WHITING PETROLEUM CORPORATION

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held May 3, 2011

 

Dear Stockholder:

 

The annual meeting of stockholders of Whiting Petroleum Corporation will be held on Tuesday, May 3, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., Mountain Time, in the Prospector Suite located in The Brown Palace Hotel, at 321 17th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, for the following purposes:

 

 

The close of business on March 11, 2011 has been fixed as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

A proxy for the meeting and a proxy statement are enclosed with this notice.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

WHITING PETROLEUM CORPORATION

 

Bruce R. DeBoer

Corporate Secretary

 

Denver, Colorado

April 1, 2011

 

 

 

 

WHITING PETROLEUM CORPORATION
1700 Broadway, Suite 2300
Denver, Colorado 80290-2300

PROXY STATEMENT
For
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held May 3, 2011

 

This proxy statement is being furnished to stockholders by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Whiting Petroleum Corporation beginning on or about April 1, 2011 in connection with a solicitation of proxies by the Board for use at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Tuesday, May 3, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., Mountain Time, in the Prospector Suite located in The Brown Palace Hotel at 321 17 th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, and all adjournments or postponements thereof (the “Annual Meeting” ) for the purposes set forth in the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

Execution of a proxy given in response to this solicitation will not affect a stockholder’s right to attend the Annual Meeting and to vote in person. Presence at the Annual Meeting of a stockholder who has signed a proxy does not in itself revoke a proxy. Any stockholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is exercised by giving notice thereof to us in writing or in open meeting.

 

A proxy, in the enclosed form, which is properly executed, duly returned to us and not revoked will be voted in accordance with the instructions contained therein. The shares represented by executed but unmarked proxies will be voted FOR the two nominees for election as directors referred to in this proxy statement, FOR approval of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement, to hold the advisory vote on the compensation of our executive officers every year, FOR the proposed amendment to our certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock and FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2011 and in accordance with the judgment of the persons named as proxies in the enclosed form of proxy on such other business or matters which may properly come before the Annual Meeting. Other than the election of two directors, the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement, the advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, the amendment to our certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock and the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2011, the Board has no knowledge of any other matters to be presented for action by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting.

 

Only holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on March 11, 2011 are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On that date, [118,115,582] shares of our common stock were issued and entitled to vote, each of which is entitled to one vote per share.

 

Except as otherwise expressly stated, all historical share and per share amounts in this proxy statement have been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one split of our common stock distributed on February 22, 2011 to holders of record as of February 7, 2011.

 

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Our certificate of incorporation and by-laws provide that our directors are divided into three classes, with staggered terms of three years each. At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders will elect two directors to hold office until the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Shares of our common stock represented by executed but unmarked proxies will be voted in favor of the election as directors of the persons named as nominees in this proxy statement; provided that, if you hold shares of our common stock through a broker-dealer, bank nominee, custodian or other securities intermediary, the intermediary will not vote those shares for the election of any nominee for director unless you give the intermediary specific voting instructions on a timely basis directing the intermediary to vote for such nominee. The Board has no reason to believe that the listed nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve as directors if elected. However, in the event that

any nominee should be unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, the shares represented by proxies received will be voted for another nominee selected by the Board. Each director will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting (assuming a quorum is present). Consequently, any shares not voted at the Annual Meeting, whether due to abstentions, broker non-votes or otherwise, will have no impact on the election of the directors.

 

The following sets forth certain information, as of March 11, 2011, about the Board’s nominees for election at the Annual Meeting and each director whose term will continue after the Annual Meeting, including an account of their specific business experience; the names of publicly held and certain other corporations of which they also are, or have been within the past five years, directors; and a discussion of their specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion that they should serve as directors.

 

Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting

 

Terms expiring at the 2011 Annual Meeting

 

D. Sherwin Artus, 73, has been a director of Whiting Petroleum Corporation since 2006. Mr. Artus joined Whiting Oil and Gas Corporation in January 1989 as Vice President of Operations and became Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in July 1999. In January 2000, he was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Artus became Senior Vice President in January 2002 (upon the appointment of Mr. Volker as President and Chief Executive Officer) and retired from the Company on April 1, 2006. Prior to joining Whiting, he was employed by Shell Oil Company in various engineering research and management positions. From 1974-1977, he was employed by Wainoco Oil and Gas Company as Production Manager. He was a co-founder and later became President of Solar Petroleum Corporation, an independent oil and gas producing company. He has over 49 years of experience in the oil and natural gas business. Mr. Artus holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Geological Engineering and a Master’s Degree in Mining Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Colorado, Wyoming, Montana and North Dakota. Mr. Artus is a member, and a past officer, of the Society of Professional Well Log Analysts and is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. Mr. Artus’s technical expertise and vast industry experience coupled with his management experience with our company and intimate knowledge of our company culture led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director.

 

Philip E. Doty, 67, was appointed on August 11, 2010 as a director of Whiting Petroleum Corporation. Mr. Doty is a certified public accountant. Since 2007, Mr. Doty has been counsel to Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC, the largest Colorado-based accounting and consulting firm, where he previously was a partner from 2002 to 2007. From 1967 to 2000 he worked at Arthur Andersen and Co., where he was a partner since 1978 and served as an audit partner and head of the Denver office oil and gas practice until his retirement in 2000. He is a graduate of Drake University with a Bachelor’s degree in accounting. Mr. Doty’s 40 years of experience as a certified public accountant and his expertise in oil and gas financial reporting and accounting led to the conclusion he should serve as a director. Mr. Doty was recommended to our Nominating and Governance Committee by our chief executive officer.

 

The Board recommends the foregoing nominees for election as directors for terms expiring at the 2014 Annual Meeting and urges each stockholder to vote FOR such nominees.

 

Directors Continuing in Office

 

Terms expiring at the 2012 Annual Meeting

 

James J. Volker, 63, who serves as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, has been a director of Whiting Petroleum Corporation since 2003 and a director of Whiting Oil and Gas Corporation since 2002. He joined Whiting Oil and Gas Corporation in August 1983 as Vice President of Corporate Development and served in that position through April 1993. In March 1993, he became a contract consultant to Whiting Oil and Gas Corporation and served in that capacity until August 2000, at which time he became Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Volker was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of Whiting Oil and Gas Corporation in January 2002. Effective January 1, 2011, Mr. Volker serves as our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Volker was co-founder, Vice President and later President of Energy Management Corporation from 1971 through 1982. He has over 30 years of experience in the oil and natural gas industry. Mr. Volker has a degree in finance from the University of Denver, an MBA from the University of Colorado and has completed H. K. VanPoolen and Associates’ course of study in

reservoir engineering. Mr. Volker’s status as our chief executive officer who applies his considerable industry experience and management qualifications and serves as a valuable resource for the other directors as to all operational and administrative aspects of our company led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director.

 

William N. Hahne, 59, has been a director since 2007. Mr. Hahne was Chief Operating Officer of Petrohawk Energy Corporation from July 2006 until October 2007. Mr. Hahne served at KCS Energy, Inc. as President, Chief Operating Officer and Director from April 2003 to July 2006, and as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from April 1998 to April 2003. He is a graduate of Oklahoma University with a BS in petroleum engineering and has 37 years of extensive technical and management experience with independent oil and gas companies including Unocal, Union Texas Petroleum Corporation, NERCO, The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company (LL&E) and Burlington Resources, Inc. He is an expert in oil and gas reserve estimating, having served as chairman for the Society of Petroleum Engineers Oil and Gas Reserve Committee. Mr. Hahne’s experience in budgeting, planning and implementing effective exploration, drilling, acquisition and development programs, expertise in horizontal drilling and shale development and knowledge of oil and gas regulation, litigation and government reporting led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director.

 

Allan R. Larson, 72, was named as a director of Whiting Petroleum Corporation effective January 1, 2011. He has more than 40 years experience in oil and gas exploration and development, primarily in the Rocky Mountains and the Midcontinent regions. For 30 years he has operated Larson Petroleum, LLC, a geological consulting company. His previous affiliations include Jade Drilling Company, Belleview Capital Corporation, Mesa Petroleum Company and Amoco Production Company. Mr. Larson earned a PhD in Geology at the University of California, Los Angeles. He earned his M.S. in Geology from UCLA and his BS degree in Geology at Pennsylvania State University. He is a member of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, the Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists, the Wyoming Geological Association, the Montana Geologic Society and the Utah Geologic Association. Mr. Larson’s geological training, technical expertise and industry experience in evaluating exploration prospects and conducting drilling and production operations within our company’s core operating areas led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director.

