminating the
contract. Additions to provisions are generally recognized in
the income statement. The present value of legal obligations
associated with the retirement of property, plant and equipment
(asset retirement obligations) that result from the acquisition,
construction, development or normal use of an asset is added to
the carrying amount of the associated asset. The additional
carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. If
the asset retirement obligation is settled for other than the
carrying amount of the liability, the Company recognizes a gain
or loss on settlement.
Financial instrumentsA financial instrument is any
contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and
a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity.
Financial assets of the Company mainly include cash and cash
equivalents,
available-for-sale
financial assets, trade receivables, loans receivable, finance
lease receivables and derivative financial instruments with a
positive fair value. Financial liabilities of the Company mainly
comprise notes and bonds, loans from banks, commercial paper,
trade payables, finance lease payables and derivative financial
instruments with a negative fair value.
Financial instruments are recognized on the balance sheet when
Siemens becomes a party to the contractual obligations of the
instrument. For regular way purchases or sales of financial
assets, i.e. purchases or sales under a contract whose terms
require delivery of the asset within the time frame established
generally by regulation or convention in the marketplace
concerned, the trade date is applied.
Initially, financial instruments are recognized at their fair
value. Transaction costs directly attributable to the
acquisition or issue of financial instruments are only
recognized in determining the carrying amount, if the financial
instruments are not measured at fair value through profit or
loss. Finance lease receivables are recognized at an amount
equal to the net investment in the lease. Subsequently,
financial assets and liabilities are measured according to the
categorycash and cash equivalents,
available-for-sale
financial assets, loans and receivables,
F-20
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
financial liabilities measured at amortized cost or financial
assets and liabilities classified as held for tradingto
which they are assigned.
Cash and cash equivalentsThe Company considers all
highly liquid investments with less than three months maturity
from the date of acquisition to be cash equivalents. Cash and
cash equivalents are measured at cost.
Available-for-sale
financial assetsInvestments in equity instruments,
debt instruments and fund shares are all classified as
available-for-sale
financial assets. They are accounted for at fair value if
reliably measurable, with unrealized gains and losses included
in Other components of equity, net of applicable deferred
income taxes. Equity instruments that do not have a quoted
market price in an active market and whose fair value cannot be
reliably measured are recorded at cost.
When
available-for-sale
financial assets incur a decline in fair value below acquisition
cost and there is objective evidence that the asset is impaired,
the cumulative loss that has been recognized in equity is
removed from equity and recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Income. The Company considers all available
evidence such as market conditions and prices, investee-specific
factors and the duration and the extent to which fair value is
less than acquisition cost in evaluating potential impairment of
its
available-for-sale
financial assets. An impairment loss may be reversed in
subsequent periods for debt instruments, if the reasons for the
impairment no longer exist.
Loans and receivablesFinancial assets classified as
loans and receivables are measured at amortized cost using the
effective interest method less any impairment losses. Impairment
losses on trade and other receivables are recognized using
separate allowance accounts. See Note 3 for further
information regarding the determination of impairment.
Financial liabilitiesSiemens measures financial
liabilities, except for derivative financial instruments, at
amortized cost using the effective interest method.
Derivative financial instrumentsDerivative
financial instruments, such as foreign currency exchange
contracts and interest rate swap contracts, are measured at fair
value. Derivative instruments are classified as held for trading
unless they are designated as hedging instruments, for which
hedge accounting is applied. Changes in the fair value of
derivative financial instruments are recognized periodically
either in net income or, in the case of a cash flow hedge, in
Other components of equity, net of applicable deferred
income taxes. Certain derivative instruments embedded in host
contracts are also accounted for separately as derivatives.
Fair value hedgesThe carrying amount of the hedged item is
adjusted by the gain or loss attributable to the hedged risk.
Where an unrecognized firm commitment is designated as the
hedged item, the subsequent cumulative change in its fair value
is recognized as a separate financial asset or liability with
corresponding gain or loss recognized in net income.
For hedged items carried at amortized cost, the adjustment is
amortized such that it is fully amortized by maturity of the
hedged item. For hedged firm commitments the initial carrying
amount of the assets or liabilities that result from meeting the
firm commitments are adjusted to include the cumulative changes
in the fair value that were previously recognized as separate
financial assets or liabilities.
Cash flow hedgesThe effective portion of changes in the
fair value of derivative instruments designated as cash flow
hedges are recognized in Other components of equity, net
of applicable deferred income taxes, and any ineffective portion
is recognized immediately in net income. Amounts accumulated in
equity are reclassified into net income in the same periods in
which the hedged item affects net income.
See Note 31, Derivative financial instruments and
hedging activities for further information.
F-21
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Share-based paymentAs permitted under IFRS 1,
First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting
Standards, IFRS 2, Share-based Payment, has not been
retrospectively applied to all share-based payment awards. This
exemption has been applied for all equity awards which were
granted prior to November 7, 2002, as well as those equity
awards granted prior to October 1, 2003, which vested
before January 1, 2005. All such equity awards exempted
from IFRS 2 continue to be accounted for under the intrinsic
value approach. IFRS 2 distinguishes between cash-settled and
equity-settled share-based payment transactions. For both types,
the fair value is measured at grant date and the compensation
expense is allocated over the period during which the employees
become unconditionally entitled to the awards. Cash-settled
awards are remeasured at fair value on each reporting date until
the award is settled. Siemens uses an option pricing model to
determine the fair value of its share-based payment plans. See
Note 33 for further information on share-based payment
transactions.
Initial
application of standards and interpretations in fiscal
2007
For information on the adoption of IFRS 8, Operating
Segments, in fiscal 2007 please refer to Notes 1 and 36.
Standards
and interpretations issued but not yet adopted
In November 2006, the IFRIC issued IFRIC Interpretation 12,
Service Concession Arrangements, to provide guidance to
private sector entities on certain recognition and measurement
issues that arise in accounting for
public-to-private
service concession arrangements. Service concession arrangements
are arrangements whereby a government or other body grants
contracts for the supply of public services (e.g. roads, energy
distribution, transportation) to private operators. This
Interpretation applies to
public-to-private
service concession arrangements if (a) the grantor controls
or regulates what services the operator must provide with the
infrastructure, to whom it must provide them, and at what price;
and (b) the grantor controlsthrough ownership,
beneficial entitlement or otherwiseany significant
residual interest in the infrastructure at the end of the term
of the arrangement. Control of the asset remains in public hands
but the private sector operator is responsible for construction
activities, as well as for operating and maintaining the public
sector infrastructure. The operator does not recognize the
infrastructure as its property, plant and equipment if the
infrastructure is existing infrastructure of the grantor, or is
infrastructure constructed or purchased by the operator as part
of the service arrangement. The operator recognizes either a
financial asset or an intangible asset, or both, as compensation
for any construction services that it provides. Any concession
arrangements within the scope of IFRIC 12 are excluded from the
scope of IFRIC 4 Determining whether an Arrangement
Contains a Lease. The Company plans to adopt IFRIC 12
beginning October 1, 2008. The involvement of the Company
in
public-to-private
service concession arrangements is currently being evaluated.
In September 2007, the International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB) issued IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements
(IAS 1). IAS 1 replaces IAS 1, Presentation of Financial
Statements (revised in 2003), as amended in 2005. The
revision is aimed at improving users ability to analyze
and compare the information given in financial statements. IAS 1
sets overall requirements for the presentation of financial
statements, guidelines for their structure and minimum
requirements for their content. The new standard is effective
for fiscal periods beginning on or after January 1, 2009,
early adoption being permitted. The Company will determine the
expected effect of the revised IAS 1 and determine an adoption
date.
3. Management
estimates and judgments
Certain of these accounting policies require critical accounting
estimates that involve complex and subjective judgments and the
use of assumptions, some of which may be for matters that are
inherently uncertain and susceptible to change. Such critical
accounting estimates could change from period to period and have
a material impact on financial condition or results of
operations. Critical accounting estimates could also involve
estimates
F-22
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
where management reasonably could have used a different estimate
in the current accounting period. Management cautions that
future events often vary from forecasts and that estimates
routinely require adjustment.
Revenue recognition on construction
contractsThe Companys Groups, particularly
PG, TS, I&S, PTD and SBT, conduct a significant portion of
their business under construction contracts with customers. The
Company generally accounts for construction projects using the
percentage-of-completion
method, recognizing revenue as performance on a contract
progresses. This method places considerable importance on
accurate estimates of the extent of progress towards completion.
Depending on the methodology to determine contract progress, the
significant estimates include total contract costs, remaining
costs to completion, total contract revenues, contract risks and
other judgments. Management of the operating Groups continually
reviews all estimates involved in such construction contracts
and adjusts them as necessary. The Company also uses the
percentage-of-completion
method for projects financed directly or indirectly by Siemens.
In order to qualify for such accounting, the credit quality of
the customer must meet certain minimum parameters as evidenced
by the customers credit rating or by a credit analysis
performed by Siemens Financial Services (SFS), which performs
such reviews in support of the Companys Corporate
Executive Committee. At a minimum, a customers credit
rating must be single B from external rating agencies, or an
equivalent SFS-determined rating. In cases where the credit
quality does not meet such standards, the Company recognizes
revenue for construction contracts and financed projects based
on the lower of cash if irrevocably received, or contract
completion. The Company believes the credit factors used provide
a reasonable basis for assessing credit quality.
Trade and other receivablesThe allowance for
doubtful accounts involves significant management judgment and
review of individual receivables based on individual customer
creditworthiness, current economic trends and analysis of
historical bad debts on a portfolio basis. For the determination
of the country-specific component of the individual allowance,
we also consider country credit ratings, which are centrally
determined based on information from external rating agencies.
Regarding the determination of the valuation allowance derived
from a portfolio-based analysis of historical bad debts, a
decline of receivables in volume results in a corresponding
reduction of such provisions and vice versa. As of
September 30, 2007 and 2006, Siemens recorded a total
valuation allowance for accounts receivable of 895 and
956, respectively. Siemens also selectively assists
customers through arranging financing from various third-party
sources, including export credit agencies, in order to be
awarded supply contracts. In addition, the Company provides
direct vendor financing and grants guarantees to banks in
support of loans to Siemens customers when necessary and deemed
appropriate.
ImpairmentSiemens tests at least annually
whether goodwill has suffered any impairment, in accordance with
its accounting policy. The determination of the recoverable
amount of a division to which goodwill is allocated involves the
use of estimates by management. The recoverable amount is the
higher of the divisions fair value less costs to sell and
its value in use. The Company generally uses discounted cash
flow based methods to determine these values. These discounted
cash flow calculations use five-year projections that are based
on the financial budgets approved by management. Cash flow
projections take into account past experience and represent
managements best estimate about future developments. Cash
flows after the planning period are extrapolated using
individual growth rates. Key assumptions on which management has
based its determination of fair value less costs to sell and
value in use include estimated growth rates, weighted average
cost of capital and tax rates. These estimates, including the
methodology used, can have a material impact on the respective
values and ultimately the amount of any goodwill impairment.
Likewise, whenever property, plant and equipment and other
intangible assets are tested for impairment, the determination
of the assets recoverable amount involves the use of
estimates by management and can have a material impact on the
respective values and ultimately the amount of any impairment.
Pensions and Other Post-Employment
BenefitsObligations for pension and other
post-employment benefits and related net periodic benefit costs
are determined in accordance with actuarial valuations. These
valuations rely on key assumptions including discount rates,
expected return on plan assets, expected salary increases,
mortality rates and health care trend rates. The discount rate
assumptions reflect the rates available on
F-23
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
high-quality fixed-income investments of appropriate duration at
the balance sheet date. The expected return on plan assets
assumptions are determined on a uniform basis, considering
long-term historical returns and asset allocations. Due to
changing market and economic conditions the underlying key
assumptions may differ from actual developments and may lead to
significant changes in pension and other post-employment benefit
obligations. Such differences are recognized in full directly in
equity in the period in which they occur without affecting
profit or loss. For a discussion of the current funding status
and a sensitivity analysis with respect to the impact of certain
critical assumptions on the net periodic benefit cost, see
Note 23.
ProvisionsSignificant estimates are involved
in the determination of provisions related to onerous contracts,
warranty costs and legal proceedings. A significant portion of
the business of certain of the operating Groups is performed
pursuant to long-term contracts, often for large projects, in
Germany and abroad, awarded on a competitive bidding basis.
Siemens records a provision for onerous sales contracts when
current estimates of total contract costs exceed expected
contract revenue. Such estimates are subject to change based on
new information as projects progress toward completion. Onerous
sales contracts are identified by monitoring the progress of the
project and updating the estimate of total contract costs which
also requires significant judgment relating to achieving certain
performance standards, for example in the IT service business,
and estimates involving warranty costs.
Siemens is subject to legal and regulatory proceedings and
government investigations in various jurisdictions. These
proceedings are, amongst others, related to the area of
competition law and to possible breaches of anticorruption
legislation in Germany, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in the
United States and similar legislation in other countries. Such
proceedings may result in criminal or civil sanctions, penalties
or disgorgements against the Company. If it is more likely than
not that an obligation of the Company exists and will result in
an outflow of resources, a provision is recorded if the amount
of the obligation can be reliably estimated. Regulatory and
legal proceedings as well as government investigations often
involve complex legal issues and are subject to substantial
uncertainties. Accordingly, management exercises considerable
judgment in determining whether it is more likely than not that
such a proceeding will result in an outflow of resources and
whether the amount of the obligation can be reliably estimated.
The Company periodically reviews the status of these proceedings
with both inside and outside counsel. These judgments are
subject to change as new information becomes available. The
required amount of a provision may change in the future due to
new developments in the particular matter. Revisions to
estimates may significantly affect results of future operations.
Upon resolution of any legal or regulatory proceeding or
government investigation, Siemens may incur charges in excess of
the recorded provisions for such matters. It can not be excluded
that the financial condition or results of operations of Siemens
will be materially affected by an unfavorable outcome of legal
or regulatory proceedings or government investigations. See
Note 29, Legal Proceedings, for additional
information.
4. Acquisitions,
dispositions and discontinued operations
a) Acquisitions
During the years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
the Company completed a number of acquisitions. These
acquisitions have been accounted for under the purchase method
and have been included in the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements since the date of acquisition.
On July 25, 2007, Siemens signed an agreement with Dade
Behring Holdings, Inc. (Dade Behring), USA, to acquire all
issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Dade Behring by
submitting a cash tender offer of U.S.$77 per share. Dade
Behring is a leading manufacturer and distributor of diagnostic
products and services to clinical laboratories. The aggregate
consideration, including the assumption of debt, amounts to
approximately U.S.$7 billion (approximately
5 billion). The transaction closed at the beginning
of November 2007 (see also Note 41, Subsequent
events).
F-24
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
aa) Acquisitions in fiscal 2007
On January 2, 2007, Siemens completed the acquisition of
the diagnostics division of Bayer Aktiengesellschaft (Bayer).
The acquisition, which was consolidated as of January 2007, will
be integrated into Med together with Diagnostic Products
Corporation, USA (DPC), which was acquired in fiscal 2006. The
Bayer diagnostics division will enable Siemens to expand its
position in the growing molecular diagnostics market. The
estimated purchase price, payable in cash, amounts to
4.5 billion (including 185 cash acquired). The
Company has not yet finalized the purchase price allocation.
Based on the preliminary purchase price allocation,
approximately 761 was allocated to intangible assets
subject to amortization, and approximately 2,738 was
reported as goodwill. Of the 761 intangible assets,
574 relate to customer relationships and 139 to
trademarks and tradenames.
On May 4, 2007, Siemens completed the acquisition of
U.S.-based
UGS Corp. (UGS), one of the leading providers of product
lifecycle management (PLM) software and services for
manufacturers. UGS, which was consolidated as of May 2007, will
be integrated into Automation and Drives (A&D). The
acquisition will enable Siemens to provide an
end-to-end
software and hardware portfolio for manufacturers encompassing
the complete lifecycle of products and production facilities.
The estimated purchase price, including the assumption of debt,
amounts to 2.7 billion (including 75 cash
acquired). The company has not yet finalized the purchase price
allocation. Based on the preliminary purchase price allocation,
approximately 1,066 was allocated to intangible assets
subject to amortization and approximately 1,880 was
recorded as goodwill.
ab) Acquisitions in fiscal 2006
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, Siemens completed the
acquisition of all of the shares of the immunodiagnostics
provider DPC. The acquisition, which is integrated into Med,
enables Siemens to expand its existing healthcare solutions
portfolio. Acquisition costs were payable in cash and amounted
to 1,416 (including 94 cash acquired). DPC is
consolidated as of August 2006. The purchase price allocation
resulted in 267 intangible assets subject to amortization
and 774 goodwill. Of the 267 intangible assets,
196 relate to customer relationships with a weighted
average useful life of 11 years and 54 to trademarks
and tradenames with a weighted average useful life of
10 years.
In fiscal 2006, the Company acquired a number of other entities,
which are also not significant individually, including the coal
gasification business of the Swiss Sustec-Group, Wheelabrator
Air Pollution Control, Inc., USA, a supplier of air pollution
control and reduction products and solutions for the coal-fired
power and industrial markets, both at PG, Electrium Limited, UK,
a vendor of electrical installation systems at A&D and
Bewator, Sweden, a supplier of products and systems for access
control solutions at Siemens Building Technologies (SBT). The
combined preliminary purchase price of these acquisitions
amounts to 425.
ac) Acquisitions in fiscal 2005
In May 2005, the Company acquired CTI Molecular Imaging, Inc.
(CTI), USA. The primary reason for the acquisition was to
strengthen the Companys commitment to molecular imaging
development. Siemens previously owned a 49% interest in a joint
venture consolidated by CTI before the acquisition of which
Siemens was the primary customer. CTI was integrated into Med
and consolidated as of May 2005, when it became a wholly owned
subsidiary. The acquisition costs amount to 809 (including
60 in cash acquired). Based on the final purchase price
allocation, 157 was allocated to intangible assets subject
to amortization and 556 to goodwill. Of the 157
intangible assets, 99 was allocated to technology and
44 to customer relationships. Technology and customer
relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis over
weighted-average useful lives of 9 years.
In fiscal 2005, the Company acquired, in several steps, the
Austrian engineering group VA Technologie AG (VA Tech) for
acquisition costs of 1,049 (including 535 cash
acquired). The VA Tech business was consolidated as of
July 15, 2005, when it became a wholly owned subsidiary of
Siemens. VA Techs metallurgy, power transmission and
distribution, and infrastructure activities were mainly
integrated into I&S and PTD to support their
F-25
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
global market targets. Smaller portions were integrated into
other business activities. In order to comply with a European
antitrust ruling, the Company sold the majority of the VA Tech
power generation business, including the hydropower activities,
to Andritz AG of Austria, in May 2006. No gain or loss was
recorded in connection with the sale of this business. The
difference between the consideration received upon the sale and
the book value of the business resulted in an increase in
goodwill. Based on the final purchase price allocation for the
VA Tech acquisition, approximately 142 was allocated to
intangible assets subject to amortization and 1,054 to
goodwill. Of the 142 intangible assets, 55 was
allocated to order backlog and 26 to technology. Order
backlog and technology are amortized on a straight-line basis
over weighted-average useful lives of four and seven years,
respectively.
In July 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of all
shares of Flender Holding GmbH, Germany (Flender), a supplier of
mechanical and electrical drive equipment, focusing on gear
technology. The primary reason for the acquisition was to enable
the Company to offer a full drive train (motor, inverter, gear)
to customers. The business is being integrated into A&D and
was consolidated as of July 2005. The acquisition costs amount
to 702. Based on the final purchase price allocation,
409 was allocated to intangible assets subject to
amortization and 428 was recorded as goodwill. Of the
409 intangible assets, 264 was allocated to customer
relationships and 101 to technology. Customer
relationships and technology are amortized over weighted-average
amortization periods of 12 years and 10 years,
respectively.
In fiscal 2005, the Company acquired Bonus Energy A/S, Denmark,
a supplier of wind energy systems and substantially all of the
assets of Robicon Corporation, USA, a manufacturer of medium
voltage drives and power controls. The combined purchase price
of the two acquisitions amounts to 476.
The Company made certain other acquisitions during the years
ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005, which did not have
a significant effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
b) Dispositions
ba) Dispositions in fiscal 2007
In April 2007, Siemens contributed its carrier-related
operations and Nokia Corporation (Nokia), Finland contributed
its Networks Business Group into Nokia Siemens Networks B.V.,
the Netherlands (NSN), in exchange for shares in NSN. Siemens
and Nokia each own an economic share of approximately 50% of
NSN. The transaction resulted in a preliminary non-cash pre-tax
gain of 1,627 which is included in discontinued operations.
Siemens has the ability to exercise significant influence over
operating and financial policies of NSN and beginning April 2007
reports its equity interest in NSN in Investments accounted
for using the equity method and its share of income (loss)
in NSN in Income (loss) from investments accounted for using
the equity method, net (see Notes 7 and 36 for further
information).
At the beginning of October 2006, the Company sold Siemens
Dispolok GmbH, Germany, which was part of the Group
Transportation Systems (TS), to Mitsui Group. The transaction
resulted in a pre-tax gain, net of related costs of 76,
which is included in Other operating income.
bb) Dispositions in fiscal 2006
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, Siemens announced the
carve out of the Distribution and Industry Logistics
(DI) and Material Handling Products (MHP) divisions,
formerly of the Logistics and Assembly Systems Group (L&A),
into separate entities (Dematic business). The Dematic business
was reported in Other Operations. In June 2006, Siemens signed
an agreement to divest a significant portion of its Dematic
business to Triton Managers II Limited based in Jersey. Closing
of the transaction occurred on August 31, 2006. The
disposal loss on the transaction amounted to 32 and is
reported in Other operating expense.
F-26
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
At the beginning of April 2006, the former operating segment
Siemens Business Services (SBS) closed the sale of its Product
Related Services (PRS) business to Fujitsu Siemens Computers
(Holding) BV (for segment information see also Note 36).
bc) Dispositions in fiscal 2005
In fiscal 2005, Siemens signed an agreement to sell its MD
business to BenQ Corporation (BenQ) based in Taiwan (the
Agreement). The Agreement also provided for the sale of
MDs operation included in Siemens Shanghai Mobile
Communications Ltd. in the Peoples Republic of China (SSMC),
subject to the consent of the Companys minority
shareholders which was obtained in July 2005. The MD
transaction, excluding SSMC and activities in certain countries
(Deferred Countries), was completed on September 30, 2005.
As part of the Agreement, Siemens purchased 50 in Global
Depositary Receipts (GDRs) on common shares in BenQ in
December 2005, which at that time represented a 2.4 percent
investment in BenQ (see also Note 10). All of the MD
activities for which the transaction was not completed as of
September 30, 2005, including the MD operations of Siemens
Shanghai Mobile Communications Ltd. in the Peoples Republic of
China, were sold in fiscal 2006. For further information see the
comments on Discontinued Operations.
c) Discontinued
operations
ca) Siemens VDO Automotive (SV)
On July 25, 2007, Siemens signed an agreement with
Continental AG, Hanover, Germany, to sell its entire SV
activities for a sales price of approximately
11.4 billion. The closing of the transaction is
subject to receipt of regulatory approvals and other customary
closing conditions and is expected in the current calendar year.
The assets and liabilities of SV are presented as held for
disposal on the balance sheet and measured at the lower of their
carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell until the sale
is completed. The historical results of SV are reported as
discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income
for all periods presented.
The carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and
liabilities of SV as of September 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
1,917
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
989
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,334
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets classified as held for disposal
|
|
|
9,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
1,402
|
|
Current provisions
|
|
|
245
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
596
|
|
Pension plans and similar commitments
|
|
|
359
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities associated with assets classified as held for
disposal
|
|
|
3,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
The net results of SV reported in the Consolidated Statements of
Income consist of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
10,324
|
|
|
|
10,017
|
|
|
|
9,610
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(9,744
|
)
|
|
|
(9,449
|
)
|
|
|
(9,007
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before
income taxes
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(1,130
|
)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of
income taxes
|
|
|
(550
|
)
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2007 income taxes include the effect of taxable
reorganizations prior to the sale of the SV activities.
cb) Former operating segment Communications (Com)
The historical results of the former operating segment
Communications (Com), with the exception of certain business
activities which are now part of Other Operations and A&D
(see Note 36 for further information), are reported as
discontinued operations in the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Income for all periods presented. The Com
activities previously included the Mobile Devices
(MD) business, which has meanwhile been sold, and the
carrier-related operations which were contributed to NSN in
April 2007. The Company is actively pursuing its plan to dispose
of the enterprise networks business, which was also previously
included in Com, and expects to finalize the disposal in the
first half of the next calendar year.
The assets and liabilities of the above transactions were
classified on the balance sheet as held for disposal and
measured at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value
less costs to sell. As of September 30, 2007, the assets
and liabilities classified as held for disposal include the
assets and liabilities of the enterprise networks business (and
also certain amounts relating to the carrier-related
operations). As of September 30, 2006, the assets and
liabilities classified as held for disposal include the
enterprise networks business and the carrier-related operations.
The carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and
liabilities classified as held for disposal and relating to the
above transactions were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents*
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
Other financial assets
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets classified as held for disposal
|
|
|
2,120
|
|
|
|
7,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
2,077
|
|
Current provisions
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
Pension plans and similar commitments
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
Payroll and social security taxes
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities associated with assets classified as held for
disposal
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
5,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
As of September 30, 2007, this caption also includes a
portion still related to the carrier-related operations.
|
F-28
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
The consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2007
includes 308 of assets and 97 of liabilities
classified as held for disposal relating to minor transactions
not presented as discontinued operations.
The net results of discontinued operations presented in the
Consolidated Statements of Income consist of the following
components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
7,576
|
|
|
|
13,428
|
|
|
|
15,440
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(8,653
|
)
|
|
|
(13,294
|
)
|
|
|
(15,948
|
)
|
Gain related to the contribution of the carrier-related
operations to NSN
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of the MD business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income
taxes
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
(919
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes corresponding to ordinary activities including the
measurement to fair value less costs to sell
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
Income taxes corresponding to the gain related to the
contribution of the carrier-related operations to NSN
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
(675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net result of discontinued operations for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2007, includes losses from the
measurement of the enterprise networks business to fair value
less costs to sell of 567.
In the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, the
Companys former operating Group, Com, sold its remaining
interest in Juniper Networks, Inc. representing
22.8 million shares for net proceeds of 465. The
transaction resulted in a non-taxable gain of 356, which
is reported in Income (loss) from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes.
In fiscal 2005, the losses from the sale of the MD business
directly attributable to BenQ amounted to 411. The net
result of discontinued operations in fiscal 2005 included
additional exit related charges of 131 resulting in a
total loss recognized on the sale of MD (excluding SSMC) of
542. No additional direct gain or loss on the transaction
was realized in fiscal 2007 and 2006. Discontinued operations in
fiscal 2007 and 2006 include charges pursuant to the terms of
the MD disposal transaction, including substantial effects
stemming from the insolvency of BenQ Mobile GmbH & Co.
OHG, Germany.
The income tax benefit from ordinary activities for fiscal year
2007 is impacted by a goodwill impairment and tax reserves. The
carve-out of the Com business is mainly tax-free. In fiscal
2006, the tax benefit includes tax benefits generated on pre-tax
losses in jurisdictions with higher statutory income tax rates
that were only partially offset by income tax expense generated
on pre-tax income in jurisdictions with lower statutory income
tax rates.
