SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A

(Amendment No. 1)

For the transition period from                    to                    

Commission file number: 0-19598

infoUSA INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

5711 South 86th Circle, Omaha, Nebraska 68127

(Address of principal executive offices)

(402) 593-4500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.0025 par value

Series A Preferred Share Purchase Rights

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ          No o

      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ          

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes þ          No o

      The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the last reported sales price of the common stock on June 30, 2004 was $262.2 million.

      As of March 3, 2005 the registrant had outstanding 53,254,728 shares of Common Stock (excluding treasury shares of 348,354).

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

      Portions of the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 29, 2005, which will be filed within 120 days of the end of fiscal year 2004, are incorporated into Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) hereof by reference.

      This Annual Report on Form 10-K has been amended to include the name and conformed signature of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm on the reports included in Item 9A, Item 15 and Exhibit 23.1. The name and conformed signatures were inadvertently omitted from the Form 10-K as originally filed.

PART I

      This Annual Report on Form 10-K, the documents incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report to shareholders, and press releases (as well as oral statements and other written statements made or to be made by the Company) contain forward-looking statements that are made pursuant to the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements related to potential future acquisitions and our strategy and plans for our business contained in Item 1 “Business,” Item 2 “Properties,” Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and other parts of this Annual Report. Such forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management’s beliefs, and certain assumptions made by our management. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict; therefore, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in any such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include those set forth in this Annual Report under “Factors That May Affect Operating Results,” as well as those noted in the documents incorporated by reference into this Annual Report. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they were made. Unless required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. However, readers should carefully review the risk factors set forth in other reports or documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, particularly the Quarterly Reports on Form  10-Q and any Current Reports on Form 8-K.

Company Profile

      infoUSA Inc. (the “Company” or “infoUSA”), is the leading provider of sales leads and databases to millions of businesses in order for them to find new prospects and grow their sales. infoUSA compiles and updates over 15 databases under one roof in Omaha, Nebraska. Our customers include salespeople, small office/home office (“SOHO”) entrepreneurs, small and medium businesses, and Fortune 2000 corporations. Our database is also part of major directory assistance search firms like Yahoo!, AOL, and in-car navigation companies. Most cars with GPS devices today use infoUSA databases because of the high accuracy of our business database. Databases compiled and continually updated are as follows:

      We employ over 600 full time people to compile and update the databases from thousands of public sources such as yellow pages, white pages, newspapers, incorporation records, real estate deed transfers, and various other sources. For the business database, we make over 20 million phone calls a year to verify the name of the owner or key executive, their address, number of employees, number of PC’s, fax numbers, e-mail addresses, and other information.

      The databases change by roughly 65% per year. We spend over $50 million a year to update these databases and related database management systems. We believe that we have the finest and most accurate databases in the industry. We believe there is no other company that compiles and updates so many databases all under one roof.

      We have also developed proprietary software for direct marketing applications, database marketing applications, e-mail marketing applications, telemarketing applications, and other sophisticated modeling applications. Our proprietary software enhances the value of our databases to the customer.

New initiatives in 2004 and 2005 include:

      Descriptions of these new initiatives can be found elsewhere within this document

Sales & Marketing Strategy

      infoUSA has served over 4 million customers who have used our sales leads and mailing lists. They use our databases to find new customers and grow their sales. That is why the logo of infoUSA bears the mark “Sales Solutions.”

      For our large clients, we distribute our databases and services through the Donnelley Group. Donnelley Marketing, the flagship Company within the Donnelley Group, was acquired by infoUSA in 1999, and has been a leader in this space since 1917. The Donnelley Group has a sales force of over 200 account executives that call on Fortune 2000 companies. These clients have a sophisticated need for databases, database marketing, and now e-mail marketing. Under the Donnelley Group, we have nine different companies that specialize in their own respective markets. These companies are Donnelley Marketing, Walter Karl, Edith Roman, Catalog Vision, Triplex, Yesmail, @Once, Value Added Reseller Group and OneSource. OneSource is the only company which has a true global database of 900,000 businesses and 11.5 million executives by title. This database is used by multinational companies for market research, prospect development, and other modeling and research applications.

      infoUSA has an extensive sales channel into medium and small businesses, SOHO markets, and salespeople. We sell directly to these markets. We employ several distribution channels such as direct mail, telemarketing, e-mail marketing, and our own sales force. We have over 700 account executives that have developed relationships with these clients.

      More than 4 million customers have used our information in the form of sales leads, prospect lists, mailing labels, printed directories, 3 x 5 cards, computer diskettes, business credit reports, DVDs, and on the Internet. Our information is used by businesses for sales leads, mailing lists, credit decisions, market research, competitive analysis, and management of vendor relationships. Sales people and small business owners use our information for new prospects, due diligence, and other day-to-day information purposes.

Sales Genie, Credit.Net, SalesLeadsUSA . . . Subscription Model

      In the past, infoUSA sold sales leads and mailing lists on an “as needed” basis. We realized that our customers need this information every day. We developed an Internet based service called “Sales Genie” for the small business & SOHO market. This is an Internet based database delivery service. All of our databases

can be accessed on a unlimited basis for a flat price of $250.00 per month. Sales Genie has a built-in contact management software and mapping ability. A small business can get all the sales leads and mailing lists for only $250.00 per month per user. For additional users the charge is $100 per user extra. This subscription product is designed for approximately 3.5 million small businesses.

      We have also developed “SalesLeadsUSA” for one person businesses, contractors, and sales executives. There are 10 million plus prospects in this group. This service offers 4 databases with limited search criteria but still offers customers unlimited sales leads and mailing lists for $75.00 per month per user, i.e., $900 per year. This service also has contact management software.

      The Company also launched an unlimited business credit report service called Credit.Net in the first quarter of 2004. A customer can obtain unlimited business credit reports for only $75.00 per month.

      Two of our directory divisions, Polk City Directories & Hill-Donnelly Directories, now offer bundled subscription packages for under $100 per month per user. These bundled packages include printed directory on a customer’s immediate region, DVD on the entire state, and Internet access for all of U.S.

      This migration from one time sales to subscription based sales is enabling us to have a better relationship with our customers, more predictable revenue, and the ability to offer more services to our customers in the arena of sales solutions.

Our Growth Strategy

      There are approximately 14 million businesses in the United States and Canada. All of these businesses are looking for cost effective solutions to find new customers and increase their sales. Our databases and applications enable these businesses to prospect for new customers and increase their sales.

      Our goal is to be the leader in proprietary databases of businesses and consumers in the United States and Canada, and to produce innovative products and services that meet the needs of these businesses for finding new prospects and increasing their sales. The information provided by our databases is integral to the new customer acquisition and retention processes for businesses. Our organization is divided into three distinct groups: Database Compilation and Update Group, The infoUSA Group (formerly known as Small & Medium Business Group), and The Donnelley Group (formerly known as The Large Business Customer Group).

      Delivery of information via the Internet is the preferred method by our customers. We are investing in Internet technology to develop subscription-based new customer development services for businesses. The Internet has opened up brand new markets for our database products that are increasingly used by our customers for multiple applications. We estimate that our total market potential for our services exceeds $20 billion per year.

      We have grown through more than 20 strategic acquisitions in last ten years. These acquisitions have enabled us to acquire the requisite critical mass to compete over the long term in the direct marketing industry. During 2004, we acquired three companies that opened up brand new distribution channels for our products and applications. Triplex increased our presence in the non-profit sector by providing data processing services and our proprietary content to their fast growing customer base. Edith Roman gave us the premier access to the publishing industry for their list brokerage and list management needs. OneSource brought a compelling application to our business that is increasingly embedded in customer relationship management systems of Global 2000 corporations. These corporations use the OneSource application to access deep information on executives of world’s 900,000 largest companies.

      As we have consolidated our position in the fastest growing segments of our industry, our goal now is to accelerate our momentum in the market for business intelligence information. Our subscription products, accessed 24/7 over the web by our customers, will be the critical impetus needed to achieve higher than 10% organic revenue growth over the longer term.

Database Compilation and Update Group

      We believe that we have the most comprehensive and up-to-date databases of businesses and consumers in the industry. The quality of our databases is far superior to our competitors. It has been repeatedly proven by our customers who have gone to the competition and then came back to get our data.

     Business Databases

      Our proprietary business database contains information on nearly 14 million businesses in the United States and Canada. We believe that we compile the most accurate, timely and comprehensive file of business information through our proprietary compilation and verification processes. The business database contains a wealth of information about businesses such as: name, address, telephone number, SIC codes, number of employees, business owner and key executive names, credit score and sales volume. We also provide fax and toll free numbers, website addresses, headline news, and public filings including liens, judgments and bankruptcies. Our data can also be further categorized in various segments such as Small Business Owners, Executives at Home, Big Businesses and their Corporate Affiliations, Growing Businesses, Places of Interest, Schools and Female Business Owners.

      We compile and update the business information from over 15,000 sources. Most of these sources fall under the following categories:

      In addition, we use information licensed from the United States Postal Service’s National Change of Address (NCOA) and Delivery Sequence File (DSF) to update and maintain our business database. Accuracy is the most important characteristic of any database and we believe our database is the most accurate in the industry.

      Other databases within our business files include:

     Consumer Databases

      Our consumer database contains approximately 180 million individuals and 112 million households and includes hundreds of data elements. Key elements in our database include: name, address, phone number, age, income, marital status, religion, ethnicity, dwelling type and size, home value, length of residence, and dozens of self-reported lifestyle elements.