 

Terms to expire at the 2013 Annual Meeting

 

Thomas L. Aller, 62, has been a director of Whiting Petroleum Corporation since 2003. Mr. Aller has served as Senior Vice President — Energy Resource Development of Alliant Energy Corporation since January 2009 and President of Interstate Power and Light Company since 2004. Prior to that, he served as President of Alliant Energy Investments, Inc. since 1998 and interim Executive Vice President — Energy Delivery of Alliant Energy Corporation since 2003 and Senior Vice President — Energy Delivery of Alliant Energy Corporation since 2004. From 1993 to 1998, he served as Vice President of IES Investments. He received his Bachelor’s Degree in political science from Creighton University and his Master’s Degree in municipal administration from the University of Iowa. Mr. Aller’s particular experience with our company, including from 1997 through 2003 when he served as a director of our company’s operating subsidiary prior to our initial public stock offering, and his business acumen and experience in the energy sector led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director.

 

Thomas P. Briggs, 62, has been a director of Whiting Petroleum Corporation since 2006. During the last five years, Mr. Briggs served as chief financial officer of Healthy Food Holdings, Inc., a private holding and management company for branded food companies. Prior to that, he served as chief financial officer of Horizon Organic, a publicly-held, organic foods company, and Vice President-Finance of a private, Denver-based food manufacturer and supplier. During the 1970s and 1980s, he was a tax and M&A consultant to oil and gas exploration companies, and chief financial officer and senior officer in two Denver-based, publicly-held independent oil and gas companies. Mr. Briggs, an inactive certified public accountant, has 26 years of management experience as a chief financial officer in public and private companies primarily in the oil and gas and food industries, and also has 10 years of public accounting experience in two of the current four worldwide public accounting firms. He is a past director of the Western Energy Alliance. Mr. Briggs holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in accounting from Duke University and a Juris Doctorate degree from the Georgetown University Law Center. From 2004 until March 2009, he was a board member and chairman of the audit committee of Corrpro Companies, Inc., a publicly held company. Mr. Briggs’ accounting and legal background as well as his considerable experience as a chief financial officer and independent certified public accountant led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director.

 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Corporate Governance Guidelines

 

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that are available on our website at www.whiting.com.

 

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

 

The Board has adopted the Whiting Petroleum Corporation Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our directors and employees, the full text of which is available on our website at www.whiting.com. Each of our directors and employees annually confirms in writing that he or she has reviewed and will fully comply with the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

 

Transactions with Related Persons

 

We had no transactions during 2010, and none are currently proposed, in which we were a participant and in which any related person had a direct or indirect material interest. Our Board has adopted written policies and procedures regarding related person transactions. For purposes of these policies and procedures:

 

 

Each of our executive officers, directors or nominees for director is required to disclose to the Nominating and Governance Committee certain information relating to related person transactions for review, approval or ratification by the Nominating and Governance Committee. Disclosure to the Nominating and Governance Committee should occur before, if possible, or as soon as practicable after the related person transaction is effected, but in any event as soon as practicable after the executive officer, director or nominee for director becomes aware of the related person transaction. The Nominating and Governance Committee’s decision whether or not to approve or ratify a related person transaction is to be made in light of the Nominating and Governance Committee’s determination that consummation of the transaction is not or was not contrary to our best interests. Any related person transaction must be disclosed to the full Board of Directors.

 

Independence of Directors

 

Of the seven directors currently serving on the Board, the Board has determined that each of Messrs. Aller, Artus, Briggs, Doty, Hahne and Larson has no material relationship with us and is independent under New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The Board has established categorical standards within our Corporate Governance Guidelines to assist in making determinations of director independence. These categorical standards are available in Appendix B to our Corporate Governance Guidelines on our website at www.whiting.com. In making its determination of independence, the Board found that each of Messrs. Aller, Artus, Briggs, Doty, Hahne and Larson met these standards.

 

Board Committees

 

The Board has standing Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees. The Board has adopted a formal written charter for each of these committees that is available on our website at www.whiting.com.

The table below provides the current composition of each standing committee of our Board:

 

 

The Audit Committee’s primary duties and responsibilities are to assist the Board in monitoring the integrity of our financial statements, the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, retention, compensation, evaluation and termination of our independent registered public accounting firm and has the sole authority to approve all audit and permitted non-audit engagement fees and terms. The Audit Committee is presently comprised of Messrs. Doty (Chairperson), Aller and Briggs, each of whom is an independent director under New York Stock Exchange listing standards and Securities and Exchange Commission rules applicable to audit committee members. The Board has determined that Mr. Doty qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by Securities and Exchange Commission rules. The Audit Committee held five meetings in 2010.

 

The Compensation Committee discharges the responsibilities of the Board with respect to our compensation programs and compensation of our executives and directors. The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for determining the compensation of our chief executive officer, approving the compensation of our executive officers and reviewing director compensation. The Compensation Committee is also charged with administration of our Production Participation Plan and Equity Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee is presently comprised of Messrs. Briggs (Chairperson), Aller and Hahne, and each of whom is an independent director under New York Stock Exchange listing standards, an outside director for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and a non-employee director for purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. The Compensation Committee held five meetings in 2010. Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee and our processes and procedures for executive compensation, including, among other matters, our use of compensation consultants and the role of our executive officers in determining compensation, is provided below under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”.

 

The principal functions of the Nominating and Governance Committee are to identify individuals qualified to become directors and recommend to the Board nominees for all directorships, identify directors qualified to serve on Board committees and recommend to the Board members for each committee, develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance guidelines and otherwise take a leadership role in shaping our corporate governance. The Nominating and Governance Committee is also charged with administering our policies and procedures regarding any transactions with related persons. The Nominating and Governance Committee is presently comprised of Messrs. Hahne (Chairperson), Artus, Doty and Larson, each of whom is an independent director under New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The Nominating and Governance Committee held seven meetings in 2010.

 

In identifying and evaluating nominees for director, the Nominating and Governance Committee seeks to ensure that the Board possesses, in the aggregate, the strategic, managerial and financial skills and experience necessary to fulfill its duties and to achieve its objectives, and seeks to ensure that the Board is comprised of directors who have broad and diverse backgrounds, possessing knowledge in areas that are of importance to us. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee believes it is important that at least one director have the requisite experience and expertise to be designated as an “audit committee financial expert.” The Nominating and Governance Committee looks at each nominee on a case-by-case basis regardless of who recommended the nominee. In looking at the qualifications of each candidate to determine if their election would further the goals described above, the Nominating and Governance Committee takes into account all factors it considers appropriate, which may include strength of character, mature judgment, career specialization, relevant technical skills or financial acumen, diversity of viewpoint and industry knowledge. At a minimum, each director nominee must have

displayed the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values and sound business judgment. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee believes that the following minimum qualifications are necessary for a director nominee to possess to be recommended by the Committee to the Board:

 

 

The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider persons recommended by stockholders to become nominees for election as directors in accordance with the foregoing and other criteria set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Nominating and Governance Committee Charter. Recommendations for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee should be sent to our Corporate Secretary in writing together with appropriate biographical information concerning each proposed nominee. Our By-Laws also set forth certain requirements for stockholders wishing to nominate director candidates directly for consideration by the stockholders. With respect to an election of directors to be held at an annual meeting, a stockholder must, among other things, give notice of an intent to make such a nomination to our Corporate Secretary in advance of the meeting in compliance with the terms and within the time period specified in the By-Laws. Pursuant to these requirements, a stockholder must give a written notice of intent to our Corporate Secretary no earlier than the 120th day and no later than the 90th day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders.

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

During 2010, Messrs. Aller, Briggs and Hahne served on the Compensation Committee of our Board. Mr. Hubbard, who retired December 31, 2010, also served on the Compensation Committee from January 1, 2010 through May 31, 2010. None of such persons has served as an employee or officer of ours. None of our executive officers serve as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of our Board or Compensation Committee.

 

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

 

The position of board chairman is filled by our chief executive officer. We believe this combined leadership structure is appropriate for our company because our chairman and chief executive officer (i) conveys a singular, cohesive message to our stockholders, employees, industry partners and the investment community and (ii) eliminates any ambiguity as to who is accountable for company performance. Our directors and management team engage frequently and directly in the flow of information and ideas and we believe our combined leadership structure facilitates the quality, quantity and timeliness of the information flow and communication.

