Edgar Filing: ALLERGAN INC

Allergan, Inc.

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 28, 2007


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-10269

ALLERGAN, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


DELAWARE		95-1622442
(State or Other Jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Incorporation or Organization)

2525 DUPONT DRIVE, IRVINE, CALIFORNIA		92612
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(714) 246-4500
(Registrant’s Telephone Number,
Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)


Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ

As of October 31, 2007, there were 307,511,888 shares of common stock outstanding (including 540,005 shares held in treasury).

ALLERGAN, INC.

FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 2007

INDEX


	Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 — FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(A) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations — Three and Nine Months Ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006		3

(B) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets — September 28, 2007 and December 31, 2006		4

(C) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Nine Months Ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006		5

(D) Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		6

ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		30

ITEM 3 — QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK		53

ITEM 4 — CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		57

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		58

ITEM 1A — RISK FACTORS		58

ITEM 2 — UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS		61

ITEM 3 — DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES		61

ITEM 4 — SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS		61

ITEM 5 — OTHER INFORMATION		61

ITEM 6 — EXHIBITS		62

SIGNATURE		64

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Allergan, Inc.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in millions, except per share amounts)


	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 28,			September 29,			September 28,			September 29,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Revenues
Product net sales	$	978.7		$	791.7		$	2,803.9		$	2,193.9
Other revenues		15.0			15.1			44.4			40.3

Total revenues		993.7			806.8			2,848.3			2,234.2

Operating costs and expenses
Cost of sales (excludes amortization of acquired intangible assets)		173.5			167.7			493.4			433.2
Selling, general and administrative		395.6			364.0			1,215.1			975.4
Research and development		164.4			120.4			528.4			930.1
Amortization of acquired intangible assets		28.7			24.9			86.1			54.8
Restructuring charges		11.0			8.6			24.3			17.1


Operating income (loss)		220.5			121.2			501.0			(176.4	)


Non-operating income (expense)
Interest income		18.4			12.8			48.6			34.3
Interest expense		(17.5	)		(11.9	)		(53.5	)		(40.2	)
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net		0.4			0.2			(1.3	)		(1.0	)
Gain on investments		—			0.1			—			0.3
Other, net		(10.5	)		(1.7	)		(15.9	)		(7.1	)

		(9.2	)		(0.5	)		(22.1	)		(13.7	)


Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest		211.3			120.7			478.9			(190.1	)
Provision for income taxes		55.3			14.3			138.7			74.0
Minority interest expense		—			—			0.4			0.1


Earnings (loss) from continuing operations		156.0			106.4			339.8			(264.2	)

Discontinued operations
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations, net of applicable income tax expense (benefit) of $0.8 million and $(0.4) million for the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2007, respectively		1.4			—			(0.8	)		—
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of applicable income tax expense of $0.9 million		—			—			—			—


Discontinued operations		1.4			—			(0.8	)		—


Net earnings (loss)	$	157.4		$	106.4		$	339.0		$	(264.2	)


Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Continuing operations	$	0.51		$	0.35		$	1.11		$	(0.91	)
Discontinued operations		—			—			—			—

Net basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.51		$	0.35		$	1.11		$	(0.91	)


Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Continuing operations	$	0.50		$	0.35		$	1.10		$	(0.91	)
Discontinued operations		0.01			—			—			—

Net diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.51		$	0.35		$	1.10		$	(0.91	)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Allergan, Inc.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in millions, except share data)


	September 28,			December 31,
	2007			2006
ASSETS

Current assets:
Cash and equivalents	$	1,413.3		$	1,369.4
Trade receivables, net		478.3			386.9
Inventories		202.5			168.5
Other current assets		322.6			205.5

Total current assets		2,416.7			2,130.3
Investments and other assets		175.5			148.2
Property, plant and equipment, net		637.6			611.4
Goodwill		1,961.8			1,833.6
Intangibles, net		1,105.9			1,043.6

Total assets	$	6,297.5		$	5,767.1


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Notes payable	$	39.6		$	102.0
Accounts payable		187.8			142.4
Accrued compensation		122.2			124.8
Other accrued expenses		289.3			235.2
Income taxes		4.6			53.7

Total current liabilities		643.5			658.1
Long-term debt		827.8			856.4
Long-term convertible notes		750.0			750.0
Deferred tax liabilities		129.7			84.8
Other liabilities		338.5			273.2
Commitments and contingencies		—			—
Minority interest		1.9			1.5
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized 5,000,000 shares; none issued		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized 500,000,000 shares; issued 307,512,000 shares as of September 28, 2007 and December 31, 2006		3.1			3.1
Additional paid-in capital		2,422.2			2,358.0
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(88.1	)		(127.4	)
Retained earnings		1,303.1			1,065.7

		3,640.3			3,299.4
Less — treasury stock, at cost (610,000 shares as of September 28, 2007 and 2,974,000 shares as of December 31, 2006, respectively)		(34.2	)		(156.3	)


Total stockholders’ equity		3,606.1			3,143.1


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	6,297.5		$	5,767.1

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Allergan, Inc.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in millions)


	Nine months ended
	September 28,			September 29,
	2007			2006
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations	$	339.8		$	(264.2	)
Non-cash items included in earnings (loss) from continuing operations:
In-process research and development charge		72.0			579.3
Depreciation and amortization		155.6			108.6
Settlement of a pre-existing distribution agreement in a business combination		2.3			—
Amortization of original issue discount and debt issuance costs		3.5			8.7
Amortization of net realized gain on interest rate swap		(0.6	)		(0.6	)
Deferred income tax benefit		(30.3	)		(7.0	)
Loss on disposal of fixed assets and investments		4.2			3.1
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments		1.3			1.0
Expense of share-based compensation plans		60.2			48.0
Minority interest expense		0.4			0.1
Restructuring charge		24.3			17.1
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables		(68.4	)		(70.3	)
Inventories		(12.6	)		35.6
Other current assets		(8.5	)		19.9
Other non-current assets		(11.2	)		1.3
Accounts payable		34.3			6.3
Accrued expenses		12.2			18.5
Income taxes		(27.2	)		(17.2	)
Other liabilities		26.5			22.5

Net cash provided by continuing operations		577.8			510.7


CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired		(312.9	)		(1,328.6	)
Issuance of note receivable		(74.8	)		—
Additions to property, plant and equipment		(73.6	)		(73.4	)
Additions to capitalized software		(18.7	)		(13.1	)
Additions to intangible assets		(5.0	)		(11.0	)
Proceeds from sale of business		16.7			—
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		8.9			3.3
Proceeds from sale of investments		—			0.6

Net cash used in investing activities		(459.4	)		(1,422.2	)


CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Dividends to stockholders		(45.6	)		(43.3	)
Debt issuance costs		—			(19.7	)
Repayments of convertible borrowings		—			(521.9	)
Payments to acquire treasury stock		(61.7	)		(307.8	)
Net repayments of notes payable		(105.5	)		(139.5	)
Bridge credit facility borrowings		—			825.0
Bridge credit facility repayments		—			(825.0	)
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes		—			797.7
Proceeds from issuance of convertible senior notes		—			750.0
Sale of stock to employees		110.3			118.1
Net proceeds from settlement of interest rate swap		—			13.0
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation		25.1			27.9

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(77.4	)		674.5


Cash flow used in discontinued operations		(5.4	)		—
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents		8.3			2.3

Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents		43.9			(234.7	)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period		1,369.4			1,296.3

Cash and equivalents at end of period	$	1,413.3		$	1,061.6


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid for:
Interest (net of capitalization)	$	32.3		$	6.0

Income taxes, net of refunds	$	166.5		$	115.5

On February 22, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of EndoArt SA for approximately $97.1 million in cash, net of cash acquired. In connection with the EndoArt SA acquisition, the Company acquired assets with a fair value of $101.9 million and assumed liabilities of $4.8 million.

On January 2, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of Groupe Cornéal Laboratoires for $215.8 million in cash, net of cash acquired. In connection with the Groupe Cornéal Laboratoires acquisition, the Company acquired assets with a fair value of $288.5 million and assumed liabilities of $79.4 million.

On March 23, 2006, the Company completed the acquisition of Inamed Corporation. In exchange for the common stock of Inamed Corporation, the Company issued common stock with a fair value of $1,859.3 million and paid $1,328.7 million in cash, net of cash acquired. In connection with the Inamed acquisition, the Company acquired assets with a fair value of $3,813.4 million and assumed liabilities of $522.7 million, based on a final measurement of the purchase price as of December 31, 2006.

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1: Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) to present fairly the financial information contained therein. These statements do not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for annual periods and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company prepared the condensed consolidated financial statements following the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim reporting. As permitted under those rules, certain footnotes or other financial information that are normally required by GAAP can be condensed or omitted. The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007 or any other period(s).

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications of prior year amounts have been made to conform with the current year presentation. Beginning with the second fiscal quarter of 2006, the Company reports amortization of acquired intangible assets on a separate line in its statements of operations. Previously, amortization of intangible assets was reported in cost of sales, selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, and research and development (R&D) expenses. Intangible asset amortization for the nine month period ended September 29, 2006 includes a total reclassification of $5.1 million, representing the reclassification of $4.3 million, $0.1 million and $0.7 million from cost of sales, SG&A expenses, and R&D expenses, respectively, previously reported for the three month period ended March 31, 2006.

Common Stock Split

On June 22, 2007, the Company completed a two-for-one stock split of its common stock. The stock split was structured in the form of a 100% stock dividend and was paid to stockholders of record on June 11, 2007.

All share and per share data (except par value) have been adjusted to reflect the effect of the stock split for all periods presented.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (SFAS No. 158). SFAS No. 158 requires the recognition of the over-funded or under-funded status of a defined benefit pension and other postretirement plan as an asset or liability, respectively, in the balance sheet, the recognition of changes in that funded status through other comprehensive income in the year in which the changes occur, and the measurement of a plan’s assets and obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year. The Company adopted the balance sheet recognition and reporting provisions of SFAS No. 158 during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2006. The Company currently expects to adopt in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2008 the provisions of SFAS No. 158 relating to the change in measurement date, which is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Historically, the Company’s policy has been to account for uncertainty in income taxes in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, which considered whether the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position was probable of being sustained. Under FIN 48,

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

the tax benefit from uncertain tax positions may be recognized only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained, based solely on its technical merits, with the taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant information. After initial adoption of FIN 48, deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities along with net operating loss and tax credit carryovers are recognized only for tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition criteria. Additionally, recognition and derecognition of tax benefits from uncertain tax positions are recorded as discrete tax adjustments in the first interim period that the more likely than not threshold is met. The Company adopted FIN 48 as of the beginning of the first quarter of 2007, which resulted in an increase to total income taxes payable of $2.8 million and interest payable of $0.5 million and a decrease to total deferred tax assets of $1.0 million and beginning retained earnings of $4.3 million. In addition, the Company reclassified $27.0 million of net unrecognized tax benefit liabilities from current to non-current liabilities.

In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140 (SFAS No. 155). SFAS No. 155 permits an entity to measure at fair value any financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. This statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued, or subject to a remeasurement event occurring after an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 155 in the first fiscal quarter of 2007. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

In June 2007, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) in EITF Issue No. 07-3, Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities (EITF 07-3), which requires that nonrefundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future R&D activities be deferred and amortized over the period that the goods are delivered or the related services are performed, subject to an assessment of recoverability. EITF 07-3 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, which will be the Company’s fiscal year 2008. The Company does not expect that the adoption of EITF 07-3 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2007, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the EITF in EITF Issue No. 06-11, Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards (EITF 06-11), which requires that the income tax benefits of dividends or dividend equivalents on unvested share-based payments be recognized as an increase in additional paid-in capital and reclassified from additional paid-in capital to the income statement when the related award is forfeited (or is no longer expected to vest). The reclassification is limited to the amount of the entity’s pool of excess tax benefits available to absorb tax deficiencies on the date of the reclassification. EITF 06-11 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, which will be the Company’s fiscal year 2008. The Company does not expect that the adoption of EITF 06-11 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159), which allows an entity to voluntarily choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. SFAS No. 159 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, which will be the Company’s fiscal year 2008. The Company has not yet evaluated the potential impact of adopting SFAS No. 159 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, which will be the Company’s fiscal year 2008. The Company has not yet evaluated the potential impact of adopting SFAS No. 157 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 2: Acquisitions

Cornéal Acquisition

On January 2, 2007, the Company purchased all of the outstanding common stock of Groupe Cornéal Laboratoires (Cornéal), a privately held healthcare company that develops, manufactures and markets dermal fillers, viscoelastics and a range of ophthalmic products, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $209.1 million, net of $2.3 million effectively paid in connection with the settlement of a pre-existing unfavorable distribution agreement. The Company recorded the $2.3 million charge at the acquisition date to effectively settle a pre-existing unfavorable distribution agreement between Cornéal and one of the Company’s subsidiaries, primarily related to distribution rights for Juvéderm™ in the United States. Prior to the acquisition, the Company also had a $4.4 million payable to Cornéal outstanding for products purchased under the distribution agreement, which was effectively settled upon the acquisition. As a result of the acquisition, the Company obtained the technology, manufacturing process and worldwide distribution rights for Juvéderm™, Surgiderm^® and certain other hyaluronic acid-based dermal fillers. The acquisition was funded from the Company’s cash and equivalents balances and its committed long-term credit facility.

The following table summarizes the components of the Cornéal purchase price:


	(in millions)
Cash consideration, net of cash acquired	$	212.0
Transaction costs		3.8

Cash paid		215.8
Less relief from a previously existing third-party payable		(4.4	)
Less settlement of a pre-existing distribution agreement		(2.3	)

	$	209.1

Purchase Price Allocation

The Cornéal purchase price was allocated to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired was allocated to goodwill. The goodwill acquired in the Cornéal acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes.

The Company believes the fair values assigned to the Cornéal assets acquired and liabilities assumed were based upon reasonable assumptions. The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired:


	(in millions)
Current assets	$	38.9
Property, plant and equipment		19.8
Identifiable intangible assets		115.7
Goodwill		112.6
Other non-current assets		1.5
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(19.3	)
Current portion of long-term debt		(11.6	)
Deferred tax liabilities — non-current		(45.9	)
Other non-current liabilities		(2.6	)

	$	209.1

The Company’s fair value estimates for the Cornéal purchase price allocation may change during the allowable allocation period, which is up to one year from the acquisition date, if additional information becomes available.

In-process Research and Development

In conjunction with the Cornéal acquisition, the Company determined that the R&D efforts related to Cornéal products did not give rise to identifiable in-process research and development assets with anticipated future economic value that could be reasonably estimated.

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Identifiable Intangible Assets

Acquired identified intangible assets include product rights for approved indications of currently marketed products, core technology and trademarks. The amount assigned to each class of intangible assets and the related weighted-average amortization periods are summarized in the following table:


	Value of
	Intangible Assets		Weighted-average
	Acquired		Amortization Period
	(in millions)
Developed technology	$	72.4	8.3 years
Core technology		39.4	13.0 years
Trademarks		3.9	9.5 years

	$	115.7

Acquired developed technology assets primarily consist of the following currently marketed Cornéal products:


	Value of
	Intangible Assets
	Acquired
	(in millions)
Juvéderm™ — worldwide	$	56.1
Surgiderm^® — worldwide		13.1
Other		3.2

	$	72.4

Impairment evaluations in the future for acquired developed technology will occur at a consolidated cash flow level within the Company’s medical devices segment, with valuation analysis and related potential impairment actions segregated among the United States, the European Union, Canada, Australia, and the rest of the world, which were the markets used to originally value the intangible assets.

The Company determined that the Cornéal assets acquired included proprietary technology which has alternative future use in the development of aesthetics products. These assets were separately valued and capitalized as core technology. Trademarks acquired are primarily related to Juvéderm™ and Surgiderm^®.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the Cornéal purchase price over the sum of the amounts assigned to assets acquired less liabilities assumed. The Company believes that the Cornéal acquisition will produce the following significant benefits:

	•		Control over the Manufacturing Process and Future Development. The acquisition will allow the Company to control product quality and availability and to gain additional expertise and intellectual property to further develop the next generation of dermal fillers.

	•		Expanded Distribution Rights. The Company has expanded its exclusive distribution rights for Juvéderm™ from the United States, Canada and Australia to all countries worldwide.

	•		Enhanced Product Mix. The complementary nature of the Company’s facial aesthetics products with those of Cornéal should benefit current customers of both companies.

	•		Operating Efficiencies. The combination of the Company and Cornéal provides the opportunity for product cost savings due to manufacturing efficiencies.

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The Company believes that these primary factors support the amount of goodwill recognized as a result of the purchase price paid for Cornéal in relation to other acquired tangible and intangible assets.

EndoArt SA Acquisition

On February 22, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of EndoArt SA (EndoArt), a provider of telemetrically-controlled (or remote-controlled) implants used in the treatment of morbid obesity and other conditions. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of EndoArt for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $97.1 million, net of cash acquired. The acquisition consideration was all cash, funded from the Company’s cash and equivalents balances.

The following table summarizes the components of the EndoArt purchase price:


	(in millions)
Cash consideration, net of cash acquired	$	96.6
Transaction costs		0.5

	$	97.1

Purchase Price Allocation

The EndoArt purchase price was allocated to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired was allocated to goodwill. The goodwill acquired in the EndoArt acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes.

The Company believes the fair values assigned to the EndoArt assets acquired and liabilities assumed were based on reasonable assumptions. The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of net assets acquired:


	(in millions)
Current assets	$	0.8
Property, plant and equipment		0.7
Identifiable intangible assets		17.6
In-process research and development		72.0
Goodwill		10.8
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(0.8	)
Deferred tax liabilities		(4.0	)

	$	97.1

The Company’s fair value estimates for the EndoArt purchase price allocation may change during the allowable allocation period, which is up to one year from the acquisition date, if additional information becomes available.

In-process Research and Development

In conjunction with the EndoArt acquisition, the Company recorded an in-process research and development expense of $72.0 million related to EndoArt’s EASYBAND^® Remote Adjustable Gastric Band System in the United States, which had not received approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as of the EndoArt acquisition date of February 22, 2007 and had no alternative future use.

As of the EndoArt acquisition date, the EASYBAND^® Remote Adjustable Gastric Band System was expected to be approved by the FDA in 2011. Additional R&D expenses needed prior to expected FDA approval are expected to range from $20 million to $25 million. This range represents management’s best estimate as to the additional R&D expenses required to obtain FDA approval to market the product in the United States. Remaining efforts will be focused on completing discussions with the FDA regarding study design and performing a future clinical trial to pursue a premarket approval in the United States.

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The estimated fair value of the in-process research and development assets was determined based on the use of a discounted cash flow model using an income approach for the acquired technologies. Estimated revenues were probability adjusted to take into account the stage of completion and the risks surrounding successful development and commercialization. The estimated after-tax cash flows were then discounted to a present value using a discount rate of 28%. At the time of the EndoArt acquisition, material net cash inflows were estimated to begin in 2011.

The major risks and uncertainties associated with the timely and successful completion of the acquired in-process projects consist of the ability to confirm the safety and efficacy of the technology based on the data from clinical trials and obtaining necessary regulatory approvals. No assurance can be given that the underlying assumptions used to forecast cash flows or the timely and successful completion of the projects will materialize as estimated. For these reasons, among others, actual results may vary significantly from estimated results.

Identifiable Intangible Assets

Acquired identifiable intangible assets include product rights for approved indications of currently marketed products and core technology. The amounts assigned to each class of intangible assets and the related weighted average amortization periods are summarized in the following table:


	Value of
	Intangible Assets		Weighted-average
	Acquired		Amortization Period
	(in millions)
Developed technology	$	12.3	11.8 years
Core technology		5.3	15.8 years

Total	$	17.6

The acquired developed technology asset represents the EASYBAND^® Remote Adjustable Gastric Band System, which has been approved in Europe and is pending approval in Australia. The Company determined that there are no substantive risks remaining in order to obtain approval in Australia.

Impairment evaluations in the future for acquired developed technology will occur at a consolidated cash flow level within the Company’s medical devices segment, with valuation analysis and related potential impairment actions segregated between two markets, Europe and Australia, which were used to originally value the intangible assets.

The Company determined that the EndoArt assets acquired included proprietary technology which has alternative future use in the development of remote adjustable gastric band products. The major risks and uncertainties associated with the core technology consist of the Company’s ability to successfully utilize the technology in future research projects.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the EndoArt purchase price over the sum of the amounts assigned to assets acquired less liabilities assumed. The Company believes that the acquisition of EndoArt will produce the following significant benefits:

	•		Increased Market Presence and Opportunities. The acquisition of EndoArt should increase the Company’s market presence and opportunities for growth in sales, earnings and stockholder returns.

	•		Enhanced Product Mix. The complementary nature of the Company’s obesity intervention products with those of EndoArt should benefit the Company’s current target group of patients and customers and provide the Company with the ability to access new patients and physician customers.

The Company believes that these primary factors support the amount of goodwill recognized as a result of the purchase price paid for EndoArt, in relation to other acquired tangible and intangible assets, including in-process research and development.

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The Company does not consider the acquisitions of Cornéal or EndoArt to be material business combinations, either individually or in the aggregate. Accordingly, the Company has not provided any supplemental pro forma operating results, which would not be materially different from historical financial statements.

Inamed Acquisition

On March 23, 2006, the Company completed the acquisition of Inamed Corporation, a global healthcare company that develops, manufactures and markets a diverse line of products, including breast implants, a range of facial aesthetics and obesity intervention products, for approximately $3.3 billion, consisting of approximately $1.4 billion in cash and 34,883,386 shares of the Company’s common stock.

In connection with the Inamed acquisition, the Company recorded a total in-process research and development expense of $579.3 million in 2006 for acquired in-process research and development assets that the Company determined were not yet complete and had no alternative future uses in their current state. The Company recorded a $562.8 million expense for in-process research and development during the first fiscal quarter of 2006 and an additional charge of $16.5 million during the second fiscal quarter of 2006. The acquired in-process research and development assets are composed of Inamed’s silicone breast implant technology for use in the United States, Inamed’s Juvéderm™ dermal filler technology for use in the United States, and Inamed’s BIB™ BioEnterics^® Intragastric Balloon technology for use in the United States, which were valued at $405.8 million, $41.2 million and $132.3 million, respectively. All of these assets had not received approval by the FDA as of the Inamed acquisition date of March 23, 2006. Because the in-process research and development assets had no alternative future use, they were charged to expense on the Inamed acquisition date.

