
Home and security products company Fortune Brands (NYSE: FBIN) met Wall Street’s revenue expectations in Q2 CY2026, but sales fell by 4.1% year on year to $1.15 billion. Its non-GAAP profit of $1.35 per share was 63.8% above analysts’ consensus estimates.
Is now the time to buy Fortune Brands? Find out by accessing our full research report, it’s free.
Fortune Brands (FBIN) Q2 CY2026 Highlights:
- Revenue: $1.15 billion vs analyst estimates of $1.16 billion (4.1% year-on-year decline, in line)
- Adjusted EPS: $1.35 vs analyst estimates of $0.82 (63.8% beat)
- Adjusted EBITDA: $277.5 million vs analyst estimates of $196.4 million (24% margin, 41.3% beat)
- Operating Margin: -0.8%, down from 14.3% in the same quarter last year
- Free Cash Flow Margin: 19.6%, up from 9.9% in the same quarter last year
- Market Capitalization: $6.22 billion
Company Overview
Targeting a wide customer base of residential and commercial customers, Fortune Brands (NYSE: FBIN) makes plumbing, security, and outdoor living products.
Revenue Growth
A company’s long-term performance is an indicator of its overall quality. Any business can have short-term success, but a top-tier one grows for years. Over the last five years, Fortune Brands’s demand was weak and its revenue declined by 9% per year. This wasn’t a great result and is a sign of poor business quality.

Long-term growth is the most important, but within industrials, a half-decade historical view may miss new industry trends or demand cycles. Fortune Brands’s annualized revenue declines of 4.1% over the last two years suggest its demand continued shrinking. 
This quarter, Fortune Brands reported a rather uninspiring 4.1% year-on-year revenue decline to $1.15 billion of revenue, in line with Wall Street’s estimates.
Looking ahead, sell-side analysts expect revenue to remain flat over the next 12 months. While this projection suggests its newer products and services will catalyze better top-line performance, it is still below average for the sector.
ONE MORE THING: The $21 AI Application Stock Wall Street Forgot. While Wall Street obsesses over who’s building AI, one company is already using it to print money. And nobody’s paying attention.
AI chip stocks trade at ridiculous valuations. This company processes a trillion consumer signals monthly using AI and trades at a third of the price. The gap won’t last. The institutions will figure it out. You need to see this first. Read the FREE Report Before They Notice.
Operating Margin
Operating margin is a key measure of profitability. Think of it as net income - the bottom line - excluding the impact of taxes and interest on debt, which are less connected to business fundamentals.
Fortune Brands has been an efficient company over the last five years. It was one of the more profitable businesses in the industrials sector, boasting an average operating margin of 13.4%. This result isn’t surprising as its high gross margin gives it a favorable starting point.
Analyzing the trend in its profitability, Fortune Brands’s operating margin decreased by 9 percentage points over the last five years. Even though its historical margin was healthy, shareholders will want to see Fortune Brands become more profitable in the future.

This quarter, Fortune Brands’s breakeven margin was -0.8%, down 15 percentage points year on year. Conversely, its gross margin actually rose, so we can assume its recent inefficiencies were driven by increased operating expenses like marketing, R&D, and administrative overhead.
Earnings Per Share
Revenue trends explain a company’s historical growth, but the long-term change in earnings per share (EPS) points to the profitability of that growth — for example, a company could inflate its sales through excessive spending on advertising and promotions.
Sadly for Fortune Brands, its EPS and revenue declined by 6.5% and 9% annually over the last five years. We tend to steer our readers away from companies with falling revenue and EPS, where diminishing earnings could imply changing secular trends and preferences. If the tide turns unexpectedly, Fortune Brands’s low margin of safety could leave its stock price susceptible to large downswings.

Like with revenue, we analyze EPS over a more recent period because it can provide insight into an emerging theme or development for the business.
For Fortune Brands, its two-year annual EPS declines of 3.7% show it’s still underperforming. These results were bad no matter how you slice the data.
In Q2, Fortune Brands reported adjusted EPS of $1.35, up from $1 in the same quarter last year. This print easily cleared analysts’ estimates, and shareholders should be content with the results. Over the next 12 months, Wall Street expects Fortune Brands’s full-year EPS to shrink by 11.4% from $3.83 to $3.39.
Key Takeaways from Fortune Brands’s Q2 Results
It was good to see Fortune Brands beat analysts’ EPS expectations this quarter. We were also excited its EBITDA outperformed Wall Street’s estimates by a wide margin. Zooming out, we think this quarter featured some important positives. The stock traded up 1.9% to $53.74 immediately following the results.
Indeed, Fortune Brands had a rock-solid quarterly earnings result, but is this stock a good investment here? What happened in the latest quarter matters, but not as much as longer-term business quality and valuation, when deciding whether to invest in this stock. We cover that in our actionable full research report which you can read here (it’s free).