 

A presiding director is designated to preside over each executive session of the non-management directors at Board meetings. The presiding director is the chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee.

 

One of the responsibilities of our Board is to review and evaluate the process in place to assess the major risks facing our company and periodically review management’s assessment of the major risks as well as options for their mitigation. Our Board leadership structure and our practice of a high degree of interaction between our directors and members of senior management facilitates this oversight function. The information flow and communication between our Board and senior management regarding long-term strategic planning and short term operational reporting includes matters of material risk inherent in our business of exploration for and production of oil and gas. Also, our Audit Committee, among other duties, is charged with overseeing significant financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor, control and report such exposures and has compliance oversight responsibilities.

Communication with Directors

 

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the full Board, non-management directors as a group or individual directors, including the presiding director, by submitting such communications in writing to our Corporate Secretary at Whiting Petroleum Corporation, c/o the Board of Directors (or, at the stockholder’s option, c/o a specific director or directors), 1700 Broadway, Suite 2300, Denver, Colorado 80290. Such communications will be delivered directly to the Board.

 

Meetings and Attendance

 

The Board held twelve meetings in 2010. No director attended less than 90% of the total number of Board and committee meetings on which they served. Directors are expected to attend our annual meeting of stockholders each year and all of our directors serving at the time, other than Mr. Hubbard (who retired on December 31, 2010), attended our 2010 annual meeting of stockholders.

 

Director Compensation

 

We use a combination of cash and equity incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified and experienced candidates to serve on the Board. In setting this compensation, our Compensation Committee considers the significant amount of time and energy expended and the skill-level required by our directors in fulfilling their duties. Our Compensation Committee grants restricted stock to our non-employee directors annually on the first of the month following the annual stockholders meeting (June 1 in 2010) to align the grants with directors’ terms of office. Grants of shares of restricted stock vest one-third each year over three years and become fully vested upon a change in control of our company. We also reimburse expenses incurred by our non-employee directors to attend Board and Board committee meetings and to attend continuing education seminars, conferences and classes. Directors who are our employees receive no compensation for service as members of either the Board or Board committees. From January 1, 2010 through May 31, 2010, non-employee directors were compensated pursuant to the schedule as follows:

 

 

Effective June 1, 2010, non-employee directors were compensated pursuant to the schedule as follows:

 

 

In addition, we make medical and dental coverage available to directors and their spouses, but directors who elect to receive such coverage are charged a premium that is equal to the COBRA rates associated with our insurance plan. As such, we consider the ability to participate in this coverage to be non-compensatory.

The following table reports compensation earned by or paid to our non-employee directors during 2010.

 

Director Compensation

 

 

 

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

In February 2010, our Board adopted stock ownership guidelines to further align the interests of our directors with the interests of our stockholders and to promote our commitment to sound corporate governance. Non-employee directors are required to hold shares of our common stock with a value equal to two times the amount of the annual retainer paid to outside directors for service on the Board (excluding additional committee retainers, if any). Non-employee directors are required to achieve the applicable level of ownership within two years of the later of the date these guidelines were adopted or the date the person first became a non-employee member of the Board. Shares that count towards satisfaction of the guidelines include: (i) shares owned outright by the director, and (ii) shares held in trust for the benefit of the director. Unexercised and/or unvested equity awards do not count towards satisfaction of the guidelines. The value of a share will be measured on January 1^st of each year as the average month end closing price for the 12 months preceding the date of calculation. All of the non-employee directors, other than our new directors Mr. Doty and Mr. Larson, currently own a sufficient number of shares of our common stock to satisfy the guidelines.

 

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

 

Certain Beneficial Owners

 

The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership by persons known to us to own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock as of March 11, 2011. The beneficial ownership information set forth below has been reported in filings made by the beneficial owners with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 

Management and Directors

 

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 11, 2011 by: (i) each director and nominee; (ii) each of the named executive officers in the Summary Compensation Table set forth below; and (iii) all of the directors, nominees and executive officers (including the named executive officers in the Summary Compensation Table) as a group. Each of the holders listed below has sole voting and investment power over the shares beneficially owned. None of the holders listed below have pledged as security any of the shares beneficially owned.

 

 

 

 

APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK

 

The Board recommends that the stockholders approve an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 175,000,000 to 300,000,000. The proposed amendment will not increase the number of authorized shares of preferred stock.

 

The Board believes that the proposed increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock is desirable to enhance our flexibility in taking possible future actions, such as raising additional equity capital, stock-based acquisitions, stock splits and dividends, equity compensation awards or other corporate purposes. The proposed amendment will allow us to accomplish these objectives. We do not have any current plans for use of the additional common stock proposed to be authorized. However, by approving this increase now, in advance of any specific need, we believe we will be able to act in a timely manner when such a need does arise or the Board believes that it is in the best interests of our company and our stockholders to take action, without the delay and expense that would be required at that time in obtaining stockholder approval of such an increase at a special meeting of stockholders.

 

We have historically issued common stock for the following purposes:

 

 

We also recently issued a large number of shares of our common stock for the following purposes:

 

 

We currently have 175,000,000 shares of authorized common stock. As of the March 11, 2011 record date, there were [118,115,582] shares of common stock issued; 1,399,920 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon conversion of our 6.25% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock; 377,336 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding options under our stockholder-approved 2003 Equity Incentive Plan; and 1,690,284 shares of common stock reserved for issuance in connection with future awards available for grant under our stockholder-approved 2003 Equity Incentive Plan. As a result, as of the record date, there were only 53,416,878 authorized shares of common stock that were not reserved and that we may issue for any future business purposes.

 

The additional common stock proposed to be authorized will have rights identical to, and have the same rights and privileges as, our currently authorized and outstanding common stock. Under our certificate of incorporation, stockholders do not have preemptive rights to subscribe to additional shares of common stock that we may issue. This means that current stockholders do not have a prior right to purchase any new issue of our capital stock in order to maintain their proportionate ownership of common stock. Use of the additional shares proposed to be authorized will not require stockholder approval unless required under Delaware corporate law or by the rules of any national securities exchange on which our common stock is then listed.

 

The Board does not intend to issue any shares of common stock except for purposes and on terms that the Board believes to be in the best interests of our stockholders and our company. However, depending on the purpose and terms of issuance at the time, if we issue additional shares of common stock or other securities convertible into common stock in the future, it could dilute the voting rights of existing stockholders and could also dilute earnings per share and book value per share of existing stockholders. The increase in authorized common stock could also make more difficult or discourage attempts to obtain control of our company, thereby having an anti-takeover effect.

The increase in authorized shares of common stock is not being proposed in response to any known threat to acquire control of our company.

 

The proposed amendment would amend and restate paragraph (a) of Article FOURTH of our certificate of incorporation to read as follows (proposed additions are indicated by underlining and proposed deletions are indicated by overstriking):

 

“(a) Authorized Capital Stock. The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 180,000,000 305,000,000 shares of capital stock, consisting of (i) 175,000,000 300,000,000 shares of common stock, each having a par value of $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), and (ii) 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, each having a par value of $0.001 per share (the “Preferred Stock”).”

 

If the amendment to the certificate of incorporation is approved by our stockholders, it will become effective upon filing a certificate of amendment to our certificate of incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, which filing we expect to make soon after the Annual Meeting.

 

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock is required for approval of the proposed amendment. Both abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes against approval of the proposed amendment. Shares of our common stock represented by executed but unmarked proxies will be voted for the proposed amendment to our certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock.

 

The Board recommends a vote FOR the proposed amendment to our certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock.

 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Objectives of Compensation Program

 

We recognize the importance of maintaining sound principles for the development and administration of our compensation program. Our compensation program is designed to advance the following core principles:

 

 

In advancing these principles, the objectives of our compensation program, including compensation of our named executive officers, are to attract and retain highly qualified and experienced employees, motivate them to achieve and advance, and reward them for superior performance.

 

What Compensation Program Is Designed to Reward, Recognize and Encourage

 

Our compensation program provides rewards for individual performance, team achievements and corporate results. It also recognizes changes in our circumstances and individual responsibilities, and it encourages an ownership mentality among our executives and other key employees.

