Edgar Filing: BofI Holding, Inc.

10-Q 2013.09.30 BOFI Q1

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



x	QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period ended September 30, 2013



¨	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 000-51201

BofI HOLDING, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		33-0867444
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4350 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 140, San Diego, CA		92122
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (858) 350-6200

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website every Interactive Data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filed, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer x	Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). ¨ Yes x No

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock on the last practicable date: 13,853,069 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, as of October 30, 2013.

Table of Contents

BofI HOLDING, INC.

INDEX



	Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION	1

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	1
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013	1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (unaudited) for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	3
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited) for the three months ended September 30, 2013	4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	36
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	37
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	39
FINANCIAL CONDITION	45
LIQUIDITY	50
OFF-BALANCE SHEET COMMITMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS	51
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND REQUIREMENTS	51
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	52

ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS	54

ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	54

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION	55

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	55

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS	55

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	55

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	55

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	55

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION	55

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS	56

SIGNATURES	57

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

BOFI HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)



(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2013			June 30, 2013
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	195,231		$	196,264
Federal funds sold	1,752			5,430
Total cash and cash equivalents	196,983			201,694
Securities:
Trading	7,734			7,111
Available-for-sale	220,081			185,607
Held-to-maturity fair value $258,906 as of September 2013 and $271,854 as of June 2012	267,670			275,691
Stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank, at cost	30,832			27,750
Loans held for sale, carried at fair value	19,695			36,665
Loans held for sale, lower of cost or fair value	51,223			40,326
Loans - net of allowance for loan losses of $14,546 as of September 2013 and $14,182 as of June 2013	2,433,001			2,256,918
Accrued interest receivable	9,172			9,763
Furniture, equipment and software—net	6,594			6,418
Deferred income tax	21,510			23,555
Cash surrender value of life insurance	5,490			5,445
Other real estate owned and repossessed vehicles	2,562			2,006
Other assets	11,635			11,822
TOTAL ASSETS	$	3,284,182		$	3,090,771

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	92,900		$	81,524
Interest bearing	2,100,064			2,010,475
Total deposits	2,192,964			2,091,999
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	110,000			110,000
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank	656,000			590,417
Subordinated debentures	5,155			5,155
Accrued interest payable	1,655			1,674
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other liabilities	35,791			23,264
Total liabilities	3,001,565			2,822,509
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 8)
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock— $0.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized;
Series A—$10,000 stated value and liquidation preference per share; 515 shares issued and outstanding as of September 2013 and June 2013	5,063			5,063
Common stock—0.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 14,729,240 shares issued and 13,803,247 shares outstanding as of September 2013; 14,638,229 shares issued and 13,733,325 shares outstanding as of June 2013	147			146
Additional paid-in capital	159,304			156,297
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)—net of tax	(10,190		)	(10,800		)
Retained earnings	139,917			127,813
Treasury stock, at cost; 925,993 shares as of September 2013 and 904,904 shares as of June 2013	(11,624		)	(10,257		)
Total stockholders' equity	282,617			268,262
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	3,284,182		$	3,090,771

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

BOFI HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2013			2012
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Loans, including fees	$	30,385		$	25,208
Investments	5,961			5,781
Total interest and dividend income	36,346			30,989
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits	5,605			5,537
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank	1,363			1,587
Other borrowings	1,268			1,380
Total interest expense	8,236			8,504
Net interest income	28,110			22,485
Provision for loan losses	500			2,550
Net interest income, after provision for loan losses	27,610			19,935
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Realized gain on sale of mortgage-backed securities	208			—
Other than temporary loss on securities:
Total impairment losses	253			(2,872		)
Loss recognized in other comprehensive income	(825		)	1,998
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings	(572		)	(874		)
Fair value gain on trading securities	623			602
Total unrealized loss on securities	51			(272		)
Prepayment penalty fee income	654			202
Gain on sale - other	3,089			—
Mortgage banking income	1,986			6,456
Banking service fees and other income	988			375
Total non-interest income	6,976			6,761
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and related costs	7,782			6,369
Professional services	1,680			918
Occupancy and equipment	549			507
Data processing and internet	1,185			571
Advertising and promotional	589			794
Depreciation and amortization	721			337
Real estate owned and repossessed vehicles	69			98
FDIC and regulator fees	547			488
Other general and administrative	1,392			1,450
Total non-interest expense	14,514			11,532
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES	20,072			15,164
INCOME TAXES	7,890			6,175
NET INCOME	$	12,182		$	8,989
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCK	$	12,104		$	8,912
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	$	12,792		$	7,707
Basic earnings per share	$	0.85		$	0.73
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.85		$	0.67

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

BOFI HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2013			2012
NET INCOME	$	12,182		$	8,989
Other comprehensive income:
Net unrealized gain (loss) from available-for-sale securities	(62		)	(198		)
Other-than-temporary impairment on hold to maturity securities recognized in other comprehensive income	1,078			(1,940		)
Unrealized gain (loss), net of reclassification adjustments, before income tax	1,016			(2,138		)
Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other comprehensive income	(406		)	856
Other comprehensive income (loss)	610			(1,282		)
Comprehensive income	$	12,792		$	7,707

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

BOFI HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)



	Convertible Preferred Stock			Common Stock						Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Income Tax			Treasury Stock			Total
	Convertible Preferred Stock			Number of Shares
(Dollars in thousands)	Shares	Amount		Issued	Treasury		Outstanding	Amount
BALANCE — July 1, 2013	515	$	5,063	14,638,229	(904,904	)	13,733,325	$	146	$	156,297		$	127,813		$	(10,800	)	$	(10,257	)	$	268,262
Net income	—	—		—	—		—	—		—			12,182			—			—			12,182
Other comprehensive income	—	—		—	—		—	—		—			—			610			—			610
Cash dividends on preferred stock	—	—		—	—		—	—		—			(78		)	—			—			(78		)
Issuance of common stock	—	—		—	—		—	—		(110		)	—			—			—			(110		)
Stock-based compensation expense	—	—		—	—		—	—		966			—			—			—			966
Restricted stock grants	—	—		64,931	(21,089	)	43,842	—		1,345			—			—			(1,367		)	(22		)
Stock option exercises and tax benefits of equity compensation	—	—		26,080	—		26,080	1		806			—			—			—			807
BALANCE — September 30, 2013	515	$	5,063	14,729,240	(925,993	)	13,803,247	$	147	$	159,304		$	139,917		$	(10,190	)	$	(11,624	)	$	282,617

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

BOFI HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2013			2012
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	12,182		$	8,989
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Accretion of discounts on securities	(2,076		)	(2,047		)
Net accretion of discounts on loans	(552		)	(611		)
Stock-based compensation expense	966			708
Tax benefit from exercise of common stock options and vesting of restricted stock grants	(1,917		)	(312		)
Valuation of financial instruments carried at fair value	(623		)	(602		)
Impairment charge on securities	572			874
Provision for loan losses	500			2,550
Deferred income taxes	1,639			680
Origination of loans held for sale	(186,696		)	(254,796		)
Unrealized (gain) loss on loans held for sale	123			(779		)
Gain on sales of loans held for sale	(5,198		)	(5,677		)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale	226,306			219,753
Loss on sale of other real estate and foreclosed assets	12			46
Depreciation and amortization of furniture, equipment and software	721			337
Net changes in assets and liabilities which provide (use) cash:
Accrued interest receivable	591			(81		)
Other assets	380			(3,601		)
Accrued interest payable	(19		)	59
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	13,077			2,171
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	59,988			(32,339		)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of investment securities	(43,245		)	(7,238		)
Proceeds from repayment of securities	19,312			23,047
Purchase of stock of Federal Home Loan Bank	(6,652		)	(915		)
Proceeds from redemption of stock of Federal Home Loan Bank	3,570			1,103
Origination of loans	(470,669		)	(207,719		)
Origination of mortgage warehouse loans, net	45,120			(71,978		)
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned and repossessed assets	146			454
Purchases of loans, net of discounts and premiums	—			(1,541		)
Principal repayments on loans	220,104			86,311
Net purchases of furniture, equipment and software	(897		)	(1,406		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(233,211		)	(179,882		)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in deposits	100,965			237,883
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances	143,000			33,000
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances	(77,417		)	(51,000		)
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options	235			21
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	(110		)	—
Tax benefit from exercise of common stock options and vesting of restricted stock grants	1,917			312
Cash dividends on preferred stock	(78		)	(77		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	168,512			220,139
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	(4,711		)	7,918
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of year	201,694			35,426
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period	$	196,983		$	43,344
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds	$	8,254		$	8,445
Income taxes paid	$	813		$	4,402
Transfers to other real estate owned and repossessed vehicles from loans	$	811		$	—
Transfers from loans held for investment to loans held for sale	$	31,367		$	541
Transfers from loans held for sale to loans held for investment	$	398		$	—

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

BOFI HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 AND 2012

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)


1.	BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of BofI Holding, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, BofI Federal Bank (formerly Bank of Internet USA, the “Bank” and collectively with BofI Holding, Inc., the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements, presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), are unaudited and reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of financial condition and results of operations for the interim periods. All adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Results for the three months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the year as a whole. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the audited annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) with respect to interim financial reporting. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes for the year ended June 30, 2013 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior-period financial statements to conform to the current period presentation.


2.	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Securities. Debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at amortized cost when management has both the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Debt securities are classified as available-for-sale when they might be sold before maturity. Trading securities refer to certain types of assets that banks hold for resale at a profit at fair value. Increases or decreases in the fair value of trading securities are recognized in earnings as they occur. Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income, net of tax.

Gains and losses on securities sales are based on a comparison of sales proceeds and the amortized cost of the security sold using the specific identification method. Purchases and sales are recognized on the trade date. Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts on securities are amortized or accreted using the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments, except for mortgage-backed securities where prepayments are anticipated. The Company’s portfolios of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities are reviewed quarterly for other than temporary impairment. In performing this review, management considers (1) the length of time and extent that fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, (3) the impact of changes in market interest rates on the market value of the security and (4) whether the Company intends to sell or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell a security in an unrealized loss position before the Company recovers the security’s amortized cost. If either of these criteria for (4) is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized in earnings. Alternatively, if the criteria for (4) is not met, the amount of impairment recognized in earnings is limited to the amount related to credit losses, while impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis.

Loans. Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at the principal balance outstanding, net of unearned interest, deferred purchase premiums and discounts, deferred loan origination fees and costs, and an allowance for loan losses. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Premiums and discounts on loans purchased as well as loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized in interest income using the level-yield method.

Recognition of interest income on all portfolio segments is generally discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the loan is well secured and in process of collection. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

Table of Contents

All interest accrued but not received for loans placed on nonaccrual, is reversed against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Loans Held for Sale. Agency loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at fair value. Net unrealized gains and losses are recognized through the income statement. The Bank generally sells its loans with the servicing released to the buyer. Gains and losses on loan sales are recorded as mortgage banking income, based on the difference between sales proceeds and carrying value. Non-agency loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value.

Loans that were originated with the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future (loans held in portfolio) but which have been subsequently designated as being held for sale for risk management or liquidity needs are carried at the lower of cost or fair value calculated on an individual loan by loan basis.

There may be times when loans have been classified as held for sale and for some reason cannot be sold. Loans transferred to a long-term-investment classification from held-for-sale are transferred at the lower of cost or market value on the transfer date. Any difference between the carrying amount of the loan and its outstanding principal balance is recognized as an adjustment to yield by the interest method. A loan cannot be classified as a long-term investment unless the Bank has both the ability and the intent to hold the loan for the foreseeable future or until maturity.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level estimated to provide for probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. Management determines the adequacy of the allowance based on reviews of individual loans and pools of loans, recent loss experience, current economic conditions, the risk characteristics of the various categories of loans and other pertinent factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective and requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses, which is charged against current period operating results and recoveries of loans previously charged-off. The allowance is decreased by the amount of charge-offs of loans deemed uncollectible. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off. See Note 5 of these financial statement footnotes and the financial statement footnotes for the year ended June 30, 2013 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.


3.	FAIR VALUE

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1:

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and equity securities that are actively traded in an exchange or over-the-counter market and are highly liquid, such as, among other assets and securities, certain U.S. treasury and other U.S Government and agency mortgage-backed debt.

Level 2:

Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets include securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments and whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3:

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models such as discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

When available, the Company generally uses quoted market prices to determine fair value, in which case the items are classified in Level 1. In some cases where a market price is available, the Company will make use of acceptable practical expedients (such as matrix pricing) to calculate fair value, in which case the items are classified in Level 2.

Table of Contents

The Company considers relevant and observable market prices in its valuations where possible. The frequency of transactions, the size of the bid-ask spread and the nature of the participants are some of the factors the Company uses to help determine whether a market is active and orderly or inactive and not orderly. Price quotes based upon transactions that are not orderly are not considered to be determinative of fair value and should be given little, if any, weight in measuring fair value.

If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed valuation techniques that use, where possible, current market-based or independently sourced market parameters, such as interest rates, credit spreads, housing value forecasts, etc. Items valued using such internally generated valuation techniques are classified according to the lowest level input or value driver that is significant to the valuation. Thus, an item may be classified in Level 3 even though there may be some significant inputs that are readily observable.

The following section describes the valuation methodologies used by the Company to measure various financial instruments at fair value, including an indication of the level in the fair-value hierarchy in which each instrument is generally classified:

Securities—trading. Trading securities are recorded at fair value. The trading portfolio consists of two different issues of floating-rate debt securities collateralized by pools of bank trust preferred securities. Recent liquidity and economic uncertainty have made the market for collateralized debt obligations less active or inactive. As quoted market prices are not available, the Level 3 fair values for these securities are determined by the Company utilizing industry-standard tools to calculate the net present value of the expected cash flows available to the securities from the underlying assets. The Company’s expected cash flows are calculated for each security and include the impact of actual and forecasted bank defaults within each collateral pool as well as structural features of the security’s tranche such as lock outs, subordination and overcollateralization. The forecast of underlying bank defaults in each pool is based upon a quarterly financial update including the trend in non-performing assets, the allowance for loan losses and the underlying bank’s capital ratios. Also a factor is the Company’s loan loss experience in the local economy in which the bank operates. At September 30, 2013, the Company’s forecast of cash flows for both securities includes actual and forecasted defaults totaling 25.60% of all banks in the collateral pools, compared to 14.1% of the banks actually in default. The expected cash flows reflect the Company’s best estimate of all pool losses which are then applied to the overcollateralization reserve and the subordinated tranches to determine the cash flows. The Company selects a discount rate margin based upon the spread between U.S. Treasury rates and the market rates for active credit grades for financial companies. The discount margin when added to the U.S. Treasury rate determines the discount rate, reflecting primarily market liquidity and interest rate risk since expected credit loss is included in the cash flows. At September 30, 2013, the Company used a weighted average discount margin of 425 basis points above U.S. Treasury rates to calculate the net present value of the expected cash flows and the fair value of its trading securities.