F-29
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
5. Other
operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Gains on sales of property, plant and equipment and intangibles
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Gains on disposals of businesses
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Other
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on disposals of businesses in fiscal 2007 includes
the gain on the sale of Siemens Dispolok GmbH (see Note 4
for further information).
Other in fiscal 2006 includes a gain of 70 related
to the settlement of an arbitration proceeding.
6. Other
operating expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
(60)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(262)
|
|
Losses on sales of property, plant and equipment and intangibles
|
|
|
(86)
|
|
|
|
(40)
|
|
|
|
(25)
|
|
Losses on disposals of businesses
|
|
|
(48)
|
|
|
|
(109)
|
|
|
|
(70)
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(859)
|
|
|
|
(111)
|
|
|
|
(65)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,053)
|
|
|
|
(260)
|
|
|
|
(422)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill in fiscal 2007 includes (52)
related to a cash-generating unit made up principally of
regional payphone activities included in Other Operations (see
also Note 7). Impairment of goodwill of (262)
in fiscal 2005 relates to the cash-generating unit
Operation-Related Services (ORS) of the former segment SBS (see
Notes 15 and 36 for further information).
Losses on disposals of businesses in fiscal 2006 includes
a pre-tax loss of 39 from the Companys sale of its
Dematic business (see also Note 4).
Other in fiscal 2007 primarily includes expenses related
to legal and regulatory matters. Included in (859) in
fiscal 2007 is a (440) total impact related to a fine
imposed by the European Commission in connection with an
antitrust investigation involving suppliers of high-voltage
gas-isolated switching systems in the power transmission and
distribution industry between 1988 and 2004 (see Notes 29
and 36 for further information). The fine is not deductible for
income tax purposes. In addition, Other in fiscal 2007
includes (152) for outside advisors engaged by the Company
in connection with investigations into alleged violations of
anti-corruption laws and related matters as well as remediation
activities (see Notes 29 and 36 for additional
information), as well as (81) primarily to fund job
placement companies for former Siemens employees affected by the
bankruptcy of BenQ Mobile GmbH & Co. OHG.
F-30
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
7. Income
(loss) from investments accounted for using the equity method,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Share of profit, net
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
Gains (losses) on sales, net
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
33
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of profit, net in fiscal 2007 includes
(429) related to NSN (see Notes 4 and 36 for
further information).
For further information on the Companys principal
investments accounted for under the equity method see also
Note 18.
8. Financial
income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
Income from pension plans and similar commitments, net
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Income from
available-for-sale
financial assets, net
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Other financial income (expense), net
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total amounts of interest income and expense were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
|
|
(428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereof: Interest expense of Operations, net
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Thereof: Other interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
Interest expense of Operations, net includes interest
income and expense primarily related to receivables from
customers and payables to suppliers, interest on advances from
customers and advanced financing of customer contracts. Other
interest income (expense), net includes all other interest
amounts primarily consisting of interest relating to corporate
debt and related hedging activities, as well as interest income
on corporate assets.
The components of Income from pension plans and similar
commitments, net were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
(1,261
|
)
|
|
|
(1,148
|
)
|
|
|
(1,143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from pension plans and similar commitments, net
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Service cost for pension plans and similar commitments are
allocated among functional costs (Cost of goods sold and
services rendered, Research and development expenses, Marketing,
selling and general administrative expenses).
The components of Income from
available-for-sale
financial assets, net were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Dividends received
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
Gains on sales, net
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Other
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from
available-for-sale
financial assets, net
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2006, Gains on sales, net includes gains of
15 and 33, respectively, on the sales of the
Companys remaining interests in Epcos AG (Epcos) and
Infineon Technologies AG (Infineon) and a pre-tax gain of
84 related to the sale of the Companys interest in
SMS Demag AG.
In fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, impairments of 12, 20
and 4, respectively, relate to current
available-for-sale
financial assets traded in an active market (see also
Note 10).
Other financial income (expense), net mainly includes the
interest component from measurement of provisions amounting to
31, 28 and (177) in fiscal 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively. In fiscal 2006 and 2005, a result of
(143) and 29, respectively, from the valuation of
the conversion right of the convertible notes was included in
Other financial income (expense), net (see also
Note 22 for additional information).
9. Income
taxes
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes is
attributable to the following geographic regions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
3,545
|
|
|
|
2,136
|
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,101
|
|
|
|
3,418
|
|
|
|
3,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Current tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
German corporation and trade taxes
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Foreign income taxes
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
309
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current tax expense in 2007, 2006 and 2005 includes
adjustments recognized for current tax of prior periods in the
amount of (44), 151 and 62, respectively.
Of the deferred tax benefit in 2007 and 2006 and the deferred
tax expense in 2005 (72) (136) and 55,
respectively, relates to the origination and reversal of
temporary differences.
For fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
the Company was subject to German federal corporation income tax
at a base rate of 25% plus solidarity surcharge of 5.5% thereon.
As a result, the statutory tax rate for the years ended
September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 consists of the federal
corporation income tax rate, including solidarity surcharge, of
26.4%, and trade tax net of federal benefit of 12.6%, for an
overall combined rate of 39%.
The combined tax rate will be reduced due to the German Tax
Reform 2008 from 39% to 31% beginning fiscal year 2008. The
change in tax rate is affected mainly by the reduction of the
German federal corporation tax rate from 25% to 15%. The
reduction of the combined tax rate was taken into account for
the calculation of the deferred tax assets and liabilities of
the German Companies. The effect amounts to 315 deferred
tax expense.
F-33
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Income tax expense differs from the amounts computed by applying
statutory German income tax rates (39% for fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005) as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Expected income tax expense
|
|
|
1,989
|
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
1,402
|
|
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible losses and expenses
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
Tax-free income
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
(475
|
)
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
Taxes for prior years
|
|
|
(572
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
Change in judgment of realizability of deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Change in tax rate effect
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Foreign tax rate differential
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
Tax effect of investments accounted for using the equity method
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual income tax expense*
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
For information regarding the adjustment of fiscal 2006 and 2005
for the correction of income tax related misstatements, please
refer to Note 2.
|
The tax effect of non-deductible losses and expenses in 2007 has
been increased mainly by cartel penalties.
The taxes for prior years in 2007 include a deferred tax benefit
of 378 from previously unrecognized tax loss carryforwards
as well as other changes in reserves.
F-34
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities on a gross basis are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
Pension plans and similar commitments
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
1,825
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
|
1,639
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
Tax loss and credit carryforward
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
1,857
|
|
Other
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
8,517
|
|
|
|
9,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
860
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,606
|
|
|
|
1,749
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
Other
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
6,503
|
|
|
|
6,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
2,014
|
|
|
|
3,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The primary decrease in total deferred tax assets, net compared
to the prior year is due to the reclassification in fiscal year
2007 to Assets classified as held for disposal (see
Note 4 for further information).
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets,
management considers to which extent it is probable that the
deferred tax asset will be realized. The ultimate realization of
deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future
taxable profits during the periods in which those temporary
differences and tax loss carryforwards become deductible.
Management considers the expected reversal of deferred tax
liabilities and projected future taxable income in making this
assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income
and projections for future taxable income over the periods which
the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it
is probable the Company will realize the benefits of these
deductible differences.
As of September 30, 2007 the Company had 6,611 of
gross tax loss carryforwards. The Company assumes that the
future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to
realize the deferred tax assets.
F-35
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Deferred tax assets have not been recognized in respect of the
following items (gross amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductible temporary differences
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax loss carryforward
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
1,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
|
2,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in unrecognized deductible temporary differences is
primarily due to reorganizations for which it is probable that
future taxable income will allow the deferred tax asset to be
recovered. The amount of unrecognized tax loss carryforward has
decreased due to deconsolidation of previously consolidated
companies. The amount of unrecognized tax loss carryforward as
of September 30, 2007 includes an amount of 107 which
is related to tax loss carryforwards for German trade tax
purposes only. The corresponding tax effect amounts to 16.
As of September 30, 2007, 2006, respectively, 203 and
323 of the unrecognized tax loss carryforwards expire over
the periods to 2023.
The Company provides for income taxes or foreign withholding
taxes on the cumulative earnings of subsidiaries when it is
determined that such earnings either will be subject to taxes or
are intended to be repatriated. In fiscal year 2007, income
taxes on cumulative earnings of 8,558 of subsidiaries have
not been provided for because such earnings will either not be
subject to any such taxes or are intended to be indefinitely
reinvested in those operations. It is not practicable to
estimate the amount of the unrecognized deferred tax liabilities
for these undistributed earnings.
Including the items charged or credited directly to equity and
the expense (benefit) from continuing and discontinued
operations, the income tax expense (benefit) consists of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
Income and expense recognized directly in equity
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
(577
|
)
|
Other changes in
equity*
|
|
|
(499
|
)
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,020
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Tax effect of reclassification on conversion right (see
Notes 22 and 26 for further information).
|
F-36
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
|
|
10.
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets
|
The following tables summarize the current portion of the
Companys investment in
available-for-sale
financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Equity instruments
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt instruments
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund shares
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Equity instruments
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt instruments
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Fund shares
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of
available-for-sale
financial assets traded in an active market for the years ended
September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were 419,
2,701 and 356, respectively. Gross realized gains on
sales of such
available-for-sale
financial assets for continuing and discontinued operations for
the years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were
10, 409 and 243, respectively. Gross realized
losses on sales of such
available-for-sale
financial assets for continuing and discontinued operations for
the years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were
31, 7 and , respectively.
In April 2006, the Company completed the sale of its remaining
interest in Infineon, representing 136.3 million shares,
for net proceeds of 1,127. The transaction resulted in a
gain of 33 (see also Note 8). In connection with the
sale, 50 was reclassified from Other components of
equity, net of income tax to net income. As a result of the
transaction, the Company no longer owns any shares of Infineon.
As of September 30, 2005, the Company had an 18.2%
ownership interest in Infineon.
In March 2006, the Company sold its remaining interest in Epcos,
representing 8.2 million shares, for net proceeds of
90. The transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain of 15
(see also Note 8).
In fiscal 2006, the Company made total investments of
1,409 in debt instruments. Net proceeds from the sale of
debt instruments in fiscal 2007 and 2006 totaled 365 and
986, respectively (see also Notes 8 and 31).
As part of the MD transaction, Siemens purchased 50 in
Global Depositary Receipts (GDRs) on common shares in BenQ
in December 2005, which at that time represented a
2.4 percent investment in BenQ. The GDRs were
impaired by 20 as of September 30, 2006. An
additional impairment of 12 was recorded in fiscal 2007.
The related impairment charges are included in Financial
income (expense), net (see also Note 8).
In November 2005, the Companys former operating Group,
Com, sold its remaining interest in Juniper, representing
22.8 million shares, for net proceeds of 465. The
transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain of 356, included in
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes. Fiscal 2005 includes the sale of 13 million
shares of Juniper for net proceeds of 263 resulting in a
pre-tax gain of 208, reported in Income (loss) from
discontinued operations, net of income taxes.
F-37
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Available-for-sale
financial assets classified as non-current are included in
Other financial assets (see also Note 19).
|
|
11.
|
Trade and
other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Trade receivables from the sale of goods and services
|
|
|
12,864
|
|
|
|
13,620
|
|
Receivables from finance leases
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
1,482
|
|
Receivables from joint ventures and associated and related
companies
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,620
|
|
|
|
15,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related companies are those in which Siemens has an ownership
interest of less than 20% and exercises no significant influence
over their operating and financial policies.
The valuation allowance on the Companys current and
long-term receivables (see Notes 12 and 19) changed as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Valuation allowance as of beginning of fiscal year
|
|
|
956
|
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
Increase in valuation allowances recorded in the income
statement in the current period
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Write-offs charged against the allowance
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
Recoveries of amounts previously written-off
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Foreign exchange translation differences
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
Reclassification to Assets held for disposal
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance as of fiscal year-end
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
956
|
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from finance leases are presented in the balance
sheet as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Receivables from finance leases, current
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
1,482
|
|
Receivables from finance leases, long-term portion
|
|
|
3,112
|
|
|
|
2,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,770
|
|
|
|
4,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Minimum future lease payments to be received are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,924
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
2010
|
|
|
943
|
|
2011
|
|
|
616
|
|
2012
|
|
|
282
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum future lease payments to be received
|
|
|
5,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows a reconciliation of minimum future
lease payments to the gross and net investment in leases and to
the present value of the minimum lease payments receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Minimum future lease payments
|
|
|
5,332
|
|
|
|
4,961
|
|
Plus: Unguaranteed residual values
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross investment in leases
|
|
|
5,522
|
|
|
|
5,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Unearned finance income
|
|
|
(662
|
)
|
|
|
(605
|
)
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in leases
|
|
|
4,770
|
|
|
|
4,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Present value of unguaranteed residual value
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum lease payments receivable
|
|
|
4,613
|
|
|
|
4,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gross investment in leases and the present value of minimum
lease payments receivable are due as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Gross investment in leases
|
|
|
5,522
|
|
|
|
5,172
|
|
Within 1 year
|
|
|
1,969
|
|
|
|
1,716
|
|
1 to 5 years
|
|
|
3,302
|
|
|
|
3,147
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
Present value of minimum lease payments receivable
|
|
|
4,613
|
|
|
|
4,299
|
|
Within 1 year
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
1 to 5 years
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
2,661
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Investments in finance leases relate primarily to medical
engineering, data processing equipment and industrial and
consumer products of third party manufacturers. Actual cash
flows will vary from contractual maturities due to future sales
of finance receivables, prepayments and write-offs.
See Note 4 for further information on Trade and other
receivables reclassified to Assets classified as held for
disposal.
F-39
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
12. Other
current financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
Loans receivable
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
Receivables from joint ventures and associated and related
companies
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,932
|
|
|
|
2,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
|
|
2,609
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
3,196
|
|
|
|
2,975
|
|
Costs and earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
7,099
|
|
|
|
7,085
|
|
Finished goods and products held for resale
|
|
|
2,558
|
|
|
|
2,544
|
|
Advances to suppliers
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,805
|
|
|
|
15,880
|
|
Advance payments received
|
|
|
(2,875
|
)
|
|
|
(3,090
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,930
|
|
|
|
12,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted
contracts relates to construction contracts with net asset
balances where contract costs plus recognized profits less
recognized losses exceed progress billings. Liabilities from
contracts for which progress billings exceed costs and
recognized profits less recognized losses are recognized in
Other current liabilities.
The aggregate amount of costs incurred and recognized profits
less recognized losses for construction contracts in progress as
of September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 amounted to
44,865, 37,395 and 31,625, respectively. Advance
payments received on construction contracts in progress were
6,159 and 5,415 as of September 30, 2007 and
2006. Revenue from construction contracts amounted to
20,465, 19,209 and 15,634, respectively, for
fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005. Information concerning construction
contracts does not include disposal groups.
See Note 4 for further information on Inventories
reclassified to Assets held for disposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Other tax receivables
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
Other
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
1,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-40
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
15. Goodwill
Goodwill has changed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
10,818
|
|
|
|
10,262
|
|
Translation differences and other
|
|
|
(726
|
)
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
Acquisitions and purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
5,096
|
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
Adjustments from the subsequent recognition of deferred tax
assets
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Dispositions and reclassifications to assets held for disposal
|
|
|
(1,565
|
)
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at year-end
|
|
|
13,589
|
|
|
|
10,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
Translation differences and other
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Impairment losses recognized during the period
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dispositions and reclassifications to assets held for disposal
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at year-end
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
9,689
|
|
|
|
8,821
|
|
Balance at year-end
|
|
|
12,501
|
|
|
|
9,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
Dispositions and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
and purchase
|
|
|
reclassifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book
|
|
|
|
value as of
|
|
|
differences
|
|
|
accounting
|
|
|
to assets held
|
|
|
|
|
|
value as of
|
|
|
|
10/1/06
|
|
|
and other
|
|
|
adjustments*
|
|
|
for disposal
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
9/30/2007
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens IT Solutions and Services (SIS)
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
Automation and Drives (A&D)
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
1,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,871
|
|
Industrial Solutions and Services (I&S)
|
|
|
1,096
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
Siemens Building Technologies (SBT)
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
Power Generation (PG)
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
Power Transmission and Distribution (PTD)
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
578
|
|
Transportation Systems (TS)
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Siemens VDO Automotive (SV)
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(1,535
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical Solutions (Med)
|
|
|
2,793
|
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,197
|
|
Osram
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Other Operations
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
|
Financing and Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens Financial Services (SFS)
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Siemens Real Estate (SRE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens
|
|
|
9,689
|
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
5,062
|
|
|
|
(1,556
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
12,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes adjustments from the subsequent recognition of deferred
tax assets.
|
F-41
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
Dispositions and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
and purchase
|
|
|
reclassifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book
|
|
|
|
value as of
|
|
|
differences
|
|
|
accounting
|
|
|
to assets held
|
|
|
|
|
|
value as of
|
|
|
|
10/1/05
|
|
|
and other
|
|
|
adjustments*
|
|
|
for disposal
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
9/30/2006
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications (Com)
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens IT Solutions and Services (SIS)
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
Automation and Drives (A&D)
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
Industrial Solutions and Services (I&S)
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,096
|
|
Siemens Building Technologies (SBT)
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
Power Generation (PG)
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
Power Transmission and Distribution (PTD)
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614
|
|
Transportation Systems (TS)
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Siemens VDO Automotive (SV)
|
|
|
1,529
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
Medical Solutions (Med)
|
|
|
2,113
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,793
|
|
Osram
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Other Operations
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
Financing and Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens Financial Services (SFS)
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Siemens Real Estate (SRE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens
|
|
|
8,821
|
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes adjustments from the subsequent recognition of deferred
tax assets.
|
In fiscal 2007, the net increase in goodwill was
2,812. The increase of 5,062 related to acquisitions
and purchase accounting adjustments was offset by (634)
primarily for U.S.$. currency translation adjustments,
(60) impairment relating to Other Operations (see also
Note 6), dispositions of (38) and (1,518) of
goodwill formerly at SV that was reclassified as part of
Assets classified as held for disposal. Acquisitions and
purchase accounting adjustments related primarily to Meds
acquisition of the diagnostics division of Bayer and
A&Ds acquisition of UGS, as well as to a PG
acquisition. For further information on acquisitions,
dispositions and discontinued operations see Note 4.
In fiscal 2006, the net increase in goodwill was 868. The
increase of 1,415 related to acquisitions and purchase
accounting adjustments was offset by (178) primarily for
U.S.$ currency translation differences and (369) of
goodwill formerly at Com that was reclassified as part of
Assets classified as held for disposal. Meds
acquisition of DPC increased goodwill by 751. For further
information on acquisitions, dispositions and discontinued
operations see Note 4. No goodwill was impaired or written
off in fiscal 2006.
Siemens tests at least annually whether goodwill suffered any
impairment, in accordance with the accounting policy stated in
Note 2. Key assumptions on which management has based its
determinations of the recoverable amount for the divisions
carrying goodwill include growth rates up to 3.5% and after-tax
discount rates of 7.5% to 10%. Where possible, reference to
market prices is made.
Within the Operations Groups the following divisions are
allocated a significant amount of goodwill:
Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics division within Med
3,331 (2006: 750), Industrial Automation Systems
division within A&D 1,154 (2006: 114) and
Industrial Applications division within PG 800
(2006: 658).
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company recorded a
goodwill impairment of 262, which is included in Other
operating expense. Based on the results of the
Companys analysis of projects at the cash-generating unit
Operation-Related Services (ORS) of the former segment SBS (see
Note 36 for further information)
F-42
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
in connection with changing markets, competition in outsourcing
business and structural challenges to attaining originally
targeted profitability, the Company revised its related business
plan and concluded that goodwill of ORS was impaired.
Significant cost pressure due to excess capacity, the necessity
for restructuring efforts and the need for new investments in
order to achieve a competitive market position caused the
Company to reassess its estimated future cash flows from its ORS
business to a level materially below earlier estimates. The fair
value of the cash-generating unit was estimated using the
present value of expected future cash flows. The growth rate
used in this calculation was 2% and the after-tax discount rate
7.8%.
16. Other
intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisi-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Amorti-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumu-
|
|
|
book
|
|
|
zation
|
|
|
|
Book value
|
|
|
|
|
|
business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value
|
|
|
lated
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
during
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
combi-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retire-
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
amorti-
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
fiscal
|
|
|
|
10/1/06
|
|
|
differences
|
|
|
nations
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
ments*
|
|
|
9/30/07
|
|
|
zation
|
|
|
9/30/07
|
|
|
year 2007
|
|
Software and other internally generated intangible assets
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
2,362
|
|
|
|
1,468
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
429
|
**
|
Patents, licenses and similar rights
|
|
|
4,075
|
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
5,406
|
|
|
|
1,681
|
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
6,393
|
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
7,768
|
|
|
|
3,149
|
|
|
|
4,619
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Includes Other intangible assets reclassified to
Assets classified as held for disposal (see Note 4
for further information).
|
|
**
|
Includes 106 impairment in connection with the
Companys regional sales organization in Germany (see
Note 36 for further information).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Amorti-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumu-
|
|
|
book
|
|
|
zation
|
|
|
|
Book value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value
|
|
|
lated
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
during
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retire-
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
amorti-
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
fiscal
|
|
|
|
10/1/05
|
|
|
differences
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
ments*
|
|
|
9/30/06
|
|
|
zation
|
|
|
9/30/06
|
|
|
year 2006
|
|
Software and other internally generated intangible assets
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
Patents, licenses and similar rights
|
|
|
3,729
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
4,075
|
|
|
|
1,688
|
|
|
|
2,387
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
6,404
|
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
1,194
|
|
|
|
6,393
|
|
|
|
3,008
|
|
|
|
3,385
|
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes Other intangible assets reclassified to
Assets classified as held for disposal (see Note 4
for further information).
|
Amortization expense for the years ended September 30, 2007
and 2006 includes 71 and 184, respectively, reported
in Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes.
Amortization expense on intangible assets is included in Cost
of goods sold and services rendered, Research and development
expenses or Marketing, selling and general administrative
expenses, depending on the use of the asset.
As of September 30, 2007, contractual commitments for
purchases of other intangible assets amount to 74.
F-43
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
17. Property,
plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisi-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
Book
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book
|
|
|
|
|
|
book
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
impairment
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
combi-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassi-
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
during fiscal
|
|
|
|
10/1/06
|
|
|
differences
|
|
|
nations
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
fications
|
|
|
Retirements*
|
|
|
9/30/07
|
|
|
depreciation
|
|
|
9/30/07
|
|
|
year 2007
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
9,800
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
1,770
|
|
|
|
8,639
|
|
|
|
4,174
|
|
|
|
4,465
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
Technical machinery and equipment
|
|
|
9,780
|
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
2,718
|
|
|
|
7,885
|
|
|
|
5,501
|
|
|
|
2,384
|
|
|
|
709
|
|
Furniture and office equipment
|
|
|
8,406
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
2,504
|
|
|
|
6,740
|
|
|
|
5,196
|
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
Equipment leased to others
|
|
|
1,614
|
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
Advances to suppliers and construction in progress
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
(670
|
)
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
30,700
|
|
|
|
(672
|
)
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,493
|
|
|
|
26,177
|
|
|
|
15,622
|
|
|
|
10,555
|
|
|
|
2,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes Property, plant and equipment reclassified to
Assets classified as held for disposal (see Note 4
for further information).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
Book
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book
|
|
|
|
|
|
book
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
impairment
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassi-
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
during fiscal
|
|
|
|
10/1/05
|
|
|
differences
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
fications
|
|
|
Retirements*
|
|
|
9/30/06
|
|
|
depreciation
|
|
|
9/30/06
|
|
|
year 2006
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
9,873
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
9,800
|
|
|
|
4,807
|
|
|
|
4,993
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
Technical machinery and equipment
|
|
|
9,758
|
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
9,780
|
|
|
|
6,709
|
|
|
|
3,071
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
Furniture and office equipment t
|
|
|
9,895
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
1,151
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
|
|
8,406
|
|
|
|
6,467
|
|
|
|
1,939
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
Equipment leased to others s
|
|
|
1,656
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
1,614
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
Advances to suppliers and construction in progress
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
(611
|
)
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,099
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
32,073
|
|
|
|
(403
|
)
|
|
|
4,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,079
|
|
|
|
30,700
|
|
|
|
18,628
|
|
|
|
12,072
|
|
|
|
2,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes Property, plant and equipment reclassified to
Assets classified as held for disposal (see Note 4
for further information).
|
Depreciation and impairment expense for the years ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 includes 313 and
532, respectively, reported in Income (loss) from
discontinued operations, net of income taxes.
In fiscal 2005, as a result of a corporate-level strategic plan
concerning the DI and MHP businesses, updated cash flow
projections based on revised operating plans were used to
determine whether an impairment was necessary (see also
Note 4). As the carrying amounts of the assets and units
exceeded their recoverable amounts, an impairment charge of
98 was recorded. The impairment charge is included in
Cost of goods sold and services rendered.
As of September 30, 2007, contractual commitments for
purchases of property, plant and equipment amount to 467.
Investment
property
Investment property consists of all property held to earn
rentals or for capital appreciation or both and not used in
production or for administrative purposes.
The carrying amount of investment property amounts to 209
and 129 compared to a fair value of 365 and
247 as of September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The fair value is primarily based on a discounted cash flow
approach and in rare cases on appraisal values.
F-44
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
18. Investments
accounted for using the equity method
As of September 30, 2007 NSN (see Notes 4 and 36 for
further information), BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH
(BSH), Fujitsu Siemens Computers (Holding) BV (FSC) and AREVA NP
S.A.S., France (Areva), which are all unlisted, were the
principal investments accounted for using the equity method.
Summarized financial information for these principal investments
accounted for using the equity method, not adjusted for the
percentage of ownership held by Siemens is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Total assets*
|
|
|
29,809
|
|
|
|
11,596
|
|
Total liabilities*
|
|
|
20,315
|
|
|
|
8,813
|
|
|
|
* |
Balance sheet information for BSH and Areva as of June 30,
for NSN and FSC as of September 30.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Revenue**
|
|
|
25,526
|
|
|
|
17,570
|
|
|
|
16,222
|
|
Net income (loss)**
|
|
|
(560
|
)
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
** |
Income statement information for NSN for the six months ended
September 30, 2007 (see also Note 4 and 36), for BSH
and Areva for the twelve months ended June 30 and for FSC for
the twelve months ended September 30.
|
Since NSNs fiscal year corresponds to the calendar year,
separate financial statements for fiscal 2007 for NSN were not
available as of the date of authorization for issue of the
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.
For further information see also Note 7.
19. Other
financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Receivables from finance leases (see Note 11)
|
|
|
3,112
|
|
|
|
2,969
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
Loans receivable
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
Trade receivables from sale of goods and services
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
Other
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,561
|
|
|
|
5,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets include interests in other companies that
are recorded at cost or at fair value if reliably measurable.
Derivative financial instruments included in this item
represent the non-current portion of derivatives designated as
hedging instruments, for which hedge accounting is applied.