 

Elements of Compensation/Why We Chose Each/How Each Relates to Objectives

 

The principal elements of compensation for our named executive officers are:

 

 

The principal focus in setting and evaluating our executive compensation is to align compensation with improved growth in the value of the company and stockholder return. In assessing total compensation, our objective is to be competitive with the industry while considering individual and company performance. Peer group data will be considered in setting and evaluating compensation, but because the data is usually not current, it is not the only consideration. The Compensation Committee’s objective is that total executive compensation be competitive with peer group compensation for like positions if company and individual performance meet predetermined standards. The companies comprising our peer group are identified below under “Role of Our Compensation Committee, Named Executive Officers and Compensation Consultants.”

 

Production Participation Plan

 

All employees, including our named executive officers, participate in our Production Participation Plan, which is the foundation for our executive compensation strategy. This is a relatively unique plan, which we chose because it combines performance-based elements related to maximizing oil and gas production and prices and to minimizing lease operating expenses, and annual bonuses in one plan. The Production Participation Plan gives each of our employees a direct participation in the results of our acquisition of, successful exploration for and development of proved reserves. Production of those reserves provides shared benefits to stockholders and employees. Achieving the best economic results from acquisition, exploration, development, and production is a complimentary goal for both us and our employees.

 

Each year, our Compensation Committee allocates to the Production Participation Plan (but does not legally convey) an interest in production income (defined as gross revenues less taxes (other than income taxes), royalties and direct lease operating expenses) from oil and natural gas wells acquired or developed during the year. Once allocated to plan participants, the interests are fixed as to that plan year. While employed, each employee is paid annually in cash his or her full interest in applicable current production income. The Production Participation Plan provides for continued post-employment participation through permanent vesting in the future production income of the Production Participation Plan at the rate of 20% per year as to every plan year. Also, employees fully vest in all plan years at the age of 62 or upon death or disability, and full vesting is accelerated in the event we voluntarily terminate the Production Participation Plan or in the event of a change in control of our company. This provides important retention incentives to all employees and a long-term, career orientation. Upon termination of employment, employees retain their vested interests in the Production Participation Plan. For plan years prior to 2004, forfeitures of unvested interests due to termination of employment are re-allocated among other plan participants. For plan years after 2003, forfeitures revert to our company.

 

We have a Production Participation Plan Credit Service Agreement with our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Volker, the purpose of which is to provide credit to him under the Production Participation Plan for services he rendered to us as a consultant from March 1993 to August 2000 as if he would have been a participant in the Production Participation Plan during such time period. We entered into this arrangement with Mr. Volker to induce him to become an officer of our company. We also have a Production Participation Plan Supplemental Agreement with our Vice President, Reservoir Engineering/Acquisitions, Mr. Lang, the purpose of which is to provide him an annual cash payment in addition to his Production Participation Plan participant entitlement to ensure that he receives a total payment equal to the average of the Production Participation Plan payments to our Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President. We entered into this arrangement with Mr. Lang to retain his services as an officer of our company. The Production Participation Plan Supplemental Agreement also provides that upon a change in control of our company or a voluntary termination of the Production Participation Plan, we will make a cash payment to Mr. Lang to ensure that his distribution is equal to the average of the Production Participation Plan distributions to our Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President. Both of these agreements were negotiated with Messrs. Volker and Lang at the time of their employment with us to give recognition to their prior experience in the oil and gas industry in addition to the individual purposes described above. See note 2 to the Summary Compensation Table and “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control — Production Participation Plan”.

 

Annual Production Participation Plan distributions will increase or decrease depending upon the quantities of oil and natural gas we produce, prices we realize and direct production costs we incur. As a result, these distributions are directly linked to our corporate operating performance.

2003 Equity Incentive Plan

 

Our 2003 Equity Incentive Plan provides long-term equity-based incentive compensation to our directors, named executive officers and other key employees. Although the Equity Incentive Plan provides for the grant of several forms of equity-based awards, including restricted stock, stock options, and stock appreciation rights, we have limited our awards to restricted stock and stock options. Our Compensation Committee formulates our restricted stock and stock option awards on an annual basis in conjunction with other compensation decisions at its January or February meeting.

 

Beginning in 2007, we made grants of restricted stock to our named executive officers that will vest based on achieving a performance objective. In 2010, that objective was to assure that the performance (whether positive or negative) of the price per share of the company’s common stock for the period from December 31, 2009 to each of the fiscal year ends preceding the first three anniversaries of the grant date, exceeds the performance (whether positive or negative) of the average price per share of common stock of the peer group of companies described in the report of the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant and identified below under “Role of Our Compensation Committee, Named Executive Officers and Compensation Consultants.”

 

In 2010, we awarded stock options to our executive officers. Such stock options vest in equal annual increments over three years from the date of grant. The stock options have a ten year term and the exercise price is the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant.

 

Awards of restricted stock and stock options encourage our executive officers to have an ownership mentality and align their interests with stockholder interests by having a continuing stake in the success of our company and the long-term value appreciation in our common stock. In particular, the performance-based restricted stock encourages our executive officers to continue performance that results in stock appreciation above rates experienced by our peer group and the stock options reward the optionholders only to the extent that our common stock price appreciates above the grant date price.

 

Base Salaries

 

We maintain base salaries for our executive officers to recognize their qualifications, experience and responsibilities as well as their unique value and historical contributions to us. Base salaries continue to be important in attracting and retaining executive officers and other employees and in motivating them to aspire to and accept enlarged responsibilities and opportunities for advancement.

 

401(k) Plan

 

We maintain a 401(k) retirement savings plan for all salaried employees including our executive officers. Although the Compensation Committee makes an annual determination as to the company matching contribution to the 401(k) plan, we have historically matched 100% of the first 7.5% of compensation contributed by our participating employees including our executive officers. These matching contributions vest to participants in equal increments over the first five years of employment.

 

Other Benefits

 

We provide all employees on an equal basis with medical, dental, vision, life and disability insurance coverage. We also provide customary vacation and paid holidays to all employees, including the named executive officers. We limit the perquisites that we make available to our named executive officers, who are entitled to only a few negligible benefits that are not available to all our employees.

 

How We Chose Amounts for Each Element

 

Our Compensation Committee monitors our executive compensation elements, both individually and collectively, based primarily on judgments as to what is appropriate under our circumstances as well as individual circumstances. We believe that awards to our executive officers under our Production Participation Plan and Equity Incentive Plan should be aligned with the interests of our stockholders and are therefore performance driven. Compensation of our executive officers in the same or similar positions in our peer group of companies is reviewed

and considered by the Compensation Committee but not targeted. We allocate a significant percentage of total compensation to incentives in support of the core principles mentioned above. There is no pre-established policy or target for allocation between cash and non-cash or between short-term and long-term incentive compensation.

 

Performance Factors

 

In April 2010, the Compensation Committee developed, and the Board ratified, six performance factors and a group of modifying factors which have become the basis for evaluating the total compensation of our executive officers. Although we may choose to modify the performance factors in the future, we believe that these six performance factors are currently the most important measurements of the overall performance of our company and its executive officers. In arriving at the awards under the Production Participation Plan and the Equity Incentive Plan, each of the six performance factors were evaluated for the current year as compared to the preceding year, and are the following:

 

 

The modifying factors also to be considered are:

 

 

For 2010, we believe that the results measured for these performance factors were exceptional and had a significant impact on the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of total compensation, however, we purposely avoided a formulaic approach in order to retain maximum flexibility and judgment. We considered the following results:

 

 

In addition, we executed various financial transactions, including redemption of our 2012 and 2013 bonds, the preferred stock exchange offer, the issuance of new bonds due 2018, completion of a restated credit agreement, achievement of an upgrade in our public debt rating, and negotiation of new oil and gas hedges and contracts, all of which reduced our interest payment obligations, increased our financial flexibility and strengthened our balance sheet.

We allocate a significant percentage of total compensation to incentives in support of the performance factors mentioned above. However, there is no pre-established policy or target for allocation between cash and non-cash or between short-term and long-term incentive compensation.

