Edgar Filing: TELEPHONE & DATA SYSTEMS INC /DE/

form10-q.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-14157

TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

36-2669023

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

30 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60602

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (312) 630-1900

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x

Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

	Class		Outstanding at June 30, 2010
	Common Shares, $.01 par value		49,849,632 Shares
	Special Common Shares, $.01 par value		48,716,833 Shares
	Series A Common Shares, $.01 par value		6,504,284 Shares

Table of Contents

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2010


Index

				Page No.
Part I.	Financial Information			3

	Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
		Consolidated Statement of Operations
			Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009	3

		Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
			Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009	4

		Consolidated Balance Sheet		5
			June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009

		Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity		7
			Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

		Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
			Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009	9

		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		10

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		25

		Overview		25
		Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009		31
			Results of Operations - Consolidated	31
			Results of Operations - Wireless	33
			Results of Operations - Wireline	37
		Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009		41
			Results of Operations - Consolidated	41
			Results of Operations - Wireless	42
			Results of Operations - Wireline	44
		Recent Accounting Pronouncements		47
		Financial Resources		47
		Liquidity and Capital Resources		49
		Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates		52
		Safe Harbor Cautionary Statement		53

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		57

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		58

Part II.	Other Information			59

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		59

	Item 1A.	Risk Factors		59

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		60

	Item 5.	Other Information		61

	Item 6.	Exhibits		61

Signatures				63

Table of Contents

Part I. Financial Information Item 1. Financial Statements


Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.

Consolidated Statement of Operations (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Operations (Unaudited)

			Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
			Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)			2010			2009			2010			2009


Operating revenues			$	1,232,219		$	1,242,070		$	2,454,654		$	2,500,296

Operating expenses
	Cost of services and products (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense reported below)			453,037			431,022			897,569			898,414
	Selling, general and administrative			501,329			471,076			982,416			934,939
	Depreciation, amortization and accretion			190,258			183,512			379,647			366,505
	Loss on asset disposals, net			1,214			3,021			6,645			7,191
		Total operating expenses		1,145,838			1,088,631			2,266,277			2,207,049

Operating income				86,381			153,439			188,377			293,247

Investment and other income (expense)
	Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities			25,997			18,363			50,900			43,700
	Interest and dividend income			2,674			2,902			5,115			4,974
	Interest expense			(29,265	)		(32,534	)		(58,223	)		(63,044	)
	Other, net			(1,929	)		(25	)		(2,119	)		474
		Total investment and other income (expense)		(2,523	)		(11,294	)		(4,327	)		(13,896	)

Income before income taxes				83,858			142,145			184,050			279,351
	Income tax expense			31,469			55,242			69,392			97,081
Net income				52,389			86,903			114,658			182,270
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax				(12,102	)		(20,539	)		(25,957	)		(41,809	)
Net income attributable to TDS shareholders				40,287			66,364			88,701			140,461
Preferred dividend requirement				(12	)		(13	)		(25	)		(26	)
Net income available to common shareholders			$	40,275		$	66,351		$	88,676		$	140,435

Basic weighted average shares outstanding				105,520			110,741			105,728			111,486
Basic earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders			$	0.38		$	0.60		$	0.84		$	1.26

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding				105,907			110,971			106,071			111,698
Diluted earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders			$	0.38		$	0.60		$	0.83		$	1.25

Dividends per share			$	0.1125		$	0.1075		$	0.2250		$	0.2150

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

				Six Months Ended June 30,
				Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)				2010			2009


Cash flows from operating activities
	Net income			$	114,658		$	182,270
	Add (deduct) adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities
			Depreciation, amortization and accretion		379,647			366,505
			Bad debts expense		39,633			42,761
			Stock-based compensation expense		16,743			14,394
			Deferred income taxes, net		(28,881	)		18,882
			Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities		(50,900	)		(43,700	)
			Distributions from unconsolidated entities		48,740			13,239
			Loss on asset disposals, net		6,645			7,191
			Other operating activities		3,381			2,125
		Changes in assets and liabilities from operations
			Accounts receivable		(20,985	)		(68,283	)
			Inventory		32,177			(9,928	)
			Accounts payable		(35,572	)		(63,963	)
			Customer deposits and deferred revenues		4,217			(5,151	)
			Accrued taxes		24,209			60,406
			Accrued interest		102			513
			Other assets and liabilities		(31,468	)		(73,300	)
					502,346			443,961

Cash flows from investing activities
	Additions to property, plant and equipment				(317,950	)		(290,821	)
	Cash paid for acquisitions and licenses				(28,264	)		(15,042	)
	Cash paid for investments				(385,000	)		(109,055	)
	Cash received for investments				15,661			—
	Other investing activities				1,479			2,040
					(714,074	)		(412,878	)

Cash flows from financing activities
	Repayment of long-term debt				(1,280	)		(1,655	)
	TDS Common Shares and Special Common Shares reissued for benefit plans, net of tax payments				845			743
	U.S. Cellular Common Shares reissued for benefit plans, net of tax payments				144			(405	)
	Repurchase of TDS Special Common Shares				(31,092	)		(86,565	)
	Repurchase of U.S. Cellular Common Shares				(21,423	)		(19,332	)
	Dividends paid				(23,732	)		(23,814	)
	Payment of debt issuance costs				—			(9,959	)
	Distributions to noncontrolling interests				(4,314	)		(3,417	)
	Other financing activities				65			769
					(80,787	)		(143,635	)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents					(292,515	)		(112,552	)

Cash and cash equivalents
	Beginning of period				670,992			777,309
	End of period			$	378,477		$	664,757

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheet — Assets (Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheet — Assets (Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)			June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)			June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009


Current assets
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	378,477	$	670,992
	Short-term investments			379,227		113,275
	Accounts receivable
		Due from customers, less allowances of $29,168 and $30,422, respectively		355,004		384,470
		Other, less allowances of $6,691 and $7,201, respectively		143,352		130,973
	Inventory			124,810		156,987
	Net deferred income tax asset			29,948		29,874
	Prepaid expenses			92,770		94,336
	Other current assets			62,659		66,764
				1,566,247		1,647,671
Investments
	Licenses			1,453,526		1,443,025
	Goodwill			718,635		707,840
	Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $114,740 and $108,944, respectively			28,693		26,589
	Investments in unconsolidated entities			200,352		203,799
	Long-term investments			107,506		—
	Other investments			9,447		9,785
				2,518,159		2,391,038
Property, plant and equipment
	In service and under construction			9,006,920		8,760,327
	Less: Accumulated depreciation			5,544,179		5,252,482
				3,462,741		3,507,845

Other assets and deferred charges				63,281		65,759

Total assets			$	7,610,428	$	7,612,313

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheet — Liabilities and Equity (Unaudited)


(Dollars and shares in thousands)				June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
(Dollars and shares in thousands)				June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009


Current liabilities
	Current portion of long-term debt			$	2,038		$	2,509
	Accounts payable				312,527			347,348
	Customer deposits and deferred revenues				169,513			164,451
	Accrued interest				12,208			12,227
	Accrued taxes				84,346			62,568
	Accrued compensation				71,722			93,524
	Other current liabilities				98,467			117,081
					750,821			799,708

Deferred liabilities and credits
	Net deferred income tax liability				492,657			517,762
	Other deferred liabilities and credits				393,485			373,862

Long-term debt					1,492,500			1,492,908

Commitments and contingencies

Noncontrolling interests with redemption features					746			727

Equity
	TDS shareholders’ equity
		Series A Common, Special Common and Common Shares
			Authorized 290,000 shares (25,000 Series A Common, 165,000 Special Common and 100,000 Common Shares)
			Issued 127,030 shares (6,504 Series A Common, 63,442 Special Common and 57,084 Common Shares) and 127,016 shares (6,492 Series A Common, 63,442 Special Common and 57,082 Common Shares), respectively
			Outstanding 105,070 shares (6,504 Series A Common, 48,716 Special Common and 49,850 Common Shares) and 106,022 shares (6,492 Series A Common, 49,725 Special Common and 49,805 Common Shares), respectively
			Par Value ($.01 per share) ($65 Series A Common, $634 Special Common and $571 Common Shares) and ($65 Series A Common, $634 Special Common and $571 Common Shares), respectively		1,270			1,270
		Capital in excess of par value			2,098,380			2,088,807
		Special Common and Common Treasury shares at cost:
			Treasury shares 21,960 (14,726 Special Common and 7,234 Common Shares) and 20,994 (13,717 Special Common and 7,277 Common Shares), respectively		(706,987	)		(681,649	)
		Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(3,139	)		(2,710	)
		Retained earnings			2,420,862			2,358,580
			Total TDS shareholders’ equity		3,810,386			3,764,298

	Preferred shares				831			832
	Noncontrolling interests				669,002			662,216

		Total equity			4,480,219			4,427,346

Total liabilities and equity				$	7,610,428		$	7,612,313

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity (Unaudited)



	TDS Shareholders
(Dollars in thousands)	Series A Common, Special Common and Common Shares		Capital in Excess of Par Value		Special Common and Common Treasury Shares			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Retained Earnings			Total TDS Shareholders’ Equity			Preferred Shares			Non controlling Interests			Total Equity
December 31, 2009	$	1,270	$	2,088,807	$	(681,649	)	$	(2,710	)	$	2,358,580		$	3,764,298		$	832		$	662,216		$	4,427,346
Add (Deduct)
Net income attributable to TDS shareholders		—		—		—			—			88,701			88,701			—			—			88,701
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests classified as equity		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			25,938			25,938
Net unrealized gain (loss) on equity investments		—		—		—			84			—			84			—			—			84
Changes related to retirement plan		—		—		—			(513	)		—			(513	)		—			—			(513	)
Common, Special Common and Series A Common Shares dividends		—		—		—			—			(23,707	)		(23,707	)		—			—			(23,707	)
Preferred dividend requirement		—		—		—			—			(25	)		(25	)		—			—			(25	)
Repurchase of shares		—		—		(31,092	)		—			—			(31,092	)		(1	)		—			(31,093	)
Dividend reinvestment plan		—		—		3,192			—			(971	)		2,221			—			—			2,221
Incentive and compensation plans		—		433		2,562			—			(1,716	)		1,279			—			—			1,279
Adjust investment in subsidiaries for repurchases, issuances and other compensation plans		—		1,364		—			—			—			1,364			—			(14,838	)		(13,474	)
Stock-based compensation awards (1)		—		7,731		—			—			—			7,731			—			—			7,731
Tax windfall (shortfall) from stock awards (2)		—		45		—			—			—			45			—			—			45
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(4,314	)		(4,314	)
June 30, 2010	$	1,270	$	2,098,380	$	(706,987	)	$	(3,139	)	$	2,420,862		$	3,810,386		$	831		$	669,002		$	4,480,219

Table of Contents

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity (Unaudited)



	TDS Shareholders
(Dollars in thousands)	Series A Common, Special Common and Common Shares		Capital in Excess of Par Value			Special Common and Common Treasury Shares			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Retained Earnings			Total TDS Shareholders’ Equity			Preferred Shares		Non controlling Interests			Total Equity
December 31, 2008	$	1,270	$	2,066,597		$	(513,108	)	$	(13,391	)	$	2,221,469		$	3,762,837		$	852	$	647,915		$	4,411,604
Add (Deduct)
Net income attributable to TDS shareholders		—		—			—			—			140,461			140,461			—		—			140,461
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests classified as equity		—		—			—			—			—			—			—		41,758			41,758
Net unrealized gain (loss) on equity investments		—		—			—			(501	)		—			(501	)		—		—			(501	)
Changes related to retirement plan		—		—			—			583			—			583			—		—			583
Common, Special Common and Series A Common Shares dividends		—		—			—			—			(23,788	)		(23,788	)		—		—			(23,788	)
Preferred dividend requirement		—		—			—			—			(26	)		(26	)		—		—			(26	)
Repurchase of shares		—		—			(86,018	)		—			—			(86,018	)		—		—			(86,018	)
Dividend reinvestment plan		—		(13	)		728			—			79			794			—		—			794
Incentive and compensation plans		—		(53	)		2,245			—			(842	)		1,350			—		—			1,350
Adjust investment in subsidiaries for repurchases, issuances and other compensation plans		—		2,545			—			—			—			2,545			—		(14,627	)		(12,082	)
Stock-based compensation awards (1)		—		6,420			—			—			—			6,420			—		—			6,420
Tax windfall (shortfall) from from stock awards (2)		—		(76	)		—			—			—			(76	)		—		—			(76	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		—		—			—			—			—			—			—		(3,417	)		(3,417	)
June 30, 2009	$	1,270	$	2,075,420		$	(596,153	)	$	(13,309	)	$	2,337,353		$	3,804,581		$	852	$	671,629		$	4,477,062

(1) Reflects TDS Corporate and TDS Telecom’s current year stock-based compensation awards impact on Capital in excess of par value. U.S. Cellular’s amounts are included in Adjust investment in subsidiaries for repurchases, issuances and other compensation plans.

(2) Reflects tax windfalls/(shortfalls) associated with the exercise of options and the vesting of restricted stock awards of TDS Common Shares and TDS Special Common Shares. U.S. Cellular’s tax windfalls/(shortfalls) associated with the exercise of options and vesting of restricted stock awards of U.S. Cellular are included in Adjust investment in subsidiaries for repurchases, issuances, and other compensation plans.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)


		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)		2010			2009			2010			2009

Net income		$	52,389		$	86,903		$	114,658		$	182,270
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income
	Net unrealized gain (loss) on equity investments		84			(501	)		84			(501	)
	Changes related to retirement plan		(257	)		136			(513	)		583
Comprehensive income			52,216			86,538			114,229			182,352
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests			(12,102	)		(20,539	)		(25,957	)		(41,809	)
Comprehensive income attributable to TDS shareholders		$	40,114		$	65,999		$	88,272		$	140,543

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Basis of Presentation

The accounting policies of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (“TDS”) conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) as set forth in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of TDS and its majority-owned subsidiaries, including TDS’ 82%-owned wireless telephone subsidiary, United States Cellular Corporation (“U.S. Cellular”), TDS’ 100%-owned wireline telephone subsidiary, TDS Telecommunications Corporation (“TDS Telecom”) and TDS’ 80%-owned printing and distribution company, Suttle-Straus, Inc. In addition, the consolidated financial statements include certain entities in which TDS has a variable interest that require consolidation under GAAP. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation.

The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by TDS, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, TDS believes that the disclosures included herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in TDS’ Current Report on Form 8-K (Items 8.01 and 9.01) filed with the SEC on August 5, 2010, which should be read in conjunction with TDS’ Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring items and adjustments to prior periods as described in Note 2 — Revision of Prior Period Amounts) necessary to present fairly the financial position as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the results of operations and comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and cash flows and changes in equity for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The results of operations and comprehensive income for the three and six months ended, and cash flows and changes in equity for the six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year.

2. Revision of Prior Period Amounts

In preparing its financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2010, TDS discovered certain errors related to accounting for operating revenues and sales tax liabilities. The quantification of these errors was subsequently refined during the second quarter of 2010. These errors resulted in the overstatement of operating revenues and understatement of sales tax liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, and the three months ended March 31, 2010. In addition to recording these adjustments, TDS recorded other adjustments to prior-year amounts to correct other immaterial items. In accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Nos. 99 and 108 (“SAB 99 and SAB 108”), TDS evaluated these errors and determined that they were immaterial to each of the reporting periods affected and, therefore, amendment of previously filed reports was not required. However, if the adjustments to correct the cumulative errors had been recorded in the first or second quarter of 2010, TDS believes the impact would have been significant to those respective periods and would impact comparisons to prior periods. As permitted by SAB 108, TDS revised in the current filing its comparative consolidated financial statements for these immaterial amounts. In addition, on August 5, 2010, TDS filed a Current Report on Form 8-K (Items 8.01 and 9.01) with the SEC to revise financial statements and other financial information previously included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010.