F-45
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
20. Other
current financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
Liabilities to joint ventures and associated and related
companies
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
Accrued interest expense
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,370
|
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,553
|
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007, Other includes 201
related to the penalty imposed by German authorities in ending
their investigation of past misconduct at the former Group Com.
See Notes 6 and 29 for further information.
21. Other
current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts and related advances
|
|
|
8,463
|
|
|
|
6,174
|
|
Payroll and social security taxes
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
|
|
1,906
|
|
Bonus obligations
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
Other employee related costs
|
|
|
2,261
|
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
Other tax liabilities
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,081
|
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,058
|
|
|
|
15,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other employee related costs primarily includes vacation
payments, accrued overtime and service anniversary awards, as
well as severance payments.
22. Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Short-term Notes and bonds
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
Loans from banks
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
Other financial indebtedness
|
|
|
4,418
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
Obligations under finance leases
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
5,637
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and bonds (maturing 20082066)
|
|
|
8,196
|
|
|
|
12,008
|
|
Loans from banks (maturing 20082016)
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
Other financial indebtedness (maturing 20082027)
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
Obligations under finance leases
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
9,860
|
|
|
|
13,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,497
|
|
|
|
15,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
As of September 30, 2007, weighted-average interest rates
for loans from banks, other financial indebtedness and
obligations under finance leases were 5.7% (2006: 5.9%), 4.9%
(2006: 5.1%) and 5.8% (2006: 6.5%), respectively. In some
countries, the Company has pledged securities and executed
promissory notes to secure borrowings in conformity with local
practice.
Commercial
paper
In April 2007 the Company
restructured its existing European- and US-commercial paper
program and established a U.S.$ 9.0 billion (approximately
6.3 billion) global multi-currency commercial paper
program including extendable notes capabilities. As of
September 30, 2007 and 2006, outstanding global commercial
paper totaled 4,332 and , respectively, with
interest rates as of September 30, 2007 from 4.23% to 5.31%
(see also Other financial indebtedness below).
Credit
facilities
The credit facilities at September 30, 2007 consisted of
approximately 6.8 billion in committed lines of
credit. These include a U.S.$5.0 billion syndicated
multi-currency revolving credit facility expiring March 2012
provided by a syndicate of international banks and a revolving
credit facility for an aggregate amount of 450 expiring in
September 2012 provided by a domestic bank. In addition, in
August 2006, the Company established a U.S.$4.0 billion
syndicated multi-currency credit facility expiring August 2013
provided by a syndicate of international banks. The facility
comprises a U.S.$1.0 billion term loan and a
U.S.$3.0 billion revolving tranche. The U.S.
$1.0 billion term loan was drawn in January 2007 and bears
interest of 0.15% above LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate).
As of September 30, 2007 and 2006, approximately 6.1
and 7.6 billion, respectively, of these lines of
credit remained unused. Commitment fees for the years ended
September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 totaled approximately
2.7, 2 and 3, respectively. The facilities are
for general business purposes.
Notes
and bonds
The Company has agreements with financial institutions under
which it may issue up to 5.0 billion in medium-term
notes. In March 2006, the Company updated its
5.0 billion medium-term note program and issued U.S.$
1.0 billion under this program comprising
U.S.$500 million floating rate notes due March 2012,
bearing interest of 0.15% above LIBOR and U.S.$500 million
5.625% notes due March 2016. As of September 30, 2007 and
2006, approximately 1.4 billion and
1.7 billion, respectively, were outstanding under
this medium-term note program.
In August 2006, the Company issued U.S.$5.0 billion notes,
which are unconditional and irrevocably guaranteed as to payment
of principal and interest by Siemens. These notes were issued in
four tranches of
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$750 million Floating Rate Notes (U.S.$ LIBOR + 0.05%)
due August 14, 2009,
|
|
|
|
U.S.$750 million 5.5% Notes due February 16, 2012,
|
|
|
|
U.S.$1.750 billion 5.75% Notes due October 17, 2016 and
|
|
|
|
U.S.$1.750 billion 6.125% Notes due August 17, 2026.
|
For the floating rate notes the Company may, on or after
February 14, 2008, redeem all or some of the Notes at the
early redemption amount, according to the conditions of the
bond. For the fixed rate notes, the Company may redeem at any
time all or some of the notes at the early redemption amount
(call) according to the conditions of the bond.
In September 2006, the Company issued a subordinated Hybrid
Capital Bond, which is on a subordinated basis guaranteed by
Siemens. The subordinated bond was issued in a EUR tranche of
900 and a British pound tranche of
F-47
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
£750 million, both with a legal final maturity on
September 14, 2066 and with a call option for Siemens after
10 years or thereafter. The bonds bear a fixed interest
rate (5.25% for the EUR tranche and 6.125% for the British pound
tranche) until September 14, 2016, thereafter, floating
rate interest according to the conditions of the bond.
Details of the Companys notes and bonds are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
(notional amount)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
(notional amount)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
2.5% 2001/2007 Swiss franc bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHF
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
5.5% 1997/2007 EUR bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR
|
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
991
|
|
6% 1998/2008 U.S.$ notes
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
U.S.$ LIBOR+0.05% 2006/2009 U.S.$ notes
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
1.375% 2003/2010 EUR convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
2,252
|
|
11% 2003/2010 EUR senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
5.75% 2001/2011 EUR bonds
|
|
|
EUR
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,041
|
|
|
|
EUR
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
5.5% 2006/2012 U.S.$ notes
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
U.S.$ LIBOR+0.15% 2006/2012 U.S.$ notes
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
5.75% 2006/2016 U.S.$ notes
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
5.625% 2006/2016 U.S.$ notes
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
6.125% 2006/2026 U.S.$ notes
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
5.25% 2006/2066 EUR bonds
|
|
|
EUR
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
EUR
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
891
|
|
6.125% 2006/2066 GBP bonds
|
|
|
GBP
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
GBP
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes adjustments for fair value hedge accounting.
|
In fiscal 2007, Siemens redeemed the outstanding amount of
991 of the 5.5 % -bond and the outstanding amount of
the 2.5%
CHF-bond
(approximately 155).
In connection with the acquisition of Flender in fiscal 2005
(see Note 4), Siemens assumed a 250, 11% senior note
due 2010, of which the Company repurchased approximately
194 until September 30, 2006. In June 2007, the
Company exercised its call option in accordance with the
indenture agreement and redeemed all remaining notes at 105.50%
of the principal amount of the notes together with any accrued
and unpaid interest. The redemption was settled on
August 1, 2007.
As of September 30, 2007, the aggregate amounts of
indebtedness maturing during the next five years and thereafter
are as follows (excluding finance leases which are disclosed
separately):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
5,589
|
|
2009
|
|
|
727
|
|
2010
|
|
|
50
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,102
|
|
2012
|
|
|
954
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
5,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-48
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Since fiscal 2003, Siemens maintained approximately
2.5 billion of convertible notes through its wholly
owned Dutch subsidiary, Siemens Finance B.V., which were fully
and unconditionally guaranteed by Siemens AG. The convertible
notes had a 1.375% coupon and were convertible into
approximately 44.5 million shares of Siemens AG at a
conversion price of 56.1681 per share, which was subject
to change under certain circumstances.
Due to the cash settlement option the conversion right component
was considered a derivative instrument recognized at fair value,
which was reported in Other current financial liabilities
as of September 30, 2005. In the third quarter of fiscal
2006, the Company irrevocably waived its option to pay a cash
amount in lieu of the delivery of shares upon exercise of the
conversion right. Immediately before notification of such
waiver, the derivative component was remeasured for the last
time through profit or loss and reclassified to Additional
paid-in capital (see Note 26).
The conversion right was contingently exercisable by the holders
upon the occurrence of one of several conditions, including,
upon the Companys share price having exceeded 110% of the
conversion price on at least 20 trading days in a period of
30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day
of any calendar quarter. This condition was met in the first
quarter of fiscal 2004. In fiscal 2006, approximately 3 of
convertible notes were exercised and were settled primarily in
cash.
Until August 2007, the Company repurchased a principal amount of
approximately 1.9 billion of its outstanding
convertible notes of the 2.5 billion 1,375%
-bond and paid approximately 3.3 billion in
cash. The purchase price was allocated to the liability
component and the conversion right component. The fair value of
the liability component was charged against the carrying amount
of the liability component with the difference being recognized
in profit and loss. The amount allocated to the conversion right
component was charged directly against Additional paid-in
capital (see Note 26 for further information).
The Company had the right, at any time from June 18, 2007,
to redeem the notes outstanding at their principal amount
together with interest accrued thereon, if Siemens share
price exceeded 130% of the conversion price on any 15 of
30 consecutive trading days before notice of early
redemption. In July 2007 these conditions were met and the
Company exercised on July 16, 2007 its option to
prematurely redeem at their principal amount the remaining
amount of outstanding notes on August 17, 2007. Until the
end of the conversion period on August 10, 2007 the
remaining notes were converted almost entirely to shares by the
note-holders, resulting in approximately 10 million shares
issued from the conditional capital (see Note 26 for
further information).
Other
financial indebtedness
Other financial indebtedness includes 469 and
512, as of September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively,
for the Companys real estate assets that were sold or
transferred and in which Siemens has retained significant risks
and rewards of ownership, including circumstances in which
Siemens participates directly or indirectly in the change in
market value of the property. Therefore, these transactions have
been accounted for as financing obligations. These real estate
properties are carried on the Companys Consolidated
Balance Sheets and no sale and profit have been recognized. As
of September 30, 2007 and 2006, Other financial
indebtedness also includes 4,332 and ,
respectively, of outstanding global commercial paper.
F-49
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Obligations
under finance leases
As of September 30, 2007 and 2006, the finance lease
liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value of
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
|
|
minimum
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
|
|
minimum
|
|
|
|
lease
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
lease
|
|
|
lease
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
lease
|
|
|
|
payment
|
|
|
interest
|
|
|
payment
|
|
|
payment
|
|
|
interest
|
|
|
payment
|
|
Due
|
|
obligation
|
|
|
expense
|
|
|
obligation
|
|
|
obligation
|
|
|
expense
|
|
|
obligation
|
|
Within 1 year
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
1 to 2 years
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
2 to 3 years
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
3 to 4 years
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
4 to 5 years
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.
Pension plans and similar commitments
Pension benefits provided by Siemens are currently organized
primarily through defined benefit pension plans which cover
virtually all of the Companys domestic employees and many
of the Companys foreign employees. To reduce the risk
exposure to Siemens arising from its pension plans, the Company
has started the redesign of benefit schemes from defined benefit
schemes towards benefit schemes which are predominantly based on
contributions made by the Company. In order to
fund Siemens pension obligations, the Companys
major pension plans are funded with assets in segregated pension
entities.
Furthermore, the Company provides other post-employment
benefits, which primarily consist of transition payments to
German employees after retirement as well as post-employment
health care and life insurance benefits to employees in the U.S.
and Canada. These predominantly unfunded other post-employment
benefit plans qualify as defined benefit plans under IFRS.
In addition to the above, the Company has foreign defined
contribution plans for pensions and other post-employment
benefits or makes contributions to social pension funds based on
legal regulations (State plans). The recognition of a liability
is not required because the obligation of the Company is limited
to the payment of the contributions into these plans or funds.
Accounting
for defined benefit plans
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
Defined benefit plans determine the entitlements of their
beneficiaries. An employees final benefit entitlement at
regular retirement age may be higher than the fixed benefits at
the balance sheet date due to future compensation or benefit
increases. The net present value of this ultimate future benefit
entitlement for service already rendered is represented by the
Defined Benefit Obligation (DBO), which is actuarially
calculated with consideration for future compensation increases.
In the case of unfunded plans, the recognized pension liability
is equal to the DBO adjusted by unrecognized past service cost.
In the case of funded plans, the fair value of the plan assets
is offset against the benefit obligations.
F-50
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
The net amount, after adjusting for the effects of unrecognized
past service cost and any asset ceiling, is recognized as
pension liability or pension asset.
The Consolidated Balance Sheets include the following
significant components related to pension plans and similar
commitments based upon the situation as of September 30,
2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Principal pension benefit plans
|
|
|
1,289
|
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
Principal other post-employment benefit plans
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
|
1,566
|
|
Reclassification to liabilities associated with assets
classified as held for disposal
|
|
|
(507
|
)
|
|
|
(381
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities for pension plans and similar commitments
|
|
|
2,780
|
|
|
|
5,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (losses)/gains and effects due to asset ceiling
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
(1,379
|
)
|
Income tax effect
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
254
|
|
Net amount recognized in the Consolidated Statements of
Income and Expense recognized in Equity (net of tax)
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
(1,125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Income
The recognized expense related to pension plans and similar
commitments in the Consolidated Statements of Income is referred
to as net periodic benefit cost (NPBC) and consists of
several separately calculated and presented components. NPBC is
comprised of the service cost, which is the actuarial net
present value of the part of the DBO for the service rendered in
the respective fiscal year; the interest cost for the
expense derived from the addition of accrued interest on the DBO
at the end of the preceding fiscal year on the basis of the
identified discount rate; and the expected return on
plan assets in the case of funded benefit plans. Past
service cost is amortized on a straight-line basis over the
average vesting period of the related benefits.
In the Consolidated Statements of Income, interest cost and the
income from the expected return on plan assets are reported as
part of Financial income (expense), net. All other
components of NPBC are allocated among functional costs (Cost
of goods sold and services rendered, Research and development
expenses, Marketing, selling and general administrative
expenses), according to the function of the employee groups
accruing benefits.
In the Consolidated Statements of Income, NPBC expenses before
income taxes for the Companys principal pension and other
post-employment benefits in fiscal 2007 aggregated to 461
compared to 578 in fiscal 2006 and 460 in fiscal
2005. Thereof 112, 130 and 123 related to
discontinued operations in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Consolidated
Statements of Income and Expense recognized in
Equity
Actuarial gains and losses, resulting for example from an
adjustment of the discount rate or from a difference between
actual and expected return on plan assets, are recognized in the
Consolidated Statements of Income and Expense recognized in
Equity in the year in which they occur. They are recorded in
their entirety directly in equity.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flow
The Company makes payments directly to the participants in the
case of unfunded benefit plans and the payments are included in
net cash used in operating activities. For funded pension plans,
the participants are paid by the external pension fund and
accordingly these payments are cash neutral to the Company. In
this case, the Companys regular funding and supplemental
cash contributions result in net cash used in operating
activities.
F-51
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
In the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow, the Companys
principal pension and other post-employment benefits resulted in
net cash used in operating activities of 906 compared to
797 in the previous fiscal year.
Principal
pension benefits
The principal pension benefit plans cover approximately 522,000
participants, including 229,000 active employees, 100,000 former
employees with vested benefits and 193,000 retirees and
surviving dependents. Individual benefits are generally based on
eligible compensation levels and/or ranking within the Company
hierarchy and years of service. Retirement benefits under these
plans vary depending on legal, fiscal and economic requirements
in each country. The majority of Siemens active employees
in Germany participate in a pension scheme introduced in fiscal
2004, the BSAV (Beitragsorientierte Siemens Altersversorgung).
The BSAV is a fully funded defined benefit pension plan whose
benefits are predominantly based on contributions made by the
company and returns earned on such contributions, subject to a
minimum return guaranteed by the Company. The BSAV is funded via
the BSAV Trust. In connection with the implementation of the
BSAV, benefits provided under defined benefit pension plans
funded via the Siemens German Pension Trust were modified to
substantially eliminate the effects of compensation increases.
The Companys principal pension benefit plans are
explicitly explained in the subsequent sections with regard to:
|
|
|
|
|
Pension obligations and funded status,
|
|
|
Components of NPBC,
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income and
Expense recognized in Equity,
|
|
|
Assumptions used for the calculation of the DBO and NPBC,
|
|
|
Sensitivity analysis,
|
|
|
Plan assets,
|
|
|
Pension plan funding, and
|
|
|
Pension benefit payments.
|
The Company did have an immaterial asset ceiling in its
principal pension benefit plans in fiscal 2007 and no asset
ceiling in fiscal 2006.
F-52
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Pension
benefits: Pension obligations and funded status
A reconciliation of the funded status of the principal pension
benefit plans to the amounts recognized in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
24,013
|
|
|
|
14,753
|
|
|
|
9,260
|
|
|
|
23,755
|
|
|
|
15,023
|
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
Total defined benefit obligation
|
|
|
25,052
|
|
|
|
15,488
|
|
|
|
9,564
|
|
|
|
26,696
|
|
|
|
16,372
|
|
|
|
10,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation (funded)
|
|
|
24,581
|
|
|
|
15,210
|
|
|
|
9,371
|
|
|
|
26,481
|
|
|
|
16,372
|
|
|
|
10,109
|
|
Defined benefit obligation (unfunded)
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded
status*
|
|
|
(1,039
|
)
|
|
|
(735
|
)
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
(2,941
|
)
|
|
|
(1,349
|
)
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
Germany
|
|
|
(735
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
(202
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(733
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized past service cost (benefits)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Effects due to asset ceiling
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
|
(1,128
|
)
|
|
|
(735
|
)
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|
|
(3,025
|
)
|
|
|
(1,349
|
)
|
|
|
(1,676
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension asset
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Pension
liability
|
|
|
(1,289
|
)
|
|
|
(768
|
)
|
|
|
(521
|
)
|
|
|
(3,054
|
)
|
|
|
(1,349
|
)
|
|
|
(1,705
|
)
|
|
|
* |
Funded status: The funded status shows the surplus (deficit) of
the DBO relative to the plan assets as of the balance sheet
date. The DBO is calculated based on the projected unit credit
method and reflects the net present value as of the balance
sheet date of the accumulated pension entitlements of active
employees, former employees with vested rights and of retirees
and their surviving dependents with consideration of future
compensation and pension increases.
|
The fair value of plan assets, DBO and funded status as of
September 30, 2005 amounted to 21,581, 24,972
and (3,391), respectively.
F-53
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
A detailed reconciliation of the changes in the DBO for fiscal
2007 and 2006 as well as additional information by country is
provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Change in defined benefit obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
|
26,696
|
|
|
|
16,372
|
|
|
|
10,324
|
|
|
|
24,972
|
|
|
|
15,932
|
|
|
|
9,040
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
Service cost
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
Settlements and curtailments
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Amendments and other
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
Actuarial (gains) losses
|
|
|
(1,660
|
)
|
|
|
(863
|
)
|
|
|
(797
|
)
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Divestments
|
|
|
(670
|
)
|
|
|
(453
|
)
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,226
|
)
|
|
|
(818
|
)
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
(1,125
|
)
|
|
|
(788
|
)
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
|
25,052
|
|
|
|
15,488
|
|
|
|
9,564
|
|
|
|
26,696
|
|
|
|
16,372
|
|
|
|
10,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
15,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
3,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total defined benefit obligation at the end of the fiscal
year includes approximately 9,072 for active employees,
2,945 for former employees with vested benefits and
13,035 for retirees and surviving dependents.
In fiscal 2007, as well as in fiscal 2006, the DBO decreased due
to an increase in discount rate for the domestic and foreign
pension plans. For the domestic pension plans in fiscal 2007, a
negative effect on DBO of an increase in pension progression
rate was largely offset by a positive effect of increased
assumed retirement ages.
F-54
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
The following table shows the change in plan assets for fiscal
year 2007 and 2006 and some additional information concerning
pension plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
|
23,755
|
|
|
|
15,023
|
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
21,581
|
|
|
|
14,349
|
|
|
|
7,232
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
953
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
Actuarial gains (losses) on plan assets
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
Acquisitions and other
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
Divestments and other
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
Employer contributions (regular)
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,226
|
)
|
|
|
(818
|
)
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
(1,125
|
)
|
|
|
(788
|
)
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
24,013
|
|
|
|
14,753
|
|
|
|
9,260
|
|
|
|
23,755
|
|
|
|
15,023
|
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
14,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
3,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
3,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2007, the DBO and the fair value of plan assets
decreased due to the contribution of the carrier related
operations of Siemens to NSN. These effects are included in the
items Divestments and Divestments and other
in the preceding two tables. In fiscal 2006, the Company merged
a defined contribution plan with a defined benefit plan at a
subsidiary in Switzerland. As a result of the merger, the
benefits of the defined contribution plan were harmonized with
those of the defined benefit plan. Accordingly, the DBO and plan
assets of the newly merged plan increased. Such amounts are
included in the items Amendments and other and
Acquisitions and other in the preceding two tables.
Vested past service cost resulting from that merger has been
recognized entirely in NPBC for fiscal 2006.
Pension
benefits: Components of NPBC
The components of the NPBC for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,513
|
)
|
|
|
(947
|
)
|
|
|
(566
|
)
|
|
|
(1,433
|
)
|
|
|
(953
|
)
|
|
|
(480
|
)
|
|
|
(1,284
|
)
|
|
|
(896
|
)
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
Amortization of past service cost (benefits)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
Loss (gain) due to settlements and curtailments
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-55
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Pension
benefits: Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statements of
Income and Expense
recognized in Equity
The actuarial gains and losses on defined benefit pension plans
recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Expense
recognized in Equity for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Actuarial losses (gains)
|
|
|
(1,442
|
)
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
|
|
(948
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
1,266
|
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Effects due to asset ceiling
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax effect
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized in the Consolidated Statements of
Income and Expense recognized in Equity (net of tax)
|
|
|
(1,223
|
)
|
|
|
(577
|
)
|
|
|
(646
|
)
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
(577
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
benefits: Assumptions for the calculation of the DBO and
NPBC
Assumed discount rates, compensation increase rates and pension
progression rates used in calculating the DBO together with
long-term rates of return on plan assets vary according to the
economic conditions of the country in which the retirement plans
are situated or where plan assets are invested as well as
capital market expectations.
The weighted-average assumptions used for the actuarial
valuation of the DBO as of the balance sheet date were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.3%
|
|
|
|
5.1%
|
|
|
|
5.6%
|
|
|
|
4.7%
|
|
|
|
4.5%
|
|
|
|
5.0%
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
5.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
6.29%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.95%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
6.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
2.7%
|
|
|
|
2.25%
|
|
|
|
3.5%
|
|
|
|
2.7%
|
|
|
|
2.25%
|
|
|
|
3.4%
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
2.25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
3.96%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.95%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
4.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of pension progression
|
|
|
1.6%
|
|
|
|
1.5%
|
|
|
|
2.0%
|
|
|
|
1.2%
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
|
1.8%
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
1.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
3.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assumptions used for the calculation of the DBO as of the
balance sheet date of the preceding fiscal year are used to
determine the calculation of interest cost and service cost of
the following year. Therefore, the assumptions used for the
calculation of the NPBC for fiscal 2008 are already determined.
The total expected return for fiscal 2008 will be based on
expected rates of return multiplied by the fair value of plan
assets at the fiscal 2007 balance sheet date (see table below).
The fair value and thus the expected return on plan assets are
adjusted for
F-56
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
significant events after the balance sheet date, such as a
supplemental funding. Due to the implementation of the BSAV, the
effect of the compensation increase on the domestic pension
plans is substantially eliminated.
The weighted-average assumptions used for determining the NPBC
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008, 2007, 2006
and 2005 are shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Dom.
|
|
|
For.
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Dom.
|
|
|
For.
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Dom.
|
|
|
For.
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Dom.
|
|
|
For.
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.3%
|
|
|
|
5.1%
|
|
|
|
5.6%
|
|
|
|
4.7%
|
|
|
|
4.5%
|
|
|
|
5.0%
|
|
|
|
4.6%
|
|
|
|
4.35%
|
|
|
|
5.1%
|
|
|
|
5.3%
|
|
|
|
5.25%
|
|
|
|
5.3%
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
5.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.35%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
6.29%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.95%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
6.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
6.7%
|
|
|
|
6.7%
|
|
|
|
6.7%
|
|
|
|
6.7%
|
|
|
|
6.75%
|
|
|
|
6.7%
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.75%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
6.97%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.95%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.95%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.95%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
6.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.75%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.85%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
2.7%
|
|
|
|
2.25%
|
|
|
|
3.5%
|
|
|
|
2.7%
|
|
|
|
2.25%
|
|
|
|
3.4%
|
|
|
|
2.6%
|
|
|
|
2.25%
|
|
|
|
3.3%
|
|
|
|
2.6%
|
|
|
|
2.25%
|
|
|
|
3.3%
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
2.25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
3.96%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.95%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
4.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of pension progression
|
|
|
1.6%
|
|
|
|
1.5%
|
|
|
|
2.0%
|
|
|
|
1.2%
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
|
1.8%
|
|
|
|
1.3%
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
|
2.1%
|
|
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
|
2.3%
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
1.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
3.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The discount rate assumptions reflect the rates available on
high-quality, fixed-income investments of appropriate duration
at the balance sheet date. The expected return on plan assets is
determined on a uniform basis, considering long-term historical
returns, asset allocation, and future estimates of long-term
investment returns. For fiscal 2007, the Company decreased the
assumption for the expected return on plan assets for the
majority of its principal pension plans due to changes in asset
allocation and revised future estimates of long-term investment
returns. For fiscal 2008 the expected return on plan assets
remained primarily unchanged. As of September 30, 2007, the
assumed retirement ages for the participants of the domestic
pension plans were increased with regard to increased retirement
ages in the German State Pension Insurance. Other actuarial
assumptions not shown in the tables above, such as employee
turnover, mortality, disability, etc., remained primarily
unchanged as of September 30, 2007.
Experience adjustments, which result from differences between
the actuarial assumptions and the actual occurrence, did not
affect the DBO in fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 and increased the
DBO by 0.8% in fiscal 2005.
F-57
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Pension
benefits: Sensitivity analysis
A one-percentage-point change of the established assumptions
mentioned above, used for the calculation of the NPBC for fiscal
2008, and a change in the fair value of plan assets of
500, as of September 30, 2007, respectively, would
result in the following increase (decrease) of the fiscal 2008
NPBC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on NPBC 2008 due to a
|
|
|
|
one-percentage-
|
|
|
one-percentage-
|
|
|
|
point/500
|
|
|
point/500
|
|
|
|
increase
|
|
|
decrease
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
224
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Rate of pension progression
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
Increases and decreases in the discount rate, rate of
compensation increase and rate of pension progression which are
used in determining the DBO do not have a symmetrical effect on
NPBC primarily due to the compound interest effect created when
determining the net present value of the future pension benefit.
If more than one of the assumptions were changed simultaneously,
the cumulative impact would not necessarily be the same as if
only one assumption was changed in isolation.
Pension
benefits: Plan assets
The asset allocation of the plan assets of the principal pension
benefit plans as of the balance sheet date for fiscal 2007 and
2006 as well as the target asset allocation for fiscal year
2008, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target asset
|
|
|
Asset allocation
|
|
|
|
allocation
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
Asset class
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
20-50
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
40-70
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
Real estate
|
|
|
5-15
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Cash and other assets
|
|
|
5-15
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives are reported under the asset class whose risk is
hedged. Current asset allocation is biased towards high quality
government and selected corporate bonds. Siemens constantly
reviews the asset allocation in light of the duration of its
pension liabilities and analyzes trends and events that may
affect asset values in order to initiate appropriate measures at
a very early stage.
The plan assets include domestic real estate with a fair value
of 270 and 369 as of September 30, 2007 and
2006, respectively, which is occupied by the Company.