 

Production Participation Plan

 

Benefits received by our executive officers are derived during three important stages of the Production Participation Plan — award, vesting and annual payment — each with different factors ultimately driving amounts paid. Awards are made based on evaluations of company, team and individual performance. As previously discussed, annual awards time-vest over five years unless our executives reach age 62 at which time they become fully vested. Executives who resign or are terminated forfeit their unvested interests in the Production Participation Plan. Because each year adds future production income to the plan, Production Participation Plan benefits accumulate and payments received by executives during and after employment are significantly influenced by each executive’s length of service. In addition, because annual payments have a direct relationship to annual production income, the amounts are significantly influenced by oil and gas prices and the effectiveness with which we produce our oil and gas reserves.

 

Production Participation Plan awards in total and individual awards to our executives are at the discretion of our Compensation Committee. Historically, the annual Production Participation Plan award has ranged from a 2% to 5% interest in production income from oil and natural gas wells acquired or developed in that year. For plan year 2010, the Compensation Committee set the total Production Participation Plan award at 2.05% after consideration of the year’s drilling and property acquisition activity level compared to other plan years, of which 55.12% was allocated to our non-officer employees and 44.88% was allocated to our officer group (18.5365% going to our named executive officers with 6.8293% to Mr. Volker and 2.9268% to each of the other named executive officers).

 

The portion of the 2010 award allocated to nonexecutive employees was an amount approximately equal to 100% of the per employee allocation for 2007 times the number of nonexecutive employees eligible to participate as of December 31, 2010. The 100% level of funding was selected to award this employee group for their contribution to our company’s success during 2010. The amount allocated in this manner was 55.12% of the 2010 award.

 

In establishing the total award and the executive participation therein, as discussed below, the Compensation Committee has purposely avoided a formulaic approach in order to retain maximum flexibility and judgment as to what it considers appropriate in the circumstances.

 

Regarding the allocation of the remaining 44.88% of the 2010 award to our officer group (including the 18.5365% to our named executive officers), the Compensation Committee considered the performance factors enumerated above and determined the allocation as follows:

 

 

The Compensation Committee periodically reviews, for the total Production Participation Plan and for each named executive officer’s interest in the Production Participation Plan, the estimated present value of both vested and unvested benefits. In its review, the Compensation Committee also compares the increases in our long-term commitments under the Production Participation Plan with the growth in our stockholders’ equity and growth in our market capitalization (aggregate market value of our common stock).

 

Restricted Stock Awards

 

The Compensation Committee believes that equity ownership is an important element of compensation to the named executive officers and other members of our management team, and believes that over time more of executive compensation should be equity-based rather than cash-based so as to better align executive compensation

with shareholder return. Consistent with this belief, we have systematically increased the named executive officers’ ownership in our common stock. Our Compensation Committee makes grants of restricted stock each year at its January or February meeting. In 2010, Messrs. Volker, Stevens, Brown, Williams and Lang were awarded 59,092, 26,100, 10,879, 8,700 and 13,050 shares of restricted stock, respectively. The vesting of the restricted stock is 100% performance-based and the restricted stock will vest if the performance (whether positive or negative) of the price per share of the company’s common stock for the period from December 31, 2009 to each of the fiscal year ends preceding the first three anniversaries of the grant date exceeds the performance (whether positive or negative) of the average price per share of common stock of the peer group of companies identified by the Compensation Committee. See “Role of Our Compensation Committee, Named Executive Officers and Compensation Consultants” below for a listing of the peer group of companies. In establishing this performance objective, the Compensation Committee aligned this portion of executive compensation directly with stockholder return relative to our peer company group. To the extent all or a portion of the awards are not earned at the end of the three years, the portion of the awards not earned will be forfeited.

 

In making the 2010 awards, the Compensation Committee considered, in addition to the performance and other factors discussed above:

 

 

Stock Options

 

The Compensation Committee philosophy regarding stock options is similar to that stated above for restricted stock awards and similar performance and other factors were considered in making the 2010 stock option awards. Equity ownership aligns executive compensation with shareholder return and stock options reward the executive officers only to the extent that our common stock price appreciates above the grant date price. Our Compensation Committee made grants of stock options to certain of our named executive officers at its January 2010 meeting. Messrs. Volker, Stevens, Brown, Williams and Lang were awarded 19,290, 7,716, 2,572, 2,572, and 2,572 options to acquire an equal number of our common stock, respectively. Such options vest in equal annual increments over three years from the date of grant. The stock options have a ten year term and the exercise price for the stock options is the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant which was $34.31.

 

Base Salaries

 

Our Compensation Committee considers executive officer base salary levels annually as part of our performance appraisal process and establishes new salary levels effective as of the first of each year. The Compensation Committee normally establishes the appropriate base salary for Mr. Volker and reviews and approves his recommendations for base salary levels of each other executive officer. After freezing the salaries of the executive officers in 2009 at 2008 levels as a result of industry conditions and low oil and gas prices in early 2009, the Compensation Committee approved salary increases for the executive officers which averaged 7%. In establishing or approving executive officer base salaries, the Compensation Committee considers, in addition to the performance and other factors discussed previously, the following:

 

 

Chief Executive Officer Compensation Factors

 

Additional factors considered in establishing the Production Participation Plan allocation, restricted stock and stock option awards and salary compensation to our chief executive officer, Mr. Volker, in amounts greater than the other named executive officers included:

 

 

Mr. Volker is paid at a level of approximately two times the level of our other named executive officers. His higher levels of compensation in each of our elements of executive compensation reflect his higher levels of overall responsibility for the combined activities of our company compared to the other members of the executive team.

 

Role of Our Compensation Committee, Named Executive Officers and Compensation Consultants

 

Our Compensation Committee, which has overall responsibility for executive compensation, monitors our director and executive officer compensation and benefit plans, policies and programs to insure that they are consistent with our compensation philosophy and corporate governance guidelines. Subject to the approval of the Board, the Compensation Committee makes annual plan awards to our named executive officers.

 

Although the Compensation Committee uses survey and peer group compensation information in monitoring compensation, the Compensation Committee recognizes that available data is generally out-of-date at the time it makes compensation decisions. For example, the 2010 Production Participation Plan award was made in January of 2011 when our preliminary 2010 operating results became available. Survey and peer company information was available only for 2009. Restricted stock and stock option awards for 2010 were established in January of 2010. At that time, survey and peer company information was available only for 2008.

 

When 2009 compensation data became available in 2010, the Compensation Committee reviewed comparisons of our 2009 executive compensation (by component and in total) with that of a peer group of eleven companies and with industry compensation survey results. The companies that comprised our peer group for purposes of 2010 compensation were Bill Barrett Corporation, Cabot Oil and Gas Corporation, Cimarex Energy Co., Comstock Resources, Continental Resources, Denbury Resources, Inc., Forest Oil Corporation, Newfield Exploration Company, Petrohawk Energy Corporation, Range Resources Corporation, and SM Energy Company. The Compensation Committee selected this group of companies due to the similarity of their operations to ours and their size relative to ours. The Compensation Committee reviews the peer group annually to assure that the companies in the group are appropriately comparable to our company.

 

The Compensation Committee has concluded such comparisons are of limited usefulness, principally because of the uniqueness of our Production Participation Plan and because the compensation data from the peer companies is out of date. However, in general, our Compensation Committee believes that our executive compensation is competitive with our peers.

 

To help ensure that our executive compensation program is competitive and is consistent with our compensation philosophy and corporate governance guidelines and that our plan awards provide rewards for accomplishment, not for expectation, our Compensation Committee does the following:

 

 

 

During 2010, the Compensation Committee directly engaged Longnecker & Associates (“Longnecker”) to advise it with respect to executive officer compensation. Specifically, Longnecker provided the Compensation Committee with an executive compensation review including information comparing its benchmarking of compensation for our executive officers to that of other compensation surveys. Longnecker provided no other services to our company.

 

Typically, our chief executive officer makes compensation recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to the executive officers that report to him. Such officers are not present at the time of these deliberations. The Compensation Committee determines the compensation of our chief executive officer with limited input from him and he is not present at the time of that deliberation. The Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may accept, modify or reject any such recommendations.

