UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (date of earliest event reported): August 30, 2007
PEDIATRIX MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
001-12111
|
|
65-0271219 |
|
|
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation)
|
|
(Commission File
Number)
|
|
(IRS Employer
Identification No.) |
1301 Concord Terrace
Sunrise, Florida 33323
(Address of principal executive office)
Registrants telephone number, including area code (954) 384-0175
Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy
the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Item 8.01. Other Events.
On August 31, 2007, Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc. (the Company) was notified that a
shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Florida on August 30, 2007, naming the Company as a nominal defendant and also naming
as defendants certain of the Companys current and former officers and directors. The lawsuit
claims that all or some of the defendant officers and directors, among other things, violated
their fiduciary duties to the Company and the federal securities laws and engaged in corporate
waste, gross mismanagement, unjust enrichment and constructive fraud with respect to the Companys
awarding of and accounting for stock option grants since at least 1996. The Company previously
announced that the Audit Committee of its Board of Directors had completed an independent
comprehensive review of the Companys stock option practices resulting in a restatement of certain
of the Companys financial statements.
This suit was filed by a plaintiff who sent one of three previously disclosed shareholder
demand letters regarding the Companys stock option practices. Also, as previously disclosed, a
Special Committee of the Board of Directors, composed of the same directors who conducted the Audit
Committees review, determined that it was not in the best interests of the Company to take further
action against the Companys current management and directors with respect to the Companys stock
option grant practices but is considering whether to take further action with respect to any of the
Companys former management and directors.
2