The following table shows the actual return on plan assets for
fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
1,366
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
2,385
|
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
F-58
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
The actual return over the last twelve months amounted to 5.6%
or 1,295 compared to an expected return of 6.5% or
1,513. The experience adjustment arising on plan assets
was (0.9)% in fiscal 2007 (fiscal 2006: (0.3)%). For the
domestic pension plans, 578 or 4.0% was realized, as
compared to an expected return on plan assets of 6.5% or an
amount of 947 that was included in the NPBC. For the
foreign pension plans, 717 or 8.2% was realized, as
compared to an expected return on plan assets of 6.5% or an
amount of 566 that was included in the NPBC.
Pension
benefits: Pension plan funding
Contributions made by the Company to its principal pension
benefit plans in fiscal 2007 and 2006, as well as those planned
in fiscal 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
(expected)
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Regular funding
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
Supplemental cash Contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regular funding is generally based on the level of service cost
incurred. For the BSAV funding corresponds to the contributions
to the beneficiaries account. Future funding decisions for
the Companys pension plans will be made with due
consideration of developments affecting plan assets and pension
liabilities, taking into account minimum funding requirements
abroad and local tax deductibility.
Pension
benefits: Pension benefit payments
The following overview comprises pension benefits paid out of
the principal pension benefit plans during the years ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006, and expected pension payments
for the next five years and in the aggregate for the five years
thereafter (undiscounted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Pension benefits paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
Expected pension payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,370
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
919
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
2013-2017
|
|
|
7,611
|
|
|
|
4,663
|
|
|
|
2,948
|
|
Other
post-employment benefits
In Germany, employees who entered into the Companys
employment on or before September 30, 1983, are entitled to
transition payments for the first six months after retirement
equal to the difference between their final compensation and the
retirement benefits payable under the corporate pension plan.
Certain foreign companies,
F-59
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
primarily in the U.S. and Canada, provide other post-employment
benefits in the form of medical, dental and life insurance. The
amount of obligations for other post-employment benefits in the
form of medical and dental benefits specifically depends on the
expected cost trend in the health care sector. To be entitled to
such healthcare benefits participants must contribute to the
insurance premiums. Participant contributions are based on
specific regulations of cost sharing which are defined in the
benefit plans. The Company has the right to adjust the cost
allocation at any time, generally this is done on an annual
basis. Premiums for life insurance benefits are paid solely by
the Company.
Other post-employment benefits are illustrated in detail in the
subsequent sections with regard to:
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations and funded status,
|
|
|
|
Plan assets,
|
|
|
|
Components of NPBC for other post-employment benefits,
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income and
Expense recognized in Equity,
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used in the calculation of the DBO and the NPBC for
other post-employment benefits,
|
|
|
|
Sensitivity analysis, and
|
|
|
|
Benefit payments.
|
The Company did not have any asset ceiling in its principal
other post-employment benefit plans, neither in fiscal 2007 nor
in 2006.
Other
post-employment benefits: Obligations and funded
status
The funded status of plan assets and a reconciliation of the
funded status to the amounts recognized in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Total defined benefit obligation
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation (funded)
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
Defined benefit obligation (unfunded)
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
|
|
(321
|
)
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
(842
|
)
|
|
|
(429
|
)
|
|
|
(413
|
)
|
Unrecognized past service cost (benefits)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
|
(766
|
)
|
|
|
(321
|
)
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
(844
|
)
|
|
|
(429
|
)
|
|
|
(415
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-60
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
The following table shows a detailed reconciliation of the
changes in the benefit obligation for other post-employment
benefits for the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Change in benefit obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Service cost
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Plan amendments and other
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gains) losses
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestments
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
post-employment benefits: Plan assets
The following table shows the change in plan assets for fiscal
2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at year end
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
post-employment benefits: Components of NPBC
The components of the NPBC for other post-employment benefits
for the years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized past service cost (benefits)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-61
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Other
post-employment benefits: Amounts recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Income and
Expense recognized in Equity
The actuarial gains and losses on other post-employment benefit
plans recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income and
Expense recognized in Equity for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Actuarial losses (gains)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Income tax effect
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized in the Consolidated Statements of
Income and Expense recognized in Equity (net of tax)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
post-employment benefits: Assumptions used in the calculation of
the DBO and NPBC
Discount rates and other key assumptions used for transition
payments in Germany are the same as those utilized for domestic
pension benefit plans.
The weighted-average assumptions used in calculating the
actuarial values for the post-employment healthcare and life
insurance benefits are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
Year ended
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
Discount rate
|
|
6.16%
|
|
5.95%
|
|
5.70%
|
U.S.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical trend rates (initial/ultimate/year):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare ineligible pre-65
|
|
9%/5%/2011
|
|
10%/5%/2011
|
|
9%/5%/2010
|
Medicare eligible post-65
|
|
9%/5%/2011
|
|
10%/5%/2011
|
|
9%/5%/2010
|
Fixed dollar benefit
|
|
4.5%
|
|
4.5%
|
|
4.5%
|
Dental trend rates (initial/ultimate/year)
|
|
6%/5%/2021
|
|
6%/5%/2021
|
|
6%/5%/2021
|
Canada:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical trend rates
|
|
4.68%
|
|
5.0%
|
|
|
Drug trend rates
|
|
4.18%
|
|
4.5%
|
|
|
Dental trend rates
|
|
4.18%
|
|
4.5%
|
|
|
Experience adjustments, which result from differences between
the actuarial assumptions and the actual occurrence, decreased
the DBO by 0.3%, 1.5% and 14.2% in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Other
post-employment benefits: Sensitivity analysis
The health care assumptions may be significantly influenced by
the expected progression in health care expense. A
one-percentage-point change in the healthcare trend rates would
have resulted in the following increase
F-62
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
(decrease) of the defined benefit obligation and the service and
interest cost as of and for the year ended September 30,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
One-percentage-point
|
|
|
|
increase
|
|
|
decrease
|
|
Effect on defined benefit obligation
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Effect on total of service and interest cost components
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Other
post-employment benefits: Benefit payments
The following overview comprises benefit payments for other
post-employment benefits paid out of the principal other defined
benefit post-employment plans during the years ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006, and expected pension payments
for the next five years and in the aggregate for the five years
thereafter (undiscounted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Payments for other post-employment benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
2007
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Expected payments for other post-employment benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
2009
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
2010
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
2011
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
2012
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
2013-2017
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Since the benefit obligations for other post-employment benefits
are generally not funded, such payments will impact the current
operating cash flow of the Company.
Defined
Contribution Plans and State Plans
The amount recognized as an expense for defined contribution
plans amounted to 269 in fiscal 2007, and 208 in
fiscal 2006, respectively. Contributions to state plans amounted
to 1,178 in fiscal 2007, and 1,074 in fiscal 2006,
respectively.
F-63
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
24. Provisions
Provisions changed during fiscal 2007 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Order related
|
|
|
Asset retirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranties
|
|
|
losses and risks
|
|
|
obligations
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance as of beginning of fiscal year
|
|
|
2,628
|
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
|
5,717
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
|
3,449
|
|
Usage
|
|
|
(888
|
)
|
|
|
(710
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
|
(2,057
|
)
|
Reversals
|
|
|
(642
|
)
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
(1,326
|
)
|
Translation differences
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
Accretion expense and effect of changes in discount rates
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Other changes*
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of fiscal year-end
|
|
|
2,440
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
5,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
In fiscal 2007, Other changes includes 330
reclassified to Liabilities associated with assets classified
as held for disposal (see Note 4 for further
information).
|
Except for asset retirement obligations (see discussion below),
the majority of the Companys provisions are generally
expected to result in cash outflows during the next 1 to
15 years.
Warranties
Warranties mainly relate to products sold. See
Note 2 for further information concerning our policy for
estimating warranty provisions. Additions to provisions already
existing at the beginning of the period amounted to 446 in
fiscal 2007.
Order
related losses and risks
Provisions for order related losses and risks are recognized for
anticipated losses and risks on uncompleted construction, sales
and leasing contracts.
Asset
retirement obligations
The Company is subject to asset retirement obligations related
to certain items of property, plant and equipment. Such asset
retirement obligations are primarily attributable to
environmental
clean-up
costs which amounted to 597, and 658, respectively,
as of September 30, 2007 and 2006 (thereof non-current
portion of 575 and 635, respectively) and to costs
primarily associated with the removal of leasehold improvements
at the end of the lease term amounting to 38, and
46, respectively as of September 30, 2007 and 2006
(thereof non-current portion of 27 and 31,
respectively).
Environmental
clean-up
costs are mainly related to remediation and environmental
protection liabilities which have been accrued for the estimated
costs of decommissioning facilities for the production of
uranium and mixed-oxide fuel elements in Hanau, Germany (Hanau
facilities), as well as in Karlstein, Germany (Karlstein
facilities). According to the German Atomic Energy Act, when
such a facility is closed, the resulting radioactive waste must
be collected and delivered to a government-developed final
storage facility. In this regard, the Company has developed a
plan to decommission the Hanau and Karlstein facilities in the
following steps: clean-out, decontamination and disassembly of
equipment and installations, decontamination of the facilities
and buildings, sorting of radioactive materials, and
intermediate and final storage of the radioactive waste. This
process will be supported by continuing engineering studies and
radioactive sampling under the supervision of German federal and
state authorities. The
F-64
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
decontamination, disassembly and sorting activities are planned
to continue until 2011; thereafter, the Company is responsible
for intermediate storage of the radioactive materials until a
final storage facility is available. The final location for all
kinds of radioactive waste is not expected to be available
before approximately 2030. With respect to the Hanau facility,
the process of setting up intermediate storage for radioactive
waste has neared completion; on September 21, 2006, the
Company received official notification from the competent
authorities that the Hanau facility has been released from the
scope of application of the German Atomic Energy Act and that
its further use is unrestricted. The ultimate costs of the
remediation are contingent on the decision of the federal
government on the location of the final storage facility and the
date of its availability. Consequently, the provision is based
on a number of significant estimates and assumptions. The
Company does not expect any recoveries from third parties and
did not reduce the provisions for such recoveries. The Company
believes that it has adequately provided for this exposure. As
of September 30, 2007 and 2006, the provision totals
597 and 658, respectively, and is recorded net of a
present value discount of 1,353, and 1,300,
respectively. The total expected payments for each of the next
five fiscal years and the total thereafter are 22,
38, 17, 6, 1, and 1,866 (includes
1,811 for the estimated costs associated with final
storage in 2033).
The Company recognizes the accretion of the provision for asset
retirement obligations using the effective interest method
applying current interest rates prevailing at the balance sheet
date. During the year ended September 30, 2007 the Company
recognized 31 in accretion expense in Financial
income(expense) net. Changes in discount rates decreased the
carrying amount of provisions by 83 as of
September 30, 2007.
See Note 4 for further information on provisions
reclassified to Liabilities associated with assets classified
as held for disposal.
25. Other
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Liabilities for employee related costs
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26. Equity
Common
stock and Additional paid-in capital
As of September 30, 2007, the Companys common stock
totaled 2,743 divided into 914,203 thousand shares with no
par value and a notional value of 3.00 per share. Each
share of common stock is entitled to one vote.
As of September 30, 2006 and 2005, the Companys
common stock totaled 2,673 and 2,673 representing
891,087 thousand shares and 891,085 thousand shares,
respectively.
In fiscal 2007, additional paid-in capital decreased by
1,168, net of applicable deferred income taxes, as a
result of the repurchase of approximately 1.9 billion
of the Companys outstanding convertible notes (see
Note 22 for further information on the convertible notes).
In fiscal 2006, additional paid-in capital increased by
487, net of applicable deferred income taxes, representing
the amount of the derivative component of the convertible notes
that was reclassified to equity upon waiving the cash settlement
option (see Note 22 for further information).
F-65
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
The following table provides a summary of outstanding capital
and the changes in authorized and conditional capital for fiscal
years 2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
Authorized capital
|
|
|
Conditional capital
|
|
|
|
(authorized and issued)
|
|
|
(not issued)
|
|
|
(not issued)
|
|
|
|
in
|
|
|
in
|
|
|
in
|
|
|
in
|
|
|
in
|
|
|
in
|
|
|
|
thousands
|
|
|
thousand
|
|
|
thousands
|
|
|
thousand
|
|
|
thousands
|
|
|
thousand
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
As of October 1, 2004
|
|
|
2,673,227
|
|
|
|
891,076
|
|
|
|
666,630
|
|
|
|
222,210
|
|
|
|
925,516
|
|
|
|
308,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement to former SNI AG shareholders
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2005
|
|
|
2,673,256
|
|
|
|
891,085
|
|
|
|
666,630
|
|
|
|
222,210
|
|
|
|
925,487
|
|
|
|
308,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion 1.375% 2003/2010 EUR convertible notes
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
New approved capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66,630
|
)
|
|
|
(22,210
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2006
|
|
|
2,673,262
|
|
|
|
891,087
|
|
|
|
675,000
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
925,481
|
|
|
|
308,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion 1.375% 2003/2010 EUR convertible notes
|
|
|
31,038
|
|
|
|
10,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,038
|
)
|
|
|
(10,346
|
)
|
Stock option plans
|
|
|
34,440
|
|
|
|
11,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,440
|
)
|
|
|
(11,480
|
)
|
Employee share purchase program
|
|
|
3,870
|
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
|
|
(3,870
|
)
|
|
|
(1,290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007
|
|
|
2,742,610
|
|
|
|
914,203
|
|
|
|
671,130
|
|
|
|
223,710
|
|
|
|
860,003
|
|
|
|
286,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
increases
In fiscal 2007 and 2006, common stock increased by approximately
31,038 thousand and 6 thousand, respectively,
through the issuance of approximately 10,346 thousand
shares and 2 thousand shares, respectively, from the
conditional capital for the conversion of 584 and
0.1, respectively, of the Companys convertible
notes. See Note 22 for additional information. No such
increase occurred in fiscal 2005.
In fiscal 2007, common stock increased by
34,440 thousand through the issuance of
11,480 thousand shares from the conditional capital to
service the stock option plans. In addition, in fiscal 2007,
common stock increased by approximately
3,870 thousand through the issuance of 1,290 thousand
shares from Authorized Capital 2006. These shares were issued to
an underwriter, repurchased and subsequently offered for
purchase to employees with respect to the Companys
employee share purchase program (see also Treasury Stock below
and Note 33 for additional information on the employee
share purchase program). No such increases occurred in fiscal
2006 and 2005, since the Company repurchased its own common
stock to accommodate share-based compensation plans and the
employee share purchase program with compensation character.
In fiscal 2005, common stock increased by 29 thousand,
through the issuance of 9 thousand shares from the conditional
capital as settlement to former shareholders of Siemens Nixdorf
Informationssysteme AG (SNI AG). No such increase
occurred in fiscal 2007 and 2006, since the Company repurchased
its own common stock to accommodate such settlement.
Authorized,
unissued capital
On September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Companys
authorized but unissued capital totaled 671, 675 and
667 or 223,710 thousand, 225,000 thousand and
222,210 thousand common shares, respectively.
F-66
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
On January 26, 2006 the Companys shareholders
authorized the Managing Board to increase, with the approval of
the Supervisory Board, capital stock by up to 75 through
the issuance of up to 25 million shares of no par value
registered in the names of the holders against contributions in
cash (Authorized Capital 2006). The authorization may be
implemented in installments. Pre-emptive rights of existing
shareholders are excluded. The new shares shall be issued under
the condition that they are offered exclusively to employees of
Siemens AG and its subsidiaries, provided these
subsidiaries are not listed companies themselves and do not have
their own employee stock schemes. The Managing Board is
authorized to determine, with the approval of the Supervisory
Board, the further content of the rights embodied in the shares
and the terms and conditions of the share issue. Authorized
Capital 2006 replaced the outstanding Authorized Capital 2001/II
of 67 (representing approximately 22 million shares)
and will expire on January 25, 2011.
On January 22, 2004, the Companys shareholders
authorized the Managing Board to increase, with the approval of
the Supervisory Board, capital stock by up to 600 through
the issuance of up to 200 million new no par value shares
registered in the names of the holders against cash
contributions and/or contributions in kind (Authorized Capital
2004). The Managing Board is authorized to determine, with the
approval of the Supervisory Board, the further content of the
rights embodied in the shares and the conditions of the share
issue.
The Managing Board is authorized, with the approval of the
Supervisory Board, to exclude pre-emptive rights of shareholders
in the event of capital increases against contributions in kind
and in certain pre-stipulated circumstances against cash.
Authorized Capital 2004 replaced Authorized Capital 2001/I of
400 (representing approximately 133 million shares)
and Authorized Capital 2003 of 250 (representing
83 million shares) and will expire on January 21, 2009.
Authorized Capital 1998 of 90 and Authorized Capital 1999
of 210 were replaced by resolution of the Annual
Shareholders Meeting on January 23, 2003. The
Companys shareholders authorized the Managing Board to
increase, with the approval of the Supervisory Board, the common
stock by up to 250 through the issuance of up to
approximately 83 million shares for which the
shareholders pre-emptive rights were excluded since these
shares were to be issued against contribution in kind
(Authorized Capital 2003). The Authorized Capital 2003 was to
expire on January 22, 2008. As mentioned above, Authorized
Capital 2003 was replaced by resolution of the Annual
Shareholders Meeting on January 22, 2004.
On February 22, 2001, the Companys shareholders
authorized the Managing Board to increase, with the approval of
the Supervisory Board, capital stock by up to 75
(representing 25 million shares) against contributions in
cash until February 1, 2006 for the purpose of issuing them
exclusively to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries,
provided these subsidiaries are not listed companies themselves
and do not have their own employee stock schemes (Authorized
Capital 2001/II). Pre-emptive rights of existing shareholders
were excluded. The Managing Board was authorized to determine,
with the approval of the Supervisory Board, the further content
of the rights embodied in the shares and the conditions of the
share issue. As mentioned above, the outstanding Authorized
Capital 2001/II of 67 (representing approximately
22 million shares) was replaced by resolution of the Annual
Shareholders Meeting on January 26, 2006.
On February 22, 2001, the Companys shareholders
authorized the Managing Board to increase, with the approval of
the Supervisory Board, common stock by up to 400 through
the issuance of up to approximately 133 million shares for
offer to existing shareholders until February 1, 2006
(Authorized Capital 2001/I). As mentioned above, Authorized
Capital 2001/I was replaced by resolution of the Annual
Shareholders Meeting on January 22, 2004.
Conditional
capital (unissued)
Conditional capital to service the 2001 and 1999 Siemens Stock
Option Plan amounts to 157, representing 52,317 thousand
shares of Siemens AG as of September 30, 2007. Conditional
capital to service the 2001 and 1999
F-67
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Siemens Stock Option Plan amounted to 191, representing
63,797 thousand shares of Siemens AG, in each of the years ended
September 30, 2006, 2005, respectively.
Conditional capital provided to service the issuance of bonds
with conversion rights or warrants amounts to 702,
734, and 734, representing 234,162 thousand, 244,507
thousand and 244,509 thousand shares of Siemens AG as of
September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
By resolution of the Annual Shareholders Meeting on
January 22, 2004, Conditional Capital 2003 of 267
(representing 89 million shares) was terminated. The
Companys shareholders authorized the Managing Board to
issue bonds in an aggregate principal amount of up to
11,250 with conversion rights (convertible bonds) or with
warrants entitling the holders to subscribe to up to
200 million new shares of Siemens AG, representing a
pro rata amount of up to 600 of the capital stock. Since
the Conditional Capital 2003 has partly been utilized, the new
Conditional Capital 2004 permits the issuance of shares under
the new authorization and the issuance of shares to service
bonds issued under the old authorization. Therefore, as of
September 30, 2007, total Conditional Capital 2004 allows
the issuance of up to 702 representing 234,162 thousand
shares of Siemens AG. The authorization will expire on
January 21, 2009.
By resolution of the Annual Shareholders Meeting on
February 22, 2001, conditional share capital of 147
was approved to service the 2001 Siemens Stock Option Plan
(Conditional Capital 2001). In addition, conditional capital
amounting to 10, 44 and 44 as of
September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, provides
to service the 1999 Siemens Stock Option Plan and the 2001
Siemens Stock Option Plan (Conditional Capital 1999).
In each of the years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and
2005 conditional capital of 0.6, representing
188 thousand shares of Siemens AG, provides for the
settlement offered to former shareholders of SNI AG who had
not tendered their SNI AG share certificates. Claims of such
shareholders to get shares of Siemens AG are time- barred
so that as of September 30, 2007 no more shares of
Siemens AG have to be issued from the conditional capital
provided for the settlement offered to former shareholders of
SNI AG.
By resolution of the Annual Shareholders Meeting on
January 23, 2003, the Managing Board was authorized to
issue bonds in an aggregate principal amount of up to
5 billion with conversion rights (convertible bonds)
or with warrants entitling the holders to subscribe to new
shares of Siemens AG. The authorization was to expire on
December 31, 2007. The shareholders also approved
conditional share capital of 267 for the issuance of up to
89 million shares to service the exercise of the conversion
or option rights of holders of these convertible bonds or
warrants attached to these bonds (Conditional Capital 2003). As
mentioned above, Conditional Capital 2003 as well as the
aforementioned authorization were terminated by resolution of
the Annual Shareholders Meeting on January 22, 2004.
Treasury
stock
At the January 2007 Annual Shareholders Meeting, the
Companys shareholders authorized the Company to repurchase
up to 10% of the 2,675 common stock outstanding on the
date of the Annual Shareholders Meeting until
July 24, 2008. Such stock may be sold via a stock exchange;
or (i) retired with the approval of the Supervisory Board,
(ii) used to meet the Companys obligations under the
1999 and the 2001 Siemens Stock Option Plans, (iii) offered
for purchase to individuals currently or formerly employed by
the Company or any of its subsidiaries or granted and
transferred with a holding period of at least two years; or
(iv) used to service conversion or option rights granted by
the Company or any of its subsidiaries. In addition, the
Supervisory Board shall be authorized to offer repurchased
shares to the members of the Managing Board of Siemens AG for
purchase as stock-based compensation under the same terms and
conditions as those offered to employees of the Company.
Additionally, the Supervisory Board may grant and transfer such
shares to members of the Managing Board with a holding period of
at least two years.
F-68
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
In fiscal 2007, the Company repurchased a total of
1,306,476 shares, including the 1,290,000 shares
relating to the capital increase from Authorized Capital 2006,
at an average price of 77.00 per share. In fiscal 2007, a
total of 1,306,508 shares of Treasury Stock were sold.
Thereof, 1,294,159 shares were issued to employees under
the employee share purchase program with compensation character
(see Note 33 for additional information) and
12,349 shares of Treasury Stock were transferred primarily
as settlement to former SNI AG stockholders. As of
September 30, 2007, 383 shares of stock remained in
treasury with a carrying amount of 29 thousand (notional
value 1 thousand).
In fiscal 2006, the Company repurchased a total of 5,925
thousand shares at an average price of 71.11 per share
primarily for the purpose of selling them to employees and
stock-based compensation plan participants and as settlement to
former SNI stockholders. In fiscal 2006, a total of 5,934
thousand shares of treasury stock were sold. Thereof, 4,166
thousand shares were issued to stock-based compensation plan
participants to accommodate the exercise of stock options. In
addition, in fiscal 2006, 1,760 thousand shares were issued to
employees under an employee share purchase program with
compensation character. See Note 33 for additional
information on share-based compensation. As of
September 30, 2006, 415 shares of stock remained in
treasury with a carrying amount of 29 thousand (notional
value 1 thousand).
In fiscal 2005, the Company repurchased a total of 3,549
thousand shares at an average price of 61.78 per share to
accommodate the Companys stock-based compensation plans.
In fiscal 2005, 1,691 thousand shares were sold in conjunction
with the exercise of stock options and 1,849 thousand shares
were issued to employees under an employee share purchase
program with compensation character. As of September 30,
2005, 9,004 shares of stock remained in treasury with a
carrying amount of 575 thousand (notional value 27
thousand).
Other
components of equity
The changes in the other components of equity are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax
|
|
|
effect
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Pretax
|
|
|
effect
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Pretax
|
|
|
effect
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) on
available-for-sale
financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) for the period
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
Reclassification adjustments for (gains) losses included in net
income
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(366
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) on derivative financial
instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustments for (gains) losses included in net
income
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
Foreign-currency translation differences
|
|
|
(566
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(566
|
)
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
|
(591
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(616
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-69
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Miscellaneous
Under the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz),
the amount of dividends available for distribution to
shareholders is based upon the earnings of Siemens AG as
reported in its statutory financial statements determined in
accordance with the German Commercial Code
(Handelsgesetzbuch). During the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007, Siemens AG management distributed
an ordinary dividend of 1,292 (1.45 per share) of
the fiscal 2006 earnings of Siemens AG to its shareholders.
The dividend was paid on January 26, 2007. During the years
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, Siemens AG
management distributed 1,201 (1.35 per share) of the
fiscal 2005 earnings and 1,112 (1.25 per share) of
the fiscal 2004 earnings of Siemens AG as an ordinary
dividend to its shareholders.
For fiscal 2007, the Managing Board proposed a dividend of
1.60 per share. Payment of the proposed dividend is
contingent upon approval by the shareholders at the Annual
Shareholders Meeting on January 24, 2008. If
approved, this would amount to approximately 1,463.
27. Additional
capital disclosures
Siemens is committed to a strong financial profile, which gives
the Company financial flexibility to achieve its growth and
portfolio optimization goals.
As of September 30, 2007 and 2006, the capital structure of
the Company was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
28,996
|
|
|
|
25,193
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
As a % of total capital (see below)
|
|
|
65%
|
|
|
|
62%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
5,637
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
9,860
|
|
|
|
13,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
15,497
|
|
|
|
15,297
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
As a % of total capital
|
|
|
35%
|
|
|
|
38%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (total equity and total debt)
|
|
|
44,493
|
|
|
|
40,490
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
In fiscal 2007, total equity increased by 15% compared to fiscal
2006 primarily due to an increase in retained earnings. Total
debt increased during fiscal 2007 by 1%. This resulted in
an increase in equity as a percentage of total capital to 65% in
fiscal 2007 (62% in fiscal 2006) and a decreased percentage
of total debt in relation to total capital of 35% (38% in
fiscal 2006).
The Company is not subject to any statutory capital
requirements. Commitments exist to sell or otherwise issue
common shares in connection with established share-based payment
plans. In fiscal 2007, commitments for share-based payment plans
have been satisfied through capital increases (see Notes 26
and 33 for additional information). Beginning with fiscal
2008, it is planned to satisfy commitments arising from
share-based payment through repurchases of the Companys
shares.
A key factor in maintaining a strong financial profile is
Siemens credit rating which is affected among other
factors by the capital structure, the profitability, the ability
to generate cash flow, geographic and product diversification as
well as a competitive market position. Siemens current
corporate credit ratings from Moodys Investors Service and
Standard & Poors are noted below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys Investors
|
|
|
Standard &
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
Poors
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
A1
|
|
|
|
AA−
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
P-1
|
|
|
|
A-1+
|
|
F-70
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
On November 9, 2007 Moodys Investors Service
downgraded Siemens long-term corporate credit rating from
Aa3 to A1 and set its outlook from negative to
stable. The rating action followed the announcements
of a share-buyback program of up to 10 billion (see
also Note 41, Subsequent events) and a capital
structure target. The rating classification of A1 is the third
highest rating within the agencys debt ratings category.