 

Termination and Change in Control Arrangements

 

Other than as described below, we do not have any employment contracts, severance agreements or severance plans in effect with respect to any of our named executive officers. We also do not provide pension arrangements, post-termination health coverage or deferred compensation plans for them. Furthermore, in the event of a change in control of our company:

 

 

Due to this vesting, our executive officers may be deemed to receive compensation which is subject to a federal 20% excise tax in addition to ordinary income tax. Our Compensation Committee decided that the benefits granted to our executive officers should not be diminished in value due to such excise tax as a result of a change in control of our company. Accordingly, the company has entered into agreements with each of our executive officers providing that, if a change in control of the company occurs and any payments to each executive officer are subject to the 20% excise tax, the company will pay the executive the amount necessary to offset the 20% excise tax and any additional taxes on this payment. However, these agreements also provide that, if the executive would not be subject to such excise tax if the total payments to the executive were reduced by an amount up to $50,000, then the amounts payable to the executive under the Production Participation Plan will be reduced so that the total payments do not exceed the maximum amount that could be paid to the executive without giving rise to such excise tax.

These change in control benefits are included in the underlying plan and grant documents as to vesting and in separate agreements as to excise taxes. We believe that they are essential elements of our executive compensation package and assist us in recruiting and retaining talented individuals. These change in control provisions are also intended to help ensure that our executives remain with us in the event of a potential change in control of our company and that our executives are not disadvantaged by a change in control of our company. See “Executive Compensation — Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” for a quantification of these benefits.

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

In February 2010, our Board adopted stock ownership guidelines to further align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders and to promote our commitment to sound corporate governance. The stock ownership guidelines for our named executive officers are determined as a multiple of the officer’s base salary. Our chief executive officer is required to hold shares of our common stock with a value equal to at least three times his annual base salary. Each of the other named executive officers are required to hold shares of our common stock with a value equal to one and one-half times his annual base salary. Named executive officers are required to achieve the applicable level of ownership within three years of the later of the date these guidelines were adopted or the date the person was initially designated a named executive officer. Shares that count towards satisfaction of the guidelines include: (i) shares owned outright by the officer, and (ii) shares held in trust for the benefit of the officer. Unexercised and/or unvested equity awards do not count towards satisfaction of the guidelines. The value of a share will be measured on January 1^st of each year as the average month end closing price for the 12 months preceding the date of calculation. All of the named executive officers currently own a sufficient number of shares of our common stock to satisfy the guidelines.

 

Accounting and Tax Treatment of Compensation

 

We account for our restricted stock and stock options grants in accordance with the requirements of FASB ASC Topic 718 which requires us to estimate and record an expense over the service or vesting period of the award. The Compensation Committee considers these requirements when determining annual grants of equity awards.

 

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits our income tax deduction for compensation paid to each of the named executive officers to $1 million, subject to several exceptions. Although our Compensation Committee considers the impact of Section 162(m) when developing and implementing our executive compensation program, we believe that it is important to preserve flexibility in designing compensation programs in order to retain and motivate superior executive talent. Accordingly, we have not adopted a policy that all compensation must qualify as deductible under Section 162(m).

 

Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code provides, among other things, rules for when compensation may be deferred and when, if deferred, it may be paid. We have reviewed and amended our compensation plans and agreements to be compliant with Section 409A.

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

 

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the above Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and, based on such review and discussion, has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Thomas P. Briggs, Chairperson

Thomas L. Aller

William N. Hahne

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Summary Compensation Information

 

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation earned in respect of the 2008, 2009 and 2010 fiscal years by our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer and each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers whose total cash compensation exceeded $100,000. The persons named in the table are sometimes referred to in this proxy statement as the “named executive officers.”

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

 

 

 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

The following table sets forth information concerning awards made during 2010 to our named executive officers under our Production Participation Plan and our 2003 Equity Incentive Plan.

 

 

 

 

 

Disclosure Regarding Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

 

Production Participation Plan

 

Award

 

Each year, our Compensation Committee allocates to the Production Participation Plan on a discretionary basis (but does not legally convey) an interest in production income from oil and natural gas wells acquired or developed during the year. Once allocated to plan participants, the interests are fixed as to that plan year and each employee is entitled to annual payments and vesting in respect of such fixed interests as described below.

 

Annual Payment

 

As to all plan years in which he or she is a participant, each employee is paid annually in cash his or her full allocated interest in production income while employed. The annual payment is made in February of each year. The payments to each of the named executive officers for 2010 are shown in the Summary Compensation Table. As the company receives higher or lower production income from the sales of oil and natural gas or higher or lower proceeds from sales of interests in properties assigned to the plan, the amounts paid increase or decrease.

 

Vesting

 

In addition to the annual payments, the Production Participation Plan provides the opportunity for continued post-employment participation because the awarded portion of the Production Participation Plan permanently vests to each employee at the rate of 20% per year as to each plan year. Upon voluntary termination of employment or termination without cause, employees retain their vested interests in the Production Participation Plan accrued as of the time of termination and forfeit their unvested interests. (Employees terminated for cause forfeit all interests in the plan, whether vested or unvested.) For plan years prior to 2004, forfeitures of interests due to termination of employment are re-allocated among other plan participants. For plan years after 2003, forfeitures revert to us. Also, employees fully vest in all plan years at the age of 62 or upon death or disability. Mr. Volker attained the age of 62 during 2008 and is fully vested. Full vesting is accelerated in the event we voluntarily terminate the Production Participation Plan or in the event of a change in control of our company. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control — Production Participation Plan” for a description of the terms of the Production Participation Plan triggered upon a termination of employment, death or disability or a termination of the Production Participation Plan or a change in control of our company and a listing of the dollar impact on each of the named executive officers of each of these events. The total value of a participant’s interest in the Production Participation Plan generally increases as he or she participates in more plan years, but such value is subject to declines caused by the distribution of annual payments and changes in production and reserves as well as oil and gas prices and will also be impacted by the degree of vesting of such participant’s interest in the plan as the result of the termination event as described above.

 

Restricted Stock

 

All shares of restricted stock we granted through December 31, 2006 under our 2003 Equity Incentive Plan vested in equal annual increments over three years from the date of grant. The vesting of all shares of restricted stock granted to executive officers of the company since the end of 2006 has been performance-based. The shares of restricted stock granted in 2007 to the named executive officers (and other executive officers) were set to vest based on the company achieving, at each of the fiscal year ends preceding the first three anniversary dates of the grant, a

9% increase (compounded annually) in the difference between (i) the per share amount of the company’s after-tax PV10% value (calculated in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission guidelines) of proved reserves and (ii) the per share amount of the company’s consolidated long-term debt. The remaining shares from the 2007 grant vested in February 2010. The shares of restricted stock granted in 2008, 2009 and 2010 to the named executive officers (and other executive officers) were set to vest one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date if the performance (whether positive or negative) of the price per share of common stock of the company for the period from December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, to each of the fiscal year ends preceding the first three anniversaries of the grant date, exceeds the performance (whether positive or negative) of the average price per share of common stock of a peer group of companies, for the same period. If the specified increase threshold or level of stock price performance is met at any of such fiscal year ends, then more than one year can vest in a given year but not to exceed a maximum of one-third of the total shares granted for every year of service that has been completed. One-third of the shares granted in 2008, 2009 and 2010 vested in February 2011. To the extent all or a portion of the awards are not earned at the end of the three years, the portion of the awards not earned will be forfeited. Dividends are payable on shares of unvested restricted stock; however, we historically have not paid any cash dividends and do not anticipate paying any cash dividend on our common stock in the foreseeable future. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control — Restricted Stock Agreements” for a description of the terms of the restricted stock triggered upon a change in control of our company.

 

Stock Options

 

All options to acquire shares of common stock we granted in 2009 and 2010 under our 2003 Equity Incentive Plan vest in equal annual increments over three years from the date of grant. The stock options have a ten year term and the exercise price for the stock options is the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant which was $12.755 for the 2009 grant and $34.31 for the 2010 grant. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control — Stock Option Agreements” for a description of the terms of the stock options triggered upon a change in control of our company.

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2010 Year-End

 

The following table sets forth information concerning unexercised stock options that, as of December 31, 2010, were exercisable and unexercisable (unvested) and unvested restricted stock awards, each as held by our named executive officers on December 31, 2010.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

 

The following table sets forth information concerning option exercises and restricted stock awards vested during 2010 for our named executive officers.

 

 

 

 

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

 

The following tables disclose potential payments and benefits under our compensation benefit plans and agreements to which the named executive officers in each situation in the tables below assuming that the termination of employment and/or change in control of our company occurred at December 31, 2010 and that our common stock was valued at the closing market price as of that date of $58.595. The actual amount of payments and benefits can only be determined at the time of such a termination or change in control, and therefore the actual amounts would vary from the estimated amounts in the tables below. In addition, the amount of payments and

benefits that named executive officers would actually receive may be materially less than the estimated amounts in the tables below because all such amounts in the tables below are on a pre-tax basis.

