e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-27115
PCTEL, Inc.
(Exact Name of Business Issuer as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
77-0364943 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
8725 W. Higgins Road, Suite 400,
|
|
60631 |
Chicago IL
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(Address of Principal Executive Office) |
|
|
(773) 243-3000
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
o Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock,
as of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Title |
|
Outstanding |
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share
|
|
22,443,875 as of May 1, 2007 |
PCTEL, Inc.
Form 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PCTEL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED, in thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
47,762 |
|
|
$ |
59,148 |
|
Short-term investment |
|
|
19,977 |
|
|
|
11,623 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $299 and $333, respectively |
|
|
17,767 |
|
|
|
14,034 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
8,503 |
|
|
|
7,258 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
2,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
96,076 |
|
|
|
94,122 |
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net |
|
|
12,842 |
|
|
|
12,357 |
|
GOODWILL |
|
|
17,602 |
|
|
|
17,569 |
|
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net |
|
|
6,756 |
|
|
|
7,451 |
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
134,528 |
|
|
$ |
132,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
2,456 |
|
|
$ |
885 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
5,389 |
|
|
|
6,964 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
10,933 |
|
|
|
9,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term accrued liabilities |
|
|
2,308 |
|
|
|
2,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
13,241 |
|
|
$ |
12,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS and CONTINGENCIES (Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares
authorized, 22,437,009 and 22,065,145 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
166,873 |
|
|
|
165,556 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(47,429 |
) |
|
|
(46,671 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
1,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
121,287 |
|
|
|
120,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
134,528 |
|
|
$ |
132,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
PCTEL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED, in thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
REVENUES |
|
$ |
18,952 |
|
|
$ |
18,566 |
|
COST OF REVENUES |
|
|
9,200 |
|
|
|
9,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
9,752 |
|
|
|
8,722 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
3,975 |
|
|
|
2,916 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
3,467 |
|
|
|
3,543 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
3,749 |
|
|
|
3,748 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
Restructuring charges, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
553 |
|
Gain on sale of assets and related royalties |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
11,636 |
|
|
|
11,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS |
|
|
(1,884 |
) |
|
|
(2,825 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME, NET |
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
|
(931 |
) |
|
|
(2,205 |
) |
BENEFIT FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
$ |
(758 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
Shares used in computing basic loss per share |
|
|
21,029 |
|
|
|
20,645 |
|
Diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
Shares used in computing diluted loss per share |
|
|
21,029 |
|
|
|
20,645 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
4
PCTEL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
($ |
758 |
) |
|
($ |
2,198 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
1,527 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
Gain on sale of assets and related royalties |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
Loss on disposal/sale of property and equipment |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Payment of withholding tax on stock-based compensation |
|
|
(778 |
) |
|
|
(1,008 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(3,733 |
) |
|
|
136 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
(1,245 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
809 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,571 |
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(1,498 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(3,208 |
) |
|
|
(528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(965 |
) |
|
|
(792 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
Purchase of short-term investments |
|
|
(19,977 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments |
|
|
11,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds on sale of assets and related royalties |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(9,069 |
) |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
Short-term borrowings, net |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(11,375 |
) |
|
|
(312 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
59,148 |
|
|
|
58,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year |
|
$ |
47,762 |
|
|
$ |
58,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
5
PCTEL, Inc.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all
of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating
results for the three months ended March 31, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results
that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007. For further information, refer to the
consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the companys annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Basis of Consolidation and Foreign Currency Translation
The company uses the United States dollar as the functional currency for the financial statements.
The company uses the local currency as the functional currency for its subsidiaries in China
(Yuan), Ireland (Euro), United Kingdom (Pounds Sterling), Serbia (Euro) and Japan (Yen). Assets
and liabilities of these operations are translated to U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect
at the applicable balance sheet date, and revenues and expenses are translated using average
exchange rates prevailing during that period. Translation gains (losses) are recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income as a component of stockholders equity. All gains and losses
resulting from other transactions originally in foreign currencies and then translated into U.S.
dollars are included in net income. Net foreign exchange gains resulting from foreign currency
transactions included in other income (expense), net were $26,000 and $28,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (SFAS No. 159) provides the option to report certain financial assets and
liabilities at fair value, with the intent to mitigate volatility in financial reporting that can
occur when related assets and liabilities are recorded on different bases. This statement is
effective for us beginning January 1, 2008. We do not expect SFAS 159 to have a material impact on
our consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 2007, the company adopted provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). See Note 10 on Income Taxes for discussion of FIN 48.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value
measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value
hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. SFAS 157 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We will adopt SFAS 157 on
its effective date. The company is in the process of determining any potential impact that the
adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our financial statements.
In May 2005, FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of
APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3. This statement applies to all voluntary changes in
accounting principle, and requires retrospective application to prior periods financial statements
for changes in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 will be effective for the company beginning in
fiscal year 2007. This statement does not have a material impact on the companys consolidated
financial statements.
2. Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
At March 31, 2007, cash equivalents were invested in money market funds as well as
certificates of deposit, commercial paper, and municipal bonds with original maturities of less
than 90 days. At March 31, 2007, short-term investments were invested in certificates of deposit,
commercial paper, and municipal bonds with original maturities of greater than 90 days.
6
3. Inventories
Inventories as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were composed of raw materials, sub
assemblies, finished goods and work-in-process. Sub assemblies are included within raw materials.
As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the allowance for inventory losses was $1.0 million and
$0.9 million, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
7,181 |
|
|
$ |
6,089 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
Excess & Obsolescence reserves |
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
|
|
(883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
$ |
8,503 |
|
|
$ |
7,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Earnings per Share
The following table set forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in
thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(758 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
22,314 |
|
|
|
21,820 |
|
Less: Weighted average shares subject to repurchase |
|
|
(1,285 |
) |
|
|
(1,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
21,029 |
|
|
|
20,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
21,029 |
|
|
|
20,645 |
|
Weighted average shares subject to repurchase |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Weighted average common stock option grants |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Weighted average common shares and common stock
Equivalents outstanding |
|
|
21,029 |
|
|
|
20,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
These amounts have been excluded since the effect is anti-dilutive. |
Common stock equivalents consist of stock options and restricted shares using the treasury stock
method. Common stock options and restricted shares are excluded from the computation of diluted
earnings per share if their effect is anti-dilutive. The weighted average common stock option
grants excluded from the calculations of diluted net loss per share were 725,000 and 491,000 for
the three months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006.
5. Stock-Based Compensation
In the first fiscal quarter of 2006, the company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share Based
Payments, which revises SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123(R)
requires the company to record compensation expense for share-based payments, including employee
stock options, at fair value. Prior to fiscal 2006, the company had accounted for its stock-based
compensation awards pursuant to Accounting Principles Opinion (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and its related interpretations, which allowed use of the intrinsic value
method. Under the intrinsic value method, compensation expense for stock option based employee
compensation was not recognized in the income statement as all stock options granted by the company
had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the option grant
date.
7
The company elected to use the modified prospective transition method to adopt SFAS No. 123(R).
Under this transition method, compensation expense includes expense for all share-based payments
granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, and the expense for all
share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006 based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R).
Total stock compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was $1.4 million in the
consolidated statement of operations, which included $0.7 million of restricted stock amortization,
$0.3 million for stock option expense, and $0.3 million for stock bonuses, and $0.1 million for
stock compensation expense for the ESPP. Total stock compensation expense for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 was $1.2 million, which included $0.5 million for restricted stock
amortization, $0.3 million for stock option expense, and $0.3 million for stock bonuses, and $0.1
million for stock compensation expense for the ESPP.
Stock Options
The fair value of each unvested option was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option valuation model with the following assumptions during the three months ended March 31, 2007
and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Weighted average fair value of options granted |
|
$ |
2.44 |
|
|
$ |
2.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
None |
|
None |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
Expected life (in years) |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
The company issued 67,260 options in the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 134,590 options
in the three months ended March 31, 2006. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the
company received $0.4 million in proceeds from the exercise of 54,108 options. For the three
months ended March 31, 2006, the company received $0.4 million in proceeds from the exercise of
58,604 options. As of March 31, 2007, the unrecognized compensation expense related to the
unvested portion of the companys stock options was approximately $1.7 million, net of estimated
forfeitures to be recognized through 2009 over a weighted average period of 1.5 years.
A summary of the companys stock option activity and related information follows for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 (in thousands except share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
Summary of |
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Option |
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Activity |
|
Price |
|
Life (Yrs) |
|
Value |
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
3,965,627 |
|
|
$ |
9.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
67,260 |
|
|
|
9.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired or cancelled |
|
|
(6,669 |
) |
|
|
9.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(19,445 |
) |
|
|
9.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(54,108 |
) |
|
|
10.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
3,952,665 |
|
|
$ |
9.66 |
|
|
|
6.77 |
|
|
$ |
5,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
3,213,669 |
|
|
$ |
9.77 |
|
|
|
6.28 |
|
|
$ |
4,846 |
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding under all Stock Plans at
March 31, 2007:
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Range of |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
Exercise Prices |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
$ 6.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7.20 |
|
|
|
445,571 |
|
|
|
5.16 |
|
|
$ |
6.88 |
|
|
|
445,571 |
|
|
$ |
6.88 |
|
7.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.83 |
|
|
|
424,870 |
|
|
|
6.39 |
|
|
|
7.52 |
|
|
|
350,665 |
|
|
|
7.53 |
|
7.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.54 |
|
|
|
419,136 |
|
|
|
6.46 |
|
|
|
8.08 |
|
|
|
327,963 |
|
|
|
7.99 |
|
8.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.11 |
|
|
|
406,508 |
|
|
|
7.24 |
|
|
|
8.91 |
|
|
|
259,180 |
|
|
|
8.89 |
|
9.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
404,230 |
|
|
|
8.71 |
|
|
|
9.40 |
|
|
|
87,911 |
|
|
|
9.73 |
|
10.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.70 |
|
|
|
635,180 |
|
|
|
6.67 |
|
|
|
10.53 |
|
|
|
597,180 |
|
|
|
10.53 |
|
10.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.55 |
|
|
|
456,170 |
|
|
|
7.06 |
|
|
|
11.20 |
|
|
|
384,199 |
|
|
|
11.25 |
|
11.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.84 |
|
|
|
720,100 |
|
|
|
6.81 |
|
|
|
11.72 |
|
|
|
720,100 |
|
|
|
11.72 |
|
12.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.30 |
|
|
|
33,400 |
|
|
|
6.39 |
|
|
|
12.82 |
|
|
|
33,400 |
|
|
|
12.82 |
|
59.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59.00 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
2.84 |
|
|
|
59.00 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
59.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 6.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
59.00 |
|
|
|
3,952,665 |
|
|
|
6.77 |
|
|
$ |
9.66 |
|
|
|
3,213,669 |
|
|
$ |
9.77 |
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP)
Eligible employees are able to purchase common stock at the lower of 85% of the fair market value
of the common stock on the first or last day of each offering period under the companys Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). Each offering period is six months. The company received proceeds of
$0.3 million from the issuance of 39,069 shares under the ESPP in February 2007.