Table of Contents

The Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2009 was revised to reflect the cumulative effect of these errors which resulted in a decrease to Retained earnings of $13.0 million. Also, in accordance with SAB 108, the Consolidated Statement of Operations and the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows have been revised as follows:

Consolidated Balance Sheet — December 31, 2009

	(Dollars in thousands)	As previously reported (1)			Adjustment			Revised
	(Dollars in thousands)	As previously reported (1)			Adjustment			Revised

	Accounts receivable - Due from customers	$	380,941		$	3,529		$	384,470
	Total current assets		1,644,142			3,529			1,647,671
	Total assets		7,608,784			3,529			7,612,313
	Customer deposits and deferred revenues		167,963			(3,512	)		164,451
	Accrued taxes		39,644			22,924			62,568
	Total current liabilities		780,296			19,412			799,708
	Retained earnings		2,371,587			(13,007	)		2,358,580
	Total TDS shareholders’ equity		3,777,305			(13,007	)		3,764,298
	Noncontrolling interests		665,092			(2,876	)		662,216
	Total equity		4,443,229			(15,883	)		4,427,346
	Total liabilities and equity		7,608,784			3,529			7,612,313


Consolidated Statement of Operations — Three Months Ended June 30, 2009

	(Dollars in thousands)	As previously reported (2)			Adjustment			Revised
	(Dollars in thousands)	As previously reported (2)			Adjustment			Revised

	Operating revenues	$	1,242,477		$	(407	)	$	1,242,070
	Cost of services and products (Excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion)		431,119			(97	)		431,022
	Selling, general and administrative expenses		470,913			163			471,076
	Depreciation, amortization and accretion		183,349			163			183,512
	Loss on asset disposals, net		2,496			525			3,021
	Total operating expenses		1,087,877			754			1,088,631
	Operating income		154,600			(1,161	)		153,439
	Interest expense		(32,245	)		(289	)		(32,534	)
	Total investment and other income (expense)		(11,005	)		(289	)		(11,294	)
	Income before income taxes		143,595			(1,450	)		142,145
	Income tax expense		53,036			2,206			55,242
	Net income		90,559			(3,656	)		86,903
	Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax		(20,828	)		289			(20,539	)
	Net income attributable to TDS shareholders		69,731			(3,367	)		66,364
	Net income available to common shareholders		69,718			(3,367	)		66,351
	Basic earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders		0.63			(0.03	)		0.60
	Diluted earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders		0.63			(0.03	)		0.60

Table of Contents

Consolidated Statement of Operations — Six Months Ended June 30, 2009

	(Dollars in thousands)	As previously reported (2)			Adjustment			Revised
	(Dollars in thousands)	As previously reported (2)			Adjustment			Revised

	Operating revenues	$	2,499,123		$	1,173		$	2,500,296
	Cost of services and products (Excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion)		898,526			(112	)		898,414
	Selling, general and administrative expenses		938,761			(3,822	)		934,939
	Depreciation, amortization and accretion		366,115			390			366,505
	Loss on asset disposals, net		4,912			2,279			7,191
	Total operating expenses		2,208,314			(1,265	)		2,207,049
	Operating income		290,809			2,438			293,247
	Interest expense		(62,350	)		(694	)		(63,044	)
	Total investment and other income (expense)		(13,202	)		(694	)		(13,896	)
	Income before income taxes		277,607			1,744			279,351
	Income tax expense		93,674			3,407			97,081
	Net income		183,933			(1,663	)		182,270
	Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax		(42,194	)		385			(41,809	)
	Net income attributable to TDS shareholders		141,739			(1,278	)		140,461
	Net income available to common shareholders		141,713			(1,278	)		140,435
	Basic earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders		1.27			(0.01	)		1.26
	Diluted earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders		1.27			(0.02	)		1.25

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows — Six Months Ended June 30, 2009

	(Dollars in thousands)	As previously reported (2)			Adjustment			Revised
	(Dollars in thousands)	As previously reported (2)			Adjustment			Revised

	Net income	$	183,933		$	(1,663	)	$	182,270
	Depreciation, amortization and accretion		366,115			390			366,505
	Deferred income taxes, net		16,237			2,645			18,882
	Loss on asset disposals, net		4,912			2,279			7,191
	Change in accounts receivable		(62,870	)		(5,413	)		(68,283	)
	Change in customer deposits and deferred revenues		(4,824	)		(327	)		(5,151	)
	Change in accrued taxes		56,741			3,665			60,406
	Change in other assets and liabilities		(71,724	)		(1,576	)		(73,300	)
	Cash flows from operating activities		443,961			—			443,961

(1) In Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on February 25, 2010.

(2) In Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 filed on August 6, 2009.

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Amounts Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities

If a tax is assessed upon the customer and TDS merely acts as an agent in collecting the tax on behalf of the governmental authority imposing such tax, the amounts collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are recorded net in Accrued taxes in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. If a tax is assessed upon TDS but billed to customers to recover it, the amounts billed to customers are recorded in Operating revenues and the amounts remitted to governmental authorities are recorded in Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The amounts recorded in Operating revenues that were billed to customers and remitted to governmental authorities totaled $41.8 million and $80.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $29.7 million and $56.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. These revenues increased primarily due to an increase in the Universal Service Fund contribution rates established by the FCC.

Table of Contents

Implementation of Revised Variable Interest Entity Accounting

TDS holds interests in certain variable interest entities (“VIEs”) as such term is defined by GAAP. The primary beneficiary of a VIE, as defined by GAAP, is required to consolidate the VIE in its financial statements. Prior to January 1, 2010, the primary beneficiary of a VIE was the entity that recognized a majority of a VIE’s expected gains or losses, as determined based on a quantitative model. Effective January 1, 2010, new provisions under GAAP related to accounting for VIEs provide for a more qualitative assessment in determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE.

The revised consolidation guidance related to VIEs effective January 1, 2010 did not change TDS’ consolidated reporting entities. See Note 11 — Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) for details on consolidated VIEs.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13, Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements—a consensus of FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (“ASU 2009-13”). ASU 2009-13 provides for less restrictive separation criteria that must be met for a deliverable to be considered a separate unit of accounting. Additionally, under this Standard, there is a hierarchy for determining the selling price of a unit of accounting and consideration must be allocated using a relative-selling price method. ASU 2009-13 will be effective for TDS on January 1, 2011; however, early adoption is permitted. TDS is currently reviewing the requirements of ASU 2009-13 and has not yet determined the impact on its financial position or results of operations.

In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements that include Software Elements—a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (“ASU 2009-14”). ASU 2009-14 amends accounting and reporting guidance for revenue arrangements involving both tangible products and software that is “more than incidental to the tangible product as a whole.” ASU 2009-14 will be effective for TDS on January 1, 2011; however, early adoption is permitted. TDS does not anticipate that this pronouncement will have a significant impact on its financial position or results of operations.

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”). ASU 2010-06 requires new disclosures regarding transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. It also clarifies existing disclosure requirements regarding the level of disaggregation in certain disclosures, inputs, and valuation techniques used in FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. TDS adopted all of the requirements of this update on January 1, 2010, its effective date, except for the new requirement regarding activity in Level 3 fair value measurements which has a later effective date under the provisions of ASU 2010-06, and will become effective on January 1, 2011. Adoption of this pronouncement has not had, and is not expected to have, a significant impact on TDS’ fair value disclosures.

Table of Contents

4. Fair Value Measurements

As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, TDS did not have any financial assets or liabilities that were required, under GAAP, to be recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in its Consolidated Balance Sheet. However, TDS has applied the provisions of fair value accounting for purposes of computing the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes. The fair value of financial instruments was as follows:

		June 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
		June 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
		Book Value		Fair Value		Book Value		Fair Value

(Dollars in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents		$	378,477	$	378,477	$	670,992	$	670,992
Short-term investments (1)(2)
	Certificates of deposit		97,614		97,614		113,275		113,275
	U.S. treasuries		180,732		180,732		—		—
	Commercial paper (3)		100,881		100,881		—		—
Long-term investments (1)(4)
	U.S. treasuries		30,181		30,213		—		—
	Commercial paper (3)		77,325		77,372		—		—
Long-term debt (5)			1,487,794		1,445,266		1,488,196		1,461,976

(1) Designated as held-to-maturity investments and are recorded at amortized cost on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(2) Maturities are less than twelve months from the respective balance sheet dates.

(3) Guaranteed under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program.

(4) Maturities range between 13 and 30 months from the balance sheet date.

(5) Excludes capital lease obligations and current portion of Long-term debt.

The fair values of Cash and cash equivalents and Short-term investments approximate their book values due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. The fair values of Long-term investments were estimated using quoted market prices for the individual issuances. The fair value of Long-term debt, excluding capital lease obligations and current portion of Long-term debt, was estimated using market prices for TDS’ 7.6% Series A notes and 6.625% senior notes, U.S. Cellular’s 7.5% senior notes, and discounted cash flow analyses for the remaining debt.

As of June 30, 2010, TDS did not have any nonfinancial assets or liabilities that required the application of fair value accounting for purposes of reporting such amounts in its Consolidated Balance Sheet.

5. Income Taxes

TDS’ overall effective tax rate on Income before income taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was 37.5% and 37.7%, respectively, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was 38.9% and 34.8%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was lower than the rate for the six months ended June 30, 2010 primarily due to a 2009 state tax benefit resulting from a state tax law change in the first quarter of 2009. This benefit, along with other minor discrete benefits, decreased income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 by $8.1 million; absent these benefits, the effective tax rate for such period would have been higher by 2.8 percentage points.

6. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders is computed by dividing Net income available to common shareholders of TDS by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders is computed by dividing Net income available to common shareholders of TDS by the weighted average number of common shares adjusted to include the effects of potentially dilutive securities. Potentially dilutive securities include incremental shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options and the vesting of restricted stock units.

Table of Contents

The amounts used in computing earnings per share and the effects of potentially dilutive securities on income and the weighted average number of Common, Special Common and Series A Common Shares are as follows:

				Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
				Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
				2010			2009			2010			2009
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)

Basic earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders
	Net income attributable to TDS			$	40,287		$	66,364		$	88,701		$	140,461
	Preferred dividend requirement				(12	)		(13	)		(25	)		(26	)
	Net income attributable to common shareholders of TDS used in basic earnings per share			$	40,275		$	66,351		$	88,676		$	140,435

Diluted earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders
	Net income attributable to common shareholders of TDS used in basic earnings per share			$	40,275		$	66,351		$	88,676		$	140,435
	Noncontrolling income adjustment (1)				(138	)		(144	)		(314	)		(339	)
	Preferred dividend adjustment (2)				12			12			25			25
	Net income attributable to common shareholders of TDS used in diluted earnings per share			$	40,149		$	66,219		$	88,387		$	140,121

Weighted average number of shares used in basic earnings per share
		Common Shares			49,872			51,697			49,862			51,695
		Special Common Shares			49,150			52,574			49,371			53,326
		Series A Common Shares			6,498			6,470			6,495			6,465
			Total		105,520			110,741			105,728			111,486
Effects of dilutive securities:
	Stock options (3)				151			50			122			50
	Restricted stock units (4)				188			131			173			113
	Preferred shares (5)				48			49			48			49
Weighted average number of shares used in diluted earnings per share					105,907			110,971			106,071			111,698

Basic earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders				$	0.38		$	0.60		$	0.84		$	1.26

Diluted earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders				$	0.38		$	0.60			0.83			1.25

(1) The noncontrolling income adjustment reflects the additional noncontrolling share of U.S. Cellular’s income computed as if all of U.S. Cellular’s issuable securities were outstanding.

(2) The preferred dividend adjustment reflects the dividend reduction related to preferred securities that were dilutive, and therefore treated as if converted for shares.

(3) Stock options exercisable into 606 Common Shares and 3,619 Special Common Shares for the three months ended June 30, 2010, and 821 Common Shares and 4,039 Special Common Shares for the three months ended June 30, 2009, were not included in computing Diluted Earnings per Share because their effects were antidilutive. Stock options exercisable into 634 Common Shares and 3,377 Special Common Shares for the six months ended June 30, 2010, and 838 Common Shares and 3,746 Special Common Shares for the six months ended June 30, 2009, were not included in computing Diluted Earnings per Share because their effects were antidilutive.

(4) Restricted stock units issuable upon vesting into 65 and 33 Special Common Shares for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, were not included in Diluted Earnings per Share because their effects were antidilutive. Restricted stock units issuable upon vesting into 87 and 44 Special Common Shares for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, were not included in Diluted Earnings per Share because their effects were antidilutive.

(5) For the class of preferred shares that is convertible for Common Shares, there were no antidilutive preferred shares for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

7. Acquisitions, Divestitures and Exchanges

TDS assesses its existing businesses on an ongoing basis with a goal of improving the competitiveness of its operations and maximizing its long-term return on capital. As part of this strategy, TDS reviews attractive opportunities to acquire additional wireless operating markets and wireless spectrum; and telecommunications companies and

Table of Contents

related service businesses. In addition, TDS may seek to divest outright or include in exchanges for other interests those interests that are not strategic to its long-term success.

On March 19, 2010, TDS acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of VISI Incorporated (“VISI”) for $18.2 million in cash, including working capital adjustments finalized during the second quarter. VISI is a managed services company which provides colocation, dedicated hosting, Internet and virtual computing services to small and medium-sized companies. VISI is included in the TDS Telecom ILEC business segment for reporting purposes.

TDS’ acquisitions during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and the allocation of the purchase price for these acquisitions were as follows:

					Allocation of Purchase Price

			Purchase price (1)		Goodwill (2)		Licenses		Intangible assets subject to amortization		Net tangible assets (liabilities)



(Dollars in thousands)
2010
	U.S. Cellular licenses		$	10,501	$	—	$	10,501	$	—	$	—
	TDS Telecom ILEC business			18,191		5,336		—		7,900		4,955
		Total	$	28,692	$	5,336	$	10,501	$	7,900	$	4,955

2009
U.S. Cellular licenses			$	12,250	$	—	$	12,250	$	—	$	—
TDS Telecom
	ILEC business			289		289		—		—		—
	ILEC other			14		14		—		—		—
		Total	$	12,553	$	303	$	12,250	$	—	$	—

(1) Cash amounts paid for acquisitions may differ from the purchase price due to cash acquired in the transactions and the timing of cash payments related to the respective transactions.

(2) None of the goodwill was amortizable for income tax purposes.

Table of Contents

8. Licenses and Goodwill

Changes in TDS’ licenses and goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are presented below.

Licenses
		U.S. Cellular (1)			TDS Telecom		Total
		U.S. Cellular (1)			TDS Telecom		Total
(Dollars in thousands)

Balance December 31, 2009		$	1,440,225		$	2,800	$	1,443,025
	Acquisitions		10,501			—		10,501
Balance June 30, 2010		$	1,450,726		$	2,800	$	1,453,526


Balance December 31, 2008		$	1,438,640		$	2,800	$	1,441,440
	Acquisitions		12,250			—		12,250
	Other		(164	)		—		(164	)
Balance June 30, 2009		$	1,450,726		$	2,800	$	1,453,526

Goodwill

		U.S. Cellular (1)			TDS Telecom (2)			Other (3)		Total
		U.S. Cellular (1)			TDS Telecom (2)			Other (3)		Total
(Dollars in thousands)

Balance December 31, 2009		$	617,222		$	450,156		$	3,802	$	1,071,180
	Accumulated impairment losses		(333,900	)		(29,440	)		—		(363,340	)
			283,322			420,716			3,802		707,840
	Acquisitions		—			5,336			—		5,336
	Other (4)		—			—			5,459		5,459
Balance June 30, 2010		$	283,322		$	426,052		$	9,261	$	718,635

Balance December 31, 2008		$	616,764		$	449,853		$	3,802	$	1,070,419
	Accumulated impairment losses		(333,900	)		(29,440	)		—		(363,340	)
			282,864			420,413			3,802		707,079
	Acquisitions		—			303			—		303
	Other		458			—			—		458
Balance June 30, 2009		$	283,322		$	420,716		$	3,802	$	707,840

(1) Prior to January 1, 2009, TDS accounted for U.S. Cellular’s share repurchases as step acquisitions, allocating a portion of the share repurchase value to TDS licenses and goodwill, as required by GAAP in effect at that time. Consequently, U.S. Cellular’s licenses, goodwill and accumulated impairment loss reported on a stand-alone basis do not match the TDS consolidated licenses, goodwill and accumulated impairment losses related to U.S. Cellular.

(2) The entire goodwill balance of $29.4 million at the TDS Telecom CLEC business segment was impaired in 2004. The remaining goodwill balance at TDS Telecom is attributed to the ILEC business segment.

(3) Other consists of “Non-reportable segment” and Corporate investments.

(4) Amount reclassified from Investments in unconsolidated entities to Goodwill in June 2010.

9. Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

Investments in unconsolidated entities consist of amounts invested in wireless and wireline entities in which TDS holds a noncontrolling interest. These investments are accounted for using either the equity or cost method.

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities totaled $26.0 million and $18.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $50.9 million and $43.7 million in the six month-periods then ended, respectively. Of those amounts, TDS’ investment in the Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership (“LA Partnership”) contributed $16.6 and $17.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $33.5 and $34.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. TDS held a 5.5% ownership interest in the LA Partnership during these periods.