      We compile and update the consumer database with over 2 billion records annually. Examples of the sources that are used to create the database are:

      We believe that our consumer data is compiled to the highest accuracy standards in the industry. Additional investment in acquiring and compiling real estate transfer and assessor data has allowed us to improve our coverage and key demographic models.

      Other high value databases we compile are:

      We create many products and services from our databases to meet the needs of millions of our current and potential customers. We create products and services such as prospect lists, mailing labels, 3 × 5 cards, diskettes, printed directories, DVDs, business credit reports, and many other online and offline applications. We also offer our information on the Internet through our various websites, such as infoUSA.com, SalesGenie.com, SalesLeadsUSA.com, Fonecart.com, Credit.Net, CityDirectory.com, Drlists.com, referenceUSA.com, newleadsUSA.com, idEXEC.com, and autolistsUSA.com. Our products and data processing services are used by clients for identifying and qualifying prospective customers, initiating direct mail and email campaigns, telemarketing, analyzing and assessing market potential, and surveying competitive markets in order to find new customers and increase their sales. Our data also enables extensive data hygiene and enhancement services and is included by many customers as a value-added enhancement to our flagship MarketZone product line. MarketZone Platinum is a fully hosted data warehousing solution including hygiene, updates, matching, campaign management, selection, reporting, and analytics for direct mail and email campaign development and execution. Market Zone Gold is a web-based prospecting tool allowing customers to integrate their customer and prospect data with infoUSA data in a hosted environment.

Our Customers and Potential Markets

      We are organized around two main customer groups: The infoUSA Group (formerly known as the Small & Medium Business Group) and The Donnelley Group (formerly known as The Large Business Group). Our products and services are designed for the unique needs of each group.

      Approximately 90% of all businesses are small companies with less than 25 employees. Small businesses are the lifeblood of our economy. We dedicated this division to meet the unique sales and marketing needs of small- and medium-sized businesses, including small office and home office businesses, and aspiring entrepreneurs. This market holds about 4 million potential prospects for infoUSA. Our products and services are used to find new customers, analyze current customers, research new markets and verify business

information. Our database changes by nearly 65% annually. As a result, our customers have a great need for current information on an ongoing basis. Our infoUSA Group offers sales leads and mailing lists in the following formats:

      Subscription-based Services . . . Sales Genie. All of our databases can be accessed on a unlimited basis for a flat price of $250.00 per month. Sales Genie has a built-in contact management software and mapping ability. A small business can get all the sales leads and mailing lists for only $250.00 per month per user. For additional users the charge is $100 per user extra. This subscription product is designed for approximately 3.5 million small businesses.

      SalesLeadsUSA. This service offers 4 databases with limited search criteria but still offers customers unlimited sales leads and mailing lists for $75.00 per month per user, i.e., $900 per year. This service also has contact management software. There are 10 million salespeople, one person businesses, and SOHO entrepreneurs who are potential customers for this service.

      Printed Prospect Lists, Mailing Labels, and Sales Lead Cards. The Company’s databases can be “sliced and diced” to create customized sales leads and mailing lists for our customers. Our small business consultants work with a business to select the right criteria such as geography, type of business and size of business to generate the most revenue. The custom list can then be delivered in printed format, put on mailing labels or provided on 3 x 5 index cards.

      Directories and DVD Products — Printed Directories, DVD and Internet access. The Company offers a variety of titles: US Business Directory, State Business Directories, Big Business Directory, Manufacturers Directory, 575,000 Physicians and Surgeons, Households USA, and Entrepreneurs Directory. Each printed directory is bundled with a CD-ROM or DVD and allows for access to the information on the Internet, for one low monthly subscription price. Our customers use the directories for lead generation, telemarketing and reference purposes.

      Credit.net — Business Credit Reports. Our business credit directories include a printed directory bundled with a DVD and Internet access to business credit reports on Credit.Net. The product is used by customers for making credit decisions, verifying company information, assisting in collection support, and identifying potential new customers. Customers can purchase individual business credit reports for $5 from the Internet or they may select a subscription based plan offering unlimited access to our business credit reports for a flat fee of $75 per month per user.

      Polk City Directories and Hill-Donnelly Directories. Two of our directory divisions, Polk City Directories & Hill-Donnelly Directories, now offer bundled subscription packages for under $100 per month per user. These bundled packages include printed directory on a customer’s immediate region, DVD on the entire state, and Internet access for all of U.S.

      Our Donnelley Group (formerly the Large Business Group) serves our largest clients from Global 2000 corporations. This Group is comprised of Donnelley Marketing, Catalog Vision, Triplex, Walter Karl, Edith Roman, Yesmail, OneSource, and the Value Added Reseller Group.

Donnelley Marketing

      Donnelley Marketing is one of the nation’s leading direct marketing solution providers, targeting large size firms where quality data and customer service is needed for their complete solution. Our mission is to help businesses find new customers, grow their sales, reduce selling costs and become more profitable. Donnelley’s reputation has been built by delivering consistent results to clients for over 85 years.

      Donnelley Marketing serves a variety of industries including traditional direct marketers, packaged goods, retailers, financial institutions, telecommunications, utilities, technology, fund raising, automotive and catalog companies. Our goal in 2004 continued to be to increase client access to our databases and data processing services while reducing turnaround time and lowering costs.

      infoConnect™ ONE PASS provides online, real-time data enhancement and file cleansing access to the following databases:

      Our newly positioned database marketing product, MarketZone® Platinum, is a closed loop, Internet-enabled, fully relational database tool for decision support, campaign management and execution system. We introduced this product to provide our clients the ability to expertly manage their customer relationships. This new product is an e-CRM (customer relationship management) solution that integrates the entire suite of Donnelley Marketing products to create real-time customer content integration. “MarketZone Platinum” has been very successful for us.

      MarketZone® Platinum is an extremely flexible, full function marketing database, campaign management and e-campaign solution which incorporates an engine to support analytic tools for extracting customer insight from today’s expanding data sets. MarketZone® Platinum enables Donnelley Marketing to quickly build and deploy custom analytic solutions to meet the evolving demands of our customers.

      MarketZone® Platinum’s multiple platform applications, modules, and campaign management/e-campaign management components can be leveraged to deliver high-performance analytic applications rapidly. These capabilities, along with our ability to provide data-processing, data and consultative services under one roof make MarketZone® Platinum a very comprehensive & compelling solution.

      MarketZone® Platinum can provide the following functions:

      CatalogVision^tm, a division of Donnelley Marketing, has been specializing in the catalog marketing industry for over 30 years serving both business-to-business and consumer direct marketers. CatalogVision^tm clients maximize the return on their promotion dollars through use of our information and processing services. Address integrity and merge/purge toolsets eliminate wasted mailings and optimize postal discounts. Relational marketing database systems enable multi-channel contact management and personalization.

      Triplex, acquired in the first quarter of 2004, specializes in providing data processing services to the non-profit sector. Our strategy is to grow this channel by selling more of our own proprietary data content into this channel.

      Walter Karl and newly acquired Edith Roman provide list brokerage, list management services and an array of database services to a broad range of direct marketing clients. Walter Karl also specializes in email list

management and brokerage services for on-line marketers. Our specialized list management services provide a strong revenue base for our customers. In addition, we have our list brokerage business, which recommends and sells specialty lists to a wide range of businesses in many industries.

      Yesmail specializes in providing customer retention solutions for direct marketers, publishers and organizations that want to grow their customer database, develop personalized relationships with these customers, and execute more effective email marketing campaigns. Yesmail provides email marketing solutions to their clients that deliver high returns on investment and strong overall results.

OneSource Global Business Database

      OneSource, acquired in the second quarter of 2004, provides a compelling application on the world’s largest 1,200,000 businesses and executives who comprise these organizations. This application is getting increasingly embedded into the customer relationship management systems of major corporations.

      OneSource provides primarily Web-based business and financial information products to professionals who need quick access to timely and reliable company, industry, and market intelligence. OneSource’s primary products, the OneSource® Business Browser^SM products, are password-protected, subscription-based products that provide sales, marketing, finance, and management professionals and consultants with industry and company profiles, research reports, media accounts, executive listings and biographies, and financial information on over 1,200,000 public and private companies. OneSource customers access this information over the Internet using standard Web browsers. As a Web-based solution, the Business Browser product line does not require the purchase of additional computer hardware by the customer.

      OneSource products and services are designed to address the information needs of leading professional and financial services firms, technology companies, and other large organizations. OneSource’s primary target market consists of Global 5000 business-to-business companies in the technology, professional services, and financial services industries and that employ large direct sales forces.

      OneSource customers use the OneSource products for such purposes as account prospecting and management (i.e., business development), competitive and peer analysis, company tracking and monitoring, and company and industry research.

Value Added Reseller Group

      The Value Added Reseller Group (formerly the Database Licensing Group) continued its strategy of working with customers for whom data remains the core foundation of their product or service. The strength of our customers’ products is predicated on the accuracy, timeliness, and relevance of the data that drives it. Our distribution channel of value added resellers and original equipment manufacturers understand that the success and profitability of their service is largely dependent on the integration of infoUSA’s best-in-breed business and consumer information. The information provided by the Licensing group has multiple applications. The company licenses out infoUSA’s databases to be used in directory assistance, mapping, in-care navigation, site location analysis and demographic modeling.

