e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for
the transition period from
to
.
Commission File Number: 001-31950
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
16-1690064
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1550 Utica Avenue South, Suite 100,
Minneapolis, Minnesota
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
55416
(Zip Code) |
(952) 591-3000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or
a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
As of
November 2, 2007, 82,647,173 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, were outstanding.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
UNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (substantially restricted) |
|
|
1,152,993 |
|
|
|
973,931 |
|
Receivables (substantially restricted) |
|
|
1,717,464 |
|
|
|
1,758,682 |
|
Trading investments (substantially restricted) |
|
|
62,300 |
|
|
|
145,500 |
|
Available for sale investments (substantially restricted) |
|
|
5,260,296 |
|
|
|
5,690,600 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
164,459 |
|
|
|
148,849 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
152,742 |
|
|
|
11,677 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
7,878 |
|
|
|
24,191 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
12,817 |
|
|
|
15,453 |
|
Goodwil |
|
|
421,078 |
|
|
|
421,316 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
91,451 |
|
|
|
85,938 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
9,043,478 |
|
|
$ |
9,276,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment service obligations |
|
$ |
7,907,393 |
|
|
$ |
8,209,789 |
|
Debt |
|
|
347,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
10,685 |
|
|
|
3,490 |
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits |
|
|
105,932 |
|
|
|
103,947 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
187,730 |
|
|
|
139,848 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
8,558,740 |
|
|
|
8,607,074 |
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares undesignated, $0.01 par value, 5,000,000 authorized, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares junior participating, $0.01 par value, 2,000,000 authorized, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares $.01 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 88,556,077 shares issued |
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
73,589 |
|
|
|
71,900 |
|
Retained income |
|
|
785,140 |
|
|
|
723,106 |
|
Unearned employee benefits |
|
|
(3,744 |
) |
|
|
(17,185 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(220,939 |
) |
|
|
(6,292 |
) |
Treasury stock: 5,919,016 and 4,285,783 shares at September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
(150,194 |
) |
|
|
(103,352 |
) |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
484,738 |
|
|
|
669,063 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
9,043,478 |
|
|
$ |
9,276,137 |
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
UNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Amounts and shares in thousands,
except per share data) |
|
REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue |
|
$ |
242,743 |
|
|
$ |
200,894 |
|
|
$ |
688,409 |
|
|
$ |
556,862 |
|
Investment revenue |
|
|
102,000 |
|
|
|
96,406 |
|
|
|
299,161 |
|
|
|
297,882 |
|
Net securities losses |
|
|
(3,162 |
) |
|
|
(869 |
) |
|
|
(2,679 |
) |
|
|
(1,728 |
) |
|
Total revenue |
|
|
341,581 |
|
|
|
296,431 |
|
|
|
984,891 |
|
|
|
853,016 |
|
Fee commissions expense |
|
|
105,453 |
|
|
|
83,144 |
|
|
|
295,744 |
|
|
|
226,246 |
|
Investment commissions expense |
|
|
64,899 |
|
|
|
63,520 |
|
|
|
192,467 |
|
|
|
185,346 |
|
|
Total commissions expense |
|
|
170,352 |
|
|
|
146,664 |
|
|
|
488,211 |
|
|
|
411,592 |
|
|
Net revenue |
|
|
171,229 |
|
|
|
149,767 |
|
|
|
496,680 |
|
|
|
441,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
49,572 |
|
|
|
44,753 |
|
|
|
149,966 |
|
|
|
128,473 |
|
Transaction and operations support |
|
|
44,277 |
|
|
|
41,318 |
|
|
|
128,129 |
|
|
|
112,615 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13,944 |
|
|
|
10,419 |
|
|
|
37,835 |
|
|
|
28,197 |
|
Occupancy, equipment and supplies |
|
|
11,975 |
|
|
|
9,314 |
|
|
|
33,377 |
|
|
|
26,748 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2,202 |
|
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
6,143 |
|
|
|
5,925 |
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
121,970 |
|
|
|
107,807 |
|
|
|
355,450 |
|
|
|
301,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
49,259 |
|
|
|
41,960 |
|
|
|
141,230 |
|
|
|
139,466 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
14,967 |
|
|
|
11,922 |
|
|
|
44,740 |
|
|
|
41,787 |
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
34,292 |
|
|
$ |
30,038 |
|
|
$ |
96,490 |
|
|
$ |
97,679 |
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average outstanding common shares |
|
|
82,488 |
|
|
|
84,298 |
|
|
|
82,956 |
|
|
|
84,468 |
|
Additional dilutive shares related to stock-based compensation |
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
Average outstanding and potentially dilutive common shares |
|
|
83,451 |
|
|
|
85,799 |
|
|
|
84,139 |
|
|
|
86,152 |
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
UNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
34,292 |
|
|
$ |
30,038 |
|
|
$ |
96,490 |
|
|
$ |
97,679 |
|
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net holding (losses) gains arising during the period, net of tax (benefit)
expense of ($88,785) and $22,689 for the three months ended September
30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and ($126,075) and ($8,306) for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively |
|
|
(144,857 |
) |
|
|
37,019 |
|
|
|
(205,699 |
) |
|
|
(13,551 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for net realized losses included in net income,
net of tax benefit of $1,202 and $330 for the three months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $1,018 and $657 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively |
|
|
1,961 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
1,661 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
(142,896 |
) |
|
|
37,558 |
|
|
|
(204,038 |
) |
|
|
(12,480 |
) |
|
Net unrealized (losses) on derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net holding (losses) arising during the period, net of tax (benefit) of
($9,716) and ($10,844), for the three months ended September 30, 2007
and 2006, respectively and ($4,836) and ($4,373) for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively |
|
|
(15,854 |
) |
|
|
(17,692 |
) |
|
|
(7,891 |
) |
|
|
(7,136 |
) |
Reclassifications adjustment for net unrealized (gains) losses included in net
income, net of tax (expense) benefit of ($976) and $2,248 for the three months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and ($4,306) and $4,158
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively |
|
|
(1,592 |
) |
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
(7,025 |
) |
|
|
6,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
(17,446 |
) |
|
|
(14,025 |
) |
|
|
(14,916 |
) |
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
Prior service costs for pension and postretirement benefit plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of prior service costs for pension and postretirement benefit
plans recorded to net income, net of tax benefit of $18 and $54 for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss for pension and postretirement benefit plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of net actuarial loss for pension and postretirement benefit
plans recorded to net income, net of tax benefit of $417 and $1,251 for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively |
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains, net of tax expense of $815 and
$30 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively,
and $1,368 and $1,574 for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 and 2006, respectively |
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(158,321 |
) |
|
|
23,581 |
|
|
|
(214,647 |
) |
|
|
(10,262 |
) |
|
COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME |
|
$ |
(124,029 |
) |
|
$ |
53,619 |
|
|
$ |
(118,157 |
) |
|
$ |
87,417 |
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
UNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
34,292 |
|
|
$ |
30,038 |
|
|
$ |
96,490 |
|
|
$ |
97,679 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13,944 |
|
|
|
10,419 |
|
|
|
37,835 |
|
|
|
28,197 |
|
Investment impairment charges |
|
|
4,629 |
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
6,124 |
|
|
|
3,529 |
|
Net gain on sale of investments |
|
|
(1,467 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(3,445 |
) |
|
|
(1,801 |
) |
Net
amortization of investment discounts |
|
|
(3,895 |
) |
|
|
(2,773 |
) |
|
|
(12,989 |
) |
|
|
(5,721 |
) |
Provision for uncollectible receivables |
|
|
2,828 |
|
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
6,780 |
|
|
|
2,763 |
|
Other non-cash items, net |
|
|
3,835 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
11,214 |
|
|
|
(1,570 |
) |
Changes in foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
2,569 |
|
Changes in other assets |
|
|
(8,039 |
) |
|
|
(1,986 |
) |
|
|
(5,288 |
) |
|
|
723 |
|
Changes in accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
11,936 |
|
|
|
6,053 |
|
|
|
21,917 |
|
|
|
2,784 |
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
25,101 |
|
|
|
14,225 |
|
|
|
64,381 |
|
|
|
31,473 |
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents (substantially restricted) |
|
|
(161,391 |
) |
|
|
(98,608 |
) |
|
|
(166,296 |
) |
|
|
(43,823 |
) |
Change in trading investments, net (substantially restricted) |
|
|
58,900 |
|
|
|
(55,575 |
) |
|
|
83,200 |
|
|
|
33,350 |
|
Change in receivables, net (substantially restricted) |
|
|
55,140 |
|
|
|
12,052 |
|
|
|
34,439 |
|
|
|
(178,935 |
) |
Change in payment service obligations |
|
|
(304,142 |
) |
|
|
(316,147 |
) |
|
|
(302,396 |
) |
|
|
(292,985 |
) |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(292,100 |
) |
|
|
(414,015 |
) |
|
|
(190,182 |
) |
|
|
(353,241 |
) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of investments classified as available-for-sale |
|
|
12,112 |
|
|
|
306,400 |
|
|
|
321,687 |
|
|
|
419,886 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of investments classified as available-for-sale |
|
|
148,710 |
|
|
|
239,261 |
|
|
|
536,569 |
|
|
|
625,567 |
|
Purchases of investments classified as available-for-sale |
|
|
(29,391 |
) |
|
|
(103,511 |
) |
|
|
(758,898 |
) |
|
|
(596,252 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(23,431 |
) |
|
|
(17,102 |
) |
|
|
(53,442 |
) |
|
|
(57,299 |
) |
Cash paid for acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,741 |
|
|
|
(1,116 |
) |
|
|
(7,311 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
108,000 |
|
|
|
430,789 |
|
|
|
44,800 |
|
|
|
384,591 |
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in credit facilities |
|
|
197,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds and tax benefit from exercise of share-based compensation |
|
|
3,736 |
|
|
|
4,135 |
|
|
|
6,867 |
|
|
|
25,128 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(12,482 |
) |
|
|
(17,504 |
) |
|
|
(45,992 |
) |
|
|
(46,236 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(4,154 |
) |
|
|
(3,405 |
) |
|
|
(12,493 |
) |
|
|
(10,242 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
184,100 |
|
|
|
(16,774 |
) |
|
|
145,382 |
|
|
|
(31,350 |
) |
|
CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS End of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
UNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
Other |
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
Additional |
|
Retained |
|
Benefits |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Stock in |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Income |
|
and Other |
|
Loss |
|
Treasury |
|
Total |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
886 |
|
|
$ |
71,900 |
|
|
$ |
723,106 |
|
|
$ |
(17,185 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,292 |
) |
|
$ |
(103,352 |
) |
|
$ |
669,063 |
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,963 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,490 |
|
Dividends ($0.15 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,493 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,493 |
) |
Employee benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
14,280 |
|
Treasury shares acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,992 |
) |
|
|
(45,992 |
) |
Unrealized foreign currency translation
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,233 |
|
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale
securities, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(204,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(204,038 |
) |
Unrealized loss on derivative financial
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,916 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,916 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost for pension
and postretirement benefits, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
Amortization of unrealized losses on pension
and postretirement benefits, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
886 |
|
|
$ |
73,589 |
|
|
$ |
785,140 |
|
|
$ |
(3,744 |
) |
|
$ |
(220,939 |
) |
|
$ |
(150,194 |
) |
|
$ |
484,738 |
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of MoneyGram International, Inc.
(MoneyGram or the Company) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01
of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary
for a fair presentation have been included and are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results
for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for future periods. For further information, refer to the Consolidated
Financial Statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006.
2. Acquisitions
Money
Express On May 31, 2006, MoneyGram completed the
acquisition of Money Express S.r.l. (Money Express), the Companys
former super agent in Italy. In connection with the acquisition, the Company formed MoneyGram
Payment Systems Italy S.r.l., a wholly-owned subsidiary, to operate the former Money Express network. The
acquisition provides the Company with the opportunity for further network expansion and more
control of marketing and promotional activities in the region.
MoneyGram acquired Money Express for $15.0 million. The acquisition cost included $1.3 million of
transaction costs and the forgiveness of $0.7 million of liabilities. The Company has finalized its
purchase price allocation, which resulted in a decrease of $0.3 million to goodwill during the
second quarter of 2007. Purchased intangible assets of $7.7 million, consisting primarily of agent
contracts and a non-compete agreement, will be amortized over useful lives ranging from three to
five years. Goodwill of $16.7 million was recorded and assigned to the Companys Global Funds
Transfer segment.
The operating results of Money Express subsequent to May 31, 2006 are included in the Companys
Consolidated Statements of Income. The financial impact of the acquisition is not material to the
Consolidated Balance Sheets or Consolidated Statements of Income.
ACH Commerce The Company purchased ACH Commerce in April 2005 for $8.5 million, of which $1.1
million was to be paid upon the second anniversary of the acquisition. Based on the terms of the
acquisition agreement, the Company paid this amount during the second quarter of 2007.
Subsequent Event On October 1, 2007, the Company acquired PropertyBridge, Inc. (PropertyBridge)
for $28.0 million, subject to certain post-closing adjustments and a potential earn-out payment
of up to $10.0 million contingent on PropertyBridges performance during 2008. PropertyBridge is a
provider of electronic payment processing services for the real
estate management industry and offers a complete solution to the resident payment cycle, including the ability to
electronically accept deposits and rent payments. Residents
can pay rent online, by phone or in person and set up recurring payments. PropertyBridge will be a
component of the Companys Global Funds Transfer segment.
3. Unrestricted Assets
The Company is regulated by various state agencies which generally require us to maintain liquid
assets and investments with an investment rating of A or higher in an amount generally equal to the
payment service obligation for those regulated payment instruments, namely teller checks, agent
checks, money orders and money transfers. Consequently, a significant amount of cash and cash
equivalents, receivables and investments are restricted to satisfy the liability to pay the face
amount of regulated payment service obligations upon presentment. The Company is not regulated by
state agencies for payment service obligations resulting from outstanding cashiers checks.
However, the Company restricts a portion of the funds related to these payment instruments due to
contractual arrangements and Company policy. The Company also
maintains several special purpose entities for the benefit of our
official check customers in which we are required to hold investments
with a value sufficient to cover the clearance of items. Assets restricted for regulatory or contractual
reasons are not available to satisfy working capital or other financing requirements. The
regulatory and contractual requirements do not require the Company to specify individual assets
held to meet the Companys payment service obligations, nor is the Company required to deposit
specific assets into a trust, escrow or other special account. Rather, the Company must maintain a
pool of liquid assets. No third party places limitations, legal or otherwise, on the Company
regarding the use of its individual liquid assets. The Company is able to withdraw, deposit or
sell
its individual liquid assets at will, with no prior notice or penalty, provided the Company
maintains a total pool of liquid assets sufficient to meet the regulatory and contractual
requirements.
8
The Company has unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, receivables and investments to the extent
those assets exceed all payment service obligations. These amounts are generally available for use
by the Company. However, management considers a portion of these amounts as providing additional
assurance that regulatory and other requirements are met during the normal fluctuations in the
value of investments. The following table shows the total amount of unrestricted assets at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,152,993 |
|
|
$ |
973,931 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
1,717,464 |
|
|
|
1,758,682 |
|
Trading investments |
|
|
62,300 |
|
|
|
145,500 |
|
Available-for-sale investments |
|
|
5,260,296 |
|
|
|
5,690,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,193,053 |
|
|
|
8,568,713 |
|
Amounts restricted to cover payment service obligations |
|
|
(7,907,393 |
) |
|
|
(8,209,789 |
) |
|
Unrestricted assets |
|
$ |
285,660 |
|
|
$ |
358,924 |
|
|
4. Investments (Substantially Restricted)
At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, no investments were classified as held-to-maturity.
Trading investments, which consist of auction rate securities, have contractual maturities in the
year 2049, with auction dates typically 28 days after the date the Company purchases the security.
The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale investments were as follows at September
30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
595,981 |
|
|
$ |
18,851 |
|
|
$ |
(188 |
) |
|
$ |
614,644 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
355,178 |
|
|
|
2,992 |
|
|
|
(20,684 |
) |
|
|
337,486 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,497,590 |
|
|
|
4,025 |
|
|
|
(24,664 |
) |
|
|
1,476,951 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
2,444,042 |
|
|
|
16,399 |
|
|
|
(281,161 |
) |
|
|
2,179,280 |
|
U.S. government agencies |
|
|
386,992 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
(1,612 |
) |
|
|
386,622 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
249,743 |
|
|
|
4,392 |
|
|
|
(6,637 |
) |
|
|
247,498 |
|
Preferred and common stock |
|
|
20,175 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(2,365 |
) |
|
|
17,815 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,549,701 |
|
|
$ |
47,906 |
|
|
$ |
(337,311 |
) |
|
$ |
5,260,296 |
|
|
9
The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale investments were as follows at December 31,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
765,525 |
|
|
$ |
25,006 |
|
|
$ |
(490 |
) |
|
$ |
790,041 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
585,611 |
|
|
|
6,659 |
|
|
|
(2,148 |
) |
|
|
590,122 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,623,220 |
|
|
|
3,876 |
|
|
|
(23,219 |
) |
|
|
1,603,877 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
1,992,164 |
|
|
|
36,920 |
|
|
|
(7,839 |
) |
|
|
2,021,245 |
|
U.S. government agencies |
|
|
342,749 |
|
|
|
2,564 |
|
|
|
(6,589 |
) |
|
|
338,724 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
311,465 |
|
|
|
7,745 |
|
|
|
(470 |
) |
|
|
318,740 |
|
Preferred and common stock |
|
|
30,175 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(2,337 |
) |
|
|
27,851 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,650,909 |
|
|
$ |
82,783 |
|
|
$ |
(43,092 |
) |
|
$ |
5,690,600 |
|
|
In rating
the securities in its investment portfolio, the Company uses ratings
from Moodys Investors Service (Moodys),
Standard & Poors (S&P) and Fitch Ratings
(Fitch). If the rating agencies have split ratings, the Company uses
the highest rating from either Moodys or S&P. Securities issued or backed by U.S. government
agencies are included in the AAA rating category. Investment grade is defined as a security having
a Moodys equivalent rating of Aaa, Aa, A or Baa or an S&P or Fitch equivalent rating
of AAA, AA, A or BBB. At September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, the Companys investment
portfolio consisted of the following ratings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Number of |
|
Fair |
|
% of Total |
|
Number of |
|
Fair |
|
% of Total |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Securities |
|
Value |
|
Portfolio |
|
Securities |
|
Value |
|
Portfolio |
|
|
AAA, including U.S. agencies |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
2,719,761 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
2,999,500 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
AA |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
1,303,232 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
1,233,254 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
A |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
999,961 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
1,206,583 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
BBB |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
88,361 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
58,009 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Below investment grade |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
148,981 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
193,254 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
$ |
5,260,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
$ |
5,690,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From July 1, 2007 through October 31, 2007, 33 securities were downgraded and 11 securities were
upgraded by one or more rating agencies. The rating agencies are continuing to review the credit
ratings for all securities, particularly asset-backed securities. The
Company does not believe the ratings changes have a material impact
on the fair value of the securities as of September 30, 2007.