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the combined results of operations of TDS’ equity method investments:

		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2010		2009		2010			2009
(Dollars in thousands)
Revenues		$	1,212,000	$	1,202,000	$	2,430,000	$	2,380,000
Operating expenses			851,000		838,000		1,714,000		1,658,000
	Operating income		361,000		364,000		716,000		722,000
Other income			12,000		12,000		20,000		21,000
Net income		$	373,000	$	376,000	$	736,000	$	743,000

10. Commitments and Contingencies

Indemnifications

TDS enters into agreements in the normal course of business that provide for indemnification of counterparties. The terms of the indemnifications vary by agreement. The events or circumstances that would require TDS to perform under these indemnities are transaction specific; however, these agreements may require TDS to indemnify the counterparty for costs and losses incurred from litigation or claims arising from the underlying transaction. TDS is unable to estimate the maximum potential liability for these types of indemnifications as the amounts are dependent on the outcome of future events, the nature and likelihood of which cannot be determined at this time. Historically, TDS has not made any significant indemnification payments under such agreements.

Legal Proceedings

TDS is involved or may be involved from time to time in legal proceedings before the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”), other regulatory authorities, and/or various state and federal courts. If TDS believes that a loss arising from such legal proceedings is probable and can be reasonably estimated, an amount is accrued in the financial statements for the estimated loss. If only a range of loss can be determined, the best estimate within that range is accrued; if none of the estimates within that range is better than another, the low end of the range is accrued. The assessment of the expected outcomes of legal proceedings is a highly subjective process that requires judgments about future events. The legal proceedings are reviewed at least quarterly to determine the adequacy of accruals and related financial statement disclosures. The ultimate outcomes of legal proceedings could differ materially from amounts accrued in the financial statements.

11. Variable Interest Entities (VIEs)

From time to time, the FCC conducts auctions through which additional spectrum is made available for the provision of wireless services. Indirectly through its interests in Aquinas Wireless L.P. (“Aquinas Wireless”), King Street Wireless L.P. (“King Street Wireless”), Barat Wireless L.P. (“Barat Wireless”) and Carroll Wireless L.P. (“Carroll Wireless”), collectively, the “limited partnerships,” U.S. Cellular, TDS’ subsidiary, participated in and was awarded spectrum licenses in each of four separate spectrum auctions (FCC Auctions 78, 73, 66, and 58). Each limited partnership qualified as a “designated entity” and thereby was eligible for bidding credits with respect to licenses purchased in accordance with the rules defined by the FCC for each auction. In most cases, the bidding credits resulted in a 25% discount from the gross winning bid.

Consolidated VIEs

As of June 30, 2010, TDS consolidates the following VIEs under GAAP:

· Aquinas Wireless;

· King Street Wireless and King Street Wireless, Inc., the general partner of King Street Wireless;

· Barat Wireless and Barat Wireless, Inc., the general partner of Barat Wireless; and

· Carroll Wireless and Carroll PCS, Inc., the general partner of Carroll Wireless.

TDS holds a variable interest in the entities listed above. It has made capital contributions and/or advances to these entities. The power to direct the activities of the VIEs that most significantly impact their economic performance is

Table of Contents

shared. Specifically, the general partner of each of these VIEs has the exclusive right to manage, operate and control the limited partnerships and make all decisions to carry on the business of the partnerships; however, the general partner of each partnership needs consent of the limited partner, a TDS subsidiary, to sell or lease certain licenses, to make certain large expenditures, admit other partners or liquidate the limited partnerships. Although the power to direct the activities of the VIEs is shared, TDS has a disproportionate level of exposure to the variability associated with the economic performance of the VIEs, indicating that TDS is the primary beneficiary of the VIEs in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, these VIEs are consolidated.

Following is a summary of the capital contributions and advances made to each entity by TDS as of June 30, 2010. The amounts shown in the table below exclude funds provided to these entities solely from the shareholder of the general partner.

(Dollars in thousands)

Aquinas Wireless		$	2,132
King Street Wireless &
	King Street Wireless, Inc.		300,904
Barat Wireless &
	Barat Wireless, Inc.		127,685
Carroll Wireless &
	Carroll PCS, Inc.		131,294
		$	562,015

The following table presents the classification of the consolidated VIEs’ assets and liabilities in TDS’ Consolidated Balance Sheet.

		June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
		June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009

(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
	Cash	$	641	$	679
	Other current assets		94		393
	Licenses		487,962		487,962
	Other assets		1,548		440
	Total assets	$	490,245	$	489,474

Liabilities
	Customer deposits and deferred revenues	$	4	$	70
	Total liabilities	$	4	$	70

Other Related Matters

TDS may agree to make additional capital contributions and/or advances to the VIEs discussed above and/or to their general partners to provide additional funding for the development of licenses granted in the various auctions. TDS may finance such amounts with a combination of cash on hand, borrowings under its revolving credit agreement and/or long-term debt. There is no assurance that TDS will be able to obtain additional financing on commercially reasonable terms or at all to provide such financial support.

These VIEs are in the process of developing long-term business and financing plans. These entities were formed to participate in FCC auctions of wireless spectrum and to fund, establish, and provide wireless service with respect to any FCC licenses won in the auctions. As such, these entities have risks similar to the business risks described in the “Risk Factors” in TDS’ Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

12. TDS and U.S. Cellular Share Repurchases

On November 19, 2009, the Board of Directors of TDS authorized a $250 million stock repurchase program for both TDS Common and Special Common Shares from time to time pursuant to open market purchases, block transactions, private purchases or otherwise, depending on market conditions. This authorization will expire on November 19, 2012.

Table of Contents

On November 17, 2009, the Board of Directors of U.S. Cellular authorized the repurchase of up to 1,300,000 Common Shares on an annual basis beginning in 2009 and continuing each year thereafter, on a cumulative basis. These purchases will be made pursuant to open market purchases, block purchases, private purchases, or otherwise, depending on market prices and other conditions. This authorization does not have an expiration date.

Share repurchases made under these authorizations and prior authorizations were as follows:

Six Months Ended June 30,		Number of Shares	Average Cost Per Share		Amount (1)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except cost per share)

2010
	U.S. Cellular Common Shares	523	$	40.97	$	21,423
	TDS Common Shares	—		—		—
	TDS Special Common Shares	1,079		28.81		31,092
2009
	U.S. Cellular Common Shares	507	$	38.13	$	19,332
	TDS Common Shares	—		—		—
	TDS Special Common Shares	3,188		26.98		86,018

(1) Amounts reported on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows may differ from these amounts due to repurchases and subsequent cash settlements occurring in different periods.

13. Noncontrolling Interests

The following schedule discloses the effects of net income attributable to TDS shareholders and changes in TDS’ ownership interest in U.S. Cellular on TDS’ equity for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

			Six Months Ended June 30,
			Six Months Ended June 30,
			2010			2009

(Dollars in thousands)
Net income attributable to TDS shareholders			$	88,701		$	140,461
	Transfer (to) from the noncontrolling interests
		Change in TDS’ Capital in excess of par value from U.S. Cellular’s issuance of U.S. Cellular shares		(4,697	)		(3,277	)
		Change in TDS’ Capital in excess of par value from U.S. Cellular’s repurchase of U.S. Cellular shares		(334	)		(405	)
		Net transfers (to) from noncontrolling interests		(5,031	)		(3,682	)
	Change from net income attributable to TDS and transfers (to) from noncontrolling interests		$	83,670		$	136,779

Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests in Finite-Lived Subsidiaries

Under GAAP, certain noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities with finite lives may meet the definition of mandatorily redeemable financial instruments. TDS’ consolidated financial statements include certain noncontrolling interests that meet the definition of mandatorily redeemable financial instruments. These mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests represent interests held by third parties in consolidated partnerships and limited liability companies (“LLCs”), where the terms of the underlying partnership or LLC agreement provide for a defined termination date at which time the assets of the subsidiary are to be sold, the liabilities are to be extinguished and the remaining net proceeds are to be distributed to the noncontrolling interest holders and TDS in accordance with the respective partnership and LLC agreements. The termination dates of these mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests range from 2085 to 2094.

The settlement value of TDS’ mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests in finite-lived subsidiaries is estimated to be $150.2 million at June 30, 2010. This amount represents the estimate of cash that would be due and payable to settle these noncontrolling interests assuming an orderly liquidation of the finite-lived consolidated partnerships and

Table of Contents

LLCs on June 30, 2010, net of estimated liquidation costs. This amount excludes redemption amounts recorded in Noncontrolling interests with redemption features in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. TDS currently has no plans or intentions relating to the liquidation of any of the related partnerships or LLCs prior to their scheduled termination dates. The corresponding carrying value of the mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests in finite-lived consolidated partnerships and LLCs at June 30, 2010 is $48.0 million, and is included in Noncontrolling interests in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The excess of the aggregate settlement value over the aggregate carrying value of these mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests is primarily due to the unrecognized appreciation of the noncontrolling interest holders’ share of the underlying net assets in the consolidated partnerships and LLCs. Neither the noncontrolling interest holders’ share, nor TDS’ share, of the appreciation of the underlying net assets of these subsidiaries is reflected in the consolidated financial statements. The estimate of settlement value was based on certain factors and assumptions which are subjective in nature. Changes in those factors and assumptions could result in a materially larger or smaller settlement amount.

14. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The changes in the cumulative balance of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:

			Six Months Ended June 30,
			Six Months Ended June 30,
			2010			2009

(Dollars in thousands)

Equity Method Investments
Balance, beginning of period			$	306		$	608
Add (deduct):
		Unrealized gains (losses) of equity method companies		84			(501	)
Net change in equity method investments				84			(501	)
Balance, end of period			$	390		$	107

Retirement Plans
Balance, beginning of period			$	(3,016	)	$	(13,999	)
Add (deduct):
	Amounts included in net periodic benefit cost for the period
		Amortization of prior service cost		(1,908	)		(400	)
		Amortization of unrecognized net loss		1,079			903
				(829	)		503
	Deferred income taxes			316			80
Net change in retirement plans				(513	)		583
Balance, end of period			$	(3,529	)	$	(13,416	)

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance, beginning of period			$	(2,710	)	$	(13,391	)
Add (deduct):
		Net change in equity method investments		84			(501	)
		Net change in retirement plans		(513	)		583
Balance, end of period			$	(3,139	)	$	(13,309	)

Table of Contents

15. Business Segment Information

Financial data for TDS’ business segments for the three and six-month periods ended, or as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, is as follows. TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carriers are designated as “ILEC” in the table and its competitive local exchange carrier is designated as “CLEC.”

			TDS Telecom											Non- Reportable Segment (1)		Other Reconciling Items (2)			Total
Three Months Ended or as of June 30, 2010	U.S. Cellular		ILEC			CLEC		ILEC/CLEC Eliminations			TDS Telecom Total
Three Months Ended or as of June 30, 2010	U.S. Cellular		ILEC			CLEC		ILEC/CLEC Eliminations			TDS Telecom Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenues	$	1,029,893	$	154,258		$	47,325	$	(2,377	)	$	199,206		$	8,713	$	(5,593	)	$	1,232,219
Cost of services and products (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense reported below)		375,507		49,302			24,495		(2,247	)		71,550			6,456		(476	)		453,037
Selling, general and administrative expense		445,177		44,167			15,978		(130	)		60,015			1,620		(5,483	)		501,329
Adjusted OIBDA (3) (4)		209,209		60,789			6,852		—			67,641			637		366			277,853
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense		144,455		36,847			6,302		—			43,149			516		2,138			190,258
(Gain) loss on asset disposals, net		1,250		(228	)		160		—			(68	)		17		15			1,214
Operating income (loss)		63,504		24,170			390		—			24,560			104		(1,787	)		86,381

Total assets		5,795,648		1,446,475			117,931		—			1,564,406			21,553		228,821			7,610,428
Capital expenditures		133,490		28,167			5,404		—			33,571			434		3,833			171,328

			TDS Telecom										Non- Reportable Segment (1)			Other Reconciling Items (2)			Total
Three Months Ended or as of June 30, 2009	U.S. Cellular		ILEC		CLEC			ILEC/CLEC Eliminations			TDS Telecom Total
Three Months Ended or as of June 30, 2009	U.S. Cellular		ILEC		CLEC			ILEC/CLEC Eliminations			TDS Telecom Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenues	$	1,042,143	$	148,208	$	50,093		$	(2,341	)	$	195,960	$	10,102		$	(6,135	)	$	1,242,070
Cost of services and products (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense reported below)		350,764		48,406		26,348			(1,995	)		72,759		7,918			(419	)		431,022
Selling, general and administrative expense		411,153		45,083		17,402			(346	)		62,139		2,054			(4,270	)		471,076
Adjusted OIBDA (3) (4)		280,226		54,719		6,343			—			61,062		130			(1,446	)		339,972
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense		138,777		35,302		6,361			—			41,663		651			2,421			183,512
Loss on asset disposals, net		2,611		283		119			—			402		—			8			3,021
Operating income (loss)		138,838		19,134		(137	)		—			18,997		(521	)		(3,875	)		153,439

Total assets		5,742,251		1,488,347		127,289			—			1,615,636		24,048			286,801			7,668,736
Capital expenditures		91,161		26,189		5,729			—			31,918		55			2,451			125,585

Table of Contents

			TDS Telecom									Non- Reportable Segment (1)			Other Reconciling Items (2)			Total
Six Months Ended or as of June 30, 2010	U.S. Cellular		ILEC		CLEC		ILEC/CLEC Eliminations			TDS Telecom Total
Six Months Ended or as of June 30, 2010	U.S. Cellular		ILEC		CLEC		ILEC/CLEC Eliminations			TDS Telecom Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenues	$	2,053,750	$	304,414	$	95,068	$	(4,771	)	$	394,711	$	18,855		$	(12,662	)	$	2,454,654
Cost of services and products (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense reported below)		743,726		95,794		48,987		(4,478	)		140,303		14,489			(949	)		897,569
Selling, general and administrative expense		874,782		85,904		31,516		(293	)		117,127		3,316			(12,809	)		982,416
Adjusted OIBDA (3) (4)		435,242		122,716		14,565		—			137,281		1,050			1,096			574,669
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense		287,688		73,905		12,667		—			86,572		1,049			4,338			379,647
(Gain) loss on asset disposals, net		6,426		32		245		—			277		(76	)		18			6,645
Operating income (loss)		141,128		48,779		1,653		—			50,432		77			(3,260	)		188,377

Total assets		5,795,648		1,446,475		117,931		—			1,564,406		21,553			228,821			7,610,428
Capital expenditures		255,004		48,357		8,590		—			56,947		704			5,295			317,950

			TDS Telecom									Non- Reportable Segment (1)			Other Reconciling Items (2)			Total
Six Months Ended or as of June 30, 2009	U.S. Cellular		ILEC		CLEC		ILEC/CLEC Eliminations			TDS Telecom Total
Six Months Ended or as of June 30, 2009	U.S. Cellular		ILEC		CLEC		ILEC/CLEC Eliminations			TDS Telecom Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenues	$	2,096,487	$	298,395	$	101,282	$	(4,415	)	$	395,262	$	21,969		$	(13,422	)	$	2,500,296
Cost of services and products (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense reported below)		736,453		96,090		53,119		(3,841	)		145,368		17,451			(858	)		898,414
Selling, general and administrative expense		819,616		86,112		34,737		(574	)		120,275		3,827			(8,779	)		934,939
Adjusted OIBDA (3) (4)		540,418		116,193		13,426		—			129,619		691			(3,785	)		666,943
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense		276,655		71,388		12,138		—			83,526		1,308			5,016			366,505
Loss on asset disposals, net		6,556		421		196		—			617		(7	)		25			7,191
Operating income (loss)		257,207		44,384		1,092		—			45,476		(610	)		(8,826	)		293,247

Total assets		5,742,251		1,488,347		127,289		—			1,615,636		24,048			286,801			7,668,736
Capital expenditures		228,902		47,600		10,724		—			58,324		189			3,406			290,821

(1) Represents Suttle-Straus.

(2) Consists of corporate operations, intercompany eliminations between U.S. Cellular, TDS Telecom and corporate investments.

(3) Adjusted OIBDA is defined as operating income excluding the effects of: depreciation, amortization and accretion (OIBDA); the net gain or loss on asset disposals (if any); and the loss on impairment of assets (if any). Adjusted OIBDA is a segment measure reported to the chief operating decision maker for purposes of making decisions about allocating resources to the segments and assessing their performance. This amount may also be commonly referred to by management as operating cash flow. This amount should not be confused with Cash flows from operating activities, which is a component of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

(4) Adjusted OIBDA excludes the net gain or loss on asset disposals and loss on impairment of assets (if any), in order to show operating results on a more comparable basis from period to period. TDS does not intend to imply that any of such amounts that are excluded are non-recurring, infrequent or unusual. Accordingly you should be aware that TDS may incur such amounts in the future.