      Our databases have many applications in addition to sales leads and mailing lists. The rapid proliferation of Internet and broadband technologies in U.S. households and businesses have opened up a cost-effective channel for us to become the leading brand for database applications. Some of our more popular applications include:

Computer Operations and Database Protection

      The Company currently operates multiple interdependent data centers. Each data center supports key components of the business and together, these sites host the core products and services that are offered by infoUSA and provide redundancy and business continuity to the organization. We have made significant investments in these data centers to provide a highly available and secure environment to operate our business and process information.

Competition

      The business and consumer marketing information industry is highly competitive. We believe that the ability to provide proprietary consumer and business databases along with data processing and database marketing services is a key competitive advantage. A number of competitors are active in specific aspects of our business. In the business sales lead products and credit report market, we face competition primarily from D & B (e.g. Dun & Bradstreet). In consumer databases, we compete primarily with Acxiom, Experian, Equifax and Harte-Hanks Data Technologies, both directly and through reseller networks.

Employees

      As of December 31, 2004, we employed 2,332 people on a full-time basis. None of our employees is represented by a labor union or is the subject of a collective bargaining agreement. We have never experienced a work stoppage and believe that our employee relations are good.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

      The executive officers of the Company are as follows:

      Vinod Gupta is the founder of the Company and has been Chairman of the Board of the Company since its incorporation in 1972. Mr. Gupta served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company from the time of its incorporation in 1972 until September 1997 and since August 1998. Mr. Gupta holds a B.S. in Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India, and an M.S. in Engineering and an M.B.A. from the University of Nebraska. Mr. Gupta also was awarded an Honorary Doctorate from the Monterey Institute of International Studies and an Honorary Doctorate from the University of Nebraska. He was appointed by President Clinton to serve as a Trustee on the Kennedy Center for Performing Arts in Washington, D.C.

      Raj Das has served as Chief Financial Officer since September 2003. Over the last ten years, Mr. Das worked in investment banking, most recently as a Vice President for Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., from April 2002 to August 2003, specializing in merger and acquisition and private equity transactions in the technology and media sectors. Prior to that, Mr. Das was a Vice President in the Technology Investment Banking Group at Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. from August 2000 to October 2001, where he focused primarily on wireless and enterprise software, services, and infrastructure companies. Prior to that, Mr. Das was a Vice President in the Information and Internet Services Group at ING Barings LLC from February 1998 to August 2000, where he focused on advertising agencies, transaction processors, IT outsourcers, and Internet and marketing services providers. Prior to that, Mr. Das served as an Associate in the Investment Banking

Department at Brenner Securities Corporation from June 1996 to February 1998 and as an Analyst in the M&A Department at Smith Barney Inc. from June 1993 to June 1995. In these capacities, he has originated and executed a wide range of financing, restructuring, and M&A transactions. From June 1995 to June 1996, Mr. Das worked as an Analyst in the Corporate Strategic Planning department at PepsiCo, Inc. Mr. Das is a summa cum laude graduate with a Bachelor of Science in Economics degree from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

      Fred Vakili has served as Executive Vice President of Administration and Chief Administrative Officer since August 1998. Mr. Vakili served as Senior Vice President of Special Projects from October 1997 to August 1998, as Senior Vice President of Value Added-Resellers Group and Canada Operations from May 1987 to October 1997, and as Senior Vice President of various Company divisions from 1985 to 1987. Mr. Vakili joined the Company in 1985 as the Product Manager for the Directory Group. Mr. Vakili holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering and Management from Iowa State University.

      Ray Butkus has served as President of Donnelley Marketing since December 2002. Mr. Butkus previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Naviant Marketing Solutions from early 1999 until the successful merger of the Company with Naviant Markets Group in late 2001. Mr. Butkus was the Vice President and General Manager for IntelliQuest’s IQ2 Net division from January 1998 through August 1999. Mr. Butkus was President and Chief Operating Officer of GEN Logistics Systems, a start-up Cyberspace venture providing information services to the transportation industry, from 1996 to 1997. Mr. Butkus worked for AT&T from 1976 to 1996, most recently as Sales Vice President, where he was responsible for a 700 person sales force and $650 million in annual revenues. Mr. Butkus holds a B.S. in Business Management from Providence College. Mr. Butkus also holds a MBA from the University of Puget Sound and is a graduate of Harvard Business School’s Advanced Management Program.

      D. Joseph Thayer has served as Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing for the infoUSA Group since February 2005, as President of the infoUSA Small Business Group from May 1999 to February 2005, as Senior Vice President of the infoUSA Vertical Markets Group from October 1997 to May 1999, and as a Vice President and General Manager since joining the Company in 1993. Prior to that, Mr. Thayer worked as a manager for US West, Inc., and as a legislative aide handling foreign trade and agricultural issues in the United States House of Representatives. Mr. Thayer holds a B.A. in Political Science from the University of Nebraska, and a Master’s degree in Business Administration and Marketing from Auburn University.

      Monica Messer has served as Chief Operations Officer since October 2003, as President of the Database Compilation and Technology Group and Chief Information Officer of the Company from February 1997 to October 2003, and served as a Senior Vice President of the Company from January 1996 to January 1997. Ms. Messer joined the Company in 1983 and has served as a Vice President of the Company since 1985. Ms. Messer holds a B.S. in Business Administration from Bellevue University and is an alum of the Stanford Business School Executive Education program in Strategy and Organization.

      Edward C. Mallin has served as President of Walter Karl since June 1998, as Executive Vice President of the National Accounts Division from January 1997 to June 1998 and as President of Compilers Plus from January 1990 to May 1998. Prior to that, Mr. Mallin was Executive Vice President of Compilers Plus which the Company acquired in January 1990. Mr. Mallin holds a B.A. in History from the University of Bridgeport and an M.A. in Business Administration from New York University.

Website Information

      The Company has a website at www.infousa.com. Contents of the website are not part of, or incorporated by this reference, into this Annual Report. The Company has made available on its website all annual and quarterly reports, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company has filed such material with, or furnished it to, the SEC.

      Our headquarters are located in a 148,000 square foot facility in Omaha, Nebraska, where we perform sales and administrative activities. Order fulfillment, shipping, and data center operations are conducted at our 30,000 square foot Carter Lake, Iowa facility, which is located 15 miles from our headquarters. Administration and management are also located in a 24,000 square foot facility in Omaha, Nebraska, which is adjacent to our sales and administration facility. Data compilation, telephone verification, data and product development, and information technology services are conducted at our 130,000 square foot Papillion, Nebraska facility which is located about 5 miles from our headquarters. Donnelley Marketing catalog sales operations are performed in a 40,000 square foot location in Marshfield, Wisconsin. We own these facilities, as well as adjacent land at certain locations for possible future expansion.

      We lease sales office space at approximately 70 different locations in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, the aggregate rental obligations of which are not significant.

      There are no material pending legal or governmental proceedings involving the Company, other than ordinary routine litigation, incidental to the business of the Company.

      No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PART II

      Our Common Stock, $0.0025 par value, is traded on the NASDAQ National Market System under the symbol “IUSA.”

      The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices for our Common Stock during each quarter of 2004 and 2003.

Common Stock

      On March 10, 2005, the last reported sale price in the NASDAQ National Market System for our Common Stock was $10.08 per share. As of March 15, 2005, there were 118 stockholders of record of the Common Stock, and an estimated additional 2,600 stockholders who held beneficial interests in shares of Common Stock registered in nominee names of banks and brokerage houses.

      On January 25, 2005, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.20 per common share. The dividend payments, totaling $10.6 million, were paid on March 1, 2005, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 8, 2005. This dividend represents the first dividend paid by the Company. This dividend is an annual dividend, and the Board of Directors has to declare any future annual dividends. No assurance can be given that dividends will be paid in the future since they are dependent on earnings, cash flows from operations, the financial condition of the Company and other factors. The existing credit agreements have certain restrictions on the ability to declare dividends on our common stock.

      The information required by this section concerning securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is set forth in or incorporated by reference into Part III, Item 12 of this Annual Report and Note 10 in our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.

      The following selected consolidated financial data as of the end of, and for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2004 are derived from the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The Company has made several acquisitions since 2000 that would affect the comparability of historical data. See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

      This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements, including without limitation statements in the discussion of comparative results of operations, accounting standards and liquidity and capital resources, within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, which are subject to the “safe harbor” created by those sections. The Company’s actual future results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Some factors which could cause future actual results to differ materially from the Company’s recent results or those projected in the forward-looking statements are described in “Factors that May Affect Operating Results” below. The Company assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements or such factors.

GENERAL

      We are the leading provider of sales leads and mailing lists to millions of businesses in order for them to find new prospects and grow their sales. infoUSA compiles and updates over 15 databases under one roof in Omaha, Nebraska. Our customers include salespeople, small office/home office (“SOHO”) entrepreneurs, small and medium businesses, and Fortune 2000 corporations. Our database is also part of major directory assistance search firms like Yahoo!, Google, AOL, and in-car navigation companies. Most cars with GPS devices today use infoUSA databases. Databases compiled and continually updated are as follows:

      We employ over 600 full time people to compile and update the databases from thousands of public sources such as yellow pages, white pages, newspapers, incorporation records, real estate deed transfers, and various other sources. For the business database, we make over 20 million phone calls a year to verify the name of the owner or key executive, their address, number of employees, number of PC’s, fax numbers, e-mail addresses, and other information.

      The databases change by roughly 65% per year. We spend over $50 million a year to update these databases and related database management systems. We believe that we have the finest and most accurate databases in the industry. We believe there is no other company that compiles and updates so many databases all under one roof.