The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities at September 30, 2007, by
contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities as
borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations, sometimes without call or prepayment
penalties. Maturities of mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities depend on the repayment
characteristics and experience of the underlying obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
In one year or less |
|
$ |
10,161 |
|
|
$ |
10,163 |
|
After one year through five years |
|
|
466,967 |
|
|
|
473,562 |
|
After five years through ten years |
|
|
528,904 |
|
|
|
541,250 |
|
After ten years |
|
|
226,684 |
|
|
|
223,789 |
|
Mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities |
|
|
4,296,810 |
|
|
|
3,993,717 |
|
Preferred and common stock |
|
|
20,175 |
|
|
|
17,815 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,549,701 |
|
|
$ |
5,260,296 |
|
|
10
At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, net unrealized losses of $289.4 million
($179.4 million net of tax benefit) and gains of $39.7 million ($24.6 million net of tax expense),
respectively, are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in Accumulated other comprehensive
loss. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, losses of $2.0 million and $1.7
million, respectively, were reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss to earnings in
connection with the sales and maturities of the underlying securities, compared to losses of $0.5
million and $1.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.
Gross realized gains and losses on sales of investments, using the specific identification method,
and other-than-temporary impairments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Gross realized gains |
|
$ |
1,467 |
|
|
$ |
1,552 |
|
|
$ |
5,396 |
|
|
$ |
4,399 |
|
Gross realized losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,330 |
) |
|
|
(1,951 |
) |
|
|
(2,598 |
) |
Other-than-temporary impairments |
|
|
(4,629 |
) |
|
|
(1,091 |
) |
|
|
(6,124 |
) |
|
|
(3,529 |
) |
|
Net securities losses |
|
$ |
(3,162 |
) |
|
$ |
(869 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,679 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,728 |
) |
|
Impairments in the three months ended September 30, 2007 related to two investments backed
primarily by home equity loans and one security backed by a diversified asset-backed pool,
including home equity loans, manufactured housing loans and aircraft leases. One investment backed
primarily by home equity loans experienced an adverse change in cash flows as a result of credit
rating downgrades in the third quarter of 2007, while the other security experienced an adverse
change in cash flows as a result of the tight credit market for commercial paper. The tight credit
market caused this security to utilize its alternative funding vehicle, which has a higher cost and
reduced cash flows available to the investors. The security backed by a diversified asset-backed
pool experienced an adverse change in cash flows as a result of credit rating downgrades in the
third quarter of 2007 that reflected collateral losses in the underlying pool. The nine months
ended September 30, 2007 also included impairments to investments backed by home equity loans
recorded in the first half of the year as a result of an adverse change in cash flows. Impairments
in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 related primarily to investments backed by
automobile, aircraft and manufactured housing collateral.
Exposure to Sub-prime Mortgages
The Company holds securities that are collateralized by sub-prime mortgages which are classified in
Other asset-backed securities. At September 30, 2007, $336.2 million, or less than 7 percent of
the fair value of the Companys $5,260.3 million investment portfolio, had direct exposure to
sub-prime mortgages as collateral. Nearly all of these securities had investment grade ratings. In
considering securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, it is important to note the vintage,
or year of origination, of the mortgages as the industry loss experience in pre-2006 vintages appears to be
much lower than the 2006 and 2007 vintages. Of the Companys $336.2 million direct exposure to
sub-prime mortgages, $298.4 million relates to sub-prime mortgages originated prior to 2006.
Following is the fair value of securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages at September 30,
2007 by vintage (based on the original security issuance date) and rating:
Direct
exposure to sub-prime mortgages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vintage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
earlier |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
AAA |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,231 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
32,982 |
|
|
$ |
44,213 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
AA |
|
|
4,574 |
|
|
|
21,946 |
|
|
|
37,574 |
|
|
|
38,874 |
|
|
|
51,136 |
|
|
|
154,104 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,339 |
|
|
|
18,382 |
|
|
|
81,344 |
|
|
|
17,695 |
|
|
|
128,760 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
BBB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,088 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Below investment grade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,574 |
|
|
$ |
33,285 |
|
|
$ |
67,187 |
|
|
$ |
129,361 |
|
|
$ |
101,813 |
|
|
$ |
336,220 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Vintage as a
percent of total direct sub-prime exposure |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
At
September 30, 2007, Other asset-backed securities with a fair value of $2,179.3 million had
gross unrealized losses of $281.2 million, which includes gross unrealized losses of $34.1 million
for securities with direct exposure to sub-prime mortgages as collateral. These unrealized losses
are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet in Accumulated other comprehensive loss.
11
Also included in Other asset-backed securities are collateralized debt
obligations (CDOs) which are backed by diversified collateral pools that may include sub-prime
mortgages of various vintages. Following is the fair value of CDOs
with indirect sub-prime mortgage exposure
by CDO type and rating. The Company
defines high grade CDOs as those having collateral with an A- or better average rating at purchase,
while mezzanine asset-backed CDOs are defined as those having collateral with a BBB/BBB- average
rating at purchase.
Indirect
exposure to sub-prime mortgages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Grade |
|
|
Mezzanine |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
AAA, including U.S. agencies |
|
$ |
92,165 |
|
|
$ |
106,883 |
|
|
$ |
199,048 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
AA |
|
|
27,240 |
|
|
|
97,774 |
|
|
|
125,014 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
A |
|
|
22,564 |
|
|
|
111,778 |
|
|
|
134,342 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
BBB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,326 |
|
|
|
17,326 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Below investment grade |
|
|
7,089 |
|
|
|
18,139 |
|
|
|
25,228 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
149,058 |
|
|
$ |
351,900 |
|
|
$ |
500,958 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDO type as
a percent of total indirect sub-prime exposure |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Determination
The Company determines the fair value of its securities using both external and internal sources.
The Company sends its entire portfolio to a third party pricing service every month-end to request
pricing. This third party pricing service uses a combination of quoted prices, broker pricing and
matrix pricing depending on the nature of the individual securities. If the third party pricing
service is not able to price a security, the Company requests pricing from various brokers. If the
Company is not able to obtain pricing from its pricing service or a broker, the Company will
internally value the security using the best available market information, pricing models and, in
certain circumstances, its own assumptions regarding how a similar market participant would value
the security. The assumptions used by the Company include expected cash flows from the security,
risk and liquidity premiums, default rates on the collateral specific to the security and interest
rate movements. In limited circumstances, as part of the normal pricing process, the Company will evaluate
pricing received from third party pricing services and brokers for reasonableness against
internal expectations. If a price falls outside of expectations, the Company will internally value
the security and evaluate the assumptions used by the third party, if possible. After evaluating the
available information, the Company may determine that the third party price does not reflect the
assumptions that a similar market participant would use in valuing the security. In these
limited circumstances, the Company will use its internal price rather
than the third party price.
During 2007, brokers have become increasingly unwilling to provide pricing on certain securities,
requiring the Company to internally value more securities. We expect this trend to continue for the
foreseeable future. Following are the categories of pricing for the Companys portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Third party pricing service |
|
$ |
3,065,508 |
|
|
|
58 |
% |
|
$ |
3,605,963 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
Broker pricing |
|
|
1,411,708 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
1,986,502 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
Internal pricing |
|
|
783,080 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
98,135 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,260,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,690,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Assessment of Unrealized Losses
At September 30, 2007, the available-for-sale investment portfolio had the following aged
unrealized losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or More |
|
Total |
|
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
$ |
5,238 |
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
5,176 |
|
|
$ |
(162 |
) |
|
$ |
10,414 |
|
|
$ |
(188 |
) |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
197,433 |
|
|
|
(19,086 |
) |
|
|
28,290 |
|
|
|
(1,598 |
) |
|
|
225,723 |
|
|
|
(20,684 |
) |
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
178,699 |
|
|
|
(5,373 |
) |
|
|
975,197 |
|
|
|
(19,291 |
) |
|
|
1,153,896 |
|
|
|
(24,664 |
) |
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
1,509,175 |
|
|
|
(246,476 |
) |
|
|
292,440 |
|
|
|
(34,685 |
) |
|
|
1,801,615 |
|
|
|
(281,161 |
) |
U.S. government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326,085 |
|
|
|
(1,612 |
) |
|
|
326,085 |
|
|
|
(1,612 |
) |
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
110,270 |
|
|
|
(6,150 |
) |
|
|
14,515 |
|
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
124,785 |
|
|
|
(6,637 |
) |
Preferred and common stock |
|
|
5,371 |
|
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
12,436 |
|
|
|
(2,028 |
) |
|
|
17,807 |
|
|
|
(2,365 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
2,006,186 |
|
|
$ |
(277,448 |
) |
|
$ |
1,654,139 |
|
|
$ |
(59,863 |
) |
|
$ |
3,660,325 |
|
|
$ |
(337,311 |
) |
|
At December 31, 2006, the available-for-sale investment portfolio had the following aged unrealized
losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or More |
|
Total |
|
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Obligations
of states and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
22,467 |
|
|
$ |
(180 |
) |
|
$ |
25,075 |
|
|
$ |
(310 |
) |
|
$ |
47,542 |
|
|
$ |
(490 |
) |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
97,747 |
|
|
|
(812 |
) |
|
|
110,859 |
|
|
|
(1,336 |
) |
|
|
208,606 |
|
|
|
(2,148 |
) |
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
173,179 |
|
|
|
(653 |
) |
|
|
1,213,278 |
|
|
|
(22,566 |
) |
|
|
1,386,457 |
|
|
|
(23,219 |
) |
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
292,742 |
|
|
|
(2,066 |
) |
|
|
318,944 |
|
|
|
(5,773 |
) |
|
|
611,686 |
|
|
|
(7,839 |
) |
U.S. government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321,117 |
|
|
|
(6,589 |
) |
|
|
321,117 |
|
|
|
(6,589 |
) |
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
6,306 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
60,832 |
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
67,138 |
|
|
|
(470 |
) |
Preferred and common stock |
|
|
5,663 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
12,173 |
|
|
|
(2,292 |
) |
|
|
17,836 |
|
|
|
(2,337 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
598,104 |
|
|
$ |
(3,763 |
) |
|
$ |
2,062,278 |
|
|
$ |
(39,329 |
) |
|
$ |
2,660,382 |
|
|
$ |
(43,092 |
) |
|
As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, 171 and 188 securities, respectively, had
unrealized losses for more than 12 months. The unrealized losses were caused by a general lack of
liquidity in the asset-backed securities market and deterioration in the broader credit markets
(the market disruption). This market disruption was triggered by concerns surrounding sub-prime
mortgage-backed securities, but also extended to other asset-backed securities in the market. The
Company believes that the unrealized losses generally are caused by liquidity discounts and risk
premiums required by market participants in response to current market conditions. Market conditions at September 30,
2007 primarily reflect wider credit spreads due to heightened concerns regarding the risk of
securities backed by mortgage-based collateral, historically low levels of activity in the related
market for these securities and a tighter credit market. These market
conditions have not adversely impacted the cash flow performance of these securities at this time,
nor have any adverse changes in expected future cash flow performance been identified at this time
based on information available through the date of this filing. The Company believes at this time that
these market conditions are temporary and will improve on a gradual basis.
The Company
regularly monitors its investment portfolio to ensure that investments that may be
other-than-temporarily impaired are identified in a timely manner and that any impairments are
charged against earnings in the proper period. Pursuant to the Companys impairment review process,
changes in individual security values are regularly monitored to identify potential impairment
indicators, such as credit rating downgrades, accelerating default rates on underlying collateral
and changes in cash flow performance. The process includes a monthly global assessment of the
Companys portfolio given current market conditions, as well as a monthly review of all securities
using a screening process to identify those securities for which fair value falls below established
thresholds for certain time periods, or which are identified through other monitoring criteria such
as credit ratings downgrades. The Company evaluates the facts related to the individual securities
identified as a result of this process, including cash flow performance, actual default rates
compared to default rates assumed in determining expected cash flows, subordination available as
credit protection on the Companys investment and the impact of any credit rating downgrades on
expected future cash flows. The Company also considers its intent and ability to hold the security
for a time sufficient to recover its amortized cost. The Company utilizes a buy and hold strategy
for its portfolio, and generally does not utilize its portfolio for liquidity purposes. While this
strategy does not factor into the pricing of securities, it does factor into the Companys
assessment of other-than-temporary
impairments. The Company believes that if cash flows continue to perform as expected, the Company
will be able to recover its amortized cost prior to or upon maturity or call of the security. Given the
facts and circumstances of the securities in an unrealized loss position, particularly the
continued cash flow performance as expected, the Company has determined that the securities
presented in the above unrealized loss table are temporarily impaired as of the date of this
filing. The Company has both the intent and ability to hold these investments to recovery.
13
Following is an assessment of the securities in an unrealized loss position at September 30, 2007
by rating and degree of loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss less than/equal to 20% |
|
|
Unrealized loss greater than 20% |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Securities |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
AAA, including U.S. agencies |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
1,730,839 |
|
|
|
(49,881 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
50,193 |
|
|
|
(18,824 |
) |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
1,781,032 |
|
|
|
(68,705 |
) |
AA |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
806,790 |
|
|
|
(71,640 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
96,034 |
|
|
|
(30,883 |
) |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
902,824 |
|
|
|
(102,523 |
) |
A |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
669,276 |
|
|
|
(59,949 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
171,306 |
|
|
|
(68,734 |
) |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
840,582 |
|
|
|
(128,683 |
) |
BBB |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
20,350 |
|
|
|
(2,582 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
38,109 |
|
|
|
(19,074 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
58,459 |
|
|
|
(21,656 |
) |
Below investment grade |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
59,296 |
|
|
|
(7,950 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
18,131 |
|
|
|
(7,794 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
77,427 |
|
|
|
(15,744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
$ |
3,286,551 |
|
|
$ |
(192,002 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
$ |
373,773 |
|
|
$ |
(145,309 |
) |
|
|
445 |
|
|
$ |
3,660,324 |
|
|
$ |
(337,311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the $337.3 million in
unrealized losses, $321.6 million
relates to securities with an investment grade rating. All of the
securities in an unrealized loss position continue to have cash flow performance as expected. The
$145.3 million of unrealized losses that are greater than 20 percent of amortized cost are comprised of 49
securities categorized in Other asset-backed securities
and four securities categorized in Commercial mortgage-backed
securities. Twenty-six securities are
mezzanine asset-backed CDOs, seven securities are high-grade asset-backed CDOs and three are
sub-prime mortgage securities. The remaining seventeen are asset-backed
securities that include a broad range of
collateral types. The Company believes that the decline in fair value on these securities is
primarily attributable to the market disruption caused by the sub-prime concerns and not credit
quality. These securities do not tend to be influenced by the credit of the issuer, but rather the
characteristics and projected cash flows of the underlying collateral.
5. Derivative Financial Instruments
The notional amount of the Companys swap agreements totaled $1.5 billion and $2.6 billion at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, with an average fixed pay rate of 4.4
percent and 4.3 percent and an average variable receive rate of 4.8 percent and 5.2 percent at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. The variable rate portion of the swaps is
generally based on federal funds, LIBOR or Treasury bill. As the swap payments are settled, the net
difference between the fixed amount the Company pays and the variable amount the Company receives
is reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income in Investment commissions expense. The
amount recognized in earnings due to ineffectiveness of the cash flow hedges was not material for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. As of September 30, 2007, the Company
estimates that $1.6 million (net of tax) of the unrealized gain included in Accumulated other
comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets will be recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Income in Investment commissions expense within the next 12 months as the swap
payments are settled.
6. Sale of Receivables
The balance of sold receivables as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was $321.5 million
and $297.6 million, respectively. The average receivables sold totaled $356.3 million and $365.3
million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, and $390.0 million
and $385.9 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. The
expense of selling the agent receivables is included in the Consolidated Statements of Income in
Investment commissions expense and totaled $5.9 million and $17.9 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, and $6.2 million and $17.7 million for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.
7. Income Taxes
The Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation
(FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, on January 1, 2007. The cumulative
effect of applying FIN No. 48 is reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained
income. As a result of the implementation of FIN No. 48, the Company recognized a $29.6 million
increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, a $7.6 million increase in deferred tax
assets and a $22.0 million reduction to the opening balance of retained income. The $29.6 million
increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits is recorded as a non-cash item in Accounts
payable and other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
14
As of January 1, 2007, the liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $39.1 million, which is
included in Accounts payable and other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Of the
$39.1 million, $31.4 million could impact the effective tax rate if recognized.
The balance at
January 1, 2007 includes $5.7 million for interest and penalties. The Company records interest and
penalties for unrecognized tax benefits in Income tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of
Income. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company recognized $1.1
million and $2.7 million in interest and penalties, respectively.
The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction
and various states and foreign jurisdictions. With a few exceptions, the Company is no longer
subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or foreign income tax examinations for years prior to
2004. The Company is currently subject to U.S. Federal, certain state and foreign income tax
examinations for 2004 through 2006.
The effective tax rate was 30.4 percent and 31.7 percent for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively, compared to 28.4 percent and 30.0 percent for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. The increase in the effective rate is due to tax
exempt investment income declining as a percentage of total pre-tax income.
8. Stockholders Equity
The Company has authorization to repurchase up to 12.0 million shares, including 5.0 million shares
approved by the Board of Directors on May 9, 2007. During the three and nine months ended September
30, 2007, the Company repurchased 470,000 shares and 1,620,000 shares of its common stock at an
average cost of $26.56 per share and $28.39 per share, respectively. As of September 30, 2007, the
Company had repurchased 6.8 million shares under the authorization and has remaining authorization
to purchase up to 5.2 million shares. Following is a summary of common stock issued and
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Common shares issued |
|
|
88,556 |
|
|
|
88,556 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(5,919 |
) |
|
|
(4,286 |
) |
Restricted stock |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
(323 |
) |
Shares held in employee equity trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
82,395 |
|
|
|
83,491 |
|
|
Following is a summary of treasury stock share activity during the nine months ended September 30,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
4,286 |
|
Stock repurchases |
|
|
1,620 |
|
Issuance of stock for exercise of stock options |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Submission of shares for withholding taxes upon exercise of stock
options and release of restricted stock |
|
|
85 |
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007 |
|
|
5,919 |
|
|
The Company has an employee equity trust (the Trust) that was used to fund the issuance of shares
under employee compensation and benefit plans. The fair value of the shares held by the Trust as of
December 31, 2006 is recorded in the Unearned employee benefits component in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The balance is reduced as shares were released to fund employee benefits.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company released 456,393 shares upon the
exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock. As of September 30, 2007, there are
no shares remaining in the Trust.