 

Descriptions of the circumstances that would trigger payments or benefits to the named executive officers, how such payments and benefits are determined under the circumstances, material conditions and obligations applicable to the receipt of payments or benefits and other material factors regarding such plans and agreements, as well as other material assumptions we have made in calculating the estimated compensation, follow these tables.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Production Participation Plan

 

The Production Participation Plan provides that if a participant with less than one full year of employment with us terminates employment with us for any reason, then all rights of such employee under the Production Participation Plan will terminate. For a participant who has one or more full years of employment with us at the date of termination with us, the participant will be able to continue to participate in distributions with respect to interests that have vested. In addition, a participant will become fully vested in all interests upon reaching age 62. As

of December 31, 2010, Mr. Volker was the only named executive officer who reached age 62. The amounts in the footnotes to the tables above reflect the estimated fair market value of all vested interests for each of the named executive officers as of December 31, 2010.

 

If a participant dies or becomes disabled during employment prior to becoming fully vested, the Production Participation Plan provides that such participant will become fully vested for purposes of future distributions. If a participant’s employment with us is terminated for cause, as determined by us, the participant will forfeit all rights to further distributions regardless of prior vesting. The amounts in the tables above under “Termination of Employment by Death or Disability” reflect the estimated fair market value of all vested interests and accelerated unvested interests as of the assumed date of death or disability.

 

The Production Participation Plan provides that upon a voluntary termination of it by us or a change in control of our company, the interests of all participants who are employees at such time will become 100% vested as to all plan years and partial plan years. In addition, all remaining oil and gas properties in the Production Participation Plan that are categorized as proved undeveloped reserves previously contributed to the Production Participation Plan but not allocated to a particular plan year will be allocated to the partial plan year established as a result of such voluntary termination or change in control. “Change in control” is defined in the Production Participation Plan to mean:

 

 

Upon a voluntary termination of the Production Participation Plan by us or a change in control of our company, we will distribute the fair market value (determined in accordance with the Production Participation Plan) of all 100% vested interests plus the allocated share in proved undeveloped reserves as of the date the plan is terminated or change in control occurs to participants in one lump sum twelve months after such a termination or within one month after such a change in control.

 

In accordance with the terms of the Production Participation Plan, upon termination of the plan or a change in control of our company, the fair market value of vested interests is to be distributed and upon termination of employment by resignation, death or disability, there is no such distribution. For illustrative purposes, we are providing an estimated value for each of these termination and change in control events in the tables above as if there were a distribution in every event. The determination of fair market value is to be made by us, using valuation reports, discount rates, and other factors then being used by us for the purchase of oil and gas properties from third parties. For purposes of the tables above, we have made the following assumptions: NYMEX forward strip pricing at year end 2010 (adjusted for area price differentials actually received), and present value of payment stream discounted at 15%. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in note 7 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011. For termination of plan or change in control, proved undeveloped reserves are risked at 60% and proved developed non-producing and behind pipe reserves are risked at 75%, 2.65% of which is deemed to be contributed to the plan (determined as the average of the three previous annual allocations to the plan by our Compensation Committee which is the minimum requirement of the Production Participation Plan). These estimates will likely vary based upon timing of applicable events, reserve

declines, levels of production, prices realized or used in the calculations, costs incurred to achieve production and other changes in our assumptions.

 

The amounts in the tables above under “Termination of Plan” and “Change in Control” reflect the estimated fair market value of all vested interests and accelerated unvested interests plus the allocated share in proved undeveloped reserves as of the assumed date the plan is terminated or change in control occurs. For purposes of this table, we have assumed that our Compensation Committee would allocate the share in proved undeveloped reserves 6.8293% to Mr. Volker and 2.9268% to each of the other named executive officers, consistent with the allocation that the Compensation Committee set for the 2010 Production Participation Plan award. For Mr. Volker, this amount also includes $30,833 payable pursuant to his Production Participation Plan Credit Service Agreement and, for Mr. Lang, this amount also includes $180,847 payable pursuant to his Production Participation Plan Supplemental Payment Agreement. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation/Why We Chose Each/How Each Relates to Objectives.”

 

Restricted Stock Agreements

 

When we make grants of restricted stock to our executive officers, including the named executive officers, we enter into restricted stock agreements with such executive officers that contain provisions that are triggered upon a termination of an executive officer or a change in control of our company. If an executive officer ceases to be employed by us for any reason, including death, then the shares of restricted stock that have not yet become fully vested will automatically be forfeited. Effective upon a change in control of our company, the shares of restricted stock will fully vest and the restrictions imposed on the restricted stock will immediately lapse. “Change in control” is defined in the restricted stock agreements to mean:

 

 

The amounts in the tables above include the value attributable to unvested restricted stock held by our named executive officers valued at the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2010.

 

Stock Option Agreements

 

When we make grants of options to acquire our common stock to our executive officers, including the named executive officers, we enter into stock option agreements with such executive officers that contain provisions that are triggered upon a termination of an executive officer or a change in control of our company. If an executive officer ceases to be employed by us for any reason, including death, then the stock options that have not yet become fully vested will automatically be forfeited. Effective upon a change in control of our company, the stock options will fully vest and the restrictions imposed on the stock options will immediately lapse. “Change in control” is defined in the stock option agreements the same as in the restricted stock agreements.

 

The amounts in the tables above include the value attributable to unvested stock options held by our named executive officers valued at the amount by which the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2010 exceeds the exercise price of the unvested options.

 

Excise Tax Agreements

 

We have entered into excise tax agreements with each of our executive officers, including the named executive officers. The excise tax agreements provide that if a change in control of our company occurs and any payments to

the executive under any agreement with, or plan of, our company are “excess parachute payments” for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code, then we will pay the executive the amount necessary to offset the 20% excise tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code and any additional taxes on this payment. However, the agreements provide that if the executive would not be subject to such excise tax if the total payments to the executive were reduced by an amount that is not in excess of $50,000, then the amounts payable to the executive under the Production Participation Plan shall be reduced so that the total payments do not exceed the maximum amount that could be paid to the executive without giving rise to such excise tax. In addition, the agreements provide that we will bear up to $15,000 of reasonable fees and costs of consultants and legal or accounting advisors engaged by the executive to advise the executive as to matters relating to the computation of any excise tax payment. “Change in control” is defined in the excise tax agreements to mean:

 

 

The amounts in tables above include the estimated values of excise tax payments under the excise tax agreements. The calculations of the potential excise tax payment assume that, upon a change in control of our company, interests in the Production Participation Plan will vest and be valued be as set forth above under “— Production Participation Plan”, shares of restricted stock will vest and be valued as set forth above under “— Restricted Stock Agreements” and stock options will vest and be valued as set forth above under “— Stock Option Agreements.” In determining the amount of any excise tax amount included in the table above, we made the following material assumptions: an excise tax rate of 20% under the Internal Revenue Code, a combined federal and state individual tax rate of 39.8% and that performance-based unvested restricted stock granted in February 2008, 2009 and 2010 and stock options granted in 2009 and 2010 are considered to be vested in contemplation of a change in control for purposes of these calculations.

 

The values determined by these calculations will vary based upon the timing of the calculation and reflect changes in oil and gas prices and stock values. These values reflect higher oil and gas prices and stock values as well as the fact that a growing portion of total compensation for our named executive officers is in restricted stock and stock option awards which vest, if at all, over time and which affect the gross-up calculation.

 

ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

Executive compensation is an important matter to us, the Board and the Compensation Committee and to our stockholders. As required by Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we our asking our stockholders to vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, on a resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the compensation tables and narrative discussion under “Executive Compensation” contained in this proxy statement.

 

As we describe in detail under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the compensation tables and narrative discussion under “Executive Compensation” contained in this proxy statement, we have designed our executive compensation programs to advance the core principles of supporting our business strategy of achieving meaningful growth in free cash flow, production of oil and natural gas and proved reserves of oil and natural gas and

increasing long-term value appreciation in our common stock. We utilize our executive compensation programs to attract and retain highly qualified and experienced employees, motivate them to achieve and advance and reward them for superior performance.