The Level 3 fair values determined by the Company for its trading securities rely heavily on management’s assumptions as to the future credit performance of the collateral banks, the impact of the global and regional recession, the timing of forecasted defaults and the discount rate applied to cash flows. The fair value of the trading securities at September 30, 2013 is sensitive to an increase or decrease in the discount rate. An increase in the discount margin of 100 basis points would have reduced the total fair value of the trading securities and decreased net income before income tax by $859. A decrease in the discount margin of 100 basis points would have increased the total fair value of the trading securities and increased net income before income tax by $1,010.

Securities—available-for-sale and held-to-maturity. Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value and consist of residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS") and debt securities issued by U.S. agencies, RMBS issued by non-agencies, collateralized loan obligations, and municipals. Held-to-maturity securities are recorded at amortized cost and consist of RMBS issued by U.S. agencies, RMBS issued by non-agencies, and municipals. Fair value for U.S. agency securities is generally based on quoted market prices of similar securities used to form a dealer quote or a pricing matrix. There continues to be significant illiquidity in the market for RMBS issued by non-agencies, impacting the availability and reliability of transparent pricing. As orderly quoted market prices are not available, the Level 3 fair values for these securities are determined by the Company utilizing industry-standard tools to calculate the net present value of the expected cash flows available to the securities from the underlying mortgage assets. The Company computes Level 3 fair values for each non-agency RMBS in the same manner (as described below) whether available-for-sale or held-to-maturity.

To determine the performance of the underlying mortgage loan pools, the Company estimates prepayments, defaults, and loss severities based on a number of macroeconomic factors, including housing price changes, unemployment rates, interest rates and borrower attributes such as credit score and loan documentation at the time of origination. The Company inputs for each security a projection of monthly default rates, loss severity rates and voluntary prepayment rates for the underlying mortgages for the remaining life of the security to determine the expected cash flows. The projections of default rates are derived by the Company from the historic default rate observed in the pool of loans collateralizing the security, increased by and decreased by the forecasted increase or decrease in the national unemployment rate. The projections of loss severity rates are derived by the Company from the historic loss severity rate observed in the pool of loans, increased by (and decreased by) the forecasted decrease or increase

Table of Contents

in the national home price appreciation ("HPA") index. The largest factors influencing the Company’s modeling of the monthly default rate are unemployment and housing price appreciation. The most updated national unemployment rate announced prior to the end of the period covered by this report (reported in August 2013) was 7.3%, down from the high of 10% in October 2009. Consensus estimates for unemployment are that the rate will continue to decline. Going forward, the Company is projecting lower monthly default rates. The range of loss severity rates applied to each default used in the Company’s projections at September 30, 2013 are from 1.6% up to 91.3% based upon individual bond historical performance. The default rates and the severities are projected for every non-agency RMBS security held by the Company and will vary monthly based upon the actual performance of the security and the macroeconomic factors discussed above.

To determine the discount rates used to compute the present value of the expected cash flows for these non-agency RMBS securities, the Company separates the securities by the borrower characteristics in the underlying pool. Specifically, “prime” securities generally have borrowers with higher FICO scores and better documentation of income. “Alt-A” securities generally have borrowers with a little lower FICO and a little less documentation of income. “Pay-option ARMs” are Alt-A securities with borrowers that tend to pay the least amount of principal (or increase their loan balance through negative amortization). The Company calculates separate discount rates for prime, Alt-A and Pay-option ARM non-agency RMBS securities using market-participant assumptions for risk, capital and return on equity. The range of annual default rates used in the Company’s projections at September 30, 2013 are from 0.05% up to 25.3% with prime securities tending toward the lower end of the range and Alt-A and Pay-option ARMs tending toward the higher end of the range. The Company applies its discount rates to the projected monthly cash flows which already reflect the full impact of all forecasted losses using the assumptions described above. When calculating present value of the expected cash flows at September 30, 2013, the Company computed its discount rates as a spread between 247 and 863 basis points over the interpolated swap curve with prime securities tending toward the lower end of the range and Alt-A and Pay-option ARMs tending toward the higher end of the range.

Loans Held for Sale. Loans held for sale at fair value are primarily single-family and multifamily residential loans. The fair value of loans held for sale is determined, by pricing for comparable assets or by existing forward sales commitment prices with investors.

Impaired Loans. Impaired loans are loans which are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the borrowers or of the collateral pledged and the accrual of interest income has been discontinued. The impaired loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. The Bank assesses loans individually and identifies impairment when the loan is classified as impaired or been restructured or management has serious doubts about the future collectibility of principal and interest, even though the loans may currently be performing. The fair value of an impaired loan is determined based on an observable market price or current appraised value of the underlying collateral. The fair value of impaired loans with specific write-offs or allocations of the allowance for loan losses are generally based on recent real estate appraisals or other third-party valuations and analysis of cash flows. These appraisals and analysis may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and income approaches. Adjustments are routinely made in the process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. These adjustments to the estimated fair value of non-performing loans may result in increases or decreases to the provision for loan losses recorded in current earnings. Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification for the inputs for determining fair value.

Other Real Estate Owned. Non-recurring adjustments to certain commercial and residential real estate properties classified as other real estate owned ("OREO") are measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value, less costs to sell. Fair values are generally based on third party appraisals of the property, resulting in a Level 3 classification. In cases where the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, less costs to sell, an impairment loss is recognized.

Mortgage Banking Derivatives. Level 3 fair values for mortgage banking derivatives are either based upon prices in active secondary markets for identical securities or based on quoted market prices of similar assets used to form a dealer quote or a pricing matrix. If no such quoted price exists, the fair value of a commitment is determined by quoted prices for a similar commitment or commitments, adjusted for the specific attributes of each commitment. These fair values are then adjusted for items such as fallout and estimated costs to originate the loan.

The Company's valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes the Company's valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with or, in some cases, more conservative than other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the relevant reporting date.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:



	September 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
ASSETS:
Securities—Trading: Collateralized Debt Obligations	$	—	$	—	$	7,734	$	7,734
Securities—Available-for-Sale:
Agency Debt	$	—	$	25,036	$	—	$	25,036
Agency RMBS	—		66,780		—		66,780
Non-Agency RMBS	—		—		44,780		44,780
Municipal	—		28,147		—		28,147
Other Debt Securities	—		55,338		—		55,338
Total—Securities—Available-for-Sale	$	—	$	175,301	$	44,780	$	220,081
Loans Held for Sale	$	—	$	19,695	$	—	$	19,695
Other assets	$	—	$	—	$	1,058	$	1,058
LIABILITIES:
Other liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	541	$	541

	June 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
ASSETS:
Securities—Trading: Collateralized Debt Obligations	$	—	$	—	$	7,111	$	7,111
Securities—Available-for-Sale:
Agency Debt	$	—	$	25,063	$	—	$	25,063
Agency RMBS	—		69,882		—		69,882
Non-Agency RMBS	—		—		49,284		49,284
Municipal	—		11,103		—		11,103
Other Debt Securities	—		30,275		—		30,275
Total—Securities—Available-for-Sale	$	—	$	136,323	$	49,284	$	185,607
Loans Held for Sale	$	—	$	36,665	$	—	$	36,665
Other assets	$	—	$	—	$	2,355	$	2,355
LIABILITIES:
Other liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	133	$	133

Table of Contents

The following tables present additional information about assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:



	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Available-for- Sale Securities: Non-Agency RMBS			Trading Securities Other Debt Securities: Non-Agency		Derivative Instruments, net			Total
Assets:
Opening Balance	$	49,284		$	7,111	$	2,222		$	58,617
Transfers into Level 3	—			—		—			—
Transfers out of Level 3	—			—		—			—
Total gains or losses for the period:
Included in earnings—Sale of mortgage-back securities	—			—		—			—
Included in earnings—Fair value gain on trading securities	—			623		—			623
Included in earnings—Mortgage banking	—			—		(1,900		)	(1,900		)
Included in other comprehensive income	445			—		—			445
Purchases, issues, sales and settlements:
Purchases	—			—		—			—
Issues	—			—		—			—
Sales	—			—		—			—
Settlements	(4,949		)	—		—			(4,949		)
Other than temporary impairment	—			—		—			—
Closing balance	$	44,780		$	7,734	$	322		$	52,836

Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for assets held at the end of the reporting period	$	—		$	623	$	(1,900	)	$	(1,277	)



	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Available-for- Sale Securities: Non-Agency RMBS			Trading Securities Other Debt Securities: Non-Agency		Derivative Instruments, net		Total
Assets:
Opening Balance	$	83,127		$	5,838	$	2,368	$	91,333
Transfers into Level 3	—			—		—		—
Transfers out of Level 3	—			—		—		—
Total gains or losses for the period:
Included in earnings—Sale of mortgage-back securities	—			—		—		—
Included in earnings—Fair value gain on trading securities	—			601		—		601
Included in earnings—Mortgage banking	—			—		651		651
Included in other comprehensive income	(914		)	—		—		(914		)
Purchases, issues, sales and settlements:
Purchases	—			—		—		—
Issues	—			—		—		—
Sales	—			—		—		—
Settlements	(6,706		)	—		—		(6,706		)
Other than temporary impairment	—			—		—		—
Closing balance	$	75,507		$	6,439	$	3,019	$	84,965

Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for assets held at the end of the reporting period	$	—		$	601	$	651	$	1,252

Table of Contents

The table below summarizes the quantitative information about level 3 fair value measurements at the periods indicated:



	September 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Securities - Trading	$	7,734	Discounted Cash Flow	Total Projected Defaults, Discount Rate over Treasury	19.4 to 31.1% (25.6%) 4.25 to 4.25% (4.25%)
Securities - Non-agency RMBS	$	44,780	Discounted Cash Flow	Constant Prepayment Rate, Constant Default Rate, Loss Severity, Discount Rate over LIBOR	2.5 to 72.7% (14.5%) 0.5 to 25.3% (8.7%) 1.6 to 91.3% (60.9%) 2.47 to 8.63% (6.12%)
Derivative Instruments, net	$	322	Sales Comparison Approach	Projected Sales Profit of Underlying Loans	0.5 to 1.5%



	June 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Securities - Trading	$	7,111	Discounted Cash Flow	Total Projected Defaults, Discount Rate over Treasury	26.3 to 31.1% (28.5%) 4.50 to 4.50% (4.50%)
Securities - Non-agency RMBS	$	49,284	Discounted Cash Flow	Constant Prepayment Rate, Constant Default Rate, Loss Severity, Discount Rate over LIBOR	2.5 to 55.4% (15.6%) 0.3 to 22.7% (10.3%) 1.6 to 96.2% (59.9%) 2.44 to 7.86% (5.60%)
Derivative Instruments, net	$	2,222	Sales Comparison Approach	Projected Sales Profit of Underlying Loans	0.5 to 1.5%

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company's residential mortgage-backed securities are prepayment rates, probability of default, and loss severity in the event of default. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Generally, a change in the assumption used for the probability of default is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the loss severity and a directionally opposite change in the assumption used for prepayment rates.

The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains and losses and interest income recorded in earnings for level 3 trading assets and liabilities that are still held at the periods indicated:



	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2013		2012
Interest income on investments	$	58	$	32
Fair value adjustment	623		602
Total	$	681	$	634

Table of Contents

The table below summarizes assets measured for impairment on a non-recurring basis was as follows:



	September 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance
Impaired Loans:
Single Family real estate secured:
Mortgage	$	—	$	—	$	11,003	$	11,003
Home Equity	—		—		54		54
Warehouse and other	—		—		—		—
Multifamily real estate secured	—		—		4,686		4,686
Commercial real estate secured	—		—		3,538		3,538
Auto and RV secured	—		—		1,242		1,242
Factoring	—		—		56		56
Commercial & Industrial	—		—		—		—
Other	—		—		2		2
Total	$	—	$	—	$	20,581	$	20,581
Other real estate owned and foreclosed assets:
Single Family real estate secured:
Mortgage	—		—		907		907
Multifamily real estate secured	—		—		1,568		1,568
Commercial real estate secured	—		—		—		—
Auto and RV secured	—		—		87		87
Total	$	—	$	—	$	2,562	$	2,562
HTM Securities - Non-Agency RMBS	$	—	$	—	$	92,580	$	92,580


	June 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance

Impaired Loans:
Single Family real estate secured:
Mortgage	$	—	$	—	$	12,372	$	12,372
Home Equity	—		—		57		57
Multifamily real estate secured	—		—		4,505		4,505
Commercial real estate secured	—		—		3,559		3,559
Auto and RV secured	—		—		1,348		1,348
Total	$	—	$	—	$	21,841	$	21,841
Other real estate owned and foreclosed assets:
Single Family real estate secured:
Mortgage	—		—		567		567
Multifamily real estate secured	—		—		1,298		1,298
Auto and RV secured	—		—		141		141
Total	$	—	$	—	$	2,006	$	2,006
HTM Securities - Non-Agency RMBS	$	—	$	—	$	97,193	$	97,193

Table of Contents

Impaired loans measured for impairment on a non-recurring basis using the fair value of the collateral for collateral-dependent loans have a carrying amount of $21,231, after charge-offs of $154 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, and life to date charge-offs of $3,602. Impaired loans had a related allowance of $650 at September 30, 2013.

Other real estate owned and foreclosed assets, which are measured at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell, had a net carrying amount of $2,562 after charge-offs of $51 for the three months ended September 30, 2013. Our other real estate owned and foreclosed assets had a net carrying amount of $2,006 after charge-offs of $152 during the year ended June 30, 2013.

Held-to-maturity securities measured for impairment on a non-recurring basis had a fair value of $92,580 and a carrying amount of $99,212 at September 30, 2013, after net impairment charge to income of $572 and changes to other comprehensive loss of $1,078 during the three months ended September 30, 2013. The Company recognized a net impairment charge to income of $874 and changes in other comprehensive loss of $1,998 for the three month periods ended September 30, 2012. These held-to-maturity securities are valued using Level 3 inputs.

The Company has elected the fair value option for Agency loans held for sale. These loans are intended for sale and the Company believes that the fair value is the best indicator of the resolution of these loans. Interest income is recorded based on the contractual terms of the loan and in accordance with the Company's policy on loans held for investment. None of these loans are 90 days or more past due nor on nonaccrual as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013.