Based on the 15% discount and the fair value of the option feature of this plan, this plan is
considered compensatory under SFAS 123(R). Compensation expense is calculated using the fair value
of the employees purchase rights under the Black-Scholes model.
The key assumptions used in the valuation model during the nine months ended March 31, 2007 and
2006 are provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Dividend yield |
|
None |
|
None |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
Expected life (in years) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Restricted Stock
Restricted stock is amortized ratably over the vesting period of the applicable shares. The
company grants restricted awards that generally vest over service periods. Grants to new employees
vest over five years. In prior years, the annual grants to employees vested over five years. In
the quarter ended March 31, 2007, the company issued its annual grants to employees with a
four-year vesting period. The company has granted certain executives with performance based
restricted stock awards. Each quarter, the company determines compensation expense for these
awards based on estimated achievement compared to the targets for each grant.
The company issued 301,130 restricted awards in the quarter ended March 31, 2007. During the
quarter ended March 31, 2006, the company issued 275,000 restricted stock awards. For the three
months ended March 31, 2007, 175,420 shares vested with a value of $1.7 million and for the three
months ended March 31, 2006, 166,360 shares vested with a value of $1.5 million. Total
unrecognized compensation expense
related to restricted stock was approximately $10.4 million, net of forfeitures to be recognized
through 2012 over a weighted average period of 3.1 years.
A summary of the companys restricted stock activity and related information follows for the three
months ended March 31, 2007:
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Restricted |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,164,748 |
|
|
|
8.56 |
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
|
301,130 |
|
|
|
10.42 |
|
Restricted shares vested |
|
|
(175,420 |
) |
|
|
8.87 |
|
Restricted shares cancelled |
|
|
(5,400 |
) |
|
|
7.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,285,058 |
|
|
|
8.98 |
|
Short Term Incentive Plan
The bonuses for the companys Short Term Incentive Plan are paid in shares of the companys common
stock. The shares earned under the plan are issued in the first quarter following the end of the
fiscal year. In the three months ended March 31, 2007, the company issued 42,923 shares, net of
shares withheld for payment of withholding tax, for the 2006 Short Term Incentive Plan. In the
three months ended March 31, 2006, the company issued 140,290 shares, net of shares withheld for
payment of withholding tax, for the 2005 Short Term Incentive plan and 14,796 shares, net of shares
withheld for payment of withholding tax, for the 2005 CEO Stretch Bonus Plan. The CEO Stretch
Bonus Plan was discontinued in 2006.
Employee Withholding Taxes on Stock Awards
Effective January 1, 2006, for ease in administering the issuance of stock awards, the company
holds back shares of vested restricted stock awards and short-term incentive plan stock awards for
the value of the statutory withholding taxes. During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
March 31, 2006, the company paid $0.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively, for withholding taxes
related to stock awards.
Stock Repurchases
The company did not repurchase any shares during the three months ended March 31, 2007. The
company is authorized to purchase 186,000 additional shares under the repurchase program.
6. Comprehensive Income
The following table provides the calculation of other comprehensive income for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(758 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,198 |
) |
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(723 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,605 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Restructuring
Dublin, Ireland Restructuring
On April 7, 2006, the company reached an agreement in principle with the labor union responsible
for the companys manufacturing and certain other personnel in its Dublin, Ireland factory to
discontinue the manufacture of the iVET, PMR and DPMR lines of the companys antenna products at
that location. The agreement was formally signed on April 20, 2006. This agreement enabled the
company to wind down its manufacturing operations at the Dublin facility, terminate 65 redundant
employee positions, downsize its space under the current lease at this location, and reduce its
pension obligations to terminated and remaining employees. Manufacturing of the lines of antenna
products was relocated either to a contract manufacturer in St. Petersburg, Russia, or to the
companys BTG facility in Bloomingdale, Illinois. The process of winding down manufacturing
operations in Dublin and relocating the products to their new manufacturing locations was completed
in
10
September 2006 and the general and administrative support functions were eliminated in December
2006. The restructuring expense incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2006 related to
an accrual for statutory employee termination benefits. During the three months ended March 31,
2007, the company made lease payments related to the facility space no longer in use.