15
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on securities classified as available-for-sale |
|
$ |
(179,431 |
) |
|
$ |
24,607 |
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivative financial instruments |
|
|
(3,571 |
) |
|
|
11,345 |
|
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
8,244 |
|
|
|
6,011 |
|
Prior service cost for pension and postretirement benefits |
|
|
(1,027 |
) |
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
Unrealized losses on pension and postretirement benefits |
|
|
(45,154 |
) |
|
|
(47,140 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(220,939 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,292 |
) |
|
9. Pensions and Other Benefits
Net periodic pension benefit expense for the Companys defined benefit pension plan and the
combined supplemental executive retirement plans (SERPs) and the defined benefit postretirement
plans includes the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
and SERPs |
|
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
574 |
|
|
$ |
480 |
|
|
$ |
1,724 |
|
|
$ |
1,441 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
523 |
|
|
$ |
478 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
2,975 |
|
|
|
2,896 |
|
|
|
8,925 |
|
|
|
8,689 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(2,521 |
) |
|
|
(2,231 |
) |
|
|
(7,563 |
) |
|
|
(6,694 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
(221 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
3,170 |
|
|
|
3,241 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
2,206 |
|
|
$ |
2,401 |
|
|
$ |
6,618 |
|
|
$ |
7,204 |
|
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
997 |
|
|
$ |
811 |
|
|
|
|
Benefits
paid through the defined benefit pension plan and the combined SERPs
were $4.1 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $12.2
million and $12.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
Company made contributions to the combined SERPs totaling $0.9 million and $2.6 million during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. No contributions were made to the
defined benefit pension plan during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. The Company
made contributions to the defined benefit pension plan and the combined SERPs totaling $14.0
million and $20.9 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006. Benefits paid
through, and contributions made to, the defined benefit postretirement plans were less than $0.1
million for both the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 and were $0.2 million and $0.1
million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The net loss and prior service cost for the defined benefit pension plan and SERPs that the Company
amortized from Accumulated other comprehensive loss into
Net periodic benefit expense was $1.1
million ($0.7 million, net of tax) and $0.1 million (less than $0.1 million, net of tax),
respectively, during the three months ended September 30, 2007 and $3.2 million ($2.0 million, net
of tax) and $0.4 million ($0.2 million, net of tax), respectively, during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. The net loss and prior service credit for the defined benefit postretirement
plan amortized from Accumulated other comprehensive loss
into Net periodic benefit expense was
nominal during the three months ended September 30, 2007 and $0.1 million (less than $0.1 million,
net of tax) and $0.2 million ($0.1 million, net of tax), respectively, during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007.
Contribution expense for the 401(k) defined contribution plan totaled $0.9 million and $0.8 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $2.5 million and $2.1
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006, respectively. In addition, the Company made discretionary profit sharing contributions to the
401(k) defined contribution plan totaling $2.5 million and $2.1 million during the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
16
10. Debt
The Company has a bank credit facility providing availability up to $350.0 million in the form of a
$250.0 million four-year revolving credit facility and a $100.0 million term loan. At December 31,
2006, the Company had outstanding borrowings under the credit facility of $150.0 million,
consisting of a $100.0 million term loan and $50.0 million under the revolving credit facility. On
September 24, 2007, the Company borrowed $197.0 million under the revolving credit facility. The
proceeds were invested in cash equivalents to supplement the
Companys unrestricted assets, and were also
used to fund the acquisition of PropertyBridge on October 1, 2007. At September 30, 2007, the
Company had
outstanding borrowings under the credit facility consisting of $247.0 million under the revolving
credit facility and a $100.0 million term loan. The maturity date of both the revolving credit
facility and term loan is June 2010. The revolving credit facility may be increased to $500.0
million under certain circumstances. The interest rate applicable to both the credit facility and
the term loan is LIBOR plus 50 basis points, subject to adjustment in the event of a change in the
credit rating of our senior unsecured debt. The usage fees on the facility range from 0.08 percent
to 0.25 percent of outstanding borrowings, depending on the credit rating of our senior unsecured
debt. Changes in the Companys credit rating from any of the credit rating agencies could affect
the interest rate and fees paid under the facility. At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
the interest rate under the Companys bank credit facility was 5.70 percent and 5.86 percent,
respectively, exclusive of the effect of commitment fees and other costs, and the usage fee was
0.125 percent.
At
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the interest rate swaps used to hedge the cash flows
of a portion of the Companys variable rate debt had an average fixed pay rate of 4.3 percent and
an average variable receive rate of 4.7 percent and 4.6 percent, respectively. See Note 5 for
further information regarding the Companys portfolio of derivative financial instruments.
Subsequent
Event
On
October 31, 2007, the Company obtained a Commitment Letter from
JPMorgan Chase Bank to provide a $150.0 million 364-day
unsecured revolving credit facility. The credit facility would have
substantially the same terms as the Companys existing credit
facility, which will remain in place. The interest rate under the new
credit facility will be, at the Companys option, either (a) LIBOR plus 60
basis points or (b) the higher of the prime rate or the federal
funds rate plus 50 basis points. In either case, the interest rate is
subject to adjustment in the event of a change in the credit rating
of the Companys
senior unsecured debt. The usage fees under the new credit
facility will range from 0.15 percent to 0.35 percent of outstanding
borrowings, depending on the credit rating of the Companys senior unsecured
debt.
11. Stock-Based Compensation
Option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the quoted market price (average of the
high and low price) of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. Stock options granted in
2007 become exercisable over a three-year period in equal installments and have a term of ten
years. For purposes of determining the fair value of stock option awards, the Company uses the
Black-Scholes single option pricing model and the assumptions set forth in the following table.
Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the price of the Companys common
stock since the spin-off on June 30, 2004. The Company uses historical information to estimate
option exercise and employee termination within the valuation model. The expected term of options
granted is derived from the output of the option valuation model and represents the period of time
that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the
contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant. Compensation cost is recognized using a straight-line method over the vesting or service
period and is net of estimated forfeitures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
29.1 |
% |
|
|
26.5 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Expected life |
|
6.5 years |
|
6.5 years |
17
Following is a summary of stock option activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Term |
|
Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
(in years) |
|
($000) |
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
4,099,514 |
|
|
$ |
19.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
406,500 |
|
|
|
29.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(349,407 |
) |
|
|
16.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(60,361 |
) |
|
|
25.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at September 30, 2007 |
|
|
4,096,246 |
|
|
$ |
20.63 |
|
|
4.92 years |
|
$ |
12,388 |
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at September 30, 2007 |
|
3,952,438 |
|
$20.48 |
|
4.83 years |
|
$ |
12,216 |
|
|
Options exercisable at September 30, 2007 |
|
|
3,144,681 |
|
|
$ |
19.16 |
|
|
4.13 years |
|
$ |
11,454 |
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during 2007 and 2006 was $11.64 and
$10.38, respectively.
The Company has granted both restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock. Restricted
stock typically vests three years from the date of grant. The vesting of performance-based
restricted stock is contingent upon the Company obtaining certain financial thresholds established
on the grant date. Provided the incentive performance targets established in the year of grant are
achieved, the performance-based restricted stock awards granted subsequent to 2002 will vest in a
three-year period from the date of grant in an equal number of shares each year. Future vesting in
all cases is subject generally to continued employment with MoneyGram. Holders of restricted stock
and performance-based restricted stock have the right to receive dividends and vote the shares, but
may not sell, assign, transfer, pledge or otherwise encumber the stock.
Restricted stock awards are valued at the quoted market price of the Companys common stock on the
date of grant and expensed using the straight-line method over the vesting or service period of the
award. Following is a summary of restricted stock activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
Restricted stock outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
322,998 |
|
|
$ |
22.39 |
|
Granted |
|
|
92,430 |
|
|
|
29.25 |
|
Vested and issued |
|
|
(173,161 |
) |
|
|
19.82 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock outstanding at September 30, 2007 |
|
|
242,267 |
|
|
$ |
26.88 |
|
|
18
Following is a summary of pertinent information related to the Companys stock-based awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Fair value of options vesting during period |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
2,591 |
|
|
$ |
5,646 |
|
Fair value of restricted stock vesting during period |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
5,193 |
|
|
|
13,369 |
|
Expense recognized related to options |
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
3,201 |
|
|
|
1,821 |
|
Expense recognized related to restricted stock |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
Intrinsic value of options exercised |
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
|
3,318 |
|
|
|
3,554 |
|
|
|
14,323 |
|
Cash received from option exercises |
|
|
3,554 |
|
|
|
2,964 |
|
|
|
6,325 |
|
|
|
20,192 |
|
Tax benefit realized for tax deductions from option exercises |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
4,936 |
|
As of September 30, 2007, the Companys unvested stock-based awards had the following unrecognized
compensation expense and remaining vesting periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
Options |
|
Stock |
|
Unrecognized compensation expense |
|
$ |
6,562 |
|
|
$ |
3,744 |
|
Remaining weighted average vesting period |
|
1.68 years |
|
1.49 years |
As of September 30, 2007, the Company has remaining authorization to issue awards of up to
6,449,324 shares of common stock under its 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, options to purchase 763,958 shares and
694,582 shares of common stock, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share because the effect would be antidilutive. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006, options to purchase 392,563 shares and 326,930 shares of common stock,
respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect
would be antidilutive. Options are generally antidilutive if the exercise price of the option is
greater than the quoted market price of the Companys common stock for the period presented.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
At
September 30, 2007, the Company had various letters of credit,
overdraft facilities and uncommitted repurchase agreements totaling $2.3 billion to assist in the management of investments and the
clearing of payment service obligations. Included in this amount is an uncommitted repurchase
agreement with one of the clearing banks totaling $1.0 billion. Overdraft facilities consist of
$14.7 million of letters of credit, all of which are outstanding at September 30, 2007. Letters of
credit totaling $4.6 million reduce amounts available under the revolving credit agreement. Fees on
the letters of credit are paid in accordance with the terms of the revolving credit agreement.
The Company has agreements with certain other co-investors to provide funds related to investments
in limited partnership interests. As of September 30, 2007, the total amount of unfunded
commitments related to these agreements was $1.4 million.
13. New Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 155,
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Instruments an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140.
SFAS No. 155 permits companies to measure any hybrid instrument in its entirety at fair value.
Changes in fair value are recorded in income. Previously, hybrid instruments were required to be
separated into two instruments, a derivative and host. Generally, the derivative instrument was
recorded at fair value. The election to measure the hybrid instrument at fair value is made on an
instrument-by-instrument basis and is irreversible. SFAS No. 155 also requires that beneficial
interests in securitized financial assets be evaluated for freestanding or embedded derivatives.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 155 on January 1, 2007 with no material impact to its Consolidated
Financial Statements.
19
In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN No. 48 is
an interpretation of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN No. 48 prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a
tax position taken or expected to be taken in an entitys tax
return. FIN No. 48 also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition of tax positions. As discussed in Note 7, the Company adopted FIN No. 48
on January 1, 2007.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This statement does not
require any new fair value measurement, but it provides guidance on how to measure fair value under
other accounting pronouncements. SFAS No. 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy to classify
the source of information used in fair value measurements. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to
valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad categories. SFAS No. 157 is
effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
SFAS No. 157 on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133 Implementation Issue No. B40, Embedded Derivatives:
Application of Paragraph 13(b) to Securitized Interests in Prepayable Financial Assets (DIG B40).
DIG B40 provides the circumstances in which an embedded derivative of a securitized interest in a
prepayable financial asset would not be subject to bifurcation. The Company adopted DIG B40 on
January 1, 2007 with no material impact to its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure certain financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. The election to measure the financial instrument
at fair value is made on an instrument-by-instrument basis for the entire instrument, with few
exceptions, and is irreversible. SFAS No. 159 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on its Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In April 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FIN 48-1, Definition of Settlement in
FASB Interpretation No. 48. FIN No. 48 requires a tax position be measured or recognized based upon
the outcomes that could be realized upon ultimate settlement with a tax authority. FSP FIN 48-1
amends FIN No. 48 to clarify when a tax position is effectively settled upon examination by a
taxing authority. The Company adopted FSP FIN 48-1 as of January 1, 2007 with no material impact to
its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2007, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued Statement of
Position (SOP) 07-1, Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide Investment
Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in
Investment Companies. SOP 07-1 provides specific guidance for determining whether an entity meets
the definition of an investment company and should follow the AICPA Audit Accounting Guide
Investment Companies (the Guide). Entities that
meet the definition of an investment company must
apply the provisions of the Guide, which includes a requirement to carry investments at fair value.
This standard is currently applicable for years beginning after
December 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of this standard, if any, on its Consolidated Financial
Statements. The FASB has proposed an indefinite delay of this
standard pending resolution of implementation issues.
In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) approved EITF 06-11, Accounting for Income
Tax Benefits on Dividends on Share-Based Payment. The EITF reached a final conclusion that a
realized income tax benefit from dividends or dividend equivalents that are charged to retained
earnings and are paid to employees for equity classified restricted stock, restricted stock units
and stock options should be recognized as an increase to additional paid-in-capital (APIC). Those
tax benefits are considered excess tax benefits under SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share Based
Payment. The amount recognized in APIC for the realized income tax benefit from dividends on those
awards should be included in the pool of excess tax benefits available to absorb tax deficiencies.
The guidance of EITF 06-11 will be adopted prospectively for the Company as of January 1, 2008. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on its Consolidated Financial
Statements.
14. Minimum Commission Guarantees
In limited circumstances, the Company may grant minimum commission guarantees as an incentive to
new or renewing agents, for a specified period of time at a contractually specified amount. Under
the guarantees, the Company will pay to the agent the difference between the contractually
specified minimum commission and the actual commissions earned by the agent.
As of September 30, 2007, the liability for minimum commission guarantees is $4.3 million. As of
September 30, 2007, the maximum amount that could be paid under commission guarantees is $26.7
million over a weighted average remaining term of 2.6 years. The maximum payment is calculated as
the contractually guaranteed minimum commission times the remaining term of the contract and,
therefore, assumes that the agent generates no money transfer transactions during the remainder of
its contract. In fiscal 2006, the Company paid $3.0 million under these guarantees, or
approximately 40 percent of the estimated maximum payment for the year.
20
15. Segment Information
The Companys business is conducted through two reportable segments, Global Funds Transfer and
Payment Systems, which are determined based upon factors such as the type of customers, the nature
of products and services provided and the distribution channels used to provide those services. The
Companys largest agent in the Global Funds Transfer segment, Wal-Mart, accounted for approximately
20 percent of total Company revenue for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
approximately 18 percent and 17 percent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006,
respectively. The following table reconciles segment operating income to Income before income
taxes as reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Funds Transfer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money transfer, including bill payment |
|
$ |
220,582 |
|
|
$ |
176,220 |
|
|
$ |
619,876 |
|
|
$ |
483,125 |
|
Retail money order |
|
|
36,871 |
|
|
|
37,231 |
|
|
|
111,303 |
|
|
|
115,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
257,453 |
|
|
|
213,451 |
|
|
|
731,179 |
|
|
|
598,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment Systems: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Official check and payment processing |
|
|
77,060 |
|
|
|
74,883 |
|
|
|
231,886 |
|
|
|
230,870 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,699 |
|
|
|
7,585 |
|
|
|
21,163 |
|
|
|
23,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
83,759 |
|
|
|
82,468 |
|
|
|
253,049 |
|
|
|
254,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
341,581 |
|
|
$ |
296,431 |
|
|
$ |
984,891 |
|
|
$ |
853,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Funds Transfer |
|
$ |
45,798 |
|
|
$ |
38,566 |
|
|
$ |
124,140 |
|
|
$ |
119,275 |
|
Payment Systems |
|
|
6,618 |
|
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
|
26,082 |
|
|
|
34,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
52,416 |
|
|
|
46,105 |
|
|
|
150,222 |
|
|
|
153,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,202 |
) |
|
|
(2,003 |
) |
|
|
(6,143 |
) |
|
|
(5,925 |
) |
Other unallocated expenses |
|
|
(955 |
) |
|
|
(2,142 |
) |
|
|
(2,849 |
) |
|
|
(7,952 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
49,259 |
|
|
$ |
41,960 |
|
|
$ |
141,230 |
|
|
$ |
139,466 |
|
|
21
The following table presents depreciation and amortization expense and capital expenditures by
segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Funds Transfer |
|
$ |
12,950 |
|
|
$ |
9,464 |
|
|
$ |
34,481 |
|
|
$ |
25,008 |
|
Payment Systems |
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
3,354 |
|
|
|
3,189 |
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
13,944 |
|
|
$ |
10,419 |
|
|
$ |
37,835 |
|
|
$ |
28,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Funds Transfer |
|
$ |
21,921 |
|
|
$ |
15,599 |
|
|
$ |
48,709 |
|
|
$ |
48,345 |
|
Payment Systems |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
1,503 |
|
|
|
4,733 |
|
|
|
8,954 |
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
23,431 |
|
|
$ |
17,102 |
|
|
$ |
53,442 |
|
|
$ |
57,299 |
|
|
The following table presents revenue by major geographic area:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
256,663 |
|
|
$ |
233,406 |
|
|
$ |
756,921 |
|
|
$ |
681,836 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
84,918 |
|
|
|
63,025 |
|
|
|
227,970 |
|
|
|
171,180 |
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
341,581 |
|
|
$ |
296,431 |
|
|
$ |
984,891 |
|
|
$ |
853,016 |
|
|
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with MoneyGram International, Inc.s
(MoneyGram, the Company, we, us and our) Consolidated Financial Statements and related
notes. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
MoneyGrams actual results could differ materially from those anticipated due to various factors
discussed under Forward-Looking Statements and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.
Summary
Following are significant items relating to the third quarter of 2007:
|
|
|
Our Global Funds Transfer segment revenue grew 21 percent over the third quarter of
2006, driven by 25 percent growth in both money transfer transaction volume and revenue. |
|
|
|
|
The net investment margin of 2.33 percent (see Table 4) increased from 2.07 percent in
the third quarter of 2006. |
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue increased 21 percent from the third quarter of 2006 to $242.7
million, driven primarily by continued growth in money transfer transaction volume. |
|
|
|
|
Expenses increased 13 percent, driven by increased headcount, depreciation and
amortization, transaction and operations support costs and infrastructure costs supporting
the growth in money transfer. |
|
|
|
|
Our $5.3 billion investment portfolio at September 30, 2007 included net unrealized
losses of $289.4 million, reflecting a $230.5 million decline from June 30, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
We drew the $197.0 million remaining balance under our credit facility and invested the
proceeds in cash equivalents to supplement our unrestricted assets and
to fund the acquisition of PropertyBridge. |
22
During the third quarter of 2007, our Board of Directors authorized hiring JP Morgan to
complete a strategic review of our Payment Systems business. The Payment Systems business includes
official check outsourcing services, money orders sold through
financial institutions and controlled disbursement processing
services. The strategic review includes all aspects of the Payment Systems business, including the
portfolio strategy and capital implications. As of the date of this
filing, no final determinations have been made
as to the plan for the Payment Systems segment. Any such plan is required to be approved by the
Companys Board of Directors.