As of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, the aggregate fair value, contractual balance (including accrued interest), and gain was as follows:



(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2013		June 30, 2013
Aggregate fair value	$	19,695	$	36,665
Contractual balance	19,207		36,070
Gain	$	488	$	595

The total amount of gains and losses from changes in fair value included in earnings for the period indicated below for loans held for sale were:



	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2013			2012
Interest income	$	195		$	431
Change in fair value	(2,023		)	555
Total Change in fair value	$	(1,828	)	$	986

Table of Contents

The following table presents quantitative information about level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at the periods indicated:



	September 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Valuation Technique(s)	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Impaired loans:
Single Family real estate secured:
Mortgage	$	11,003	Sales comparison approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales	-81.8 to 34.8% (-2.4%)
Home Equity	$	54	Sales comparison approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales	-17.5 to 89.6% (23.3%)
Multifamily real estate secured	$	4,686	Sales comparison approach and income approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales and adjustments for differences in net operating income expectations, Capitalization rate	-64.7 to 35.9% (-17.2%)
Commercial real estate secured	$	3,538	Sales comparison approach and income approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales and adjustments for differences in net operating income expectations, Capitalization rate	-33.7 to 60.0% (5.8%)
Auto and RV secured	$	1,242	Sales comparison approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales	-19.7 to 46.8% (8.9%)
Other real estate owned:
Single Family real estate secured:
Mortgage	$	907	Sales comparison approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales	-50.6 to 39.8% (-11.8%)
Multifamily real estate secured	$	1,568	Sales comparison approach and income approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales and adjustments for differences in net operating income expectations, Capitalization rate	-79.1 to 38.6% (-18.0%)
Auto and RV secured	$	87	Sales comparison approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales	-57.5 to 19.9% (-1.0%)
HTM Securities-Non-Agency MBS	$	92,580	Discounted Cash Flow	Constant Prepayment Rate, Constant Default Rate, Loss Severity, Discount Rate over LIBOR	2.5 to 26.3% (13.8%) 1.5 to 25.3% (9.4%) 3.5 to 74.6% (60.4%) 3.0 to 8.6% (7.4%)

Table of Contents



	June 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Valuation Technique(s)	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Impaired loans:
Single Family real estate secured:
Mortgage	$	12,372	Sales comparison approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales	-94.4 to 39.8% (-19.1%)
Home Equity	$	57	Sales comparison approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales	-17.5 to 89.6% (22.6%)
Multifamily real estate secured	$	4,505	Sales comparison approach and income approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales and adjustments for differences in net operating income expectations, Capitalization rate	-79.1 to 35.9% (-21.5%)
Commercial real estate secured	$	3,559	Sales comparison approach and income approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales and adjustments for differences in net operating income expectations, Capitalization rate	-33.7 to 60.0% (5.8%)
Auto and RV secured	$	1,348	Sales comparison approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales	-5.1 to 46.8% (9.68%)
Other real estate owned:
Single Family real estate secured:
Mortgage	$	567	Sales comparison approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales	-50.6 to 22.6% (-18.7%)
Multifamily real estate secured	$	1,298	Sales comparison approach and income approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales and adjustments for differences in net operating income expectations, Capitalization rate	-59.2 to 38.6% (-10.6%)
Auto and RV secured	$	141	Sales comparison approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales	-57.5 to 19.9% (-3.4%)
HTM Securities - Non-Agency MBS	$	97,193	Discounted Cash Flow	Constant Prepayment Rate, Constant Default Rate, Loss Severity, Discount Rate over LIBOR	6.1 to 55.4% (16.6%) 1.5 to 22.5% (12.2%) 3.5 to 74.5% (60.3%) 3.0 to 7.9% (6.8%)

Fair value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at the periods indicated:



	September 30, 2013
			Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)	Carrying Amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	196,983	$	196,983	$	—	$	—	$	196,983
Securities trading	7,734		—		—		7,734		7,734
Securities available-for-sale	220,081		—		175,301		44,780		220,081
Securities held-to-maturity	267,670		—		54,210		204,696		258,906
Loans held for sale, at fair value	19,695		—		19,695		—		19,695
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value	51,223		—		—		51,258		51,258
Loans held for investment—net	2,433,001		—		—		2,527,287		2,527,287
Accrued interest receivable	9,172		—		—		9,172		9,172
Financial liabilities:
Time deposits and savings	$	2,192,964	$	—	$	2,211,847	$	—	$	2,211,847
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	110,000		—		116,399		—		116,399
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank	656,000		—		661,892		—		661,892
Subordinated debentures and other borrowings	5,155		—		5,304		—		5,304
Accrued interest payable	1,655		—		1,655		—		1,655

Table of Contents

Carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments at period-end were as follows:



	June 30, 2013
	Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)	Carrying Amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	201,694	$	201,694	$	—	$	—	$	201,694
Securities trading	7,111		—		—		7,111		7,111
Securities available-for-sale	185,607		—		136,323		49,284		185,607
Securities held-to-maturity	275,691		—		97,340		174,514		271,854
Loans held for sale, at fair value	36,665		—		36,665		—		36,665
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value	40,326		—		—		40,424		40,424
Loans held for investment—net	2,256,918		—		—		2,316,802		2,316,802
Accrued interest receivable	9,763		—		—		9,763		9,763
Financial liabilities:
Time deposits and savings	$	2,091,999	$	—	$	2,109,725	$	—	$	2,109,725
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	110,000		—		117,215		—		117,215
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank	590,417		—		595,651		—		595,651
Subordinated debentures and other borrowings	5,155		—		5,317		—		5,317
Accrued interest payable	1,674		—		1,674		—		1,674

The methods and assumptions, not previously presented, used to estimate fair value are described as follows:

Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, interest bearing deposits, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits, short-term debt, and variable rate loans or deposits that reprice frequently and fully. For fixed rate loans, deposits, borrowings or subordinated debt and for variable rate loans, deposits, borrowings or subordinated debt with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk. A discussion of the methods of valuing trading securities, available for sale securities and loans held for sale can be found earlier in this footnote. The carrying amount of FHLB Stock approximates the estimated fair value of this investment. The fair value of off-balance sheet items is not considered material.

Table of Contents


4.	SECURITIES

The amortized cost, carrying amount and fair value for the major categories of securities trading, available-for-sale, and held-to-maturity at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013 were:



	September 30, 2013
	Trading		Available-for-sale									Held-to-maturity
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Unrecognized Gains		Unrecognized Losses			Fair Value
Mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) :
U.S. agencies ¹	$	—	$	67,259	$	1,227	$	(1,706	)	$	66,780	$	52,071	$	2,139	$	—		$	54,210
Non-agency ²	—		40,323		5,055		(598		)	44,780		179,493		4,686		(18,248		)	165,931
Total mortgage-backed securities	—		107,582		6,282		(2,304		)	111,560		231,564		6,825		(18,248		)	220,141
Other debt securities:
U.S. agencies ¹	—		25,023		13		—			25,036		—		—		—			—
Municipal	—		28,706		73		(632		)	28,147		36,106		2,677		(18		)	38,765
Non-agency	7,734		54,770		569		(1		)	55,338		—		—		—			—
Total other debt securities	7,734		108,499		655		(633		)	108,521		36,106		2,677		(18		)	38,765
Total debt securities	$	7,734	$	216,081	$	6,937	$	(2,937	)	$	220,081	$	267,670	$	9,502	$	(18,266	)	$	258,906

	June 30, 2013
	Trading		Available-for-sale									Held-to-maturity
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Unrecognized Gains		Unrecognized Losses			Fair Value
Mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) :
U.S. agencies ¹	$	—	$	70,517	$	1,143	$	(1,778	)	$	69,882	$	54,825	$	2,386	$	—		$	57,211
Non-agency ²	—		45,271		4,221		(208		)	49,284		184,742		5,758		(15,986		)	174,514
Total mortgage-backed securities	—		115,788		5,364		(1,986		)	119,166		239,567		8,144		(15,986		)	231,725
Other debt securities:
U.S. agencies ¹	—		25,049		14		—			25,063		—		—		—			—
Municipal	—		11,062		41		—			11,103		36,124		4,005		—			40,129
Non-agency	7,111		29,646		630		(1		)	30,275		—		—		—			—
Total other debt securities	7,111		65,757		685		(1		)	66,441		36,124		4,005		—			40,129
Total debt securities	$	7,111	$	181,545	$	6,049	$	(1,987	)	$	185,607	$	275,691	$	12,149	$	(15,986	)	$	271,854

__________________________________


^1.	U.S. government-backed or government sponsored enterprises including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae.


^2.	Private sponsors of securities collateralized primarily by pools of 1-4 family residential first mortgages. Primarily super senior securities secured by prime, Alt-A or pay-option ARM mortgages.

The Company’s non-agency RMBS available-for-sale portfolio with a total fair value of $44,780 at September 30, 2013 consists of twenty-four different issues of super senior securities with a fair value of $28,993; one senior structured whole loan securities with a fair value of $15,618 and three mezzanine z-tranche securities with a fair value of $169 collateralized by seasoned prime and Alt-A first-lien mortgages. The Company acquired its mezzanine z-tranche securities in fiscal 2009 and accounts for them by measuring the excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the purchase price (accretable yield) and recognizes interest income over the remaining life of the security.

The non-agency RMBS held-to-maturity portfolio with a carrying value of $179,493 at September 30, 2013 consists of eighty-one different issues of super senior securities totaling $177,425 and one senior-support security with a carrying value of $2,068. Debt securities with evidence of credit quality deterioration since issuance and for which it is probable at purchase that the Company will be unable to collect all of the par value of the security are accounted for under ASC Topic 310, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer ("ASC Topic 310"). Under ASC Topic 310, the excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the purchase price is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized in interest income over the remaining life of the security. The Company has one senior support security that it acquired at a significant discount that evidenced credit deterioration at acquisition and is accounted for under ASC Topic 310. For a cost of $17,440 the Company acquired the senior support security with a contractual par

Table of Contents

value of $30,560 and accretable and non-accretable discounts that were projected to be $9,015 and $3,805, respectively. Since acquisition, repayments from the security have been received more rapidly than projected at acquisition, but expected total payments have declined, resulting in a determination that the security was other than temporarily impaired although not credit related and therefore no expenses recorded for the fiscal 2013 year and a charge of $572 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was recorded. At September 30, 2013 the security had a remaining contractual par value of zero and amortizable and non-amortizable premium are currently projected to be zero and $2,472, respectively.

The current face amounts of debt securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity that were pledged to secure borrowings at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013 were $206,317 and $208,826 respectively.

The securities with unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position were as follows:



	September 30, 2013
	Available-for-sale securities in loss position for															Held-to-maturity securities in loss position for
	Less Than 12 Months					More Than 12 Months					Total					Less Than 12 Months					More Than 12 Months					Total
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
RMBS:
U.S. agencies	$	26,869	$	(1,682	)	$	2,787	$	(24	)	$	29,656	$	(1,706	)	$	—	$	—		$	6	$	—		$	6	$	—
Non-agency	979		(6		)	2,019		(592		)	2,998		(598		)	42,936		(5,061		)	51,256		(13,187		)	94,192		(18,248		)
Total RMBS securities	27,848		(1,688		)	4,806		(616		)	32,654		(2,304		)	42,936		(5,061		)	51,262		(13,187		)	94,198		(18,248		)
Other Debt:
U.S. agencies	—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—
Municipal Debt	24,603		(632		)	—		—			24,603		(632		)	1,766		(18		)	—		—			1,766		(18		)
Non- agency	3,633		(1		)	—		—			3,633		(1		)	—		—			—		—			—		—
Total Other Debt	28,236		(633		)	—		—			28,236		(633		)	1,766		(18		)	—		—			1,766		(18		)
Total debt securities	$	56,084	$	(2,321	)	$	4,806	$	(616	)	$	60,890	$	(2,937	)	$	44,702	$	(5,079	)	$	51,262	$	(13,187	)	$	95,964	$	(18,266	)

	June 30, 2013
	Available-for-sale securities in loss position for															Held-to-maturity securities in loss position for
	Less Than 12 Months					More Than 12 Months					Total					Less Than 12 Months					More Than 12 Months					Total
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
RMBS:
U.S. agencies	$	27,212	$	(1,714	)	$	4,611	$	(64	)	$	31,823	$	(1,778	)	$	3	$	—		$	5	$	—		$	8	$	—
Non-agency	6,070		(14		)	2,415		(194		)	8,485		(208		)	49,030		(2,517		)	48,009		(13,469		)	97,039		(15,986		)
Total RMBS securities	33,282		(1,728		)	7,026		(258		)	40,308		(1,986		)	49,033		(2,517		)	48,014		(13,469		)	97,047		(15,986		)
Other Debt:
U.S. agencies	—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—
Municipal Debt	—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—
Non-agency	7,232		(1		)	—		—			7,232		(1		)	—		—			—		—			—		—
Total Other Debt	7,232		(1		)	—		—			7,232		(1		)	—		—			—		—			—		—
Total debt securities	$	40,514	$	(1,729	)	$	7,026	$	(258	)	$	47,540	$	(1,987	)	$	49,033	$	(2,517	)	$	48,014	$	(13,469	)	$	97,047	$	(15,986	)

Table of Contents

There were 26 securities that were in a continuous loss position at September 30, 2013 for a period of more than 12 months. There were 24 securities that were in a continuous loss position at June 30, 2013 for a period of more than 12 months. The following table summarizes amounts of credit loss recognized in the income statement through other than temporary impairment charges which reduced non-interest income:



	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2013			2012
Beginning balance	$	(15,336	)	$	(11,835	)
Additions for the amounts related to credit loss for which an other than temporary impairment was not previously recognized	—			—
Increases to the amount related to the credit loss for which other than temporary impairment was previously recognized	(572		)	(874		)
Ending balance	$	(15,908	)	$	(12,709	)

At September 30, 2013, 43 non-agency RMBS with a total carrying amount of $102,902 were determined to have cumulative credit losses of $15,908 of which $572 was recognized in earnings during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and $874 was recognized in earnings for the three months period ended September 30, 2012. This quarter’s other than temporary impairment of $572 is related to one non-agency RMBS with a total carrying amount of $2,068. The Company measures its non-agency RMBS in an unrecognized loss position at the end of the reporting period for other than temporary impairment by comparing the present value of the cash flows currently expected to be collected from the security with its amortized cost basis. If the calculated present value is lower than the amortized cost, the difference is the credit component of an other than temporary impairment of its debt securities. The excess of present value over the fair value of the security (if any) is the noncredit component only if the Company does not intend to sell the security and will not be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. The credit component of the other than temporary impairment is recorded as a loss in earnings and the noncredit component as a charge to other comprehensive income, net of the related income tax benefit.

To determine the cash flow expected to be collected and to calculate the present value for purposes of testing for other-than-temporary impairment, the Company utilizes the same industry-standard tool and the same cash flows as those calculated for Level 3 fair values as discussed in footnote 3. The Company computes cash flows based upon the cash flows from underlying mortgage loan pools. The Company estimates prepayments, defaults, and loss severities based on a number of macroeconomic factors, including housing price changes, unemployment rates, interest rates and borrower attributes such as credit score and loan documentation at the time of origination. The Company inputs for each security a projection of monthly default rates, loss severity rates and voluntary prepayment rates for the underlying mortgages for the remaining life of the security to determine the expected cash flows. The projections of default rates are derived by the Company from the historic default rate observed in the pool of loans collateralizing the security, increased by (or decreased by) the forecasted increase or decrease in the national unemployment rate. The projections of loss severity rates are derived by the Company from the historic loss severity rate observed in the pool of loans, increased by (or decreased by) the forecasted increase or decrease in the national HPA index. The largest factors influencing the Company’s modeling of the monthly default rate is unemployment and housing price appreciation. The most updated unemployment rate announced prior to the end of the period covered by this report (reported in August 2013) was 7.3%, down from the high of 10% in October 2009. Consensus estimates for unemployment are that the rate will continue to decline. The discount rates used to compute the present value of the expected cash flows for purposes of testing for the credit component of the other than temporary impairment are either the implicit rate calculated in each of the Company’s securities at acquisition or the last accounting yield. The Company calculates the implicit rate at acquisition based on the contractual terms of the security, considering scheduled payments (and minimum payments in the case of pay-option ARMs) without prepayment assumptions. Once the discount rate (or discount margin in the case of floating rate securities) is calculated as described above, the discount is used in the industry-standard model to calculate the present value of the cash flows.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, there were no security sales.