 

The Compensation Committee has overseen the development and implementation of our executive compensation programs in line with these core compensation principles. The Compensation Committee also continuously reviews, evaluates and updates our executive compensation programs to ensure that we provide rewards for individual performance, team achievements and corporate results and encourage an ownership mentality among our executives and other key employees. With these core compensation principles in mind, the Compensation Committee took the following compensation actions:

 

 

The Compensation Committee’s compensation actions like those described above demonstrate our continued commitment to align executive compensation with stockholders’ interests while providing competitive compensation to attract, motivate and retain our named executive officers and other key talent. We will continue to review and adjust our executive compensation programs with these goals in mind to ensure the long-term success of our company and generate increased long-term value to our stockholders.

 

The Board requests the support of our stockholders for the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. This advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers gives our stockholders the opportunity to make their opinions known about our executive compensation programs. As we seek to align our executive compensation programs with the interests of our stockholders while continuing to retain key talented executives that drive our company’s success, we ask that our stockholders approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. Accordingly, for the reasons we discuss above, the Board recommends that stockholders vote in favor of the following resolution:

 

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the compensation tables and narrative discussion under “Executive Compensation” contained in the proxy statement.”

 

This vote on the compensation of our named executive officers is advisory and not binding on us, the Board or the Compensation Committee. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares having voting power present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting (assuming a quorum is present) is required for stockholders to approve the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. Consequently, broker non-votes will have no effect on approval of the resolution, but abstentions will act as a vote against approval of the resolution. Shares of our common stock represented by executed but unmarked proxies will be voted in favor of the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement; provided that, if you hold shares of our common stock through a broker-dealer, bank nominee, custodian or other securities intermediary, the intermediary will not vote those shares for approval of

the compensation of our named executive officers unless you give the intermediary specific voting instructions on a timely basis directing the intermediary to vote in such manner. Although the outcome of this advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers is non-binding, the Compensation Committee and the Board will review and consider the outcome of this vote when making future compensation decisions for our named executive officers.

 

The Board recommends a vote FOR the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the accompanying compensation tables under “Executive Compensation” contained in this proxy statement.

 

ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF THE ADVISORY VOTE ON
THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

As required by Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are seeking a vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, on a resolution regarding the frequency of the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to the executive compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. Stockholders may vote to approve holding an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers every one, two or three years.

 

The Board has given serious consideration to the recommended frequency of the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers. After considering the benefits and consequences of each option for holding the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, the Board recommends that stockholders approve holding the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers once every year.

 

An annual advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive compensation will allow us to obtain information on stockholders’ views of the compensation of our named executive officers on a consistent basis. Additionally, an annual advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers will provide the Board and the Compensation Committee with more direct input from stockholders on our executive compensation policies, practices and procedures. Finally, an annual advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers is consistent with our objectives of engaging in regular dialogue with our stockholders on corporate governance matters, including our executive compensation philosophy, policies and programs.

 

For the reasons discussed above, the Board recommends that stockholders vote in favor of holding an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers at an annual meeting of stockholders every year. When voting on this advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, stockholders should understand that they are not voting “for” or “against” the recommendation of the Board to hold the advisory vote every year. Rather, stockholders will have the option to choose whether to approve holding future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers every one, two or three years, or to abstain entirely from voting on the matter. Shares of our common stock represented by executed but unmarked proxies will be voted for holding the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers every year; provided that, if you hold shares of our common stock through a broker-dealer, bank nominee, custodian or other securities intermediary, the intermediary will not vote those shares for any frequency unless you give the intermediary specific voting instructions on a timely basis directing the intermediary to vote for such frequency.

 

The option that receives the most votes from stockholders will be considered by the Board as the stockholder’s recommendation as to the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. However, the outcome of this vote on the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers is advisory and will not be binding on us or the Board. Accordingly, the Board may choose to hold the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers on a more or less frequent basis than the option recommended by stockholders. Nevertheless, the Board will review and consider the outcome of this vote when making its determination as to the frequency of future advisory stockholder votes on the compensation of our named executive officers.

 

The Board recommends a vote for holding the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers every year.

 

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Deloitte & Touche LLP has served as our independent auditors since 2003 and the Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2011. The Board recommends to the stockholders the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, to audit our financial statements for 2011. Shares of our common stock represented by executed but unmarked proxies will be voted in favor of the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2011.

 

Stockholder ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm is not required. We are doing so because we believe it is a sound corporate governance practice. If our stockholders fail to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Audit Committee will, in its discretion, consider whether or not to retain Deloitte & Touche LLP or to select another independent registered public accounting firm for the subsequent year. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a new independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it feels that such a change would be in the best interests of us and our stockholders.

 

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares having voting power present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting (assuming a quorum is present) is required for the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year 2011. Consequently, broker non-votes will have no effect on the ratification of the resolution, but abstentions will act as a vote against ratification of the resolution.

 

The Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

 

Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire. Such representatives are also expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

 

The following table presents fees for audit services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the audit of our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and fees for other permitted services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP during those periods:

 

 

 

 

The Audit Committee has concluded that the provision of non-audit services listed above is compatible with maintaining the independence of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

 

The Audit Committee has established pre-approval policies and procedures with respect to audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. Pursuant to these policies and procedures, the Audit Committee may delegate authority to one or more of its members when appropriate to grant such pre-approvals, provided that decisions of such member or members to grant pre-approvals are presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. In addition, the Audit Committee pre-approves particular services, subject to certain monetary limits, after the Audit Committee is presented with a schedule describing the services to be approved. The Audit Committee’s pre-approval policies do not permit the delegation of the Audit Committee’s responsibilities to management.

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

 

The Audit Committee provides the following report:

 

 

Philip E. Doty, Chairperson

Thomas L. Aller

Thomas P. Briggs

 

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers to file reports concerning their ownership of our equity securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission and us. Based solely upon information provided to us by individual directors and executive officers, we believe that, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, all of our directors and executive officers timely complied with the Section 16(a) filing requirements.

 

MISCELLANEOUS

 

Stockholder Proposals

 

Proposals which stockholders intend to present at and have included in our proxy statement for the 2012 annual meeting pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Rule 14a-8” ) must be received at our offices by the close of business on December 3, 2011. In addition, a stockholder who otherwise intends to present business at the 2012 annual meeting (including, nominating persons for election as directors) must comply with the requirements set forth in our By-Laws. Among other things, to bring business before an annual meeting, a stockholder must give written notice thereof, complying with the By-Laws, to our Corporate Secretary not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day and not later than the close of business on the 90th day prior to the anniversary date of the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders (subject to certain exceptions if the annual meeting is advanced or delayed a certain number of days). Under the By-Laws, if we do not receive notice of a stockholder proposal submitted otherwise than pursuant to Rule 14a-8 (i.e., proposals stockholders intend to present at the 2012 annual meeting but do not intend to include in our proxy statement for such meeting) during the time period between January 4, 2012 and February 3, 2012, then the notice will be considered untimely and we will not be required to present such proposal at the 2012 annual meeting. If the Board chooses to present such proposal at the 2012 annual meeting, then the persons named in proxies solicited by the Board for the 2012 annual meeting may exercise discretionary voting power with respect to such proposal.

Other Matters

 

The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by us. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, proxies may be solicited personally and by telephone by certain of our officers and regular employees. We will reimburse brokers and other nominees for their reasonable expenses in communicating with the persons for whom they hold our common stock. We have also made arrangements with D.F. King & Co., Inc. to assist us in soliciting proxies and have agreed to pay them $7,500 plus reasonable expenses for these services.

 

Pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, services that deliver our communications to stockholders that hold their stock through a bank, broker or other holder of record may deliver to multiple stockholders sharing the same address a single copy of our annual report to stockholders and proxy statement. Upon request, we will promptly deliver a separate copy of the annual report to stockholders and/or proxy statement to any stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of each document was delivered. For future deliveries of annual reports to stockholders and/or proxy statements, stockholders may also request us to deliver multiple copies at a shared address to which a single copy of each document was delivered. Stockholders sharing an address who are currently receiving multiple copies of the annual report to stockholders and/or proxy statement may also request delivery of a single copy upon request. Stockholders may notify us of their requests orally or in writing by contacting Corporate Secretary, Whiting Petroleum Corporation, at 303-837-1661 or 1700 Broadway, Suite 2300, Denver, Colorado 80290-2300.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

WHITING PETROLEUM CORPORATION

 

Bruce R. DeBoer

Corporate Secretary

 

April 1, 2011