Unaudited pro forma operating results for the Company, assuming the Inamed acquisition occurred on January 1, 2006 and excluding any pro forma charges for in-process research and development, inventory fair value adjustments and Inamed share-based compensation expense in 2006 and transaction costs are as follows:


	Three months ended		Nine months ended
	September 29,		September 29,
(in millions, except per share amounts)	2006		2006
Product net sales	$	791.7	$	2,293.3
Total revenues	$	806.8	$	2,333.6
Net earnings	$	123.6	$	334.9
Basic earnings per share	$	0.41	$	1.11
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.41	$	1.09

The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of the actual results that would have been achieved had the acquisition occurred as of January 1, 2006, or the results that may be achieved in the future.

Note 3: Discontinued Operations

On July 2, 2007, the Company completed the sale of the ophthalmic surgical device business that it acquired as a part of the Cornéal acquisition in January 2007, for net cash proceeds of $29.6 million. The net assets of the disposed business consisted of current assets of $22.9 million, non-current assets of $10.0 million and current liabilities of $4.2 million. In conjunction with the sale, the Company recognized income tax expense of $0.9 million, resulting in no net gain or loss on the disposal of the business.

The following amounts related to the ophthalmic surgical device business have been segregated from continuing operations and reported as discontinued operations through the date of disposition. The Company did not account for its ophthalmic surgical device business as a separate legal entity. Therefore, the following selected financial data for the Company’s discontinued operations is presented for informational purposes only and does not necessarily reflect what the net sales or earnings would have been had the business operated as a stand-alone entity. The financial information for the Company’s discontinued operations includes allocations of certain expenses to the ophthalmic surgical device business. These amounts have been allocated to the Company’s discontinued operations on the basis that is considered by management to reflect most fairly or reasonably the utilization of the services provided to, or the benefit obtained by, the ophthalmic surgical device business.

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, selected financial data of the Company’s discontinued operations. There were no comparable amounts for the corresponding periods in 2006.

Selected Financial Data for Discontinued Operations


	Three months ended		Nine months ended
	September 28,		September 28,
	2007		2007
	(in millions)
Net sales	$	—	$	20.0

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes	$	2.2	$	(1.2	)
Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations	$	1.4	$	(0.8	)

The earnings from discontinued operations before income taxes of $2.2 million in the three month period ended September 28, 2007 primarily relate to an adjustment to the estimated fair value of ophthalmic surgical inventory associated with the Cornéal acquisition.

Note 4: Restructuring Charges, Integration Costs, and Transition and Duplicate Operating Expenses

Restructuring and Integration of Cornéal Operations

In connection with the January 2007 Cornéal acquisition, the Company initiated a restructuring and integration plan to merge the Cornéal facial aesthetics business operations with the Company’s operations. Specifically, the restructuring and integration activities involve moving key business functions to Company locations, integrating Cornéal’s distributor operations with the Company’s existing distribution network and integrating Cornéal’s information systems with the Company’s information systems. The Company currently estimates that the total pre-tax charges resulting from the restructuring and integration of the Cornéal facial aesthetics business operations will be between $29.0 million and $37.0 million, consisting primarily of contract termination costs, salaries, travel and consulting costs, all of which are expected to be cash expenditures.

The foregoing estimates are based on assumptions relating to, among other things, a reduction of approximately 19 positions, principally general and administrative positions at Cornéal locations. Charges associated with the workforce reduction, including severance, relocation and one-time termination benefits, and payments to public employment and training programs, are currently expected to total approximately $5.0 million to $7.0 million. Estimated charges include estimates for contract termination costs, including the termination of duplicative distribution arrangements. Contract termination costs are expected to total approximately $16.0 million to $21.0 million.

The Company began to record costs associated with the restructuring and integration of the Cornéal facial aesthetics business in the first quarter of 2007 and expects to continue to incur costs up through and including the second quarter of 2008. The restructuring charges primarily consist of employee severance, one-time termination benefits, employee relocation, termination of duplicative distributor agreements and other costs related to the restructuring of the Cornéal operations. During the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2007, the Company recorded $11.2 million and $13.2 million, respectively, related to the restructuring of the Cornéal operations. The integration and transition costs primarily consist of salaries, travel, communications, recruitment and consulting costs. During the three month period ended September 28, 2007, the Company recorded $1.3 million of integration and transition costs associated with the Cornéal integration, consisting of $0.1 million in cost of sales and $1.2 million in SG&A expenses. During the nine month period ended September 28, 2007, the Company recorded $6.9 million of integration and transition costs, consisting of $0.1 million in cost of sales and $6.8 million in SG&A expenses.

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The following table presents the cumulative restructuring activities related to the Cornéal operations during the nine month period ended September 28, 2007:


	Employee		Contract Termination
	Severance		Costs			Total
	(in millions)
Net charge during the nine month period ended September 28, 2007	$	4.9	$	8.3		$	13.2
Spending		—		(2.9	)		(2.9	)

Balance at September 28, 2007 (included in “Other accrued expenses”)	$	4.9	$	5.4		$	10.3

Restructuring and Integration of Inamed Operations

In connection with the March 2006 Inamed acquisition, the Company initiated a global restructuring and integration plan to merge Inamed’s operations with the Company’s operations and to capture synergies through the centralization of certain general and administrative and commercial functions. Specifically, the restructuring and integration activities involve eliminating certain general and administrative positions, moving key commercial Inamed business functions to the Company’s locations around the world, integrating Inamed’s distributor operations with the Company’s existing distribution network and integrating Inamed’s information systems with the Company’s information systems.

The Company has incurred, and anticipates that it will continue to incur, charges relating to severance, relocation and one-time termination benefits, payments to public employment and training programs, integration and transition costs, and contract termination costs in connection with the Inamed restructuring. The Company currently estimates that the total pre-tax charges resulting from the restructuring, including integration and transition costs, will be between $47.0 million and $57.0 million, all of which are expected to be cash expenditures. In addition to the pre-tax charges, the Company expects to incur capital expenditures of approximately $15.0 million to $20.0 million, primarily related to the integration of information systems. The Company also expects to pay an additional amount of approximately $1.5 million to $2.0 million for taxes related to intercompany transfers of trade businesses and net assets.

The foregoing estimates are based on assumptions relating to, among other things, a reduction of approximately 60 positions, principally general and administrative positions at Inamed locations. These workforce reduction activities began in the second quarter of 2006 and are expected to be substantially completed by the end of 2007. Charges associated with the workforce reduction, including severance, relocation and one-time termination benefits, and payments to public employment and training programs, are currently expected to total approximately $8.0 million to $10.0 million. Estimated charges include estimates for contract and lease termination costs, including the termination of duplicative distribution arrangements. Contract and lease termination costs are expected to total approximately $13.0 million to $17.0 million. The Company began to record these costs in the second quarter of 2006 and expects to continue to incur them up through and including the fourth quarter of 2007.

On January 30, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an additional plan to restructure and eventually sell or close the collagen manufacturing facility in Fremont, California that the Company acquired in the Inamed acquisition. This plan is the result of a reduction in anticipated future market demand for human and bovine collagen products. In connection with the restructuring and eventual sale or closure of the collagen manufacturing facility, the Company estimates that total pre-tax charges for severance, lease termination and contract settlement costs will be between $6.0 million and $8.0 million, all of which are expected to be cash expenditures. The foregoing estimates are based on assumptions relating to, among other things, a reduction of approximately 69 positions, consisting principally of manufacturing positions at the facility, that are expected to result in estimated total employee severance costs of approximately $1.5 million to $2.0 million. Estimated charges for contract and lease termination costs are expected to total approximately $4.5 million to $6.0 million. The Company began to record these costs in the first quarter of 2007 and expects to continue to incur them up through and including the fourth quarter of 2008. Prior to any closure or sale of the collagen manufacturing facility, the Company intends to manufacture a sufficient quantity of inventories of collagen products to meet estimated market demand through 2010.

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

As of September 28, 2007, the Company has recorded cumulative pre-tax restructuring charges of $23.4 million, cumulative pre-tax integration and transition costs of $25.1 million, and $1.6 million for income tax costs related to intercompany transfers of trade businesses and net assets. The restructuring charges primarily consist of employee severance, one-time termination benefits, employee relocation, termination of duplicative distributor agreements and other costs related to restructuring the former Inamed operations. During the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2007, the Company recorded a $0.3 million restructuring charge reversal and $9.9 million of restructuring charges, respectively. The integration and transition costs primarily consist of salaries, travel, communications, recruitment and consulting costs. During the three month period ended September 28, 2007, the Company recorded $0.8 million of integration and transition costs associated with the Inamed integration, consisting of $0.1 million in cost of sales and $0.7 million in SG&A expenses. During the nine month period ended September 28, 2007, the Company recorded $4.4 million of integration and transition costs, consisting of $0.1 million in cost of sales and $4.3 million in SG&A expenses.

During the three and nine month periods ended September 29, 2006, the Company recorded pre-tax restructuring charges of $6.4 million and $8.1 million, respectively, related to restructuring the former Inamed operations. For the three month period ended September 29, 2006, the Company recorded $5.1 million of integration and transition costs associated with the Inamed integration, consisting of $0.2 million in cost of sales and $4.9 million in SG&A expenses. For the nine month period ended September 29, 2006, the Company recorded $15.5 million of integration and transition costs associated with the Inamed integration, consisting of $0.7 million in cost of sales, $14.6 million in SG&A expenses and $0.2 million in R&D expenses. During the three month period ended September 29, 2006, the Company also paid $0.8 million for income tax costs related to intercompany transfers of trade businesses and net assets, which the Company included in its provision for income taxes.

The following table presents the cumulative restructuring activities related to the Inamed operations through September 28, 2007:


	Employee			Contract and Lease
	Severance			Termination Costs			Total
	(in millions)
Net charge during 2006	$	6.1		$	7.4		$	13.5
Spending		(2.1	)		(2.5	)		(4.6	)

Balance at December 31, 2006		4.0			4.9			8.9
Net charge during the nine month period ended September 28, 2007		3.4			6.5			9.9
Spending		(4.1	)		(9.1	)		(13.2	)

Balance at September 28, 2007 (included in “Other accrued expenses”)	$	3.3		$	2.3		$	5.6

Restructuring and Streamlining of European Operations

Effective January 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the initiation and implementation of a restructuring of certain activities related to the Company’s European operations to optimize operations, improve resource allocation and create a scalable, lower cost and more efficient operating model for the Company’s European R&D and commercial activities. Specifically, the restructuring involved moving key European R&D and select commercial functions from the Company’s Mougins, France and other European locations to the Company’s Irvine, California, Marlow, United Kingdom and Dublin, Ireland facilities and streamlining functions in the Company’s European management services group. The workforce reduction began in the first quarter of 2005 and was substantially completed by the close of the second quarter of 2006.

As of December 31, 2006, the Company substantially completed all activities related to the restructuring and streamlining of its European operations. As of December 31, 2006, the Company recorded cumulative pre-tax restructuring charges of $37.5 million, primarily related to severance, relocation and one-time termination benefits, payments to public employment and training programs, contract termination costs and capital and other asset-related expenses. During the nine month period ended September 28, 2007, the Company recorded an additional $1.0 million of restructuring charges for an abandoned leased facility related to its European operations. During the three and nine month periods ended September 29, 2006, the Company recorded $2.0 million and $8.1 million, respectively, of restructuring charges related to its European operations. As of September 28, 2007, remaining accrued expenses of $6.6 million for restructuring charges related to the restructuring and streamlining of the Company’s European operations are included in “Other accrued expenses” and “Other liabilities” in the amount of $3.1 million and $3.5 million, respectively.

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Additionally, as of December 31, 2006, the Company has incurred cumulative transition and duplicate operating expenses of $11.8 million relating primarily to legal, consulting, recruiting, information system implementation costs and taxes in connection with the European restructuring activities. For the three month period ended September 29, 2006, the Company recorded $0.3 million of transition and duplicate operating expenses, consisting of $0.2 million in SG&A expenses and $0.1 million in R&D expenses. For the nine month period ended September 29, 2006, the Company recorded $2.8 million of transition and duplicate operating expenses, consisting of $2.3 million in SG&A expenses and $0.5 million in R&D expenses. Additionally, during the nine month period ended September 29, 2006, the Company recorded a $3.4 million loss related to the sale of its Mougins, France facility, which was included in SG&A expenses. There were no transition and duplicate operating expenses related to the restructuring and streamlining of the Company’s European operations recorded in the first nine months of 2007.

Other Restructuring Activities

Included in the third quarter and first nine months of 2007 are $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of restructuring charges related to the Company’s February 2007 EndoArt acquisition. Included in the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 are $0.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively, of restructuring charges related to the scheduled June 2005 termination of the Company’s manufacturing and supply agreement with Advanced Medical Optics, which the Company spun-off in June 2002. Also included in the first nine months of 2006 is a $0.4 million restructuring charge reversal related to the streamlining of the Company’s operations in Japan.

Note 5: Intangibles and Goodwill

At September 28, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the components of amortizable and unamortizable intangibles and goodwill and certain other related information were as follows:

Intangibles


	September 28, 2007							December 31, 2006
						Weighted							Weighted
						Average							Average
	Gross		Accumulated			Amortization		Gross		Accumulated			Amortization
	Amount		Amortization			Period		Amount		Amortization			Period
	(in millions)					(in years)		(in millions)					(in years)
Amortizable Intangible Assets:
Developed technology	$	887.6	$	(88.9	)		14.8	$	796.4	$	(39.9	)		15.4
Customer relationships		42.3		(20.6	)		3.1		42.3		(10.3	)		3.1
Licensing		154.7		(58.6	)		8.0		149.4		(44.2	)		8.0
Trademarks		28.1		(9.6	)		6.4		23.5		(5.7	)		6.5
Core technology		190.8		(20.8	)		15.2		142.6		(11.4	)		15.8

		1,303.5		(198.5	)		13.4		1,154.2		(111.5	)		13.9

Unamortizable Intangible Assets:
Business licenses		0.9		—					0.9		—

	$	1,304.4	$	(198.5	)			$	1,155.1	$	(111.5	)

Developed technology consists primarily of current product offerings, primarily saline and silicone breast implants, obesity intervention products and dermal fillers acquired in connection with the Inamed, Cornéal and EndoArt acquisitions. Customer relationship assets consist of the estimated value of relationships with customers acquired in connection with the Inamed acquisition, primarily in the breast implant market in the United States. Licensing assets consist primarily of capitalized payments to third party licensors related to the achievement of regulatory approvals to commercialize products in specified markets and up-front payments associated with royalty obligations for products that have achieved regulatory approval for marketing. Core technology consists of proprietary technology associated with silicone breast implants and intragastric balloon systems acquired in connection with the Inamed acquisition, dermal filler technology acquired in connection with the Cornéal acquisition, gastric band technology acquired in connection with the EndoArt acquisition, and a drug delivery technology acquired in connection with the Company’s 2003 acquisition of Oculex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The increase in developed technology, trademarks and core technology at September 28, 2007 compared to December 31, 2006

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

is primarily due to the Cornéal and EndoArt acquisitions. The increase in licensing assets is primarily due to a milestone payment incurred in 2007 related to expected annual Restasis^® net sales.

The following table provides amortization expense by major categories of acquired amortizable intangible assets for the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006, respectively:


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 28,		September 29,		September 28,		September 29,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
	(in millions)				(in millions)
Developed technology	$	16.3	$	13.3	$	48.7	$	26.6
Customer relationships		3.4		3.5		10.2		6.9
Licensing		4.7		4.7		14.4		13.9
Trademarks		1.2		1.1		3.6		2.3
Core technology		3.1		2.3		9.2		5.1

	$	28.7	$	24.9	$	86.1	$	54.8

Amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets generally benefits multiple business functions within the Company, such as the Company’s ability to sell, manufacture, research, market and distribute products, compounds and intellectual property. The amount of amortization expense excluded from cost of sales consists primarily of amounts amortized with respect to developed technology and licensing intangible assets.

Estimated amortization expense is $115.6 million for 2007, $114.1 million for 2008, $103.9 million for 2009, $99.7 million for 2010 and $93.2 million for 2011.

Goodwill


	September 28,		December 31,
	2007		2006
	(in millions)
Specialty Pharmaceuticals	$	10.0	$	9.4
Medical Devices		1,951.8		1,824.2

	$	1,961.8	$	1,833.6

Goodwill related to the Inamed, Cornéal and EndoArt acquisitions are reflected in the Medical Devices balance above.

Note 6: Inventories

Components of inventories were:


	September 28,		December 31,
	2007		2006
	(in millions)
Finished products	$	123.7	$	107.1
Work in process		40.5		31.2
Raw materials		38.3		30.2

Total	$	202.5	$	168.5

At September 28, 2007, approximately $12.2 million of Allergan’s finished goods medical device inventories, primarily breast implants, were held on consignment at a large number of doctors’ offices, clinics, and hospitals worldwide. The value and quantity at any one location is not significant.

Note 7: Income Taxes

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

domestic production activities. The Company’s effective tax rate may be subject to fluctuations during the year as new information is obtained, which may affect the assumptions management uses to estimate the annual effective tax rate, including factors such as the Company’s mix of pre-tax earnings in the various tax jurisdictions in which it operates, valuation allowances against deferred tax assets, the recognition or derecognition of tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions, utilization of R&D tax credits and changes in or the interpretation of tax laws in jurisdictions where the Company conducts operations. The Company recognizes interest on income taxes payable as interest expense and penalties related to income taxes payable as income tax expense in its consolidated statements of operations. The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of its assets and liabilities along with net operating loss and credit carryforwards. The Company records a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets to reduce the net carrying value to an amount that it believes is more likely than not to be realized. When the Company establishes or reduces the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets, its provision for income taxes will increase or decrease, respectively, in the period such determination is made.

Valuation allowances against deferred tax assets were $26.6 million and $20.8 million at September 28, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. Changes in the valuation allowances are generally a component of the estimated annual effective tax rate. The increase in the amount of valuation allowances at September 28, 2007 compared to December 31, 2006 is primarily due to the EndoArt acquisition.

In the first fiscal quarter of 2007, the Company adopted FIN 48, which resulted in an increase in total income taxes payable of $2.8 million and interest payable of $0.5 million and a decrease in total deferred tax assets of $1.0 million and beginning retained earnings of $4.3 million. In addition, the Company reclassified $27.0 million of net unrecognized tax benefit liabilities from current to non-current liabilities. The Company’s total unrecognized tax benefit liabilities recorded under FIN 48 as of the date of adoption were $61.7 million, including $37.1 million of uncertain tax positions that were previously recognized as income tax expense and $18.7 million relating to uncertain tax positions of acquired subsidiaries that existed at the time of acquisition. Total interest accrued on income taxes payable was $7.6 million as of the date of adoption and no income tax penalties were recorded. There have been no material changes in the Company’s total unrecognized tax benefit liabilities as of September 28, 2007.

The Company expects that during the next 12 months it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefit liabilities related to research credits, AMT credits and transfer pricing may decrease by approximately $25.9 million due to the settlement of a U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tax audit.

The Company has not provided for withholding and U.S. taxes for the unremitted earnings of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries because it has currently reinvested these earnings indefinitely in such operations, or the U.S. taxes on such earnings will be offset by appropriate credits for foreign income taxes paid. At December 31, 2006, the Company had approximately $725.5 million in unremitted earnings outside the United States for which withholding and U.S. taxes were not provided. Such earnings would become taxable upon the sale or liquidation of these non-U.S. subsidiaries or upon the remittance of dividends. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of the deferred tax liability on such unremitted earnings. Upon remittance, certain foreign countries impose withholding taxes that are then available, subject to certain limitations, for use as credits against the Company’s U.S. tax liability, if any. The Company annually updates its estimate of unremitted earnings outside the United States after the completion of each fiscal year.

Note 8: Share-Based Compensation

The Company recognizes compensation expense for all share-based awards made to employees and directors. The fair value of share-based awards is estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the portion that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as compensation cost over the requisite service period using the straight-line single option method.

The determination of fair value using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables, including expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, expected dividends and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. The Company currently estimates stock price volatility based upon an equal weighting of the five year

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

historical average and the average implied volatility of at-the-money options traded in the open market. The Company estimates employee stock option exercise behavior based on actual historical exercise activity and assumptions regarding future exercise activity of unexercised, outstanding options.

Share-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards that are ultimately expected to vest, and the Company has applied an estimated forfeiture rate to unvested awards for the purpose of calculating compensation cost. These estimates will be revised, if necessary, in future periods if actual forfeitures differ from the estimates. Changes in forfeiture estimates impact compensation cost in the period in which the change in estimate occurs.

For the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006, share-based compensation expense was as follows:


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 28,		September 29,		September 28,		September 29,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
	(in millions)				(in millions)
Cost of sales	$	1.3	$	1.0	$	4.3	$	3.4
Selling, general and administrative		13.6		11.0		41.3		32.8
Research and development		4.1		4.0		14.6		11.8

Pre-tax share-based compensation expense		19.0		16.0		60.2		48.0
Income tax benefit		7.6		5.7		22.3		17.2

Net share-based compensation expense	$	11.4	$	10.3	$	37.9	$	30.8

As of September 28, 2007, total compensation cost related to non-vested stock options and restricted stock not yet recognized was $128.1 million, which is expected to be recognized over the next 48 months (32 months on a weighted-average basis). The Company has not capitalized as part of inventory any share-based compensation costs because such costs were negligible.

Note 9: Employee Retirement and Other Benefit Plans

The Company sponsors various qualified defined benefit pension plans covering a substantial portion of its employees. In addition, the Company sponsors two supplemental nonqualified plans covering certain management employees and officers and one retiree health plan covering U.S. retirees and dependents.