Table of Contents

The Company had recorded unrealized gains and unrealized losses in accumulated other comprehensive loss as follows:



(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2013			June 30, 2013
Available-for-sale debt securities—net unrealized gains	$	4,000		$	4,061
Held-to-maturity debt securities—non credit related	(20,989		)	(22,067		)
Subtotal	(16,989		)	(18,006		)
Tax benefit	6,799			7,206
Net unrealized loss on investment securities in accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(10,190	)	$	(10,800	)

The expected maturity distribution of the Company’s mortgage-backed securities and the contractual maturity distribution of the Company’s other debt securities classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at September 30, 2013 were:



	September 30, 2013
	Available-for-sale				Held-to-maturity				Trading
(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Fair Value
RMBS—U.S. agencies¹:
Due within one year	$	5,634	$	5,456	$	1,633	$	1,692	$	—
Due one to five years	18,017		17,572		6,415		6,648		—
Due five to ten years	15,840		15,674		7,601		7,878		—
Due after ten years	27,768		28,078		36,422		37,992		—
Total RMBS—U.S. agencies¹	67,259		66,780		52,071		54,210		—
RMBS—Non-agency:
Due within one year	9,777		10,559		26,580		25,731		—
Due one to five years	17,343		19,219		62,409		59,059		—
Due five to ten years	6,348		7,407		39,871		36,450		—
Due after ten years	6,855		7,595		50,633		44,691		—
Total RMBS—Non-agency	40,323		44,780		179,493		165,931		—
Other debt:
Due within one year	35,479		35,524		—		—		—
Due one to five years	40,935		41,368		—		—		—
Due five to ten years	9,677		9,746		—		—		—
Due after ten years	22,408		21,883		36,106		38,765		7,734
Total other debt	108,499		108,521		36,106		38,765		7,734
Total	$	216,081	$	220,081	$	267,670	$	258,906	$	7,734

__________________________

^1.RMBS distributions include impact of expected prepayments and other timing factors.

Table of Contents


5.	LOANS & ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The following table sets forth the composition of the loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:



(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2013			June 30, 2013
Single family real estate secured:
Mortgage	$	1,204,813		$	1,070,668
Home equity	21,369			22,537
Warehouse and other	216,539			204,878
Multifamily real estate secured	805,796			768,023
Commercial real estate secured	28,843			29,000
Auto and RV secured	17,452			18,530
Factoring	91,855			108,144
Commercial & Industrial	85,247			78,721
Other	8,126			419
Total gross loans	2,480,040			2,300,920
Allowance for loan losses	(14,546		)	(14,182		)
Unaccreted discounts and loan fees	(32,493		)	(29,820		)
Net mortgage loans on real estate	$	2,433,001		$	2,256,918

__________________________________


^1.	The balance of single family warehouse was $62,686 at September 30, 2013 and $107,806 at June 30, 2013.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The Company’s goal is to maintain the allowance for loan losses (sometimes referred to as the allowance) at a level that is considered to be commensurate with estimated probable incurred credit losses in the portfolio. Although the adequacy of the allowance is reviewed quarterly, management performs an ongoing assessment of the risks inherent in the portfolio. While the Company believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at September 30, 2013, future additions to the allowance will be subject to continuing evaluation of estimated and known, as well as inherent, risks in the loan portfolio.

Allowance for Loan Loss Disclosures—The assessment of the adequacy of the Company’s allowance for loan losses is based upon a number of quantitative and qualitative factors, including levels and trends of past due and nonaccrual loans, change in volume and mix of loans, collateral values and charge-off history.

The Company provides general loan loss reserves for its recreational vehicle ("RV") and auto loans based upon the borrower credit score at the time of origination and the Company’s loss experience to date. The allowance for loan loss for the RV and auto loan portfolio at September 30, 2013 was determined by classifying each outstanding loan according to semi-annually refreshed FICO score and providing loss rates. The Company had $16,210 of RV and auto loan balances subject to general reserves as follows: FICO greater than or equal to 770: $4,244; 715 – 769: $5,121; 700 – 714: $1,347; 660 – 699: $2,730 and less than 660: $2,768.

The Company provides general loan loss reserves for mortgage loans based upon the size and class of the mortgage loan and the loan-to-value ratio (LTV) at date of origination. The allowance for each class is determined by dividing the outstanding unpaid balance for each loan by the loan-to-value and applying a loss rates. The LTV groupings for each significant mortgage class are as follows:

The Company had $1,193,810 of single family mortgage portfolio loan balances subject to general reserves as follows: LTV less than or equal to 60%: $759,165; 61% – 70%: $359,085; 71% – 80%: $65,582; and greater than 80%: $9,978.

The Company had $801,110 of multifamily mortgage portfolio loan balances subject to general reserves as follows: LTV less than or equal to 55%: $354,157; 56% – 65%: $299,615; 66% – 75%: $139,120; 76% – 80%: $6,332 and greater than 80%: $1,886.The Company divides the LTV analysis into two classes, separating the purchased loans from the loans underwritten directly by the Company. Based on historical performance, the Company concluded that originated multifamily loans require lower estimated loss rates.

The Company had $25,305 of commercial real estate loan balances subject to general reserves as follows: LTV less than or equal to 50%: $15,717; 51% – 60%: $6,558; 61% – 70%: $2,087; and 71% – 80%: $943.

The Company's commercial secured portfolio consists of business loans well-collateralized by residential real estate. The Company's other portfolio consists of receivables factoring for businesses and consumers. The Company allocates its allowance for loan loss for these asset types based on qualitative factors which consider the value of the collateral and the financial position of the issuer of the receivables.

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio classes for the periods indicated:



	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
	Single Family
(Dollars in Thousands)	Mortgage			Home Equity			Warehouse & Other			Multifamily			Commercial Real Estate			Auto and RV Secured			Factoring			Commercial & Industrial			Other/Consumer			Total
Balance at July 1, 2013	$	4,812		$	183		$	1,250		$	3,186		$	1,378		$	1,536		$	201		$	1,623		$	13		$	14,182
Provision for loan loss	704			(38		)	(360		)	681			(383		)	(216		)	(6		)	(134		)	252			500
Charge-offs	(98		)	—			—			—			—			(30		)	—			—			(26		)	(154		)
Recoveries	—			7			—			—			—			5			—			—			6			18
Balance at September 30, 2012	$	5,418		$	152		$	890		$	3,867		$	995		$	1,295		$	195		$	1,489		$	245		$	14,546

	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012
	Single Family
(Dollars in Thousands)	Mortgage			Home Equity			Warehouse & Other			Multifamily			Commercial Real Estate			Auto and RV Secured			Factoring			Commercial & Industrial			Other/Consumer			Total
Balance at July 1, 2012	$	4,030		$	192		$	108		$	2,558		$	398		$	2,159		$	86		$	102		$	3		$	9,636
Provision for loan loss	519			144			175			29			1,111			166			29			243			134			2,550
Charge-offs	(264		)	(166		)	—			(375		)	(906		)	(180		)	—			—			(137		)	(2,028		)
Recoveries	—			11			—			—			—			—			—			—			2			13
Balance at September 30, 2012	$	4,285		$	181		$	283		$	2,212		$	603		$	2,145		$	115		$	345		$	2		$	10,171

Table of Contents

The following table presents our loans evaluated individually for impairment by class:



	September 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Unpaid Principal Balance			Charge-off			Unpaid Book Balance			Accrued Interest / Origination Fees			Recorded Investment			Related Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
Single Family Real Estate Secured:
Mortgage:
Purchased	$	7,193		$	1,909		$	5,284		$	(7	)	$	5,277		$	—
Home Equity:
In-house originated	90			70			20			—			20			—
Multifamily Real Estate Secured:
Purchased	2,120			531			1,589			5			1,594			—
Commercial Real Estate Secured:
Purchased	2,316			900			1,416			1			1,417			—
Auto and RV Secured:
In-house originated	1,039			694			345			19			364			—
With an allowance recorded:
Single Family Real Estate Secured:
Mortgage:
In-house originated	870			—			870			—			870			2
Purchased	4,849			—			4,849			5			4,854			50
Home Equity:
In-house originated	34			—			34			(1		)	33			—
Multifamily Real Estate Secured:
In-house originated	848			—			848			10			858			1
Purchased	2,249			—			2,249			18			2,267			228
Commercial Real Estate Secured:
Purchased	2,122			—			2,122			1			2,123			40
Auto and RV Secured:
In-house originated	897			—			897			15			912			329
Factoring:
In-house originated	56			—			56			(20		)	36			—
Other	2			—			2			—			2			—
Total	$	24,685		$	4,104		$	20,581		$	46		$	20,627		$	650
As a % of total gross loans	1.00		%	0.17		%	0.83		%	—		%	0.83		%	0.03		%

Table of Contents



	June 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Unpaid Principal Balance			Charge-off			Unpaid Book Balance			Accrued Interest / Origination Fees			Recorded Investment			Related Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
Single Family Real Estate Secured:
Mortgage:
Purchased	$	7,988		$	2,183		$	5,805		$	(8	)	$	5,797		$	—
Home Equity:
In-house originated	91			70			21			—			21			—
Multifamily Real Estate Secured:
Purchased	2,497			594			1,903			6			1,909			—
Commercial Real Estate Secured:
Purchased	2,316			888			1,428			1			1,429			—
Auto and RV Secured:
In-house originated	1,274			831			443			22			465			—
Other:

With an allowance recorded:
Single Family Real Estate Secured:
Mortgage:
In-house originated	2,179			—			2,179			4			2,183			4
Purchased	4,388			—			4,388			3			4,391			33
Home Equity:
In-house originated	35			—			35			—			35			—
Multifamily Real Estate Secured:
In-house originated	851			—			851			10			861			107
Purchased	1,752			—			1,752			17			1,769			5
Commercial Real Estate Secured:
Purchased	2,131			—			2,131			1			2,132			411
Auto and RV Secured:
In-house originated	905			—			905			16			921			505
Total	$	26,407		$	4,566		$	21,841		$	72		$	21,913		$	1,065
As a % of total gross loans	1.15		%	0.20		%	0.95		%	—		%	0.95		%	0.05		%

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method:



	September 30, 2013
	Single Family
(Dollars in thousands)	Single Family		Home Equity			Warehouse and Other			Multifamily Real Estate Secured		Commercial Real Estate Secured			Auto and RV Secured		Factoring			Commercial & Industrial			Other		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	52	$	—		$	—		$	229	$	40		$	329	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	650
Collectively evaluated for impairment	5,366		152			890			3,638		955			966		195			1,489			245		13,896
Total ending allowance balance	$	5,418	$	152		$	890		$	3,867	$	995		$	1,295	$	195		$	1,489		$	245	$	14,546
Loans:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment¹	$	11,003	$	54		$	—		$	4,686	$	3,538		$	1,242	$	56		$	—		$	2	$	20,581
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	1,193,810		21,315			216,539			801,110		25,305			16,210		91,799			85,247			8,124		2,459,459
Principal loan balance	1,204,813		21,369			216,539			805,796		28,843			17,452		91,855			85,247			8,126		2,480,040
Unaccreted discounts and loan fees	2,867		(8		)	(1,099		)	1,339		(70		)	295		(35,597		)	(220		)	—		(32,493		)
Accrued interest receivable	3,953		84			197			3,137		68			91		38			280			—		7,848
Total recorded investment in loans	$	1,211,633	$	21,445		$	215,637		$	810,272	$	28,841		$	17,838	$	56,296		$	85,307		$	8,126	$	2,455,395

________________

^1.Loans evaluated for impairment include TDRs that have been performing for more than six months.

Table of Contents



	June 30, 2013
	Single Family
(Dollars in thousands)	Single Family		Home Equity			Warehouse and Other			Multifamily Real Estate Secured		Commercial Real Estate Secured			Auto and RV Secured		Factoring			Commercial & Industrial			Other		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	37	$	—		$	—		$	112	$	411		$	505	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	1,065
Collectively evaluated for impairment	4,775		183			1,250			3,074		967			1,031		201			1,623			13		13,117
Total ending allowance balance	$	4,812	$	183		$	1,250		$	3,186	$	1,378		$	1,536	$	201		$	1,623		$	13	$	14,182
Loans:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment¹	$	12,372	$	56		$	—		$	4,506	$	3,559		$	1,348	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	21,841
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	1,058,296		22,481			204,878			763,517		25,441			17,182		108,144			78,721			419		2,279,079
Principal loan balance	1,070,668		22,537			204,878			768,023		29,000			18,530		108,144			78,721			419		2,300,920
Unaccreted discounts and loan fees	1,796		(6		)	(901		)	784		(74		)	332		(31,488		)	(263		)	—		(29,820		)
Accrued interest receivable	3,649		92			216			2,992		88			91		61			833			1		8,023
Total recorded investment in loans	$	1,076,113	$	22,623		$	204,193		$	771,799	$	29,014		$	18,953	$	76,717		$	79,291		$	420	$	2,279,123

________________

^1.Loans evaluated for impairment include TDRs that have been performing for more than six months.

Credit Quality Disclosures. Non-performing loans consisted of the following:



(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2013			June 30, 2013
Single Family Real Estate Secured:
Mortgage:
In-house originated	$	870		$	2,179
Purchased	9,122			9,174
Home Equity:
In-house originated	12			37
Purchased	—			—
Warehouse and Other	—			—
Multifamily Real Estate Secured:
In-house originated	848			851
Purchased	2,211			2,031
Commercial Real Estate Secured:
In-house originated	—			—
Purchased	2,122			3,559
Total nonaccrual loans secured by real estate	15,185			17,831
Auto and RV Secured	402			472
Factoring	56			—
Commercial and Industrial	—			—
Other	2			—
Total non-performing loans	$	15,645		$	18,303
Non-performing loans to total loans	0.63		%	0.80		%

Approximately 23.95% of our non-performing loans at September 30, 2013 were considered TDRs, compared to 28.86% at June 30, 2013. Borrowers that make timely payments after TDRs are considered non-performing for at least six months.

Generally, after six months of timely payments, those TDRs are reclassified from the non-performing loan category to performing and any previously deferred interest income is recognized. Approximately 63.87% of the Bank’s non-performing loans are single family first

Table of Contents

mortgages already written down to 52.09% in aggregate, of the original appraisal value of the underlying properties. Generally these loans have experienced longer delays completing the foreclosure process due to the poor servicing practices of one of our seller servicers.