      We have also developed proprietary software for direct marketing applications, database marketing applications, e-mail marketing applications, telemarketing applications, and other sophisticated modeling applications. Our proprietary software enhances the value of our databases to the customer.

      New initiatives in 2004 and 2005 include:

      infoUSA has over 4 million customers who have used our sales leads and mailing lists. They use our databases to find new customers and grow their sales. That is why the logo of infoUSA bears the mark “Sales Solutions.”

      For our large clients, we distribute our databases and services through the Donnelley Group. Donnelley Marketing, the flagship Company within the Donnelley Group, was acquired by infoUSA in 1999, and has been a leader in this space since 1917. The Donnelley Group has a sales force of over 200 account executives that call on Fortune 2000 companies. These clients have a sophisticated need for databases, database marketing, and now e-mail marketing. Under the Donnelley Group, we have seven different companies that specialize in their own respective markets. These companies are Donnelley Marketing, Walter Karl, Edith Roman, Catalog Vision, Triplex, Yesmail, @Once, and OneSource. OneSource is the only company which has a true global database of 900,000 businesses and 2 million executives by title. This database is used by multinational companies for market research, prospect development, and other modeling and research applications.

      infoUSA has an extensive sales channel into medium and small businesses, SOHO markets, and salespeople. We sell directly to these markets. We employ several distribution channels such as direct mail, telemarketing, e-mail marketing, and our own sales force. We have over 700 account executives that have developed relationships with these clients.

      More than 4 million customers have used our information in the form of sales leads, prospect lists, mailing labels, printed directories, 3 × 5 cards, computer diskettes, business credit reports, DVDs, and on the Internet. Our information is used by businesses for sales leads, mailing lists, credit decisions, market research, competitive analysis, and management of vendor relationships. Sales people and small business owners use our information for new prospects, due diligence, and other day-to-day information purposes.

      In the past, infoUSA sold sales leads and mailing lists on an “as needed” basis. We realized that our customers need this information every day. We developed an Internet based service called “Sales Genie” for the small business & SOHO market. This is an Internet based database delivery service. All of our databases can be accessed on a unlimited basis for a flat price of $250.00 per month. Sales Genie has a built-in contact

management software and mapping ability. For additional users the charge is $100 per user extra. This subscription product is designed for approximately 3.5 million small businesses.

      We have also developed “SalesLeadsUSA” for one person businesses, contractors, and sales executives. There are 10 million plus prospects in this group. This service offers 4 databases with limited search criteria but still offers customers unlimited sales leads and mailing lists for $75.00 per month per user, i.e., $900 per year. This service also has contact management software.

      The Company also launched an unlimited business credit report service called Credit.Net in the first quarter of 2004. A customer can obtain unlimited business credit reports for only $75.00 per month.

      Two of our directory divisions, Polk City Directories & Hill-Donnelly Directories, now offer bundled subscription packages for under $100 per month per user. These bundled packages include printed directory on a customer’s immediate region, DVD on the entire state, and Internet access for all of U.S.

      This migration from one time sales to subscription based sales is enabling us to have a better relationship with our customers, more predictable revenue, and the ability to offer more services to our customers in the arena of sales solutions.

      Operating income for 2004 was $41.3 million, or 12% of net sales, down from $48.6 million, or 16% of net sales, for 2003. The primary reasons for the decline in operating income were (i) higher operating cost structures associated with the companies we acquired during 2004 including Triplex, Edith Roman and OneSource, and (ii) deferral of approximately $8.9 million of revenues during 2004 related to accounting for our new line of subscription products.

      Internal revenue growth is the primary objective of the Company. However, we still look for strategic acquisitions, which are opportunistic in nature. We like to acquire companies where we can get better than 25% operating margin. During 2002 and 2003, the Company acquired DoubleClick’s email deployment business, ClickAction®, Yesmail® and Markado®. As described in the notes to the accompanying financial statements, the Company acquired the following entities in 2004: (i) Triplex, a provider of direct marketing and database marketing services to nonprofit and catalog customers; (ii) Edith Roman®, a provider of list brokerage and list management services, data processing services and email marketing services; and (iii) OneSource, a provider of a global database of over 900,000 of the largest business worldwide. This database is deep in content and includes financial information and other public information.

      The Company has systematically integrated the operations of the acquired companies into existing operations of the Company. In most cases, the results of operations for these acquired activities are no longer separately accounted for from existing activities. The Company cannot report the results of the operations of acquired companies upon completion of the integration as the results are “commingled” with existing results. Additionally, upon integration of the acquired operations, the Company frequently combines acquired products or features with existing products, and experiences significant cross selling of products between business units, including sales of acquired products by existing business units and sales by acquired business units of existing products. Due to recent and potential future acquisitions, future results of operations will not be comparable to historical data.

      Through acquisitions, the Company has increased its presence in the consumer marketing information industry, greatly increased its ability to provide data processing and e-mail marketing solutions, added to its consumer CD-ROM/ DVD product lines, increased its presence in list management and list brokerage

services and broadened its offerings of business and consumer marketing information. The following table summarizes the more significant acquisitions:

      In February 2005, infoUSA acquired @Once. The purchase price was $8.1 million. @Once is a retention based e-mail technology company with operations similar to Yesmail’s.

      The Company frequently evaluates the strategic opportunities available and intends to pursue strategic acquisitions of complementary products, technologies or businesses that it believes fit its business strategy. In connection with future acquisitions, the Company expects that it will be required to incur additional acquisition-related charges to operations.

      On February 10, 2005, the Company announced that it proposed to acquire Digital Impact, Inc. (Nasdaq: DIGI) for $2.00 per share in cash. The Company’s proposal has been communicated to the Digital Impact board of directors but has not yet resulted in a substantive discussion regarding the terms of a potential transaction. Based on publicly available information with respect to Digital Impact, based on the $2.00 per share price, the transaction would have a total equity value of approximately $74 million. At this time, there is no certainty whether this transaction will be consummated at $2.00 per share or at all.

      Associated with the acquisitions previously described, the Company recorded amortization expense on goodwill and other purchased intangibles as summarized in the following table (amounts in thousands):

      Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the audited Consolidated Financial Statements. Of those policies, we have identified the following to be the most critical because they are the most important to our portrayal of our results of operations and financial condition and they require subjective or complex management judgments:

      Revenue recognition. Revenue from the sale of prospect lists (paper form or electronic), mailing labels, published directories, other sales lead products and DVD and CD information products are recognized upon shipment. These product sales are typically evidenced by a written purchase order or by credit card authorization. Terms and conditions for retail channel sales of DVD and CD information products include rights of return. Accordingly, we estimate and record an allowance for product returns and reduce the amount of recognized revenue by anticipated product returns. The estimate of the product returns is made by giving consideration to the historical trends in sales and product returns, estimates of product inventory currently in the channel of distribution, and the timing and release of new product versions. List brokerage sales revenues are recognized net of costs.

      Data processing and e-mail customer retention solution revenues are billed on a time and materials basis, with the recognition of revenue occurring as the services are rendered to the customer.

      Revenue from the licensing of our data to third parties and the sale of our subscription-based products are recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the agreement, when we commit to provide the customer either continuous data access (i.e., “24/7” access via the Internet) or updates of data files over a period of time. Licenses and subscriptions are evidenced by written contracts. We also license data to customers with no such commitments. In those cases, we recognize revenue when the data is shipped to the customer, provided all revenue recognition criteria have been met.

      We assess collectibility of revenues and our allowance for doubtful accounts based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the credit-worthiness of the customer. We do not request collateral from our customers. An allowance for doubtful accounts is established to record our trade accounts receivable at estimated net realizable value. If we determine that collection of revenues are not reasonably assured at or prior to the delivery of our products, we recognize revenue upon the receipt of cash. Cash-basis revenue recognition periodically occurs in those cases where we sell or license our information products to a poorly capitalized company, such as an Internet startup company. However, sales recognized on this basis are not a significant portion of our total revenues.

      Database Costs. The Company’s database and production costs are generally charged to expense as incurred and relate principally to maintaining, verifying and updating its databases, fulfilling customer orders and the production of DVD/ CD titles. Costs to develop new databases are capitalized by the Company and amortized upon the successful completion of the databases, over a period ranging from one to five years. Our cost of maintaining the Company’s consumer and business databases does not necessarily vary directly with

revenues since a significant portion of the cost is the maintenance and verification of our existing data. Consequently, operating income may vary significantly with changes in revenue from period-to-period, as our ability to adjust certain elements of our cost structure is limited in the short-run.

      Because we expense the costs of maintaining and verifying the Company’s existing database, our balance sheet does not include an asset for the value of our database. We believe that our databases of consumer and business information are valuable intellectual property assets. Our success in marketing our products and services depends, in large part, on our ability to maintain an accurate and reliable database of business and consumer information.

      Valuation of long-lived and intangible assets and goodwill. The Company assesses the impairment of identifiable intangibles, long-lived assets and related goodwill and enterprise level goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors the Company considered important which could trigger an impairment review included the following:

      When we determine that the carrying value of intangibles, long-lived assets and related goodwill and enterprise level goodwill may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we measure impairment based on estimated fair value of the assets. Net intangible assets, long-lived assets, and goodwill amounted to $365.3 million as of December 31, 2004.

      The Company completed an impairment test as of October 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and determined that no impairment existed. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process. The first step compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered to not be impaired, and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary. However, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test shall be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss. The second step is essentially a purchase price allocation exercise, which allocates the newly determined fair value of the reporting unit to the assets. For purposes of the allocation, the fair values of all assets, including both recognized and unrecognized intangible assets, are determined. The residual goodwill value is then compared to the carrying value of goodwill to determine the impairment charge.