The numerical modifier 1 indicates that our long-term debt ranks
in the higher end of the A category. The Moodys rating
outlook is an opinion regarding the likely direction of an
issuers rating over the medium-term. Rating outlooks fall
into the following six categories: positive, negative, stable,
developing, ratings under review and no outlook.
Moodys Investors Services rating for Siemens
short-term corporate credit and commercial paper is
P-1, the
highest available rating in the prime rating system, which
assesses issuers ability to honor senior financial
obligations and contracts. It applies to senior unsecured
obligations with an original maturity of less than one year.
In addition, Moodys Investors Service published a credit
opinion. The most recent credit opinion for Siemens as of
November 13, 2007 classified the liquidity profile of the
Company as very healthy.
Standard & Poors rates Siemens long-term
corporate credit AA−. On June 15, 2007
Standard & Poors resolved the
CreditWatch negative, dated April 26, 2007 and
kept a negative outlook. Within
Standard & Poors long-term issue and issuer
credit ratings, an obligation rated AA has the second
highest rating category assigned. The modifier
− indicates that Siemens long-term debt
ranks in the lower end of the AA category. The
Standard & Poors rating outlook is an
opinion regarding the likely direction of an issuers
rating over the medium-term. Rating outlooks fall into the
following four categories: Positive, Negative, Stable and
Developing. Outlooks have a time frame of typically two years.
Ratings appear on CreditWatch when an event or deviation from an
expected trend has occurred or is expected, and additional
information is necessary to take a rating action. A rating
review will normally be completed within approximately
90 days, unless the outcome of a specific event is pending.
Siemens short-term debt and commercial paper is rated
A-1+ within
Standard & Poors short-term issue credit
ratings, giving Siemens the highest-ranking short-term rating.
28. Commitments
and contingencies
Guarantees
and other commitments
The following table presents the undiscounted amount of maximum
potential future payments for each major group of guarantee:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Guarantees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit guarantees
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
Guarantees of third-party performance
|
|
|
1,995
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
Herkules obligations
|
|
|
4,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other guarantees
|
|
|
1,882
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,463
|
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit guarantees cover the financial obligations of
third parties in cases where Siemens is the vendor and/or
contractual partner. These guarantees generally provide that in
the event of default or non-payment by the primary debtor,
Siemens will be required to settle such financial obligations.
In addition, Siemens provides credit guarantees generally as
credit-line guarantees with variable utilization to joint
ventures and associated and related companies. The maximum
amount of these guarantees is subject to the outstanding balance
of the credit or, in case where a credit line is subject to
variable utilization, the nominal amount of the credit line.
These guarantees usually have terms of between one and five
years. Except for statutory recourse provisions against the
primary debtor, credit
F-71
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
guarantees are generally not subject to additional contractual
recourse provisions. As of September 30, 2007 and 2006, the
Company has accrued 13 and 24, respectively,
relating to credit guarantees.
Furthermore, Siemens issues Guarantees of third-party
performance, which include performance bonds and guarantees
of advanced payments in cases where Siemens is the general or
subsidiary partner in a consortium. In the event of
non-fulfillment of contractual obligations by the consortium
partner(s), Siemens will be required to pay up to an
agreed-upon
maximum amount. These agreements span the term of the contract,
typically ranging from three months to seven years. Generally,
consortium agreements provide for fallback guarantees as a
recourse provision among the consortium partners. No significant
liability has been recognized in connection with these
guarantees.
The Federal Republic of Germany has commissioned a consortium
consisting of SIS and IBM Deutschland GmbH (IBM) to modernize
and operate the non-military information and communications
technology of the German Federal Armed Forces (Bundeswehr). This
project is called HERKULES. A project company, BWI
Informationstechnik GmbH (BWI) will provide the services
required by the terms of the contract. SIS is a shareholder in
the project company. The total contract value amounts to a
maximum of approximately 6 billion. In connection
with the consortium and execution of the contract between BWI
and the Federal Republic of Germany in December 2006, Siemens
issued several guarantees connected to each other legally and
economically in favor of the Federal Republic of Germany and of
the consortium member IBM. The guarantees ensure that BWI has
sufficient resources to provide the required services and to
fulfill its contractual obligations. These guarantees are listed
as a separate item HERKULES obligations in
the table above due to their compound and multilayer nature.
Total future payments potentially required by Siemens amount to
4.2 billion and will be reduced by approximately
400 per year over the
10-year
contract period. Yearly payments under these guarantees are
limited to 400 plus, if applicable, a maximum of 90
in unused guarantees carried forward from the prior year.
Other guarantees include indemnifications issued in
connection with dispositions of business entities. Such
indemnifications protect the buyer from tax, legal and other
risks related to the purchased business entity. As of
September 30, 2007 and 2006, the total accruals for
Other guarantees amounted to 102 and 129,
respectively.
The increase in Guarantees of third-party performance and
Other guarantees in fiscal 2007 is due primarily to the
contribution of the carrier-related operations into NSN at the
beginning of April 2007. As of September 30, 2007, Other
guarantees therefore includes the amounts related to the
indemnification provisions related to the contribution of the
carrier-related operations into NSN (see Note 4 for further
information).
As of September 30, 2007, future payment obligations under
non-cancellable operating leases are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
581
|
|
2009
|
|
|
475
|
|
2010
|
|
|
362
|
|
2011
|
|
|
261
|
|
2012
|
|
|
220
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
551
|
|
Total operating rental expense for the years ended
September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was 875, 816
and 740, respectively.
As of September 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company has
commitments to make capital contributions of 103 and
173, respectively, to other non-consolidated companies.
The Company is jointly and severally liable and has capital
contribution obligations as a partner in commercial partnerships
and as a participant in various consortiums.
F-72
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
29. Legal
Proceedings
Public prosecutors and other government authorities in
jurisdictions around the world are conducting investigations of
Siemens AG and its consolidated subsidiaries (hereinafter
Siemens or the Company shall refer to
Siemens AG and, unless the context otherwise requires, to its
consolidated subsidiaries) and certain of its current and former
employees regarding allegations of public corruption, including
criminal breaches of fiduciary duty including embezzlement, as
well as bribery, money laundering and tax evasion, among others.
These investigations involve allegations of corruption at a
number of Siemens business Groups.
The Munich public prosecutor continues to conduct an
investigation of certain current and former employees of the
Company on suspicion of criminal breaches of fiduciary duty
including embezzlement, as well as bribery and tax evasion. To
date, the Munich prosecutor has conducted searches of Company
premises and private homes and several arrest warrants have been
issued for current and former employees, including former
members of senior management, who are or were associated with
the former Com Group and the Company. In addition, the Munich
prosecutor has recently sought and received information from two
German subsidiaries of the Company in connection with an
investigation of allegations of criminal breach of fiduciary
duty against a former employee and unnamed others.
On October 4, 2007, pursuant to the application of the
Munich prosecutor, the Munich district court imposed a fine of
201 on Siemens. According to the courts decision, a
former manager of the former Com Group committed bribery of
foreign public officials in Russia, Nigeria and Libya in 77
cases during the period from 2001 to 2004 for the purpose of
obtaining contracts on behalf of the Company, whereby he acted
in concert with others. In determining the fine, the court based
its decision on unlawfully obtained economic advantages in the
amount of at least 200 which the court determined the
Company had derived from illegal acts of the former employee, to
which an additional fine in the amount of 1 was added.
The decision of the Munich district court and the settlement
(tatsächliche Verständigung) entered into the
same day with the German tax authorities, conclude the German
investigations into illegal conduct and tax violations only as
they relate to Siemens AG and only as to the former Com Group.
As previously reported, there are ongoing investigations in
Switzerland, Italy, and Greece. These investigations relate to
allegations that certain current and former employees of the
former Com Group opened slush fund accounts abroad and operated
a system to misappropriate funds from the Company and,
specifically, that these individuals siphoned off money from Com
via off-shore companies and their own accounts in Switzerland
and Liechtenstein. The Company has learned that Liechtenstein
prosecutors have transferred their investigation to Swiss and
Munich prosecutors.
As previously reported, Milan and Darmstadt prosecutors have
been investigating allegations that former Siemens employees
provided improper benefits to former employees of Enel in
connection with Enel contracts. In Italy, legal proceedings
against two former employees ended when the
patteggiamento (plea bargaining procedure
without the admission of guilt or responsibility) by the charged
employees and Siemens AG entered into force in November 2006.
Prosecutors in Darmstadt brought charges against two other
former employees not covered by the
patteggiamento. In May 2007, the Regional
Court of Darmstadt sentenced one former employee to two years in
prison, suspended on probation, on counts of commercial bribery
and embezzlement.
Another former employee was sentenced to nine months in prison,
suspended on probation, on counts of aiding and abetting
commercial bribery. In connection with these sentences, Siemens
AG was ordered to disgorge 38 of profits. The prosecutors
and both defendants have appealed the decision of the Regional
Court of Darmstadt. Siemens AG has also appealed the decision
with respect to the disgorgement.
As previously reported, in 2004 the public prosecutor in
Wuppertal initiated an investigation against Siemens employees
regarding allegations that they participated in bribery related
to the awarding of an EU contract for the
F-73
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
refurbishment of a power plant in Serbia in 2002. In August
2007, the public prosecutor conducted searches of the premises
of the PG Group in Erlangen, Offenbach and Karlsruhe in relation
to this investigation. The investigation is ongoing.
In addition, there is a significant number of ongoing
investigations into allegations of public corruption involving
the Company, certain of its current and former employees or
projects in which the Company is involved in a number of
jurisdictions around the world, including China, Hungary,
Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Nigeria, Norway and Russia, among
others. Specific examples include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
There are currently numerous public corruption-related
governmental investigations in China, involving several
divisions of Siemens Ltd. China, primarily Med, but also
A&D and SIS. The investigations have been initiated by
prosecutors in several regions and provinces, including
Guangdong, Jilin, Xian, Wuxi, Shanghai, Ting Hu, Shandong,
Hunan, and Guiyang.
|
|
|
|
Siemens Zrt. Hungary and certain of its employees are being
investigated by Hungarian authorities in connection with
allegations concerning suspicious payments in connection with
consulting agreements with a variety of shell corporations and
bribery relating to the awarding of a contract for the delivery
of communication equipment to the Hungarian Armed Forces.
|
|
|
|
The public prosecutor in Kalimantan Province, Indonesia, has
charged the head of the Med division of Siemens PT Indonesia in
connection with allegations that he participated in bribery,
fraud, and overcharging related to the awarding of a contract
for the delivery of medical equipment to a hospital in 2003.
|
|
|
|
Authorities in Nigeria have conducted a search of Siemens
premises in connection with an investigation into alleged
illegal payments.
|
|
|
|
The Norwegian government is investigating allegations of bribery
and overcharging of the Norwegian Department of Defense related
to the awarding of a contract for the delivery of communication
equipment in 2001.
|
|
|
|
The public prosecutor in Milan is investigating allegations as
to whether two employees of Siemens S.p.A. made illegal payments
to employees of the state-owned gas and power group ENI.
|
As previously reported, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is
conducting an investigation of possible criminal violations of
U.S. law by Siemens in connection with the matters described
above and other allegations of corruption. During the second
quarter of fiscal 2007, Siemens was advised that the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) enforcement
division had converted its informal inquiry into these matters
into a formal investigation. The Company is cooperating with
these investigations.
The SEC and the DOJ are also investigating possible violations
of U.S. law by Siemens in connection with the
Oil-for-Food
Program. The Company is cooperating with the SEC and DOJ. A
French investigating magistrate commenced a preliminary
investigation regarding the participation of French companies,
including Siemens France S.A.S., in the
Oil-for-Food
Program. German prosecutors also began an investigation in this
matter and conducted searches of Company premises and private
homes in Erlangen and Berlin in August 2007. Siemens is
cooperating with the authorities in France and Germany.
As a result of the above described matters and as a part of its
policy of cooperation, Siemens contacted the World Bank and
offered to assist the World Bank in any matter that might be of
interest to the World Bank. Since that time, Siemens has been in
contact with the World Bank Department of Institutional
Integrity and intends to continue its policy of cooperation.
In February 2007, the Company announced that public prosecutors
in Nuremberg are conducting an investigation of certain current
and former employees of the Company on suspicion of criminal
breach of fiduciary
F-74
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
duties against Siemens, tax evasion and a violation of the
German Works Council Constitution Act
(Betriebsverfassungsgesetz). The investigation relates to
an agreement entered into by Siemens with an entity controlled
by the former head of the independent employee association AUB
(Arbeitsgemeinschaft Unabhängiger
Betriebsangehöriger). The prosecutors are investigating
payments made during the period 2001 to 2006 for which Siemens
may not have received commensurate services in return. The
former head of AUB was arrested in February 2007. Since
February, searches have been conducted at several Siemens AG
premises and private homes and an arrest warrant was issued for
a member of the Managing Board, in connection with this
investigation, who was taken into custody. This executives
term has expired and he therefore is no longer a member of the
Managing Board. In addition to this former member of the
Managing Board, other current and former members of the
Companys senior management have been named as suspects in
this matter. In April 2007, the former member of the Managing
Board posted bail in the amount of 5 and was released from
custody. In this connection, a bank issued a bond
(Bankbürgschaft) in the amount of 5, 4.5
of which was guaranteed by the Company pursuant to provisions of
German law. The former member of the Managing Board has provided
the Company a personal undertaking to cooperate with and fully
support the independent investigation conducted by
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP (Debevoise), as described
below, and to repay all costs incurred and payments made by the
Company in connection with the bank guarantee in the event he is
found to have violated his obligations to the Company in
connection with the facts under investigation by the Nuremberg
prosecutors. The investigation into the allegations involving
the Companys relationship with the former head of AUB and
the AUB has also been included within the scope of the
investigation being conducted by Debevoise. In April 2007, the
labor union IG Metall lodged a criminal complaint against
unknown individuals on suspicion that the Company breached the
provisions of Section 119 of the Works Council Constitution
Act by providing undue preferential support to AUB in connection
with elections of the members of the Companys works
councils.
In February 2007, an alleged holder of American Depositary
Shares of the Company filed a derivative lawsuit with the
Supreme Court of the State of New York against certain current
and former members of the Companys Managing and
Supervisory Boards as well as against the Company as a nominal
defendant, seeking various forms of relief relating to the
allegations of corruption and related violations at Siemens. The
suit is currently stayed.
The Company has engaged Debevoise, an independent external law
firm, to conduct an independent and comprehensive investigation
to determine whether anti-corruption regulations have been
violated and to conduct an independent and comprehensive
assessment of the compliance and control systems of Siemens.
Debevoise reports directly and exclusively to the Compliance
Committee of the Supervisory Board (formerly the Audit
Committee) and is being assisted by forensic accountants from
the international accounting firm Deloitte & Touche.
Debevoises investigation of allegations of corruption at
the former Com Group, the Companys other Groups and at
regional Siemens subsidiaries is ongoing.
The Company has conducted an analysis of the impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements of issues
raised by allegations of violations of anti-corruption
legislation. As previously reported, within the former Com
Group, the Companys other Groups and regional companies a
number of Business Consultant Agreements (BCAs) and similar
sales-related arrangements have been identified. The Company has
identified a large volume of payments made in connection with
these contracts as well as other payments for which the Company
has not been able either to establish a valid business purpose
or to clearly identify the recipient. These payments raise
concerns in particular under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
(FCPA) in the United States, anti-corruption legislation in
Germany and similar legislation in other countries. The payments
identified were recorded as deductible business expenses in
prior periods in determining income tax provisions. As
previously reported, the Companys investigation determined
that certain of these payments were non-deductible under tax
regulations of Germany and other jurisdictions.
In fiscal 2007, the Company substantially completed its analysis
of the tax deductibility of payments under the BCAs and other
sales-related agreements with third-party intermediaries
identified at the former Com Group, the
F-75
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
remaining Groups and in regional companies. In fiscal 2007, the
Company also substantially completed its risk-based analysis of
cash and check payments at the former Com Group, the
Companys other Groups and in regional companies, for which
limited documentation was available, and which may also raise
concerns under the FCPA and anti-corruption legislation in
Germany and other countries.
The Company has accounted for income tax-related charges with
respect to fiscal
2000-2006
and adjusted comparative amounts for fiscal 2005 and 2006 as
reported under Note 2.
The Company remains subject to corruption-related investigations
in the U.S. and other jurisdictions around the world. As a
result, additional criminal or civil sanctions could be brought
against the Company itself or against certain of its employees
in connection with possible violations of law, including the
FCPA. In addition, the scope of pending investigations may be
expanded and new investigations commenced in connection with
allegations of bribery and other illegal acts. The
Companys operating activities, financial results and
reputation may also be negatively affected, particularly due to
imposed penalties, disgorgements, compensatory damages, the
formal or informal exclusion from public procurement contracts
or the loss of business licenses or permits. In addition to the
fine imposed by the Munich district court mentioned above and
certain immaterial non-German tax penalties, no material
expenses or provisions for any such penalties or damages have
been recorded as management does not yet have enough information
to reliably estimate such amounts. We expect that we will need
to record expenses and provisions in the future for fines,
penalties or other charges, which could be material, in
connection with the investigations. We will also have to bear
the costs of continuing investigations and related legal
proceedings, as well as the costs of on-going compliance
remediation efforts. Furthermore, changes affecting the
Companys course of business or changes to its compliance
programs beyond those already taken may turn out to be required.
In addition to the proceedings described above, the Company is
also involved in a number of anti-trust and other legal
proceedings:
A Mexican governmental control authority barred Siemens Mexico
from bidding on public contracts for a period of three years and
nine months beginning November 30, 2005. This proceeding
arose from allegations that Siemens Mexico did not disclose
alleged minor tax discrepancies when it was signing a public
contract in 2002. Upon appeal by Siemens Mexico, the execution
of the debarment was stayed on December 13, 2005 and
subsequently reduced to a period of four months. Upon further
appeal, the execution of the reduced debarment was stayed by the
competent Mexican court in April 2006. A final decision on the
appeal has not yet been announced.
In February 2007, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. (SMS)
announced that it had reached an agreement with the U.S.
Attorneys Office for the Northern District of Illinois to
settle allegations made in an indictment filed in January 2006.
The agreement resolves all allegations made against SMS in the
indictment. Under the agreement, SMS has pled guilty to a single
federal criminal charge of obstruction of justice in connection
with civil litigation that followed a bid to provide radiology
equipment to Cook County Hospital in 2001. In addition, SMS has
agreed to pay a fine of U.S.$1 million and restitution of
approximately U.S.$1.5 million.
In December 2006, the Japanese Fair Trade Commission (FTC)
searched the offices of more than ten producers and dealers of
healthcare equipment, including Siemens Asahi Medical
Technologies Ltd., in connection with an investigation into
possible anti-trust violations. Siemens Asahi Medical
Technologies is cooperating with the FTC in the ongoing
investigation.
In February 2007, the French Competition Authority launched an
investigation into possible anti-trust violations involving
several companies active in the field of suburban trains,
including Siemens Transportation Systems S.A.S. in Paris, and
the offices were searched. The Company is cooperating with the
French Competition Authority.
F-76
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
In February 2007, the Norwegian Competition Authority launched
an investigation into possible anti-trust violations involving
Norwegian companies active in the field of fire security,
including Siemens Building Technologies AS. The Company is
cooperating in the ongoing investigation with the Norwegian
Competition Authority. The Norwegian Competition Authority has
not yet announced a schedule for the completion of the
investigation.
In February 2007, the European Commission launched an
investigation into possible anti-trust violations involving
European producers of power transformers, including Siemens AG
and VA Tech, which Siemens acquired in July 2005. The German
Anti-trust Authority (Bundeskartellamt) has become
involved in the proceeding and is responsible for investigating
those allegations which relate to the German market. Power
transformers are electrical equipment used as major components
in electric transmission systems in order to adapt voltages. The
Company is cooperating in the ongoing investigation with the
European Commission and the German Anti-trust Authority. The
European Commission and the German Anti-trust Authority have not
yet announced a schedule for the completion of their
investigation.
In April 2007, Siemens AG and VA Tech filed actions before the
European Court of First Instance in Luxemburg against the
decisions of the European Commission dated January 24,
2007, to fine Siemens and VA Tech for alleged anti-trust
violations in the European Market of high-voltage gas-insulated
switchgear between 1988 and 2004. Gas-insulated switchgear is
electrical equipment used as a major component for turnkey power
substations. The fine imposed on Siemens amounted to
396.6. The fine imposed on VA Tech, which Siemens AG
acquired in July 2005, amounted to 22.1. VA Tech was
declared jointly liable with Schneider Electric for a separate
fine of 4.5. The European Court of First Instance has not
yet issued a decision. Furthermore, authorities in Brazil, New
Zealand, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and South Africa are
conducting investigations into the same possible anti-trust
violations. On October 25, 2007, upon the Companys
appeal, a Hungarian competition court reduced administrative
fines imposed on Siemens AG from 0.3 to 0.1 and from
0.6 to 0.1 regarding VA Tech.
In April 2007, the Polish Competition Authority launched an
investigation against Siemens Sp. z o.o. Poland regarding
possible anti-trust violations in the market for the maintenance
of diagnostic medical equipment. The Company is cooperating in
the ongoing investigation with the Polish Competition Authority.
In June 2007, the Turkish Anti-trust Agency confirmed its
earlier decision to impose a fine of approximately
6 million on Siemens AS Turkey based on alleged
anti-trust violations in the traffic lights market. Siemens
Turkey has appealed this decision and this appeal is still
pending. It is possible that as a result of this decision,
Siemens could be debarred from participating in public sector
tender offers in Turkey for a one- to two-year period.
The Company requested arbitration against the Republic of
Argentina before the International Center for Settlement of
Investment Disputes (ICSID) of the World Bank. The Company
claimed that Argentina unlawfully terminated the Companys
contract for the development and operation of a system for the
production of identity cards, border control, collection of data
and voters registers and thereby violated the Bilateral
Investment Protection Treaty between Argentina and Germany
(BIT). The Company sought damages for expropriation and
violation of the BIT of approximately U.S.$500 million.
Argentina disputed jurisdiction of the ICSID arbitration
tribunal and argued in favor of jurisdiction of the Argentine
administrative courts. The arbitration tribunal rendered a
decision on August 4, 2004, finding that it had
jurisdiction over Siemens claims and that Siemens was
entitled to present its claims. A hearing on the merits of the
case took place before the ICSID arbitration tribunal in
Washington in October 2005. A unanimous decision on the merits
was rendered on February 6, 2007, awarding Siemens
compensation in the amount of U.S.$217.8 million on account
of the value of its investment and consequential damages, plus
compound interest thereon at a rate of 2.66% since May 18,
2001. The tribunal also ruled that Argentina is obligated to
indemnify Siemens against any claims of subcontractors in
relation to the project (amounting to approximately
U.S.$44 million) and, furthermore, that Argentina would be
obligated to pay Siemens the full amount of the contract
performance bond (U.S.$20 million) in the event this bond
was not returned
F-77
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
within the time period set by the tribunal (which period
subsequently elapsed without delivery). On June 4, 2007,
Argentina filed with the ICSID an application for the annulment
and stay of enforcement of the award, alleging serious
procedural irregularities. An ad hoc committee has been
appointed to consider Argentinas application. Siemens
currently expects that the ad hoc committee will not render a
decision before 2009.
Information required under IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent
Liabilities and Contingent Assets is not disclosed for
certain legal proceedings, if the Company concludes that the
disclosure can be expected to prejudice seriously the outcome of
the litigation.
Siemens AG and its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in
various other legal actions and proceedings arising in
connection with their activities as a global diversified group.
Some of these pending proceedings have been previously
disclosed. Some of the legal actions include claims for
substantial compensatory or punitive damages or claims for
indeterminate amounts of damages. Siemens is from time to time
also involved in regulatory investigations beyond those
described above. Siemens is cooperating with the relevant
authorities in several jurisdictions and, where appropriate,
conducts internal investigations regarding potential wrongdoing
with the assistance of in-house and external counsel. Given the
number of legal actions and other proceedings to which Siemens
is subject, some may result in adverse decisions. Siemens
contests actions and proceedings when it considers it
appropriate. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting
the outcome of such matters, particularly in cases in which
claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages, Siemens
often cannot predict what the eventual loss or range of loss
related to such matters will be. Although the final resolution
of these matters could have a material effect on Siemens
consolidated operating results for any reporting period in which
an adverse decision is rendered, Siemens believes that its
consolidated financial position should not be materially
affected by the matters discussed in this paragraph.
30. Additional
disclosures on financial instruments
This section gives a comprehensive overview of the significance
of financial instruments for Siemens and provides additional
information on balance sheet items that contain financial
instruments.
The following table presents the carrying amounts of each
category of financial assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
|
|
10,214
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
Loans and receivables
|
|
|
21,428
|
|
|
|
21,060
|
|
Financial assets held for trading
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
Derivatives with a hedging relationship
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,311
|
|
|
|
33,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities measured at amortized cost
|
|
|
25,926
|
|
|
|
24,540
|
|
Financial liabilities held for trading
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
Derivatives with a hedging relationship
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,843
|
|
|
|
25,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-78
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
The following table presents the fair values and carrying
amounts of financial assets and liabilities measured at cost or
amortized cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
Financial assets measured at cost or amortized cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
|
|
10,214
|
|
|
|
10,214
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
18,163
|
|
|
|
18,163
|
|
|
|
18,428
|
|
|
|
18,428
|
|
Other non-derivative financial assets
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities measured at cost or amortized cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
8,431
|
|
|
|
8,431
|
|
|
|
8,497
|
|
|
|
8,497
|
|
Notes and bonds
|
|
|
8,897
|
|
|
|
8,889
|
|
|
|
13,238
|
|
|
|
13,157
|
|
Loans from banks and other financial indebtedness
|
|
|
6,287
|
|
|
|
6,322
|
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
|
|
1,823
|
|
Obligations under finance leases
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
Other non-derivative financial liabilities
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
* |
This caption consists of equity instruments classified as
available-for-sale,
for which a fair value could not be reliably measured and which
are recognized at cost.
|
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, current
receivables, trade payables, other current financial liabilities
and commercial paper and borrowings under revolving credit
facilities approximate their carrying amount largely due to the
short-term maturities of these instruments.
Long-term fixed-rate and variable-rate receivables, including
receivables from finance leases, are evaluated by the Company
based on parameters such as interest rates, specific country
risk factors, individual creditworthiness of the customer and
the risk characteristics of the financed project. Based on this
evaluation, allowances are taken to account for the expected
losses of these receivables. As of September 30, 2007 and
2006, the carrying amounts of such receivables, net of
allowances, approximate their fair values.
The fair value of quoted notes and bonds is based on price
quotations at the balance sheet date. The fair value of unquoted
notes and bonds, loans from banks and other financial
indebtedness, obligations under finance leases as well as other
non-current financial liabilities is estimated by discounting
future cash flows using rates currently available for debt of
similar terms and remaining maturities.
F-79
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value are
presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Financial assets measured at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
943
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
Without hedging relationship
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
In connection with fair value hedges
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
In connection with cash flow hedges
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Embedded derivatives
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Financial liabilities measured at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
Without hedging relationship
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
In connection with fair value hedges
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
In connection with cash flow hedges
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Embedded derivatives
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
Fair values for
available-for-sale
financial assets are derived from quoted market prices in active
markets, if available. In certain cases, fair values are
estimated using a valuation technique.