The following table provides the outstanding unpaid balance of loans that are performing and non-performing by portfolio class:



	September 30, 2013
	Single Family
(Dollars in thousands)	Mortgage		Home Equity		Warehouse & Other		Multifamily Real Estate Secured		Commercial Real Estate Secured		Auto and RV Secured		Factoring		Commercial & Industrial		Other		Total
Performing	$	1,194,821	$	21,357	$	216,539	$	802,737	$	26,721	$	17,050	$	91,799	$	85,247	$	8,124	$	2,464,395
Non-performing	9,992		12		—		3,059		2,122		402		56		—		2		15,645
Total	$	1,204,813	$	21,369	$	216,539	$	805,796	$	28,843	$	17,452	$	91,855	$	85,247	$	8,126	$	2,480,040



	June 30, 2013
	Single Family
(Dollars in thousands)	Mortgage		Home Equity		Warehouse & Other		Multifamily Real Estate Secured		Commercial Real Estate Secured		Auto and RV Secured		Factoring		Commercial & Industrial		Other		Total
Performing	$	1,059,315	$	22,500	$	204,878	$	765,141	$	25,441	$	18,058	$	108,144	$	78,721	$	419	$	2,282,617
Non-performing	11,353		37		—		2,882		3,559		472		—		—		—		18,303
Total	$	1,070,668	$	22,537	$	204,878	$	768,023	$	29,000	$	18,530	$	108,144	$	78,721	$	419	$	2,300,920

The Company divides loan balances when determining general loan loss reserves between purchases and originations as follows:



	September 30, 2013
	Single Family Real Estate Secured: Mortgage						Multifamily Real Estate Secured						Commercial Real Estate Secured
(Dollars in thousands)	Origination		Purchase		Total		Origination		Purchase		Total		Origination		Purchase		Total
Performing	$	1,071,130	$	123,691	$	1,194,821	$	606,608	$	196,129	$	802,737	$	6,570	$	20,151	$	26,721
Non-performing	870		9,122		9,992		848		2,211		3,059		—		2,122		2,122
Total	$	1,072,000	$	132,813	$	1,204,813	$	607,456	$	198,340	$	805,796	$	6,570	$	22,273	$	28,843



	June 30, 2013
	Single Family Real Estate Secured: Mortgage						Multifamily Real Estate Secured						Commercial Real Estate Secured
(Dollars in thousands)	Origination		Purchase		Total		Origination		Purchase		Total		Origination		Purchase		Total
Performing	$	925,974	$	133,341	$	1,059,315	$	559,163	$	205,978	$	765,141	$	6,627	$	18,814	$	25,441
Non-performing	2,179		9,174		11,353		851		2,031		2,882		—		3,559		3,559
Total	$	928,153	$	142,515	$	1,070,668	$	560,014	$	208,009	$	768,023	$	6,627	$	22,373	$	29,000

From time to time the Company modifies loan terms temporarily for borrowers who are experiencing financial stress. These loans are performing and accruing and will generally return to the original loan terms after the modification term expires.

Table of Contents

The Company classifies these loans as performing TDRs that consisted of the following:



	September 30, 2013
	Single Family
(Dollars in thousands)	Mortgage		Home Equity		Warehouse & Other		Multifamily Real Estate Secured		Commercial Real Estate Secured		Auto and RV Secured		Factoring		Commercial & Industrial		Other		Total
Performing loans temporarily modified as TDR	$	1,011	$	42	$	—	$	1,627	$	1,416	$	840	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,936
Non-performing loans	9,992		12		—		3,059		2,122		402		56		—		2		15,645
Total impaired loans	$	11,003	$	54	$	—	$	4,686	$	3,538	$	1,242	$	56	$	—	$	2	$	20,581

	June 30, 2013
	Single Family
(Dollars in thousands)	Mortgage		Home Equity		Warehouse & Other		Multifamily Real Estate Secured		Commercial Real Estate Secured		Auto and RV Secured		Factoring		Commercial & Industrial		Other		Total
Performing loans temporarily modified as TDR	$	1,019	$	20	$	—	$	1,623	$	—	$	876	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	3,538
Non-performing loans	11,353		37		—		2,882		3,559		472		—		—		—		18,303
Total impaired loans	$	12,372	$	57	$	—	$	4,505	$	3,559	$	1,348	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	21,841



	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
	Single Family
(Dollars in thousands)	Mortgage		Home Equity		Warehouse & Other		Multifamily Real Estate Secured		Commercial Real Estate Secured		Auto and RV Secured		Factoring		Commercial & Industrial		Other		Total
Interest income recognized on performing TDRs	$	10	$	1	$	—	$	30	$	20	$	17	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	78
Average balances of performing TDRs	$	1,014	$	35	$	—	$	1,626	$	1,419	$	861	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,955
Average balances of impaired loans	$	11,320	$	55	$	—	$	4,898	$	3,544	$	1,281	$	19	$	—	$	18	$	21,135

	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012
	Single Family
(Dollars in thousands)	Mortgage		Home Equity		Warehouse & Other		Multifamily Real Estate Secured		Commercial Real Estate Secured		Auto and RV Secured		Factoring		Commercial & Industrial		Other		Total
Interest income recognized on performing TDRs	$	24	$	—	$	—	$	5	$	23	$	31	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	83
Average balances of performing TDRs	$	2,061	$	23	$	—	$	1,718	$	1,712	$	1,555	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	7,069
Average balances of impaired loans	$	10,048	$	113	$	—	$	5,936	$	2,055	$	2,393	$	—	$	—	$	4	$	20,549

The Company's loan modifications included Single Family, Multifamily and Commercial loans of which included one or a combination of the following: a reduction of the stated interest rate or delinquent property taxes that were paid by the Bank and either repaid by the borrower over a one year period or capitalized and amortized over the remaining life of the loan. The Company's loan modifications also included RV loans in which borrowers were able to make interest-only payments for a period of six months to a year which then reverted back to fully amortizing.

Table of Contents

Credit Quality Indicators

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings.

Pass. Loans classified as pass are well protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the fair value, less cost to acquire and sell, of any underlying collateral in a timely manner.

Special Mention. Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.

Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

The Company reviews and grades loans following a continuous loan review process, featuring coverage of all loan types and business lines at least quarterly. Continuous reviewing provides more effective risk monitoring because it immediately tests for potential impacts caused by changes in personnel, policy, products or underwriting standards.

Table of Contents

The following table presents the composition of our loan portfolio by credit quality indicators:



	September 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Pass			Special Mention			Substandard			Doubtful			Total
Single Family Real Estate Secured:
Mortgage:
In-house originated	$	1,062,503		$	4,499		$	4,998		$	—		$	1,072,000
Purchased	122,282			607			9,924			—			132,813
Home Equity:
In-house originated	5,398			32			74			—			5,504
Purchased	15,865			—			—			—			15,865
Warehouse and Other:
In-house originated	216,539			—			—			—			216,539
Multifamily Real Estate Secured:
In-house originated	599,426			2,198			5,832			—			607,456
Purchased	181,834			9,095			7,411			—			198,340
Commercial Real Estate Secured:
In-house originated	6,570			—			—			—			6,570
Purchased	17,066			955			4,252			—			22,273
Auto and RV Secured:
In-house originated	16,423			318			711			—			17,452
Factoring:
In-house originated	91,799			—			56			—			91,855
Commercial secured and other:
In-house originated	84,249			998			—			—			85,247
Other	8,124			—			2			—			8,126
Total	$	2,428,078		$	18,702		$	33,260		$	—		$	2,480,040
As a % of total gross loans	97.91		%	0.75		%	1.34		%	—		%	100.00		%

	June 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Pass			Special Mention			Substandard			Doubtful			Total
Single Family Real Estate Secured:
Mortgage
In-house originated	$	920,254		$	5,371		$	2,528		$	—		$	928,153
Purchased	131,213			1,323			9,979			—			142,515
Home Equity
In-house originated	5,866			32			56			—			5,954
Purchased	16,583			—			—			—			16,583
Warehouse and Other
In-house originated	204,878			—			—			—			204,878
Multifamily Real Estate Secured
In-house originated	554,924			1,358			3,625			107			560,014
Purchased	193,804			8,482			5,723			—			208,009
Commercial Real Estate Secured
In-house originated	6,627			—			—			—			6,627
Purchased	17,146			951			3,865			411			22,373
Auto and RV Secured
In-house originated	17,508			247			775			—			18,530
Factoring
In-house originated	108,144			—			—			—			108,144
Commercial secured and other:
In-house originated	77,721			1,000			—			—			78,721
Other	417			2			—			—			419
Total	$	2,255,085		$	18,766		$	26,551		$	518		$	2,300,920
As a % of total gross loans	98.01		%	0.82		%	1.15		%	0.02		%	100.00		%

Table of Contents

The Company considers the performance of the loan portfolio and its impact on the allowance for loan losses. The Company also evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of its loans. The following table provides the outstanding unpaid balance of loans that are past due 30 days or more by portfolio class as of the period indicated:



	September 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	30-59 Days Past Due			60-89 Days Past Due			90+ Days Past Due			Total
Single family real estate secured:
Mortgage:
In-house originated	$	2,946		$	5		$	—		$	2,951
Purchased	1,243			—			6,003			7,246
Home equity:
In-house originated	32			32			12			76
Multifamily real estate secured:
In-house originated	2,116			—			—			2,116
Purchased	—			494			128			622
Auto and RV secured	510			125			160			795
Factoring	151			—			56			207
Total	$	6,998		$	656		$	6,359		$	14,013
As a % of total gross loans	0.28		%	0.03		%	0.26		%	0.57		%

	June 30, 2013
(Dollars in Thousands)	30-59 Days Past Due			60-89 Days Past Due			90+ Days Past Due			Total
Single family real estate secured:
Mortgage
In-house originated	$	—		$	3,051		$	—		$	3,051
Purchased	1,400			565			7,323			9,288
Home equity
In-house originated	125			32			12			169
Multifamily real estate secured
In-house originated	3,701			—			—			3,701
Purchased	—			60			399			459
Commercial real estate secured
Purchased	316			—			—			316
Auto and RV secured	453			21			177			651
Factoring	112			—			—			112
Commercial and industrial	4,824			—			—			4,824
Total	$	10,931		$	3,729		$	7,911		$	22,571
As a % of total gross loans	0.48		%	0.16		%	0.34		%	0.98		%

Table of Contents


6.	STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company has two equity incentive plans, the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (“2004 Plan”) and the 1999 Stock Option Plan (collectively, the "Plans"), which provide for the granting of non-qualified and incentive stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights and other awards to employees, directors and consultants.

1999 Stock Option Plan. In July 1999, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 1999 Stock Option Plan ("1999 Plan") and in August 2001, the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment to the 1999 Plan such that 15% of the outstanding shares of the Company would always be available for grants under the 1999 Plan. The 1999 Plan is designed to encourage selected employees and directors to improve operations and increase profits, to accept or continue employment or association with the Company through participation in the growth in the value of the common stock. The 1999 Plan requires that option exercise prices be not less than fair market value per share of common stock on the option grant date for incentive and nonqualified options. The options issued under the 1999 Plan generally vest in between three and five years. Option expiration dates are established by the plan administrator but may not be later than 10 years after the date of the grant.

In November 2007, the shareholders of the Company approved the termination of the 1999 Plan. No new option awards will be made under the 1999 Plan and the outstanding awards under the 1999 Plan will continue to be subject to the terms and conditions of the 1999 Plan.

2004 Stock Incentive Plan. In October 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors and the stockholders approved the 2004 Plan. In November 2007, the 2004 Plan was amended and approved by the Company’s stockholders. The maximum number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2004 Plan is 14.8% of the Company’s outstanding common stock measured from time to time. In addition, the number of shares of the Company’s common stock reserved for issuance will also automatically increase by an additional 1.5% on the first day of each of four fiscal years starting July 1, 2007. At September 30, 2013, there were a maximum of 2,555,356 shares available for issuance under the limits of the 2004 Plan.

Stock Options. At September 30, 2013, expense related to stock option grants has been fully recognized.

A summary of stock option activity under the Plans during the periods indicated is presented below:



	Number of Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share
Outstanding - July 1, 2012	190,117		$	8.93
Granted	—		—
Exercised	(27,135	)	9.59
Canceled	(500	)	11.00
Outstanding - June 30, 2013	162,482		$	8.81
Granted	—		—
Exercised	(26,080	)	9.01
Canceled	—		—
Outstanding - September 30, 2013	136,402		$	8.77
Options exercisable - June 30, 2013	162,482		$	8.81
Options exercisable - September 30, 2013	136,402		$	8.77

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes information as concerning currently outstanding and exercisable options:



As of September 30, 2013
Options Outstanding				Options Exercisable
Exercise Prices		Number Outstanding	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	Number Exercisable	Weighted- Average Exercise Price
$	7.35	44,350	2.82	44,350	$	7.35
8.50		7,500	2.16	7,500	8.50
9.20		7,500	1.90	7,500	9.20
9.50		65,020	1.82	65,020	9.50
10.00		12,032	0.75	12,032	10.00
$	8.77	136,402	2.07	136,402	$	8.77

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable under the Plans at September 30, 2013 was $7,643.

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. Under the 2004 Plan, employees and directors are eligible to receive grants of restricted stock and restricted stock units. The Company determines stock-based compensation expense using the fair value method. The fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units is equal to the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

During the quarters ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company granted 104,970 and 114,578 restricted stock units respectively, to employees and directors. Restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards granted during these quarters vest over 3 years, one-third on each anniversary date, except for any RSUs granted to our CEO, vest one-fourth on each fiscal year end.

The Company's income before income taxes and net income for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 included stock award expense was $966 and $708, with total income tax benefit of $391 and $283, respectively. The Company recognizes compensation expense based upon the grant-date fair value divided by the vesting and the service period between each vesting date. At September 30, 2013, unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested awards aggregated to $10,581 and is expected to be recognized in future periods as follows:



(Dollars in thousands)	Stock Award Compensation Expense
For the fiscal year remainder:
2014	$	3,216
2015	3,512
2016	2,740
2017	1,113
Total	$	10,581

The following table presents the status and changes in restricted stock grants for the periods indicated:



	Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit Shares		Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Non-vested balance at July 1, 2012	360,662		$	13.20
Granted	181,483		28.83
Vested	(213,355	)	13.32
Cancelled	(30,305	)	18.01
Non-vested balance at June 30, 2013	298,485		$	22.13
Granted	104,970		58.21
Vested	(64,931	)	14.92
Cancelled	(1,205	)	28.29
Non-vested balance at September 30, 2013	337,319		$	34.73

Table of Contents

The total fair value of shares vested for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was $4,237.

2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. In October 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors and stockholders approved the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which is intended to qualify as an “Employee Stock Purchase Plan” under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. An aggregate total of 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock has been reserved for issuance and will be available for purchase under the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. At September 30, 2013, there have been no shares issued under the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.


7.	EARNINGS PER SHARE ("EPS")

Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income or loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted to common stock that would then share in our earnings.

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted EPS:



	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2013			2012
Earnings Per Common Share
Net income	$	12,182		$	8,989
Preferred stock dividends	(78		)	(77		)
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	12,104		$	8,912
Average common shares issued and outstanding	13,850,909			11,825,054
Average unvested Restricted stock grant and RSU shares	330,948			366,008
Total qualifying shares	14,181,857			12,191,062
Earnings per common share	$	0.85		$	0.73
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	12,104		$	8,912
Preferred stock dividends to dilutive convertible preferred	—			—
Dilutive net income attributable to common shareholders	$	12,104		$	8,912
Average common shares issued and outstanding	14,181,857			12,191,062
Dilutive effect of Stock Options	79,631			74,464
Dilutive effect of convertible preferred stock	—			987,757
Total dilutive common shares issued and outstanding	14,261,488			13,253,283
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.85		$	0.67


8.	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Credit-Related Financial Instruments. The Company is a party to credit-related financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments are commitments to extend credit. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.