      At December 31, 2004, the Company had seven detail reporting units that possess goodwill and therefore require testing pursuant to SFAS 142. The seven detail reporting units represent a subset of the operating segments reported upon in the accompanying financial statements. These reporting units represent financial information one level lower than the reported operating segments, and these individual reporting units have discrete financial information available and have different economic characteristics.

      The Company used the Gordon growth model to calculate residual values. The Gordon growth model refers to the concept of taking the residual year cash flow and determining the value of a growing, perpetual annuity. The long-term growth rate used for each reporting unit ranged from 3% to 5%. The Company used weighted average cost of capitals ranging from 13.0%to 14.4% in its discounted cash flows analysis.

      The following accounting policies are also viewed by Company management as significant in the review and analysis of the Company’s operating results and financial condition.

      Related party transactions. As discussed in Note 12 to the audited Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K, the Company has commonly entered into transactions with entities owned by Mr. Gupta, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The transactions are authorized by the Company’s management and board of directors to support activities related to customer relationship,

business development, new acquisitions and other strategic initiatives. Arrangements between the Company, Annapurna Corporation and other related parties are subject to periodic review by the Company’s management and board of directors.

      Income Taxes. Accounting for income taxes requires significant judgments in the development of estimates used in income tax calculations. Such judgments include, but would not be limited to, the likelihood the Company would realize the benefits of net operating loss carryforwards, the adequacy of valuation allowances, and the rates used to measure transactions with foreign subsidiaries. As part of the process of preparing the Company’s financial statements, the Company is required to estimate its income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. The judgments and estimates used are subject to challenge by domestic and foreign taxing authorities. It is possible that either domestic or foreign taxing authorities could challenge those judgments and estimates and draw conclusions that would cause the Company to incur tax liabilities in excess of those currently recorded. Changes in the geographical mix or estimated amount of annual pretax income could impact the Company’s overall effective tax rate.

      To the extent recovery of deferred tax assets is not likely based on estimation of future taxable income in each jurisdiction, the Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Although the Company has considered future taxable income along with prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, if the Company should determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its deferred tax assets in the future, and adjustment to deferred tax assets would be charged to income in the period any such determination was made. Likewise, in the event the Company was able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of the net recorded amount, an adjustment to deferred tax assets would increase income in the period any such determination was made.

      Investments. The Company records a non-cash charge to earnings when it determines that an investment has experienced an “other than temporary” decline in market value. To make this determination, the Company reviews the carrying value of its non-marketable investment securities at the end of each reporting period for impairment. Other-than-temporary impairments are generally recognized if the market value of the investment is below its current carrying value for an extended period, which the Company generally defines as six to nine months, or if the issuer has experienced significant financial declines or difficulties in raising capital to continue operations, among other factors. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of underlying investments could result in an inability to recover the carrying value of the recorded non-marketable investment securities, thereby possibly requiring additional impairment charges in the future.

Results of Operations

      The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain items from the Company’s statement of operations data expressed as a percentage of net sales. The amounts and related percentages may not be fully comparable due to the Company’s acquisition of the e-mail business from DoubleClick in March 2002, Hill Donnelly in June 2002, City Publishing in September 2002, ClickAction in December 2002, Yesmail in

March 2003, Markado in September 2003, Triplex in February 2004, Edith Roman in June 2004 and OneSource in June 2004:

2004 Compared to 2003

      Net sales for 2004 were $344.9 million, an increase of 11% from $311.3 million for 2003.

      Net sales of the infoUSA Group segment for 2004 were $144.6 million, a 7% decrease from $155.3 million for 2003. The decrease in net sales is principally due the deferral of revenue totaling $8.9 million during 2004 related to the sale of subscription-based products.

      The infoUSA Group segment principally engages in the selling of sales lead generation and consumer DVD products to small to medium sized businesses, small office and home office businesses and individual consumers. This segment also includes the sale of content via the Internet. Historically, this group has principally offered one-time sales leads products, although the group continues to migrate a growing number of customers to subscription-based products. During 2004, the Company began to sell subscription products and to defer the revenues associated with the sale of these subscription-based products. Conversions from one-

time sales to this subscription format will cause this group to experience short-term reductions in reported revenue due to the deferred revenue recognition practices associated with the sale of these types of products. Sales of subscription-based products require the Company to recognize revenues over the subscription period instead of at the time of sale.

      Net sales of the Donnelley Group segment for 2004 were $200.3 million, a 28% increase from $156.0 million for 2003. The increase was principally due to the acquisition of Triplex in February 2004 and Edith Roman and OneSource in June 2004. The Donnelley Group segment principally engages in the selling of data processing services, Web-based business and financial information products and services, licensed databases, database marketing solutions, e-mail marketing solutions and list brokerage and list management services to large companies. This segment includes the licensing of databases for Internet directory assistance services.

      Database and production costs for 2004 were $102.8 million, or 30% of net sales, compared to $87.1 million, or 28% of net sales for 2003. The increase in database and production costs principally relates to the acquisition of Triplex in February 2004 and OneSource in June 2004. These acquired companies historically had higher database and production costs structures, expressed as a percentage of net sales, than the Company’s existing businesses.

      Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2004 were $166.7 million, or 48% of net sales, compared to $144.1 million, or 46% of net sales for 2003. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses principally relates to the Company’s planned increase in direct marketing costs and the addition of sales staff beginning during the second half of 2003. Additionally, the increase is due to the acquisition of companies during 2004 including Triplex, Edith Roman and OneSource. These acquired companies historically had higher selling, general and administrative cost structures, expressed as a percentage of net sales, than the Company’s existing businesses.

      Depreciation expense for 2004 was $14.1 million, or 4% of net sales, compared to $14.6 million, or 5% of net sales for 2003.

      Amortization expense for 2004 was $15.9 million, or 5% of net sales, compared to $13.3 million, or 4% of net sales for 2003. Amortization expense increased as a percentage of net sales as identifiable intangible assets recorded as part of the acquisition of OneSource totaling $31.3 million were recorded and subject to amortization. SFAS No. 142 requires the Company to complete an annual impairment test on goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite life rather than record amortization expense on those assets. The Company last completed impairment tests as of October 31, 2004, as required by SFAS 142, and established that no impairment exists.

      During 2004, the Company recorded non-cash stock compensation expense of $0.8 million, compared to $0.2 million for 2003. These charges represent non-cash stock compensation expense related to non-employee consulting agreements. The Company will incur additional non-cash compensation expense for these consultants’ options during the vesting period of those options. The amount of compensation expense will be affected by changes in the fair value of the Company’s common stock and interest rates.

      During 2002, a principal of one of the acquisitions made by the Company in 1996 was awarded $1.7 million by an arbitrator for settlement of a dispute regarding exercise of stock options issued by the Company. During 2003, the Company determined that it was not likely to be successful in its appeal of the dispute and recorded a settlement charge of $1.7 million.

      The Company recorded restructuring charges (severance) during 2004 and 2003 of $2.9 million and $1.9 million, respectively, related to workforce reductions as a part of the Company’s continuing strategy to reduce unnecessary costs and focus on core operations. The workforce reduction charges included involuntary employee separation costs during 2004 and 2003 for approximately 376 and 140 employees, respectively.

      The Company recorded integration-related costs during 2004 and 2003 of $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Acquisition costs include costs related to unsuccessful acquisition efforts and integration-related costs including general and administrative costs, information system conversion costs and other direct integration-related charges. These costs were not directly related to the recent acquisitions of various companies, and therefore could not be capitalized as part of the acquisitions.

      Including the factors previously described, the Company had operating income of $41.3 million, or 12% of net sales during 2004, compared to operating income of $48.6 million, or 15% of net sales for 2003. The decrease in operating income as a percentage of net sales is a result of the following items: 1) increased operating expenses represented as percentage of net sales associated with companies acquired in 2004 including Triplex, Edith Roman and OneSource, and 2) deferred revenue associated with the sale of subscription-based products described in the section “net sales” above.

      Operating income for the infoUSA Group segment for 2004 was $45.4 million, or 31% of net sales, as compared to $48.9 million, or 32% of net sales for 2003. Operating costs for the infoUSA Group segment decreased from $106.4 million for 2003 to $99.1 million for 2004 (a net decrease of $7.3 million), although the deferral of revenue totaling $8.9 million during 2004 related to the sale of subscription-based products offset the cost savings recorded.

      Operating income for the Donnelley Group segment for 2004 was $82.5 million, or 41% of net sales, as compared to $76.8 million, or 49% of net sales for 2003. The decrease in operating income as a percentage of net sales is principally due to increased operating expenses represented as percentage of net sales associated with companies acquired during 2004 including Triplex, Edith Roman and OneSource.

      Other expense, net was $(12.6) million, or 4% of net sales, and $(16.8) million, or 5% of net sales, for 2004 and 2003, respectively. Other income (expense), net is comprised of interest expense, investment income and other income or expense items, which do not represent components of operating income and operating expense of the Company.

      Interest expense was $9.2 million and $11.5 million for 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decrease is principally due to lower interest rates on the Company’s former credit facility refinanced in May 2003, the reduction in the amount of 9¹/2% Senior Subordinated Notes outstanding and favorable interest rates. Investment income (loss) was $(0.2) million and $1.1 million, for 2004 and 2003, respectively.