The Company enters into derivative financial instruments with
various counterparties, principally financial institutions with
investment grade credit ratings. The calculation of fair values
for derivative financial instruments depends on the type of
instruments:
Derivative interest rate contractsThe fair values
of derivative interest rate contracts (e.g. interest rate swap
agreements) are estimated by discounting expected future cash
flows using current market interest rates and yield curve over
the remaining term of the instrument. Interest rate options are
valued on the basis of quoted market prices or on estimates
based on option pricing models.
Derivative currency contractsThe fair value of
forward foreign exchange contracts is based on forward exchange
rates. Currency options are valued on the basis of quoted market
prices or on estimates based on option pricing models.
Credit default swapsThe fair value of credit
default swaps is calculated by comparing discounted expected
future cash flows using current bank conditions with discounted
expected future cash flows using contracted conditions.
In determining the fair values of the derivative financial
instruments, certain compensating effects from underlying
transactions (e.g. firm commitments and anticipated
transactions) are not taken into consideration.
Net gains (losses) of financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
69
|
|
Loans and receivables
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
Financial liabilities measured at amortized cost
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Financial assets and financial liabilities held for trading
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Net gains (losses) on
available-for-sale
financial assets include impairment losses, gains or losses on
derecognition and the ineffective portion of fair value hedges.
For the amount of unrealized gains or losses on
F-80
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
available-for-sale
financial assets recognized directly in equity during the fiscal
year and the amount removed from equity and recognized in net
income for the fiscal year see Other components of equity
in Note 26.
Net losses on loans and receivables contain changes in valuation
allowances, gains or losses on derecognition as well as
recoveries of amounts previously written-off.
Net gains on financial liabilities measured at amortized cost
are comprised of gains or losses from derecognition and the
ineffective portion of fair value hedges.
Net gains (losses) on financial assets and financial liabilities
held for trading consist of changes in the fair value of
derivative financial instruments (including interest income and
expense), for which hedge accounting is not applied.
31. Derivative
financial instruments and hedging activities
As part of the Companys risk management program, a variety
of derivative financial instruments are used to reduce risks
resulting primarily from fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates and interest rates, as well as to reduce credit
risks. For additional information on the Companys risk
management strategies, including the use of derivative financial
instruments to mitigate or eliminate certain of these risks, see
also Note 32.
The fair values of each type of derivative financial instruments
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Interest rate swaps and combined interest/currency swaps
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Options
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded derivatives
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
Other
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
943
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency exchange risk management
As described in Note 32, the Company employs various
derivative financial instruments in order to mitigate or
eliminate certain foreign-currency exchange risks.
Derivative
financial instruments not designated as hedges
The Company manages its risks associated with fluctuations in
foreign-currency-denominated receivables, payables, debt, firm
commitments and anticipated transactions and to some extent
planned transactions primarily through a Company-wide portfolio
approach. This approach concentrates the associated Company-wide
risks centrally, and various derivative financial instruments,
primarily foreign exchange contracts and, to a lesser extent,
interest rate and cross-currency interest rate swaps and
options, are utilized to minimize such risks. Such a strategy
does not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under IAS 39,
Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.
Accordingly, all such derivative financial instruments are
recorded at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets,
either as Other current financial assets or Other
current financial liabilities, and changes in fair values
are charged to net income (loss).
The Company also has foreign-currency derivative instruments,
which are embedded in certain sale and purchase contracts
denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of
the significant parties to the
F-81
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
contract, principally the U.S.$. Gains or losses relating to
such embedded foreign-currency derivatives are reported in
Cost of goods sold and services rendered in the
Consolidated Statements of Income.
Hedging
activities
The Companys operating units applied hedge accounting for
certain significant anticipated transactions and firm
commitments denominated in foreign currencies. Specifically, the
Company entered into foreign exchange contracts to reduce the
risk of variability of future cash flows resulting from
forecasted sales and purchases and firm commitments resulting
from its business units entering into long-term contracts
(project business) and standard product business which are
denominated primarily in U.S.$.
Cash flow hedgesChanges in fair value of forward
exchange contracts that were designated as foreign-currency cash
flow hedges are recorded in Other components of equity.
During the years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
net gains of 1, 3 and 37, respectively, were
reclassified from Other components of equity into net
income (loss) because the occurrence of the related hedged
forecasted transaction was no longer probable.
It is expected that 119 of net deferred gains in Other
components of equity will be reclassified into Cost of
goods sold and services rendered during the year ended
September 30, 2008, when the hedged forecasted
foreign-currency denominated sales and purchases occur.
As of September 30, 2007, the maximum length of time over
which the Company is hedging its future cash flows associated
with foreign-currency forecasted transactions is 184 months.
Fair value hedgesAs of September 30, 2007 and
2006, the Company hedged firm commitments using forward exchange
contracts that were designated as foreign-currency fair value
hedges of future sales related primarily to the Companys
project business and, to a lesser extent, purchases. As of
September 30, 2007 and 2006, the hedging transactions
resulted in the recognition of financial assets of 2 and
6, respectively, and financial liabilities of 31 and
7, respectively, for the hedged firm commitments, whose
changes in fair value were charged to Cost of goods sold and
services rendered. Changes in fair value of the derivative
contracts were also recorded in Cost of goods sold and
services rendered.
Interest
rate risk management
Interest rate risk arises from the sensitivity of financial
assets and liabilities to changes in market rates of interest.
The Company seeks to mitigate such risk by entering into
interest rate derivative financial instruments such as interest
rate swaps (see also Note 32), options and, to a lesser
extent, cross-currency interest rate swaps and interest rate
futures.
Derivative
financial instruments not designated as hedges
The Company uses a portfolio-based approach to manage its
interest rate risk associated with certain interest-bearing
assets and liabilities, primarily interest-bearing investments
and debt obligations. This approach focuses on mismatches in the
structure of the interest terms of these assets and liabilities
without referring to specific assets or liabilities. Such a
strategy does not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under
IAS 39. Accordingly, all interest rate derivative instruments
used in this strategy are recorded at fair value, either as
Other current financial assets or Other current
financial liabilities, and changes in the fair values are
charged to Financial income (expense), net. Net cash
receipts and payments relating to interest rate swaps used in
offsetting relationships are also recorded in Financial
income (expense), net.
F-82
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Fair
value hedges of fixed-rate debt obligations
Under the interest rate swap agreements outstanding during the
year ended September 30, 2007, the Company agrees to pay a
variable rate of interest multiplied by a notional principle
amount, and receive in return an amount equal to a specified
fixed rate of interest multiplied by the same notional principal
amount. These interest rate swap agreements offset an impact of
future changes in interest rates on the fair value of the
underlying fixed-rate debt obligations. The interest rate swap
contracts are reflected at fair value in the Companys
Consolidated Balance Sheets and the related portion of
fixed-rate debt being hedged is reflected at an amount equal to
the sum of its carrying amount plus an adjustment representing
the change in fair value of the debt obligations attributable to
the interest rate risk being hedged. Changes in the fair value
of interest rate swap contracts and the offsetting changes in
the adjusted carrying amount of the related portion of
fixed-rate debt being hedged, are recognized as adjustments to
the line item Financial income (expense), net in the
Consolidated Statements of Income. The net effect recognized in
Financial income (expense), net, representing the
ineffective portion of the hedging relationship, amounted to
7 in fiscal 2007. Net cash receipts and payments relating
to such interest rate swap agreements are recorded as interest
expense, which is part of Financial income (expense), net.
The Company had interest rate swap contracts to pay variable
rates of interest (average rate of 5.2% and 5.0% as of
September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively) and received
fixed rates of interest (average rate of 5.7% and 5.7% as of
September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively). The notional
amount of indebtedness hedged as of September 30, 2007 and
2006 was 7,326 and 5,752, respectively. This
resulted in 82% and 44% of the Companys underlying notes
and bonds being subject to variable interest rates as of
September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The notional
amounts of these contracts mature at varying dates based on the
maturity of the underlying hedged items. The net fair value of
interest rate swap contracts (excluding accrued interest) used
to hedge indebtedness as of September 30, 2007 and 2006 was
20 and 207, respectively.
Fair
value hedges of
available-for-sale
financial assets
During the year ended September 30, 2007, the Company
applied fair value hedge accounting for certain fixed-rate
available-for-sale
financial assets. To offset the impact of future changes in
interest rates on the fair value of the underlying fixed-rate
available-for-sale
financial assets, interest rate swap agreements were entered
into. The interest rate swap contracts and the related portion
of the
available-for-sale
financial assets are reflected at fair value in the
Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in the fair
value of interest rate swap contracts and the offsetting changes
in fair value of the
available-for-sale
financial assets being hedged attributable to the interest rate
risk being hedged are recognized as adjustments to the line
item Financial income (expense), net in the
Consolidated Statements of Income. The net effect recognized in
Financial income (expense), net, representing the
ineffective portion of the hedging relationship, amounted to
9 in fiscal 2007.
Cash flow
hedges of revolving term deposits
During the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, the
Company applied cash flow hedge accounting for a revolving term
deposit. Under the interest rate swap agreements entered into,
the Company agrees to pay a variable rate of interest multiplied
by a notional principle amount, and to receive in return an
amount equal to a specified fixed rate of interest multiplied by
the same notional principal amount. These interest rate swap
agreements offset the effect of future changes in interest
payments of the underlying variable-rate term deposit. The
interest rate swap contracts are reflected at fair value and the
effective portion of changes in fair value of the interest rate
swap contracts that were designated as cash flow hedges are
recorded in Other components of equity. Net cash receipts
and payments relating to such interest rate swap agreements are
recorded as interest income, which is part of Financial
income (expense), net.
F-83
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
32. Financial
risk management
Market
risks
Market fluctuations may result in significant cash-flow and
profit volatility risk for Siemens. Its worldwide operating
business as well as its investment and financing activities are
affected by changes in foreign exchange rates, interest rates
and equity prices. To optimize the allocation of the financial
resources across the Groups, as well as to secure an optimal
return for its shareholders, Siemens identifies, analyzes and
proactively manages the associated financial market risks. The
Company seeks to manage and control these risks primarily
through its regular operating and financing activities, and uses
derivative instruments when deemed appropriate.
Management of financial market risk is a key priority for
Siemens Managing Board. As a member of this Board, the
Chief Financial Officer covers the specific responsibility for
this part of the overall risk management system. At the highest
level, the Managing Board retains ultimate accountability. For
practical business purposes, the Managing Board delegates
responsibilities to central functions and to the Groups. SFS
holds a minor trading portfolio which is subject to tight
limits. As of September 30, 2007, it has a
value-at-risk
close to zero.
Within the various methodologies to analyze and manage risk,
Siemens implemented a system based on sensitivity
analysis. This tool enables the risk managers to identify
the risk position of the entities. Sensitivity analysis provides
an approximate quantification of the exposure in the event that
certain specified parameters were to be met under a specific set
of assumptions. The risk estimates provided here assume:
|
|
|
|
|
a 20% decrease in equity prices of all investments traded in an
active market, which are classified as current
available-for-sale
financial assets;
|
|
|
|
a simultaneous, parallel foreign exchange rates shift in which
the Euro appreciates against all currencies by 10%;
|
|
|
|
a parallel shift of 100-basis points of the interest rate yield
curves in all currencies.
|
The potential economic impact, due to these assumptions, is
based on the occurrence of adverse market conditions and
reflects estimated changes resulting from the sensitivity
analysis. Actual results that are included in the Consolidated
Statements of Income may differ substantially from these
estimates due to actual developments in the global financial
market.
Any market sensitive instruments, including equity and interest
bearing investments that our Companys pension plans hold
are not included in the following quantitative and qualitative
disclosure. For additional information see Note 23.
Equity
price risk
Siemens investment portfolio consists of direct and
indirect investments in publicly traded companies held for
purposes other than trading. These participations result from
strategic partnerships, spin-offs, IPOs of strategic venture
capital investments or compensation from M&A transactions.
The equity investments are monitored based on their current
market value, affected by the fluctuations in the volatile stock
markets worldwide. The market value of Siemens portfolio
as of September 30, 2007 was 197, a reduction of
19 compared to September 30, 2006.
An adverse move in equity prices of 20% as of September 30,
2007 would reduce the value of Siemens equity investments
by 39 compared to 43 the year before, meaning that
the equity price risk has slighty decreased
year-over-year.
F-84
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Foreign
currency exchange rate risk
Transaction
risk and currency management
Siemens international operations expose the Company to
foreign-currency exchange risks in the ordinary course of
business. The Company employs various strategies discussed below
involving the use of derivative financial instruments to
mitigate or eliminate certain of those exposures.
Foreign exchange rate fluctuations may create unwanted and
unpredictable earnings and cash flow volatility. Each Siemens
unit conducting business with international counterparties that
leads to future cash flows denominated in a currency other than
its functional currency is exposed to the risk from changes in
foreign exchange rates. The risk is mitigated by closing all
types of business transactions (sales and procurement of
products and services as well as investment and financing
activities) mainly in the functional currency. In addition, the
foreign currency exposure is partly balanced by purchasing of
goods, commodities and services in the respective currencies as
well as production activities and other contributions along the
value chain in the local markets.
Operating units are prohibited from borrowing or investing in
foreign currencies on a speculative basis. Intercompany
financing or investments of operating units are preferably done
in their functional currency or on a hedged basis.
Siemens has established a foreign exchange risk management
system that has an established track record for years. Each
Siemens unit is responsible for recording, assessing,
monitoring, reporting and hedging its foreign currency
transaction exposure. The Group-wide binding guideline developed
by the Corporate Finance department, provides the concept for
the identification and determination of the single net currency
position and commits the units to hedge it in a narrow band: at
least 75% but no more than 100% of their net foreign currency
exposure. In addition, the Corporate Finance department provides
a framework of the organizational structure necessary for
foreign currency exchange management, proposes hedging
strategies and defines the hedging instruments available to the
entities: forward contracts, currency put and call options and
stop-loss orders. The execution of the hedging transactions in
the global financial markets is done by SFS as an exclusive
service provider for all Siemens entities on behalf of Corporate
Treasury. SFS executes hedging instruments used for hedge
accounting relationships individually with external
counterparts. For other hedging purposes Siemens has a
Company-wide portfolio approach which generates a benefit from
any potential off-set of divergent cash flows in the same
currency, as well as optimized transaction costs. For additional
information relating to the effect of this Company-wide
portfolio approach on the Consolidated Financial Statements, as
well as for a discussion of hedging activities employed to
mitigate or eliminate foreign currency exchange risks, please
refer to Note 31.
The foreign exchange rate sensitivity is calculated by
aggregation of the net foreign exchange rate exposure of the
Operations, Financing and Real Estate Groups and Corporate
Treasury. The values and risks are the unhedged positions
multiplied by an assumed 10% appreciation of the Euro against
all other currencies. As of September 30, 2007, a parallel
10% negative shift of all foreign currencies would have resulted
in a decline of 47 in future cash flows compared to a
decline of 38 the year before. Such decline in Euro values
of future cash flows might reduce the unhedged portion of
revenues but would also decrease the unhedged portion of cost of
materials. Since the Companys foreign currency inflows
exceed the outflows, an appreciation of the Euro against foreign
currencies would have a negative financial impact to the extent
that future sales are not already hedged. Future changes in the
foreign exchange rates can impact sales prices and may lead to
margin changes, the extent of which is determined by the
matching of foreign currency revenues and expenses.
Siemens defines foreign currency exposure generally as balance
sheet items in addition to firm commitments which are
denominated in foreign currencies, as well as foreign currency
denominated cash inflows and cash outflows from anticipated
transactions for the following three months. This foreign
currency exposure is determined based on the respective
functional currencies of the exposed Siemens entities.
F-85
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
The tables below show the net foreign exchange transaction
exposure by major currencies as of September 30, 2007 and
2006. In some currencies Siemens has both substantial sales and
costs, which have been off-set in the table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007*
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
GBP
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Gross balance sheet exposure
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
Thereof: Financial assets
|
|
|
7,858
|
|
|
|
3,642
|
|
|
|
4,769
|
|
|
|
16,269
|
|
Thereof: Financial liabilities
|
|
|
(7,635
|
)
|
|
|
(3,321
|
)
|
|
|
(4,561
|
)
|
|
|
(15,517
|
)
|
Gross exposure from firm commitments and anticipated
transactions
|
|
|
3,730
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
|
5,315
|
|
Foreign exchange transaction exposure
|
|
|
3,952
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
6,063
|
|
Economically hedged exposure
|
|
|
(3,893
|
)
|
|
|
(567
|
)
|
|
|
(1,132
|
)
|
|
|
(5,592
|
)
|
Change in future cash flows after hedging activities resulting
from a 10% appreciation of the Euro
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006*
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
GBP
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Gross balance sheet exposure
|
|
|
2,210
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
3,095
|
|
Thereof: Financial assets
|
|
|
13,778
|
|
|
|
3,483
|
|
|
|
5,522
|
|
|
|
22,783
|
|
Thereof: Financial liabilities
|
|
|
(11,568
|
)
|
|
|
(3,151
|
)
|
|
|
(4,969
|
)
|
|
|
(19,688
|
)
|
Gross exposure from firm commitments and anticipated transactions
|
|
|
5,344
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
5,558
|
|
Foreign exchange transaction exposure
|
|
|
7,554
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
8,653
|
|
Economically hedged exposure
|
|
|
(7,291
|
)
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
|
(576
|
)
|
|
|
(8,276
|
)
|
Change in future cash flows after hedging activities resulting
from a 10% appreciation of the Euro
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Effects
of currency translation
Many Siemens subsidiaries are located outside the Euro zone.
Since the financial reporting currency of Siemens is the Euro,
the financial statements of these subsidiaries are translated
into euros so that the financial results can be included in the
Consolidated Financial Statements of Siemens. To consider the
effects of foreign exchange translation risk within risk
management, the assumption is that investments in foreign-based
operations are permanent and that reinvestment is continuous.
Whenever a divestment of a particular asset or entity is made,
the value of this transaction risk is included in the
sensitivity analyses. Effects from currency fluctuations on the
translation of net asset amounts into Euro are reflected in the
Companys consolidated equity position.
Interest
rate risk
Siemens interest rate risk exposure is mainly related to
debt obligations like bonds, loans, commercial paper programs
and interest-bearing deposits and investments. Siemens seeks to
limit this risk through the use of derivative instruments which
allow it to hedge fair value changes by swapping fixed rates of
interest into variable rates of interest (for additional
information see Note 31).
To optimize the Companys position with regard to interest
income and interest expenses and to minimize the overall
financial interest rate risk, Corporate Treasury performs
corporate interest rate risk management together with SFS as
operating service provider. Part of the interest rate risk
management concept is a Corporate-wide
F-86
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
interest rate overlay management to match interest periods of
hedges with intended maturities of assets and liabilities. Where
it is not contrary to country-specific regulations, all Groups
and affiliated companies generally obtain any required financing
through Corporate Treasury in the form of loans or intercompany
clearing accounts. The same concept is adopted for deposits of
cash generated by the units.
Interest rate risk is measured by using either fair value
sensitivity or cash flow sensitivity depending on whether the
instrument has a fixed or variable interest rate. The total fair
value sensitivity as well as the total cash flow sensitivity is
generated by aggregating the sensitivities of the various
exposures denominated in different currencies. Depending on
whether Siemens has a long or short interest rate position,
interest rate risk can arise on increasing or decreasing market
moves in the relevant yield curve.
The fair value sensitivity calculation for fixed interest rate
instruments shows the change in fair value, defined as present
value, caused by a hypothetical 100-basis point shift in the
yield curve. The first step in this calculation is to use the
yield curve to discount the gross cash flows, meaning the
present value of future interest and principal payments of
financial instruments with fixed interest rates. A second
calculation discounts the gross cash flows using a 100-basis
point shift of the yield curve. In all cases, Siemens uses the
generally accepted and published yield curves on the relevant
balance sheet date. The fair value interest rate risk results
primarily from long-term fixed rate debt obligations and
interest-bearing investments. Assuming a 100-basis point
increase in interest rates, this risk was 40 as of
September 30, 2007, increasing from the comparable value of
24 as of September 30, 2006, assuming a 100-basis
point decrease.
For variable-rate instruments, the interest rate risk is
monitored by using the cash flow sensitivity also assuming a
100-basis point shift of the yield curves. Such risk mainly
results from hedges of fixed-rate debt obligations that swap
fixed-rates of interest into variable-rates of interest. This
exposure leads to a cash flow interest rate risk of 72 as
of September 30, 2007, compared to 32 as of
September 30, 2006, assuming a 100-basis point increase in
interest rates.
Liquidity
risk
Liquidity risk results from the Companys potential
inability to meet its financial liabilities, e.g. settlement of
its financial debt, paying its suppliers and settling finance
lease obligations. Beyond effective net working capital and cash
management, Siemens mitigates liquidity risk by arranged
borrowing facilities with highly rated financial institutions,
via a medium-term note program and via its global multi-currency
commercial paper program. For further information on sources of
liquidity see Note 22.
In addition to the above mentioned sources of liquidity, Siemens
constantly monitors funding options available in the capital
markets, as well as trends in the availability and costs of such
funding, with a view to maintaining financial flexibility and
limiting repayment risks.
The following table reflects all contractually fixed pay-offs
for settlement, repayments and interest resulting from
recognized financial liabilities, including derivative financial
instruments with a negative market value as of
September 30, 2007. For derivative financial instruments
the market value is presented, whereas for the other obligations
the respective undiscounted cash flows for the respective
upcoming fiscal years are presented. Cash
F-87
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
outflows for financial liabilities without fixed amount or
timing, including interest, are based on the conditions existing
at September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 to
|
|
|
2013 and
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
thereafter
|
|
|
Non-derivative financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and bonds
|
|
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
992
|
|
|
|
4,068
|
|
|
|
6,707
|
|
Loans from banks
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
Other financial indebtedness
|
|
|
4,445
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Obligations under finance leases
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
8,418
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other financial liabilities
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Derivative financial liabilities
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
The risk implied from the values shown in the table above,
reflects the one-sided scenario of cash outflows only. Leasing
obligations, trade payables and other financial liabilities
mainly originate from the financing of assets used in our
ongoing operations such as property, plant, equipment and
investments in working capitale.g. inventories and trade
receivables. These assets are considered in the Companys
overall liquidity risk. To monitor existing financial assets and
liabilities as well as to enable an effective controlling of
future risks, Siemens has established a comprehensive risk
reporting covering its worldwide business units.
The balanced view of liquidity and financial indebtedness is
stated in the calculation of the net liquidity amount and is
used for internal corporate finance management as well as
external communication with investors, analysts and rating
agencies. It results from the total amount of cash and cash
equivalents as well as current
available-for-sale
financial assets, less the amount of commercial paper,
medium-term notes, bonds, loans from banks and obligations under
finance leases as stated on the balance sheet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
|
|
10,214
|
|
Current
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
Total liquidity
|
|
|
4,198
|
|
|
|
10,810
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
5,637
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
9,860
|
|
|
|
13,122
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
15,497
|
|
|
|
15,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liquidity
|
|
|
(11,299
|
)
|
|
|
(4,487
|
)
|
The Companys capital resources are comprised of cash and
cash equivalents, current
available-for-sale
financial assets and cash flow from operating activities. In
contrast, capital requirements include scheduled debt service,
regular capital spending and ongoing cash requirements from
operating activities.
Credit
risk
The Company is exposed to credit risk in connection with its
significant project business in the fields of public
infrastructure and transport, healthcare, utilities and IT where
direct or indirect financing in various forms may be provided to
customers. In limited cases, the Company may also take an equity
interest as part of the project financing.
The Company is also exposed to credit risk via its leasing
activities, primarily related to medical engineering, data
processing equipment and industrial and consumer products of
third party manufacturers. Siemens credit risk
F-88
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
regarding such activities presents additional risks as the
volume of such transactions is higher, customers tend to be
smaller for which transparent credit histories are often not
available.
Credit risk is defined as an unexpected loss in cash and
earnings if the customer is unable to pay its obligations in due
time, if the value of property that serves as collateral
declines, or if the projects Siemens has invested in are not
successful. The effective monitoring and controlling of credit
risk is a core competency of our risk management system.
Corporate Treasury has implemented a group-wide binding credit
policy. Hence, credit evaluations and ratings are performed on
all customers with an exposure or requiring credit beyond a
centrally defined limit.
Customer ratings, analyzed and defined by a designated SFS
department, and individual customer limits are based on
generally accepted rating methodologies, the input from external
rating agencies and Siemens default experiences. Such ratings
are processed by internal risk assessment specialists. Ratings
and credit limits are carefully considered in determining the
conditions under which direct or indirect financing will be
offered to customers by the operating units.
Credit risk is recorded and monitored on an ongoing basis
applying different approaches dependent on the underlying
product. Central systems are used for leasing business,
factoring, monitoring of operating counterparty risk, real-time
monitoring of treasury counterparty risk, as are a number of
decentralized tools for management of individual credit risks
within the operating units. A central IT application processes
data from the operating units together with rating and default
information and calculates an estimate which may be used as a
basis for individual bad debt provisions. Apart from this
automated process, individual management judgment is applied, in
particular to incorporate the latest developments and
qualitative information.
To mitigate credit risk, Corporate Treasury has developed a
guideline under which operating units may sell portions of their
receivable portfolio on a non-recourse basis, either directly to
SFS or to external parties. Receivable sales to external parties
are generally only performed for customers with a credit rating
below investment grade or for long-term projects with a
financing component. Beginning in fiscal 2008, Siemens will
change its receivable management guidelines.
SFS uses credit default swaps, classified as derivatives, to
protect from credit risks stemming from its receivables purchase
business. In respect of financial assets that are not protected
through the use of credit default swaps the maximum exposure to
credit risk, without taking account of any collateral, is
represented by their carrying amount. Credit risks arising from
credit guarantees are described in Note 28. After
consideration of credit default swap derivatives there were no
significant concentrations of credit risk as of
September 30, 2007.
Concerning trade receivables and other receivables, as well as
other loans or receivables included in Other financial
assets that are neither impaired nor past due, there were no
indications as of September 30, 2007, that defaults in
payment obligations will occur. For further information
regarding the concept for the determination of allowances on
receivables see Note 3.
33. Share-based
payment
Share-based payment plans at Siemens are designed as
equity-settled plans as well as cash-settled plans. Total
expense for share-based payment recognized in net income for
continuing and discontinued operations amounted to 92,
56 and 60 for the years ended September 30,
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and refers primarily to
equity-settled awards, including the Companys employee
share purchase program. The total income tax benefit recognized
in the Consolidated Statements of Income for share-based payment
was 58, 35 and 38 in fiscal 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively.
F-89
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
I.
Equity-settled awards
Cash received from stock option exercises and from the
Companys employee share purchase program for the three
years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 amounts to
903, 313 and 173, respectively.