The Company’s exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these commitments. The Company follows the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

At September 30, 2013, the Company had commitments to originate $51.4 million in fixed rate loans and $64.6 million in variable rate loans, totaling an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $115.9 million. Our fixed rate commitments to originate had rates ranging from 3.00% to 9.10%. At September 30, 2013, the Company also had commitments to sell $41.8 million in fixed rate loans and $2.7 million in variable rate loans, totaling an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $44.6 million.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer so long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The commitments for equity lines of credit may expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment

Table of Contents

amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Company, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer.


9.	RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In the ordinary course of business, the Company has granted related party loans collateralized by real property to officers, directors and their affiliates that are considered to be insiders by regulation. There was one new related party loan granted under the provisions of the employee loan program during the three months ended September 30, 2013, and no refinances of existing loans or new loans granted during the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Table of Contents


Item 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion provides information about the results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, off balance sheet items, contractual obligations and capital resources of BofI Holding, Inc. and subsidiary. This information is intended to facilitate the understanding and assessment of significant changes and trends related to our financial condition and the results of our operations. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial information in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013, and the interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in this report.

Some matters discussed in this report may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and as such, may involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as “estimate,” “project,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “believe,” “will,” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, expectations of the environment in which we operate and projections of future performance. Forward-looking statements are inherently unreliable and actual results may vary. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements include economic conditions, changes in the interest rate environment, changes in the competitive marketplace, risks associated with credit quality and other risk factors discussed under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Factors That May Affect Our Performance” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013, which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All written and oral forward-looking statements made in connection with this report, which are attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing information.

General

Our company, BofI Holding, Inc., is the holding company for BofI Federal Bank, a diversified financial services company with approximately $3.3 billion in assets that provides consumer and business banking products through its branchless, low-cost distribution channels and affinity partners. The Bank has deposit and loan customers nationwide including consumer and business checking, savings and time deposit accounts and financing for single family and multifamily residential properties, small-to-medium size businesses in target sectors, and selected specialty finance receivables. The Bank generates fee income from consumer and business products including fees from loans originated for sale and transaction fees earned from processing payment activity. BofI Holding, Inc.'s common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and is a component of the Russell 3000 Index.

BofI Federal Bank is a federal savings bank wholly-owned by our company and regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC"). The parent company, BofI Holding, Inc., is a unitary savings and loan holding company regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

We distribute our deposit products through a wide range of retail distributions channels, and our deposits consist of demand, savings and time deposits accounts. We distribute our loan products through our retail, correspondent and wholesale channels, and the loans we retain are primarily first mortgages secured by single family real property and by multifamily real property. Our mortgage-backed securities consist primarily of mortgage pass-through securities issued by government-sponsored entities and non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations and pass-through mortgage-backed securities issued by private sponsors. We believe our flexibility to adjust our asset generation channels has been a competitive advantage allowing us to avoid markets and products where credit fundamentals are poor.

Critical Accounting Policies

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make a number of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions based upon historical experience and various factors and circumstances. We believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates and assumptions that could have a material effect on the carrying value of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and our results of operations for the reporting periods.

Table of Contents

Our significant accounting policies and practices are described in greater detail in Note 1 to our June 30, 2013 audited consolidated financial statements and under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year end June 30, 2013.

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In addition to the results presented in accordance with GAAP, this report includes non-GAAP financial measures such as core earnings. Core earnings exclude realized and unrealized gains and losses associated with our securities portfolios. Excluding these gains and losses provides investors with an understanding of our Bank's core lending and mortgage banking business. Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied and are not audited. Readers should be aware of these limitations and should be cautious as their use of such measures. Although we believe the non-GAAP financial measures disclosed in this report enhance investors' understanding of its business and performance, these non-GAAP measures should not be consider in isolation, or as a substitute for GAAP basis financial measures.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following tables set forth certain selected financial data concerning the periods indicated:

BofI HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION



(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2013		June 30, 2013		September 30, 2012
Selected Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets	$	3,284,182	$	3,090,771	$	2,617,319
Loans—net of allowance for loan losses	2,433,001		2,256,918		1,912,999
Loans held for sale, at fair value	19,695		36,665		52,433
Loans held for sale, lower of cost or market	51,223		40,326		69,567
Allowance for loan losses	14,546		14,182		10,171
Securities—trading	7,734		7,111		6,439
Securities—available-for-sale	220,081		185,607		160,378
Securities—held-to-maturity	267,670		275,691		300,039
Total deposits	2,192,964		2,091,999		1,852,971
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	110,000		110,000		120,000
Advances from the FHLB	656,000		590,417		404,000
Subordinated debentures and other borrowings	5,155		5,155		5,155
Total stockholders’ equity	282,617		268,262		214,706

Table of Contents

BofI HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION



	At or for the Three Months Ended
	September 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2013			2012
Selected Income Statement Data:
Interest and dividend income	$	36,346		$	30,989
Interest expense	8,236			8,504
Net interest income	28,110			22,485
Provision for loan losses	500			2,550
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	27,610			19,935
Non-interest income	6,976			6,761
Non-interest expense	14,514			11,532
Income before income tax expense	20,072			15,164
Income tax expense	7,890			6,175
Net income	$	12,182		$	8,989
Net income attributable to common stock	$	12,104		$	8,912
Per Share Data:
Net income:
Basic	$	0.85		$	0.73
Diluted	$	0.85		$	0.67
Book value per common share	$	20.11		$	16.36
Tangible book value per common share	$	20.11		$	16.36
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic	14,181,857			12,191,062
Diluted	14,261,488			13,253,283
Common shares outstanding at end of period	13,803,247			12,813,171
Common shares issued at end of period	14,729,240			13,647,741
Performance Ratios and Other Data:
Loan originations for investment	$	470,669		$	279,697
Loan originations for sale	$	186,696		$	254,796
Loan purchases	$	—		$	1,541
Return on average assets	1.63		%	1.44		%
Return on average common stockholders’ equity	17.73		%	18.46		%
Interest rate spread¹	3.73		%	3.58		%
Net interest margin²	3.86		%	3.70		%
Efficiency ratio	41.37		%	39.43		%
Capital Ratios:
Equity to assets at end of period	8.61		%	8.20		%
Tier 1 leverage (core) capital to adjusted tangible assets³	8.50		%	8.20		%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio³	14.65		%	12.83		%
Total risk-based capital ratio³	15.41		%	13.44		%
Tangible capital to tangible assets³	8.50		%	8.20		%
Asset Quality Ratios:
Net annualized charge-offs to average loans outstanding	0.02		%	0.42		%
Non-performing loans to total loans	0.63		%	1.07		%
Non-performing assets to total assets	0.55		%	0.82		%
Allowance for loan losses to total loans at end of period	0.59		%	0.53		%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans	92.98		%	48.96		%

_________________________

^1.Interest rate spread represents the difference between the annualized weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the annualized weighted average

rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.

^2.Net interest margin represents annualized net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

^3.Reflects regulatory capital ratios of BofI Federal Bank.

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

For the three months ended September 30, 2013, we had net income of $12.2 million compared to net income of $9.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Net income attributable to common stockholders was $12.1 million or $0.85 per diluted share for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to net income attributable to common shareholders of $8.9 million or $0.67 per diluted share for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Other key comparisons between our operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 are:

•

Net interest income increased $5.6 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2013 due to a 19.9%, increase in average earning assets primarily from the growth in our loan portfolio, and a net decrease in the average funding rate of our liabilities. Our net interest margin increased 16 basis points in the quarter ended September 30, 2013 compared to September 30, 2012. The overall rate on interest earning assets was lower by 11 basis points for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to September 30, 2012, primarily due to a decrease in market interest rates for new loans and borrower repayments of higher rate loans. This reduction on the asset side was more than offset by a 26 basis point reduction in average rates paid on interest bearing liabilities for the three months ending September 30, 2013 compared to September 30, 2012. The reduction was primarily due to a shift in the deposit mix towards interest bearing demand and savings accounts and away from time deposits, as well as a decrease in average rates paid on demand and savings accounts of 12 basis points.

•

Non-interest income increased $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in non-interest income for the quarter was the result of a $3.1 million increase in gain on sale - other primarily resulting from sales of structured settlements, a $0.6 million increase in banking service fees and other income, a $0.5 million increase in prepayment penalty fee income, and a combined $0.5 million increase in gains on securities, partially offset by a $4.5 million decrease in mortgage banking income.

•

Non-interest expense increased $3.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012. For the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012 salaries and related expenses increased $1.4 million primarily due to the overall increase in staff, mainly in our loan and deposit areas to support the overall growth of the Bank. Professional fees increased $0.8 million due to acquisition contracts and new business costs, data processing and internet were up $0.6 million due to core system updates and increased bank customers.

We define net income without the after-tax impact of realized and unrealized securities gains and losses as adjusted earnings ("core earnings"), a non-GAAP measurement, which we believe provides useful information about the Bank's operating performance. Core earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, were $12.0 million and $9.2 million, respectively.

Below is a reconciliation of net income to core earnings:



	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2013			2012
Net Income	$	12,182		$	8,989
Realized securities gains	(208		)	—
Unrealized securities losses	(51		)	272
Tax provision	102			(111		)
Core Earnings	$	12,025		$	9,150

Net Interest Income

Net interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 totaled $28.1 million, an increase of 25.0%, compared to net interest income of $22.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. The growth of net interest income is primarily due to net loan portfolio growth which increased average earning assets and due to a net decrease in the average funding rate of our liabilities.

Total interest and dividend income during the three months ended September 30, 2013 increased 17.3% to $36.3 million compared to $31.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in interest and dividend income for

Table of Contents

the 2013 quarter was attributable primarily to growth in average earning assets from growth in the loan portfolio. The average balance of loans increased 21.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in interest income on loans was partially offset by lower rates earned on loans and mortgage-backed securities. The loan portfolio yield for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 decreased 5 basis points and the total interest-earning assets yield decreased 11 basis points from the 2012 period. The net growth in average earning assets for the 2013 quarter was funded largely by increased deposits and to a lesser extent borrowings.

Total interest expense was $8.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, a decrease of $0.3 million or 3.2% as compared with the same period in 2012. The average funding rate decreased by 26 basis points while average interest-bearing liabilities grew 16.1%. Contributing to the decrease in the average funding rates were decreases in the average rates for time deposits of 10 basis points, FHLB advances of 38 basis points and demand and savings accounts of 12 basis points for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the period in 2012. Net interest margin, defined as annualized net interest income divided by average earning assets, increased by 16 basis points to 3.86% for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared with 3.70% for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.

Table of Contents

Average Balances, Net Interest Income, Yields Earned and Rates Paid

The following table presents information regarding (i) average balances; (ii) the total amount of interest income from interest-earning assets and the weighted average yields on such assets; (iii) the total amount of interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities and the weighted average rates paid on such liabilities; (iv) net interest income; (v) interest rate spread; and (vi) net interest margin for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:



	For the three month period ended
	September 30,
	2013						2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Balance²		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yields Earned/Rates Paid¹		Average Balance²		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yields Earned/Rates Paid¹
Assets:
Loans^{3, 4}	$	2,345,467	$	30,385	5.18	%	$	1,926,883	$	25,208	5.23	%
Federal funds sold	—		—		—	%	6,724		3		0.18	%
Interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions	60,250		42		0.28	%	307		—		—	%
Mortgage-backed and other investment securities^4,5	483,819		5,609		4.64	%	477,612		5,756		4.82	%
Stock of the FHLB, at cost	26,356		310		4.70	%	20,657		22		0.43	%
Total interest-earning assets	2,915,892		36,346		4.99	%	2,432,183		30,989		5.10	%
Non-interest-earning assets	72,105						65,707
Total assets	$	2,987,997					$	2,497,890
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Interest-bearing demand and savings	$	1,049,471	$	1,777	0.68	%	$	739,572	$	1,488	0.80	%
Time deposits	962,711		3,828		1.59	%	960,332		4,049		1.69	%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	110,000		1,232		4.48	%	120,000		1,339		4.46	%
Advances from the FHLB	477,554		1,363		1.14	%	418,685		1,587		1.52	%
Other borrowings	5,155		36		2.79	%	5,155		41		3.18	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	2,604,891		8,236		1.26	%	2,243,744		8,504		1.52	%
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits	82,860						21,817
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities	22,149						18,902
Stockholders’ equity	278,097						213,427
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,987,997					$	2,497,890
Net interest income			$	28,110					$	22,485
Interest rate spread⁶					3.73	%					3.58	%
Net interest margin⁷					3.86	%					3.70	%

__________________________


^1.	Annualized.


^2.	Average balances are obtained from daily data.


^3.	Loans include loans held for sale, loan premiums and unearned fees.


^4.	Interest income includes reductions for amortization of loan and investment securities premiums and earnings from accretion of discounts and loan fees. Loan fee income is not significant. Also, includes $32.6 million and $33.3 million of Community Reinvestment Act loans which are taxed at a reduced rate for the 2013 and 2012 three month periods, respectively.


^5.	Includes $5.5 million of municipal securities which are taxed at a reduced rate for both the 2013 and 2012 three month periods, respectively.

Table of Contents


^6.	Interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.


^7.	Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

Average Balances, Net Interest Income, Yields Earned and Rates Paid

The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income. Information is provided with respect to (i) effects on interest income and interest expense attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate); (ii) effects on interest income and interest expense attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume); and (iii) changes in rate/volume (change in rate multiplied by change in volume) for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:



	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013 vs 2012
	Increase (Decrease) Due to
(Dollars in thousands)	Volume			Rate			Rate/Volume			Total Increase (Decrease)
Increase/(decrease) in interest income:
Loans	$	5,473		$	(241	)	$	(55	)	$	5,177
Federal funds sold	(3		)	(3		)	3			(3		)
Interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions	—			—			42			42
Mortgage-backed and other investment securities	75			(215		)	(7		)	(147		)
Stock of the FHLB, at cost	6			221			61			288
	$	5,551		$	(238	)	$	44		$	5,357
Increase/(decrease) in interest expense:
Interest-bearing demand and savings	$	620		$	(222	)	$	(109	)	$	289
Time deposits	10			(240		)	9			(221		)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	(112		)	6			(1		)	(107		)
Advances from the FHLB	224			(398		)	(50		)	(224		)
Other borrowings	—			(5		)	—			(5		)
	$	742		$	(859	)	$	(151	)	$	(268	)

Provision for Loan Losses

The loan loss provision was $0.5 million compared to $2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012. The decrease in the provision for the three month period ended September 30, 2013 is due to a favorable decrease in the loan charge-offs partially offset by addition to the allowance for growth of the loan portfolio. Provisions for loan losses are charged to income to bring the allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management based on the factors discussed under “Financial Condition-Asset Quality and Allowance for Loan Losses.”