The following table shows the restructuring activity during the three months ended March 31, 2007
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Payments |
|
|
2007 |
|
Facility lease |
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($26 |
) |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Short Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Maxrad Tianjin |
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
PCTEL Limited (Ireland) |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,071 |
|
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The borrowings for Maxrad Tianjin are denominated in Chinese Yuan and the weighted average interest
rate on these borrowings was 6.4% during the three months ended March 31, 2007. The borrowings for
PCTEL Limited are denominated in Euros and the weighted average interest rate on these borrowings
was 5.3% during the three months ended March 31, 2007.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Warranties and Sales Returns
The companys BTG segment allows its major distributors and certain other customers to return
unused product under specified terms and conditions. In accordance with FAS 48, the company
accrues for product returns at the time of original sale based on historical sales and return
trends. The companys allowance for sales returns was $238,000 and $242,000 at March 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively.
The company offers repair and replacement warranties of on average two years for antennas products
and one year for scanner products. The companys warranty reserve for these products based on
historical sales and costs of repair and replacement trends. The company reports warranty reserves
as a current liability included in accrued liabilities. The warranty reserve was $177,000 and
$184,000 at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
Legal Proceedings
Ronald H. Fraser v. PC-Tel, Inc., Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A.
In March 2002, plaintiff Ronald H. Fraser (Fraser) filed a complaint in the California Superior
Court for breach of contract and declaratory relief against us and for breach of contract,
conversion, negligence and declaratory relief against the companys transfer agent, Wells Fargo
Bank Minnesota, N.A. The complaint seeks compensatory damages allegedly suffered by Fraser as a
result of the sale of certain stock by Fraser during a secondary offering in April 2000. At a
mandatory settlement conference held in September 2004, Fraser stipulated to judgment in favor of
the company. In November 2004 Fraser appealed the judgment entered against him. On February 6,
2007, the Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District issued an opinion affirming the trial
courts order granting PCTELs motion for summary judgment. On March 2, 2007, Fraser submitted an
appeal of this decision and on March 7, 2007, the Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District
denied his appeal. In March 2007, Fraser appealed to the Supreme Court of California. The
company believes this appeal is without merit, but cannot predict or determine the outcome of this
proceeding or the potential range of loss, if any.
11
10. Income Taxes
For the three months ended March 31, 2007, the company recorded an income tax benefit of $0.2
million. This tax benefit represents a projected effective rate of 18.6%. The tax rate for the
three months ended March 31, 2007 differs from the statutory tax rate because the company has a
valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets. Provision for deferred tax liabilities related to
goodwill amortization and projected utilization of research and development credits also impacted
the statutory rate.
Significant management judgment is required to assess the likelihood that the companys deferred
tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. The company maintains a valuation
allowance against deferred tax assets, as a result of uncertainties regarding whether they will be
realized.
The company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 prescribes the recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of
uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Upon adoption, the company
decreased deferred tax assets and the associated valuation allowances by $0.9 million. There was
no net balance sheet impact as a result of adoption of FIN 48.
The company files a consolidated federal income tax return, income tax returns with various states,
and foreign income tax returns in various foreign jurisdictions. Our federal and our state income
tax years, with limited exceptions, are closed through 2001. The company does not believe that any
of its tax positions will significantly change within the next twelve months. Future changes in
the unrecognized tax benefit will have no impact on the effective tax rate due to the existence of
the valuation allowance.
The company classifies interest and penalties associated with our uncertain tax positions as a
component of income tax expense. There were no interest or penalties related to income taxes
recorded in the consolidated financial statements.
11. Industry Segment, Customer and Geographic Information
The company principally operates in three business segments. They are Broadband Technology
Group (BTG), Mobility Solutions Group (MSG), and Licensing. Intercompany sales and profits are
eliminated. The segment information for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 has been restated to
reflect the companys current segment reporting structure.
PCTELs chief operating decision maker (CEO) uses only the below measures in deciding how to
allocate resources and assess performance among the segments.
The results of operations by segment are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
BTG |
|
MSG |
|
LICENSING |
|
TOTAL |
Three months ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
16,341 |
|
|
$ |
2,335 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
18,952 |
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
7,156 |
|
|
|
2,324 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
9,752 |
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,636 |
|
Operating Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ |
1,884 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
BTG |
|
MSG |
|
LICENSING |
|
TOTAL |
Three months ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
16,059 |
|
|
$ |
2,117 |
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
$ |
18,566 |
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
6,234 |
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
8,722 |
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,547 |
|
Operating Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ |
2,825 |
) |
The companys revenues to customers outside of the United States, as a percent of total
revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, are as follows:
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
(unaudited) |
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Europe |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
North America |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
Asia Pacific |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
Latin America |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from the companys major customers representing 10% or more of total revenues for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
(Unaudited) |
|
March 31, |
Customer |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Tessco Technologies |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
Tessco is a customer in the companys BTG segment
12. Benefit Plans
401(k) Plan
The 401(k) plan covers all of the domestic employees beginning the first of the month following the
month they begin their employment. Under this plan, employees may elect to contribute a portion of
their current compensation to the 401(k) plan up to the statutorily prescribed annual limit. The
company may make discretionary contributions to the 401(k) plan. The company made $180,000 and
$151,000 in employer contributions to the 401(k) plan for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively.