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Components of net periodic benefit cost for the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006, respectively, were as follows:


	Three months ended
							Other
							Postretirement
	Pension Benefits						Benefits
	September 28,			September 29,			September 28,			September 29,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
	(in millions)						(in millions)
Service cost	$	6.2		$	5.7		$	0.7		$	0.7
Interest cost		7.6			6.9			0.5			0.4
Expected return on plan assets		(9.1	)		(8.0	)		—			—
Amortization of prior service cost		—			—			(0.2	)		(0.1	)
Plans acquired in business combination		—			—			—			—
Recognized net actuarial loss		2.8			3.2			—			—

Net periodic benefit cost	$	7.5		$	7.8		$	1.0		$	1.0


	Nine months ended
							Other
							Postretirement
	Pension Benefits						Benefits
	September 28,			September 29,			September 28,			September 29,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
	(in millions)						(in millions)
Service cost	$	18.8		$	17.1		$	2.1		$	2.2
Interest cost		23.2			20.5			1.5			1.3
Expected return on plan assets		(27.7	)		(24.2	)		—			—
Amortization of prior service cost		—			—			(0.6	)		(0.4	)
Plans acquired in business combination		0.5			—			—			—
Recognized net actuarial loss		8.6			9.7			—			—

Net periodic benefit cost	$	23.4		$	23.1		$	3.0		$	3.1

In the nine months ended September 28, 2007, the Company recorded $0.5 million in pension expense to recognize the pension liability of two non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans acquired in connection with the Inamed acquisition that were determined to be material during the period. In 2007, the Company expects to contribute between $20.0 million and $21.0 million to its U.S. and non-U.S. pension plans and between $0.8 million and $0.9 million to its other postretirement plan.

Note 10: Litigation

The following supplements and amends the discussion set forth under Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings” in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2007.

In June 2001, after receiving paragraph 4 invalidity and noninfringement Hatch-Waxman Act certifications from Apotex, Inc. indicating that Apotex had filed an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) with the FDA for a generic form of Acular^®, the Company and Roche Palo Alto, LLC, formerly known as Syntex (U.S.A.) LLC, the holder of the Acular^® patent, filed a lawsuit entitled “Syntex (U.S.A.) LLC and Allergan, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc., et al.” in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Following a trial, the court entered final judgment in the Company’s favor in January 2004, holding that the patent at issue is valid, enforceable and infringed by Apotex’s proposed generic drug. Following an appeal by Apotex, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an opinion in May 2005 affirming the lower court’s ruling on inequitable conduct and claim construction and reversing and remanding the issue of obviousness. On remand, in June 2006, the district court ruled that the defendants’ ANDA infringes U.S. Patent No. 5,110,493 (the ‘“493 patent”), which is owned by Syntex and licensed by Allergan, and that the patent is valid and enforceable. The district court further ruled that the effective date of any approval of the defendants’ ANDA may not occur before the patent expires in 2009 and that the defendants, and all persons and entities acting in concert with them, are enjoined from making any preparations to make, sell, or offer for sale ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution 0.5% in the United States. In April 2007,

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling in all respects and entered a Judgment Per Curiam. Apotex filed a Motion to Recall and Stay the Mandate and a Combined Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which motion was denied. On July 9, 2007, Apotex filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States. On October 1, 2007, the Supreme Court of the United States denied Apotex’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari. In June 2001, the Company filed a separate lawsuit in Canada against Apotex similarly relating to a generic version of Acular^®. On April 27, 2007, the court set a trial date in the Canadian lawsuit for February 2, 2009.

In May 2005, after receiving a paragraph 4 invalidity and noninfringement Hatch-Waxman Act certification from Apotex indicating that Apotex had filed an ANDA with the FDA for a generic form of Acular LS^®, the Company and Roche Palo Alto, LLC, formerly known as Syntex (U.S.A.) LLC, the holder of the ‘493 patent, filed a lawsuit entitled “Roche Palo Alto LLC, formerly known as Syntex (U.S.A.) LLC and Allergan, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc., et al.” in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. In the complaint, the Company and Roche asked the court to find that the ‘493 patent is valid, enforceable and infringed by Apotex’s proposed generic drug. Apotex filed an answer to the complaint and a counterclaim against the Company and Roche. The Company and Roche moved for summary judgment. On September 11, 2007, the court granted the Company and Roche’s motion for summary judgment. On September 26, 2007, Apotex filed a Notice of Appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

In February 2007, the Company received a paragraph 4 invalidity and noninfringement Hatch-Waxman Act certification from Exela PharmSci, Inc. indicating that Exela had filed an ANDA with the FDA for a generic form of Alphagan^® P. In the certification, Exela contends that U.S. Patent Nos. 5,424,078, 6,562,873, 6,627,210, 6,641,834 and 6,673,337, all of which are assigned to the Company and are listed in the Orange Book under Alphagan^® P, are invalid and/or not infringed by the proposed Exela product. In March 2007, the Company filed a complaint against Exela in the United States District Court for the Central District of California entitled “Allergan, Inc. v. Exela PharmSci, Inc., et al.” (the “Exela Action”). In its complaint, the Company alleges that Exela’s proposed product infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,641,834. In April 2007, the Company filed an amended complaint adding Paddock Laboratories, Inc. and PharmaForce, Inc. as defendants. In April 2007, Exela filed a complaint for declaratory judgment in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division, entitled “Exela PharmSci, Inc. v. Allergan, Inc.” Exela’s complaint seeks a declaration of noninfringement, unenforceability, and/or invalidity of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,424,078, 6,562,873, 6,627,210, 6,641,834 and 6,673,337. In June 2007, Exela filed a voluntary dismissal without prejudice in the Virginia action.

In May 2007, the Company received a paragraph 4 invalidity and noninfringement Hatch-Waxman Act certification from Apotex, Inc. indicating that Apotex had filed ANDAs with the FDA for generic versions of Alphagan^® P and Alphagan^® P 0.1%. In the certification, Apotex contends that U.S. Patent Nos. 5,424,078, 6,562,873, 6,627,210, 6,641,834 and 6,673,337, all of which are assigned to the Company and are listed in the Orange Book under Alphagan^® P and Alphagan^® P 0.1%, are invalid and/or not infringed by the proposed Apotex products. In May 2007, the Company filed a complaint against Apotex in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware entitled “Allergan, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc. and Apotex Corp.” (the “Apotex Action’’). In its complaint, the Company alleges that Apotex’s proposed products infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 5,424,078, 6,562,873, 6,627,210, 6,641,834 and 6,673,337. In June 2007, Apotex filed an answer, defenses, and counterclaims. In July 2007, the Company filed a response to Apotex’s counterclaims.

In May 2007, the Company filed a motion with the multidistrict litigation panel to consolidate the Exela Action and the Apotex Action in the District of Delaware. A hearing on the Company’s motion took place on July 26, 2007. On August 20, 2007, the panel granted the Company’s motion and transferred the Exela Action to the District of Delaware for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the Apotex Action.

On October 18, 2007, the Company received a paragraph 4 invalidity and noninfringement Hatch-Waxman Act certification from Apotex Corp. indicating that Apotex had filed an ANDA with the FDA for a generic version of Zymar^®. In the certification, Apotex contends that U.S. Patent Nos. 5,880,283 and 6,333,045, both of which are licensed to the Company and are listed in the Orange Book under Zymar^®, are invalid and/or not infringed by the proposed Apotex product.

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Inamed Related Litigation Matters Assumed in the Company’s Acquisition of Inamed

In connection with its purchase of Collagen Aesthetics, Inc. (Collagen) in September 1999, the Company’s subsidiary, Inamed, assumed certain liabilities relating to the Trilucent breast implant, a soybean oil-filled breast implant, which had been manufactured and distributed by various subsidiaries of Collagen between 1995 and November 1998. In November 1998, Collagen announced the sale of its LipoMatrix, Inc. subsidiary, manufacturer of the Trilucent implants to Sierra Medical Technologies, Inc. Collagen retained certain liabilities for Trilucent implants sold prior to November 1998.

In March 1999, the United Kingdom Medical Devices Agency, or MDA, announced the voluntary suspension of marketing and withdrawal of the Trilucent implant in the United Kingdom as a precautionary measure. The MDA did not identify any immediate hazard associated with the use of the product but stated that it sought the withdrawal because it had received “reports of local complications in a small number of women” who had received those implants, involving localized swelling. The same notice stated that there “has been no evidence of permanent injury or harm to general health” as a result of these implants. In March 1999, Collagen agreed with the U.K. National Health Service that, for a period of time, it would perform certain product surveillance with respect to U.K. patients implanted with the Trilucent implant and pay for explants for any U.K. women with confirmed Trilucent implant ruptures. Subsequently, LipoMatrix’s notified body in Europe suspended the product’s CE Mark pending further assessment of the long-term safety of the product. Sierra Medical has since stopped sales of the product. Subsequent to acquiring Collagen, Inamed elected to continue the voluntary program.

In June 2000, the MDA issued a hazard notice recommending that surgeons and their patients consider explanting the Trilucent implants even if the patient is asymptomatic. The MDA also recommended that women avoid pregnancy and breast-feeding until the explantation as a precautionary measure stating that “although there have been reports of breast swelling and discomfort in some women with these implants, there has been no clinical evidence of any serious health problems, so far.”

Concurrently with the June 2000 MDA announcement, Inamed announced that, through its AEI, Inc. subsidiary, it had undertaken a comprehensive program of support and assistance for women who have received Trilucent breast implants, under which it was covering medical expenses associated with the removal and replacement of those implants for women in the European Community, the United States and other countries. After consulting with competent authorities in each affected country, Inamed terminated this support program in March 2005 in all countries other than the United States and Canada. Notwithstanding the termination of the general program, Inamed continued to pay for explantations and related expenses in certain cases if a patient justified her delay in having her Trilucent implants removed on medical grounds or owing to lack of notice. Under this program, Inamed may pay a fee to any surgeon who conducts an initial consultation with any Trilucent implantee. Inamed also pays for the explantation procedure and related costs, and for replacement (non-Trilucent) implants for women who are candidates for and who desire them. To date, virtually all of the U.K. residents and more than 95% of the non-U.K. residents who have requested explantations as a result of an initial consultation have had them performed. However, there may be other U.K. residents and non-U.K. residents who have not come forth that may request explantation.

A Spanish consumer union has commenced a single action in the Madrid district court in which the consumer union, Avinesa, alleges that it represents 38 Spanish Trilucent explantees. To date, approximately 65 women in Spain have commenced individual legal proceedings in court against Inamed, of which approximately 4 were still pending as of September 28, 2007. Prior to the issuance of a decision by an Appellate Court sitting in Madrid in the second quarter of 2005, Inamed won approximately one-third, and lost approximately two-thirds of its Trilucent cases in the lower courts. The average damages awarded in cases the Company lost were approximately $18,000. In the second quarter of 2005, in a case called Gomez Martin v. AEI, for the first time an appellate court in Spain issued a decision holding that Trilucent breast implants were not “defective” within the meaning of applicable Spanish product liability law and dismissed a €60,000 (approximately $78,000) award issued by the lower court. While this ruling was a positive development for Inamed, it may not be followed by other Spanish appellate courts or could be modified or found inapplicable to other cases filed in the Madrid district. Since the ruling in Gomez Martin v. AEI, Inamed has had greater success in winning the Spanish cases than before the ruling. In 2006, the Company settled nine Spanish litigated matters; the average compensation paid per case was under €12,000 (approximately $16,000).

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

As of September 28, 2007, the Company had an accrual for future Trilucent claims, costs, and expenses of $2.7 million.

The Company is involved in various other lawsuits and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. These other matters are, in the opinion of management, immaterial both individually and in the aggregate with respect to the Company’s consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations.

Because of the uncertainties related to the incurrence, amount and range of loss on any pending litigation, investigation or claim, management is currently unable to predict the ultimate outcome of any litigation, investigation or claim, determine whether a liability has been incurred or make an estimate of the reasonably possible liability that could result from an unfavorable outcome. The Company believes, however, that the liability, if any, resulting from the aggregate amount of uninsured damages for any outstanding litigation, investigation or claim will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations. However, an adverse ruling in a patent infringement lawsuit involving the Company could materially affect its ability to sell one or more of its products or could result in additional competition. In view of the unpredictable nature of such matters, the Company cannot provide any assurances regarding the outcome of any litigation, investigation or claim to which the Company is a party or the impact on the Company of an adverse ruling in such matters. As additional information becomes available, the Company will assess its potential liability and revise its estimates.

Note 11: Guarantees

The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, provides that the Company will indemnify, to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, each person that is involved in or is, or is threatened to be, made a party to any action, suit or proceeding by reason of the fact that he or she, or a person of whom he or she is the legal representative, is or was a director or officer of the Company or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise. The Company has also entered into contractual indemnity agreements with each of its directors and executive officers pursuant to which, among other things, the Company has agreed to indemnify such directors and executive officers against any payments they are required to make as a result of a claim brought against such executive officer or director in such capacity, excluding claims (i) relating to the action or inaction of a director or executive officer that resulted in such director or executive officer gaining personal profit or advantage, (ii) for an accounting of profits made from the purchase or sale of securities of the Company within the meaning of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or similar provisions of any state law or (iii) that are based upon or arise out of such director’s or executive officer’s knowingly fraudulent, deliberately dishonest or willful misconduct. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is unlimited. However, the Company has purchased directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies intended to reduce the Company’s monetary exposure and to enable the Company to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. The Company has not previously paid any material amounts to defend lawsuits or settle claims as a result of these indemnification provisions. As a result, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification arrangements is minimal.

The Company customarily agrees in the ordinary course of its business to indemnification provisions in agreements with clinical trials investigators in its drug development programs, in sponsored research agreements with academic and not-for-profit institutions, in various comparable agreements involving parties performing services for the Company in the ordinary course of business, and in its real estate leases. The Company also customarily agrees to certain indemnification provisions in its drug discovery and development collaboration agreements. With respect to the Company’s clinical trials and sponsored research agreements, these indemnification provisions typically apply to any claim asserted against the investigator or the investigator’s institution relating to personal injury or property damage, violations of law or certain breaches of the Company’s contractual obligations arising out of the research or clinical testing of the Company’s compounds or drug candidates. With respect to real estate lease agreements, the indemnification provisions typically apply to claims asserted against the landlord relating to personal injury or property damage caused by the Company, to violations of law by the Company or to certain breaches of the Company’s contractual obligations. The indemnification provisions appearing in the Company’s collaboration agreements are similar, but in addition provide some limited indemnification for the

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

collaborator in the event of third party claims alleging infringement of intellectual property rights. In each of the above cases, the term of these indemnification provisions generally survives the termination of the agreement. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company could be required to make under these provisions is generally unlimited. The Company has purchased insurance policies covering personal injury, property damage and general liability intended to reduce the Company’s exposure for indemnification and to enable the Company to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. The Company has not previously paid any material amounts to defend lawsuits or settle claims as a result of these indemnification provisions. As a result, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification arrangements is minimal.

Note 12: Product Warranties

The Company provides warranty programs for breast implant sales primarily in the United States, Europe, and certain other countries. Management estimates the amount of potential future claims from these warranty programs based on actuarial analyses. Expected future obligations are determined based on the history of product shipments and claims and are discounted to a current value. The liability is included in both current and long-term liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The U.S. programs include the ConfidencePlus™ and ConfidencePlus™ Premier warranty programs. The ConfidencePlus™ program currently provides lifetime product replacement and $1,200 of financial assistance for surgical procedures within ten years of implantation. The ConfidencePlus™ Premier program, which requires a low additional enrollment fee, currently provides lifetime product replacement, $2,400 of financial assistance for surgical procedures within ten years of implantation and contralateral implant replacement. The enrollment fee is deferred and recognized as income over the ten year warranty period for financial assistance. The warranty programs in non-U.S. markets have similar terms and conditions to the U.S. programs. The Company does not warrant any level of aesthetic result and, as required by government regulation, makes extensive disclosures concerning the risks of the use of its products and implantation surgery. Changes to actual warranty claims incurred and interest rates could have a material impact on the actuarial analysis and the Company’s estimated liabilities. Substantially all of the product warranty liability arises from the U.S. warranty programs. The Company does not currently offer any similar warranty program on any other product.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the change in estimated product warranty liabilities through September 28, 2007:


	(in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2006	$	24.8
Provision for warranties issued during the period		5.5
Settlements made during the period		(3.7	)

Balance at September 28, 2007	$	26.6


Current portion	$	6.3
Non-current portion		20.3

Total	$	26.6

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 13: Earnings Per Share

The table below presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 28,		September 29,		September 28,			September 29,
	2007		2006		2007			2006
	(in millions, except per share amounts)
Net earnings (loss):
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations	$	156.0	$	106.4	$	339.8		$	(264.2	)
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations		1.4		—		(0.8	)		—

Net earnings (loss)	$	157.4	$	106.4	$	339.0		$	(264.2	)


Weighted average number of shares issued		305.9		301.8		304.9			290.7
Net shares assumed issued using the treasury stock method for options and non-vested equity shares and share units outstanding during each period based on average market price		3.4		3.3		3.4			—

Diluted shares		309.3		305.1		308.3			290.7


Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Continuing operations	$	0.51	$	0.35	$	1.11		$	(0.91	)
Discontinued operations		—		—		—			—

Net basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.51	$	0.35	$	1.11		$	(0.91	)


Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Continuing operations	$	0.50	$	0.35	$	1.10		$	(0.91	)
Discontinued operations		0.01		—		—			—

Net diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.51	$	0.35	$	1.10		$	(0.91	)

For the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2007, options to purchase 3.9 million and 7.6 million shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $49.94 to $64.43 and $48.07 to $64.43 per share, respectively, were outstanding, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect from the assumed exercise of these options calculated under the treasury stock method would be anti-dilutive. There were no potentially diluted common shares related to the Company’s 1.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 for the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2007, as the Company’s average stock price for the respective periods was less than the conversion price of the notes.

For the three month period ended September 29, 2006, options to purchase 5.1 million shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $44.63 to $63.76 per share were outstanding, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect from the assumed exercise of these options calculated under the treasury stock method would be anti-dilutive. There were no potentially diluted common shares related to the Company’s 1.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 for the three and nine month periods ended September 29, 2006, as the Company’s average stock price for the respective periods was less than the conversion price of the notes. Stock options outstanding during the nine month period ended September 29, 2006 were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the Company incurred a loss from continuing operations and, as a result, the impact would be antidilutive. Options to purchase 21.7 million shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $6.50 to $63.76 per share were outstanding as of September 29, 2006. Additionally, for the nine month period ended September 29, 2006, the effect of approximately 2.2 million common shares related to the Company’s Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due 2022 was not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the Company incurred a loss from continuing operations and, as a result, the impact would be antidilutive.

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 14: Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table summarizes the components of comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006:


	Three months ended
(in millions)	September 28, 2007									September 29, 2006
				Tax									Tax
	Before-tax			(Expense)			Net-of-tax			Before-tax			(Expense)			Net-of-tax
	Amount			or Benefit			Amount			Amount			or Benefit			Amount
Foreign currency translation adjustments	$	22.7		$	—		$	22.7		$	(0.7	)	$	—		$	(0.7	)
Amortization of deferred holding gains on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges		(0.3	)		0.1			(0.2	)		(0.3	)		0.1			(0.2	)
Unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities		0.3			(0.1	)		0.2			0.2			(0.1	)		0.1

Other comprehensive income (loss)	$	22.7		$	—			22.7		$	(0.8	)	$	—			(0.8	)

Net earnings								157.4									106.4

Total comprehensive income							$	180.1								$	105.6


	Nine months ended
(in millions)	September 28, 2007									September 29, 2006
				Tax									Tax
	Before-tax			(Expense)			Net-of-tax			Before-tax			(Expense)			Net-of-tax
	Amount			or Benefit			Amount			Amount			or Benefit			Amount
Foreign currency translation adjustments	$	38.3		$	—		$	38.3		$	13.1		$	—		$	13.1
Deferred holding gains on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges		—			—			—			13.0			(5.1	)		7.9
Amortization of deferred holding gains on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges		(1.0	)		0.4			(0.6	)		(0.6	)		0.2			(0.4	)
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities		2.7			(1.1	)		1.6			(0.8	)		0.3			(0.5	)

Other comprehensive income	$	40.0		$	(0.7	)		39.3		$	24.7		$	(4.6	)		20.1

Net earnings (loss)								339.0									(264.2	)

Total comprehensive income (loss)							$	378.3								$	(244.1	)

Note 15: Business Segment Information

Through the first fiscal quarter of 2006, the Company operated its business on the basis of a single reportable segment — specialty pharmaceuticals. Due to the Inamed acquisition, beginning with the second fiscal quarter of 2006, the Company operates its business on the basis of two reportable segments — specialty pharmaceuticals and medical devices. The specialty pharmaceuticals segment produces a broad range of pharmaceutical products, including: ophthalmic products for glaucoma therapy, ocular inflammation, infection, allergy and dry eye; skin care products for acne, psoriasis and other prescription and over-the-counter dermatological products; and Botox^® for certain therapeutic and cosmetic indications. The medical devices segment produces breast implants for aesthetic augmentation and reconstructive surgery; facial aesthetics products; the LAP-BAND^® System designed to treat severe and morbid obesity and the BIB™ System for the treatment of obesity. The Company provides global marketing strategy teams to ensure development and execution of a consistent marketing strategy for its products in all geographic regions that share similar distribution channels and customers.

The Company evaluates segment performance on a revenue and operating income (loss) basis exclusive of general and administrative expenses and other indirect costs, restructuring charges, in-process research and development expenses, amortization of identifiable intangible assets related to the Inamed, Cornéal and EndoArt acquisitions and certain other adjustments, which are not allocated to the Company’s segments for performance assessment by the Company’s chief operating decision maker. Other adjustments excluded from the Company’s segments for performance assessment represent income or expenses that do not reflect, according to established Company-defined criteria, operating income or expenses associated with the Company’s core business activities. Because operating segments are generally defined by the products they design and sell, they do not make sales to each other. The Company does not discretely allocate assets to its operating segments, nor does the Company’s chief operating decision maker evaluate operating segments using discrete asset information.

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Operating Segments


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 28,		September 29,		September 28,		September 29,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
	(in millions)				(in millions)
Product net sales:
Specialty pharmaceuticals	$	783.9	$	675.4	$	2,246.8	$	1,949.3
Medical devices		194.8		116.3		557.1		244.6

Total product net sales		978.7		791.7		2,803.9		2,193.9
Other corporate and indirect revenues		15.0		15.1		44.4		40.3

Total revenues	$	993.7	$	806.8	$	2,848.3	$	2,234.2


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 28,		September 29,		September 28,		September 29,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
	(in millions)				(in millions)
Operating income (loss):
Specialty pharmaceuticals	$	277.1	$	235.6	$	751.2	$	641.9
Medical devices		52.8		36.7		163.9		88.6

Total segments		329.9		272.3		915.1		730.5
General and administrative expenses, other indirect costs and other adjustments		74.9		122.9		247.8		271.4
In-process research and development		—		—		72.0		579.3
Amortization of acquired intangible assets (a)		23.5		19.6		70.0		39.1
Restructuring charges		11.0		8.6		24.3		17.1

Total operating income (loss)	$	220.5	$	121.2	$	501.0	$	(176.4	)


(a)		Represents amortization of identifiable intangible assets related to the Inamed, Cornéal and EndoArt acquisitions.