      During 2004, the Company wrote-off deferred financing costs of $0.1 million related to the prior credit facility as a result of the financing on March 25, 2004 of the Credit Facility.

      During 2004 the Company redeemed the remainder of its outstanding 9¹/2% Senior Subordinated Notes of $30.0 million at a premium of 4.75% to face amount. The premium paid on the redemption was $1.5 million, representing amounts paid in excess of the carrying value of the debt. As part of the redemption, the Company recorded charges of $0.6 million for net unamortized debt issue costs related to the Senior Subordinated Notes.

      During 2004, the Company recorded a loss of $1.0 million for an other-than-temporary decline in the value of a nonmarketable equity investment.

      During 2003, the Company purchased $67.0 million of its 9¹/2% Senior Subordinated Notes of which $11.5 million were from the Chief Executive Officer. All purchases of 9¹/2% Senior Subordinated Notes occurred at the same price and under the same terms. As part of these purchases, the Company recorded charges of $1.6 million for related net unamortized debt issue costs and $3.1 million for amounts paid in excess of the carrying value of the debt.

      During 2003, the Company expensed $0.8 million for net unamortized debt issue costs and $0.8 million in bank fees associated with the refinancing of the credit facility.

      A provision for income taxes of $10.9 million and $12.1 million was recorded during 2004 and 2003, respectively, reflecting an effective income tax rate of approximately 38%.

2003 Compared to 2002

      Net sales for 2003 were $311.3 million, an increase of 3% from $302.5 million in 2002. Net sales of the infoUSA Group segment for 2003 were $155.3 million, a less than 1% decrease from $155.4 million in 2002. Excluding the results of the Polk City Directories division included within this segment, the infoUSA Group segment sales were $126.7 million in 2003, up 7% from $118.3 million in 2002. The decrease in net sales for the Polk City Directories division was principally due to changes in the timing of production and delivery of certain printed directories. The infoUSA Group segment principally engages in the selling of sales lead generation and consumer DVD products to small to medium sized companies, small office and home office businesses and individual consumers. This segment also includes the sale of content via the Internet.

      Net sales of the Donnelley Group segment for 2003 were $156.0 million, a 6% increase from $147.1 in 2002. The increase was principally due to the acquisition of ClickAction in December 2002, Yesmail in March 2003 and Markado in September 2003. The Donnelley Group segment principally engages in the selling of data processing services, licensed databases, database marketing solutions, e-mail marketing solutions and list brokerage and list management services to large companies. This segment includes the licensing of databases for Internet directory assistance services.

      Database and production costs for 2003 were $84.1 million, or 28% of net sales, compared to $84.7 million, or 28% of net sales in 2002.

      Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2003 were $144.1 million, or 46% of net sales, compared to $132.0 million, or 44% of net sales in 2002. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses principally relates to the Company’s planned increase in direct marketing costs and the addition of approximately 200 sales staff during 2003. Total advertising costs increased $10.2 million to $25.3 million during 2003, up from $15.1 million during 2002. Additionally, the increase is partially due to the acquisition of various companies during 2002 and 2003, including Hill-Donnelly, City Publishing, the e-mail list business of DoubleClick, ClickAction, Yesmail and Markado. These acquired companies historically had higher selling,

general and administrative cost structures, expressed as a percentage of net sales, than the Company’s existing businesses. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was partially offset by a decrease in bad debt expense totaling $3.4 million during 2003 compared to 2002.

      Depreciation and amortization expenses for 2003 totaled $27.8 million, or 9% of net sales, compared to $28.1 million, or 9% of net sales in 2002. The Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, as of January 1, 2002. SFAS No. 142 requires the Company to complete an annual impairment test on goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite life rather than record amortization expense on those assets. The Company completed impairment tests as of October 31, 2003, as required by SFAS 142, and established that no impairment exists.

      During 2003, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $219 thousand, compared to $52 thousand in 2002. The Company recorded non-cash stock compensation expenses related to a non-employee consulting agreement executed during 2002. The Company will incur additional non-cash compensation expense for the 2002 consultant options during the vesting period of those options. The amount of compensation expense will be affected by changes in the fair value of the Company’s common stock.

      The Company recorded restructuring charges during 2003 and 2002 of $1.9 million and $2.5 million, respectively, related to workforce reductions as a part of the Company’s continuing strategy to reduce unnecessary costs and focus on core operations. The workforce reduction charges included involuntary employee separation costs during 2003 and 2002 for approximately 140 and 230 employees, respectively.

      The Company recorded charges during 2003 and 2002 of $1.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively, related to the Company’s disposition of certain legal matters. On May 14, 2002, a principal of one of the acquisitions made by the Company in 1996 was awarded $1.7 million by an arbitrator for settlement of a dispute regarding exercise of stock options issued by the Company. Although the Company has appealed the arbitrator’s decision, the Company’s management recorded a litigation charge of $1.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2003, for the arbitrators’ award.

      The Company recorded integration-related costs during 2003 and 2002 of $57 thousand and $181 thousand, respectively. The integration-related costs included consulting costs, information system conversion and other direct integration-related charges. These costs were not directly related to the recent acquisition of various companies, and therefore could not be capitalized.

      Including the factors previously described, the Company had operating income of $48.6 million, or 16% of net sales for 2003, compared to operating income of $54.6 million, or 18% of net sales in 2002. The decrease in operating income as a percentage of net sales is a result of the following items: 1) the Company’s planned increase in direct marketing costs and the addition of sales staff, beginning during the quarter ended September 30, 2003: 2) a decline in net sales for Polk City Directories during the quarter ended September 30, 2003; 3) a litigation settlement charge of $1.7 million recorded during the quarter ended September 30, 2003; and 4) increased operating expenses represented as percentage of net sales associated with companies acquired during 2002 and 2003 including City Publishing, Hill-Donnelly, ClickAction, Yesmail and Markado.

      Operating income for the infoUSA Group segment for 2003 was $48.9 million, or 32% of net sales, as compared to $60.2 million, or 39% of net sales in 2002. The decrease in operating income as a percentage of nets sales is principally due to items 1), 2) and 4) described in the preceding paragraph.

      Operating income for the Donnelley Group segment for 2003 was $76.8 million, or 49% of net sales, as compared to $76.9 million, or 52% of net sales in 2002. The decrease in operating income as a percentage of net sales is principally due to increased operating expenses represented as percentage of net sales associated with companies acquired during 2002 and 2003 including ClickAction, Yesmail and Markado.

      Other expense, net was $(16.8) million, or 5% of net sales, and $(21.4) million, or 7% of net sales, for 2003 and 2002, respectively. Other income or (expense), net is comprised of interest expense, investment income, minority interest in subsidiary and other income or expense items, which do not represent components of operating expense of the Company.

      On May 27, 2003 the Company’s Secured Credit Facility was amended and restated to increase the credit available from $115 million to $145 million to facilitate the partial redemption of the Company’s 9¹/2% Senior Subordinated Notes. As a result of the refinancing, the Company expensed $0.8 million in non-amortized deferred financing costs associated with the issue of the previous facility and $0.7 million in bank fees associated with the new facility. During 2003, the Company purchased $67 million of its 9¹/2% Senior Subordinated Notes. As part of these purchases, the Company recorded charges of $1.7 million for related net non-amortized debt issue costs and $3.2 million for amounts paid in excess of carrying value of the debt.

      Interest expense was $11.5 million and $16.1 million for 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease is principally due to lower interest rates on the Senior Secured Credit Facility in May 2003, the continued reduction in the amount of 9¹/2% Senior Subordinated Notes outstanding and favorable interest rates. Investment income was $1.1 million and $179 thousand, for 2003 and 2002, respectively.

      A provision for income taxes of $12.1 million and $12.7 million was recorded for 2003 and 2002, respectively. Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002, the Company ceased amortizing goodwill and certain intangible assets for financial reporting purposes and consequently, the amortization expense for those assets does not affect either book or taxable income in 2003 or 2002.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      Our principal sources of liquidity are cash flow provided by our operating activities, our revolving credit facilities, and cash and cash equivalents on hand. Our ability to generate cash from our operations is one of our fundamental financial strengths. We use cash flows from operations, along with borrowings, to fund capital expenditures, pursue growth initiatives, make acquisitions and retire outstanding indebtedness.

      The Company is not subject to significant variability in cash flows from operations. The Company’s sales (including those subject to deferred revenue recognition practices), cash receipts and cash disbursements occur fairly evenly through the course of a fiscal year. The Company is not subject to significant variations due to seasonalities in business lines.

      Cash flows from operations on an annual basis have historically been well in excess of contractual obligations, including required debt payments, capital lease obligations, operating leases and other long-term obligations, and the Company believes that this financial condition will remain comparable for the foreseeable future. The Company does not anticipate utilizing cash flows from operations to fund significant capital expenditures in the foreseeable future. Additionally, the Company had $50.0 million of available borrowing capacity under its debt facilities at December 31, 2004, and has been historically successful in negotiating and obtaining additional debt financing as necessary.

      The Company believes that its existing sources of liquidity and cash generated from operations will satisfy the Company’s projected working capital, debt repayments and other cash requirements for at least the next 12 months. Acquisitions of other technologies, products or companies, or internal product development efforts may require the Company to obtain additional equity or debt financing, which may not be available or may be dilutive.