Personal Retirement Savings Account
The Personal Retirement Savings Account (PRSA) covers all current employees of PCTEL Limited in
Ireland and the United Kingdom. Under this plan, there is no limit for employee contributions of
their current compensation to the PRSA plan. The company may make discretionary contributions to
this plan. The company made contributions of approximately $10,000 and $3,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively.
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
The company provides an Executive Deferred Compensation Plan for executive officers and senior
managers. Under this plan, our executives may defer up to 50% of salary and 100% of cash bonuses
with a minimum of $1,500. In addition, the company provides a 4% matching cash contribution which
vests over three years subject to the executives continued service. The executive has a choice of
investment alternatives from a menu of mutual funds. The plan is administered by the Compensation
Committee and an outside party tracks investments and provides our executives with quarterly
statements showing relevant contribution and investment data. Upon termination of employment,
death, disability or retirement, the executive will receive the value of his account in accordance
with the provisions of the plan. Upon retirement, the executive may request to receive either a
lump sum payment, or payments in annual installments over 15 years or over the lifetime of the
participant with 20 annual payments guaranteed. At the March 31, 2007, the deferred compensation
obligation of $0.9 million was included in Other Long-Term Accrued Liabilities. The company funds
the obligation related to the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan with corporate-owned life
insurance policies. The cash surrender value of such policies is included in Other Assets.
Post-retirement health insurance
On January 6, 2006, upon authorization of the Board of Directors, the company and Mr. Singer
entered into an amended and restated employment agreement which eliminated the post-retirement
healthcare benefits for Mr. Singer and his family that were previously included in his original
employment agreement. Mr. Singer requested the elimination of these benefits for reasons related
to future corporate expense, the companys commitment to defined contribution plans rather than
defined benefit plans, and parity of benefits with other executives of the company. The company
reversed the liability of $141,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2006.
13
Pension Plan Ireland
As part of the acquisition of Sigma in July 2005, the company assumed the liability for the Sigma
employee participants in Sigma Communications Group Retirement and Death Benefit Plan (old plan).
This old plan was closed to new employees in December 2003. At July 4, 2005 and December 31,
2005, a third party actuary determined the companys pension assets, accumulated pension
obligation, and the projected benefit obligation related to the Sigma participants in the old plan.
In the first quarter of 2006, the company set up a new plan the PCTEL Europe Pension Plan (the
Plan) for the 56 employees of Sigma that were participants in the old plan.
As part of the restructuring of the Dublin operation, the company terminated the Plan on June 16,
2006. The company negotiated the terms of the pension termination with the Sigma labor union since
the Sigma labor union represents the majority of the people in the Plan. Under the terms of the
settlement, the company funded 50% of the cash shortfall in the Plan as calculated by the third
party actuary less any severance amounts given to employees that exceeded 3 weeks severance for
every year of service. The funding shortfall was based on pension requirements in accordance with
Irish regulations. The company incurred approximately $0.6 million in cash expense to fund the
pension shortfall and for related expenses. The result was a non-cash net gain on the termination
of the pension plan of $2.6 million, which was recorded as an offset to restructuring cost.
Prior to the termination of the Plan, the effect on operations of the pension plan for the three
months ended March 31, 2006, was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Service costs |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
Interest costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic expense |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The company made pension contributions of $38,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2006.
14
Item 2: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following information should be read in conjunction with the condensed interim financial
statements and the notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report and in conjunction
with the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006 contained in our Form 10-K filed
on March 16, 2007. Except for historical information, the following discussion contains forward
looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including statements regarding our
anticipated revenues, profits, costs and expenses and revenue mix. These forward-looking statements
include, among others, those statements including the words, may, will, plans, seeks,
expects, anticipates, intends, believes and words of similar import. Such statements
constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Our
actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
Introduction
PCTEL focuses on wireless broadband mobility. We design and develop innovative antennas that
extend the reach of broadband and other wireless networks and that simplify the implementation of
those networks. We provide highly specialized software-defined radios that facilitate the design
and optimization of broadband wireless networks and we develop software that simplifies and secures
wireless access to the network. We provide our products, both software and RF products, to
wireless and private carriers, wireless infrastructure and handset providers, wireless equipment
distributors, VARs and other OEMs. Additionally, we license our intellectual property, principally
related to a discontinued modem business, to semiconductor, PC manufacturers, modem suppliers, and
others.
We operate in three separate product segments: our Broadband Technology Group (BTG), Mobility
Solutions Group (MSG), and Licensing. PCTEL maintains expertise in several technology areas.