Table 1 Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
2007 |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
2007 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
vs. |
|
September 30 |
|
vs. |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%) |
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue |
|
$ |
242,743 |
|
|
$ |
200,894 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
$ |
688,409 |
|
|
$ |
556,862 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Investment revenue |
|
|
102,000 |
|
|
|
96,406 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
299,161 |
|
|
|
297,882 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Net securities gains (losses) |
|
|
(3,162 |
) |
|
|
(869 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
(2,679 |
) |
|
|
(1,728 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Total revenue |
|
|
341,581 |
|
|
|
296,431 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
984,891 |
|
|
|
853,016 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee commissions expense |
|
|
105,453 |
|
|
|
83,144 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
295,744 |
|
|
|
226,246 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Investment commissions expense |
|
|
64,899 |
|
|
|
63,520 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
192,467 |
|
|
|
185,346 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Total commissions expense |
|
|
170,352 |
|
|
|
146,664 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
488,211 |
|
|
|
411,592 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
Net revenue |
|
|
171,229 |
|
|
|
149,767 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
496,680 |
|
|
|
441,424 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
49,572 |
|
|
|
44,753 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
149,966 |
|
|
|
128,473 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Transaction and operations support |
|
|
44,277 |
|
|
|
41,318 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
128,129 |
|
|
|
112,615 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13,944 |
|
|
|
10,419 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
37,835 |
|
|
|
28,197 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Occupancy, equipment and supplies |
|
|
11,975 |
|
|
|
9,314 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
33,377 |
|
|
|
26,748 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2,202 |
|
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
6,143 |
|
|
|
5,925 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
121,970 |
|
|
|
107,807 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
355,450 |
|
|
|
301,958 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
49,259 |
|
|
|
41,960 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
141,230 |
|
|
|
139,466 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
14,967 |
|
|
|
11,922 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
44,740 |
|
|
|
41,787 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
34,292 |
|
|
$ |
30,038 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
$ |
96,490 |
|
|
$ |
97,679 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
NM = Not meaningful
23
Table 2 Results of Operations as a Percentage of Total Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue |
|
|
71 |
% |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Investment revenue |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Net securities gains (losses) |
|
|
-1 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee commissions expense |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Investment commissions expense |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total commissions expense |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Transaction and operations support |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Occupancy, equipment and supplies |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
NM= Not meaningful
For the third quarter of 2007, total revenue and net revenue grew 15 percent and 14 percent,
respectively, over the third quarter of 2006 driven primarily by transaction growth in the money
transfer business. Investment revenue increased six percent in the third quarter of 2007 over the
third quarter of 2006 as investments earned wider spreads due to the disruption in the credit
markets resulting from heightened concerns regarding the risk of securities backed by
mortgage-based collateral. Total expenses, excluding commissions, increased 13 percent over the
third quarter of 2006 to support the expansion of the money transfer business. The increases were
primarily due to increased headcount, depreciation and amortization, transaction and operations
support costs and infrastructure costs supporting the growth in money transfer. Headcount was
higher as we continued to staff our retail money transfer locations in Western Europe and increase
our support functions. Depreciation and amortization increased due to the Companys prior period
investments in signage, computer hardware and capitalized software to enhance the money transfer
platform.
A significant amount of our internationally originated transactions and settlements with
international agents are conducted in the Euro. In addition, the operating expenses of our
international subsidiaries are denominated in the Euro. In the third quarter of 2007, the Euro
strengthened significantly against the U.S. dollar. While the strong Euro benefits the
internationally originated revenue in our consolidated income statement, this benefit is
significantly offset by the impact on commissions paid and operating expenses incurred in Euros.
The impact of fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate on the
Companys consolidated net income has been
minimal.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, total revenue and net revenue increased by 15 percent
and 13 percent, respectively, over the same period in 2006 for the reasons described above.
Investment revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was flat compared to the same
period in 2006. Wider spreads earned in 2007 as discussed above were offset by higher investment
revenue in 2006 that benefited from $12.4 million of pre-tax cash flow on previously impaired
investments and income from limited partnerships, compared to a nominal amount of pre-tax cash flow
in 2007. Total expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased by 18 percent over
the same period in 2006 to support the expansion of the money transfer business as described above.
24
Table 3 Net Fee Revenue Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
2007 |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
2007 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
vs. |
|
September 30 |
|
vs. |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
Fee and other revenue |
|
$ |
242,743 |
|
|
$ |
200,894 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
$ |
688,409 |
|
|
$ |
556,862 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
Fee commissions expense |
|
|
(105,453 |
) |
|
|
(83,144 |
) |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
(295,744 |
) |
|
|
(226,246 |
) |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
Net fee revenue |
|
$ |
137,290 |
|
|
$ |
117,750 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
$ |
392,665 |
|
|
$ |
330,616 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions as a % of
fee and other revenue |
|
|
43.4 |
% |
|
|
41.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.0 |
% |
|
|
40.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue is comprised of fees on money transfers, money orders and official check
transactions. It is a growing portion of our total revenue, increasing to 71 percent and 70 percent
of total revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, from 68
percent and 65 percent of total revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006,
respectively. Fee and other revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007
increased by 21 percent and 24 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior
year, primarily driven by the growth in the money transfer business. Growth in money transfer
revenue (including urgent bill payment) continued to be in line with growth in money transfer
transaction volume due to the positive benefit from the Euro exchange
rate, product mix and impact of our pricing initiatives. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the higher
margin money transfer product grew at a faster pace than bill payment products. We anticipate money
transfer revenue and money transfer volume growth percentages to remain similar, subject to
fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate, pricing initiatives and product mix. See further discussion
under Table 7 Global Funds Transfer Segment.
Fee commissions consist primarily of fees paid to our third-party agents for the money transfer
service. We generally do not pay fee commissions on our money order products. For the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007, fee commissions expense increased 27 percent and 31 percent,
respectively, compared to the same periods in 2006, and also grew at a faster pace than fee
revenue, primarily driven by the mix of product revenue due to higher money transfer transaction
volume and tiered commissions. Tiered commissions are commission rates that are adjusted upward,
subject to certain caps, as an agents transaction volume grows. We use tiered commission rates as
an incentive for select agents to grow transaction volume by paying for performance and allowing
them to participate in adding market share for MoneyGram.
Net fee revenue increased 17 percent and 19 percent for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2007, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2006. The increase in net fee revenue is
primarily driven by the increase in money transfer transaction volume. Growth in net fee revenue
was less than fee and other revenue growth, primarily due to tiered commissions.
Table 4 Net Investment Revenue Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
2007 |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
2007 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
vs. |
|
September 30 |
|
vs. |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
Components of net investment revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment revenue |
|
$ |
102,000 |
|
|
$ |
96,406 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
$ |
299,161 |
|
|
$ |
297,882 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Investment commissions expense (1) |
|
|
(64,899 |
) |
|
|
(63,520 |
) |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(192,467 |
) |
|
|
(185,346 |
) |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
Net investment revenue |
|
$ |
37,101 |
|
|
$ |
32,886 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
$ |
106,694 |
|
|
$ |
112,536 |
|
|
|
-5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents and investments |
|
$ |
6,304,433 |
|
|
$ |
6,297,739 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,265,515 |
|
|
$ |
6,357,165 |
|
|
|
-1 |
% |
Payment service obligations (2) |
|
|
4,788,379 |
|
|
|
4,743,030 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
4,747,844 |
|
|
|
4,813,544 |
|
|
|
-1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average yields earned and rates paid (3): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment yield |
|
|
6.42 |
% |
|
|
6.07 |
% |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
|
6.38 |
% |
|
|
6.26 |
% |
|
|
0.12 |
% |
Investment commission rate |
|
|
5.38 |
% |
|
|
5.31 |
% |
|
|
0.07 |
% |
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
5.15 |
% |
|
|
0.27 |
% |
Net investment margin |
|
|
2.33 |
% |
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
|
0.26 |
% |
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
2.37 |
% |
|
|
-0.09 |
% |
25
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Investment commissions expense includes payments made to financial institution customers
based on short-term interest rate indices on the outstanding balances of official checks sold
by that financial institution, as well as costs associated with swaps and the sale of
receivables program. |
|
(2) |
|
Commissions are paid to financial institution customers based upon average outstanding
balances generated by the sale of official checks only. The average balance in the table
reflects only the payment service obligations for which commissions are paid and does not
include the average balance of the sold receivables ($356.3 million and $390.0 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $365.3 million and $385.9
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively) as these are not
recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
|
(3) |
|
Average yields/rates are calculated by dividing the applicable amount shown in Components of
net investment revenue by the applicable amount shown in Average balances, divided by the
number of days in the period presented and multiplied by the number of days in the year. The
Net investment margin is calculated by dividing Net investment revenue by the Cash
equivalents and investments average balance, divided by the number of days in the period
presented and multiplied by the number of days in the year. |
Investment revenue increased six percent in the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to
the same period in 2006 due to wider spreads earned on our investments. During the three months
ended September 30, 2007, our cash investments and adjustable rate securities, which are primarily
tied to LIBOR, earned a wider spread due to the disruption in the credit markets. Investment
revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was flat compared to the same period in 2006.
The wider spreads earned in 2007 were offset by higher investment revenue in 2006 that benefited
from $12.4 million of pre-tax cash flow on previously impaired investments and income from limited
partnerships, as well as lower average investable balances in 2007. A nominal amount of pre-tax
cash flow was recorded in 2007. We anticipate that our average investable balances will be in the
range of $6.2 billion to $6.3 billion for the year.
Investment commissions expense remained relatively flat with a two percent increase in the three
months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. Our commissions are primarily
based on a federal funds index. In September 2007, the federal funds rate decreased, resulting in
flat commissions in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the same period in the prior year.
Investment commissions expense increased four percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2007
over the prior year reflecting higher commissions paid to financial institution customers resulting
from higher short-term rates for the first half of the year. This increase was partially offset by
the decrease in the federal funds rate for the third quarter as discussed above.
The Company had $1.5 billion of outstanding swaps with an average fixed pay rate of 4.4 percent at
September 30, 2007, compared to $2.6 billion with an average fixed pay rate of 4.3 percent at
December 31, 2006. Approximately $475.0 million, $375.0 million and $300.0 million of swaps matured
in the first, second and third quarters of 2007, respectively, with an average fixed pay rate of
5.0 percent, 3.7 percent and 3.9 percent, respectively. The run off of lower priced swaps during
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 also increased investment commission expense over the same
period in the prior year. Additional swaps of $50.0 million with an average fixed pay rate of 5.6
percent will mature in the fourth quarter of 2007. No swap agreements were entered into during the
three months ended September 30, 2007. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we entered
into $150.0 million of swap agreements. We expect any replacement swaps to be at higher average
rates than swaps that have matured.
Net investment revenue increased 13 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2007, compared
to the same period in 2006, reflecting increased investment revenue on investments tied to LIBOR
and flat commissions expense as discussed above. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, net
investment revenue decreased five percent compared to the same period in 2006 reflecting the
benefit of pre-tax cash flow on previously impaired investments and income from limited
partnerships recorded in 2006 and higher investment commission expense in 2007.
The net investment margin increased to 2.33 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2007,
reflecting increased net investment revenue as average investable balances remained constant. For
the nine months ended September 30, 2007, net investment margin decreased to 2.28 from the prior
year, reflecting a decrease in both net investment revenue and average investable balances.
26
Table 5 Summary of Gains, Losses and Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
2007 |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
2007 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
vs. |
|
September 30 |
|
vs. |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
Gross realized gains |
|
$ |
1,467 |
|
|
$ |
1,552 |
|
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
|
$ |
5,396 |
|
|
$ |
4,399 |
|
|
$ |
997 |
|
Gross realized losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,330 |
) |
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
(1,951 |
) |
|
|
(2,598 |
) |
|
|
647 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairments |
|
|
(4,629 |
) |
|
|
(1,091 |
) |
|
|
(3,538 |
) |
|
|
(6,124 |
) |
|
|
(3,529 |
) |
|
|
(2,595 |
) |
|
Net securities gains (losses) |
|
$ |
(3,162 |
) |
|
$ |
(869 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,293 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,679 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,728 |
) |
|
$ |
(951 |
) |
|
The Company had net securities losses of $3.2 million and $2.7 million in the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007, respectively, compared to net securities losses of $0.9 million and $1.7
million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. Impairments in the
three months ended September 30, 2007 related to two securities backed by home equity loans and one
security backed by manufactured housing loans and aircraft leases.
One investment backed primarily by home equity loans experienced an
adverse change in cash flows as a results of credit rating
downngrades in the third quarter of 2007, while the other security
experienced an adverse change in cash flows as a result of the tight
credit market for commercial paper. The tight credit market caused
this security to utilize its alternative funding vehicle, which has a
higher cost and reduced cash flows available to the investors. The
security backed by a diversified asset-backed pool experienced an
adverse change in cash flows as a result of credit rating downgrades
in the third quarter of 2007 that reflected collateral losses in the
underlying pool. The nine months ended September 30, 2007 also included impairments of securities backed
by home equity loans recorded in the first half of the year. Impairments in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006 related primarily to securities backed by automobile, aircraft and
manufactured housing collateral.
The Company regularly monitors its investment portfolio to ensure that investments that may be
other-than-temporarily impaired are identified in a timely manner and that any impairments are
charged against earnings in the proper period. Pursuant to the Companys impairment review process,
changes in individual security values are regularly monitored to identify potential impairment
indicators, such as credit rating downgrades, accelerating default rates on underlying collateral
and changes in cash flow performance. The process includes a monthly global assessment of the
Companys portfolio given current market conditions, as well as a monthly review of all securities
using a screening process to identify those securities for which fair value falls below established
thresholds for certain time periods, or which are identified through other monitoring criteria such
as credit ratings downgrades. The Company evaluates the facts related to the individual securities
identified as a result of this process, including cash flow performance, actual default rates
compared to default rates assumed in determining expected cash flows, subordination available as
credit protection on the Companys investment and the impact of any credit rating downgrades on
expected future cash flows. The Company also considers its intent and ability to hold the security
for a time sufficient to recover its amortized cost. The Company utilizes a buy and hold strategy
for its portfolio, and generally does not utilize its portfolio for liquidity purposes. While this
strategy does not factor into the pricing of securities, it does factor into the Companys
assessment of other-than-temporary impairments. The Company believes that if cash flows continue to
perform as expected, the Company will be able to recover its amortized cost prior to or upon maturity or
call of the security. Given the facts and circumstances of the securities in an unrealized loss
position, particularly the continued cash flow performance as expected, the Company has determined
that its securities in an unrealized loss position are temporarily impaired as of the date of this
filing. The Company believes that the unrealized losses were caused by a general lack of liquidity
in the asset-backed securities market and deterioration in the broader credit markets (the market
disruption). This market disruption was triggered by concerns surrounding sub-prime
mortgage-backed securities, but also extended into other asset-backed securities in the market. The
Companys asset-backed securities do not tend to be influenced by the credit of the issuer, but
rather by the characteristics and projected cash flows of the underlying collateral. The Company
has both the intent and ability to hold these investments to recovery. For further information
regarding the Companys securities, refer to Note 4 Investments in the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Expenses
Compensation and benefits Compensation and benefits includes salaries and benefits, management
incentive programs and other employee related costs. Compensation and benefits increased 11 percent
and 17 percent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, compared to
the same periods in 2006, due to higher headcount supporting the growth of the money transfer
business, partially offset by lower incentive compensation accruals. As of September 30, 2007, the
number of employees increased 13 percent over the third quarter of 2006 as we increased headcount
for our support functions and continued to staff our retail locations in France and Germany. We
expect compensation and benefits to continue to increase in the remainder of 2007 compared to 2006
due to the additional headcount, partially offset by lower incentive compensation accruals for
plans where the amount of payment is tied to the Companys stock price.
27
Transaction and operations support Transaction and operations support expenses include marketing
costs, professional fees and other outside service costs, telecommunications and forms expense
related to our products. Transaction and operations support costs increased seven percent and 14
percent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, compared to the same
periods in 2006, due to higher costs related to the expansion of the money transfer business and
the global network. Agent forms and supplies increased 19 percent and 21 percent for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, over the prior year primarily due to higher
transaction volumes. Similar to prior years, we anticipate higher marketing expense in the fourth
quarter of 2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, professional fees increased 13
percent over the prior year to support compliance activities and enhancements to our technology
systems. The Company also experienced higher provisions for loss in both the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007 over the same periods in 2006.
Depreciation and amortization Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation on point of
sale equipment, agent signage, computer hardware and software (including capitalized software
development costs), office furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements and amortization of our
intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization expense for both the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 increased 34 percent over the same periods in 2006, primarily due to the
Companys investment in signage, computer hardware and capitalized software in prior periods to
enhance our support functions, as well as amortization of acquired intangible assets.
The Company is currently implementing a new system to provide improved connections between our
agents and our marketing, sales, customer service and accounting functions. The new system and
associated processes are intended to increase the flexibility of our back office, thereby improving
operating efficiencies. As we continue to invest in the infrastructure for future growth, we expect
depreciation and amortization expense to increase.
Occupancy, equipment and supplies Occupancy, equipment and supplies includes facilities rent and
maintenance costs, software and equipment maintenance costs, freight and delivery costs and
supplies. Occupancy, equipment and supplies expense for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2007 increased 29 percent and 25 percent, respectively, over the same periods in 2006. Office
rent increased due to normal annual increases and expanded locations. Software expense and
maintenance increases relate primarily to purchased licenses to support our growth and compliance
initiatives. Freight and delivery and supplies expenses have increased in connection with the
growth in our agent locations.
Interest expense Interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007
increased ten and four percent over the same periods in 2006, reflecting interest expense on a
higher debt balance at September 30, 2007 due to additional debt incurred at the end of the
quarter. This increase was somewhat offset by interest rate debt swaps used to hedge the cash flows
of a portion of our variable rate debt.
Income taxes The effective tax rate was 30.4 percent and 31.7 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively, compared to 28.4 percent and 30.0 percent for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. The increase in the effective rate was due to tax
exempt investment income declining as a percentage of total pre-tax income. We expect our effective
tax rate to be around 31 percent for the full year.
Acquisitions
Money
Express On May 31, 2006, MoneyGram completed the
acquisition of Money Express S.r.l. (Money Express), the
Companys former super agent in Italy S.r.l. In connection with the acquisition, the Company formed
MoneyGram Payment Systems Italy S.r.l., a wholly-owned subsidiary, to operate the former Money Express
network. The acquisition provides the Company with the opportunity for further network expansion
and more control of marketing and promotional activities in the region.
MoneyGram acquired Money Express for $15.0 million. The acquisition cost included $1.3 million of
transaction costs and the forgiveness of $0.7 million of liabilities. The Company has finalized its
purchase price allocation, which resulted in a decrease of $0.3 million to goodwill during the
second quarter of 2007. Purchased intangible assets of $7.7 million, consisting primarily of agent
contracts and a non-compete agreement, will be amortized over useful lives ranging from three to
five years. Goodwill of $16.7 million was recorded and assigned to the Companys Global Funds
Transfer segment.