Table of Contents

16. Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

Following are supplemental cash flow disclosures regarding transactions related to stock-based compensation awards:

	TDS:
		Six Months Ended June 30,
		Six Months Ended June 30,
		2010		2009

	(Dollars and shares in thousands)
	Common Shares withheld		—		—
	Special Common Shares withheld		—		—

	Aggregate value of Common Shares withheld	$	—	$	—
1	Aggregate value of Special Common Shares withheld		—		—

	Cash receipts upon exercise of stock options	$	845	$	743
	Cash disbursements for payment of taxes		—		—
	Net cash receipts from exercise of stock options and vesting of other stock awards	$	845	$	743

	U.S. Cellular:

		Six Months Ended June 30,
		Six Months Ended June 30,
		2010			2009

(Dollars and shares in thousands)
Common Shares withheld (1)			86			34

Aggregate value of Common Shares withheld		$	3,620		$	1,213

Cash receipts upon exercise of stock options		$	1,876		$	808
Cash disbursements for payment of taxes (2)			(1,732	)		(1,213	)
Net cash receipts from exercise of stock
	options and vesting of other stock awards	$	144		$	(405	)

(1) Such shares were withheld to cover the exercise price of stock options, if applicable, and required tax withholdings.

(2) In certain situations, TDS and U.S. Cellular withhold shares that are issuable upon the exercise of stock options or the vesting of restricted shares to cover, and with a value equivalent to, the amount of taxes required to be withheld from the stock award holder at the time of the exercise or vesting. TDS and U.S. Cellular then pay the amount of the required tax withholdings to the taxing authorities in cash.

TDS declared and paid dividends of $23.7 million or $0.2250 per share during the six months ended June 30, 2010. TDS declared and paid dividends of $23.8 million or $0.2150 per share in the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition

and Results of Operations

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (“TDS”) is a diversified telecommunications company providing high-quality telecommunications services in 36 states to approximately 6.1 million wireless customers and 1.1 million wireline equivalent access lines at June 30, 2010. TDS conducts substantially all of its wireless operations through its 82%‑owned subsidiary, United States Cellular Corporation (“U.S. Cellular”), and provides wireline services through its incumbent local exchange carrier (“ILEC”) and competitive local exchange carrier (“CLEC”) operations under its wholly owned subsidiary, TDS Telecommunications Corporation (“TDS Telecom”). TDS conducts printing and distribution services through its 80%‑owned subsidiary, Suttle-Straus, Inc. which represents a small portion of TDS’ operations.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with TDS’ interim consolidated financial statements and notes included in Item 1 above, and with the description of TDS’ business, its audited consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in TDS’ Current Report on Form 8-K (Items 8.01 and 9.01) filed with the SEC on August 5, 2010, which should be read in conjunction with the TDS Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

OVERVIEW

The following is a summary of certain selected information contained in the comprehensive Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations that follows. The overview does not contain all of the information that may be important. You should carefully read the entire Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and not rely solely on the overview.

U.S. Cellular

U.S. Cellular provides wireless telecommunications services to approximately 6.1 million customers in five geographic market areas in 26 states. As of June 30, 2010, U.S. Cellular’s average penetration rate in its consolidated operating markets, calculated by dividing U.S. Cellular’s total customers by the total population of 46.5 million in such markets, was 13.2%. U.S. Cellular operates on a customer satisfaction strategy, striving to meet or exceed customer needs by providing a comprehensive range of wireless products and services, excellent customer support, and a high-quality network. U.S. Cellular’s business development strategy is to acquire and operate controlling interests in wireless licenses in areas adjacent to or in proximity to its other wireless licenses, thereby building contiguous operating market areas. U.S. Cellular believes that operating in contiguous market areas will continue to provide it with certain economies in its capital and operating costs.

Financial and operating highlights in the six months ended June 30, 2010 included the following:

· Total customers were 6,144,000 at June 30, 2010, including 5,775,000 retail customers.

· Retail customer net additions were 31,000 in 2010 compared to 4,000 in 2009. In the postpaid category, there was a net loss of 31,000 in 2010 compared to net additions of 28,000 in 2009. Prepaid net additions increased to 62,000 in 2010 compared to a net loss of 24,000 in 2009.

· Postpaid customers comprised approximately 94% of U.S. Cellular’s retail customers as of June 30, 2010. The postpaid churn rate improved to 1.4% in 2010 compared to 1.6% in 2009.

· Service revenues of $1,937.6 million decreased $20.2 million (1%) year-over-year, primarily due to decreases in retail service revenues ($17.6 million) and inbound roaming revenues ($9.4 million). Retail service revenues decreased due to a decline in voice revenues which was partially offset by continued growth in data revenues. Data revenues grew 31% year-over-year to $416.6 million.

· Additions to property, plant and equipment totaled $255.0 million, including expenditures to construct cell sites, increase capacity in existing cell sites and switches, expand mobile broadband services based on third generation Evolution Data Optimized technology (“3G”) to additional markets, outfit new and remodel existing retail stores, develop new billing and other customer management related systems and platforms, and enhance existing office systems. Total cell sites in service increased 5% year-over-year to 7,416.

Table of Contents

· U.S. Cellular’s innovative Battery Swap program and Overage Protection service remained popular with its customers in 2010. By June 30, 2010, U.S. Cellular had completed 2.1 million battery swaps since the program launched in May 2009. Also, U.S. Cellular had nearly 2.2 million customers sign up for Overage Protection since it launched in November 2009.

· U.S. Cellular continued its efforts on a number of marketing initiatives and other multi-year initiatives including the development of a Billing and Operational Support System (“BSS/OSS”) with a new point-of-sale system to consolidate billing on one platform; an Electronic Data Warehouse/Customer Relationship Management System to collect and analyze information more efficiently to build and improve customer relationships; and a new Internet/Web platform to enable customers to complete a wide range of transactions and to manage their accounts online.

In addition, Mary N. Dillon was appointed as President and CEO and a director of U.S. Cellular on June 1, 2010, as a result of the retirement of John E. Rooney.

U.S. Cellular anticipates that its future results will be affected by the following factors:

- Continued uncertainty related to current economic conditions and their impact on customer purchasing and payment behaviors;

- Increased competition in the wireless industry, including potential reductions in pricing for products and services overall and impacts associated with the expanding presence of carriers offering low-priced, unlimited prepaid service;

- Potential increases in prepaid customers as a percentage of U.S. Cellular’s customer base in response to changes in customer preferences and industry dynamics;

- Increasing penetration in the wireless industry, requiring U.S. Cellular to grow revenues primarily from selling additional products and services to its existing customers, increasing the number of multi-device users among its existing customers, increasing data products and services and attracting wireless customers switching from other wireless carriers rather than by adding customers that are new to wireless service;

- Continued growth in revenues from data products and services and lower growth or declines in revenues from voice services;

- The effects of recent industry consolidation, such as Verizon’s acquisition of Alltel, and possible further industry consolidation, on roaming revenues, service pricing and equipment pricing;

- Costs of developing and enhancing office and customer support systems, including costs and risks associated with the completion and potential benefits of the multi-year initiatives described above;

- Continued enhancements to U.S. Cellular’s wireless networks;

- Uncertainty related to the National Broadband Plan and other rulemaking by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”), including uncertainty relating to future eligible telecommunication carrier (“ETC”) funding from the universal service fund (“USF”); and

- Possible operational and other changes that may occur as a result of the appointment of a new President and CEO.

See “Results of Operations—Wireless.”

Table of Contents

2010 Wireless Estimates

U.S. Cellular’s estimates of full-year 2010 results are shown below. Such estimates represent U.S. Cellular’s views as of the date of filing of U.S. Cellular’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010. Such forward‑looking statements should not be assumed to be accurate as of any future date. U.S. Cellular undertakes no duty to update such information whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. There can be no assurance that final results will not differ materially from such estimated results.

	2010 Estimated Results
	Current	Previous (1)
Service revenues	$3,925-$4,000 million	$3,975-$4,075 million
Adjusted OIBDA (2)	$800-$850 million	$850-$950 million
Operating income (3)	$200-$250 million	$250-$350 million
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expenses, and losses on disposals and impairment of assets (3)	Approx. $600 million	Approx. $600 million
Capital expenditures	Approx. $600 million	Approx. $600 million

(1) The 2010 Estimated Results as disclosed in TDS’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010.

(2) Adjusted OIBDA is defined as operating income excluding the effects of: depreciation, amortization and accretion (OIBDA); the net gain or loss on asset disposals (if any); and the loss on impairment of assets (if any). This measure also may be commonly referred to by management as operating cash flow. This measure should not be confused with Cash flows from operating activities, which is a component of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

(3) The 2010 Estimated Results include estimates for Depreciation, amortization and accretion expenses and losses on disposals of assets, but do not include an estimate for losses on impairment of assets since these cannot be predicted.

U.S. Cellular management currently believes that the foregoing estimates represent a reasonable view of what is achievable considering actions that U.S. Cellular has taken and will be taking. However, the current general economic conditions have created a challenging business environment that could continue to significantly impact actual results. U.S. Cellular expects to continue its focus on customer satisfaction by delivering a high quality network, attractively priced service plans, a broad line of handsets and other products, and outstanding customer service in its company-owned and agent retail stores and customer care centers. U.S. Cellular believes that future growth in its revenues will result primarily from selling additional products and services, including data products and services, to its existing customers, increasing the number of multi‑device users among its existing customers and attracting wireless users switching from other wireless carriers, rather than by adding users that are new to wireless service. U.S. Cellular is focusing on opportunities to increase revenues, pursuing cost reduction initiatives in various areas and implementing a number of initiatives to enable future growth. The initiatives are intended, among other things, to allow U.S. Cellular to accelerate its introduction of new products and services, better segment its customers for new services and retention, sell additional services such as data, expand its Internet sales and customer service capabilities, improve its prepaid products and services and reduce operational expenses over the long term.

TDS Telecom

TDS Telecom provides high-quality telecommunications services, including full-service local exchange service, long-distance telephone service and broadband access, to rural and suburban area communities. TDS Telecom’s business plan is designed as a full-service telecommunications company, including both ILEC and CLEC operations. TDS Telecom’s strategy is to be the preferred provider of telecommunications services—including voice, broadband and video services—in its chosen markets. This strategy encompasses many components, including:

· Developing services and products;

· Formulating market and customer strategies;

· Investing in networks and deploying advanced technologies;

· Assessing the competitive environment and responding when appropriate;

· Advocating with respect to state and federal regulations for positions that support its ability to provide advanced telecommunications services to its customers; and

· Exploring transactions to acquire or divest properties that would result in strengthening its operations.

Both ILECs and CLECs are faced with significant challenges, including growing competition from wireless and other wireline providers (other CLECs and cable providers), changes in regulation, technologies such as Voice over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”), the uncertainty in the economy and the industry-wide decline in use of second lines by customers.

Table of Contents

These challenges could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of TDS Telecom in the future.

Financial and operating highlights in the six months ended June 30, 2010 included the following:

· Overall equivalent access lines served by TDS Telecom as of June 30, 2010 decreased 2% to 1,122,300 compared to June 30, 2009. Equivalent access lines are the sum of physical access lines and high-capacity data lines adjusted to estimate the equivalent number of physical access lines in terms of capacity. A physical access line is an individual circuit connecting a customer to a telephone company’s central office facilities. Each digital subscriber line (“DSL”) is treated as an equivalent access line in addition to a voice line that may operate on the same copper loop.

· Operating revenues of $394.7 million remained flat in 2010 compared to 2009 primarily due to an increase in ILEC data customers and revenue from acquisitions offset by a decline in ILEC and CLEC physical access lines and a decrease in network usage by inter-exchange carriers.

· Operating expenses decreased 2% in 2010 to $344.3 million as a result of workforce reduction initiatives and employee benefit modifications implemented during 2009. Costs also decreased for reduced expenses of acquiring and serving fewer CLEC customers. Partially offsetting these declines was an increase in legal expense and consulting expense related to the cost to acquire a managed services company in March 2010. Operating expenses also increased in 2010 due to acquisitions.

TDS anticipates that TDS Telecom’s future results will be affected by the following factors:

- Continued uncertainty related to current economic conditions and the challenging business environment;

- Continued increasing competition from wireless and other wireline providers (other CLECs and cable providers) and technologies such as Voice over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”), third generation Evolution-Data Optimized (“3G”) mobile networks, and the development of fourth-generation mobile technology (“4G”);

- Continued declines in physical access lines in service related to voice lines and second lines and continued increases in high-speed data customers;

- Continued focus on customer retention programs, including discounting for “triple-play” bundles including voice, DSL and satellite TV;

- Continued focus on cost-reduction initiatives through product cost improvement and process efficiencies;

- The effect of recent industry consolidation, such as the recent agreement by CenturyTel (d/b/a CenturyLink) to acquire Qwest International, and possible further industry consolidation, and the effects on competition;

- The Federal government’s disbursement of Broadband Stimulus Funds to bring broadband to rural customers;

- Uncertainty related to the National Broadband Plan and other rulemaking by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”), including uncertainty relating to future funding from the universal service fund (“USF”); and

- Potential acquisitions by TDS Telecom.

See “Results of Operations—Wireline.”

2010 Wireline Estimates

TDS Telecom’s estimates of full-year 2010 results are shown below. Such forward-looking statements should not be assumed to be accurate as of any future date. Such estimates represent TDS Telecom’s view as of the filing date of TDS’ Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010. TDS undertakes no duty to update such information whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. There can be no assurance that final results will not differ materially from these estimated results.

Table of Contents

The following is unchanged from guidance as disclosed in TDS’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010.

		2010 Estimated Results
		2010 Estimated Results

ILEC and CLEC Operations:
	Operating revenues	$760 - $790 million
	Adjusted OIBDA (1)	$250 - $275 million
	Operating income (2)	$80 - $105 million
	Depreciation, amortization and accretion expenses and losses on asset disposals (2)	Approx. $170 million
	Capital expenditures (3)	Approx. $155 million

(1) Adjusted OIBDA is defined as operating income excluding the effects of: depreciation, amortization and accretion (OIBDA); the net gain or loss on asset disposals (if any); and the loss on impairment of assets (if any). This measure also may be commonly referred to by management as operating cash flow. This measure should not be confused with Cash flows from operating activities, which is a component of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

(2) The 2010 Estimated Results include only the estimate for Depreciation, amortization and accretion expenses and losses on asset disposals, but do not include an estimate for losses on impairment of assets since these cannot be predicted.

(3) The capital expenditure guidance does not include amounts awarded to TDS Telecom through the Broadband Stimulus program under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

The above estimates reflect the expectations of TDS Telecom’s management considering the current general economic conditions. During this challenging business environment, TDS Telecom will continue to focus on its cost-reduction initiatives through product cost improvement and process efficiencies. TDS Telecom also plans to continue to focus on customer retention programs, including “triple-play” bundles including voice, DSL and satellite TV.

Cash Flows and Investments - TDS and its subsidiaries had cash and cash equivalents totaling $378.5 million; short-term investments in the form of U.S. treasury securities, certificates of deposit and commercial paper aggregating $379.2 million; long-term investments in the form of U.S. treasury securities and commercial paper of $107.5 million; and borrowing capacity under their revolving credit facilities of $696.4 million as of June 30, 2010. Also, during the six months ended June 30, 2010, TDS and its subsidiaries generated $502.3 million of cash flows from operating activities. Management believes that cash on hand, expected future cash flows from operating activities and sources of external financing provide substantial liquidity and financial flexibility and are sufficient to permit TDS and its subsidiaries to finance their contractual obligations and anticipated capital and operating expenditures for the foreseeable future.

See “Financial Resources” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for additional information related to cash flows, investments and revolving credit agreements.

Recent Developments

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

Congress enacted the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, or the Recovery Act, which provides, among other things, for an aggregate appropriation of $7.2 billion to fund grants and loans to provide broadband infrastructure, access and equipment to consumers residing in rural, unserved or underserved areas of the United States. During the first round of funding under the Recovery Act, TDS Telecom was awarded two grants in the aggregate amount of $12.5 million. During the first quarter of 2010, TDS Telecom submitted 46 applications for the second round of funding, which were due March 29, 2010. On August 4, 2010, the Rural Utilities Service (“RUS”) announced that TDS Telecom was approved for $114.5 million in Broadband Stimulus funds for projects in 18 states. In total, TDS Telecom will receive $85.9 million in federal grants and will provide $28.6 million of its own funds to complete 39 projects. Any remaining funds available in the second round are expected to be awarded by September 30, 2010. There is no assurance TDS Telecom will receive any additional grants or loans in this second round of funding. U.S. Cellular has not received any grants of Recovery Act funds. The distribution of Recovery Act funds to other telecommunications service providers could impact competition in certain of U.S. Cellular’s and TDS Telecom’s service areas.