Product net sales for the Company’s various global product portfolios are presented below. The Company’s principal markets are the United States, Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific. The U.S. information is presented separately as it is the Company’s headquarters country. U.S. sales, including manufacturing operations, represented 65.4% and 68.1% of the Company’s total consolidated product net sales for the three month periods ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006, respectively, and 65.7% and 67.6% of the Company’s total consolidated product net sales for the nine month periods ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006, respectively.

Sales to two customers in the Company’s specialty pharmaceuticals segment generated over 10% of the Company’s total consolidated product net sales. Sales to McKesson Drug Company for the three month periods ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006 were 11.0% and 11.8% of the Company’s total consolidated product net sales, respectively, and 11.2% and 13.3% of the Company’s total consolidated product net sales for the nine month periods ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006, respectively. Sales to Cardinal Healthcare for the three month periods ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006 were 11.0% and 13.9% of the Company’s total consolidated product net sales, respectively, and 11.2% and 13.5% of the Company’s total consolidated product net sales for the nine month periods ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006, respectively. No other country or single customer generates over 10% of total product net sales. Net sales for the Europe region also include sales to customers in Africa and the Middle East, and net sales in the Asia Pacific region include sales to customers in Australia and New Zealand.

Long-lived assets are assigned to geographic regions based upon management responsibility for such items.

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Product Net Sales by Product Line


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 28,		September 29,		September 28,		September 29,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
	(in millions)				(in millions)
Specialty Pharmaceuticals:
Eye Care Pharmaceuticals	$	457.7	$	403.4	$	1,292.1	$	1,144.5
Botox^®/Neuromodulators		296.7		237.7		872.0		709.1
Skin Care		29.5		34.3		82.7		95.7

Total Specialty Pharmaceuticals		783.9		675.4		2,246.8		1,949.3

Medical Devices:
Breast Aesthetics		69.7		54.1		217.8		118.7
Obesity Intervention		74.0		47.1		195.9		92.9
Facial Aesthetics		49.3		15.1		141.6		33.0

Core Medical Devices		193.0		116.3		555.3		244.6
Other		1.8		—		1.8		—

Total Medical Devices		194.8		116.3		557.1		244.6


Total product net sales	$	978.7	$	791.7	$	2,803.9	$	2,193.9

Geographic Information

Product Net Sales by Geographic Region


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 28,		September 29,		September 28,		September 29,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
	(in millions)				(in millions)
United States	$	638.3	$	538.0	$	1,836.4	$	1,480.0
Europe		190.4		137.7		559.8		399.9
Latin America		59.4		46.4		157.8		122.0
Asia Pacific		52.4		39.8		140.8		106.7
Other		36.1		28.2		103.8		82.5

		976.6		790.1		2,798.6		2,191.1
Manufacturing operations		2.1		1.6		5.3		2.8

Total product net sales	$	978.7	$	791.7	$	2,803.9	$	2,193.9

Long-Lived Assets


	September 28,		December 31,
	2007		2006
	(in millions)
United States	$	2,912.5	$	2,986.4
Europe		296.3		16.0
Latin America		22.1		18.7
Asia Pacific		6.9		6.6
Other		0.1		0.2

		3,237.9		3,027.9
Manufacturing operations		299.9		279.8
General corporate		214.2		215.3

Total	$	3,752.0	$	3,523.0

The increase in long-lived assets at September 28, 2007 compared to December 31, 2006 was primarily due to the Company’s 2007 Cornéal and EndoArt acquisitions. Long-lived assets related to the Cornéal and EndoArt acquisitions, including goodwill and intangible assets, are reflected in the Europe balance above. Goodwill and intangible assets related to the Inamed acquisition are reflected in the United States balance above.

Note 16: Subsequent Event

On October 16, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of Esprit Pharma Holding Company, Inc. (Esprit), pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 18, 2007 (Merger Agreement), by and among the Company, Esmeralde Acquisition, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (Merger Sub), Esprit

Allergan, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

and the Escrow Participants’ Representative named in the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub was merged with and into Esprit, with Esprit surviving and becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The acquisition of Esprit will provide the Company with a dedicated urologics product line within its specialty pharmaceuticals segment. Upon the terms set forth in the Merger Agreement, the Company paid an aggregate of $370 million in cash, minus Esprit’s debt and certain transaction compensation and expenses, for all of the outstanding equity securities of Esprit. In addition, the Company repaid all of Esprit’s outstanding debt at the date of acquisition. The acquisition consideration was all cash, funded from current cash and equivalent balances.

As of September 28, 2007, the Company had a note receivable from Esprit in the amount of $74.8 million, which is included in “Other current assets”. At the date of acquisition, Esprit’s debt included a note payable to the Company for $74.8 million plus accrued interest, which effectively reduced the cash consideration paid by the Company at closing.

ALLERGAN, INC.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This financial review presents our operating results for the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006, and our financial condition at September 28, 2007. Except for the historical information contained herein, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements which are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We discuss such risks, uncertainties and other factors throughout this report and specifically under the caption “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part II below. The following review should be read in connection with the information presented in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes for the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2007 and our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation and presentation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires us to establish policies and to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements. In our judgment, the accounting policies, estimates and assumptions described below have the greatest potential impact on our consolidated financial statements. Accounting assumptions and estimates are inherently uncertain and actual results may differ materially from our estimates.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue from product sales when goods are shipped and title and risk of loss transfer to our customers. A substantial portion of our revenue is generated by the sale of specialty pharmaceutical products (primarily eye care pharmaceuticals and skin care products) to wholesalers within the United States, and we have a policy to attempt to maintain average U.S. wholesaler inventory levels at an amount less than eight weeks of our net sales. A portion of our revenue is generated from consigned inventory of breast implants maintained at physician, hospital and clinic locations. These customers are contractually obligated to maintain a specific level of inventory and to notify us upon the use of consigned inventory. Revenue for consigned inventory is recognized at the time we are notified by the customer that the product has been used. Notification is usually through the replenishing of the inventory, and we periodically review consignment inventories to confirm the accuracy of customer reporting.

We generally offer cash discounts to customers for the early payment of receivables. Those discounts are recorded as a reduction of revenue and accounts receivable in the same period that the related sale is recorded. The amounts reserved for cash discounts were $2.8 million and $2.3 million at September 28, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. Provisions for cash discounts deducted from consolidated sales in the third quarter of 2007 and the third quarter of 2006 were $8.7 million and $8.1 million, respectively. Provisions for cash discounts deducted from consolidated sales in the first nine months of 2007 and the first nine months of 2006 were $25.2 million and $23.2 million, respectively. We permit returns of product from most product lines by any class of customer if such product is returned in a timely manner, in good condition and from normal distribution channels. Return policies in certain international markets and for certain medical device products, primarily breast implants, provide for more stringent guidelines in accordance with the terms of contractual agreements with customers. Our estimates for sales returns are based upon the historical patterns of products returned matched against the sales from which they originated, and management’s evaluation of specific factors that may increase the risk of product returns. The amount of allowances for sales returns recognized in our consolidated balance sheets at September 28, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were $28.6 million and $20.1 million, respectively. Provisions for sales returns deducted from consolidated sales were $72.5 million and $44.4 million in the third quarter of 2007 and the third quarter of 2006, respectively. Provisions for sales returns deducted from consolidated sales were $224.2 million and $102.4 million in the first nine months of 2007 and the first nine months of 2006, respectively. The increase in the allowance for sales returns at September 28, 2007 compared to December 31, 2006 and the increase in the provision for sales returns in the third quarter and first nine months of 2007 compared to the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 were primarily due to growth in net sales of medical device products, primarily breast implants, which generally have a significantly higher rate of return than specialty pharmaceutical products. Historical allowances for cash discounts and product returns have been within the amounts reserved or accrued.

We participate in various managed care sales rebate and other incentive programs, the largest of which relates to Medicaid and Medicare. Sales rebate and other incentive programs also include chargebacks, which are contractual discounts given primarily to federal government agencies, health maintenance organizations, pharmacy benefits managers and group purchasing organizations. Sales rebates and incentive accruals reduce revenue in the same period that the related sale is recorded and are included in “Other accrued expenses” in our consolidated balance sheets. The amounts accrued for sales rebates and other incentive programs at September 28, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were $71.0 million and $71.2 million, respectively. Provisions for sales rebates and other incentive programs deducted from consolidated sales were $52.0 million and $160.1 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2007, respectively. Provisions for sales rebates and other incentive programs deducted from consolidated sales were $38.9 million and $132.0 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2006, respectively. The increase in the provisions for sales rebates and other incentive programs in the third quarter and first nine months of 2007 compared to the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 is primarily due to an increase in U.S. specialty pharmaceutical sales, principally eye care pharmaceutical products, which are subject to such rebate and incentive programs. In addition, an increase in our published list prices in the United States for pharmaceutical products, which occurred for several of our products early in each of 2007 and 2006, generally results in higher provisions for sales rebates and other incentive programs deducted from consolidated sales.

Our procedures for estimating amounts accrued for sales rebates and other incentive programs at the end of any period are based on available quantitative data and are supplemented by management’s judgment with respect to many factors, including but not limited to, current market dynamics, changes in contract terms, changes in sales trends, an evaluation of current laws and regulations and product pricing. Quantitatively, we use historical sales, product utilization and rebate data and apply forecasting techniques in order to estimate our liability amounts. Qualitatively, management’s judgment is applied to these items to modify, if appropriate, the estimated liability amounts. There are inherent risks in this process. For example, customers may not achieve assumed utilization levels; customers may misreport their utilization to us; and actual movements of the U.S. Consumer Price Index — Urban (CPI-U), which affect our rebate programs with U.S. federal and state government agencies, may differ from those estimated. On a quarterly basis, adjustments to our estimated liabilities for sales rebates and other incentive programs related to sales made in prior periods have not been material and have generally been less than 0.5% of consolidated product net sales. An adjustment to our estimated liabilities of 0.5% of consolidated product net sales on a quarterly basis would result in an increase or decrease to net sales and earnings before income taxes of approximately $4.0 million to $5.0 million. The sensitivity of our estimates can vary by program and type of customer. Additionally, there is a significant time lag between the date we determine the estimated liability and when we actually pay the liability. Due to this time lag, we record adjustments to our estimated liabilities over several periods, which can result in a net increase to earnings or a net decrease to earnings in those periods. Material differences may result in the amount of revenue we recognize from product sales if the actual amount of rebates and incentives differ materially from the amounts estimated by management.

We recognize license fees, royalties and reimbursement income for services provided as other revenues based on the facts and circumstances of each contractual agreement. In general, we recognize income upon the signing of a contractual agreement that grants rights to products or technology to a third party if we have no further obligation to provide products or services to the third party after entering into the contract. We defer income under contractual agreements when we have further obligations indicating that a separate earnings process has not been completed.

Pensions

We sponsor various pension plans in the United States and abroad in accordance with local laws and regulations. Our U.S. pension plans account for a large majority of our aggregate pension plans’ net periodic benefit costs and projected benefit obligations. In connection with these plans, we use certain actuarial assumptions to determine the plans’ net periodic benefit costs and projected benefit obligations, the most significant of which are the expected long-term rate of return on assets and the discount rate.

Our assumption for the weighted average expected long-term rate of return on assets in our U.S. pension plans for determining the net periodic benefit cost is 8.25% for 2007, which is the same rate used for 2006. Our assumptions for the weighted average expected long-term rate of return on assets in our non-U.S. pension plans were 6.43% and 6.19% for 2007 and 2006, respectively. We determine, based upon recommendations from our pension plans’ investment advisors, the expected rate of return using a building block approach that considers diversification

and rebalancing for a long-term portfolio of invested assets. Our investment advisors study historical market returns and preserve long-term historical relationships between equities and fixed income in a manner consistent with the widely-accepted capital market principle that assets with higher volatility generate a greater return over the long run. They also evaluate market factors such as inflation and interest rates before long-term capital market assumptions are determined. The expected rate of return is applied to the market-related value of plan assets. Market conditions and other factors can vary over time and could significantly affect our estimates of the weighted average expected long-term rate of return on our plan assets. As a sensitivity measure, the effect of a 0.25% decline in our rate of return on assets assumptions for our U.S. and non-U.S. pension plans would increase our expected 2007 pre-tax pension benefit cost by approximately $1.2 million.

The weighted average discount rates used to calculate our U.S. and non-U.S. pension benefit obligations at December 31, 2006 and our net periodic benefit costs for 2007 were 5.90% and 4.65%, respectively. The discount rates used to calculate our U.S. and non-U.S. net periodic benefit costs for 2006 were 5.60% and 4.24%, respectively. We determine the discount rate largely based upon an index of high-quality fixed income investments (for our U.S. plans, we use the U.S. Moody’s Aa Corporate Long Bond Index and for our non-U.S. plans, we use the iBoxx £ Corporate AA 10+ Year Index and the iBoxx £ Corporate AA 15+ Year Index) and, for our U.S. plans, a constructed hypothetical portfolio of high quality fixed income investments with maturities that mirror the pension benefit obligations at the plans’ measurement date. Market conditions and other factors can vary over time and could significantly affect our estimates for the discount rates used to calculate our pension benefit obligations and net periodic pension benefit costs for future years. As a sensitivity measure, the effect of a 0.25% decline in the discount rate assumption for our U.S and non-U.S. pension plans would increase our expected 2007 pre-tax pension benefit costs by approximately $3.7 million and increase our pension plans’ projected benefit obligations at December 31, 2006 by approximately $27.0 million.

Share-Based Compensation

We recognize compensation expense for all share-based awards made to employees and directors. The fair value of share-based awards is estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the portion that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as compensation cost over the requisite service period using the straight-line single option method.

The determination of fair value using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables, including expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, expected dividends and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. We currently estimate stock price volatility based upon an equal weighting of the five year historical average and the average implied volatility of at-the-money options traded in the open market. We estimate employee stock option exercise behavior based on actual historical exercise activity and assumptions regarding future exercise activity of unexercised, outstanding options.

Share-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards that are ultimately expected to vest, and we have applied an estimated forfeiture rate to unvested awards for the purpose of calculating compensation cost. These estimates will be revised, if necessary, in future periods if actual forfeitures differ from the estimates. Changes in forfeiture estimates impact compensation cost in the period in which the change in estimate occurs.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes is determined using an estimated annual effective tax rate, which is generally less than the U.S. federal statutory rate, primarily because of lower tax rates in certain non-U.S. jurisdictions, research and development, or R&D, tax credits available in the United States and other jurisdictions, and deductions available in the United States for domestic production activities. Our effective tax rate may be subject to fluctuations during the year as new information is obtained, which may affect the assumptions we use to estimate our annual effective tax rate, including factors such as our mix of pre-tax earnings in the various tax jurisdictions in which we operate, valuation allowances against deferred tax assets, the recognition or derecognition of tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions, utilization of R&D tax credits and changes in or the interpretation of tax laws in jurisdictions where we conduct business. We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities along with net operating loss and tax credit

carryovers. We record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets to reduce the net carrying value to an amount that we believe is more likely than not to be realized. When we establish or reduce the valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, our provision for income taxes will increase or decrease, respectively, in the period such determination is made.

Valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets were $26.6 million and $20.8 million at September 28, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. Changes in the valuation allowances are recognized in the provision for income taxes as incurred and are generally included as a component of the estimated annual effective tax rate. The increase in the amount of valuation allowances at September 28, 2007 compared to December 31, 2006 is primarily due to our February 2007 acquisition of EndoArt SA, or EndoArt. Material differences in the estimated amount of valuation allowances may result in an increase or decrease in the provision for income taxes if the actual amounts for valuation allowances required against deferred tax assets differ from the amounts we estimate.

We have not provided for withholding and U.S. taxes for the unremitted earnings of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries because we have currently reinvested these earnings indefinitely in these foreign operations. At December 31, 2006, we had approximately $725.5 million in unremitted earnings outside the United States for which withholding and U.S. taxes were not provided. Income tax expense would be incurred if these funds were remitted to the United States. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of the deferred tax liability on such unremitted earnings. Upon remittance, certain foreign countries impose withholding taxes that are then available, subject to certain limitations, for use as credits against our U.S. tax liability, if any. We annually update our estimate of unremitted earnings outside the United States after the completion of each fiscal year.

In the first quarter of 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Historically, our policy has been to account for uncertainty in income taxes in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, which considered whether the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position was probable of being sustained. Under FIN 48, the tax benefit from uncertain tax positions may be recognized only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained, based solely on its technical merits, with the taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant information. After initial adoption of FIN 48, we recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities along with net operating loss and tax credit carryovers only for tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition criteria. Additionally, we record the recognition and derecognition of tax benefits from uncertain tax positions as discrete tax adjustments in the first interim period that the more likely than not threshold is met. Due to the inherit risks in the estimates and assumptions used in determining the sustainability of our tax positions and in the measurement of the related tax, our provision for income taxes and our effective tax rate may vary significantly from our estimates and from amounts reported in future or prior periods. We discuss this change in accounting principle and its effect on our consolidated financial statements in Note 7, Income Taxes, in the financial statements under Item 1(D) of Part I of this report.

Purchase Price Allocation

The purchase price allocation for acquisitions requires extensive use of accounting estimates and judgments to allocate the purchase price to the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired, including in-process research and development, and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values. Additionally, we must determine whether an acquired entity is considered to be a business or a set of net assets, because a portion of the purchase price can only be allocated to goodwill in a business combination.

On January 2, 2007, we acquired Groupe Cornéal Laboratoires, or Cornéal, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $209.1 million, net of cash acquired. On February 22, 2007, we acquired EndoArt for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $97.1 million, net of cash acquired. The purchase prices for the acquisitions were allocated to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition dates. We engaged an independent third-party valuation firm to assist us in determining the estimated fair values of in-process research and development, identifiable intangible assets and certain tangible assets. Such a valuation requires significant estimates and assumptions, including but not limited to, determining the timing and

estimated costs to complete the in-process projects, projecting regulatory approvals, estimating future cash flows, and developing appropriate discount rates. We believe the estimated fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on reasonable assumptions. However, the fair value estimates for the purchase price allocations may change during the allowable allocation period, which is up to one year from the acquisition dates, if additional information becomes available.

Discontinued Operations

On July 2, 2007, we completed the sale of the ophthalmic surgical device business that we acquired as a part of the Cornéal acquisition in January 2007, for net cash proceeds of $29.6 million. The net assets of the disposed business consisted of current assets of $22.9 million, non-current assets of $10.0 million and current liabilities of $4.2 million. In conjunction with the sale, we recognized income tax expense of $0.9 million, resulting in no net gain or loss on the disposal of the business.

The following amounts related to the ophthalmic surgical device business have been segregated from continuing operations and reported as discontinued operations through the date of disposition. We did not account for our ophthalmic surgical device business as a separate legal entity. Therefore, the following selected financial data for the discontinued operations is presented for informational purposes only and does not necessarily reflect what the net sales or earnings would have been had the business operated as a stand-alone entity. The financial information for the discontinued operations includes allocations of certain expenses to the ophthalmic surgical device business. These amounts have been allocated to the discontinued operations on the basis that is considered by management to reflect most fairly or reasonably the utilization of the services provided to, or the benefit obtained by, the ophthalmic surgical device business.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, selected financial data of the discontinued operations. There were no comparable amounts for the corresponding periods in 2006.

Selected Financial Data for Discontinued Operations


	Three months ended		Nine months ended
	September 28,		September 28,
	2007		2007
	(in millions)
Net sales	$	—	$	20.0

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes	$	2.2	$	(1.2	)
Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations	$	1.4	$	(0.8	)

Continuing Operations

Headquartered in Irvine, California, we are a technology-driven, global health care company that discovers, develops and commercializes specialty pharmaceutical and medical device products for the ophthalmic, neurological, facial aesthetics, medical dermatological, breast aesthetics, obesity intervention, urologics and other specialty markets. We are a pioneer in specialty pharmaceutical research, targeting products and technologies related to specific disease areas such as glaucoma, retinal disease, dry eye, psoriasis, acne and movement disorders. Additionally, we discover, develop and market medical devices, aesthetic-related pharmaceuticals, and over-the-counter products. Within these areas, we are an innovative leader in saline and silicone gel-filled breast implants, dermal facial fillers and obesity intervention products, therapeutic and other prescription products, and to a limited degree, over-the-counter products that are sold in more than 100 countries around the world. We employ approximately 7,500 persons around the world. Our principal markets are the United States, Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific.

Results of Continuing Operations

Through the first fiscal quarter of 2006, we operated our business on the basis of a single reportable segment — specialty pharmaceuticals. Due to the Inamed acquisition, beginning in the second fiscal quarter of 2006, we operate our business on the basis of two reportable segments — specialty pharmaceuticals and medical devices. The specialty pharmaceuticals segment produces a broad range of pharmaceutical products, including: ophthalmic products for glaucoma therapy, ocular inflammation, infection, allergy and dry eye; skin care products for acne, psoriasis and other prescription and over-the-counter dermatological products; and Botox^® for certain therapeutic and aesthetic indications. The medical devices segment produces breast implants for aesthetic augmentation and reconstructive surgery; facial aesthetics products; the LAP-BAND^® System designed to treat severe and morbid obesity and the BIB™ System for the treatment of obesity. We provide global marketing strategy teams to coordinate the development and execution of a consistent marketing strategy for our products in all geographic regions that share similar distribution channels and customers.

Management evaluates our business segments and various global product portfolios on a revenue basis, which is presented below. We also report sales performance using the non-GAAP financial measure of constant currency sales. Constant currency sales represent current period reported sales, adjusted for the translation effect of changes in average foreign exchange rates between the current period and the corresponding period in the prior year. We calculate the currency effect by comparing adjusted current period reported sales, calculated using the monthly average foreign exchange rates for the corresponding period in the prior year, to the actual current period reported sales. We routinely evaluate our net sales performance at constant currency so that sales results can be viewed without the impact of changing foreign currency exchange rates, thereby facilitating period-to-period comparisons of our sales. Generally, when the U.S. dollar either strengthens or weakens against other currencies, the growth at constant currency rates will be higher or lower, respectively, than growth reported at actual exchange rates.