The operating results of Money Express subsequent to May 31, 2006 are included in the Companys
Consolidated Statements of Income. The financial impact of the acquisition is not material to the
Consolidated Balance Sheets or Consolidated Statements of Income.
28
ACH Commerce The Company purchased ACH Commerce in April 2005 for $8.5 million, of which $1.1
million was to be paid upon the second anniversary of the acquisition. Based on the terms of the
acquisition agreement, the Company paid this amount during the second quarter of 2007.
Subsequent Event On October 1, 2007, the Company acquired PropertyBridge, Inc. (PropertyBridge)
for $28.0 million, subject to certain post-closing adjustments and a potential earn-out payment
of up to $10.0 million contingent on PropertyBridges performance during 2008. PropertyBridge is a
provider of electronic payment processing services for the real
estate management industry and offers a complete solution to the resident payment cycle, including the ability to
electronically accept deposits and rent payments. Residents
can pay rent online, by phone or in person and set up recurring payments. PropertyBridge will be a
component of the Companys Global Funds Transfer segment.
Segment Performance
We measure financial performance by our two business segments Global Funds Transfer and Payment
Systems. The business segments are determined based upon factors such as the type of customers, the
nature of products and services provided and the distribution channels used to provide those
services. Through our agent network and retail locations, the Global Funds Transfer segment
provides our retail consumers with money transfer services, domestic money orders and bill payment
services. The Payment Systems segment provides official check services and money orders for
financial institutions and controlled disbursements processing for our business customers. Segment
pre-tax operating income and segment operating margin are used to evaluate performance and allocate
resources.
We manage our investment portfolio on a consolidated level and the specific investment securities
are not identifiable to a particular segment. However, average investable balances are allocated to
our segments based upon the average balances generated by that segments sale of payment
instruments. The investment yield generally is allocated based upon the total average investment
yield. Gains and losses are allocated based upon the allocation of average investable balances. Our
derivatives portfolio is also managed on a consolidated level and the derivative instruments are
not specifically identifiable to a particular segment. The total costs associated with our
derivatives portfolio are allocated to each segment based upon the percentage of that segments
average investable balances to the total average investable balances. Other unallocated expenses
represent pension and benefit obligation expense. Table 6 reconciles segment operating income to
income before income taxes as reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Table 6 Segment Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
2007 |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
2007 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
vs. |
|
September 30 |
|
vs. |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
Operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Funds Transfer |
|
$ |
45,798 |
|
|
$ |
38,566 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
$ |
124,140 |
|
|
$ |
119,275 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Payment Systems |
|
|
6,618 |
|
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
|
-12 |
% |
|
|
26,082 |
|
|
|
34,068 |
|
|
|
-23 |
% |
|
Total segment operating income |
|
|
52,416 |
|
|
|
46,105 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
150,222 |
|
|
|
153,343 |
|
|
|
-2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2,202 |
|
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
6,143 |
|
|
|
5,925 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Other unallocated expenses |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
2,142 |
|
|
|
-55 |
% |
|
|
2,849 |
|
|
|
7,952 |
|
|
|
-64 |
% |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
49,259 |
|
|
$ |
41,960 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
$ |
141,230 |
|
|
$ |
139,466 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
29
Table 7 Global Funds Transfer Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
2007 |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
2007 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
vs. |
|
September 30 |
|
vs. |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
Money transfer revenue |
|
$ |
220,582 |
|
|
$ |
176,220 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
$ |
619,876 |
|
|
$ |
483,125 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
Retail money orders and other |
|
|
36,871 |
|
|
|
37,231 |
|
|
|
-1 |
% |
|
|
111,303 |
|
|
|
115,333 |
|
|
|
-3 |
% |
|
Total revenue |
|
|
257,453 |
|
|
|
213,451 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
731,179 |
|
|
|
598,458 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions |
|
|
(110,422 |
) |
|
|
(87,942 |
) |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
(310,680 |
) |
|
|
(240,439 |
) |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
147,031 |
|
|
$ |
125,509 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
$ |
420,499 |
|
|
$ |
358,019 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
45,798 |
|
|
$ |
38,566 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
$ |
124,140 |
|
|
$ |
119,275 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total revenue for the Global Funds Transfer segment is comprised primarily of fees on money
transfers, as well as fees on retail money orders and urgent bill payment products, investment
revenue and securities gains and losses. Global Funds Transfer revenue increased 21 percent and 22
percent in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, over the same periods
in 2006. Total Global Funds Transfer segment revenue continues to be driven by the growth in the
money transfer business. Growth in money transfer revenue (including urgent bill payment) increased
25 percent and 28 percent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively,
compared to the same periods in 2006, in line with growth in money transfer transaction volume at
an increase of 25 percent over the prior periods. This was primarily driven by the lapping of our
simplified pricing initiatives, pricing stability, product mix (money transfer transaction growth
versus urgent bill payment transaction growth) and a benefit from the stronger Euro exchange rate.
Our simplified pricing initiatives include reducing the number of pricing tiers or bands which
allows us to manage our price-volume dynamic while streamlining the point of sale process for our
agents and customers. Our pricing philosophy continues to be to maintain a price point below our
higher priced competitor, but above the niche players in the market.
Domestic originated transactions (including urgent bill payment) increased 26 percent and 29
percent in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, compared to the same
periods in 2006, with continued growth across all corridors. International, or transactions
originated outside of North America, grew 34 percent and 35 percent in the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2006. Transaction volume to
Mexico grew six percent and nine percent in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
respectively, compared to the same periods in 2006. Economic conditions in the U.S. housing market
and immigration concerns continue to dampen this growth. Mexico is a relatively small portion of
our total money transfer business and represented ten percent of our total transactions for both
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. The growth in money transfer
transactions is a result of our continued network expansions and targeted pricing initiatives to
provide a strong consumer value proposition supported by targeted marketing efforts. The money
transfer agent base grew 33 percent to approximately 138,000 agent locations at September 30, 2007
compared to September 30, 2006, reflecting the strongest unit location growth we have ever seen.
The increase continues to be primarily in the international markets, including the United Kingdom
and India. In connection with the agent location growth, the Company incurred roll-out costs
including but not limited to signage, agent forms, marketing and training. These expenses are
incurred in advance of generating any significant revenue from the added locations. As expected,
retail money order transaction volume declined six percent and five percent for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2006 due to trends
in paper- based products.
Money transfer agents are located in the following geographic regions: 33,000 locations in North
America; 21,600 locations in Latin America (including Mexico which represents 10,200 locations);
43,300 locations in Western Europe and the Middle East; 10,500 locations in the Indian
subcontinent; 13,200 locations in Asia Pacific; 12,000 locations in Eastern Europe and 5,100
locations in Africa.
Investment revenue in Global Funds Transfer increased seven percent in the three months ended
September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006, as a result of a wider spread earned on our
cash investments and adjustable rate securities due to the disruption in the credit markets.
Investment revenue in Global Funds Transfer was flat in the nine months ended September 30, 2007
compared to the same period in 2006, as the wider spreads earned were offset by higher investment
revenue in 2006 that benefited from $2.8 million of pre-tax cash flow on previously impaired
investments and income from limited partnerships, as well as lower average investable balances in
the current year. A nominal amount of pre-tax cash flow was recorded in 2007.
30
Commissions expense consists primarily of fees paid to our third-party agents for the money
transfer service and costs associated with swaps and the sale of receivables program. Commissions
expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased 26 percent and 29 percent,
respectively, compared to the same periods in 2006, primarily driven by tiered commission rates
paid to certain agents and increases in the Euro exchange rate. Tiered commissions are commission
rates that are adjusted upward, subject to certain caps, as an agents transaction volume grows. We
use tiered commission rates as an incentive for select agents to grow transaction volume by paying
the agents for performance and allowing the agent to participate in adding market share for
MoneyGram. Tiered commissions did not have an impact until the third quarter of 2006. Our largest
agent, Wal-Mart, is expected to hit a new tier in the fourth
quarter of 2007, so commissions will be up slightly in
the fourth quarter. This is the last performance-based commission tier adjustment in the contract.
Operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2007 increased 19 percent to $45.8
million from the same period in 2006, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8 percent compared to
18.1 percent in the prior year. The decrease in operating margin reflects higher money transfer
commissions and an increase in operating expenses, as we continue to grow our global presence.
Higher operating expenses reflect increased headcount as we continued to increase our support
functions to support the expansion of the money transfer business and staffed our retail locations
in Western Europe. The retail strategy has also resulted in increased costs related to compliance
and technology infrastructure. These expenses are incurred in advance of generating any significant
revenue. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, operating income increased four percent from
the same period in 2006 and reflected a decrease in operating margin to 17.0 percent from 19.9
percent in the prior year. Operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 included
$2.8 million of cash flows from previously impaired investments and income from limited partnership
interests. We expect our operating margin for the full year 2007 to be approximately 16 percent
with the fourth quarter declining due to the timing of expenses, primarily marketing.
Table 8 Payment Systems Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
2007 |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
2007 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
vs. |
|
September 30 |
|
vs. |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
Official check and payment processing |
|
$ |
77,060 |
|
|
$ |
74,883 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
231,886 |
|
|
$ |
230,870 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Other revenue |
|
|
6,699 |
|
|
|
7,585 |
|
|
|
-12 |
% |
|
|
21,163 |
|
|
|
23,159 |
|
|
|
-9 |
% |
|
Total revenue |
|
|
83,759 |
|
|
|
82,468 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
253,049 |
|
|
|
254,029 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions |
|
|
(59,930 |
) |
|
|
(58,722 |
) |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(177,532 |
) |
|
|
(171,153 |
) |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
23,829 |
|
|
$ |
23,746 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
75,517 |
|
|
$ |
82,876 |
|
|
|
-9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
6,618 |
|
|
$ |
7,539 |
|
|
|
-12 |
% |
|
$ |
26,082 |
|
|
$ |
34,068 |
|
|
|
-23 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable equivalent basis (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
87,526 |
|
|
$ |
86,812 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
265,103 |
|
|
$ |
267,164 |
|
|
|
-1 |
% |
Commissions |
|
|
(59,930 |
) |
|
|
(58,722 |
) |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(177,532 |
) |
|
|
(171,153 |
) |
|
|
4 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
10,386 |
|
|
|
11,883 |
|
|
|
-13 |
% |
|
|
38,136 |
|
|
|
47,204 |
|
|
|
-19 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The taxable equivalent basis numbers (commonly used by financial institutions) are non-GAAP
measures that are used by the Companys management to evaluate the effect of tax-exempt
securities on the Payment Systems segment. The tax-exempt investments in the investment
portfolio have lower pre-tax yields, but produce higher income on an after-tax basis than
comparable taxable investments. An adjustment is made to present revenue and operating income
resulting from amounts invested in tax-exempt securities on a taxable equivalent basis. The
adjustment is calculated using a 35 percent tax rate and is $3.8 million and $4.3 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $12.1 million and $13.1
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The presentation
of taxable equivalent basis numbers is supplemental to results presented under GAAP and may
not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. These non-GAAP
measures should be used in addition to, but not as a substitute for measures presented under
GAAP. |
31
Total revenue includes investment revenue, securities gains and losses, per-item fees charged to
our official check financial institution customers and fees earned on our rebate processing
business. Payment Systems revenue increased two percent in the three months
ended September 30, 2007 and was flat for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the
same periods in 2006. Both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 were impacted by
higher investment losses recorded in the third quarter, as well as lower average investable
balances in the current year periods. The nine months ended September 30, 2006 benefited from
higher investment revenue due to $9.6 million of pre-tax cash flow on previously impaired
investments and income from limited partnerships. The decrease in revenue for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 also reflects lower average investable balances and was partially offset by
higher yields on the investment portfolio.
Commissions expense includes payments made to financial institution customers based on official
check average investable balances and short-term interest rate indices, as well as costs associated
with swaps. Commission expense increased two percent and four percent for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2006, primarily due to the
effect of the runoff of lower interest rate swaps.
Operating margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was 7.9 percent and 10.3
percent, respectively (11.9 percent and 14.4 percent, respectively, on a taxable equivalent basis)
as compared to 9.1 percent and 13.4 percent, respectively (13.7 percent and 17.7 percent,
respectively, on a taxable equivalent basis) for the same periods in 2006. Lower operating margins
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 were primarily the result of higher
investment losses recorded in the third quarter. The operating margin for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 benefited by 3.4 percentage points from pre-tax cash flows from previously
impaired securities and income from limited partnership interests.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
One of our primary financial goals is to maintain adequate liquidity to manage the fluctuations in
the balances of payment service assets and obligations resulting from sales of official checks,
money orders and other payment instruments, the timing of the collections of receivables and the
timing of the presentment of such instruments for payment. In addition, we strive to maintain
adequate liquidity for capital expenditures and other normal operating cash needs.
At September 30, 2007, we had cash and cash equivalents of $1.2 billion, net receivables of $1.7
billion and investments of $5.3 billion, all substantially restricted for payment service
obligations. We rely on the funds from ongoing sales of payment instruments and portfolio cash
flows to settle payment service obligations as they are presented. Due to the continuous nature of
the sales and settlement of our payment instruments, we are able to invest in securities with a
longer term than the average life of our payment instruments. The Companys daily net cash
settlements tend to follow a pattern whereby certain days of the week are typically net cash inflow
days, while other days are typically net cash outflows. On the days with a net cash outflow, the
Company has historically utilized repurchase agreements to fund the shortfall. These repurchase
agreements are then generally repaid on the next net cash inflow day. The repurchase agreements are
uncommitted facilities with various banks and require specific securities to be designated as
collateral for borrowings under the agreements. The acceptance of securities as collateral is at
the discretion of the Companys counterparty. During the third quarter of 2007, the Company began
investing more heavily in short-term securities to enhance the Companys liquidity. This shift was
accomplished by reinvesting proceeds from normal maturities of our investments into shorter term
securities. As a result of this enhanced liquidity, the Company has reduced its use of repurchase
agreements. At September 30, 2007, the Company had no amounts outstanding under repurchase
agreements.
We are regulated by various state agencies that generally require us to maintain liquid assets and
investments with an investment rating of A or higher in an amount generally equal to the payment
service obligation for those regulated payment instruments, namely teller checks, agent checks,
money orders and money transfers. Consequently, a significant amount of cash and cash equivalents,
receivables and investments are restricted to satisfy the liability to pay the face amount of
regulated payment service obligations upon presentment. We are not regulated by state agencies for
our payment service obligations resulting from outstanding cashiers checks. However, we restrict a
portion of the funds related to these payment instruments due to contractual arrangements and
Company policy. The Company also maintains several special purpose
entities for the benefit of our official check customers in which we
are required to hold investments with a value sufficient to cover the
clearance of items. Assets restricted for regulatory or contractual reasons are not available to
satisfy working capital or other financing requirements. The regulatory and contractual
requirements do not require the Company to specify individual assets held to meet our payment
service obligations, nor is the Company required to deposit specific assets into a trust, escrow or
other special account. Rather, the Company must maintain a pool of liquid assets. No third party
places limitations, legal or otherwise, on the Company regarding the use of its individual liquid
assets. The Company is able to withdraw, deposit and sell its individual liquid assets at will,
with no prior notice or penalty, provided the Company maintains a total pool of liquid assets
sufficient to meet the regulatory and contractual requirements.
32
As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents,
receivables and investments to the extent those assets exceed all payment service obligations, or
unrestricted assets, as summarized in Table 9. These amounts are generally available. However,
management considers a portion of these amounts as providing additional assurance that regulatory
and other requirements are met during the normal fluctuations in the value of investments.
The Companys available-for-sale investment portfolio is a highly rated, diverse buy and hold
portfolio. The securities are purchased for the long-term. Except for a small portion of securities
used as collateral for repurchase agreements, the available-for-sale investment portfolio is not
integral to the Companys daily liquidity. During the third quarter of 2007, the Companys
unrestricted assets declined due to unrealized losses in our available-for-sale investment
portfolio. As further discussed in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company
believes these unrealized losses represent temporary impairments at this time. Market conditions at
September 30, 2007 primarily reflect wider credit spreads due to heightened concerns regarding the
risk of securities backed by mortgage-based collateral, historically low levels of activity in the
related market for these securities and a tighter credit market. To
supplement our unrestricted assets and to fund the acquisition of PropertyBridge, the Company drew on the
balance of its credit facility in September 2007 and invested the $197.0 million of proceeds in
cash equivalents.
Table 9 Unrestricted Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,152,993 |
|
|
$ |
987,918 |
|
|
$ |
1,274,768 |
|
|
$ |
973,931 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
1,717,464 |
|
|
|
1,775,431 |
|
|
|
1,599,654 |
|
|
|
1,758,682 |
|
Trading investments |
|
|
62,300 |
|
|
|
121,200 |
|
|
|
107,000 |
|
|
|
145,500 |
|
Available for sale investments |
|
|
5,260,296 |
|
|
|
5,624,054 |
|
|
|
5,490,141 |
|
|
|
5,690,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,193,053 |
|
|
|
8,508,603 |
|
|
|
8,471,563 |
|
|
|
8,568,713 |
|
Amounts restricted to cover payment service obligations |
|
|
(7,907,393 |
) |
|
|
(8,211,535 |
) |
|
|
(8,129,757 |
) |
|
|
(8,209,789 |
) |
|
Unrestricted assets |
|
$ |
285,660 |
|
|
$ |
297,068 |
|
|
$ |
341,806 |
|
|
$ |
358,924 |
|
|
The decrease in unrestricted assets from June 30, 2007 is due to a net decline in the market value
of our investments of $230.5 million, repurchases of our common stock totaling $12.5 million,
capital expenditures totaling $23.4 million and the payment of dividends totaling $4.2 million.
This activity was partially offset by $197.0 million in borrowings under our credit facility which
were invested in cash and cash equivalents and changes in our working capital resulting from the
timing of normal operating activities.
Table 10 Cash Flows Used In Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
34,292 |
|
|
$ |
30,038 |
|
|
$ |
96,490 |
|
|
$ |
97,679 |
|
Total adjustments to reconcile net income |
|
|
25,101 |
|
|
|
14,225 |
|
|
|
64,381 |
|
|
|
31,473 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities before changes
in payment service assets and obligations |
|
|
59,393 |
|
|
|
44,263 |
|
|
|
160,871 |
|
|
|
129,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents (substantially restricted) |
|
|
(161,391 |
) |
|
|
(98,608 |
) |
|
|
(166,296 |
) |
|
|
(43,823 |
) |
Change in trading investments, net (substantially restricted) |
|
|
58,900 |
|
|
|
(55,575 |
) |
|
|
83,200 |
|
|
|
33,350 |
|
Change in receivables, net (substantially restricted) |
|
|
55,140 |
|
|
|
12,052 |
|
|
|
34,439 |
|
|
|
(178,935 |
) |
Change in payment service obligations |
|
|
(304,142 |
) |
|
|
(316,147 |
) |
|
|
(302,396 |
) |
|
|
(292,985 |
) |
|
Net change in payment service assets and obligations |
|
|
(351,493 |
) |
|
|
(458,278 |
) |
|
|
(351,053 |
) |
|
|
(482,393 |
) |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(292,100 |
) |
|
$ |
(414,015 |
) |
|
$ |
(190,182 |
) |
|
$ |
(353,241 |
) |
|
Table 10 summarizes the net cash flows used in operating activities. Operating activities used net
cash of $292.1 million and $414.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006, respectively, for a decrease in cash used of $121.9 million. This decrease is primarily due
to $106.6 million of additional working capital from normal operating activities impacting our
payment service assets and obligations, other assets and accounts payable and other liabilities.