Table of Contents

National Broadband Plan and Related Matters

In 2009, Congress directed the FCC to develop a National Broadband Plan to ensure every American has “access to broadband capability.” In March 2010, the FCC released the plan which describes the FCC’s goals in enhancing broadband availability and the methods for achieving those goals over the next decade.

The FCC notes that about one-half of the plan will be addressed by the FCC, while the remainder would be addressed by Congress, the Executive Branch and state and local governments working closely with private and non-profit sectors. TDS cannot predict the outcome of these deliberations or what effect any final rules, regulations or laws may have on its ability to compete in the provision of wireline and wireless broadband services to its customer base. Changes in regulation or the amount or distribution of funds to U.S. Cellular, TDS Telecom and other telecommunications service providers could impact competition in certain of U.S. Cellular’s and TDS Telecom’s service areas, and could have a material adverse affect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations.

Net Neutrality

As disclosed in TDS’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, the FCC initiated a rulemaking proceeding in 2009 designed to codify its existing “Net Neutrality” principles and impose new requirements that could have the effect of restricting the ability of wireless and wireline Internet service providers to manage applications and content that traverse their networks. These principles, which the FCC initially announced in 2005, espoused the right of consumers to access lawful Internet content, to run applications and use services of their choice. In 2008, the FCC ruled that Comcast had violated these principles by moderating the amount of bandwidth used by certain peer-to-peer services and ordered Comcast to discontinue this practice. Comcast challenged this order and, on April 6, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that the FCC had exceeded its authority under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, when it sought to regulate Comcast’s network management practices for its high-speed Internet access service. In 2010, the FCC sought and received comments on its Net Neutrality proposals and concerning the impact of the Comcast case on those proposals. It is currently evaluating those comments. Accordingly, the status of the FCC’s network neutrality proceeding is uncertain at this time and, as a result, there may be further proceedings or legislation relating to the FCC’s authority to regulate the Internet. TDS cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter or the effect it will have on its wireless or wireline broadband services.

Table of Contents

Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2009

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – CONSOLIDATED

Six Months Ended June 30,			2010			2009			Increase/ (Decrease)			Percentage Change
Six Months Ended June 30,			2010			2009			Increase/ (Decrease)			Percentage Change
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating revenues
	U.S. Cellular		$	2,053,750		$	2,096,487		$	(42,737	)	(2	)%
	TDS Telecom			394,711			395,262			(551	)	—
	All other (1)			6,193			8,547			(2,354	)	(28	)%
		Total operating revenues		2,454,654			2,500,296			(45,642	)	(2	)%
Operating expenses
	U.S. Cellular			1,912,622			1,839,280			73,342		4	%
	TDS Telecom			344,279			349,786			(5,507	)	(2	)%
	All other (1)			9,376			17,983			(8,607	)	(48	)%
		Total operating expenses		2,266,277			2,207,049			59,228		3	%
Operating income (loss)
	U.S. Cellular			141,128			257,207			(116,079	)	(45	)%
	TDS Telecom			50,432			45,476			4,956		11	%
	All other (1)			(3,183	)		(9,436	)		6,253		66	%
		Total operating income		188,377			293,247			(104,870	)	(36	)%
Other income and (expenses)
	Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities			50,900			43,700			7,200		16	%
	Interest and dividend income			5,115			4,974			141		3	%
	Interest expense			(58,223	)		(63,044	)		4,821		8	%
	Other, net			(2,119	)		474			(2,593	)	>(100	)%
		Total other income (expenses)		(4,327	)		(13,896	)		9,569		69	%

Income before income taxes				184,050			279,351			(95,301	)	(34	)%
	Income tax expense			69,392			97,081			(27,689	)	(29	)%

Net income				114,658			182,270			(67,612	)	(37	)%
	Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax			(25,957	)		(41,809	)		15,852		38	%
Net income attributable to TDS shareholders				88,701			140,461			(51,760	)	(37	)%
		Preferred dividend requirement		(25	)		(26	)		1		4	%
Net income available to common shareholders			$	88,676		$	140,435		$	(51,759	)	(37	)%

Basic earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders			$	0.84		$	1.26		$	(0.42	)	(33	)%
Diluted earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders			$	0.83		$	1.25		$	(0.42	)	(34	)%

(1) Consists of other corporate operations, intercompany eliminations between U.S. Cellular, TDS Telecom and corporate investments.

Operating Revenues and Expenses

See “Results of Operations – Wireless” and “Results of Operations – Wireline” below for factors that affected consolidated Operating revenues and expenses.

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities represents TDS’ share of net income from entities in which it has a noncontrolling interest and that are accounted for by the equity method. TDS follows the equity method of accounting for unconsolidated entities over which it has the ability to exercise significant influence, generally entities in which its ownership interest is less than or equal to 50% but equals or exceeds 20% for corporations and 3% for partnerships and limited liability companies.

Table of Contents

TDS’ investment in the Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership contributed $33.5 million and $34.0 million to Equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities in 2010 and 2009, respectively. Equity income increased primarily due to a $7.1 million impairment loss recognized on an equity method investment in 2009.

Interest expense

The decrease in interest expense in 2010 was primarily a result of a $5.7 million decrease in interest due to redemption of U.S. Cellular’s 8.75% senior notes in December 2009.

Income tax expense

See Note 5 — Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the change in income tax expense and the overall effective tax rate on Income before income taxes.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax includes the noncontrolling public shareholders’ share of U.S. Cellular’s net income and the noncontrolling shareholders’ or partners’ share of certain U.S. Cellular subsidiaries’ net income or loss.

			Six Months Ended June 30,
			Six Months Ended June 30,
			2010			2009

(Dollars in thousands)
Net income attributable to U.S. Cellular noncontrolling
	interests, net of tax
		Noncontrolling public shareholders’	$	(15,942	)	$	(30,908	)
		Noncontrolling shareholders’ or partners’		(10,015	)		(10,901	)
			$	(25,957	)	$	(41,809	)

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – WIRELESS

TDS provides wireless telephone service through U.S. Cellular, an 82%-owned subsidiary. U.S. Cellular owns, manages and invests in wireless markets throughout the United States.

Following is a table of summarized operating data for U.S. Cellular’s consolidated operations.

As of June 30, (1)	2010			2009
Total market population of consolidated operating markets (2)		46,546,000			46,306,000
Customers (3)		6,144,000			6,155,000
Market penetration (2)		13.2	%		13.3	%
Total full-time equivalent employees		8,882			8,673
Cell sites in service		7,416			7,043

For the Six Months Ended June 30, (4)	2010			2009
Net retail customer additions (5)		31,000			4,000
Net customer additions (5)		3,000			(41,000	)
Average monthly service revenue per customer (6)	$	52.57		$	52.54
Postpaid churn rate (7)		1.4	%		1.6	%

(1) Amounts include results for U.S. Cellular’s consolidated operating markets as of June 30.

(2) Calculated using 2009 and 2008 Claritas population estimates for 2010 and 2009, respectively. “Total market population of consolidated operating markets” is used only for the purposes of calculating market penetration of consolidated operating markets, which is calculated by dividing customers by the total market population (without duplication of population in overlapping markets).

The total market population and penetration measures for consolidated operating markets apply to markets in which U.S. Cellular provides wireless service to customers. For comparison purposes, total market population and penetration related to all consolidated markets in which U.S. Cellular owns an interest were 90,468,000 and 6.8%, and 83,726,000 and 7.4%, as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(3) U.S. Cellular’s customer base consists of the following types of customers:

	June 30,
	2010	2009
Customers on postpaid service plans in which the end user is a customer of U.S. Cellular (“postpaid customers”)	5,451,000	5,448,000
Customers on prepaid service plans in which the end user is a customer of U.S. Cellular (“prepaid customers”)	324,000	263,000
Total retail customers	5,775,000	5,711,000

End user customers acquired through U.S. Cellular’s agreements with third parties (“reseller customers”)	369,000	444,000
Total customers	6,144,000	6,155,000

(4) Amounts include results for U.S. Cellular’s consolidated operating markets for the period January 1 through June 30; operating markets acquired during a particular period are included as of the acquisition date.

(5) “Net retail customer additions” represents the number of net customers added to U.S. Cellular’s retail customer base through its marketing distribution channels; this measure excludes activity related to reseller customers and customers transferred through acquisitions, divestitures or exchanges. “Net customer additions” represents the number of net customers added to U.S. Cellular’s overall customer base through its marketing distribution channels; this measure includes activity related to reseller customers but excludes activity related to customers transferred through acquisitions, divestitures or exchanges.

Table of Contents

(6) Management uses this measurement to assess the amount of service revenue that U.S. Cellular generates each month on a per customer basis. Average monthly service revenue per customer is calculated as follows:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010		2009
Service revenues per Consolidated Statement of Operations (000s)	$	1,937,584	$	1,957,802
Divided by average customers during period (000s)*		6,143		6,210
Divided by number of months in each period		6		6
Average monthly service revenue per customer	$	52.57	$	52.54

* “Average customers during period” is calculated by adding the number of total customers, including reseller customers, at the beginning of the first month of the period and at the end of each month in the period and dividing by the number of months in the period plus one. Acquired and divested customers are included in the calculation on a prorated basis for the amount of time U.S. Cellular included such customers during each period.

(7) Postpaid churn rate represents the percentage of the postpaid customer base that disconnects service each month.

Components of Operating Income

Six Months Ended June 30,		2010		2009		Increase/ (Decrease)			Percentage Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Retail service		$	1,728,875	$	1,746,480	$	(17,605	)	(1	)%
Inbound roaming			112,844		122,280		(9,436	)	(8	)%
Other			95,865		89,042		6,823		8	%
	Service revenues		1,937,584		1,957,802		(20,218	)	(1	)%
Equipment sales			116,166		138,685		(22,519	)	(16	)%
	Total operating revenues		2,053,750		2,096,487		(42,737	)	(2	)%

System operations (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion reported below)			420,656		394,697		25,959		7	%
Cost of equipment sold			323,070		341,756		(18,686	)	(5	)%
Selling, general and administrative			874,782		819,616		55,166		7	%
Depreciation, amortization and accretion			287,688		276,655		11,033		4	%
Loss on asset disposals, net			6,426		6,556		(130	)	(2	)%
	Total operating expenses		1,912,622		1,839,280		73,342		4	%
	Operating income	$	141,128	$	257,207	$	(116,079	)	(45	)%

Operating Revenues

Service revenues

Service revenues consist primarily of: (i) charges for access, airtime, roaming, recovery of regulatory costs and value-added services, including data products and services and long distance, provided to U.S. Cellular’s retail customers and to end users through third-party resellers (“retail service”); (ii) charges to other wireless carriers whose customers use U.S. Cellular’s wireless systems when roaming, including long-distance roaming (“inbound roaming”); and (iii) amounts received from the USF.

Retail service revenues

The decrease in Retail service revenues in 2010 was primarily due to a significant reduction in revenues from voice services.

· The average number of customers decreased to 6,143,000 in 2010 from 6,210,000 in 2009.

· Average monthly retail service revenue per customer increased slightly less than 1% to $46.91 in 2010 from $46.87 in 2009. The net increase resulted from growth in revenues from data products and services and revenues related to regulatory cost recovery, which together offset a decline in revenues from voice services. The

Table of Contents

average monthly retail service revenue per customer also reflects the impact of a reduction in the number of lower revenue reseller customers.

Revenues from voice services declined year-over-year primarily due to a reduction in average voice revenue per customer. The reduction in average voice revenue per customer reflects industry competition which has resulted in lower pricing overall as well as growth in family plans and service plans with enhanced coverage areas and value (such as free incoming calls, free mobile-to-mobile and unlimited minutes). U.S. Cellular expects continued pressure on revenues from voice services in the foreseeable future due to industry competition related to service plan offerings.

Revenues from data products and services totaled $416.6 million in 2010 and $318.9 million in 2009, and represented 21% of service revenues in 2010 compared to 16% of service revenues in 2009. Such growth, which positively impacted average monthly retail service revenue per customer, reflected customers’ continued and increasing usage of U.S. Cellular’s text, picture, and video messaging services, easyedge^SM service and applications, premium mobile Internet services, smartphone handsets and services, and modems. In March 2010, U.S. Cellular launched new data offerings for its prepaid customers, which included picture and video messaging, ringtones, email services, and easyedge^SM service and applications. U.S. Cellular expects that the growth in revenues from data products and services will continue as customers increasingly purchase premium and smartphone devices along with data plans and applications and utilize U.S. Cellular’s 3G network. U.S. Cellular’s 3G network covered approximately 98% of its customers as of June 30, 2010.

Revenues related to regulatory cost recovery increased due to an increase in the USF contribution rates established by the FCC (most of the USF contribution revenues for amounts passed through to customers are offset by expenses as discussed below).

Inbound roaming revenues

The decrease in Inbound roaming revenues in 2010 was primarily due to a decline in roaming revenues from the combined entity of Verizon Wireless (“Verizon”) and Alltel Corporation (“Alltel”). In January 2009, Verizon acquired Alltel. As a result of this transaction, the network footprints of Verizon and Alltel were combined. This has resulted in a decrease in inbound roaming revenues for U.S. Cellular, since the combined Verizon and Alltel entity has reduced its usage of U.S. Cellular’s network in certain coverage areas that were used by Verizon and Alltel as separate entities. U.S. Cellular anticipates that inbound roaming revenues for the full year 2010 will be flat to slightly higher than the prior year due to the positive impact of increasing minutes of use and increasing data usage from U.S. Cellular’s roaming partners, partially offset by the negative impact of decreasing rates per minute or kilobyte of use.

Equipment sales revenues

Equipment sales revenues include revenues from sales of handsets and related accessories to both new and existing customers, as well as revenues from sales of handsets and accessories to agents. All equipment sales revenues are recorded net of anticipated rebates.

U.S. Cellular’s customer retention efforts include offering new smartphones and premium handsets at discounted prices to existing customers as the expiration date of the customer’s service contract approaches. U.S. Cellular also continues to sell handsets to agents; this practice enables U.S. Cellular to provide better control over the quality of handsets sold to its customers, establish roaming preferences and earn quantity discounts from handset manufacturers which are passed along to agents. U.S. Cellular anticipates that it will continue to sell handsets to agents in the future.

The decrease in 2010 equipment sales revenues was driven by declines of 15% in average revenue per handset sold and 5% in total handsets sold. Average revenue per handset sold declined due to aggressive promotional pricing across all categories of handsets.

Operating Expenses

System operations expenses (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion)

System operations expenses (excluding Depreciation, amortization, and accretion) include charges from wireline telecommunications service providers for U.S. Cellular’s customers’ use of their facilities, costs related to local interconnection to the wireline network, charges for maintenance of U.S. Cellular’s network, long-distance charges, outbound roaming expenses and payments to third-party data product and platform developers.

Table of Contents

Key components of the overall increase in system operations expenses were as follows:

· Maintenance, utility and cell site expenses increased $14.1 million, or 9%, driven primarily by an increase in the number of cell sites within U.S. Cellular’s network. The number of cell sites totaled 7,416 at June 30, 2010 and 7,043 at June 30, 2009, as U.S. Cellular continued to grow by expanding and enhancing coverage in its existing markets.

· Customer usage expenses increased $10.5 million, or 8%, primarily due to an increase in data usage.

· Expenses incurred when U.S. Cellular’s customers used other carriers’ networks while roaming increased $1.4 million, or 2%, primarily due to higher data usage.

U.S. Cellular expects total system operations expenses to increase on a year-over-year basis in the foreseeable future, driven by the following factors:

· Increases in the number of cell sites and other network facilities within U.S. Cellular’s systems as it continues to add capacity and enhance quality; and

· Increases in total customer usage, driven by text messaging and other data usage, both on U.S. Cellular’s network and by U.S. Cellular’s customers on other carriers’ networks when roaming.

Cost of equipment sold

Cost of equipment sold decreased in 2010 primarily due to a 5% decline in total handsets sold as well as a slight reduction in the average cost per handset sold.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses include salaries, commissions and expenses of field sales and retail personnel and facilities; telesales department salaries and expenses; agent commissions and related expenses; corporate marketing and merchandise management; and advertising expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses also include bad debts expense, costs of operating customer care centers and corporate expenses.

Key components of the net increase in Selling, general and administrative expenses in 2010 were as follows:

· Selling and marketing expenses increased by $7.8 million, or 2%, primarily due to higher sales related expenses, partially offset by lower advertising expense and lower commissions expense reflecting fewer eligible customer additions.

· General and administrative expenses increased $47.4 million, or 11%, due to higher USF contributions (most of the USF contribution expenses are offset by revenues for amounts passed through to customers as discussed above); higher costs related to marketing initiatives and investments in multi-year initiatives for business support systems as described in the Overview section; and higher employee related expenses.