These include DSP chipset programming, Radio Frequency, software engineering, mobile device
operating systems, antenna design and manufacture, mechanical engineering, wireless connectivity,
authentication, security, specialized communication devices, advanced algorithm development, and
cellular engineering. We report revenue and gross profit for BTG, MSG, and Licensing as separate
product segments. In 2006, we reorganized from four segments to three segments. The revenues and
gross profit by segment have been restated to reflect our current segment reporting structure.
Growth in product revenue is dependent both on gaining further revenue traction in the existing
product profile as well as further acquisitions to support the wireless initiatives. Revenue
growth for antenna products is correlated to emerging wireless applications in broadband wireless,
in-building wireless, wireless Internet service providers, GPS and Mobile SATCOM. The LMR, PMR,
DPMR and on-glass mobile antenna applications represent mature markets. Revenue for scanners and
receivers is tied to the deployment of new wireless technology, such as 2.5G and 3G, and the need
for existing wireless networks to be tuned and reconfigured on a regular basis. Revenue growth in
the MSG segment is correlated to the success of data services offered by the customer base. The
roll out of such data services is in the early stage of market development.
Licensing revenue is dependent on the signing of new license agreements and the success of the
licensees in the marketplace. New licenses often contain up front payments pertaining to past
royalty liability, or one time payments if the license is perpetual. This can make licensing
revenue uneven. During 2006, we were successful in licensing our modem technology to what we
believe is the last of the significant users of its modem technology that are not already under
license. We anticipate that licensing revenue will decline in 2007 to approximately $1.0 million or
less and will continue to decline significantly in future periods.
15
Results of Operations
Three months Ended March 31, 2007
(All amounts in tables, other than percentages, are in thousands)
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BTG |
|
MSG |
|
LICENSING |
|
TOTAL |
Three months ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
16,341 |
|
|
$ |
2,335 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
18,952 |
|
% change from year ago period |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
(29.2 |
%) |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
16,059 |
|
|
$ |
2,117 |
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
$ |
18,566 |
|
% change from year ago period |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
88.7 |
% |
|
|
(20.7 |
%) |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
BTG revenues were approximately $16.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007, an
increase of 2% from the prior year period. Growth in scanner sales was offset by a decrease in
antenna revenue resulting from the elimination of lower margin antenna product lines.
MSG revenues increased approximately 10% to $2.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2007
compared to the same period in fiscal 2006. The revenue continues to be a mixture of license,
maintenance fees and customization fees for the roaming client product and revenue associated with
our IMS (IP multimedia subsystem) software. Data client revenues dominate MSG revenues as IMS
technology is currently in its pre-commercial deployment trial stage throughout the world.
Licensing revenues were approximately $0.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2007
compared to $0.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2006. With the completion of the
modem patent litigation last year, we only have several relatively small licensing agreements that
will run to completion in 2007.
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BTG |
|
MSG |
|
LICENSING |
|
TOTAL |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
$ |
7,156 |
|
|
$ |
2,324 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
9,752 |
|
Percentage of revenue |
|
|
43.8 |
% |
|
|
99.5 |
% |
|
|
98.6 |
% |
|
|
51.5 |
% |
% of revenue
change from year ago period |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
(0.1 |
%) |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
$ |
6,234 |
|
|
$ |
2,103 |
|
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
$ |
8,722 |
|
Percentage of revenue |
|
|
38.8 |
% |
|
|
99.3 |
% |
|
|
98.7 |
% |
|
|
47.0 |
% |
% of revenue change from year ago period |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.3 |
%) |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Our product segments vary significantly in gross profit percent. The increase in overall gross
profit as a percentage of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the prior
year is due to the higher mix of MSG products and scanners, as well margin improvements within the
antenna product line.
BTG margin was 43.8% in the three months ended March 31, 2007 approximately 5.0% better than the
comparable period in fiscal 2006. The margin improvement reflects growth in our higher margin
scanner products, improvements achieved in our iVET antenna products that were outsourced to lower
manufacturing sources in 2006, the elimination of lower margin antenna products from the portfolio,
and increased efficiencies in our Bloomingdale, Illinois facility. We expect long-term gross profit
in this segment to be in the mid 40% range.
MSG margin was approximately 99.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The cost of goods
sold in the segment relates primarily to third party licenses included in the Roaming Client
product. Compared to 2006, gross profit as a percentage of revenue was 0.2% higher than the three
months ended March 31, 2006. We expect long-term gross profit in this segment to be in the upper
90% range.
16
Licensing margin was approximately 98.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Compared to
2006, gross profit as a percentage of revenue was 0.1% worse than the three months ended March 31,
2006.
Research and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
Research and development |
|
$ |
3,975 |
|
|
$ |
2,916 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
21.0 |
% |
|
|
15.7 |
% |
% change from year ago period |
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
18.1 |
% |
Research and development expenses include costs for software and hardware development, prototyping,
certification and pre-production costs. All costs incurred prior to establishing the technological
feasibility of computer software products to be sold are research and development costs and
expensed as incurred in accordance with FAS 86. No significant costs have been incurred subsequent
to determining the technological feasibility.