The remaining decrease is due to changes in non-cash expenses, including depreciation and
amortization and provision of uncollectible receivables.
33
Operating activities used net cash of $190.2 million and $353.2 million during the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, for a decrease in cash used of $163.1 million.
This decrease is primarily due to $144.5 million of additional working capital from normal
operating activities impacting our payment service assets and obligations, other assets and
accounts payable and other liabilities. The remaining decrease is due to changes in non-cash
expenses, including depreciation and amortization and provision of uncollectible receivables.
To understand the cash flow activity of our business, the cash provided by (used in) operating
activities relating to the payment service assets and obligations should be reviewed in conjunction
with the cash provided by (used in) investing activities related to our investment portfolio.
Table 11 Cash Flows Provided By Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Net investment activity |
|
$ |
131,431 |
|
|
$ |
442,150 |
|
|
$ |
99,358 |
|
|
$ |
449,201 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(23,431 |
) |
|
|
(17,102 |
) |
|
|
(53,442 |
) |
|
|
(57,299 |
) |
Cash (paid) received for acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,741 |
|
|
|
(1,116 |
) |
|
|
(7,311 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
$ |
108,000 |
|
|
$ |
430,789 |
|
|
$ |
44,800 |
|
|
$ |
384,591 |
|
|
Table 11 summarizes the net cash provided by investing activities. Investing activities primarily
consist of activity within our investment portfolio. Other investing activity consisted of the use
of cash of $23.4 million and $17.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, and $53.4 million and $57.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006, respectively, for the purchase of property and equipment and development of software related
to our continued investment in the money transfer platform and compliance activities.
During the third quarter of 2006, the Company received a payment from the previous owner of
MoneyExpress for a purchase adjustment related to net assets. In the nine months ended September
30, 2006, the Company acquired MoneyExpress, its former super agent in Italy. In addition, we
acquired a 50 percent interest in a corporate aircraft in the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
In April 2005, the Company purchased ACH Commerce for $8.5 million,
of which $1.1 million was to be paid upon the second anniversary of the acquisition. Based on the
terms of the acquisition agreement, the Company paid this amount
during the second quarter of 2007.
Table 12 Cash Flows Used in Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Net change in credit facilities |
|
$ |
197,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
197,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Proceeds and
tax benefit from exercise of share-based compensation |
|
|
3,736 |
|
|
|
4,135 |
|
|
|
6,867 |
|
|
|
25,128 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(12,482 |
) |
|
|
(17,504 |
) |
|
|
(45,992 |
) |
|
|
(46,236 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(4,154 |
) |
|
|
(3,405 |
) |
|
|
(12,493 |
) |
|
|
(10,242 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
$ |
184,100 |
|
|
$ |
(16,774 |
) |
|
$ |
145,382 |
|
|
$ |
(31,350 |
) |
|
Table 12 summarizes the net cash flows used in financing activities. During the three months ended
September 30, 2007, the Company borrowed $197.0 million under its revolving credit facility. Other
sources of cash relate primarily to the exercise of share-based compensation, which provided $3.6
million and $3.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively,
and $6.3 million and $20.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The exercise of share-based compensation generated $0.2 million and $1.2 million of
tax benefits in the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $0.5 million
and $4.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cash used by
financing activities related primarily to our purchase of $12.5 million and $17.5 million of
treasury stock during the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $46.0
million and $46.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
In addition, we paid $4.2 million and $3.4 million in dividends during the three months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $12.5 million and $10.2 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
34
Other Funding Sources and Requirements
We have a bank credit facility providing availability up to $350.0 million in the form of a $250.0
million four-year revolving credit facility and a $100.0 million term loan that is available to be
used for general corporate purposes and to support letters of credit. At December 31, 2006, we had
outstanding borrowings under the credit facility of $150.0 million, consisting of a $100.0 million
term loan and $50.0 million under the revolving credit facility. On September 24, 2007, we borrowed
$197.0 million under the revolving credit facility. The proceeds were invested in cash equivalents
to supplement our unrestricted assets and fund the acquisition of PropertyBridge on October
1, 2007. At September 30, 2007, we had outstanding borrowings under the credit facility consisting
of $247.0 million under the revolving credit facility and a $100.0 million term loan. The maturity
date of both the revolving credit facility and term loan is June 2010. The revolving credit
facility may be increased to $500.0 million under certain circumstances. The interest rate
applicable to both the credit facility and the term loan is LIBOR plus 50 basis points, subject to
adjustment in the event of a change in the credit rating of our senior unsecured debt. The usage
fees on the facility range from 0.08 percent to 0.25 percent of outstanding borrowings, depending
on the credit rating of our senior unsecured debt. At September 30, 2007, the interest rate under the bank
credit facility was 5.70 percent, exclusive of the effect of commitment fees and other costs, and
the usage fee was 0.125 percent.
Loans under the bank credit facility are guaranteed on an unsecured basis by our material domestic
subsidiaries. Borrowings under the bank credit facilities are subject to various covenants,
including interest coverage ratio, leverage ratio and consolidated total indebtedness ratio. The
interest coverage ratio of earnings before interest and taxes to interest expense must not be less
than 3.5 to 1.0. The leverage ratio of total debt to total capitalization must be less than 0.5 to
1.0. The consolidated total indebtedness ratio of total debt to earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization must be less than 3.0 to 1.0. At September 30, 2007, we were in
compliance with all of the covenants under the bank credit facility.
Subsequent Event On
October 31, 2007, the Company obtained a Commitment Letter from
JPMorgan Chase Bank to provide a $150.0 million 364-day
unsecured revolving credit facility. The credit facility would have
substantially the same terms as the Companys existing credit
facility, which will remain in place. The interest rate under the new
credit facility will be, at our option, either (a) LIBOR plus 60
basis points or (b) the higher of the prime rate or the federal funds
rate plus 50 basis points. In either case, the interest rate is
subject to adjustment in the event of a change in the credit rating
of our senior unsecured debt. The usage under fees under the new
credit facility will range from 0.15 percent to
0.35 percent of outstanding borrowings, depending on the credit
rating of our senior unsecured debt.
At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the interest rate swaps used to hedge the cash flows
of a portion of the Companys variable rate debt had an average fixed pay rate of 4.3 percent and
an average variable receive rate of 4.7 percent and 4.6 percent, respectively. See Note 5 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the Companys portfolio of
derivative financial instruments.
At September 30, 2007, we had various letters of credit, overdraft facilities and uncommitted
repurchase agreements totaling $2.3 billion to assist in the management of investments and the
clearing of payment service obligations. Included in this amount is an uncommitted repurchase
agreement with one of the clearing banks totaling $1.0 billion
that has never been used. Overdraft facilities consist of $14.7 million of letters of credit, all of which are outstanding at
September 30, 2007. Letters of credit totaling $4.6 million reduce amounts available under the
revolving credit agreement. Fees on the letters of credit are paid in accordance with the terms of
the revolving credit agreement.
The Company has agreements with certain other co-investors to provide funds related to investments
in limited partnership interests. As of September 30, 2007, the total amount of unfunded
commitments related to these agreements was $1.4 million.
We have an agreement to sell on an offering basis undivided percentage ownership interests in
certain receivables, primarily from our money order agents, in an amount not to exceed
$400.0 million. The Company uses the agreement to accelerate cash flows for
investment purposes. These receivables are sold to commercial paper conduits (trusts) sponsored by
a financial institution and represent a small percentage of the total assets in these conduits. Our
rights and obligations are limited to the receivables transferred, and are accounted for as sales
transactions under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 140, Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. The assets and
liabilities associated with these conduits, including our sold receivables, are not recorded or
included in our Consolidated Financial Statements. The receivables are sold at a
discount based upon short-term interest rates. On average, we sold receivables totaling $356.3 million and $365.3 million during
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, for a total discount of $5.1 and
$15.2 million, respectively. For the Company to offer its
receivables under the agreement, its credit rating on
its senior unsecured debt must be at least BB+ and Ba1. The agreement expires in December 2007 and we
are currently discussing an extension to the agreement. Regardless of
the Companys credit rating, the acceptance of the
Companys offerings under this agreement is at the discretion of
the counterparty.
35
Table 13 Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
(Amounts in Thousands) |
|
Total |
|
1 year |
|
2-3 years |
|
4-5 years |
|
5 years |
|
Debt, including interest payments |
|
$ |
401,392 |
|
|
$ |
19,779 |
|
|
$ |
381,613 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating leases |
|
|
54,190 |
|
|
|
10,076 |
|
|
|
17,928 |
|
|
|
13,786 |
|
|
|
12,400 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
(2,815 |
) |
|
|
2,608 |
|
|
|
(4,868 |
) |
|
|
(555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other obligations |
|
|
1,410 |
|
|
|
1,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
454,177 |
|
|
$ |
33,873 |
|
|
$ |
394,673 |
|
|
$ |
13,231 |
|
|
$ |
12,400 |
|
|
Debt consists of principal amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility and term loan at
September 30, 2007, as well as related interest payments. As described above, interest payments on
our outstanding debt are based on a floating interest rate indexed to LIBOR. For disclosure
purposes, the interest rate for future periods has been assumed to be 5.70 percent, which is the
rate in effect on September 30, 2007. Operating leases consist of various leases for buildings and
equipment used in our business. Derivative financial instruments represent the net payable
(receivable) under our interest rate swap agreements. Other obligations are unfunded capital
commitments related to limited partnership interests included in our investment portfolio.
The Company has funded, noncontributory pension plans. Our funding policy is to contribute at least
the minimum contribution required by applicable regulations. MoneyGram did not make a contribution
to the funded pension plans during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. There are no required
contributions for the funded pension plan in 2007; however, the Company may choose to make
contributions during the remainder of 2007. The Company also has certain unfunded pension and
postretirement plans that require benefit payments over extended periods of time. During the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we paid benefits totaling $0.9 million and $2.9 million,
respectively, related to these unfunded plans. Benefit payments under these unfunded plans are
expected to be $1.2 million in the remainder of 2007. Expected contributions and benefit payments
under these plans are not included in the table above.
As a result of the adoption of the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, on January 1, 2007 we
recorded a liability for unrecognized tax benefits of $39.1 million, which is included in Accounts
payable and other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Of the $39.1 million, $31.4
million could affect the effective tax rate if recognized. As of September 30, 2007, the liability
for unrecognized tax benefits is $40.7 million. This amount is not reflected in the table above.
In limited circumstances, the Company may grant minimum commission guarantees as an incentive to
new or renewing agents, for a specified period of time at a contractually specified amount. Under
the guarantees, the Company will pay to the agent the difference between the contractually
specified minimum commission and the actual commissions earned by the agent. As of September 30,
2007, the minimum commission guarantees had a maximum payment of $26.7 million over a weighted
average remaining term of 2.6 years. The maximum payment is calculated as the contractually
guaranteed minimum commission times the remaining term of the contract and, therefore, assumes that
the agent generates no money transfer transactions during the remainder of its contract. As of
September 30, 2007, the liability for minimum commission guarantees is $4.3 million. Minimum
commission guarantees are not reflected in the table above.
In
October 2007, both Moodys and Fitch downgraded the
Companys senior unsecured debt rating to the lowest level of
investment grade at Baa3 and BBB- respectively, and placed the Company on watch for potential
additional downgrades. Standard & Poors
(S&P) current rating is BBB. Moodys and Fitch have cited, among other factors, the reduction in the Companys
unrestricted assets caused by its net unrealized losses as the rationale for these downgrades,
despite the growth and profitability of the
Companys core money transfer business. A securities rating is not a recommendation
to buy, sell or hold securities, is subject to revision at any time
and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. It is possible that one or more rating agencies will in
the future downgrade the Companys debt rating further, and that one or more of the ratings could then be
below investment grade. It is important to note that state and federal regulatory authorities do
not consider such ratings as criteria in determining licensing or regulatory compliance;
accordingly any change in debt ratings is not expected to directly affect our regulatory status as a money
services business. The financial impact of any downgrade in the Companys debt ratings will depend
on the actual ratings, whether
36
the ratings are split between investment and non-investment grade and which agency takes this action. Any downgrade could increase the Companys cost of borrowing
and/or could result in the termination of its sale of receivables facility. It is also possible
that ratings downgrades could affect our ability to attract and
retain customers. One Payment Systems
financial institution customer has the right to terminate its contracts in the event of a downgrade
by S&P to below BBB and another has the right to terminate if no rating agency has rated the Companys debt as
investment grade. The Company considers it unlikely that either client will take action to
terminate in the near future and neither of these agreements are material to the net income of the
segment or the Company.
Although no assurance can be given, we expect operating cash flows and short-term borrowings to be
sufficient to finance our ongoing business, maintain adequate capital levels and meet debt and
clearing agreement covenants.
The Company has an effective universal shelf registration on file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The universal shelf registration provides for the issuance of up to $500.0 million of
our securities, including common stock, preferred stock and debt securities. The securities may be
sold from time to time in one or more series. The terms of the securities and any offering of the
securities will be determined at the time of the sale. The shelf registration is intended to
provide the Company with additional funding sources for general corporate purposes, including
working capital, capital expenditures, debt payment and the financing of possible acquisitions or
stock repurchases.
Stockholders Equity
On May 9, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors approved an increase of the Companys current
authorization to purchase shares of common stock by an additional 5,000,000 shares to a total of
12,000,000 shares. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we purchased 470,000
shares and 1,620,000 shares of our common stock at an average price of $26.56 and $28.39 per share,
respectively. As of September 30, 2007, the Company had remaining authorization to purchase up to
5,205,000 shares of its common stock.
The Company paid cash dividends of $0.15 per share of common stock during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. On August 16, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors declared a cash dividend
of $0.05 per share of common stock, which was paid on October 1, 2007. Any future determination to
pay dividends on MoneyGram common stock will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and
will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, cash requirements, prospects and
such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant. Subject to Board approval, the
Company intends to continue paying a quarterly dividend, which will be funded through cash
generated from operating activities.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Finance and Investment Committee of the Board of Directors generally approves any transactions
and strategies, including any potential off-balance sheet arrangements, which materially affect
investment results and cash flows.
We have an agreement to sell, on a periodic basis, undivided percentage ownership interests in
certain receivables, primarily from our money order agents, in an amount not to exceed $400.0
million. For further information regarding this agreement, refer to Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Other Funding Sources and
Requirements.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America (GAAP) requires estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could
differ from those estimates. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies,
assumptions and estimates to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and in
accordance with GAAP.
Critical accounting policies are those policies that management believes are most important to the
portrayal of the Companys financial position and results of operations, and that require management
to make estimates that are difficult, subjective or complex. There were no changes to our critical
accounting policies during the quarter ended September 30, 2007. For further information regarding
our critical accounting policies, refer to Part II, Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Policies in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
37
Recent Accounting Developments
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Instruments an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140. SFAS No. 155 permits companies to measure any hybrid
instrument in its entirety at fair value. Changes in fair value are recorded in income. Previously,
hybrid instruments were required to be separated into two instruments, a derivative and host.
Generally, the derivative instrument was recorded at fair value. The election to measure the hybrid
instrument at fair value is made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irreversible. SFAS No.
155 also requires that beneficial interests in securitized financial assets be evaluated for
freestanding or embedded derivatives. The Company adopted SFAS No. 155 on January 1, 2007 with no
material impact to its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN No. 48 is
an interpretation of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN No. 48 prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a
tax position taken or expected to be taken in an entitys tax return. FIN No. 48 also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition of tax positions. As discussed in Note 7, the Company adopted FIN No. 48
on January 1, 2007.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This statement does not
require any new fair value measurement, but it provides guidance on how to measure fair value under
other accounting pronouncements. SFAS No. 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy to classify
the source of information used in fair value measurements. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to
valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad categories. SFAS No. 157 is
effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
SFAS No. 157 on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133 Implementation Issue No. B40, Embedded Derivatives:
Application of Paragraph 13(b) to Securitized Interests in Prepayable Financial Assets (DIG B40).
DIG B40 provides the circumstances in which an embedded derivative of a securitized interest in a
prepayable financial asset would not be subject to bifurcation. The Company adopted DIG B40 on
January 1, 2007 with no material impact to its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure certain financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. The election to measure the financial instrument
at fair value is made on an instrument-by-instrument basis for the entire instrument, with few
exceptions, and is irreversible. SFAS No. 159 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on its Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In April 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FIN 48-1, Definition of Settlement in
FASB Interpretation No. 48. FIN No. 48 requires a tax position be measured or recognized based
upon the outcomes that could be realized upon ultimate settlement with a tax authority. FSP FIN
48-1 amends FIN No. 48 to clarify when a tax position is effectively settled upon examination by a
taxing authority. The Company adopted FSP FIN 48-1 as of January 1, 2007 with no material impact to
its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2007, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued Statement of
Position (SOP) 07-1, Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide Investment
Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in
Investment Companies. SOP 07-1 provides specific guidance for determining whether an entity meets
the definition of an investment company and should follow the AICPA Audit Accounting Guide
Investment Companies (the Guide). Entities that
meet the definition of an investment company must
apply the provisions of the Guide, which includes a requirement to
carry investments at fair value. This standard is currently applicable
for years beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of this standard, if any, on its
Consolidated Financial Statements. The FASB has proposed an
indefinite delay of this standard pending resolution of
implementation issues.
In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) approved EITF 06-11, Accounting for Income
Tax Benefits on Dividends on Share-Based Payment. The EITF reached a final conclusion that a
realized income tax benefit from dividends or dividend equivalents that are charged to retained
earnings and are paid to employees for equity classified restricted stock, restricted stock units
and stock options should be recognized as an increase to additional paid-in-capital (APIC). Those
tax benefits are considered excess tax benefits under SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment. The amount recognized in APIC for the realized income tax benefit from dividends on those
awards should be included in the pool of excess tax benefits available to absorb tax deficiencies.
The guidance of EITF 06-11 will be adopted prospectively for the Company as of January 1, 2008. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on its Consolidated Financial
Statements.