U.S. Cellular expects Selling, general and administrative expenses to increase on a year-over-year basis in the foreseeable future driven primarily by increases in expenses associated with acquiring, serving and retaining customers, as well as costs related to its multi-year initiatives discussed previously.

Depreciation, amortization and accretion

Depreciation, amortization and accretion increased primarily due to an increase in the gross property, plant and equipment balances from 2009 to 2010.

See “Financial Resources” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for a discussion of U.S. Cellular’s capital expenditures.

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – WIRELINE

TDS Telecom served 1,122,300 equivalent access lines at June 30, 2010, a net decrease of 25,800 lines from the 1,148,100 equivalent access lines served at June 30, 2009.

TDS Telecom provides services through its ILEC and CLEC operations. An ILEC is an incumbent local exchange telephone company that formerly had the exclusive right and responsibility to provide local transmission and switching services in its designated service territory. CLEC depicts companies that enter the operating areas of incumbent local exchange telephone companies to offer local exchange and other telephone services.

On March 19, 2010, TDS acquired 100% interest in a managed services company which provides colocation, dedicated hosting, Internet and virtual computing services. The operations of the managed services company is included in the ILEC operations from the date of acquisition.

The following table summarizes operating data for TDS Telecom’s ILEC and CLEC operations:

As of June 30,		2010	2009	Increase/ (Decrease)
As of June 30,		2010	2009	Increase/ (Decrease)

ILEC
	Equivalent access lines	779,200	775,800	3,400
	Physical access lines	525,000	548,000	(23,000	)
	High-speed data customers	223,200	197,100	26,100
	Long-distance customers	369,100	354,100	15,000

CLEC
	Equivalent access lines	343,100	372,300	(29,200	)
	High-speed data customers	35,000	38,700	(3,700	)

An ILEC company acquired on November 30, 2009 increased the equivalent and physical access line counts at June 30, 2010 by 7,800 and 5,800, respectively.

The decline in CLEC equivalent access lines from 2009 to 2010 is primarily the result of attrition in residential customers due to a shift in TDS Telecom’s CLEC strategy to focus on serving primarily a commercial subscriber base.

TDS Telecom

Components of Operating Income

Six months ended June 30,			2010			2009			Increase/ (Decrease)			Percentage Change
Six months ended June 30,			2010			2009			Increase/ (Decrease)			Percentage Change
(Dollars in thousands)

Operating revenues
	ILEC revenues		$	304,414		$	298,395		$	6,019		2	%
	CLEC revenues			95,068			101,282			(6,214	)	(6	)%
	Intra-company elimination			(4,771	)		(4,415	)		(356	)	(8	)%
		TDS Telecom operating revenues		394,711			395,262			(551	)	—

Operating expenses
	ILEC expenses			255,635			254,011			1,624		1	%
	CLEC expenses			93,415			100,190			(6,775	)	(7	)%
	Intra-company elimination			(4,771	)		(4,415	)		(356	)	(8	)%
		TDS Telecom operating expenses		344,279			349,786			(5,507	)	(2	)%

	TDS Telecom operating income		$	50,432		$	45,476		$	4,956		11	%

Table of Contents

ILEC Operations

Components of Operating Income

Six months ended June 30,	2010		2009		Increase/ (Decrease)			Percentage Change
Six months ended June 30,	2010		2009		Increase/ (Decrease)			Percentage Change
(Dollars in thousands)

Voice revenues	$	90,296	$	95,457	$	(5,161	)	(5	)%
Data revenues		60,291		50,551		9,740		19	%
Network access revenues		134,893		134,949		(56	)	—
Miscellaneous revenues		18,934		17,438		1,496		9	%
Total operating revenues		304,414		298,395		6,019		2	%

Cost of services and products (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion reported below)		95,794		96,090		(296	)	—
Selling, general and administrative expenses		85,904		86,112		(208	)	—
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		73,905		71,388		2,517		4	%
Loss on asset disposals, net		32		421		(389	)	(92	)%
Total operating expenses		255,635		254,011		1,624		1	%

Total operating income	$	48,779	$	44,384	$	4,395		10	%

Operating Revenues

Voice revenues (charges for providing local telephone exchange and long-distance services).

The decrease in Voice revenues in 2010 was primarily due to a 6% decline in average physical access lines in service (excluding the impact of acquisitions) which negatively impacted local service revenues by $4.5 million. Additionally, local service and long-distance revenues decreased by $2.4 million attributed to bundled offerings, which encourage customers to take multiple products such as local service, long-distance, advanced calling features and voice messaging services at a reduced price. Acquisitions increased Voice revenues $0.8 million in 2010.

Data revenues (charges for providing Internet and other data related services, including revenue from a managed service business).

The increase in Data revenues in 2010 was primarily due to a 14% growth in average high-speed data customers which accounted for increased revenues of $6.4 million. Increases in usage of other data products increased revenues by $0.6 million. Decreases in dial-up customers decreased Data revenues $1.7 million. Acquisitions increased Data revenues $4.0 million in 2010.

Network access revenues (compensation from other telecommunication carriers for carrying long-distance traffic on TDS Telecom’s local telephone network and for local interconnection).

Revenues received through inter-state regulatory recovery mechanisms increased by $0.4 million. A 5% decrease in intra-state minutes of use and a 15% decline in inter-state minutes of use combined to reduce revenues $1.3 million in 2010. Additionally, in 2009, $0.9 million of access charges previously invoiced were recognized as revenues as their collectability became reasonably assured. Acquisitions increased Network access revenues $1.4 million in 2010.

Miscellaneous revenues (charges for leasing, selling, installing and maintaining customer premise equipment and reselling direct broadcast satellite service as well as other miscellaneous services).

Miscellaneous revenues increased primarily due to satellite and video revenues.

Table of Contents

Operating Expenses

Cost of services and products (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion)

Labor related costs decreased $2.6 million due to workforce reduction initiatives as well as modifications in employee retirement benefits. The cost of promotions was also $2.2 million less in 2010. Higher circuit bandwidth costs of $1.2 million to support the growth in high-speed data products partially offset these decreases. Acquisitions increased cost of services and products $2.5 million in 2010.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Decreases in 2010 compared to 2009 included employee costs of $3.2 million due to a workforce reduction, modification of employee retirement benefits of $1.1 million and lower bad debt expense of $0.8 million. A discrete legal expense of $2.5 million was also recorded in 2009. Partially offsetting these decreases was an increase in Universal Service Funding of $1.6 million due to higher rates. A discrete expense of $1.6 million was recorded in 2010 for an asset loss for which an insurance claim has been filed. Additionally, legal and consulting expense incurred to acquire a managed services company increased costs in the first quarter of 2010 by $1.1 million. Acquisitions increased Selling, general and administrative expenses $2.1 million in 2010.

Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense

Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense increased $0.6 million in 2010 due to accelerated depreciation expense on certain video assets due to technological obsolescence. Acquisitions increased Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense $1.9 million in 2010.

CLEC Operations

Components of Operating Income

Six months ended June 30,	2010		2009		Increase/ (Decrease)			Percentage Change
Six months ended June 30,	2010		2009		Increase/ (Decrease)			Percentage Change
(Dollars in thousands)

Retail revenues	$	85,154	$	90,625	$	(5,471	)	(6	)%
Wholesale revenues		9,914		10,657		(743	)	(7	)%
Total operating revenues		95,068		101,282		(6,214	)	(6	)%

Cost of services and products (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion reported below)		48,987		53,119		(4,132	)	(8	)%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		31,516		34,737		(3,221	)	(9	)%
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		12,667		12,138		529		4	%
Loss on asset disposals, net		245		196		49		25	%
Total operating expenses		93,415		100,190		(6,775	)	(7	)%

Total operating income	$	1,653	$	1,092	$	561		51	%

Operating Revenues

Retail revenues (charges to CLEC customers for the provision of direct telecommunication services).

Average CLEC equivalent access lines in service decreased 8% from 2009, decreasing retail revenues $7.3 million. Residential equivalent access lines decreased 24% as the CLEC operation continues to implement its strategic shift towards serving primarily a commercial subscriber base. Average commercial equivalent access lines declined 3% from 2009 to 2010. An increase in average revenue per commercial subscriber resulted in higher revenues of $1.8 million in 2010.

Wholesale revenues (charges to other carriers for utilizing TDS Telecom’s network infrastructure).

The decline in wholesale revenues in 2010 was primarily driven by a 24% reduction in minutes of use.

Table of Contents

Operating Expenses

Cost of services and products (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion)

Cost of services and products decreased in 2010 due to a $3.3 million reduction in purchased network related services, primarily caused by the decrease in the residential customer base.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased in 2010 primarily due to reductions in employee related expenses of $1.5 million and in sales and marketing promotions of $1.1 million.

Depreciation, amortization and accretion

Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense increased during 2010 primarily due to accelerated depreciation expense on certain equipment due to technological obsolescence.

Table of Contents

Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2009

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – CONSOLIDATED

Three Months Ended June 30,			2010			2009			Increase/ (Decrease)			Percentage Change
Three Months Ended June 30,			2010			2009			Increase/ (Decrease)			Percentage Change
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating revenues
	U.S. Cellular		$	1,029,893		$	1,042,143		$	(12,250	)	(1	)%
	TDS Telecom			199,206			195,960			3,246		2	%
	All other (1)			3,120			3,967			(847	)	(21	)%
		Total operating revenues		1,232,219			1,242,070			(9,851	)	(1	)%
Operating expenses
	U.S. Cellular			966,389			903,305			63,084		7	%
	TDS Telecom			174,646			176,963			(2,317	)	(1	)%
	All other (1)			4,803			8,363			(3,560	)	(43	)%
		Total operating expenses		1,145,838			1,088,631			57,207		5	%
Operating income (loss)
	U.S. Cellular			63,504			138,838			(75,334	)	(54	)%
	TDS Telecom			24,560			18,997			5,563		29	%
	All other (1)			(1,683	)		(4,396	)		2,713		62	%
		Total operating income		86,381			153,439			(67,058	)	(44	)%
Other income and (expenses)
	Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities			25,997			18,363			7,634		42	%
	Interest and dividend income			2,674			2,902			(228	)	(8	)%
	Interest expense			(29,265	)		(32,534	)		3,269		10	%
	Other, net			(1,929	)		(25	)		(1,904	)	>(100	)%
		Total investment and other income (expense)		(2,523	)		(11,294	)		8,771		78	%

Income before income taxes				83,858			142,145			(58,287	)	(41	)%
	Income tax expense			31,469			55,242			(23,773	)	(43	)%

Net income				52,389			86,903			(34,514	)	(40	)%
	Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax			(12,102	)		(20,539	)		8,437		41	%
Net income attributable to TDS shareholders				40,287			66,364			(26,077	)	(39	)%
		Preferred dividend requirement		(12	)		(13	)		1		8	%
Net Income available to common shareholders			$	40,275		$	66,351		$	(26,076	)	(39	)%

Basic earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders			$	0.38		$	0.60		$	(0.22	)	(37	)%
Diluted earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders			$	0.38		$	0.60		$	(0.22	)	(37	)%

(1) Consists of non-reportable segment, corporate operations and intercompany eliminations.

Operating Revenues and Expenses

See “Results of Operations – Wireless” and “Results of Operations – Wireline” below for factors that affected consolidated Operating Revenues and Expenses.

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities

TDS’ investment in the Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership (“LA Partnership”) contributed $16.6 million and $17.1 million to Equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities in 2010 and 2009, respectively. Equity income increased primarily due to a $7.1 million impairment loss recognized on an equity method investment in 2009.

Table of Contents

Interest expense

The decrease in interest expense in 2010 was primarily a result of a $2.8 million decrease in interest due to a redemption of U.S. Cellular’s 8.75% senior notes in December 2009.

Income tax expense

See Note 5 — Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the change in income tax expense and the overall effective tax rate on Income before income taxes.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax includes the noncontrolling public shareholders’ share of U.S. Cellular’s net income, the noncontrolling shareholders’ or partners’ share of certain U.S. Cellular subsidiaries’ net income or loss and other TDS noncontrolling interests.

			Three Months Ended June 30,
			Three Months Ended June 30,
			2010			2009
(Dollars in thousands)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax
	U.S. Cellular
		Noncontrolling public shareholders’	$	(7,334	)	$	(15,213	)
		Noncontrolling shareholders’ or partners’		(4,768	)		(5,326	)
			$	(12,102	)	$	(20,539	)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — WIRELESS

Three Months Ended June 30,		2010		2009		Increase/ (Decrease)			Percentage Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Retail service		$	863,836	$	870,802	$	(6,966	)	(1	)%
Inbound roaming			60,902		62,223		(1,321	)	(2	)%
Other			47,838		41,323		6,515		16	%
	Service revenues		972,576		974,348		(1,772	)	—
Equipment sales			57,317		67,795		(10,478	)	(15	)%
	Total operating revenues		1,029,893		1,042,143		(12,250	)	(1	)%

System operations (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion reported below)			213,542		194,709		18,833		10	%
Cost of equipment sold			161,965		156,055		5,910		4	%
Selling, general and administrative			445,177		411,153		34,024		8	%
Depreciation, amortization and accretion			144,455		138,777		5,678		4	%
Loss on asset disposals, net			1,250		2,611		(1,361	)	(52	)%
	Total operating expenses		966,389		903,305		63,084		7	%
	Operating income	$	63,504	$	138,838	$	(75,334	)	(54	)%

Operating Revenues

Retail service revenues

The decrease in retail service revenues in 2010 was primarily due to a significant reduction in revenues from voice services.

· The average number of customers decreased to 6,151,000 in 2010 from 6,199,000 in 2009.

Table of Contents

· Average monthly retail service revenue per customer was essentially flat at $46.81 in 2010 compared to $46.82 in 2009, as an increase in revenues from data products and services offset a decline in revenues from voice services. The average monthly retail service revenue per customer also reflects the impact of a reduction in the number of lower revenue reseller customers.

Revenues from data products and services totaled $215.3 million in 2010 and $162.0 million in 2009, and represented 22% of total service revenues in 2010 compared to 17% of total service revenues in 2009. Such growth, which positively impacted average monthly retail service revenue per customer, reflected customers’ continued and increasing usage of U.S. Cellular’s text, picture, and video messaging services, easyedge^SM service and applications, premium mobile Internet services, smartphone handsets and services, and modems.

Revenues related to regulatory cost recovery increased due to an increase in the USF contribution rates established by the FCC.

Inbound roaming revenues

The decrease in Inbound roaming revenues in 2010 was primarily due to a decline in roaming revenues from the combined entity of Verizon and Alltel.

Equipment sales revenues

The decrease in 2010 Equipment sales revenues was driven by a decline in average revenue per handset sold of 22% due to aggressive promotional pricing across all categories of handsets. The impact of lower overall pricing was offset somewhat by a shift in mix of handsets purchased by customers to handsets with expanded capabilities, such as smartphones and premium handsets, together with a 4% increase in the total number of handsets sold.

Operating Expenses

System operations expenses (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion)

Key components of the overall increase in system operations expenses were as follows:

· Maintenance, utility and cell site expenses increased $8.9 million, or 11%, driven primarily by an increase in the number of cell sites within U.S. Cellular’s network;

· Customer usage expenses on U.S. Cellular’s systems increased $10.0 million, or 15%, primarily due to an increase in data usage.

Cost of equipment sold

The increase in Cost of equipment sold was due to an increase in total handsets sold of 4%, together with a shift in the mix of handsets purchased by customers to handsets with expanded capabilities, such as smartphones and premium handsets, which resulted in an increase in average cost per handset sold of 2%.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Key components of the net increase in Selling, general and administrative expenses were as follows:

· Selling and marketing expenses increased by $13.9 million, or 7%, primarily due to higher sales related expenses, and higher commissions resulting from a greater number of eligible customer additions and renewals.

· General and administrative expenses increased $20.1 million, or 9%, due to higher USF contributions (most of the USF contribution expenses are offset by revenues for amounts passed through to customers as discussed above); higher costs related to marketing initiatives and investments in multi-year initiatives for business support systems as described in the Overview section; and higher employee related expenses.