Research and development expenses increased approximately $1.1 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 compared to the comparable period in 2006. The increase is due to incremental
investments in headcount and expenses across all products.
Sales and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
3,467 |
|
|
$ |
3,543 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
19.1 |
% |
% change from year ago period |
|
|
(2.1 |
%) |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
Sales and marketing expenses include costs associated with the sales and marketing employees, sales
representatives, product line management, and trade show expenses.
Sales and marketing expenses decreased approximately $0.1 million for the three months ended March
31, 2007 compared to the same period in fiscal 2006 due to lower rep firm commissions for BTG
products.
General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
General and administrative |
|
$ |
3,749 |
|
|
$ |
3,748 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
19.8 |
% |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
% change from year ago period |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(10.1 |
%) |
General and administrative expenses include costs associated with the general management, finance,
human resources, information technology, legal, insurance, public company costs, and other
operating expenses to the extent not otherwise allocated to other functions.
General
and administrative expenses were virtually unchanged for the three months ended March 31,
2007 compared to the same period in fiscal 2006 as higher stock-based compensation expense offset
reduction of costs associated with the Dublin facility. In the three months ended March 31, 2006,
we also reversed a liability of $141,000 for CEO retirement benefits.
17
Amortization of Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
Amortization of other intangible assets |
|
$ |
695 |
|
|
$ |
1,037 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
The amortization of intangible assets relates to DTI in 2003, MAXRAD in January 2004, the antenna
product lines from Andrew Corporation in October 2004, and the antenna product lines from Sigma in
July 2005. The $0.3 million decrease for amortization in the three months ended March 31, 2007 is
due to lower amortization for the intangible assets that were impaired during the three months
ended September 30, 2006.
Restructuring Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
553 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
On April 7, 2006, we reached an agreement in principle with the labor union responsible for our
manufacturing and certain other personnel in our Dublin, Ireland factory to discontinue the
manufacture of the iVET, PMR and DPMR lines of our antenna products at that location. The agreement
was formally signed on April 20, 2006. This agreement enabled us to wind down our manufacturing
operations at the Dublin facility, terminate 65 redundant employee positions, downsize our space
under the current lease at this location, and reduce our pension obligations to terminated and
remaining employees. Manufacturing of the lines of antenna products was relocated either to a
contract manufacturer in St. Petersburg, Russia, or to our BTG facility in Bloomingdale, Illinois.
The process of winding down manufacturing operations in Dublin and relocating the products to their
new manufacturing locations was completed in September 2006 and the general and administrative
support functions were eliminated in December 2006. The restructuring expense incurred during the
three months ended March 31, 2006 related to an accrual for statutory employee termination
benefits.
Gain on sale of assets and related royalties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
Gain on sale of assets and related royalties |
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
All royalty amounts represent royalties from Conexant. The royalty agreement with Conexant runs
through June 30, 2009.
Other Income, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
Other income, net |
|
$ |
953 |
|
|
$ |
620 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Other income, net, consists primarily of interest income, and also interest expense and foreign
exchange gains and losses. Interest income increased for the three months ended March 31, 2007
compared to the same periods in fiscal 2006 due primarily to higher interest rates, higher yielding
cash investments, and higher average cash balances.
During the first quarter of 2006, we invested our available cash equivalents in money market funds
with original maturities of less than 90 days. Starting in the quarter ended June 30, 2006, we
also invested in commercial paper and certificates of deposit, and starting in the quarter
18
ended
December 31, 2006, we invested in financial securities with maturities greater than 90 days. We
expect to continue to invest our cash in money market funds, commercial paper, municipal bonds, and
certificates of deposit.
Benefit for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
($173 |
) |
|
|
($7 |
) |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
The tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2007 differs from the statutory rate of 35%
because we provide a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets, and also due to the
utilization of research credits and provisions of deferred tax liabilities related to goodwill
amortization that is deductible for tax purposes.
The tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2006 differs from the statutory rate of 35%
because of the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets, the provision for deferred tax
liabilities related to goodwill that is deductible for tax purposes, and the utilization of NOL
carryforwards.
We regularly evaluate our estimates and judgments related to uncertain tax positions and, when
necessary, establish contingency reserves to account for our uncertain tax positions. As we obtain
more information via the settlement of tax audits and through other pertinent information, these
projections and estimates are reassessed and may be adjusted accordingly. These adjustments may
result in significant income tax provisions or provision reversals.
Stock-based compensation expense
In the three months ended March 31, 2007, we recognized stock-based compensation expense of $1.4
million in the condensed consolidated statements of operations, which included $0.7 million of
restricted stock, $0.3 million for stock option expense, and $0.3 million for stock bonuses, and
$0.1 million for stock compensation expense for the ESPP. Total stock compensation expense for
the three months ended March 31, 2006 was $1.2 million, which included $0.5 million for restricted
stock amortization, $0.3 million for stock option expense, and $0.3 million for stock bonuses, and
$0.1 million for stock compensation expense for the ESPP.