The following table compares net sales by product line within each reportable segment and certain selected pharmaceutical products for the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006:


	Three months ended
	September 28,			September 29,			Change in Product Net Sales								Percent Change in Product Net Sales
(in millions)	2007			2006			Total			Performance			Currency		Total			Performance			Currency
Net Sales by Product Line:
Specialty Pharmaceuticals:
Eye Care Pharmaceuticals	$	457.7		$	403.4		$	54.3		$	42.9		$	11.4		13.5	%		10.6	%		2.9	%
Botox/Neuromodulator		296.7			237.7			59.0			52.4			6.6		24.8	%		22.0	%		2.8	%
Skin Care		29.5			34.3			(4.8	)		(4.8	)		—		(14.0	)%		(14.0	)%		—	%

Total Specialty Pharmaceuticals		783.9			675.4			108.5			90.5			18.0		16.1	%		13.4	%		2.7	%

Medical Devices:
Breast Aesthetics		69.7			54.1			15.6			13.5			2.1		28.8	%		25.0	%		3.8	%
Obesity Intervention		74.0			47.1			26.9			25.8			1.1		57.1	%		54.8	%		2.3	%
Facial Aesthetics		49.3			15.1			34.2			33.6			0.6		226.5	%		222.5	%		4.0	%

Core Medical Devices		193.0			116.3			76.7			72.9			3.8		66.0	%		62.7	%		3.3	%
Other		1.8			—			1.8			1.8			—		N/A			N/A			N/A

Total Medical Devices		194.8			116.3			78.5			74.7			3.8		67.5	%		64.2	%		3.3	%


Total product net sales	$	978.7		$	791.7		$	187.0		$	165.2		$	21.8		23.6	%		20.9	%		2.7	%


Domestic product net sales		65.4	%		68.1	%
International product net sales		34.6	%		31.9	%

Selected Product Sales (a):
Alphagan P, Alphagan and Combigan	$	89.8		$	80.0		$	9.8		$	7.4		$	2.4		12.2	%		9.3	%		2.9	%
Lumigan and Ganfort		100.4			86.4			14.0			11.2			2.8		16.2	%		13.0	%		3.2	%
Other Glaucoma		3.9			3.4			0.5			0.2			0.3		14.8	%		7.3	%		7.5	%
Restasis		88.2			69.3			18.9			18.9			—		27.3	%		27.3	%		—	%


	Nine months ended
	September 28,			September 29,			Change in Product Net Sales								Percent Change in Product Net Sales
(in millions)	2007			2006			Total			Performance			Currency		Total			Performance			Currency
Net Sales by Product Line:
Specialty Pharmaceuticals:
Eye Care Pharmaceuticals	$	1,292.1		$	1,144.5		$	147.6		$	119.6		$	28.0		12.9	%		10.4	%		2.5	%
Botox/Neuromodulator		872.0			709.1			162.9			146.7			16.2		23.0	%		20.7	%		2.3	%
Skin Care		82.7			95.7			(13.0	)		(13.0	)		—		(13.6	)%		(13.6	)%		—	%

Total Specialty Pharmaceuticals		2,246.8			1,949.3			297.5			253.3			44.2		15.3	%		13.0	%		2.3	%

Medical Devices:
Breast Aesthetics		217.8			118.7			99.1			94.9			4.2		83.5	%		79.9	%		3.6	%
Obesity Intervention		195.9			92.9			103.0			101.0			2.0		110.9	%		108.7	%		2.2	%
Facial Aesthetics		141.6			33.0			108.6			107.4			1.2		329.1	%		325.5	%		3.6	%

Core Medical Devices		555.3			244.6			310.7			303.3			7.4		127.0	%		124.0	%		3.0	%
Other		1.8			—			1.8			1.8			—		N/A			N/A			N/A

Total Medical Devices		557.1			244.6			312.5			305.1			7.4		127.8	%		124.7	%		3.1	%


Total product net sales	$	2,803.9		$	2,193.9		$	610.0		$	558.4		$	51.6		27.8	%		25.5	%		2.3	%


Domestic product net sales		65.7	%		67.6	%
International product net sales		34.3	%		32.4	%

Selected Product Sales (a):
Alphagan P, Alphagan and Combigan	$	244.8		$	221.2		$	23.6		$	17.5		$	6.1		10.6	%		7.9	%		2.7	%
Lumigan and Ganfort		284.0			241.0			43.0			35.5			7.5		17.8	%		14.7	%		3.1	%
Other Glaucoma		11.4			12.0			(0.6	)		(1.3	)		0.7		(5.0	)%		(10.6	)%		5.6	%
Restasis		243.9			201.0			42.9			42.9			—		21.4	%		21.4	%		—	%


(a)		Percentage change in selected product net sales is calculated on amounts reported to the nearest whole dollar.

Product Net Sales

The $187.0 million increase in product net sales in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third quarter of 2006 primarily resulted from an increase of $108.5 million in our specialty pharmaceuticals product net sales and an increase of $78.5 million in our medical device product net sales. The increase in specialty pharmaceuticals product net sales is due primarily to increases in sales of our eye care pharmaceuticals and Botox^® product lines. The increase in medical device product net sales is due primarily to increases in sales of our breast aesthetics, obesity intervention and facial aesthetics product lines.

Eye care pharmaceuticals sales increased in the third quarter of 2007 compared to third quarter of 2006 primarily because of strong growth in sales of Restasis^®, our therapeutic treatment for chronic dry eye disease, an increase in sales of our glaucoma drug Lumigan^®, including strong sales growth from Ganfort^®, our Lumigan^® and timolol

combination, which we launched in 2006 in certain European markets, an increase in product net sales of Alphagan^® P 0.1%, our most recent generation of Alphagan^® for the treatment of glaucoma that we launched in the United States in the first quarter of 2006, an increase in sales of Combigan™ in Europe, Latin America, Asia and Canada, an increase in sales of Acular LS^®, our more recent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory, and growth in sales of eye drop products, primarily Refresh^® and Optive™, our artificial tear recently launched in the United States, Europe and Latin America. This increase in eye care pharmaceuticals sales was partially offset by lower sales of Alphagan^® P 0.15% due to a general decline in U.S. wholesaler demand resulting from a decrease in promotion efforts, and lower sales of Acular^®, our older generation anti-inflammatory. We continue to believe that generic formulations of Alphagan^® may have a negative effect on future net sales of our Alphagan^® franchise. We estimate the majority of the increase in our eye care pharmaceuticals sales was due to a shift in sales mix to a greater percentage of higher priced products, and an overall net increase in the volume of product sold. We increased the published list prices for certain eye care pharmaceutical products in the United States, ranging from seven percent to nine percent, effective February 3, 2007. We increased the published U.S. list price for Restasis^® by seven percent, Lumigan^® by seven percent, Alphagan^® P 0.15% and Alphagan^® P 0.1% by eight percent, Acular LS^® by nine percent, Elestat^® by seven percent, and Zymar^® by seven percent. This increase in prices had a positive net effect on our U.S. sales for the third quarter of 2007, but the actual net effect is difficult to determine due to the various managed care sales rebate and other incentive programs in which we participate. Wholesaler buying patterns and the change in dollar value of prescription product mix also affected our reported net sales dollars, although we are unable to determine the impact of these effects. We have a policy to attempt to maintain average U.S. wholesaler inventory levels of our specialty pharmaceutical products at an amount less than eight weeks of our net sales. At September 28, 2007, based on available external and internal information, we believe the amount of average U.S. wholesaler inventories of our specialty pharmaceutical products was near the lower end of our stated policy levels.

Botox^® sales increased in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third quarter of 2006 primarily due to strong growth in demand in the United States and in international markets for both cosmetic and therapeutic use. Effective January 1, 2007, we increased the published price for Botox^® and Botox^® Cosmetic in the United States by approximately four percent, which may have had a positive effect on our U.S. sales growth in the third quarter of 2007, primarily related to sales of Botox^® Cosmetic. In the United States, the actual net effect from the increase in price for sales of Botox^® for therapeutic use is difficult to determine, primarily due to rebate programs with U.S. federal and state government agencies. International Botox^® sales benefited from strong sales growth for both cosmetic and therapeutic use in Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific. We believe our worldwide market share for neuromodulators, including Botox^®, is currently over 85%.

Skin care sales decreased in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third quarter of 2006 primarily due to lower sales of Tazorac^® in the United States, principally due to the impact of a negative change in formulary positions at key managed care plans from the end of 2006, and physician dispensed creams, including M.D. Forte^® and Prevage™ MD in the United States, partially offset by an increase in new product sales of Vivité™, a physician dispensed line of skin care products. Net sales of Tazorac^®, Zorac^® and Avage^® decreased $4.3 million, or 16.3%, to $22.1 million in the third quarter of 2007, compared to $26.4 million in the third quarter of 2006. The decrease in sales of Tazorac^®, Zorac^® and Avage^® resulted primarily from lower U.S. wholesaler demand, partially offset by an increase in the published U.S. list price for these products of nine percent effective February 3, 2007.

Breast aesthetics product net sales, which consist primarily of sales of silicone gel-filled and saline-filled breast implants and tissue expanders, increased $15.6 million, or 28.8%, to $69.7 million in the third quarter of 2007 compared to $54.1 million in the third quarter of 2006 primarily due to strong sales growth in North America, Europe, Latin America and Asia. Net sales were positively impacted in the United States in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third quarter of 2006 by the November 2006 U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and Health Canada, approvals of certain silicone gel-filled breast implants for breast augmentation, reconstruction and revision and the transition of the market from lower priced saline products to higher priced silicone products in North America.

Obesity intervention product net sales, which consist primarily of sales of devices used for minimally invasive long-term treatments of obesity such as our LAP-BAND^® and LAP-BAND AP^tm Systems and BIB™ System, increased $26.9 million, or 57.1%, to $74.0 million in the third quarter of 2007 compared to $47.1 million in the third quarter of 2006 primarily due to strong sales growth in North America, Europe and Asia. Net sales of obesity intervention products were also positively benefited in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third quarter of

2006 by an approximately three percent increase in the published U.S. list price for our LAP-BAND^{^®}System effective July 2, 2007 and the introduction in the United States of a premium priced, next generation Advanced Platform (AP) Band.

Facial aesthetics product net sales, which consist primarily of sales of hyaluronic acid-based and collagen-based dermal fillers used to correct facial wrinkles, increased $34.2 million, or 226.5%, to $49.3 million in the third quarter of 2007 compared to $15.1 million in the third quarter of 2006 primarily due to strong sales growth in North America, Europe and Asia Pacific. Net sales were positively impacted in the United States in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third quarter of 2006 by the January 2007 launch of our FDA approved hyaluronic acid-based dermal fillers Juvéderm™ Ultra and Juvéderm™ Ultra Plus. This increase in net sales was partially offset by a general decline in sales of collagen-based dermal fillers due to reduced promotion efforts. Net sales of facial aesthetic products in Europe and Asia were positively impacted in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third quarter of 2006 by the acquisition of Cornéal in January 2007.

Net sales of other medical devices were $1.8 million in the third quarter of 2007 and consist of sales of ophthalmic surgical devices under a manufacturing and supply agreement. The manufacturing and supply agreement was entered into in conjunction with the July 2007 sale of the former Cornéal ophthalmic surgical device business, and we currently expect this agreement to be substantially completed by the end of 2007.

Foreign currency changes increased product net sales by $21.8 million in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third quarter of 2006, primarily due to the strengthening of the euro, Brazilian real, Canadian dollar, Australian dollar and the British pound compared to the U.S. dollar.

U.S. sales as a percentage of total product net sales decreased by 2.7 percentage points to 65.4% in the third quarter of 2007 compared to U.S. sales of 68.1% in the third quarter of 2006, primarily due to an increase in international specialty pharmaceutical product net sales as a percentage of total product net sales. The increase in the international specialty pharmaceuticals net sales as a percentage of total product net sales was primarily due to growth in international product net sales of Botox^® and eye care pharmaceuticals, partially offset by a decrease in U.S. skin care net sales.

The $610.0 million increase in product net sales in the first nine months of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 primarily resulted from an increase of $297.5 million in our specialty pharmaceuticals product net sales and an increase of $312.5 million in our medical device product net sales. The increase in product net sales for the first nine months of 2007 is primarily due to the same factors discussed above with respect to the increase in product net sales in the third quarter of 2007. In addition, net sales of eye care pharmaceuticals benefited from an increase in net sales of Elestat^®, our topical antihistamine used for the prevention of itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis, and Zymar^®, an ophthalmic anti-infective product for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis, in the first nine months of 2007 compared to the first nine months of 2006. The increase in medical device product net sales for the first nine months of 2007 compared to the first nine months of 2006 was also positively benefited by the March 2006 Inamed and January 2007 Cornéal acquisitions.

Foreign currency changes increased product net sales by $51.6 million in the first nine months of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006, primarily due to the strengthening of the euro, Brazilian real, British pound, Australian dollar and the Canadian dollar compared to the U.S. dollar.

U.S. sales as a percentage of total product net sales decreased by 1.9 percentage points to 65.7% in the first nine months of 2007 compared to U.S. sales of 67.6% in the first nine months of 2006, due primarily to an increase in total medical device net sales, which have a higher percentage of international product net sales than our specialty pharmaceutical net sales, and an increase in international specialty pharmaceutical product net sales as a percentage of total specialty pharmaceutical net sales. The increase in the international percentage of specialty pharmaceutical net sales was primarily due to growth in international product net sales of Botox^® and eye care pharmaceuticals, partially offset by a decrease in U.S. skin care net sales.

Other Revenues

Other revenues decreased $0.1 million to $15.0 million in the third quarter of 2007 compared to $15.1 million in the third quarter of 2006. The decrease in other revenues is due to a $1.3 million decrease in reimbursement income, primarily related to services provided in connection with a contractual agreement for the development of Posurdex^® for the ophthalmic specialty pharmaceutical market in Japan, partially offset by an increase of approximately $1.2 million in royalty income earned, principally from sales of Botox^® in Japan and China by GlaxoSmithKline, or GSK, under a license agreement, and other miscellaneous royalty income.

Other revenues increased $4.1 million to $44.4 million in the first nine months of 2007 compared to $40.3 million in the first nine months of 2006 primarily due to a $6.7 million increase in royalty income earned, partially offset by a $2.6 million decrease in reimbursement income, principally due to the same factors described above with respect to the decrease in reimbursement income and increase in royalty income in the third quarter of 2007.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales increased $5.8 million, or 3.5%, in the third quarter of 2007 to $173.5 million, or 17.7% of product net sales, compared to $167.7 million, or 21.2% of product net sales, in the third quarter of 2006. Cost of sales includes charges of $0.5 million in the third quarter of 2007 and $23.9 million in the third quarter of 2006 for purchase accounting fair-market value inventory adjustment rollouts related to the January 2007 acquisition of Cornéal and the March 2006 acquisition of Inamed, respectively. Excluding the effect of these purchase accounting charges, cost of sales increased $29.2 million, or 20.3%, in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third quarter of 2006. This increase in cost of sales, excluding the effect of purchase accounting charges, is primarily a result of the 23.6% increase in product net sales and an increase in the mix of medical device product net sales as a percentage of total product net sales. Our medical device product net sales generally have a higher cost of sales percentage compared to our specialty pharmaceutical products. Cost of sales as a percentage of product net sales in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third quarter of 2006 also benefited from an increase in the mix of sales related to the January 2007 launch of Juvéderm™ Ultra, Juvéderm™ Ultra Plus and the November 2006 FDA approval of certain silicone gel-filled breast implants in the United States, which generally have lower cost of sales as a percentage of product net sales compared to our collagen-based dermal fillers and saline-filled breast implants.

Cost of sales increased $60.2 million, or 13.9%, in the first nine months of 2007 to $493.4 million, or 17.6% of product net sales, compared to $433.2 million, or 19.7% of product net sales, in the first nine months of 2006. Cost of sales includes charges of $0.5 million in the first nine months of 2007 and $47.9 million in the first nine months of 2006 for purchase accounting fair-market value inventory adjustment rollouts related to the January 2007 acquisition of Cornéal and the March 2006 acquisition of Inamed, respectively. Excluding the effect of these purchase accounting charges, cost of sales increased $107.6 million, or 27.9%, in the first nine months of 2007 compared to the first nine months of 2006. This increase in cost of sales, excluding the effect of purchase accounting charges, in the first nine months of 2007 compared to the first nine months of 2006 is primarily a result of the 27.8% increase in product net sales. Cost of sales as a percentage of product net sales, excluding the effect of purchase accounting charges, in the first nine months of 2007 compared to the first nine months of 2006 was negatively impacted by the increase in medical device product net sales, which generally have a higher cost of sales percentage compared to our specialty pharmaceutical products.

Selling, General and Administrative

Selling, general and administrative, or SG&A, expenses increased $31.6 million, or 8.7%, to $395.6 million, or 40.4% of product net sales, in the third quarter of 2007 compared to $364.0 million, or 46.0% of product net sales, in the third quarter of 2006. The increase in SG&A expenses in dollars primarily relates to an increase in promotion, selling and marketing expenses, partially offset by a reduction in general and administrative expenses. Promotion expenses primarily increased due to additional costs to promote our medical device product lines that we obtained in the Inamed acquisition, including an increase in direct-to-consumer advertising and other promotional costs for our LAP-BAND^® System, Juvéderm^tm Ultra and Juvéderm^tm Ultra Plus dermal fillers, and Natrelle^® silicone breast implant products. The increase in selling and marketing expenses principally relate to personnel and related incentive compensation costs driven by the expansion of our U.S. and European facial aesthetics, neuroscience, breast implant and obesity intervention sales forces. General and administrative expenses decreased in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third quarter of 2006 primarily due to the impact of a $28.5 million contribution in the third quarter of 2006 to The Allergan Foundation, partially offset by an increase in legal, finance, information systems and facilities costs in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third quarter of 2006. In the third quarter of 2007, SG&A expenses

included $1.9 million of integration and transition costs related to the Inamed and Cornéal acquisitions. In the third quarter of 2006, SG&A expenses included $4.9 million of integration and transition costs related to the acquisition of Inamed and $0.2 million of transition and duplicate operating expenses primarily related to the restructuring and streamlining of our European operations.

SG&A expenses increased $239.7 million, or 24.6%, to $1,215.1 million, or 43.3% of product net sales, in the first nine months of 2007 compared to $975.4 million, or 44.5% of product net sales, in the first nine months of 2006. The increase in SG&A expenses in the first nine months of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 primarily resulted from the same factors described above with respect to the increase in SG&A expenses in the third quarter of 2007. The increase in selling and marketing expenses in the first nine months of 2007 compared to the first nine months of 2006 was also impacted by an increase in our U.S. and European ophthalmology sales forces. Additionally, we did not incur any significant SG&A expenses related to our medical device product lines prior to our acquisition of Inamed on March 23, 2006. In the first nine months of 2007, SG&A expenses also include $11.1 million of integration and transition costs related to the Inamed and Cornéal acquisitions, $6.4 million of expenses associated with the settlement of a patent dispute assumed in the Inamed acquisition that related to tissue expanders and $2.3 million of expenses associated with the settlement of a pre-existing unfavorable distribution agreement with Cornéal. In the first nine months of 2006, SG&A expenses included a $28.5 million contribution to The Allergan Foundation, $14.6 million of integration and transition costs related to the acquisition of Inamed and $5.7 million of transition and duplicate operating expenses, including a loss of $3.4 million on the sale of our Mougins, France facility, primarily related to the restructuring and streamlining of our European operations.

Research and Development

Research and development, or R&D, expenses increased $44.0 million, or 36.5%, to $164.4 million in the third quarter of 2007, or 16.8% of product net sales, compared to $120.4 million, or 15.2% of product net sales, in the third quarter of 2006. The increase in R&D expenses primarily resulted from higher rates of investment in our eye care pharmaceuticals and Botox^® product lines, increased spending for new pharmaceutical technologies, and the addition of development expenses associated with our medical device products acquired in the Inamed, Cornéal and EndoArt acquisitions. R&D spending increases in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third quarter of 2006 were primarily driven by an increase in clinical trial costs associated with Posurdex^®, Trivaris^tm, certain Botox^® indications for overactive bladder and migraine headache, and alpha agonists for the treatment of neuropathic pain, an increase in costs related to breast implant follow-up studies, and additional spending on obesity intervention technologies.

R&D expenses decreased $401.7 million, or 43.2%, to $528.4 million in the first nine months of 2007, or 18.8% of product net sales, compared to $930.1 million, or 42.4% of product net sales, in the first nine months of 2006. R&D expenses for the first nine months of 2007 include a charge of $72.0 million for in-process research and development assets acquired in the EndoArt acquisition, and for the first nine months of 2006 include a charge of $579.3 million for in-process research and development assets acquired in the Inamed acquisition. In-process research and development represents an estimate of the fair value of purchased in-process technology as of the date of acquisition that had not reached technical feasibility and had no alternative future uses in its current state. Excluding the effect of the in-process research and development charges, R&D expenses increased by $105.6 million, or 30.1%, to $456.4 million in the first nine months of 2007, or 16.3% of product net sales, compared to $350.8 million, or 16.0% of product net sales in first nine months of 2006. The increase in R&D expenses in dollars, excluding the in-process research and development charges, was primarily a result of the same factors described above with respect to the increase in R&D expenses in the third quarter of 2007.

Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets

Amortization of acquired intangible assets increased $3.8 million to $28.7 million in the third quarter of 2007, or 2.9% of product net sales, compared to $24.9 million, or 3.1% of product net sales, in the third quarter of 2006. This increase in amortization expense is primarily due to an increase in amortization of acquired intangible assets related to the Cornéal and EndoArt acquisitions.

Amortization of acquired intangible assets increased $31.3 million to $86.1 million in the first nine months of 2007, or 3.1% of product net sales, compared to $54.8 million, or 2.5% of product net sales, in the first nine months

of 2006. This increase in amortization expense in dollars and as a percentage of product net sales is primarily due to an increase in amortization of acquired intangible assets related to the Inamed, Cornéal and EndoArt acquisitions.