Table of Contents

Non-Interest Income

The following table sets forth information regarding our non-interest income for the periods shown:



	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2013			2012			Inc (Dec)
Realized gain on securities:
Sale of mortgage-backed securities	$	208		$	—		$	208
Total realized gain on securities	208			—			208
Other than temporary loss on securities:
Total impairment losses	$	253		$	(2,872	)	$	3,125
Loss recognized in other comprehensive loss	(825		)	1,998			(2,823		)
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings	(572		)	(874		)	302
Fair value gain on trading securities	623			602			21
Total unrealized loss on securities	51			(272		)	323
Prepayment penalty fee income	654			202			452
Mortgage banking income	1,986			6,456			(4,470		)
Gain on sale - other	3,089			—			3,089
Banking service fees and other income	988			375			613
Total non-interest income	$	6,976		$	6,761		$	215

Non-interest income increased $0.2 million to $7.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The increase was primarily the result of a $3.1 million increase in gain on sale - other, primarily resulting from sales of structured settlements. A decline of $4.5 million in mortgage banking income tempered the increase in non-interest income as interest rates ticked up and the number of loans eligible for rate reductions dropped. Other contributions to the increase were a $0.5 million net positive change in securities gains, a $0.5 million increase in prepayment penalty fee income and a $0.6 million increase in banking service fees and other income due primarily to prepaid card sponsorships added in 2013.

Non-Interest Expense

The following table sets forth information regarding our non-interest expense for the periods shown:



	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2013		2012		Inc (Dec)
Salaries and related costs	$	7,782	$	6,369	$	1,413
Professional services	1,680		918		762
Occupancy and equipment	549		507		42
Data processing and internet	1,185		571		614
Advertising and promotional	589		794		(205		)
Depreciation and amortization	721		337		384
Real estate owned and repossessed vehicles	69		98		(29		)
FDIC and regulator fees	547		488		59
Other general and administrative	1,392		1,450		(58		)
Total non-interest expenses	$	14,514	$	11,532	$	2,982

Non-interest expense, which is comprised primarily of compensation, data processing and internet expenses, occupancy, advertising and promotional and other operating expenses, was $14.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, up from $11.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in compensation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2013 is primarily due to the expansion of the Banks' staffing for lending products, strategic partnerships, business banking and regulatory compliance.

Table of Contents

Total salaries and related costs increased $1.4 million to $7.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 compared to $6.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 due to increased staffing levels to support growth in deposit and lending activities. Our staff increased to 320 from 261, or 22.6% between the quarters ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Professional services, which include accounting and legal fees, increased $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the same period last year. The increases were primarily due to legal fees related to acquisition contracts and business expansion costs.

Advertising and promotional expense decreased $0.2 million for the three months periods ended September 30, 2013, compared to the same period ended September 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily due to declines in online, email and direct leads expense primarily related to Agency mortgage banking.

Data processing and internet expense increased $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the same period last year. The increase was primarily due to growth in the number of customer accounts and enhancements to the Bank's core processing system.

The cost of our Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or “FDIC” and "OCC" standard regulatory charges increased $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the same period last year. The increase was due to the overall growth of the Bank's liabilities. As an FDIC-insured institution, the Bank is required to pay deposit insurance premiums to the FDIC.

Other general and administrative expense decreased $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the same period last year, due to a decrease in loan origination expense.

Provision for Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rates (income tax provision divided by net income before income tax) for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were 39.31% and 40.72%, respectively. The reduction in the tax rate is the result of changes in state tax allocations.

Table of Contents

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Balance Sheet Analysis

Our total assets increased $193.4 million, or 6.3%, to $3,284.2 million, as of September 30, 2013, up from $3,090.8 million at June 30, 2013. The increase in total assets was primarily due to an increase of $176.1 million in net loans held for investment. Total liabilities increased $179.1 million, primarily due to an increase in deposits of $101.0 million and an increase in borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (the “FHLB”) of $65.6 million.

Loans

Net loans held for investment increased 7.8% to $2,433.0 million at September 30, 2013 from $2,256.9 million at June 30, 2013. The increase in the loan portfolio was due to loan originations and purchases of $470.7 million, offset by loan repayments of $265.2 million, net transfers to our held for sale portfolio of $31.0 million and a net increase in the allowance of $0.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2013.

The following table sets forth the composition of the loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:



	September 30, 2013					June 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount			Percent		Amount			Percent
Single family real estate secured:
Mortgage	$	1,204,813		48.59	%	$	1,070,668		46.53	%
Home equity	21,369			0.86	%	22,537			0.98	%
Warehouse and other	216,539			8.73	%	204,878			8.90	%
Multifamily real estate secured	805,796			32.49	%	768,023			33.38	%
Commercial real estate secured	28,843			1.16	%	29,000			1.26	%
Auto and RV secured	17,452			0.70	%	18,530			0.81	%
Factoring	91,855			3.70	%	108,144			4.70	%
Commercial & Industrial	85,247			3.44	%	78,721			3.42	%
Other	8,126			0.33	%	419			0.02	%
Total gross loans	2,480,040			100.00	%	2,300,920			100.00	%
Allowance for loan losses	(14,546		)			(14,182		)
Unaccreted discounts and loan fees	(32,493		)			(29,820		)
Net mortgage loans on real estate	$	2,433,001				$	2,256,918

The Bank originates and purchases mortgage loans with terms that may include repayments that are less than the repayments for fully amortizing loans, including interest only loans, option adjustable-rate mortgages, and other loan types that permit payments that may be smaller than interest accruals. The Bank's lending guidelines for interest only loans are adjusted for the increased credit risk associated with these loans by requiring borrowers with such loans to borrow at LTVs that are lower than standard amortizing ARM loans and by calculating debt to income ratios for qualifying borrowers based upon a fully amortizing payment, not the interest only payment. The Company's Internal Asset Review Committee monitors and performs reviews of interest only loans. Adverse trends reflected in the Company's delinquency statistics, grading and classification of interest only loans would be reported to management and the Board of Directors. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had $377.6 million of interest only mortgage loans and $6.9 million of option adjustable-rate mortgage loans. Through September 30, 2013, the net amount of deferred interest on these loan types was not material to the financial position or operating results of the Company.

Table of Contents

Asset Quality and Allowance for Loan Loss

Non-performing Assets

Non-performing loans are comprised of loans past due 90 days or more on nonaccrual status and other nonaccrual loans. Non-performing assets include non-performing loans plus other real estate owned and repossessed vehicles. At September 30, 2013, our non-performing loans totaled $15.6 million, or 0.63% of total gross loans and our total non-performing assets totaled $18.2 million, or 0.55% of total assets.

Non-performing loans and foreclosed assets or “non-performing assets” consisted of the following as of the dates indicated:



(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2013			June 30, 2013			Inc (Dec)
Non-performing assets:
Non-accrual loans:
Single family real estate secured:
Mortgage	$	9,992		$	11,353		$	(1,361	)
Home equity	12			37			(25		)
Multifamily real estate secured	3,059			2,882			177
Commercial real estate secured	2,122			3,559			(1,437		)
Total non-performing loans secured by real estate	15,185			17,831			(2,646		)
Auto and RV secured	402			472			(70		)
Factoring	56			—			56
Other	2			—			2
Total non-performing loans	15,645			18,303			(2,658		)
Foreclosed real estate	2,475			1,865			610
Repossessed—vehicles	87			141			(54		)
Total non-performing assets	$	18,207		$	20,309		$	(2,102	)
Total non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans	0.63		%	0.80		%	(0.17		)%
Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets	0.55		%	0.66		%	(0.11		)%

Total non-performing assets decreased from $20.3 million at June 30, 2013 to $18.2 million at September 30, 2013. As a percentage of total assets, non-performing assets decreased from 0.66% at June 30, 2013 to 0.55% at September 30, 2013. The non-performing assets decrease of approximately $2.1 million, was primarily the result of certain single family and commercial real estate loans offset by a net increase in the multifamily segment of our portfolio.

A troubled debt restructuring is a concession made to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties, typically permanent or temporary modifications of principal and interest payments or an extension of maturity dates. When a loan is delinquent and classified as a troubled debt restructuring no interest is accrued until the borrower demonstrates over time (typically six months) that it can make payments. When a loan is considered a troubled debt restructuring and is on nonaccrual, it is considered non-performing and included in the table above. The Bank had performing troubled debt restructurings on mortgage loans and RV loans with outstanding balances totaling $4.9 million at September 30, 2013 and $3.5 million at June 30, 2013.

Allowance for Loan Losses

We are committed to maintaining the allowance for loan losses at a level that is considered to be commensurate with estimated and known risks in the portfolio. Although the adequacy of the allowance is reviewed quarterly, our management performs an ongoing assessment of the risks inherent in the portfolio. While we believe that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at September 30, 2013, future additions to the allowance will be subject to continuing evaluation of estimated and known, as well as inherent, risks in the loan portfolio.

The assessment of the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses is based upon a number of quantitative and qualitative factors, including levels and trends of past due and nonaccrual loans, change in volume and mix of loans, collateral values and charge-off history.

We provide general loan loss reserves for our RV and auto loans based upon the borrower credit score at the time of origination and the Company’s loss experience to date. The allowance for loan loss for the RV and auto loan portfolio at September 30, 2013 was determined by classifying each outstanding loan according to the semi-annually refreshed FICO score and providing loss rates. The Company had $16,210 (dollars in thousands) of RV and auto loan balances subject to general reserves as follows: FICO greater than or equal to 770: $4,244; 715 – 769: $5,121; 700 -714: $1,347; 660 – 699: $2,730 and less than 660: $2,768.

Table of Contents

We experienced increased charge-offs of RV loans in fiscal 2007 through 2011, due to the nationwide recession. Our portfolio of RV loans is expected to decrease in the future because the Bank ceased originating RV loans in fiscal 2009.

The Company provides general loan loss reserves for mortgage loans based upon the size and class of the mortgage loan and the loan-to-value ratio (LTV) at date of origination. The allowance for each class is determined by dividing the outstanding unpaid balance for each loan by the loan-to-value and applying quantitative and qualitative loss rates. The LTV groupings for each significant mortgage class are as follows (dollars in thousands):

The weighted average LTV percentage for our entire real estate loan portfolio was 55% at September 30, 2013. We believe that this percentage is lower and more conservative than most banks, which results in lower average mortgage loan charge-offs when compared to many other comparable banks.

While we anticipate that such level of charge-offs will continue into the future, given the uncertainties surrounding the improvement of the U.S. economy, we may experience an increase in the relative amount of charge-offs and we may be required to increase our loan loss provisions in the future to provide a larger loss allowance for one or more of our loan types.

The following table summarizes impaired loans as of:



(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2013		June 30, 2013
Non-performing loans—90+ days past due plus other non-accrual loans	$	11,898	$	13,020
Troubled debt restructuring loans—non-accrual	3,747		5,283
Troubled debt restructuring loans—performing	4,936		3,538
Total impaired loans	$	20,581	$	21,841

The following table reflects management’s allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan category and the ratio of each loan category to total loans as of the dates indicated:



	September 30, 2013				June 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount of Allowance		Allocation as a % of Allowance		Amount of Allowance		Allocation as a % of Allowance
Single family real estate secured:
Mortgage	5,418		37.26	%	4,812		33.93	%
Home equity	152		1.04	%	183		1.29	%
Warehouse and other	890		6.12	%	1,250		8.81	%
Multifamily real estate secured	3,867		26.58	%	3,186		22.47	%
Commercial real estate secured	995		6.84	%	1,378		9.72	%
Auto and RV secured	1,295		8.90	%	1,536		10.83	%
Factoring	195		1.34	%	201		1.42	%
Commercial & Industrial	1,489		10.24	%	1,623		11.44	%
Other	245		1.68	%	13		0.09	%
Total	$	14,546	100.00	%	$	14,182	100.00	%

The loan loss provision was $0.5 million and $2.6 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. The decrease in the loan loss provision was the result of lower charge-offs and improvements in non-performing loans and delinquencies. We believe that the lower average LTV in the Bank’s mortgage loan portfolio will continue to result in future lower average mortgage loan charge-offs when compared to many other comparable banks. Our general loan loss reserves are based upon historical losses and expected future trends. The resolution of the Bank’s existing REO and non-performing loans should not have a significant adverse impact on our operating results.

Table of Contents

Investment Securities

Total investment securities were $495.5 million as of September 30, 2013, compared with $468.4 million at June 30, 2013. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we purchased $43.2 million in Municipal debt, had received principal repayments of approximately $8.7 million in our available-for-sale portfolio. In our held-to-maturity portfolio, we received principal repayments of $10.9 million with the balance of the change attributable to accretion and other activities. We currently classify agency mortgage-backed and debt securities as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale at the time of purchase based upon small issue size and based on issue features, such as callable terms.

Deposits

Deposits increased a net $101.0 million, or 4.8%, to $2,193.0 million at September 30, 2013, from $2,092.0 million at June 30, 2013. Our deposit growth composition was the result of a 50.2% increase in interest-bearing demand accounts and an 16.9% increase in savings accounts as a result of our acquisition of approximately $173 million in deposits from Principal Bank, including $142 million in checking, savings and money market accounts and $31 million in time deposit accounts, and increased promotion and competitive pricing of savings accounts partially offset by a decline in our time deposits during the three months ended September 30, 2013.

The following table sets forth the composition of the deposit portfolio as of the dates indicated:



	September 30, 2013				June 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Rate¹		Amount		Rate¹
Non-interest bearing	$	92,900	—	%	$	81,524	—	%
Interest bearing:
Demand	468,028		0.51	%	311,539		0.50	%
Savings	749,771		0.67	%	641,534		0.67	%
Total demand and savings	1,217,799		0.60	%	953,073		0.61	%
Time deposits:
Under $100,000	163,449		1.33	%	183,754		1.36	%
$100,000 or more	718,816		1.63	%	873,648		1.52	%
Total time deposits²	882,265		1.58	%	1,057,402		1.50	%
Total interest bearing	2,100,064		1.01	%	2,010,475		1.08	%
Total deposits	$	2,192,964	0.97	%	$	2,091,999	1.04	%

______________________________

^1.Based on weighted-average stated interest rates at end of period.

^2.The total includes brokered deposits of $446.5 million and $435.6 million as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, respectively, of which $294.7 million and $283.5 million, respectively, are time deposits.

The following table sets forth the number of deposit accounts by type as of the date indicated:



	September 30, 2013	June 30, 2013	September 30, 2012
Checking and savings accounts	30,938	23,569	21,308
Time deposits	10,005	11,103	12,004
Total number of deposit accounts	40,943	34,672	33,312

Table of Contents

Borrowings

The following table sets forth the composition of our borrowings as of the dates indicated:



	September 30, 2013					June 30, 2013					September 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance			Weighted Average Rate		Balance			Weighted Average Rate		Balance			Weighted Average Rate
Repurchase agreements	$	110,000		4.40	%	$	110,000		4.40	%	$	120,000		4.34	%
FHLB Advances	656,000			0.85	%	590,417			0.92	%	404,000			1.57	%
Subordinated debentures and other borrowings	5,155			2.66	%	5,155			2.67	%	5,155			2.86	%
	$	771,155		1.37	%	$	705,572		1.48	%	$	529,155		2.21	%

Weighted average cost of borrowings during the quarter	1.77		%			1.83		%			2.18		%
Borrowings as a percent of total assets	23.48		%			22.83		%			20.22		%

At September 30, 2013, total borrowings amounted to $771.2 million, up from $705.6 million or 9.30% from June 30, 2013 and up $242.0 million or 45.73% from September 30, 2012. Total borrowings represented 23.48% of total assets and had a weighted average cost of 1.77% at September 30, 2013, compared with 22.83% of total assets at a weighted average cost of 1.83% at June 30, 2013 and 20.22% of total assets at a weighted average cost of 2.18% at September 30, 2012.