Stock
Option Plans
Description
of plans1999 Siemens Stock Option Plan
As part of a stock option plan for members of the Managing
Board, key executives and other eligible employees, the
Companys shareholders authorized the Managing Board on
February 18, 1999 to distribute non-transferable options
exercisable for up to an aggregate of 10 million common
shares. The authority to distribute options under this plan
would have originally expired on February 18, 2004. With
the ratification by Siemens shareholders of the 2001 Siemens
Stock Option Plan (for further details see below), the 1999
Siemens Stock Option Plan (the 1999 Plan) has been replaced and
no further options under this plan have been granted.
Under the 1999 Plan, the exercise price is equal to the average
market price of Siemens stock during the five days
preceding the date the options were granted. The options are
exercisable within the five years following a holding period of
two years if Siemens AG stock price outperforms the Dow Jones
Stoxx-Index
by at least two percentage points on five consecutive days. This
percentage applies to the first year of the five-year option
exercise period, and increases by 0.5 percentage points in each
subsequent year.
The terms of the plan allow the Company, at its discretion upon
exercise of the option, to offer optionees settlement of the
options in either newly issued shares of common stock of Siemens
AG from the Conditional Capital reserved for this purpose,
treasury stock or cash. The alternatives offered to optionees
are determined by the Managing Board in each case as approved by
the Supervisory Board. Compensation in cash is equal to the
difference between the exercise price and the average market
price of the Companys stock on the five trading days
preceding the exercise of the stock options.
Description
of plans2001 Siemens Stock Option Plan
At the Annual Shareholders Meeting on February 22,
2001, shareholders authorized Siemens AG to establish the
2001 Siemens Stock Option Plan, making available up to
55 million options. Compared to the 1999 Plan, the number
of eligible recipients is significantly larger. The option
grants are subject to a two-year vesting period, after which
they may be exercised for a period of up to three years. The
exercise price is equal to 120% of the reference price, which
corresponds to the average opening market price of
Siemens AG during the five trading days preceding the date
of the stock option grant. However, an option may only be
exercised if the trading price of the Companys shares
reaches a performance target which is equal to the exercise
price at least once during the life of the option. The terms of
the plan allow the Company, at its discretion upon exercise of
the option, to offer optionees settlement of the options in
either newly issued shares of common stock of Siemens AG
from the Conditional Capital reserved for this purpose, treasury
stock or cash. The alternatives offered to optionees are
determined by the Managing Board in each case as approved by the
Supervisory Board. Compensation in cash shall be equal to the
difference between the exercise price and the opening market
price of the Companys stock on the day of exercising the
stock options. The amount of shares authorized to be issued to
accommodate stock option exercises is 52,317 thousand as of
September 30, 2007. The Company is also authorized to
repurchase up to 10% of the 2,675 common stock outstanding
on the date of the Annual Shareholders Meeting on
January 25, 2007 until July 24, 2008.
The issuance of stock options to members of the Managing Board
on or after October 1, 2003, has been subject to the
proviso that the Supervisory Board may restrict the stock option
exercise in the event of extraordinary, unforeseen changes in
the market price of the Siemens share. Those restrictions may
reduce the number of options exercisable by each Board Member,
provide for an exercise in cash for a constricted amount only,
or suspend the
F-90
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
exercise of the option until the extraordinary effects on the
share price have ceased. The fair value of the options has not
been adjusted for effects resulting from such restrictions.
Reasonable estimates cannot be made until it is probable that
such adverse events will occur. Since it is not possible to
reliably estimate the fair value of those options at the grant
date, compensation costs are determined based on the current
intrinsic value of the option until the date at which the number
of shares to which a Board member is entitled to and the
exercise price are determinable. Upon that date, fair value will
be determined in accordance with the fair value recognition
provisions of IFRS 2, Share-Based Payment, based on an
appropriate fair value option pricing model.
The Supervisory as well as the Managing Board decided not to
grant any stock options in fiscal 2007. Since the authority to
distribute options under the 2001 Siemens Stock Option Plan
expired on December 13, 2006, no further options will be
granted under this plan.
In November 2005, the Supervisory Board and Managing Board
granted options to 597 key executives for 3,023,830 shares
with an exercise price of 74.59 of which options for
315,495 shares were granted to the Managing Board. In
November 2004, the Supervisory Board and Managing Board granted
options to 624 key executives for 2,945,035 shares with an
exercise price of 72.54 of which options for
296,270 shares were granted to the Managing Board.
Details on option exercise activity and weighted average
exercise prices for the years ended September 30, 2007,
2006 and 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
in millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
(years)
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
Outstanding, beginning of period
|
|
|
26,729,148
|
|
|
|
74.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,611,556
|
|
|
|
71.93
|
|
|
|
28,054,326
|
|
|
|
70.86
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,023,830
|
|
|
|
74.59
|
|
|
|
2,945,035
|
|
|
|
72.54
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(11,480,500
|
)
|
|
|
70.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,215,508
|
)
|
|
|
55.71
|
|
|
|
(1,696,362
|
)
|
|
|
54.31
|
|
Options forfeited/expired
|
|
|
(6,642,376
|
)
|
|
|
85.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(690,730
|
)
|
|
|
76.57
|
|
|
|
(691,443
|
)
|
|
|
74.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
8,606,272
|
|
|
|
72.13
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
26,729,148
|
|
|
|
74.67
|
|
|
|
28,611,556
|
|
|
|
71.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, end of period
|
|
|
5,754,342
|
|
|
|
70.90
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
20,978,443
|
|
|
|
74.96
|
|
|
|
17,486,809
|
|
|
|
71.21
|
|
The total grant-date fair value of options vested during the
years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was 11,
76 and 84, respectively.
F-91
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
The following table summarizes information on stock options
outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Value as of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Value as of
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Options
|
|
|
remaining life
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
remaining life
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
prices
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
(years)
|
|
|
per share
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
exercisable
|
|
|
(years)
|
|
|
per share
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
53.70
|
|
|
858,618
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
53.70
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
858,618
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
53.70
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
72.54
|
|
|
1,313,805
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
72.54
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
1,313,805
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
72.54
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
73.25
|
|
|
3,256,759
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
73.25
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
3,256,759
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
73.25
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
74.59
|
|
|
2,851,930
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
74.59
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
74.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.23
|
|
|
325,160
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
86.23
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
325,160
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
86.23
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Fair
value information
The Companys determination of the fair value of grants is
based on an option pricing model which was developed for use in
estimating the fair values of options that have no vesting
restrictions. Option valuation models require the input of
highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price
volatility. Assumptions made in estimating the fair value of
grants made during the years ended September 30, 2006 and
2005, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions at grant date
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.99%
|
|
|
|
2.72%
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
2.41%
|
|
|
|
2.07%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
18.30%
|
|
|
|
20.38%
|
|
Expected option life
|
|
|
3.5 yrs.
|
|
|
|
3 yrs.
|
|
Estimated weighted average fair value per option
|
|
|
4.06
|
|
|
|
4.54
|
|
Fair value of total options granted during fiscal year
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Stock
awards
In the first quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company introduced
stock awards and phantom stock as another means for providing
share-based compensation to members of the Managing Board and
other eligible employees. Stock awards are subject to a four
year vesting period. Upon expiration of the vesting period, the
recipient receives Siemens shares without payment of
consideration. Stock awards are forfeited if the grantees
employment with the Company terminates prior to the expiration
of the vesting period. During the vesting period, grantees are
not entitled to dividends. Stock awards may not be transferred,
sold, pledged or otherwise encumbered. Stock awards may be
settled in newly issued shares of common stock of
Siemens AG, treasury stock or in cash. The settlement
method will be determined by the Managing Board and the
Supervisory Board.
Each fiscal year, the Company decides whether or not to grant
Siemens stock awards. Siemens stock awards may be granted only
once a year within thirty days following the date of publication
of the business results for the previous fiscal year. The
Supervisory Board decides annually after the end of each fiscal
year how many stock awards to grant to the Managing Board and
the Managing Board decides annually how many stock awards to
grant to members of the top management of domestic and foreign
subsidiaries and eligible employees.
In fiscal 2007, the Company granted 1,232,893 stock awards to
5,162 employees and members of the Managing Board, of which
37,302 awards were granted to the Managing Board. In fiscal
2006, the Company granted 1,076,860 stock awards to 5,198
employees and members of the Managing Board, of which 25,221
awards were granted to the Managing Board. In fiscal 2005, the
Company granted 1,152,508 stock awards to 5,343
F-92
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
employees and members of the Managing Board, of which 24,177
awards were granted to the Managing Board. Details on stock
award activity and weighted average grant-date fair value are
summarized in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Nonvested, beginning of period
|
|
|
2,154,871
|
|
|
|
56.44
|
|
|
|
1,136,048
|
|
|
|
55.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,232,893
|
|
|
|
67.70
|
|
|
|
1,076,860
|
|
|
|
57.28
|
|
|
|
1,152,508
|
|
|
|
55.63
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(116,854
|
)
|
|
|
59.38
|
|
|
|
(58,037
|
)
|
|
|
56.17
|
|
|
|
(16,460
|
)
|
|
|
55.63
|
|
Nonvested, end of period
|
|
|
3,270,910
|
|
|
|
60.58
|
|
|
|
2,154,871
|
|
|
|
56.44
|
|
|
|
1,136,048
|
|
|
|
55.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value was determined as the market price of Siemens shares
less the present value of dividends expected during the
4 year vesting period which resulted in a fair value of
67.70, 57.28 and 55.63, respectively, per
stock award granted in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005. Total fair
value of stock awards granted in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005
amounted to 83, 62 and 64, respectively.
As of September 30, 2007, unrecognized compensation costs
related to stock awards amounted to 99, which is expected
to be recognized over a weighted average vesting period of
2.5 years.
Employee
share purchase program
Under an employee share purchase program with compensation
character, employees may purchase a limited number of shares in
the Company at preferential prices once a year. Up to a
stipulated date in the first quarter of each fiscal year,
employees may order the shares, which are usually issued in the
second quarter of the fiscal year. The employee share purchase
program is measured at fair value. During the years ended
September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 the Company incurred
compensation expense (before income taxes) of 27, 38
and 31, respectively, related to the sale of repurchased
shares to employees, based on a preferential employee share
price of 51.20, 46.12 and 43.24, respectively,
and a grant-date fair value of 20.79, 21.19 and
16.86 respectively, per share. For information on
corresponding Siemens share repurchases, see Note 26.
Stock
appreciation rights (SARs)
Where local regulations restrict the grant of stock options in
certain jurisdictions, the Company grants SARs to
employees under the same conditions as the 2001 Siemens Stock
Option Plan except that SARs are exercisable in cash only.
F-93
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Details on SARs activity and weighted average exercise
prices are summarized in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
Outstanding, beginning of period
|
|
|
349,900
|
|
|
|
73.47
|
|
|
|
267,720
|
|
|
|
73.05
|
|
|
|
198,850
|
|
|
|
73.25
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,270
|
|
|
|
74.59
|
|
|
|
76,670
|
|
|
|
72.54
|
|
SARs exercised
|
|
|
(106,280
|
)
|
|
|
73.06
|
|
|
|
(2,300
|
)
|
|
|
73.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs forfeited
|
|
|
(45,340
|
)
|
|
|
73.72
|
|
|
|
(12,790
|
)
|
|
|
73.20
|
|
|
|
(7,800
|
)
|
|
|
73.25
|
|
Outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
198,280
|
*
|
|
|
73.63
|
|
|
|
349,900
|
|
|
|
73.47
|
|
|
|
267,720
|
|
|
|
73.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, end of period
|
|
|
123,335
|
|
|
|
73.05
|
|
|
|
181,950
|
|
|
|
73.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Thereof 35,485 SARs with a 72.54 exercise price and
a weighted average remaining life of 2.2 years, 87,850
SARs with a 73.25 exercise price and a weighted
average remaining life of 1.2 years and 74,945 SARs with a
74.59 exercise price and a weighted average remaining life
of 3.2 years.
|
In fiscal 2007, the expected volatility is based on historical
volatility of Siemens shares, implied volatility for traded
Siemens options with similar terms and features, and certain
other factors. The expected term is derived by applying the
simplified method and is determined as the average of the
vesting term and the contractual term. The risk-free interest
rate is based on applicable governmental bonds. Changes in
subjective assumptions can materially affect the fair value of
the SARs.
Phantom
stock
Where local regulations restrict the grants of stock awards in
certain jurisdictions, the Company grants phantom stock to
employees under the same conditions as the Siemens stock awards,
except that grantees receive the share prices equivalent
value in cash only at the end of the four year vesting period.
In fiscal 2005, 28,628 phantom stock rights were granted and 391
phantom stock rights forfeited, resulting in a balance of 28,237
phantom stock rights as of September 30, 2005. In fiscal
2006, 33,153 phantom stock rights were granted and 805 phantom
stock rights forfeited, resulting in a balance of 60,585 phantom
stock rights as of September 30, 2006. In fiscal 2007,
36,962 phantom stock rights were granted and 9,087 phantom stock
rights forfeited, resulting in a balance of 88,460 phantom stock
rights as of September 30, 2007. None of the phantom stock
rights were vested as of September 30, 2007.
34. Personnel
costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Wages and salaries
|
|
|
18,631
|
|
|
|
18,719
|
|
|
|
16,908
|
|
Statutory social welfare contributions and expenses for optional
support payments
|
|
|
3,076
|
|
|
|
3,064
|
|
|
|
2,725
|
|
Expenses relating to pension plans and employee benefits
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,525
|
|
|
|
22,790
|
|
|
|
20,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses relating to pension plans and employee benefits
includes service cost for the period. Expected return on plan
assets and interest cost are included in Financial income
(expense), net.
F-94
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
The average number of employees in fiscal year 2007 and 2006 was
386,200 and 368,500, respectively (based on continuing
operations). Part-time employees are included on a proportionate
basis rather than being counted as full units. The employees
were engaged in the following activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Manufacturing and services
|
|
|
237.2
|
|
|
|
221.8
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
84.2
|
|
|
|
85.0
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
30.9
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
Administration and general services
|
|
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386.2
|
|
|
|
368.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35. Earnings
per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(shares in thousands)
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
3,909
|
|
|
|
2,642
|
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
Less: Portion attributable to minority interest
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to shareholders
of Siemens AG
|
|
|
3,710
|
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
2,635
|
|
Plus: Effect of assumed conversion, net of tax
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to shareholders
of Siemens AG plus effect of assumed conversion
|
|
|
3,736
|
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
2,672
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic
|
|
|
898,135
|
|
|
|
890,850
|
|
|
|
890,732
|
|
Effect of dilutive convertible debt securities and share-based
payment
|
|
|
37,035
|
|
|
|
2,292
|
|
|
|
45,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingdiluted
|
|
|
935,170
|
|
|
|
893,142
|
|
|
|
936,530
|
|
Basic earnings per share (from continuing operations)
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
|
Diluted earnings per share (from continuing operations)
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
|
|
|
2.85
|
|
For additional information on the convertible debt see also
Notes 22 and 26.
36. Segment
information
As of September 30, 2007, the Company has twelve reportable
segments referred to as Groups reported among the components
used in Siemens financial statement presentation as
described in Note 1. The Groups are organized based on the
nature of products and services provided.
Within the Operations component, Siemens has nine Groups
which involve manufacturing, industrial and commercial goods,
solutions and services in areas more or less related to
Siemens origins in the electrical business. Also included
in Operations is SEI (see discussion below), as well as
operating activities not associated with a Group, the latter of
which are reported under Other Operations, as well as
other reconciling items discussed in Reconciliation to
financial statements below.
In fiscal 2006, Siemens announced portfolio changes that
resulted in dissolving Com as a Group and reportable segment. As
discussed in Note 4, the primary business components of the
former operating segment Com were either already disposed of
(carrier networks and MD) or still held for disposal
(enterprise networks) as of
F-95
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
September 30, 2007. Beginning October 1, 2006,
A&D assumed responsibility for Coms Wireless Modules
business. Except for Wireless Modules and other businesses
including the former division Siemens Home and Office
Communication Devices that was reclassified from Com to Other
Operations in the third quarter of fiscal 2006, the
historical results of the former operating segment Com are
presented as discontinued operations. Current and prior-year
segment disclosures exclude the applicable information included
in the Companys financial statement presentation.
Due to the increased importance of the Companys strategic
investments accounted for under the equity method, in particular
the creation of NSN (see Note 4 for further information),
Siemens has created a new reportable segment Strategic Equity
Investments (SEI) beginning in fiscal 2007. SEI represents an
operating segment, having its own management that reports the
results of the segment to the Managing Board. In addition to the
investments in Fujitsu Siemens Computers (Holding) BV (FSC) and
BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (BSH), the Siemens
investment in NSN is also reported in SEI beginning in the third
quarter of fiscal 2007. The investments in FSC and BSH
were included within Other Operations until September 30,
2006. Prior-year information was reclassified for comparability
purposes for these two investments. In fiscal 2007,
SEI results of (161) includes (429) related to
the investment in NSN.
A new Group called Siemens IT Solutions and
Services (SIS) was created effective April 1, 2007.
SIS consists primarily of the activities of the former segment
SBS that were bundled with other information technology
activities. Prior-year information was reclassified for
comparability purposes.
In fiscal 2007, Siemens also signed an agreement to sell its
entire SV activities to Continental AG (see
Note 4 for further information). The historical results of
the SV business are reported as discontinued operations.
Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, SV ceased
to represent a reportable segment. Current and prior-year
segment disclosures therefore exclude the applicable information
included in the Companys financial statement presentation.
The Financing and Real Estate component includes the
Groups SFS and SRE. The Eliminations,
reclassifications and Corporate Treasury component
separately reports the consolidation of transactions among
Operations and Financing and Real Estate, as well
as certain reclassifications and the activities of the
Companys Corporate Treasury.
The accounting policies of these components, as well as the
Groups included, are generally the same as those used for
Siemens and are described in Note 2, Summary of
significant accounting policies. Corporate overhead is
generally not allocated to segments. Intersegment transactions
are generally based on market prices.
New orders are determined principally as the estimated revenue
of accepted purchase orders and order value changes and
adjustments, excluding letters of intent.
Operations
The Managing Board is responsible for assessing the performance
of the Operations Groups. The Companys
profitability measure for its Operations Groups is
earnings before financing interest, certain pension costs, and
income taxes (Group profit) as determined by the Managing Board
as the chief operating decision maker (see discussion below).
Group profit excludes various categories of items which are not
allocated to the Groups since the Managing Board does not regard
such items as indicative of the Groups performance. Group
profit represents a performance measure focused on operational
success excluding the effects of capital market financing
issues. The major categories of items excluded from Group profit
are presented below.
Financing interest is any interest income or expense other than
interest income related to receivables from customers, from cash
allocated to the Groups and interest expense on payables to
suppliers. Financing interest is
F-96
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
excluded from Group profit because decision-making regarding
financing is typically made centrally by Corporate Treasury.
Similarly, decision-making regarding essential pension items is
done centrally. As a consequence, Group profit includes only
amounts related to the service cost of pension plans, while all
other pension related costs (including charges for the German
pension insurance association and plan administration costs) are
included in the line item Corporate items, pensions and
eliminations.
Furthermore, income taxes are excluded from Group profit since
tax expense is subject to legal structures which typically do
not correspond to the structure of the Operations Groups.
The effect of certain litigation and compliance issues is also
not included in Group profit when the Company concludes that
such items are not indicative of the Groups performance
since the results of operations of the Groups may be distorted
by the amount and the irregular nature of such events. This may
also be the case for items that refer to more than one Group or
have a corporate or central character.
The Managing Board also determined net capital employed as
additional information to assess the capital intensity of the
Operations Groups. Its definition corresponds with the
Group profit measure. Net capital employed is based on total
assets excluding intragroup financing receivables and intragroup
investments and tax related assets, as the corresponding
positions are excluded from Group profit (asset-based
adjustments). The remaining assets are reduced by
non-interest-bearing liabilities other than tax related
liabilities (e.g. trade payables) and provisions
(liability-based adjustments) to derive net capital employed.
The reconciliation of total assets to net capital employed is
presented below.
Other Operations primarily refers to operating activities
not associated with a Group, as well as to assets recently
acquired as part of acquisitions for which the allocation to the
Groups are not yet finalized but excluding the investment in
Infineon, which was included in Corporate items prior to its
sale (see Note 10 for further information). The Dematic
business was included in Other Operations before a
significant portion of it was sold (see Note 4 for further
information).
Reconciliation
to financial statements
Reconciliation to financial statements includes items
which are excluded from the definition of Group profit as well
as costs of corporate headquarters.
Corporate items includes corporate charges such as
personnel costs for corporate headquarters, the results of
corporate-related derivative activities, as well as corporate
projects and non-operating investments. Pensions includes
the Companys pension related income (expenses) not
allocated to the Groups. Eliminations represents the
consolidation of transactions within the Operations
component.
In fiscal 2007, Corporate items, pensions and
eliminations in the column Group profit includes
(1,728) related to corporate items, as well as 70
and (14) related to pensions and eliminations,
respectively. Included in (1,728) above is a (440)
total impact related to a fine imposed by the European
Commission in connection with an antitrust investigation
involving suppliers of high-voltage gas-isolated switching
systems in the power transmission and distribution industry
between 1988 and 2004 (see Notes 6 and 29 for further
information). In addition, (1,728) also includes
(152) for outside advisors engaged by the Company in
connection with investigations into alleged violations of
anti-corruption laws and related matters as well as remediation
activities (see Notes 6 and 29 for additional information),
as well as (106) impairment related to Siemens
regional sales organization in Germany. In fiscal 2006,
Corporate items, pensions and eliminations in the column
Group profit includes (553) related to corporate items, as
well as 26 and related to pensions and
eliminations, respectively. In fiscal 2006, Corporate
items includes pre-tax gains of 33 and 15,
respectively, from the sale of the Companys remaining
interest in Infineon and Epcos (see Note 10). In fiscal
2005, Corporate items, pensions and eliminations in the
column Group
F-97
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
profit includes (647) related to corporate items, as well
as 51 and (22) related to pensions and eliminations,
respectively.
Other interest expense of Operations relates primarily to
interest paid on debt and corporate financing transactions
through Corporate Treasury.
The following table reconciles total assets of the
Operations component to net capital employed of the
Operations Groups as disclosed in Segment
Information according to the above definition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Total assets of Operations
|
|
|
87,658
|
|
|
|
80,019
|
|
Asset-based adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intragroup financing receivables and investments
|
|
|
(10,834
|
)
|
|
|
(16,028
|
)
|
Tax-related assets
|
|
|
(2,845
|
)
|
|
|
(3,786
|
)
|
Liability-based adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans and similar commitments
|
|
|
(2,779
|
)
|
|
|
(5,081
|
)
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
(38,398
|
)
|
|
|
(37,133
|
)
|
Assets classified as held for disposal and associated liabilities
|
|
|
(7,576
|
)
|
|
|
(1,993
|
)
|
Other adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,575
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments (line item Other assets related and
miscellaneous reconciling items within the Segment
Information table)
|
|
|
(62,432
|
)
|
|
|
(67,596
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capital employed of Corporate items, pensions and
eliminations
|
|
|
3,536
|
|
|
|
6,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capital employed of Operations Groups
|
|
|
28,762
|
|
|
|
18,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2007, Segment
Information discloses Free cash flow and Additions to
property, plant and equipment and intangibles. These replace Net
cash from operating and investing activities and Capital
spending, which were reported until March 31, 2007. Free
cash flow represents net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities less additions to intangible assets and property,
plant and equipment. At the same time, beginning in the third
quarter of fiscal 2007, Amortization, depreciation and
impairments presented in Segment information includes
amortization and impairments of intangible assets other than
goodwill and depreciation and impairments of property, plant and
equipment.
The following table reconciles Free cash flow of the
Operations, Financing and Real Estate and
Eliminations, reclassifications and Corporate Treasury
components as disclosed in Segment Information to the
corresponding consolidated amount for the Company and to net
cash provided by operating activities as presented in the
Siemens Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow. In addition,
Additions to intangible assets and property, plant and equipment
and Amortization, depreciation and impairments of the
Operations, Financing and Real
F-98
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Estate and Eliminations, reclassifications and
Corporate Treasury components as disclosed in Segment
Information are reconciled to Siemens Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
property, plant
|
|
|
Net cash provided by
|
|
|
Amortization,
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
|
and equipment
|
|
|
operating activities
|
|
|
depreciation
|
|
|
|
(I)
|
|
|
(II)
|
|
|
(I) + (II)
|
|
|
and impairments
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing, according to Segment information
|
|
|
4,094
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
2,313
|
|
|
|
2,415
|
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
6,407
|
|
|
|
3,405
|
|
|
|
2,322
|
|
|
|
2,187
|
|
|
|
1,882
|
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
Impairment*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(3,178
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(515
|
)
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
(2,494
|
)
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (1) (Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow)
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
2,997
|
|
|
|
3,284
|
|
|
|
2,951
|
|
|
|
3,913
|
|
|
|
4,061
|
|
|
|
2,761
|
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
|
|
2,676
|
|
|
|
3,105
|
|
Financing and Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing, according to Segment information
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
Impairment*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (2) (Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow)
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
Eliminations, reclassifications and Corporate Treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing, according to Segment information
|
|
|
2,330
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,330
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (3) (Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow)
|
|
|
2,330
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,330
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SiemensTotal (1)+(2)+(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing, according to Segment information
|
|
|
6,755
|
|
|
|
1,820
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
3,067
|
|
|
|
3,183
|
|
|
|
2,670
|
|
|
|
9,822
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
3,198
|
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
Impairment*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(3,178
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(510
|
)
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
(2,494
|
)
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flow (excluding Free cash flow)
|
|
|
3,577
|
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3,751
|
|
|
|
4,052
|
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
|
7,328
|
|
|
|
5,659
|
|
|
|
3,642
|
|
|
|
3,751
|
|
|
|
3,118
|
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
|
|
* |
Goodwill impairment and impairment of non-current
available-for-sale
financial assets and investments accounted for using the equity
methodcontinuing operations.
|
Financing
and Real Estate
The Companys performance measurement for its Financing
and Real Estate Groups is Income before income taxes.
In contrast to the performance measurement used for the
Operations Groups, interest income and expense is an
important source of revenue and expense for Financing and
Real Estate.
For the years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
Income before income taxes at SFS includes interest
revenue of 553, 557 and 491, respectively, and
interest expense of 359, 331 and 257,
respectively. In addition, Income before income taxes
includes earnings from equity investees for the years ended
September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 of 59, 57 and
46, respectively.
For the years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
Income before income taxes at SRE includes interest
revenue of 31, 49 and 51, respectively, and
interest expense of 117, 138 and 147,
respectively.
Eliminations,
reclassifications and Corporate Treasury
Income before income taxes consists primarily of interest
income due to cash management activities, corporate finance, and
certain currency and interest rate derivative instruments.
F-99
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Description
of business segments
The Operations Groups are comprised of the following
businesses:
Siemens IT Solutions and Services (SIS)SIS provides
information and communications services to customers primarily
in the manufacturing industry, telecommunications and media, the
public sector, service industries, the healthcare sector, the
transportation and airports sector and utilities. SIS designs,
builds and operates both discrete and large-scale information
and communications-systems.
Automation and Drives (A&D)A&D produces
and installs manufacturing automation systems, motion control
and drive systems, low voltage controllers and installation
systems, process automation systems and instrument products, and
electronic assembly systems and provides related solutions and
services.