The following table summarizes the stock-based compensation expense by income statement line item
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense |
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,397 |
|
|
$ |
1,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
Net loss |
|
($ |
758 |
) |
|
($ |
2,198 |
) |
Charges for depreciation, amortization,
stock-based compensation, and other
non-cash items |
|
|
1,556 |
|
|
|
1,445 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
(4,006 |
) |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
($ |
3,208 |
) |
|
($ |
528 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(9,069 |
) |
|
|
(450 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents at the end of period |
|
|
47,762 |
|
|
|
58,622 |
|
Short-term investements at end of period |
|
|
19,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
Our cash and short-term investments, net of short-term borrowings were approximately $66.7 million
and $58.6 million as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. Our working capital
was $85.1 million and $69.0 million as of March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in
cash and working capital at March 31, 2007 compared to March 31, 2006 is due to cash from
operations, including the $7.0 million license settlement received in July 2006.
We consumed $3.2 million of net cash from operating activities during the three months ended March
31, 2007 substantially due to unfavorable changes in operating assets and liabilities of $4.0
million. The primary change was an increase in accounts receivable of $3.7 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2007. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we only used $0.5
million in cash from operating activities as changes in operating assets and liabilities was $0.2
million for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
We consumed $9.1 million of cash for investing activities. We used $8.3 for the purchase of
short-term investments and $0.9 million for capital expenditures offset by $0.3 million in proceeds
from the sale of assets and related royalties. For the three months ended March 31, 2006, we
purchased capital expenditures of $0.8 million offset by $0.3 million in proceeds from the sale of
assets and related royalties.
Cash flow from financing activities was $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Proceeds from the sale of common stock related to stock option exercises and shares purchased
through the ESPP contributed $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. During the
period ended March 31, 2007, we also borrowed an additional $0.2 million for working capital needs
in Ireland. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the company generated $0.7 million from
the proceeds from the sale of common stock related to stock option exercises and shares purchased
through the ESPP.
We believe that the existing sources of liquidity, consisting of cash, short-term investments and
cash from operations, will be sufficient to meet the working capital needs for the foreseeable
future. We continue to evaluate opportunities for development of new products and
potential acquisitions of technologies or businesses that could complement the business. We may
use available cash or other sources of funding for such purposes.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
As of March 31, 2007, we had lease obligations of approximately $5.0 million through 2013. As of
March 31, 2007, we had purchase obligations of $8.0 million for the purchase of inventory, as well
as for other goods and services, in the ordinary course of business, and exclude the balances for
purchases currently recognized as liabilities on the balance sheet.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we extended the lease for the Dublin, Ireland facility an
additional six months through December 2007.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We use certain critical accounting policies as described in Item 7. Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Policies of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended
December 31, 2006. There have been no material changes in any of our critical accounting policies
since
20
December 31, 2006, except for the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). See Note 10 of Notes
to Financial Statements on Income Taxes, including discussion of the impact of adopting FIN 48:
Uncertain Tax Positions on January 1, 2007.
Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
See our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K (Item 7A). As of March 31, 2007, there have been no
material changes in this information.
Item 4: Controls and Procedures
The companys management evaluated, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures as of the
end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the companys
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that
information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or
submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and
communicated to the companys management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures, and that such
information is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission
rules and forms. There has been no change in the
companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II Other Information
Item 1: Legal Proceedings
Ronald H. Fraser v. PC-Tel, Inc., Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A.
In March 2002, plaintiff Ronald H. Fraser (Fraser) filed a complaint in the California Superior
Court for breach of contract and declaratory relief against us and for breach of contract,
conversion, negligence and declaratory relief against our transfer agent, Wells Fargo Bank
Minnesota, N.A. The complaint seeks compensatory damages allegedly suffered by Fraser as a result
of the sale of certain stock by Fraser during a secondary offering in April 2000. At a mandatory
settlement conference held in September 2004, Fraser stipulated to judgment in favor of us. In
November 2004 Fraser appealed the judgment entered against him. On February 6, 2007, the Court of
Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District issued an opinion affirming the trial courts order
granting PCTELs motion for summary judgment. On March 2, 2007, Fraser submitted an appeal of this
decision and on March 7, 2007, the Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District denied his
appeal. In March 2007, Fraser appealed to the Supreme Court of California. We believe this appeal
is without merit, but we cannot predict or determine the outcome of this proceeding or the
potential range of loss, if any.
Item 1A: Risk Factors
Factors That May Affect Our Business, Financial Condition and Future Operating Results
There have been no material changes with respect to risk factors as previously disclosed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
21
Item 6: Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Reference |
10.58
|
|
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement,
dated as of April 20,
2007 by and between
PCTEL, Inc. and Martin H.
Singer
|
|
Incorporated by reference
to the same number filed
with the Registrants
Current Report on Form
8-K filed on April 26,
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of
Principal Executive
Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of
Principal Financial
Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of
Principal Executive
Officer and Principal
Financial Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906
of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
Filed herewith |
22
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCTEL, Inc.
A Delaware Corporation
(Registrant)
|
|
|
/s/ Martin H. Singer |
|
|
Martin H. Singer
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Date:
May 10, 2007
23