      The Company has announced that it proposes to acquire all of the common stock of Digital Impact. The Company anticipates that the cost of acquiring the shares of common stock of Digital Impact, based on a $2.00 per share price, would be approximately $74 million, plus transaction fees and expenses. The Company intends to obtain the necessary funds by drawing on a financing commitment provided to the Company from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., pursuant to a commitment letter dated February 23, 2005. The commitment letter is subject to certain conditions, including the negotiation and execution of definitive loan documents satisfactory to the parties and satisfaction of the conditions to the tender offer to the Digital Impact shareholders. Upon consummation of the financing, the Company will have the ability to borrow up to $300 million, consisting of (i) a multiple advance term credit facility of $250 million and (ii) a revolving credit facility of $50 million. These loans will be secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company.

      On March 25, 2004, the Company financed a new Senior Secured Credit Facility administered by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. The new credit facility provides for a $120.0 million Term A loan with a maturity date of March 2009 and a $50.0 million revolving line of credit with a maturity date of March 2007.

      On June 4, 2004, the Company negotiated an amended and restated Senior Secured Credit Facility (the “Credit Facility”) administered by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. in conjunction with the acquisition of OneSource. The Credit Facility provides for a new $80.0 million Term B loan with a maturity date of June 2010.

      The Credit Facility provides for grid-based interest pricing based upon the Company’s consolidated total leverage ratio and ranges from base rate plus 1.00% to 1.75% for base rate loans and LIBOR plus 2.00% to 2.75% for use of the revolving credit facility. The term loans interest rates range from base rate plus 1.50% to 2.00% or LIBOR plus 2.50% to 3.00%. Substantially all of the assets of the Company are pledged as security under the terms of the Credit Facility. At December 31, 2004, the Term A loan had a balance of $105.0 million bearing an interest rate of 5.06%, the Term B loan had a balance of $69.6 million bearing an interest rate of 5.25% and $50.0 million was available under the revolving credit facility.

      The Company is subject to certain financial covenants in the Credit Facility, including minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio, maximum consolidated total leverage ratio and minimum consolidated net worth. The fixed charge coverage ratio and leverage ratio financial covenants are based on EBITDA (“Earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization”), as adjusted, providing for adjustments to EBITDA for certain agreed upon items including investment income (loss), other charges (gains), asset impairments, non-cash stock compensation expense and other items defined within the Credit Facility. The Company was in compliance with all restrictive covenants of the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2004.

      As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s principal sources of liquidity included $50.0 million available under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had a working capital deficit of $56.7 million. Included in this working capital deficit amount is deferred revenue of $53.0 million.

      Net cash provided by operating activities during 2004 totaled $73.0 million compared to $56.6 million for 2003.

      During 2004, the Company spent $4.4 million for additions of property and equipment and $2.6 million related to software and database development costs, compared to $5.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively during 2003.

      During 2004, the Company spent a total of $110.0 million for acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired of $19.3 million. The Company paid $6.2 million for Triplex (net of cash acquired of $0.2 million) including capitalized acquisition costs of $0.3 million. The Company paid $12.3 million for Edith Roman (net of cash acquired of $1.2 million) including capitalized acquisition costs of $0.3 million. The Company paid $91.5 million for OneSource (net of cash acquired of $17.9 million) including capitalized acquisition costs of $1.8 million.

      During 2004, the Company borrowed a total of $273.2 million in debt while making repayments on debt totaling $222.0 million during 2004. These amounts reflect activity for the financing of the acquisitions of Triplex, Edith Roman and OneSource during 2004, the refinancing of the Company’s Senior Secured Credit Facility in March 2004 and the redemption of the Company’s 9¹/2% Senior Subordinated Notes in April 2004.

      Trade accounts receivable increased to $51.7 million at December 31, 2004 from $40.9 million at December 31, 2003. The increase is principally due to the acquisition of OneSource in June 2004. The day’s sales outstanding (“DSO”) ratio, excluding list brokerage sales, for 2004 was 54 days compared to 49 days for 2003.

      List brokerage trade accounts receivable increased to $19.6 million at December 31, 2004 from $12.8 million at December 31, 2003. The increase is due to the acquisition of Edith Roman in June 2004, which provides list brokerage sales operations.

      Deferred marketing costs decreased to $2.6 million at December 31, 2004 from $5.5 million at December 31, 2003. The decrease is the result of the Company’s decreased spending during 2004 on direct marketing costs that are subject to deferral and amortization.

      List brokerage trade accounts payable increased to $15.4 million at December 31, 2004 from $9.5 million at December 31, 2003. The increase is due to the acquisition of Edith Roman in June 2004, which provides list brokerage sales operations.

      Accrued expenses increased to $7.0 million at December 31, 2004 from $0.8 million at December 31, 2003. The increase is principally due to the acquisition of OneSource in June 2004, accrued severance costs associated with the various acquisitions during 2004 and the termination of existing employees during 2004. Additionally, accrued expenses includes a hold-back amount of $1.1 million related to the acquisition of Triplex which was paid in January 2005.

      Deferred revenue increased to $53.0 million at December 31, 2004 from $19.8 million at December 31, 2003. The increase is principally due to the acquisition of OneSource in June 2004.

      Long-term debt, net of current portion increased to $162.1 million at December 31, 2004 from $122.5 million at December 31, 2003. The net increase is due to the financed acquisitions of Triplex, Edith Roman and OneSource during 2004.

      Selected other balance sheet accounts, including prepaid expenses, accounts payable, and accrued payroll expenses, increased (decreased) moderately from their respective account balances at December 31, 2003 to their respective account balances at December 31, 2004. The increase (decrease) in these account balances is due to the acquisition of certain companies during 2004 and payment timing differences related to various general operating expenses.

      The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2004:

      Unconditional purchase obligations include service contracts for internet, phone and data communication services, software and hardware maintenance services, consulting agreements, data processing services and data center hosting agreements.

      Other than for long-term debt arrangements, the Company has historically not entered into significant long-term contractual commitments, and does not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future. The Company principally negotiates longer-term contracts that bear terms of one year or less, although some contracts may bear terms of up to three years.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

      Other than rents associated with facility leasing arrangements, the Company does not engage in off-balance sheet financing activities.

Accounting Standards

      In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets. This Statement amends the guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions. APB 29 provided an exception to the basic measurement principle (fair value) for exchanges of similar assets, requiring that some nonmonetary exchanges be recorded on a carryover basis. SFAS 153 eliminates the exception to fair value for exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchange transactions that do not have commercial substance, that is, transactions that are not expected to result in significant changes in the cash flows of the reporting entity. The provisions of SFAS No. 153 are effective for exchanges of nonmonetary assets occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. As of December 31, 2004, management believes that SFAS No. 153 will have no significant effect on the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company.

      In December 2004, the FASB revised SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payments. SFAS 123(R) eliminates the alternative to use APB Opinion 25’s intrinsic value method of accounting (generally resulting in recognition of no compensation cost) and instead requires a company to recognize in its financial statements the cost of employee services received in exchange for valuable equity instruments issued, and liabilities incurred, to employees in share-based payment transactions (e.g., stock options). The cost will be based on the grant-date fair value of the award and will be recognized over the period for which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. For public entities that do not file as small business issuers, the provisions of the revised statement are to be applied prospectively for awards that are granted, modified, or settled in the first interim or annual period beginning after June 15, 2005. Additionally, public entities would recognize compensation cost for any portion of awards granted or modified after December 15, 1994, that is not yet vested at the date the standard is adopted, based on the grant-date fair value of those awards calculated under SFAS 123 (as originally issued) for either recognition or pro forma disclosures. When the Company adopts the standard on July 1, 2005, it will be required to report in its financial statements the share-based compensation expense for the last six months of 2005 and may choose to use the modified retrospective application method to restate results for the two earlier interim periods. As of December 31, 2004, management believes that adopting the new statement will have a negative impact of

approximately one cent per share (one cent per share if the modified retrospective application method is used) for the year ending December 31, 2005, representing the expense to be recognized from July 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005 for the unvested portion of awards which were granted prior to July 1, 2005.

      In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) revised FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. FIN No. 46® addresses consolidation by business enterprises of certain variable interest entities. For public entities that are not small business issuers, the provisions of FIN No. 46® are effective no later than the end of the first reporting period that ends after March 15, 2004. If the variable interest entity is considered to be a special-purpose entity, FIN No. 46® shall be applied no later than the first reporting period that ends after December 15, 2003. Management has determined that adoption of this interpretation did not have any effect on the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.

      In November 2003, the FASB ratified a consensus on the disclosure provisions of EITF 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” (EITF 03-1). In March 2004, the FASB reached a consensus regarding the application of a three-step impairment model to determine whether investments accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” and other cost method investments are other-than-temporarily impaired. However, with the issuance of FSP EITF 03-1-1, “Effective Date of Paragraphs 10-20 of EITF 03-1,” on September 30, 2004, the provisions of the consensus relating to the measurement and recognition of other-than-temporary impairments will be deferred pending further clarification from the FASB. The remaining provisions of this rule, which primarily relate to disclosure requirements, are required to be applied prospectively to all current and future investments accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 115 and other cost method investments. The Company will evaluate the potential impact of EITF 03-1 after the FASB completes its reassessment.

Inflation

      We do not believe that the rate of inflation has had a material effect on our operating results. However, inflation could adversely affect our future operating results if it were to result in a substantial weakening economic condition.