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — WIRELINE

TDS Telecom

Components of Operating Income

Three months ended June 30,			2010			2009			Increase/ (Decrease)			Percentage Change
(Dollars in thousands)

Operating revenues
	ILEC revenues		$	154,258		$	148,208		$	6,050		4	%
	CLEC revenues			47,325			50,093			(2,768	)	(6	)%
	Intra-company elimination			(2,377	)		(2,341	)		(36	)	(2	)%
		TDS Telecom operating revenues		199,206			195,960			3,246		2	%

Operating expenses
	ILEC expenses			130,088			129,074			1,014		1	%
	CLEC expenses			46,935			50,230			(3,295	)	(7	)%
	Intra-company elimination			(2,377	)		(2,341	)		(36	)	(2	)%
		TDS Telecom operating expenses		174,646			176,963			(2,317	)	(1	)%

TDS Telecom operating income			$	24,560		$	18,997		$	5,563		29	%

ILEC Operations

Components of Operating Income

Three months ended June 30,	2010			2009		Increase/ (Decrease)			Percentage Change
(Dollars in thousands)

Voice revenues	$	45,738		$	46,879	$	(1,141	)	(2	)%
Data revenues		31,993			25,491		6,502		26	%
Network access revenues		66,951			67,118		(167	)	—
Miscellaneous revenues		9,576			8,720		856		10	%
Total operating revenues		154,258			148,208		6,050		4	%

Cost of services and products (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion reported below)		49,302			48,406		896		2	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		44,167			45,083		(916	)	(2	)%
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		36,847			35,302		1,545		4	%
Loss on asset disposals, net		(228	)		283		(511	)	>(100	)%
Total operating expenses		130,088			129,074		1,014		1	%

Total operating income	$	24,170		$	19,134	$	5,036		26	%

Table of Contents

Operating Revenues

Voice revenues

The decrease in Voice revenues in 2010 was primarily due to a 5% decline in average physical access lines in service (excluding the impact of 2009 acquisitions). Acquisitions increased 2010 Voice revenues $0.4 million.

Data revenues

The increase in Data revenues in 2010 was primarily due to the 13% growth in average high-speed data customers which accounted for increased revenues of $2.9 million. Customers converting to higher DSL speeds drove the average revenue per customer higher, increasing revenues $0.8 million, net of bundling discounts in 2010. These increases were partially offset by a $0.8 million decrease caused by a decline in dial-up customers. Acquisitions increased Data revenues $3.1 million.

Network access revenues

A 4% decrease in intra-state minutes of use had a negative impact on revenues of $0.5 million. Acquisitions generated a $0.7 million increase in 2010 Network access revenues to offset this decline.

Miscellaneous revenues increased primarily due to satellite and video revenues.

Operating Expenses

Cost of services and products (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion)

Labor related costs decreased $1.0 million due to workforce reduction initiatives as well as modifications in employee retirement benefits. The cost of promotions was also $1.3 million less in 2010. Higher cost of goods sold and circuit bandwidth costs increased Cost of service and products $0.8 million. Acquisitions increased Cost of service and products $1.7 million in 2010.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Decreases from 2009 to 2010 included a reduction in employee costs of $1.6 million due to a workforce reduction, modification of employee retirement benefits of $0.3 million and a reduction in bad debt expense of $0.4 million. A discrete legal expense of $2.5 million was also recorded in 2009. Additionally, a discrete expense of $1.6 million was recorded in 2010 for an asset loss for which an insurance claim has been filed. Acquisitions increased Selling, general and administrative expenses $1.6 million in 2010.

Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense

Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense increased $1.3 million in 2010 as a result of acquisitions.

Table of Contents

CLEC Operations

Components of Operating Income

Three months ended June 30,	2010		2009			Increase/ (Decrease)			Percentage Change
Three months ended June 30,	2010		2009			Increase/ (Decrease)			Percentage Change
(Dollars in thousands)

Retail revenues	$	42,487	$	45,055		$	(2,568	)	(6	)%
Wholesale revenues		4,838		5,038			(200	)	(4	)%
Total operating revenues		47,325		50,093			(2,768	)	(6	)%

Cost of services and products (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion reported below)		24,495		26,348			(1,853	)	(7	)%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		15,978		17,402			(1,424	)	(8	)%
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		6,302		6,361			(59	)	(1	)%
Loss on asset disposals, net		160		119			41		34	%
Total operating expenses		46,935		50,230			(3,295	)	(7	)%


Total operating income	$	390	$	(137	)	$	527		>100	%

Operating Revenues

Retail revenues

Average CLEC equivalent access lines in service decreased 8% in 2010 compared to 2009, which resulted in a decrease in retail revenues of $3.4 million. Average residential equivalent access lines decreased 24% as the CLEC operation continues to implement its strategic shift towards serving primarily a commercial subscriber base. The average equivalent access lines related to commercial customers declined 3%. Partially offsetting this decline was an increase in the average revenue per commercial subscriber which resulted in higher revenues of $0.8 million in 2010.

Wholesale revenues

The decline in wholesale revenues in 2010 was primarily driven by a 18% reduction in minutes of use partially offset by an increase in average rates resulting from a more favorable mixture of traffic carried.

Operating Expenses

Cost of services and products (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion)

Cost of services and products decreased in 2010 due to reduction in purchased network related services, primarily caused by the smaller residential customer base, which decreased expenses by $1.8 million.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased in 2010 primarily due to a decrease in employee related costs and a reduction in advertising expense.

Table of Contents

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Recent accounting pronouncements either are not expected to have a significant effect on TDS’ financial condition or results of operations or TDS is currently analyzing such pronouncements in order to determine their impact, if any.

See Note 3 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on recent accounting pronouncements.

FINANCIAL RESOURCES

TDS operates a capital- and marketing-intensive business. TDS utilizes cash from its operating activities, cash proceeds from divestitures and dispositions of investments, short-term credit facilities, long-term debt financing and cash on hand to fund its acquisitions (including licenses), construction costs, operating expenses and share repurchases. Cash flows may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year due to seasonality, the timing of acquisitions, capital expenditures and other factors. The table below and the following discussion in this Financial Resources section summarize TDS’ cash flow activities in the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009.

		2010			2009
		2010			2009

(Dollars in thousands)
Cash flows from (used in):
	Operating activities	$	502,346		$	443,961
	Investing activities		(714,074	)		(412,878	)
	Financing activities		(80,787	)		(143,635	)
	Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(292,515	)	$	(112,552	)

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

The following table presents Adjusted OIBDA and is included for purposes of analyzing operating activities. TDS believes this measure provides useful information to investors regarding TDS’ financial condition and results of operations because it highlights certain key cash and non-cash items and their impacts on cash flows from operating activities:

		2010		2009

(Dollars in thousands)
Operating income		$	188,377	$	293,247
Non-cash items
	Depreciation, amortization and accretion		379,647		366,505
	Loss on asset disposals, net		6,645		7,191
Adjusted OIBDA (1) (2)		$	574,669	$	666,943

(1) Adjusted OIBDA is a segment measure reported to the chief operating decision maker for purposes of making decisions about allocating resources to the segments and assessing their performance. Adjusted OIBDA is defined as operating income excluding the effects of: depreciation, amortization and accretion (OIBDA); the net gain or loss on asset disposals (if any); and the loss on impairment of assets (if any). This measure also may be commonly referred to by management as operating cash flow. This measure should not be confused with Cash flows from operating activities, which is a component of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. See Note 15 — Business Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2) Adjusted OIBDA excludes the net gain or loss on asset disposals and loss on impairment of assets (if any), in order to show operating results on a more comparable basis from period to period. TDS does not intend to imply that any of such amounts that are excluded are non-recurring, infrequent or unusual and, accordingly, they may be incurred in the future.

Cash flows from operating activities in 2010 were $502.3 million, an increase of $58.3 million from 2009. Significant changes included the following:

· Adjusted OIBDA, as shown in the table above, declined by $92.2 million primarily due to a decrease in U.S. Cellular operating income. See discussion in the “Results of Operations — Wireless” for factors that affected U.S. Cellular operating income.

Table of Contents

· In 2009, a $38.0 million deposit was paid to the Internal Revenue Service to eliminate any potential interest expense subsequent to the deposit. The deposit was recorded as a cash outflow in Change in other assets and liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows in 2009.

· A $33.0 million distribution from the LA Partnership was received in June 2010. A $33.0 million distribution from the LA Partnership was approved in June 2009, but not received until July 2009, resulting in lower Distributions from unconsolidated entities in 2009.

· Income tax payments, net of refunds, increased by $53.4 million to $84.9 million in 2010 from $31.5 million in 2009. This increase primarily relates to tax payments made in 2010 related to the 2009 tax year and the discontinuance of the bonus depreciation deduction in 2010.

· Changes in accounts receivable required $21.0 million and $68.3 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively, causing a year-over-year increase in cash flows of $47.3 million. Changes in inventory provided $32.2 million in 2010 and required $9.9 million in 2009, resulting in a $42.1 million increase in cash inflows. Both the accounts receivable and inventory balances can fluctuate significantly based on the timing of wireless promotions.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

TDS makes substantial investments to acquire wireless licenses and properties and to construct, operate and upgrade modern high-quality communications networks and facilities as a basis for creating long-term value for shareholders. In recent years, rapid changes in technology and new opportunities have required substantial investments in potentially revenue‑enhancing and cost-reducing upgrades to TDS’ networks.

Cash used for property, plant and equipment and system development expenditures totaled $318.0 million in 2010 and $290.8 million in 2009. These expenditures were made to provide for customer and usage growth, to upgrade service and to take advantage of service-enhancing and cost-reducing technological developments in order to maintain competitive services.

· U.S. Cellular’s capital expenditures totaled $255.0 million in 2010 and $228.9 million in 2009 representing expenditures to construct cell sites, increase capacity in existing cell sites and switches, upgrade technology including the overlay of 3G technology in certain markets, develop new and enhance existing office systems, and construct new and remodel existing retail stores.

· TDS Telecom’s capital expenditures for its ILEC operations totaled $48.4 million in 2010 and $47.6 million in 2009 representing expenditures to upgrade plant and equipment to provide enhanced services. TDS Telecom’s capital expenditures for its CLEC operations totaled $8.6 million in 2010 and $10.7 million in 2009 for switching and other network facilities.

· Corporate and other capital expenditures totaled $6.0 million in 2010 and $3.6 million in 2009.

The following table presents Free cash flow. TDS believes that Free cash flow as reported by TDS is useful to investors and other users of its financial information in evaluating the amount of cash generated by business operations, after capital expenditures.

(Dollars in thousands)	2010			2009

Cash flows from operating activities	$	502,346		$	443,961
Capital expenditures		(317,950	)		(290,821	)
Free cash flow (1)	$	184,396		$	153,140

(1) Free cash flow is defined as Cash flows from operating activities minus Capital expenditures. Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure.

See Cash flows from Operating Activities and Cash flows from Investing Activities for details on the changes to the components of Free cash flow.

Table of Contents

Cash payments for acquisitions in 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

Cash Payment for Acquisitions (1)	2010		2009
(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. Cellular licenses	$	10,501	$	12,050
TDS Telecom business		17,763		2,701
Other		—		291
Total	$	28,264	$	15,042

(1) Cash amounts paid for the acquisitions may differ from the purchase price due to cash acquired in the transactions and the timing of cash payments related to the respective transactions.

In 2010, TDS invested $385.0 million in U.S. treasuries and commercial paper with maturities of greater than three months from the acquisition date. Also, $15.7 million in certificates of deposit (“CDs”) were redeemed in 2010 and $109.1 million of CDs were purchased in 2009.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

In 2010, TDS repurchased Special Common Shares at an aggregate cost of $31.1 million. In 2009, TDS repurchased Special Common Shares at an aggregate cost of $86.0 million. A total of $84.6 million was paid in cash before June 30, 2009 and $1.4 million was paid in July 2009. In addition, in January 2009 TDS paid $2.0 million for the fourth quarter 2008 share repurchases. Payments for repurchases of U.S. Cellular Common Shares required $21.4 million in 2010 and $19.3 million in 2009. See Note 12 — TDS and U.S. Cellular Share Repurchases in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to these transactions.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

TDS believes that existing cash balances, expected cash flows from operating activities and funds available under its revolving credit facilities provide substantial liquidity and financial flexibility for TDS to meet its normal financing needs (including working capital, construction and development expenditures and share repurchases under approved programs) for the foreseeable future. In addition, TDS and its subsidiaries may have access to public and private capital markets to help meet their financing needs.

Consumer spending significantly impacts TDS’ operations and performance. Factors that influence levels of consumer spending include: unemployment rates, increases in fuel and other energy costs, conditions in residential real estate and mortgage markets, labor and healthcare costs, access to credit, consumer confidence and other macroeconomic factors. Changes in these and other economic factors could have a material adverse effect on demand for TDS’ products and services and on TDS’ financial condition and results of operations.

TDS cannot provide assurances that circumstances that could have a material adverse affect on its liquidity or capital resources will not occur. Economic conditions, changes in financial markets or other factors could restrict TDS’ liquidity and availability of financing on terms and prices acceptable to TDS, which could require TDS to reduce its construction, development, acquisition or share repurchase programs. Such reductions could have a material adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

At June 30, 2010, TDS had $378.5 million in cash and cash equivalents, which included cash and short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. The primary objective of TDS’ cash and cash equivalents investment activities is to preserve principal. At June 30, 2010, the majority of TDS’ cash and cash equivalents was held in money market funds that invest exclusively in U.S. Treasury securities with original maturities of less than three months or in repurchase agreements fully collateralized by such obligations. TDS also invested directly in U.S. Treasury securities that qualify as cash equivalents. TDS monitors the financial viability of the money market funds and direct investments in which it invests and believes that the credit risk associated with these investments is low.

Short-term and Long-term Investments

At June 30, 2010, TDS had $379.2 million in Short-term investments and $107.5 million in Long-term investments. Short-term and Long-term investments consist of Certificates of deposit (Short-term only), U.S. treasuries and commercial paper that are designated as held-to-maturity investments, and are recorded at amortized cost in the

Table of Contents

Consolidated Balance Sheet. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, TDS made $385.0 million of investments in U.S. treasuries and commercial paper. Such commercial paper investments are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. TDS’ objective was to earn a higher rate of return on cash balances that are not anticipated to be required to meet liquidity needs in the foreseeable future, while maintaining a low level of investment risk. See Note 4 — Fair Value Measurements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details on Short-term and Long-term investments.

Revolving Credit Facilities

TDS has a $400 million and U.S. Cellular has a $300 million revolving credit facility available for general corporate purposes. At June 30, 2010, there were no outstanding borrowings and $3.4 million of outstanding letters of credit, leaving $396.6 million available for use under the TDS revolving credit facility, and there were no outstanding borrowings and $0.2 million of outstanding letters of credit, leaving $299.8 million available for use under the U.S. Cellular revolving credit facility. In connection with U.S. Cellular’s revolving credit facility, TDS and U.S. Cellular entered into a subordination agreement dated June 30, 2009 together with the administrative agent for the lenders under U.S. Cellular’s revolving credit facility. At June 30, 2010, no U.S. Cellular debt was subordinated pursuant to this subordination agreement.

TDS’ and U.S. Cellular’s interest cost on their revolving credit facilities is subject to increase if their current credit ratings from nationally recognized credit rating agencies are lowered, and is subject to decrease if the ratings are raised. The credit facilities would not cease to be available nor would the maturity date accelerate solely as a result of a downgrade in TDS’ or U.S. Cellular’s credit rating. However, a downgrade in TDS’ or U.S. Cellular’s credit rating could adversely affect their ability to renew the credit facilities or obtain access to other credit facilities in the future.

TDS and U.S. Cellular’s credit ratings from nationally recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade as of June 30, 2010.

The continued availability of the revolving credit facilities requires TDS and U.S. Cellular to comply with certain negative and affirmative covenants, maintain certain financial ratios and make representations regarding certain matters at the time of each borrowing. TDS and U.S. Cellular believe they were in compliance as of June 30, 2010 with all of the covenants and requirements set forth in their revolving credit facilities.

Long-Term Financing

TDS and its subsidiaries’ long-term debt and indentures do not contain any provisions resulting in acceleration of the maturities of outstanding debt in the event of a change in TDS’ credit rating. However, a downgrade in TDS’ credit rating could adversely affect its ability to obtain long-term debt financing in the future. TDS believes it and its subsidiaries were in compliance as of June 30, 2010 with all covenants and other requirements set forth in long-term debt indentures. TDS and U.S. Cellular have not failed to make nor do they expect to fail to make any scheduled payment of principal or interest under such indentures.

The long-term debt principal payments due for the remainder of 2010 and the next four years represent less than 1% of the total long-term debt obligation at June 30, 2010. Refer to Market Risk — Long-Term Debt in TDS’ Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for additional information regarding required principal payments and the weighted average interest rates related to TDS’ long-term debt.

TDS, at its discretion, may from time to time seek to retire or purchase its outstanding debt through cash purchases and/or exchanges for other securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, tender offers, exchange offers or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.

Capital Expenditures

U.S. Cellular’s capital expenditures for 2010 are expected to be approximately $600 million. These expenditures are expected to be for the following general purposes:

· Expand and enhance U.S. Cellular’s coverage in its service areas;

· Provide additional capacity to accommodate increased network usage by current customers;

· Overlay 3G technology in certain markets;

Table of Contents

· Enhance U.S. Cellular’s retail store network;

· Develop and enhance office systems; and

· Develop new billing and other customer management related systems and platforms.