38
Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements with respect to the
financial condition, results of operation, plans, objectives, future performance and business of
MoneyGram International, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Statements preceded by, followed by or that
include words such as may, will, expect, anticipate, continue, estimate, project,
believes or similar expressions are intended to identify some of the forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are included, along
with this statement, for purposes of complying with the safe harbor provisions of that Act. These
forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially
from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements due to, among others, the risks and
uncertainties described in Part II, Item 1A under the caption Risk Factors of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, as well as the various factors described below. Since it is not possible to
foresee all such factors, you should not consider these factors to be a complete list of all risks
or uncertainties.
|
|
|
Customer Retention. We may be unable to renew material retail agent and financial
institution customer contracts, or we may experience a loss of business from significant
agents or customers. |
|
|
|
|
Market Value of Securities. Material changes in the market value of securities we hold
or permanent impairments of portfolio securities may materially adversely affect our results
of operation and financial condition. |
|
|
|
|
Strategic Review of Payment Systems Segment. The outcome of the strategic review of our
Payment Systems segment and our ability to effectively operate the
segment during and after the review
could materially impact our results of operation and financial condition. |
|
|
|
|
Failure to maintain sufficient capital and unrestricted assets. We may be unable to
maintain sufficient capital and unrestricted assets, which may hamper
our ability to pursue our growth strategy and fund key strategic
initiatives, such as product development
and acquisitions. |
|
|
|
|
Further Downgrade in Credit Ratings. A further downgrade in our credit ratings could
have a material adverse affect on our cost of funds and our ability to attract and retain
customers. |
|
|
|
|
Investment Portfolio Credit Risk. If an issuer of securities in our investment portfolio
defaulted on its payment obligations, the value of our securities would decline, adversely
affecting the value of our investment portfolio. |
|
|
|
|
Liquidity. Material changes in our need for, and the availability of, liquid assets may
affect our ability to meet our payment service regulatory and contractual obligations and
may materially adversely affect our results of operation and financial condition. |
|
|
|
|
Development of New and Enhanced Products and Related Investment. We may be unable to
successfully and timely implement new or enhanced technology, delivery methods and product
and service offerings and we may invest in new products or services that are not successful. |
|
|
|
|
Intellectual Property. The loss of intellectual property protection, the inability to
secure or enforce intellectual property protection or the inability to successfully defend
against an intellectual property infringement action could harm our business and prospects. |
|
|
|
|
Competition. We may be unable to compete against our large competitors, niche
competitors or new competitors that may enter the markets in which we operate. |
|
|
|
|
U.S. and International Regulation. Failure by us or our agents to comply with the laws
and regulatory requirements in the U.S. and abroad, or changes in laws, regulations or other
industry practices and standards could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Operation in Politically Volatile Areas. Offering money transfer transactions through
agents in regions that are politically volatile or, in a limited number of cases, are
subject to certain Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) restrictions could cause
contravention of U.S. law or regulations, subject us to fines and penalties and cause us
reputational harm. |
|
|
|
|
Network and Data Security. If we suffer system interruptions and system failures due to
defects in our software, development delays and installation difficulties, or we suffer a
material security breach of our systems, our business could be harmed. |
39
|
|
|
Business Interruption. In the event of a breakdown, catastrophic event, security breach,
improper operation or any other event impacting our systems or processes or our vendors
systems or processes, or improper action by our employees, agents, customer financial
institutions or third-party vendors, we could suffer financial loss, loss of customers,
regulatory sanctions and damage to our reputation. |
|
|
|
|
Agent Credit and Fraud Risks. We may face credit and fraud exposure if we are unable to
collect funds from our agents who receive the proceeds from the sale of our payment
instruments. |
|
|
|
|
Third-Party Fraud. Fraudulent activity using our services could lead to reputational
damage to our brand and could reduce the use and acceptance of our services. |
|
|
|
|
Litigation or Investigations. Our business and results of operations may be materially
adversely affected by lawsuits or investigations, which could result in material
settlements, fines or penalties. |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Fluctuations. Fluctuations in interest rates may materially adversely
affect revenue derived from investment of funds received from the sale of our payment
instruments and commissions paid to financial institution customers. |
|
|
|
|
New Retail Locations and Acquisitions. Opening new Company owned retail locations and
acquiring businesses subjects us to new risks and may cause a diversion of capital and
managements attention from our core business. |
|
|
|
|
International Migration Patterns. Changes in immigration laws or other circumstances
that discourage international migration could adversely affect our money transfer remittance
volume or growth rate. |
|
|
|
|
Banking Relationships. Inability by us or our agents to maintain existing or establish
new banking relationships could adversely affect our business, results of operation and our
financial condition. |
|
|
|
|
International. Our business and results of operation may be adversely affected by
political, economic or other instability in countries in which we have material agent
relationships. |
|
|
|
|
Internal Controls. Our inability to maintain compliance with the internal control
provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could have a material adverse
effect on our business and stock price. |
|
|
|
|
Anti-Takeover Provisions. Provisions in our charter documents and specific provisions of
Delaware law may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a merger or change in
control of our Company. |
|
|
|
|
Other Factors. Additional risk factors may be described in our other filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. |
Actual results may differ materially from historical and anticipated results. These forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date on which such statements are made, and we undertake no
obligation to update such statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after such date.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company believes that there have been no material changes in our market risk since December 31,
2006, except as set forth below. For further information on market risk, refer to Part II, Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Enterprise
Risk Management in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The
Company uses Value-at-Risk (VAR) modeling and net
investment revenue simulation analysis as one method of measuring and analyzing consolidated interest rate risk. VAR is a risk assessment methodology that
estimates the potential decline in the value of a security or portfolio under various market
conditions. VAR quantifies the change in market value due to changes in volatility and interest
rates over a given time horizon and given a certain level of confidence. The Company utilizes VAR
to quantify the potential decline in the fair value of its investment portfolio using a 95 percent
confidence level and a one-month time horizon. The Company uses a Monte Carlo model that derives
the interest rate change from volatility assumptions, specified probability and time horizon. The
model includes the Companys investment portfolio and interest rate derivative contracts.
40
At September 30, 2007, the VAR is $(27.5) million, given a 95 percent confidence level and a
one-month time horizon. Accordingly, there is a five percent chance the loss on the investment
portfolio over the next month will exceed the $(27.5) million. The high, low
and average VAR for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $(28.3) million, $(20.0) million
and $(25.3) million, respectively. The high, low and average VAR for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 was $(28.3) million, $(16.9) million and $(21.2) million, respectively.
The net investment revenue simulation analysis incorporates substantially all of the Companys
interest sensitive assets and liabilities, together with forecasted changes in the balance sheet
and assumptions that reflect the current interest rate environment. This analysis assumes the yield
curve increases gradually over a one-year period. Table 14 summarizes the changes to our pre-tax
income from continuing operations under various scenarios.
The modeling of our investment portfolio involves a number of assumptions including prepayments,
interest rates and volatility. The VAR model and net investment revenue simulation analyses are
risk analysis tools and do not purport to represent actual losses that will be incurred by the
Company. While we believe that these assumptions are reasonable, different assumptions could
produce materially different estimates.
Table 14 Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis Point Change in Interest Rates |
|
|
Down |
|
Down |
|
Down |
|
Up |
|
Up |
|
Up |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
200 |
|
100 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
100 |
|
200 |
|
Pre-tax income from |
|
$ |
9,071 |
|
|
$ |
6,245 |
|
|
$ |
3,480 |
|
|
$ |
(3,886 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,348 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,249 |
) |
continuing operations
Percent change |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
-2.2 |
% |
|
|
-3.6 |
% |
|
|
-6.3 |
% |
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures As of the end of the period covered by this report (the
Evaluation Date), the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
were effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting There were no changes in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during
the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are party to a variety of legal proceedings that arise in the normal course of our business. In
these actions, plaintiffs may request punitive or other damages that may not be covered by
insurance. We accrue for these items as losses become probable and can be reasonably estimated.
While the results of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, management
believes that the final outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated results of operations or financial position.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Various risks and uncertainties could affect our business. Any of the risks described below or
elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or our other filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission could have a material impact on our business, financial condition or results of
operations. It is not possible to predict or identify all risk factors. Additional risks and
uncertainties not presently known to us or that we believe to be immaterial may also impair our
business operations. Therefore, the following is not intended to be a complete discussion of all
potential risks or uncertainties.
RISK FACTORS
If we lose key customers in either of our segments or are unable to maintain our Global Funds
Transfer agent network, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
41
We may not be able to retain all of our current retail agents or financial institution customers.
The competition for retail agents and financial institution customers is intense. Larger
customers, particularly in our Global Funds Transfer segment are increasingly demanding financial
concessions and more information technology customization. The development and equipment necessary
to meet these demands could require substantial capital expenditures. If we were unable to meet
these demands, we could lose customers and our business and results of operations would be
adversely affected.
If agents decide to leave our Global Funds Transfer network, or if we are unable to sign new agents
to our network, our revenue would decline. Existing agents may generate fewer transactions or less
revenue for various reasons, including increased competition. An agent may encounter business
difficulties unrelated to its provision of our services, which could cause the agent to reduce its
number of locations or hours of operation, or cease doing business altogether. Many of our high
volume agents are in the check cashing industry. There are risks associated with the check cashing
industry that could cause this portion of our agent base to decline. Any regulatory action that
adversely affects check cashers could also cause this portion of our agent base to decline.
A substantial portion of our transaction volume is generated by a limited number of key agents.
During 2006 and 2005, our ten largest agents accounted for 31 percent of our total revenue during
each period and 44 percent and 46 percent, respectively, of the revenue of our Global Funds
Transfer segment. Our largest agent, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., accounted for 17 percent and 13 percent
of our total revenue and 24 percent and 19 percent of the revenue of our Global Funds Transfer
segment in 2006 and 2005, respectively. If any of these key agents were not to renew their
contracts with us, or if such agents were to reduce the number of their locations, or cease doing
business, we might not be able to replace the volume of business conducted through these agents,
and our business and results of operations would be adversely affected.
During 2006 and 2005, our ten largest financial institution customers accounted for 10 percent and
13 percent, respectively, of our total revenue and 36 percent and 39 percent, respectively, of the
revenue of our Payment Systems segment in 2006 and 2005. Our largest financial institution customer
generated 4 percent of our total revenue and 12 percent and 11 percent of the revenue in our
Payment Systems segment in 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Material changes in the market value of securities we hold, or in the securities as to which we act as an advisor, may materially affect our results of operation and financial condition.
The market value of our portfolio may decline in the future due to a variety of factors, including general market conditions, decline in credit rating of the issuer or the tranche of securities in which the Company has invested, credit issues, cash flow performance, defaults or downgrades related to the underlying collateral of the security, liquidity or risk discounts or increases in interest rates for comparable obligations.
The market values of securities we hold has declined and the Company recorded an unrealized loss
of $230.5 million in the third quarter of 2007. The Company holds various types of securities,
including obligations of state and political subdivisions, U.S. government agencies, commercial
and residential mortgage-backed securities, other asset-backed securities and corporate debt
securities. The other asset-backed securities are collateralized by various types of loans
and leases, including home equity, corporate, manufactured housing, credit card and airline.
While the Company obtains third party valuations for the majority of its securities, brokers
and other third parties have increasingly declined to provide valuations for some securities
due to recent market volatility. Despite the Companys robust valuation process, it is possible
that values determined by the Company could differ from those determined by other holders of
similar securities and from the ultimate sale prices if we sold the securities. In addition,
credit rating agencies are continually reviewing securities for potential downgrades which may
impact the fair value of our securities in the future.
The declines in market value of our
portfolio are reflected as an unrealized loss (net of taxes) in Stockholders equity unless the
loss on a specific security is determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired. The Companys
process to determine whether a security is other-than-temporarily impaired includes numerous
objective factors as well as subjective judgments, as described in Note 4 to the Financial
Statements. It is possible that certain of the Companys judgments made in the impairment
evaluation process could prove incorrect. Furthermore, the Company could in the future
determine that securities currently in an unrealized loss position reflected as temporary
impairments have become other-than-temporarily impaired, thereby resulting in a realized
loss through an impairment charge in the Companys income statement.
Our wholly owned subsidiary has entered into an agreement to act as collateral advisor for a
pool of investment securities owned by a third party in which the Company has a residual
interest. Deterioration in the value or performance of this investment pool, while not material
to the Companys own performance, could adversely affect the business and prospects of the
collateral adviser.
We are subject to credit risk related to our investment portfolio and our use of derivatives.
Our credit risk includes the risk that the Company may not collect
interest or principal associated with its investments, as well as counterparty risk associated
with its derivative financial instruments. Approximately 93% of the Companys investment
portfolio as of September 30, 2007 consists of securities that are not issued or guaranteed by
the U.S. government. The Company holds asset-backed securities that are collateralized by
various types of loans and leases, including home equity, corporate, manufactured housing,
credit card and airline, as well as collateralized debt obligations backed by diversified
collateral pools that include residential and commercial mortgages. Certain types of investments
may present a greater risk of non-payment due to the structure of the security, the tranche we
hold and/or the underlying collateral. For example, default rates on the underlying collateral
of a security could accelerate to a level where the Company might not collect any or all of its
interest or principal. In certain cases, it may be impossible to predict for a number of years,
whether a security will experience higher rates of underlying collateral default and the related
impact on the payment of principal and interest. If an issuer of securities or a swap counterparty
defaults or experiences other credit problems, the value of the investment or swap could decline,
and the Companys income and cash flow could be adversely affected.
42
The outcome of the strategic review of our Payment Systems segment and our ability to effectively
operate the segment during and after the review could materially impact our results of operation and
financial condition.
The Company has recently announced the strategic review of its Payment Systems segment. The
Company does not yet know what actions will be taken as a result of the strategic review; however,
both the announcement of the strategic review, as well as future implementation of any plan for the
segment could cause key financial institution customers to seek to terminate or not renew their
agreements with us. The Payment Systems segment represents
approximately 25 percent of the Companys total revenue. The outcome of the strategic review, regardless of the specific
action to be taken, may cause a reduction in the Companys revenue and operating income.
Additionally, the Company could incur expenses and charges in implementing any plan. Any plan to
be implemented for the Payment Systems segment could have impacts on our business as a whole.
The result of the strategic review may have an impact on the Companys investment portfolio. A
large portion of the Companys investment portfolio is generated by the Payment Systems segment,
although specific assets in the investment portfolio are not allocated between the lines of
business. The Company has currently determined that the unrealized losses in its investment
portfolio represent temporary impairments as we have both the intent and ability to hold these
investments to maturity. The outcome of the strategic review and the ultimate plan for the
Payments System segment may change this determination and cause the Company to recognize
impairment charges in the Companys consolidated income
statement.
Failure to maintain sufficient capital or unrestricted assets could materially impact our results
of operation and financial condition.
If the Company does not have sufficient capital, we may not be able to pursue our growth strategy
and fund key strategic initiatives such as product development and acquisitions. The Company
recently experienced a decline in its unrestricted assets as a result of the loss of value in the
investment portfolio and fully drew on its $350 million credit facility to supplement its
unrestricted assets and fund an acquisition. The Company has obtained
the commitment of a lender
for a new 364-day $150 million revolving credit agreement. However, there can be no assurance that
the additional $150 million revolving credit facility will provide sufficient capital for the
Company, or that the Company will at all times have access to additional capital. If the Company
raises additional funds through further issuances of equity securities, our existing shareholders
could suffer dilution and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and
privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock.
A further downgrade in our credit rating may materially affect our results of operation and
financial condition.
In October
2007, two of the three debt rating agencies announced a downgrade of
the Companys senior unsecured debt to the
lowest level of investment grade and placed the Company on watch for potential further downgrades.
Both have cited, among other factors, the reduction in the Companys unrestricted assets caused by
its net unrealized losses. It is possible that one or more rating agencies will in the future
determine to downgrade the Companys debt further and that one or more of the ratings could then be
below investment grade. The financial impact of any downgrade in the Companys debt ratings will
depend on the actual ratings, whether the ratings are split between investment and non-investment
grade and the identity of the agency taking this action. Any downgrade could increase the
Companys cost of borrowing. Our sale of receivables counterparty may also decline to purchase
additional receivables or terminate its agreement with us upon a decline in our debt
ratings. It is also possible that ratings downgrades could affect our ability to attract and
retain customers. One financial institution customer in our Payment Systems segment has the right
to terminate its contract in the event of a downgrade by S&P and another has the right
to terminate if no rating agency has rated the Companys debt as investment grade.
43
Our business may require cash in amounts greater than the amount of available credit facilities and
liquid assets that we have on hand at a particular time, and if we were forced to ultimately
liquidate assets or secure other financing as a result of unexpected liquidity needs, our earnings
could be reduced.
We are subject to risks relating to daily liquidity needs, as well as extraordinary events, such as
the unexpected loss of a significant customer or unexpected termination of our sale of receivables
agreement. Material decreases in the value of our investment portfolio due to market conditions
may also affect our ability to obtain liquid assets through uncommitted repurchase agreements. On a
daily basis, we receive remittances from our agents and financial institution customers and we must
clear and pay the financial instruments that were previously sold and currently are presented for
payment. We monitor and maintain a liquidity portfolio along with credit lines and repurchase
agreements in order to cover payment service obligations as they are presented as well as maintain
a sufficient cushion above the payment service obligations. We have
currently fully drawn our $350.0 million credit agreement and
have obtained the commitment of a lender
for a new 364-day $150.0 million unsecured revolving credit
facility. If these sources of funds are insufficient as a result of unexpected
liquidity needs, and we were forced to liquidate portfolio assets or
secure other financing, our
earnings would be reduced. In addition, if we were to lose any of our significant customers, in
addition to losing the related revenues, we may have to liquidate investments or seek to borrow for
a period of time to fund our obligation to clear the outstanding instruments issued on behalf of
that customer at the termination of its contract. We may not be able to plan effectively for every
customer contract termination, which could result in sale of investments at a loss or at lower
profits than we would otherwise realize due to prevailing market conditions.
The Company also maintains several special purpose entities for the benefit of our official check
customers in which we are required to hold investments with a value sufficient to cover the
clearance of items. Investments held in these special purpose entities may not be available for
other liquidity needs.
If we fail to successfully develop and timely introduce new and enhanced products and services or
we make substantial investments in an unsuccessful new product or service, our business, prospects,
financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our future growth will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to develop and successfully
introduce new and enhanced methods of providing money transfer, money order, official check, bill
payment and related services that keep pace with competitive introductions, technological changes
and the demands and preferences of our agents, financial institution customers and consumers. Many
of our competitors offer stored-value cards and other electronic payment mechanisms, including
various internet-based and cellular phone payment services, that could be substituted for traditional forms of
payment, such as the money orders, bill payment and money transfer services that we offer. If these
alternative payment mechanisms become widely substituted for our products and services, and we do
not develop and ramp up similar alternative payment mechanisms successfully and on a timely basis,
our business and prospects could be adversely affected. Additionally, we may make future
investments or enter into strategic alliances to develop new technologies and services to further
our strategic objectives, strengthen our existing businesses and remain competitive. Investments in
new technologies and strategic alliances are inherently risky and we cannot guarantee that such
investments or alliances will be successful or will not materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
If we are unable to adequately protect the intellectual property rights related to our existing and
any new or enhanced products and services, or if we are unable to avoid infringing on the rights of
others, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely
affected.