Industrial Solutions and Services
(I&S)I&S is a solution provider for
Infrastructure and Industry with own standard products
worldwide. I&S aims to optimize the production and
operational processes of customers in the sectors water, metals,
traffic control, airport logistics, postal automation, marine
solutions, oil and gas, paper, cement and opencast mining.
Siemens Building Technologies (SBT)SBT provides
products, systems and services for monitoring and regulating the
temperature and ventilation, fire safety, security and energy
efficiency of commercial and industrial property, as well as
special applications for airports, tunnels, harbors or stadiums.
Power Generation (PG)PG provides customers
worldwide with a full range of equipment necessary for the
efficient conversion of energy into electricity and heat.
PGs offerings include engineering and manufacturing of key
components, equipment, and systems, individualized planning,
engineering and construction of coal and gas fired power plants
as well as comprehensive servicing, retrofitting and modernizing
of existing facilities. PG also engineers and manufactures wind
energy plants and customizes smaller gas turbines, steam
turbines and compressors for industrial applications. It also
supplies control technology for all plant types.
Power Transmission and Distribution (PTD)PTD
supplies energy utilities and large industrial power users with
equipment, systems and services used to process and transmit
electrical power from the source, typically a power plant, to
various points along the power transmission network and to
distribute power via a distribution network to the end-user.
Transportation Systems (TS)TS provides products and
services for the rail industry, including signaling and control
systems, railway electrification systems, complete heavy rail
systems including rapid transit systems, locomotives, light rail
systems and other rail vehicles.
Medical Solutions (Med)Med develops, manufactures
and markets diagnostic and therapeutic systems, devices and
consumables, as well as information technology systems for
clinical and administrative purposes. Med provides technical
maintenance, professional and consulting services and works with
Siemens Financial Services to provide financing and related
services to the customers.
OsramOsram designs, manufactures and sells a full
spectrum of lighting products for a variety of applications such
as general lighting and automotive, photo-optic and
opto-semiconductor lighting.
The Financing and Real Estate Groups are comprised of the
following two businesses:
Siemens Financial Services (SFS)SFS, the
Companys international financial services segment,
provides a variety of customized financial solutions both to
third parties and to other Siemens business Groups and their
customers.
F-100
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Siemens Real Estate (SRE)SRE owns and manages a
substantial part of Siemens real estate portfolio and
offers a range of services encompassing real estate development,
real estate disposal and asset management, as well as lease and
services management.
37. Geographic
information
The following table presents data by geographic region as of and
for the years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by location of customer
|
|
|
Revenue by location of companies
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
12,594
|
|
|
|
12,382
|
|
|
|
11,788
|
|
|
|
20,848
|
|
|
|
20,152
|
|
|
|
17,204
|
|
Europe (other than Germany)
|
|
|
22,801
|
|
|
|
20,489
|
|
|
|
18,064
|
|
|
|
23,310
|
|
|
|
21,025
|
|
|
|
18,142
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
14,832
|
|
|
|
14,609
|
|
|
|
12,113
|
|
|
|
15,744
|
|
|
|
14,515
|
|
|
|
12,268
|
|
Americas other than U.S.
|
|
|
4,489
|
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
3,410
|
|
|
|
2,997
|
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
10,937
|
|
|
|
9,457
|
|
|
|
7,175
|
|
|
|
7,092
|
|
|
|
6,133
|
|
|
|
4,698
|
|
Africa, Middle East, C.I.S.
|
|
|
6,795
|
|
|
|
5,788
|
|
|
|
3,897
|
|
|
|
2,044
|
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens
|
|
|
72,448
|
|
|
|
66,487
|
|
|
|
55,781
|
|
|
|
72,448
|
|
|
|
66,487
|
|
|
|
55,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
6,514
|
|
|
|
8,476
|
|
|
|
8,109
|
|
Europe (other than Germany)
|
|
|
8,581
|
|
|
|
7,644
|
|
|
|
7,125
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
9,738
|
|
|
|
6,924
|
|
|
|
6,726
|
|
Americas other than U.S.
|
|
|
972
|
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
Africa, Middle East, C.I.S.
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siemens
|
|
|
27,675
|
|
|
|
25,146
|
|
|
|
24,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets consist of property, plant and equipment,
goodwill and other intangible assets.
38. Related
party transactions
Joint
ventures and associates
Siemens has a number of significant joint ventures and
associates. The Company has relationships with many of these
entities in the ordinary course of business whereby the Company
buys and sells a wide variety of products and services on
arms length terms. The Companys principal joint
ventures and associates as of September 30, 2007 are NSN,
BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH, Fujitsu Siemens
Computers (Holding) BV and Areva NP. As described in
Note 4, NSN was created in April 2007. Financial
information for fiscal 2006 and 2005 therefore does not include
any amounts related to NSN.
In fiscal 2007, Siemens generated revenue from its four
principal joint ventures and associates, as indicated above,
amounting to 78. In fiscal 2006 and 2005, revenue
generated from the Companys principal joint ventures and
associates totaled 76 and 69, respectively.
During fiscal 2006, the former operating segment SBS sold its
Product Related Services (PRS) business to Fujitsu Siemens
Computers (Holding) BV on arms length terms. For further
information, see Note 4.
F-101
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
As of September 30, 2007 and 2006, receivables from the
Companys principal joint ventures and associates amount to
11 and 10, respectively. As of September 30,
2007 and 2006, liabilities to the Companys principal joint
ventures and associates total 35 and 12,
respectively.
For further information regarding guarantees in connection with
the contribution of the carrier related operations into NSN see
also Note 28, Commitments and contingencies.
Related
individuals
Except for the guarantee provided by the Company for a bond
issued by a bank in connection with the release from custody of
a former member of our Corporate Executive Committee in fiscal
2007 (see Note 29 for additional information), no major
transaction took place between the Company and the other members
of the Managing Board and the Supervisory Board.
For further information see also Note 39,
Remuneration.
In addition, some of the members of the Companys
Supervisory Board and Managing Board hold, or in the last year
have held, positions of significant responsibility with other
entities. The Company has relationships with almost all of these
entities in the ordinary course of business whereby the Company
buys and sells a wide variety of products and services on
arms length terms. Dr. Josef Ackermann is the
Chairman of the Management Board of Deutsche Bank AG. The
Companys transactions with Deutsche Bank AG are
conducted on arms length basis and include securities
underwriting, other investment banking services, and credit,
money market and foreign exchange business.
39. Remuneration
Information concerning the remuneration of the members of the
Managing Board and of the Supervisory Board is included in
Item 6, Directors, Senior Management and
Employees, on pages 96-107.
40. Reconciliation
and additional US GAAP disclosures
Explanation
of transition to IFRS
As described in Note 1, in addition to its primary
financial reporting for fiscal 2006 under U.S. GAAP, in
December 2006 the Company also published its first IFRS
Consolidated Financial Statements. The IFRS Consolidated
Financial Statements as of September 30, 2006 were
presented as supplemental information and serve as a basis for
Siemens primary IFRS reporting beginning with the first
quarter of fiscal 2007. The IFRS Consolidated Financial
Statements as of September 30, 2006 included a
reconciliation of equity and net income from U.S. GAAP to
IFRS for all balance sheet dates presented, as well as a
reconciliation of equity as of October 1, 2004, when IFRS
was adopted.
The most significant change from US GAAP was the adoption of the
new option to recognize actuarial gains and losses in equity in
the period in which they occur. Thus, actuarial gains and losses
were recognized directly in equity as of the date of transition
to IFRS as well as in all subsequent periods presented.
Siemens applied IFRS 1 in making the transition to IFRS,
with October 1, 2004 as the date of transition to IFRS.
IFRS 1 requires that all IFRS standards and interpretations
that are effective for the first IFRS Consolidated Financial
Statements for the year ended September 30, 2006, be
applied consistently and retrospectively for all
F-102
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
fiscal years presented. However, this standard provides
exemptions and exceptions to this general requirement in
specific cases. Siemens applied the following exemptions:
a. Business combinations
Business combinations that occurred before October 1, 2004,
were not restated retrospectively in accordance with
IFRS 3, Business Combinations. Within the limits
imposed by IFRS 1, the carrying amounts of assets acquired
and liabilities assumed as part of past business combinations as
well as the amounts of goodwill that arose from such
transactions as they were determined under U.S. GAAP, are
considered their deemed cost under IFRS at the date of
transition.
b. Currency translation differences
Cumulative translation differences as of October 1, 2004,
arising from translation into euro of the financial statements
of foreign operations whose functional currency is other than
euro were reset to zero. Accordingly, the cumulative translation
differences were included in Retained earnings in the
IFRS opening balance sheet. In the case of subsequent disposal
of an entity concerned, no amount of currency translation
difference relating to the time prior to the transition date
will be included in the determination of the gain or loss on
disposal of such entity.
c. Share-based payment
As permitted under IFRS 1, IFRS 2 has not been
retrospectively applied to all share-based payment awards. This
exemption has been applied for all equity awards which were
granted prior to November 7, 2002, as well as those equity
awards granted prior to October 1, 2003, which vested
before January 1, 2005. All such equity awards exempted
from IFRS 2 continue to be accounted for under the
intrinsic value approach as under U.S. GAAP.
Reconciliation
of equity and net income from IFRS to U.S. GAAP
As described in Note 1, the consolidated financial
statements of Siemens have been prepared in accordance with
IFRS, which differs in certain respects from U.S. GAAP.
The following reconciliation describes the effect of major
differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP on equity as of
September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, as well as
on net income for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explanatory
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
note
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Equity under IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
29,627
|
|
|
|
25,895
|
|
|
|
23,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization of development costs
|
|
a
|
|
|
(282
|
)
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
Investments accounted for using the equity method
|
|
b
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Sale and leaseback transactions
|
|
c
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
Financial instruments
|
|
d
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
266
|
|
Pensions and other post-employment benefits
|
|
e
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
Termination benefits
|
|
f
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
Provisions
|
|
g
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
h
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
1,527
|
|
|
|
2,026
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
1,383
|
|
|
|
3,733
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity under U.S. GAAP before reclassification of minority
interest
|
|
|
|
|
31,010
|
|
|
|
29,628
|
|
|
|
27,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in presentation of minority interest
|
|
i
|
|
|
(631
|
)
|
|
|
(702
|
)
|
|
|
(656
|
)
|
Equity under U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
30,379
|
|
|
|
28,926
|
|
|
|
26,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-103
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explanatory
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
note
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net income under IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
4,038
|
|
|
|
3,345
|
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
Capitalization of development costs
|
|
a
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Investments accounted for using the equity method
|
|
b
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Sale and leaseback transactions
|
|
c
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
Financial instruments
|
|
d
|
|
|
(1,436
|
)
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Pensions and other post-employment benefits
|
|
e
|
|
|
(719
|
)
|
|
|
(613
|
)
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
Termination benefits
|
|
f
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Provisions
|
|
g
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
h
|
|
|
1,194
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
177
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
(1,390
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income under U.S. GAAP before reclassification of
minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
2,648
|
|
|
|
3,256
|
|
|
|
2,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in presentation of minority interest
|
|
i
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
Net income under U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
2,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a. Capitalization of development costs
Under IFRS, development costs are capitalized if specified
criteria are met, while they are expensed under U.S. GAAP,
except for internally generated software. Due to the fact that
product development costs (less related amortization) cannot be
capitalized under U.S. GAAP equity decreased by 282,
251 and 230, as of September 30, 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively. The resulting decrease in net income under
U.S. GAAP was 74, 17 and 13 in fiscal
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
b. Investments accounted for using the equity method
U.S. GAAP requires that the application of the equity
method be based on financial information provided by the
associated companies and joint ventures that is in compliance
with US GAAP. Due to resulting U.S. GAAP adjustments
relating to investments accounted for using the equity method,
equity increased by 61, 141 and 164 as of
September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net income
under US GAAP decreased by 75, 32 and 15 in
fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, as compared to IFRS.
c. Sale and leaseback transactions
IFRS and U.S. GAAP differ with respect to the accounting for a
gain arising from a sale and leaseback transaction. If the
leaseback is an operating lease and the transaction is
established at fair value, any gain on sale is recognized
immediately. Under U.S. GAAP any gain on sale is deferred and
amortized over the lease term. Adjustments made in this respect
decreased equity under U.S. GAAP by 211, 207 and
186 as of September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005. The
effect on net income was a decrease of 5 and 21 in
fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively, and an increase of 22
in fiscal 2005.
d. Financial instruments
Under IFRS, a compound financial instrument with terms and
conditions that grant the issuer the right to settle the option
in cash upon conversion is divided into separate liability
components (bifurcated) at inception. The conversion right
component is considered a derivative instrument and measured at
fair value through profit or loss. The residual liability
component representing the debt obligation is measured at fair
value at inception and is subsequently measured at amortized
cost using the effective interest method. In the third quarter
of fiscal 2006, Siemens decided to waive the cash settlement
option of the convertible bond and reclassified the conversion
right
F-104
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
component, which then is deemed to be an equity component, to
Additional paid-in capital (see Note 22 for further
information). Under U.S. GAAP, the conversion feature of debt
instruments convertible into shares of the issuer is generally
not separated (bifurcated) from the debt instrument and not
accounted for separately at fair value.
As described in Note 22, in fiscal 2007 the Company
repurchased parts of the convertible bonds outstanding. Under
IFRS the purchase price is allocated to the liability component
and the conversion right component. The amount allocated to the
liability component is charged against the carrying amount of
the liability component with the difference being recognized in
profit and loss. The amount allocated to the conversion right
component is charged directly against Additional paid-in
capital. Under U.S. GAAP the entire purchase price relates
to the debt instrument and is charged against the carrying
amount with the difference being recognized in profit and loss.
As of September 30, 2005, the bifurcated conversion right
component increased equity by 375 under U.S. GAAP, due to
the consideration of the conversion right as a derivative
instrument and its re-measurement to fair value as well as the
accretion of the debt component under IFRS. As of
September 30, 2006, equity decreased by 230 mainly
due to this reclassification of the conversion right component
under IFRS. As of September 30, 2007, there were no
differences between equity under U.S. GAAP and IFRS related to
the topics described above. Compared to IFRS net income was by
1,436 lower under U.S. GAAP in fiscal 2007 due to the fact
that the part of the purchase price allocated to the conversion
right component was charged directly against Additional
paid-in capital under IFRS. Net income increased under U.S.
GAAP by 198 and 25 in fiscal 2006 and 2005,
respectively, in relation to the fair value re-measurement of
the conversion right and additional interest expense under IFRS.
Under IFRS the short-cut-method that may be applied
under U.S. GAAP to hedge interest rate risk, if certain
conditions are met, is not allowed. As the requirements for the
application of hedge accounting under IFRS are more restrictive,
hedge accounting related to interest rate risk for certain
fixed-rate debt obligations was discontinued under IFRS. IFRS 1
requires that the corresponding basis adjustments recognized
under U.S. GAAP as of September 30, 2004 be carried forward
to the IFRS opening balance and deferred over the remaining life
of the related instrument. Therefore, the termination of hedge
accounting resulted in an increase in equity of 7 and
6 as of September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively,
and a decrease in equity of 89 as of September 30,
2005. The effect on net income was a decrease of 1 in
fiscal 2007, an increase of 96 in fiscal 2006 and a
decrease of 89 in fiscal 2005.
Under IFRS, all equity instruments, including non-exchange
traded equity investments are measured at fair value, if
reliably measurable, with unrealized gains and losses included
in Other components of equity, net of applicable deferred
income taxes. Investments for which a fair value is not reliably
measurable are recorded at cost. Under U.S. GAAP, equity
instruments for which there is no readily determinable market
value are recorded at cost. The necessary adjustments under U.S.
GAAP decreased equity as of September 30, 2007, by 8.
The adjustments decreased equity as of September 30, 2006
and 2005 by 29 and 20, respectively.
e. Pensions and other post-employment benefits
As of September 30, 2007 the Company fully adopted
SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)
(SFAS No. 158). SFAS No. 158
requires companies to recognize the funded status of a defined
benefit plan, which is the difference between plan assets and
the projected benefit obligation (PBO), in the Consolidated
Balance Sheet. Actuarial gains and losses and prior service cost
or benefits are recognized as a component of other comprehensive
income, net of tax, until they are amortized as a component of
net periodic benefit cost.
Because the company recorded actuarial gains and losses under
IFRS in retained earnings, net of tax, the differences in equity
between IFRS and U.S. GAAP as of September 30, 2007
resulted from unvested past service cost or benefits and effects
due to asset ceilings. As of September 30, 2007 the
difference from unvested past service benefits and asset
ceilings leads to lower liabilities under U.S. GAAP for pension
plans and similar commitments by
F-105
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
128 with a corresponding increase in equity. This figure
includes a one-time effect of the adoption of
SFAS No. 158 to the change in measurement date of the
PBO and the fair value of plan assets of the Companys
pension benefit plans to September 30. Adopting
SFAS No. 158, the measurement date of the PBO and the
fair value of plan assets of the Companys pension benefit
plans is September 30. Prior to the adoption of
SFAS No. 158 the measurement date of the
Companys foreign plans was either September 30 or
June 30.
Under U.S. GAAP, actuarial gains and losses exceeding the
corridor continue to be amortized over the average
remaining service period of active plan participants. Likewise,
prior service cost and benefits were amortized over the average
remaining service period of active plan participants. Together
with minor effects from settlements and curtailments this leads
to a lower net income under U.S. GAAP of 706, 602
and 549 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, as compared
to IFRS.
Prior to adopting SFAS No. 158 the Company accounted
in line with U.S. GAAP SFAS No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions
(SFAS No. 87). SFAS 87 defines an
accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) that, in contrast to the
projected benefit obligation, does not include assumptions about
future compensation increases. If the ABO exceeds the fair value
of plan assets, a liability at least equal to such
differencereferred to as the minimum liabilityis
recorded on the balance sheet. The difference between the amount
recorded on the balance sheet and the minimum
liabilityreferred to as the additional minimum liability
(AML)is recognized either as an intangible pension asset,
to the extent that past service cost exists, or within
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI) (similar to
Other components of equity under IFRS). As the AML
recorded by the Company under U.S. GAAP represents a significant
portion of the total unrecognized actuarial losses existing at
each balance sheet date presented, the reduction in equity
compared to U.S. GAAP resulting from pensions was significantly
less than the amount of such unrecognized actuarial losses.
The overall impact prior to the adoption of
SFAS No. 158 was an increase in the liabilities for
pension plans and similar commitments and a decrease in equity
of 1,588 and 749 as of September 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively. Besides pensions, differences in the
accounting for other long-term post employment benefits affected
equity and net income. Other long-term post-employment benefits
are employee benefits that are paid regardless of the reason for
the employees departure. Differences between the
aforementioned amounts and the amounts provided in the tables
above resulted primarily from such benefits.
f. Termination benefits
A significant portion of the adjustments resulting from
termination benefits relates to the partial retirement program
available to Siemens employees in Germany. The majority of
participants opted for a partial retirement arrangement that is
typically composed of a full-time service period and an inactive
period, where the employee receives 50% of the salary for each
year during the entire partial retirement period plus a
supplementary amount of 25%. In addition, participants receive a
severance payment at the end of the inactive period. IFRS
requires that both the supplementary amount and the severance
payment are recognized in full as expense immediately when a
partial retirement agreement is established, while under U.S.
GAAP both of these benefit elements of the partial retirement
arrangement are recognized as expense on a pro rata basis from
the signing of the partial retirement contract until the end of
the service period. Adjustments due to partial retirement
obligations increased equity under U.S. GAAP by 190,
213 and 296 as of September 30, 2007, 2006, and
2005, respectively, whereas net income decreased by 15,
82 and 73 in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Another difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS arises from
voluntary termination agreements. Under U.S. GAAP, a liability
is recognized only when a voluntary termination agreement has
been signed by both the employer and the employee. By contrast,
under IFRS, a liability is recognized when the employer has
irrevocably committed itself to grant a termination benefit.
Such agreements resulted in higher equity under U.S. GAAP than
under IFRS by 102, 319 and 8 as of
September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net income
decreased under U.S.
F-106
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
GAAP by 213 in fiscal 2007 and increased under by
313 and 3 for the years ended September, 30, 2006
and 2005, respectively.
g. Provisions
Under IFRS, provisions generally must be discounted and
recognized at present value at each balance sheet date, i.e. the
discount rate should be adjusted at each reporting date to
reflect current market conditions. In contrast, under U.S. GAAP,
discounting of provisions is limited to specific cases, such as
to asset retirement obligations, whereby U.S. GAAP requires such
obligations be discounted only using the discount rate
determined when the provision is initially recognized. With
respect to asset retirement obligations, applicable interest
rates were therefore different for IFRS compared to U.S. GAAP.
Due to a lower discount rate under IFRS, the present values to
be recognized under IFRS increased with a positive effect on
equity under U.S. GAAP of 219 as compared to IFRS as of
September 30, 2005 and in net income of 134 in fiscal
2005. As of September 30, 2006 equity under U.S. GAAP was
157 higher than under IFRS, whereas net income was
62 lower due to an increase in the discount rate
applicable under IFRS in fiscal 2006 as compared to 2005. As of
September 30, 2007, equity under U.S. GAAP was 76
higher than under IFRS, whereas net income under U.S. GAAP was
81 lower than under IFRS.
This reconciling item contains various other differences with
respect to recognition and measurement of provisions, such as
provisions for onerous contracts and provisions with a range of
possible outcomes where each point in that range is as likely as
any other.
h. Deferred taxes
The adjustments as described above resulted in additional
differences between the carrying amount of assets and
liabilities in the Consolidated Financial Statements and their
tax basis. Deferred taxes were recognized on temporary
differences, with differences in pension accounting between U.S.
GAAP and IFRS having the most significant impact.
This reconciling item also includes tax effects resulting from
differences in accounting for income taxes between U.S. GAAP and
IFRS. For the Company, such effects mainly result from
calculating deferred taxes on elimination of intragroup profits.
According to IFRS, deferred taxes on intragroup profit
elimination are calculated with reference to the tax rate of the
acquiring company whereas, under U.S. GAAP, the tax rate in the
sellers or manufacturers jurisdiction is used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Accounting for pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
(496
|
)
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Conversion rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
(316
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Intragroup profits
|
|
|
909
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
164
|
|
Other adjustments
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
1,527
|
|
|
|
1,194
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-107
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Net deferred income tax assets and liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
1,468
|
|
|
|
4,779
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
911
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
1,899
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
4,329
|
|
The split of the deferred taxes in current and non current is
exclusive of deferred taxes in assets and liabilities.
i. Change in presentation of minority interest
Under IFRS, minority interest is reported as a separate item
within equity. U.S. GAAP requires minority interest to be
presented separately from equity. Consistent with the balance
sheet presentation, under IFRS the minorities share of net
income is presented as an allocation of net income, whereas,
under U.S. GAAP, the minorities share is considered in
determining net income.
Assets held for disposal and discontinued operations
According to IFRS, a discontinued operation is a component of an
entity that either has been disposed of, or is classified as
held for sale, and represents (or is part of a single
coordinated plan to dispose of) a separate major line of
business or geographical area of operations or is a subsidiary
acquired exclusively with a view to resale. Under U.S. GAAP, the
results of operations of a component of an entity that either
has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale shall be
reported in discontinued operations if the operations and cash
flows have been (or will be) eliminated from the ongoing
operations of the entity as a result of the disposal transaction
and the entity will not have any significant continuing
involvement in the operations of the component after the
disposal transaction.
The results and financial position of the carrier-related
business and the enterprise networks business have been
presented as discontinued operations under IFRS. These
businesses are not presented as discontinued operations under
U.S. GAAP due to Siemens continuing involvement in the
carrier-related business and due to the anticipated continuing
involvement in the enterprise networks business and therefore
have been recorded as continuing activities under U.S. GAAP.
F-108
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income and condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets in accordance with U.S. GAAP
The following tables present the Companys condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 and condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2007
and 2006.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income in accordance with
U.S. GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
78,890
|
|
|
|
77,559
|
|
|
|
66,089
|
|
Cost of goods sold and services rendered, Research and
development expenses, Marketing, selling and general
administrative expenses
|
|
|
(74,855
|
)
|
|
|
(75,105
|
)
|
|
|
(63,623
|
)
|
Other operating income (expense), net
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Income from investments accounted for using the equity method,
net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
Financial income (expense), net
|
|
|
(1,665
|
)
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
3,728
|
|
|
|
3,549
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(955
|
)
|
|
|
(872
|
)
|
|
|
(858
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
2,650
|
|
|
|
2,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
2,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
|
|
2.85
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
|
|
3.42
|
|
|
|
2.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
2.29
|
|
|
|
2.85
|
|
|
|
2.74
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2.68
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
2.33
|
|
F-109
SIEMENS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(in millions of , except where otherwise stated and per
share amounts)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in accordance with
U.S. GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
|
|
10,214
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
14,620
|
|
|
|
15,149
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
12,930
|
|
|
|
12,790
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
4,845
|
|
|
|
6,269
|
|
Assets classified as held for disposal
|
|
|
11,555
|
|
|
|
7,189
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
47,955
|
|
|
|
51,611
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
12,517
|
|
|
|
9,776
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
10,557
|
|
|
|
12,072
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
7,859
|
|
|
|
3,922
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
14,582
|
|
|
|
13,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
93,470
|
|
|
|
90,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
5,637
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
8,382
|
|
|
|
8,444
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
25,288
|
|
|
|
22,888
|
|
Liabilities associated with assets classified as held for
disposal
|
|
|
4,405
|
|
|
|
5,545
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
43,712
|
|
|
|
39,052
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
9,853
|
|
|
|
13,399
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
8,895
|
|
|
|
8,691
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
62,460
|
|
|
|
61,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
30,379
|
|
|
|
28,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
93,470
|
|
|
|
90,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of
Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements. Siemens adopted
SAB 108 at the end of fiscal 2007. The correction of
misstatements during fiscal 2007 is described in Note 2.
The correction of adjustments under U.S. GAAP is the same as
under IFRS.
41. Subsequent
events
At the beginning of November 2007, Siemens completed the
acquisition of Dade Behring which will be integrated into
Meds Diagnostics division (see also Note 4 for
further information).
On November 7, 2007, the Company also announced a share
buyback program with a total volume of up to
10 billion by 2010.
F-110
PART III,
CONTINUED
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
1.1
|
|
|
English translation of Articles of Association of Siemens
Aktiengesellschaft updated as of October 2007
|
2.1
|
|
|
The total amount of long-term debt securities authorized under
any instrument does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the
Company on a consolidated basis. We hereby agree to furnish to
the Commission, upon its request, a copy of any instrument
defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of Siemens
Aktiengesellschaft or of its subsidiaries for which consolidated
or unconsolidated financial statements are required to be filed
|
4.1
|
|
|
Sale and Purchase Agreement dated July 25, 2007 regarding
the sale and purchase of the Siemens VDO Automotive Group
|
8.1
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
12.1
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
12.2
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
13.1
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18. U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
13.2
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18. U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
14.1
|
|
|
Consent of KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft
Aktiengesellschaft Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
|
III-1
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on
Form 20-F
and has duly caused the undersigned to sign this annual report
on its behalf.
Date: November 28, 2007
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
Peter Löscher
President and Chief Executive Officer
Joe Kaeser
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Dr. Ralf P. Thomas
Corporate Vice President and Controller
III-2