Restructuring Charges, Integration Costs, and Transition and Duplicate Operating Expenses

Restructuring charges in the third quarter of 2007 were $11.0 million compared to $8.6 million in the third quarter of 2006. Restructuring charges in the first nine months of 2007 were $24.3 million compared to $17.1 million in the first nine months of 2006. The $2.4 million increase in restructuring charges in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third quarter of 2006 was primarily due to an increase in restructuring costs associated with the integration of the Cornéal operations, partially offset by a decrease in restructuring costs associated with the integration of the Inamed operations and the streamlining of our European operations. The $7.2 million increase in restructuring charges in the first nine months of 2007 compared to the first nine months of 2006 was primarily due to an increase in restructuring costs associated with the integration of the Cornéal and Inamed operations, partially offset by a decrease in restructuring costs associated with the streamlining of our European operations.

Restructuring and Integration of Cornéal Operations

In connection with our January 2007 Cornéal acquisition, we initiated a restructuring and integration plan to merge the Cornéal facial aesthetics business operations with our operations. Specifically, the restructuring and integration activities involve moving key business functions to our locations, integrating Cornéal’s distributor operations with our existing distribution network and integrating Cornéal’s information systems with our information systems. We currently estimate that the total pre-tax charges resulting from the restructuring and integration of the Cornéal facial aesthetics business operations will be between $29.0 million and $37.0 million, consisting primarily of contract termination costs, salaries, travel and consulting costs, all of which are expected to be cash expenditures.

We began to record costs associated with the restructuring and integration of the Cornéal facial aesthetics business in the first quarter of 2007 and expect to continue to incur costs up through and including the second quarter of 2008. The restructuring charges primarily consist of employee severance, one-time termination benefits, employee relocation, termination of duplicative distributor agreements and other costs related to the restructuring of the Cornéal operations. During the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2007, we recorded $11.2 million and $13.2 million, respectively, related to the restructuring of the Cornéal operations. The integration and transition costs primarily consist of salaries, travel, communications, recruitment and consulting costs. During the three month period ended September 28, 2007, we recorded $1.3 million of integration and transition costs associated with the Cornéal integration, consisting of $0.1 million in cost of sales and $1.2 million in SG&A expenses. During the nine month period ended September 28, 2007, we recorded $6.9 million of integration and transition costs, consisting of $0.1 million in cost of sales and $6.8 million in SG&A expenses.

The following table presents the cumulative restructuring activities related to the Cornéal operations during the nine month period ended September 28, 2007:


	Employee		Contract Termination
	Severance		Costs			Total
	(in millions)
Net charge during the nine month period ended September 28, 2007	$	4.9	$	8.3		$	13.2
Spending		—		(2.9	)		(2.9	)

Balance at September 28, 2007 (included in “Other accrued expenses”)	$	4.9	$	5.4		$	10.3

Restructuring and Integration of Inamed Operations

In connection with the March 2006 Inamed acquisition, we initiated a global restructuring and integration plan to merge Inamed’s operations with our operations and to capture synergies through the centralization of certain general and administrative and commercial functions. Specifically, the restructuring and integration activities involve eliminating certain general and administrative positions, moving key commercial Inamed business functions to our locations around the world, integrating Inamed’s distributor operations with our existing distribution network and integrating Inamed’s information systems with our information systems.

We have incurred, and anticipate that we will continue to incur, charges relating to severance, relocation and one-time termination benefits, payments to public employment and training programs, integration and transition costs, and contract termination costs in connection with the Inamed restructuring. We currently estimate that the total pre-tax charges resulting from the restructuring, including integration and transition costs, will be between $47.0 million and $57.0 million, all of which are expected to be cash expenditures. In addition to the pre-tax charges, we expect to incur capital expenditures of approximately $15.0 million to $20.0 million, primarily related to the integration of information systems. We also expect to pay an additional amount of approximately $1.5 million to $2.0 million for taxes related to intercompany transfers of trade businesses and net assets.

The foregoing estimates are based on assumptions relating to, among other things, a reduction of approximately 60 positions, principally general and administrative positions at Inamed locations. These workforce reduction activities began in the second quarter of 2006 and are expected to be substantially completed by the end of 2007. Charges associated with the workforce reduction, including severance, relocation and one-time termination benefits, and payments to public employment and training programs, are currently expected to total approximately $8.0 million to $10.0 million. Estimated charges include estimates for contract and lease termination costs, including the termination of duplicative distribution arrangements. Contract and lease termination costs are expected to total approximately $13.0 million to $17.0 million. We began to record these costs in the second quarter of 2006 and expect to continue to incur them up through and including the fourth quarter of 2007.

On January 30, 2007, our Board of Directors approved an additional plan to restructure and eventually sell or close our collagen manufacturing facility in Fremont, California that we acquired in the Inamed acquisition. This plan is the result of a reduction in anticipated future market demand for human and bovine collagen products. In connection with the restructuring and eventual sale or closure of the collagen manufacturing facility, we estimate that total pre-tax charges for severance, lease termination and contract settlement costs will be between $6.0 million and $8.0 million, all of which are expected to be cash expenditures. The foregoing estimates are based on assumptions relating to, among other things, a reduction of approximately 69 positions, consisting principally of manufacturing positions at our facility, that are expected to result in estimated total employee severance costs of approximately $1.5 million to $2.0 million. Estimated charges for contract and lease termination costs are expected to total approximately $4.5 million to $6.0 million. We began to record these costs in the first quarter of 2007 and expect to continue to incur them up through and including the fourth quarter of 2008. Prior to any closure or sale of the collagen manufacturing facility, we intend to manufacture a sufficient quantity of inventories of collagen products to meet estimated market demand through 2010.

As of September 28, 2007, we have recorded cumulative pre-tax restructuring charges of $23.4 million, cumulative pre-tax integration and transition costs of $25.1 million, and $1.6 million for income tax costs related to intercompany transfers of trade businesses and net assets. The restructuring charges primarily consist of employee severance, one-time termination benefits, employee relocation, termination of duplicative distributor agreements and other costs related to restructuring the former Inamed operations. During the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2007, we recorded a $0.3 million restructuring charge reversal and $9.9 million of restructuring charges, respectively. The integration and transition costs primarily consist of salaries, travel, communications, recruitment and consulting costs. During the three month period ended September 28, 2007, we recorded $0.8 million of integration and transition costs associated with the Inamed integration, consisting of $0.1 million in cost of sales and $0.7 million in SG&A expenses. During the nine month period ended September 28, 2007, we recorded $4.4 million of integration and transition costs, consisting of $0.1 million in cost of sales and $4.3 million in SG&A expenses.

During the three and nine month periods ended September 29, 2006, we recorded pre-tax restructuring charges of $6.4 million and $8.1 million, respectively, related to restructuring the former Inamed operations. For the three month period ended September 29, 2006, we recorded $5.1 million of integration and transition costs associated with the Inamed integration, consisting of $0.2 million in cost of sales and $4.9 million in SG&A expenses. For the nine month period ended September 29, 2006, we recorded $15.5 million of integration and transition costs associated with the Inamed integration, consisting of $0.7 million in cost of sales, $14.6 million in SG&A expenses and $0.2 million in R&D expenses. During the three month period ended September 29, 2006, we also paid $0.8 million for income tax costs related to intercompany transfers of trade businesses and net assets, which we included in our provision for income taxes.

The following table presents the cumulative restructuring activities related to the Inamed operations through September 28, 2007:


	Employee			Contract and Lease
	Severance			Termination Costs			Total
	(in millions)
Net charge during 2006	$	6.1		$	7.4		$	13.5
Spending		(2.1	)		(2.5	)		(4.6	)

Balance at December 31, 2006		4.0			4.9			8.9
Net charge during the nine month period ended September 28, 2007		3.4			6.5			9.9
Spending		(4.1	)		(9.1	)		(13.2	)

Balance at September 28, 2007 (included in “Other accrued expenses”)	$	3.3		$	2.3		$	5.6

Restructuring and Streamlining of European Operations

Effective January 2005, our Board of Directors approved the initiation and implementation of a restructuring of certain activities related to our European operations to optimize operations, improve resource allocation and create a scalable, lower cost and more efficient operating model for our European R&D and commercial activities. Specifically, the restructuring involved moving key European R&D and select commercial functions from our Mougins, France and other European locations to our Irvine, California, Marlow, United Kingdom and Dublin, Ireland facilities and streamlining functions in our European management services group. The workforce reduction began in the first quarter of 2005 and was substantially completed by the close of the second quarter of 2006.

As of December 31, 2006, we substantially completed all activities related to the restructuring and streamlining of our European operations. As of December 31, 2006, we recorded cumulative pre-tax restructuring charges of $37.5 million, primarily related to severance, relocation and one-time termination benefits, payments to public employment and training programs, contract termination costs and capital and other asset-related expenses. During the first nine months of 2007, we recorded an additional $1.0 million of restructuring charges for an abandoned leased facility related to our European operations. During the three and nine month periods ended September 29, 2006, we recorded $2.0 million and $8.1 million, respectively, of restructuring charges related to our European operations. As of September 28, 2007, remaining accrued expenses of $6.6 million for restructuring charges related to the restructuring and streamlining of our European operations are included in “Other accrued expenses” and “Other liabilities” in the amount of $3.1 million and $3.5 million, respectively.

Additionally, as of December 31, 2006, we have incurred cumulative transition and duplicate operating expenses of $11.8 million relating primarily to legal, consulting, recruiting, information system implementation costs and taxes in connection with the European restructuring activities. For the three month period ended September 29, 2006, we recorded $0.3 million of transition and duplicate operating expenses, consisting of $0.2 million in SG&A expenses and $0.1 million in R&D expenses. For the nine month period ended September 29, 2006, we recorded $2.8 million of transition and duplicate operating expenses, consisting of $2.3 million in SG&A expenses and $0.5 million in R&D expenses. Additionally, during the nine month period ended September 29, 2006, we recorded a $3.4 million loss related to the sale of our Mougins, France facility, which was included in SG&A expenses. There were no transition and duplicate operating expenses related to the restructuring and streamlining of our European operations recorded in the first nine months of 2007.

Other Restructuring Activities

Included in the third quarter and first nine months of 2007 are $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in restructuring charges related to the February 2007 EndoArt acquisition. Included in the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 are $0.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively, of restructuring charges related to the scheduled June 2005 termination of our manufacturing and supply agreement with Advanced Medical Optics, which was spun-off in June 2002. Also included in the first nine months of 2006 is a $0.4 million restructuring charge reversal related to the streamlining of our operations in Japan.

Operating Income (Loss)

Management evaluates business segment performance on an operating income (loss) basis exclusive of general and administrative expenses and other indirect costs, restructuring charges, in-process research and development expenses, amortization of identifiable intangible assets related to business acquisitions and certain other adjustments, which are not allocated to our business segments for performance assessment by our chief operating decision maker. Other adjustments excluded from our business segments for purposes of performance assessment represent income or expenses that do not reflect, according to established company-defined criteria, operating income or expenses associated with our core business activities.

General and administrative expenses, other indirect costs and other adjustments not allocated to our business segments for purposes of performance assessment consisted of the following items: for the third quarter of 2007, general and administrative expenses of $69.4 million, integration and transition costs related to the Inamed and Cornéal acquisitions of $2.1 million, a purchase accounting fair-market value inventory adjustment related to the Cornéal acquisition of $0.5 million and other net indirect costs of $2.9 million; for the third quarter of 2006, general and administrative expenses of $64.6 million, a contribution to The Allergan Foundation of $28.5 million, a purchase accounting fair-market value inventory adjustment related to the Inamed acquisition of $23.9 million, integration and transition costs related to the former Inamed operations of $5.1 million, transition and duplicate operating expenses related to the restructuring and streamlining of our operations in Europe of $0.3 million and other net indirect costs of $0.5 million; for the first nine months of 2007, general and administrative expenses of $213.6 million, integration and transition costs related to the Inamed and Cornéal acquisitions of $11.3 million, $6.4 million of expenses associated with the settlement of a patent dispute, $2.3 million of expenses associated with the settlement of a pre-existing unfavorable distribution agreement with Cornéal, a purchase accounting fair-market value inventory adjustment related to the Cornéal acquisition of $0.5 million and other net indirect costs of $13.7 million; and for the first nine months of 2006, general and administrative expenses of $173.2 million, a contribution to The Allergan Foundation of $28.5 million, a purchase accounting fair-market value inventory adjustment related to the Inamed acquisition of $47.9 million, integration and transition costs related to the former Inamed operations of $15.5 million, transition and duplicate operating expenses related to the restructuring and streamlining of our operations in Europe of $6.2 million and other net indirect costs of $0.1 million.

The following table presents operating income for each reportable segment for the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006 and a reconciliation of our segments operating income to consolidated operating income (loss):


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 28,		September 29,		September 28,		September 29,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
	(in millions)				(in millions)
Operating income (loss):
Specialty pharmaceuticals	$	277.1	$	235.6	$	751.2	$	641.9
Medical devices		52.8		36.7		163.9		88.6

Total segments		329.9		272.3		915.1		730.5
General and administrative expenses, other indirect costs and other adjustments		74.9		122.9		247.8		271.4
In-process research and development		—		—		72.0		579.3
Amortization of acquired intangible assets (a)		23.5		19.6		70.0		39.1
Restructuring charges		11.0		8.6		24.3		17.1

Total operating income (loss)	$	220.5	$	121.2	$	501.0	$	(176.4	)


(a)		Represents amortization of identifiable intangible assets related to the Inamed, Cornéal and EndoArt acquisitions.

Our consolidated operating income in the third quarter of 2007 was $220.5 million, or 22.5% of product net sales, compared to consolidated operating income of $121.2 million, or 15.3% of product net sales in the third quarter of 2006. The $99.3 million increase in consolidated operating income was due to a $187.0 million increase in product net sales, partially offset by a $0.1 million decrease in other revenues, a $5.8 million increase in cost of sales, a $31.6 million increase in SG&A expenses, a $44.0 million increase in R&D expenses, a $3.8 million increase in amortization of acquired intangible assets and a $2.4 million increase in restructuring charges.

Our specialty pharmaceuticals segment operating income in the third quarter of 2007 was $277.1 million, compared to operating income of $235.6 million in the third quarter of 2006. The $41.5 million increase in specialty pharmaceuticals segment operating income was due primarily to an increase in product net sales of our eye care pharmaceuticals and Botox^® product lines, partially offset by an increase in cost of sales, an increase in promotion, selling and marketing expenses, primarily due to increased sales personnel costs and additional promotion and marketing expenses to support our expanded selling efforts, and an increase in R&D expenses.

Our medical devices segment operating income in the third quarter of 2007 was $52.8 million, compared to operating income of $36.7 million in the third quarter of 2006. The increase in our medical devices segment operating income of $16.1 million in the third quarter of 2007 was due primarily to an increase in product net sales, and the combined operating results of the Cornéal and EndoArt acquisitions, partially offset by an increase in cost of sales, an increase in promotion, selling and marketing expenses, including an increase in direct-to-consumer advertising expenses, and an increase in R&D expenses.

Our consolidated operating income in the first nine months of 2007 was $501.0 million, or 17.9% of product net sales, compared to a consolidated operating loss of $176.4 million, or (8.0)% of product net sales in the first nine months of 2006. The $677.4 million increase in consolidated operating income was due to a $610.0 million increase in product net sales, a $4.1 million increase in other revenues, and a $401.7 million decrease in R&D expenses, partially offset by a $60.2 million increase in cost of sales, a $239.7 million increase in SG&A expenses, a $31.3 million increase in amortization of acquired intangible assets and a $7.2 million increase in restructuring charges.

Our specialty pharmaceuticals segment operating income for the nine month period ended September 28, 2007 was $751.2 million, compared to operating income of $641.9 million for the nine month period ended September 29, 2006. The $109.3 million increase in specialty pharmaceuticals segment operating income was due primarily to the same reasons discussed in the analysis of the third quarter of 2007.

Our medical devices segment operating income for the nine month period ended September 28, 2007 was $163.9 million, compared to operating income of $88.6 million for the nine month period ended September 29, 2006. The

increase in our medical devices segment operating income of $75.3 million was due to the combined operating results of the Inamed, Cornéal and EndoArt acquisitions in 2007 compared to only six months of operating results for the Inamed acquisition only in 2006.

Non-Operating Income and Expenses

Total net non-operating expenses in the third quarter of 2007 were $9.2 million compared to $0.5 million in the third quarter of 2006. Interest income in the third quarter of 2007 was $18.4 million compared to interest income of $12.8 million in the third quarter of 2006. The increase in interest income was primarily due to higher average cash equivalent balances, earning interest, of approximately $329 million and an increase in average interest rates earned on all cash equivalent balances earning interest of approximately 0.1% in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third quarter of 2006. Interest expense increased $5.6 million to $17.5 million in the third quarter of 2007 compared to $11.9 million in the third quarter of 2006 primarily due to a $4.3 million reversal of previously accrued statutory interest expense included in the third quarter of 2006 associated with the resolution of several significant uncertain income tax audit issues. During the third quarter of 2007, we recorded a net unrealized gain on derivative instruments of $0.4 million compared to a net unrealized gain of $0.2 million in the third quarter of 2006. Other, net expense was $10.5 million in the third quarter of 2007, consisting primarily of $10.3 million in net realized losses from foreign currency transactions. Other, net expense was $1.7 million in the third quarter of 2006, which includes net realized losses from foreign currency transactions of $1.4 million.

Total net non-operating expenses in the first nine months of 2007 were $22.1 million compared to $13.7 million in the first nine months of 2006. Interest income in the first nine months of 2007 was $48.6 million compared to interest income of $34.3 million in the first nine months of 2006. The increase in interest income was primarily due to a $4.9 million reversal of previously recognized estimated statutory interest income included in the first nine months of 2006 related to a matter involving the recovery of previously paid state income taxes, higher average cash equivalent balances, earning interest, of approximately $200 million and an increase in average interest rates earned on all cash equivalent balances earning interest of approximately 0.3% in the first nine months of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. Interest expense increased $13.3 million to $53.5 million in the first nine months of 2007 compared to $40.2 million in the first nine months of 2006, primarily due to an increase in average outstanding borrowings for the first nine months of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 and a $4.9 million reversal of previously accrued statutory interest expense included in the first nine months of 2006 associated with the resolution of several significant uncertain income tax audit issues, partially offset by the write-off of unamortized debt origination fees of $4.4 million in the first nine months of 2006 due to the redemption of our Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due 2022. We incurred a substantial increase in borrowings to fund the Inamed acquisition on March 23, 2006. During the first nine months of 2007, we recorded a net unrealized loss on derivative instruments of $1.3 million compared to a net unrealized loss of $1.0 million in the first nine months of 2006. We recorded a net gain of $0.3 million on the sale of third party equity investments in the first nine months of 2006. Other, net expense was $15.9 million in the first nine months of 2007, consisting primarily of $15.9 million in net realized losses from foreign currency transactions. Other, net expense was $7.1 million in the first nine months of 2006, which includes $4.8 million of accrued costs for a previously disclosed contingency involving non-income taxes in Brazil and net realized losses from foreign currency transactions of $2.5 million.

Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2007 was 26.2%. Included in our operating income for the third quarter of 2007 are total integration and transition costs of $2.1 million related to the Inamed and Cornéal acquisitions and total restructuring charges of $11.0 million. In the third quarter of 2007, we recorded income tax benefits of $0.6 million related to the total integration and transition costs and $3.6 million related to the total restructuring charges. Excluding the impact of the total pre-tax charges of $13.1 million and the total net income tax benefit of $4.2 million for the items discussed above, our adjusted effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2007 was 26.5%. We believe the use of an adjusted effective tax rate provides a more meaningful measure of the impact of income taxes on our results of operations because it excludes the effect of certain items that are not included as part of our core business activities. This allows stockholders to better determine the effective tax rate associated with our core business activities.

The calculation of our adjusted effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2007 is summarized below:


	2007
	(in millions)
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest, as reported	$	211.3
Total integration and transition costs		2.1
Total restructuring charges		11.0

	$	224.4


Provision for income taxes, as reported	$	55.3
Income tax benefit for:
Total integration and transition costs		0.6
Total restructuring charges		3.6

	$	59.5


Adjusted effective tax rate		26.5	%

Our effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2007 was 29.0%. Included in our operating income for the first nine months of 2007 are pre-tax charges of $72.0 million for in-process research and development acquired in the EndoArt acquisition, $2.3 million of expenses associated with the settlement of a pre-existing unfavorable distribution agreement with Cornéal, total integration and transition costs of $11.3 million related to the Inamed and Cornéal acquisitions, total restructuring charges of $24.3 million and a legal settlement cost of $6.4 million. In the first nine months of 2007, we recorded income tax benefits of $2.6 million related to the total integration and transition costs, $6.9 million related to the total restructuring charges and $2.5 million related to the legal settlement cost. We did not record any income tax benefit for the in-process research and development charges or the expenses associated with the settlement of the pre-existing unfavorable distribution agreement with Cornéal. Included in the provision for income taxes in the first nine months of 2007 is $1.6 million of tax benefit related to state income tax refunds resulting from the settlement of tax audits. Excluding the impact of the total pre-tax charges of $116.3 million and the total net income tax benefit of $13.6 million for the items discussed above, our adjusted effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2007 was 25.6%.