We rely on a combination of patent, trademark and copyright laws, trade secret protection and
confidentiality and license agreements to protect the intellectual property rights related to our
products and services. We also investigate the intellectual property rights of third parties to
prevent our infringement of those rights. We may be subject to claims of third parties that we
infringe or have misappropriated their proprietary rights. We may be required to spend resources to
defend any such claims or to protect and police our own rights. Some intellectual property rights
may not be protected by intellectual property laws, particularly in foreign jurisdictions. The loss
of intellectual property protection, the inability to secure or enforce intellectual property
protection or to successfully defend against an intellectual property infringement action could
harm our business and prospects.
We face intense competition, and if we are unable to continue to compete effectively, our business,
financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.
The industries in which we compete are highly competitive, and we face a variety of competitors
across our businesses. In addition, new competitors or alliances among established companies may
emerge. Our primary competition comes from Western Union, which has substantially greater
transaction volume than we do. Western Union has a larger agent base, a more established brand name
and substantially greater financial and marketing resources than we do. We cannot anticipate what,
if any, effect Western Union will have on our business or the money transfer industry generally.
44
Money transfer, money order and walk-in bill payment services within the Global Funds Transfer
segment of our business compete in a concentrated industry, with a small number of large
competitors and a large number of small, niche competitors. Our large competitors are other
providers of money orders and money transfer services, including Western Union and the U.S. Postal
Service with respect to money orders. We also compete with banks and niche person-to-person money
transfer service providers that serve select send and receive corridors. The electronic bill
payment services within the Global Funds Transfer segment of our business compete in a highly
fragmented consumer to business payment industry. Competitors in the electronic payments area
include financial institutions, third parties that host financial institution and biller payment
services, third parties that offer payment services directly to consumers and billers offering
their own bill payment services.
The Payment Systems segment of our business competes in a concentrated industry with a small number
of large competitors. Our competitors in this segment are Federal Home Loan Banks. We also compete with financial institutions
that have developed internal processing capabilities or services similar to ours and do not
outsource these services.
Recent levels of growth in consumer money transfer transactions and other payment products may not
continue. In addition, consolidation among payment services companies has occurred and could
continue. If we are unable to compete effectively in the changing marketplace, our business,
financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.
Our agents and MoneyGram are subject to a number of risks relating to U.S. and International
regulatory requirements which could result in material settlements, fines or penalties or changes
in their or our business operations that may adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Our business is subject to a wide range of laws and regulations which vary from country to country.
The money transfer business is subject to a variety of regulations aimed at the prevention of money
laundering and terrorism. We are subject to U.S. federal anti-money laundering laws, including the
Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act, the requirements of the Office of Foreign
Assets Control (OFAC), which prohibit us from transmitting money to specified countries or on
behalf of prohibited individuals and the anti-money laundering laws in many countries where we
operate, particularly in the European Union. We are also subject to financial services regulations,
money transfer and payment instrument licensing regulations, currency control regulations, escheat
laws, laws covering consumer privacy, data protection and information security and consumer
disclosure and consumer protection laws. Many of the laws to which we are subject are evolving,
unclear and inconsistent across various jurisdictions, making compliance challenging.
Any intentional or negligent violation of the laws and regulations set forth above by our employees
or our agents could lead to significant fines or penalties, and could limit our ability to conduct
business in some jurisdictions. In addition to those direct costs, a failure by us or our agents to
comply with applicable laws and regulations also could seriously damage our reputation and brands,
and result in diminished revenue and profit and increased operating costs.
Changes in laws, regulations or other industry practices and standards, or interpretations of legal
or regulatory requirements may occur which could increase our compliance and other costs of doing
business, could require significant systems redevelopment, reduce the market for or value of our
products or services or render our products or services less profitable or obsolete, and could have
an adverse effect on our results of operations. Changes in the laws affecting the kinds of entities
that are permitted to act as money transfer agents (such as changes in requirements for
capitalization or ownership) could adversely affect our ability to distribute our services and the
cost of providing such services, both by us and our agents. If onerous regulatory requirements were
imposed on our agents, they could lead to a loss of agents, which, in turn, could lead to a loss of
retail business.
Failure by us or our agents to comply with the laws and regulatory requirements of applicable
regulatory authorities could result in, among other things, revocation of required licenses or
registrations, loss of approved status, termination of contracts with banks or retail
representatives, administrative enforcement actions and fines, class action lawsuits, cease and
desist orders and civil and criminal liability. The occurrence of one or more of these events could
materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company conducts money transfer transactions through agents in some regions that are
politically volatile or, in a limited number of cases, are subject to certain OFAC restrictions.
The Company conducts money transfer transactions through agents in some regions that are
politically volatile or, in a limited number of cases, are subject to certain OFAC restrictions.
While the Company has instituted policies and procedures to protect against violations of law, it
is possible that the Companys money transfer service or other products could be used by
wrong-doers in a contravention of U.S. law or regulations. In addition to monetary fines or
penalties that the Company could incur, the Company is also subject to reputational harm that could
adversely impact the value of the shareholders investment.
45
We face security risks related to our electronic processing and transmission of confidential
customer information. A material breach of security of our systems could harm our business.
Any significant security or privacy breaches in our facilities, computer networks and databases
could harm our business and reputation, cause inquiries and fines or penalties from regulatory or
governmental authorities and cause a loss of customers. We rely on encryption software and other
technologies to provide security for processing and transmission of confidential customer
information. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or
other events or developments, including improper acts by third parties, may result in a compromise
or breach of the security measures we use to protect customer transaction data. We may be required
to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against these security breaches or to
alleviate problems caused by these breaches. Third-party contractors also may experience security
breaches involving the storage and transmission of our confidential customer information. If users
gain improper access to our or our contractors systems or databases, they may be able to steal,
publish, delete or modify confidential customer information. A security breach could lead to
reputational harm and make our customers less confident in our services.
Our business involves the movement of large sums of money, and, as a result, our business is
particularly dependent on our ability to process and settle transactions accurately and on the
efficient and uninterrupted operation of our computer network systems and data centers.
Our ability to provide reliable service largely depends on the efficient and uninterrupted
operation of our computer network systems and data centers. Our business involves the movement of
large sums of money. Our revenues consist primarily of transaction fees that we charge for the
movement of this money and investment revenues. These transaction fees represent only a small
fraction of the total amount of money that we move. Because we are responsible for large sums of
money that are substantially greater than our revenues, the success of our business particularly
depends upon the efficient and error-free handling of the money that is remitted to us and that is
used to clear payment instruments or complete money transfers. We rely on the ability of our
employees and our internal systems and processes to process these transactions in an efficient,
uninterrupted and error-free manner. In addition, we rely on third-party vendors in our business,
including clearing banks which clear our money orders and official checks and certain of our
telecommunications providers.
In the event of a breakdown, catastrophic event (such as fire, natural disaster, power loss,
telecommunications failure or physical break-in), security breach, improper operation or any other
event impacting our systems or processes or our vendors systems or processes, or improper action
by our employees, agents, customer financial institutions or third party vendors, we could suffer
financial loss, loss of customers, regulatory sanctions and damage to our reputation. The measures
we have enacted, such as the implementation of disaster recovery plans and redundant computer
systems, may not be successful and we may experience problems other than system failures. We may
also experience software defects, development delays and installation difficulties, which would
harm our business and reputation and expose us to potential liability and increased operating
expenses. Certain of our agent contracts, including Wal-Mart, contain service level standards
pertaining to the operation of our system, and give the agent a right to collect damages and in
extreme situations a right of termination for system downtime exceeding agreed upon service levels.
If we face system interruptions and system failures our business interruption insurance may not be
adequate to compensate us for all losses or damages that we may incur.
We face credit and fraud risks from our retail agents.
The vast majority of our Global Funds Transfer business is conducted through independent agents
that provide our products and services to consumers at their business locations. Our agents receive
the proceeds from the sale of our payment instruments and money transfers and we must then collect
these funds from the agents. As a result, we have credit exposure to our agents, which averages
approximately $1.2 billion in the aggregate, representing a combination of money orders, money
transfers and bill payment proceeds. During 2006, this credit exposure was spread across almost
29,000 agents, of which 13 owed us in excess of $15.0 million each at any one time.
We are not insured against credit losses, except in circumstances of agent theft or fraud. If an
agent becomes insolvent, files for bankruptcy, commits fraud or otherwise fails to remit money
order or money transfer proceeds to us, we must nonetheless pay the money order or complete the
money transfer on behalf of the consumer. Moreover, we have made, and may in the future make,
secured or unsecured loans to retail agents under limited circumstances or allow agents to retain
our funds for a period of time before remitting them to us. The failure of agents owing us large
amounts to remit funds to us or to repay such amounts could materially adversely affect our
business, results of operations and our financial condition.
46
An increase in fraudulent activity using our services could lead to reputational damage to our
brand and could reduce the use and acceptance of our services.
Criminals are using increasingly sophisticated methods to engage in illegal activities such as
fraud and identity theft. As we make more of our services available over the internet we subject
ourselves to new types of credit and fraud risk, as requirements such as customer authentication
are more complex with internet services. If fraud levels involving our services were to rise, it
could lead to regulatory intervention and reputational and financial damage to our brand. This in
turn could reduce the use and acceptance of our services or increase our compliance costs, and
thereby have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Litigation or investigations involving our agents or MoneyGram, which could result in material
settlements, fines or penalties may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Our business has in the past been, and may in the future continue to be, the subject of class
actions, regulatory actions, investigations or other litigation. The outcome of class action
lawsuits, regulatory actions or investigations is difficult to assess or quantify. Plaintiffs or
law enforcement agencies in these types of lawsuits or investigations may seek recovery of very
large or indeterminate amounts, and the magnitude of these actions may remain unknown for
substantial periods of time. The cost to defend or settle future lawsuits or investigations may be
significant.
There may also be adverse publicity associated with lawsuits and investigations that could decrease
customer acceptance of our agents and our services. As a result, litigation or investigations
involving our agents or MoneyGram may adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by fluctuations in
interest rates.
We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from the investment of funds we receive from the
sale of payment instruments, such as official checks and money orders, until these instruments are
settled. We generally invest these funds in long-term fixed-income securities. We pay the financial
institutions to which we provide official check outsourcing services a commission based on the
average balance of funds produced by their sale of official checks. This commission is generally
calculated on the basis of a variable rate based on short-term financial indices, such as the
federal funds rate. In addition, we have agreements to sell, on a periodic basis, undivided
percentage interests in some of our receivables from agents at a price that is discounted based on
short-term interest rates. To mitigate the effects of interest rate fluctuations on our commission
expense and the net proceeds from our sales of agent receivables, we enter into variable-to-fixed
rate swap agreements. These swap agreements require us to pay our counterparty a fixed interest
rate on an agreed notional amount, while our counterparty pays us a variable interest rate on that
same notional amount.
Fluctuations in interest rates affect the value and amount of revenue produced by our investment
portfolio, the amount of commissions that we pay, the net proceeds from our sale of receivables and
the amount that we pay or receive under our swap agreements. As a result, our net investment
revenue, which is the difference, or spread, between the amount we earn on our investment
portfolio and the commissions we pay and the discount on the sale of receivables, net of the effect
of the swap agreements, is subject to interest rate risk as the components of net investment
revenue are not perfectly matched through time and across all possible interest rate scenarios.
Certain investments in our portfolio, primarily fixed-rate mortgage-backed investments, are subject
to prepayment with no penalty to the borrower. As interest rates decrease, borrowers are more
likely to prepay fixed-rate debt, resulting in cash flows that are received earlier than expected.
Replacing the higher-rate investments that prepay with lower rate investments could reduce our net
investment revenue. Conversely, an increase in interest rates may result in slower than expected
prepayments and, therefore, cash flows that are received later than expected. In this case, there
is risk that the cost of our commission payments may reprice faster than our investments and at a
higher cost, which could reduce our net investment revenue.
The opening of new retail locations and acquisition or start-up of businesses create risks and may
affect our operating results.
We have recently opened several Company owned retail locations for the sale of our products and
services. Operating such retail locations presents new risks for us. After substantial capital
investment in such retail locations it is uncertain how such locations will be accepted in the
market and how quickly transaction volume will increase to offset such investment. We may be
subject to additional laws and regulations which are triggered by our ownership of the retail
locations and our employment of the individuals staffing such retail locations. We also become
subject to certain risks inherent in operating any retail location including theft, personal injury
and property damage, risks associated with long-term lease obligations and employee matters.
47
Additionally, we may from time to time acquire or start-up businesses both inside and outside of
the U.S. The acquisition and integration of businesses, such as
our recent acquisition of PropertyBridge, involve a number of risks. We may not be
able to successfully integrate any businesses that we acquire, including their facilities,
personnel, financial systems, distribution, operations and general operating procedures. If we fail
to successfully integrate acquisitions, we could experience increased costs and other operating
inefficiencies, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
The diversion of capital and managements attention from our core business that results from
opening retail locations or acquiring or starting-up new businesses could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
A material slow down or complete disruption in international migration patterns could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The money transfer business relies in part on migration patterns, as individuals move from their
native country into countries with greater economic opportunities or a more stable political
environment. A significant portion of money transfer transactions are initiated by immigrants or
refugees sending money back to their native countries. Changes in immigration laws, economic
development patterns that discourage international migration and political or other events (such as
war, terrorism or health emergencies) that make it more difficult for individuals to migrate or
work abroad could adversely affect our money transfer remittance volume or growth rate and could
each have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
An inability for our agents or for us to maintain adequate banking relationships may adversely
affect our financial condition.
We and our agents are considered Money Service Businesses, or MSBs, in the United States under
the Bank Secrecy Act. The federal banking regulators are increasingly taking the stance that MSBs,
as a class, are high risk. As a result, several financial institutions, which look to the federal
regulators for guidance, have terminated their banking relationships with some of our agents and
one with us. If agents are unable to maintain existing or establish new banking relationships, they
may not be able to continue to offer our services. Any inability on our part to maintain existing
or establish new banking relationships could adversely affect our business, results of operations
and our financial condition.
There are a number of risks associated with our international sales and operations that could harm
our business.
We provided money transfer services between and among approximately 170 countries and territories
at September 30, 2007, and our strategy is to expand our international business. Our ability to
grow in international markets and our future results could be harmed by a number of factors,
including:
|
|
|
changes in political and economic conditions and potential instability in certain
regions; |
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory requirements or in foreign policy and the adoption of foreign laws
detrimental to our business; |
|
|
|
|
burdens of complying with a wide variety of laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
|
possible fraud or theft losses, and lack of compliance by international representatives
in remote locations and foreign legal systems where collection and enforcement may be
difficult or costly; |
|
|
|
|
reduced protection for our intellectual property rights; |
|
|
|
|
unfavorable tax rules or trade barriers; |
|
|
|
|
inability to secure, train or monitor international agents; and |
|
|
|
|
failure to successfully manage our exposure to foreign currency exchange rates. |
Failure to maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse affect on our business and stock price.
We are required to certify and report on our compliance with the requirements of Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public
accounting firm addressing these assessments. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal
controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be
able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that
we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404. In
order to achieve effective internal controls we may need to enhance our accounting systems or
processes which could increase our cost of doing business. Any failure to achieve and maintain an
effective internal control environment could have a material adverse effect on our business.
48
Our charter documents, our rights plan and Delaware law contain provisions that could delay or
prevent an acquisition of our Company, which could inhibit your ability to receive a premium on
your investment from a possible sale of our Company.
Our charter documents contain provisions that may discourage third parties from seeking to acquire
our Company. In addition, we have adopted a rights plan which enables our Board of Directors to
issue preferred share purchase rights that would be triggered by certain prescribed events. These
provisions and specific provisions of Delaware law relating to business combinations with
interested stockholders may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a merger or change
in control of our Company. Some of these provisions may discourage a future acquisition of our
Company even if stockholders would receive an attractive value for their shares or if a significant
number of our stockholders believed such a proposed transaction to be in their best interests. As a
result, stockholders who desire to participate in such a transaction may not have the opportunity
to do so.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On November 18, 2004, our Board of Directors authorized a plan to repurchase, at our discretion, of
up to 2,000,000 shares of MoneyGram common stock on the open market. On August 18, 2005, the Board
of Directors increased its share buyback authorization by 5,000,000 shares to a total of 7,000,000
shares. On May 9, 2007, the Board of Directors increased its share buyback authorization by an
additional 5,000,000 shares to a total of 12,000,000 shares. These authorizations were announced
publicly in our press releases issued on November 18, 2004, August 18, 2005 and May 9, 2007,
respectively. The repurchase authorization is effective until such time as the Company has
repurchased 12,000,000 common shares. Shares of MoneyGram common stock tendered to the Company in
connection with the exercise of stock options or vesting of restricted stock are not considered
repurchased shares under the terms of the repurchase authorization. As of September 30, 2007, we
have repurchased 6,795,000 shares of our common stock under this authorization and have remaining
authorization to repurchase up to 5,205,000 shares.
The following table sets forth information in connection with purchases made by us, or on our
behalf, of shares of our common stock during the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007. The
total number of shares purchased includes shares surrendered to the Company in payment of
individual income taxes in connection with the exercise of stock options or the vesting of
restricted stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
of Shares that May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Average Price |
|
Announced Plan |
|
Under the Plan or |
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
Paid per Share |
|
or Program |
|
Program |
|
July 1 - July 31, 2007 |
|
|
330,000 |
|
|
$ |
27.78 |
|
|
|
330,000 |
|
|
|
5,345,000 |
|
August 1 - August 31, 2007 |
|
|
143,633 |
|
|
$ |
23.67 |
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
5,205,000 |
|
September 1 - September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,205,000 |
|
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits are filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as listed in the accompanying Exhibit
Index.
49
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MoneyGram International, Inc.
(Registrant)
|
|
November 7, 2007 |
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Jean C. Benson
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Controller |
|
|
(Chief Accounting Officer and
Authorized Officer) |
|
|
50
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
+10.1
|
|
MoneyGram International, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, as
amended and restated August 16, 2007 (incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 99.01 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K filed August 22, 2007). |
|
|
|
+10.2
|
|
MoneyGram Supplemental Pension Plan, as amended and restated
August 16, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit
99.02 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed August
22, 2007). |
|
|
|
+10.3
|
|
MoneyGram International, Inc. Executive Severance Plan (Tier I),
as amended and restated August 16, 2007 (incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 99.03 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K filed August 22, 2007). |
|
|
|
+10.4
|
|
MoneyGram International, Inc. Executive Severance Plan (Tier
II), as amended and restated August 16, 2007 (incorporated
herein by reference from Exhibit 99.04 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed August 22, 2007). |
|
|
|
+10.5
|
|
2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of MoneyGram
International, Inc., as amended and restated August 16, 2007
(incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 99.05 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 22, 2007). |
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
*32.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
*32.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
+ |
|
Denotes form of management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as
an exhibit to this report. |
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
51