Factors That May Affect Operating Results

      The Internet is widely accepted by businesses all over the world. It is a very fluid distribution channel for information. The Company has always used the cutting edge technology to deliver its information to its customers. infoUSA was the first database company to offer its products on magnetic media, CD, DVD and also the Internet. Our Sales Genie, SalesLeadsUSA and other products are now being offered on the Internet on a subscription basis. We cannot guarantee that in the future that the Internet will be as prevalent as it is now, but we believe this will be the primary method of delivery of information.

      The business and consumer marketing information industry in which we operate is highly competitive. Intense competition could harm us by causing, among other things, price reductions, reduced gross margins, and loss of market share. Our competition includes: Acxiom, Experian (a subsidiary of Great Universal Stores, P.L.C. (“GUS”)), Equifax, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. and Dun & Bradstreet©.

      In addition, we may face competition from new entrants to the business and consumer marketing information industry as a result of the rapid expansion of the Internet, which creates a substantial new channel for distributing business information to the market. Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, better name recognition and greater financial resources than we do, which may enable them to implement their business strategies more readily than we can.

      As of December 31, 2004, we had total indebtedness of $196.2 million. Substantially all of our assets are pledged as security under the terms of the Credit Facility.

      Our ability to pay principal and interest on the indebtedness under the Credit Facility and our ability to satisfy our other debt obligations will depend upon our future operating performance. Our performance will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors. Certain of these factors are beyond our control. The future availability of revolving credit under the Credit Facility will depend on, among other things, our ability to meet certain specified financial ratios and maintenance tests. We expect that our operating cash flow should be sufficient to meet our operating expenses, to make necessary capital expenditures and to service our debt requirements as they become due. If we are unable to service our indebtedness, however, we will be forced to take actions such as reducing or delaying acquisitions and/or capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing our indebtedness (including the Credit Facility) or seeking additional equity capital. We may not be able to implement any such measures or obtain additional financing or terms that are favorable or satisfactory to us, if at all.

      Our operating results may fluctuate on a quarterly and annual basis. Our expense levels are relatively fixed and are based, in part, on our expectations as to future revenues. As a result, unexpected changes in revenue levels may have a disproportionate effect on operating performance in any given period. In some period or periods our operating results may be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. Our failure to meet analyst or investor expectations could result in a decrease in the market price of our common stock.

      We provide marketing information and services to our customers in a variety of formats, including printed formats, electronic formats such as CD-Rom and DVD, and over the Internet. Advances in information technology may result in changing customer preferences for products and product delivery formats. If we do not successfully adapt our products and services to take advantage of changes in technology and customer preferences, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

      We have adopted an Internet strategy because we believe that the Internet represents an important and rapidly evolving market for marketing information products and services. Our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected if we:

      To increase our revenues, we must enhance and improve existing products and continue to introduce new products and new versions of existing products that keep pace with technological developments, satisfy increasingly sophisticated customer requirements, and achieve market acceptance. We believe much of our future growth prospects will rest on our ability to continue to expand into newer products and services. Products and services that we plan to market in the future are in various stages of development. We cannot

assure you that the marketplace will accept these products. If our current or potential customers are not willing to switch to or adopt our new products and services, our ability to increase revenues will be impaired.

      We engage in direct marketing, as do many of our customers. Certain data and services provided by us are subject to regulation by federal, state and local authorities in the United States as well as those in Canada and the United Kingdom. For instance, some of the data and services that we provide are subject to regulation under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which regulates the use of consumer credit information, and to a lesser extent, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which regulates the use of non-public personal information. We are also subject to the United Kingdom’s Data Protection Act of 1998, which became fully effective on October 24, 2001 and regulates the manner in which we can use third-party data, and recent regulatory limitations relating to use of the Electoral Roll, one of our key data sources in the United Kingdom. In addition, growing concerns about individual privacy and the collection, distribution and use of information about individuals have led to self-regulation of such practices by the direct marketing industry through guidelines suggested by the Direct Marketing Association and to increased federal and state regulation. There is increasing awareness and concern among the general public regarding marketing and privacy concerns, particularly as it relates to the Internet. This concern is likely to result in new laws and regulations. Compliance with existing federal, state and local laws and regulations and industry self-regulation has not to date seriously affected our business, financial condition or results of operations. Nonetheless, federal, state and local laws and regulations designed to protect the public from the misuse of personal information in the marketplace and adverse publicity or potential litigation concerning the collection, management or commercial use of such information may increasingly affect our operations. This could result in substantial regulatory compliance or litigation expense or a loss of revenue.

      Our business strategy includes continued growth through acquisitions of complementary products, technologies or businesses. We have made over 20 acquisitions since 1996 and completed the integration of these acquisitions into our existing business by the end of 2004. We continue to evaluate strategic opportunities available to us and intend to pursue opportunities that we believe fit our business strategy. Acquisitions of companies, products or technologies may result in the diversion of management’s time and attention from day-to-day operations of our business and may entail numerous other risks, including difficulties in assimilating and integrating acquired operations, databases, products, corporate cultures and personnel, potential loss of key employees of acquired businesses, difficulties in applying our internal controls to acquired businesses, and particular problems, liabilities or contingencies related to the businesses being acquired. To the extent our efforts to integrate future acquisitions fail, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

      The Company has identified interest rate risk as the Company’s primary market risk exposure. The Company is exposed to significant future earnings and cash flow exposures from significant changes in interest rates as nearly all of the Company’s debt is at variable rates. If necessary, the Company could refinance the Company’s debt to fixed rates or utilize interest rate protection agreements to manage interest rate risk. For example, each 100 basis point increase (decrease) in the interest rate would cause an annual increase (decrease) in interest expense of approximately $2.0 million. At December 31, 2004, the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt is based on quoted market prices at the reporting date or is estimated by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at rates currently offered to the Company for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities. At December 31, 2004, the Company had long-term debt with a carrying value of $196.2 million and estimated fair value of approximately the same. The Company has no significant operations subject to risks of foreign currency fluctuations.

      The information required by this item (other than selected quarterly financial data which is set forth below) is incorporated by reference to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The following table sets forth selected financial information for each of the eight quarters in the two-year period ended December 31, 2004. This unaudited information has been prepared by the Company on the same basis as the consolidated financial statements and includes all normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly this information when read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto.

      No reports under this item have been required to be filed involving a change of accountants or disagreements on accounting and financial disclosure.

(a) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

      Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining “adequate internal control over financial reporting” for the Company as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

      An internal control significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects the company’s ability to initiate, authorize, record, process, or report external financial data reliably in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected. An internal control material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.

      Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the criteria for effective internal control described in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on its assessment, management concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 because of the following material weaknesses:

      Management engaged KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company’s financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, to attest to and report on management’s evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. KPMG LLP’s report is included herein.

(b) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

      As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Management notes that a total of over 100 business processes and approximately 750 controls around those processes where identified by the Company as part of its overall evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. Based upon that evaluation and the material weaknesses described above, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2004, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not adequate to enable the Company to record, process, summarize and report information required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings within the required time period. Management notes that the deficiencies in disclosure

controls and procedures did not have a material impact on the Company’s operating income, net income, and earnings per share for the fourth quarter of 2004 and fiscal 2004. However, such deficiencies resulted in more than a remote likelihood that the financial statements could have been materially misstated. Furthermore, management notes that the Company has taken significant steps during the first quarter of 2005 to remediate the material weaknesses identified by management.

(c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

      During the quarter ended December 31, 2004, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Remediation Plan

      Our management, with the oversight of the Company’s Audit Committee, has devoted considerable effort to remediating the material weaknesses identified, and has made improvements in our internal controls over financial reporting to address these weaknesses. Specifically, the Company’s remediation plans are as follows:

      We believe that these steps address the weaknesses that affected our internal controls over financial reporting in fiscal year 2004. We will continue with our on-going evaluation and will improve our internal controls over financial reporting as necessary to assure their effectiveness.

      Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, will be or have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitation in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Stockholders and Board of Directors

infoUSA Inc.:

      We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting (Item 9A(a)), that infoUSA Inc. did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, because of the effect of an insufficient depth of accounting resources and insufficient policies and procedures governing the valuation of cost method investments, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). infoUSA Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

      We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

      Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

      A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that result in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included in management’s assessment as of December 31, 2004:

      We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of infoUSA Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004. These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2004 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 9, 2005, which expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

      In our opinion, management’s assessment that infoUSA Inc. did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO. Also, in our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

Omaha, Nebraska

March 9, 2005

Item 9B. Other Information

      None.

PART III

      The required information regarding Directors of the registrant is incorporated by reference to the information under the caption “Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting” and “Incumbent Directors whose Terms of Office Continue After the Annual Meeting” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 29, 2005.

      The required information regarding Executive Officers of the registrant is contained in Part I of this Form 10-K.

      The required information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act is incorporated by reference to the information under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 29, 2005.

Code of Ethics

      We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on our website at www.infousa.com under the caption Investor Relations.

      We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 10 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by posting such information on our website, at the address and location specified above and, to the extent required by the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market, by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC, disclosing such information.

      Incorporated by reference to the information under the captions “Election of Directors — Board Compensation,” “Executive Compensation,” and “Certain Transactions” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 29, 2005.

      Incorporated by reference to the information under the caption “Security Ownership” and “Executive Compensation — Equity Compensation Plan Table” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 29, 2005.

      Incorporated by reference to the information under the captions “Certain Transactions” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 29, 2005.

      Incorporated by reference to the information under the caption “Auditors’ Fees” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 29, 2005.

PART IV

      (a) The following documents are filed as a part of the Report:

      Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are not applicable or are not required or the information required to be set forth therein is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: April 1, 2005

      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.