The calculation of our adjusted effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2007 is summarized below:


	2007
	(in millions)
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest, as reported	$	478.9
In-process research and development expense		72.0
Settlement of pre-existing unfavorable distribution agreement with Cornéal		2.3
Total integration and transition costs		11.3
Total restructuring charges		24.3
Legal settlement cost		6.4

	$	595.2


Provision for income taxes, as reported	$	138.7
Income tax benefit for:
Total integration and transition costs		2.6
Total restructuring charges		6.9
Legal settlement cost		2.5
State income tax refunds		1.6

	$	152.3


Adjusted effective tax rate		25.6	%

Our effective tax rates for the third quarter and the first nine months of 2006 were 11.8% and 38.9%, respectively, our effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2006 was 551.3%, and our adjusted effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2006 was 25.9%. Included in our operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2006 are pre-tax charges of $579.3 million for in-process research and development acquired in the Inamed acquisition, a $47.9 million charge to cost of sales associated with the Inamed purchase accounting fair-market value inventory adjustment rollout, total integration, transition and duplicate operating expenses of $26.9 million related to the Inamed acquisition and restructuring and streamlining of our European operations, a $28.5 million contribution to The Allergan Foundation and total restructuring charges of $22.3 million. In 2006, we recorded income tax benefits of $15.7 million related to the Inamed purchase accounting fair-market value inventory adjustment rollout, $9.1 million related to total integration, transition and duplicate operating expenses, $11.3 million related to the contribution to The Allergan Foundation and $3.5 million related to total restructuring charges. Also included in the provision for income taxes in 2006 is a $17.2 million reduction in the provision for income taxes due to the reversal of the valuation allowance against a deferred tax asset that we have determined is now realizable, a reduction of $14.5 million in estimated income taxes payable primarily due to the resolution of several significant previously uncertain income tax audit issues associated with the completion of an audit by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service for tax years 2000 to 2002, a $2.8 million reduction in income taxes payable previously estimated for the 2005 repatriation of foreign earnings that had been permanently re-invested outside the United States, a beneficial change of $1.2 million for the expected income tax benefit for previously paid state income taxes, which became recoverable due to a favorable state court decision concluded in 2004, an unfavorable adjustment of $3.9 million for a previously filed income tax return currently under examination and a provision for income taxes of $1.6 million related to intercompany transfers of trade businesses and net assets associated with the Inamed acquisition. Excluding the impact of the total pre-tax charges of $704.9 million and the total net income tax benefits of $69.8 million for the items discussed above, our adjusted effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2006 was 25.9%.

The calculation of our adjusted effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2006 is summarized below:


	2006
	(in millions)
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest, as reported	$	(19.5	)
In-process research and development expense		579.3
Inamed fair-market value inventory rollout		47.9
Total integration, transition and duplicate operating expenses		26.9
Contribution to The Allergan Foundation		28.5
Total restructuring charges		22.3

	$	685.4


Provision for income taxes, as reported	$	107.5
Income tax (provision) benefit for:
Inamed fair-market value inventory rollout		15.7
Total integration, transition and duplicate operating expenses		9.1
Contribution to The Allergan Foundation		11.3
Total restructuring charges		3.5
Reduction in valuation allowance associated with a deferred tax asset		17.2
Resolution of uncertain income tax audit issues		14.5
Adjustment to estimated taxes on 2005 repatriation of foreign earnings		2.8
Recovery of previously paid state income taxes		1.2
Unfavorable adjustment for previously filed tax return currently under examination		(3.9	)
Intercompany transfers of trade businesses and net assets		(1.6	)

	$	177.3


Adjusted effective tax rate		25.9	%

The decrease in the adjusted effective tax rate to 25.6% in the first nine months of 2007 compared to the adjusted effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2006 of 25.9% is primarily due to fluctuations in the mix of earnings, including increased deductions in the United States for interest expense, and the beneficial tax rate effect from increased deductions related to the amortization of acquired intangible assets for the full fiscal year 2007 compared to approximately nine months of such beneficial tax rate effect in fiscal year 2006.

Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations

Our earnings from continuing operations in the third quarter of 2007 were $156.0 million compared to earnings from continuing operations of $106.4 million in the third quarter of 2006. The $49.6 million increase in earnings from continuing operations was primarily the result of the increase in operating income of $99.3 million, partially offset by the increase in net non-operating expense of $8.7 million and the increase in the provision for income taxes of $41.0 million.

Our earnings from continuing operations in the first nine months of 2007 were $339.8 million compared to a loss from continuing operations of $264.2 million in the first nine months of 2006. The $604.0 million increase in earnings from continuing operations was primarily the result of the increase in operating income of $677.4 million, partially offset by the increase in net non-operating expense of $8.4 million and the increase in the provision for income taxes of $64.7 million.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We assess our liquidity by our ability to generate cash to fund our operations. Significant factors in the management of liquidity are: funds generated by operations; levels of accounts receivable, inventories, accounts payable and capital expenditures; the extent of our stock repurchase program; funds required for acquisitions; adequate credit facilities; and financial flexibility to attract long-term capital on satisfactory terms.

Historically, we have generated cash from operations in excess of working capital requirements. The net cash provided by continuing operations for the nine month period ended September 28, 2007 was $577.8 million compared to cash provided of $510.7 million for the nine month period ended September 29, 2006. The increase in net cash provided by continuing operations of $67.1 million was primarily due to an increase in earnings, including the effect of adjusting for non-cash items, of $138.6 million, partially offset by a net increase in cash required to fund growth in net operating assets and liabilities and an increase in income taxes paid.

Net cash used in investing activities in the first nine months of 2007 was $459.4 million. Net cash used in investing activities in the first nine months of 2006 was $1,422.2 million. In the first nine months of 2007, we paid $312.9 million, net of cash acquired, for the acquisitions of Cornéal and EndoArt. In the first nine months of 2006, we paid $1,328.6 million, net of cash acquired, for the cash portion of the Inamed acquisition. In August 2007, we issued a note receivable of $74.8 million to Esprit Pharma Holding Company, Inc., or Esprit. The note receivable plus accrued interest was effectively settled as a result of our acquisition of Esprit on October 16, 2007 as discussed below. In the first nine months of 2007, we received $16.7 million from the sale of the ophthalmic surgical device business that we acquired as a part of the Cornéal acquisition. We invested $73.6 million in new facilities and equipment during the first nine months of 2007 compared to $73.4 million during the same period in 2006. Additionally, in the first nine months of 2007, we capitalized as intangible assets total milestone payments of $5.0 million related to Restasis^® and collected $8.9 million on a receivable related to the 2006 sale of our Mougins, France facility. In the first nine months of 2006, we capitalized as intangible assets total milestone fees of $11.0 million paid in connection with obtaining regulatory approvals to commercialize the Juvéderm^tm dermal filler family of products in the United States and Australia and collected $3.3 million primarily from the sale of our Mougins, France facility. Net cash used in investing activities also includes $18.7 million and $13.1 million to acquire software during the first nine months of 2007 and 2006, respectively. We currently expect to invest between $140 million and $150 million in capital expenditures for administrative and manufacturing facilities and other property, plant and equipment during 2007. In July 2007, our Board of Directors approved the investment of up to $95 million for the construction of a new office building at our main facility in Irvine, California. We currently expect to incur design related costs for this office building in 2008, followed by major construction activities beginning in 2009.

Net cash used in financing activities was $77.4 million in the first nine months of 2007 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $674.5 million in the first nine months of 2006. In the first nine months of 2007, we repurchased approximately 1.1 million shares of our common stock for $61.7 million, had net repayments of notes payable of $105.5 million and paid $45.6 million in dividends. This use of cash was partially offset by $110.3 million received from the sale of stock to employees and $25.1 million in excess tax benefits from share-based compensation. In the first nine months of 2006, we borrowed $825.0 million under a bridge credit facility entered into in connection with the transaction in order to fund part of the cash portion of the Inamed purchase price. On

April 12, 2006, we completed concurrent private placements of $750 million in aggregate principal amount of 1.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026, or 2026 Convertible Notes, and $800 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Senior Notes due 2016, or 2016 Notes. We used part of the proceeds from these debt issuances to repay all borrowings under the bridge credit facility. Additionally, in the first nine months of 2006 we received $118.1 million from the sale of stock to employees, $13.0 million upon termination of an interest rate swap contract related to the 2016 Notes and $27.9 million in excess tax benefits from share-based compensation. These amounts were partially offset by net repayments of notes payable of $139.5 million, cash payments of $19.7 million in offering fees related to the issuance of the 2026 Convertible Notes and the 2016 Notes, cash paid on the conversion of our Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due 2022 of $521.9 million, repurchase of approximately 5.8 million shares of our common stock for approximately $307.8 million and $43.3 million in dividends paid to stockholders. Effective October 30, 2007, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share, payable on November 30, 2007 to stockholders of record on November 9, 2007. We maintain an evergreen stock repurchase program. Our evergreen stock repurchase program authorizes us to repurchase our common stock for the primary purpose of funding our stock-based benefit plans. Under the stock repurchase program, we may maintain up to 18.4 million repurchased shares in our treasury account at any one time. As of September 28, 2007, we held approximately 0.6 million treasury shares under this program. We are uncertain as to the level of stock repurchases, if any, to be made in the future.

Net cash used by discontinued operations was $5.4 million for the nine month period ended September 28, 2007.

The 2026 Convertible Notes, pay interest semi-annually at a rate of 1.50% per annum and are convertible, at the holder’s option, at an initial conversion rate of 15.7904 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes. In certain circumstances the 2026 Convertible Notes may be convertible into cash in an amount equal to the lesser of their principal amount or their conversion value. If the conversion value of the 2026 Convertible Notes exceeds their principal amount at the time of conversion, we will also deliver common stock or, at our election, a combination of cash and common stock for the conversion value in excess of the principal amount. We will not be permitted to redeem the 2026 Convertible Notes prior to April 5, 2009, will be permitted to redeem the 2026 Convertible Notes from and after April 5, 2009 to April 4, 2011 if the closing price of our common stock reaches a specified threshold, and will be permitted to redeem the 2026 Convertible Notes at any time on or after April 5, 2011. Holders of the 2026 Convertible Notes will also be able to require us to redeem the 2026 Convertible Notes on April 1, 2011, April 1, 2016 and April 1, 2021 or upon a change in control of us. The 2026 Convertible Notes mature on April 1, 2026, unless previously redeemed by us or earlier converted by the note holders.

The 2016 Notes, were sold at 99.717% of par value with an effective interest rate of 5.79%, will pay interest semi-annually at a rate of 5.75% per annum, and are redeemable at any time at our option, subject to a make-whole provision based on the present value of remaining interest payments at the time of the redemption. The aggregate outstanding principal amount of the 2016 Notes will be due and payable on April 1, 2016, unless earlier redeemed by us.

On January 31, 2007, we entered into a nine-year, two-month interest rate swap with a $300.0 million notional amount with semi-annual settlements and quarterly interest rate reset dates. The swap receives interest at a fixed rate of 5.75% and pays interest at a variable interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 0.368%, and effectively converts $300.0 million of our 2016 Notes to a variable interest rate. Based on the structure of the hedging relationship, the hedge meets the criteria for using the short-cut method for a fair value hedge under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 133). Under the provisions of SFAS No. 133, the investment in the derivative and the related long-term debt are recorded at fair-value. As a result, we have recognized an asset associated with the fair-value of the derivative of $4.7 million reported in “Investments and other assets” and a corresponding increase in “Long-term debt” of $4.7 million reported in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 28, 2007. As the hedge meets the criteria for using the short-cut method under the provisions of SFAS No. 133, the change in the fair-value of the derivative is assumed to exactly equal the related change in the fair-value of the 2016 Notes, so there is no gain or loss reported in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations related to the interest rate hedge.

At September 28, 2007, we had a committed long-term credit facility, a commercial paper program, a medium term note program, an unused debt shelf registration statement that we may use for a new medium term note

program and other issuances of debt securities, and various foreign bank facilities. In May 2007, we amended the termination date of our committed long-term credit facility to May 2012. The termination date can be further extended from time to time upon our request and acceptance by the issuer of the facility for a period of one year from the last scheduled termination date for each request accepted. The committed long-term credit facility allows for borrowings of up to $800 million. The commercial paper program also provides for up to $600 million in borrowings. The current medium term note program allows us to issue up to an additional $5.7 million in registered notes on a non-revolving basis. The debt shelf registration statement provides for up to $350 million in additional debt securities. Borrowings under the committed long-term credit facility and medium-term note program are subject to certain financial and operating covenants that include, among other provisions, maintaining maximum leverage ratios. Certain covenants also limit subsidiary debt. We believe we were in compliance with these covenants at September 28, 2007. As of September 28, 2007, we had no borrowings under our committed long-term credit facility, $59.3 million in borrowings outstanding under the medium term note program, $5.3 million in borrowings outstanding under various foreign bank facilities and no borrowings under our commercial paper program.

At December 31, 2006, we had consolidated unrecognized net actuarial losses of $162.1 million which were included in our accrued pension benefit liabilities. The unrecognized net actuarial losses resulted primarily from lower than expected investment returns on pension plan assets in 2002 and 2001 and decreases in the discount rates used to measure projected benefit obligations that occurred from 2001 to 2005. Assuming constant actuarial assumptions estimated as of our pension plans’ measurement date of September 30, 2006, we expect the amortization of these unrecognized net actuarial losses, which is a component of our annual pension cost, to be approximately $11.3 million in 2007 compared to $13.0 million in 2006. The future amortization of the unrecognized net actuarial losses is not expected to materially affect future pension contribution requirements. In the first nine months of 2007 and 2006, we paid pension contributions of $7.3 million and $7.0 million, respectively, to our U.S. defined benefit pension plan. In 2007, we expect to pay pension contributions of between approximately $20.0 million and $21.0 million for our U.S. and non-U.S. pension plans.

In connection with our March 2006 Inamed acquisition, we initiated a global restructuring and integration plan to merge the Inamed operations with our operations and to capture synergies through the centralization of certain general and administrative functions. In addition, in January 2007, we initiated an additional plan to restructure and eventually sell or close our collagen manufacturing facility in Fremont, California that we acquired in connection with the Inamed acquisition. As of September 28, 2007, we have recorded cumulative pre-tax restructuring and integration charges of $48.5 million and $1.6 million of income tax costs related to intercompany transfers of trade businesses and net assets. We currently estimate that the total pre-tax charges resulting from the restructurings, including integration and transition costs, will be between $53.0 million and $65.0 million, all of which are expected to be cash expenditures. In addition to the pre-tax charges, we expect to incur capital expenditures of approximately $15.0 million to $20.0 million, primarily related to the integration of information systems, and to pay an additional amount of approximately $1.5 million to $2.0 million for taxes related to intercompany transfers of trade businesses and net assets.

In connection with our January 2007 Cornéal acquisition, we initiated a restructuring and integration plan to merge the Cornéal facial aesthetics business operations with our operations. As of September 28, 2007, we have recorded pre-tax restructuring and integration costs of $20.1 million. We currently estimate that the total pre-tax charges resulting from the restructuring and integration of the Cornéal facial aesthetics business operations will be between $29.0 million and $37.0 million, all of which are expected to be cash expenditures.

On October 16, 2007, we completed the acquisition of Esprit, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 18, 2007, or Merger Agreement, by and among us, Esmeralde Acquisition, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary, or Merger Sub, Esprit and the Escrow Participants’ Representative named in the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub was merged with and into Esprit, with Esprit surviving and becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary. The acquisition of Esprit will provide us with a dedicated urologics product line within our specialty pharmaceuticals segment. Upon the terms set forth in the Merger Agreement, we paid an aggregate of $370 million in cash, minus Esprit’s debt and certain transaction compensation and expenses, for all of the outstanding equity securities of Esprit. In addition, we repaid all of Esprit’s outstanding debt at the date of acquisition. The acquisition consideration was all cash, funded from current cash and equivalent balances. At the

date of acquisition, Esprit’s debt included a note payable to us for $74.8 million plus accrued interest, which effectively reduced the cash consideration paid by us at closing.

A significant amount of our existing cash and equivalents are held by non-U.S. subsidiaries. We currently plan to use these funds in our operations outside the United States. Withholding and U.S. taxes have not been provided for unremitted earnings of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries because we have reinvested these earnings indefinitely in such operations. As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately $725.5 million in unremitted earnings outside the United States for which withholding and U.S. taxes were not provided. Tax costs would be incurred if these funds were remitted to the United States.

We believe that the net cash provided by operating activities, supplemented as necessary with borrowings available under our existing credit facilities and existing cash and equivalents, will provide us with sufficient resources to meet our current expected obligations, working capital requirements, debt service and other cash needs over the next year.

ALLERGAN, INC.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

In the normal course of business, our operations are exposed to risks associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. We address these risks through controlled risk management that includes the use of derivative financial instruments to economically hedge or reduce these exposures. We do not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

To ensure the adequacy and effectiveness of our interest rate and foreign exchange hedge positions, we continually monitor our interest rate swap positions and foreign exchange forward and option positions both on a stand-alone basis and in conjunction with our underlying interest rate and foreign currency exposures, from an accounting and economic perspective.

However, given the inherent limitations of forecasting and the anticipatory nature of the exposures intended to be hedged, we cannot assure you that such programs will offset more than a portion of the adverse financial impact resulting from unfavorable movements in either interest or foreign exchange rates. In addition, the timing of the accounting for recognition of gains and losses related to mark-to-market instruments for any given period may not coincide with the timing of gains and losses related to the underlying economic exposures and, therefore, may adversely affect our consolidated operating results and financial position.

Interest Rate Risk

Our interest income and expense is more sensitive to fluctuations in the general level of U.S. interest rates than to changes in rates in other markets. Changes in U.S. interest rates affect the interest earned on our cash and equivalents, interest expense on our debt as well as costs associated with foreign currency contracts.

In February 2006, we entered into interest rate swap contracts based on the 3-month LIBOR with an aggregate notional amount of $800 million, a swap period of 10 years and a starting swap rate of 5.198%. We entered into these swap contracts as a cash flow hedge to effectively fix the future interest rate for our $800 million aggregate principal amount 2016 Notes issued in April 2006. In April 2006, we terminated the interest rate swap contracts and received approximately $13.0 million. The total gain is being amortized as a reduction to interest expense over a 10 year period to match the term of the 2016 Notes. As of September 28, 2007, the remaining unrecognized gain, net of tax, of $6.7 million is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss.

On January 31, 2007, we entered into a nine-year, two-month interest rate swap with a $300.0 million notional amount with semi-annual settlements and quarterly interest rate reset dates. The swap receives interest at a fixed rate of 5.75% and pays interest at a variable interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 0.368%, and effectively converts $300.0 million of our 2016 Notes to a variable interest rate. Based on the structure of the hedging relationship, the hedge meets the criteria for using the short-cut method for a fair value hedge under the provisions of SFAS No. 133. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 133, the investment in the derivative and the related long-term debt are recorded at fair value. At September 28, 2007, we have recognized an asset associated with the fair-value of the derivative of $4.7 million reported in “Investments and other assets” and a corresponding increase in “Long-term debt” of $4.7 million reported in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet. The differential to be paid or received as interest rates change is accrued and recognized as an adjustment of interest expense related to the 2016 Notes. The adjustment of interest expense in the nine month period ended September 28, 2007 is immaterial.

At September 28, 2007, we had approximately $4.8 million of variable rate debt compared to $102.0 million of variable rate debt at December 31, 2006. If interest rates were to increase or decrease by 1% for the year, annual interest expense, including the effect of the $300.0 million notional amount of our interest rate swap entered into on January 31, 2007, would increase or decrease by approximately $3.0 million.

The tables below present information about certain of our investment portfolio and our debt obligations at September 28, 2007 and December 31, 2006.


	September 28, 2007
																				Fair
	Maturing in																			Market
	2007			2008			2009		2010		2011			Thereafter			Total			Value
	(in millions, except interest rates)
ASSETS
Cash Equivalents:
Commercial Paper	$	850.9		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	850.9		$	850.9
Weighted Average Interest Rate		5.05	%		—			—		—		—			—			5.05	%
Foreign Time Deposits		102.3			—			—		—		—			—			102.3			102.3
Weighted Average Interest Rate		4.12	%		—			—		—		—			—			4.12	%
Other Cash Equivalents		395.5			—			—		—		—			—			395.5			395.5
Weighted Average Interest Rate		5.09	%		—			—		—		—			—			5.09	%
Total Cash Equivalents	$	1,348.7		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	1,348.7		$	1,348.7
Weighted Average Interest Rate		4.99	%		—			—		—		—			—			4.99	%

LIABILITIES
Debt Obligations:
Fixed Rate (US$)	$	—		$	34.3		$	—	$	—	$	750.0		$	823.1		$	1,607.4		$	1,728.0
Weighted Average Interest Rate		—			6.91	%		—		—		1.50	%		5.84	%		3.84	%
Fixed Rate (non-US$)		0.5			—			—		—		—			—			0.5			0.5
Weighted Average Interest Rate		4.15	%		—			—		—		—			—			4.15	%
Other Variable Rate (non-US$)		4.8			—			—		—		—			—			4.8			4.8
Weighted Average Interest Rate		5.45	%		—			—		—		—			—			5.45	%
Total Debt Obligations (a)	$	5.3		$	34.3		$	—	$	—	$	750.0		$	823.1		$	1,612.7		$	1,733.3
Weighted Average Interest Rate		5.33	%		6.91	%		—		—		1.50	%		5.84	%		3.84	%

INTEREST RATE DERIVATIVES
Interest Rate Swaps:
Fixed to Variable (US$)	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	300.0		$	300.0		$	4.7
Average Pay Rate		—			—			—		—		—			5.60	%		5.60	%
Average Receive Rate		—			—			—		—		—			5.75	%		5.75	%


(a)		Total debt obligations in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 28, 2007 include debt obligations of $1,612.7 million and the interest rate swap fair value adjustment of $4.7 million.


	December 31, 2006
																				Fair
	Maturing in																			Market
	2007			2008			2009		2010		2011			Thereafter			Total			Value
	(in millions, except interest rates)
ASSETS
Cash Equivalents:
Repurchase Agreements	$	130.0		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	130.0		$	130.0
Weighted Average Interest Rate		5.35	%		—			—		—		—			—			5.35	%
Commercial Paper		771.0			—			—		—		—			—			771.0			771.0
Weighted Average Interest Rate		5.29	%		—			—		—		—			—			5.29	%
Foreign Time Deposits		288.6			—			—		—		—			—			288.6			288.6
Weighted Average Interest Rate		3.75	%		—			—		—		—			—			3.75	%
Other Cash Equivalents		138.7			—			—		—		—			—			138.7			138.7
Weighted Average Interest Rate		5.91	%		—			—		—		—			—			5.91	%
Total Cash Equivalents	$	1,328.3		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	1,328.3		$	1,328.3
Weighted Average Interest Rate		5.03	%		—			—		—		—			—			5.03	%

LIABILITIES
Debt Obligations:
Fixed Rate (US$)	$	—		$	33.5		$	—	$	—	$	750.0		$	822.9		$	1,606.4		$	1,686.7
Weighted Average Interest Rate		—			6.91	%		—		—		1.50	%		5.84	%		3.84	%
Other Variable Rate (non-US$)		102.0			—			—		—		—			—			102.0			102.0
Weighted Average Interest Rate		5.46	%		—			—		—		—			—			5.46	%
Total Debt Obligations	$	102.0		$	33.5		$	—	$	—	$	750.0		$	822.9		$	1,708.4		$	1,788.7
Weighted Average Interest Rate		5.46	%		6.91	%		—		—		1.50	%		5.84	%		3.93	%

Foreign Currency Risk

Overall, we are a net recipient of currencies other than the U.S. dollar and, as such, benefit from a weaker dollar and are adversely affected by a stronger dollar relative to major currencies worldwide. Accordingly, changes in exchange rates, and in particular a strengthening of the U.S. dollar, may negatively affect our consolidated revenues or operating costs and expenses as expressed in U.S. dollars.