We have sold securities under various agreements to repurchase for total proceeds of $110.0 million. The repurchase agreements have interest rates between 3.75% and 4.75% and scheduled maturities between November 2013 and December 2017. Under these agreements, we may be required to repay the $110.0 million and repurchase our securities before the scheduled maturity if the issuer requests repayment on scheduled quarterly call dates. The weighted-average remaining contractual maturity period is 1.45 years and the weighted average remaining period before such repurchase agreements could be called is 0.12 years.

We regularly use advances from the FHLB to manage our interest rate risk and, to a lesser extent, manage our liquidity position. Generally, FHLB advances with terms between three and ten years have been used to fund the purchase of single family and multifamily mortgages and to provide us with interest rate risk protection should rates rise. At September 30, 2013, a total of $15.0 million of FHLB advances include agreements that allow the FHLB, at its option, to put the advances back to us after specified dates. The weighted-average remaining contractual maturity period of the $15.0 million in putable advances is 2.25 years and the weighted average remaining period before such advances could be put to us is 0.16 years.

Stockholders’ Equity

Stockholders’ equity increased $14.4 million to $282.6 million at September 30, 2013 compared to $268.3 million at June 30, 2013. The increase was the result of our net income for the three months ended September 30, 2013 of $12.2 million, vesting and issuance of RSU's and exercise of stock options of $1.8 million, a $0.6 million unrealized gain in other comprehensive income, net of tax and a reduction of $0.1 million in dividends declared on preferred stock.

Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY

Cash flow information is as follows:



	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2013			2012
Operating Activities	$	59,988		$	(32,339	)
Investing Activities	$	(233,211	)	$	(179,882	)
Financing Activities	$	168,512		$	220,139

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we had net cash inflows from operating activities of $60.0 million compared to outflows of $32.3 million for the for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Net operating cash inflows and outflows fluctuate due to the timing of mortgage loan originations and sales.

Net cash outflows from investing activities totaled $233.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, while outflows totaled $179.9 million for the same period in 2013. The increase was primarily due to higher loan originations which were only partially offset by increased repayments of loans in the 2014 period compared to the same period in the prior year.

Our net cash provided by financing activities totaled $168.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, while inflows totaled $220.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Net cash provided by financing activities increased primarily from growth in deposits and a net increase in FHLB advances for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to September 30, 2012. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Bank could borrow up to 40.0% of its total assets from the FHLB. Borrowings are collateralized by the pledge of certain mortgage loans and investment securities to the FHLB. At September 30, 2013, the Company had $542.1 million available immediately and an additional $37.4 million available with additional collateral. At September 30, 2013, we also had two $10.0 million unsecured federal funds purchase lines with two different banks under which no borrowings were outstanding.

The Bank has the ability to borrow short-term from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Discount Window. At September 30, 2013, the Bank did not have any borrowings outstanding and the amount available from this source was $24.9 million. The credit line is collateralized by consumer loans and mortgage-backed securities.

In an effort to expand our Bank’s liquidity options, we have issued brokered deposits, with $446.5 million outstanding at September 30, 2013. We believe our liquidity sources to be stable and adequate for our anticipated needs and contingencies. We believe we have the ability to increase our level of deposits and borrowings to address our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.

AT-THE-MARKET OFFERING

On March 11, 2013, we entered into an At-the-Market (ATM) Equity Distribution Agreement with each of Raymond James & Associates, Inc., JMP Securities LLC, Liquidnet, Inc., and Sandler O'Neill + Partners L.P. (the “Distribution Agents”) pursuant to which we may issue and sell through the Distribution Agents from time to time shares of our common stock in at the market offerings with an aggregate offering price of up to $50,000,000 (the “ATM Offering”). The sales of shares of our common stock under the Equity Distribution Agreement are to be made in “at the market” offerings as defined in Rule 415 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, including sales made directly on the NASADAQ Global Select Market (the principal existing trading market for our common stock), or sales made through a market maker or any other trading market for our common stock, or (with our prior consent) in privately negotiated transactions at negotiated prices. The aggregate compensation payable to the Distribution Agents under the Distribution Agreement is 2.5% of the gross sales price of the shares sold under the agreement. We have also agreed to reimburse the Distribution Agents for up to $125,000 in their expenses and have provided the Distribution Agents with customary indemnification rights.

In fiscal year 2013, we commenced sales of common stock through the ATM Offering. There were no sales through the ATM Offering during the quarter ended September 30, 2013. The details of the shares of common stock sold through the ATM Offering through September 30, 2013 are as follows:



Distribution Agent	Month	Per Share Price and Number of Shares Sold			Net Proceeds		Compensation to Distribution Agent
Raymond James & Associates	March 2013	$	35.25	200,000	$	6,874	$	176

As of September 30, 2013, the total gross sales we completed and the remaining sales we have available under the ATM Offering were $7,050,000 and $42,950,000, respectively.

Table of Contents

OFF-BALANCE SHEET COMMITMENTS

At September 30, 2013, we had commitments to originate loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $115.9 million, and commitments to sell loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $44.6 million. We have no commitments to purchase loans, investment securities or any other unused lines of credit.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The Company enters into contractual obligations in the normal course of business primarily as a source of funds for its asset growth and to meet required capital needs. Our time deposits due within one year of September 30, 2013 totaled $440.8 million. We believe the large percentage of time deposits that mature within one year reflects customers’ hesitancy to invest their funds long term. If these maturing deposits do not remain with us, we may be required to seek other sources of funds, including other time deposits and borrowings. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on deposits and borrowings than we currently pay on time deposits maturing within one year. We believe, however, based on past experience, a significant portion of our time deposits will remain with us. We believe we have the ability to attract and retain deposits by adjusting interest rates offered.

The following table presents certain of our contractual obligations as of the period indicated:



	As of September 30, 2013
			Payments Due by Period¹
(Dollars in thousands)	Total		Less Than One Year		One To Three Years		Three To Five Years		More Than Five Years
Long-term debt obligations²	$	801,644	$	570,656	$	70,279	$	106,060	$	54,649
Time deposits²	894,151		445,439		192,030		70,753		185,929
Operating lease obligations³	14,424		1,998		3,983		4,292		4,151
Total	$	1,710,219	$	1,018,093	$	266,292	$	181,105	$	244,729

________________________________


^1.	Our contractual obligations include long-term debt, time deposits and operating leases as shown. We had no capitalized leases or material commitments for capital expenditures at September 30, 2013.


^2.	Amounts include principal and interest due to recipient.


^3.	Payments are for a lease of real property.

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND REQUIREMENTS

BofI Federal Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements set by the federal banking agencies. Failure by our Bank to meet minimum capital requirements could result in certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, our Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Our Bank’s capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation require our Bank to maintain certain minimum capital amounts and ratios. Regulations of the OCC require our Bank to maintain minimum ratios of tangible capital to tangible assets of 1.5%, core capital to tangible assets of 4.0% and total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0%. At September 30, 2013, our Bank met all the capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject. At September 30, 2013, our Bank was “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be “well capitalized,” our Bank must maintain minimum leverage, tier 1 risk-based and total risk-based capital ratios of at least 5.0%, 6.0% and 10.0%, respectively. Management believes that no conditions or events have occurred since September 30, 2013 that management believes would materially adversely change the Bank’s capital classification. From time to time, we may need to raise additional capital to support our Bank’s further growth and to maintain its “well capitalized” status.

Table of Contents

The Bank’s capital amounts, capital ratios and capital requirements were as follows:



	As of September 30, 2013
	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				To be “Well Capitalized” Under Prompt Corrective Action Regulations
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
Tier 1 leverage (core) capital to adjusted tangible assets		$280,391	8.50	%		$131,957	4.00	%		$164,946	5.00	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	280,391		14.65	%	N/A		N/A		114,835		6.00	%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	294,937		15.41	%	153,114		8.00	%	191,392		10.00	%
Tangible capital (to tangible assets)	280,391		8.50	%	49,484		1.50	%	N/A		N/A

	As of June 30, 2013
	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				To be “Well Capitalized” Under Prompt Corrective Action Regulations
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
Tier 1 leverage (core) capital to adjusted tangible assets		$268,103	8.63	%		$124,277	4.00	%		$155,346	5.00	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	268,103		14.52	%	N/A		N/A		110,813		6.00	%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	282,285		15.28	%	147,751		8.00	%	184,689		10.00	%
Tangible capital (to tangible assets)	268,103		8.63	%	46,604		1.50	%	N/A		N/A

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We measure interest rate sensitivity as the difference between amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that mature or contractually re-price within a given period of time. The difference, or the interest rate sensitivity gap, provides an indication of the extent to which an institution’s interest rate spread will be affected by changes in interest rates. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities and negative when the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive assets. In a rising interest rate environment, an institution with a positive gap would be in a better position than an institution with a negative gap to invest in higher yielding assets or to have its asset yields adjusted upward, which would cause the yield on its assets to increase at a faster pace than the cost of its interest-bearing liabilities. During a period of falling interest rates, however, an institution with a positive gap would tend to have its assets reprice at a faster rate than one with a negative gap, which would tend to reduce the growth in its net interest income.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities at September 30, 2013:



	Term to Repricing, Repayment, or Maturity at
	September 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	One Year or Less			Over One Year Through Five Years			Over Five Years			Total
Interest-earning assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	196,983		$	—		$	—		$	196,983
Securities¹	301,170			16,894			177,421			495,485
Stock of the FHLB, at cost	30,832			—			—			30,832
Loans—net of allowance for loan loss²	339,497			1,564,182			529,322			2,433,001
Loans held for sale	71,188			—			—			71,188
Total interest-earning assets	939,670			1,581,076			706,743			3,227,489
Non-interest earning assets	—			—			—			56,693
Total assets	$	939,670		$	1,581,076		$	706,743		$	3,284,182
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits³	$	1,658,604		$	257,813		$	183,647		$	2,100,064
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	75,000			35,000			—			110,000
Advances from the FHLB⁴	486,000			125,000			45,000			656,000
Other borrowed funds	5,155			—			—			5,155
Total interest-bearing liabilities	2,224,759			417,813			228,647			2,871,219
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities	—			—			—			130,346
Stockholders’ equity	—			—			—			282,617
Total liabilities and equity	$	2,224,759		$	417,813		$	228,647		$	3,284,182
Net interest rate sensitivity gap	$	(1,285,089	)	$	1,163,263		$	478,096		$	356,270
Cumulative gap	$	(1,285,089	)	$	(121,826	)	$	356,270		$	356,270
Net interest rate sensitivity gap—as a % of interest earning assets	(136.76		)%	73.57		%	67.65		%	11.04		%
Cumulative gap—as % of cumulative interest earning assets	(136.76		)%	(4.83		)%	11.04		%	11.04		%

________________________

^1.Comprised of U.S. government securities and mortgage-backed securities, which are classified as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale and trading. The table reflects contractual re-pricing dates.

^2.The table reflects either contractual re-pricing dates or maturities.

^3.The table assumes that the principal balances for demand deposit and savings accounts will re-price in the first year.

^4.The table reflects either contractual repricing dates or maturities and does not estimate prepayments or puts.

Table of Contents

Although “gap” analysis is a useful measurement device available to management in determining the existence of interest rate exposure, its static focus as of a particular date makes it necessary to utilize other techniques in measuring exposure to changes in interest rates. For example, gap analysis is limited in its ability to predict trends in future earnings and makes no assumptions about changes in prepayment tendencies, deposit or loan maturity preferences or repricing time lags that may occur in response to a change in the interest rate environment.

We attempt to measure the effect market interest rate changes will have on the net present value of assets and liabilities, which is defined as market value of equity. The market value of equity for these purposes is not intended to refer to the trading pricing of our common stock. We analyze the market value of equity sensitivity to an immediate parallel and sustained shift in interest rates derived from the current treasury and LIBOR yield curves. For rising interest rate scenarios, the industry market interest rate forecast was increased by 100, 200 and 300 basis points.

The following table indicates the sensitivity of market value of equity to the interest rate movement described above:



	As of September 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Net Present Value		Percentage Change from Base		Net Present Value as a Percentage of Assets
Up 300 basis points	$	226,997	(38.6	)%	7.24	%
Up 200 basis points	277,264		(25.0	)%	8.58	%
Up 100 basis points	328,915		(11.0	)%	9.89	%
Base	369,537		—	%	10.86	%
Down 100 basis points	385,116		4.2	%	11.15	%
Down 200 basis points	388,321		5.1	%	11.16	%

The computation of the prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes is based on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of interest rates, asset prepayments, runoffs in deposits and changes in repricing levels of deposits to general market rates, and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Furthermore, these computations do not take into account any actions that we may undertake in response to future changes in interest rates.


ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

For quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding market risks in our portfolio, see, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”


ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer along with our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

Management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that the Company's internal controls will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of internal controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Also, any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls in future periods are subject to the risk that those internal controls may become inadequate because of changes in business conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not involved in any material legal proceedings. From time to time we may be a party to a claim or litigation that arises in the ordinary course of business, such as claims to enforce liens, claims involving the origination and servicing of loans, and other issues related to the business of the Bank.


ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS

We face a variety of risks that are inherent in our business and our industry. These risks are described in more detail under “MD&A - Factors That May Affect Our Performance," in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013. We encourage you to read these factors in their entirety. Moreover, other factors may also exist that we cannot anticipate or that we currently do not consider to be significant based on information that is currently available.


ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The table below sets forth our market repurchases of BofI common stock and the BofI common shares retained in connection with net settlement of restricted stock awards during the three months ended September 30, 2013. Purchases made relate to the stock repurchase plan of 414,991 shares that was originally approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on July 5, 2005, plus an additional 500,000 shares approved on November 20, 2008. Stock repurchased under this plan will be held as treasury shares.



Period	Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid Per Shares		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Stock Repurchases
Quarter Ended September 30, 2013
July 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013	—	$	—	—	319,291
Balance at September 30, 2013	595,700	$	5.72	595,700	319,291
Stock Retained in Net Settlement
Beginning Balance at July 1, 2013	309,204
July 1, 2013 to July 31, 2013	1,076
August 1, 2013 to August 31, 2013	18,696
September 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013	1,317
Ending Balance at September 30, 2013	330,293
Total Treasury Shares at September 30, 2013	925,993

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

Table of Contents


ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS



Exhibit		Document

31.1		Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2		Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS		XBRL Instant Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Definition Document

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



			BofI Holding, Inc.

Dated:	November 5, 2013	By:	/s/ Gregory Garrabrants
			Gregory Garrabrants President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:	November 5, 2013	By:	/s/ Andrew J. Micheletti
			Andrew J. Micheletti Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)