TDS Telecom’s anticipated capital expenditures for 2010 are expected to be approximately $155 million to upgrade plant and equipment to provide enhanced services.

TDS plans to finance its capital expenditures program for 2010 using cash flows from operating activities, existing cash balances and, if necessary, short-term debt.

Acquisitions, Divestitures and Exchanges

TDS assesses its existing wireless and wireline interests on an ongoing basis with a goal of improving the competitiveness of its operations and maximizing its long-term return on investment. As part of this strategy, TDS reviews attractive opportunities to acquire additional wireless operating markets, telecommunications companies, wireless spectrum and related service businesses. In addition, TDS may seek to divest outright or include in exchanges for other wireless interests those wireless interests that are not strategic to its long-term success. TDS also may be engaged from time to time in negotiations relating to the acquisition, divestiture or exchange of companies, strategic properties or wireless spectrum. In general, TDS may not disclose such transactions until there is a definitive agreement. See Note 7 — Acquisitions, Divestitures and Exchanges in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details on significant transactions in 2010.

Variable Interest Entities

TDS consolidates certain entities because they are “variable interest entities” under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). See Note 11—Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the details of these variable interest entities. TDS may elect to make additional capital contributions and/or advances to these variable interest entities in future periods in order to fund their operations.

Share Repurchase Programs

TDS and U.S. Cellular have repurchased and expect to continue to repurchase their Special Common Shares (TDS only) and Common Shares, subject to their repurchase programs. For additional information related to the current TDS and U.S. Cellular repurchase authorizations and repurchases during 2010 and 2009, see Note 12 — TDS and U.S. Cellular Share Repurchases in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 2, Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Contractual and Other Obligations

There was no material change between December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010 to the Contractual and Other Obligations disclosed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in TDS’ Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

TDS had no transactions, agreements or other contractual arrangements with unconsolidated entities involving “off-balance sheet arrangements,” as defined by Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules, that had or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on its financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Table of Contents

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

TDS prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. TDS’ significant accounting policies are discussed in detail in Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and TDS’ Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates is discussed in detail in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, both of which are included in TDS’ Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Changes to significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 3 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q. There were no material changes to TDS’ application of critical accounting policies and estimates during the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Table of Contents

PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

SAFE HARBOR CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

This Form 10-Q, including exhibits, contains statements that are not based on historical facts and represent forward-looking statements, as this term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, that address activities, events or developments that TDS intends, expects, projects, believes, estimates, plans or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. The words “believes,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “projects” and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying them. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, events or developments to be significantly different from any future results, events or developments expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include those set forth below, as more fully discussed under “Risk Factors” in TDS’ Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. However, such factors are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements contained in this document. Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could have material adverse effects on future results, performance or achievements. TDS undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You should carefully consider the Risk Factors in TDS’ Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, the following factors and other information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this Form 10-Q to understand the material risks relating to TDS’ business.

· Intense competition in the markets in which TDS operates could adversely affect TDS’ revenues or increase its costs to compete.

· A failure by TDS to successfully execute its business strategy or allocate resources or capital could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations.

· A failure by TDS’ service offerings to meet customer expectations could limit TDS’ ability to attract and retain customers and could have an adverse effect on TDS’ operations.

· TDS’ systems infrastructure may not be capable of supporting changes in technologies and services expected by customers, which could result in lost customers and revenues.

· An inability to obtain or maintain roaming arrangements with other carriers on terms that are acceptable to TDS could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations.

· TDS currently receives a significant amount of roaming revenues from its wireless business. As a result of consolidation of companies in the wireless industry, TDS roaming revenues have declined significantly from amounts earned in certain prior years. Further industry consolidation and continued build outs by existing and new wireless carriers could cause roaming revenues to decline even more, which would have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

· A failure by TDS to obtain access to adequate radio spectrum to meet current or anticipated future needs and/or to accurately predict future needs for radio spectrum could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business and operations.

· In the event that the FCC conducts auctions of additional spectrum in the future, TDS is likely to participate in such auctions as an applicant or as a non-controlling partner in another auction applicant and, during certain periods, will be subject to the FCC’s anti-collusion rules, which could have an adverse effect on TDS.

· Changes in the regulatory environment or a failure by TDS to timely or fully comply with any applicable regulatory requirements could adversely affect TDS’ financial condition, results of operations or ability to do business.

· Changes in USF funding and/or intercarrier compensation could have a material adverse impact on TDS’ financial position or results of operations.

· An inability to attract and/or retain management, technical, sales and other personnel could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations.

Table of Contents

· TDS’ assets are concentrated in the U.S. telecommunications industry. As a result, its results of operations may fluctuate based on factors related entirely to conditions in this industry.

· The completion of acquisitions by other companies has led to increased consolidation in the wireless telecommunications industry. TDS’ lower scale relative to larger wireless carriers has in the past and could in the future prevent or delay its access to new products including handsets, new technology and/or new content and applications which could adversely affect TDS’ ability to attract and retain customers and, as a result, could adversely affect its business, financial condition or results of operations.

· Inability to manage its supply chain or inventory successfully could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations.

· Changes in general economic and business conditions, both nationally and in the markets in which TDS operates, could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations.

· Changes in various business factors could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations.

· Advances or changes in telecommunications technology, such as Voice over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”), High-Speed Packet Access, WiMAX or Long-Term Evolution (“LTE”), could render certain technologies used by TDS obsolete, could reduce TDS’ revenues or could increase its costs of doing business.

· TDS could incur higher than anticipated intercarrier compensation costs.

· TDS is subject to numerous surcharges and fees from federal, state and local governments, and the applicability and the amount of these fees are subject to great uncertainty.

· Changes in TDS’ enterprise value, changes in the market supply or demand for wireless licenses or wireline markets, adverse developments in the business or the industry in which TDS is involved and/or other factors could require TDS to recognize impairments in the carrying value of its license costs, goodwill and/or physical assets.

· Costs, integration problems or other factors associated with developing and enhancing business support systems, acquisitions/divestitures of properties or licenses and/or expansion of TDS’ business could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations.

· A significant portion of TDS’ wireless revenues is derived from customers who buy services through independent agents who market TDS’ services on a commission basis. If TDS’ relationships with these agents are seriously harmed, its wireless revenues could be adversely affected.

· TDS’ investments in technologies which are unproven may not produce the benefits that TDS expects.

· A failure by TDS to complete significant network construction and systems implementation activities as part of its plans to improve the quality, coverage, capabilities and capacity of its network and support systems could have an adverse effect on its operations.

· Financial difficulties (including bankruptcy proceedings) of any of TDS’ key suppliers or vendors, termination or impairment of TDS’ relationships with such suppliers or vendors, or a failure by TDS to manage its supply chain effectively could result in delays or termination of TDS’ receipt of required equipment or services, or could result in excess quantities of required equipment or services, any of which could adversely affect TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations.

· TDS has significant investments in entities that it does not control. Losses in the value of such investments could have an adverse effect on TDS’ financial condition or results of operations.

· A failure by TDS to maintain flexible and capable telecommunication networks or information technology, or a material disruption thereof, including breaches of network or information technology security, could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations.

Table of Contents

· Wars, conflicts, hostilities and/or terrorist attacks or equipment failures, power outages, natural disasters or other events could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations.

· The market prices of TDS’ Common Shares and Special Common Shares are subject to fluctuations due to a variety of factors.

· Identification of errors in financial information or disclosures could require amendments to or restatements of financial information or disclosures included in this or prior filings with the SEC.

· Restatements of financial statements by TDS and related matters, including resulting delays in filing periodic reports with the SEC, could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations.

· The existence of material weaknesses in the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting could result in inaccurate financial statements or other disclosures or failure to prevent fraud, which could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations.

· Changes in facts or circumstances, including new or additional information that affects the calculation of potential liabilities for contingent obligations under guarantees, indemnities, claims, litigation or otherwise, could require TDS to record charges in excess of amounts accrued in the financial statements, if any, which could have an adverse effect on TDS’ financial condition or results of operations.

· Early redemptions or repurchases of debt, issuances of debt, changes in operating leases, changes in purchase obligations or other factors or developments could cause the amounts reported under Contractual Obligations in TDS’ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations to be different from the amounts actually incurred.

· An increase in the amount of TDS’ debt could subject TDS to higher interest costs and restrictions on its financing, investing and operating activities and could decrease its net income and cash flows.

· Disruption in credit or other financial markets, a deterioration of U.S. or global economic conditions or other events, could, among other things, impede TDS’ access to or increase the cost of financing its operating and investment activities and/or result in reduced revenues and lower operating income and cash flows, which would have an adverse effect on TDS’ financial condition or results of operations.

· Uncertainty of access to capital for telecommunications companies, deterioration in the capital markets, other changes in market conditions, changes in TDS’ credit ratings or other factors could limit or restrict the availability of financing on terms and prices acceptable to TDS, which could require TDS to reduce its construction, development or acquisition programs.

· TDS’ and U.S. Cellular’s credit facilities and the indentures governing their senior notes include restrictive covenants that limit their operating flexibility and TDS and U.S. Cellular may be unable to service their debt or to refinance their indebtedness before maturity.

· Changes in income tax rates, laws, regulations or rulings, or federal or state tax assessments, could have an adverse effect on TDS’ financial condition or results of operations.

· Settlements, judgments, restraints on its current or future manner of doing business and/or legal costs resulting from pending and future litigation could have an adverse effect on TDS’ financial condition, results of operations or ability to do business.

· The possible development of adverse precedent in litigation or conclusions in professional studies to the effect that radio frequency emissions from handsets, wireless data devices and/or cell sites cause harmful health consequences, including cancer or tumors, or may interfere with various electronic medical devices such as pacemakers, could have an adverse effect on TDS’ wireless business, financial condition or results of operations.

Table of Contents

· Claims of infringement of intellectual property and proprietary rights of others, primarily involving patent infringement claims, could prevent TDS from using necessary technology to provide services or subject TDS to expensive intellectual property litigation or monetary penalties, which could have an adverse effect on TDS’ business, financial condition or results of operations.

· Certain matters, such as control by the TDS Voting Trust and provisions in the TDS Restated Certificate of Incorporation, may serve to discourage or make more difficult a change in control of TDS.

· Any of the foregoing events or other events could cause customer net additions, revenues, operating income, capital expenditures and/or any other financial or statistical information to vary from TDS’ forward-looking estimates by a material amount.

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

MARKET RISK

Long-term Debt

As of June 30, 2010, TDS’ long-term debt was in the form of fixed-rate notes with original maturities ranging up to 40 years. Fluctuations in market interest rates can lead to significant fluctuations in the fair values of these fixed-rate notes.

See Note 4 — Fair Value Measurements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the fair market value of TDS’ long-term debt as of June 30, 2010.

Refer to the disclosure under Market Risk — Long-Term Debt in TDS’ Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, for additional information regarding required principal payments and the weighted average interest rates related to TDS’ long-term debt. There have been no material changes to such information since December 31, 2009.

Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

TDS maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is processed, recorded, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to TDS’ management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), TDS carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of TDS’ disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on this evaluation, TDS’ Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that TDS’ disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2010, at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in TDS’ internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect TDS’ internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

In addition to the information set forth in this Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in TDS’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which could materially affect TDS’ business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in this Form 10-Q and in TDS’ Annual Report on Form 10-K may not be the only risks that could affect TDS. Additional unidentified or unrecognized risks and uncertainties could materially adversely affect TDS’ business, financial condition and/or operating results. In addition, you are referred to the above Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and in particular the section captioned “Overview,” for disclosures of certain developments that have occurred since TDS filed its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Subject to the foregoing, TDS has not identified for disclosure any material changes to the risk factors as previously disclosed in TDS’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

In December 2009, TDS completed the authorization made in 2008 for the repurchase of up to $250 million in aggregate purchase price of both TDS Common and Special Common shares. On November 19, 2009, the Board of Directors of TDS authorized a new $250 million stock repurchase program for both TDS Common and Special Common shares. Depending on market conditions, such shares may be repurchased in compliance with Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act, or pursuant to accelerated share repurchase arrangements, prepaid share repurchases, private transactions or as otherwise authorized. This authorization will expire in November 2012.

The following table provides certain information with respect to all purchases made by or on behalf of TDS, and any open market purchases made by any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined by the SEC) of TDS, of TDS Common and Special Common Shares during the quarter covered by this Form 10-Q.

TDS PURCHASES OF COMMON SHARES AND SPECIAL COMMON SHARES

			(a)	(b)		(c)		(d)
Period			Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April 1 – 30, 2010
	Common		—	$	—	—
	Special Common		48,297		29.90	48,297
		Total	48,297		29.90	48,297	$	230,870,289
May 1 – 31, 2010
	Common		—		—	—
	Special Common		217,000		28.74	217,000
		Total	217,000		28.74	217,000		224,632,987
June 1 – 30, 2010
	Common		—		—	—
	Special Common		303,000		28.39	303,000
		Total	303,000		28.39	303,000		216,031,547
Total for or as of end of the quarter
	ended June 30, 2010
	Common		—		—	—
	Special Common		568,297		28.65	568,297
		Total	568,297	$	28.65	568,297	$	216,031,547

The following is additional information with respect to the Common and Special Common Shares authorization:

i. The date the program was announced was November 20, 2009 by Form 8-K.

ii. The amount originally approved was up to $250 million in aggregate purchase price of TDS Common and Special Common Shares.

iii. The expiration date for the program is November 19, 2012.

iv. The Common and Special Common Shares authorization did not expire during the second quarter of 2010.

v. TDS did not determine to terminate the foregoing Common and Special Common Shares repurchase program prior to expiration, or cease making further purchases thereunder, during the second quarter of 2010.

Table of Contents

Item 5. Other Information.

The following information is being provided to update prior disclosures made pursuant to the requirements of Form 8-K, Item 2.03 — Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation Under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant.

Neither TDS nor U.S. Cellular borrowed or repaid any amounts under their revolving credit facilities in the second quarter of 2010 and had no borrowings outstanding under their revolving credit facilities as of June 30, 2010.

A description of TDS’ revolving credit facility is included under Item 1.01 in TDS’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 30, 2009 and is incorporated by reference herein.

A description of U.S. Cellular’s revolving credit facility is included under Item 1.01 in U.S. Cellular’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 30, 2009 and is incorporated by reference herein.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit 10.1 – Terms of Letter Agreement dated May 3, 2010 between U.S. Cellular and Mary N. Dillon, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.2 to U.S. Cellular’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 6, 2010

Exhibit 10.2 – U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan 2010 Stock Option Award Agreement evidencing U.S. Cellular stock options granted to Mary N. Dillon on June 1, 2010 (with accelerated vesting in the event of termination without cause or for good reason), is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to U.S. Cellular’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 1, 2010

Exhibit 10.3 – U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan 2010 Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement evidencing U.S. Cellular restricted stock units granted to Mary N. Dillon on June 1, 2010 (with accelerated vesting in the event of termination without cause or for good reason), is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to U.S. Cellular’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 1, 2010

Exhibit 10.4 – U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan 2010 Stock Option Award Agreement evidencing U.S. Cellular stock options granted to Mary N. Dillon on June 1, 2010 (without accelerated vesting in the event of termination without cause or for good reason), is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to U.S. Cellular’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 1, 2010

Exhibit 10.5 – U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan 2010 Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement evidencing U.S. Cellular restricted stock units granted to Mary N. Dillon on June 1, 2010 (without accelerated vesting in the event of termination without cause or for good reason), is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to U.S. Cellular’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 1, 2010

Exhibit 11 – Computation of Earnings per share is included herein as Note 6 – Earnings Per Share in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Exhibit 12 – Statement regarding computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges.

Exhibit 31.1 – Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Exhibit 31.2 – Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Exhibit 32.1 – Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Exhibit 32.2 – Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Exhibit 101.INS – XBRL Instance Document

Exhibit 101.SCH – XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

Exhibit 101.PRE – XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document

Table of Contents

Exhibit 101.CAL – XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document

Exhibit 101.LAB – XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document

Exhibit 101.DEF – XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

The foregoing exhibits include only the exhibits that relate specifically to this Form 10-Q or that supplement the exhibits identified in TDS’ Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Reference is made to TDS’ Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for a complete list of exhibits, which are incorporated herein except to the extent supplemented or superseded above.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
		(Registrant)

Date:	August 5, 2010		/s/ LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.
			LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Date:	August 5, 2010		/s/ Kenneth R. Meyers
			Kenneth R. Meyers, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Date:	August 5, 2010		/s/ Douglas D. Shuma
			Douglas D. Shuma, Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

Signature page for the TDS 2010 Second Quarter Form 10-Q