From time to time, we enter into foreign currency option and forward contracts to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility associated with foreign exchange rate changes to allow our management to focus its attention on our core business issues. Accordingly, we enter into various contracts which change in value as foreign exchange rates change to economically offset the effect of changes in the value of foreign currency assets and liabilities, commitments and anticipated foreign currency denominated sales and operating expenses. We enter into foreign currency option and forward contracts in amounts between minimum and maximum anticipated foreign exchange exposures, generally for periods not to exceed one year.

We use foreign currency option contracts, which provide for the purchase or sale of foreign currencies to offset foreign currency exposures expected to arise in the normal course of our business. While these instruments are subject to fluctuations in value, such fluctuations are anticipated to offset changes in the value of the underlying exposures.

All of our outstanding foreign currency option contracts are entered into to reduce the volatility of earnings generated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily earnings denominated in the Canadian dollar, Mexican peso, Australian dollar, Brazilian real, euro, Japanese yen, Swedish krona, Swiss franc and U.K. pound. Current changes in the fair value of open foreign currency option contracts are recorded through earnings as “Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net” while any realized gains (losses) on settled contracts are recorded through earnings as “Other, net” in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The premium costs of purchased foreign exchange option contracts are recorded in “Other current assets” and amortized to “Other, net” over the life of the options.

All of our outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts are entered into to protect the value of intercompany receivables denominated in currencies other than the lender’s functional currency. The realized and unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency forward contracts and the revaluation of the foreign denominated intercompany receivables are recorded through “Other, net” in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The following table provides information about our foreign currency derivative financial instruments outstanding as of September 28, 2007 and December 31, 2006. The information is provided in U.S. dollars, as presented in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


	September 28, 2007					December 31, 2006
				Average Contract					Average Contract
	Notional			Rate or Strike		Notional			Rate or Strike
	Amount			Amount		Amount			Amount
	(in millions)					(in millions)
Foreign currency forward contracts:
(Receive U.S. dollar/pay foreign currency)
Euro	$	132.3			1.39	$	142.3			1.32
Canadian dollar		5.4			1.02		1.8			1.15
Australian dollar		16.2			0.83		9.1			0.78
Swiss franc		2.0			1.18		—			—

	$	155.9				$	153.2

Estimated fair value	$	(4.9	)			$	(0.7	)


Foreign currency sold — put options:
Canadian dollar	$	9.9			1.14	$	35.0			1.14
Mexican peso		3.9			11.09		14.3			11.00
Australian dollar		7.0			0.78		20.6			0.78
Brazilian real		4.0			2.29		11.7			2.24
Euro		20.3			1.34		73.0			1.34
Japanese yen		2.6			111.35		9.6			113.06
Swedish krona		2.0			6.75		7.7			6.79
Swiss franc		1.8			1.17		6.1			1.18

	$	51.5				$	178.0

Estimated fair value	$	0.1				$	3.8


Foreign currency purchased — call options:
U.K. pound	$	1.8			1.96	$	15.3			1.96

Estimated fair value	$	0.1				$	0.2

ALLERGAN, INC.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls or procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within Allergan have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, we have investments in certain unconsolidated entities. As we do not control or manage these entities, our disclosure controls and procedures with respect to such entities are necessarily substantially more limited than those we maintain with respect to our consolidated subsidiaries.

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 28, 2007, the end of the quarterly period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and were operating at the reasonable assurance level.

Further, management determined that, as of September 28, 2007, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the first nine month period of 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting, except for the potential impact from reporting the Inamed and Cornéal acquisitions, as more fully disclosed in Note 2, Acquisitions, to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements under Item 1(D) of Part I of this report. We are currently in the process of assessing and integrating Inamed’s and Cornéal’s internal controls over financial reporting into our financial reporting systems and expect to complete our integration activities related to internal controls over financial reporting by December 31, 2007.

ALLERGAN, INC.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to Note 10, Litigation, to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements under Item 1(D) of Part I of this report.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The risk factors presented below supplement and amend the risk factors previously disclosed by us in Part II, Item 1A of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three month periods ended June 29, 2007 and March 30, 2007 and Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

We operate in a highly competitive business.

The pharmaceutical and medical device industries are highly competitive and they require an ongoing, extensive search for technological innovation. They also require, among other things, the ability to effectively discover, develop, test and obtain regulatory approvals for products, as well as the ability to effectively commercialize, market and promote approved products, including communicating the effectiveness, safety and value of products to actual and prospective customers and medical professionals.

Many of our competitors have greater resources than we have. This enables them, among other things, to make greater research and development, or R&D, investments and spread their R&D costs, as well as their marketing and promotion costs, over a broader revenue base. Our competitors may also have more experience and expertise in obtaining marketing approvals from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and other regulatory authorities. In addition to product development, testing, approval and promotion, other competitive factors in the pharmaceutical and medical device industries include industry consolidation, product quality and price, product technology, reputation, customer service and access to technical information.

It is possible that developments by our competitors could make our products or technologies less competitive or obsolete. Our future growth depends, in part, on our ability to develop products which are more effective. For instance, for our eye care products to be successful, we must be able to manufacture and effectively market those products and persuade a sufficient number of eye care professionals to use or continue to use our current products and the new products we may introduce. Glaucoma must be treated over an extended period and doctors may be reluctant to switch a patient to a new treatment if the patient’s current treatment for glaucoma remains effective. Sales of our existing products may decline rapidly if a new product is introduced by one of our competitors or if we announce a new product that, in either case, represents a substantial improvement over our existing products. Similarly, if we fail to make sufficient investments in R&D programs, our current and planned products could be surpassed by more effective or advanced products developed by our competitors.

Until December 2000, Botox^® was the only neuromodulator approved by the FDA. At that time, the FDA approved Myobloc^®, a neuromodulator formerly marketed by Elan Pharmaceuticals and now marketed by Solstice Neurosciences, Inc. Ipsen Ltd. is seeking FDA approval of its Dysport^® neuromodulator for certain therapeutic indications, and Medicis, its licensee for the United States, Canada and Japan, is seeking approval of Reloxin^® for cosmetic indications. Ipsen has marketed Dysport^® in Europe since 1991, prior to our European commercialization of Botox^® in 1992. In June 2006, Ipsen received the marketing authorization for a cosmetic indication for Dysport^® in Germany. In 2007, Ipsen granted an exclusive development and marketing license for Dysport^® to Galderma in the European Union, Russia, Eastern Europe and the Middle East, and first rights of negotiation for other countries around the world, except the United States, Canada and Japan. Reloxin^® is also currently under review for use in aesthetic medicine indications by the French regulatory authorities as part of an application for a license across the European Union.

Mentor Corporation is conducting clinical trials for a competing neuromodulator in the United States. In addition, we are aware of competing neuromodulators currently being developed and commercialized in Asia,

Europe, South America and other markets. A Chinese entity received approval to market a botulinum toxin in China in 1997, and we believe that it has launched or is planning to launch its botulinum toxin product in other lightly regulated markets in Asia, South America and Central America. These lightly regulated markets may not require adherence to the FDA’s current Good Manufacturing Practice, or cGMP, regulations or the regulatory requirements of the European Medical Evaluation Agency or other regulatory agencies in countries that are members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Therefore, companies operating in these markets may be able to produce products at a lower cost than we can. In addition, Merz received approval from German authorities for Xeomin^® and launched its product in July 2005. Merz is currently in clinical trials in the United States for cervical dystonia, blepharospasm and cosmetic indications and is awaiting therapeutic licenses for Xeomin^® in approximately ten countries across the European Union. A Korean botulinum toxin, Meditoxin^®, was approved for sale in Korea in June 2006. The company, Medy-Tox Inc., received exportation approval from Korean authorities in early 2005 to ship their product under the tradename Neuronox^®. In February 2007, Q-Med announced a worldwide license for Neuronox^®, with the exception of certain countries in Asia where Medy-Tox may retain the marketing rights. Our sales of Botox^® could be materially and negatively impacted by this competition or competition from other companies that might obtain FDA approval or approval from other regulatory authorities to market a neuromodulator.

Mentor Corporation is our principal competitor in the United States for breast implants. Mentor announced that, like us, it received FDA approval in November 2006 to sell its silicone breast implants. The conditions under which Mentor is allowed to market its silicone breast implants in the United States are similar to ours, including indications for use and the requirement to conduct post-marketing studies. If patients or physicians prefer Mentor’s breast implant products to ours or perceive that Mentor’s breast implant products are safer than ours, our sales of breast implants could materially suffer. We are aware of several companies conducting clinical studies of breast implant products in the United States. Internationally, we compete with several manufacturers, including Mentor Corporation, Silimed, Medicor Corporation, Poly Implant Prostheses, Nagor, Laboratoires Sebbin and LPI.

Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation began marketing Restylane^®, a dermal filler, in January 2004. Through our purchase of Inamed, we acquired the rights to sell a competing dermal filler, Juvéderm™, in the United States, Canada and Australia and Hydrafill™ in certain European countries. Juvéderm™ was approved by the FDA for sale in the United States in June 2006, and we announced nationwide availability of Juvéderm™ in January 2007. We cannot assure you that Juvéderm™ will offer equivalent or greater facial aesthetic benefits to competitive dermal filler products, that it will be competitive in price or gain acceptance in the marketplace.

Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., a Johnson & Johnson company, announced a September 2007 FDA approval of its gastric band product, the Realize™ Adjustable Gastric Band, which will compete against our LAP-BAND^® System in the U.S. market. The LAP-BAND^® System also competes with surgical obesity procedures, including gastric bypass, vertical banded gastroplasty, sleeve gastrectomy and biliopancreatic diversion.

We also face competition from generic drug manufacturers in the United States and internationally. For instance, Falcon Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., an affiliate of Alcon Laboratories, Inc., attempted to obtain FDA approval for a brimonidine product to compete with our Alphagan^® P product. However, pursuant to our March 2006 settlement with Alcon, Alcon agreed not to sell, offer for sale or distribute its brimonidine product until September 30, 2009, or earlier if specified market conditions occur. The primary market condition will have occurred if the extent to which prescriptions of Alphagan^® P have been converted to other brimonidine-containing products we market has increased to a specified threshold. In October 2007, we received a paragraph 4 Hatch-Waxman Act certification from Apotex Corp. in which it purports to have sought FDA approval to market a generic gatifloxacin 0.3% ophthalmic solution.

Uncertainties exist in integrating the business and operations of Inamed, Cornéal and Esprit into our own.

We are currently integrating certain of Inamed’s, Cornéal’s and Esprit’s functions and operations into our own, although there can be no assurance that we will be successful in this endeavor. There are inherent challenges in integrating the operations that could result in a delay or the failure to achieve the anticipated synergies and, therefore, any potential cost savings and increases in earnings. Issues that must be addressed in integrating the operations of Inamed, Cornéal and Esprit into our own include, among other things:

	•		conforming standards, controls, procedures and policies, business cultures and compensation structures between the companies;

	•		conforming information technology and accounting systems;

	•		consolidating corporate and administrative infrastructures;

	•		consolidating sales and marketing operations;

	•		retaining existing customers and attracting new customers;

	•		retaining key employees;

	•		identifying and eliminating redundant and underperforming operations and assets;

	•		minimizing the diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business concerns;

	•		coordinating geographically dispersed organizations;

	•		managing tax costs or inefficiencies associated with integrating the operations of the combined company; and

	•		making any necessary modifications to operating control standards to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

If we are not able to adequately address these challenges, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of the integration of the companies. Actual cost and sales synergies, if achieved at all, may be lower than we expect and may take longer to achieve than we anticipate.

If our collaborative partners do not perform, we will be unable to develop and market products as anticipated.

We have entered into collaborative arrangements with third parties to develop and market certain products, including our arrangement with GlaxoSmithKline to market Botox^® in Japan and China and certain other products in the United States and our arrangement with Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to market Sanctura XR™ in the United States. We cannot assure you that these collaborations will be successful, lead to significant sales of our products in our partners’ territories or lead to the creation of additional products. If we fail to maintain our existing collaborative arrangements or fail to enter into additional collaborative arrangements, our licensing revenues and/or the number of products from which we could receive future revenues could decline.

Our dependence on collaborative arrangements with third parties subjects us to a number of risks. These collaborative arrangements may not be on terms favorable to us. Agreements with collaborative partners typically allow partners significant discretion in marketing our products or electing whether or not to pursue any of the planned activities. We cannot fully control the amount and timing of resources our collaborative partners may devote to products based on the collaboration, and our partners may choose to pursue alternative products to the detriment of our collaboration. In addition, our partners may not perform their obligations as expected. Business combinations, significant changes in a collaborative partner’s business strategy, or its access to financial resources may adversely affect a partner’s willingness or ability to complete its obligations. Moreover, we could become involved in disputes with our partners, which could lead to delays or termination of the collaborations and time-consuming and expensive litigation or arbitration. Even if we fulfill our obligations under a collaborative agreement, our partner can terminate the agreement under certain circumstances. If any collaborative partners were to terminate or breach our agreements with them, or otherwise fail to complete their obligations in a timely manner, we could be materially and adversely affected.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table discloses the purchases of our equity securities during the third fiscal quarter of 2007.

Total Number

of Shares

Maximum Number

Purchased as

(or Approximate

Part of

Dollar Value) of

Publicly

Shares that May

Total Number

Average

Announced

Yet Be Purchased

of Shares

Price Paid

Plans

Under the Plans

Period

Purchased(1)

per Share

or Programs

or Programs(2)

June 30, 2007 to July 31, 2007

N/A

16,825,591

August 1, 2007 to August 31, 2007

N/A

17,702,810

September 1, 2007 to September 28, 2007

N/A

17,789,592

Total

N/A


(1)		We maintain an evergreen stock repurchase program, which we first announced on September 28, 1993. Under the stock repurchase program after giving effect to our June 22, 2007 two-for-one stock split, we may maintain up to 18.4 million repurchased shares in our treasury account at any one time. As of September 28, 2007, we held approximately 0.6 million treasury shares under this program.

(2)		The share numbers reflect the maximum number of shares that may be purchased under our stock repurchase program and are as of the end of each of the respective periods. The share numbers also reflect our June 22, 2007 two-for-one stock split.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibits (numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K)


2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 18, 2007, by and among Allergan, Inc., Esmeralde Acquisition, Inc., Esprit Pharma Holding Company, Inc. and the Escrow Participants’ Representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on September 24, 2007)

3.1		Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Allergan, Inc., as filed with the State of Delaware on May 22, 1989 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 No. 33-28855, filed on May 24, 1989)

3.2		Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Allergan, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to Allergan, Inc.’s Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2000)

3.3		Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Allergan, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 20, 2006)

3.4		Allergan, Inc. Bylaws (originally filed as Exhibit 3 to Allergan, Inc.’s Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 1995 and re-filed herewith pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(3)(ii))

3.5		First Amendment to Allergan, Inc. Bylaws (originally filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended September 24, 1999 and re-filed herewith pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(3)(ii))

3.6		Second Amendment to Allergan, Inc. Bylaws (originally filed as Exhibit 3.5 to Allergan, Inc.’s Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2002 and re-filed herewith pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(3)(ii))

3.7		Third Amendment to Allergan, Inc. Bylaws (originally filed as Exhibit 3.6 to Allergan, Inc.’s Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2003 and re-filed herewith pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(3)(ii))

3.8		Fourth Amendment to Allergan, Inc. Bylaws (originally filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2007 and re-filed herewith pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(3)(ii))

3.9		Fifth Amendment to Allergan, Inc. Bylaws (originally filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 25, 2007 and re-filed herewith pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(3)(ii))

3.10		Sixth Amendment to Allergan, Inc. Bylaws (originally filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2007 and re-filed herewith pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(3)(ii))

4.1		Indenture, dated as of April 12, 2006, between Allergan, Inc. and Wells Fargo, National Association relating to the $750,000,000 1.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2006)

4.2		Indenture, dated as of April 12, 2006, between Allergan, Inc. and Wells Fargo, National Association relating to the $800,000,000 5.75% Senior Notes due 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2006)


4.3		Form of 1.50% Convertible Senior Note due 2026 (incorporated by reference to (and included in) the Indenture dated as of April 12, 2006 between Allergan, Inc. and Wells Fargo, National Association at Exhibit 4.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2006)

4.4		Form of 5.75% Senior Note due 2016 (incorporated by reference to (and included in) the Indenture dated as of April 12, 2006 between Allergan, Inc. and Wells Fargo, National Association at Exhibit 4.2 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2006)

4.5		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 12, 2006, among Allergan, Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as representatives of the Initial Purchasers named therein, relating to the $750,000,000 1.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2006)

4.6		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 12, 2006, among Allergan, Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated, as representative of the Initial Purchasers named therein, relating to the $800,000,000 5.75% Senior Notes due 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2006)

10.1		Severance and General Release Agreement between Allergan, Inc. and Roy J. Wilson, dated as of October 6, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 10, 2006)

10.2		Stock Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2006, by and among Allergan, Inc., Allergan Holdings France, SAS, Waldemar Kita, the European Pre-Floatation Fund II and the other minority stockholders of Groupe Cornéal Laboratories and its subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 2, 2006)

10.3		First Amendment to Stock Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2007, by and among Allergan, Inc., Allergan Holdings France, SAS, Waldemar Kita, the European Pre-Floatation Fund II and the other minority stockholders of Groupe Cornéal Laboratories and its subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Allergan, Inc.’s Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended March 30, 2007)

10.4		Allergan, Inc. Deferred Directors’ Fee Program (Restated July 30, 2007)

10.5		Amended and Restated License, Commercialization and Supply Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2007, by and among Esprit Pharma, Inc. and Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (incorporated by reference to (and included as Exhibit C to) the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 18, 2007, by and among Allergan, Inc., Esmeralde Acquisition, Inc., Esprit Pharma Holding Company, Inc. and the Escrow Participants’ Representative at Exhibit 2.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on September 24, 2007) (Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment, which was granted by the SEC on October 12, 2007)

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

32		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: November 6, 2007


	ALLERGAN, INC.
	/s/ Jeffrey L. Edwards
	Jeffrey L. Edwards
	Executive Vice President, Finance and Business Development, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

INDEX OF EXHIBITS


2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 18, 2007, by and among Allergan, Inc., Esmeralde Acquisition, Inc., Esprit Pharma Holding Company, Inc. and the Escrow Participants’ Representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on September 24, 2007)

3.1		Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Allergan, Inc., as filed with the State of Delaware on May 22, 1989 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 No. 33-28855, filed on May 24, 1989)

3.2		Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Allergan, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to Allergan, Inc.’s Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2000)

3.3		Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Allergan, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 20, 2006)

3.4		Allergan, Inc. Bylaws (originally filed as Exhibit 3 to Allergan, Inc.’s Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 1995 and re-filed herewith pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(3)(ii))

3.5		First Amendment to Allergan, Inc. Bylaws (originally filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended September 24, 1999 and re-filed herewith pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(3)(ii))

3.6		Second Amendment to Allergan, Inc. Bylaws (originally filed as Exhibit 3.5 to Allergan, Inc.’s Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2002 and re-filed herewith pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(3)(ii))

3.7		Third Amendment to Allergan, Inc. Bylaws (originally filed as Exhibit 3.6 to Allergan, Inc.’s Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2003 and re-filed herewith pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(3)(ii))

3.8		Fourth Amendment to Allergan, Inc. Bylaws (originally filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2007 and re-filed herewith pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(3)(ii))

3.9		Fifth Amendment to Allergan, Inc. Bylaws (originally filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 25, 2007 and re-filed herewith pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(3)(ii))

3.10		Sixth Amendment to Allergan, Inc. Bylaws (originally filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2007 and re-filed herewith pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(3)(ii))

4.1		Indenture, dated as of April 12, 2006, between Allergan, Inc. and Wells Fargo, National Association relating to the $750,000,000 1.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2006)

4.2		Indenture, dated as of April 12, 2006, between Allergan, Inc. and Wells Fargo, National Association relating to the $800,000,000 5.75% Senior Notes due 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2006)


4.3		Form of 1.50% Convertible Senior Note due 2026 (incorporated by reference to (and included in) the Indenture dated as of April 12, 2006 between Allergan, Inc. and Wells Fargo, National Association at Exhibit 4.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2006)

4.4		Form of 5.75% Senior Note due 2016 (incorporated by reference to (and included in) the Indenture dated as of April 12, 2006 between Allergan, Inc. and Wells Fargo, National Association at Exhibit 4.2 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2006)

4.5		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 12, 2006, among Allergan, Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as representatives of the Initial Purchasers named therein, relating to the $750,000,000 1.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2006)

4.6		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 12, 2006, among Allergan, Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated, as representative of the Initial Purchasers named therein, relating to the $800,000,000 5.75% Senior Notes due 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2006)

10.1		Severance and General Release Agreement between Allergan, Inc. and Roy J. Wilson, dated as of October 6, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 10, 2006)

10.2		Stock Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2006, by and among Allergan, Inc., Allergan Holdings France, SAS, Waldemar Kita, the European Pre-Floatation Fund II and the other minority stockholders of Groupe Cornéal Laboratories and its subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 2, 2006)

10.3		First Amendment to Stock Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2007, by and among Allergan, Inc., Allergan Holdings France, SAS, Waldemar Kita, the European Pre-Floatation Fund II and the other minority stockholders of Groupe Cornéal Laboratories and its subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Allergan, Inc.’s Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended March 30, 2007)

10.4		Allergan, Inc. Deferred Directors’ Fee Program (Restated July 30, 2007)

10.5		Amended and Restated License, Commercialization and Supply Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2007, by and among Esprit Pharma, Inc. and Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (incorporated by reference to (and included as Exhibit C to) the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 18, 2007, by and among Allergan, Inc., Esmeralde Acquisition, Inc., Esprit Pharma Holding Company, Inc. and the Escrow Participants’ Representative at Exhibit 2.1 to Allergan, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on September 24, 2007) (Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment, which was granted by the SEC on October 12, 2007)

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

32		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350